基于知识价值链的中国微车行业专利战略研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着知识经济和经济全球化深入发展,知识产权日益成为国家发展的战略性资源和国际竞争力的核心要素,成为建设创新型国家的重要支撑和掌握发展主动权的关键。汽车产业是我国重要的支柱产业,因产业链长、关联度高、就业面广、消费拉动大,在国民经济和社会发展中发挥着重要作用。其中微型汽车行业因其产品具有燃料消耗少、使用费用低,占地面积小、用途灵活,适应我国广大农村、中小城镇及中小企业的生产和消费需要等特点,近二十年来发展尤为迅猛。但是,我国微型汽车产业的技术创新和专利运用水平低的问题依然突出。首先,从技术创新角度上来看,行业研发能力普遍较弱,核心技术和专利拥有量少。技术进步主要表现为提高生产质量、创新生产工艺和对引进产品进行适用性改进,专利类型以实用新型和外观设计为主。其次,从专利运用角度来看,企业作为市场主体,灵活运用专利能力不强,专利数量、专利水平、专利布局尚不能满足汽车产业国内外发展的需要。更为严峻的是,跨国汽车公司在我国汽车产业自主发展道路上已经树起了由专利组成的知识产权壁垒。因而,研究如何从战略的高度,推进以专利为核心的知识产权创造、保护、运用和管理,突破国际跨国汽车公司的知识产权壁垒,对提升我国微车产业核心竞争力具有十分重要的现实意义。
     同时,产业全球化和知识产权运用日益加强的发展态势,使知识产权特别是专利的创造、保护、运用和管理等相关战略研究成为学术界、产业界和政府共同关注的问题。纵观国内外的研究成果,主要集中在对专利战略概念、功能、类型及某些环节的制定策略上,并得到了许多令人信服的结论。但关于专利信息分析、专利开发、申请、运用和保护等观点和理论还没有形成系统的体系,这正为本文的深入研究提供了契机与理论开拓空间。
     本论文遵循“理论研究→模型构建→实证分析→战略设计”的研究思路展开论述。在梳理并吸收国内外专家学者相关研究成果的基础上,综合运用产业经济学、国际经济学、技术创新经济学、管理学、知识产权法学等多门学科理论,提出了知识价值链概念,构建了基于知识价值链的专利战略模型,探讨了专利信息分析、专利开发、专利申请、专利运用和专利保护战略的内涵及运作模式;构建了基于知识价值链的专利战略改进型SWOT分析模型,以微车专利信息为重点,分析了我国微车行业实施专利战略的内外部环境,确定了微车行业专利战略选择,提出了战略设计构想。本文试图通过上述研究,建立一个系统的微车行业专利战略理论框架。
     论文的主要内容分为六部分:
     第一,理论基础研究。通过对国内外相关文献研究成果的综述与评析,归纳了与本文研究主体有紧密关系的理论基础,剖析了其中存在的不足,为后文的模型构建奠定了基础,并确定了论文的理论分析框架。
     第二,研究框架的构建。在界定知识价值链(KVC)含义的基础上,从专利基本战略和支撑体系两大模块,构建了专利战略模型;基于KVC思想,引入并突出了专利活动的定量分析元素,构建了专利战略改进型SWOT分析模型,为专利战略的具体制定和实施提供依据。
     第三,基于KVC的专利战略系统。从专利战略模型之专利基本战略和资源支撑体系两大子系统角度,着重论证了专利信息战略、专利开发战略、专利申请战略、专利运用和保护等基本战略的内涵及运作模式;论证了专利战略的要素支撑、组织支撑和文化支撑内涵及构成。
     第四,基于KVC的微车专利活动状况分析。紧密结合知识价值链,主要借助专利地图分析方法和比较分析方法,全面深入地剖析了中外微车行业的专利基本活动和支撑活动态势,总结了日本微车产业专利战略成功的经验。
     第五,基于KVC的专利战略选择。在前章主要对专利信息进行定量分析的基础上,本章结合对微车行业及技术发展外部环境进行的定性分析,找出了影响微车行业专利战略的关键因素,并基于KVC的专利战略改进型SWOT分析模型进行战略匹配,得出我国微车行业的专利战略组合,即以S0进攻型专利战略为主,辅之以WO防御型专利战略的攻防兼备战略。
     第六,基于KVC的专利战略的系统设计。基于知识价值链的专利战略理论模型,主要从专利战略的原则、目标、重点及支撑体系角度,对我国微车行业专利战略进行了系统设计,提出了相应的专利开发、专利申请和专利联盟等战略设想及具体谋略。认为微车行业应针对不同的技术领域实施不同的专利战略:在微车车身和发动机领域,实施技术领先型专利开发战略、自主创新模式、进攻性专利布局战略和专利联盟战略(S0战略)。同时,在微车电子电器、新能源、底盘、传动技术领域,实施追随型专利技术开发和联合开发、利用失效专利开发战略、外围防御型专利申请战略、专利购买战略和专利诉讼战略(W0战略)。
With the rapid development of globalization and knowledge economy, intellectual property has become a core strategic resource for competitiveness and innovation for a nation. Automobile industry is an important pillar industry of our country, it has a long industrial chain that has a high association with other industry, holds a wide range of employment and brings plentiful consumption. It plays an important role in national economy and social development. Cross-passenger-car industry, because of its characteristics of low fuel consumption, low cost, small area occupation, flexible usage, adapt to production and consumption of China's vast rural areas, small towns and small and medium-sized enterprise, also has obtained considerable development during nearly two decades. However, from perspective of technological innovation, it has problems in research capacity as well as operation of intellectual property. First of all, from perspective of technology innovation, industry research and development ability is generally weak, the amount of core technology patent is pretty small. Technology progress is mainly covering production quality and production technology improvement. Patent type mostly is utility model and design. Secondly, from the point of view of patent application, enterprise has low ability in patents operation. The quantity, level and layout of patents cannot meet the needs of automobile industry development. More seriously, multinational auto companies have established barriers of intellectual property to our auto industry. Therefore, it is very important to study, in view of strategy, on how to create, protect, operate and manage intellectual property to break through intellectual property barriers set up by international multinational auto company.
     At the same time, with development of industry globalization and intellectual property operation, relative strategy studies on creation, protection, utilization and management of intellectual property rights especially patent, become a concern in circles of academia, industry and government. The research results in domestic and abroad mainly focus on patent strategic concept, function, type, and some link of strategies, and got a lot of convincing conclusions. But those viewpoints and theories have not formed a system. It provides an opportunity for this dissertation to do further studies on theoretical development.
     This dissertation follows a research notion of "theory research, framework construction, empirical analysis, strategic design". Based on research of domestic and foreign experts, with integrated theories of industrial economics, international economics, technology innovation, management and intellectual property law, this dissertation puts forward theory of knowledge value chain model. Also based on this model, constructs a patent strategy model which consists of basic patent strategies and resource support system, discusses conceptions and operation modes of patent information analysis, patent development, patent application and protection strategy, sets up an improved SWOT analysis model. Focusing on patent information, this dissertation analyses internal and external environment of Chinese cross-passenger-car industry, makes choice for patent strategy and puts forward a strategic design idea. Through research, this dissertation tries to establish a theoretical framework for cross-passenger-car industry.
     The main contents of this dissertation are divided into six parts:
     Firstly, theoretical basis for research. Through review research achievements on related theories at home and abroad, this dissertation analyses existing insufficiency, sets up foundation and theoretical analyzing framework for later model building.
     Secondly, construction of research framework. Based on the idea of KVC, patent strategy model is constructed from two major functional modules of basic patent activity flow and patent activity support; by introducing quantitative analysis elements in patent activity, constructs an improved SWOT analytical model to provide basis for specific formulation and implementation of patent strategy.
     Thirdly, patent strategy system based on KVC. From basic strategy and resources supporting system, this dissertation emphatically demonstrates concepts and modes of strategies of patent information, development, application and protection; Demonstrates composition of resources support, organizational support and culture support.
     Fourthly, analysis of patent activities. On KVC basis, with patent map analysis and comparative analysis methods, this dissertation deeply analyses basic patent activities and support activities for Chinese and foreign cross-passenger-car industry, summarizes successful patent strategy experience of Japanese car industry.
     Fifthly, patent strategy choice based on KVC. Using patent strategy improved SWOT analysis model, from point of view of basic patents activities and support activities, find out the key influencing factors related industry patent development strategy, puts forward strategy matching for cross-passenger-car industry, namely SO offensive patent strategy accompanied by WO defensive strategy.
     Lastly, patent strategy system design based on KVC. In compliance with patent strategy model based on knowledge value chain, mainly from respect of patent strategy principle, target, emphasis and supporting system, this dissertation conceives patent strategy system for cross-passenger-car industry, puts forward corresponding such strategic ideas as patent development, patent application and patent alliance. Cross-passenger-car industry should take different strategies according to different technology level:in the field of body and engine, take strategies of advanced technology development, independent innovation mode, aggressive patent layout and patent alliance. Meanwhile, in line of r electronic, new energy, chassis, transmission technology, take strategies of follow-up technology development, joint development, utilization of invalid patent strategy, defensive patent layout, patent purchase and litigation strategy.
引文
1 迈克尔.波特.竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社,2005:54-65.
    2 Ching ChyiLee,Wai Hung Julius Chu. Who Should Control Inventory in a Supply Chain [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2005(164):158-172.
    3 夏火松.企业知识价值链与知识价值链管理[J].情报杂志,2003(7):11-12.
    4 王瑞敏,刘险峰.基于知识价值链的知识管理模型研究[J].情报杂志,2006(8):94-96.
    5 张润彤,曹宗媛,朱晓敏.知识管理概论[M].北京:首都经贸大学出版社,2005(3):743.
    6 陶锐.基于知识增值过程的企业知识价值链研究[J].科学决策,2009(5):49-54.
    7 注:知识右上角的0、1、2、3、4表示知识发生了价值增值
    8 宗蕴璋,金中坤.企业知识价值链的构建与知识价值实现路径研究[J].江苏商论,2012(9):115-117.
    9 王瑞敏,刘险峰.基于知识价值链的知识管理模型研究[J].情报杂志,2006(8):94-96.
    10 周颖,王家斌.企业知识优势形成的理论分析[J].《科技与管理》,2005(3):34-36.
    11 彭锐,吴金希.核心能力的构建:知识价值链模型[J].经济管理,2003(18)):20-25.
    12 Birger Wernerfelt. "A Resource-based View of the Firm" [J], Strategic Management Journal.1984(4):71-80.
    13 斋藤优.发明专利经济学[M].北京:专利文献出版社,1990(8):201.
    14 高桥明夫,魏启学译.日立的专利管理[M].北京:专利文献出版社,1990(6)
    15 刘凤朝,潘雄峰,王元地.企业专利战略理论研究[J].商业研究,2005(13):16-18.
    17 李建蓉,专利文献与信息[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2002::9.
    18 周颖;潘开灵.企业战略资源协同竞争优势研究[J].科技创业月刊2008(1):10-14
    19 王黎萤.研发团队创新气氛的维度开发与结构验证[J].科学学研究.2010(6):952-959
    13 田文英、纪梦然.我国知识产权人才及其结构探析[J].中国人力资源开发.2006(4):35-39
    14刘善仕、刘婷婷、刘向阳.人力资源管理系统、创新能力与组织绩效关系——以高新技术企业为例[J].科学学研究2007(8):764-771
    25 王进.我国汽车研发投入严重不足(N).中国证券报.2007-10-24
    26 陈柳钦.谈新能源汽车产业发展的政策支持[J].汽车工业研究,2010(6)
    27 深圳市人民政府.关于印发深圳市科技创新奖励办法的通知[N],深府[2007]52号.2007-3-17发布.
    [1]张永训.面向产业结构调整的FAW微型车发展战略若干问题研究[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2010.
    [2]杨吉生.吉林省汽车产业专利战略研究[J].情报科学,2010(6):956-960.
    [3]薛雪,崔英波.中国汽车产业国际竞争力的SWOT分析与提升策略研究[J].吉林省经济管理干部学院学报,2013(2):25-29.
    [4]赵韩,徐国胜,张炳力,窦聪.安徽省发展新能源汽车的SWOT分析[J].合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版),2011(6):1-5.
    [5]祖明.我国自主品牌汽车企业跨国经营SWOT分析[J].安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版),2012(1):15-19.
    [6]王璜.SWOT分析与中国汽车自主品牌发展策略[J].企业家天地,2006(2):35-36.
    [7]王钦凤.南京汽车集团公司自主研发汽车SWOT分析[J].轻型汽车技术,2006(4):46-51.
    [8]章家清,王维.关于自主汽车品牌国际竞争力的SWOT分析[J].特区经济,2008(1):267-268.
    [9]张磊鑫.基于SWOT-PEST模型的锂电池汽车发展战略分析[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2012.
    [10]朱金福.海通用公司发展新能源汽车的SWOT分析[J].商场现代化,2009(6):258-259.
    [11]翟彬,鲁笑颜.基于SWOT分析的后危机时代我国汽车产业自主创新研究[J].经济问题探索,2010(3)
    [12]吕义超.我国电动汽车产业的专利分析与发展对策研究[D].江苏大学硕士学位论文,2010.
    [13]汪张林,孙世杰.我国新能源汽车产业知识产权状况个案研究[J].经济纵横,2011(6):84-87.
    [14]李云彪.基于专利分析的中国汽车行业技术创新战略研究[J].工业技术经济,2012(12):3-12.
    [15]迈克尔·波特.竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社.2005:54-65.
    [16]王开明,万君康.企业战略理论的新发展:资源基础理论[J].《科技进步与对策》.2001(1)
    [17]夏火松.业知识价值链与知识价值链管理[J].情报杂志,2003(7):11-12
    [18]王瑞敏,险峰.于知识价值链的知识管理模型研究[J].情报杂志,2006(8):94-96
    [19]彭锐,吴金希.核心能力的构建:知识价值链模型[J].经济管理,2003(18):20-25
    [20]宗蕴璋,金中坤.企业知识价值链的构建与知识价值实现路径研究[J].江苏商论.2012(9):115-117
    [21]盛小平.面向企业核心竞争力的知识价值链研究[J].图书情报工作,2007(7):10-17
    [22]张润彤,蓝天.供应链知识管理系统研究[J].物流技术,2008(3)
    [23]刘利,朱雪忠.基于博弈模型的专利联营许可行为研究[J.科研管理,2011(11)
    [24]朱国军,杨晨.专利运营能力支撑技术跨越研究[M].电子工业出版社,2009
    [25]任声策.专利联盟中企业的专利战略研究[D].《上海交通大学博士论文》,2007-04-01
    [26]李伟.企业发展中的专利:从专利资源到专利能力——基于企业能力理论的视野[J].《自然辩证法通讯》,2008(8)
    [27]任声策,安艳,宣国良.公司专利战略的PLL框架模型[J].研究与发展管理,2007(5):67-74.
    [28]文礼朋.TRIPS体制与中国的技术追赶[M].社会科学文献出版社,2010.
    [29]李薇薇.我国新能源汽车的绿色知识产权战略研究[D].《华中科技大学博士论文》,2012年5-20
    [30]陈湘玲.论企业专利战略研究[J].情报科学,2008(1).
    [31]牟莉莉,汪克夷,冯桂平,于晓丹.专利保护与企业绩效关系研究[J].《科技与管理》,2009:9
    [32]毛金生,冯小兵,陈燕.专利分析和预警操作实务[M].清华大学出版社,2009.
    [33][美]马歇尔·菲尔普斯,戴维·克兰.烧掉舰船—微软称霸全球的知识产权战略[M].谷永亮译,北京:东方出版社,2010.
    [34][美]汤姆森,斯特里克兰.战略管理(第13版)[M].段盛华等译,北京:中国财政经济出版社,2006.
    [35]高桥明夫.日立的专利管理(开拓企业未来的专利及其战略作用)[M].北京:专利文献出版社,1990,14-32.
    [36]冯晓青.企业知识产权战略(第2版)[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2005
    [37]朱月仙.企业专利产出与其经济产出间关系的计量研究[D].四川大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [38]王玉民,马维野.专利商用化的策略与运用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
    [39]张志成,刘晓慧.跨国公司知识产权战略研究及评析[M].北大知识产权评论(第2卷).北京:法律出版社,2004
    [40]刘二亮,纪艳彬,王清香,刘建东.知识价值链与企业核心竞争力关系研究[J].北华航天工业学院学报2007(6):43-48
    [41]郭斌.基于核心能力的企业竞争优势理论[M].北京:科学出版社,2003(12).
    [42]陈则孚.知识资本[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2003(1).
    [43]夏露.基于微笑曲线理论的企业专利战略探讨[J].经济纵横2011(12)
    [44]沙伦·奥斯特.现代竞争分析[M].张志奇,李强,陈海威译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004年.
    [45]王黎萤.研发团队创新气氛的维度开发与结构验证[J].科学学研究.2010(6):952-959
    [46]田文英、纪梦然.我国知识产权人才及其结构探析[J].中国人力资源开发.2006(4):35-39
    [47]刘善仕、刘婷婷、刘向阳.人力资源管理系统、创新能力与组织绩效关系——以高新技术企业为例[J].科学学研究2007(8):764-771
    [48]刘云.日本汽车工业发展之路[M].汽车工业研究,1997(3):2-7
    [49]王丽丽.论知识经济时代的技术创新及其知识产权保护[D].吉林:吉林大学,2004
    [50]郭斌.基于核心能力的企业竞争优势理论[M].北京:科学出版社,2003(12)
    [51]郝敏.日本专利战略法制评析[J].国际技术经济研究,2007(4).
    [52]贾良定.专业化、协调与企业战略[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2002(5).
    [53]孙婷婷,唐五湘.专利申请量与R&D支出之关系的定量分析[J].情报科学,2008,18(2).
    [54]倪昊,程春红,刘太刚.绿色创新,知识产权商用化的便捷通路[N].中国知识产权报,2009-04-10.
    [55]钮京晖.谁是知识经济的掘金者[J].电子知识产权,2008(2).
    [56]王晋刚.专利地图引导企业专利战略[J].中国发明与专利,2008(5):55-57.
    [57]周寄中,张黎,汤超颖.关于自主创新与知识产权之间的联动[J].管理评论,2005(11)
    [58]魏衍亮.我国汽车行业先进技术专利布局[N].中国知识产权报,2007.9.12(11).
    [59]赵鹏飞.我国汽车工业企业知识产权建设对策研究[J].汽车科技,2006(9):7-10.
    [60]吴齐芳.我国汽车企业知识产权布局研究[J].汽车科技,2008(7):45-48.
    [61]李冰.知识产权对高新技术产业化的推动作用[J].中国创业投资与高科技,2005(2).
    [62]杨全发,韩樱.知识产权保护与跨国公司对外直接投资策略[J].经济研究,2006(4)
    [63]曹雷.面向专利战略的专利信息分析研究[J].科技管理研究,2005(3)
    [64]刘华.专利制度与经济增长:理论与现实——对中国专利制度运行绩效的评估[J].中国软科学,2002(10).
    [65]余翔,姚黎.企业专利引进战略的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2004(4)36.
    [66]杨莹,和金生.我国汽车产业专利战略研究[J].现代财经2007(1).
    [67]刘凤朝,潘雄锋.我国八大经济区专利结构分析及其变动模式研究[J].中国软科学,2005(6).
    [68]李艳刚,郝丽丽.企业专利战略制定过程研究[J].经济论坛,2008(17):69-70.
    [69]王楠.论中国企业专利战略的困境[J].商业研究,2006(16).
    [70]刘吕黎.论中国世界工厂及其对策[J].中国工业经济,2002(10).
    [71]戴璐琳,汤志武.企业发展与专利战略[J].科技与经济,2001,14(2).
    [72]冯晓青.企业技术创新中的专利战略研究[J].渝州大学学报(社会科学版),2002(2).
    [73]冯晓青.美、日企业专利战略及其对我国企业的启示与借鉴[J].当代经济管理,2008(1):80-87.
    [74]方虹,王文霞.国公司在华专利战略及我国对策[J].中国科技投资,2008(2).
    [75]杨薇炯.利地图与企业专利战略关联及其在专利战略中的作用研究[J].情报理论与实践,2010(1):55-58.
    [76]李钊.基于层次分析法和大战略矩阵的企业专利战略研究[J].情报杂志,2010(7):25-30.
    [77]王桂侠.企业知识产权经营的模式与策略分析[J].新材料产业,2007(8):74-77.
    [78]王玲,杨武.基于中国创新实践的专利组合理论体系研究[[J1.科学学研究,2007.
    [79]土珊珊,田金信.基于专利地图的R&D联盟专利战略制定方法研究[[J].科学研究.2010(6):846-852.
    [80]魏衍亮.全球专利化经营的商业模式[J].中国知识产权报,2008-04-09.
    [81]谢朝阳,吴永林,程正中.知识产权保护的帕累托改进—组建国家知识产权经营管理公司的设想[J].科技进步与对策,2009(13):26-29.
    [82]王晓璐,陈向东,许坷.专利联盟内成员的专利组合质量差别化分析—以MPEG-II专利池为例[J].技术经济,2011(1):1-4.
    [83]王玉民,马维野.专利商用化的策略与运用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
    [84]徐明华,陈锦其.专利联盟理论及其对我国企业专利战略的启示[J].科研管理,2009(4):162-167.
    [85]杨莹,陈柳钦.竞争论维度下的企业专利战略管理[J].知识产权,2007(3).
    [86]袁晓东,孟奇勋.专利集中战略:一种新的战略类型[J].中国科技论坛,2011(3):88-94.
    [87]周勇涛.基于动态环境下专利战略变化研究[D].华中科技大学博十学位论文,2009.
    [88]刘华,孟奇勋.公共政策视阈下的知识产权利益集团运作机制研究[J].法商研究,2009(4):121-129.
    [89]Chink ChyiLee. Knowledge Value Chain [J]. The Journal of Management Development, 2000,19(9):783
    [90]C W Hollsopple, M Singh. The Knowledge Chain Model:Activi-ties for Competitiveness [J]. Expert System with Applications,2001 (20):77-98
    [91]Birger Wernerfelt. A Resource-based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 5, no.2, April-June, pp.171-80,1984.
    [92]Geary, S., Bawden, P. From Innovation to Commercialisation 2007. Intellectual Asset Management, February 2007,14-18.
    [93]Donoghue T O, Zweimuller J. Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth [J]. Journal of Economic Growth,2004,9(1):81-123.
    [94]Schneider P H. International Trade, Economic Growth and Intellectual Property Right s:A panel data Study of Developed and Developing Eountries [J]. Journal of Development Economics,2005,78(2):529-547.
    [95]FalveyN, Foser, D Greenaway. Intellectual Property Right s and Economic Growth [J]. Review of Development Economics,2006,10(4):700-719.
    [96]Walter G Park. International Patent Protection:1960-2005[J]. Research Policy,2008,37(4): 761-766.
    [97]Schmookler J. Invention and Economic Growth [M]. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA., 1966.56.
    [98]Griliches Z. Paten t statistics as economic indicators:a survey [J]. Journal of Economic Literature,1990,18(4):1661-1707.
    [99]ErnstH. Pa tent applications and subsequent changes of performance:evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level [J]. Research Policy,2001,30(1):143-157.
    [100]Anandarajan A, ChinC L, eta.l The effect of innovative activity on firm performance:the experience of taiwan [J]. Advances in Accounting,2007,23(1):1-30.
    [101]Albuquerque E. Domestic patents and developing countries:arguments for their study and data from Brazil (1980-1995) [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(9):1047-1060.
    [102]Arundel A, Kablal. What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firm s [J]. Research Policy,1998,27(2):127-141.
    [103]Blind K, Edler J, et a.l Motives to patent:empirical evidence from Germ any [J]. Research Policy,2006,35(5):655-672.
    [104]Jaffe A B, Lerner J. Innovation and Its Discontents:How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and W a t to Do about It [M]. Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press,2004.
    [105]NarinF, NomaE, Perry R. Patents as indicators of corporate techno logical strength Research Policy.1987,16(1),143-155.
    [106]Griliches Z, Hall B H, Pakes A. R& D, patents, and market value revisited:is there a second (technological opportunity) factor? [J]. Economies of Innovation and New Technology,1991, 1(3):183-201.
    [107]Austin D H. An event-study approach to measuring innovative output:the case of bio technology [J]. American Economic Review,1993,83(2):253-258.
    [108]Scherer F M. Corporate inventive output, profits and growth [J]. The Journal of Political Economy,1965,73 (3):290-297.
    [109]ComanorWS, Scherer FM. Pa tent statistics as a measure of technical change [J]. Journal of Political Economy,1969,77(3):392-398.
    [110]Alamy. Patents as Financial Assets:Trolls Demanding Tolls. The Economist, September 12, 2009.
    [111]Alexy, O., Criscuolo, P. and Salter, A. Does IP strategy Have to Cripple open Innovation? MIT Sloan Management Review,2009,51(1):70-77.
    [112]Backler, W., Boutenko, V and Mallouk, S. Winning in the Evolving Marketplace of Ideas: Intellectual Property Strategy for the Twenty-first Century [J]. The Boston Consulting Group, April 30,2010.
    [113]Bessen,J. Patent Thickets:Strategic Patenting of Complex Technologies [J].WorkingPapers,2003.
    [114]Entezarkheir, M. Patent Thicket and Market Value:An Empirical Analysis. Feb 2008.
    [115]Ernst, H. Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management. World Patent Information,2003, (25):233-242.
    [116]Ewing, T. The Intellectual Ventures IP Portfolio in the United States:Patent&Published Applications.2nd Edition, January 2010.
    [117]Ghyo Sun Park, Seong Don Hwang. The Rise of NPE. Managing Intellectual Property,2010.
    [118]Rivette, K. G., Kline, D. Discovering New Value in Intellectual Property. Harvard Business Review, January 2010.
    [119]Siebert, R. B., Graevenitz, G. V Jostling for Advantage:Licensing and Entry into Patent Portfolio Races. Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,2010,73(2):225-245.
    [120]Peter Drahos.Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting [J].Journal of World Intellectual Property,2004(5).
    [121]Roslender. Robin, Accounting for Intellectual Capital:A Contemporary Management Accounting Perspective. Management Accounting,2000(3).
    [122]Schultze,U.,A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work, MIS 2000 Quarterly,1.
    [123]Shin Minsoo, Tony Holden & Ruth A. Schimidt, From knowledge theory toward management practice:Towards an integrated approach, Information processing and Management,2001 (37).
    [124]Sue Newell, M.Robertson, H. Scarbrough, and Jacky Swan Managing Knowledge Work. N.Y.:Palgrave2002.
    [125]Dzinkowski R. The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital:An Introduction. Management Accounting,2000 (2)
    [126]Drucker, P.F,2002. Managing in the Next Society. New York City, Truman Talley Books.
    [127]CW Holsapple&KD Joshi (2001), Organizational knowledge resources, Decision Support Systems,31.
    [128]Bots, PWG and de Bruin, H., Effective Knowledge Management in Professional Organizations:Going by the rules.35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press2002.
    [129]Bontis, N., Assessing knowledge assets:A review of the models used to measure intellectual Capital, International Journal of Management Reviews,2001
    [130]Andersen R.& McLean R., Accounting for the Creation of Value, At:Andriessen, D., Tiessen, R.,2000, Weightless Weight-Find your Real Value in a Future of Intangible Assets, Pearson Education, London 2000
    [131]Ask Me(2000),Knowledge Chain Management White Paper http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?kw=knowledge%2520management&x=40&sortb y=comp&docid=25119.
    [132]Barney. Strategic Factor Markets:Expectations,Luck, and Business Strategy. Management Science,1986(10).
    [133]Lohr, S. Patent Auctions Offer Protections to Inventors. The New York Times, September 20, 2009.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700