经济林产业形象遮蔽的风险管理
|
摘要
经济林产业化程度高、关联产品市场美誉度好、品牌效应突出、与经济林相关的主题林业观光旅游开发程度好、市场营销与宣传意识领先的行政区域将在消费者中具有突出的经济林产业形象,从而遮蔽了经济林产业化程度较低、关联产品市场美誉度较差、品牌效应一般、与经济林相关的主题林业观光旅游开发较滞后、市场营销与宣传意识较落后的地区在消费者中的形象,导致后者产业的竞争力受到限制。形象遮蔽(或称“屏蔽”)的研究目前仅集中于旅游地形象遮蔽的研究,其属于旅游规划学研究的前沿领域。该理论起源于国内,国外则未见专门涉及旅游地形象遮蔽研究的文献报道。国内外文献检索的结果表明,有关经济林产业形象遮蔽现象的研究尚未有文献报道,也未有关花椒产业形象遮蔽的相关文献报道,更没有关于形象遮蔽风险的研究报道。
越西县属四川省凉山州,史载所产花椒远在北宋时就曾进贡,因而被称之为“贡椒”。由于越西贡椒的悠久历史和优良品质,当地政府提出打造大凉山越西贡椒产业。尽管如此,北距越西100公里左右的汉源,其贡椒历史更为悠久,并且主栽品种与越西一致,均为“正路”和“大红袍”。汉源贡椒在四川为道地产品,市场销售的花椒多冠以“汉源贡椒”之名,销售价格高于其他产地花椒,“汉源贡椒”实际已成为品牌。汉源县在贡椒品牌打造、贡椒产业形象建设、贡椒产业文化建设以及产业链建设等方面明显先于越西,并且,汉源县在花椒系列产品的加工、龙头企业的培育与带动能力建设、贡椒系列产品市场知名度与美誉度、品牌建设力度、产业历史文化挖掘力度等方面明显优于越西。换言之,汉源贡椒产业的综合开发程度明显好于越西,即越西处于汉源贡椒产业的阴影之下。由此可见,由于汉源贡椒品种栽培的广域性、较高的市场认可度和超前的产业发展,导致了越西贡椒产业受到了汉源的“形象遮蔽”。花椒属于经济林,但是目前传统的林业产业经济学、森林资源经济学理论并不能有效分析并解决当前越西贡椒产业面临的“形象遮蔽”问题。
因此,本文以现有的旅游地形象遮蔽理论为基础,结合风险管理理论,对旅游地形象遮蔽理论在经济林产业上应用的可行性,适合性作了深入的论证,构建了经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的理论体系,并以越西贡椒产业为例,分析了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的发生机制,并在此基础上运用故障树分析法对其风险进行了系统识别,构建了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的评价指标体系,并对其进行了详细的风险原始值测量；在此基础上,基于TOPSIS对越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险进行了管理优先度评价,并应用MLP神经网络对其进行了综合评价。基于风险评价结果,最后构建了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽的应对机制。主要结论如下：
(1)旅游地形象遮蔽与经济林产业形象遮蔽的相关性
本文研究发现旅游地形象遮蔽与经济林产业形象遮蔽具有较大的相关性,将旅游地形象遮蔽理论用于经济林产业形象遮蔽的研究是符合经济林产业的内在属性和功能的。其主要原因有两点：第一,旅游地形象遮蔽与经济林产业形象遮蔽均涉及主体、客体、介体,并且首因效应和类化原则的认知规律均通过主体发生,旅游地形象遮蔽与经济林产业形象遮蔽的形成在本质上是一致的；第二,经济林产业的观光属性与游憩功能决定了经济林产业形象也可以包含旅游地形象,反之,亦然。因此,经济林的游憩观光属性与功能就内在的与旅游的属性与功能保持一致。
(2)经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的理论基础研究
①关于经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的概念研究结论
本文以逻辑学关于概念的理论为依据,以旅游地形象遮蔽概念为基础,界定了经济林产业形象遮蔽、经济林产业形象遮蔽风险这两种概念的内涵、外延,并详细研究了经济林产业形象遮蔽、经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的特征。本研究还采用了逻辑学中有关概念间相互关系的理论,发现形象遮蔽与旅游地形象遮蔽、经济林产业形象遮蔽以及经济林产业形象遮蔽风险等3种概念间相互关系也为相容关系,外延部分重合。因此,进一步证实了旅游地形象遮蔽理论与经济林产业形象遮蔽理论具有较高的相关性。
②关于经济林产业形象遮蔽的发生机制研究的结论
基于旅游地形象遮蔽的发生机制,分析了经济林产业形象遮蔽的发生机制,即受首因效应和类化原则的认知规律的共同作用,相关受众(消费者、营销人员、项目评审专家、与产业化项目审批、管理、验收相关的政府官员等)会感知到不同行政区域的同一经济林木产业化综合开发程度的优劣差异,从而形成对不同行政区域经济林产业形象的优劣定位。
基于必然性与偶然性、复杂性与认识论的哲学范畴,发现风险主要来源于三类：必然性风险的发生是由于必然存在的人类主观认知偏离能衍生出风险,导致实践结果与预期目标的偏差；偶然性风险产生于自身天然具有的有限预测性,即损失之于风险承受主体的有限控制性；认知风险的发生是由于客观复杂性与人类认知能力的有限性的严重不对称即导致风险的生成,完善了风险管理学中关于风险发生的深层机制的研究。
基于系统动力学中的因果关系与反馈回路分析方法,找到了关于经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的发生机制的两条主要因果反馈回路：第一条,经济林种植的历史文化——经济林树种的栽培——经济性状——品质形象——品牌形象——经济林种植规模——经济林产业的市场形象——经济林产业化形象——形象感知水平——经济林产业形象遮蔽风险；第二条,经济林种植历史文化——经济林种植规模——加工企业——物流——餐饮——经济林产业化形象——形象感知水平——经济林产业形象遮蔽风险。本研究发现这两条主要因果反馈回路所揭示的经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的发生机制与旅游地形象遮蔽的发生机制在本质上是相同的。
③关于经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的理论体系构建的研究结论
构建了较为齐全的、系统化的经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的理论体系,包括经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的哲学基础理论体系、经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的基础科学理论体系、经济林产业形象遮蔽风险管理的技术科学体系以及经济林产业形象遮蔽风险管理的工程技术体系。该理论体系不仅以现有的旅游地形象遮蔽理论体系为依据,同时融合了哲学、逻辑学、林学、生态学、系统动力学、风险管理等理论与相关技术科学,大大拓展了经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的研究深度与应用范畴。
(3)越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的识别
构建了越西贡椒产业形象的认知遮蔽风险、种质资源相似性遮蔽风险、越西贡椒产业形象传播遮蔽风险、越西贡椒产业的空间遮蔽风险的子顶风险事件的故障树,并在此基础上合成了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的总故障树。越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的总故障树、各子顶风险事件的故障树各事件间的主要逻辑演绎关系为或门风险事件。通过计算得到的越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险故障树的所有最小风险割集为28个并且都为1阶(低阶)风险割集,即风险割集中仅有1个底风险事件存在,且其重要性程度非常高。
(4)基于TOPSIS的越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的管理优先度评价
风险事件Q.13(越西与汉源贡椒的生物学性状相似性风险)、Q.14(越西与汉源贡椒的生物学性状相对极差趋同性风险)、Q.15(越西与汉源贡椒亲缘关系相近性风险)Q.22(越西贡椒产业的外拓路径网络的可达性指数的遮蔽风险)具有较高的风险管理优先度；越西贡椒认知遮蔽风险(Q.1—Q.12)、形象获取路径差异性风险(Q.16—Q.19)的风险管理优先度居中；Q.20(α、 β、γ指数性的遮蔽风险)、Q.21(越西贡椒产业的外拓物流通路的网络结点遮蔽风险)、Q.23(越西贡椒产业的外拓路径网络的平均径路长的遮蔽风险)的风险管理优先度最低。
(5)基于MLP的越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的评价
越西贡椒产业形象认知遮蔽风险值为0.47,而汉源为0.29；越西风险级别属于“风险中等”,而汉源则为“风险小”,汉源要明显低于越西。越西与汉源贡椒种质资源相似性遮蔽风险值均为0.49,风险等级为“风险中等”,该研究结果显示汉源贡椒的种质资源与越西具有很大的相似性,即相似性遮蔽风险很大。越西贡椒产业形象传播遮蔽风险为0.85,风险等级为“风险很大”；而汉源则为0.75,风险等级为“风险大”。越西贡椒产业形象的空间遮蔽风险值为0.55,风险等级为“风险中等”；汉源为0.44,风险等级也为“风险中等”,但越西稍高于汉源。越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽的综合风险值为0.60,风险等级为“风险中等”,而汉源为0.50,风险等级同于越西,但越西的风险值高于汉源。评价结果表明,汉源贡椒产业对越西贡椒产业形象产生了遮蔽风险。
(6)越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的应对机制构建
基于旅游地形象定位与区域贡椒产业协同发展构建了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的应对机制。基于旅游地形象定位理论,提出“丝绸之路上的大凉山贡椒彝乡——越西”、“越西贡椒——文昌帝张亚子的显化”两种新的越西贡椒产业形象。但由于越西贡椒产业化综合竞争力远不及汉源,两地的贡椒产业发展格局极不均衡,因此,仅靠形象重新定位不能从根本上有效应对风险。基于此,本文提出了越西与汉源贡椒产业的发展要走区域化的协同式发展道路,建立基于“1+1+N”(越西+汉源+N个贡椒产地)的四川省贡椒产业化发展综合协调与管理办公室(简称“省贡椒协调与管理办”),对越西、汉源及其它产地的贡椒产业统一化、垂直化、协同化管理。
Tourism image masking belongs to the frontier of tourism planning studies. Internal scholars have been done relatively systemic and deep researches on tourism image masking about its meaning, extension and mechanism. Yet papers and literature show that no studies are on the image masking of product forestry industry and the pepper industry image masking, further no studies reported on the risk of image masking. So this article combine risk management theory with the theory of tourism image masking, do deep argumentation on the feasibility and aptness of tourism image masking application in product forestry industry image. And then put forward the concept of product forestry industry image masking, also discuss deeply on its meaning, extension and its risk about character and mechanism. At last form a system of product forestry industry image masking risk theory.
The plantation euroky, higher market recognition degree and advanced industry develop of Hanyuan peppers make the Yuexi pepper industry under the masking of Hanyuan pepper industry image. Take this case for example, analysis have been done to the mechanism of its occurrence. Risk system recognition is working under the help of fault-tree analysis method based on the first step. Also construct a system of assessment index about Yuexi pepper industry image making risk, and measure the original value of risk at length. Then evaluate the manage priority of Yuexi pepper industry image masking risk based on TOPSIS(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution). And evaluate which synthetically with MLP neural network. At last build the reply strategy mechanism of Yuexi pepper industry image masking based on the final result. The main conclusions are as follow,
(1) The relativity between Tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking
In this article studies show that the relativity between tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking are close, the use of tourism image masking in studying product forestry industry image masking is accordant with the inner attribute and function of product forestry industry. First, subject, object and intermedium are involved in both. They are common in that the cognition rules of primacy effect and apperception principle both arise from the subject. The formation of tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking is comfortable in itself. Second, tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking both have sightseeing and recreation functions which make them keep in line in attribute and function.
(2)Basic theory study on product forestry image masking risk
①Conclusion about the concept of product forestry image masking risk
The concepts of product forestry image masking and product forestry image masking risk are defined in meaning and extension according tourism image masking with the concept theory in logic, which are traverse in character. The correlations in concepts of image masking, tourist image masking, product forestry industry image masking and product forestry industry image masking are compatibility relation and extension part superposition, which is a witness to the close relationship between tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking further.
②Conclusions of occurrence mechanism about product forestry industry image masking
Analyzing the occurrence mechanism of forestry industry image masking finds related people (consumer, salesperson, program review expert and anyone refer to forestry industry) would apperceive the difference of same product forestry industry comprehensive development in different administrative regions, which lead to the formation of different images about goodness and badness. Risk root in philosophy category such as the inevitability and contingency, complicacy and epistemology. First, the inevitability risk occurs because that the risk derive from the inherent cognitive deviation of human leading to the deviation of practical results and the targets. Second, the occurrence of accidental risk arises from the severe asymmetry between the limited human cognitive abilities and objective complexity that lead to the generation of risk. Third, occurrence of cognitive risk due to the limitation of human cognitive ability tending to inevitable truth.
Based on the analysis of causality and feedback loops in the system dynamics method, two main causal feedback loops are find on the forest industry image masking risk mechanism. One is history and culture of product forestry industry image-the plantation of product forestry-economy character-quality image-brand image-area of product forestry plantation-market image of product forestry industry-industry image of product forestry-image perception level-product forestry industry image masking risk, the other one is plantation history and culture of product forestry-area of product forestry processors-materials circulation-dinning industry-image of product forestry-image perception level-product forestry industry image masking risk. The two loops opening out the occurrence mechanism of product forestry industry image masking risk are uniform in itself.
③Conclusions about the theory construction of product forestry industry image masking risk
Including philosophy theory system, basic science theory system, technology management system and engineering techniques system, the constructed theory system is complete and systemic. The theory system not only base on the tourism image masking but also introject philosophy, logic, forestry, system dynamics, risk management and related technology science, which greatly expand the depth of research and application areas of the forest industry image masking risk.
(3)Identification of the pepper industry image masking in Yuexi
Cognition making risk, comparability masking risk of germ plasm source, spread masking risk, fault-tree of space masking risk about sub-top risk events are constructed and formed to a total fault-tree of the pepper industry image masking in Yuexi. The logical deductive relationship among events of total fault-tree and sub-top risk events fault-tree is or-gate risk event. There are total28minimum risk cutsets in Yuexi pepper industry image masking risk, all of which are one-step risk cutset (lowclass step). The one-step risk cutset is that only one basic risk event is in the risk cutset and is very important.
(4)Risk management evaluation of the Yuexi pepper industry image masking basic on TOPSIS
Risk events Q.13(biological characteristics similarity risk between Yuexi and Hanyuan), Q.14(comparative range of biological traits convergence risk), Q.15(peppers kinship similar risk of Yuexxi and Hanyuan), Q.22(the reachability index of the extension path network making risk in Yuexi pepper industry) are with Higher risk management priority. While cognition masking risk (Q.1-Q.12) and difference risk of image obtain path (Q.16-Q.19) are in the middle. The lowest are Q.20(α、β、γ index masking risk), Q.21(network nodes masking risk of extention path network) and Q.23(average pathway length masking risk of extention path network).
(5)Evaluation of the Yuexi pepper industry image masking risk based on MLP
Cognition masking risk value of Yuexi pepper industry image is0.47(middle risk), while which in Hanyuan is0.29(low risk). Similarity masking risk value of pepper germ plasm source in Yuexi and Hanyuan are both0.49(higher risk), which reveal that the pepper in Yuexi and Hanyuan share a common genetic. Spread masking risk value of Yuexi pepper industry is0.85(the highest risk). And Hanyuan Gets the value0.75(High risk). Space masking risk value of Yuexi pepper industry is0.55(middle risk), which is higher than that of Hanyuan (0.44). Aggregate risk value of Yuexi pepper industry image masking is0.60(middle risk). The risk class of Yuexi is same to that of Hanyuan, but which value is higher than that of Hanyuan (0.50). as a result pepper industry image of Hanyuan leads to the masking risk to that of Yuexi.
(7)Construction of mechanism replying to the masking risk of Yuexi pepper industry image
Build the pepper industry image masking risk replying mechanisms based on tourist destination and regional pepper industry collaborative development. Put forward two new industry images of Hanyuan pepper industry, one is Daliangshan tribute pepper Yi Township in The Silk Road-Yuexi, and the other one is Yuexi tribute pepper-the reincarnation of Wenchang Emperor Zhang Yazi. But because of the pepper industry comprehensive competitiveness of Yuexi nowhere near Hanyuan and both pepper pattern of industrial development is very uneven. So only new image location is poor to reply the risk radically. Based on this the paper proposes a development road of the Yuexi and Hanyuan pepper industry going regionalization collaborative. Build the Sichuan pepper industry development coordination and management office based on "1+1+N"(Yuexi+Hanyuan+others pepper origin) to manage the pepper industry in Yuexi and Hanyuan uniformly, perpendicularly, synergistically.
越西县属四川省凉山州,史载所产花椒远在北宋时就曾进贡,因而被称之为“贡椒”。由于越西贡椒的悠久历史和优良品质,当地政府提出打造大凉山越西贡椒产业。尽管如此,北距越西100公里左右的汉源,其贡椒历史更为悠久,并且主栽品种与越西一致,均为“正路”和“大红袍”。汉源贡椒在四川为道地产品,市场销售的花椒多冠以“汉源贡椒”之名,销售价格高于其他产地花椒,“汉源贡椒”实际已成为品牌。汉源县在贡椒品牌打造、贡椒产业形象建设、贡椒产业文化建设以及产业链建设等方面明显先于越西,并且,汉源县在花椒系列产品的加工、龙头企业的培育与带动能力建设、贡椒系列产品市场知名度与美誉度、品牌建设力度、产业历史文化挖掘力度等方面明显优于越西。换言之,汉源贡椒产业的综合开发程度明显好于越西,即越西处于汉源贡椒产业的阴影之下。由此可见,由于汉源贡椒品种栽培的广域性、较高的市场认可度和超前的产业发展,导致了越西贡椒产业受到了汉源的“形象遮蔽”。花椒属于经济林,但是目前传统的林业产业经济学、森林资源经济学理论并不能有效分析并解决当前越西贡椒产业面临的“形象遮蔽”问题。
因此,本文以现有的旅游地形象遮蔽理论为基础,结合风险管理理论,对旅游地形象遮蔽理论在经济林产业上应用的可行性,适合性作了深入的论证,构建了经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的理论体系,并以越西贡椒产业为例,分析了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的发生机制,并在此基础上运用故障树分析法对其风险进行了系统识别,构建了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的评价指标体系,并对其进行了详细的风险原始值测量；在此基础上,基于TOPSIS对越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险进行了管理优先度评价,并应用MLP神经网络对其进行了综合评价。基于风险评价结果,最后构建了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽的应对机制。主要结论如下：
(1)旅游地形象遮蔽与经济林产业形象遮蔽的相关性
本文研究发现旅游地形象遮蔽与经济林产业形象遮蔽具有较大的相关性,将旅游地形象遮蔽理论用于经济林产业形象遮蔽的研究是符合经济林产业的内在属性和功能的。其主要原因有两点：第一,旅游地形象遮蔽与经济林产业形象遮蔽均涉及主体、客体、介体,并且首因效应和类化原则的认知规律均通过主体发生,旅游地形象遮蔽与经济林产业形象遮蔽的形成在本质上是一致的；第二,经济林产业的观光属性与游憩功能决定了经济林产业形象也可以包含旅游地形象,反之,亦然。因此,经济林的游憩观光属性与功能就内在的与旅游的属性与功能保持一致。
(2)经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的理论基础研究
①关于经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的概念研究结论
本文以逻辑学关于概念的理论为依据,以旅游地形象遮蔽概念为基础,界定了经济林产业形象遮蔽、经济林产业形象遮蔽风险这两种概念的内涵、外延,并详细研究了经济林产业形象遮蔽、经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的特征。本研究还采用了逻辑学中有关概念间相互关系的理论,发现形象遮蔽与旅游地形象遮蔽、经济林产业形象遮蔽以及经济林产业形象遮蔽风险等3种概念间相互关系也为相容关系,外延部分重合。因此,进一步证实了旅游地形象遮蔽理论与经济林产业形象遮蔽理论具有较高的相关性。
②关于经济林产业形象遮蔽的发生机制研究的结论
基于旅游地形象遮蔽的发生机制,分析了经济林产业形象遮蔽的发生机制,即受首因效应和类化原则的认知规律的共同作用,相关受众(消费者、营销人员、项目评审专家、与产业化项目审批、管理、验收相关的政府官员等)会感知到不同行政区域的同一经济林木产业化综合开发程度的优劣差异,从而形成对不同行政区域经济林产业形象的优劣定位。
基于必然性与偶然性、复杂性与认识论的哲学范畴,发现风险主要来源于三类：必然性风险的发生是由于必然存在的人类主观认知偏离能衍生出风险,导致实践结果与预期目标的偏差；偶然性风险产生于自身天然具有的有限预测性,即损失之于风险承受主体的有限控制性；认知风险的发生是由于客观复杂性与人类认知能力的有限性的严重不对称即导致风险的生成,完善了风险管理学中关于风险发生的深层机制的研究。
基于系统动力学中的因果关系与反馈回路分析方法,找到了关于经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的发生机制的两条主要因果反馈回路：第一条,经济林种植的历史文化——经济林树种的栽培——经济性状——品质形象——品牌形象——经济林种植规模——经济林产业的市场形象——经济林产业化形象——形象感知水平——经济林产业形象遮蔽风险；第二条,经济林种植历史文化——经济林种植规模——加工企业——物流——餐饮——经济林产业化形象——形象感知水平——经济林产业形象遮蔽风险。本研究发现这两条主要因果反馈回路所揭示的经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的发生机制与旅游地形象遮蔽的发生机制在本质上是相同的。
③关于经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的理论体系构建的研究结论
构建了较为齐全的、系统化的经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的理论体系,包括经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的哲学基础理论体系、经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的基础科学理论体系、经济林产业形象遮蔽风险管理的技术科学体系以及经济林产业形象遮蔽风险管理的工程技术体系。该理论体系不仅以现有的旅游地形象遮蔽理论体系为依据,同时融合了哲学、逻辑学、林学、生态学、系统动力学、风险管理等理论与相关技术科学,大大拓展了经济林产业形象遮蔽风险的研究深度与应用范畴。
(3)越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的识别
构建了越西贡椒产业形象的认知遮蔽风险、种质资源相似性遮蔽风险、越西贡椒产业形象传播遮蔽风险、越西贡椒产业的空间遮蔽风险的子顶风险事件的故障树,并在此基础上合成了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的总故障树。越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的总故障树、各子顶风险事件的故障树各事件间的主要逻辑演绎关系为或门风险事件。通过计算得到的越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险故障树的所有最小风险割集为28个并且都为1阶(低阶)风险割集,即风险割集中仅有1个底风险事件存在,且其重要性程度非常高。
(4)基于TOPSIS的越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的管理优先度评价
风险事件Q.13(越西与汉源贡椒的生物学性状相似性风险)、Q.14(越西与汉源贡椒的生物学性状相对极差趋同性风险)、Q.15(越西与汉源贡椒亲缘关系相近性风险)Q.22(越西贡椒产业的外拓路径网络的可达性指数的遮蔽风险)具有较高的风险管理优先度；越西贡椒认知遮蔽风险(Q.1—Q.12)、形象获取路径差异性风险(Q.16—Q.19)的风险管理优先度居中；Q.20(α、 β、γ指数性的遮蔽风险)、Q.21(越西贡椒产业的外拓物流通路的网络结点遮蔽风险)、Q.23(越西贡椒产业的外拓路径网络的平均径路长的遮蔽风险)的风险管理优先度最低。
(5)基于MLP的越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的评价
越西贡椒产业形象认知遮蔽风险值为0.47,而汉源为0.29；越西风险级别属于“风险中等”,而汉源则为“风险小”,汉源要明显低于越西。越西与汉源贡椒种质资源相似性遮蔽风险值均为0.49,风险等级为“风险中等”,该研究结果显示汉源贡椒的种质资源与越西具有很大的相似性,即相似性遮蔽风险很大。越西贡椒产业形象传播遮蔽风险为0.85,风险等级为“风险很大”；而汉源则为0.75,风险等级为“风险大”。越西贡椒产业形象的空间遮蔽风险值为0.55,风险等级为“风险中等”；汉源为0.44,风险等级也为“风险中等”,但越西稍高于汉源。越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽的综合风险值为0.60,风险等级为“风险中等”,而汉源为0.50,风险等级同于越西,但越西的风险值高于汉源。评价结果表明,汉源贡椒产业对越西贡椒产业形象产生了遮蔽风险。
(6)越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的应对机制构建
基于旅游地形象定位与区域贡椒产业协同发展构建了越西贡椒产业形象遮蔽风险的应对机制。基于旅游地形象定位理论,提出“丝绸之路上的大凉山贡椒彝乡——越西”、“越西贡椒——文昌帝张亚子的显化”两种新的越西贡椒产业形象。但由于越西贡椒产业化综合竞争力远不及汉源,两地的贡椒产业发展格局极不均衡,因此,仅靠形象重新定位不能从根本上有效应对风险。基于此,本文提出了越西与汉源贡椒产业的发展要走区域化的协同式发展道路,建立基于“1+1+N”(越西+汉源+N个贡椒产地)的四川省贡椒产业化发展综合协调与管理办公室(简称“省贡椒协调与管理办”),对越西、汉源及其它产地的贡椒产业统一化、垂直化、协同化管理。
Tourism image masking belongs to the frontier of tourism planning studies. Internal scholars have been done relatively systemic and deep researches on tourism image masking about its meaning, extension and mechanism. Yet papers and literature show that no studies are on the image masking of product forestry industry and the pepper industry image masking, further no studies reported on the risk of image masking. So this article combine risk management theory with the theory of tourism image masking, do deep argumentation on the feasibility and aptness of tourism image masking application in product forestry industry image. And then put forward the concept of product forestry industry image masking, also discuss deeply on its meaning, extension and its risk about character and mechanism. At last form a system of product forestry industry image masking risk theory.
The plantation euroky, higher market recognition degree and advanced industry develop of Hanyuan peppers make the Yuexi pepper industry under the masking of Hanyuan pepper industry image. Take this case for example, analysis have been done to the mechanism of its occurrence. Risk system recognition is working under the help of fault-tree analysis method based on the first step. Also construct a system of assessment index about Yuexi pepper industry image making risk, and measure the original value of risk at length. Then evaluate the manage priority of Yuexi pepper industry image masking risk based on TOPSIS(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution). And evaluate which synthetically with MLP neural network. At last build the reply strategy mechanism of Yuexi pepper industry image masking based on the final result. The main conclusions are as follow,
(1) The relativity between Tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking
In this article studies show that the relativity between tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking are close, the use of tourism image masking in studying product forestry industry image masking is accordant with the inner attribute and function of product forestry industry. First, subject, object and intermedium are involved in both. They are common in that the cognition rules of primacy effect and apperception principle both arise from the subject. The formation of tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking is comfortable in itself. Second, tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking both have sightseeing and recreation functions which make them keep in line in attribute and function.
(2)Basic theory study on product forestry image masking risk
①Conclusion about the concept of product forestry image masking risk
The concepts of product forestry image masking and product forestry image masking risk are defined in meaning and extension according tourism image masking with the concept theory in logic, which are traverse in character. The correlations in concepts of image masking, tourist image masking, product forestry industry image masking and product forestry industry image masking are compatibility relation and extension part superposition, which is a witness to the close relationship between tourism image masking and product forestry industry image masking further.
②Conclusions of occurrence mechanism about product forestry industry image masking
Analyzing the occurrence mechanism of forestry industry image masking finds related people (consumer, salesperson, program review expert and anyone refer to forestry industry) would apperceive the difference of same product forestry industry comprehensive development in different administrative regions, which lead to the formation of different images about goodness and badness. Risk root in philosophy category such as the inevitability and contingency, complicacy and epistemology. First, the inevitability risk occurs because that the risk derive from the inherent cognitive deviation of human leading to the deviation of practical results and the targets. Second, the occurrence of accidental risk arises from the severe asymmetry between the limited human cognitive abilities and objective complexity that lead to the generation of risk. Third, occurrence of cognitive risk due to the limitation of human cognitive ability tending to inevitable truth.
Based on the analysis of causality and feedback loops in the system dynamics method, two main causal feedback loops are find on the forest industry image masking risk mechanism. One is history and culture of product forestry industry image-the plantation of product forestry-economy character-quality image-brand image-area of product forestry plantation-market image of product forestry industry-industry image of product forestry-image perception level-product forestry industry image masking risk, the other one is plantation history and culture of product forestry-area of product forestry processors-materials circulation-dinning industry-image of product forestry-image perception level-product forestry industry image masking risk. The two loops opening out the occurrence mechanism of product forestry industry image masking risk are uniform in itself.
③Conclusions about the theory construction of product forestry industry image masking risk
Including philosophy theory system, basic science theory system, technology management system and engineering techniques system, the constructed theory system is complete and systemic. The theory system not only base on the tourism image masking but also introject philosophy, logic, forestry, system dynamics, risk management and related technology science, which greatly expand the depth of research and application areas of the forest industry image masking risk.
(3)Identification of the pepper industry image masking in Yuexi
Cognition making risk, comparability masking risk of germ plasm source, spread masking risk, fault-tree of space masking risk about sub-top risk events are constructed and formed to a total fault-tree of the pepper industry image masking in Yuexi. The logical deductive relationship among events of total fault-tree and sub-top risk events fault-tree is or-gate risk event. There are total28minimum risk cutsets in Yuexi pepper industry image masking risk, all of which are one-step risk cutset (lowclass step). The one-step risk cutset is that only one basic risk event is in the risk cutset and is very important.
(4)Risk management evaluation of the Yuexi pepper industry image masking basic on TOPSIS
Risk events Q.13(biological characteristics similarity risk between Yuexi and Hanyuan), Q.14(comparative range of biological traits convergence risk), Q.15(peppers kinship similar risk of Yuexxi and Hanyuan), Q.22(the reachability index of the extension path network making risk in Yuexi pepper industry) are with Higher risk management priority. While cognition masking risk (Q.1-Q.12) and difference risk of image obtain path (Q.16-Q.19) are in the middle. The lowest are Q.20(α、β、γ index masking risk), Q.21(network nodes masking risk of extention path network) and Q.23(average pathway length masking risk of extention path network).
(5)Evaluation of the Yuexi pepper industry image masking risk based on MLP
Cognition masking risk value of Yuexi pepper industry image is0.47(middle risk), while which in Hanyuan is0.29(low risk). Similarity masking risk value of pepper germ plasm source in Yuexi and Hanyuan are both0.49(higher risk), which reveal that the pepper in Yuexi and Hanyuan share a common genetic. Spread masking risk value of Yuexi pepper industry is0.85(the highest risk). And Hanyuan Gets the value0.75(High risk). Space masking risk value of Yuexi pepper industry is0.55(middle risk), which is higher than that of Hanyuan (0.44). Aggregate risk value of Yuexi pepper industry image masking is0.60(middle risk). The risk class of Yuexi is same to that of Hanyuan, but which value is higher than that of Hanyuan (0.50). as a result pepper industry image of Hanyuan leads to the masking risk to that of Yuexi.
(7)Construction of mechanism replying to the masking risk of Yuexi pepper industry image
Build the pepper industry image masking risk replying mechanisms based on tourist destination and regional pepper industry collaborative development. Put forward two new industry images of Hanyuan pepper industry, one is Daliangshan tribute pepper Yi Township in The Silk Road-Yuexi, and the other one is Yuexi tribute pepper-the reincarnation of Wenchang Emperor Zhang Yazi. But because of the pepper industry comprehensive competitiveness of Yuexi nowhere near Hanyuan and both pepper pattern of industrial development is very uneven. So only new image location is poor to reply the risk radically. Based on this the paper proposes a development road of the Yuexi and Hanyuan pepper industry going regionalization collaborative. Build the Sichuan pepper industry development coordination and management office based on "1+1+N"(Yuexi+Hanyuan+others pepper origin) to manage the pepper industry in Yuexi and Hanyuan uniformly, perpendicularly, synergistically.
引文
Allen E., Seaman C. Likert Scales and Data Analyses[J]. Quality Progress,2007, Pages: 64-65.
Annika S. Kangas, Jyrki Kangas. Probability, possibility and evidence:approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 6, Issue 2, March 2004, Pages 169-188.
Armstrong R. The midpoint on a Five-Point Likert-Type Scale[J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills,1987, Volume 64:Pages 359-362.
B.A. Wintle, D.B. Lindenmayer. Adaptive risk management for certifiably sustainable forestry[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, Volume 256, Issue 6,5 September 2008,
Pages 1311-1319. Barry A Gardiner, Christopher P Quine. Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage-a review with particular reference to the effects of strong winds [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, Volume 135, Issues 1-3,15 September 2000, Pages 261-277. Berge C. Graphs[M]. North Holland,1971.
Bondy J.A, Murty U.S.R. Graph Theory with Applications[M]. Macmillan Press LTD, 1976.
Brown, V; Paulus, P. B. A simple dynamic model of social factors in group brainstorming[J]. Small Group Research,1996,27, Pages 91-114.
Brumelle, S., Stanbury, W.T., Thompson, W.A., Vertinsky, I.,Wehrung, D.. Framework for the analysis of risks in forest management and silvi cultural investments [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,1990,35, Pages 279-299, Dlna Neiger, Kristian Rotaru, Leonid Churilov. Supply chain risk identification with
value-focused process engineering [J]. Journal of Operations Management, Volume 27, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages 154-168.
Eliana Angelini, Giacomo di Tollo, Andrea Roli. A neural network approach for credit risk evaluation [J].The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Volume 48, Issue 4, November 2008, Pages 733-755.
Erik R Larsen, Ann van Ackere, Kim Warren. The growth of service and the service of growth:Using system dynamics to understand service quality and capital allocation [J].
Decision Support Systems, Volume 19, Issue 4, April 1997, Pages 271-287. Even S. Graph Algorithms[M]. Maryland Computer Science Press,1979. Fiona D Patterson, Kevin Neailey.A Risk Register Database System to aid the
management of project risk International[J]. Journal of Project Management, Volume
20, Issue 5, July 2002, Pages 365-374. Fussell, J. B. and Vesely, W.E. A new methodology for obtaining cut sets[J]. American
Nuclear Society Transactions, Vol.15, No.1,1972, pp.262-263. Forrester, Jay W. Industrial dynamics[M]. Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press,1961. Forrester, Jay W. Principles of Systems[M]. The MIT Press,1968. Forrester, Jay W. World Dynamics(2nd ed.)[M]. Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press,1973. Gardiner B, Quine C. Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage-a review
with particular reference to the effects of strong winds. [J]..For Ecol Manag,2000,135:
Pages 261-277. Gibbons A. Algorithmic Graph Theory[M].. Cambridge Univesity Press,1985. Gondran M., Minoux M. Graphs and Algorithms[M]. A Wiley-Interscience Publication,
1984. Hazel Taylor. Congruence between risk management theory and practice in Hong Kong
vendor-driven IT projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 23,
Issue 6, August 2005, Pages 437-444. Henri Louberge, Stephane Villeneuve, Marc Chesney.Long-term risk management of
nuclear waste:a real options approach[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,
Volume 27, Issue 1, November 2002, Pages 157-180. Hunt John. D. Image As a Factor in Tourism Development [J]. Journal of Travel Research,
1975,13(1):1-7. Huw Lloyd-Ellis, Xiaodong Zhu. Fiscal shocks and fiscal risk management [J]. Journal of
Monetary Economics, Volume 48, Issue 2, October 2001, Pages 309-338. Hwang, C.L.,Yoon, K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making:Methods and Applications.
New York:Springer-Verlag,1981. Hwang, C.L.; Lai, Y.J.; Liu, T.Y. A new approach for multiple objective decision making[J].
Computers and Operational Research,1993, Volome 20, Issue 8:Pages 889-899. Jaafari. Management of risks,uncertainties and opportunities:time for afundamental
shift[J],International Journal of project management,2001, Jamieson S. Likert Scales:How to (Ab)use Them[J]. Medical Education,2004,Volume 38,
Issue 12, Pages 1217-1218.
John Madar. Clinical risk management in newborn and neonatal resuscitation[J].Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Volume 10, Issue 1, February 2005, Pages 45-61.
Joseph P. Hughes, Loretta J. Mester, Choon-Geol Moon. Journal of Banking & Finance, Volume 25, Issue 12, December 2001, Pages 2169-2208.
Kyung Min Kang, Moosung Jae. A quantitative assessment of LCOs for operations using system dynamics[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Volume 87, Issue 2, February 2005, Pages 211-222.
L. Boeing Singh, Satyanarayana N. Kalidindi.Traffic revenue risk management through Annuity Model of PPP road projects in India[J].International Journal of Project Management, Volume 24, Issue 7, October 2006, Pages 605-613.
Lean Yu, Shouyang Wang, Kin Keung Lai. Credit risk assessment with a multistage neural network ensemble learning approach [J].Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 34, Issue 2, February 2008, Pages 1434-1444.
Leroy C. Edozien. Risk management in gynaecology Obstetrics [J]. Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, Volume 20, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 7-13.
Likert R. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes [J]. Archives of Psychology,1932, 140:Pages 1-55.
Luiz Pinguelli Rosa. Specific case of large energy system impact in Brazil-Risk assessment and management of nuclear energy [J]. Environment International, Volume 10, Issues 5-6,1984, Pages 437-440.
M. Amiri, M. Zandieh, B. Vahdani, R. Soltani, V. Roshanaei. An integrated eigenvector-DEA-TOPSIS methodology for portfolio risk evaluation in the FOREX spot market[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 37, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 509-516.
Michael Adler, Erio Ziglio.Gazing Into the Oracle:The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health[M]. London:Kingsley Publishers,1996.
Nam-Hong Yim, Soung-Hie Kim, Hee-Woong Kim, Kee-Young Kwahk. Knowledge based decision making on higher level strategic concerns:system dynamics approach [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 27, Issue 1, July 2004, Pages 143-158.
Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics" [J]. Advances in Health Science Education,2010,Volumel5, Issue 5, Pages 625-632.
Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination:Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. New York, New York:Charles Scribner's Sons[M].1953.
P ike S. Destination Image Analysis-----a Review of 142 Papers from 1973 to 2000 [J]. Tourism Management,2002,23(2):541-549.
Paulus, P. B.; Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G.,Camacho, L. M. Perception of performance in group brainstorming:The illusion of group productivity[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1993,64 (4):Pages 575-586.
Peter C. Smith, Ann van Ackere. A note on the integration of system dynamics and economic models[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2002, Pages 1-10.
Pukkala T, Kangas J. A method for integrating risk and attitude toward risk into forest planning[J].1996. For Sci 42:Pages 198-205.
Randers, Jorgen. Elements of the System Dynamics Method[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,1980.
Robert J. Chapman. The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management [J]. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 19, Issue 3, April 2001, Pages 147-160.
Roberts, Edward B.. Managerial Applications of System Dynamics[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,1978.
Rowe G., Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool:issues and analysis [J]. International Journal of Forecasting, October 1999,Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 353-375.
Ruey-Chyn Tsaur. Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, Volume 218, Issue 8,15 December 2011, Pages 4295-4304.
S. Mohammad H. Mojtahedi, S. Meysam Mousavi, Ahmad Makui. Project risk identification and assessment simultaneously using multi-attribute group decision making technique[J]. Safety Science, Volume 48, Issue 4, April 2010, Pages 499-507.
SC Ward, CB Chapman. Extending the use of risk analysis in project management [J]. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 9, Issue 2, May 1991, Pages 117-123.
Shenping Hu, Jinpeng Zhang. Risk Assessment of Marine Traffic Safety at Coastal Water Area [J]. Procedia Engineering, Volume 45,2012, Pages 31-37.
Sterman, John D. Business Dynamics:Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world[M]. McGraw Hill,2000.
T Madhusudan, S Chaudhury, PK Chakraborty. Risk factors for suicide in wives of military personnel [J].Medical Journal Armed Forces India, Volume 64, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages 127-128.
Teeter, L.D., Dyer, A.A.,. A multiattribute utility model for incorporating risk in fire management planning[J].Forest Science 32,1986, Pages 1032-1048.
Tsz Leung Yip. Port traffic risks-A study of accidents in Hong Kong waters [J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, Volume 44, Issue 5, September 2008, Pages 921-931.
Tung Bui, Claudia Loebbecke. Supporting cognitive feedback using system dynamics:A demand model of the global system of mobile telecommunication[J]. Decision Support Systems, Volume 17, Issue 2,21 May 1996, Pages 83-98.
William C. Hunter, Stephen D. Smith Risk management in the global economy:A review essay [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, Volume 26, Issues 2-3, March 2002, Pages 205-221.
Williams H. Risk Management and Insurance[M],1964
Xiao-Hua Jin, Guomin Zhang. Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks[J]. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 29, issue 5, July 2011, Pages 591-603.
Xuhong He, Jiejuan Tong, Jiefei Chen. Maintenance risk management in Daya Bay nuclear power plant:PSA model, tools and applications[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 103-112.
Ying-Ming Wang, Taha M.S. Elhag. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 31, Issue 2, August 2006, Pages 309-319.
Yoon, K.P.; Hwang, C. Multiple Attribute Decision Making:An Introduction. California: SAGE publications,1995.
白丽敏.旅游目的地形象测量的理论与方法研究——以桂林阳朔为例[D].南宁：广西大学,2007.
卞显红.城市旅游空间分析及其发展透视[M],北京：中国物资出版社,2005.
曹欢德.边缘旅游地的开发研究——以漳州市芗城区为例[J].金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版),2005,19(4)：27-53.
陈传康.陈传康旅游文集[M].青岛：青岛出版社,2003.
陈琳琳.速生丰产林项目融资风险分析[J].四川林勘设计,2005(04)：10-18.
陈文汇,刘俊昌.林业高科技项目风险投资的经济分析与决策[J].北京林业管理干部学院学报,2005(02)：57-60.
陈晓梅.国内几种主要旅游地形象理论的比较研究[J].桂林航天工业高等专科学校学报,2008,(1)：45-48.
都军伟,王永纲,李凯.MLP神经网络定点计算及误差分析[J].中国科学技术大学学报,2009,39(6)：612-618.
戴继洲,徐升艳.旅游地旅游形象USP与产品策划研究--以内蒙古克什克腾旗为例[J].资源与产业,2007,9(2)：90-93.
邓惠群.林业的市场风险及避减对策[J].贵州林业科技,1994(04).
丁华,杨望暾.屏蔽非主流型旅游资源的理论与实例研究[J].特区经济,2007(1)：172-174.
冯国文.概率分析在林业项目经济评价中的应用[J].林业调查规划,1998,23(04)：52-54.
范道津,陈伟珂.风险管理理论与工具[M].天津：天津大学出版社,2010.
郭树华,安淑萍.河北省林业工程项目风险管理问题初探[J].林业经济,2002(12)：37-39.
郭捷.工程项目风险分析与BT模式风险管理实证研究[D].天津：天津大学博士论文,2004.
何晓琦.浅议林业工程资金的审计风险[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2003,3(5)：64-66.
何苗等.MLP神经网络在子宫颈细胞图像识别中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(4)：293-296.
韩玲.基于人工神经网络——多层感知器(MLP)的遥感影像分类模型[J].测绘学报,2004,(9)：29-30.
胡青云,张铁成.旅游阴影区发展的博弈分析[J].甘肃联合大学学报(自然科学版),2009,23(1)：89-93.
黄晓辉,汪芳,陈丹丹.线型旅游空间的形象认知要素与形象设计探讨——以无锡古运河为例[J].华中建筑,2007,25(8)：113-121.
黄训江,侯光明.投资项目风险管理优先度评价研究[J].工业技术经济,2005(2)：107-109.
黄振宁.世界银行贷款林业项目审计风险控制探析[J].广西林业,2009,(01)：9-11.
简盖元.商品林业投资风险AHP分析[J].科技和产业,2007,7(04)：55-58.
匡文治.世界银行贷款林业项目的风险与对策[J].林业财务与会计,2002(01)：15.
李启权.基于RBF神经网络的土壤属性信息空间插值方法研究[D].雅安：四川农业大 学,2006.
李建华.基于BP神经网络法的高速公路公司财务风险预警研究[J].中国产业,2011,(6)：34-35.
李风芝,高建瓴.可靠性理论在水轮发电机组故障诊断中应用的研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2006,16(21)：186-187.
李忱,吴丽花.基于BP神经网络的供应链突发风险评价模型[J].北京信息科技大学学报,2012,26(1)：1-5.
李国平,叶文.游客感知“灰度区”旅游形象策划探讨[J].人文地理,2002(4)：49-53.
李际平等.林业系统工程基础[M].长沙：国防科技大学出版社,2006.
李娟.旅游屏蔽区错位发展研究——以陕西省三原县为例[D].西安：陕西师范大学,2008.
李蕾蕾.旅游地形象策划：理论与实务[M],广州：广东旅游出版社,1999.
李少明.项目风险管理优先度评价[D].南京：东南大学,2006.
李少明.项目风险管理优先度评价研究[D].南京：东南大学,2006.
李巍,张树夫.以认知心理测评解析南京旅游地形象[J].南京师范大学学报,2008,31(1)：118-124.
李卫华.关于偶然性的形式多样性及其作用的认识[J].教学与研究,2001(2)：70-72.
李雪松,田里.旅游形象屏蔽机理解析[J].旅游科学,2009,23(4)：26-30.
李雪松,田里.旅游形象屏蔽理论研究[M].北京：中国旅游出版社,2012.
李照霞.天然林保护工程建设项目的风险评价与管理[J].防护林科技,2003(3)：47-48.
林影.复杂性问题与偶然性问题初探[J].华南理工大学学报(社会科学版),2002,4(1)：22-25.
刘红霞等.森林有害生物风险分析研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,2001,23(6)：46-51.
刘秋香,万建平,刘昆仑.基于实物期权的林业项目投资研究[J].林业经济问题,2006,26(6)：532-534.
刘睿文.旅游形象不对称作用理论研究fJ].地理与地理信息科学,2006,22(4)：75-79.
刘雄,杨斌.黑竹沟旅游开发新思路---基于旅游地“形象遮蔽”和“形象叠加”的研究[J].四川林堪设计,2009,(2)：52-55.
刘轩.攀枝花麻疯树生物柴油产业的风险管理[D].雅安：四川农业大学,2009：44-45.
连丽霞.形式逻辑教程[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2004.
卢有杰,卢家仪.项目风险管理[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998
陆学均等.四川汉源花椒主要病虫害调查初报[J].四川林堪设计,2010,(2)：74-76.
吕永波,胡天军,雷黎.系统工程[M].北京：北方交通大学出版社,2003.
罗治英.DIS：地区形象论[M].北京：中央编译出版社,1997.
罗巍.数控机床故障分析与可靠性评价技术的研究[D].长春：吉林大学,2011.
苗学玲.“旅游地形象策划”的10年：中国期刊全文数据库1994—2003年旅游地形象研究述评[J].旅游科学,2005,19(4)：64-70.
冒天诚.故障树与船舶自动控制系统的故障诊断[M].大连：大连海事大学出版社,2000.
牛瑞萍.林区建设工程项目经济与风险综合评价研究[D].哈尔滨：东北林业大学,2007.
齐宏伟,李富.我国林业产业的比较优势及引资风险分析[J].开发研究,2007(5)：79-81.
钱学森等.论系统工程[M].长沙：湖南科学技术出版社,1982.
邱菀华.现代项目风险管理方法与实践[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
任勇宽,杨长平,干友民.我国草坪学研究文献的统计分析[J].草业科学,2010,27(1)：60-64.
沈建明.项目风险管理[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2003.
粟路军,许春晓.旅游地形象设计的双筛法研究[J].湖南财经高等专科学校学报,2010,26(124)：61-65.
隋丽娜.旅游形象感知模型及其应用研究——以长三角居民对韩国旅游形象感知为例[D].杭州：浙江工商大学,2007.
宋保维.系统可靠性设计与分析[M].西安：西北工业大学出版社,2008.
沈继忱等.故障树分析法在炉膛安全监控系统可靠性分析中的应用[J].黑龙江电力,2009,32(1)：16-20.
孙建英,石晓军,袁秀清.MLP神经网络的分类功能与其它方法的比较及其在经济管理中的应用[J].技术经济与管理,1999(3)：20-22.
汤勇,王玉玺.林业项目投资风险分析方法研究：一种基于影响图的风险解析方法[J].绿色中国,2007(07)：54-57.
陶长江.基于旅游形象屏蔽机理的温泉旅游目的地形象定位——以象州温泉为例[J].浙江旅游职业学院学报,2011,7(1)：11-16.
王琪.我国木本油料资源开发项目与风险投资研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2008.
王尚明,唐志蕴,陈世清.工业原料林项目建设风险分析及防范[J].桉树科技,2008,25(01)：47-51.
王树禾.图论[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.
王金玉,商福强,赵庄.基于故障树方法的柴油机产品可靠性分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2008(1)：16-18.
王衍用.孟子故里旅游开发研究[J].地理学与国土研究,1993,9(2)：50-52.
吴必虎,宋治清.一种区域旅游形象分析的技术程序[J].经济地理,2001,21(4)：496-499.
吴家国.普通逻辑[M].上海：上海人民出版社,1993.
吴晋峰、包浩生.旅游系统的空间结构模式研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(1)：96101.
吴彤.科学哲学视野中的客观复杂性[J].系统辩证学学报,2001,9(4)：44-47.
吴卫红,张爱美.林业项目投资风险管理对策分析[J].林业经济,2006(09)：66-68.
武曙红,张小全.CDM林业碳汇项目的非持久性风险分析[J].林业科学,2007,43(08)：123-126.
夏南凯,宋海瑜.城市开发风险的系统分析和应对策略[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2008,19(4)：39-46.
夏自谦,颜颖.论林业生态工程建设项目风险监测[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(S2).
熊冬梅,桑利娥.马克思主义哲学原理[M].西安：西北大学出版社,2007：85-90.
徐国祯.系统工程在林业上的应用[J].世界林业研究,1993(4)：21-26.
徐雪漫.林业项目投资风险分析及防范研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2004.
许春晓.旅游地屏蔽现象研究[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2001,(1)：71-80.
许春晓.旅游资源非优区适度开发与实例研究[J].经济地理,1993,13(2).
薛玉梅.旅游形象感知模式的心理机制及相关营销策略[J].贵州社会科学,2005,(2)：27-28,32.
严江平,苗红,肖星,张林.“阴影区旅游地”开发的理论与实践[J].未来与发展,2002(2)：31-34.
颜颖.中国林业生态工程项目风险管理研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2008.
颜颖.中国林业生态工程项目风险管理研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2008：24-25.
杨吾扬,梁进社.高等经济地理学[M].北京：北京大学出版社,1997.
杨振之,陈谨.“形象遮蔽”与“形象叠加”的理论与实证研究[J].旅游学刊,2003,18(3)：62-67.
杨振之.旅游资源开发与规划[M].成都：四川大学出版社,2002.
殷平.关于旅游资源非显优区的基础研究[J].北方交通大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(2)：70-73.
俞飞,徐阳阳.旅游景区形象屏蔽的形成及演进研究[J].2011,20(5)：48-51.
俞飞.旅游地形象屏蔽理论国内研究综述[J].商场现代化,2009,(18)：131-132.
岳金柱,冯仲科.森林火灾扑救风险管理问题的探讨与研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(2)：120-125.
张安.论旅游地形象发生发展中的几个“效应”问题及其实践意义[J].旅游学刊2001,16(03)：60-63.
张兰,张彩虹.商品林项目融资风险及对策[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(03)：69-72.
张凌云.旅游地空间竞争的交叉弹性分析[J].地理学与国土研究,1989,5(1)：40-43.
张启龙.考虑环境成本的林木质发电项目风险与经济性评价[D].北京：北京林业大学,2009.
章锦河.旅游区域空间竞争理论、方法与实证研究[D].安徽芜湖：安徽师范大学,2002.
章守芹.区域本色形象和旅游诱导形象的遮蔽研究[D].大连：东北财经大学,2011.
周海京,遇今.故障模式、影响及危害性分析与故障树分析[M].北京：航空工业出版社,2003.
Annika S. Kangas, Jyrki Kangas. Probability, possibility and evidence:approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 6, Issue 2, March 2004, Pages 169-188.
Armstrong R. The midpoint on a Five-Point Likert-Type Scale[J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills,1987, Volume 64:Pages 359-362.
B.A. Wintle, D.B. Lindenmayer. Adaptive risk management for certifiably sustainable forestry[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, Volume 256, Issue 6,5 September 2008,
Pages 1311-1319. Barry A Gardiner, Christopher P Quine. Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage-a review with particular reference to the effects of strong winds [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, Volume 135, Issues 1-3,15 September 2000, Pages 261-277. Berge C. Graphs[M]. North Holland,1971.
Bondy J.A, Murty U.S.R. Graph Theory with Applications[M]. Macmillan Press LTD, 1976.
Brown, V; Paulus, P. B. A simple dynamic model of social factors in group brainstorming[J]. Small Group Research,1996,27, Pages 91-114.
Brumelle, S., Stanbury, W.T., Thompson, W.A., Vertinsky, I.,Wehrung, D.. Framework for the analysis of risks in forest management and silvi cultural investments [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,1990,35, Pages 279-299, Dlna Neiger, Kristian Rotaru, Leonid Churilov. Supply chain risk identification with
value-focused process engineering [J]. Journal of Operations Management, Volume 27, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages 154-168.
Eliana Angelini, Giacomo di Tollo, Andrea Roli. A neural network approach for credit risk evaluation [J].The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Volume 48, Issue 4, November 2008, Pages 733-755.
Erik R Larsen, Ann van Ackere, Kim Warren. The growth of service and the service of growth:Using system dynamics to understand service quality and capital allocation [J].
Decision Support Systems, Volume 19, Issue 4, April 1997, Pages 271-287. Even S. Graph Algorithms[M]. Maryland Computer Science Press,1979. Fiona D Patterson, Kevin Neailey.A Risk Register Database System to aid the
management of project risk International[J]. Journal of Project Management, Volume
20, Issue 5, July 2002, Pages 365-374. Fussell, J. B. and Vesely, W.E. A new methodology for obtaining cut sets[J]. American
Nuclear Society Transactions, Vol.15, No.1,1972, pp.262-263. Forrester, Jay W. Industrial dynamics[M]. Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press,1961. Forrester, Jay W. Principles of Systems[M]. The MIT Press,1968. Forrester, Jay W. World Dynamics(2nd ed.)[M]. Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press,1973. Gardiner B, Quine C. Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage-a review
with particular reference to the effects of strong winds. [J]..For Ecol Manag,2000,135:
Pages 261-277. Gibbons A. Algorithmic Graph Theory[M].. Cambridge Univesity Press,1985. Gondran M., Minoux M. Graphs and Algorithms[M]. A Wiley-Interscience Publication,
1984. Hazel Taylor. Congruence between risk management theory and practice in Hong Kong
vendor-driven IT projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 23,
Issue 6, August 2005, Pages 437-444. Henri Louberge, Stephane Villeneuve, Marc Chesney.Long-term risk management of
nuclear waste:a real options approach[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,
Volume 27, Issue 1, November 2002, Pages 157-180. Hunt John. D. Image As a Factor in Tourism Development [J]. Journal of Travel Research,
1975,13(1):1-7. Huw Lloyd-Ellis, Xiaodong Zhu. Fiscal shocks and fiscal risk management [J]. Journal of
Monetary Economics, Volume 48, Issue 2, October 2001, Pages 309-338. Hwang, C.L.,Yoon, K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making:Methods and Applications.
New York:Springer-Verlag,1981. Hwang, C.L.; Lai, Y.J.; Liu, T.Y. A new approach for multiple objective decision making[J].
Computers and Operational Research,1993, Volome 20, Issue 8:Pages 889-899. Jaafari. Management of risks,uncertainties and opportunities:time for afundamental
shift[J],International Journal of project management,2001, Jamieson S. Likert Scales:How to (Ab)use Them[J]. Medical Education,2004,Volume 38,
Issue 12, Pages 1217-1218.
John Madar. Clinical risk management in newborn and neonatal resuscitation[J].Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Volume 10, Issue 1, February 2005, Pages 45-61.
Joseph P. Hughes, Loretta J. Mester, Choon-Geol Moon. Journal of Banking & Finance, Volume 25, Issue 12, December 2001, Pages 2169-2208.
Kyung Min Kang, Moosung Jae. A quantitative assessment of LCOs for operations using system dynamics[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Volume 87, Issue 2, February 2005, Pages 211-222.
L. Boeing Singh, Satyanarayana N. Kalidindi.Traffic revenue risk management through Annuity Model of PPP road projects in India[J].International Journal of Project Management, Volume 24, Issue 7, October 2006, Pages 605-613.
Lean Yu, Shouyang Wang, Kin Keung Lai. Credit risk assessment with a multistage neural network ensemble learning approach [J].Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 34, Issue 2, February 2008, Pages 1434-1444.
Leroy C. Edozien. Risk management in gynaecology Obstetrics [J]. Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, Volume 20, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 7-13.
Likert R. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes [J]. Archives of Psychology,1932, 140:Pages 1-55.
Luiz Pinguelli Rosa. Specific case of large energy system impact in Brazil-Risk assessment and management of nuclear energy [J]. Environment International, Volume 10, Issues 5-6,1984, Pages 437-440.
M. Amiri, M. Zandieh, B. Vahdani, R. Soltani, V. Roshanaei. An integrated eigenvector-DEA-TOPSIS methodology for portfolio risk evaluation in the FOREX spot market[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 37, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 509-516.
Michael Adler, Erio Ziglio.Gazing Into the Oracle:The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health[M]. London:Kingsley Publishers,1996.
Nam-Hong Yim, Soung-Hie Kim, Hee-Woong Kim, Kee-Young Kwahk. Knowledge based decision making on higher level strategic concerns:system dynamics approach [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 27, Issue 1, July 2004, Pages 143-158.
Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics" [J]. Advances in Health Science Education,2010,Volumel5, Issue 5, Pages 625-632.
Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination:Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. New York, New York:Charles Scribner's Sons[M].1953.
P ike S. Destination Image Analysis-----a Review of 142 Papers from 1973 to 2000 [J]. Tourism Management,2002,23(2):541-549.
Paulus, P. B.; Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G.,Camacho, L. M. Perception of performance in group brainstorming:The illusion of group productivity[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1993,64 (4):Pages 575-586.
Peter C. Smith, Ann van Ackere. A note on the integration of system dynamics and economic models[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2002, Pages 1-10.
Pukkala T, Kangas J. A method for integrating risk and attitude toward risk into forest planning[J].1996. For Sci 42:Pages 198-205.
Randers, Jorgen. Elements of the System Dynamics Method[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,1980.
Robert J. Chapman. The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management [J]. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 19, Issue 3, April 2001, Pages 147-160.
Roberts, Edward B.. Managerial Applications of System Dynamics[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,1978.
Rowe G., Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool:issues and analysis [J]. International Journal of Forecasting, October 1999,Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 353-375.
Ruey-Chyn Tsaur. Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, Volume 218, Issue 8,15 December 2011, Pages 4295-4304.
S. Mohammad H. Mojtahedi, S. Meysam Mousavi, Ahmad Makui. Project risk identification and assessment simultaneously using multi-attribute group decision making technique[J]. Safety Science, Volume 48, Issue 4, April 2010, Pages 499-507.
SC Ward, CB Chapman. Extending the use of risk analysis in project management [J]. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 9, Issue 2, May 1991, Pages 117-123.
Shenping Hu, Jinpeng Zhang. Risk Assessment of Marine Traffic Safety at Coastal Water Area [J]. Procedia Engineering, Volume 45,2012, Pages 31-37.
Sterman, John D. Business Dynamics:Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world[M]. McGraw Hill,2000.
T Madhusudan, S Chaudhury, PK Chakraborty. Risk factors for suicide in wives of military personnel [J].Medical Journal Armed Forces India, Volume 64, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages 127-128.
Teeter, L.D., Dyer, A.A.,. A multiattribute utility model for incorporating risk in fire management planning[J].Forest Science 32,1986, Pages 1032-1048.
Tsz Leung Yip. Port traffic risks-A study of accidents in Hong Kong waters [J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, Volume 44, Issue 5, September 2008, Pages 921-931.
Tung Bui, Claudia Loebbecke. Supporting cognitive feedback using system dynamics:A demand model of the global system of mobile telecommunication[J]. Decision Support Systems, Volume 17, Issue 2,21 May 1996, Pages 83-98.
William C. Hunter, Stephen D. Smith Risk management in the global economy:A review essay [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, Volume 26, Issues 2-3, March 2002, Pages 205-221.
Williams H. Risk Management and Insurance[M],1964
Xiao-Hua Jin, Guomin Zhang. Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks[J]. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 29, issue 5, July 2011, Pages 591-603.
Xuhong He, Jiejuan Tong, Jiefei Chen. Maintenance risk management in Daya Bay nuclear power plant:PSA model, tools and applications[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 103-112.
Ying-Ming Wang, Taha M.S. Elhag. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 31, Issue 2, August 2006, Pages 309-319.
Yoon, K.P.; Hwang, C. Multiple Attribute Decision Making:An Introduction. California: SAGE publications,1995.
白丽敏.旅游目的地形象测量的理论与方法研究——以桂林阳朔为例[D].南宁：广西大学,2007.
卞显红.城市旅游空间分析及其发展透视[M],北京：中国物资出版社,2005.
曹欢德.边缘旅游地的开发研究——以漳州市芗城区为例[J].金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版),2005,19(4)：27-53.
陈传康.陈传康旅游文集[M].青岛：青岛出版社,2003.
陈琳琳.速生丰产林项目融资风险分析[J].四川林勘设计,2005(04)：10-18.
陈文汇,刘俊昌.林业高科技项目风险投资的经济分析与决策[J].北京林业管理干部学院学报,2005(02)：57-60.
陈晓梅.国内几种主要旅游地形象理论的比较研究[J].桂林航天工业高等专科学校学报,2008,(1)：45-48.
都军伟,王永纲,李凯.MLP神经网络定点计算及误差分析[J].中国科学技术大学学报,2009,39(6)：612-618.
戴继洲,徐升艳.旅游地旅游形象USP与产品策划研究--以内蒙古克什克腾旗为例[J].资源与产业,2007,9(2)：90-93.
邓惠群.林业的市场风险及避减对策[J].贵州林业科技,1994(04).
丁华,杨望暾.屏蔽非主流型旅游资源的理论与实例研究[J].特区经济,2007(1)：172-174.
冯国文.概率分析在林业项目经济评价中的应用[J].林业调查规划,1998,23(04)：52-54.
范道津,陈伟珂.风险管理理论与工具[M].天津：天津大学出版社,2010.
郭树华,安淑萍.河北省林业工程项目风险管理问题初探[J].林业经济,2002(12)：37-39.
郭捷.工程项目风险分析与BT模式风险管理实证研究[D].天津：天津大学博士论文,2004.
何晓琦.浅议林业工程资金的审计风险[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2003,3(5)：64-66.
何苗等.MLP神经网络在子宫颈细胞图像识别中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(4)：293-296.
韩玲.基于人工神经网络——多层感知器(MLP)的遥感影像分类模型[J].测绘学报,2004,(9)：29-30.
胡青云,张铁成.旅游阴影区发展的博弈分析[J].甘肃联合大学学报(自然科学版),2009,23(1)：89-93.
黄晓辉,汪芳,陈丹丹.线型旅游空间的形象认知要素与形象设计探讨——以无锡古运河为例[J].华中建筑,2007,25(8)：113-121.
黄训江,侯光明.投资项目风险管理优先度评价研究[J].工业技术经济,2005(2)：107-109.
黄振宁.世界银行贷款林业项目审计风险控制探析[J].广西林业,2009,(01)：9-11.
简盖元.商品林业投资风险AHP分析[J].科技和产业,2007,7(04)：55-58.
匡文治.世界银行贷款林业项目的风险与对策[J].林业财务与会计,2002(01)：15.
李启权.基于RBF神经网络的土壤属性信息空间插值方法研究[D].雅安：四川农业大 学,2006.
李建华.基于BP神经网络法的高速公路公司财务风险预警研究[J].中国产业,2011,(6)：34-35.
李风芝,高建瓴.可靠性理论在水轮发电机组故障诊断中应用的研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2006,16(21)：186-187.
李忱,吴丽花.基于BP神经网络的供应链突发风险评价模型[J].北京信息科技大学学报,2012,26(1)：1-5.
李国平,叶文.游客感知“灰度区”旅游形象策划探讨[J].人文地理,2002(4)：49-53.
李际平等.林业系统工程基础[M].长沙：国防科技大学出版社,2006.
李娟.旅游屏蔽区错位发展研究——以陕西省三原县为例[D].西安：陕西师范大学,2008.
李蕾蕾.旅游地形象策划：理论与实务[M],广州：广东旅游出版社,1999.
李少明.项目风险管理优先度评价[D].南京：东南大学,2006.
李少明.项目风险管理优先度评价研究[D].南京：东南大学,2006.
李巍,张树夫.以认知心理测评解析南京旅游地形象[J].南京师范大学学报,2008,31(1)：118-124.
李卫华.关于偶然性的形式多样性及其作用的认识[J].教学与研究,2001(2)：70-72.
李雪松,田里.旅游形象屏蔽机理解析[J].旅游科学,2009,23(4)：26-30.
李雪松,田里.旅游形象屏蔽理论研究[M].北京：中国旅游出版社,2012.
李照霞.天然林保护工程建设项目的风险评价与管理[J].防护林科技,2003(3)：47-48.
林影.复杂性问题与偶然性问题初探[J].华南理工大学学报(社会科学版),2002,4(1)：22-25.
刘红霞等.森林有害生物风险分析研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,2001,23(6)：46-51.
刘秋香,万建平,刘昆仑.基于实物期权的林业项目投资研究[J].林业经济问题,2006,26(6)：532-534.
刘睿文.旅游形象不对称作用理论研究fJ].地理与地理信息科学,2006,22(4)：75-79.
刘雄,杨斌.黑竹沟旅游开发新思路---基于旅游地“形象遮蔽”和“形象叠加”的研究[J].四川林堪设计,2009,(2)：52-55.
刘轩.攀枝花麻疯树生物柴油产业的风险管理[D].雅安：四川农业大学,2009：44-45.
连丽霞.形式逻辑教程[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2004.
卢有杰,卢家仪.项目风险管理[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998
陆学均等.四川汉源花椒主要病虫害调查初报[J].四川林堪设计,2010,(2)：74-76.
吕永波,胡天军,雷黎.系统工程[M].北京：北方交通大学出版社,2003.
罗治英.DIS：地区形象论[M].北京：中央编译出版社,1997.
罗巍.数控机床故障分析与可靠性评价技术的研究[D].长春：吉林大学,2011.
苗学玲.“旅游地形象策划”的10年：中国期刊全文数据库1994—2003年旅游地形象研究述评[J].旅游科学,2005,19(4)：64-70.
冒天诚.故障树与船舶自动控制系统的故障诊断[M].大连：大连海事大学出版社,2000.
牛瑞萍.林区建设工程项目经济与风险综合评价研究[D].哈尔滨：东北林业大学,2007.
齐宏伟,李富.我国林业产业的比较优势及引资风险分析[J].开发研究,2007(5)：79-81.
钱学森等.论系统工程[M].长沙：湖南科学技术出版社,1982.
邱菀华.现代项目风险管理方法与实践[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
任勇宽,杨长平,干友民.我国草坪学研究文献的统计分析[J].草业科学,2010,27(1)：60-64.
沈建明.项目风险管理[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2003.
粟路军,许春晓.旅游地形象设计的双筛法研究[J].湖南财经高等专科学校学报,2010,26(124)：61-65.
隋丽娜.旅游形象感知模型及其应用研究——以长三角居民对韩国旅游形象感知为例[D].杭州：浙江工商大学,2007.
宋保维.系统可靠性设计与分析[M].西安：西北工业大学出版社,2008.
沈继忱等.故障树分析法在炉膛安全监控系统可靠性分析中的应用[J].黑龙江电力,2009,32(1)：16-20.
孙建英,石晓军,袁秀清.MLP神经网络的分类功能与其它方法的比较及其在经济管理中的应用[J].技术经济与管理,1999(3)：20-22.
汤勇,王玉玺.林业项目投资风险分析方法研究：一种基于影响图的风险解析方法[J].绿色中国,2007(07)：54-57.
陶长江.基于旅游形象屏蔽机理的温泉旅游目的地形象定位——以象州温泉为例[J].浙江旅游职业学院学报,2011,7(1)：11-16.
王琪.我国木本油料资源开发项目与风险投资研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2008.
王尚明,唐志蕴,陈世清.工业原料林项目建设风险分析及防范[J].桉树科技,2008,25(01)：47-51.
王树禾.图论[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.
王金玉,商福强,赵庄.基于故障树方法的柴油机产品可靠性分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2008(1)：16-18.
王衍用.孟子故里旅游开发研究[J].地理学与国土研究,1993,9(2)：50-52.
吴必虎,宋治清.一种区域旅游形象分析的技术程序[J].经济地理,2001,21(4)：496-499.
吴家国.普通逻辑[M].上海：上海人民出版社,1993.
吴晋峰、包浩生.旅游系统的空间结构模式研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(1)：96101.
吴彤.科学哲学视野中的客观复杂性[J].系统辩证学学报,2001,9(4)：44-47.
吴卫红,张爱美.林业项目投资风险管理对策分析[J].林业经济,2006(09)：66-68.
武曙红,张小全.CDM林业碳汇项目的非持久性风险分析[J].林业科学,2007,43(08)：123-126.
夏南凯,宋海瑜.城市开发风险的系统分析和应对策略[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2008,19(4)：39-46.
夏自谦,颜颖.论林业生态工程建设项目风险监测[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(S2).
熊冬梅,桑利娥.马克思主义哲学原理[M].西安：西北大学出版社,2007：85-90.
徐国祯.系统工程在林业上的应用[J].世界林业研究,1993(4)：21-26.
徐雪漫.林业项目投资风险分析及防范研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2004.
许春晓.旅游地屏蔽现象研究[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2001,(1)：71-80.
许春晓.旅游资源非优区适度开发与实例研究[J].经济地理,1993,13(2).
薛玉梅.旅游形象感知模式的心理机制及相关营销策略[J].贵州社会科学,2005,(2)：27-28,32.
严江平,苗红,肖星,张林.“阴影区旅游地”开发的理论与实践[J].未来与发展,2002(2)：31-34.
颜颖.中国林业生态工程项目风险管理研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2008.
颜颖.中国林业生态工程项目风险管理研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2008：24-25.
杨吾扬,梁进社.高等经济地理学[M].北京：北京大学出版社,1997.
杨振之,陈谨.“形象遮蔽”与“形象叠加”的理论与实证研究[J].旅游学刊,2003,18(3)：62-67.
杨振之.旅游资源开发与规划[M].成都：四川大学出版社,2002.
殷平.关于旅游资源非显优区的基础研究[J].北方交通大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(2)：70-73.
俞飞,徐阳阳.旅游景区形象屏蔽的形成及演进研究[J].2011,20(5)：48-51.
俞飞.旅游地形象屏蔽理论国内研究综述[J].商场现代化,2009,(18)：131-132.
岳金柱,冯仲科.森林火灾扑救风险管理问题的探讨与研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(2)：120-125.
张安.论旅游地形象发生发展中的几个“效应”问题及其实践意义[J].旅游学刊2001,16(03)：60-63.
张兰,张彩虹.商品林项目融资风险及对策[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(03)：69-72.
张凌云.旅游地空间竞争的交叉弹性分析[J].地理学与国土研究,1989,5(1)：40-43.
张启龙.考虑环境成本的林木质发电项目风险与经济性评价[D].北京：北京林业大学,2009.
章锦河.旅游区域空间竞争理论、方法与实证研究[D].安徽芜湖：安徽师范大学,2002.
章守芹.区域本色形象和旅游诱导形象的遮蔽研究[D].大连：东北财经大学,2011.
周海京,遇今.故障模式、影响及危害性分析与故障树分析[M].北京：航空工业出版社,2003.