我国开放式基金业绩与价值评估研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
证券投资基金从其提供的产品和服务角度看,是一种金融投资产品。随着证券投资基金的迅速发展,特别是基金品种的不断丰富,我国对证券投资基金的研究依然相对滞后,尤其是对基金内在价值及其与市场业绩一致程度的研究缺乏深入的探讨。广义的基金业绩评价不仅指基金市场表现的业绩评价,还包括对基金内在价值的评估。对投资者而言,他们应该密切关注基金内在价值,但是相关研究表明我国证券市场为弱式有效,使得基金市场业绩偏离内在价值。因此,我们有必要全面分析开放式基金业绩驱动因素,构建完善的基金业绩评价指标体系,衡量、分析和评价开放式基金市场业绩。此外,建立一套科学、完备的评价体系,使市场各方能够对基金的市场业绩和内在价值进行客观评价,具有很高的理论价值和现实意义。
     论文以基金投资组合为立足点,以开放式基金为研究对象,选取股票型基金为样本,研究了样本基金内在价值和市场业绩表现。理论部分主要探讨了现代投资组合理论、资本资产定价理论和有效市场假说理论,通过对投资组合的构建、选择和优化的理论分析,深入研究基金内在价值的来源,为评估其价值提供理论依据。实证部分在明确基金业绩来源于投资组合所产生的收益基础上,遵循“最优投资组合→超额收益→基金业绩”的思路,将资产选择理论和非线性规划法相结合,检验基金经理所确定的投资组合是否为“最优投资组合”,然后根据财务估价的思想,运用三阶段估值模型研究开放式的内在价值。接着采用“先分解再综合”的思路,在分析出业绩驱动因素的基础上,将熵权法和层次分析法相结合计算业绩评价指标体系的层级间综合权重系数,再与模糊评判法进行综合评价。最后,采用目前通用的检验模型对基金业绩持续性进行了实证研究。
     论文提出了基金与股票一样具有内在价值的构想,重点对开放式基金内在价值进行实证研究,并分析市场业绩是否偏离内在价值。研究发现样本基金的投资组合并非达到最优,基于此,我们通过非线性规划法重新确定出样本基金最优投资组合及其权重,为准确计算基金投资组合的β系数和必要报酬率提供依据。研究结果显示,不少样本基金的市场业绩偏离了内在价值,主要是由于我国证券市场的弱式有效性和基金业发展不健全。我国开放式基金业绩持续性较弱,实证结果显示,股票型基金的中期和中长期业绩对未来中期、中长期和长期的业绩均没有很好的预测作用。投资者不能根据中期的业绩来判断基金在未来任何时候的业绩走势。出现这种情形,可能是中长期本身业绩就包含了太多不稳定的因素,不能预测基金未来的业绩。检验期内出现了显著的业绩反转现象,说明某些时段内用基金过去的业绩不但不能预测未来业绩,并且可能适得其反。
In the products and services point of view,securities investment funds are financial investment products.Nowadays,securities investment funds in our country developing rapidly,particularly species of the open-end funds are doom.However,the research on securities investment funds is still lagging behind,especially about the coordination of value and its market performance.Generalized performance evaluation system of the fund is not only evaluation of operating performance,but also the assessment of its intrinsic value of the fund.Because the securities market in our country is weaker efficient,the fund's market performance tend to deviate from the intrinsic value.So that we need to have a comprehensive analysis of the open-end funds performance driver factors,and to construct a sound evaluation system which measures the market performance of the open-end funds.In addition,it is high theoretical value and practical significance to establish a scientific,comprehensive evaluation system,so that the investors are able to market performance and its intrinsic value.
     In our research,our country open-end funds are selected as the research object and the fund's investment portfolio as the standpoint.We research the intrinsic value of the sample funds and the market performance of the theoretical analysis and empirical analysis.The theory research is based on three major theories,which are Modern Portfolio Theory,Capital Asset Pricing Theory and the Efficient Market Hypothesis.By constructing、selecting the portfolio and making the portfolio optimized,we study the sources of fund's intrinsic value in order to assess its value and provide a theoretical basis.It's clear that the fund performance is generated by the investment portfolio. Therefore,following the "optimal portfolio→excess returns→fund performance" line of thinking,we will select the assets of non-linear programming theory to test the investment portfolio chosed by the fund manager whether realize optimal.In accordance with the financial valuation of the idea,we use three-stage valuation model.Then we analyze the performance of drivers on the basis of the entropy theory and the right level of analysis combined computing performance evaluation index system level integrated weights,with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method evaluation.We are committed to research open-end fund's intrinsic value and market performance,in order to predict the future investment and fund information provided by professional competence,which are based on fund performance is the prerequisite for sustainability.Therefore,we apply the current test model into empirical analysis.
     In our paper,broke the existing most scholars who focus on the performance of fund market research as the core ideas,with emphasis on the intrinsic value of open-end funds and analyse the performance whether deviate from the intrinsic value.The study has found the sample fund's investment portfolio is not optimal,based on this,we adopt non-linear programming method to determine optimal portfolio samples and their weights,to accurately calculate the fund's investment portfolio of theβcoefficient and the necessary rate of return to provide basis.The results have shown that many samples' market performance has deviated from the intrinsic value,mainly because of our country's securities markets are weak efficiency and sound development of the fund industry.The empirical results of open-end fund performance persistence show that equity fund are not very good role in prediction for medium-and long-term performance of future medium-term,medium and long-term and long-term results.The medium-term investors should not judge the performance of the fund at any time in the future performance of the trend.During the test period,it has shown remarkable performance inversion,the funds not only past performance can not predict future performance,and may be just the opposite.
引文
[1]Santini,DL and JW Abet.Determinants of net new money flows to the equity mutual fund industry[J].Journal of economics and business,1998,5:419-429.
    [2]Bennett A,Martin Young.Determinants of Mutual Fund Flows:Evidence from New Zealand [Z].PACAP/FMA Meeting.2000.
    [3]Bergst resser and Poterba.Do after-tax returns affect mutual fund inflows?[J].Journal of Financial Economics Volume 63,Issue 3,March 2002,Pages 381-414
    [4]JT Greene,C Hodges,D Rakowski.Redemption Policies and Daily Mutual Fund Flows[J].Working Paper.2001.
    [5]Sunder.Earnings management and revelation principle[J].Glover Review of Accounting Studies.1998.
    [6]Hu P.Relative Risk Choices by Mutual Fund Managers[R].USA:SAS Institute,2001.
    [7]WN Goetzmann,RG Ibbotson.Do winners repeat?[J].Journal of Portfolio Management.1994.
    [8]Chakarabartih and Rungta Mutual Funds Industry in India:An indepth look into the problems of credibility,Risk and Brand[J].The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance,6(2),27-45.
    [9]A Kempf,S Ruenzi.Tournaments in Mutual Funds Family[J].Working Paper.2004.
    [10]BM Barber,T Odean.Trading is hazardous to your wealth:The common stock investment performance of individual investors[J].Journal of Finance.2000.
    [11]Fortune,Peter.Mutual Funds,Part Ⅱ:Fund Flows and Security Returns[J].New England Economic Review.1998,1-2:3-22.
    [12]ER Sirri,P Tufano.Costly search and mutual fund flows[J].Journal of Finance.1998.
    [13]Roston Marcn.Mutual fund managers and life cycle risk,an empirical investigation.1996.
    [14]Nanda,Narayanan and Warther.Liquidity,investment ability,and mutual fund structure[J].Journal of Financial Economics 2000,3:417-443.
    [15]Dangl,Wu and Zechner.Mutual Fund Flows and Optimal Manager Replacement[J].Review of Financial Studies.2004.
    [16]姚颐,刘志远.我国开放式基金赎回行为的实证研究[J].经济科学.2004,5:48-57.
    [17]李曜.从行为金融学看基金的赎回现象,分红及基金经理选择[Z].南京大学2003年行为金融学国际研讨会入选论文.
    [18]陈铭新,张世英.开放式基金投资者赎回行为的模拟[J].天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版).2003,36(1):96-99.
    [19]李曜,于进杰.开放式基金赎回机制的外部效应[J].财经研究.2004,12:111-120.
    [20]陈慧群.行为金融学对投资基金各现象之解释[J].市场周刊财经论坛.2004,7:46-47.
    [21]赵旭,吴冲锋.开放式基金流动性赎回风险实证分析与评价[J].运筹与管理.2003,6;1-6.
    [22]李军,娄静,王亚南.开放式基金投资者的赎回行为与对策研究[Z].深交所:第七届会员单位与基金公司优秀研究成果,2005.
    [23]郭晓亭,林略,冉向东.开放式基金赎回量的估算方法探讨[J].经济师.2004,1.
    [24]姚颐,刘志远.开放式基金的“赎回困惑”现象研究[J].证券市场导报.2005,2:37-41.
    [25]Dangl,Thomas,Youchang Wu et al.Mutual Fund Flows and Optimal Manager Replacement [D].University of Vienna,2004.
    [26]Chang and Lewellen.An arbitrage pricing approach to evaluating mutual fund performance [J].Journal of Financial Research.1985.
    [27]M Grinblatt,S Titman.Mutual fund performance:An analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings [J].Journal of Business.1989.
    [28]Fama and French.Common risk factors in the returns on bonds and stocks[J].Journal of Financial Economics.1993.
    [29]Carhart.Optical simulation of phase-distorted imaging systems:nonlinear and adaptive optics approach[J].Optical Engineering.1995.
    [30]Franco Modigliani and Leah Modigliani.Risk-adjusted performance[J].Journal of Portfolio Management Winter,1997.
    [31]Antonella Basso and Stefania Funari.A data envelopment analysis approach to measure the mutual fund performance[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001.
    [32]Andrew.Lo.The statistics of Sharpe ratios[J].Financial Analysts Journal,2002.
    [33]陈收,杨宽,吴启芳,舒彤.投资基金绩效评价的Sharpe指数与衰减度实证分析[J].管理科学学报.2003,6:79-85.
    [34]刘艳武,蒋瑛琨.Shape指数评价中国证券市场基金业绩的适用性[J].金融研究.2004,10:94-99.
    [35]史敏,汪寿阳,徐山鹰.修正的Sharpe指数及其在基金业绩评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践.2006,7.
    [36]张昱.基于詹森阿尔法的开放式基金业绩评价[J].财贸经济.2007,7:35-38.
    [37]苟文峰.基金业绩评估的创新指标SR——基于Sharpe指数的改进及中国基金业的实证研究[J].西安财经学院学报.2005,2.
    [38]邓超,唐小碑.基于修正的沃斯价值比率模型的开放式基金绩效评价研究[J].商丘师范学院学报.2008,8.
    [39]徐翠萍,史清华,石正华.基于VaR的基金业绩评价模型构建及有效性检验[J].统计与决策.2007,1:120-121.
    [40]陶志刚,李志波.开放式基金投资风险的Va R模型算法[J].大庆石油学院学报.2007, 10:114-117.
    [41]韩琦.基于VaR方法的开放式基金风险实证研究[J].经济理论研究.2007:77-78.
    [42]杨湘豫,彭丽娜.基于VaR的开放式股票型基金市场风险的测量与评价[J].财经理论与实践.2006,4:45-47.
    [43]周泽炯.基于GARCH模型的VAR方法对我国开放式基金风险的分析[J].经济管理(新管理).2006,11:46-49.
    [44]闫云娟,冯大一.聚类分析在开放式基金绩效研究中的应用[J].华东交通大学学报.2008,5:77-80.
    [45]李德辉,方兆本.证券投资基金业绩的随机占优检验[J].中国科学技术大学学报.2007,7:762-766.
    [46]常笑霓,于春明.基金绩效评价的新方法及实证研究[J].山东建筑工程学院学报.2005,3:48-51.
    [47]薛丽思,仲伟俊.基于SOM神经网络的基金业绩分类评价[J].统计与决策.2006,11:94-96.
    [48]储晶,肖冬荣,夏景明.基于SVM的基金业绩评估系统研究[J].统计与决策.2005,10:34-36.
    [49]赵中秋,陈倩.李金林.基于多元分析法的我国开放式基金绩效评价[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版).2005,6:53-56.
    [50]董铁牛,杨乃定,姜继娇,王良.基于极效率DEA的开放式基金业绩评价[J].管理评论.2007,11:11-18.
    [51]康卫星,赵承黎,戚莎莎.我国开放式基金业绩评价研究——基于交叉效率单元与DEA 方法的实证研究[J].经济师.2007,10:103-105.
    [52]周坤,颜异,陈春玲.评价开放式基金业绩的最小凸性投入需求集方法及其应用[J].科技情报开发与经济.2007,17:135-137.
    [53]Bollen,Nicholas R,Jeffrey A.Busse.Short-Term Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance [J].The Review of Financial Studies.2004,18:569-597.
    [54]Harri,B.W.Brorsen.Performance persistence and the source of returns for hedge funds[J].Financial Economics.2004,14:131-141.
    [55]Goldham,J.A.Kroeger.Performance,persistence and benchmarks of selected South African unit trusts for the period 1998-2002[J].S.Afr.J.Bus.Manage.2005,36(4):81-90.
    [56]William G.Droms,David A.Walker.Performance Persistence of Fixed Income Mutual Funds[J].Journal of Economics and Finance.2006,30:347-355.
    [57]李德辉,方兆本,余雁.扫描统计量——检测基金业绩持续性的新方法[J].运筹于管理.2006,2:82-87.
    [58]Jan,Yin-Ching,Mao-Wei Hung.Short-Run and Long-Run Persistence in Mutual Funds[J].Journal of Investing.2004,13:67-71.
    [59]Carhart,Mark M..On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance[J].Journal of Finance.1997,52:57-82.
    [60]D Hendricks,J Patel,R Zeckhauser.Hot hands in mutual funds:Short-run persistence of relative performance,1974-1988[J].Journal of Finance,1993.
    [61]Goetzmann,William N.,Roger G.Ibbotson.Do Winners Repeat? Patterns in Mutual Fund Performance[J].Journal of Portfolio Management.1994,20:9-18.
    [62]Elton,Edwin J.,Martin J.Gruber,Christopher R.Blake.The Persistence of Risk-Adjusted Mutual Fund Performance[J].Journal of Business.1996,69:133-157.
    [63]Luis Vicente,Luis Ferruz.Performance Persistence in Spanish Equity Funds[J].Financial Economics.2005,15:1305-1313.
    [64]Brown et al.A Suriviorship Bias in Performance Studies[J].Review of Financial Studies.1992,5:553-580.
    [65]Grinblatt,Titman.Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks [J].Journal of Finance,1997.
    [66]Hallahan,Faff.Induced Persistence or Reversals in Fund Performance? The Effect of Survivorship Bias[J].Applied Financial Economics,2001.
    [67]Aneel Keswani.Mutual Fund Performance Persistence and Competition:A Cross-Sector Analysis[J].The Journal of Financial Research.2006,14:349-366.
    [68]Mark Kritzman.Can bond managers perform consistently?[J].Journal of Portfolio Management,1983.
    [69]HendricksD,J Patel.The JOshape of Performance Persistence Given Survivorship Bias[J].Review of Economics and Statistics.1997,79:161-166.
    [70]S Phelps,L Detzel.The Nonpersistence of Mutual Fund Performance[J].Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics,1997.
    [71]Brown S J,W N Goetzmarm.Performance Persistence[J].Journal of Finance.1995,50:679-698.
    [72]Malkiel B G.Returns from Investing in Equity Equal Funds 1971 to 1991[J].Journal of Finance.1995,50:549-572.
    [73]Christopherson J A,W E Ferson,D A Glassman.Conditioning Manager Alphas on Economic Information:Another Look at Persistence of Performance[J].Review of Financial Studies.1998,11(1):111-142.
    [74]Allen D E,ML Tan.A.Test of the Persistence in the Performance of UK Managed Funds[J].Journal of Business Finance and Accounting.1999,26:559-595.
    [75]Louis Cheng Lynn Pi,D Wort.Are There Hot Hands among Mutual Funds Houses in Hongkong[J].Journal of Business Finance & Accounting.1999,(1-2):103-135.
    [76]王向阳,袁定川.开放式基金的业绩与特征影响因素分析[J].经济论坛.2005,17.58-60.
    [77]肖奎喜,杨义群.我国开放式基金业绩持续性的实证检验[J].财贸研究.2005,2:55-59.
    [78]任杰,陈权宝.中国开放式基金业绩持续性实证研究[J].浙江金融.2007,11:41-42.
    [79]Zhiping Chert,Ruiyue Lin.Mutual fund performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis with new risk measures[J].Springer Spectrum.2006,28:375-398.
    [80]Harry Markowitz.Portfolio Selection[J].Journal of finance,1952.
    [81]李博.资产组合的收益与风险[M].中国经济出版社.北京:第一版,2006,6:5.
    [82]李博.资产组合的收益与风险[M].中国经济出版社.北京:第一版,2006,6:30-32.
    [83]王永海.资产定价理论[M].经济科学出版社.北京:第一版,2001:96-98.
    [84]陈柳钦,吕红.CAPM理论在我国证券市场中的应用分析[J].http://www.cninfo.com.cn.
    [85]贾险峰,曹小清.中国证券投资基金业绩管理与控制[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2004:34.
    [86]Fama E F.Components of Investment Performance[J].Journal of Finance.1972,27:551-567.
    [87]巴曙松等.2005年度中国基金行业发展评估报告[R],2006.
    [88]坚持长期投资,持有人结构稳定——2007年中报封闭式基金持有人结构分析[R].上海申银万国证券研究所有限公司,2007.
    [89]中国证券投资基金2007年行业统计报告[R].中国银河证券基金研究中心,2007.
    [90]《中国基金行业发展评估报告》课题组.中国基金报告[R].中国流.2006:29-35.
    [91]Sharp Willian F.Mutual fund performance[J].Journal of Business.1966,39:119-138.
    [92]King,Benjamine.Market and Industry Factors in Stock Price Behavior[J].Journal of Bussiness.1966,39:139-140.
    [93]Bell,Frederick.The Relation of the Structure of Common Stock Prices to Historical,Exceptional and Industrial Variables[J].Journal of Finance.1976,3:187-197.
    [94]Elton,Edwin J.et al.Are Betas Best?[J].Journal of Finance.1978,12:1375-1384.
    [95]Rosenberg,Ban'.Extra-Market Components of Covariance in Security Returns.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1974,3:263-274.
    [96]罗林.中国股票市场风险模型[J].金融研究,2003,4:32-43.
    [97]袁素平.基于以GARCH模型的贝塔系数均值回归分析[J].经济纵横,2007,12:85-87.
    [98]周少甫,杜福林.上海股市时变贝塔系数的估计[J].统计与决策2005,11:17-19.
    [99]郜志宇,冯连胜,沈琦.收益法价值评估中贝塔系数(β)的理论及其应用[J].企业价值评估.
    [100]Richard C.Grinold,Ronald N.Kahn(著),廖理(译).积极型投资组合管理——控制风险获取超额收益的数量方法[M].清华大学出版社.北京:第二版,2008:37-44.
    [101]埃德温J.埃尔顿,马丁J.格鲁伯,斯蒂芬J.布朗,威廉N.格茨曼.现代投资组合理论与投资分析[M].机械工业出版社,北京:第一版,2008:95-96.
    [102]埃德温J.埃尔顿,马丁J.格鲁伯,斯蒂芬J.布朗,威廉N.格茨曼.现代投资组合理论与投资分析[M].机械工业出版社,北京:第一版,2008:120.
    [103]李博.资产组合的收益与风险[M].中国经济出版社.北京,第一版,2006,8:49-50.
    [104]唐俊,丁立刚,魏福红,张景.负债下摩擦市场允许卖空时的最优投资组合[J].包头钢铁学院学报.2006,9:292-295.
    [105]Philippe Jorion.Value at risk:the new benchmark for controlling market risk1997-McGraw-Hill New York
    [106]陈伟忠,孙奉军.组合投资与投资基金管理[M].北京:中国金融山版社,2004.
    [107]JL Treynor.How to rate management of investment funds[J].Harvard business review,1965.
    [108]Jensen M.The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964[J].Journal of Finance,1968,23:389-416.
    [109]魏隽.熵权系数法在软件产业发展战略选择中的应用[J].河北经贸大学学报,2002,23(2):82-87.
    [110]黄福广.证券投资基金评级理论与方法[M].第一版.北京:中国经济山版社,2005,11.
    [111]苏金明,阮沈勇.Matlab6.1实用指南(上、下册)[M].第一版.电子工业出版社,2002:55-78.
    [112]劳兰珺,张志刚.中国开放式基金业绩排序稳定性的Kendall检验[J].系统工程.2007,1:118-122.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700