观赏草耐旱性研究与景观配置应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
观赏草种类繁多,株形、色彩和花序等观赏特性独具一格,且繁殖容易,养护管理相对简单,可广泛应用于各类不同的城市绿地环境。观赏草的耐旱性与园林配置应用的系统研究,对于建立节水型园林,丰富城市园林景观,体现园林植物的物种多样性和景观多样性,提高城市绿化水平等具有重要的理论意义和实践应用价值。主要研究结果如下:
     一、通过分析观赏草的涵义以及与草坪草的区别,明确观赏草的概念。对观赏草的分类形式,种植与养护管理,以及国内外的研究现状进行了总结。
     二、通过对国外观赏草应用历史沿革以及造景形式的分析借鉴,将国外观赏草的应用历史归纳为三个阶段,即中世纪时期“繁花草丛”的出现视为观赏草的应用萌发期;19世纪后期至20世纪30~40年代,一些禾草种类开始应用于花境配置和庭园造景,称为造景应用期;20世纪中后期观赏草开始作为一个观赏植物类群得到广泛应用,并用于公园、城市绿地等开敞空间以及生态建设,进入广泛应用期。
     三、选取园林绿化中常用的4种观赏草为试材,研究其自然失水胁迫下的形态与生理变化规律,为耐早观赏草的园林应用提供理论依据。夏季自然失水胁迫试验结果表明,斑叶芒和灯心草的枯叶率与生理指标(游离脯氨酸和电解质外渗率)出现剧烈变化的转折点均在干旱胁迫第10d,两种观赏草的枯叶率与生理指标均呈极显著正相关,综合评价两种观赏草的耐旱性为:灯心草>斑叶芒;秋季自然失水胁迫试验结果表明,随着干旱胁迫时间的延长,斑叶芒、狼尾草、矮蒲苇的游离脯氨酸、电解质外渗率(REC)、丙二醛(MDA)含量不断增加,与枯叶率的增加呈显著正相关。比较形态和生理指标后,认为狼尾草的耐早性最强,斑叶芒次之,矮蒲苇对干旱最敏感。
     四、经过一年多的实地调查,统计出目前杭州西湖风景区应用的观赏草种类约44种,观赏草在风景区内的应用方式比较单一,蒲苇、菖蒲、灯心草、芦竹等传统、本土种类应用频度较高,分布种类和数量较集中的几个景点为茅乡水情、长桥公园等新建景区或改造的传统景区。此外,通过调查、观察记录取得风景区内常见观赏草的物候期。
     五、结合景观生态学原理,探讨了观赏草在园林花境、地被、护坡、滨水和岩石园等的应用和生态配置模式,并对沪杭地区观赏草的应用现状作了概述,为观赏草的广泛应用提供理论参考。
Ornamental grasses, as excellent additions to different environments of urban green spaces, have various species, combining with their unique shapes, foliage colors, inflorescences, easy propagation and maintenance. Being water-saving, diversified, artistic and ecological urban landscape, the systematic researches on drought tolerance and landscape uses of ornamental grasses will indicate the academic significance and practical value. The main results were summarized as follow:
     1. Based on the difference of concepts between ornamental grass and turf grass, the definition of ornamental grass were discussed. The classification, planting and maintenance, reseach status of ornamental grasses were introduced.
     2. With the typical application examples of ornamental grasses in foreign gardens, the application history of ornamental grasses aboard was summarized as three stages. The poetic-sounding flowery mead in the 16~(th) and 17~(th) ceturies was thinked as the original application of ornamental grasses. The landscaping application stage was from the late 1800s to the early 1900s, with several dozen grasses were considered fine subjects for traditional borders and transitional areas of the gradens. Ornamental grasses truly came into their own in the second half of the 20~(th) century, which was considered as widely application stage.
     3. According to the study on changes of shape and physiological in four species of ornamental grasses under drought stress, some theoretical foundation for selecting and breeding of drought-tolerant ornamental grasses resources are put forward. The result of the drought-tolerant experiment in summer showed that the increase of the percentage of withered leaves, content of free proline and REC appeared dramatically from the 10~(th) day, respectively. There were significant positive correlations between the percentage of withered leaves and physiological indexes in Soft rush and Zebra grass under the drought stress. It was indicated that the drought tolerance of Soft rush was better than Zebra grass, based on the analysis of growth appearance and physiological characteristics. The result of the drought-tolerant experiment in autumn showed that the proline content, REC and MDA content increased continuously along with the drought treatments in Fountain grass, Zebra grass and Pampus grass, and it showed obviously positive correlation with the increasing of percentage of withered leaves. The SOD activities in Zebra grass and Fountain grass were remarkable higher than Pampus grass in later stage of drought treatment. According to the morphological and physiological analysis, the drought tolerance decreased in following order: Fountain grass > Zebra grass >Pampus grass.
     4. Having been investigating ornamental grasses in Hangzhou landscape area for more than one year, 44 species of ornamental grasses were concluded. The application modes of ornamental grasses were singularity. Application frequency of traditional or autochthonous species was higher than others in Hangzhou landscape area, such as Cortaderia selloana, Acorus calamus, Arundo donax and Juncus effuses et al, and the distribution and quantity of ornamental grasses were more concentrated in newly-built scenic spots. Besides, the phenophases of ornamental grasses in Hangzhou westlake scenic spot were put forward.
     5. Based on the principles of landscape ecology, the application and planting design of ornamental grasses in flower border, ground covers, slope greening, waterside, and rock garden were analyzed. The status for landscape use of ornamental grasses in Shanghai, Hangzhou was analyzed as well. It will be theoretical benefit to the extended apply for ornamental grasses in landscape.
引文
1. Anthony Archer-wills.阎宏伟,金煜,李伟,张志全译.园林水景设计[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2002.
    2. Beckwith AG, Zhang Y J, Seeram NP, Cameron AC, Nair MG. Relationship of light quantity and anthoeyanin production in Pennisetum setaceum Cvs. Rubrum and Red Riding Hood[J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 52 (3): 456-461 FEB 11 2004
    3. Bisgrove, Richard. The gardens of Gertrude Jekyll[M]. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2000.
    4. Brand MH. Small divisions of ornamental grasses produce the best growth following direct potting. HORTSCIENCE 34(6): 1126-1128 OCT 1999
    5. Brian clouston.陈自新,许慈安译.风景园林植物配置[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1992.
    6. Chris B, Marc V M, Dirk I. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance[J]. Annual Review Plant Physiol and Plant Molecular Biology, 1992, 43:83-116
    7. Cosentino SL, Patane C, Sanzone E, Copani V, Foti S. Effects of soil water content and nitrogen supply on the productivity of Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deu. In a Mediterranean environment[J]. Industrial crops and products, 2007, 25(1): 75-88.
    8. Domenech R, Vila M, Pino J, Gesti J. Historical land-use legacy and Cortaderia selloana invasion in the Mediterranean region[J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 11(7): 1054-1064 JUL 2005
    9. Farrell AD, Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Jones MB. Genotypic variation in cold tolerance influences the yield of Miscanthus. Annals of applied biology, 2006, 149(3): 337-345.
    10. Fiona Gilsenan. Landscapeing with Ornamental Grasses [M]. Menlo Park: Sunset Books, Jan 2002.
    11. Giannopplitics C N, Ries S K. Superoxidase dismutase. Ⅰ. Occun-ence in higher plants. Plant Physiology, 1977, 59:309-314
    12. Grewal S S, Samra J S. Studies on a biological erosion control system integrating tree and grasses to manage degraded soils of foot-hill Himalayas[A]. Vetiver: a miracle grass[C]. Chiang Rai,Thailand, 1996.68-69.
    13. Hans-Martin Nelte(德),丁小荣,李琴(译).最新德国景观设计[M].福建:福建科学技术出版社,2004:246-247.
    14. Harvey MP, Brand MH. Division size and shade density influence growth and container production of Hakonechloa macra Makino 'Aureola'. HORTSCIENCE 37(1): 196-199 FEB 2002
    15. Harvey MP, Elliott GC, Brand MH. Groeth response of Hakonechloa macra (Makino) 'Aureola' to fertilizer formulation and concentration, and to dolomitic lime in the potting mix[J]. HORTSCIENCE 39(2): 261-266 APR 2004
    16. Heath R L, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. Ⅰ. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1968, 125: 189-198
    17. Hertling UM, Lubke RA. Assessing the potential for biological invasion - the case of Ammophila arenaria in South Africa[J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 96 (9-10): 520-527 SEP-OCT 2000
    18. Jiang Y W, Huang B. Drought and heat stress injury to two cool-season turfgrasses in relation to antioxidant metabolism and lipid peroxidation. Crop Science, 2001,41:436-442
    19. Joanna Poncavage. Grace your landscape with ornamental grasses. Organic Gardening, 1997, 44(8): 40-46
    20. John C Fech. Omamental grasses: Popular, easy to manage [J]. Landscape Management, May 1998.
    21. John Greenlee. The Encyclopedia of Ornamental Grasses[M]. New York: Michael Friedman Publishing Group, 1992.
    22. Karen L Kerkhoff. Divide Ornamental Grasses [J]. Grounds Maintenance, Mar 2004.
    23. Leveque, Georges. French garden style[M]. New York: Barton's, 1990:112
    24. Liu J P, Zhu J K. Proline accumulation and salt stress-induced gene expression in salt hypersensitive mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 1997,114
    25. Philip Swindells.时真妹,于凤军译.园林水景大百科[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2004.
    26. Rodriguez OS. Hedgerows and mulch as soil conservation measures evaluated under field simulated rainfall[J]. Soil Technology, 1997, 11(1): 79-93.
    27. Sugahara K, Ohwaki Y, Banzai K. Erosion control in pineapple fields on the island of Ishigaki[J]. Jarq-japan Agricultural research quarterly, 2001, 35(2): 91-96.
    28. Trigg, Lois B. The South Embraces Ornamental Grasses [J]. Birmingham: Southern Living, Nov 1989: 79-80.
    29. Tsuyuzaki S. Miscanthus sinensis grassland is an indicator plant community to predict forest regeneration and development on ski slopes in Japan[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2005, 5(2): 109-115.
    30. William Lake Douglas, Susan R. Frey, Norman K. Johnson, Susan littlefield, Michael Van Valkenburgh. Garden Design[M]. New York, N.Y.,1984.
    31. Xu BC, Li FM, Shan L, Ma YQ, Ichizen N, Huang J. Gas exchange, biomass partition, and water relationships of three grass seedlings under water, stress[J]. Weed Biology and management, 2006, 6(2): 79-88.
    32. Young JA, Clements CD, Jones TA. Germination of seeds of robust needlegrass[J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT 56(3):247-250 MAY 2003
    33. Zhao Y G. Fernandez C J, Bowman D C,Nowak R S. Selection criteria for drought-resistance breeding in turfgrass. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 1994, 119(6): 1317-1324
    34.陈少裕.膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害.植物生理学通讯,1991,27(2):84-90
    35.陈煜,杨志民,李志华.草坪草耐荫性研究进展.中国草地学报,2006,28(3):71-76
    36.代宏文,周连碧.尾矿库边坡植被生态稳定技术研究[J].矿冶,2002,11(增刊):257-261.
    37.丁世民.观赏植物的另类观赏草[J].北京农业,2004.3
    38.高鹤,刘建秀.南京地区观赏草的种类、观赏价值及其造景配置[J].草原与草坪,2005.3
    39.宫长荣,汪耀富.淹水胁迫对烤烟生理生化特性的影响.中国农业科学,1995,28:126-130
    40.杭州园林文物管理局,等.杭州园林植物配置[c].成都:城市建设杂志社,1981.
    41.侯福林.植物生理学实验教程[M].科学出版社,2004.93-94.
    42.黄平,左海涛,韩烈保,武菊英,拔节期水分胁迫对荻生长和生物质特性的影响[J].草地学报,2007,3(2):153-157.
    43.黄义雄.厦门海沧采石废弃地景观生态重建探究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002,18(1):112-115.
    44.蒋德安,朱诚.植物生理学实验指导[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1999.
    45.金涛,杨永胜.现代城市水景设计与营建[M].北京:中国城市出版社,2003,8
    46.金研铭,徐惠风,刘兴土.不同水分处理下乌拉苔草生长形状和某些生理指标的研究[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2005,11(4):272-279.
    47.靖元孝,陈兆平,杨丹箐.香根草(Vetiveria zezanioides)对淹水的反应和适应初报[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2001,11(4):40-43.
    48.兰茜J·奥得诺,刘建秀译.观赏草及其景观配置[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003.
    49.李湘萍,等.江苏湿地植物群落学特征及其分布和演替规律[J].南京林业大学学报,1998(1).
    50.梁雪连,陈平.草坪草耐热性研究进展.农业与技术,2006,26(2):68-73
    51.刘娥娥,宗会,郭振飞.干旱、盐和低温对水稻幼苗脯氨酸含量的影响.热带亚热带植物学,2000,8:235-238
    52.刘坤良,袁娥.多姿多彩的园艺观赏草[J].浙江林业,2005.1
    53.刘坤良,袁娥.自然园林的主旋律——园艺观赏草探秘[J].园林,2004.8
    54.刘磊,管开云.滇中地区特色观赏禾草资源[J].园艺学报,2005,5:929
    55.刘彦琴,张丰雪,杨敏生.电导率在白杨杂种无性系耐旱鉴定中的应用[J].河北林果研究,1997,12(4):301-305
    56.刘艳,黄乔乔,马博英,徐礼根.高温干旱胁迫下香根草光合特性等生理指标的变化[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(5):638~642.
    57.卢少云,陈斯平,陈斯曼,梁潇,郭振飞.三种暖季型草坪草在干旱条件下脯氨酸含量和抗氧化酶活性的变化.园艺学报,2003,30(3):303-306
    58.吕秀立,张冬梅,张春英,罗玉兰.金叶苔草离体培养和快速繁殖技术[J].杂草科学,2005,3:30-55.
    59.绿意.观赏草在庭园中的设计与应用[J].园林,2005.12
    60.美文.壮美的观赏草[J].园林,2003.12
    61.米海莉,许兴,李树华,何军,魏玉情,李前荣.干旱胁迫下牛心朴子幼苗相对含水量、质膜透性及保护酶活性的变化[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(11):1871-1876.
    62.任全进,白春平,浦振祥,侯尔勤,沈家喜.江苏地区观赏草及其在园林中的应用[J].中国野生植物资源,2007,2(1):22-24.
    63.宋希强,钟云芳,张启翔.浅析观赏草在园林中的运用[J].中国园林,2004,(3):32-36.
    64.苏雪痕.植物造景[J].北京:中国林业出版社,1994.
    65.汤章城,王育启,吴亚华.不同抗旱品种高梁苗中脯氨酸积累的差异.植物生理学报,1986,12:154-162
    66.唐岱,万利军,罗敬川,梅运涛.重庆地区观赏禾草种质资源研究[J].西南农业大学学报,1994,8(4):396-399.
    67.唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及DPS数据处理系统[M].北京:科学出版社,2002,162-651
    68.陶莉.浅谈观赏草在园林设计中的应用[J].山西林业,2006,4:31-32.
    69.王庆海,武菊英,滕文军.模糊综合评判在观赏草景观效果评价中的应用[J].北京园林,2005.21(4)
    70.王炜,孙发政,刘荣堂.深圳类芦边坡绿化的应用状况.草坪与地被科学进展[J].2006.8:233-237
    71.魏钰,张佐双,朱仁元.花境设计与应用大全(上、下册)[M].北京:北京出版社,2006,6
    72.吴彩芸,等.杭州园林水景的水生植物调查及其配置应用[J].中国园林,2006(1):83-88
    73.武菊英,滕文军,王庆海,孙振元.多年生观赏草在北京地区的生长状况与观赏价值评价[J].园艺学报,2006,33(5):1145-1148.
    74.武菊英,王国进.可持续旱景园林与观赏草[J].科技潮,2003.10
    75.武菊英,滕文军,王庆海.狼尾草的生物学特性及在园林中的应用[J].中国园林,2005.12
    76.武菊英,滕文军,王庆海.耐旱多年生观赏草春季观赏性评价[J].华北农学报,2006.21(1)
    77.武菊英.观赏草:为花园设计注入新的活力[J].中国花卉园艺,2003.15
    78.武菊英.生态和观赏效果俱佳的狼尾草[J].中国花卉园艺,2003.21
    79.夏汉平,敖惠修,刘世忠.香根草生态工程应用于公路护坡的效益研究[J].草业科学,2002,19(1):52-56.
    80.徐化成.景观生态学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997:50-51.
    81.徐雨晴,陆佩玲,于强等.气候变化对植物物候影响的研究进展[J].资源科学,2004,1(1):129-136.
    82.徐泽荣,张刚,黄建梅,徐泽力,马彩霞.四川主要野生观赏草[J].四川草原,2005.7.
    83.许文花,杨清辉.水分胁迫对斑茅不同无性系的影响[J].甘蔗,2004,3:13-17.
    84.杨静.观赏草在园林中的应用[J].遵义科技,2004.3
    85.张玲慧,夏宜平.地被植物在园林中的应用及研究现状[J].中国园林,2003(9):54-57.
    86.章崇玲,曾国平,陈建勋.干旱胁迫对菜苔叶片保护酶活性和膜脂过氧化的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2000,8(4):23-26
    87.赵世伟.园林植物种植设计与应用[M].北京:北京出版社,2006,2
    88.赵伟,陈雅君,柳凤.草坪草抗寒性研究进展.四川草原,2005,11:17-23
    89.赵岩,戚海峰,张志国.山东省主要野生观赏草资源及其评价[J].中国农学通报,2006,11(11):263-266.
    90.钟云芳.园林新宠——观赏草[J].中国花卉园艺,2005.18
    91.周久亚,刘建秀,陈树元.草坪草抗旱性研究概述.草业科学,2002,19(5):61-66
    92.周源,董玉芝,昝少平,盛芳.土壤逐渐干旱过程中长寿花叶片生理指标的动态变化[J].新疆农业科学,2006,43(2):153-155
    93.朱钧珍.园林理水艺术[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1998.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700