用户名: 密码: 验证码:
房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
居民消费需求不足,房价过高是目前我国宏观经济的核心问题,就如何扩大国内居民有效需求、抑制房价的快速上涨显然已成为我国政府宏观调控工作的重点。房地产市场的快速发展,使得房地产业与经济增长和宏观经济稳定之间关系越来越紧密,其中一个重要渠道就是房价对居民消费的影响。但是,我国很多城市房价收入比过高、波动幅度较大,这不仅可能会抑制住房消费,而且可能已经出现了房地产泡沫。房地产泡沫的产生,会加大我国经济平稳发展的隐患,风险隐患可能从房地产领域传导至金融领域,引发金融危险,使银行的房地产信贷违约率提高和信用风险加大。一直以来,我国货币政策当局与经济学家对房地产价格波动表现出极大地关注与兴趣,关于房价波动对消费的影响由此成为大家纷纷研究的热点。目前为止,大多数研究基本上都认可了房价波动对居民消费具有显著的财富效应,而且这种财富效应比股市等其余金融资产的财富效应要大。不过也有一些学者对此提出质疑,他们认为住房本身就具有特殊性,它具有消费和投资的双重属性,如果把住房的消费品属性考虑进来,财富效应是否能发挥就不确定了。因此,研究房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响机理,不仅对房地产市场的健康发展,而且对改善居民生活水平与协调经济健康发展都具有重要理论和现实意义。
     根据以往房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的相关文献,我们可知房价对居民消费的影响因研究对象的不同,选取样本及其运用方法的差异,结果具有很明显的不确定性特征。对于产生不确定性的原因,本文归纳为以下三点:第一,房价对消费影响的正向财富效应和负面挤出效应是相互影响甚至是相互抵消的,最终房价对消费的净效应取决于这两种效应的力量比较;第二,房价波动能否及时变现为流动性资产取决于抵押借贷成本的高低和信贷市场的发达程度,对于发展较为完善的信贷市场国家而言,房价波动对消费的影响可能更倾向于财富效应,但对于发展不完善的信贷市场国家来说,影响更倾向于负效应;第三,财富效应渠道和抵押效应渠道并不真正是由房价波动导致的结果,而是由其他影响房价和消费的共同因素,如收入、利率和信贷约束条件等的作用,导致房价和消费朝同一方向变动,才使得房价和消费表现出一定程度的正相关性。
     因此,本文要研究房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响,就必须将这些不确定性因素考虑进来,才能更为准确地估计出房价对消费的真实影响。我们采取以下措施:第一,在消费效用函数中加入住房消费的影响,考虑住房的消费品属性;第二,在消费者实现消费最优化过程中,加入住房的资金约束和抵押约束条件,考虑住房的投资品属性;第三,将影响消费和房价的共同因素加入模型中,避免出现遗漏变量偏差问题。
     基于此,与以往相关文献不同,本文不仅考虑了住房的投资品属性,还将住房的消费品属性考虑进来,在消费者跨期最优选择模型基础上,引入房价、住房面积以及消费习惯、借贷约束等相关变量,构建出在消费习惯、不确定性、流动性约束条件下,能够检验出房价波动对居民消费影响的动态面板模型,就房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响进行多层次分析。不仅探讨房价对我国城镇居民消费的整体影响效应,而且就房价波动对居民消费的影响效应是否存在非对称性也进行研究,同时还考察了房价波动对居民消费的中东西地区差异,以及是否存在门槛效应也展开了深入探讨。
     兼顾考虑住房的投资品和消费品双重属性,对本文所构建的动态面板模型进行多层次的实证分析,研究发现:(1)我国城镇居民受到较强消费习惯与收入敏感性的影响。(2)考虑非对称效应时,房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响整体表现为财富效应,不过存在明显的非对称性,房价向上波动10%将使得居民消费支出增长0.263%,而房价向下波动10%将引起其相应下降0.208%。显然,城镇居民消费变化随房价上涨的幅度稍大于随其下降的幅度。(3)考虑地区性差异时,东西部地区房价波动对城镇居民消费表现为促进作用,房价每上涨10%,其相应的消费支出分别增长0.729%、0.054%;而中部地区与之相反,房价上涨对居民消费支出具有挤出效应,抑制其增长,房价每上涨10%,消费支出下降0.484%。显然,房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响表现出明显的地区差异性,影响差异不仅体现在强度上面,在影响方向上也有所反映,且差异会随着房价波动幅度的变化发生改变。(4)考虑门槛效应时,房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响存在门槛效应,即房价温和上涨推动财富升值,提振消费信心,而房价上涨过快将施与居民压力,引致当前消费减少。当房价涨幅小于门槛值13.31%时,对城镇居民消费的影响以财富效应为主导,且影响大小随房价涨幅呈先增大后减少的倒U形曲线特征,在临界值6.55%整体财富效应达到最大;若房价涨幅大于13.31%,挤出效应占据主导地位,且随房价进一步攀升更加明显。
The residents' insuffic ient consumptio n de mand, high hous ing price are the coreproble ms of our country's macroeconomic, on how to expand domestic effectivedema nd, curb the rapid increasing of hous ing price have obvious ly become the focusof the governme nt macroeconomic regulatio n and contro l in our country. The rapiddeve lopme nt of the real estate market, making the relations hip of real estate industrywith economic growth a nd macroeconomic stability become more c losed, one of theimportant channe ls is the influe nce of hous ing price to consumption. However,hous ing price rises so obvious ly that make the hous ing price to inco me ratio is high inmany c ities of our country, whic h not only inhib ite the hous ing consumption, but alsoaggravate the bubble of real estate price. The existe nce of real estate bubble will beaggravate the hidden risk to steadily deve lop about the economic, the risk fro m therea l estate sector may be spread to the fina ncia l sector, trigger fina nc ial risk, increasethe bank real estate credit defa ult rates and credit risk. For a long time, mo netaryauthorities and economists has s hown great interesting with price fluctuation of rea lestate, the relations hip about the m has become a research hotspot. So far, most studiesgenera lly found that the hous ing price to residents' consumption has a significantwealth effect, and the wea lth effect is b igger tha n the rest o f the financ ia l assets suchas stock market. But, there are also ha ve other sounds, they think the hous ing itse lfhas particular characteristics with the dua l nature of cons umption and investment, iftak ing the hous ing cons umption goods attrib ute into account, the wealth effect isuncerta in to pla y. Therefore, studying the impact mecha nis m of price fluctuation tourban residents' consumptio n, not only to the hea lthy deve lop ment o f the rea l estatemarket, but also to improve the residents' living standard and coordinating economichealthy developme nt ha ve important theoretical and practical s ignificance.
     Based on past related literature of price fluctuation on res idents' consumptio n,we know the results have obvious characteristic of uncerta inty due to the d ifferencesof the research object, se lect sa mples and the method. For causes of the uncertainty,this artic le summarized as the three fo llowing po ints: first, the wealth effect and thecrowding-out effect about the impact of house price on cons umption are influenceeach other and even cance l out, the fina l net e ffect depends on the power of these twoeffects; Second, house price fluctuatio n can time ly liquidation of liq uid ity assets depends on borrowing costs of the d iscretion mortga ge and develop ment of creditmarket, for the deve lopment o f perfect credit ma rket, house price fluctuation oncons umptio n may be more inc lined to the wealth effect, but for imperfectdeve lopme nt of cred it market, the effect are more prone to negative effect; Third, thewealth e ffect channe l and the collatera l channel are not really caused by pricefluctuation, but by other common factors that affect the hous ing price andcons umptio n in the sa me direction, such as income, interest rates and creditconstra ints, which make house price and cons umptio n show certain degree of p ositivecorrelation.
     Therefore, to study the effect of price fluctuatio n on China urban residents'cons umptio n, it is necessary to take these uncerta inties into account, so that we willbe more accurate ly estimate the rea l impact. Thus we take the following measures:First, adding the e ffect of ho us ing consumptio n into the consumption utility function,cons idering the hous ing consumption attribute; Second, in the process of optimizationto consumer cons umptio n, joining the conditio ns of hous ing funding constraints andmortga ge constra ints, cons idering the housing investment property; Third, adding thecommo n factors influe nc ing the consumption and hous ing price, avo iding the proble mof omitted variable bias.
     Based on this, unlike the previous literature, this paper not only cons iders thehous ing investme nt property, but a lso takes the ho us ing consumptio n attrib ute intoaccount. we induce hous ing price, housing area, consumptio n habits, borrowingconstra ints, and other re lated variables into the consumption inter-temporal optima lselectio n model, establis he a dyna mic panel model which can test the effect out of thehouse price fluctuation to res idents' consumption, ana lyzing the multip le effectperspectives of house price impact on urban res idents' consumptio n in China,discuss ing the effect of price to overall of urban residents' consumption, and stud yingthe asymmetry impact of house price fluctuations on residents' consumption, what’smore, we also inspecte the regio na l differences about the house price fluctuation toresidents' consumptio n, as well as the thresho ld effect about the m.
     Both cons idering the dua l attributes of hous ing investme nt and consumptio ngoods, this paper constructe a dyna mic pane l model to emp ir ical ana lys is formulti-leve l, the results shown that:(1)China's urban residents are affected by thestrong consumption habits and income sens itivity.(2)cons ider ing the asymmetriceffect of ho use price fluctuatio n impact on China urban residents' consumption, theoverall performance is the wealth effect, but shown obvio us asymmetry, house price upward fluctuation b y10%will enab le consumption spend ing increased by0.263%,downward the same percentage will cause consumption corresponding fa ll by0.208%.Obvious ly, the urban residents' consumption c hanges along with the price ris ingslightly greater than the decline.(3) considering the regio nal d ifferences, the effect ofhouse price fluctuation on urban residents' consumption is wealth effect in the easternand western regio nal, house price rises per10%, the correspond ing consumption willbe growth of0.729%,0.054%respective ly; by contrast, the impact of house price oncons umptio n shows crowding-out effect in the central regio n, house price rises per10%, the consumption will be drop by0.484%. Obvio us ly, the effect of house pricefluctuation o n China urban res idents' consumption s hown c lear regiona l d ifferences,the differences not only reflected in the intens io n, but also in the influence direction,and the differences will be changed as the range of house price volatility.(4)cons idering the thresho ld e ffect, the paper puts forward house price influe nc ingcons umptio n exists thresho ld effect, house price ris ing modestly promotes wealthapprec iatio n, boosts consumptio n confide nce; Price ris ing excess ive ly fast bringshuge pressure, causes current consumption to reduce. if ho use price rises less than13.31%, the impact of house price ris ing on consumption is do minated by the wealtheffect, with the increasing of ho use price the effect size shown inverted u-shapedcurve characteristic, the overall wealth effect reaches the maximum on the critica lvalue6.55%, if the margin of house price rising is greater than13.31%, the overalleffect appears crowding out effect with house price ris ing further more obvious effect.
引文
①数据根据历年《中国统计年鉴》数据整理计算所得,下同。
    ①不少研究如李文星等(2008)[103]、王学义、张冲(2013)[104]等就专门从人口年龄结构的变动来寻求我国居民消费需求不足的原因。因此,我们在模型中加入抚养系数尽量减少遗漏变量偏差问题。
    ①根据历年《中国统计年鉴》数据整理得出,下同。
    ①注:数据来源于历年的《中国统计年鉴》和31个省市的统计年鉴数据计算所得。
    ①本章是在《统计研究》文章《房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响研究》基础上完成的。
    ①1998年的住房制度改革,使得1998年之后房地产才开始市场化。黄静、屠梅曾(2009)[51]就特别强调要使用房改以后的数据。韩丽鹏等(2010)[69]、高波、王辉龙(2011)[125]均是采取房改之后的数据。
    ①抚养系数的影响系数小说明我国人口年龄结构变化并不是目前居民消费过低的原因。(李文星等,2008[103])
    ①本章是在《统计研究》文章《房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响研究》基础上完成的。
    ①况伟大(2011)[61]计算得出2008年我国35个大中城市房价收入比高达7.43,大于根据世界银行(1992)房价收入比4-6倍的经验数据,认为高房价收入比抑制了我国住房消费,而且产生了房价泡沫,并指出中等收入者难以承受如此之高的房价水平。一些学者甚至指出,北京、上海等一线城市的房价收入比超过20以上(白彦锋,2012)[134]。
    ①根据历年《中国统计年鉴》数据整理得出,下同。
    ①刘宗明(2012)[78]认为财政分权增加了地方政府对土地财政的依赖,地方政府在单位土地上期望更高的价格,而地价的提高导致房地产开发成本增加,进而推动房价上涨。
    [1] Sheiner L. Hous ing Prices and the Savings of Re nters, Journa l of UrbanEconomics,1995,38(1):94-125
    [2] Carroll C D, Otsuka M, Slacalek J. How large is the Hous ing Wealth Effect? ANew Approach. NBER Working Paper12746,2006, Cambridge, MA02138,1-18
    [3] Piazzes i M, Schne ider M, Tuze l S. Hous ing, Consumption, and asset pric ing.Nationa l bureau o f econo mic research,2006, Cambridge, MA02138,531-569
    [4] Yoshikawa H, Ohtake F. Fema le labor supply, hous ing dema nd, and the savingRate in Janpan European Econoemic Review,1989,33:997-1030
    [5] Enge lhardt G V. House Price and Home Owner Saving Beha vior. Regiona lScie nce and Urban Econo mics,1996,(36):209-237
    [6] Case K E. Real Estate and the Macroeconomy. Brookings Papers on EconomicActivity,2000,(2):119-162
    [7] Mehra Y P. The Wealth Effect in Emp irical Life-Cycle Aggre gate Consumpt ionEquations. Econo mic Quarterly Federal Reserve Bank o f Richmo nd,2001,87(2):45-68
    [8] Giro uard N, Blo ndal S. House Prices and Econo mic Activity, Organization forEconomic Cooperatio n and Developme nt Econo mics. Department WorkingPaper No279,http://cd i.mecon.go v.ar/biblio/docelec/oecd/edwp279.pdf,2001
    [9] Chen J. Reevaluating the Assoc iatio n between Housing Wealth and AggregateConsumption: New Evidence fro m Sweden. Journa l of Hous ing Econo mics,2006,(4):321-348
    [10] Iacovie llo M. Hous ing wea lth and consumptio n. Federal Reserve BoardInternationa l Finance Discuss ion, http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2011/1027/default. htm,2011
    [11] Ludvigson S, Steinde l C. How important is the Stock Market Effect onConsumption. Econo mic Polic y Review,1999,5(2):29-51
    [12] Sousa R M. Fina nc ial Wealth, Hous ing Wea lth and Consumption. Internationa lResearch Journa l of F ina nce and Econo mics,2008,(19):167-191
    [13] Bostic R S, Gabrie l S, Painter G. Ho using Wealth, Financ ia l Wealth, a ndConsumption: New Evidence from Micro Data. Regio nal Science and UrbanEconomics,2009,39(1):79-89
    [14] Raphael B, Stuart G, Gary P. Hous ing wealth, fina nc ial wea lth, andcons umptio n: New evidence fro m micro data. Regio na l Scie nce a nd UrbanEconomics,2009,(39):79-89
    [15] Thomson M, Tang K K. An Empirical Assessment of House Price Adjustments onAggregate Consumption. Paper Prepared for The Australasian MacroeconomicsWorkshop Australian National University, Canberra15-16April, http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv.php?pid=UQ:10509&dsID=MacroWorkshop.pdf,2004
    [16] Boone. Financial Market Liberalization. OECD Working Paper, www.ru.nl/.../semmler_young_financia lmarketliberalization.pdf,2002
    [17] Kim K H. Housing and the Korean Economy. Journa l of Housing Econo mics,2003,13:321-341
    [18] Bover O. Wealth Effects on Consumption: M icroeconometric Estimates fromThe Spanish Surgery o f House hold F ina nces. Working Paper, No.0522,http://www. bde.es,2005
    [19] Case K E, Quigley J M, Shiller R. Comparing Wealth Effects: The StockMarket versus the Housing Market. Advances in Macroeconomics,2005,5(1):1235-1255
    [20] Takhtama nova Y, Sierminska E. Wealth Effects out of Fina nc ial and Hous ingWealth: Cross Country and Age Group Comparisons. Work ing Paper,http://www. frbsf.org/econo mic-research/files/wp07-01bk.pdf,2007
    [21] Gan J. Hous ing Wealth and Consumptio n Growth: Evidence from a Large Panelof Househo lds. SSRN Working Paper Series, http://www.ckgsb.edu.cn/userfiles/doc/ck_frsc_2008_4234_07.pdf,2007
    [22] Raymond Y C, Man K F, Choy L. The impact of Hous ing a nd Fina nc ial Wealthon Household Consumption: Evidence fro m Hong Kong. Journa l of Rea l EstateLiterature,2007,(3):429-440
    [23] Elliott J. Walter Wealth and Wea lth Proxies in a Perma nent Income Mode l.Quarterly Journa l o f Economics, MIT Press,1980,(5):509-535
    [24] Levin L. Are assets fungible? Testing the behaviora l theory o f life-cyclesavings. Econ. Organ. Beha vior,1998,59-83
    [25] Phang S Y. Strategic Develop ment of Airport and Rail Infrastructur e Case ofSingapore. Transport Policy,2003,10(l):27-33
    [26] Haurin D R, Rosentha l S S. House price appreciatio n, savings and consumerexpenditures. Ohio State University Working Paper, http://www.econ.ohio-state.edu/haurin/wp/House%20Price%20Appreciation,%20Savings,%20and%20Consumer%20Expend itures.pdf,2006
    [27] Muellbauer J. Hous ing, Credit a nd Consumer Expend iture. Symposium Paper,http://www.kc.frb.org/pub licat/sympos/2007/pdf/2007.09.17.muellba uer.pdf,2007
    [28] Calo miris C, Longho fer S D, Miles M. The (Mythica l?) Hous ing Wea lth Effect.NBER Working Paper, No.15075, www.nber.org/papers/w15075.pdf,2009
    [29] André C, Gupta R, Kanda P T. Do House Prices Impact Consumption andInterest Rate? OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No.947,http://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/947-en.html,2013
    [30] Li W, Yao R. The life-cyc le effects of ho use price changes. Journal o f Money,Credit, and Banking,2007,39(6):1375-1409
    [31] Campbell J, Cocco J. How Do House Prices Affect Consumption? Evidencefro m Micro Data. Journa l of Monetary Econo mic,2007,54(3):591-621
    [32] Munne ll A H, Soto M. The Hous ing Bubble and Retire ment Security. CRRWorking Paper, crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ib_8-12.pdf,2008.
    [33] Attanasio O P, Robert L, Andrew B, Busts. Consumptio n, House Prices andExpectations. Econo mica,2009,(301):20-50
    [34] Calo miris C W, Longho fer S D, Miles W. The Hous ing Wealth Effect: TheCruc ia l Roles of De mographics, Wea lth Distrib ution and Wealth Shares. NBERWorking Papers17740, Natio na l Bureau o f Economic Research,2012,2:49-99
    [35] Greenspan A. Opening Re marks. Presentatio n at Federal Reserve Bank ofKansas City Symposium. http://www.kc.frb.org/pub licat/InLateAugust/InLateAugust.pdf,2001
    [36] Case K E, Quigle y J M, Shiller R J. Comparing Wealth Effects: The StockMarket versus the Housing Market. University of C alifornia, Berkeley,2003,(9):1-15
    [37] Edison H, Bayoumi T. Wealth Effects and the New Econo my. Internationa lMonetary Fund, http://onlinelibrary.wile y.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2362.00085/pdf,2002
    [38] Dvornak N, Kohler M. Hous ing Wealth, Stock Market Wealth and Consumption:APane l Leve l Ana lys is for Australia. The Economic Record,2003,83(261):117-130
    [39] Benja min J D, Chinloy P, Jud D. Real Estate versus Financ ia l Wealth inConsumption. The Journa l o f Real Finance and Economic,2004,29:341-354
    [40] Sousa R M. Consumptio n,(Dis)aggregate Wealth, and Asset Returns. Journa l ofEmpirica l Finance,2010,17(4):606-622
    [41]唐建伟.股票与房地产价格变化对消费的影响.上海金融学院学报,2004,(1):48-51
    [42]刘建江,杨玉娟,袁冬梅.从消费函数理论看房地产财富效应的作用机制.消费经济,2005,21(2):93-96
    [43]邬丽萍.房地产价格上涨的财富效应分析.求索,2006,(1):27-29
    [44]李国学.美国房地产价格变动趋势及其经济效应分析.国际经济评论,2006,(11-12):39-43
    [45]邓健,张玉新.房价波动对居民消费的影响机制.管理世界,2011,(4):171-172
    [46]黄平.我国房地产财富效应与货币政策关系的实证检验.上海金融,2006,(6):32-35
    [47]骆祚炎.基于流动性的城镇居民住房资产财富效应分析—兼论房地产市场的平稳发展.当代经济科学,2007,29(4):51-56
    [48]骆祚炎.居民金融资产结构性财富效应分析:一种模型的改进.数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(12):97-110
    [49]宋勃.房地产市场财富效应的理论分析和中国经验的实证检验:1998-2006.经济科学,2007,(5):41-53
    [50]丁攀,胡宗义.股价与房价波动对居民消费影响的动态研究.统计与决策,2008,(15):106-108
    [51]黄静,屠梅曾.房地产财富与消费:来自于家庭微观调查数据的证据.管理世界,2009,(7):35-45
    [52]崔光灿.房地产价格与宏观经济互动关系实证研究—基于我国31个省份面板数据分析.经济理论与经济管理,2009,(1):57-62
    [53]王柏杰,何炼成,郭立宏.房地产价格、财富与居民消费效应—来自中国省际面板数据的证据.经济学家,2011,(5):57-65
    [54]朱新玲,黎鹏.我国房地产市场财富效应的实证分析.武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006,(2):16-18
    [55]刘旦,姚玲珍.中国城镇住宅财富效应的微观检验.北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008,24(1):33-39
    [56]李祥,李勇刚.人口抚养比、房价波动与居民消费-基于面板数据联立方程模型.经济管理研究,2013,(3):35-41
    [57]赖溟溟,白钦先.我国居民消费财富效应的实证研究.上海金融,2008,(8):15-18
    [58]杜莉,潘春阳,张苏予,蔡江南.房价上升促进还是抑制了居民消费—基于我国1172个地级市城市面板数据的实证研究.2010,浙江社会科学,(8):24-30
    [59]李成武.中国房地产财富效应地区差异分析.财经问题研究,2010,(2):124-129
    [60]唐志军,徐会军,巴曙松.中国房地产市场波动对宏观经济波动的影响.统计研究,2010,27(2):15-22
    [61]况伟大.房价变动与中国城市居民消费.世界经济,2011,(10):21-34
    [62]陈彦斌,邱哲圣.高房价如何影响居民储蓄率和财产不平等.经济研究,2011,(10):25-38
    [63]陈健,陈杰,高波.信贷约束、房价与居民消费率.金融研究,2012,(4):45-57
    [64]朱国钟.“房奴效应”还是“财富效应”?—房价上涨对国民消费影响的一个理论分析.管理世界,2013,(3):34-47
    [65]陈斌开,杨汝岱.土地供给、住房价格与中国城镇居民储蓄.经济研究,2013,(1):110-122
    [66]王培辉,袁薇.中国房地产市场财富效应研究—基于省际面板数据的实证分析.当代财经,2010,(6):92-98
    [67]陈健,高波.收入差距、房价与消费变动-基于面板数据联立方程模型的分析.2012,(2):53-62
    [68]张红.房地产经济学.北京,清华大学出版社,2005
    [69]韩丽鹏,谢秀娥,郭晓杰.我国房地产价格的财富效应研究—基于35个大中城市面板数据的分析.价格理论与实践,2010,(1):64-65
    [70]许家军,葛扬.收入差距对我国房地产财富效应的影响.现代经济探讨,2011,(3):84-87
    [71]谢洁玉,吴斌珍,李宏彬,郑思齐.中国城市房价与居民消费.金融研究,2012,(6):13-27
    [72]刘建江,杨玉娟.浅议房地产市场财富效应及其传导机制.中国房地产金融,2005,(7):7-10
    [73]马辉.股票市场、房地产市场对消费行为的影响.吉林大学硕士学位论文,吉林大学,2006
    [74]李玉山,李晓嘉.对我国居民消费的财富效应计量分析.山西财经大学学报,2006,(2):71-74
    [75]张漾滨.中国股价与房价波动对居民消费的影响研究.管理世界,2012,(1):178-179
    [76] Attanasio O P, Weber G. Is Consumption Growth Cons istent with Interte mporalOptimization? Evidence fro m the Cons umer Expend iture Surve y. Journa l ofPolitica l Econo my,1995,103(6):1121-1157
    [77] Attanasio O, Blow L, Hamilto n R, et al. Booms and Busts: Consumptio n,House Prices and Expectations. Working Paper, Institute for Fiscal Stud ies,London,http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp0524.pdf,2005
    [78]刘宗明.财政分权、房价上涨与消费抑制.财经科学,2012,(2):54-62
    [79] Caner M, Hansen B E. Instrumenta l Variable Estimation o f A Thres hold Mode l.Econometric Theory,2004,20(5):813-843
    [80] Keynes J M. The General Theory of Emp loyme nt Interest and Money. NewYork, Publis hed by Class ic Books America,1936
    [81] Duesenberry J S. Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior.Cambridge, Harvard Univers ity Press,1949
    [82]李春风,陈乐一,李玉双.消费习惯下我国城镇居民持久收入的边际消费倾向-基于缓冲储备模型的理论与实证分析.2012,(11):61-70
    [83]李春风,陈乐一,刘建江.房价波动对我国城镇居民消费的影响研究.统计研究,2013,(2):14-22
    [84] Modigliani F, Brumberg R. Utility Ana lys is and the Consumptio n Function: AnInterpretation o f Cross-Section Data. Post Keynes ian Eco nomics RutgersUniversity Press,1954,388-436
    [85] Friedman M. A Theory of the Consumption Functio n. Prineeton, PrineetonUniversity,1957
    [86] Hall R. Stochastic Imp licatio n of the Life Cycle-Perma nent Income Hypothesis:Theory and Evide nce. Journa l of Politica l Econo my,1978,(86):971-987
    [87]孙从海.消费信用理论研究与经验考察.西南财经大学出版社,2003
    [88]许永兵.消费行为与经济增长:以中国城镇居民为例的实证研究.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007
    [89] Zeldes S. Consumption and liq uid ity constra ints: an e mpirica l investigatio n.Journa l of Politica l Economy,1989,(2):305-346
    [90] Deaton A. Saving and Liq uidity Constraint. Econometrica l.1991,59(5):1221-1248
    [91] Lela nd H E. Savings and uncerta inty: the precautio nary demand for saving.Quarterly Journa l o f Economics,1968,82(3):465-473
    [92] Lusadi A. On the importance of the Precautio nary Saving Motive. AmericanEconomic Review,1998,88(2):449-453
    [93] Dyna n K E. How Prudent are Cons umers? Journa l of Politica l Economy.1993,101(6):1104-1113
    [94] Carroll C D. Summers L H. Consumption growth paralle ls income growth:Some new evidence. In: Bernhe im, B., Shoven, J.B.(Eds.), Nationa l Savingsand Economic Performa nce. Chicago Univers ity Press, http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5995.pdf,1991
    [95] Carroll C D. The buffer stock theory of saving: Some macroeconomic evidence.Brookings Pap. Econ. Act,1992,(2):61-135
    [96] Deaton A. Understand ing Cons umptio n. Oxford: Oxford Univers ity Press,1992
    [97]龙志和,周浩明.我国城镇居民预防性储蓄实证研究.经济研究,2000,(11):33-38
    [98] Shea J. Myopia, Liq uid ity Constraints, and Aggregate Consumptio n: A SimpleTest. Journa l of Money, Credit and Bank ing,1995,27(3):798-805
    [99] Campbell J Y, Mank iw N G. Consumption, Income and Interest Rates:Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annua l,1989,4:185-216
    [100] Muellbauer J. Habits, Rationa lity and Myopia in the Life Cyc le ConsumptionFunction. Annales d’ Economie et de Statistique,1988,(9):47-70
    [101] Dyna n K E. Habit Formation in Consumer Preference, Evide nce fro m PanelData. The America n Economic Re view,2000,90(3):391-406
    [102] Campbell J, Mankiw G. Perma nent Inco me Current Income, and Consumptio n.Journa l of Bus iness Economics and Statistics,1990,8(3):265-279
    [103]李文星,徐长生,艾春荣.中国人口年龄结果和居民消费:1989-2004.经济研究,2008,(7):118-129
    [104]王学义,张冲.中国人口年龄结构与居民医疗保健消费.统计研究,2013,(3):59-63
    [105] Ludwig, A, Slock T. The Impact of Changes in Stock Prices and House Priceson Consumption in OECD Countries. IMF Working Paper, http://www. imf.org/externa l/pubs/cat/lo ngres.cfm?sk=15554.0,2002
    [106]刘红.房地产周期与经济周期的互动机理研究.北京,新华出版社,2010
    [107] Skinner J S. Hous ing Wealth and aggre gate Saving.1989
    [108]朱仁友,丁如曦.2002年~2010年中国西部地区房价收入比分析.价格月刊,2012,(7):16-20
    [109]崔光庆,王景武.中国区域金融差异与政府行为理论与经验解释.金融研究,2006,(6):79-89
    [110]龙海明,唐怡,凤伟俊.我国信贷资金区域配置失衡研究.金融研究,2011,(9):54-64
    [111]李春风,陈乐一,李玉双.我国收入等级不同城镇居民的消费敏感性.湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2012,(6):73-78
    [112]陈乐一.建国以来我国历次经济波动回眸.管理世界,2007,(12):148-149
    [113]陈乐一,粟壬波.当前中国经济周期阶段研究.学习与探索,2013,(5):98-103
    [114] Westerlund J. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin ofEconomics and Statistics,2007,69:709-748
    [115] Benito A, Mumtaz H. Consumptio n Excess Sens itivity, Liq uid ity Constra intsand The Collatera l Ro le of Hous ing. Working Paper No.306, Bank of England,http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=933296,2006-08
    [116] Iacovie llo M, Minetti R. The Credit Channe l of Monetary Polic y: Evidencefro m the Hous ing Market. Journa l of Macroeconomics,2008,30(1):69-96
    [117] Iacovie llo M. Housing Wealth and Consumption. Internationa l Encyc lopedia ofHousing and Home,2012,673-678
    [118] Aok i K. Houses as Collateral: has the link between House Prices andConsumption in the UK changed? Econo mic policy review,2002,8(1):163-177
    [119] Case K E, Quigley J M, Shiller R. Comparing Wealth Effects: The StockMarket versus the Hous ing Market. University of California, Berkeley,2003,September:1-15
    [120]段忠东,朱孟楠.扩大内需政策下的房价冲击与居民消费增长-厦门的实证研究.中央财经大学学报,2011,(5):86-91
    [121]曾砥柱.我国股票市场财富效应及非对称性研究:[湖南大学硕士学位论文].长沙:湖南大学,2009
    [122] Caba llero R J. Consumptio n Puzzles and Precautionary Savings. Journal ofMonetary Economics,1990,(25):113-136
    [123] Carroll C D. How Does Future Inco me Affect Current Consumption? QuarterlyJourna l of Ecomo mics,1994,109(1):111-148
    [124] Carroll C D. Theoretica l Foundations of Buffer Stock Saving. NBER WorkingPaper, http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/57365/1/665471742.pdf,2004
    [125]高波,王辉龙.长三角房地产价格波动与居民消费的实证分析.产业经济研究,2011,(1):1-10
    [126] Arellano M, Bover O. Another Look at Instrume nta l Variab le Estimation ofError Components Mode ls. Journa l o f Eco nometrics,1995,68:29-51
    [127] Blundell R, Bond S. Initia l conditio ns and mo ment restrictio ns in dynamicpane l data mode ls. Journa l o f Econometrics,1998,87:115-143
    [128] Apergis N, Miller S. Consumptio n asymmetry a nd the Stock Market: Emp iricalEvidence. Economics Letters,2006,93:337-342
    [129]胡永刚,郭长林.股票财富、信号传递与中国城镇居民消费.经济研究,2012,(3):115-126
    [130]李亚明,佟仁城.中国房地产财富效应的协整分析和误差修正模型.系统工程理论与实践,2007,(11):1-7
    [131]姚玲珍,丁彦皓.房价变动对不同收入阶层消费的挤出效应-基于上海市的经验论证.现代财经,2013,(5):3-15
    [132]杜莉,沈建光,潘春阳.房价上升对城镇居民平均消费倾向的影响-基于上海入户调查数据的实证研究.金融研究,2013,(3):44-57
    [133]姚树洁,戴颖杰.房地产资产财富效应的区域效应与时序差异:基于动态面板模型的估计.当代经济科学.2012,34(6):88-97
    [134]白彦锋.房产税未来能成为我国地方财政收入的可靠来源吗.经济理论与经济管理,2012,(5):57-64
    [135]刘建江,周湘辉.双重效应下房价上涨对我国居民消费影响的实证研究.学海.2010,(3):151-156
    [136] Hansen B E. Inference When a Nuisa nce Parameters is not identified under theNull Hypothesis. Econo metrica,1996,64(2):413-430
    [137] Hansen B E. Thresho ld Effects in Non-Dyna mic Panels: Estimatio n, Testing,and Inference. Journa l of Econo metrics,1999,93:345-368
    [138] Hansen B E. Sa mple Splitting and Thresho ld Estimation. Economet Rica,2000,68:575-603
    [139]牟峰.近年来我国房价上涨原因分析:[华南理工大学硕士学位论文].广州:华南理工大学,2010
    [140] Gocrffre y, Andrew M. Modeling Re giona l House price:A Review o f the Literat-ure. The Center for Spatia l and Real Estate Department o f Economies,1998,The Univers ity o f Reading
    [141]徐忠平,卫鹏鹏.房价上涨的原因及平抑措施.中国物价,2005,(5):62-64
    [142]曲世军,张友祥.我国房价上涨的原因及对策分析.经济纵横,2007,(9):33-35
    [143]王菁娜,陈朔.我国房价上涨的特殊原因及对策建议.经济纵横,2009,(12):122-125
    [144]吴锦华.我国城市房价上涨的深层次原因与对策.经济管理,2010,32(4):167-172
    [145]沈艳.货币供应量、通胀、刚性需求推高房价-再议房价上涨原因及对策建议.价格理论与实践,2011,(2):31-32
    [146]冉令杰.房价上涨的原因分析.经济研究导刊,2012,(4):158
    [147]哈继铭.人口结构与城市化推动房地产发展.中国房地信息,2007,(7):28-29
    [148]刘学良.婴儿潮是房价的主要“推手”.新产经,2012,(11):37-38
    [149]谢琛,袁建华.基于灰色理论的人口年龄结构对房地产需求影响分析.数学的实践与认识,2010,40(10):201-209
    [150] Wei S J, Zhang X B. The Competitive Saving Motive: Evidence fro m Ris ingSex Ratios and Saving Rates in China. Journal of Politica l Economy,2011,119:511-564
    [151] Gyourko J, Linne man P. The Affordab ility o f the American Drea m: AnExa mination of the Last30Years. Journal o f Hous ing Research,1993,(4):39-72
    [152] Mark Duda,郑思齐.利率和收入差距如何左右住房支付能力.城市开发,2006,(10):53-55
    [153]茅于轼.过大的收入差距是房地产泡沫的一个主要原因[EB/OL]. http://blog.Eastmone y.com/maoyushi888/blo g_140308187.html,2010
    [154] Simon H A. The Inc idence of a Ta x on Urban Real Property. The QuarterlyJourna l of Econo mics,1943,57(3):398-420
    [155] Netzer D. Econo mics of the Property Tax. Washingto n, BrookingsInstitute,1966
    [156] Hamilto n B W. Zoning and Property Taxatio n in a System o f LocalGovernments. Urban Studies,1975,(12):205-211
    [157] Hamilto n B W. Cap italization o f Intrajurisd ictiona l Differences in Loca l TaxPrices. The American Econo mic Review,1976,66(5):743-753
    [158] Fische l W A. Property Ta xation and the Tiebout Model: Evidence for theBenefit View fro m Zo ning and Voting. Journa l o f Ec ono mic Literature,1992,30(1):171-177
    [159] Fische l W A. Homevoters, Munic ipal Corporate Governance, and the BenefitView o f the Property Tax. Nationa l Tax Journa l,2001,54(1):157-173
    [160] Mieszkowski P. The Property Tax: An Exc ise Tax or a Profits Tax. Journa l o fPublic Econo mics,1972,1(1):73-96
    [161] Mieszkowski P M, Zodrow G B. The New View of the Property Tax: AReformulatio n. Regiona l Science and Urban Economics,1986,16(3):309-327
    [162]况伟大.房产税、地价与房价.中国软科学,2012,(4):25-37
    [163]林毅夫,蔡昉,李周.中国经济转型时期的地区差距分析.经济研究,1998,(6):1-3
    [164] Bouguigno n F, Morrisson C. Inequa lity and Deve lopment: the Role of Dua lis m.Journa l of Deve lopme nt Econo mics,1998,57:233-257
    [165]陆铭,陈钊,万广华.因患寡,而患不均—中国的收入差距、投资、教育和增长的相互影响.经济研究,2005,(12):4-14
    [166]陈硕,高琳.央地关系:财政分权度量及作用机制再评估.管理世界,2012,(6):43-59
    [167] Quigley J M, Raphae l S. Is Housing Unaffordable? Why Isn't It MoreAffordab le? Journa l o f Economic Perspectives,2004,(18):191-214
    [168]陈钊,陈杰,刘晓峰.安得广厦千万间:中国城镇住房改革的回顾与展望.世界经济文汇,2008,(1):43-54
    [169]尹中立.房价上涨拉大收入差距.中国证券报,2010-6-30

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700