四川发展农区牧草的关键技术研究
摘要
针对农区发展草食性畜牧业饲草严重缺乏的现状，四川农业大学荣廷昭院士等根据西南地区的生态特点和目前农区主要推广牧草墨西哥玉米、高丹草等存在的优缺点，提出了发展营养体农业的思路，并成功选育了玉草1号和玉草2号等饲草玉米新品种(2007年7月通过省级鉴定，2007年10月通过四川省品种审定委员会审定)。本研究以墨西哥大刍草、高丹草和新选饲草组合玉草1号、玉草2号为主要研究材料，对它们的产量和品质及其构成进行了研究，同时还对影响产量和品质的主要因素进行了分析，探讨了在四川发展农区牧草的主要生产技术，提出了四川农区牧草的产业发展思路。主要研究结果如下：
1．对高丹草、墨西哥玉米和新选饲草玉米组合比较研究表明，饲草玉米玉草1号产量优于其他组合。其鲜、干物质产量分别为174045kg·hm~(-2)和22208 kg·hm~(-2)，比高丹草和墨西哥玉米分别高出26900 kg·hm~(-2)、29200 kg·hm~(-2)，高18．3％、20．2％；干物质产量分别高出3300 kg·hm~(-2)、6100 kg·hm~(-2)，高17．5％、37．9％。2004年以来在四川的雅安、西充、雁江区、洪雅县、南江县、武胜县、东兴区、泸定县、金川县等县和云南、重庆、甘肃、广东等地进行了示范种植，结果表明饲草玉米比对照的鲜草产量普遍高50％以上。饲草玉米生长动态研究表明，其生长曲线符合Logistic模型，拟合方程为y=2983/1+25.6e~(-0.05x) (y为草长、x为发育天数，r=0．995)。
2．饲草玉米第1次刈割(孕穗期)粗蛋白质(CP)和无氮浸出物(NFE)含量最高，分别为17．57％、48．73％，粗纤维(CF)含量最低，为21．65％，粗脂肪(EE)和粗灰分(CA)含量分别为4．30％和7．75％。饲草玉米CP和CF产量分别为2788．2kg·hm~(-2)和4713．3 kg·hm~(-2)，高于高丹草(2211．2 kg·hm~(-2)和3952．3 kg·hm~(-2))和墨西哥玉米(2128．4 kg·hm~(-2)和2813．9 kg·hm~(-2))。饲草玉米全年共刈割4次，各茬次平均营养成分含量为15．1％(CP)、25．6％(CF)、3．1％(EE)、8．9％(CA)、47．3％(NFE)，营养品质优于对照高丹草(CP：14．6％、CF：26．2％、EE：4．0％、CA：8．6％、NFE：46．6％)。饲草玉米第1次刈割可溶性糖含量为9．8％，氨基酸总量为3．1％，其中赖氨酸含量(0．41％)高于对照高丹草(0．39％)和墨西哥玉米(0．39％)。总能(GE)、消化能(DE)、代谢能(ME)和可消化养分总量(TDN)在孕穗期或抽雄始期最高，抽雄始期鲜草产量和干物质产量分别达101400 kg·hm~(-2)和18350kg·hm~(-2)，粗蛋白(CP)、粗纤维(CF)、粗脂肪(EE)、粗灰分(CA)和无氮浸出物(NFE)含量分别为14．2％、24.3%、3．9％、6．3％和51．3％。
3．留茬高度试验结果表明，草长220cm刈割的鲜草产量、干草产量和CP产量均显著高于草长190cm时刈割，但其CP含量和RFV较低，NDF含量较高。草长160cm时刈割的鲜、干草产量和CP产量均显著低于草长190cm时刈割，但CP含量和RFV较高。研究表明，留茬25cm、草长190cm刈割适用于青饲利用，留茬15cm、草长220cm刈割适用于青贮利用。
密度试验结果表明，在密度37500株·hm~(-2)下的分蘖数、总茎粗、干物率均为最高，密度45000株·hm~(-2)次之，52500株·hm~(-2)最低。处理间各品质指标总体表现为：37500株·hm~(-2)的CP含量、CP产量以及RFV均为最高，45000株·hm~(-2)次之，52500株·hm~(-2)最低；37500株·hm~(-2)的NDF含量最低，52500株·hm~(-2)最高。研究表明，种植密度为45000株·hm~(-2)时产草量较高，饲用品质较优。
施氮量和刈割间隔时间对玉草1号产量、品质均有显著影响，但施氮量和刈割间隔时间的互作效应对产量、品质的影响不显著。不施氮的处理总鲜草产量、干草产量、CP含量、CP产量和RFV均为最低，显著低于施氮量为2．2g／株的处理，而施氮量为2．2g/株的处理又显著低于施氮量为3．8g／株和5．4g/株的处理，后两者的总鲜干、草产量、CP含量、CP产量、NDF含量和RFV差异均不显著。刈割间隔时间为65d的处理总鲜草产量、总干草产量、NDF含量和CP产量均为最高，显著高于刈割间隔时间为55d和45d的处理，但是其CP含量和RFV却要显著低于刈割间隔时间为45d的处理。研究表明，施氮量为3．8g／株，刈割间隔时间为45d刈割的植株适宜于青饲利用，刈割间隔时间为65d的植株适宜于青贮利用。
4．2007年在洪雅县进行的饲草玉米与牛鞭草饲喂奶牛试验结果表明，奶牛在饲喂饲草玉米后日产奶量平均值为16．58 kg，比饲喂牛鞭草的对照组每头奶牛日产奶量增加1．18 kg，增7．66％，表明给奶牛饲喂饲草玉米可明显增加其日产奶量。在南江县进行的南江黄羊在圈养、放牧喂养模式及其与常规饲喂模式下饲草玉米与自然野草对其体重等生育指标的影响试验结果表明，在圈养条件下，配合饲喂40％和60％的饲草玉米玉草1号，黄羊体重增加值(4．9 kg／只)均比饲喂自然野草时(2．00 kg／只)的增加值高；在放牧情况下，配合饲喂饲草玉米玉草1号对黄羊的生长发育作用与自然野草相比差异不显著；无论是圈养(4．9 kg、3．8 kg)或是放牧条件(4．6 kg、4．5 kg)下，饲喂玉草1号后，黄羊体重的增加值均大于对照组(2．5 kg)即常规饲养方法。
5．本文研究结果表明，饲草玉米具有产量高，品质优等优点，适于西南区广泛种植。为使该成果迅速地转化为现实生产力，本文提出了饲草玉米产业发展思路、目标和主要措施。
As forage grass of herbivorous stockbreeding in agricultural areas was very short, academician Rong Tingzhao of Sichuan Agricultural University presented the idea for development of nutritive agriculture according to ecological characteristics in the southwestern areas and advantages or disadvantages of Euchlaena mexicana and Gaodan grass in agricultural areas at present, and then successfully selected and bred new forage maize variety-Yucao No.1 and Yucao No.2, which passed the provincial appraisal in July 2007, and were certified by Crop Authorization Committee of Sichuan province in October 2007. With the main materials of Zea Mexican Schard, Gaodan grass and newly bred forage maize Yucao No. 1 and Yucao No.2, the study on the yield and the quality of them were carried out, and the main factors which had an impact on them were also investigated. Then the key technologies of forage maize grown in Sichuan were discussed and ideas for industry development of forage maize were also presented. The main results were as follows:
1. The results of study on Gaodan-grass、Zea mexicana and newly bred forage maize combination showed that the yield of Yucao No. 1 was better than other combinations. Its fresh matter and dry matter yield were 174045 kg·ha~(-1) and 22208 kg·ha~(-1) respectively, which were 26900 kg·ha~(-1)(18.3%) and 29200 kg·ha~(-1)(20.2%) higher than that of Gaodan-grass and Zea mexicana separately. And the dry matter yield of Sicao No.l was 3300 kg·ha~(-1)(17.5%) and 6100 kg·ha~(-1)(37.9%) higher than that of Gaodan-grass and Zea mexicana separately. Since 2004, forage maize were planted in some areas of Sichuan such as Ya'an, Xichong, Yanjiang, Hongya, Nanjiang, Wusheng, Dongxing, Luding, Jinchuan, and also in Yunnan, Chongqing, Gansu, Guangdong. From the results above all these place, the fresh yield of forage maize was 50% higher than that of CK. Furthermore, results from growth dynamic of forage maize indicated that its growth rate conformed to a logistic model, fitting equation was y=2983/1+25.6e~(-0.05x) (y means grass length, x means growth days,r=0.995).
2. The crude protein (CP) and nitrogen-free extract (NFE) content of forage maize were 17.57% and 48.73% respectively, which reached the highest at booting stage of the first harvest; the content of crude fiber (CF) was the lowest 21.65%; the content of ether extract (EE) and crude ashes (CA) were 4.30% and 7.75%. The crude protein (CP) and crude fiber (CF) yield of forage maize were 2788.2 kg·ha~(-1) and 4713.3 kg·ha~(-1) separately, which were higher than that of Gaodan-grass(2211.2 kg·ha~(-1)和3952.3 kg·ha~(-1)) and Zea mexicana (2128.4 kg·ha~(-1) and 2813.9 kg·ha~(-1)) . The forage maize harvested four times in a year, and its average nutrition composition at each time were 15.1% (CP), 25.6% (CF), 3.1% (EE), 8.9% (CA), 47.3% (NFE), which were better than Gaodan-grass (CP: 14.6%, CF: 26.2%, EE: 4.0%, CA: 8.6%, NFE: 46.6%). The dissolvable sugar and amino-acid content of forage maize at the booting stage of the first harvest were 9.8% and 3.1% respectively. The Lysine content of forage maize (0.41%) was higher than Gaodan-grass (0.39%) and Zea mexicana (0.39%). Gross energy (GE), digestible energy (DE), metabolize energy (ME) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) were highest at booting stage or initial tasseling stage. Fresh and dry matter yield at initial tasseling stage were 101400 kg·ha~(-1) and 18350 kg·ha~(-1), and the content of crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), ether extract (EE), crude ashes (CA) and nitrogen-free extract (NFE) were 14.2%, 24.3%, 3.9%, 6.3% and 51.3%, respectively.
3. The results of mowed height indicated that fresh yield, dry yield and CP yield of forage maize harvested at 220cm grass length were all significantly higher than that at 190cm grass length. NDF content was also larger, but CP and RFV content were lower. Fresh yield, dry yield and CP yield of forage maize harvested at 160cm grass length were all significantly lower than at 190cm, while CP and RFV content were higher. Accordingly, it was useful for green forage when mowed height was 25cm and grass length was 190cm, and it was useful for green silage when mowed height was 15cm and grass length was 220cm.
The results of plant density showed that tillering number, culm diameter and dry matter content with plant density of 37500 plant/ha~(-1) reached the highest, 45000 plant/ha~(-1) followed and 52500 plant/ha~(-1) was the lowest. CP content, CP yield and RFV with plant density of 37500 plant/ha~(-1) were the largest, 45000 plant/ha~(-1) followed and 52500 plant/ha~(-1) was the lowest; NDF content with plant density of 37500 plant/ha~(-1) was the lowest while 52500 plant/ha~(-1) was the highest. Therefore, grass yield and forage nutritive value were better with the plant density of 45000 plant/ha~(-1).
Nitrogen fertilizer amount and cutting interval time had a significant effect on yield and quality of Yucao No.1, but their interaction showed no significant effect on yield and quality of Yucao No.1. The gross fresh yield, dry yield, CP content, CP yield and RFV without nitrogen fertilizer were the lowest, which significantly lower than that with nitrogen fertilizer of 2.2 g/plant; while the gross fresh yield, dry yield, CP content, CP yield and RFV with nitrogen fertilizer of 2.2 g/plant was significantly lower than that with nitrogen fertilizer of 3.8 g/plant and 5.4 g/plant, whose gross fresh yield, dry yield, CP content, CP yield, NDF content and FRV were not significant. The gross fresh yield, dry yield, NDF content and CP yield with 65d cutting interval time were the highest, which were significantly higher than that with 55d and 45d; while the CP content and RFV with 65d were significantly lower than that with 45d. Therefore, it was useful for green forage when nitrogen fertilizer amount was 3.8 g/plant and cutting interval time was 45d, and it was useful for green silage when cutting interval time was 65d with the same nitrogen fertilizer amount.
4. Dairy cows were bred by forage maize and hemarthriacompressa in Hongya in 2007, and the results showed that after breeding dairy cows with forage maize, the average of daily milk yield was 16.58 kg, and increased by 1.18 kg(7.66%) comparing with the CK which breeding dairy cows with hemarthriacompressa. Accordingly, the daily milk yield could obviously improved by breeding dairy cows with forage maize. In Nanjiang, the effect of forage maize and wild grass on the growing indexes such as weight of Nanjiang yellow cows by different feeding modes such as captive, grazing and conventional feeding were investigated. The results suggested that under captive feeding, the weight value-added of cows raised by 40% and 60% forage maize-Yucao No.1 (4.9kg/each) was higher than that by wild grass (2.00g/each); under grazing feeding, the effect of Yucao No.1 on the growth and development of yellow cows was not significant with that of wild grass. However, no matter captive feeding (4.9 kg、3.8 kg) or grazing feeding (4.6kg、4.5 kg) , the weight value-added of yellow cows raised by Yucao No.l was larger than that by conventional feeding, the CK (2.5kg).
5. All above results indicated that forage maize with high yield and good quality was fit for planting in the southwestern areas. The study presented ideas for industry development, objectives and main measures of forage maize to put research findings into real productivity rapidly.
1．对高丹草、墨西哥玉米和新选饲草玉米组合比较研究表明，饲草玉米玉草1号产量优于其他组合。其鲜、干物质产量分别为174045kg·hm~(-2)和22208 kg·hm~(-2)，比高丹草和墨西哥玉米分别高出26900 kg·hm~(-2)、29200 kg·hm~(-2)，高18．3％、20．2％；干物质产量分别高出3300 kg·hm~(-2)、6100 kg·hm~(-2)，高17．5％、37．9％。2004年以来在四川的雅安、西充、雁江区、洪雅县、南江县、武胜县、东兴区、泸定县、金川县等县和云南、重庆、甘肃、广东等地进行了示范种植，结果表明饲草玉米比对照的鲜草产量普遍高50％以上。饲草玉米生长动态研究表明，其生长曲线符合Logistic模型，拟合方程为y=2983/1+25.6e~(-0.05x) (y为草长、x为发育天数，r=0．995)。
2．饲草玉米第1次刈割(孕穗期)粗蛋白质(CP)和无氮浸出物(NFE)含量最高，分别为17．57％、48．73％，粗纤维(CF)含量最低，为21．65％，粗脂肪(EE)和粗灰分(CA)含量分别为4．30％和7．75％。饲草玉米CP和CF产量分别为2788．2kg·hm~(-2)和4713．3 kg·hm~(-2)，高于高丹草(2211．2 kg·hm~(-2)和3952．3 kg·hm~(-2))和墨西哥玉米(2128．4 kg·hm~(-2)和2813．9 kg·hm~(-2))。饲草玉米全年共刈割4次，各茬次平均营养成分含量为15．1％(CP)、25．6％(CF)、3．1％(EE)、8．9％(CA)、47．3％(NFE)，营养品质优于对照高丹草(CP：14．6％、CF：26．2％、EE：4．0％、CA：8．6％、NFE：46．6％)。饲草玉米第1次刈割可溶性糖含量为9．8％，氨基酸总量为3．1％，其中赖氨酸含量(0．41％)高于对照高丹草(0．39％)和墨西哥玉米(0．39％)。总能(GE)、消化能(DE)、代谢能(ME)和可消化养分总量(TDN)在孕穗期或抽雄始期最高，抽雄始期鲜草产量和干物质产量分别达101400 kg·hm~(-2)和18350kg·hm~(-2)，粗蛋白(CP)、粗纤维(CF)、粗脂肪(EE)、粗灰分(CA)和无氮浸出物(NFE)含量分别为14．2％、24.3%、3．9％、6．3％和51．3％。
3．留茬高度试验结果表明，草长220cm刈割的鲜草产量、干草产量和CP产量均显著高于草长190cm时刈割，但其CP含量和RFV较低，NDF含量较高。草长160cm时刈割的鲜、干草产量和CP产量均显著低于草长190cm时刈割，但CP含量和RFV较高。研究表明，留茬25cm、草长190cm刈割适用于青饲利用，留茬15cm、草长220cm刈割适用于青贮利用。
密度试验结果表明，在密度37500株·hm~(-2)下的分蘖数、总茎粗、干物率均为最高，密度45000株·hm~(-2)次之，52500株·hm~(-2)最低。处理间各品质指标总体表现为：37500株·hm~(-2)的CP含量、CP产量以及RFV均为最高，45000株·hm~(-2)次之，52500株·hm~(-2)最低；37500株·hm~(-2)的NDF含量最低，52500株·hm~(-2)最高。研究表明，种植密度为45000株·hm~(-2)时产草量较高，饲用品质较优。
施氮量和刈割间隔时间对玉草1号产量、品质均有显著影响，但施氮量和刈割间隔时间的互作效应对产量、品质的影响不显著。不施氮的处理总鲜草产量、干草产量、CP含量、CP产量和RFV均为最低，显著低于施氮量为2．2g／株的处理，而施氮量为2．2g/株的处理又显著低于施氮量为3．8g／株和5．4g/株的处理，后两者的总鲜干、草产量、CP含量、CP产量、NDF含量和RFV差异均不显著。刈割间隔时间为65d的处理总鲜草产量、总干草产量、NDF含量和CP产量均为最高，显著高于刈割间隔时间为55d和45d的处理，但是其CP含量和RFV却要显著低于刈割间隔时间为45d的处理。研究表明，施氮量为3．8g／株，刈割间隔时间为45d刈割的植株适宜于青饲利用，刈割间隔时间为65d的植株适宜于青贮利用。
4．2007年在洪雅县进行的饲草玉米与牛鞭草饲喂奶牛试验结果表明，奶牛在饲喂饲草玉米后日产奶量平均值为16．58 kg，比饲喂牛鞭草的对照组每头奶牛日产奶量增加1．18 kg，增7．66％，表明给奶牛饲喂饲草玉米可明显增加其日产奶量。在南江县进行的南江黄羊在圈养、放牧喂养模式及其与常规饲喂模式下饲草玉米与自然野草对其体重等生育指标的影响试验结果表明，在圈养条件下，配合饲喂40％和60％的饲草玉米玉草1号，黄羊体重增加值(4．9 kg／只)均比饲喂自然野草时(2．00 kg／只)的增加值高；在放牧情况下，配合饲喂饲草玉米玉草1号对黄羊的生长发育作用与自然野草相比差异不显著；无论是圈养(4．9 kg、3．8 kg)或是放牧条件(4．6 kg、4．5 kg)下，饲喂玉草1号后，黄羊体重的增加值均大于对照组(2．5 kg)即常规饲养方法。
5．本文研究结果表明，饲草玉米具有产量高，品质优等优点，适于西南区广泛种植。为使该成果迅速地转化为现实生产力，本文提出了饲草玉米产业发展思路、目标和主要措施。
As forage grass of herbivorous stockbreeding in agricultural areas was very short, academician Rong Tingzhao of Sichuan Agricultural University presented the idea for development of nutritive agriculture according to ecological characteristics in the southwestern areas and advantages or disadvantages of Euchlaena mexicana and Gaodan grass in agricultural areas at present, and then successfully selected and bred new forage maize variety-Yucao No.1 and Yucao No.2, which passed the provincial appraisal in July 2007, and were certified by Crop Authorization Committee of Sichuan province in October 2007. With the main materials of Zea Mexican Schard, Gaodan grass and newly bred forage maize Yucao No. 1 and Yucao No.2, the study on the yield and the quality of them were carried out, and the main factors which had an impact on them were also investigated. Then the key technologies of forage maize grown in Sichuan were discussed and ideas for industry development of forage maize were also presented. The main results were as follows:
1. The results of study on Gaodan-grass、Zea mexicana and newly bred forage maize combination showed that the yield of Yucao No. 1 was better than other combinations. Its fresh matter and dry matter yield were 174045 kg·ha~(-1) and 22208 kg·ha~(-1) respectively, which were 26900 kg·ha~(-1)(18.3%) and 29200 kg·ha~(-1)(20.2%) higher than that of Gaodan-grass and Zea mexicana separately. And the dry matter yield of Sicao No.l was 3300 kg·ha~(-1)(17.5%) and 6100 kg·ha~(-1)(37.9%) higher than that of Gaodan-grass and Zea mexicana separately. Since 2004, forage maize were planted in some areas of Sichuan such as Ya'an, Xichong, Yanjiang, Hongya, Nanjiang, Wusheng, Dongxing, Luding, Jinchuan, and also in Yunnan, Chongqing, Gansu, Guangdong. From the results above all these place, the fresh yield of forage maize was 50% higher than that of CK. Furthermore, results from growth dynamic of forage maize indicated that its growth rate conformed to a logistic model, fitting equation was y=2983/1+25.6e~(-0.05x) (y means grass length, x means growth days,r=0.995).
2. The crude protein (CP) and nitrogen-free extract (NFE) content of forage maize were 17.57% and 48.73% respectively, which reached the highest at booting stage of the first harvest; the content of crude fiber (CF) was the lowest 21.65%; the content of ether extract (EE) and crude ashes (CA) were 4.30% and 7.75%. The crude protein (CP) and crude fiber (CF) yield of forage maize were 2788.2 kg·ha~(-1) and 4713.3 kg·ha~(-1) separately, which were higher than that of Gaodan-grass(2211.2 kg·ha~(-1)和3952.3 kg·ha~(-1)) and Zea mexicana (2128.4 kg·ha~(-1) and 2813.9 kg·ha~(-1)) . The forage maize harvested four times in a year, and its average nutrition composition at each time were 15.1% (CP), 25.6% (CF), 3.1% (EE), 8.9% (CA), 47.3% (NFE), which were better than Gaodan-grass (CP: 14.6%, CF: 26.2%, EE: 4.0%, CA: 8.6%, NFE: 46.6%). The dissolvable sugar and amino-acid content of forage maize at the booting stage of the first harvest were 9.8% and 3.1% respectively. The Lysine content of forage maize (0.41%) was higher than Gaodan-grass (0.39%) and Zea mexicana (0.39%). Gross energy (GE), digestible energy (DE), metabolize energy (ME) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) were highest at booting stage or initial tasseling stage. Fresh and dry matter yield at initial tasseling stage were 101400 kg·ha~(-1) and 18350 kg·ha~(-1), and the content of crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), ether extract (EE), crude ashes (CA) and nitrogen-free extract (NFE) were 14.2%, 24.3%, 3.9%, 6.3% and 51.3%, respectively.
3. The results of mowed height indicated that fresh yield, dry yield and CP yield of forage maize harvested at 220cm grass length were all significantly higher than that at 190cm grass length. NDF content was also larger, but CP and RFV content were lower. Fresh yield, dry yield and CP yield of forage maize harvested at 160cm grass length were all significantly lower than at 190cm, while CP and RFV content were higher. Accordingly, it was useful for green forage when mowed height was 25cm and grass length was 190cm, and it was useful for green silage when mowed height was 15cm and grass length was 220cm.
The results of plant density showed that tillering number, culm diameter and dry matter content with plant density of 37500 plant/ha~(-1) reached the highest, 45000 plant/ha~(-1) followed and 52500 plant/ha~(-1) was the lowest. CP content, CP yield and RFV with plant density of 37500 plant/ha~(-1) were the largest, 45000 plant/ha~(-1) followed and 52500 plant/ha~(-1) was the lowest; NDF content with plant density of 37500 plant/ha~(-1) was the lowest while 52500 plant/ha~(-1) was the highest. Therefore, grass yield and forage nutritive value were better with the plant density of 45000 plant/ha~(-1).
Nitrogen fertilizer amount and cutting interval time had a significant effect on yield and quality of Yucao No.1, but their interaction showed no significant effect on yield and quality of Yucao No.1. The gross fresh yield, dry yield, CP content, CP yield and RFV without nitrogen fertilizer were the lowest, which significantly lower than that with nitrogen fertilizer of 2.2 g/plant; while the gross fresh yield, dry yield, CP content, CP yield and RFV with nitrogen fertilizer of 2.2 g/plant was significantly lower than that with nitrogen fertilizer of 3.8 g/plant and 5.4 g/plant, whose gross fresh yield, dry yield, CP content, CP yield, NDF content and FRV were not significant. The gross fresh yield, dry yield, NDF content and CP yield with 65d cutting interval time were the highest, which were significantly higher than that with 55d and 45d; while the CP content and RFV with 65d were significantly lower than that with 45d. Therefore, it was useful for green forage when nitrogen fertilizer amount was 3.8 g/plant and cutting interval time was 45d, and it was useful for green silage when cutting interval time was 65d with the same nitrogen fertilizer amount.
4. Dairy cows were bred by forage maize and hemarthriacompressa in Hongya in 2007, and the results showed that after breeding dairy cows with forage maize, the average of daily milk yield was 16.58 kg, and increased by 1.18 kg(7.66%) comparing with the CK which breeding dairy cows with hemarthriacompressa. Accordingly, the daily milk yield could obviously improved by breeding dairy cows with forage maize. In Nanjiang, the effect of forage maize and wild grass on the growing indexes such as weight of Nanjiang yellow cows by different feeding modes such as captive, grazing and conventional feeding were investigated. The results suggested that under captive feeding, the weight value-added of cows raised by 40% and 60% forage maize-Yucao No.1 (4.9kg/each) was higher than that by wild grass (2.00g/each); under grazing feeding, the effect of Yucao No.1 on the growth and development of yellow cows was not significant with that of wild grass. However, no matter captive feeding (4.9 kg、3.8 kg) or grazing feeding (4.6kg、4.5 kg) , the weight value-added of yellow cows raised by Yucao No.l was larger than that by conventional feeding, the CK (2.5kg).
5. All above results indicated that forage maize with high yield and good quality was fit for planting in the southwestern areas. The study presented ideas for industry development, objectives and main measures of forage maize to put research findings into real productivity rapidly.
引文
[1] Babnik.D. Some environmental effects on relationships between in sacco degradability of protein and dry matter and chemical composition of Italian ryegrass. Archives of Animal Nutrition,1995,48:3,303-317
[2] Brown, R.H., E.R. Beatty, W.J. Ethredge, and D.D. Hayes. Influence of row width and plant population on yield of two varieties of corn. Agron. J. 1970,62:767-770
[3] Cherney. DJR, Chemey. J H. Grass forage quality and digestion kinetics as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and maturity. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 1997,11 (2): 105-120
[4] Cox, W.J., D.J.R.Cherney, and J.J.Hanchar. Row spacing, hybrid, and plant density effects on corn silage yield and quality. J. 1998, Prod. Agric. 11:128-134
[5] Cox, W.J., S. Kalonge, D.J.R. Chreney, and W.S. Reid. Growth, yield, and quality of forage maize under different nitrogen management practices. Agron. J. 1993. 85: 341 -347
[6] Cummings,GA.,and Teel,M.R, Effect of nitrogen, potassium, and plant age on certain nitrogenous constituents and malate content of Orchardgrass (Dactylis gLomerrta L.). Agron, J,1965, 57: 127-129
[7] Cusicanqui, J.A., and J.G Lauer. 1999. Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agron. J. 91:911-915
[8]Evaeas，P.S．，任继周译．五种草地牧草三种留茬高度的多次采摘对根系生长的影响．畜牧兽医文摘．1974：74-45
[9] Evans MMS, Kermicle J L. Teosinte crossing barrierl, a locus governing hybridization of teosinte with maize. Theor. Appl. Genet, 2001, 103: 259-265
[10] Gillinham,J .R., M.M .Shirer, et al. Relativeof occurrence of toxic concentrations of canide and nitrate invarieties of sudangrass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids[J].Agron.J ,1969,61:727-730
[11] Goering H K, Hemken R W, Clark N A, et al. Intake and digestibility of different maturities, varieties and plant populations. Animal Sci., 1970,29: 512
[12]Greg J. Cuomo, Daren D. Redfeam, and David C. Blouin. Plant density effects on tropical corn forage mass, morphology, and nutritive value. Agron. J. 1998, 90: 93-96
[13] Hans-Joachim G. Jung. Analysis of forage fiber and cell walls in ruminant nutrition. The Journal of Nutrition. 1997, 5: 810-813
[14] Hiernaux,P.,Diarra,L.and Deleeuw.P. N. Modelling tillering of annual grasses as a function of plant density: concentration to sahelian rangelands productivity and dynamics. Agricultural Systems, 1994,46:121-139
[15] Jauhar P P. Synthesis and cytological characterization of trigeneric hybrids involving durum wheat, Thinopyrum bessarabicum, and Lophopyrum elongatum. Theor. Appl. Genet, 1992, 84:511 -519
[16] Jerry H. Cherney., Marvin H. Hall. Forage quality inperspective. Agronomy Facts.2001, 30: 1-4
[17] Joseph C.Burns, Douglas S. et al. Nitrogen and defoliation management: Effect on yield and nutritive of flaccidgrass. Agron. J, 1998,90,85-92
[18] Jung H G,D R Mertens, and DR Buxton. Forage quality variation among maize inbreds: in vitro fiber digestion kinetics and prediction with NIRS.Crop Sci., 1998, 38:205-210
[19] Langer,R.H.M.Tillering in herbage grasses.Herb.Abstr,1963,33:141-148
[20] Larson, W.E., and J.J. Hanway. Corn and corn improvement. Corn production, 1977, 2: 625-669
[21] Muchow, R. C. Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid tropical environment: I . Leaf growth and leaf nitrogen. Field Crops Res. 1988a, 18: 1-16
[22] Neylon J. M. and L. kung, Jr. Effects of cutting height and maturity on the nutritive value of corn silage for lactating cows. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86: 2163-2169
[23]Paul chandler著，于旭华译．影响青贮玉米营养价值的因素及其评价方法[J]．国外畜牧 科技，2001，4：2526
[24] Pinter, L., Z. Alfoldi, Z. Burucs, and E. Paldi. 1994. Feed value of YuCao 1 hybrids varying in tolerance to plant density. Agron. J. 86:799-804
[25] Qilin Tang, Tingzhao Rong, Yunchun Song, et al. Introgression of perennial teosinte genome into maize and identification of genomic in situ hybridization and microsatellite markers. Crop Science, 2005,45: 717-721
[26] Reith, J. W. S., R. H. E. Inkson, et al. The effect of fertilizers on herbage production. 2. The effect of nitrogen, phosphous and potassium on botanical and chemical composition. J. Agr. Sci, 1964,63:209
[27] Rhykerd,C.L.,C.H.Noiler.The role of nitrogen in forage production[M].The Science of Gra ss land Agriculture.Third edition,The Iowa State University Press/Ames.Iowa,USA.1973, 416-424
[28] Rinne M,Jaakkola S,Huhtanen P,et al.The effect of grass growth stage at harvest on energy and protein values of silage for dairy cows.[R] Proceedings of the animal nutrition conference in Tartu,Estonia May, 1998,28-29
[29]Neylon J M,Wyattx L.Effects of cutting height and maturity on the nutritive value of corn silage for lactating cows.[J]Journal Dairy Science.2003,86:2163-2169
[30] Roland Welle, Willi Greten, et al. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy on Chopper to Measure Maize Forage Quality Parameters Online, Crop Sci., 2003,43:1407-1413
[31] Rutger.J. N& Crowder L.V. Effect of high plant density on silage and grain yield of six corn hybrids[J].CropSci., 1967,7:182-184
[32] Rutger J N, Crowder L V. Effect of population and row width on corn silage yields. Agron. J., 1967, 59:475-476
[33] Skalova H. and Krahulec F. The response of three Festuca rubra clones to changes in light quality and plant density. Functional Ecology, 1992,6: 282-290.
[34] Springer T. L., C. L. Dewald, P. L. Sims and R. L. Gillen. How Does Plant Population Density Affect the Forage Yield of Eastern Gamagrass? Crop Sci. (2003) 43:2206-2211
[35] Urbano.D. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and quality of three tropical grasses. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad del Zulia, 1997,14:1,129-139
[36] William D. Widdicombe and Kurt D. Thelen. Row width and plant density effect on corn forage hybrids. Agron. J., 2002, 94: 326-330
[37] Wright, D.L., and D.L. Pritchard. Tropical corn production and use. Agronomy Facts. 1988, 228
[38]安晓宁，胡耀高，刘渊等．中国畜牧业科学技术发展战略与对策(下)[J]．世界农业,1999，(3)：38-39
[39]白琪林，陈绍江等．近红外漫反射光谱法测定玉米秸秆NDF与ADF含量．光谱学与光谱分析,2004,24(11)：1345-1347
[40]白琪林，陈绍江等．近红外漫反射光谱法测定青贮玉米品质性状的研究．中国农业科学,2006,39(7)：1346-1351．车敦仁，郎百宁等．施氨水平对无芒雀麦产量和营养成分含量的影响．中国草业科学，1987，4(5)：11-16
[41]曹墨菊，荣廷昭，唐祈林．栽培玉米与近缘野生材料杂交后代的性状表现[J]．西南农业学报，2002，15(2)：9-12．陈喜斌主编．饲料学[M]．北京：科学出版社，2003，24-25
[42]陈锦新，张国平，赵国平．密度和氮肥对杂交狼尾草产量和品质的影响．浙江农业大学学报，1998,24(2)：185-188
[43]陈喜斌主编．饲料学[M]．北京：科学出版社，2003，24-25．丁成龙，顾洪如，白淑娟等．不同施肥量、密度对美洲狼尾草产量的影响[J].中国草地，1999，(5)：12-14
[44]董爱香，赵美琦等．夏季施氮、钾肥对高羊茅褐斑病的影响．草地学报，2002，10(3)： 203-206
[45]樊江文．在施肥和不施肥条件下刈割频度和强度对红三叶和鸭茅混播草地生产力的影响[J]．草业科学，1996，3：23-29
[46]冯国郡，阿不来提·阿不拉，梁晓玲等．分蘖多穗型青贮玉米密度对生物产量的影响及主要性状的相关分析[J]．新疆农业科学，2003，40(6)：344-346
[47]韩文友主编．饲料与饲养学[M]．北京：中国农业出版社，1997，5-10
[48]何世炜，常系华，张建全等．氮素用量和密度对玉米营养体产量的影响[J]．草业学报，2003，2：74-79
[49]胡延吉主编．植物育种学[M]．北京：高等教育出版社．2003，159-160
[50]胡跃高主编．中国农业结构变格机制研究[M]．北京：中国农业出版社，1998
[51]胡跃高，李志坚，李国辉．论我国绿色饲料产业建设基本战略问题[J]．中国农业大学学报，1998，3(5)：29-34
[52]霍成君，韩建国，洪绂曾等．刈割期和留茬高度对新麦草产草量及品质的影响[J]．草地学报,2000,8(4)：319-327
[53]霍成君，韩建国，洪绂曾等．刈割期和留茬高度对混播草地产草量和品质的影响[J]．草地学报,2001,23(4)：258-264
[54]姜华，毕玉芬，何承刚等．不同时期刈割对黑麦草生产性能、蛋白质含量及光合效率的影响[J]．云南农业大学学报，2003，2：149-152
[55]焦雄忠，程箴华．玉米种植密度问题的思考[J]．新疆农业科技，1997，6：10
[56]李冬郁，谷明光．玉米野生亲缘种质的应用[J]．广西农业科学，2000，3：123-125
[57]李冬郁，郭乐群，张忠等．玉米野生近缘种类玉米和研究和利用[J]．玉米科学，2001，9(2)：11-13
[58]李国辉，李志坚，胡跃高．青刈黑麦产草量与营养动态分析[J]．草地学报，2000，1：49-54
[59]李文庆，徐保民，冯永军等．氮肥对黑麦草生长及其内部组分的影响[J]．中国草地，2003，1：27-31
[60]李永刚，王婷．青贮玉米密度与产量及产量构成因素的研究．西北农业学报，2005，14(1)：149-152
[61]李志丹，白昌军等．刈割周期、施肥量对5种臂形草属牧草产量与品质的影响．热带农业科学，2006，26(4)：10-13
[62]李志坚，周道玮，胡跃高．不同施肥水平与组合对饲用黑麦生产性能的影响研究[J]．草业学报，2005，14(4)：72-81
[63]林洁荣，刘建昌，苏水金.留茬高度对闽牧42牧草的影响．草业科学,2002,19(8)：25-28
[64]李文庆，徐保民，冯永军等．氮肥对黑麦草生长及其内部组分的影响[J]．中国草地，2003，1：27-31
[65]黎裕，王天宇，石云素等．基因组学方法在玉米种质资源研究中的应用[J]．植物资源遗传学报，2003，4(3)：256-260
[66]刘彩霞、王康宁．用中性、酸性洗涤纤维及粗纤维预测猪饲粮消化能值的比较．西南农业学报，2000，13，增刊：51-56
[67]刘国栋．营养体农业与我国南方草业的持续发展[J]．草业学报，1999，(6)：1-7
[68]刘纪麟主编．玉米育种学(第二版)[M]．北京：中国农业出版社，2002，21-25
[69]刘景辉，赵宝平等．刈割次数与留茬高度对内农1号苏丹草产草量和品质的影响．草地学报，2005,13(2)93-96,110
[70]刘经荣，张美良，郑群英等．不同施N水平对黑麦草产量和品质的效应[J]．江西农业大学学报，2003，06：844-847
[71]刘敬阳，陈凤生．刈割方式对杂交狼尾草产草量的影响安徽农业科学．2005,33(6)：957-958，973
[72]刘洋．饲草刈青应注意的几个问题[J]．湖北畜牧兽医，2003，1：60-61
[73]卢茄义次主编，薛德蓉译．作物的光合作用与物质生产．科学出版杜，1979，451-468
[74]卢小良．青饲玉米抗性育种的远缘杂种优势试验[J]．华南农业大学学报，1993，14(4)：133-137
[75]吕殿青，同延安，孙本华等．氮肥施用对环境污染影响的研究．植物营养与肥料学报，1998,4(1)：8-15
[76]牛应泽．不同选育方法对“玉米×大刍草”远缘杂交(Zmays×Zmexicana)后代育种效果的研究[J]．四川农业大学学报，1993，11(4)：579-584
[77]潘永年．一年生黑麦草的氨肥增产效益[J]．草业科学，1989，6(1)：55-57
[78]任继周．草业科学研究方法[M]．北京：中国农业出版社．1998，189-191
[79]任继周，侯扶江．我国山区发展营养体农业是持续发展和脱贫致富的重要途径[J]．大自然探索,1999,(1)：48-52
[80]宋金昌，范莉，杨宗泽等．饲用墨西哥玉米生长特性及其营养成分含量的研究[J]．草业科学，2005，22(4)：53-56
[81]隋连敏，张丽英．淀粉酶用量对玉米样品中性洗涤纤维测定结果影响的研究．饲料工业，2002，23(10)：16-17
[82]孙学钊，梁祖铎．变换刈割间隔期对多年生黑麦草生长、产量、品质的影响．牧草与饲料,1991，1：19-23
[83]孙学钊，梁祖铎．变换留茬高度对多年生黑麦草再生长产量品质的影响．草业科学，1991，8(4)：63-68
[84]孙彦，史德宽，杨青川．施肥与刈割对新麦草产量影响的研究[J]．草地学报，1998,6(1)：11-19
[85]唐祈林，李晚忱，宋运淳等．玉米与四倍体多年生玉米代换种质的选育及其基因组原位杂交鉴定[J]．遗传学报，2004，31(4)：340-344
[86]唐祈林，荣廷昭．玉米近缘野生材料和自交系48-2及其远缘杂种F1过氧化物酶同工酶分析[J]．四川农业大学学报，2003，21(1)：10-13
[87]唐祈林，荣廷昭，潘光堂等．用玉米近缘材料创造玉米新种质[J]．作物学报，2000，33(增刊)：62-66
[88]唐祈林，杨克诚，郑祖平等．玉米与玉米近缘种可杂交性研究[J]．作物学报，2006，32(1)：144-146
[89]田立双，李凤山等．密度对杂交狼尾草产量和品质的影响．草业科学，2006，23(4)：50-53
[90]田松杰，石云素，宋燕春等．利用AFLP技术研究玉米与其野生近缘种的遗传关系[J]．作物学报，2004，30(4)：354-359
[91]佟屏亚．确立玉米在饲料中的主导地位[J]．中国农业资源与区划，1995(3)：24-27(8)：1555-1561
[92]瓦庆荣，代志进等．留茬高度对人工草地牧草产量及质量的影响,2000,9(1)：65-68
[93]王金梅，李运起等．刈割间隔时间对苜蓿产量、品质及越冬率的影响．河北农业大学学报，2006，29(3)：86-90
[94]王俊卿，董宽虎等．施肥水平和刈割制度对鸭茅生产性能的影响．草原与草坪，2000(2)：29-31
[95]王永军，王空军，董树亭等．氮肥用量、时期对墨西哥玉米产量及饲用营养晶质的影响[J]．中国农业科学,2005,38(3)：492-497
[96]王永军，王空军，董树亭等．留茬高度与刈割时期对墨西哥玉米再生性能的影响[J]．中国农业科学，2005，38(8)：1555-1561
[97]王永军，王空军，董树亭等．留茬高度与刈割时株高对墨西哥玉米产量及饲用品质的影响[J]．作物学报,2006,32(1)：155-158
[98]王永军，王空军，董树亭等．施氮对墨西哥玉米植株硝态氮累积及产量的影响[J]．作物学报,2006,32(3)：345-350
[99]王云，于忠等．密度对天农青饲1号高粱-苏丹草杂交种经济性状的影响．中国糖料,2005,(2)：39-41
[100]王朝辉，李生秀，田霄鸿等不同氮肥用量对蔬菜硝酸盐累积的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，1998，4(1)：22-28
[101]王朝辉，李生秀．蔬菜不同器官的硝态氮与水分、全氮、全磷的关系[J]．植物营养与肥，??1996,2，(2)：144-152
[102]夏劲伟．氮肥对一年生黑麦草产量及品质影响的研究．南京农业大学硕士学位论文，2000
[103]邢素芝，汪建飞等．施肥对高粱杂交草生长及干物质积累的影响．安徽技术师范学院学报,2002,16(2)：31-33
[104]徐广通，袁洪福．现代近红外光谱技术及应用进展．光谱学与光谱分析,2000,20(2)：134-142
[105]许岳飞，毕玉芬等．王草不同刈割次数、留茬高度与生理性状和产量关系的研究．四川草原，2006，122：23-27
[106]严衍禄，赵龙莲．现代近红外光谱分析的信息处理技术．光谱学与光谱分析,2000,20(6)：777-780
[107]杨恒山，王国君等．杂交狼尾草“牧特利”生物学特性及刈割次数对产草量和品质的影响．草地学报，2004，12(4)：318-321
[108]杨祈锋，滕怀渊，牛菊兰，等．饲用双低油菜华协1号营养成分含量动态及营养价值研究．草业学报，2003，12(2)：87-92
[109]姚爱兴，邵生荣，刘彩霞．不同施氮水平与播种量对宁苏丹草生长特性及产草量的影响[J]．中国草地，1997(5)：29-32,41
[110]余汝华，莫放等．刈割时间对青贮玉米秸秆饲料营养成分的影响冲国农学通报，2006，22(6)： 10-13
[111]于应文，蒋文兰，徐震．刈割对多年生黑麦草分蘖与叶片生长动态及生产力的影响[J]．西北植物学报，2002，22(4)：900-906
[112]曾日秋，郑芥丹，洪月云等．亚热带牧草闽牧42行距及留茬高度试验研究[J]．中国草地，2000，4：16-18
[113]詹秋文，钱章强．高梁和苏丹草杂种优势利用的研究[J]．作物学报，2004，30(1)：73-77
[114]詹秋文，钱章强，林平等．高梁．苏丹草杂交种产量构成因子及最适密度的研究．中国农学通报,2001，(17)5：18-20
[115]张德强，周国逸，温达志等．刈割时间和次数对牧草产量和品质的影响[J]．热带亚热带植物学报,2000,增刊Ⅲ：43-45
[116]张丽英主编．饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第二版)[M]．北京：中国农业大学出版社，2002，45-79
[117]张吉旺，王空军，胡昌浩等．种植密度对玉米饲用营养价值的影响[J]．杂粮作物，2000，20(5)：29-31
[118]张吉旺，胡昌浩，王空军等．种植密度对全株玉米饲用营养价值的影响[J]．中国农业科??学，2005，38(6)：1126-1131
[119]张吉鵾．反刍家畜粗饲料品质评定的指标及其应用比较．中国畜牧杂志,2006,42(5)：47-50
[120]张丽英主编．饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第二版)[M]．北京：中国农业大学出版社，2002，45-79
[121]张瑞珍，张恩和，孙长占．不同基因型玉米品种氮素营养效率差异的研究[J]．吉林农业大学学报,2003,25(2)：183-186
[122]郑庆福，李凤山．种植密度对杂交甜高粱“甜格雷兹”生长、品质及产量的影响．草原与草坪,2005,111(4)：61-65
[123]钟小仙，江海东等．氮肥水平和刈割间隔对杂交狼尾草根系活力和粗蛋白含量的影响．草业学报,2004,13(6)：60-64
[124]周从福，陈仙祥，张美霞等．墨西哥专用青饲玉米最佳种植密度研究[J]．贵州农业科学，2004，32(4)：35-37
[125]周洪生，邓迎海，李竞雄．玉米(Zea mays L．)×大刍草(Zea diploperennis L．)远缘杂交选育玉米自交系的研究[J]．作物学报，1997，23(3)：333-337
[126]周国逸，温达志，张德强等．割草对牧草分蘖萌发的影响[J]．热带亚热带植物学报，2000，增刊Ⅲ：28-34
[2] Brown, R.H., E.R. Beatty, W.J. Ethredge, and D.D. Hayes. Influence of row width and plant population on yield of two varieties of corn. Agron. J. 1970,62:767-770
[3] Cherney. DJR, Chemey. J H. Grass forage quality and digestion kinetics as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and maturity. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 1997,11 (2): 105-120
[4] Cox, W.J., D.J.R.Cherney, and J.J.Hanchar. Row spacing, hybrid, and plant density effects on corn silage yield and quality. J. 1998, Prod. Agric. 11:128-134
[5] Cox, W.J., S. Kalonge, D.J.R. Chreney, and W.S. Reid. Growth, yield, and quality of forage maize under different nitrogen management practices. Agron. J. 1993. 85: 341 -347
[6] Cummings,GA.,and Teel,M.R, Effect of nitrogen, potassium, and plant age on certain nitrogenous constituents and malate content of Orchardgrass (Dactylis gLomerrta L.). Agron, J,1965, 57: 127-129
[7] Cusicanqui, J.A., and J.G Lauer. 1999. Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agron. J. 91:911-915
[8]Evaeas，P.S．，任继周译．五种草地牧草三种留茬高度的多次采摘对根系生长的影响．畜牧兽医文摘．1974：74-45
[9] Evans MMS, Kermicle J L. Teosinte crossing barrierl, a locus governing hybridization of teosinte with maize. Theor. Appl. Genet, 2001, 103: 259-265
[10] Gillinham,J .R., M.M .Shirer, et al. Relativeof occurrence of toxic concentrations of canide and nitrate invarieties of sudangrass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids[J].Agron.J ,1969,61:727-730
[11] Goering H K, Hemken R W, Clark N A, et al. Intake and digestibility of different maturities, varieties and plant populations. Animal Sci., 1970,29: 512
[12]Greg J. Cuomo, Daren D. Redfeam, and David C. Blouin. Plant density effects on tropical corn forage mass, morphology, and nutritive value. Agron. J. 1998, 90: 93-96
[13] Hans-Joachim G. Jung. Analysis of forage fiber and cell walls in ruminant nutrition. The Journal of Nutrition. 1997, 5: 810-813
[14] Hiernaux,P.,Diarra,L.and Deleeuw.P. N. Modelling tillering of annual grasses as a function of plant density: concentration to sahelian rangelands productivity and dynamics. Agricultural Systems, 1994,46:121-139
[15] Jauhar P P. Synthesis and cytological characterization of trigeneric hybrids involving durum wheat, Thinopyrum bessarabicum, and Lophopyrum elongatum. Theor. Appl. Genet, 1992, 84:511 -519
[16] Jerry H. Cherney., Marvin H. Hall. Forage quality inperspective. Agronomy Facts.2001, 30: 1-4
[17] Joseph C.Burns, Douglas S. et al. Nitrogen and defoliation management: Effect on yield and nutritive of flaccidgrass. Agron. J, 1998,90,85-92
[18] Jung H G,D R Mertens, and DR Buxton. Forage quality variation among maize inbreds: in vitro fiber digestion kinetics and prediction with NIRS.Crop Sci., 1998, 38:205-210
[19] Langer,R.H.M.Tillering in herbage grasses.Herb.Abstr,1963,33:141-148
[20] Larson, W.E., and J.J. Hanway. Corn and corn improvement. Corn production, 1977, 2: 625-669
[21] Muchow, R. C. Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid tropical environment: I . Leaf growth and leaf nitrogen. Field Crops Res. 1988a, 18: 1-16
[22] Neylon J. M. and L. kung, Jr. Effects of cutting height and maturity on the nutritive value of corn silage for lactating cows. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86: 2163-2169
[23]Paul chandler著，于旭华译．影响青贮玉米营养价值的因素及其评价方法[J]．国外畜牧 科技，2001，4：2526
[24] Pinter, L., Z. Alfoldi, Z. Burucs, and E. Paldi. 1994. Feed value of YuCao 1 hybrids varying in tolerance to plant density. Agron. J. 86:799-804
[25] Qilin Tang, Tingzhao Rong, Yunchun Song, et al. Introgression of perennial teosinte genome into maize and identification of genomic in situ hybridization and microsatellite markers. Crop Science, 2005,45: 717-721
[26] Reith, J. W. S., R. H. E. Inkson, et al. The effect of fertilizers on herbage production. 2. The effect of nitrogen, phosphous and potassium on botanical and chemical composition. J. Agr. Sci, 1964,63:209
[27] Rhykerd,C.L.,C.H.Noiler.The role of nitrogen in forage production[M].The Science of Gra ss land Agriculture.Third edition,The Iowa State University Press/Ames.Iowa,USA.1973, 416-424
[28] Rinne M,Jaakkola S,Huhtanen P,et al.The effect of grass growth stage at harvest on energy and protein values of silage for dairy cows.[R] Proceedings of the animal nutrition conference in Tartu,Estonia May, 1998,28-29
[29]Neylon J M,Wyattx L.Effects of cutting height and maturity on the nutritive value of corn silage for lactating cows.[J]Journal Dairy Science.2003,86:2163-2169
[30] Roland Welle, Willi Greten, et al. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy on Chopper to Measure Maize Forage Quality Parameters Online, Crop Sci., 2003,43:1407-1413
[31] Rutger.J. N& Crowder L.V. Effect of high plant density on silage and grain yield of six corn hybrids[J].CropSci., 1967,7:182-184
[32] Rutger J N, Crowder L V. Effect of population and row width on corn silage yields. Agron. J., 1967, 59:475-476
[33] Skalova H. and Krahulec F. The response of three Festuca rubra clones to changes in light quality and plant density. Functional Ecology, 1992,6: 282-290.
[34] Springer T. L., C. L. Dewald, P. L. Sims and R. L. Gillen. How Does Plant Population Density Affect the Forage Yield of Eastern Gamagrass? Crop Sci. (2003) 43:2206-2211
[35] Urbano.D. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and quality of three tropical grasses. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad del Zulia, 1997,14:1,129-139
[36] William D. Widdicombe and Kurt D. Thelen. Row width and plant density effect on corn forage hybrids. Agron. J., 2002, 94: 326-330
[37] Wright, D.L., and D.L. Pritchard. Tropical corn production and use. Agronomy Facts. 1988, 228
[38]安晓宁，胡耀高，刘渊等．中国畜牧业科学技术发展战略与对策(下)[J]．世界农业,1999，(3)：38-39
[39]白琪林，陈绍江等．近红外漫反射光谱法测定玉米秸秆NDF与ADF含量．光谱学与光谱分析,2004,24(11)：1345-1347
[40]白琪林，陈绍江等．近红外漫反射光谱法测定青贮玉米品质性状的研究．中国农业科学,2006,39(7)：1346-1351．车敦仁，郎百宁等．施氨水平对无芒雀麦产量和营养成分含量的影响．中国草业科学，1987，4(5)：11-16
[41]曹墨菊，荣廷昭，唐祈林．栽培玉米与近缘野生材料杂交后代的性状表现[J]．西南农业学报，2002，15(2)：9-12．陈喜斌主编．饲料学[M]．北京：科学出版社，2003，24-25
[42]陈锦新，张国平，赵国平．密度和氮肥对杂交狼尾草产量和品质的影响．浙江农业大学学报，1998,24(2)：185-188
[43]陈喜斌主编．饲料学[M]．北京：科学出版社，2003，24-25．丁成龙，顾洪如，白淑娟等．不同施肥量、密度对美洲狼尾草产量的影响[J].中国草地，1999，(5)：12-14
[44]董爱香，赵美琦等．夏季施氮、钾肥对高羊茅褐斑病的影响．草地学报，2002，10(3)： 203-206
[45]樊江文．在施肥和不施肥条件下刈割频度和强度对红三叶和鸭茅混播草地生产力的影响[J]．草业科学，1996，3：23-29
[46]冯国郡，阿不来提·阿不拉，梁晓玲等．分蘖多穗型青贮玉米密度对生物产量的影响及主要性状的相关分析[J]．新疆农业科学，2003，40(6)：344-346
[47]韩文友主编．饲料与饲养学[M]．北京：中国农业出版社，1997，5-10
[48]何世炜，常系华，张建全等．氮素用量和密度对玉米营养体产量的影响[J]．草业学报，2003，2：74-79
[49]胡延吉主编．植物育种学[M]．北京：高等教育出版社．2003，159-160
[50]胡跃高主编．中国农业结构变格机制研究[M]．北京：中国农业出版社，1998
[51]胡跃高，李志坚，李国辉．论我国绿色饲料产业建设基本战略问题[J]．中国农业大学学报，1998，3(5)：29-34
[52]霍成君，韩建国，洪绂曾等．刈割期和留茬高度对新麦草产草量及品质的影响[J]．草地学报,2000,8(4)：319-327
[53]霍成君，韩建国，洪绂曾等．刈割期和留茬高度对混播草地产草量和品质的影响[J]．草地学报,2001,23(4)：258-264
[54]姜华，毕玉芬，何承刚等．不同时期刈割对黑麦草生产性能、蛋白质含量及光合效率的影响[J]．云南农业大学学报，2003，2：149-152
[55]焦雄忠，程箴华．玉米种植密度问题的思考[J]．新疆农业科技，1997，6：10
[56]李冬郁，谷明光．玉米野生亲缘种质的应用[J]．广西农业科学，2000，3：123-125
[57]李冬郁，郭乐群，张忠等．玉米野生近缘种类玉米和研究和利用[J]．玉米科学，2001，9(2)：11-13
[58]李国辉，李志坚，胡跃高．青刈黑麦产草量与营养动态分析[J]．草地学报，2000，1：49-54
[59]李文庆，徐保民，冯永军等．氮肥对黑麦草生长及其内部组分的影响[J]．中国草地，2003，1：27-31
[60]李永刚，王婷．青贮玉米密度与产量及产量构成因素的研究．西北农业学报，2005，14(1)：149-152
[61]李志丹，白昌军等．刈割周期、施肥量对5种臂形草属牧草产量与品质的影响．热带农业科学，2006，26(4)：10-13
[62]李志坚，周道玮，胡跃高．不同施肥水平与组合对饲用黑麦生产性能的影响研究[J]．草业学报，2005，14(4)：72-81
[63]林洁荣，刘建昌，苏水金.留茬高度对闽牧42牧草的影响．草业科学,2002,19(8)：25-28
[64]李文庆，徐保民，冯永军等．氮肥对黑麦草生长及其内部组分的影响[J]．中国草地，2003，1：27-31
[65]黎裕，王天宇，石云素等．基因组学方法在玉米种质资源研究中的应用[J]．植物资源遗传学报，2003，4(3)：256-260
[66]刘彩霞、王康宁．用中性、酸性洗涤纤维及粗纤维预测猪饲粮消化能值的比较．西南农业学报，2000，13，增刊：51-56
[67]刘国栋．营养体农业与我国南方草业的持续发展[J]．草业学报，1999，(6)：1-7
[68]刘纪麟主编．玉米育种学(第二版)[M]．北京：中国农业出版社，2002，21-25
[69]刘景辉，赵宝平等．刈割次数与留茬高度对内农1号苏丹草产草量和品质的影响．草地学报，2005,13(2)93-96,110
[70]刘经荣，张美良，郑群英等．不同施N水平对黑麦草产量和品质的效应[J]．江西农业大学学报，2003，06：844-847
[71]刘敬阳，陈凤生．刈割方式对杂交狼尾草产草量的影响安徽农业科学．2005,33(6)：957-958，973
[72]刘洋．饲草刈青应注意的几个问题[J]．湖北畜牧兽医，2003，1：60-61
[73]卢茄义次主编，薛德蓉译．作物的光合作用与物质生产．科学出版杜，1979，451-468
[74]卢小良．青饲玉米抗性育种的远缘杂种优势试验[J]．华南农业大学学报，1993，14(4)：133-137
[75]吕殿青，同延安，孙本华等．氮肥施用对环境污染影响的研究．植物营养与肥料学报，1998,4(1)：8-15
[76]牛应泽．不同选育方法对“玉米×大刍草”远缘杂交(Zmays×Zmexicana)后代育种效果的研究[J]．四川农业大学学报，1993，11(4)：579-584
[77]潘永年．一年生黑麦草的氨肥增产效益[J]．草业科学，1989，6(1)：55-57
[78]任继周．草业科学研究方法[M]．北京：中国农业出版社．1998，189-191
[79]任继周，侯扶江．我国山区发展营养体农业是持续发展和脱贫致富的重要途径[J]．大自然探索,1999,(1)：48-52
[80]宋金昌，范莉，杨宗泽等．饲用墨西哥玉米生长特性及其营养成分含量的研究[J]．草业科学，2005，22(4)：53-56
[81]隋连敏，张丽英．淀粉酶用量对玉米样品中性洗涤纤维测定结果影响的研究．饲料工业，2002，23(10)：16-17
[82]孙学钊，梁祖铎．变换刈割间隔期对多年生黑麦草生长、产量、品质的影响．牧草与饲料,1991，1：19-23
[83]孙学钊，梁祖铎．变换留茬高度对多年生黑麦草再生长产量品质的影响．草业科学，1991，8(4)：63-68
[84]孙彦，史德宽，杨青川．施肥与刈割对新麦草产量影响的研究[J]．草地学报，1998,6(1)：11-19
[85]唐祈林，李晚忱，宋运淳等．玉米与四倍体多年生玉米代换种质的选育及其基因组原位杂交鉴定[J]．遗传学报，2004，31(4)：340-344
[86]唐祈林，荣廷昭．玉米近缘野生材料和自交系48-2及其远缘杂种F1过氧化物酶同工酶分析[J]．四川农业大学学报，2003，21(1)：10-13
[87]唐祈林，荣廷昭，潘光堂等．用玉米近缘材料创造玉米新种质[J]．作物学报，2000，33(增刊)：62-66
[88]唐祈林，杨克诚，郑祖平等．玉米与玉米近缘种可杂交性研究[J]．作物学报，2006，32(1)：144-146
[89]田立双，李凤山等．密度对杂交狼尾草产量和品质的影响．草业科学，2006，23(4)：50-53
[90]田松杰，石云素，宋燕春等．利用AFLP技术研究玉米与其野生近缘种的遗传关系[J]．作物学报，2004，30(4)：354-359
[91]佟屏亚．确立玉米在饲料中的主导地位[J]．中国农业资源与区划，1995(3)：24-27(8)：1555-1561
[92]瓦庆荣，代志进等．留茬高度对人工草地牧草产量及质量的影响,2000,9(1)：65-68
[93]王金梅，李运起等．刈割间隔时间对苜蓿产量、品质及越冬率的影响．河北农业大学学报，2006，29(3)：86-90
[94]王俊卿，董宽虎等．施肥水平和刈割制度对鸭茅生产性能的影响．草原与草坪，2000(2)：29-31
[95]王永军，王空军，董树亭等．氮肥用量、时期对墨西哥玉米产量及饲用营养晶质的影响[J]．中国农业科学,2005,38(3)：492-497
[96]王永军，王空军，董树亭等．留茬高度与刈割时期对墨西哥玉米再生性能的影响[J]．中国农业科学，2005，38(8)：1555-1561
[97]王永军，王空军，董树亭等．留茬高度与刈割时株高对墨西哥玉米产量及饲用品质的影响[J]．作物学报,2006,32(1)：155-158
[98]王永军，王空军，董树亭等．施氮对墨西哥玉米植株硝态氮累积及产量的影响[J]．作物学报,2006,32(3)：345-350
[99]王云，于忠等．密度对天农青饲1号高粱-苏丹草杂交种经济性状的影响．中国糖料,2005,(2)：39-41
[100]王朝辉，李生秀，田霄鸿等不同氮肥用量对蔬菜硝酸盐累积的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，1998，4(1)：22-28
[101]王朝辉，李生秀．蔬菜不同器官的硝态氮与水分、全氮、全磷的关系[J]．植物营养与肥，??1996,2，(2)：144-152
[102]夏劲伟．氮肥对一年生黑麦草产量及品质影响的研究．南京农业大学硕士学位论文，2000
[103]邢素芝，汪建飞等．施肥对高粱杂交草生长及干物质积累的影响．安徽技术师范学院学报,2002,16(2)：31-33
[104]徐广通，袁洪福．现代近红外光谱技术及应用进展．光谱学与光谱分析,2000,20(2)：134-142
[105]许岳飞，毕玉芬等．王草不同刈割次数、留茬高度与生理性状和产量关系的研究．四川草原，2006，122：23-27
[106]严衍禄，赵龙莲．现代近红外光谱分析的信息处理技术．光谱学与光谱分析,2000,20(6)：777-780
[107]杨恒山，王国君等．杂交狼尾草“牧特利”生物学特性及刈割次数对产草量和品质的影响．草地学报，2004，12(4)：318-321
[108]杨祈锋，滕怀渊，牛菊兰，等．饲用双低油菜华协1号营养成分含量动态及营养价值研究．草业学报，2003，12(2)：87-92
[109]姚爱兴，邵生荣，刘彩霞．不同施氮水平与播种量对宁苏丹草生长特性及产草量的影响[J]．中国草地，1997(5)：29-32,41
[110]余汝华，莫放等．刈割时间对青贮玉米秸秆饲料营养成分的影响冲国农学通报，2006，22(6)： 10-13
[111]于应文，蒋文兰，徐震．刈割对多年生黑麦草分蘖与叶片生长动态及生产力的影响[J]．西北植物学报，2002，22(4)：900-906
[112]曾日秋，郑芥丹，洪月云等．亚热带牧草闽牧42行距及留茬高度试验研究[J]．中国草地，2000，4：16-18
[113]詹秋文，钱章强．高梁和苏丹草杂种优势利用的研究[J]．作物学报，2004，30(1)：73-77
[114]詹秋文，钱章强，林平等．高梁．苏丹草杂交种产量构成因子及最适密度的研究．中国农学通报,2001，(17)5：18-20
[115]张德强，周国逸，温达志等．刈割时间和次数对牧草产量和品质的影响[J]．热带亚热带植物学报,2000,增刊Ⅲ：43-45
[116]张丽英主编．饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第二版)[M]．北京：中国农业大学出版社，2002，45-79
[117]张吉旺，王空军，胡昌浩等．种植密度对玉米饲用营养价值的影响[J]．杂粮作物，2000，20(5)：29-31
[118]张吉旺，胡昌浩，王空军等．种植密度对全株玉米饲用营养价值的影响[J]．中国农业科??学，2005，38(6)：1126-1131
[119]张吉鵾．反刍家畜粗饲料品质评定的指标及其应用比较．中国畜牧杂志,2006,42(5)：47-50
[120]张丽英主编．饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第二版)[M]．北京：中国农业大学出版社，2002，45-79
[121]张瑞珍，张恩和，孙长占．不同基因型玉米品种氮素营养效率差异的研究[J]．吉林农业大学学报,2003,25(2)：183-186
[122]郑庆福，李凤山．种植密度对杂交甜高粱“甜格雷兹”生长、品质及产量的影响．草原与草坪,2005,111(4)：61-65
[123]钟小仙，江海东等．氮肥水平和刈割间隔对杂交狼尾草根系活力和粗蛋白含量的影响．草业学报,2004,13(6)：60-64
[124]周从福，陈仙祥，张美霞等．墨西哥专用青饲玉米最佳种植密度研究[J]．贵州农业科学，2004，32(4)：35-37
[125]周洪生，邓迎海，李竞雄．玉米(Zea mays L．)×大刍草(Zea diploperennis L．)远缘杂交选育玉米自交系的研究[J]．作物学报，1997，23(3)：333-337
[126]周国逸，温达志，张德强等．割草对牧草分蘖萌发的影响[J]．热带亚热带植物学报，2000，增刊Ⅲ：28-34