中国海归企业二元网络对技术创新绩效的作用机制研究
|
摘要
随着经济全球化、网络经济和知识经济的迅猛发展及全球竞争的加剧，我国在经过三十多年的经济快速发展后，经济面临全面的转型、产业结构面临全面升级的压力，以创新带动产业转型升级为特征的新一轮经济发展势在必行。过去我们实行的引进来、市场换技术的发展模式，已经不能适用我国迫切的技术创新、产业链高端延伸和优化出口产品结构的需求。由于跨国公司垄断了高端、核心技术的技术，并实施技术梯度转移等战略，我国的技术进步是线性而缓慢的，难以实现跨越式的技术进步和实现跨越式的追赶。同时，中国制造的高端工作回流到美国本土，低端工作正在转移到其他发展中国家，而且美国实际上已经取代中国成为世界制造工厂，现实情形非常严峻。在这样的大背景下，海归回国创业的同时也带回了先进的发展理念、融资方式和管理模式。海归企业在各行业发展迅速，推动了IT、通讯、新技术、互联网、新经济等诸多领域的发展，而且通过技术革新使得传统产业具有新的活力。海归企业通过技术创新直接推动经济发展，同时也带动和提升了我国的企业文化，海归企业已经逐步成为我国新经济和高科技产业的中坚力量之一。
目前管理学中国本土化的研究发展迅速，从而引出了社会文化的情境性作用及西方相关管理理论适用性的问题。西方社会网络理论的本土化研究在社会学和管理学都有所展开，但是对比和综合的研究还相对缺乏。关于中国海归企业的学术研究，则严重滞后于现实状况。目前关于中国海归企业的研究文献比较少，已有的文献研究对海归企业的国际社会网络及技术创新等问题有所涉及，但是关于中国海归企业的技术创新和发展模式等问题的相关文献则比较匮乏，对于海归企业的国内社会网络的研究还是空白。因此，本文以中国海归企业为研究样本，结合海归独有的优势和特征，较为系统地分析了基于二元网络的中国海归企业组织学习对技术创新绩效的影响机制，并回答了以下几个问题：（1）海归企业二元网络的内在差异机理是什么？（2）二元网络对企业组织学习的作用机制如何？（3）海归企业组织学习对技术创新绩效的作用机制如何？（4）技术和市场不确定性对企业组织学习和技术创新绩效关系的影响机理如何？
为了回答这些问题，本文结合调查问卷和案例等方法，进行了以下相应的研究，主要包括（1）结合社会学的社会网络和社会文化等相关理论，遵循社会文化差异到信任差异再到社会网络差异的逻辑，系统深入的分析了海归企业二元网络的内在差异机理，从而为海归企业二元网络的测量建立了理论基础；（2）在文献分析和海归企业二元网络机理的基础上，提出了相关的假设，构建了基于结构方程的概念模型。然后通过问卷调查和结构方程分析等方法，对假设进行了验证；（3）在前述研究的基础上，引入了市场不确定性和技术不确定性两个行业环境变量，通过数据分析验证了组织学习与技术创新绩效之间的权变关系；（4）最后通过跨案例方法对二元网络、组织学习和技术创新之间的关系进行了验证。
通过分析研究，本文得出以下结论：（1）海归企业的二元网络对组织学习与技术创新绩效的正向影响。研究发现，就国外社会网络的特征变量结构洞和联结强度而言，结构洞的直接影响和间接影响都不显著，而联结强度对技术创新绩效的直接影响和间接影响显著。联结强度对技术创新的间接影响说明国外社会网络的联结强度促进了利用性学习，从而促进了技术创新绩效。直接影响说明联结强度可以直接促进技术创新绩效。但是联结强度对探索性学习有一定的阻碍作用。总体而言，国外社会网络对海归企业的影响主要集中在联结强度这一维度，而且总体上较好的促进了企业的技术创新绩效。就国内社会网络特征变量的政府关系和商业关系而言，政府关系和商业关系的直接影响都不显著，而通过利用性学习的间接影响都显著,说明对技术创新绩效的正向影响均完全通过利用性学习较好的促进了企业的技术创新绩效。商业关系对探索性学习的作用不显著，说明通过探索性学习的间接影响不存在，即探索性学习对商业关系对技术创新绩效的中介作用不存在。总体而言，国内社会网络对海归企业技术创新绩效的影响主要集中在组织的利用性学习。（2）海归企业组织学习的内部负向作用及对技术创新绩效的正向影响。利用性学习对技术创新绩效的作用和探索性学习对技术创新绩效的作用都是显著的正向作用，说明海归企业的组织学习明显促进了企业的技术创新绩效。而且利用性学习的影响系数明显大于探索性学习的影响系数。就探索性学习和利用性学习之间的关系而言，探索性学习对利用性学习的作用为负向显著，说明二者之间存在对立关系。（3）海归企业组织学习对技术创新绩效的权变影响。组织学习对技术创新绩效的权变影响主要是由于市场不确定性和技术不确定性造成的。本研究主要考察在不确定性高即市场和技术波动大和不确定性低即市场和技术比较稳定的情形下，组织学习对技术创新影响的变化状况。结果显示，市场不确定性和技术不确定性两个调节变量都负向调节利用性学习对技术创新绩效的作用关系，正向调节探索性学习和技术创新绩效的关系。也就是说在市场和技术高不确定性的情形下，加强探索性学习更能促进技术创新绩效，而在市场和技术较稳定的情形下，加强利用性学习更能促进技术创新绩效，这也为企业平衡探索性学习和利用性学习提供了一定的指导。
本文研究的贡献主要包括：(1)以往的研究均是在不同的社会文化环境下，对不同主体的社会网络分别进行研究，本文首先引入了二元网络的概念，将同一主体同时具有的两个不同的社会网络纳入研究。从本土化的管理研究视角出发，在一定程度上整合了社会网络和关系的相关理论，将不同的测量方式纳入研究框架，构建了二元网络理论，更贴近海归企业的社会现实情形，是一种理论整合运用的尝试。(2)本文结合社会网络理论和组织学习理论，构建了海归企业的技术创新机制框架，通过基于国内外社会网络的不同度量方式，深入剖析了海归企业基于二元网络并以组织学习为中介的技术创新机制，对中国海归企业的发展模式研究建立了一定的基础。(3)由于海归企业集聚在高科技行业，而高科技行业不同于传统行业和其他行业，技术发展迅速，而且需要跟踪国外前沿的最新发展，同时要适应多变的市场，因而技术和市场不确定性波动比较大。本文则聚焦于这种行业特征，揭示了市场和技术不确定性对组织学习和技术创新绩效关系的权变作用，在一定程度上建立了海归企业探索性学习和利用性学习的平衡理论。
本文研究的实践启示包括：(1)海归企业应该加强跨文化的学习，实施在中国情境下的再本土化，从而适应中国本土化的经营环境。(2)海归企业应充分发挥国外社会网络优势，并着力打造国内社会网络。(3)海归企业应根据不同的产业环境平衡组织学习，培养权变管理能力。政府应在政策制定上，根据相关行业状况，适当支持海归企业的探索性学习。(4)政府和企业应联手打造海归企业集群，实施整体突进，增强和发挥海归企业的集群化优势，基于产业链的来进行资源的优化配置。
With the economic globalization, the rapid development of network economy andknowledge economy and intense global competition, after more than30years of rapideconomic development in our country, the economy is in urgent need of the comprehensivetransformation, a comprehensive upgrade of industrial structure and a new round of economicdevelopment characterized by the industry transformation and upgrade driven by innovationsof is imperative. The model of "introduction of technology "and "Market for Technology "have already not suit for technology innovation, industry chain extension to high-end andoptimizing the structure of export products, because gradient transfer strategy ofmonopolying high-end and the core technology of multinational company, our country'stechnological progress is linear and slow, then difficuty to make leapfrog technologicalprogress and realize leap-forward pursuing. At the same time, high-end manufacturing jobsback to the United States, the low end jobs are transferring to other developing countries, andthe US actually has overtaken China as the world manufacturing factory, the reality is veryserious.In such a background, returnees come back and entrepreneur, promote industrydevelopment of the new economy, new technology, the Internet, IT, communication et al,inject vitality into the many traditional industries, returnee enterprise experience rapiddevelopment, they bring new enterprise management mode, financing mode and developmentphilosophy, and directly promote economic development through technological innovation,but also lead and promote the corporate culture in our country, the returnee enterprise havegradually become one of the backbone of the new economy and high-tech industries in China
Indigenous research in Chinese management is developing rapidly, which leads to thecontextual function of social culture and the issue of the applicability of Western managementtheory.Study on the Indigenous research of the Western social network theory in sociologyand management has expanded, but systemic and comparative study is lack. And currentlyacademic research about returnee enterprise serious lag behind reality, especially literatureabout technology innovation and development mode of China returnee enterprises is scarce.Therefore, taking returnee enterprise as the research sample, using various methods, andcombining unique advantages and characteristics of returnee enterprise, comparativelysystematically analysis and verify the mechanism of organizational learning impact on technology innovation performance based on ambidextrous network of returnee enterprise,then answer the following questions：1) What is the mechanism of intrinsic differences in theambidextrous network of the returnee enterprise?(2) What is the mechanism of theambidextrous network impact on organization learning?(3) What is the mechanism of theorganization learning impact on technology innovation performance of the returnee enterprise?(4) What is the mechanism of the technology and market uncertainty impact on therelationship between organizational learning and technology innovation performance?
To answer these questions, this article make the following the corresponding researchcombined with the methods of questionnaire and case study, mainly including (1) accordingto the related theory of social network and social culture of sociology, follow the social andcultural differences to trust differences,then social network differences in logic, analysis theinherent differences of ambidextrous network in-depth, thus establish the theoreticalfoundation of ambidextrous network of returnees enterprise;(2) based on the literatureanalysis and the mechanism of ambidextrous network, puts forward the relevant hypothesis,the concept of structural equation model of concept model is constructed. Through themethods of questionnaire and structural equation analysis, the hypothesis is verified;(3) onthe basis of the foregoing research, the introduction of market and technology uncertaintyenvironment variables, through data analysis to verify the contingency of the relationshipbetween organizational learning and innovation performance;(4) the last step is to verify arelationship among ambidextrous network, organization learning and technology innovationby the method of multiple cases study.
Through the above research, we get the following conclusions:(1) Positive influence ofambidextrous network of the returnee enterprise on organizational learning and technologyinnovation performance.Study found that as for the characteristic variables of overseas socialnetworks, structural holes direct influence and indirect influence on technology innovationperformance is not significant, and the connection strength direct influence and indirectinfluence is significant. Indirect effect of connection strength shows overseas social networkpromotes the organizational learning, so as to promote the technology innovationperformance. Direct effect of the connection strength show connection strength can directlypromote the technological innovation performance. But there is slight negative impact of theconnection strength on explorative study. Overall, overseas social network of returneesenterprises mainly focused on the influence of connection strength, and influence ofconnection strength have a positive influence on technology innovation performance.As forthe characteristic variables of domestic social network, direct effects of the government andbusiness relations are not significant, and indirect effects through exploitive learning aresignificant show that positive influence of the government and business relations ontechnology innovation performance are completely through the use of exploitive learning andthen promote the enterprise technology innovation performance. The impact of Businessrelations on exploratory study is not significant, shows no indirect effects through exploratorylearning exists, namely mediating impact of the exploratory study on relationship between business relationships and technology innovation performance does not exist. In general, theinfluence of domestic social network on returnee enterprises mainly focused on the influenceof the organization exploitive study on technology innovation performance.(2) Internalnegative influence of organizational learning of returnee enterprise and positive influence oforganizational learning on technology innovation performance.Positive effects of exploratorystudy and exploitive study on the technology innovation performance are significant, showthat organizational learning of returnee enterprise significantly promotes the technologyinnovation performance. And the influence coefficient of exploitive study is significantlygreater than the influence coefficient of exploratory study. As for the relationship betweenexploratory study and exploitive study, the impact of exploratory study on exploitive study isnegative significantly, it show the opposite relation does exist between exploratory study andexploitive study.(3) Contingent effect of organization learning of returnee enterprise ontechnology innovation performance.Contingent effect of Organizational learning ontechnology innovation performance is mainly due to the market uncertainty and technologicaluncertainty. This study is to investigate the change of relation between organizationallearning and technology innovation performance under the conditions of the high uncertaintyand low uncertainty. According to the results, market uncertainty and technologicaluncertainty both negatively moderate relation between exploitive study and technologyinnovation performance, both positively moderate relation between exploratory study andtechnology innovation performance. That is to say, in the case of the high market and thetechnology uncertainty, strengthening the exploratory study more can promote thetechnological innovation performance, and in the case of relatively stable situation,strengthening the exploitive study more can promote the technological innovationperformance, this also provides some guidance for balancing the exploitive study andexploratory study.
These research results indicate that, this paper makes a little contribution in thefollowing areas:（1）Previous researchs are about the social networks of subjects in differentsocial and cultural environment respectively. This paper first introduced the concept ofambidextrous network to study the two different social networks of the same subject at thesame time. From the localization of the management study perspective, to a certain extent,integrating with theory of social networks and guanxi, taking the different measure methodinto the research framework, builds the theory of ambidextrous network, closely reflect to thereality of returnee enterprise, it is an attempt to integrate different theories（.2）Combining thetheory of social network and organizational learning theory to study the technologyinnovation mechanism of returnee enterprise.Based on organizational learning and socialnetwork theory, this paper analyzes the impact mechanism of ambidextrous social network ofthe returnee enterprise on organizational learning. Especially through the different measureway of social networks domestic and oversea, investigates the mediation mechanism oforganizational learning of technology innovation based on ambidextrous network of thereturnee enterprise.(3)Returnee enterprises gathered in the high-tech industry where is different from traditional industry and other industries, technology is developing rapidly inhigh-tech industry and the need to track the latest development of frontier abroad, at the sametime to adapt to the changeful market, technology and market uncertainty are change greatly.This study focuse on the characteristics of high-tech industry, reveals the contingent effect oforganization learning of returnee enterprise on technology innovation performance due totechnology and market uncertainty, and establish the balance mechanism of exploratory studyand exploitive study of the returnee enterprise to a certain extent.
Our study have some implications to practitioners and policy makers:(1)Returneeenterprises should strengthen cross-cultural management learning, implementreacclimatization in Chinese context, so as to adapt to the local business environment.(2)Returnee enterprises should give full play to the advantage of overseas social networks andfocus on expanding internal social network.(3) Returnee enterprises should be based on avariety of industry environment to balance organizational learning and develop the capacityof contingency management. The Government should appropriately support the exploratorystudy of Returnee enterprises in accordance with the relevant industry conditions.(4) TheGovernment and Returnee enterprises should join forces to build enterprise clusters andReturnee enterprises should make progress as a whole, enhance and play advantage ofenterprise cluster and optimize the allocation of resources based on industry chain.
目前管理学中国本土化的研究发展迅速，从而引出了社会文化的情境性作用及西方相关管理理论适用性的问题。西方社会网络理论的本土化研究在社会学和管理学都有所展开，但是对比和综合的研究还相对缺乏。关于中国海归企业的学术研究，则严重滞后于现实状况。目前关于中国海归企业的研究文献比较少，已有的文献研究对海归企业的国际社会网络及技术创新等问题有所涉及，但是关于中国海归企业的技术创新和发展模式等问题的相关文献则比较匮乏，对于海归企业的国内社会网络的研究还是空白。因此，本文以中国海归企业为研究样本，结合海归独有的优势和特征，较为系统地分析了基于二元网络的中国海归企业组织学习对技术创新绩效的影响机制，并回答了以下几个问题：（1）海归企业二元网络的内在差异机理是什么？（2）二元网络对企业组织学习的作用机制如何？（3）海归企业组织学习对技术创新绩效的作用机制如何？（4）技术和市场不确定性对企业组织学习和技术创新绩效关系的影响机理如何？
为了回答这些问题，本文结合调查问卷和案例等方法，进行了以下相应的研究，主要包括（1）结合社会学的社会网络和社会文化等相关理论，遵循社会文化差异到信任差异再到社会网络差异的逻辑，系统深入的分析了海归企业二元网络的内在差异机理，从而为海归企业二元网络的测量建立了理论基础；（2）在文献分析和海归企业二元网络机理的基础上，提出了相关的假设，构建了基于结构方程的概念模型。然后通过问卷调查和结构方程分析等方法，对假设进行了验证；（3）在前述研究的基础上，引入了市场不确定性和技术不确定性两个行业环境变量，通过数据分析验证了组织学习与技术创新绩效之间的权变关系；（4）最后通过跨案例方法对二元网络、组织学习和技术创新之间的关系进行了验证。
通过分析研究，本文得出以下结论：（1）海归企业的二元网络对组织学习与技术创新绩效的正向影响。研究发现，就国外社会网络的特征变量结构洞和联结强度而言，结构洞的直接影响和间接影响都不显著，而联结强度对技术创新绩效的直接影响和间接影响显著。联结强度对技术创新的间接影响说明国外社会网络的联结强度促进了利用性学习，从而促进了技术创新绩效。直接影响说明联结强度可以直接促进技术创新绩效。但是联结强度对探索性学习有一定的阻碍作用。总体而言，国外社会网络对海归企业的影响主要集中在联结强度这一维度，而且总体上较好的促进了企业的技术创新绩效。就国内社会网络特征变量的政府关系和商业关系而言，政府关系和商业关系的直接影响都不显著，而通过利用性学习的间接影响都显著,说明对技术创新绩效的正向影响均完全通过利用性学习较好的促进了企业的技术创新绩效。商业关系对探索性学习的作用不显著，说明通过探索性学习的间接影响不存在，即探索性学习对商业关系对技术创新绩效的中介作用不存在。总体而言，国内社会网络对海归企业技术创新绩效的影响主要集中在组织的利用性学习。（2）海归企业组织学习的内部负向作用及对技术创新绩效的正向影响。利用性学习对技术创新绩效的作用和探索性学习对技术创新绩效的作用都是显著的正向作用，说明海归企业的组织学习明显促进了企业的技术创新绩效。而且利用性学习的影响系数明显大于探索性学习的影响系数。就探索性学习和利用性学习之间的关系而言，探索性学习对利用性学习的作用为负向显著，说明二者之间存在对立关系。（3）海归企业组织学习对技术创新绩效的权变影响。组织学习对技术创新绩效的权变影响主要是由于市场不确定性和技术不确定性造成的。本研究主要考察在不确定性高即市场和技术波动大和不确定性低即市场和技术比较稳定的情形下，组织学习对技术创新影响的变化状况。结果显示，市场不确定性和技术不确定性两个调节变量都负向调节利用性学习对技术创新绩效的作用关系，正向调节探索性学习和技术创新绩效的关系。也就是说在市场和技术高不确定性的情形下，加强探索性学习更能促进技术创新绩效，而在市场和技术较稳定的情形下，加强利用性学习更能促进技术创新绩效，这也为企业平衡探索性学习和利用性学习提供了一定的指导。
本文研究的贡献主要包括：(1)以往的研究均是在不同的社会文化环境下，对不同主体的社会网络分别进行研究，本文首先引入了二元网络的概念，将同一主体同时具有的两个不同的社会网络纳入研究。从本土化的管理研究视角出发，在一定程度上整合了社会网络和关系的相关理论，将不同的测量方式纳入研究框架，构建了二元网络理论，更贴近海归企业的社会现实情形，是一种理论整合运用的尝试。(2)本文结合社会网络理论和组织学习理论，构建了海归企业的技术创新机制框架，通过基于国内外社会网络的不同度量方式，深入剖析了海归企业基于二元网络并以组织学习为中介的技术创新机制，对中国海归企业的发展模式研究建立了一定的基础。(3)由于海归企业集聚在高科技行业，而高科技行业不同于传统行业和其他行业，技术发展迅速，而且需要跟踪国外前沿的最新发展，同时要适应多变的市场，因而技术和市场不确定性波动比较大。本文则聚焦于这种行业特征，揭示了市场和技术不确定性对组织学习和技术创新绩效关系的权变作用，在一定程度上建立了海归企业探索性学习和利用性学习的平衡理论。
本文研究的实践启示包括：(1)海归企业应该加强跨文化的学习，实施在中国情境下的再本土化，从而适应中国本土化的经营环境。(2)海归企业应充分发挥国外社会网络优势，并着力打造国内社会网络。(3)海归企业应根据不同的产业环境平衡组织学习，培养权变管理能力。政府应在政策制定上，根据相关行业状况，适当支持海归企业的探索性学习。(4)政府和企业应联手打造海归企业集群，实施整体突进，增强和发挥海归企业的集群化优势，基于产业链的来进行资源的优化配置。
With the economic globalization, the rapid development of network economy andknowledge economy and intense global competition, after more than30years of rapideconomic development in our country, the economy is in urgent need of the comprehensivetransformation, a comprehensive upgrade of industrial structure and a new round of economicdevelopment characterized by the industry transformation and upgrade driven by innovationsof is imperative. The model of "introduction of technology "and "Market for Technology "have already not suit for technology innovation, industry chain extension to high-end andoptimizing the structure of export products, because gradient transfer strategy ofmonopolying high-end and the core technology of multinational company, our country'stechnological progress is linear and slow, then difficuty to make leapfrog technologicalprogress and realize leap-forward pursuing. At the same time, high-end manufacturing jobsback to the United States, the low end jobs are transferring to other developing countries, andthe US actually has overtaken China as the world manufacturing factory, the reality is veryserious.In such a background, returnees come back and entrepreneur, promote industrydevelopment of the new economy, new technology, the Internet, IT, communication et al,inject vitality into the many traditional industries, returnee enterprise experience rapiddevelopment, they bring new enterprise management mode, financing mode and developmentphilosophy, and directly promote economic development through technological innovation,but also lead and promote the corporate culture in our country, the returnee enterprise havegradually become one of the backbone of the new economy and high-tech industries in China
Indigenous research in Chinese management is developing rapidly, which leads to thecontextual function of social culture and the issue of the applicability of Western managementtheory.Study on the Indigenous research of the Western social network theory in sociologyand management has expanded, but systemic and comparative study is lack. And currentlyacademic research about returnee enterprise serious lag behind reality, especially literatureabout technology innovation and development mode of China returnee enterprises is scarce.Therefore, taking returnee enterprise as the research sample, using various methods, andcombining unique advantages and characteristics of returnee enterprise, comparativelysystematically analysis and verify the mechanism of organizational learning impact on technology innovation performance based on ambidextrous network of returnee enterprise,then answer the following questions：1) What is the mechanism of intrinsic differences in theambidextrous network of the returnee enterprise?(2) What is the mechanism of theambidextrous network impact on organization learning?(3) What is the mechanism of theorganization learning impact on technology innovation performance of the returnee enterprise?(4) What is the mechanism of the technology and market uncertainty impact on therelationship between organizational learning and technology innovation performance?
To answer these questions, this article make the following the corresponding researchcombined with the methods of questionnaire and case study, mainly including (1) accordingto the related theory of social network and social culture of sociology, follow the social andcultural differences to trust differences,then social network differences in logic, analysis theinherent differences of ambidextrous network in-depth, thus establish the theoreticalfoundation of ambidextrous network of returnees enterprise;(2) based on the literatureanalysis and the mechanism of ambidextrous network, puts forward the relevant hypothesis,the concept of structural equation model of concept model is constructed. Through themethods of questionnaire and structural equation analysis, the hypothesis is verified;(3) onthe basis of the foregoing research, the introduction of market and technology uncertaintyenvironment variables, through data analysis to verify the contingency of the relationshipbetween organizational learning and innovation performance;(4) the last step is to verify arelationship among ambidextrous network, organization learning and technology innovationby the method of multiple cases study.
Through the above research, we get the following conclusions:(1) Positive influence ofambidextrous network of the returnee enterprise on organizational learning and technologyinnovation performance.Study found that as for the characteristic variables of overseas socialnetworks, structural holes direct influence and indirect influence on technology innovationperformance is not significant, and the connection strength direct influence and indirectinfluence is significant. Indirect effect of connection strength shows overseas social networkpromotes the organizational learning, so as to promote the technology innovationperformance. Direct effect of the connection strength show connection strength can directlypromote the technological innovation performance. But there is slight negative impact of theconnection strength on explorative study. Overall, overseas social network of returneesenterprises mainly focused on the influence of connection strength, and influence ofconnection strength have a positive influence on technology innovation performance.As forthe characteristic variables of domestic social network, direct effects of the government andbusiness relations are not significant, and indirect effects through exploitive learning aresignificant show that positive influence of the government and business relations ontechnology innovation performance are completely through the use of exploitive learning andthen promote the enterprise technology innovation performance. The impact of Businessrelations on exploratory study is not significant, shows no indirect effects through exploratorylearning exists, namely mediating impact of the exploratory study on relationship between business relationships and technology innovation performance does not exist. In general, theinfluence of domestic social network on returnee enterprises mainly focused on the influenceof the organization exploitive study on technology innovation performance.(2) Internalnegative influence of organizational learning of returnee enterprise and positive influence oforganizational learning on technology innovation performance.Positive effects of exploratorystudy and exploitive study on the technology innovation performance are significant, showthat organizational learning of returnee enterprise significantly promotes the technologyinnovation performance. And the influence coefficient of exploitive study is significantlygreater than the influence coefficient of exploratory study. As for the relationship betweenexploratory study and exploitive study, the impact of exploratory study on exploitive study isnegative significantly, it show the opposite relation does exist between exploratory study andexploitive study.(3) Contingent effect of organization learning of returnee enterprise ontechnology innovation performance.Contingent effect of Organizational learning ontechnology innovation performance is mainly due to the market uncertainty and technologicaluncertainty. This study is to investigate the change of relation between organizationallearning and technology innovation performance under the conditions of the high uncertaintyand low uncertainty. According to the results, market uncertainty and technologicaluncertainty both negatively moderate relation between exploitive study and technologyinnovation performance, both positively moderate relation between exploratory study andtechnology innovation performance. That is to say, in the case of the high market and thetechnology uncertainty, strengthening the exploratory study more can promote thetechnological innovation performance, and in the case of relatively stable situation,strengthening the exploitive study more can promote the technological innovationperformance, this also provides some guidance for balancing the exploitive study andexploratory study.
These research results indicate that, this paper makes a little contribution in thefollowing areas:（1）Previous researchs are about the social networks of subjects in differentsocial and cultural environment respectively. This paper first introduced the concept ofambidextrous network to study the two different social networks of the same subject at thesame time. From the localization of the management study perspective, to a certain extent,integrating with theory of social networks and guanxi, taking the different measure methodinto the research framework, builds the theory of ambidextrous network, closely reflect to thereality of returnee enterprise, it is an attempt to integrate different theories（.2）Combining thetheory of social network and organizational learning theory to study the technologyinnovation mechanism of returnee enterprise.Based on organizational learning and socialnetwork theory, this paper analyzes the impact mechanism of ambidextrous social network ofthe returnee enterprise on organizational learning. Especially through the different measureway of social networks domestic and oversea, investigates the mediation mechanism oforganizational learning of technology innovation based on ambidextrous network of thereturnee enterprise.(3)Returnee enterprises gathered in the high-tech industry where is different from traditional industry and other industries, technology is developing rapidly inhigh-tech industry and the need to track the latest development of frontier abroad, at the sametime to adapt to the changeful market, technology and market uncertainty are change greatly.This study focuse on the characteristics of high-tech industry, reveals the contingent effect oforganization learning of returnee enterprise on technology innovation performance due totechnology and market uncertainty, and establish the balance mechanism of exploratory studyand exploitive study of the returnee enterprise to a certain extent.
Our study have some implications to practitioners and policy makers:(1)Returneeenterprises should strengthen cross-cultural management learning, implementreacclimatization in Chinese context, so as to adapt to the local business environment.(2)Returnee enterprises should give full play to the advantage of overseas social networks andfocus on expanding internal social network.(3) Returnee enterprises should be based on avariety of industry environment to balance organizational learning and develop the capacityof contingency management. The Government should appropriately support the exploratorystudy of Returnee enterprises in accordance with the relevant industry conditions.(4) TheGovernment and Returnee enterprises should join forces to build enterprise clusters andReturnee enterprises should make progress as a whole, enhance and play advantage ofenterprise cluster and optimize the allocation of resources based on industry chain.
引文
[1]张维迎.理性思考中国改革[J].权衡,2006(6):72-79.
[2]郎咸平,孙晋.中国经济到了最危险的边缘[M].东方出版社.2012.
[3]王辉耀.中国留学发展报告(2012)No.1(2012版)[M].社会科学文献出版社.2012.
[4]教育部留学服务中心,科学技术部火炬高技术产业开发中心,人力资源和社会保障部留学人员和专家服务中心,北京海外学人科技服务中心编.中国留学人员创业年鉴2011卷[Z].中国致公出版社,2011.
[5]王辉耀,路江涌.海归创业企业与民营企业对接合作与对比研究报告[M].北京大学出版社.2012.
[6]罗珉.中国管理学反思与发展思路[J].管理学报,2008(4):478-482.
[7]张笑峰,曹春辉,王磊.经济转型与管理创新时期管理学研究回顾与展望.管理学报,2012(12):1761-1771.
[8] Xiao Z, Tsui A S. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinesehigh-tech firms[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2007,52(1):1-31.
[9] Bian Y. Bringing strong ties back in: indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China[J].American Sociological Review,1997,62(3):266-285.
[10]孙晓娥,边燕杰.留美科学家的国内参与及其社会网络—强弱关系假设的再探讨[J].社会.2011(2):194-215.
[11] Wright M, Liu Xiao hui, Trevor Buck, Igor Filatotchev. Returnee Entrepreneurs, Science ParkLocation Choice and Performance: An Analysis of SMEs in China[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice,2008,32(1):131-156.
[12] March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization science,1991,2(1):71-87.
[13]朱朝晖,陈劲.探索性学习与挖掘性学习及其平衡研究[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(10):54-59.
[14] Jagdish Bhagwati.The Brain Drain and Taxation II: Theory and Empirical Analysis[M]. Amsterdam:North-Holl Publinshing Co,1976
[15] Robert E. Lucas,Jr.Why Doesn't Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries?[J].The AmericanEconomic Review,1990,80(2):92-96.
[16] Saxenian, A. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route128[M].Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press,1994.
[17] Saxenian, A. From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgradingin India and China[J]. Studies in Comparative International Development,2005,40(2):35-61
[18] Amsden,Alice H., Chu,Wan-wen.Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrating Polcies[M].Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press,2003
[19] Raj, Dhooleka Sarhadi.Where Are You From?: Middle-class Migrants in the Modern World[M].Berkeley University of California Press,2003.
[20] Dai,O, Liu,X. Returnee entrepreneurs and firm performance in Chinese high-technologyindustries[J].International Business Review,2009,18(4):373-386.
[21] Filatotchev I, Liu X., Buck T, Wright M. The export orientation and export performance ofhigh-technology SMEs in emerging markets: The effects of knowledge transfer by returneeentrepreneurs[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(6):1005-1021.
[22] Liu X,Lu J,Filatotchev I,Buck T,Wright M.Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers andinnovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2010,41(7):1183-1197.
[23] Chen Y. The limits of brain circulation: Chinese returnees and technological development in Beijing[J].Pacific Affairs,2008,81(2):195-215.
[24] S Scott W R, Davis G F. Networks in and around organizations[J]. Organizations and Organizing:Rational, Natural, and Open Systems Perspectives, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ,2007:278-309.
[25] Freeman L C. The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science[M].Empirical Press Vancouver,2004.
[26]刘军.整体网分析讲义[M].格致出版社,2009.
[27]罗家德.社会网分析讲义[M].社会科学文献出版社,2010.
[28] Borgatti S P, Mehra A, Brass D J, et al. Network analysis in the social sciences[J]. science,2009,323(5916):892-895.
[29] Allee V, Taug J. Collaboration, innovation, and value creation in a global telecom[J]. LearningOrganization, The,2006,13(6):569-578.
[30] Gulati R. Alliances and networks[J]. Strategic management journal,1998,19(4):293-317.
[31] Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities onalliance formation[J]. Strategic management journal,1999,20(5):397-420.
[32] Brass D J, Galaskiewicz J, Greve H R. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevelperspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(6):795-817.
[33] Inkpen A C. Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances[J]. TheAcademy of Management Executive,1998,12(4):69-80.
[34] Johannisson B, Ramirez-Pasillas M. Networking for entrepreneurship: building a topography model ofhuman, social and cultural capital[J]. W. Bygrave et al,2001.
[35] Zaheer A, McEvily B. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities[J].Strategic management journal,1999,20(12):1133-1156.
[36]张枢盛，陈继祥.基于文化视角的中国海归创业二元网络研究[J].现代管理科学,2012(12):14-17.
[37] Wilson, Robert B.1989. Exchange.pp:83-93in Allocation,Information, and Markets: The NewPalgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by J.Eatwell,M. Milgate, and P. Newman. New York:W. W.Norton and Co.
[38] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. Americanjournal of sociology,1985:481-510.
[39] Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance oforganizations: The network effect[J]. American sociological review,1996:674-698.
[40] Granovetter M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American journal of sociology,1973:1360-1380.
[41] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from?1[J]. American journal ofsociology,1999,104(5):1439-1493.
[42] Simsek Z, Lubatkin M H, Floyd S W. Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: A structuralembeddedness perspective[J]. Journal of Management,2003,29(3):427-442.
[43] Chen H F, Wang I C. The Determinants and Effects of Embeddedness on MNC‘sSubsidiaries[C].International Conference on Ttrade, Investment, and Industrial Policy in the Asia-PacificRegion. Taipei: Soochow University.2001:283-303.
[44] Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J].Academy of management review,1998:242-266.
[45] Coleman, J. Social capital in the creation of human capital [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1988,94:95-121.
[46] Ronald B. Structural holes: The social structure of competition[J]. Cambridge: Harvard,1992.
[47]姚小涛,席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2003,3.
[48] Bourdieu P. The social space and the genesis of groups[J]. Theory and society,1985,14(6):723-744.
[49] Dyer J H, Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizationalcompetitive advantage[J]. Academy of management review,1998,23(4):660-679.
[50] Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study[J].Administrative science quarterly,2000,45(3):425-455.
[51] Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A. Guest editors‘introduction to the special issue: strategic networks[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):199-201.
[52] Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: the efficacy of multiplecontacts[J]. Organization studies,2002,23(4):525-548.
[53] Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness[J].Administrative science quarterly,1997:35-67.
[54] Dyer Jeffrey H, Kentaro N. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network:the Toyota case[J]. Strategic Management Journal, Chichester,2000,21(3):345-367.
[55] Powell W W. Learning from collaboration[J]. California management review,1998,40(3):228-240.
[56] Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position andabsorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of management journal,2001,44(5):996-1004.
[57] Zaheer A, Bell G G. Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, andperformance[J]. Strategic management journal,2005,26(9):809-825.
[58] Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural andrelational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):369-386.
[59] Lee D J,Pae J H, Wong Y H.A model of close business relationships in China (Guanxi)[J].EuropeanJournal of Marketing,2001,35(1/2):51-69
[60] Leung T K P, Lai K, Chan R Y K, et al.The roles of Xinyong and Guanxi in Chinese relationshipmarketing[J].European Journal of Marketing,2005,39(5/6):528-565
[61] Gu, F. F., Hung, K., Tse, D. K. When does guanxi matter? Issues of capitalization and itsdark sides[J].Journal of Marketing,2008,72(4):12-28
[62] Chadee D D, Zhang B Y．The impact of Guanxi on export performance: A study of New Zealandfirms exporting to China[J].Journal of Global Marketing,2000,14(1/2):129-132
[63] Lee D Y, Dawes P L. Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets[J]. Journalof International Marketing,2005,13(2):28-43
[64] Zhuang G J, Xi Y M, Tsang A S L. Power, conflict, and cooperation: The impact of Guanxi in aChinese marketing channel[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2010,39(1):137-149
[65] Peng, M. W., Luo, Y. Managerial ties and organizational performance in a transition economy: Thenature of a micro-macro link[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(3):486–501.
[66] Zhang, Q., Fung, H. China‘s social capital and financial performance of private enterprises[J].Journalof Small Business and Enterprise Development,2006,13(2):198-207
[67]郭海,王栋,薛佳奇.企业管理者的社会关系:研究回顾与展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(7):154-159.
[68] Luo, X., Chung, C. N. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in businessgroup performance during institutional transition[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2005,50(3):404-439
[69] Liu, Y., Li, Y., Xue, J. Transfer of market knowledge in a channel relationship: Impacts of attitudinalcommitment and satisfaction[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2010,39(2):229-239.
[70] Li, J. J., Zhou, K. Z., Shao, A. T. Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreignorganizations in China: An interactive perspective[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(2):339-352
[71] Chen, C. C., Chen, Y. R., Xin, K. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justiceperspective[J]. Organization Science,2004,15(2):200-209
[72] Vanhonacker, W. R. When good guanxi turns bad. Harvard Business Review[J].2004,82:18-19
[73] McEvily, B., Marcus, A. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities[J].StrategicManagement Journal,2005,26(11):1033-1055
[74] Atuahene-Gima K, Li H, De Luca L M. The contingent value of marketing strategy innovativeness forproduct development performance in Chinese new technology ventures[J]. Industrial MarketingManagement,2006,35(3):359-372.
[75] Zou, H., Chen, X., Ghauri, P. Antecedents and consequences of new venture growth strategy: Anempirical study in China[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2010,27(3):393-421
[76] Yang, Mayfair. Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China[M]. Ithaca NY:Cornell University Press,1994
[77] Guthrie D. The declining significance of guanxi in China‘s economic transition[J]. China Quarterly,1998,154:254-282
[78] Zhang J, Keh H T. Interorganizational exchanges in China: Organizational forms and governancemechanisms[J].Management and Organization Review,2010,6(1):123-147
[79] Schumpeter, Joseph A.The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit,interest and the business cycle[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press,1934.
[80] Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy[M]. London: Allen and Unwin,1942.
[81] Michael L. Tushman, Richard R. Nelson. Introduction: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly.1990,35(1):1-8.
[82] Fariborz Damanpour.Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants andModerators. The Academy of Management Journal.1991,34(3):555-590.
[83] Robert D. Dewar, Jane E. Dutton.The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An EmpiricalAnalysis. Management Science.1986,32(11):1422-1433.
[84] Michael L. Tushman, Philip Anderson. Technological Discontinuities and OrganizationalEnvironments. Administrative Science Quarterly.1986,31(3):439-465.
[85] Philip Anderson,Michael L.Tushman.Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: ACyclical Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly.1990,35(4):604-633.
[86] Rebecca M. Henderson,Kim B.Clark. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of ExistingProduct Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly.1990,35(1):9-30.
[87] Gemünden H G, Ritter T, Heydebreck P. Network configuration and innovation success: An empiricalanalysis in German high-tech industries[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing,1996,13(5):449-462.
[88] Ritter T, Gemünden H G. Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and itsantecedents[J]. Journal of Business Research,2003,56(9):745-755.
[89] Hagedoorn J, Cloodt M. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multipleindicators?[J]. Research policy,2003,32(8):1365-1379.
[90]韦影.企业社会资本对技术创新绩效的影响[D].浙江大学,2006.
[91]陈劲,陈钰芬.企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(3):86-91.
[92] Yang J, Liu H, Gao S, et al. Technological innovation of firms in China: Past, present, and future[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2012:1-22.
[93] Argirys C, Sch n D A. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective[J]. Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,1978.
[94]彼得,圣吉.第五项修炼——学习型组织的艺术与实务[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998.
[95]张鹏.企业社会资本,组织学习和技术创新绩效研究[D].山东大学,2009.
[96] Crossan M M, Berdrow I. Organizational learning and strategic renewal[J]. Strategic ManagementJournal,2003,24(11):1087-1105.
[97]蒋春燕,赵曙明.社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系-组织学习的中介作用[J].管理世界,2006(10):90-98.
[98] Crossan M M, Lane H W, White R E. An organizational learning framework: From intuition toinstitution[J]. Academy of management review,1999:522-537.
[99] Holmqvist M. A dynamic model of intra-and interorganizational learning[J]. Organization Studies,2003,24(1):95-123.
[100] March, J G. Exploration and exploitationin organizational learning[J].Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.
[101] Levinthal D A, March J G.The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14:95-112.
[102] McGrath R. Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity and the Role of Managerial Oversight [J].Academy of Management Journal.2001,44(1),pp.118-133.
[103] Van Wijk,R,Van den Bosch F A J,Volberda H W, KnowledgeandNetworks[A],InM.Easterby-Smith,et al.(eds.) The Black well Handbook of Organizational Learning and KnowledgeManagement[C]. Malden,M A,Blackwell Pub.2003,pp.428-453.
[104] Knott A M. Exploration and Exploitation as Complements[A].In N.Bontis and C.W.Choo(eds.),TheStrategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge： A Collection ofReadings[C].Oxford University Press, New York,2002.pp.339-358.
[105] Vanhaverbeke W P M, Gilsing V, Beerkens B, et al. Exploration and exploitation intechnology-based alliance networks[M]. UNU-MERIT, Maastricht Economic and Social Research andTraining Centre on Innovation and Technology,2007.
[106] Atuahene-Gima K, Murray J Y. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: asocial capital perspective on new technology ventures in China[J]. Journal of International Marketing,2007,15(02):1-29.
[107] Land S, Engelen A, Brettel M. Top management's social capital and learning in new productdevelopment and its interaction with external uncertainties[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2012,41(3):521-530.
[108]窦红宾,王正斌.网络结构对企业成长绩效的影响研究——利用性学习,探索性学习的中介作用[J].南开管理评论,2011(3):15-25.
[109] Koka B R, Prescott J E. Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position,environmental change, and strategy on firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(6):639-661.
[110] Stata R, Almond P. Organizational learning: The key to management innovation[M].1989.
[111] C.Mabey, G. Salaman, Strategic H uman Resource Management [M], Oxford: Blackwell,1995.
[112] Baker W E, Sinkula J M. The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation onorganizational performance[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science,1999,27(4):411-427.
[113] Calantone R, Garcia R, Dr ge C. The effects of environmental turbulence on new productdevelopment strategy planning[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2003,20(2):90-103.
[114] Forrester R H. Capturing learning and applying knowledge: an investigation of the use of innovationteams in Japanese and American automotive firms[J]. Journal of Business Research,2000,47(1):35-45.
[115] Yeung A C L, Lai K, Yee R W Y. Organizational learning, innovativeness, and organizationalperformance: a qualitative investigation[J]. International journal of production research,2007,45(11):2459-2477.
[116] Yli‐Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza H J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledgeexploitation in young technology‐based firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(6‐7):587-613.
[117] Weerawardena J, O'Cass A, Julian C. Does industry matter? Examining the role of industry structureand organizational learning in innovation and brand performance[J]. Journal of Business Research,2006,59(1):37-45.
[118] Chang S J, Xu D. Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China[J]. StrategicManagement Journal,2008,29(5):495-518.
[119] Tsai M T, Huang Y C. Exploratory learning and new product performance: The moderating role ofcognitive skills and environmental uncertainty[J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2008,19(2):83-93.
[120] Li C R, Chu C P, Lin C J. The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for newproduct development performance[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2010,39(7):1186-1197.
[121] Liu H, Luo J, Huang J X. Organizational learning, NPD and environmental uncertainty: Anambidexterity perspective[J]. Asian Business&Management,2011,10(4):529-553.
[122] Ambler T. Reflections in China: Re-orienting images of marketing[J]. MarketingManagement,1995,4(1):22-27.
[123]边燕杰.关系社会学及其学科地位[J].西安交通大学学报:社会科学版,2010(003):1-6.
[124] Barney J B, Zhang S. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese managementversus a Chinese theory of management[J]. Management and Organization Review,2009,5(1):15-28.
[125] Leung K. Indigenous Chinese management research: Like it or not, we need it[J]. Management andOrganization Review,2012,8(1):1-5.
[126] Peng M W, Heath P S. The Growth Of The Firm In Planned Economies In Transition:Institutions,organizations, and strategic choice[J]. Academy of Management Review,1996,21(2):492-528
[127] Ahlstrom D, Bruton G D. An Institutional Perspective On The Role Of Culture In Shaping strategicactions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2002,26(4):53-69
[128] Peng M W. Institutional transitions and strategic choices[J]. Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):275-293
[129] Xin K R, Pearce J L. Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes For Formal Institutional Support[J].Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(6):1641-1658
[130] Li H., Atuahene-Gima K. Product Innovation Strategy And The Performance Of New TechnologyVentures In China[J]. Academy Of Management Journal,2001,44(6):1123-1134
[131]秦海霞.关系网络的建构：私营企业主的行动逻辑[D].上海大学,2005.
[132] Dunfee,T. W., Warren, D. E. Is Guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in China[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2001,32(3):191-204.
[133] Boisot, M., Child, J. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China‘s emergingeconomic order[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(4):600-628
[134] Luk, L. C., Yau, H. M., Sin, Y. M., Tse, C. B., Chow, P. M., Lee, S. Y. The effects of social capitaland organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts[J]. Journal of International BusinessStudies,2008,39(4):589-612.
[135] Park, S., Luo, Y. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chineseorganizations[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(5):455-477.
[136] Lee, S. H., Oh, K. Corruption in Asia: Pervasiveness and arbitrariness[J]. Asia Pacific Journal ofManagement,2007,24(1):97-114.
[137]Ambler, T. Marketing‘s third paradigm:Guanxi[J]. Business Strategy Review,1994,5(4),69-80.
[138] Hwang, K.K. Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1987,92(4):944-974.
[139]费孝通.乡土中国生育制度［M］.北京:北京大学出版社,1998．
[140]黄光国．人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏[A].杨国枢编,中国人的心理[C].台北:桂冠图书股份有限公司.1988.289-317.
[141]庄贵军.关系在中国的文化内涵:管理学者的视角[J].当代经济科学,2012,34(1):18-45.
[142]庄贵军,席酉民.关系营销在中国的文化基础[J].管理世界,2003(10):98-109.
[143]韩巍,席酉民.关系:中国商业活动的基本模式探讨[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001年31(1):43-47.
[144] Yang, G. S. Chinese social orientation: A perspective of social interaction[A]. In G. S.Yang (eds.),Chinese Psychology and Behaviors [C]. Taipei: Guiguang Publishing Co. Ltd.(In Chinese).1992. pp.87-142.
[145] Powell WW. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization [A]. In Staw BM,Cummings LL (eds.).Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.12[C]. JAI Press: Greenwich, CT,1990,pp.295-336.
[146]韩巍.基于文化的企业及企业集团管理行为研究[M].机械工业出版社,2004年1月版.
[147](美)费正清.美国与中国[M].商务印书馆,1971年版.
[148] Li S M,Park S H,Li S H．The great leap forward：The transition from relation-based governance torule-based governance[J]. Organizational Dynamics,2004,33(1):63-78.
[149]梁漱溟.中国文化要义[M].香港集成图书公司.1963.
[150] Hofstede, G. Culture‘s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values[M]. Sage:Newbury Park, CA.1980.
[151]高玉林,杨洲.中西社会信任结构之比较[J].河北学刊,2006,26(4):43-48.
[152] Putnam R D. The prosperous community[J]. The american prospect,1993,4(13):35-42.
[153] Fukuyama F. Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust workplace[J].Stern Business Magazine,1997,4(1):1-16.
[154] Knack S, Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation[J].The Quarterly journal of economics,1997,112(4):1251-1288.
[155] Barney J B, Hansen M H. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage[J]. Strategicmanagement journal,1994,15(S1):175-190.
[156] Sako M, Helper S. Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industryin Japan and the United States[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,1998,34(3):387-417.
[157]韦伯儒教与道教[M].商务印书馆,1995
[158]张小路.现代社会诚信体系及其建设[J].河北学刊,2004,3:102-106.
[159] Geyskens,I., Steemkamp, J.E.M., Scheer, L.K., Kumar,N., The effect of trust and interdependenceon relationship commitment: a trans-Atlantic study[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,1996(13):303-35
[160] Wee, C.H.(1994), Research on Chinese management: some issues and challenges‘in Proceedings ofSymposium: Theorizing about Chinese Business and Management, City Polytechnic of Hong Kong, HongKong.
[161]李沛良.论中国式社会学研究的关联概念与命题[J].北京大学社会学与人类学所,《东西社会研究》,北京:北京大学出版社,1993.
[162] Lin N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action[M]. Cambridge University Press,2002.
[163]李智超,罗家德.透过社会网观点看本土管理理论[J].管理学报,2011,8(12):1737-1747.
[164]彭泗清.信任的建立机制:关系运作与法制手段[J].社会学研究,1999,2:53-66
[165]姚小涛,张田,席酉民.强关系与弱关系:企业成长的社会关系依赖研究①[J].管理科学学报,2008,11(1).
[166]边燕杰,李煜.中国城市家庭的社会网络资本[J].清华社会学评论,2000,2:1-18.
[167]罗家德,王竞,张佳音,等.社会网研究的架构——以组织理论与管理研究为例[J].社会,2008,28(6):15-38.
[168]王辉耀.当代中国海归[M].中国发展出版社,2007.
[169]王辉耀.与民企合作:海归创业新模式[J].中国人才,2012(7):34-36.
[170]王辉耀,路江涌.国际人才蓝皮书:中国海归创业发展报告(2012) NO.1[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2012.
[171] Moliterno T P, Mahony D M. Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach[J]. Journal ofManagement,2011,37(2):443-467.
[172] Hansen M, The Search-transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge AcrossOrganizational Sub units[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44,82-111.
[173] Rhee M. Network updating and exploratory learning environment[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2004,41:933-949.
[174] Katila R,Ahuja G. Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior andNew Product Introduction[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2002,6(45):1183-1194.
[175] Mom T J M, van den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Investigating managers‘exploration andexploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows[J].Journal of Management Studies,2007,44(6):910-931.
[176] Jiang C. The Impact of Entrepreneur‘s Social Capital on Knowledge Transfer in Chinese High-techFirms:The Mediating Efects of Absorptive Capacity and Guanxi Development[J].International Journal ofEntrepreneurship and Innovation Management,2005,5(3/4):269-283.
[177] Gulati R,Nohria N,Zaheer A. Strategic Networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):203-215.
[178] Tiwana A. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of allianceambidexterity[J]. Strategic Management Journal.2008,29(3):251-272.
[179] Burt R. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Harvard University Press,Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.1992.
[180]陈钰芬.开放式创新的机理与动态模式研究[D].博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[181]陈劲.创新全球化-企业技术创新国际化范式[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
[182]李文鹣,孙林杰,谢刚.借鉴国际经验,透视我国政府在中小企业产学研中的作用[J].研究与发展管理,2005,4:67-70.
[183]吴军民.行业行会的组织运作:一种社会资本分析视角—以广东南海专业镇行业行会为例[J].管理世界,2005,(10):50-57.
[184]邓淑华,郭涛.中关村三三会打造精品项目推介平台[N].中国高新技术产业导报,2012-02-20(12).
[185]黄淳.深圳万余名人才近期将获房补[N].晶报,2011-04-14(4).
[186]李冰心.政策实现零障碍上海海归企业―日增一家‖[N].新民晚报,2010-06-07(15).
[187]Ryans A, More R, Barclay D, et al. Winning market leadership: Strategic market planning fortechnology-driven businesses[M]. Toronto: John Wiley,2008.
[188] Lavie D. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in theUS software industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(12):1187-1212.
[189] Stuart T E, Hoang H, Hybels R C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance ofentrepreneurial ventures[J]. Administrative science quarterly,1999,44(2):315-349.
[190] Miner A S, Amburgey T L, Stearns T M. Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics:Buffering and transformational shields[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990:689-713.
[191] Lee C, Lee K, Pennings J M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study ontechnology‐based ventures[J]. Strategic management journal,2001,22(6‐7):615-640.
[192] Podolny J M, Page K L. Network forms of organization[J]. Annual review of sociology,1998:57-76.
[193] Guo C, Miller J K. Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China[J].Management and Organization Review,2010,6(2):267-291.
[194] Standifird S S, Marshall R S. The transaction cost advantage of guanxi‘based business practices[J].Journal of World Business,2000,35(1):21-42.
[195] Kaufman P, Jayachandran S, Rose R L. The role of relational embeddedness in retail buyers'selection of new products[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2006:580-587.
[196] Krug B, Hendrischke H. Framing China: Transformation and Institutional Change through Co‐evolution[J]. Management and Organization Review,2008,4(1):81-108.
[197] He Z,Wong P. Exploration vs Exploitation: AnEmpirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis[J].OrganizationS cience,2004,15(4):481-494.
[198] Rothaermel,Deeds D L.Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of NewProduct Development[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004,25(3):201-221.
[199] Gupta A. K, Smith K G, Shalley C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(4):693-706.
[200] Holmqvist M. Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration with in and betweenorganizations: An empirical study of product development[J]. Organization Science,2004,15(1):70-81.
[201] Raisch S,Birkinshaw J,Probst G,Tushman M L.Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitationand exploration fo rsustained performance[J]. Organization Science,2009,20(4):685-695.
[202] Atuahene-Gima K, Slater S F, Olson E M. The contingent value of responsive and proactive marketorientations for new product program performance[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005,22(6),464-482.
[203] Garcia R, Calantone R, Levine R. The role of knowledge in resource allocation to exploration versusexploitation in technologically oriented organizations*[J]. Decision Sciences,2003,34(2):323-349.
[204] Levitt B, March J G. Organizational learning[J]. Annual review of sociology,1988:319-340.
[205] Karim S, Mitchell W. Path-Dependent and Path-Breaking Change: Reconfiguring BusinessResources Following Acquisitions in the US Medical Sector,1978-1995[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000:1061-1081.
[206] Lewin A Y, Long C P, Carroll T N. The coevolution of new organizational forms[J]. OrganizationScience,1999,10(5):535-550.
[207] Brislin R W. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material[J]. Handbook ofcross-cultural psychology,1980,2(2):349-444.
[208] Stangor C. Research methods for the behavioral sciences[M]. Wadsworth Publishing Company,2010.
[209] Uma S, Bougie R. Research Methods for Business: A skill building approach[J]. John Wiley andSons Inc., New York,2009.
[210]（美）贝里等著.因果关系模型[M].吴晓刚主编.北京:格致出版社,2011.
[211]李茂能.图解AMOS在学术研究中的应用[M].重庆大学出版社,2011
[212] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychologicalresearch: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of personality and socialpsychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182.
[213] Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models[J].Sociological methodology,1982,13(1982):290-312.
[214]吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆大学出版社,2009.
[215] Dillman D A. Mail and telephone surveys[M]. New York: Wiley,1978.
[216] Li H, Atuahene‐Gima K. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, andperformance in Chinese technology ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(6):469-490.
[217] Zhang Y, Li H. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties withservice intermediaries[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(1):88-109.
[218] Li J J, Poppo L, Zhou K Z. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition,uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(4):383-400.
[219] Li J J, Zhou K Z. How foreign firms achieve competitive advantage in the Chinese emergingeconomy: Managerial ties and market orientation[J]. Journal of Business Research,2010,63(8):856-862.
[220] Sheng S, Zhou K Z, Li J J. The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidencefrom China[J]. Journal of Marketing,2011,75(1):1-15.
[221] Heirati N, O'Cass A, Ngo L V. The contingent value of marketing and social networking capabilitiesin firm performance[J]. Journal of Strategic Marketing,2013,21(1):1-17.
[222] Zahra S A, Ireland R D, Hitt M A. International expansion by new venture firms: Internationaldiversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance[J]. Academy of Managementjournal,2000:925-950.
[223] Tabachnick B G, Fidell L S, Osterlind S J. Using multivariate statistics(4th ed)[M].NewYork:HarperCollins,2001.
[224] Rigdon Edward E. Structural equation modeling: nontraditional alternatives. In:Everitt Brian, HowellDavid, editors. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioralscience, vol.4. New York, NY: Wiley;2005. p.1934-41.
[225] Nunnally J C. Psychometric Theory:2d Ed[M]. McGraw-Hill,1978.
[226] Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.)[M]. New York: Allyn andBacon,(2007).
[227] Bagozzi R P, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models[J]. Journal of the academy ofmarketing science,1988,16(1):74-94.
[228] Hair J F, Anderson R E, Tatham R L, et al. Multivariate data analysis,5th[M]. NY: Prentice HallInternational,1998.
[229]易丹辉.结构方程模型方法与应用[M].中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[230] Paladino A. Analyzing the Effects of Market and Resource Orientations on Innovative Outcomes inTimes of Turbulence*[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2008,25(6):577-592.
[231] Lichtenthaler U. Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity oforganizational learning processes[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(4):822-846.
[232] Slater S F, Narver J C. Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performancerelationship?[J]. The Journal of Marketing,1994:46-55.
[233] Helfat C E, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, et al. Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change inorganizations[M]. Wiley-Blackwell,2009.
[234] Galbraith J R. Designing complex organizations[M]. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.,1973.
[235] Milliken F J. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and responseuncertainty[J]. Academy of Management review,1987:133-143.
[236] Jaworski B J, Kohli A K. Market orientation: antecedents and consequences[J]. The Journal ofmarketing,1993:53-70.
[237]王伟毅,李乾文.环境不确定性与创业活动关系研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(3):53-58.
[238]李大元,项保华,陈应龙.企业动态能力及其功效:环境不确定性的影响[J].南开管理评论,2009(006):60-68.
[239]武立东,王凯,黄海昕.组织外部环境不确定性的研究述评[J].管理学报,2012,9(11):1712-1717.
[240]冯军政.环境动荡性,动态能力对企业不连续创新的影响作用研究[D].浙江大学,2012.
[241] Bstieler L. The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty on New Product Development andTime Efficiency*[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005,22(3):267-284.
[242] Thompson J D. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory[M].Transaction Pub,1967.
[243] Wan W P, Yiu D W. From crisis to opportunity: Environmental jolt, corporate acquisitions, and firmperformance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30(7):791-801.
[244] Lumpkin G T, Dess G G. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance:The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle[J]. Journal of business venturing,2001,16(5):429-451.
[245] Justin Tan J, Litsschert R J. Environment‐strategy relationship and its performance implications:An empirical study of the chinese electronics industry[J]. Strategic management journal,1994,15(1):1-20.
[246] Yang C, Wang Y D, Niu H J. Does industry matter in attributing organizational learning to itsperformance?: Evidence from the taiwanese economy[J]. Asia Pacific Business Review,2007,13(4):547-563.
[247] Jiang X, Li Y. The relationship between organizational learning and firms‘financial performance instrategic alliances: a contingency approach[J]. Journal of World Business,2008,43(3):365-379.
[248]杨智,邓炼金,方二.市场导向,战略柔性与企业绩效:环境不确定性的调节效应[J].中国软科学,2010(009):130-139.
[249] Atuahene-Gima K, Li H. Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness And New Product DevelopmentOutcomes In New Technology Ventures[J]. Academy Of Management Journal,2004,47(4):583-597.
[250] Atuahene-Gima K, Murray J Y. Antecedents and outcomes of marketing strategycomprehensiveness[J]. Journal of Marketing,2004:33-46.
[251] Kotabe M, Jiang C X, Murray J Y. Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptivecapacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China[J].Journal of World Business,2011,46(2):166-176.
[252] Li J J. The formation of managerial networks of foreign firms in China: The effects of strategicorientations[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2005,22(4):423-443.
[253] Jansen J J P, Van Den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation,and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Managementscience,2006,52(11):1661-1674.
[254] Chen J, Reilly R R, Lynn G S. The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: themoderating effects of uncertainty[J]. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on,2005,52(2):199-212.
[255] Song M, Montoya-Weiss M M. The Effect Of Perceived Technological Uncertainty On JapaneseNew Product Development[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(1):61-80.
[256] Dess G G, Robinson R B. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objectivemeasures: the case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit[J]. Strategic managementjournal,1984,5(3):265-273.
[257] Henderson R. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence fromthe photolithographic alignment equipment industry[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics,1993:248-270.
[258] Herrmann A, Gassmann O, Eisert U. An empirical study of the antecedents for radical productinnovations and capabilities for transformation[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2007,24(1):92-120.
[259] Iansiti M. Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment[J].Research Policy,1995,24(4):521-542.
[260] Auh S, Menguc B. Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitiveintensity[J]. Journal of Business Research,2005,58(12):1652-1661.
[261] Liao J, Welsch H. Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: a comparison oftechnology-and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs[J]. The Journal of high technologymanagement research,2003,14(1):149-170.
[262] Lu L Y Y, Yang C. The R&D and marketing cooperation across new product development stages: Anempirical study of Taiwan's IT industry[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2004,33(7):593-605.
[263] Zahra S A., Nielsen A P, Bogner W C. Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competencedevelopment[J]. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1999(23):169-189
[264] Zahra S A. Goverance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact ofindustry technological opportunities[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996:1713-1735.
[265] Baysinger B, Hoskisson R E. Diversification strategy and R&D intensity in multiproduct firms[J].Academy of Management Journal,1989,32(2):310-332.
[266] Jansen J, Volberda H W, Van Den Bosch F. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, andambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents[J]. Schmalenbach BusinessReview,2005,57:351-363.
[267] S rensen J B, Stuart T E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation[J]. Administrativescience quarterly,2000,45(1):81-112.
[268] Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivitydilemma revisited[J]. The Academy of Management Review,2003:238-256.
[269] Yin R K. Case study research: Design and methods[M]. SAGE Publications, Incorporated,2008.
[270] Eisenhardt K M. Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of management review,1989:532-550.
[271] Weick K E. The generative properties of richness[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(1):14-19.
[272] Tsui A S. Taking stock and looking ahead: MOR and Chinese management research[J]. Managementand Organization Review,2007,3(3):327-334.
[273] Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges[J].Academy of management journal,2007,50(1):25-32.
[274] Herriott R E, Firestone W A. Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description andgeneralizability[J]. Educational researcher,1983,12(2):14-19.
[275] Sanders P. Phenomenology: a new way of viewing organizational research[J]. Academy ofmanagement review,1982:353-360.
[276] Chen Y. The limits of brain circulation: Chinese returnees and technological development inBeijing[J]. Pacific Affairs,2008,81(2):195-215.
[2]郎咸平,孙晋.中国经济到了最危险的边缘[M].东方出版社.2012.
[3]王辉耀.中国留学发展报告(2012)No.1(2012版)[M].社会科学文献出版社.2012.
[4]教育部留学服务中心,科学技术部火炬高技术产业开发中心,人力资源和社会保障部留学人员和专家服务中心,北京海外学人科技服务中心编.中国留学人员创业年鉴2011卷[Z].中国致公出版社,2011.
[5]王辉耀,路江涌.海归创业企业与民营企业对接合作与对比研究报告[M].北京大学出版社.2012.
[6]罗珉.中国管理学反思与发展思路[J].管理学报,2008(4):478-482.
[7]张笑峰,曹春辉,王磊.经济转型与管理创新时期管理学研究回顾与展望.管理学报,2012(12):1761-1771.
[8] Xiao Z, Tsui A S. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinesehigh-tech firms[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2007,52(1):1-31.
[9] Bian Y. Bringing strong ties back in: indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China[J].American Sociological Review,1997,62(3):266-285.
[10]孙晓娥,边燕杰.留美科学家的国内参与及其社会网络—强弱关系假设的再探讨[J].社会.2011(2):194-215.
[11] Wright M, Liu Xiao hui, Trevor Buck, Igor Filatotchev. Returnee Entrepreneurs, Science ParkLocation Choice and Performance: An Analysis of SMEs in China[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice,2008,32(1):131-156.
[12] March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization science,1991,2(1):71-87.
[13]朱朝晖,陈劲.探索性学习与挖掘性学习及其平衡研究[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(10):54-59.
[14] Jagdish Bhagwati.The Brain Drain and Taxation II: Theory and Empirical Analysis[M]. Amsterdam:North-Holl Publinshing Co,1976
[15] Robert E. Lucas,Jr.Why Doesn't Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries?[J].The AmericanEconomic Review,1990,80(2):92-96.
[16] Saxenian, A. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route128[M].Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press,1994.
[17] Saxenian, A. From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgradingin India and China[J]. Studies in Comparative International Development,2005,40(2):35-61
[18] Amsden,Alice H., Chu,Wan-wen.Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrating Polcies[M].Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press,2003
[19] Raj, Dhooleka Sarhadi.Where Are You From?: Middle-class Migrants in the Modern World[M].Berkeley University of California Press,2003.
[20] Dai,O, Liu,X. Returnee entrepreneurs and firm performance in Chinese high-technologyindustries[J].International Business Review,2009,18(4):373-386.
[21] Filatotchev I, Liu X., Buck T, Wright M. The export orientation and export performance ofhigh-technology SMEs in emerging markets: The effects of knowledge transfer by returneeentrepreneurs[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(6):1005-1021.
[22] Liu X,Lu J,Filatotchev I,Buck T,Wright M.Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers andinnovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2010,41(7):1183-1197.
[23] Chen Y. The limits of brain circulation: Chinese returnees and technological development in Beijing[J].Pacific Affairs,2008,81(2):195-215.
[24] S Scott W R, Davis G F. Networks in and around organizations[J]. Organizations and Organizing:Rational, Natural, and Open Systems Perspectives, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ,2007:278-309.
[25] Freeman L C. The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science[M].Empirical Press Vancouver,2004.
[26]刘军.整体网分析讲义[M].格致出版社,2009.
[27]罗家德.社会网分析讲义[M].社会科学文献出版社,2010.
[28] Borgatti S P, Mehra A, Brass D J, et al. Network analysis in the social sciences[J]. science,2009,323(5916):892-895.
[29] Allee V, Taug J. Collaboration, innovation, and value creation in a global telecom[J]. LearningOrganization, The,2006,13(6):569-578.
[30] Gulati R. Alliances and networks[J]. Strategic management journal,1998,19(4):293-317.
[31] Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities onalliance formation[J]. Strategic management journal,1999,20(5):397-420.
[32] Brass D J, Galaskiewicz J, Greve H R. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevelperspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(6):795-817.
[33] Inkpen A C. Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances[J]. TheAcademy of Management Executive,1998,12(4):69-80.
[34] Johannisson B, Ramirez-Pasillas M. Networking for entrepreneurship: building a topography model ofhuman, social and cultural capital[J]. W. Bygrave et al,2001.
[35] Zaheer A, McEvily B. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities[J].Strategic management journal,1999,20(12):1133-1156.
[36]张枢盛，陈继祥.基于文化视角的中国海归创业二元网络研究[J].现代管理科学,2012(12):14-17.
[37] Wilson, Robert B.1989. Exchange.pp:83-93in Allocation,Information, and Markets: The NewPalgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by J.Eatwell,M. Milgate, and P. Newman. New York:W. W.Norton and Co.
[38] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. Americanjournal of sociology,1985:481-510.
[39] Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance oforganizations: The network effect[J]. American sociological review,1996:674-698.
[40] Granovetter M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American journal of sociology,1973:1360-1380.
[41] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from?1[J]. American journal ofsociology,1999,104(5):1439-1493.
[42] Simsek Z, Lubatkin M H, Floyd S W. Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: A structuralembeddedness perspective[J]. Journal of Management,2003,29(3):427-442.
[43] Chen H F, Wang I C. The Determinants and Effects of Embeddedness on MNC‘sSubsidiaries[C].International Conference on Ttrade, Investment, and Industrial Policy in the Asia-PacificRegion. Taipei: Soochow University.2001:283-303.
[44] Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J].Academy of management review,1998:242-266.
[45] Coleman, J. Social capital in the creation of human capital [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1988,94:95-121.
[46] Ronald B. Structural holes: The social structure of competition[J]. Cambridge: Harvard,1992.
[47]姚小涛,席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2003,3.
[48] Bourdieu P. The social space and the genesis of groups[J]. Theory and society,1985,14(6):723-744.
[49] Dyer J H, Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizationalcompetitive advantage[J]. Academy of management review,1998,23(4):660-679.
[50] Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study[J].Administrative science quarterly,2000,45(3):425-455.
[51] Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A. Guest editors‘introduction to the special issue: strategic networks[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):199-201.
[52] Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: the efficacy of multiplecontacts[J]. Organization studies,2002,23(4):525-548.
[53] Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness[J].Administrative science quarterly,1997:35-67.
[54] Dyer Jeffrey H, Kentaro N. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network:the Toyota case[J]. Strategic Management Journal, Chichester,2000,21(3):345-367.
[55] Powell W W. Learning from collaboration[J]. California management review,1998,40(3):228-240.
[56] Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position andabsorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of management journal,2001,44(5):996-1004.
[57] Zaheer A, Bell G G. Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, andperformance[J]. Strategic management journal,2005,26(9):809-825.
[58] Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural andrelational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):369-386.
[59] Lee D J,Pae J H, Wong Y H.A model of close business relationships in China (Guanxi)[J].EuropeanJournal of Marketing,2001,35(1/2):51-69
[60] Leung T K P, Lai K, Chan R Y K, et al.The roles of Xinyong and Guanxi in Chinese relationshipmarketing[J].European Journal of Marketing,2005,39(5/6):528-565
[61] Gu, F. F., Hung, K., Tse, D. K. When does guanxi matter? Issues of capitalization and itsdark sides[J].Journal of Marketing,2008,72(4):12-28
[62] Chadee D D, Zhang B Y．The impact of Guanxi on export performance: A study of New Zealandfirms exporting to China[J].Journal of Global Marketing,2000,14(1/2):129-132
[63] Lee D Y, Dawes P L. Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets[J]. Journalof International Marketing,2005,13(2):28-43
[64] Zhuang G J, Xi Y M, Tsang A S L. Power, conflict, and cooperation: The impact of Guanxi in aChinese marketing channel[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2010,39(1):137-149
[65] Peng, M. W., Luo, Y. Managerial ties and organizational performance in a transition economy: Thenature of a micro-macro link[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(3):486–501.
[66] Zhang, Q., Fung, H. China‘s social capital and financial performance of private enterprises[J].Journalof Small Business and Enterprise Development,2006,13(2):198-207
[67]郭海,王栋,薛佳奇.企业管理者的社会关系:研究回顾与展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(7):154-159.
[68] Luo, X., Chung, C. N. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in businessgroup performance during institutional transition[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2005,50(3):404-439
[69] Liu, Y., Li, Y., Xue, J. Transfer of market knowledge in a channel relationship: Impacts of attitudinalcommitment and satisfaction[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2010,39(2):229-239.
[70] Li, J. J., Zhou, K. Z., Shao, A. T. Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreignorganizations in China: An interactive perspective[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(2):339-352
[71] Chen, C. C., Chen, Y. R., Xin, K. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justiceperspective[J]. Organization Science,2004,15(2):200-209
[72] Vanhonacker, W. R. When good guanxi turns bad. Harvard Business Review[J].2004,82:18-19
[73] McEvily, B., Marcus, A. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities[J].StrategicManagement Journal,2005,26(11):1033-1055
[74] Atuahene-Gima K, Li H, De Luca L M. The contingent value of marketing strategy innovativeness forproduct development performance in Chinese new technology ventures[J]. Industrial MarketingManagement,2006,35(3):359-372.
[75] Zou, H., Chen, X., Ghauri, P. Antecedents and consequences of new venture growth strategy: Anempirical study in China[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2010,27(3):393-421
[76] Yang, Mayfair. Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China[M]. Ithaca NY:Cornell University Press,1994
[77] Guthrie D. The declining significance of guanxi in China‘s economic transition[J]. China Quarterly,1998,154:254-282
[78] Zhang J, Keh H T. Interorganizational exchanges in China: Organizational forms and governancemechanisms[J].Management and Organization Review,2010,6(1):123-147
[79] Schumpeter, Joseph A.The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit,interest and the business cycle[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press,1934.
[80] Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy[M]. London: Allen and Unwin,1942.
[81] Michael L. Tushman, Richard R. Nelson. Introduction: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly.1990,35(1):1-8.
[82] Fariborz Damanpour.Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants andModerators. The Academy of Management Journal.1991,34(3):555-590.
[83] Robert D. Dewar, Jane E. Dutton.The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An EmpiricalAnalysis. Management Science.1986,32(11):1422-1433.
[84] Michael L. Tushman, Philip Anderson. Technological Discontinuities and OrganizationalEnvironments. Administrative Science Quarterly.1986,31(3):439-465.
[85] Philip Anderson,Michael L.Tushman.Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: ACyclical Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly.1990,35(4):604-633.
[86] Rebecca M. Henderson,Kim B.Clark. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of ExistingProduct Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly.1990,35(1):9-30.
[87] Gemünden H G, Ritter T, Heydebreck P. Network configuration and innovation success: An empiricalanalysis in German high-tech industries[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing,1996,13(5):449-462.
[88] Ritter T, Gemünden H G. Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and itsantecedents[J]. Journal of Business Research,2003,56(9):745-755.
[89] Hagedoorn J, Cloodt M. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multipleindicators?[J]. Research policy,2003,32(8):1365-1379.
[90]韦影.企业社会资本对技术创新绩效的影响[D].浙江大学,2006.
[91]陈劲,陈钰芬.企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(3):86-91.
[92] Yang J, Liu H, Gao S, et al. Technological innovation of firms in China: Past, present, and future[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2012:1-22.
[93] Argirys C, Sch n D A. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective[J]. Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,1978.
[94]彼得,圣吉.第五项修炼——学习型组织的艺术与实务[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998.
[95]张鹏.企业社会资本,组织学习和技术创新绩效研究[D].山东大学,2009.
[96] Crossan M M, Berdrow I. Organizational learning and strategic renewal[J]. Strategic ManagementJournal,2003,24(11):1087-1105.
[97]蒋春燕,赵曙明.社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系-组织学习的中介作用[J].管理世界,2006(10):90-98.
[98] Crossan M M, Lane H W, White R E. An organizational learning framework: From intuition toinstitution[J]. Academy of management review,1999:522-537.
[99] Holmqvist M. A dynamic model of intra-and interorganizational learning[J]. Organization Studies,2003,24(1):95-123.
[100] March, J G. Exploration and exploitationin organizational learning[J].Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.
[101] Levinthal D A, March J G.The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14:95-112.
[102] McGrath R. Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity and the Role of Managerial Oversight [J].Academy of Management Journal.2001,44(1),pp.118-133.
[103] Van Wijk,R,Van den Bosch F A J,Volberda H W, KnowledgeandNetworks[A],InM.Easterby-Smith,et al.(eds.) The Black well Handbook of Organizational Learning and KnowledgeManagement[C]. Malden,M A,Blackwell Pub.2003,pp.428-453.
[104] Knott A M. Exploration and Exploitation as Complements[A].In N.Bontis and C.W.Choo(eds.),TheStrategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge： A Collection ofReadings[C].Oxford University Press, New York,2002.pp.339-358.
[105] Vanhaverbeke W P M, Gilsing V, Beerkens B, et al. Exploration and exploitation intechnology-based alliance networks[M]. UNU-MERIT, Maastricht Economic and Social Research andTraining Centre on Innovation and Technology,2007.
[106] Atuahene-Gima K, Murray J Y. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: asocial capital perspective on new technology ventures in China[J]. Journal of International Marketing,2007,15(02):1-29.
[107] Land S, Engelen A, Brettel M. Top management's social capital and learning in new productdevelopment and its interaction with external uncertainties[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2012,41(3):521-530.
[108]窦红宾,王正斌.网络结构对企业成长绩效的影响研究——利用性学习,探索性学习的中介作用[J].南开管理评论,2011(3):15-25.
[109] Koka B R, Prescott J E. Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position,environmental change, and strategy on firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(6):639-661.
[110] Stata R, Almond P. Organizational learning: The key to management innovation[M].1989.
[111] C.Mabey, G. Salaman, Strategic H uman Resource Management [M], Oxford: Blackwell,1995.
[112] Baker W E, Sinkula J M. The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation onorganizational performance[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science,1999,27(4):411-427.
[113] Calantone R, Garcia R, Dr ge C. The effects of environmental turbulence on new productdevelopment strategy planning[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2003,20(2):90-103.
[114] Forrester R H. Capturing learning and applying knowledge: an investigation of the use of innovationteams in Japanese and American automotive firms[J]. Journal of Business Research,2000,47(1):35-45.
[115] Yeung A C L, Lai K, Yee R W Y. Organizational learning, innovativeness, and organizationalperformance: a qualitative investigation[J]. International journal of production research,2007,45(11):2459-2477.
[116] Yli‐Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza H J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledgeexploitation in young technology‐based firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(6‐7):587-613.
[117] Weerawardena J, O'Cass A, Julian C. Does industry matter? Examining the role of industry structureand organizational learning in innovation and brand performance[J]. Journal of Business Research,2006,59(1):37-45.
[118] Chang S J, Xu D. Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China[J]. StrategicManagement Journal,2008,29(5):495-518.
[119] Tsai M T, Huang Y C. Exploratory learning and new product performance: The moderating role ofcognitive skills and environmental uncertainty[J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2008,19(2):83-93.
[120] Li C R, Chu C P, Lin C J. The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for newproduct development performance[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2010,39(7):1186-1197.
[121] Liu H, Luo J, Huang J X. Organizational learning, NPD and environmental uncertainty: Anambidexterity perspective[J]. Asian Business&Management,2011,10(4):529-553.
[122] Ambler T. Reflections in China: Re-orienting images of marketing[J]. MarketingManagement,1995,4(1):22-27.
[123]边燕杰.关系社会学及其学科地位[J].西安交通大学学报:社会科学版,2010(003):1-6.
[124] Barney J B, Zhang S. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese managementversus a Chinese theory of management[J]. Management and Organization Review,2009,5(1):15-28.
[125] Leung K. Indigenous Chinese management research: Like it or not, we need it[J]. Management andOrganization Review,2012,8(1):1-5.
[126] Peng M W, Heath P S. The Growth Of The Firm In Planned Economies In Transition:Institutions,organizations, and strategic choice[J]. Academy of Management Review,1996,21(2):492-528
[127] Ahlstrom D, Bruton G D. An Institutional Perspective On The Role Of Culture In Shaping strategicactions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2002,26(4):53-69
[128] Peng M W. Institutional transitions and strategic choices[J]. Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):275-293
[129] Xin K R, Pearce J L. Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes For Formal Institutional Support[J].Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(6):1641-1658
[130] Li H., Atuahene-Gima K. Product Innovation Strategy And The Performance Of New TechnologyVentures In China[J]. Academy Of Management Journal,2001,44(6):1123-1134
[131]秦海霞.关系网络的建构：私营企业主的行动逻辑[D].上海大学,2005.
[132] Dunfee,T. W., Warren, D. E. Is Guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in China[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2001,32(3):191-204.
[133] Boisot, M., Child, J. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China‘s emergingeconomic order[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(4):600-628
[134] Luk, L. C., Yau, H. M., Sin, Y. M., Tse, C. B., Chow, P. M., Lee, S. Y. The effects of social capitaland organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts[J]. Journal of International BusinessStudies,2008,39(4):589-612.
[135] Park, S., Luo, Y. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chineseorganizations[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(5):455-477.
[136] Lee, S. H., Oh, K. Corruption in Asia: Pervasiveness and arbitrariness[J]. Asia Pacific Journal ofManagement,2007,24(1):97-114.
[137]Ambler, T. Marketing‘s third paradigm:Guanxi[J]. Business Strategy Review,1994,5(4),69-80.
[138] Hwang, K.K. Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1987,92(4):944-974.
[139]费孝通.乡土中国生育制度［M］.北京:北京大学出版社,1998．
[140]黄光国．人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏[A].杨国枢编,中国人的心理[C].台北:桂冠图书股份有限公司.1988.289-317.
[141]庄贵军.关系在中国的文化内涵:管理学者的视角[J].当代经济科学,2012,34(1):18-45.
[142]庄贵军,席酉民.关系营销在中国的文化基础[J].管理世界,2003(10):98-109.
[143]韩巍,席酉民.关系:中国商业活动的基本模式探讨[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001年31(1):43-47.
[144] Yang, G. S. Chinese social orientation: A perspective of social interaction[A]. In G. S.Yang (eds.),Chinese Psychology and Behaviors [C]. Taipei: Guiguang Publishing Co. Ltd.(In Chinese).1992. pp.87-142.
[145] Powell WW. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization [A]. In Staw BM,Cummings LL (eds.).Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.12[C]. JAI Press: Greenwich, CT,1990,pp.295-336.
[146]韩巍.基于文化的企业及企业集团管理行为研究[M].机械工业出版社,2004年1月版.
[147](美)费正清.美国与中国[M].商务印书馆,1971年版.
[148] Li S M,Park S H,Li S H．The great leap forward：The transition from relation-based governance torule-based governance[J]. Organizational Dynamics,2004,33(1):63-78.
[149]梁漱溟.中国文化要义[M].香港集成图书公司.1963.
[150] Hofstede, G. Culture‘s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values[M]. Sage:Newbury Park, CA.1980.
[151]高玉林,杨洲.中西社会信任结构之比较[J].河北学刊,2006,26(4):43-48.
[152] Putnam R D. The prosperous community[J]. The american prospect,1993,4(13):35-42.
[153] Fukuyama F. Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust workplace[J].Stern Business Magazine,1997,4(1):1-16.
[154] Knack S, Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation[J].The Quarterly journal of economics,1997,112(4):1251-1288.
[155] Barney J B, Hansen M H. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage[J]. Strategicmanagement journal,1994,15(S1):175-190.
[156] Sako M, Helper S. Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industryin Japan and the United States[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,1998,34(3):387-417.
[157]韦伯儒教与道教[M].商务印书馆,1995
[158]张小路.现代社会诚信体系及其建设[J].河北学刊,2004,3:102-106.
[159] Geyskens,I., Steemkamp, J.E.M., Scheer, L.K., Kumar,N., The effect of trust and interdependenceon relationship commitment: a trans-Atlantic study[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,1996(13):303-35
[160] Wee, C.H.(1994), Research on Chinese management: some issues and challenges‘in Proceedings ofSymposium: Theorizing about Chinese Business and Management, City Polytechnic of Hong Kong, HongKong.
[161]李沛良.论中国式社会学研究的关联概念与命题[J].北京大学社会学与人类学所,《东西社会研究》,北京:北京大学出版社,1993.
[162] Lin N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action[M]. Cambridge University Press,2002.
[163]李智超,罗家德.透过社会网观点看本土管理理论[J].管理学报,2011,8(12):1737-1747.
[164]彭泗清.信任的建立机制:关系运作与法制手段[J].社会学研究,1999,2:53-66
[165]姚小涛,张田,席酉民.强关系与弱关系:企业成长的社会关系依赖研究①[J].管理科学学报,2008,11(1).
[166]边燕杰,李煜.中国城市家庭的社会网络资本[J].清华社会学评论,2000,2:1-18.
[167]罗家德,王竞,张佳音,等.社会网研究的架构——以组织理论与管理研究为例[J].社会,2008,28(6):15-38.
[168]王辉耀.当代中国海归[M].中国发展出版社,2007.
[169]王辉耀.与民企合作:海归创业新模式[J].中国人才,2012(7):34-36.
[170]王辉耀,路江涌.国际人才蓝皮书:中国海归创业发展报告(2012) NO.1[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2012.
[171] Moliterno T P, Mahony D M. Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach[J]. Journal ofManagement,2011,37(2):443-467.
[172] Hansen M, The Search-transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge AcrossOrganizational Sub units[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44,82-111.
[173] Rhee M. Network updating and exploratory learning environment[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2004,41:933-949.
[174] Katila R,Ahuja G. Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior andNew Product Introduction[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2002,6(45):1183-1194.
[175] Mom T J M, van den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Investigating managers‘exploration andexploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows[J].Journal of Management Studies,2007,44(6):910-931.
[176] Jiang C. The Impact of Entrepreneur‘s Social Capital on Knowledge Transfer in Chinese High-techFirms:The Mediating Efects of Absorptive Capacity and Guanxi Development[J].International Journal ofEntrepreneurship and Innovation Management,2005,5(3/4):269-283.
[177] Gulati R,Nohria N,Zaheer A. Strategic Networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):203-215.
[178] Tiwana A. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of allianceambidexterity[J]. Strategic Management Journal.2008,29(3):251-272.
[179] Burt R. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Harvard University Press,Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.1992.
[180]陈钰芬.开放式创新的机理与动态模式研究[D].博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[181]陈劲.创新全球化-企业技术创新国际化范式[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
[182]李文鹣,孙林杰,谢刚.借鉴国际经验,透视我国政府在中小企业产学研中的作用[J].研究与发展管理,2005,4:67-70.
[183]吴军民.行业行会的组织运作:一种社会资本分析视角—以广东南海专业镇行业行会为例[J].管理世界,2005,(10):50-57.
[184]邓淑华,郭涛.中关村三三会打造精品项目推介平台[N].中国高新技术产业导报,2012-02-20(12).
[185]黄淳.深圳万余名人才近期将获房补[N].晶报,2011-04-14(4).
[186]李冰心.政策实现零障碍上海海归企业―日增一家‖[N].新民晚报,2010-06-07(15).
[187]Ryans A, More R, Barclay D, et al. Winning market leadership: Strategic market planning fortechnology-driven businesses[M]. Toronto: John Wiley,2008.
[188] Lavie D. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in theUS software industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(12):1187-1212.
[189] Stuart T E, Hoang H, Hybels R C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance ofentrepreneurial ventures[J]. Administrative science quarterly,1999,44(2):315-349.
[190] Miner A S, Amburgey T L, Stearns T M. Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics:Buffering and transformational shields[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990:689-713.
[191] Lee C, Lee K, Pennings J M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study ontechnology‐based ventures[J]. Strategic management journal,2001,22(6‐7):615-640.
[192] Podolny J M, Page K L. Network forms of organization[J]. Annual review of sociology,1998:57-76.
[193] Guo C, Miller J K. Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China[J].Management and Organization Review,2010,6(2):267-291.
[194] Standifird S S, Marshall R S. The transaction cost advantage of guanxi‘based business practices[J].Journal of World Business,2000,35(1):21-42.
[195] Kaufman P, Jayachandran S, Rose R L. The role of relational embeddedness in retail buyers'selection of new products[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2006:580-587.
[196] Krug B, Hendrischke H. Framing China: Transformation and Institutional Change through Co‐evolution[J]. Management and Organization Review,2008,4(1):81-108.
[197] He Z,Wong P. Exploration vs Exploitation: AnEmpirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis[J].OrganizationS cience,2004,15(4):481-494.
[198] Rothaermel,Deeds D L.Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of NewProduct Development[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004,25(3):201-221.
[199] Gupta A. K, Smith K G, Shalley C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(4):693-706.
[200] Holmqvist M. Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration with in and betweenorganizations: An empirical study of product development[J]. Organization Science,2004,15(1):70-81.
[201] Raisch S,Birkinshaw J,Probst G,Tushman M L.Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitationand exploration fo rsustained performance[J]. Organization Science,2009,20(4):685-695.
[202] Atuahene-Gima K, Slater S F, Olson E M. The contingent value of responsive and proactive marketorientations for new product program performance[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005,22(6),464-482.
[203] Garcia R, Calantone R, Levine R. The role of knowledge in resource allocation to exploration versusexploitation in technologically oriented organizations*[J]. Decision Sciences,2003,34(2):323-349.
[204] Levitt B, March J G. Organizational learning[J]. Annual review of sociology,1988:319-340.
[205] Karim S, Mitchell W. Path-Dependent and Path-Breaking Change: Reconfiguring BusinessResources Following Acquisitions in the US Medical Sector,1978-1995[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000:1061-1081.
[206] Lewin A Y, Long C P, Carroll T N. The coevolution of new organizational forms[J]. OrganizationScience,1999,10(5):535-550.
[207] Brislin R W. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material[J]. Handbook ofcross-cultural psychology,1980,2(2):349-444.
[208] Stangor C. Research methods for the behavioral sciences[M]. Wadsworth Publishing Company,2010.
[209] Uma S, Bougie R. Research Methods for Business: A skill building approach[J]. John Wiley andSons Inc., New York,2009.
[210]（美）贝里等著.因果关系模型[M].吴晓刚主编.北京:格致出版社,2011.
[211]李茂能.图解AMOS在学术研究中的应用[M].重庆大学出版社,2011
[212] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychologicalresearch: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of personality and socialpsychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182.
[213] Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models[J].Sociological methodology,1982,13(1982):290-312.
[214]吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆大学出版社,2009.
[215] Dillman D A. Mail and telephone surveys[M]. New York: Wiley,1978.
[216] Li H, Atuahene‐Gima K. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, andperformance in Chinese technology ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(6):469-490.
[217] Zhang Y, Li H. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties withservice intermediaries[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(1):88-109.
[218] Li J J, Poppo L, Zhou K Z. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition,uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(4):383-400.
[219] Li J J, Zhou K Z. How foreign firms achieve competitive advantage in the Chinese emergingeconomy: Managerial ties and market orientation[J]. Journal of Business Research,2010,63(8):856-862.
[220] Sheng S, Zhou K Z, Li J J. The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidencefrom China[J]. Journal of Marketing,2011,75(1):1-15.
[221] Heirati N, O'Cass A, Ngo L V. The contingent value of marketing and social networking capabilitiesin firm performance[J]. Journal of Strategic Marketing,2013,21(1):1-17.
[222] Zahra S A, Ireland R D, Hitt M A. International expansion by new venture firms: Internationaldiversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance[J]. Academy of Managementjournal,2000:925-950.
[223] Tabachnick B G, Fidell L S, Osterlind S J. Using multivariate statistics(4th ed)[M].NewYork:HarperCollins,2001.
[224] Rigdon Edward E. Structural equation modeling: nontraditional alternatives. In:Everitt Brian, HowellDavid, editors. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioralscience, vol.4. New York, NY: Wiley;2005. p.1934-41.
[225] Nunnally J C. Psychometric Theory:2d Ed[M]. McGraw-Hill,1978.
[226] Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.)[M]. New York: Allyn andBacon,(2007).
[227] Bagozzi R P, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models[J]. Journal of the academy ofmarketing science,1988,16(1):74-94.
[228] Hair J F, Anderson R E, Tatham R L, et al. Multivariate data analysis,5th[M]. NY: Prentice HallInternational,1998.
[229]易丹辉.结构方程模型方法与应用[M].中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[230] Paladino A. Analyzing the Effects of Market and Resource Orientations on Innovative Outcomes inTimes of Turbulence*[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2008,25(6):577-592.
[231] Lichtenthaler U. Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity oforganizational learning processes[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(4):822-846.
[232] Slater S F, Narver J C. Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performancerelationship?[J]. The Journal of Marketing,1994:46-55.
[233] Helfat C E, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, et al. Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change inorganizations[M]. Wiley-Blackwell,2009.
[234] Galbraith J R. Designing complex organizations[M]. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.,1973.
[235] Milliken F J. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and responseuncertainty[J]. Academy of Management review,1987:133-143.
[236] Jaworski B J, Kohli A K. Market orientation: antecedents and consequences[J]. The Journal ofmarketing,1993:53-70.
[237]王伟毅,李乾文.环境不确定性与创业活动关系研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(3):53-58.
[238]李大元,项保华,陈应龙.企业动态能力及其功效:环境不确定性的影响[J].南开管理评论,2009(006):60-68.
[239]武立东,王凯,黄海昕.组织外部环境不确定性的研究述评[J].管理学报,2012,9(11):1712-1717.
[240]冯军政.环境动荡性,动态能力对企业不连续创新的影响作用研究[D].浙江大学,2012.
[241] Bstieler L. The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty on New Product Development andTime Efficiency*[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005,22(3):267-284.
[242] Thompson J D. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory[M].Transaction Pub,1967.
[243] Wan W P, Yiu D W. From crisis to opportunity: Environmental jolt, corporate acquisitions, and firmperformance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30(7):791-801.
[244] Lumpkin G T, Dess G G. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance:The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle[J]. Journal of business venturing,2001,16(5):429-451.
[245] Justin Tan J, Litsschert R J. Environment‐strategy relationship and its performance implications:An empirical study of the chinese electronics industry[J]. Strategic management journal,1994,15(1):1-20.
[246] Yang C, Wang Y D, Niu H J. Does industry matter in attributing organizational learning to itsperformance?: Evidence from the taiwanese economy[J]. Asia Pacific Business Review,2007,13(4):547-563.
[247] Jiang X, Li Y. The relationship between organizational learning and firms‘financial performance instrategic alliances: a contingency approach[J]. Journal of World Business,2008,43(3):365-379.
[248]杨智,邓炼金,方二.市场导向,战略柔性与企业绩效:环境不确定性的调节效应[J].中国软科学,2010(009):130-139.
[249] Atuahene-Gima K, Li H. Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness And New Product DevelopmentOutcomes In New Technology Ventures[J]. Academy Of Management Journal,2004,47(4):583-597.
[250] Atuahene-Gima K, Murray J Y. Antecedents and outcomes of marketing strategycomprehensiveness[J]. Journal of Marketing,2004:33-46.
[251] Kotabe M, Jiang C X, Murray J Y. Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptivecapacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China[J].Journal of World Business,2011,46(2):166-176.
[252] Li J J. The formation of managerial networks of foreign firms in China: The effects of strategicorientations[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2005,22(4):423-443.
[253] Jansen J J P, Van Den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation,and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Managementscience,2006,52(11):1661-1674.
[254] Chen J, Reilly R R, Lynn G S. The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: themoderating effects of uncertainty[J]. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on,2005,52(2):199-212.
[255] Song M, Montoya-Weiss M M. The Effect Of Perceived Technological Uncertainty On JapaneseNew Product Development[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(1):61-80.
[256] Dess G G, Robinson R B. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objectivemeasures: the case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit[J]. Strategic managementjournal,1984,5(3):265-273.
[257] Henderson R. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence fromthe photolithographic alignment equipment industry[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics,1993:248-270.
[258] Herrmann A, Gassmann O, Eisert U. An empirical study of the antecedents for radical productinnovations and capabilities for transformation[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2007,24(1):92-120.
[259] Iansiti M. Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment[J].Research Policy,1995,24(4):521-542.
[260] Auh S, Menguc B. Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitiveintensity[J]. Journal of Business Research,2005,58(12):1652-1661.
[261] Liao J, Welsch H. Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: a comparison oftechnology-and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs[J]. The Journal of high technologymanagement research,2003,14(1):149-170.
[262] Lu L Y Y, Yang C. The R&D and marketing cooperation across new product development stages: Anempirical study of Taiwan's IT industry[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2004,33(7):593-605.
[263] Zahra S A., Nielsen A P, Bogner W C. Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competencedevelopment[J]. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1999(23):169-189
[264] Zahra S A. Goverance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact ofindustry technological opportunities[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996:1713-1735.
[265] Baysinger B, Hoskisson R E. Diversification strategy and R&D intensity in multiproduct firms[J].Academy of Management Journal,1989,32(2):310-332.
[266] Jansen J, Volberda H W, Van Den Bosch F. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, andambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents[J]. Schmalenbach BusinessReview,2005,57:351-363.
[267] S rensen J B, Stuart T E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation[J]. Administrativescience quarterly,2000,45(1):81-112.
[268] Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivitydilemma revisited[J]. The Academy of Management Review,2003:238-256.
[269] Yin R K. Case study research: Design and methods[M]. SAGE Publications, Incorporated,2008.
[270] Eisenhardt K M. Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of management review,1989:532-550.
[271] Weick K E. The generative properties of richness[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(1):14-19.
[272] Tsui A S. Taking stock and looking ahead: MOR and Chinese management research[J]. Managementand Organization Review,2007,3(3):327-334.
[273] Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges[J].Academy of management journal,2007,50(1):25-32.
[274] Herriott R E, Firestone W A. Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description andgeneralizability[J]. Educational researcher,1983,12(2):14-19.
[275] Sanders P. Phenomenology: a new way of viewing organizational research[J]. Academy ofmanagement review,1982:353-360.
[276] Chen Y. The limits of brain circulation: Chinese returnees and technological development inBeijing[J]. Pacific Affairs,2008,81(2):195-215.