河南省环境与经济协调发展时空变化分析
|
摘要
环境与经济协调发展是实现社会可持续的重要保障。随着中部崛起发展战略的实施,河南省经济发展取得了巨大成就,与此同时对环境质量却造成了较大压力,如何在发展中实现环境与经济的协调就成为当前河南省重大而紧迫的问题,因此研究河南省区域环境与经济协调发展状况,对河南省实现可持续发展具有重要的现实意义。
本文回顾了国内外环境与经济协调发展的相关研究,阐述了环境与经济协调发展的理论基础,在分析河南省经济发展状况、环境质量现状以及环保现状的基础上,根据指标选取原则和所能搜集到的资料来构建河南省环境与经济协调发展评价指标体系,然后运用熵值法对各指标进行客观赋权,对河南省18个城市的经济发展与环境质量综合得分进行了测算,并利用廖重斌提出的协调发展度模型进行环境与经济协调度和协调发展度的评价。根据指标体系评价结果,分析2000-2009年河南省经济发展、环境质量、环境与经济协调度和协调发展度的时空变化特征,最后对河南省环境与经济协调发展存在的问题进行分析,并提出相应的对策措施。本文得出的主要结论有:
(1)从时间角度分析,河南省各城市总体经济实力呈较好增长趋势,环境质量有所改善,协调程度相对较高,各城市的协调发展度也在不断提高。
(2)从空间角度分析,河南省区域经济发展得分总体表现为北高南低,西高东低的空间分布格局;环境质量综合得分总体表现为南北、东西方向上均为“中间高,两端低”的空间分布格局;协调度出现“中间低,两端高”,大致呈“<”型分布;协调发展度较高的城市大多位于河南省西部,而黄淮地区的协调发展度较低。
(3)河南省环境与经济协调发展存在的问题主要有三产结构不合理,区域经济增长方式粗放,未形成良好的循环经济发展体系,环保基础设施滞后、投资不足,环境质量改善存在瓶颈。针对以上问题提出了相应对策,建议推行绿色GDP核算体系,做好产业结构转型,重视第三产业的发展,努力发展循环经济,扎实推进生态省建设,加强完善预防为主的环境管理措施,认真抓好工业污染防治。
The coordinative development of environment and economy is an important social sustainable guarantee. With the implementation of the strategy development in the central of China, Henan province has made great achievements in economic development, while the environment quality has resulted in greater pressure. How to achieve the coordination development between environment and economy has become a major and urgent problem in Henan province, therefore, the research in regional coordinated development between environment and economy has an important practical significance.
The thesis looked back the related researches of the coordination between environment and economy in domestic and foreign countries, and described the theoretic basis of the coordination between environment and economy. On the basis of analyzing the economic development, environment guality and environmental status in henna province, according to the principles in selected indicators and data which can collect to establish the evaluation index system for appraising coordinative development between environment and economic in Henan province, then calculated the scores of economy development and environment quality for the 18 cities in Henan by the entropy method of objectively weighting each index, and appraised the coordinative degree and coordinative development degree by the evaluation model which Liao chongbin proposed.
According to the evaluation result, the text analyzed the spatio-temporal evolvement of economy strength, environment quality, coordinative degree and coordinative development degree from 2000 to 2009. Finally, the thesis analyzed the problems which exist in coordinative development between environment and economy, and then proposed the corresponding countermeasures.
This paper achieved conclusions as follows:
(1) From the time point of view, the overall economic strength of each city in Henan province is in good growth trends, and environmental quality has improved, and coordinative degree is relatively high and the coordinative development degree of cities is also rising.
(2) From the spatial point of view, the score of regional economic development overall persents the spatial pattern that is high in north and west but low in south and east; The score of environment quality overall persents high in south and north but low in the middle area. Coordinative degree is higher in the south and north than in the middle, which roughly presents distribution of“<”. The higher degree of coordinative development cities is mostly in the western part of Henan, which are lower in Huanghuai erae.
(3) The problems which in the coordinative development in Henan are irrational industrial structure, the rude growth pattern in the regional economy, not forming a better circular economy development system, lagging behind the infrastructure of environmental protection, and insufficient investment and bottlenecks to improve the quality of the environment. Then the countermeasures were proposed to solve the above problems are implementing green GDP, adjusting the industrial structure, paying attention to the development of the third industry, putting more effort to develop recycling economy, solidly progressing the ecological province development, improving the environment management measures, seriously grasping the industrial pollution prevention.
本文回顾了国内外环境与经济协调发展的相关研究,阐述了环境与经济协调发展的理论基础,在分析河南省经济发展状况、环境质量现状以及环保现状的基础上,根据指标选取原则和所能搜集到的资料来构建河南省环境与经济协调发展评价指标体系,然后运用熵值法对各指标进行客观赋权,对河南省18个城市的经济发展与环境质量综合得分进行了测算,并利用廖重斌提出的协调发展度模型进行环境与经济协调度和协调发展度的评价。根据指标体系评价结果,分析2000-2009年河南省经济发展、环境质量、环境与经济协调度和协调发展度的时空变化特征,最后对河南省环境与经济协调发展存在的问题进行分析,并提出相应的对策措施。本文得出的主要结论有:
(1)从时间角度分析,河南省各城市总体经济实力呈较好增长趋势,环境质量有所改善,协调程度相对较高,各城市的协调发展度也在不断提高。
(2)从空间角度分析,河南省区域经济发展得分总体表现为北高南低,西高东低的空间分布格局;环境质量综合得分总体表现为南北、东西方向上均为“中间高,两端低”的空间分布格局;协调度出现“中间低,两端高”,大致呈“<”型分布;协调发展度较高的城市大多位于河南省西部,而黄淮地区的协调发展度较低。
(3)河南省环境与经济协调发展存在的问题主要有三产结构不合理,区域经济增长方式粗放,未形成良好的循环经济发展体系,环保基础设施滞后、投资不足,环境质量改善存在瓶颈。针对以上问题提出了相应对策,建议推行绿色GDP核算体系,做好产业结构转型,重视第三产业的发展,努力发展循环经济,扎实推进生态省建设,加强完善预防为主的环境管理措施,认真抓好工业污染防治。
The coordinative development of environment and economy is an important social sustainable guarantee. With the implementation of the strategy development in the central of China, Henan province has made great achievements in economic development, while the environment quality has resulted in greater pressure. How to achieve the coordination development between environment and economy has become a major and urgent problem in Henan province, therefore, the research in regional coordinated development between environment and economy has an important practical significance.
The thesis looked back the related researches of the coordination between environment and economy in domestic and foreign countries, and described the theoretic basis of the coordination between environment and economy. On the basis of analyzing the economic development, environment guality and environmental status in henna province, according to the principles in selected indicators and data which can collect to establish the evaluation index system for appraising coordinative development between environment and economic in Henan province, then calculated the scores of economy development and environment quality for the 18 cities in Henan by the entropy method of objectively weighting each index, and appraised the coordinative degree and coordinative development degree by the evaluation model which Liao chongbin proposed.
According to the evaluation result, the text analyzed the spatio-temporal evolvement of economy strength, environment quality, coordinative degree and coordinative development degree from 2000 to 2009. Finally, the thesis analyzed the problems which exist in coordinative development between environment and economy, and then proposed the corresponding countermeasures.
This paper achieved conclusions as follows:
(1) From the time point of view, the overall economic strength of each city in Henan province is in good growth trends, and environmental quality has improved, and coordinative degree is relatively high and the coordinative development degree of cities is also rising.
(2) From the spatial point of view, the score of regional economic development overall persents the spatial pattern that is high in north and west but low in south and east; The score of environment quality overall persents high in south and north but low in the middle area. Coordinative degree is higher in the south and north than in the middle, which roughly presents distribution of“<”. The higher degree of coordinative development cities is mostly in the western part of Henan, which are lower in Huanghuai erae.
(3) The problems which in the coordinative development in Henan are irrational industrial structure, the rude growth pattern in the regional economy, not forming a better circular economy development system, lagging behind the infrastructure of environmental protection, and insufficient investment and bottlenecks to improve the quality of the environment. Then the countermeasures were proposed to solve the above problems are implementing green GDP, adjusting the industrial structure, paying attention to the development of the third industry, putting more effort to develop recycling economy, solidly progressing the ecological province development, improving the environment management measures, seriously grasping the industrial pollution prevention.
引文
[1] Grossman G. M.,Krueger A. B.Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement[R].National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3914,NBER,Cambridge MA,1991.
[2] Grossman G. M.,Krueger A. B. Economic growth and the environment[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110(2):353-377.
[3] Panayotou T.Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve:Turning a Black Box into a Policy Tool[J].Environment and Development Economies,1997(2):465-484.
[4] Hilton F G H,Levimon A.Factoring the Environmental Kuzents Curves:Evidence form automotive emissions[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1998,35:126-141.
[5] John A. List,Craig A. Gallet.The Environmental Kuznets Curve:Does One Size Fit All[J].Ecological Economics,1999,31(3):409-423.
[6] David l. Stem,Michael S.Common.Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2001,41(2):162-178.
[7] Markus P.Technical Progress,Structural Change and the Environmental Kuznets Curve[J].Ecological Economics,2002,42:381-389.
[8] Cropper,M.and C. Griffiths,The interaction of population growth and environment quality[J].American Econmic Review,1994(84):250-254.
[9] Brain Walker.National,regionial and local scale priorities in the economic growth versus environment trade-off[J].Ecological Economics,1995,15:145-147.
[10] DeSerpa.Pigou and Coase in Perspective[J].Camridge Joural of Economics,1993(17):27-50.
[11] Norgaard R R.Economic Indivators of Resource Scarity:a Critical Essay[J].Journal of Environment Economics and Management.Academic Press,New York,1990,19.
[12] Sherry Bartz,David L.Kelly.Economic growth and the environment:Theory and facts[J].Resource and Energy Economics 2008,30:115-149.
[13] Yoshiaki Tsuzuki.Comparison of pollutant discharge per capita(PDC) and its relationship with economic development:An indicator for ambient water quality improvement as well as the Millennium Development Goals(MDGs) sanitation indicator[J].ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS,2009,9:971-981.
[14]吴林娣,方国伟.环境与社会、经济协调发展评价指标体系初探[J].上海环境科学,1995,7(14):2-5.
[15]吴跃明,郎东峰,张子珩.环境-经济系统协调度模型及其指标体系[J].1996,2(6):47-50.
[16]吴跃明,张翼,王勤耕.论环境-经济系统协调度[J].环境污染与防治,1997,1(19):20-23.
[17]蔡宁.经济环境协调标准及其辅助决策模型的研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1999,1:85-90.
[18]廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系—以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].热带地理,1999,2(19):171-177.
[19]林道辉,沈学优,刘亚儿.环境与经济协调发展理论研究进展[J].环境污染与防治,2002,2(24):120- 123.
[20]王长征,刘毅.经济与环境协调研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2002,1(21):58-65.
[21]李艳,曾珍香,武优西.等.经济-环境系统协调发展评价方法研究及应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003,5:54-58.
[22]李崇明,丁烈云.小城镇资源环境与社会经济协调发展评价模型及应用研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,11:134-139.
[23]刘兆德,陈素青,张义玲.中国省市区环境与社会经济地域关联分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,1(15):71-75.
[24]刘鸿亮,曹凤中.21世纪经济与环境协调发展全新思维模式的建立[J].环境科学研究,2006,4(19):148-153.
[25]段小芳,周敬宣,李湘梅.基于环境库兹涅茨曲线的协调度研究——以武汉市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,1(17):25-29.
[26]王茂军,张学霞.中国区域可持续发展水平的时空分异初探[J].中国人口资源与环境,2001,2(11):80-85.
[27]张晓东,池天河.90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析[J].地理研究,2001,4(20):506-515.
[28]王丽珂,许洪春.发达地区环境与经济协调发展度评价[J].工业技术经济,2008,6(27):107-110.
[29]李孝坤,韦杰.重庆都市区环境与经济协调发展演进分析及对策探讨[J].经济地理,2005,3(25):387-390.
[30]张妍,尚金城,于相毅.城市经济与环境发展耦合机制的研究[J].环境科学学报,2003,23(1):107-112.
[31]陈来卿,杨再高.广州经济结构与环境协调状况的综合评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2003,3(13):68-73.
[32]陈向红.广州市环境与经济发展协调度分析[J].中国环境科学学会学术年会优秀论文集,2006:746-750.
[33]杨士弘.广州城市环境与经济协调发展预测及调控研究[J].地理科学,1994,2(14):136-143.
[34]方一平,陈国阶.成都市城市环境与经济协调发展分析[J].城市环境与城市生态,2000,5(13):21-23.
[35]宁小莉.包头市城市环境与经济协调发展分析与评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,1(22):32-35.
[36]邓维,陆根法,殷惠惠.等.镇江市环境与经济协调发展评价及对策研究[J],环境保护科学,2005,31(129):58-60.
[37]张远,李芬,郑丙辉.等.海岸带城市环境-经济系统的协调发展评价及应用--以天津市为例[J].中国人口资源与环境,2005,2(15):53-55.
[38]宋玉斌,汤海燕,倪才英.等.南昌市生态环境与经济协调发展度分析评价[J].环境与可持续发展,2007,1:39-41.
[39]杨春妍,曾辉.深圳市经济与环境协调发展的演进分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,4(16):84-89.
[40]李鹤,张平宇,刘文新.1990年以来辽宁省环境与经济协调度评价[J].地理科学,2007,4(27):486-492.
[41]寇晓东,薛惠锋.1992-2004年西安市环境经济发展协调度分析[J].环境科学与技术,2007,4(30):52-55.
[42]林道辉,杨志峰.密云水库水环境保护与库区社会经济可持续发展研究[J].水科学进展,2000,11(1):38-42.
[43]苏伟.广西近海环境与经济可持续发展协调性分析[J].环境与可持续发展,2008,1:46-49.
[44]秦耀辰,赵秉栋,张俊军.等.河南省持续发展系统动力学模拟与调控[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,7:124-131.
[45]郭镭,张华,袁去病.区域环境-经济协调发展定量分析方法研究[J].四川环境,2003,5(22):67-72.
[46]李春生,李哲,等.河南省矿业城市环境库兹涅茨曲线分析-以焦作为例[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版),2006,2(36):54-57.
[47]冯军旗,何争光,马勇光.郑州市环境库兹涅茨曲线分析[J].河南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,4(35):117-120.
[48]谷蕾,符燕,张小磊.等.开封市环境库兹涅茨曲线特征分析[J].河南科学,2006,5(24):764-767.
[49]谷蕾,马建华,王广华.河南省1985-2006年环境库兹涅茨曲线特征分析[J].地域研究与开发,2008,4(27):113-116.
[50]班春峰,徐梦洁.等.河南省环境库兹涅茨曲线的实证研究[J].环境科学与管理,2008,9(33):36-41.
[51]郜慧,余国忠,赵承美.等.河南省环境污染状况计量模型研究-基于环境库兹涅茨曲线特征[J].河南科学,2009,12(27):1597-1601.
[52]朱甲羽.河南区域经济协调发展状况评价研究,南昌大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[53]王动.经济增长与环境污染的实证探析-以河南省新乡市为例[J].河南机电高等专科学校学报,2010,1(18):34-37.
[54]唐剑武,叶文虎.环境承载力的本质及其定量化初步研究[J].中国环境科学,1998,3(18):1-4.
[55]周国强.环境保护与可持续发展概论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2005:181-193.
[56]钟水映,简新华.人口、资源与环境经济学[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:243-260.
[57]张晓东,池天河.90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析[J].地理研究,2001,20(4):506-514.
[58]张晓东,朱德海.中国区域经济与环境协调度预测分析[J].资源科学,2003.25(2):1-6.
[59] Serageldin and Steer. Valuing the Environment:Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Development [A].held at the world bank. Washington DC,September 30-Oct.,1994.
[60]李春晖,杨勤业.环境代际公平判别模型及其应用研究[J].地理科学进展,1997,2000,19(3):220-226.
[61] United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development.Indicators of SustainableDevelopment:Framework and Methodologies[M].New York:United Nations,1997.
[62]范爱琪,刘书俊.长江口海洋产业绿色GDP核算指标的研究[J].环境保护科学,2010,36(5):48-68.
[63]周阳品,黄光庆.绿色GDP的发展及其在中国的实践[J].环境科学导刊,2009,28(2):11-14.
[64]左玉辉,华新,柏益尧.经济-环境调控[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:130-153.
[65]朱德明.环境保护基础设施投资对经济增长的拉动表现[J].环境导报,1998,(1):1-3.
[2] Grossman G. M.,Krueger A. B. Economic growth and the environment[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110(2):353-377.
[3] Panayotou T.Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve:Turning a Black Box into a Policy Tool[J].Environment and Development Economies,1997(2):465-484.
[4] Hilton F G H,Levimon A.Factoring the Environmental Kuzents Curves:Evidence form automotive emissions[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1998,35:126-141.
[5] John A. List,Craig A. Gallet.The Environmental Kuznets Curve:Does One Size Fit All[J].Ecological Economics,1999,31(3):409-423.
[6] David l. Stem,Michael S.Common.Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2001,41(2):162-178.
[7] Markus P.Technical Progress,Structural Change and the Environmental Kuznets Curve[J].Ecological Economics,2002,42:381-389.
[8] Cropper,M.and C. Griffiths,The interaction of population growth and environment quality[J].American Econmic Review,1994(84):250-254.
[9] Brain Walker.National,regionial and local scale priorities in the economic growth versus environment trade-off[J].Ecological Economics,1995,15:145-147.
[10] DeSerpa.Pigou and Coase in Perspective[J].Camridge Joural of Economics,1993(17):27-50.
[11] Norgaard R R.Economic Indivators of Resource Scarity:a Critical Essay[J].Journal of Environment Economics and Management.Academic Press,New York,1990,19.
[12] Sherry Bartz,David L.Kelly.Economic growth and the environment:Theory and facts[J].Resource and Energy Economics 2008,30:115-149.
[13] Yoshiaki Tsuzuki.Comparison of pollutant discharge per capita(PDC) and its relationship with economic development:An indicator for ambient water quality improvement as well as the Millennium Development Goals(MDGs) sanitation indicator[J].ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS,2009,9:971-981.
[14]吴林娣,方国伟.环境与社会、经济协调发展评价指标体系初探[J].上海环境科学,1995,7(14):2-5.
[15]吴跃明,郎东峰,张子珩.环境-经济系统协调度模型及其指标体系[J].1996,2(6):47-50.
[16]吴跃明,张翼,王勤耕.论环境-经济系统协调度[J].环境污染与防治,1997,1(19):20-23.
[17]蔡宁.经济环境协调标准及其辅助决策模型的研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1999,1:85-90.
[18]廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系—以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].热带地理,1999,2(19):171-177.
[19]林道辉,沈学优,刘亚儿.环境与经济协调发展理论研究进展[J].环境污染与防治,2002,2(24):120- 123.
[20]王长征,刘毅.经济与环境协调研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2002,1(21):58-65.
[21]李艳,曾珍香,武优西.等.经济-环境系统协调发展评价方法研究及应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003,5:54-58.
[22]李崇明,丁烈云.小城镇资源环境与社会经济协调发展评价模型及应用研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,11:134-139.
[23]刘兆德,陈素青,张义玲.中国省市区环境与社会经济地域关联分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,1(15):71-75.
[24]刘鸿亮,曹凤中.21世纪经济与环境协调发展全新思维模式的建立[J].环境科学研究,2006,4(19):148-153.
[25]段小芳,周敬宣,李湘梅.基于环境库兹涅茨曲线的协调度研究——以武汉市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,1(17):25-29.
[26]王茂军,张学霞.中国区域可持续发展水平的时空分异初探[J].中国人口资源与环境,2001,2(11):80-85.
[27]张晓东,池天河.90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析[J].地理研究,2001,4(20):506-515.
[28]王丽珂,许洪春.发达地区环境与经济协调发展度评价[J].工业技术经济,2008,6(27):107-110.
[29]李孝坤,韦杰.重庆都市区环境与经济协调发展演进分析及对策探讨[J].经济地理,2005,3(25):387-390.
[30]张妍,尚金城,于相毅.城市经济与环境发展耦合机制的研究[J].环境科学学报,2003,23(1):107-112.
[31]陈来卿,杨再高.广州经济结构与环境协调状况的综合评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2003,3(13):68-73.
[32]陈向红.广州市环境与经济发展协调度分析[J].中国环境科学学会学术年会优秀论文集,2006:746-750.
[33]杨士弘.广州城市环境与经济协调发展预测及调控研究[J].地理科学,1994,2(14):136-143.
[34]方一平,陈国阶.成都市城市环境与经济协调发展分析[J].城市环境与城市生态,2000,5(13):21-23.
[35]宁小莉.包头市城市环境与经济协调发展分析与评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,1(22):32-35.
[36]邓维,陆根法,殷惠惠.等.镇江市环境与经济协调发展评价及对策研究[J],环境保护科学,2005,31(129):58-60.
[37]张远,李芬,郑丙辉.等.海岸带城市环境-经济系统的协调发展评价及应用--以天津市为例[J].中国人口资源与环境,2005,2(15):53-55.
[38]宋玉斌,汤海燕,倪才英.等.南昌市生态环境与经济协调发展度分析评价[J].环境与可持续发展,2007,1:39-41.
[39]杨春妍,曾辉.深圳市经济与环境协调发展的演进分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,4(16):84-89.
[40]李鹤,张平宇,刘文新.1990年以来辽宁省环境与经济协调度评价[J].地理科学,2007,4(27):486-492.
[41]寇晓东,薛惠锋.1992-2004年西安市环境经济发展协调度分析[J].环境科学与技术,2007,4(30):52-55.
[42]林道辉,杨志峰.密云水库水环境保护与库区社会经济可持续发展研究[J].水科学进展,2000,11(1):38-42.
[43]苏伟.广西近海环境与经济可持续发展协调性分析[J].环境与可持续发展,2008,1:46-49.
[44]秦耀辰,赵秉栋,张俊军.等.河南省持续发展系统动力学模拟与调控[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,7:124-131.
[45]郭镭,张华,袁去病.区域环境-经济协调发展定量分析方法研究[J].四川环境,2003,5(22):67-72.
[46]李春生,李哲,等.河南省矿业城市环境库兹涅茨曲线分析-以焦作为例[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版),2006,2(36):54-57.
[47]冯军旗,何争光,马勇光.郑州市环境库兹涅茨曲线分析[J].河南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,4(35):117-120.
[48]谷蕾,符燕,张小磊.等.开封市环境库兹涅茨曲线特征分析[J].河南科学,2006,5(24):764-767.
[49]谷蕾,马建华,王广华.河南省1985-2006年环境库兹涅茨曲线特征分析[J].地域研究与开发,2008,4(27):113-116.
[50]班春峰,徐梦洁.等.河南省环境库兹涅茨曲线的实证研究[J].环境科学与管理,2008,9(33):36-41.
[51]郜慧,余国忠,赵承美.等.河南省环境污染状况计量模型研究-基于环境库兹涅茨曲线特征[J].河南科学,2009,12(27):1597-1601.
[52]朱甲羽.河南区域经济协调发展状况评价研究,南昌大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[53]王动.经济增长与环境污染的实证探析-以河南省新乡市为例[J].河南机电高等专科学校学报,2010,1(18):34-37.
[54]唐剑武,叶文虎.环境承载力的本质及其定量化初步研究[J].中国环境科学,1998,3(18):1-4.
[55]周国强.环境保护与可持续发展概论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2005:181-193.
[56]钟水映,简新华.人口、资源与环境经济学[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:243-260.
[57]张晓东,池天河.90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析[J].地理研究,2001,20(4):506-514.
[58]张晓东,朱德海.中国区域经济与环境协调度预测分析[J].资源科学,2003.25(2):1-6.
[59] Serageldin and Steer. Valuing the Environment:Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Development [A].held at the world bank. Washington DC,September 30-Oct.,1994.
[60]李春晖,杨勤业.环境代际公平判别模型及其应用研究[J].地理科学进展,1997,2000,19(3):220-226.
[61] United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development.Indicators of SustainableDevelopment:Framework and Methodologies[M].New York:United Nations,1997.
[62]范爱琪,刘书俊.长江口海洋产业绿色GDP核算指标的研究[J].环境保护科学,2010,36(5):48-68.
[63]周阳品,黄光庆.绿色GDP的发展及其在中国的实践[J].环境科学导刊,2009,28(2):11-14.
[64]左玉辉,华新,柏益尧.经济-环境调控[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:130-153.
[65]朱德明.环境保护基础设施投资对经济增长的拉动表现[J].环境导报,1998,(1):1-3.