江浙沪地区外来植物入侵性风险评估系统的构建
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来,随着经济、社会及各种对外交流的发展,外来植物入侵风险逐渐增加。江浙沪地区作为我国的对外交流、经济贸易中心,外来入侵植物的数量急剧增加,因此必须建立适应本区域的外来植物入侵性风险评估体系。本文主要以江苏、浙江和上海为研究区域,进行草本植物的生态学调查,通过对植物性状与入侵性,植物分布与环境因子等关系的研究,找出构建本区域外来植物入侵性风险评估体系的指标,构建相应的入侵风险评估系统。主要研究结果如下:
     1.江浙沪地区共调查有171种外来植物,隶属38科74属。本区域的外来植物种类种类丰富,优势科现象明显,菊科最多(47种),其次是禾本科(29)、豆科(13)和苋科(10);该地区外来植物地理分布类型中热带分布占大多数,区系特点是比较年轻的,主要来自美洲(56%)和欧洲(29%),因此在引种时应加强对这些原产地物种的控制。
     2.通过对江浙沪地区植物的生态调查,以498个样地,431种植物的生态重要值为基础,计测其生态位宽度发现,猪殃殃、野塘蒿、小飞蓬、加拿大一枝黄花、一年蓬出现的频率最高,在调查区域有广泛的分布;498个样地中总的生态重要值最高的分别是加拿大一枝黄花(23.099)、猪殃殃(20.802)、大巢菜(16.865)、葎草(16.635)、野老鹳草(11.642)、野塘蒿(11.447)等,这些都是危害大、入侵性强的植物;生态位宽度最大的分别是猪殃殃(5.193)、野塘蒿(5.044)、加拿大一枝黄花(4.804)、小飞蓬(4.817)、一年蓬(4.542)和钻形紫菀(4.041),这些植物都具有更强的入侵能力,更能够适应多样化的生境。因此,植物的生境多样化程度可以作为构建风险评估系统的一个指标,分布于多样化生境的,应赋予较大的权值。
     3.基于498个样地植物的野外调查,建立样地-环境因子数据矩阵,运用SPSS 13.0中的Bivariate相关性分析模块,计算生态重要值和人为干扰度之间的相关系数,探讨这种相关性与植物杂草性(入侵性)之间的关系。发现调查区域内生态重要值与人为干扰度间相关系数最大的分别是狗尾草(0.313)、牛筋草(0.265)、马唐(0.251)、加拿大一枝黄花(0.227)、钻形紫菀(0.222)和苍耳(0.213)等,这些植物均为杂草或重要的外来入侵植物;最不适于生活在人为干扰环境的植物有三脉叶马兰(-0.250)、鱼腥草(-0.239)、野大豆(-0.238)、过路黄(-0.235)、渐尖毛蕨(-0.225)、绞股蓝(-0.225)等,结合文献资料和野外观察,表明生态重要值与人为干扰强度间的相关系数越大,植物的入侵能力也越强,此相关系数可以作为植物对人为干扰环境的一种入侵能力,再进一步分析这种相关系数(即入侵能力)与植物学性状间的关系。
     4.计测了421种被子植物26个植物学性状,统计分析了这些性状和入侵性之间的关系。发现该地区具有入侵倾向的植物多数具有以下性状:一、二年生生活型、没有营养繁殖器官如块根、块茎等、花部呈辐射对称、两性花、传播体(果实或种子)小、种子数量多、生活在阳生生境中、植株直立、风媒传粉、果实或种子无刺、植株有毒等。
     5.文献检索表明,具有入侵性的植物一般都具有较小的DNA C-值,染色体倍性高,种子具有休眠且萌发不整齐,通过释放化感物质抑制土著植物的种子萌发和幼苗生长。针对前人在植物入侵风险评估系统中存在的不足,结合本文的研究结果,结合文献检索资料,提出了江浙沪地区外来植物入侵性风险评估体系。该体系共包括5个一级指标,27个二级指标,各指标的加权值即是最终的评估分数,得分0-29的,可以接受,允许其引进;得分30-59的,有一定的风险,引入后采取一定的措施严格控制其逃逸和扩散;得分60-100的,入侵风险高,不可接受,必须禁止引进。最后选取本地区有分布的54种外来植物对该评估系统进行验证,确认了这一系统的合理性。
In recent years, with the development of economic,social and foreign exchange, alien plant invasions become more and more evident. As foreign exchange, economic and trade center of China, the number of alien invasive plants in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai increased dramatically, so a Risk Assessment System for exotic plants in this area should be established to prevent plant invasions effectively. Based on the current theory of invasion ecology, the investigation of herbs in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai, the relationship between attributes of plants and invasiveness, distribution of plants and environmental factors, the indices in relation to plant invasiveness were identified, thus a risk assessment sysment for exotic plants in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai were established. The main results are:
     1. The species of alien plants in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai were surveyed with the square plot method in different habitats. Based on our investigation, together with the literature, 171 alien plant species, belonging to 74 genera and 38 families, were confirmed. Among them,Compositae (47 species), Gramineae (29), Leguminosae (13), Maranthaceae (10) are the dominant families. In this region, the proportion of tropical distribution of these 171 alien plant species was higher, floristic characteristic was younger. Totally about 85% of the alien plants originate from America (56%) and Europe (29%), so appropriate measures to control the introduction of the plants from America and Europe are essential.
     2. Based on the ecological important value of 431 plants in 498 sites, their niche breadth was calculated based on the Shannon equation. Galium aparine var. tenerum, Conyza bonariensis, Conyza canadensis, Solidago canadensis and Erigeron annuus had the highest frequency and a broad distribution; Solidago canadensis, Galium aparine var. tenerum, Vicia sativa, Humulus scandens, Geranium carolinianum and Conyza bonariensis, had the largest total important values, being 23.099,20.802,16.865,16.635,11.642 and 11.447, respectively; Galium aparine var. tenerum, Conyza bonariensis, Solidago canadensis, Conyza canadensis, Erigeron anuus and Aster subulatus had the largest niche breadth, being 5.193,5.044,4.804, 4.817,4.542,4.041, respectively, which means that these plants are higher invasive because of their ability to adapt to diverse habitats. Therefor, the degree of diverse habitats for a apecies could be used as an indicator to build risk assessment system.
     3. Pearson correlations between the ecological important value and the disturbance intensity were calculated to elucidate the ability to adapt the disturbed environment for a species.The results showed:Setaria viridis, Eleusine indica, Digitaria sanguinalis, Solidago canadensis, Aster subulatus, Xanthium sibiricum had the largest correlation coefficients, being 0.313,0.265,0.251,0.227,0.222 and 0.213, respectively; while Aster ageratoides Aster ageratoides (-0.250), Houttuynia cordata (-0.239), Glycine soja (-0.238), Lysimachia christinae (-0.235), Cyclosorus acuminatus (-0.225) and Gynostemma pentaphyllum (-0.225) had the largest negective correlation coefficients, being less than -0.225. According to the investigation in the field, as well as the check of related literature, the larger the correlation coefficient was, the more suitable for a species to grow in the disturbed ebvironment, and thus the plant had laeger invasiveness.
     4. A total of 26 characters of 421 plants in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai were recorded, and the relationship between these characters with their invasiveness (namely the correlation coefficient between the ecological important value and the disturbance intensity for a species) were analyzed. Our results showed that the invasive plants tend to have annual or biennial life form, toxic. These plants also adapted to xeric or suuny habitats. They are likely to have wind pollinated bieesual flowers, actinomorphic flowers and produce many small mucilaginous or armed seeds. They are unlikely to have thorns, or reproduce vegetatively.
     5.Invasive plants are generally characterized by having smaller DNA C-values, dormancy and irregular germination seeds; higher polyploid and allelochemicals to inhibit seed germination and seedling growth of indigenous plants. Sum up the above, a risk assessment system was established about invasive plants in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai. This system includes five one-level indexes and 27 two-level indexes, the weighted value of each index is the final assessment scores. A species whose assessment scores from 0 to 29 is acceptable, allowing it to introduce, those from 30 to 59 is of certain risk, certain measures should be taken after introduction to control their escape and spread, and those from 60 to 100 is of high risk, and are unacceptable, we must prohibit them from introduction. Finally,54 exotic plants in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and shanghai were selected to authenticate this system.
引文
[1]丁建清.应对外来生物入侵挑战,促进可持续发展[J].中国科学院院刊.2008,23(4):330-335.
    [2]Xu H G, Ding H D, Li M Y et al.2006. The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China [J]. Biological Invasions,8:1495-1500.
    [3]马晔,沈珍瑶.外来植物的入侵机制及其生态风险评价[J].生态学杂志.2006,25(8):983-988.
    [4]Qiang S. Multivariate analysis, description, and ecological interpretation of weed vegetation in the summer crop fields of Anhui province, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology.2005,47:1193-1210.
    [5]Lin W, Zhou G, Cheng X, et al. Fast economic development accelerates biological invasions in China.[J]. PLoS ONE.2007,211:1208.
    [6]Weber E, Sun S G, Li B. Invasive alien plants in China:diversity and ecological insights[J]. Biological Invasions.2008,108:1411-1429.
    [7]范继辉,蒋莉,程根伟.我国南方生物入侵的问题与对策[J].应用生态学报.2005,16:568-572.
    [8]Lu J Z, Weng E S, Wu X W, et al. Potential distribution of Solidago canadensis in China[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica.2007,45:670-674.
    [9]Wang R, Wang Y Z. Invasion dynamics and potential spread of the invasive alien plant species Ageratina adenophora Asteraceae in China[J]. Diversity and Distributions.2006, 12:397-408.
    [10]Pan X Y, Geng Y P, Zhang W J, et al. The influence of abiotic stress and phenotypic plasticity on the distribution of invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides along a riparian zone[J]. Acta Oecologica.2006,30:333-341.
    [11]Seastedt T. Resourceful invaders[J]. Nature.2007,446:985-986.
    [12]Rejmanek M, Richardson D M. What attributes make some plant species more invasive?[J]. Ecology.1996,77:1655-1661.
    [13]Mack R N, Simberloff D, Lonsdale W M, Evans H., Clout M., Bazzaz F. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control.Ecol Appl,2000,103:689-710.
    [14]Baker H G. Characteristics and modes of origin of seeds. In:Baker HG, Stebbins GL, eds. The Genetics of Colonizing Species[M]. Washington DC:Academic Press,1965.
    [15]丁建清,解焱.中国外来种入侵机制及对策[C].《保护中国的生物多样性(二)》(汪松、谢彼德、解焱编辑).北京:中国环境科学出版社,1996,107-128.
    [16]郭水良,李扬汉.我国东南地区外来杂草研究初报.杂草科学,1995,2:4-8.
    [17]郭水良,李扬汉.中国境内的新外来杂草—常春藤叶婆婆纳.杂草科学,1996,2:6-7.
    [18]丁建清,王韧,付卫东.恶性水生杂草水葫芦在我国发生、危害及其防治策略[J].杂草学报,1995,9(2):49-52.
    [19]强胜,曹学章.中国异域杂草的考察与分析[J].植物资源与环境学报,2000,9(4):34-38.
    [20]许汝梅,叶万辉.生物入侵-理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2003,79-82.
    [21]郑云翔,郑博颖.黄顶菊的传播及对生态环境的影响[J].杂草科学,2007,2:30-31.
    [22]黄贤明,唐廷贵,梁宇等.外来植物黄顶菊的入侵警报及防空对策[J].生物多样性,2004,12(20):274-279.
    [23]蒋明,曹家树,丁炳阳,刘青娥.新外来杂草——裂叶月见草的生物学特性及防空对策[J].生物学通报,2004,39(9):20-22.
    [24]齐淑艳,徐文铎,文言.外来入侵植物牛膝菊种群构建生物量结构[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(12):2283-2286.
    [25]齐淑艳,徐文铎.外来入侵植物粗毛牛膝菊在辽宁地区的新发现[J].辽宁林业科技,2008,4:20-21.
    [26]万方浩,王韧.恶性害草豚草的生物学及生态学特征.杂草学报,1990,4(1):45-48.
    [27]王志西,刘祥君,高亦柯等.豚草与三裂叶豚草种子休眠规律研究.植物研究,1999,19(2):159-164.
    [28]郭水良,顾德兴,刘鹏等.北美车前生物与生态学特征研究.生态学报,1996,16(3):302-307.
    [29]郭水良,李扬汉.中国境内睫毛婆婆纳生态学特征的研究.应用生态学报,1998,9(2):133-138.
    [30]黄忠良,曹洪麟,梁晓东等.不同生境和森林内薇甘菊的生存和危害[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2000,8(2):131-138.
    [31]温达志,叶万辉,冯惠玲.外来入侵杂草薇甘菊及其伴生种基本光合特性的比较[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2000,8(2):139-146.
    [32]宋启示,付军,唐建维等.紫茎泽兰的化学互感潜力.植物生态学报,2000,24(3):362-365.
    [33]顾建中,史小玲,向国红等.外来入侵植物斑地锦的生物学特性及危害特点研究[J].杂草科学,2008,1:19-22.
    [34]黄红娟,张朝贤,孟庆会等.外来入侵植物假高粱的化感潜力[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(7):1234-1237.
    [35]刘慧圆,明冠华.外来入侵种意大利苍耳的分布现状及防控措施[J].生物学通报,2008,43(5):15-16.
    [36]曾东强,韦家书,张国良等.外来入侵植物银胶菊的生物学特性[J].广西农业生物科学,2008,27(3):261-265.
    [37]韦美玉,陈世军,刘丽萍.外来入侵植物粉花月见草的繁殖生物学特性[J].广西植物,2009,29(2):227-230.
    [38]全国明,章家恩,徐华勤等.外来入侵植物飞机草的生物学特征及控制策略[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(09):236-243.
    [39]祖元刚,沙伟.三裂叶豚草与普通豚草的染色体核型研究.植物研究,1999,19(1):48-52.
    [40]王大力,祝心如.豚草与三裂叶豚草挥发油成分的GC和GC/MS分析.质谱学报,1996,17(3):37-41.
    [41]关广清.豚草和三裂叶豚草的形态特征和变异类型[J].沈阳农学院学报,1985,1694:9-17.
    [42]王大力.豚草属植物的化感作用研究综述[J].生态学杂志,1995,14(4):48-53.
    [43]王丰,郭继明,郭灵云.北美车前染色体核型研究[J].植物学通报,1993,10(2):57.
    [44]刘大胜,张学杰,常光玲等.外来入侵植物空心莲子草花粉形态及生活力测定[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(35):15447-15448.
    [45]刘大胜,张学杰,周俊山等.外来入侵植物空心莲子草光和日变化初步研究[J].环境 污染与防治,2007,29(9):671-673.
    [46]朱芳艳,徐善峰,沈云霞等.外来入侵植物空心莲子草几丁质酶特性研究[J].生态科学,2007,26(4):298-302.
    [47]许文超,徐娇,陶哺等.外来入侵植物黄顶菊的化感作用初步研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2007,30(6):63-67.
    [48]陈艳,刘坤,张国良等.外来入侵杂草黄顶菊生物活性及化学成分研究进展[J].杂草科学,2007,4:1-3.
    [49]张建国,张明如.浙江外来有害生物入侵预警体系构建研究.福建林业科技,2009,36(1):100-105.
    [50]秦卫华,余水评等.上海市国家自然保护区外来入侵植物调查研究.杂草科学,2007,1:29-33.
    [51]方镇许,于有根,吴荣杜等.豚草生物学特性调查[J].浙江农业科学,2006,3:312-314.
    [52]庄卫红.加拿大一枝黄花在南汇地区的发生和防治[J].上海农业科技,2009,1:123-124.
    [53]高雷,李博.入侵植物凤眼莲研究现状及存在的问题[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(6):735-752.
    [54]郝建华,强胜.外来入侵性杂草——胜红蓟[J].杂草科学,2005,4:54-58.
    [55]陈集双,姜永厚.外来入侵生物控制[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2006:125-230.
    [56]马铃,强胜.外来入侵性杂草薇甘菊的研究进展[j].杂草科学,2006,1:55-59.
    [57]曹培健,于明坚,金孝锋,丁炳扬.水盾草入侵沉水植物群落主要种群生态位和种间联结研究[J].浙江大学学报农业与生命科学版,2006,32(3):334-340.
    [58]黄华,郭水良.外来入侵植物加拿大一枝黄花的繁殖生物学研究[J].生态学报,2005,25(1):1795-2803.
    [59]Walck J L, Baskin J M, Baskin C C. Why is Solidago shortii narrowly endemic and S. altissima geographically widespread? A Comprehensive comparative study of biological traits. Journal of Biogeography.2001,2810:1221-1231.
    [60]Gaudet, Keddy. A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature,1988,334:242-243.
    [61]Kolar C S, Lodge D M. Progress in invasion biology:Predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2001,16:199-204.
    [62]Daehler C C, Carino D A. Predicting invasive plants:prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biological invasions,2000,2:93-102.
    [63]Radford I J, Cousens R D. Invasiveness and comparative life-history traits of exotic and indigenous Senecio species in Australia. Oecologia,2000,125:531-542.
    [64]Raejmanek M, Richardson D M. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology,1996,776:1655-1661.
    [65]郭水良,盛海燕.北美车前(Plantago virginica)种群密度制约的统计分析.植物研究,2002,22(2):236-240.
    [66]James J J, Drenovsky R E. A basis for relative growth rate differences between vative and invasive forb seedlings[J]. Rangeland Ecology and Management,2007,60:395-400.
    [67]Smith C M, Walters L J, Fragmentation as a strategy for Caulerpa species:fates of fragments and implications for management of an invasive weed. Marine Ecology-Pubblicaxioni Della Stazione Zoologica Di Napoli Ⅰ,1999,203-4:307-319.
    [68]Sutherland S. What makes a weed a weed:life history traits of native and exotic plants in the USA[J]. Oecologia,2004,141:24-39.
    [69]郭水良,黄华,朱亦君等.金华市郊10种杂草的热值和灰分含量及其适应意义[J],植物研究,2005,25(4):460-464.
    [70]李洪远,孟伟庆.湿地中的植物入侵及湿地植物的入侵性[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(5):577-580.
    [71]李博,徐炳声,陈家宽.从上海外来杂草区系剖析植物入侵的一般特征[J].生物多样性,2001,9(4):446-457.
    [72]贺俊英,谢彩琴.繁殖生物学特征在外来入侵植物入侵性中的意义[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),2009,38(2):217-221.
    [73]Weber E, Gut D. Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation,2004,12:171-179.
    [74]Funk J L, Vitousek P M. Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems[J]. Nature,2007,446:1079-1081.
    [75]Pheloung P C, Williams P A, Halloy S R. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,1999,57:239-251.
    [76]OEPP/EPPO. EPPO Standard PM 5/3 Guidelines on pest risk analysis-pest risk assessment scheme.Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin,1997,27:281-305.
    [77]Daehler C C, Denslow J S, Ansari S, Kuo H C. A risk-assessment system for screening out invasive pest plants from Hawaii and other Pacific Islands [J]. Conservation biology, 2004.182:360-368.
    [78]许志刚.植物检疫学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.
    [79]印丽萍,黄晓藻,周国梁.外来生物风险评估指标体系构建及其原则[J].植物检疫,2006,20(增刊):35-38.
    [80]Kolar C S and Lodge D M. Eeological Predietions and Risk Assessment for Alien Fishes in North Ameriea. Seienee,2002,298:1233-1236.
    [81]Reiehard S H H and Hamilton C W. Predieting invasions of woody plants introduced to North Ameriea. Conservation Biology,1997,11:193-203.
    [82]郭琼霞,黄可辉等.外来入侵植物——“加拿大一枝黄花”传入中国的定量风险研究.武夷科学,2005,21:81-85.
    [83]Scott T J. A predictive model for forecasting fire blight of pear and apple in Washington State. Acta Horticulture,1993,338:153-160.
    [84]Bennett M D. Plant genome values:how much do we know? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A.1998,95:2011-2016.
    [85]Rejmanek M. A theory of seed plant invasiveness:the first sketch[J]. Biological Conservation,1996,78:171-181.
    [86]Williamson M H, Fitter A. The characters of successful invaders[J]. Biological Conservation,1996,78:163-170.
    [87]李伟丰.外来有害生物对生物多样性的影响[J].安徽农业通报,2007,13(2):81-83.
    [88]Denslow J S, Daehler C C. Hawaii exotic plant evaluation protocol (draft version8[OL]. http://www. botany. hawaii.edu/faculty/daehler/WRA/hepep.htm,2005-06-10.
    [89]徐海根,王健民,强胜,王长永.外来物种入侵、生物安全、遗传资源[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
    [90]李振宇,解焱.中国外来入侵种[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2002,43-45.
    [91]欧健,卢昌义.厦门市外来植物入侵风险评价指标体系的研究.厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2006,45(6):883-888.
    [92]Maillet J, Lopez-Garcia C. What criteria are relevant for predicting the invasive capacity of a new agricultural? The case of invasive American species in France. Weed Research, 2000,40:11-26.
    [93]Rejmanek M. Invasive plants:approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology,2000, 255:497-507.
    [94]黄建辉,韩兴国,杨亲二等.外来种入侵的生物学与生态学基础的若干问题[J].生物多样性,2003,11(3):240-247.
    [95]高增祥等.外来种入侵的过程、机理和预测[J].生态学报,2003.23(3):559-570.
    [96]Kuster E C, Kuhn I, Bruelheide H & Klotz S. Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora [J]. Journal of Ecology,2008,96:860-868.
    [97]Liu J, Liang S C, Liu F H et al. Invasive alien plant species in China:regional distribution patterns [J]. Diversity and Distributions,2005,11:341-347.
    [98]Tucker K C, Richardson D M. An expert system for screening potentially invasive alien plants in South African Fynbos [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,1995. 44:309-338.
    [99]Williamson M H. Invasions. Ecography,1999,22:5-12.
    [100]郭水良,陈国奇,毛俐慧.DNA C-值与被子植物入侵性关系的数据统计分析——以中国境内有分布的539种被子植物为例[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3698-3705.
    [101]倪丽萍,郭水良,黄华.金华市郊外来杂草的区系地理及植物学性状分析[J].浙江师范大学学报自然科学版,2007,301:80-87.
    [102]陈国奇,李明丽,郭水良,印丽萍.哪些性状与中国东南部地区草本被子植物的入侵性相关[J].生态学报,2009,29(9):1-7.
    [103]Williamson M, Fitter A. The varying success of invaders J. Ecology,1996,77 6:1661-1666.
    [104]Feng Y L, Lei Y B, Wang R F, et al. Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versu cell walls in an invasive plant [J]. PLANS,2008,1066:1853-1856.
    [105]上海科学院.上海植物志[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1999.
    [106]郭水良.外域杂草的产生、传播及生物与生态学特性的分析[J].广西植物,1995,15(1):89-95.
    [107]Rejmanek M. What makes a species invasive? [M]//Pysek P, Prach K, Rejmanek M, et al. Plant I nvasions-General Aspects and Special Problems. Amsterdam:SPB Academic Publishing,1995:3-13.
    [108]广东地图出版社.新编中国地图册.广州:广东地图出版社,2004.
    [109]浙江植物志编委会.浙江植物志[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,1993.
    [110]江苏植物研究所.江苏植物志[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1982.
    [111]李扬汉.中国杂草志[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998.
    [112]吴征镒.中国种子植物属的分布区类型[J].云南植物研究,1991增刊Ⅳ:1-139.
    [113]陆庆光译.世界100种恶性外来入侵生物[J].世界环境,2001,4:42-44.
    [114]曾宪峰.中国植物区系地理学研究的回顾和展望.生物学通报,1998,33(6):2-4.
    [115]楼炉焕,金水虎.浙江古田山自然保护区种子植物区系分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2000,22(5):33-39.
    [116]王荷生.中国植物区系的性质和各成分间的关系[J].云南植物研究,2000,22(2):119-126.
    [117]W.沙菲尔著.付子桢译.普通植物地理学原理[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1958.
    [118]刘胜祥.植物资源学[M].武汉:武汉出版社,1992.
    [119]云南大学生物系编.植物生态学[M].北:人民教育出版社,1980,187-190.
    [120]崔宝山.湿地生态系统生态特征变化极其可持续性问题[J].生态学杂志,1999,18(2):43-49.
    [121]刘灿然,马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法[J].生态学报,1997,17(6):601-610.
    [122]任继周,李向林.草地农业生态学研究进展与趋势[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1017-1021.
    [123]张金屯.制备数量生态学方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995,121-154.
    [124]钟永德,李迈和,Norbert Kraeuchi.地球暖化促进植物迁移于入侵[J].地理研究,2004,23(3):347-356.
    [125]吴世捷,高力行.不受欢迎的生物多样性:香港的外来植物物种[J].生物多样性,2002,10(1):109-118.
    [126]Kee Dae Kim. Invasive plants on disturbed Korean sand dunes [J]. Estuarine, Coastal 6and Shelf Science,2004,1-12.
    [127]谢小伟,郭水良,黄华.浙江金华市区地面苔藓植物分布与环境因子关系研究[J].武汉植物研究,2003,21(2):129-133.
    [128]Baker H G. The evolution of weeds[J]. Annual of Review of Ecological System, 1974, 5:1-24.
    [129]Williamson M. Invaders, weeds and the risk from genetically modified organisms[J]. Experientia,1993,49:219-224.
    [130]Mcintyre S, Martin T G, Heard K M, et al. Plant traits predict impact of invading species:an analysis of herbaceous vegetation in the subtropics[J]. Australian Journal of Botany,2005,53:757-770.
    [131]Grotkopp E, Rejmanek M, Rost T L. Toward a Causal Explanation of Plant Invasiveness:Seedling Growth and Life-History Strategies of 29 Pine Pinus Species[J]. American Naturalist,2002,159:396-419.
    [132]Bennett M D. Variation in genomic form in plants and its ecological implications [J]. New Phytologist,1987,106:177-200.
    [133]王四海,孙卫邦,成晓.逃逸外来植物肿柄菊在云南的生长繁殖特性、地理分布现状及群落特征[J].生态学报,2004,24(3):444-449.
    [134]Daws M I, Hall J, Flynn S, et al. Do invasive species have bigger seeds? Evidence from intra-and inter-specific comparisons[J]. South African Journal of Botany,2007, 3:138-143.
    [135]史刚荣,马成仓.外来植物成功入侵的生物学特征[J].应用生态学报,2006,18(4):46-51.
    [136]吴晓雯,罗晶,陈家宽,李博.中国外来入侵植物的分布格局及其与环境因子和人类活动的关系[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(4):576-584.
    [137]Swift H. The constancy of desoxyribose nucleic acid in plant nuclei. Genetics,1950, 36:643-654.
    [138]Sunderland N, Mcleish J. Nucleic acid content and concentration in root cells of higher plants[J]. Experimental Cell Research,1961,24:541-554.
    [139]Bennett M D. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B.1972,181:109-135.
    [140]Grime J P, Mowforth M A. Variation in genome size-an ecological interpretation. Nature,1982,2995879:151-153.
    [141]Lawrence M E. Senecio L. Asteraceae in Aust ralia:nuclear DNA amounts. Austral ian Journal of Botany,1985,33:221-232.
    [142]Hughes C E, Styles B T. The benefits and potential risks of woody legume introductions.International Tree Crops Journal,1987,4:209-248.
    [143]Grotkopp E, Stoltenberg R, Rejmanek M, et al. The effect of genome size on invasiveness. American Journal of Botany,1998,85:34.
    [144]付改兰,冯玉龙.外来入侵植物和本地植物核DNA C-值的比较及其与入侵性的关系[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(10):1590-1594.
    [145]李国旗,安树青,陈兴龙,程晓莉,张纪林.生物的C-值矛盾与其生态适应性的关系初探[J].大自然探索,1999,18(2):61-66.
    [146]Gray A J. Do invading species have definable genetic characteristics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,1986, B314:655-674.
    [147]李娜,印丽萍,郭水良.高粱属4种植物的核型及其入侵性关系的探讨[J].植物检疫,2009,23(6):6-9.
    [148]Thompson J D. The biology of an invasive plant:what makes Spartina anglica so successful? BioScience,41:393-401.
    [149]Williams D G., Mack R N, Black R A. Ecophysiology fmtroduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii:the role of phenotypic plasticity. Ecology,1991,76:1569-1580.
    [150]陈国奇.应用植物性状和DNA C-值评估被子植物入侵性的研究[C].2009,52-53.
    [151]Rice E L. Allelopathy edition[M]. New York:Academic Press.1984,1-3.
    [152]Callaway R M, Aschehoug E T. Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors:a mechanism for exotic invasion[J]. Science,2000,290:521-523.
    [153]Bais H P, Vepachedu R, Gilroy S, et al. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion, from molecules and genes to species interactions[J]. Science,2003,301:1377-1381.
    [154]Fitter A. Making allelopathy respectable[J]. Science,2003,301:1377-1380.
    [155]Sahid I B, Sagau J B. Allelopathic effect of Lantana Lantana camara and Siam weed Chromolaena odorata on selected crops[J]. Weed Science,1993,41:303-308.
    [156]Gross E M, Meyer H, Schilling G. Release and ecological impact of algicidal hydrolysable polyphenols in Myriophyllum spicatum[J]. Phytochemistry,1996, 411:133-138.
    [157]Sharma G P, Singh J S, Raghubanshi A S. Plant invasions:Emerging trends and future implications[J]. Current science,2005,88:726-733.
    [158]何衍彪,张茂新,何庭玉等.飞机草化感作用的初步研究[J].华南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,23(3):60-62.
    [159]邵华,彭少麟,张弛等.薇甘菊的化感作用研究[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(5):62-65.
    [160]孙文浩,俞子文,俞叔文.城市富营养水域的生物治理和凤眼莲抑制藻类生长的机理[J].环境科学学报,1989,9(2):188-195.
    [161]曾任森,林象联,骆世明等.蟛蜞菊的生化他感作用及生化他感作用物的分离鉴定[J].生态学报,1996,16(1):20-27.
    [162]孔垂华,胡飞,骆世明.胜红蓟对作物的化感作用[J].中国农业科学,1997,30(5):95.
    [163]方芳,郭水良.入侵植物加拿大一枝黄花对环境的生理适应性研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(1):47-52.
    [164]林嵩,翁伯琦.外来植物化感作用研究综述[J].福建农业学报,2005,20(3):202-210.
    [165]Hierro J L, Maron J L, Callaway R M. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range[J]. Journal of Ecology,2005,93:5-15.
    [166]魏守辉,强胜,马波,韦继光.土壤杂草种子库与杂草综合管理[J].土壤,2005,37(2):121-128.
    [167]Kudoh H, Nakayama M, LihovaJ, et al. Does invasion involve alternation of germination requirements? A comparative study between native and introduced strains of an annual Brassicaceae, Cardamine hirsuta[J]. Ecological Research,2007,22:869-875.
    [168]杨彩宏,冯莉,岳茂峰.恶性杂草马齿苋(Portulaca oleracea)种子萌发特性的研究[J].植物保护,2009,35(1):62-65.
    [169]李鸣光,张炜银,张军丽等.薇甘菊种子萌发特性的初步研究[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2002,41(6):57-59.
    [170]王建军,赵宝玉,李明涛等.生态入侵植物豚草及其综合防治[J].草业科学,2006,23(4):71-75.
    [171]赵敏.外来入侵生物豚草的综合防治与对策[J].农业环境与发展,2003,(5):38-39.
    [172]王银朝,赵宝玉,樊泽锋等.紫茎泽兰及其危害研究进展[J].动物医学进展,2005,26(5):45-48.
    [173]和爱军,刘轮辉.紫茎泽兰浸提液对几种植物发芽的影响[J].杂草学报,1990,4(4):35-38.
    [174]江贵波,曾任森.外来入侵植物的危害及防治[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(2):273-274.
    [175]孙善谋.加拿大一枝黄花的危害与防治[J].农技服务,2008,25(6):60-91.
    [176]郭水良,方芳,倪丽萍等.检疫性杂草毒莴苣的光和特征及其入侵地群落学生态调查[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(12):2316-2320.
    [177]Gossett L, Lester J, Gonzalez L. Galveston Bay Invasive Species Risk Assessment Final Report [R]. USA:Environmental Institute of Houston University & Houston Advanced Research Center,2004:10-17.
    [178]李明丽,郭水良,印丽萍,陈国奇.江浙沪不同杂草类群性状与入侵性关系的比较[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,2:82-91.
    [179]徐汝梅.生物入侵-数据集成、数量分析与预警.北京:科学出版社,2003.
    [180]蒋青,梁忆冰,王乃扬等.有害生物危险性评价的定量分析方法研究[J].植物检疫,1994,9(4):208-211.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700