2050热轧增加板坯侧压能力可行性研究
|
摘要
宝钢2050热轧于1989年建成投产,经历二十多年的新产品开发,以适应激烈的市场竞争,其在品种与规格上均比设计时有较大的突破。新型高硬度组轧材的变形抗力目前难以在原设计的侧压量下顺利轧制,增加板坯侧压能力成为2050热轧亟待解决的难题。
本文详细论述了增加板坯侧压能力的整个流程,它包括必要性论证、改造方案的选择、改造后板坯厚度增大对于后续水平轧机的影响,并以此为工程背景,通过建立侧压过程有限元模型,系统研究了不同定宽机模块对于轧制力及板形变化的影响,为改造过程中定宽机的选型提供了依据,同时对于改善轧制过程稳定性及轧后板形质量具有重要作用。本文研究工作取得了如下主要结果:
1、2050热轧线对于板坯的调宽主要由E1立辊轧机完成,E1轧机在实际生产中出现的侧压能力不足说明了改造的必要性。在增加侧压能力的三种可供选择中,确定了增建SSP定宽机为最佳方案。另外还对比分析了三家SSP制造商产品的各自特点。
2、在分析侧压轧制原理、SSP结构及模块运动模型的基础上,利用Marc软件建立了SSP侧压有限元模型,得出了模块工作面数量、模块截面形状对于轧制力峰值的影响规律。此外,在板坯变形方面,得出了板坯头部失宽量、切头切尾量、“狗骨”高度与侧压量间的回归曲线函数关系式,比较了三种SSP模块侧压后对轧制力及板形影响的优劣。
3、对立辊轧机实际生产中,辊槽因磨损和重车变宽对轧后板坯横截面形状产生的影响做了分析,得出了对于板坯“狗骨”形状的影响规律。此外研究了立辊辊槽不对中对轧制后板坯形状的影响,解释了造成板形恶化的原因。
4、研究了进一步提高立辊轧制力时,E1轧机的工作状态。通过建立E1轧机重要部件机架、丝杆螺母的有限元模型,计算了在轧制极限负荷8MN的条件下,轧机力学薄弱点的位置,提出了改进方案,结果为提升现有设备轧制能力提供了理论依据。
5、研究了增建SSP后,对后续R1水平轧机的影响。以经SSP最大侧压量350mm轧制后的板坯为研究对象,计算了R1轧机此时在满足咬入条件下的最大压下量以及稳定轧制条件,提出了改善咬入和稳定轧制的措施。另外,通过建立SSP侧压和水平轧制综合有限元模型确定轧制力,校核了R1主电机功率,结果表明其在改造后,仍满足带钢压下的需求。
Founded and put into operation in 1989. Baosteel 2050 has a twenty-year’s history of new product development to face the market competition. It has a major breakthrough in the varieties and specifications than the original design. However, it now turns hard for original lateral pressure to roll high deformation-resistance slab efficiently. Thus, increasing slab lateral pressure becomes a key issue that 2050 hot rolling needs to solve.
This paper discusses the entire process of increasing slab lateral pressure. It includes preliminary necessity studies, reform plan's determination and influence on the following horizontal mill after reform. Take this as project background, it studys the influence of different die shapes on rolling force and slab shape by establishing the FEM model of SSP process. The result provides reference in SSP selection during the application of transformation process. In addition, it also has important theoretical reference value in improving the stability of pressing process and the quality of rolled slab shape. This research has main results as following:
1. Slab width reduction is mainly completed by E1 edger mill. Reform necessity has been proven by frequent lateral pressure insufficiency of E1 during practical production. Adding SSP has been chosen as the best option comparing to others. Besides, products' characteristics from there different SSP manufactures have been compared.
2. Based on the analysis of rolling theory, SSP structure and motion model. the FEM model of SSP process has been built by software Marc, which simulates and studys the influence of die’s working face quantity and section shape on the peak of rolling force. And refering to slab shape deformation, it regresses the function between slab head width reduction, head and tail cut, dog-bone height and edging draughts respectively. Thus, the merits of three SSP die on rolling force and slab shape has been compared.
3. Influence of abraded and lathed vertical roll groove on the dog-bone shape of rolled slab has been studied during actual production of edger mill. Besides, influence of the unalignment of vertical roll groove and slab on rolled slab shape has also been analyzed, which demonstrates the reason of corresponding slab deterioration.
4. E1 mill's working condition has been studied when further increasing lateral pressure of edger mill. Through establishing FEM model of E1 edger mill's key components such as mill stand and screw/nut pairs, the location of probable mechanical failure under ultimate rolling load 8MN has been forecasted, and corresponding improving solution has been proposed. The result provides a theoretical reference in increasing slab lateral pressure of present equipment.
5. The following R1 horizontal mill's working condition after adding SSP has been studied. Taking the slab rolled by SSP under maximum amount of lateral pressure 350mm as research object, this chapter calculates R1 mill's both maximum pressing volume under the requirements of biting condition and subsequent stable rolling condition. In addition, by establishing the comprehensive FEM model of both SSP pressing and horizontal rolling, it calculates the rolling force and then checks R1 mill's main electric motor power, result shows that it still meets the rolling requirements after adding SSP.
本文详细论述了增加板坯侧压能力的整个流程,它包括必要性论证、改造方案的选择、改造后板坯厚度增大对于后续水平轧机的影响,并以此为工程背景,通过建立侧压过程有限元模型,系统研究了不同定宽机模块对于轧制力及板形变化的影响,为改造过程中定宽机的选型提供了依据,同时对于改善轧制过程稳定性及轧后板形质量具有重要作用。本文研究工作取得了如下主要结果:
1、2050热轧线对于板坯的调宽主要由E1立辊轧机完成,E1轧机在实际生产中出现的侧压能力不足说明了改造的必要性。在增加侧压能力的三种可供选择中,确定了增建SSP定宽机为最佳方案。另外还对比分析了三家SSP制造商产品的各自特点。
2、在分析侧压轧制原理、SSP结构及模块运动模型的基础上,利用Marc软件建立了SSP侧压有限元模型,得出了模块工作面数量、模块截面形状对于轧制力峰值的影响规律。此外,在板坯变形方面,得出了板坯头部失宽量、切头切尾量、“狗骨”高度与侧压量间的回归曲线函数关系式,比较了三种SSP模块侧压后对轧制力及板形影响的优劣。
3、对立辊轧机实际生产中,辊槽因磨损和重车变宽对轧后板坯横截面形状产生的影响做了分析,得出了对于板坯“狗骨”形状的影响规律。此外研究了立辊辊槽不对中对轧制后板坯形状的影响,解释了造成板形恶化的原因。
4、研究了进一步提高立辊轧制力时,E1轧机的工作状态。通过建立E1轧机重要部件机架、丝杆螺母的有限元模型,计算了在轧制极限负荷8MN的条件下,轧机力学薄弱点的位置,提出了改进方案,结果为提升现有设备轧制能力提供了理论依据。
5、研究了增建SSP后,对后续R1水平轧机的影响。以经SSP最大侧压量350mm轧制后的板坯为研究对象,计算了R1轧机此时在满足咬入条件下的最大压下量以及稳定轧制条件,提出了改善咬入和稳定轧制的措施。另外,通过建立SSP侧压和水平轧制综合有限元模型确定轧制力,校核了R1主电机功率,结果表明其在改造后,仍满足带钢压下的需求。
Founded and put into operation in 1989. Baosteel 2050 has a twenty-year’s history of new product development to face the market competition. It has a major breakthrough in the varieties and specifications than the original design. However, it now turns hard for original lateral pressure to roll high deformation-resistance slab efficiently. Thus, increasing slab lateral pressure becomes a key issue that 2050 hot rolling needs to solve.
This paper discusses the entire process of increasing slab lateral pressure. It includes preliminary necessity studies, reform plan's determination and influence on the following horizontal mill after reform. Take this as project background, it studys the influence of different die shapes on rolling force and slab shape by establishing the FEM model of SSP process. The result provides reference in SSP selection during the application of transformation process. In addition, it also has important theoretical reference value in improving the stability of pressing process and the quality of rolled slab shape. This research has main results as following:
1. Slab width reduction is mainly completed by E1 edger mill. Reform necessity has been proven by frequent lateral pressure insufficiency of E1 during practical production. Adding SSP has been chosen as the best option comparing to others. Besides, products' characteristics from there different SSP manufactures have been compared.
2. Based on the analysis of rolling theory, SSP structure and motion model. the FEM model of SSP process has been built by software Marc, which simulates and studys the influence of die’s working face quantity and section shape on the peak of rolling force. And refering to slab shape deformation, it regresses the function between slab head width reduction, head and tail cut, dog-bone height and edging draughts respectively. Thus, the merits of three SSP die on rolling force and slab shape has been compared.
3. Influence of abraded and lathed vertical roll groove on the dog-bone shape of rolled slab has been studied during actual production of edger mill. Besides, influence of the unalignment of vertical roll groove and slab on rolled slab shape has also been analyzed, which demonstrates the reason of corresponding slab deterioration.
4. E1 mill's working condition has been studied when further increasing lateral pressure of edger mill. Through establishing FEM model of E1 edger mill's key components such as mill stand and screw/nut pairs, the location of probable mechanical failure under ultimate rolling load 8MN has been forecasted, and corresponding improving solution has been proposed. The result provides a theoretical reference in increasing slab lateral pressure of present equipment.
5. The following R1 horizontal mill's working condition after adding SSP has been studied. Taking the slab rolled by SSP under maximum amount of lateral pressure 350mm as research object, this chapter calculates R1 mill's both maximum pressing volume under the requirements of biting condition and subsequent stable rolling condition. In addition, by establishing the comprehensive FEM model of both SSP pressing and horizontal rolling, it calculates the rolling force and then checks R1 mill's main electric motor power, result shows that it still meets the rolling requirements after adding SSP.
引文
[1]史荣,左虹,戚向东等.宝钢2050连轧机新产品开发与轧机能力评估.钢铁. 2007, 42(12): 45-46
[2]曹建国,张杰,张少军.轧钢设备及自动控制.北京:化学工业出版社. 2010.
[3]侯张宝.板坯调宽技术.南方钢铁. 1989,(1):9-10
[4]冯宪章.连铸坯在线大侧压调宽技术及其应用.北京:冶金工业出版社. 2008.
[5]金学俊.现代热轧新技术.世界钢铁. 1955,77(3):48-55
[6]张冶.热轧宽带钢轧机发展方向.钢铁技术. 1995,(4):10-11
[7] Masahiro Takeuchi. Heavy Width Reduction Rolling of Slabs. Nippon Steel Technical Report. 1983,(21):235-246
[8] Hideyuki Nikaidu. Development of Slab Sizing Press for Heavy Width Reduction in Hot Strip Mills. Iron&Steel Engineer. 1990,(9):21-26
[9] Muller H A, Robde W. Behaviour of Slabs Under Deformation in a Sizing Press With Large Width Reductions. MPT. 1992,15(5):60-69
[10]王昭东,李辉.调宽压力机-热轧板带调宽技术的新进展.上海金属. 1993,15(2):14-15
[11]单芳.定宽压力机提高热轧机的灵活性.太钢译文. 1995,(3):41-43
[12]冯宪章,刘才,江光彪等. 1580大侧压定宽机运动学仿真及优化分析.机械工程学报. 2004,40(8):178-182
[13]焦四海.调宽压力机调宽过程的有限元分析.东北大学,博士学位论文. 1998.
[14]张齐兵. IHI定宽压力机的运动学分析.冶金设备. 1998,(5):9-11
[15]冯宪章.宝钢SP定宽机侧压框架动力学分析.重型机械. 2004,(2):34-37
[16] Vladimir B, Ginzburg. Width Control in Hot Strip Mills. Iron&Steel Engineer. 1991,68(6):25-39
[17] Nakamura S. Slab Width Control for Hot Direct Rolling. Transactions ISIJ. 1988,(28):110-116
[18]焦四海,周旭,刘相华等.调宽压力机调宽过程中的弹塑性有限元分析.钢铁. 1999,(10):21-23
[19]焦四海,周旭,刘相华等.调宽压力机调宽时板坯变形影响因素.钢铁. 1999,(12):34-38
[20]焦四海,周旭.调宽压力机调宽时板坯变形特点.钢铁. 2000,35(12):34-37
[21]冯宪章,刘才,江光彪. SP侧压过程板坯头部失宽的有限元分析.钢铁. 2005,40(3):56-58
[22]冯宪章,刘才.定宽机主曲柄初始位置对模块有效行程的影响.燕山大学学报. 2004,28(6):471-474
[23]史荣,江光彪,刘才等. SP轧机运动状态分析.钢铁. 2005,(8):11-13
[24]史荣,刘才,李旭明等. SP定宽机侧压冲击力的有限元模拟及试验研究.机械工程学报. 2006,(6):34-36
[25]王英杰,江光彪,刘才等. SP轧制过程及侧压模块受力的测试研究及有限元分析.钢铁. 2004,39(7):42-46
[26]杨雄,李长生,刘相华等.用有限元法分析板坯调宽过程中切头量的变化.钢铁研究学报. 2002,(6):7-9
[27]杨雄,李长生,刘相华等.连铸板坯大侧压不对称变形有限元分析.钢铁研究. 2002,(1):7-9
[28]杨雄,板坯SP调宽不对称变形及其切头量有限元分析.东北大学,硕士学位论文. 2002.
[29]占红创,大侧压机运动特性及其同步控制方法研究.东北大学,硕士学位论文. 2005.
[30]宁宇,周成,曹燕等. SP大侧压变形后板坯形状的研究.塑性工程学报. 2009,16(2):96-100
[31]陈键就,李保生. SP大侧压定宽机模块运动轨迹图谱分析.重型机械. 1998,(1):25-27
[32]刘慧,齐志新,王国栋等.不同形状立辊轧边变形的有限元分析.冶金设备. 2004,(2):19-21
[33]刘慧,高彩茹,王国栋等.立辊形状对板坯断面形状的影响.塑性工程学报. 2003,10(5):86-89
[34]杜晓钟,王爱丽,张中元.热带钢粗轧立辊调宽轧制过程变形研究及应用.太原科技大学学报. 2009,30(1):36-39
[35]刘慧,王国栋,刘相华.立辊轧边的显式动力有限元模拟.钢铁研究学报. 2006,18(3):18-20
[36] Biggs D L, Hardy S J, Brown K J. Finite Element Modeling of Camber Development During Hot Rolling of Strip Steel. Iron and Steel Making. 1998,25(1):81-89
[37] Biggs D L, Hardy S J. Influence of Process Variables on Development of Camber During Hot Rolling of Strip Steel. Iron and Steel Making. 2000,27(1):55-62
[38] Tanaka Y, Omori K, Miyake T. Camber Control Techniques in Plate Rolling. Kawasaki Steel Technical Report. 1987,6(16):12-20
[39]熊尚武,吕程,刘相华等.孔型立轧过程的三维刚塑性有限元分析.应用力学学报. 1999,16(4):149-153
[40]熊尚武,朱祥霖,王超.热带粗轧机组立轧变形规律研究.轧钢. 1996,(5):2-4
[41]熊尚武,朱祥霖,刘相华等.热带粗轧机组立轧稳定轧制变形规律的实验研究和有限元分析.塑性工程学报. 1997,4(1):60-65
[42]金兹伯格VB著.姜明东,王国栋译.高精度板带材轧制理论与实践.北京:冶金工业出版社. 2000.
[43]章传国,韩静涛,刘靖.立辊调宽热粗轧过程三维有限元模拟.塑性工程学报. 2006,13(1):74-77
[44]许建国,杜晓钟.热带钢粗轧立辊调宽轧制过程有限元模拟.冶金设备. 2007,(4):31-33
[45]喻海良,刘相华,赵宪明等.多道次立-平辊轧制立辊孔型对轧件头尾形状影响的有限元分析.钢铁研究学报. 2007,19(1):26-30
[46]喻海良,刘相华,李长生.立辊孔型内倒角半径对轧件变形的影响.钢铁. 2006,41(6):47-51
[47]赵宪明,王国栋,朴海斗等.立辊形状对粗轧板坯侧弯的影响.东北大学学报. 2002,23(12):1174-1176
[48]刘海平. SP定宽机轧制过程的有限元模拟.燕山大学,硕士学位论文. 2003.
[49]冯宪章,刘才.板坯定宽过程狗骨分布的有限元分析.冶金设备. 2004,(4):1-3
[50]蒋昭等.宝钢2050毫米带钢热连轧机装备研制技术.哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社. 1998.
[51]苗润涛. 1580mm热轧机板坯大侧压新技术.宝钢技术. 1998,(2):27-31
[52]李景洋.大侧压定宽机在宝钢三热轧中的应用.中国计量协会冶金分会2007年年会. 2007.
[53]李铁柱,郑万德. SP大侧压定宽机性能讨论.鞍钢技术. 2002,(1):50
[54]李旭明. SP轧机的动力学分析.燕山大学,硕士学位论文. 2004.
[55]冯宪章,王利红,王金凤.模块角度对板坯截面形状的影响.塑性工程学报.2005,12(1):98-101
[56]陈火红. Marc有限元实例分析教程.北京:机械工业出版社. 2002.
[57]温景林.金属材料成型摩擦学.沈阳:东北大学出版社. 2000.
[58] H.Grafe, W.Rohde. Flexible Hot Strip Prodcution by Use of a Slab Sizing Press. Iron and Exposition of AIAE. 1993,(9):20-23
[59]张小平,秦建平.轧制理论.北京:冶金工业出版社. 2006.
[2]曹建国,张杰,张少军.轧钢设备及自动控制.北京:化学工业出版社. 2010.
[3]侯张宝.板坯调宽技术.南方钢铁. 1989,(1):9-10
[4]冯宪章.连铸坯在线大侧压调宽技术及其应用.北京:冶金工业出版社. 2008.
[5]金学俊.现代热轧新技术.世界钢铁. 1955,77(3):48-55
[6]张冶.热轧宽带钢轧机发展方向.钢铁技术. 1995,(4):10-11
[7] Masahiro Takeuchi. Heavy Width Reduction Rolling of Slabs. Nippon Steel Technical Report. 1983,(21):235-246
[8] Hideyuki Nikaidu. Development of Slab Sizing Press for Heavy Width Reduction in Hot Strip Mills. Iron&Steel Engineer. 1990,(9):21-26
[9] Muller H A, Robde W. Behaviour of Slabs Under Deformation in a Sizing Press With Large Width Reductions. MPT. 1992,15(5):60-69
[10]王昭东,李辉.调宽压力机-热轧板带调宽技术的新进展.上海金属. 1993,15(2):14-15
[11]单芳.定宽压力机提高热轧机的灵活性.太钢译文. 1995,(3):41-43
[12]冯宪章,刘才,江光彪等. 1580大侧压定宽机运动学仿真及优化分析.机械工程学报. 2004,40(8):178-182
[13]焦四海.调宽压力机调宽过程的有限元分析.东北大学,博士学位论文. 1998.
[14]张齐兵. IHI定宽压力机的运动学分析.冶金设备. 1998,(5):9-11
[15]冯宪章.宝钢SP定宽机侧压框架动力学分析.重型机械. 2004,(2):34-37
[16] Vladimir B, Ginzburg. Width Control in Hot Strip Mills. Iron&Steel Engineer. 1991,68(6):25-39
[17] Nakamura S. Slab Width Control for Hot Direct Rolling. Transactions ISIJ. 1988,(28):110-116
[18]焦四海,周旭,刘相华等.调宽压力机调宽过程中的弹塑性有限元分析.钢铁. 1999,(10):21-23
[19]焦四海,周旭,刘相华等.调宽压力机调宽时板坯变形影响因素.钢铁. 1999,(12):34-38
[20]焦四海,周旭.调宽压力机调宽时板坯变形特点.钢铁. 2000,35(12):34-37
[21]冯宪章,刘才,江光彪. SP侧压过程板坯头部失宽的有限元分析.钢铁. 2005,40(3):56-58
[22]冯宪章,刘才.定宽机主曲柄初始位置对模块有效行程的影响.燕山大学学报. 2004,28(6):471-474
[23]史荣,江光彪,刘才等. SP轧机运动状态分析.钢铁. 2005,(8):11-13
[24]史荣,刘才,李旭明等. SP定宽机侧压冲击力的有限元模拟及试验研究.机械工程学报. 2006,(6):34-36
[25]王英杰,江光彪,刘才等. SP轧制过程及侧压模块受力的测试研究及有限元分析.钢铁. 2004,39(7):42-46
[26]杨雄,李长生,刘相华等.用有限元法分析板坯调宽过程中切头量的变化.钢铁研究学报. 2002,(6):7-9
[27]杨雄,李长生,刘相华等.连铸板坯大侧压不对称变形有限元分析.钢铁研究. 2002,(1):7-9
[28]杨雄,板坯SP调宽不对称变形及其切头量有限元分析.东北大学,硕士学位论文. 2002.
[29]占红创,大侧压机运动特性及其同步控制方法研究.东北大学,硕士学位论文. 2005.
[30]宁宇,周成,曹燕等. SP大侧压变形后板坯形状的研究.塑性工程学报. 2009,16(2):96-100
[31]陈键就,李保生. SP大侧压定宽机模块运动轨迹图谱分析.重型机械. 1998,(1):25-27
[32]刘慧,齐志新,王国栋等.不同形状立辊轧边变形的有限元分析.冶金设备. 2004,(2):19-21
[33]刘慧,高彩茹,王国栋等.立辊形状对板坯断面形状的影响.塑性工程学报. 2003,10(5):86-89
[34]杜晓钟,王爱丽,张中元.热带钢粗轧立辊调宽轧制过程变形研究及应用.太原科技大学学报. 2009,30(1):36-39
[35]刘慧,王国栋,刘相华.立辊轧边的显式动力有限元模拟.钢铁研究学报. 2006,18(3):18-20
[36] Biggs D L, Hardy S J, Brown K J. Finite Element Modeling of Camber Development During Hot Rolling of Strip Steel. Iron and Steel Making. 1998,25(1):81-89
[37] Biggs D L, Hardy S J. Influence of Process Variables on Development of Camber During Hot Rolling of Strip Steel. Iron and Steel Making. 2000,27(1):55-62
[38] Tanaka Y, Omori K, Miyake T. Camber Control Techniques in Plate Rolling. Kawasaki Steel Technical Report. 1987,6(16):12-20
[39]熊尚武,吕程,刘相华等.孔型立轧过程的三维刚塑性有限元分析.应用力学学报. 1999,16(4):149-153
[40]熊尚武,朱祥霖,王超.热带粗轧机组立轧变形规律研究.轧钢. 1996,(5):2-4
[41]熊尚武,朱祥霖,刘相华等.热带粗轧机组立轧稳定轧制变形规律的实验研究和有限元分析.塑性工程学报. 1997,4(1):60-65
[42]金兹伯格VB著.姜明东,王国栋译.高精度板带材轧制理论与实践.北京:冶金工业出版社. 2000.
[43]章传国,韩静涛,刘靖.立辊调宽热粗轧过程三维有限元模拟.塑性工程学报. 2006,13(1):74-77
[44]许建国,杜晓钟.热带钢粗轧立辊调宽轧制过程有限元模拟.冶金设备. 2007,(4):31-33
[45]喻海良,刘相华,赵宪明等.多道次立-平辊轧制立辊孔型对轧件头尾形状影响的有限元分析.钢铁研究学报. 2007,19(1):26-30
[46]喻海良,刘相华,李长生.立辊孔型内倒角半径对轧件变形的影响.钢铁. 2006,41(6):47-51
[47]赵宪明,王国栋,朴海斗等.立辊形状对粗轧板坯侧弯的影响.东北大学学报. 2002,23(12):1174-1176
[48]刘海平. SP定宽机轧制过程的有限元模拟.燕山大学,硕士学位论文. 2003.
[49]冯宪章,刘才.板坯定宽过程狗骨分布的有限元分析.冶金设备. 2004,(4):1-3
[50]蒋昭等.宝钢2050毫米带钢热连轧机装备研制技术.哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社. 1998.
[51]苗润涛. 1580mm热轧机板坯大侧压新技术.宝钢技术. 1998,(2):27-31
[52]李景洋.大侧压定宽机在宝钢三热轧中的应用.中国计量协会冶金分会2007年年会. 2007.
[53]李铁柱,郑万德. SP大侧压定宽机性能讨论.鞍钢技术. 2002,(1):50
[54]李旭明. SP轧机的动力学分析.燕山大学,硕士学位论文. 2004.
[55]冯宪章,王利红,王金凤.模块角度对板坯截面形状的影响.塑性工程学报.2005,12(1):98-101
[56]陈火红. Marc有限元实例分析教程.北京:机械工业出版社. 2002.
[57]温景林.金属材料成型摩擦学.沈阳:东北大学出版社. 2000.
[58] H.Grafe, W.Rohde. Flexible Hot Strip Prodcution by Use of a Slab Sizing Press. Iron and Exposition of AIAE. 1993,(9):20-23
[59]张小平,秦建平.轧制理论.北京:冶金工业出版社. 2006.