消费维权公益诉讼制度研究
摘要
只有在一个建立起了完善的消费维权公益诉讼制度体系的国家中,消费者的公共利益才能得到切实的维护,人们的普遍消费权益才能得到真正的实现,一个健全的消费者保护的法律体系才能营造起来。建立起完善的消费维权公益诉讼制度,对于我国消费者权益保护法律制度的完善具有非常重要的意义。本文对消费维权公益诉讼这一制度的相关问题进行了研究,以期对我国的消费者权益保护立法与实践有所启示.
本文包含三个部分:前言,正文和结语,正文分为四章:
第一章“消费维权公益诉讼概述”。本章介绍了公益诉讼的概念及历史沿革,消费维权公益诉讼的含义及特征,以及消费维权公益诉讼的法理基础及经济分析。消费维权公益诉讼与传统的普通消费侵权救济诉讼方式相比,有其显著的独有特征,消费维权公益诉讼是一种有经济效益的诉讼。
第二章“建立我国消费维权公益诉讼制度的必要性”。本章首先论述了我国消费者权益保护诉讼的现实状况,指出了现行消费者诉讼制度存在的问题:诉讼主体制度不健全、诉讼效益不经济、举证责任不合理。然后分析了我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度的必要性:保护消费者公共利益的需要、弥补诉讼救济途径不足的需要、制止侵犯消费者权益行为进一步加剧的需要等。
第三章“国外消费者权益保护诉讼制度研究及借鉴”。本章介绍了美国的消费者集团诉讼和德国的消费者团体诉讼,并分析了我国移植美德两国消费者诉讼模式的可能性,总结了我国消费者诉讼制度需要完善的地方。
第四章“我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度的可行性及设想”。本章论述了我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度的可行性并对我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度提出了几点设想:健全原告资格制度、举证责任合理分担、、减轻诉讼费用、建立诉讼激约机制、适当延长诉讼时效等,以期对推动我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度的出台提供一些思路。
Only in the country that founded the perfect commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits,consumer's common benefits could obtain the practical maintenance,then people's universal expense rights and benefits could obtain real realization and a perfect legal framework that consumer rights and benefits are protected could build.Building a perfect commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits has very great significance.This article explores related question about the commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits,wish to have the enlightenment to our country's legislation and the practice of consumer rights and interests protection.
This article contains three parts:introduction,body and conclusion,the body is divided into four chapters:
In Part 1.It focuses on the basic theory of the commonweal litigation of the consumer rights and benefits.It explains the concept and historical evolution of the commonweal litigation,the meaning and characteristics of the commonweal litigation of the consumer rights and benefits,and the legal basis and economic analysis of the system.Comparing to the traditional litigation of the consumer rights and benefits,the commonweal litigation of the consumer rights and benefits has its unique characteristics ,and it has economic effectiveness.
In Part 2.It focuses on the necessity of setting up the commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits.Fist it points out the problem that the current litigation system of consumer rights and benefits has:litigant system has defect, litigation does not benefit in economy,the responsibility of affording proof is not reasonable.Finally it analyze the necessity of setting up the commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits:the need to protect consumers' common benefits,make up for lack of litigation relief,stop further acts of infringement to the consumers' benefits,and so on.
In Part 3.It focuses on the consumer group litigation of the United States and the consumer organisation litigation of Germany.It tries to analyze the possibility of learn from the two countries and the system that need to retain and perfec for China.
In Part 4.It focuses on the feasibility of building the commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits in China,and introduces several points:building a perfect litigant system,sharing the responsibility of affording proof reasonably ,reducing the cost of litigation,setting up litigation encouraging mechanism, extending the statute of limitation,and so on.With a view to promoting the proceedings of setting up commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits in China.
本文包含三个部分:前言,正文和结语,正文分为四章:
第一章“消费维权公益诉讼概述”。本章介绍了公益诉讼的概念及历史沿革,消费维权公益诉讼的含义及特征,以及消费维权公益诉讼的法理基础及经济分析。消费维权公益诉讼与传统的普通消费侵权救济诉讼方式相比,有其显著的独有特征,消费维权公益诉讼是一种有经济效益的诉讼。
第二章“建立我国消费维权公益诉讼制度的必要性”。本章首先论述了我国消费者权益保护诉讼的现实状况,指出了现行消费者诉讼制度存在的问题:诉讼主体制度不健全、诉讼效益不经济、举证责任不合理。然后分析了我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度的必要性:保护消费者公共利益的需要、弥补诉讼救济途径不足的需要、制止侵犯消费者权益行为进一步加剧的需要等。
第三章“国外消费者权益保护诉讼制度研究及借鉴”。本章介绍了美国的消费者集团诉讼和德国的消费者团体诉讼,并分析了我国移植美德两国消费者诉讼模式的可能性,总结了我国消费者诉讼制度需要完善的地方。
第四章“我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度的可行性及设想”。本章论述了我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度的可行性并对我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度提出了几点设想:健全原告资格制度、举证责任合理分担、、减轻诉讼费用、建立诉讼激约机制、适当延长诉讼时效等,以期对推动我国建立消费维权公益诉讼制度的出台提供一些思路。
Only in the country that founded the perfect commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits,consumer's common benefits could obtain the practical maintenance,then people's universal expense rights and benefits could obtain real realization and a perfect legal framework that consumer rights and benefits are protected could build.Building a perfect commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits has very great significance.This article explores related question about the commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits,wish to have the enlightenment to our country's legislation and the practice of consumer rights and interests protection.
This article contains three parts:introduction,body and conclusion,the body is divided into four chapters:
In Part 1.It focuses on the basic theory of the commonweal litigation of the consumer rights and benefits.It explains the concept and historical evolution of the commonweal litigation,the meaning and characteristics of the commonweal litigation of the consumer rights and benefits,and the legal basis and economic analysis of the system.Comparing to the traditional litigation of the consumer rights and benefits,the commonweal litigation of the consumer rights and benefits has its unique characteristics ,and it has economic effectiveness.
In Part 2.It focuses on the necessity of setting up the commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits.Fist it points out the problem that the current litigation system of consumer rights and benefits has:litigant system has defect, litigation does not benefit in economy,the responsibility of affording proof is not reasonable.Finally it analyze the necessity of setting up the commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits:the need to protect consumers' common benefits,make up for lack of litigation relief,stop further acts of infringement to the consumers' benefits,and so on.
In Part 3.It focuses on the consumer group litigation of the United States and the consumer organisation litigation of Germany.It tries to analyze the possibility of learn from the two countries and the system that need to retain and perfec for China.
In Part 4.It focuses on the feasibility of building the commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits in China,and introduces several points:building a perfect litigant system,sharing the responsibility of affording proof reasonably ,reducing the cost of litigation,setting up litigation encouraging mechanism, extending the statute of limitation,and so on.With a view to promoting the proceedings of setting up commonweal litigation system of the consumer rights and benefits in China.
引文
[1]周楠.罗马法原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.887-888.
[2][意]莫诺·卡佩莱蒂.福利国家与接近正义[M].刘俊样等译,北京:法律出版社,2000.68-69.
[3]同上,第69页。
[4]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.53.
[1]边立宏.从消费者群体权益保护视角谈我国的公益诉讼[J].产业与科技论坛,2007,6(9):91.
[2]ST,PAUL.Black's Law Dictionnary[M].Minn:West Publishing Co,1990.316.
[3]DAVIE M,WALKER.The Oxford Companion to law[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1980.282.
[4]The Shorter Oxford Dictionnary(1)[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1973.410.
[1]储皖中.打假更须用足法[N].法制日报,1996-10-16.
[2]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.225-226.
[3][意]莫诺·卡佩莱蒂.福利国家与接近正义[M].刘俊样等译,北京:法律出版社,2000.82.
[1]张明华.建立消费者公益诉讼制度之构想[J].中国工商管理研究,2003,(3):56.
[2]韩志红、阮大强.新型诉讼-经济公益诉讼的理论与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,1996.60.
[3][日]小岛武司.诉讼制度改革的法理与实证[M].陈刚、郭美松等译,北京:法律出版社,2001.170.
[1][法]热拉尔·卡.消费者权益保护[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.45.
[2]颜运秋、马永双.消费者公益诉讼的法理与规则分析[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(5):77.
[1]颜运秋、马永双.消费者公益诉讼的法理与规则分析[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(5):76-78.
[1][美]波斯纳.法律的经济分析(下)[M].蒋兆康译,北京:中国人百利全书出版社,1997.677.
[2]同上,第677页。
[1][美]波斯纳.法律的经济分析(下)[M].蒋兆康译,北京:中国人百利全书出版社,1997.677.
[2]同上,第677页。
[3]韩晓波.消费者权益公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[1]黄娟.消费者保护诉讼制度改革刍议[J].河北法学,2002,(1):33.
[1]颜运秋.消费者权益对公益诉讼的呼唤[J].消费经济,2004,(5):52.
[1]韩晓波.消费者权益公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[1]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.234.
[1]韩晓波.消费者权益公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[1]MICHELE,TARUFFO.Some Remarks On Group Litigation In Compar-ative Perspective[J].15 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law,2001,(405):20.
[1]钟瑞华.美国消费者集体诉讼初探[J].环球法律评论,2005,(3):343..
[2]葛傲雪.论我国消费者公益诉讼制度的构建[J].研究生法学,2006,(3):38.
[3]朱凌.论集团诉讼对消费者权益的保护[D].北京:对外经济贸易大学,2006.
[1]MICHAELS,GREVE.Consumer Law,Class Actions,and the Common Law[J].Chap-manLaw Review,2004,(7):155.
[1]RICHARDB.Cappalli and Claudio Consolo,ClassActions for ContinentalEurope?[J]A Preliminary Inquiry,1992,(2):21.
[2]GERAINT,HOWELLS AND RHODA,JAMES.Litigation in the Consumer Interest[J].ILSA Journal of Internatioonal and Comparative Law,2002,(3):42.
[1]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.121
[1]张大海.德国群体诉讼研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2008.
[1]黎雅琴.论美国消费者集团诉讼制度以及对我国的启示[D].湖南:湖南大学,2007.
[2]钱雄伟.论消费领域公益诉讼之完善[J].鄂州大学学报,2007,(6):29.
[3]葛傲雪.论我国消费者公益诉讼制度的构建[J].研究生法学,2006,(3):38.
[1]来恩浩.论我国消费者公益诉讼的若干问题[J].宁波广播电视大学学报,2006,(4):77.
[1]来恩浩.论我国消费者公益诉讼的若干问题[J].宁波广播电视大学学报,2006,(4):77-78.
[2]同本页注[1].
[1][日]宫洋健一.近代市民法和现代的经济结构[J].现代经济季刊,1976,(24):17.
[1]韩晓波.消费者公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[2]来恩浩.论我国消费者公益诉讼的若干问题[J].宁波广播电视大学学报,2006,(4):78-79.
[1]张维迎.产权、政府与信誉[M].北京:三联书店,2000,136-139.
[2]王新红、傅强.关于建亿经济法诉讼制度的几个问题[J].中南大学学报,2004,(3):285-286.
[3]韩晓波.《消费者公益诉讼法律制度研究》[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[1]钱雄伟.论消费领域公益诉讼之完善[J].鄂州大学学报,2007,(6):29.
[2]ROBER D,COOTER.Punitive Damages for Deterrence:When and How Much?[J].ALA.L.REV:1989,(40):136.
[3]颜运秋、马永双.消费者公益诉讼的法理与规则分析[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(5):79-80.
[1]打假英雄郭英贤办公室遇刺身亡 疑凶已被警方抓获.http://www.ehina.org.en/ehinese/law/781545.htm,2005-03-16.
[2]廖深基.《试论中国特色公益诉讼制度的构建》[J].福建师范大学学报(哲社版),2004,(6):77.
[1]殷玉萍.《论我国公益诉讼制度的建构--以消费者群体权益保护为视角》[J].经济研究导刊,2009,(5):172.
[2]莫小春.《和谐社会视野下构建消费者公益诉讼制度的必要性和对策》[J].商场现代化,2007,(34):303.
[1]周楠.罗马法原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.
[2]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.
[3]韩志红、阮大强.新型诉讼-经济公益诉讼的理论与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,1996.
[4]李响、陆文婷.美国集团诉讼制度与文化[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2005.
[5]蔡彦敏、洪浩.正当程序法律分析-当代美国民事诉讼制度研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000.
[6]张维迎.产权、政府与信誉[M].北京:三联书店,2000.
[7]邱联恭.程序制度机能论[M].台北:三民书局,1992.
[8]肖建国.民事诉讼程序价值论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.
[9]何文燕、廖永安.民事诉讼理论与改革的探索[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.
[10]常怡.比较民事诉讼法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[11]赵泽君.民事诉讼规则疑难问题例说[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2003.
[12]汤维建.美国民事诉讼规则[M].北京:中国检察出版,2003.
[13][意]莫诺·卡佩莱蒂.福利国家与接近正义[M].刘俊样等译,北京:法律出版社,2000.
[14][法]热拉尔·卡.消费者权益保护[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[15][日]小岛武司.诉讼制度改革的法理与实证[M].陈刚、郭美松等译,北京:法律出版社,2001.
[16][美]迈克尔·D·贝勒斯.法律的原则--一个规范的分析[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996.
[17][美]波斯纳.法律的经济分析(下)[M].蒋兆康译,北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.
[18]ST.PAUL,.Black's Law Dictionary[M].NewYork:West Publishing Co,1980.23.
[19]ST,PAUL.Black's Law Dictionnary[M].Minn:West Publishing Co,1990.316.
[20]DAVIE M,WALKER.The Oxford Companion to law[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1980.282.
[21]The Shorter Oxford Dictionnary(1)[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1973.410.
[1]边立宏.从消费者群体权益保护视角谈我国的公益诉讼[J].产业与科技论坛,2007,6(9).
[2]张明华.建立消费者公益诉讼制度之构想[J].中国工商管理研究,2003,(3).
[3]颜运秋、马永双.消费者公益诉讼的法理与规则分析[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(5).
[4]来恩浩.论我国消费者公益诉讼的若干问题[J].宁波广播电视大学学报,2006,(4).
[5]莫小春.和谐社会视野下构建消费者公益诉讼制度的必要性和对策[J].商场现代化,2007,(34).
[6]陈松.建立消费者协会代表诉讼制度设立消费者救济基金加强对消费者权益的保护[J].科技信息(学术版),2006,(9).
[7]黄娟.消费者保护诉讼制度改革刍议[J].河北法学,2002,(1).
[8]颜运秋.消费者权益对公益诉讼的呼唤[J].消费经济,2004,(5).
[9]钟瑞华.美国消费者集体诉讼初探[J].环球法律评论,2005,(3).
[10]葛傲雪.论我国消费者公益诉讼制度的构建[J].研究生法学,2006,(3).
[11][日]宫洋健一.近代市民法和现代的经济结构[J].现代经济季刊,1976,(24).
[12]王新红、傅强.关于建亿经济法诉讼制度的几个问题[J].中南大学学报,2004,(3).
[13]钱雄伟.论消费领域公益诉讼之完善[J].鄂州大学学报,2007,(6).
[14]廖深基.试论中国特色公益诉讼制度的构建[J].福建师范大学学报(哲社版),2004,(6).
[15]EDWARD,F.SHERMAN.Consumer Class Actions:Who are the Real Winners?[J].University of Maine School of Law,2004,(3):19.
[16]KERRY,BARNETT.Equitable Trusts:An Effective Remedy in Consumer Class Ac- tions[J]96 Yale L.J.1987,(6):1591.
[17]MICHAELS,GREVE.Consumer Law,Class Actions,and the Common Law[J].ChapmanLaw Review,2004,(7):155.
[18]THEODORE EISENBERG,GEOFFERY MILLER.The Role of Opt-Outs and Objectors in ClassAction Litigation:Theoretical and Empirical Issues[J].Vanderbilt Law Review ,2004,(10):36.
[19]ALEXANDRA,LAHAV.Fundamental Principles for Class Action Governance[J].IndianaLaw Review,2003,(3):52.
[20]RICHARD B.Cappalli and Claudio Consolo,Class Actions for ContinentalEurope?[J]A Preliminary Inquiry,1992,(2):21.
[21]MICHELE,TARUFFO.Some Remarks On Group Litigation In Comparative Perspective [J].15 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law,2001,(405):20.
[22]GERAINT,HOWELLS AND RHODA,JAMES.Litigation in the Consumer Interest [J].ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law,2002,(3):42.
[23]ROBER D,COOTER.Punitive Damages for Deterrence:When and How Much?[J].ALA.L.REV:1989,(40):136.
[1]韩晓波.消费者公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[2]张大海.德国群体诉讼研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2008.
[3]黎雅琴.《论美国消费者集团诉讼制度以及对我国的启示》[D].湖南:湖南大学,2007.
[4]朱凌.论集团诉讼对消费者权益的保护[D].北京:对外经济贸易大学,2006.
[1]储皖中.打假更须用足法[N].法制日报,1996-10-16.
[1]打假英雄郭英贤办公室遇刺身亡 疑凶已被警方抓获.http://www.ehina.org.en/ehinese/law/781545.htm,2005-03-16.
[2][意]莫诺·卡佩莱蒂.福利国家与接近正义[M].刘俊样等译,北京:法律出版社,2000.68-69.
[3]同上,第69页。
[4]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.53.
[1]边立宏.从消费者群体权益保护视角谈我国的公益诉讼[J].产业与科技论坛,2007,6(9):91.
[2]ST,PAUL.Black's Law Dictionnary[M].Minn:West Publishing Co,1990.316.
[3]DAVIE M,WALKER.The Oxford Companion to law[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1980.282.
[4]The Shorter Oxford Dictionnary(1)[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1973.410.
[1]储皖中.打假更须用足法[N].法制日报,1996-10-16.
[2]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.225-226.
[3][意]莫诺·卡佩莱蒂.福利国家与接近正义[M].刘俊样等译,北京:法律出版社,2000.82.
[1]张明华.建立消费者公益诉讼制度之构想[J].中国工商管理研究,2003,(3):56.
[2]韩志红、阮大强.新型诉讼-经济公益诉讼的理论与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,1996.60.
[3][日]小岛武司.诉讼制度改革的法理与实证[M].陈刚、郭美松等译,北京:法律出版社,2001.170.
[1][法]热拉尔·卡.消费者权益保护[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.45.
[2]颜运秋、马永双.消费者公益诉讼的法理与规则分析[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(5):77.
[1]颜运秋、马永双.消费者公益诉讼的法理与规则分析[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(5):76-78.
[1][美]波斯纳.法律的经济分析(下)[M].蒋兆康译,北京:中国人百利全书出版社,1997.677.
[2]同上,第677页。
[1][美]波斯纳.法律的经济分析(下)[M].蒋兆康译,北京:中国人百利全书出版社,1997.677.
[2]同上,第677页。
[3]韩晓波.消费者权益公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[1]黄娟.消费者保护诉讼制度改革刍议[J].河北法学,2002,(1):33.
[1]颜运秋.消费者权益对公益诉讼的呼唤[J].消费经济,2004,(5):52.
[1]韩晓波.消费者权益公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[1]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.234.
[1]韩晓波.消费者权益公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[1]MICHELE,TARUFFO.Some Remarks On Group Litigation In Compar-ative Perspective[J].15 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law,2001,(405):20.
[1]钟瑞华.美国消费者集体诉讼初探[J].环球法律评论,2005,(3):343..
[2]葛傲雪.论我国消费者公益诉讼制度的构建[J].研究生法学,2006,(3):38.
[3]朱凌.论集团诉讼对消费者权益的保护[D].北京:对外经济贸易大学,2006.
[1]MICHAELS,GREVE.Consumer Law,Class Actions,and the Common Law[J].Chap-manLaw Review,2004,(7):155.
[1]RICHARDB.Cappalli and Claudio Consolo,ClassActions for ContinentalEurope?[J]A Preliminary Inquiry,1992,(2):21.
[2]GERAINT,HOWELLS AND RHODA,JAMES.Litigation in the Consumer Interest[J].ILSA Journal of Internatioonal and Comparative Law,2002,(3):42.
[1]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.121
[1]张大海.德国群体诉讼研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2008.
[1]黎雅琴.论美国消费者集团诉讼制度以及对我国的启示[D].湖南:湖南大学,2007.
[2]钱雄伟.论消费领域公益诉讼之完善[J].鄂州大学学报,2007,(6):29.
[3]葛傲雪.论我国消费者公益诉讼制度的构建[J].研究生法学,2006,(3):38.
[1]来恩浩.论我国消费者公益诉讼的若干问题[J].宁波广播电视大学学报,2006,(4):77.
[1]来恩浩.论我国消费者公益诉讼的若干问题[J].宁波广播电视大学学报,2006,(4):77-78.
[2]同本页注[1].
[1][日]宫洋健一.近代市民法和现代的经济结构[J].现代经济季刊,1976,(24):17.
[1]韩晓波.消费者公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[2]来恩浩.论我国消费者公益诉讼的若干问题[J].宁波广播电视大学学报,2006,(4):78-79.
[1]张维迎.产权、政府与信誉[M].北京:三联书店,2000,136-139.
[2]王新红、傅强.关于建亿经济法诉讼制度的几个问题[J].中南大学学报,2004,(3):285-286.
[3]韩晓波.《消费者公益诉讼法律制度研究》[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[1]钱雄伟.论消费领域公益诉讼之完善[J].鄂州大学学报,2007,(6):29.
[2]ROBER D,COOTER.Punitive Damages for Deterrence:When and How Much?[J].ALA.L.REV:1989,(40):136.
[3]颜运秋、马永双.消费者公益诉讼的法理与规则分析[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(5):79-80.
[1]打假英雄郭英贤办公室遇刺身亡 疑凶已被警方抓获.http://www.ehina.org.en/ehinese/law/781545.htm,2005-03-16.
[2]廖深基.《试论中国特色公益诉讼制度的构建》[J].福建师范大学学报(哲社版),2004,(6):77.
[1]殷玉萍.《论我国公益诉讼制度的建构--以消费者群体权益保护为视角》[J].经济研究导刊,2009,(5):172.
[2]莫小春.《和谐社会视野下构建消费者公益诉讼制度的必要性和对策》[J].商场现代化,2007,(34):303.
[1]周楠.罗马法原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.
[2]颜运秋.公益诉讼理念研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.
[3]韩志红、阮大强.新型诉讼-经济公益诉讼的理论与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,1996.
[4]李响、陆文婷.美国集团诉讼制度与文化[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2005.
[5]蔡彦敏、洪浩.正当程序法律分析-当代美国民事诉讼制度研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000.
[6]张维迎.产权、政府与信誉[M].北京:三联书店,2000.
[7]邱联恭.程序制度机能论[M].台北:三民书局,1992.
[8]肖建国.民事诉讼程序价值论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.
[9]何文燕、廖永安.民事诉讼理论与改革的探索[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.
[10]常怡.比较民事诉讼法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[11]赵泽君.民事诉讼规则疑难问题例说[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2003.
[12]汤维建.美国民事诉讼规则[M].北京:中国检察出版,2003.
[13][意]莫诺·卡佩莱蒂.福利国家与接近正义[M].刘俊样等译,北京:法律出版社,2000.
[14][法]热拉尔·卡.消费者权益保护[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[15][日]小岛武司.诉讼制度改革的法理与实证[M].陈刚、郭美松等译,北京:法律出版社,2001.
[16][美]迈克尔·D·贝勒斯.法律的原则--一个规范的分析[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996.
[17][美]波斯纳.法律的经济分析(下)[M].蒋兆康译,北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.
[18]ST.PAUL,.Black's Law Dictionary[M].NewYork:West Publishing Co,1980.23.
[19]ST,PAUL.Black's Law Dictionnary[M].Minn:West Publishing Co,1990.316.
[20]DAVIE M,WALKER.The Oxford Companion to law[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1980.282.
[21]The Shorter Oxford Dictionnary(1)[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1973.410.
[1]边立宏.从消费者群体权益保护视角谈我国的公益诉讼[J].产业与科技论坛,2007,6(9).
[2]张明华.建立消费者公益诉讼制度之构想[J].中国工商管理研究,2003,(3).
[3]颜运秋、马永双.消费者公益诉讼的法理与规则分析[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(5).
[4]来恩浩.论我国消费者公益诉讼的若干问题[J].宁波广播电视大学学报,2006,(4).
[5]莫小春.和谐社会视野下构建消费者公益诉讼制度的必要性和对策[J].商场现代化,2007,(34).
[6]陈松.建立消费者协会代表诉讼制度设立消费者救济基金加强对消费者权益的保护[J].科技信息(学术版),2006,(9).
[7]黄娟.消费者保护诉讼制度改革刍议[J].河北法学,2002,(1).
[8]颜运秋.消费者权益对公益诉讼的呼唤[J].消费经济,2004,(5).
[9]钟瑞华.美国消费者集体诉讼初探[J].环球法律评论,2005,(3).
[10]葛傲雪.论我国消费者公益诉讼制度的构建[J].研究生法学,2006,(3).
[11][日]宫洋健一.近代市民法和现代的经济结构[J].现代经济季刊,1976,(24).
[12]王新红、傅强.关于建亿经济法诉讼制度的几个问题[J].中南大学学报,2004,(3).
[13]钱雄伟.论消费领域公益诉讼之完善[J].鄂州大学学报,2007,(6).
[14]廖深基.试论中国特色公益诉讼制度的构建[J].福建师范大学学报(哲社版),2004,(6).
[15]EDWARD,F.SHERMAN.Consumer Class Actions:Who are the Real Winners?[J].University of Maine School of Law,2004,(3):19.
[16]KERRY,BARNETT.Equitable Trusts:An Effective Remedy in Consumer Class Ac- tions[J]96 Yale L.J.1987,(6):1591.
[17]MICHAELS,GREVE.Consumer Law,Class Actions,and the Common Law[J].ChapmanLaw Review,2004,(7):155.
[18]THEODORE EISENBERG,GEOFFERY MILLER.The Role of Opt-Outs and Objectors in ClassAction Litigation:Theoretical and Empirical Issues[J].Vanderbilt Law Review ,2004,(10):36.
[19]ALEXANDRA,LAHAV.Fundamental Principles for Class Action Governance[J].IndianaLaw Review,2003,(3):52.
[20]RICHARD B.Cappalli and Claudio Consolo,Class Actions for ContinentalEurope?[J]A Preliminary Inquiry,1992,(2):21.
[21]MICHELE,TARUFFO.Some Remarks On Group Litigation In Comparative Perspective [J].15 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law,2001,(405):20.
[22]GERAINT,HOWELLS AND RHODA,JAMES.Litigation in the Consumer Interest [J].ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law,2002,(3):42.
[23]ROBER D,COOTER.Punitive Damages for Deterrence:When and How Much?[J].ALA.L.REV:1989,(40):136.
[1]韩晓波.消费者公益诉讼法律制度研究[D].山东:山东大学,2006.
[2]张大海.德国群体诉讼研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2008.
[3]黎雅琴.《论美国消费者集团诉讼制度以及对我国的启示》[D].湖南:湖南大学,2007.
[4]朱凌.论集团诉讼对消费者权益的保护[D].北京:对外经济贸易大学,2006.
[1]储皖中.打假更须用足法[N].法制日报,1996-10-16.
[1]打假英雄郭英贤办公室遇刺身亡 疑凶已被警方抓获.http://www.ehina.org.en/ehinese/law/781545.htm,2005-03-16.