大坝安全风险管理关键技术研究及其系统开发
|
摘要
我国建坝数量达8.6万余座,病险水库达40%左右,1982~2000年年均溃坝率为2.782×10-4,高于世界平均水平(1.92×10-4),可见传统大坝安全管理模式在管理大坝安全方面还有待改善;随着下游居民增多、社会经济快速发展,大坝安全不仅包括工程安全,更应关注下游公共安全,所以风险管理模式是我国社会发展的必然。因此本文研究大坝安全风险管理理念及其关键技术,并将整套体系系统化,开发了一套大坝安全风险管理系统,有很好的理论价值和实践意义。
首先对大坝安全风险管理理论体系进行了研究,确定了管理对象,建立了管理框架及流程,全面总结了研究方法,并建立了全生命周期风险管理模型,初步探索我国大坝安全风险管理模式,提出总体战略,并就如何实现现代大坝安全管理模式提出了六条建议。对我国大坝安全管理体系的完善有着很好的参考价值。基于风险管理理念,主要对下游公共安全的管理过程(溃坝洪水分析、溃坝风险评估、应急疏散)进行技术研究。
考虑水库调蓄作用,建立侵蚀模型模拟溃口发展过程;基于双扫描耦合方法建立一、二维耦合数学模型模拟洪水演进过程,最后利用自主开发程序和粒子技术实现溃口洪水可视化,利用自主开发的GIS系统实现溃坝洪水演进的可视化。
基于支持向量机(SVM)理论,考虑影响溃坝生命损失的13个因素,建立了改进SVM模型,其精度优于考虑5个因素的SVM模型和改进Graham法;总结了大坝风险标准、溃坝概率分析、经济损失估计以及社会环境评价的实用方法;并利用二次开发技术实现了基于GIS的溃坝损失评估全过程分析及其可视化。
考虑山区洪灾特性,提出了山区洪灾避难场所选取方法,基于风险理念进行居民撤离顺序评价,考虑是否与源点直接相连提出了路线权重的分情况计算方法,并建立了山区洪灾疏散速度模型;考虑居民撤离顺序和避难场所容量,对Dijkstra算法进行了改进,并基于GIS研究了山区洪灾应急疏散过程的实现和可视化。
对两河口土心墙堆石坝最大可能洪水下四分之一逐渐溃情况进行了风险分析、评价和处理。分析结果为生命损失可容忍,经济损失不可容忍,社会与环境影响可容忍。河口镇居民可在1.14小时内安全疏散到避难场所。
以高级编程语言Delphi为开发工具,结合数据库管理、地理信息系统、图形图像处理、虚拟现实、专家系统、二次开发等技术,引进各种先进算法,开发了大坝安全风险管理系统,可视化、系统化、数字化地实现了大坝安全全过程风险管理,为相关人员提供了方便、快捷、高效的工作和信息交流平台,为今后管理工作提供一种新模式。
There are about 86000 dams in China,40% of which are sick and dangerous.The average leak rate is 2.784×10-4 from 1982 to 2000 in China,which is higher than the world average level (1.92×10-4),So the traditional management mode has much time to improve;Along with the more people and the rapid developments downstream,what we need to care is not just the engineering safety,but also the public safety,so the risk management mode is necessary to China.The paper researched the idea,the main techniques and the system of dam safety risk management which has great theory value and practical significance.
The paper researched the system info of dam safety risk management,which contains the objects,the frame and the process,the methods and the model of life cycle risk management.The article also desked study the mode of dam safety risk management in China,and came up with the total strategy and six suggestments to realize the mode.
Based on the modern mode, the paper paid close attention to the processes of public safety downsteam which includes the dambreak flood analysis,the risk evaluation and the emergency evacuation.
Considering the reservoir regulation function, erosion model was established to simulate the burst development process. Based on double scanning coupling method , a one-dimensional and two-dimensional coupling mathematics model was established to simulate the flood evolution process. At the last, own system and particle technique are used to display the burst development process visually,and GIS is used to display the floods evolution process visually.
Based on support vector machine (SVM) theory, considering 13 factors which affect loss of life, the improvement SVM model was established which was superior to the SVM model considering five factors and improved method of Graham; The dam risk standard, probability analysis, calculation of economic loss and social environment evaluation method were summarized;At the last, second development technology was used to achieve the whole process of loss estimation in GIS system.
Considering mountain flood characteristics, the method for selecting mountain flood shelter was put forward; Based on risk concept, residents evacuated sequence were evaluated; Considering whether directly connected with the point of origin,the route weight calculation method were proposed , and a mountainous area flood evacuation speed model was established; Considering residents evacuated sequence and shelter capacity,Dijkstra algorithm was improved, and the mountain flood emergency evacuation process was implemented and visualized based on GIS. the article analysed ,evaluated and treated the risk of LiangHeKou soil core wall rockfill dam in quarter gradually collapse situation of the largest possible flooding.
The loss of life can tolerate, economic loss is intolerable, social and environmental impacts can tolerate. It is need 1.14 hours for residents in HeKouZhen to evacuate to shelters.
With a high-level programming language Delphi as a development tool, combining database management, geography information system, image processing, virtual reality, expert system and second development techniques, with introduction of advanced algorithms, the article realized the whole dam safety risk management visually systemically and digitally,which can provide a convenient, quick and efficient work and information exchange platform for related personnel,and suggest a new management mode for future.
首先对大坝安全风险管理理论体系进行了研究,确定了管理对象,建立了管理框架及流程,全面总结了研究方法,并建立了全生命周期风险管理模型,初步探索我国大坝安全风险管理模式,提出总体战略,并就如何实现现代大坝安全管理模式提出了六条建议。对我国大坝安全管理体系的完善有着很好的参考价值。基于风险管理理念,主要对下游公共安全的管理过程(溃坝洪水分析、溃坝风险评估、应急疏散)进行技术研究。
考虑水库调蓄作用,建立侵蚀模型模拟溃口发展过程;基于双扫描耦合方法建立一、二维耦合数学模型模拟洪水演进过程,最后利用自主开发程序和粒子技术实现溃口洪水可视化,利用自主开发的GIS系统实现溃坝洪水演进的可视化。
基于支持向量机(SVM)理论,考虑影响溃坝生命损失的13个因素,建立了改进SVM模型,其精度优于考虑5个因素的SVM模型和改进Graham法;总结了大坝风险标准、溃坝概率分析、经济损失估计以及社会环境评价的实用方法;并利用二次开发技术实现了基于GIS的溃坝损失评估全过程分析及其可视化。
考虑山区洪灾特性,提出了山区洪灾避难场所选取方法,基于风险理念进行居民撤离顺序评价,考虑是否与源点直接相连提出了路线权重的分情况计算方法,并建立了山区洪灾疏散速度模型;考虑居民撤离顺序和避难场所容量,对Dijkstra算法进行了改进,并基于GIS研究了山区洪灾应急疏散过程的实现和可视化。
对两河口土心墙堆石坝最大可能洪水下四分之一逐渐溃情况进行了风险分析、评价和处理。分析结果为生命损失可容忍,经济损失不可容忍,社会与环境影响可容忍。河口镇居民可在1.14小时内安全疏散到避难场所。
以高级编程语言Delphi为开发工具,结合数据库管理、地理信息系统、图形图像处理、虚拟现实、专家系统、二次开发等技术,引进各种先进算法,开发了大坝安全风险管理系统,可视化、系统化、数字化地实现了大坝安全全过程风险管理,为相关人员提供了方便、快捷、高效的工作和信息交流平台,为今后管理工作提供一种新模式。
There are about 86000 dams in China,40% of which are sick and dangerous.The average leak rate is 2.784×10-4 from 1982 to 2000 in China,which is higher than the world average level (1.92×10-4),So the traditional management mode has much time to improve;Along with the more people and the rapid developments downstream,what we need to care is not just the engineering safety,but also the public safety,so the risk management mode is necessary to China.The paper researched the idea,the main techniques and the system of dam safety risk management which has great theory value and practical significance.
The paper researched the system info of dam safety risk management,which contains the objects,the frame and the process,the methods and the model of life cycle risk management.The article also desked study the mode of dam safety risk management in China,and came up with the total strategy and six suggestments to realize the mode.
Based on the modern mode, the paper paid close attention to the processes of public safety downsteam which includes the dambreak flood analysis,the risk evaluation and the emergency evacuation.
Considering the reservoir regulation function, erosion model was established to simulate the burst development process. Based on double scanning coupling method , a one-dimensional and two-dimensional coupling mathematics model was established to simulate the flood evolution process. At the last, own system and particle technique are used to display the burst development process visually,and GIS is used to display the floods evolution process visually.
Based on support vector machine (SVM) theory, considering 13 factors which affect loss of life, the improvement SVM model was established which was superior to the SVM model considering five factors and improved method of Graham; The dam risk standard, probability analysis, calculation of economic loss and social environment evaluation method were summarized;At the last, second development technology was used to achieve the whole process of loss estimation in GIS system.
Considering mountain flood characteristics, the method for selecting mountain flood shelter was put forward; Based on risk concept, residents evacuated sequence were evaluated; Considering whether directly connected with the point of origin,the route weight calculation method were proposed , and a mountainous area flood evacuation speed model was established; Considering residents evacuated sequence and shelter capacity,Dijkstra algorithm was improved, and the mountain flood emergency evacuation process was implemented and visualized based on GIS. the article analysed ,evaluated and treated the risk of LiangHeKou soil core wall rockfill dam in quarter gradually collapse situation of the largest possible flooding.
The loss of life can tolerate, economic loss is intolerable, social and environmental impacts can tolerate. It is need 1.14 hours for residents in HeKouZhen to evacuate to shelters.
With a high-level programming language Delphi as a development tool, combining database management, geography information system, image processing, virtual reality, expert system and second development techniques, with introduction of advanced algorithms, the article realized the whole dam safety risk management visually systemically and digitally,which can provide a convenient, quick and efficient work and information exchange platform for related personnel,and suggest a new management mode for future.
引文
[1] http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-01/29/content_1795245.htm
[2]澳大利亚GHD公司,中国水利水电科学研究院,中国洪水管理战略研究,河南:黄河水利出版社,2006,45
[3]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保等,大坝风险评价与风险管理,北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006,12~13
[4]李雷,大坝风险管理与应急预案现代大坝安全理念,中国水利,2009,22:63~66
[5]蔡跃波,盛金保,中国大坝风险管理对策思考,中国水利,2008,20:20~22
[6] http://www.icold-cigb.net/images/Bullet/B59.PDF
[7]ANCOLD,Guidelines on Risk Assessment,Australian National Committee on Large Dams,1994
[8]Canadian Dam Association,Dam Safety Guidelines,1999
[9]世界银行,水坝安全法律框架比较研究报告,世界银行法律、司法与发展丛书,2002
[10]ANCOLD,Guidelines on Risk Assessment,2003
[11]ANCOLD(Australian National Committee on Large Dams),Guidelines on Assessment of the Consequences of Dam Failure,May 2000
[12]Guidelines for Failure Impact Assessment of Water Dams,Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines,2002,4
[13]B.C.Hydro,Guidelines for Consequence-based Dam Safety Evaluations and Improvement,1993
[14]U.S.Bureau of Reclamation(USBR),Guidelines for Achieving Public Protection in Dam Safety Decision Making,Dam Safety Office,Department of the Interior,Denver,Colorado.1,1997
[15]M.Johannesson,S.O.Hansson,C.Ruden,Risk management-the Swedish way(s),Journal of Environmental Management,1999,57:267~281
[16]Juite Wang,Willie Lin,Yu-Hsiang Huang,A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects,Technovation,2010,30:601~611
[17]Jan Jaap Bouma,Delphine Francois,Peter Troch,Risk assessment and water management,Environmental Modelling&Software,2005,20:141~151
[18]Denis Coeur,Michel Lang,Use of documentary sources on past flood events for flood risk management and land planning,C.R.Geoscience,2008,340:644~650
[19]Erich J.Plate,Flood risk and flood management,Journal of Hydrology,2002,267:2~11
[20]Papers of the 20th ICOLD,Question 76:The use of risk analysis to support dam safety decision and management,The 20th International Congress on Large Dams,Beijing,China,September 2000
[21]Ritter A,Die fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen,Zeitschrift des Vereines deuscher Ingenieure,1892,36(33):947~954
[22]Dressler R.F,Hydraulic resistance effects upon the dam-break functions,Journal of Research,1952,49(3):217~225
[23]Dressler R.F,Unsteady non-linear waves in sloping channels,Royal Society of London,Proc.Series A,1958,247:186~198
[24]Stoker J J,Water Wave,New York:Interscience Publisher,1957:334~341
[25]Chen C,Ambruster J T,Dam-break wave model:Formulation and Verification,J Hydraul Eng,1980,106(5):747~767
[26]林秉南,龚振瀛,王连详,突泄坝址过程线简化分析,清华大学学报,1980,20(1):17~31
[27]谢任之,溃坝水力学,济南:山东科学技术出版社,1989
[28]Dressler,R.F,Comparison of theories and experiments for the hydraulic dambreak wave,Assemblee generale de Rome,Int,Association of Hydrology,1954,3:319~328
[29]HARLOW F.H,WELCH J.E,Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with a free surface,Phys,Fluids,1965,8:2182~2189
[30] HIRT C.W,NICHOLS B.D,Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries,J.Comput,Phys,1981,39:201~225
[31]CHEGINI A,Fundamental investigations of dam-break flows,PhD dissertation,University of Manchester,1997
[32]Ferreira R, Leal J,1D mathematical modeling of the instantaneous dam-break flood wave over mobile bed:application of TVD and flux-splitting s c h e m e s , P r o c , E u r o p e a n C o n c e r t e d A c t i o n o n D a m - B r e a k Modelling,Munich,1998:175~222
[33]Zhixian Cao,Gareth Pender,Steve Wallis etc.,Computational Dam-Break Hydraulics over Erodible Sediment Bed,JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING,2004,7:689~703
[34]张挺,长河道洪水演进计算:[硕士学位论文],四川:四川大学,2001
[35]李云,范子武,吴时强等,大型行蓄洪区洪水演进数值模拟与三维可视化技术,水利学报,2005,36(10):1158~1164
[36]王领元,应用MIKE对河流一、二维的数值模拟:[硕士学位论文],大连:大连理工大学,2007
[37]DHI,MIKE11 Short introduction and tutorial-a modeling system for rivers and chananels,DHI Software,Denmark,2002,6
[38]符传君,练继建,溃坝水流在复杂河道中传播的三维数值模拟,水利学报,2007,38(10):1151~1157
[39]张大伟,堤坝溃决水流数学模型及其应用研究:[博士学位论文],北京:清华大学,2008
[40]李绍武,王建军,郝品正等,河道三维数值模型及应用,港工技术,2008,1:1~4
[41]塔娜,王志军,溃坝及洪水演进数值模拟研究,黑龙江水专学报,2008,35(4):4~7
[42]陈生水,钟启明,任强,土石坝漫顶破坏溃口发展数值模型研究,水利水运工程学报,2009,(4):53~58
[43]郑力,钱忠东,曹志先等,溃坝水流三维计算模型比较,武汉大学学报(工学版),2009,42(6):758~763
[44]施国庆,朱淮宁,荀厚平等,水库溃坝损失及其计算方法研究,灾害学,1998,13(4):28~33
[45]Brown C A,Graham W J,Assesing the threat to life from dam failure,Paper No.88044 of the Water Resources Bulletin,American Water Resources Association,USBR,1988,12
[46]DeKay M L,McClelland G H,Predicting Loss of life in Cases of Dam Failure and Flash Flood,Risk Analysis,1993,(2):193~205
[47]GRAHAM W J ,A procedure for estimating loss of life caused by dam Failure,Sedimentation & River Hydraulics,1999,6(5):1-43
[48]Timo Maijala,RESCDAM development of rescue actions based on dam-break flood analysis,Finland Environment Institute,1999.6~2001.3
[49]Assaf H,Hartford D N D , J D,Estimating dam breach flood survival probabilities,ANCOLD Bulletin NO107:23~42
[50]杨杰,大坝安全监控中若干不确定性问题的分析方法与应用研究:[博士学位论文],南京:河海大学,2005
[51]ZHOU Kefa(周克发),Study on the analysis method for loss of life due to dam breach(溃坝生命损失分析方法研究) :[硕士学位论文],Nanjing:Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute,2006
[52]王志军,顾冲时,刘红彩,基于GIS与支持向量机的溃坝损失评估,长江科学院院报,2008,25(4):28~32
[53]王志军,顾冲时,娄一青,基于支持向量机的溃坝生命损失评估模型及应用,水力发电,2008,34(1):67~70
[54]王志军,顾冲时,刘红彩,基于模糊物元与指数平滑法的溃坝生命损失估算,长江科学院院报,2009,26(1):25~28
[55]吴欢强,溃坝生命损失风险评价的关键技术研究:[硕士学位论文],江西:南昌大学,2009
[56]何晓燕,孙丹丹,黄金池,大坝溃决社会及环境影响评价,岩土工程学报,2008,30(11):1752~1756
[57]冯迪江,王志军,石元辉,基于模糊灰色理论的溃坝社会影响评价,黑龙江水专学报,2009,36(2):1~4
[58]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保,溃坝后果严重程度评价模型研究,安全与环境学报,2006,6(1):1~4
[59]赵利,溃坝后果的灰色模糊综合评判研究:[硕士学位论文],大连:大连理工大学,2008
[60]徐强,陈健云,李静,基于灰色系统动力学的溃坝损失评价模型,人民黄河,2009,31(4):24~26
[61]程翠云,钱新,盛金保,基于属性综合评价模型的水库溃坝后果评价,中国农村水利水电,2010,(11):101~110
[62]Ale,B.J.M,Tolerable or Acceptable:A Comparison of Risk Regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands,Risk Analysis,2005,25(2):231~241
[63]HSE,Reducing Risk Protecting People HSE’s Decision-Making Process,2001
[64]HSE,The Tolerability of Risk from Nuclear Power Stations,HSE Books,UK,1992
[65]HSE,Nuclear Safety Directorate Business Management System,Technical Assessment Guide-Demonstration of ALARP,2005
[66]Australian Geomechanics Society,Landslide Risk Management Concepts and Guidelines,AGS Sub-committee on Landslide Risk Management,Australian Geomechanics,2000
[67]唐文武,施晓东,朱大奎,GIS中使用改进的Dijkstra算法实现最短路径的计算,中国图象图形学报,2000,5(12):1019~1023
[68]花玲玲,基于GIS空间分布特征的Dijkstra最短路径算法研究:[硕士学位论文],四川:重庆大学,2007
[69]袁媛,汪定伟,灾害扩散实时影响下的应急疏散路径选择模型,系统仿真学报,2008,20(6):1563~1566
[70]黄冬梅,方钱,改进的Dijkstra算法在风暴潮系统中的应用,计算机工程,2010,36(20):275~280
[71]郝春梅,一种改进的Dijkstra算法的分析及程序实现,计算机与现代化,2011,(1):36~38
[72]Shestopal VO,Grubits S J,Evacuation model for merging traffic flows in multi-room and multi-storey buildings,Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science,1994:625~632
[73]Fahy R F,Exit 89-An evacuation model for high-rise buildings:model description and example applications,Fire Safety Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium,Boston,1994:657~668
[74]Fahy R F,A Practical Example of an Evacuation Model for Complex Spaces, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire,Carrickfergus:University of Ulster Fire SERT Centre,1998:743~751
[75] Fahy R F,Verifying the Predictive capability if EXIT89,2nd Int.Symposium on H u m a n B e h a v i o r i n F i r e . B o s t o n : M a s s a c h u s e t t e s In s t i t u t e o f Technology,Cambridge,2001:53~64
[76]http://www.ise.ufl.edu/kisko/files/evacnet/EVAC4UG.HTM 2006-10-3
[77]Lo S M,Fang Z,Lin P,An evacuation model:the SGEM package,Fire Safety Journal,2004,39:169~190
[78]Zhi G S,Zhi S ,Lo M S,Fang Z,Lina P,A graph-based algorithm for extracting units and loops from architectural floor plans for building evacuation model,Computer-Aided Design,2003,35:1~14
[79]Fang Z,Lo M S,Lu A J,On the relationship between crowd density and movement velocity,Fire Safety Journal,2003,38:271~283
[80]Owen M,Galea E,Lawrence P.The EXODUS evacuation model applied to b u i l d i n g e v a c u a t i o n s c e n a r i o s , J o u r n a l o f F i r e P r o t e c t i o n Engineering,1996,8(2):65~86
[81]Galea E R,Gwynne S,Blackshields D.maritime EXODUS evacuation analysis of the IMO Day and Night Test Scenarios,Report to IMO Correspondence Group on recommendations on ship analysis for new and existing passen ger ships,FP46,University of Greenwich,2001
[82]Galea E R,A General Approach to Validating Evacuation Models with an Application To EXODUS,Journal of Fire Sciences,1998,16:414~436
[83]Gwynne S,Galea E R,Owen M et al,A systematic comparison of building EXODUS predictions with experimental data from the Stapelfeldt trials and the Milburn House evacuation,Applied Mathematical Modelling,2005,29:818~851
[84]Gwynne S,Galea E R,Owen M et al,Modelling occupant interaction with fire conditions using the building EXODUS evacuation model,Fire Safety Journal,2001,36:327~357
[85]Gwynne S,Galea E R,Owen M et al,The introduction of social aptation within evacuation modeling,Fire and Material,2006,30:285~309
[86]Gwynne S,Galea E R,Owen M et al,Adaptive Decision Making in Response to Crowd Formations in building EXODUS,Journal of Applied Fire Science,1999,8(4):265~289
[87]Ketehell.N,Cole.S,Webber.D.M et al,The EGRESS code for human movement and behavior in emergency evacuations,Engineering for crowd safety,1993:17~18
[88]Steven Mitchell,Essam Radwan,Using a Generic Network Model to Represent a Case Network for Evacuation Simulation,Proceeding of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference Toronto,Canada,2006:596~599
[89]刘永志,张行南,张文婷等,基于GIS和OREMS的洪灾避难系统,灾害学,2007,22(3):17~21
[90]周亚飞,刘茂,基于OREMS的城市应急交通疏散研究,中国安全科学学报,2010,20(4):171~176
[91]张毅华,陈森发,应急疏散路径选择元胞传输宏观模型,系统管理学报,2009,18(6):676~680
[92]刘勇,基于蚁群算法的应急救援最优路径研究:[硕士学位论文],北京:中国地质大学,2010
[93]风险分析在支持大坝安全决策和管理中的应用,风险分析76专题总报告,第20届国际大坝会议,北京,2000
[94]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会,GB/T23694-2009,风险管理术语,北京:中国标准出版社,2009-5-06
[95]彭雪辉,郝健,施伯兴,我国水库大坝风险管理,中国水利,2008,12:10~13
[96]吴晓斌,蔡力群,水库大坝安全管理新理念大坝风险管理,江西水利科技,2008,34(4):292~295
[97]郭明香,刘观云,蒙特卡洛法在水下隧道施工风险评价中的应用,浙江建筑,2010,27(9):50~53
[98]高雪梅,工程结构可靠度分析的一次二阶矩法探讨,山西建筑,2009,35(20):57~58
[99]胡德秀,周孝德,均值一次二阶矩法在水质非突发性风险分析中的应用,西北水资源与水工程,2003,14(1):19~20
[100]莫崇勋,董增川,麻荣永等,积分-一次二阶矩法在广西澄碧河水库漫坝风险分析中的应用研究,水力发电学报,2008,27(2):44~49
[101]陈凤兰,王长新,泄洪风险计算中JC法与MC法的比较,水利水电科技进展,1996,16(6):40~42
[102]冯敏杰,基于神经网络的边坡稳定可靠度分析方法研究:[硕士学位论文],安徽:合肥工业大学,2008
[103]李典庆,常晓林,基于贝叶斯网络的大坝安全风险分析,水电2006国际研讨会,2006:539~545
[104]李典庆,周创兵,陈益峰等,边坡可靠度分析的随机响应面法及程序实现,岩土力学与工程学报,2010,29(8):1513~1523
[105]李锦辉,基于随机有限元的堤防渗透失稳风险分析及除险加固策略研究:[硕士学位论文],南京:河海大学,2004
[106]王建军,于长波,李其汉,工程中的随机有限元方法,应用力学学报,2009,26(2):297~303
[107]徐强,陈健云,李静,关于大坝风险的Vague集事故树的评价模型,价值工程,2008,(10):3~6
[108]王仁钟,李雷,盛金保,水库大坝的社会与环境风险标准研究,安全与环境学报,2006,6(1):8~11
[109]Stephen C Ward,Chris B Chapman,Risk-management perspective on the project lifecycle,International Journal of Project Management,1995,13(3):145~149
[110]张亚莉,杨乃定,杨朝君,项目的全寿命周期风险管理的研究,科学管理研究,2004,22(2):27~30
[111]李雪淋,王卓甫,水利工程全生命周期中生态环境的可持续发展,建筑经济,2007,(4):66~68
[112]万会龙,周而复始的管理循环:扣紧企业管理薄弱环节戴明环环环相扣的管理模式解读,施工企业管理,2009,6:69~70
[113]李莹,基于全生命周期的水电勘察设计项目风险管理研究:[硕士学位论文],北京:华北电力大学,2010
[114]李雷,我国水库大坝安全管理发展趋势和挑战,中国水利,2005,8:24~26
[115]孙继昌,中国的水库大坝安全管理,中国水利,2008,20:10~14
[116]李雷,蔡跃波,盛金保,中国大坝安全与风险管理的现状及其战略思考,岩土工程学报,2008,30(11):1581~1586
[117]吴晓斌,蔡力群,水库大坝安全管理新理念大坝风险管理,江西水利科技,2008,34(4):292~295
[118]王维志,中国人口年鉴1994,北京:经济管理出版社,1994:247~250
[119]U.S.Bureau of Reclamation,1988.Downstream Hazard Classification G u i d e l i n e s , A C E R Te c h n i c a l M e m o r a n d u m N o . 11 . A s s i s t a n t Commissioner-Engineering and Research,Denver,Colorado,December 1988,57
[120]张大伟,程晓陶,黄金池等,基于Godunov格式的溃坝水流数学模型,水科学进展,2010,21(2):167~172
[121]FRANCO A B,Computational and experimental modeling of flow due to dam-break events ,Lisbon: Technical University of Lisbon,1996
[122]黄信能,吴欢强,我国溃坝生命损失风险评价标准探讨,吉林水利,2010,(7):22~26
[123]ANCOLD(Australian National Committee on Large Dams),Guidelines on Risk Assessment,July 2001
[124]ANCOLD(Australian National Committee on Large Dams),Guidelines on Assessment of the Consequences of Dam Failure,May 2000
[125]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保等,大坝风险评价与风险管理,北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006,100
[126]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保等,大坝风险评价与风险管理,北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006,101
[127]王仁钟,李雷,盛金保,水库大坝的社会与环境风险标准研究,安全与环境学报,2006,6(1):8~11
[128]周克发,李雷,盛金保,我国溃坝生命损失评价模型初步研究,安全与环境学报,2007,6:145~149
[129]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保等,大坝风险评价与风险管理,北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006,80~81
[130]黄凌,基于三维洪水演进数值模拟的溃坝损失评价与对策研究:[博士学位论文],天津:天津大学,2010
[131]张洪,刘曙光,郑茂辉,黄浦江上游流域防洪疏散计划的初步研究,中国农村水利水电,2010,(11):15~21
[132]刘强,阮雪景,吴绍洪,重大自然灾害应急避难场所选址原则与模型建构,海洋地质动态,2010,26(5):45~54
[133]于山,苏幼坡,刘天适等,唐山大地震震后救援与恢复重建,北京:中国科学技术出版社,2003,105~125
[134]世文学,刘卫东,孙永福等,基于DEM的堰塞湖1/3溃决模拟及人员撤离方案研究,山东大学学报(工学版),2009,39(5):144~148
[135]王志军,张治军,李子阳,GIS支持下的溃坝损失评估方法研究,水力发电,2008,34(8):75~87
[136]胡强,山地城市避难场所可达性研究:[硕士学位论文],四川:重庆大学,2010
[137]胡忠日,安全疏散研究的国内外动态和发展趋势,消防科学与技术,2001,6
[138]Helbing D,related self-driven many particle systems, Rev.M Od,Phys,2001,73(4):1067~1141
[139]袁媛,汪定伟,灾害扩散实时影响下的应急疏散路径选择模型,系统仿真学报,2008,20(6):1563~1566
[140]黄冬梅,方钱,Dijkstra算法在风暴潮系统中的应用,计算机工程,2010,36(20):275~280
[141]高吉,在ArcGIS矢量图中搜寻最短路径的实现,北京测绘,2009,(2):16~18
[142]王沫然,MATLAB与科学计算机,北京:北京电子与工业出版社,2004
[2]澳大利亚GHD公司,中国水利水电科学研究院,中国洪水管理战略研究,河南:黄河水利出版社,2006,45
[3]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保等,大坝风险评价与风险管理,北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006,12~13
[4]李雷,大坝风险管理与应急预案现代大坝安全理念,中国水利,2009,22:63~66
[5]蔡跃波,盛金保,中国大坝风险管理对策思考,中国水利,2008,20:20~22
[6] http://www.icold-cigb.net/images/Bullet/B59.PDF
[7]ANCOLD,Guidelines on Risk Assessment,Australian National Committee on Large Dams,1994
[8]Canadian Dam Association,Dam Safety Guidelines,1999
[9]世界银行,水坝安全法律框架比较研究报告,世界银行法律、司法与发展丛书,2002
[10]ANCOLD,Guidelines on Risk Assessment,2003
[11]ANCOLD(Australian National Committee on Large Dams),Guidelines on Assessment of the Consequences of Dam Failure,May 2000
[12]Guidelines for Failure Impact Assessment of Water Dams,Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines,2002,4
[13]B.C.Hydro,Guidelines for Consequence-based Dam Safety Evaluations and Improvement,1993
[14]U.S.Bureau of Reclamation(USBR),Guidelines for Achieving Public Protection in Dam Safety Decision Making,Dam Safety Office,Department of the Interior,Denver,Colorado.1,1997
[15]M.Johannesson,S.O.Hansson,C.Ruden,Risk management-the Swedish way(s),Journal of Environmental Management,1999,57:267~281
[16]Juite Wang,Willie Lin,Yu-Hsiang Huang,A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects,Technovation,2010,30:601~611
[17]Jan Jaap Bouma,Delphine Francois,Peter Troch,Risk assessment and water management,Environmental Modelling&Software,2005,20:141~151
[18]Denis Coeur,Michel Lang,Use of documentary sources on past flood events for flood risk management and land planning,C.R.Geoscience,2008,340:644~650
[19]Erich J.Plate,Flood risk and flood management,Journal of Hydrology,2002,267:2~11
[20]Papers of the 20th ICOLD,Question 76:The use of risk analysis to support dam safety decision and management,The 20th International Congress on Large Dams,Beijing,China,September 2000
[21]Ritter A,Die fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen,Zeitschrift des Vereines deuscher Ingenieure,1892,36(33):947~954
[22]Dressler R.F,Hydraulic resistance effects upon the dam-break functions,Journal of Research,1952,49(3):217~225
[23]Dressler R.F,Unsteady non-linear waves in sloping channels,Royal Society of London,Proc.Series A,1958,247:186~198
[24]Stoker J J,Water Wave,New York:Interscience Publisher,1957:334~341
[25]Chen C,Ambruster J T,Dam-break wave model:Formulation and Verification,J Hydraul Eng,1980,106(5):747~767
[26]林秉南,龚振瀛,王连详,突泄坝址过程线简化分析,清华大学学报,1980,20(1):17~31
[27]谢任之,溃坝水力学,济南:山东科学技术出版社,1989
[28]Dressler,R.F,Comparison of theories and experiments for the hydraulic dambreak wave,Assemblee generale de Rome,Int,Association of Hydrology,1954,3:319~328
[29]HARLOW F.H,WELCH J.E,Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with a free surface,Phys,Fluids,1965,8:2182~2189
[30] HIRT C.W,NICHOLS B.D,Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries,J.Comput,Phys,1981,39:201~225
[31]CHEGINI A,Fundamental investigations of dam-break flows,PhD dissertation,University of Manchester,1997
[32]Ferreira R, Leal J,1D mathematical modeling of the instantaneous dam-break flood wave over mobile bed:application of TVD and flux-splitting s c h e m e s , P r o c , E u r o p e a n C o n c e r t e d A c t i o n o n D a m - B r e a k Modelling,Munich,1998:175~222
[33]Zhixian Cao,Gareth Pender,Steve Wallis etc.,Computational Dam-Break Hydraulics over Erodible Sediment Bed,JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING,2004,7:689~703
[34]张挺,长河道洪水演进计算:[硕士学位论文],四川:四川大学,2001
[35]李云,范子武,吴时强等,大型行蓄洪区洪水演进数值模拟与三维可视化技术,水利学报,2005,36(10):1158~1164
[36]王领元,应用MIKE对河流一、二维的数值模拟:[硕士学位论文],大连:大连理工大学,2007
[37]DHI,MIKE11 Short introduction and tutorial-a modeling system for rivers and chananels,DHI Software,Denmark,2002,6
[38]符传君,练继建,溃坝水流在复杂河道中传播的三维数值模拟,水利学报,2007,38(10):1151~1157
[39]张大伟,堤坝溃决水流数学模型及其应用研究:[博士学位论文],北京:清华大学,2008
[40]李绍武,王建军,郝品正等,河道三维数值模型及应用,港工技术,2008,1:1~4
[41]塔娜,王志军,溃坝及洪水演进数值模拟研究,黑龙江水专学报,2008,35(4):4~7
[42]陈生水,钟启明,任强,土石坝漫顶破坏溃口发展数值模型研究,水利水运工程学报,2009,(4):53~58
[43]郑力,钱忠东,曹志先等,溃坝水流三维计算模型比较,武汉大学学报(工学版),2009,42(6):758~763
[44]施国庆,朱淮宁,荀厚平等,水库溃坝损失及其计算方法研究,灾害学,1998,13(4):28~33
[45]Brown C A,Graham W J,Assesing the threat to life from dam failure,Paper No.88044 of the Water Resources Bulletin,American Water Resources Association,USBR,1988,12
[46]DeKay M L,McClelland G H,Predicting Loss of life in Cases of Dam Failure and Flash Flood,Risk Analysis,1993,(2):193~205
[47]GRAHAM W J ,A procedure for estimating loss of life caused by dam Failure,Sedimentation & River Hydraulics,1999,6(5):1-43
[48]Timo Maijala,RESCDAM development of rescue actions based on dam-break flood analysis,Finland Environment Institute,1999.6~2001.3
[49]Assaf H,Hartford D N D , J D,Estimating dam breach flood survival probabilities,ANCOLD Bulletin NO107:23~42
[50]杨杰,大坝安全监控中若干不确定性问题的分析方法与应用研究:[博士学位论文],南京:河海大学,2005
[51]ZHOU Kefa(周克发),Study on the analysis method for loss of life due to dam breach(溃坝生命损失分析方法研究) :[硕士学位论文],Nanjing:Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute,2006
[52]王志军,顾冲时,刘红彩,基于GIS与支持向量机的溃坝损失评估,长江科学院院报,2008,25(4):28~32
[53]王志军,顾冲时,娄一青,基于支持向量机的溃坝生命损失评估模型及应用,水力发电,2008,34(1):67~70
[54]王志军,顾冲时,刘红彩,基于模糊物元与指数平滑法的溃坝生命损失估算,长江科学院院报,2009,26(1):25~28
[55]吴欢强,溃坝生命损失风险评价的关键技术研究:[硕士学位论文],江西:南昌大学,2009
[56]何晓燕,孙丹丹,黄金池,大坝溃决社会及环境影响评价,岩土工程学报,2008,30(11):1752~1756
[57]冯迪江,王志军,石元辉,基于模糊灰色理论的溃坝社会影响评价,黑龙江水专学报,2009,36(2):1~4
[58]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保,溃坝后果严重程度评价模型研究,安全与环境学报,2006,6(1):1~4
[59]赵利,溃坝后果的灰色模糊综合评判研究:[硕士学位论文],大连:大连理工大学,2008
[60]徐强,陈健云,李静,基于灰色系统动力学的溃坝损失评价模型,人民黄河,2009,31(4):24~26
[61]程翠云,钱新,盛金保,基于属性综合评价模型的水库溃坝后果评价,中国农村水利水电,2010,(11):101~110
[62]Ale,B.J.M,Tolerable or Acceptable:A Comparison of Risk Regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands,Risk Analysis,2005,25(2):231~241
[63]HSE,Reducing Risk Protecting People HSE’s Decision-Making Process,2001
[64]HSE,The Tolerability of Risk from Nuclear Power Stations,HSE Books,UK,1992
[65]HSE,Nuclear Safety Directorate Business Management System,Technical Assessment Guide-Demonstration of ALARP,2005
[66]Australian Geomechanics Society,Landslide Risk Management Concepts and Guidelines,AGS Sub-committee on Landslide Risk Management,Australian Geomechanics,2000
[67]唐文武,施晓东,朱大奎,GIS中使用改进的Dijkstra算法实现最短路径的计算,中国图象图形学报,2000,5(12):1019~1023
[68]花玲玲,基于GIS空间分布特征的Dijkstra最短路径算法研究:[硕士学位论文],四川:重庆大学,2007
[69]袁媛,汪定伟,灾害扩散实时影响下的应急疏散路径选择模型,系统仿真学报,2008,20(6):1563~1566
[70]黄冬梅,方钱,改进的Dijkstra算法在风暴潮系统中的应用,计算机工程,2010,36(20):275~280
[71]郝春梅,一种改进的Dijkstra算法的分析及程序实现,计算机与现代化,2011,(1):36~38
[72]Shestopal VO,Grubits S J,Evacuation model for merging traffic flows in multi-room and multi-storey buildings,Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science,1994:625~632
[73]Fahy R F,Exit 89-An evacuation model for high-rise buildings:model description and example applications,Fire Safety Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium,Boston,1994:657~668
[74]Fahy R F,A Practical Example of an Evacuation Model for Complex Spaces, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire,Carrickfergus:University of Ulster Fire SERT Centre,1998:743~751
[75] Fahy R F,Verifying the Predictive capability if EXIT89,2nd Int.Symposium on H u m a n B e h a v i o r i n F i r e . B o s t o n : M a s s a c h u s e t t e s In s t i t u t e o f Technology,Cambridge,2001:53~64
[76]http://www.ise.ufl.edu/kisko/files/evacnet/EVAC4UG.HTM 2006-10-3
[77]Lo S M,Fang Z,Lin P,An evacuation model:the SGEM package,Fire Safety Journal,2004,39:169~190
[78]Zhi G S,Zhi S ,Lo M S,Fang Z,Lina P,A graph-based algorithm for extracting units and loops from architectural floor plans for building evacuation model,Computer-Aided Design,2003,35:1~14
[79]Fang Z,Lo M S,Lu A J,On the relationship between crowd density and movement velocity,Fire Safety Journal,2003,38:271~283
[80]Owen M,Galea E,Lawrence P.The EXODUS evacuation model applied to b u i l d i n g e v a c u a t i o n s c e n a r i o s , J o u r n a l o f F i r e P r o t e c t i o n Engineering,1996,8(2):65~86
[81]Galea E R,Gwynne S,Blackshields D.maritime EXODUS evacuation analysis of the IMO Day and Night Test Scenarios,Report to IMO Correspondence Group on recommendations on ship analysis for new and existing passen ger ships,FP46,University of Greenwich,2001
[82]Galea E R,A General Approach to Validating Evacuation Models with an Application To EXODUS,Journal of Fire Sciences,1998,16:414~436
[83]Gwynne S,Galea E R,Owen M et al,A systematic comparison of building EXODUS predictions with experimental data from the Stapelfeldt trials and the Milburn House evacuation,Applied Mathematical Modelling,2005,29:818~851
[84]Gwynne S,Galea E R,Owen M et al,Modelling occupant interaction with fire conditions using the building EXODUS evacuation model,Fire Safety Journal,2001,36:327~357
[85]Gwynne S,Galea E R,Owen M et al,The introduction of social aptation within evacuation modeling,Fire and Material,2006,30:285~309
[86]Gwynne S,Galea E R,Owen M et al,Adaptive Decision Making in Response to Crowd Formations in building EXODUS,Journal of Applied Fire Science,1999,8(4):265~289
[87]Ketehell.N,Cole.S,Webber.D.M et al,The EGRESS code for human movement and behavior in emergency evacuations,Engineering for crowd safety,1993:17~18
[88]Steven Mitchell,Essam Radwan,Using a Generic Network Model to Represent a Case Network for Evacuation Simulation,Proceeding of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference Toronto,Canada,2006:596~599
[89]刘永志,张行南,张文婷等,基于GIS和OREMS的洪灾避难系统,灾害学,2007,22(3):17~21
[90]周亚飞,刘茂,基于OREMS的城市应急交通疏散研究,中国安全科学学报,2010,20(4):171~176
[91]张毅华,陈森发,应急疏散路径选择元胞传输宏观模型,系统管理学报,2009,18(6):676~680
[92]刘勇,基于蚁群算法的应急救援最优路径研究:[硕士学位论文],北京:中国地质大学,2010
[93]风险分析在支持大坝安全决策和管理中的应用,风险分析76专题总报告,第20届国际大坝会议,北京,2000
[94]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会,GB/T23694-2009,风险管理术语,北京:中国标准出版社,2009-5-06
[95]彭雪辉,郝健,施伯兴,我国水库大坝风险管理,中国水利,2008,12:10~13
[96]吴晓斌,蔡力群,水库大坝安全管理新理念大坝风险管理,江西水利科技,2008,34(4):292~295
[97]郭明香,刘观云,蒙特卡洛法在水下隧道施工风险评价中的应用,浙江建筑,2010,27(9):50~53
[98]高雪梅,工程结构可靠度分析的一次二阶矩法探讨,山西建筑,2009,35(20):57~58
[99]胡德秀,周孝德,均值一次二阶矩法在水质非突发性风险分析中的应用,西北水资源与水工程,2003,14(1):19~20
[100]莫崇勋,董增川,麻荣永等,积分-一次二阶矩法在广西澄碧河水库漫坝风险分析中的应用研究,水力发电学报,2008,27(2):44~49
[101]陈凤兰,王长新,泄洪风险计算中JC法与MC法的比较,水利水电科技进展,1996,16(6):40~42
[102]冯敏杰,基于神经网络的边坡稳定可靠度分析方法研究:[硕士学位论文],安徽:合肥工业大学,2008
[103]李典庆,常晓林,基于贝叶斯网络的大坝安全风险分析,水电2006国际研讨会,2006:539~545
[104]李典庆,周创兵,陈益峰等,边坡可靠度分析的随机响应面法及程序实现,岩土力学与工程学报,2010,29(8):1513~1523
[105]李锦辉,基于随机有限元的堤防渗透失稳风险分析及除险加固策略研究:[硕士学位论文],南京:河海大学,2004
[106]王建军,于长波,李其汉,工程中的随机有限元方法,应用力学学报,2009,26(2):297~303
[107]徐强,陈健云,李静,关于大坝风险的Vague集事故树的评价模型,价值工程,2008,(10):3~6
[108]王仁钟,李雷,盛金保,水库大坝的社会与环境风险标准研究,安全与环境学报,2006,6(1):8~11
[109]Stephen C Ward,Chris B Chapman,Risk-management perspective on the project lifecycle,International Journal of Project Management,1995,13(3):145~149
[110]张亚莉,杨乃定,杨朝君,项目的全寿命周期风险管理的研究,科学管理研究,2004,22(2):27~30
[111]李雪淋,王卓甫,水利工程全生命周期中生态环境的可持续发展,建筑经济,2007,(4):66~68
[112]万会龙,周而复始的管理循环:扣紧企业管理薄弱环节戴明环环环相扣的管理模式解读,施工企业管理,2009,6:69~70
[113]李莹,基于全生命周期的水电勘察设计项目风险管理研究:[硕士学位论文],北京:华北电力大学,2010
[114]李雷,我国水库大坝安全管理发展趋势和挑战,中国水利,2005,8:24~26
[115]孙继昌,中国的水库大坝安全管理,中国水利,2008,20:10~14
[116]李雷,蔡跃波,盛金保,中国大坝安全与风险管理的现状及其战略思考,岩土工程学报,2008,30(11):1581~1586
[117]吴晓斌,蔡力群,水库大坝安全管理新理念大坝风险管理,江西水利科技,2008,34(4):292~295
[118]王维志,中国人口年鉴1994,北京:经济管理出版社,1994:247~250
[119]U.S.Bureau of Reclamation,1988.Downstream Hazard Classification G u i d e l i n e s , A C E R Te c h n i c a l M e m o r a n d u m N o . 11 . A s s i s t a n t Commissioner-Engineering and Research,Denver,Colorado,December 1988,57
[120]张大伟,程晓陶,黄金池等,基于Godunov格式的溃坝水流数学模型,水科学进展,2010,21(2):167~172
[121]FRANCO A B,Computational and experimental modeling of flow due to dam-break events ,Lisbon: Technical University of Lisbon,1996
[122]黄信能,吴欢强,我国溃坝生命损失风险评价标准探讨,吉林水利,2010,(7):22~26
[123]ANCOLD(Australian National Committee on Large Dams),Guidelines on Risk Assessment,July 2001
[124]ANCOLD(Australian National Committee on Large Dams),Guidelines on Assessment of the Consequences of Dam Failure,May 2000
[125]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保等,大坝风险评价与风险管理,北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006,100
[126]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保等,大坝风险评价与风险管理,北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006,101
[127]王仁钟,李雷,盛金保,水库大坝的社会与环境风险标准研究,安全与环境学报,2006,6(1):8~11
[128]周克发,李雷,盛金保,我国溃坝生命损失评价模型初步研究,安全与环境学报,2007,6:145~149
[129]李雷,王仁钟,盛金保等,大坝风险评价与风险管理,北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006,80~81
[130]黄凌,基于三维洪水演进数值模拟的溃坝损失评价与对策研究:[博士学位论文],天津:天津大学,2010
[131]张洪,刘曙光,郑茂辉,黄浦江上游流域防洪疏散计划的初步研究,中国农村水利水电,2010,(11):15~21
[132]刘强,阮雪景,吴绍洪,重大自然灾害应急避难场所选址原则与模型建构,海洋地质动态,2010,26(5):45~54
[133]于山,苏幼坡,刘天适等,唐山大地震震后救援与恢复重建,北京:中国科学技术出版社,2003,105~125
[134]世文学,刘卫东,孙永福等,基于DEM的堰塞湖1/3溃决模拟及人员撤离方案研究,山东大学学报(工学版),2009,39(5):144~148
[135]王志军,张治军,李子阳,GIS支持下的溃坝损失评估方法研究,水力发电,2008,34(8):75~87
[136]胡强,山地城市避难场所可达性研究:[硕士学位论文],四川:重庆大学,2010
[137]胡忠日,安全疏散研究的国内外动态和发展趋势,消防科学与技术,2001,6
[138]Helbing D,related self-driven many particle systems, Rev.M Od,Phys,2001,73(4):1067~1141
[139]袁媛,汪定伟,灾害扩散实时影响下的应急疏散路径选择模型,系统仿真学报,2008,20(6):1563~1566
[140]黄冬梅,方钱,Dijkstra算法在风暴潮系统中的应用,计算机工程,2010,36(20):275~280
[141]高吉,在ArcGIS矢量图中搜寻最短路径的实现,北京测绘,2009,(2):16~18
[142]王沫然,MATLAB与科学计算机,北京:北京电子与工业出版社,2004