汽车制造商产能扩大下3PL-MRCD系统仿真优化研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在实地调研、总结和评述相关文献的基础上,本论文深入分析了在国内众多汽车制造商产能扩大背景下的第三方物流企业(3PL)运作决策优化问题。首先建立符合零部件供应物流实际运作的离散(随机动态)仿真模型,即基于3PL的零部件循环取货越库配送(3PL-MRCD)模型;然后,探讨了产能扩大对3PL-MRCD物流绩效(零部件平均物流时间及物流量)的重要影响;最后,深入研究了3PL-MRCD系统的仿真优化设计及稳健(仿真)优化设计。具体而言,论文主要完成的创新性工作总结如下:
     建立零部件从始端循环取货、中端越库配送直到终端线边仓库的供应物流3PL-MRCD仿真模型,通过灵敏度分析探讨了汽车制造商产能扩大对系统物流绩效的影响,在此基础上提出了四种可供3PL选择的物流绩效改进方案,包括车辆调度方法、车辆排队规则、越库中心库台分配模式及不同车辆类型。
     提出针对复杂系统的多重响应序贯分支因子筛选设计方法(MSB)。鉴于3PL-MRCD系统的复杂性(存在较多的因子),提出首先筛选出影响系统的关键因子、再针对关键因子进行优化的研究步骤。由于所研究的响应(系统绩效或仿真输出)具有多维性,提出一个针对多重响应的序贯分支筛选法,MSB将传统序贯分支法(SB)拓展到多重响应领域,蒙特卡洛实验表明MSB比SB更具效率和效力,并最终应用到3PL-MRCD系统中,筛选出影响系统绩效最重要的少量因子。
     基于响应面(RSM)和Kriging元模型两类仿真优化方法对筛选出的关键因子进行优化(MSB-RSM和MSB-Kriging),确定其最大化系统绩效的最优参数水平。在优化结果的基础上,对比分析了产能扩大后3PL可能的四种物流决策方案,确定了物流绩效改进的最佳思路,并比较分析了MSB-RSM和MSB-Kriging两类方法拟合的优劣以及传统RSM和MSB-RSM方法的效率与效力。
     采用拉丁超立方采样(LHS)与RSM和Kriging相结合的仿真优化方法对3PL-MRCD系统进行稳健优化设计。利用LHS在环境因子若干等概率空间中随机样本点与筛选出的关键因子进行交叉设计,最终确定在最小化系统绩效变动的参数水平。在优化结果的基础上,应用自由分布的Bootstrap法对比分析了仿真优化与稳健优化方法最优解的优劣。
On the basis of field observations and literature review, this dissertation deeply examines the best operating settings of Chinese third-party logistics under the expansion of their serving manufacturer. In the proposed framework, a random (stochastic) dynamic model that agrees with the3PL's practical operations more; i.e., milk-run pickup and cross-docking distribution (3PL-MRCD for short) is constructed, and then changes of the3PL-MRCD performances (cycle time, CT and number of throughput, NT) due to the addition of the assembly plant capacity are explored. Two types of metamodel-based optimization routines simultaneously---simulation optimization methods and robust (simulation) methods---to identify factor levels that would maximize system potential are employed. More specifically, the main contributions of the dissertation are as follows.
     To understand the changes of the3PL-MRCD system after the expansion auto maker, a process-centric modeling paradigm that ranges from the start milk-run pickup, middle cross-docking distribution, to the end factory warehouse is contructed using Arena software. Next, by conducting sensitivity analysis, the changes of system performances are observed, and logistics modes; namely, truck scheduling, truck dispatching rule, door assignment and truck type selection to improve system performance of interest are provided.
     To optimize the3PL-MRCD system, which involves a large number affecting factors, a hybnrid optimization framework that first searches for a few important factors dominating the system performance, and next identify the best settings of them is innovatively presented. Since the3PL-MRCD system contains two types of response; i.e., CT and NT, a novel method for factor screening in random discrete-event simulation with multiple response types, called multiple sequential bifurcation (MSB) is introduced. This MSB extends basic sequential bifurcation (SB) to incorporate multiple responses. The performance of MSB is proven and compared with the original SB procedure in two Monte Carlo experiments. Finally, the MSB is successful in eliminating the unimportant ones among numerous factors within the3PL-MRCD system, which further exhibits its robustness.
     To determine the optimal levels of these key factors found by MSB, two types of metamodel-based approaches; namely, response surface methodlogy (RSM) and Kriging are adopt. These metamodels are capable of describing the relationship between key factors and multiple system responses of interest, and ultimately enable optimization. After that, simulation outputs from four input combinations, which represent four decisions the3PL may make are compared objectively, and the most desired way to improve system performance after the expansion of the assembly plants'capacity is then provided. In addition, the fitness between MSB-RSM and MSB-Kriging methods, and also the efficiency and efficacy between classical RSM and our MSB-RSM are compared.
     To discern the robust conditions for the key factors found by MSB, a robust procedure that combines the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) with RSM and Kriging methods is presented, and an environmental factor is taken into account. LHS can account for the distribution of the environmental factor, and form a cross (combined) design with the decision (key) factors. After that, this design to build LHS-RSM and LHS-Kriging metamodels is exploited, respectively, and find the robust operation conditions for decision factors that minimize the variability of two responses while ensure their mean values stay with a desired targets. Finally, a distribution-free bootstrapping procedure to further compare the results obtained by the simulation optimization and the robust optimization methods are presented.
引文
[1]Alegre J., Laguna M., Pacheco J. Optimizing the periodic pick-up of raw materials for a manufacturer of auto parts [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007,179(3):736-746
    [2]Alonso F., Alvarez M. J., Beasley J. E. A tabu search algorithm for the periodic vehicle routing problem with multiple vehicle trips and accessibility restrictions [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2007,59(7):963-976
    [3]Alpan G, Ladier A. L., Larbi R., Penz B. Heuristic solutions for transshipment problems in a multiple door cross docking warehouse[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2011a,61(2):402-408
    [4]Alpan G, Larbi R., Penz B. A bounded dynamic programming approach to schedule operations in a cross docking platform[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2011b,60(3):385-396
    [5]Alvarez-Perez G, Gonzalez-Velarde J., Fowler J. W. Crossdocking just in time scheduling:An alternative solution approach[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2009,60(4):554-564
    [6]Amoako-Gyampah K., Meredith J. R. The operations management research agenda: An update[J]. Journal of Operations Management,1989,8(3):250-262
    [7]Ankenman B. E., Nelson B. L., Staum J. Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling[J]. Operations Research,2010,58(2):371-382
    [8]Apte U. M., Viswanathan S. Effective cross docking for improving distribution efficiencies [J]. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications,2000, 3(3):291-302
    [9]Aytug H., Dogan C. A., Bezmez G Determining the number of Kanbans:A simulation metamodeling approach[J]. Simulation,1996,67(1):23-32
    [10]Azi N., Gendreau M., Potvin J. Y. An exact algorithm for a vehicle routing problem with time windows and multiple use of vehicles[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2010,202(3):756-763
    [11]Banks J., Carson J. S., Nelson B. L. Discrete-event simulation[M].4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prenticd-Hall,2005
    [12]Bartholdi J. J.,Ⅲ, Gue K. R. The best shape for a crossdock[J]. Transportation Science,2004,38(2):235-244
    [13]Bartholdi J. J., Ⅲ, Gue K. R. Reducing labor costs in an LTL crossdocking terminal[J]. Operations Research,2000,48(6):823-832
    [14]Barton R. R., Meckesheimer M. Chapter 18 Metamodel-Based Simulation Optimization[M]. Shane, G H., Barry L. N. eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Elsevier.2006:535-574
    [15]Bettonvil B. W., Kleijnen J. P. C. Searching for important factors in simulation models with many factors:Sequential bifurcation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1997,96(1):180-194
    [16]Boloori Arabani A. R., Fatemi Ghomi S., Zandieh M. A multi-criteria cross-docking scheduling with Just-In-Time approach[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2010,49(5):741-756
    [17]Boloori Arabani A. R., Fatemi Ghomi S. M. T., Zandieh M. Meta-heuristics implementation for scheduling of trucks in a cross-docking system with temporary storage[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011a,38(3):1964-1979
    [18]Boloori Arabani A. R., Zandieh M., Ghomi S. M. T. F. Multi-objective genetic-based algorithms for a cross-docking scheduling problem[J]. Applied Soft Computing,2011b,11(8):4954-4970
    [19]Box G. E. P., Wilson K. B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series B (Statistical Methodology),1951,13(1):1-45
    [20]Boy sen N. Truck scheduling at zero-inventory cross docking terminals [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2010,37(1):32-41
    [21]Boysen N., Bock S. Scheduling just-in-time part supply for mixed-model assembly lines[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2011,211(1):15-25
    [22]Boysen N., Fliedner M. Cross dock scheduling:Classification, literature review and research agenda[J]. Omega,2010,38(6):413-422
    [23]Boysen N., Fliedner M., Scholl A. Scheduling inbound and outbound trucks at cross docking terminals[J]. OR Spectrum,2008,32(1):135-161
    [24]Bozer Y. A., Carlo H. J. Optimizing inbound and outbound door assignments in less-than-truckload crossdocks[J]. HE Transactions,2008,40(11):1007-1018
    [25]Braysy O., Gendreau M. Vehicle routing problem with time windows, Part I:Route construction and local search algorithms [J]. Transportation Science,2005a,39(1): 104-118
    [26]Braysy O., Gendreau M. Vehicle routing problem with time windows, part II: Metaheuristics[J]. Transportation Science,2005b,39(1):119-139
    [27]Brandao J., Mercer A. A tabu search algorithm for the multi-trip vehicle routing and scheduling problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1997, 100(1):180-191
    [28]Can B., Heavey C. Comparison of experimental designs for simulation-based symbolic regression of manufacturing systems[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2011,61(3):447-462
    [29]Chan F. T. S., Chan H. K. A comprehensive survey and future trend of simulation study on FMS scheduling [J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,2004,15(1): 87-102
    [30]Chan K. K., Spedding T. A. On-line optimization of quality in a manufacturing system[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2001,39(6):1127-1145
    [31]Chang K.-H., Hong L. J., Wan H. Stochastic trust-region response-surface method (STRONG)-A new response-surface framework for simulation optimization[J]. INFORMS Journal on Computing,2012,
    [32]Chen F., Lee C. Y. Minimizing the makespan in a two-machine cross-docking flow shop problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2009,193(1):59-72
    [33]Chen F., Song K. L. Minimizing makespan in two-stage hybrid cross docking scheduling problem[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2009,36(6): 2066-2073
    [34]Chen P., Guo Y., Lim A., Rodrigues B. Multiple crossdocks with inventory and time windows[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2006a,33(1):43-63
    [35]Chen V. C. P., Tsui K. L., Barton R. R., Meckesheimer M. A review on design, modeling and applications of computer experiments [J]. HE Transactions,2006b, 38(4):273-291
    [36]Cheng R. C. H. Searching for important factors:Sequential bifurcation under uncertainty[C]. Withers, D. H., Barry L. N., Andradottir S., Healy K. J. eds. Proc 1997 Winter Simulation Conf, Institute of Electrical and Eletronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ,1997:275-280
    [37]Clarke G, Wright J. W. Scheduling of vehicles from a central depot to a number of delivery points[J]. Operations Research,1964,12(4):568-581
    [38]Conn A. R., Gould N. I. M., Toint P. L. Trust-region methods[M]. Society for Industrial Mathematics,2000
    [39]Conway R. W. Some tactical problems in digital simulation[J]. Management Science,1963,10(1):47-61
    [40]Conway R. W., Johnson B. M., Maxwell W. L. Some problems of digital systems simulation[J]. Management Science,1959,6(1):92-110
    [41]Dabbas R. M., Chen H. N., Fowler J. W., Shunk D. A combined dispatching criteria approach to scheduling semiconductor manufacturing systems [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2001,39(3):307-324
    [42]Dantzig G. B., Ramser J. H. The truck dispatching problem[J]. Management Science,1959,6(1):80-91
    [43]De S. K., Baron M. Step-up and step-down methods for testing multiple hypotheses in sequential experiments [J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference,2012,142(7):2059-2070
    [44]Deflandre D., Kleijnen J. P. C. Statistical analysis of random simulations: Bootstrap tutorial [M]. Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University,2002
    [45]Dellino G, Kleijnen J. P. C., Meloni C. Robust optimization in simulation:Taguchi and krige combined[J]. INFORMS Journal on Computing,2012,24(3):471-484
    [46]Dellino G, Kleijnen J. P. C., Meloni C. Robust optimization in simulation:Taguchi and Krige combined [J]. INFORMS Journal on Computing,2011,
    [47]Dellino G, Kleijnen J. P. C., Meloni C. Robust optimization in simulation:Taguchi and response surface methodology [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2010,125(1):52-59
    [48]Dellino G, Kleijnen J. P. C., Meloni C. Robust simulation-optimization using metamodels[C]. eds. Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2009,2009:540-550
    [49]Dengiz B., Akbay K. S. Computer simulation of a PCB production line: Metamodeling approach[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2000, 63(2):195-205
    [50]Dengiz B., Bektas T., Ultanir A. E. Simulation optimization based DSS application: A diamond tool production line in industry [J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory,2006,14(3):296-312
    [51]Derringer G, Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables[J]. Journal of quality technology,1980,12(4):214-219
    [52]Doerner K. F., Fuellerer G, Hartl R. F., Gronalt M., Iori M. Metaheuristics for the vehicle routing problem with loading constraints [J]. Networks,2007,49(4): 294-307
    [53]Dondo R., Mendez C. A., Cerda J. The multi-echelon vehicle routing problem with cross docking in supply chain management[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering,2011,35(12):3002-3024
    [54]Du T., Wang F. K., Lu P. Y. A real-time vehicle-dispatching system for consolidating milk runs[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review,2007,43(5):565-577
    [55]Durieux S., Pierreval H. Regression metamodeling for the design of automated manufacturing system composed of parallel machines sharing a material handling resource[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2004,89(1):21-30
    [56]Efron B., Tibshirani R. J. An introduction to the bootstrap[M]. New York: Chapman & Hall,1993
    [57]Ekren B. Y, Heragu S. S., Krishnamurthy A., Malmborg C. J. Simulation based experimental design to identify factors affecting performance of AVS/RS[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2010,58(1):175-185
    [58]Feyzioglu O., Pierreval H., Deflandre D. A simulation-based optimization approach to size manufacturing systems[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2005,43(2):247-266
    [59]Floudas C. A., Gounaris C. E. A review of recent advances in global optimization[J]. Journal of Global Optimization,2009,45(1):3-38
    [60]Fu M. C. Are we there yet? The marriage between simulation & optimization[J]. OR/MS Today,2007,36(3):16-17
    [61]Fu M. C. Feature article:Optimization for simulation:Theory vs. practice[J]. INFORMS Journal on Computing,2002,14(3):192-215
    [62]Fuellerer G., Doerner K. F., Hartl R. F., Iori M. Metaheuristics for vehicle routing problems with three-dimensional loading constraints [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2010,201(3):751-759
    [63]Gumus M., Bookbinder J. H. Cross-docking and its implications in location-distribution systems[J]. Journal of Business Logistics,2004,25(2): 199-228
    [64]Gendreau M., Iori M., Laporte G, Martello S. A Tabu search heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with two-dimensional loading constraints [J]. Networks, 2008,51(1):4-18
    [65]Gharbi A., Kenne J. P. Optimal production control problem in stochastic multiple-product multiple-machine manufacturing systems [J]. IIE Transactions, 2003,35(10):941-952
    [66]Giddings A. P., Bailey T. G, Moore J. T. Optimality analysis of facility location problems using response surface methodology [J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2001,31(1):38-52
    [67]Gonzalo M., Diego M., Fidel T. Modeling and development of an ARENA(?) interface for Petri Nets:A case study in a Colombian cosmetics company[M]. Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation. Miami, Florida; Winter Simulation Conference.2008:1368-1375
    [68]Gue K. R. The effects of trailer scheduling on the layout of freight terminals[J]. Transportation Science,1999,33(4):419-428
    [69]Hayashi K., Nemoto T. Procurement logistics of Japanese auto manufacturers in inland China-intermodal transport utilizing the Yangtze River [J]. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics,2010,26(1):119-137
    [70]Holweg M., Miemczyk J. Logistics in the "three-day car" age:Assessing the responsiveness of vehicle distribution logistics in the UK[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2002,32(10):829-850
    [71]Hopp W. J. Supply chain science[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill/Irwin,2008
    [72]Iori M., Salazar-Gonzalez J. J., Vigo D. An exact approach for the vehicle routing problem with two-dimensional loading constraints [J]. Transportation Science, 2007,41(2):253-264
    [73]Irizarry M. D. L. A., Wilson J. R., Trevino J. A flexible simulation tool for manufacturing-cell design, I:Model structure, operation, and case study[J]. IIE Transactions,2001a,33(10):827-836
    [74]Irizarry M. D. L. A., Wilson J. R., Trevino J. A flexible simulation tool for manufacturing-cell design, II:Response surface analysis and case study[J]. IIE Transactions,2001b,33(10):837-846
    [75]Jahangirian M., Eldabi T., Naseer A., Stergioulas L. K., Young T. Simulation in manufacturing and business:A review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2010,203(1):1-13
    [76]Jayaraman V., Ross A. A simulated annealing methodology to distribution network design and management[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2003, 144(3):629-645
    [77]Kaneko J., Nojiri W. The logistics of Just-in-Time between parts suppliers and car assemblers in Japan[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2008,16(3):155-173
    [78]Kelton W. D., Sadowski R. P., Sturrock D. T. Simulation with ARENA[M].4th ed. New York:McGraw-Hill,2007
    [79]Kenne J. P., Gharbi A. Experimental design in production and maintenance control problem of a single machine, single product manufacturing system[J]. International Journal of Production Research,1999,37(3):621-637
    [80]Kleijnen J. P. C. Design and analysis of simulation experiments[M]. New York: Springer US,2008a
    [81]Kleijnen J. P. C. Factor screening in simulation experiments:Review of sequential bifurcation[M]. Alexopoulos, C., Goldsman D., Wilson J. R. eds. Advancing the Frontiers of Simulation. New York; Springer.2009a:153-167
    [82]Kleijnen J. P. C. Kriging metamodeling in simulation:A review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2009b,192(3):707-716
    [83]Kleijnen J. P. C. An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2005,164(2): 287-300
    [84]Kleijnen J. P. C. Response surface methodology for constrained simulation optimization:An overview[J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory,2008b, 16(1):50-64
    [85]Kleijnen J. P. C. Sensitivity analysis and related analyses:A review of some statistical techniques [J]. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation,1997, 57(1-4):111-142
    [86]Kleijnen J. P. C. Sensitivity analysis of simulation models:an overview[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2010,2(6):7585-7586
    [87]Kleijnen J. P. C. Simulation and optimization in production planning:A case study[J]. Decision Support Systems,1993,9(3):269-280
    [88]Kleijnen J. P. C., Bettonvil B. W., Persson F. Screening for the important factors in large discrete-event simulation models:Sequential bifurcation and its applications[M]. Dean, A., Lewis S. M. eds. Screening:Methods for Experimentation in Industry, Drug Discovery, and Genetic. New York; Springer. 2006a:287-307
    [89]Kleijnen J. P. C., Deflandre D. Validation of regression metamodels in simulation: Bootstrap approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,170(1): 120-131
    [90]Kleijnen J. P. C., den Hertog D., Angun E. Response surface methodology's steepest ascent and step size revisited[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,159(1):121-131
    [91]Kleijnen J. P. C., den Hertog D., Angun E. Response surface methodology's steepest ascent and step size revisited:Correction[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006b,170(2):664-666
    [92]Kleijnen J. P. C., Sanchez S. M., Lucas T. W., Cioppa T. M. State-of-the-art review: A user's guide to the brave new world of designing simulation experiments[J]. INFORMS Journal on Computing,2005,17(3):263-289
    [93]Kleijnen J. P. C., Sargent R. G. A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2000, 120(1):14-29
    [94]Kleijnen J. P. C., Smits M. T. Performance metrics in supply chain management[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2003,54(5):507-514
    [95]Kleijnen J. P. C., van Beers W. C. M. Application-driven sequential designs for simulation experiments:Kriging metamodelling[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2004,55(8):876-883
    [96]Konur D., Golias M. M. Cost-stable truck scheduling at a cross-dock facility with unknown truck arrivals:A meta-heuristic approach[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review,2013,49(1):71-91
    [97]Kreng V. B., Chen F. T. The benefits of a cross-docking delivery strategy:A supply chain collaboration approach[J]. Production Planning & Control,2008,19(3): 229-241
    [98]Kumar S., Nottestad D. A. Capacity design:An application using discrete-event simulation and designed experiments [J]. HE Transactions,2006,38(9):729-736
    [99]Larbi R., Alpan G., Baptiste P., Penz B. Scheduling cross docking operations under full, partial and no information on inbound arrivals[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2011,38(6):889-900
    [100]Lau R. S. M., Xie J. X., Zhao X. D. Effects of inventory policy on supply chain performance:A simulation study of critical decision parameters [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2008,55(3):620-633
    [101]Lavoie P., Kenne J. P., Gharbi A. Production control and combined discrete/continuous simulation modeling in failure-prone transfer lines [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2007,45(24):5667-5685
    [102]Law A. M. Simulation modeling and analysis[M].4th ed. Boston:McGraw-Hill, 2007
    [103]Lee Y. H., Jung J. W., Lee K. M. Vehicle routing scheduling for cross-docking in the supply chain[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2006,51(2):247-256
    [104]Leyffer S., Mahajan A. Nonlinear constrained optimization:Methods and software[J]. Argonee National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,2010,60439
    [105]Li Y., Lim A., Rodrigues B. Crossdocking---JIT scheduling with time windows[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2004,55(12):1342-1351
    [106]Liao C. J., Lin Y. M., Shih S. C. Vehicle routing with cross-docking in the supply chain[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(10):6868-6873
    [107]Liao T. W., Egbelu P. J., Chang P. C. Two hybrid differential evolution algorithms for optimal inbound and outbound truck sequencing in cross docking operations [J]. Applied Soft Computing,2012, (0):
    [108]Lim A., Miao Z. W., Rodrigues B., Xu Z. Transshipment through crossdocks with inventory and time windows[J]. Naval Research Logistics (NRL),2005,52(8): 724-733
    [109]Longo F., Mirabelli G. An advanced supply chain management tool based on modeling and simulation[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2008,54(3): 570-588
    [110]Lophaven S. N., Nielsen H. B., S(?)ndergaard J. DACE:A MATLAB Kriging toolbox (version 2.0)[M]. Lyngby:Technical University of Denmark,2002
    [111]Ma H., Miao Z., Lim A., Rodrigues B. Crossdocking distribution networks with setup cost and time window constraint[J]. Omega,2011,39(1):64-72
    [112]Macedo R., Alves C., Valerio de Carvalho J. M., Clautiaux F., Hanafi S. Solving the vehicle routing problem with time windows and multiple routes exactly using a pseudo-polynomial model[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2011, 214(3):536-545
    [113]MathWorks. Statistics Toolbox. User's manual[M]. Natick, MA:MathWorks,2005
    [114]McWilliams D. L., Stanfield P. M., Geiger C. D. The parcel hub scheduling problem:A simulation-based solution approach[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2005,49(3):393-412
    [115]Miller G A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two:Some limits on our capacity for processing information[J]. Psychological Review,1956,343/352(2): 81-97
    [116]Montgomery D. C. Design and analysis of experiments[M].6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons,2007
    [117]Musa R., Arnaout J. P., Jung H. Ant colony optimization algorithm to solve for the transportation problem of cross-docking network[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2010,59(1):85-92
    [118]Myers R. H., Khuri A. I., Carter W. H. Response surface methodology: 1966-1988[J]. Technometrics,1989,31(2):137-157
    [119]Myers R. H., Montgomery D. C., Anderson-Cook C. M. Response surface methodology:Process and product optimization using designed experiments [M]. 3th ed. New York:John Wiley & Sons,2009
    [120]Nair V. N., Abraham B., MacKay J., Nelder J. A., Box G, Phadke M. S., Kacker R. N., Sacks J., Welch W. J., Lorenzen T. J., Shoemaker A. C., Tsui K. L., Lucas J. M., Taguchi S., Myers R. H., Vining G. G, Wu C. F. J. Taguchi's parameter design:A panel discussion[J]. Technometrics,1992,34(2):127-161
    [121]Nashimoto M., Ishihara S., Nemoto T., Inaba J. Logistics management of automotive parts in south China[J]. Journal of Japan Logistics Society,2009, (17): 161-168
    [122]Nelson B. L.50th anniversary article:Stochastic simulation research in management science[J]. Management Science,2004,50(7):855-868
    [123]Nemoto T., Hayashi K., Hashimoto M. Milk-run logistics by Japanese automobile manufacturers in Thailand[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2010, 2(3):5980-5989
    [124]Nocedal J., Wright S. J. Numerical optimization[M].2th ed. New York:Springer verlag,2006
    [125]Noguera J. H., Watson E. F. Response surface analysis of a multi-product batch processing facility using a simulation metamodel[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2006,102(2):333-343
    [126]Oh Y. H., Hwang H., Cha C. N., Lee S. A dock-door assignment problem for the Korean mail distribution center [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2006, 51(2):288-296
    [127]Olafsson S. Chapter 21 Metaheuristics[M]. Shane, G. H., Barry L. N. eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Elsevier.2006: 633-654
    [128]Olivera A., Viera O. Adaptive memory programming for the vehicle routing problem with multiple trips[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2007,34(1): 28-47
    [129]Pannirselvam G. P., Ferguson L. A., Ash R. C., Siferd S. P. Operations management research:an update for the 1990s[J]. Journal of Operations Management,1999, 18(1):95-112
    [130]Petch R. J., Salhi S. A multi-phase constructive heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with multiple trips[J]. Discrete Applied Mathematics,2003,133(1):69-92
    [131]Press W. H., Teukolsky S. A., Vetterling W. T., Flannery B. P. Numerical recipes 3rd edition:The art of scientific computing[M]. Cambridge university press,2007
    [132]Ramaekers K., Janssens G. K., Landeghem H. V. Toward logistics systems parameter optimization through the use of response surfaces[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Belgian, French and Italian Operations Research Societies,2006,4(4): 331-342
    [133]Reis dos Santos M. I., Porta Nova A. M. O. Statistical fitting and validation of non-linear simulation metamodels:A case study[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,171(1):53-63
    [134]Ross A., Jayaraman V. An evaluation of new heuristics for the location of cross-docks distribution centers in supply chain network design[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2008,55(1):64-79
    [135]Sacks J., Welch W. J., Toby J. M., Wynn H. P. Design and analysis of computer experiments[J]. Statistical Science,1989,4(4):409-423
    [136]Salhi S., Petch R. J. A GA based heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with multiple trips[J]. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms,2007,6(4): 591-613
    [137]Sanchez S. M. Design of experiments:robust design:seeking the best of all possible worlds [M]. Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation. Orlando, Florida; Society for Computer Simulation International.2000:69-76
    [138]Sanchez S. M., Sanchez P. J., Ramberg J. S., Moeeni F. Effective engineering design through simulation[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 1996,3(2):169-185
    [139]Santos F. A., Mateus G. R., Salles da Cunha A. A branch-and-price algorithm for a behicle routing problem with cross-docking[J]. Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics,2011,37(0):249-254
    [140]Sargent R. G. Verification and validation of simulation models[M]. Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation. Miami, Florida; Winter Simulation Conference.2008:157-169
    [141]Sargent R. G. Verification and validation of simulation models[M]. Proceedings of the 41th Conference on Winter Simulation. Austin, Texas; Winter Simulation Conference.2009:162-176
    [142]Shang J. Robust design and optimization of material handling in an FMS[J]. International Journal of Production Research,1995,33(9):2437-2454
    [143]Shang J., Li S., Tadikamalla P. Operational design of a supply chain system using the Taguchi method, response surface methodology, simulation, and optimization[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2004,42(18): 3823-3849
    [144]Shang J., Tadikamalla P. Multicriteria design and control of a cellular manufacturing system through simulation and optimization[J]. International Journal of Production Research,1998,36(6):1515-1528
    [145]Shang J., Tadikamalla P. Output maximization of a CIM system:Simulation and statistical approach[J]. International Journal of Production Research,1993,31(1): 19-41
    [146]Shen H., Wan H. Controlled sequential factorial design for simulation factor screening[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2009,198(2):511-519
    [147]Shen H., Wan H., Sanchez S. M. A hybrid method for simulation factor screening[J]. Naval Research Logistics (NRL),2010,57(1):45-57
    [148]Shi W., Kleijnen J. P. C., Liu Z.-X. Factor screening for simulation with multiple responses:Sequential bifurcation. Working Paper,2012, Tilburg Univerisity, Netherland, Tilburg, http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=122462
    [149]Shukla S. K., Tiwari M. K., Wan H. D., Shankar R. Optimization of the supply chain network:Simulation, Taguchi, and Psychoclonal algorithm embedded approach[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2010,58(1):29-39
    [150]Simpson T. W., Booker A. J., Ghosh D., Giunta A. A., Koch P. N., Yang R. J. Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization:A panel discussion[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,2004,27(5):302-313
    [151]Smith J. S. Survey on the use of simulation for manufacturing system design and operation[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems,2003,22(2):157-171
    [152]Soltani R., Sadjadi S. J. Scheduling trucks in cross-docking systems:A robust meta-heuristics approach[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review,2010,46(5):650-666
    [153]Staum J. Better simulation metamodeling:the why, what, and how of stochastic kriging[M]. Winter Simulation Conference. Austin, Texas; Winter Simulation Conference.2009:119-133
    [154]Sung C. S., Song S. H. Integrated service network design for a cross-docking supply chain network[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2003, 54(12):1283-1295
    [155]Swain J. J. New frontiers in simulation:Biennial survey of discrete-event simulation software tools[J]. OR/MS Today,2007,34(5):23-43
    [156]Taguchi G. System of experimental designs[M]. New York:UNIPUB/Krauss International, White Plains,1987
    [157]Taillard E. D., Laporte G., Gendreau M. Vehicle routeing with multiple use of vehicles[J]. The Journal of the Operational Research Society,1996,47(8): 1065-1070
    [158]Tang S. L., Yan H. Pre-distribution vs. post-distribution for cross-docking with transshipments[J]. Omega,2011,38(3/4):192-202
    [159]Tsai C. S. Evaluation and optimisation of integrated manufacturing system operations using Taguch's experiment design in computer simulation[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2002,43(3):591-604
    [160]Tsui L. Y, Chang C. H. A microcomputer based decision support tool for assigning dock doors in freight yards[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,1990,19(1/4): 309-312
    [161]Tsui L. Y, Chang C. H. An optimal solution to a dock door assignment problem[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,1992,23(1/4):283-286
    [162]Vahdani B., Soltani R., Zandieh M. Scheduling the truck holdover recurrent dock cross-dock problem using robust meta-heuristics [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2010,46(5):769-783
    [163]Vahdani B., Zandieh M. Scheduling trucks in cross-docking systems:Robust meta-heuristics[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2010,58(1):12-24
    [164]van Beers W. C. M., Kleijnen J. P. C. Customized sequential designs for random simulation experiments:Kriging metamodeling and bootstrapping[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,186(3):1099-1113
    [165]van Beers W. C. M., Kleijnen J. P. C. Kriging for interpolation in random simulation[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2003,54(3):255-262
    [166]Vashi V. H., Bienstock C. C., Mentzer J. T. The use of response surface methodology to optimize logistics simulation models[J]. Journal of Business Logistics,1995,16(2):197-225
    [167]Vis I. F. A., Roodbergen K. J. Layout and control policies for cross docking operations [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2011,61(4):911-919
    [168]Vis I. F. A., Roodbergen K. J. Positioning of goods in a cross-docking environment[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2008,54(3):677-689
    [169]Waller M. A., Cassady C. R., Ozment J. Impact of cross-docking on inventory in a decentralized retail supply chain[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review,2006,42(5):359-382
    [170]Wan H., Ankenman B. E., Nelson B. L. Controlled sequential bifurcation:A new factor-screening method for discrete-event simulation[J]. Operations Research, 2006,54(4):743-755
    [171]Wan H., Ankenman B. E., Nelson B. L. Improving the efficiency and efficacy of controlled sequential bifurcation for simulation factor screening[J]. INFORMS Journal on Computing,2010,22(3):482-492
    [172]Wan X. T., Pekny J. F., Reklaitis G. V. Simulation-based optimization with surrogate models:Application to supply chain management[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering,2005,29(6):1317-1328
    [173]Wen M., Larsen J., Clausen J., Cordeau J. F., Laporte G Vehicle routing with cross-docking[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2008,60(12): 1708-1718
    [174]YalcInkaya O., Mirac Bayhan G. Modelling and optimization of average travel time for a metro line by simulation and response surface methodology [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2009,196(1):225-233
    [175]Yan H., Tang S. L. Pre-distribution and post-distribution cross-docking operations [J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review,2009,45(6):843-859
    [176]Yu W., Egbelu P. J. Scheduling of inbound and outbound trucks in cross docking systems with temporary storage[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008,184(1):377-396
    [177]Zakerifar M., Biles W. E., Evans G. W. Kriging metamodeling in multiple-objective simulation optimization[J]. Simulation,2011,87(10):843-856
    [178]陈建华,帅颖,林东波等.三级供应链循环取货成本优化模型[J].武汉理工大学学报:信息与管理工程版,2009,31(5):838-841
    [179]国务院发展研究中心产业经济研究部,中国汽车工程学会,大众汽车集团(中国).中国汽车行业发展报告(汽车蓝皮书)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011
    [180]盛昭瀚,张维.管理科学研究中的计算实验方法[J].管理科学学报,2011,14(5):1-10
    [181]施文,刘志学,杨威.零部件循环取货越库物流系统仿真优化[J].计算机集成制造系统.2012,18(12):2765-2776.
    [182]汪金莲,蒋祖华.汽车制造厂零部件人厂物流的循环取货路径规划[J].上海交通大学学报,2009,43(11):1703-1709
    [183]王旭,陈栋,王振锋.汽车零部件Milk-run车辆调度优化模型和算法[J].计算机应用,2011,31(4):1125-1128
    [184]徐秋华.Milkrun——循环取货方式在上海通用汽车的实践和应用[J].汽车与配件,2003(3):21-24
    [185]周洲,曾海屏,李波.广汽本田零部件取货物流优化之道[J].物流技术与应用,2009,14(10):66-70
    [186]左晓露,刘志学,郑长征.汽车零部件循环取货物流模式的分析与优化[J].汽车工程,2011,33(1):79-84

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700