黄家场—隆昌地区嘉五~1～雷一~1段碳酸盐岩储层评价
|
摘要
黄家场-隆昌地区位于蜀南地区泸州古隆起的边缘地带,蜀南地区的油气资源比较丰富,嘉陵江组已发现长垣、麻柳场等气藏。工区嘉五1和雷一1属于半局限～局限海台地相,针孔比较发育,储层非均质性较强,成岩作用比较复杂,有利储层的分布及控制因素不明确将直接影响了该区的勘探开发效果。从试油结果来看,灵1井嘉五1段于2008年通过上试获气3.34×104m3/d,展示了嘉五1段具有良好的勘探潜力。在这种情况下,为了指导下一步勘探开发工作,首先要对储层特征、储层参数分布和储层分布等进行研究,在此基础上对储层进行评价。
本文基于研究区各个小构造嘉五1段和雷一1段钻井、录井、测井、测试和分析化验等资料的分析,采用传统的基础地质学与数学地质学相结合的方法,总结前人对该区及周边的研究成果,开展嘉五1～雷一1段储层评价研究。
总结前人对蜀南地区沉积相的研究成果,将工区嘉五1和雷一1段划分为局限台坪亚相、半局限泻湖亚相和潮坪亚相。通过对储层段岩石学特征、成岩作用、储集空间类型、孔隙结构及储层物性特征研究,得到以下结论,嘉五1段和雷一1段储层岩石类型较多,以微晶～亮晶内碎屑鲕粒灰岩和白云岩为主,储集空间类型丰富,以粒间溶孔和粒内溶孔为主;嘉五1段储层孔喉类型以中等到细为主,而雷一1段储层主要为大中孔喉;储层受沉积环境及成岩作用的影响,其中,溶蚀作用对储层的贡献较为重要,而胶结作用和充填作用使孔隙度降低,特别是渗透率,降低更快。利用常规测井参数资料识别储层,在此基础上运用支持向量机法和多元逐步回归法分别解释储层孔隙度和含水饱和度。根据研究区储层物性参数及孔隙结构参数和四川海相碳酸盐岩分类标准,将工区储层划分为四类,再结合小层厚度以单井优势类别将单井归类。研究区储层大都为Ⅱ、Ⅲ类储层,雷一1段储层以Ⅱ类为主,而嘉五1段储层以Ⅲ类为主。综合分析储层分布、储层物性参数分布及储层分类评价等,结合研究区气水分布情况,对黄家场—隆昌地区嘉五1段和雷一1段储层进行了综合评价,并划分出研究区内较为有利的区带。
Huang Jiachang-Longchang area is located in the edge zone of Luzhou palaeohigh,there are plenty of petroleum and natural gas resources, Changba, Maliuchang reservoir, etc. have gas in Jia Lingjiang formation. T1j51~T2l11 formation in the study area are semi-confined~restricted sea platform facies,pinhole development,reservoir heterogeneity,diagenesis complicated, the control factor and the distribution of beneficial reservoir are complicatd and these will affect the exploration outcome..According to the well testing report, T1j51 formation of Ling1 well produced 3.34×104m3/d gas in the well testing in 2008, and this demonstrated its excellent exploration potential. In this case, in order to guide further exploration and development.this paper studies firstly reservoir characteristics,the distribution of reservoir parameters and reservoir distribution, etc. and evaluates the reservoir further on this basis.
Analysing the study area’s various datas belonged to T1j51~T2l11 formation,such as the data of drilling.sample logging.well logging.testing and laboratory test, adopting the methods combined with the traditional fundamental geology and mathematical geology, summarizing previous research results of this area ,this paper studies and evaluates the reservoir of T1j51~T2l11 formation.
According to previous research of the sedimentary facies of Shunan region,T1j51~T2l11 formation in the study atea are roughly divided into sub-limit sets flat subfacies, semi-restricted lagoon subfacies and tidal flat subfacies.Studying the petrology characteristics of reservoir rocks,diagenesis,reservoir space types,pore structure and reservoir characteristics,this paper have this conclusion:first,rock types of T1j51~T2l11 are complexed,and the most are microcrystal~calcsparite limestone and dolomite.reservoir space type is complicated,and the most are intergranular dissolution pores and intragranular dissolution pores;second,the pore throat types of T1j51 mainly is medium-narrow.and the pore throat types of T2l11 mainly is large-medium;third,the sedimentary environment and diagenesis affect the reservoir’s property.Among them,the contribution of dissolution was positive ,while cementation and filling could reduce the porosity and the permeability.Permeablity is more sensitive. This paper uses logging data to distinguish reservoir.On this basis,it use the methods of support vector machine method and multiple regressionfor to calculate porosity and water saturation.Based on the physical parameters of the reservoir,pore structure parameters and the classification criteria of marine carbonate rocks in Sichuan,the reservoirs are divided into four categories,Then,the category of the single well is decided by the layers’overwhelming category. The most reservoir types of this area areⅡandⅢ, the main reservoir type of T2l11 isⅡ,and the main reservoir type of T1j51 formation isⅢ;Comprehensively analysing the distribution of reservoir and physical parameters and the classification of the reservoir,combining with the gas and water distribution, the author conducts a comprehensive evaluation of T1j51~T2l11’s reservoir, and find out the more favorable zones.
本文基于研究区各个小构造嘉五1段和雷一1段钻井、录井、测井、测试和分析化验等资料的分析,采用传统的基础地质学与数学地质学相结合的方法,总结前人对该区及周边的研究成果,开展嘉五1～雷一1段储层评价研究。
总结前人对蜀南地区沉积相的研究成果,将工区嘉五1和雷一1段划分为局限台坪亚相、半局限泻湖亚相和潮坪亚相。通过对储层段岩石学特征、成岩作用、储集空间类型、孔隙结构及储层物性特征研究,得到以下结论,嘉五1段和雷一1段储层岩石类型较多,以微晶～亮晶内碎屑鲕粒灰岩和白云岩为主,储集空间类型丰富,以粒间溶孔和粒内溶孔为主;嘉五1段储层孔喉类型以中等到细为主,而雷一1段储层主要为大中孔喉;储层受沉积环境及成岩作用的影响,其中,溶蚀作用对储层的贡献较为重要,而胶结作用和充填作用使孔隙度降低,特别是渗透率,降低更快。利用常规测井参数资料识别储层,在此基础上运用支持向量机法和多元逐步回归法分别解释储层孔隙度和含水饱和度。根据研究区储层物性参数及孔隙结构参数和四川海相碳酸盐岩分类标准,将工区储层划分为四类,再结合小层厚度以单井优势类别将单井归类。研究区储层大都为Ⅱ、Ⅲ类储层,雷一1段储层以Ⅱ类为主,而嘉五1段储层以Ⅲ类为主。综合分析储层分布、储层物性参数分布及储层分类评价等,结合研究区气水分布情况,对黄家场—隆昌地区嘉五1段和雷一1段储层进行了综合评价,并划分出研究区内较为有利的区带。
Huang Jiachang-Longchang area is located in the edge zone of Luzhou palaeohigh,there are plenty of petroleum and natural gas resources, Changba, Maliuchang reservoir, etc. have gas in Jia Lingjiang formation. T1j51~T2l11 formation in the study area are semi-confined~restricted sea platform facies,pinhole development,reservoir heterogeneity,diagenesis complicated, the control factor and the distribution of beneficial reservoir are complicatd and these will affect the exploration outcome..According to the well testing report, T1j51 formation of Ling1 well produced 3.34×104m3/d gas in the well testing in 2008, and this demonstrated its excellent exploration potential. In this case, in order to guide further exploration and development.this paper studies firstly reservoir characteristics,the distribution of reservoir parameters and reservoir distribution, etc. and evaluates the reservoir further on this basis.
Analysing the study area’s various datas belonged to T1j51~T2l11 formation,such as the data of drilling.sample logging.well logging.testing and laboratory test, adopting the methods combined with the traditional fundamental geology and mathematical geology, summarizing previous research results of this area ,this paper studies and evaluates the reservoir of T1j51~T2l11 formation.
According to previous research of the sedimentary facies of Shunan region,T1j51~T2l11 formation in the study atea are roughly divided into sub-limit sets flat subfacies, semi-restricted lagoon subfacies and tidal flat subfacies.Studying the petrology characteristics of reservoir rocks,diagenesis,reservoir space types,pore structure and reservoir characteristics,this paper have this conclusion:first,rock types of T1j51~T2l11 are complexed,and the most are microcrystal~calcsparite limestone and dolomite.reservoir space type is complicated,and the most are intergranular dissolution pores and intragranular dissolution pores;second,the pore throat types of T1j51 mainly is medium-narrow.and the pore throat types of T2l11 mainly is large-medium;third,the sedimentary environment and diagenesis affect the reservoir’s property.Among them,the contribution of dissolution was positive ,while cementation and filling could reduce the porosity and the permeability.Permeablity is more sensitive. This paper uses logging data to distinguish reservoir.On this basis,it use the methods of support vector machine method and multiple regressionfor to calculate porosity and water saturation.Based on the physical parameters of the reservoir,pore structure parameters and the classification criteria of marine carbonate rocks in Sichuan,the reservoirs are divided into four categories,Then,the category of the single well is decided by the layers’overwhelming category. The most reservoir types of this area areⅡandⅢ, the main reservoir type of T2l11 isⅡ,and the main reservoir type of T1j51 formation isⅢ;Comprehensively analysing the distribution of reservoir and physical parameters and the classification of the reservoir,combining with the gas and water distribution, the author conducts a comprehensive evaluation of T1j51~T2l11’s reservoir, and find out the more favorable zones.
引文
[1]王允城.油气储层评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1999.
[2]陈立官.油气测井地质[M].地质出版社.1990.
[3]杜奉屏等.碳酸盐岩储集层测井解释文集[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1983.
[4]赵良孝等,碳酸盐岩储层测井评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1994.
[5]马永生等,碳酸盐岩储层沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1999.
[6]Campbell等.Petroleum reservoir property evaluation[M].John M. Campbell.1973.
[7]Abhijit Y. Dandekar.Petroleum reservoir rock and fluid properties[M].2006.
[8]李渭.安塞坪桥油区长6油层组测井储层评价[D].西安:西北大学.2009.
[9]柳建华等.在塔河油田应用FMI成像测井技术识别和评价缝洞型储层.新疆石油地质[J].2001.22(6):487-489.
[10]吴海燕等.成像、核磁共振测井在埕北裂缝性储层评价中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质.2002.23(1):45-48.
[11]苏成义等.缝洞型古潜山油藏储量参数解释方法研究[J].岩性油气藏.2003.10(2):38-41.
[12]王磊.薄层测井曲线校正方法及储层识别模型研究[D].成都:西南石油大学.2006.
[13]智慧文.塔河油田奥陶系碳酸盐岩测井储层评价研究[D].成都:成都理工大学.2006.
[14]赵路子.蜀南地区嘉陵江组沉积相研究及有利储集相带预测[D].西南石油大学.2004.
[15]赖天华.黄家场—隆昌地区嘉五1～雷一1段储层含油气评价研究[R].西南石油大学.2009.
[16]胡必嘉.蜀南—川中过渡带嘉陵江组储层测井评价研究[D].西南石油大学.2006.
[17]庞崇友.蜀南西部地区嘉陵江组天然气的运移与聚集条件研究[D].西南石油大学.2005.
[18]雷一文等.自贡地区嘉陵江组储层评价及勘探目标研究[R].四川:中国石油西南油气田分公司蜀南气矿.2007.
[19]胡海涛,蜀南地区麻柳场嘉陵江组储层测井评价方法研究[D].西南石油大学.2007.
[20]夏先禹邹绍春.川中南部中三叠统雷一l段天然气地质特征及川中地区三叠系大中气田勘探目标评价[M].四川石油管理局.1991.
[21]陶莹.麻黄山西区块东北部延安组储层特征及评价[D].成都理工大学.2009.
[22] Cristianini N,Shawe-Taylor J.支持向量机导论[M].李国正,王猛,曾华军(译).北京:电子工业出版社,2004.
[23]陈荣淋.基于可拓学和支持向量机理论的砂土液化势综合评价研究[D].侨大学,2006.
[24]裘亦楠等.油气储层评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
[25]赵良孝等.碳酸盐岩储层测井评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.
[26]宋子齐谭成仟.灰色理论油气储层评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.
[27]裘亦楠等.“中国油气储层评价研究”总结1989-1990[M].1991.
[28]战薇芸.蜀南长垣坝构造带嘉陵江组储层评价及气水分布特征[D].西南石油大学,2007.
[29]胡华.蜀南地区长垣坝构造带嘉陵江组沉积相研究及有利储集相带预测[D].西南石油大学,2005.
[30]陈洪德李余生等.川南下三叠统嘉陵江组沉积相及有利相带预测研究[D].2001.
[31]高红.鄂尔多斯盆地中央古隆起东坡古生界测井储层评价[D].西安:西北大学,2005.
[32]贾倩.伊通地堑岔路河断陷流体识别及油气藏分布研究[D].武汉:石油地质大学,2008.
[33]周安富.蜀南地区嘉陵江组储层改造技术及应用研究[D].西南石油大学,2004.
[34]戴建文.阿曼Daleel油田上Shuaiba段储层裂缝特征及分布规律研究[D].成都理工大学,2009.
[35]中国地质大学沉积盆地及沉积矿产研究所储层科研组.中国油气储层评价研究报告鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪延安组三角洲及河流砂体内部构成及不均一性研究[M].1991.
[36]石油科技专辑4储层评价研究进展[M].大庆:中国石油天然气总公司科技发展部,1990.
[37]河南石油勘探局石油勘探开发研究院.中国油气储层评价研究报告泌阳凹陷核桃园组储层牲及评价[M].河南:河南石油勘探局石油勘探开发研究院,1989.
[38]胡罡.川东北部罗家寨构造带飞仙关组储层评价[M].成都:成都理工大学出版社,2004.
[39]叶德胜等.新疆塔里木盆地北部储层沉积、成岩特征及储层评价[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1995.
[40]祁华忠.廊固凹陷曹家务地区下第三系沙三段储层评价[D].成都:成都理工大学,2005.
[41]张瀛.麻柳场构造嘉陵江组储层评价与预测研究[D].南充:西南石油学院.2005.
[42]杨斌,匡立春,孙中春等.一种用于测井油气层综合识别的支持向量机方法[J].测井技术.2005,29(6): 511-514.
[43]蔡军等.CMR和FMI测井在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].河南油田.2002.16(6):17-20.
[44]耿斌等.Geolog在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用—以新疆塔河油田奥陶系储层为例[J].石油物探.2002.41(增刊):310-312.
[45]徐星赵万优.Star-II成像测井在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].测井技术.2001.25(5):358-365.
[46]李素杰,李喜海:测井技术在曙光低潜山带碳酸盐岩裂缝型储层评价中的应用[J].特种油气藏.2000.7(3):8-11.
[47]魏历灵等:测井资料在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].新疆地质.2005.23(1):73-78.
[48]倪国辉徐剑波.国外X油田多方法测井储层评价[J].大庆石油学院学报.2008.32(4):9-15.
[49]李军等.核磁共振资料在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].江汉石油学院.2004.26(1):48-51.
[50]赵军等.横波各向异性在碳酸盐岩裂缝性储层评价中的应用[J].测井技术.2005.29(2):118-121.
[51]丁熊等.灰色关联分析在磨溪嘉二段碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].西部探矿工程.2008.(2):69-71.
[52]吴智勇等.基于测井资料的碳酸盐岩储层评价方法——以辽河西部凹陷曙103块潜山为例[J].石油与天然气地质.2000.21(2):157-160.
[53]张凌云.基于常规测井的花茶油田碳酸盐岩储层评价技术[J].海洋石油.2007.27(2):97-102.
[54]李中锋何顺利.模糊数学在长庆气田碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].天然气工业. 2005.25(3):55-57.
[55]周彦等.四川盆地磨溪构造嘉二段孔隙型碳酸盐岩储层的评价[J].石油学报.2009.30(3):372-378.
[56]康志宏等.塔河碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏动态储层评价技术[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版).2007.34(2):143-146.
[57]翟永红等.塔中地区石炭系碳酸盐岩成岩作用与储层评价[J].江汉石油学院学报.1995.17(3):13-18.
[58]Anthony Zaikowski,Robert R. Spangler. Noble gas and methane partitioning from ground water:An aid to natural gas exploration and reservoir evaluation[J]. GEOLOGY,1990.18:72-74.
[59]Paul F. Worthington. A continuum approach to the petrophysical classification and evaluation of reservoir rocks[J]. Petroleum Geoscfence.1995.1:97-708.
[60]Shi-Yi Zheng.etc.Productivity evaluation of hydraulically fractured gas-condensate reservoirs[J]. Petrnleum Georscience.2006.12:275一283.
[61]I.D.Bryant.Well-bore reservoir evaluation technologies to optimize field evitalization[J]. Petrnlevnz Georczence.2002.8:339-348.
[62]O.J.Vetter等.Test and Evaluation Methokology for Scale Inhibitor Evaluation[J].SPE 16259,1987.
[63]Zhiwen Deng.New geophysical techniques for oil and gas reservoir evaluation in eastern China[J].The Leading Edge.2007.26(3): 284-293.
[64]Mara Abela等.Knowledge acquisition and interpretation problem-solving methods for visual expertise:S study of petroleum-reservoir evaluation.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering[J].2005.47(9-2):51-69.
[65]McCoy;R. L.Reservoir engineering and formation evaluation[M].Gulf Pub. Co.1983.
[66]Abhijit Y. Dandekar.Petroleum reservoir rock and fluid properties[M].CRC/ Taylor & Francis. 2006.
[2]陈立官.油气测井地质[M].地质出版社.1990.
[3]杜奉屏等.碳酸盐岩储集层测井解释文集[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1983.
[4]赵良孝等,碳酸盐岩储层测井评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1994.
[5]马永生等,碳酸盐岩储层沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1999.
[6]Campbell等.Petroleum reservoir property evaluation[M].John M. Campbell.1973.
[7]Abhijit Y. Dandekar.Petroleum reservoir rock and fluid properties[M].2006.
[8]李渭.安塞坪桥油区长6油层组测井储层评价[D].西安:西北大学.2009.
[9]柳建华等.在塔河油田应用FMI成像测井技术识别和评价缝洞型储层.新疆石油地质[J].2001.22(6):487-489.
[10]吴海燕等.成像、核磁共振测井在埕北裂缝性储层评价中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质.2002.23(1):45-48.
[11]苏成义等.缝洞型古潜山油藏储量参数解释方法研究[J].岩性油气藏.2003.10(2):38-41.
[12]王磊.薄层测井曲线校正方法及储层识别模型研究[D].成都:西南石油大学.2006.
[13]智慧文.塔河油田奥陶系碳酸盐岩测井储层评价研究[D].成都:成都理工大学.2006.
[14]赵路子.蜀南地区嘉陵江组沉积相研究及有利储集相带预测[D].西南石油大学.2004.
[15]赖天华.黄家场—隆昌地区嘉五1～雷一1段储层含油气评价研究[R].西南石油大学.2009.
[16]胡必嘉.蜀南—川中过渡带嘉陵江组储层测井评价研究[D].西南石油大学.2006.
[17]庞崇友.蜀南西部地区嘉陵江组天然气的运移与聚集条件研究[D].西南石油大学.2005.
[18]雷一文等.自贡地区嘉陵江组储层评价及勘探目标研究[R].四川:中国石油西南油气田分公司蜀南气矿.2007.
[19]胡海涛,蜀南地区麻柳场嘉陵江组储层测井评价方法研究[D].西南石油大学.2007.
[20]夏先禹邹绍春.川中南部中三叠统雷一l段天然气地质特征及川中地区三叠系大中气田勘探目标评价[M].四川石油管理局.1991.
[21]陶莹.麻黄山西区块东北部延安组储层特征及评价[D].成都理工大学.2009.
[22] Cristianini N,Shawe-Taylor J.支持向量机导论[M].李国正,王猛,曾华军(译).北京:电子工业出版社,2004.
[23]陈荣淋.基于可拓学和支持向量机理论的砂土液化势综合评价研究[D].侨大学,2006.
[24]裘亦楠等.油气储层评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
[25]赵良孝等.碳酸盐岩储层测井评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.
[26]宋子齐谭成仟.灰色理论油气储层评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.
[27]裘亦楠等.“中国油气储层评价研究”总结1989-1990[M].1991.
[28]战薇芸.蜀南长垣坝构造带嘉陵江组储层评价及气水分布特征[D].西南石油大学,2007.
[29]胡华.蜀南地区长垣坝构造带嘉陵江组沉积相研究及有利储集相带预测[D].西南石油大学,2005.
[30]陈洪德李余生等.川南下三叠统嘉陵江组沉积相及有利相带预测研究[D].2001.
[31]高红.鄂尔多斯盆地中央古隆起东坡古生界测井储层评价[D].西安:西北大学,2005.
[32]贾倩.伊通地堑岔路河断陷流体识别及油气藏分布研究[D].武汉:石油地质大学,2008.
[33]周安富.蜀南地区嘉陵江组储层改造技术及应用研究[D].西南石油大学,2004.
[34]戴建文.阿曼Daleel油田上Shuaiba段储层裂缝特征及分布规律研究[D].成都理工大学,2009.
[35]中国地质大学沉积盆地及沉积矿产研究所储层科研组.中国油气储层评价研究报告鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪延安组三角洲及河流砂体内部构成及不均一性研究[M].1991.
[36]石油科技专辑4储层评价研究进展[M].大庆:中国石油天然气总公司科技发展部,1990.
[37]河南石油勘探局石油勘探开发研究院.中国油气储层评价研究报告泌阳凹陷核桃园组储层牲及评价[M].河南:河南石油勘探局石油勘探开发研究院,1989.
[38]胡罡.川东北部罗家寨构造带飞仙关组储层评价[M].成都:成都理工大学出版社,2004.
[39]叶德胜等.新疆塔里木盆地北部储层沉积、成岩特征及储层评价[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1995.
[40]祁华忠.廊固凹陷曹家务地区下第三系沙三段储层评价[D].成都:成都理工大学,2005.
[41]张瀛.麻柳场构造嘉陵江组储层评价与预测研究[D].南充:西南石油学院.2005.
[42]杨斌,匡立春,孙中春等.一种用于测井油气层综合识别的支持向量机方法[J].测井技术.2005,29(6): 511-514.
[43]蔡军等.CMR和FMI测井在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].河南油田.2002.16(6):17-20.
[44]耿斌等.Geolog在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用—以新疆塔河油田奥陶系储层为例[J].石油物探.2002.41(增刊):310-312.
[45]徐星赵万优.Star-II成像测井在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].测井技术.2001.25(5):358-365.
[46]李素杰,李喜海:测井技术在曙光低潜山带碳酸盐岩裂缝型储层评价中的应用[J].特种油气藏.2000.7(3):8-11.
[47]魏历灵等:测井资料在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].新疆地质.2005.23(1):73-78.
[48]倪国辉徐剑波.国外X油田多方法测井储层评价[J].大庆石油学院学报.2008.32(4):9-15.
[49]李军等.核磁共振资料在碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].江汉石油学院.2004.26(1):48-51.
[50]赵军等.横波各向异性在碳酸盐岩裂缝性储层评价中的应用[J].测井技术.2005.29(2):118-121.
[51]丁熊等.灰色关联分析在磨溪嘉二段碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].西部探矿工程.2008.(2):69-71.
[52]吴智勇等.基于测井资料的碳酸盐岩储层评价方法——以辽河西部凹陷曙103块潜山为例[J].石油与天然气地质.2000.21(2):157-160.
[53]张凌云.基于常规测井的花茶油田碳酸盐岩储层评价技术[J].海洋石油.2007.27(2):97-102.
[54]李中锋何顺利.模糊数学在长庆气田碳酸盐岩储层评价中的应用[J].天然气工业. 2005.25(3):55-57.
[55]周彦等.四川盆地磨溪构造嘉二段孔隙型碳酸盐岩储层的评价[J].石油学报.2009.30(3):372-378.
[56]康志宏等.塔河碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏动态储层评价技术[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版).2007.34(2):143-146.
[57]翟永红等.塔中地区石炭系碳酸盐岩成岩作用与储层评价[J].江汉石油学院学报.1995.17(3):13-18.
[58]Anthony Zaikowski,Robert R. Spangler. Noble gas and methane partitioning from ground water:An aid to natural gas exploration and reservoir evaluation[J]. GEOLOGY,1990.18:72-74.
[59]Paul F. Worthington. A continuum approach to the petrophysical classification and evaluation of reservoir rocks[J]. Petroleum Geoscfence.1995.1:97-708.
[60]Shi-Yi Zheng.etc.Productivity evaluation of hydraulically fractured gas-condensate reservoirs[J]. Petrnleum Georscience.2006.12:275一283.
[61]I.D.Bryant.Well-bore reservoir evaluation technologies to optimize field evitalization[J]. Petrnlevnz Georczence.2002.8:339-348.
[62]O.J.Vetter等.Test and Evaluation Methokology for Scale Inhibitor Evaluation[J].SPE 16259,1987.
[63]Zhiwen Deng.New geophysical techniques for oil and gas reservoir evaluation in eastern China[J].The Leading Edge.2007.26(3): 284-293.
[64]Mara Abela等.Knowledge acquisition and interpretation problem-solving methods for visual expertise:S study of petroleum-reservoir evaluation.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering[J].2005.47(9-2):51-69.
[65]McCoy;R. L.Reservoir engineering and formation evaluation[M].Gulf Pub. Co.1983.
[66]Abhijit Y. Dandekar.Petroleum reservoir rock and fluid properties[M].CRC/ Taylor & Francis. 2006.