不同品种玉米作为奶牛饲料的营养价值评定
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本试验分别从河北省、河南省和山东省采集三个不同品种的玉米(浚单20、先玉335和郑单958),研究其对奶牛的营养价值。用化学分析法测定玉米的主要营养成分含量,采用瘤胃尼龙袋法测定其瘤胃降解率,通过消化试验测定玉米主要营养成分的表观消化率和有效能。
     试验1:用化学分析法对河北、河南和山东三个地区不同玉米(浚单20、先玉335和郑单958)的主要营养成分含量进行测定。结果表明,不同玉米的DM、CP、EE、NDF、ADF、Ash、Ca和P含量的整体变化范围分别为83.63%~86.57%、7.91%~10.41%、3.39%~4.21%、10.76%~13.60%、2.95%~4.63%、1.17%~1.59%、0.02%~0.04%和0.20%~0.31%。浚单20在不同地区的CP、EE和P的含量有显著性差异(P<0.05),先玉335在不同地区的DM、CP、NDF、ADF、Ash和P的含量有显著差异(P<0.05);郑单958在不同地区的DM、CP、EE、NDF、ADF、Ash和P含量有显著差异(P<0.05)。不同品种玉米在同一地区的大部分养分含量均有显著性差异(P<0.05),河北先玉335的CP含量(10.41%)比河北郑单958( 7.91%)显著高31.61%,比河北浚单20(8.89%)显著高17.10%;山东郑单958的NDF含量(12.35%)比山东先玉335 (10.76%)显著高14.78%。
     试验2:选用4头健康状况良好,平均体重为600kg,安装有瘤胃瘘管的青年荷斯坦奶牛,以1.3倍的维持需要进行饲喂。采用瘤胃尼龙袋法测定玉米在2、4、8、16、24、36和48 h的DM、CP、NDF和ADF的降解率。结果表明:不同玉米的DM、CP、NDF和ADF的有效降解率分别为54.72%~66.99%、39.04%~49.94%、44.30%~46.17%和42.32%~46.70%。浚单20、先玉335和郑单958在不同地区的DM和CP的有效降解率有显著性差异(P<0.05),郑单958在不同地区的NDF和ADF降解率有显著性差异(P<0.05),先玉335在不同地区的ADF有效降解率有显著性差异(P<0.05),浚单20在不同地区的NDF和ADF有效降解率无显著性差异(P>0.05)。不同品种玉米在河北和山东地区的DM和CP有效降解率均有显著性差异(P<0.05),NDF和ADF有效降解率无显著性差异(P>0.05);在河南地区的DM和ADF有效降解率存在显著性差异(P<0.05),CP和NDF有效降解率无显著性差异(P>0.05)。河北浚单20、山东先玉335和河北郑单958的DM、CP有效降解率最高;河南浚单20、河北先玉335和河北郑单958的NDF有效降解率最高;河北浚单20、河北先玉335和河北郑单958的ADF有效降解率最高。本试验得到了有效降解率预测模型,整体预测效果较好。
     试验3:选用20头14~16月龄,平均体重300kg,健康并发育良好的青年荷斯坦奶牛,分成4组,每组5头,试验玉米代替基础日粮的20%进行饲养试验,采用全收粪法测定玉米主要营养物质的表观消化率和有效能。结果表明:不同地区玉米替代基础日粮后,日粮DM、CP、NDF、ADF、Ca、P和GE的表观消化率分别为64.25%~66.41%、65.35%~67.01%、47.94%~49.81%、44.49%~46.03%、29.25%~32.82%和66.82%~67.81%,玉米原料的DM、CP、NDF、ADF、Ca、P和GE的表观消化率分别为80.58%~88.68%、70.42%~74.49%、74.04%~78.67%、75.22%~79.67%、63.27%~70.92%、77.04%~84.37%和84.74%~88.85%,玉米的GE、DE和NEL分别为18.66MJ/kg~18.94 MJ/kg、16.00 MJ/kg~16.59 MJ/kg、8.41 MJ/kg~8.73 MJ/kg。河北地区浚单20、先玉335和郑单958的主要营养物质的表观消化率差异显著(P<0.05),能量消化率、GE、DE以及NEL之间均差异不显著(P>0.05)。河南地区三种玉米的主要营养物质和能量的表观消化率以及DE和NEL之间均差异显著(P<0.05),其中先玉335的DE和NEL比郑单958分别高3.69%和3.80%(P<0.05),浚单20的DE和NEL比郑单958分别高3.5%和3.57%(P<0.05)。山东地区除DM和P外,其他养分的表观消化率以及GE、DE和NEL之间均有显著性差异(P<0.05),其中郑单958的GE比先玉335高1.23%(P<0.05),先玉335的DE和NEL分别比郑单958高2.60%和2.83%(P<0.05)。生长地区对浚单20、先玉335和郑单958的主要营养物质表观消化率有显著性影响(P<0.05),对浚单20的GE有显著影响(P<0.05),其中河南地区比河北地区高0.91%;对先玉335的GE、DE和NEL有显著影响(P<0.05),其中河北地区比和河南地区分别高2.41%和2.46%,山东地区比河南地区分别高2.35%和2.46%。生长地区对郑单958的GE、DE和NEL没有显著影响(P>0.05)。本试验得到了3个(NEL)预测模型,且预测效果较好(R2分别为0.9720、0.9716和0.9582)。
Three corn varieties, Xundan 20, Xianyu 335 and Zhengdan 958, which comes from Hebei province, Henan province and Shandong province, were collected to study the nutritional value for dairy cows.The main nutrient content of corns was determined by chemical analysis.The rumen degradation was measured by Nylon Bag technique.The apparent digestibilities of the mian nutrient and bioavailble energy of corns were measured through the digestion trial.
     Experiment 1: The main nutrient content of different corns was determined by chemical analysis. The results showed that, the whole range of variation of DM, CP, EE, NDF, ADF, Ash, Ca and P in different regions was 83.63%~86.57%, 7.91%~10.41%, 3.39%~4.21%, 10.76%~13.60%, 2.95%~4.63%, 1.17%~1.59%, 0.02%~0.04% and 0.20%~0.31%, respectively. The content of CP, EE, P for Xundan 20, DM, CP, NDF, ADF ,Ash, P for Xianyu 335 and DM, CP, EE, NDF, ADF, Ash, P for Zhengdan 958 in different regions had significant difference(P<0.05). Most of the nutrient content of different varieties in the same area had significant difference (P<0.05), the content of CP for Hebei Xianyu 335 (10.41%) was significant 31.61% higher than Hebei Zhengdan 958 (7.91%) and significant 17.10% higher than Hebei Xundan 20, the content of NDF for Shandong Zhengdan 958 (12.35%) was significant 14.78% higher than Shandong Xianyu 335 (10.76%).
     Experiment 2: Four healthy ruminally cannulated Holstein cows (average 600 kg) were used, fed at 1.3 times of maintainance requirement.The degradation of different corns at different time points (2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48 h ) was determined by the technology of Nylon Bag .The result showed that, the effective degradation of DM, CP, NDF and ADF of corns in different region was 54.72%~66.99%, 39.04%~49.94%, 44.30%~46.17% and 42.32%~46.70%, respectively. The effective degradation of DM , CP for Xundan 20, Xianyu 335 and Zhengdan 958 in different regions had significant difference (P<0.05), the effective degradation of NDF, ADF for Zhengdan 958 and ADF for Xianyu 335 in different regions had significant difference (P<0.05), NDF, ADF for Xundan 20 had no significant difference (P>0.05). The effective degradation of DM and CP in Hebei and DM and ADF in Henan had significant difference (P<0.05), the effective degradation of Shandong had the same trend with Hebei. The effective degradation of DM, CP for different corns in Hebei and Shandong had significant difference (P<0.05), NDF, ADF had no significant difference (P>0.05). The effective degradation of DM, ADF for different corns in Henan had significant difference (P<0.05), CP, NDF had no significant difference (P>0.05). The effective degradation of DM, CP for Hebei Xundan 20, Shandong Xianyu 335 and Hebei Zhengdan 958 was the highest, the effective degradation of NDF for Henan Xundan 20, Hebei Xianyu 335 and Hebei Zhengdan 958 was the highest, the effective degradation of ADF for Hebei Xundan 20, Hebei Xianyu 335 and Hebei Zhengdan 958 was the highest. This experiment had obtained the prediction model of effective degradation and the whole predictive effect was well.
     Experiment 3:Twenty Holstein cows ,14~16 month-old , average 300 kg body weight,healthy and well-developed, were divided into 4 groups each group with 5 duplicates. The trial corn replaced 20% of the basic ration in the feeding experiment. the apparent digestibility of the main nutrient and bioavailble energy of corn was determined by the methods of collecting whole feces.The result showed that, the apparent digestibility of DM, CP, NDF, ADF, Ca, P and GE for different test diet and corn raw materials was 64.25%~66.41%, 65.35%~67.01%, 47.94%~49.81%, 44.49%~46.03%, 29.25%~32.82% , 66.82%~67.81% and 80.58%~88.68%,70.42%~74.49%, 74.04%~78.67%, 75.22%~79.67%, 63.27%~70.92%, 77.04%~84.37%, 84.74%~88.85%, respectively.The Gross Energy(GE), Digest Energy(DE) and Net Energy for Lactating (NEL)of corns was 18.66MJ/kg~18.94 MJ/kg, 16.00 MJ/kg~16.59 MJ/kg and 8.41 MJ/kg~8.73 MJ/kg, respectively. The apparent digestibility of the main nutrient in Hebei showed significant difference (P<0.05), the apparent digestibility of energy, GE, DE and NEL had no significant difference (P>0.05). The apparent digestibility of the main nutrient and energy, DE and NEL in Henan showed significant difference (P<0.05), except DM and P, DE and NEL of Xianyu 335 was 3.69% and 3.80% higher than Zhengdan 958 (P<0.05), DE and NEL of Xundan 20 was 3.5% and 3.57% higher than Zhengdan 958 (P<0.05), respectively.The apparent digestibility of other nutrient, GE,DE and NEL in Shandong had significant difference (P<0.05), GE of Zhengdan 958 was 1.23% higher than Xianyu 335, DE and NEL of Xianyu 335 was 2.60% and 2.83% higher than Zhengdan 958 (P<0.05), respectively. The growth region had a significant effect on the apparent digestibility of the main nutrient of different corns (P<0.05), had a significant effect on DE and NEL of Xianyu 335(P<0.05), Henan area was 2.41% and 2.46% higher than Hebei, Shandong was 2.35% and 2.46% higher than Hebei, respectively. The growth region had no significant effect on Xundan 20 and Zhengdan 958 (P>0.05). This experiment had obtained three prediction models of NEL and the predictive effect was well (R2 was 0.9720, 0.9716 and 0.9582, respectively).
引文
[1]杨红旗.中国玉米产业现状与发展问题探讨[J].中国农学通报, 2011, 27(6):368~373.
    [2]李永泉,侯文英.先玉335增产机理与山旱地高产栽培[J].种子科技, 2008, (2):65~66.
    [3]华福平,申为民,张毅,等.从郑单958看黄淮海夏玉米的育种目标[J].种子, 2004, 5(5):47~49.
    [4]李妍妍,丰光,王亮,等.郑单958和先玉335在不同区域的产量比较[J].中国种业, 2009, (8):36~37.
    [5]李强.高产广适玉米浚单20的特性研究[J].农技服务, 2010, 27(4):428~429.
    [6]彭超,全世文.当前我国玉米市场与贸易分析及未来展望[J] .农业展望, 2011, (6):7~11.
    [7] 2010/11年度世界玉米供需(美国农业部月度预测)[J].农业展望, 2011, (01) :61.
    [8]潘月红. 2011/12年度世界玉米供需(美国农业部月度预测)[1][J].农业展望, 2011, (9) :62.
    [9]李奎,冯杰,许梓荣.谷物的营养价值及其影响因素[J].饲料博览, 2004, (6):12~14.
    [10] Dierick N A, Decuypere. Endogenous lipolysis in feedstuffs and compound feeds feeds forpigs: effect of storage time and conditions and lipase and/or emulsifier addition [J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2002, (16):53~70.
    [11]张永根.玉米DDGS作为反刍动物能量或蛋白饲料原料的营养价值[J].饲料工业, 2010, (S1):92~97.
    [12]张忠远,张显东,单安山.瘤胃缓冲剂和DDGS对奶牛产奶量和乳成分影响的研究[J].饲料工业, 2003, 24(10):24~25.
    [13]郭志强,宋代军,顾维智,等.玉米DDGS饲喂肉鸭的营养价值研究[J].饲料工业, 2008, 29 (19): 36~38.
    [14]李恒鑫. DDGS对蛋鸡营养价值评定[J].现代畜牧兽医, 2005, (10):17~19.
    [15]郭亮,李德发.玉米,玉米蛋白粉,菜籽粕和玉米干酒糟可溶物的猪消化能值测定[J].饲料工业, 2000, 21(10):29~31.
    [16]李佩华,周太嫣.玉米蛋白粉对产蛋鸡饲用价值的研究[J].辽宁畜牧兽医, 1994, (3):15~17.
    [17]杨具田,蔡应奎,臧荣鑫,等.不同日粮对蛋黄色泽与蛋品品质的影响[J].中兽医医药杂志,2003,22(5):17~19.
    [18]陆恒.高蛋白玉米的营养优势及科学利用[J].粮油食品科技, 2004, 12(1):46~48.
    [19] Whitlock L A, Schingoethe D J, Hippen A R, et al. Milk Production and Composition from Cows Fed High Oil or Conventional Corn at Two Forage Concentrations[J]. J.Dairy Sci, 2003, 86:2428~2437.
    [20] Bond P L, Sullivan T W, Douglas J H, et al.Composition and nutritional value of an experimental high-protein corn in the diets of broilers and laying hens[J]. Poultry Science, 1991, 70(7):1578~1584.
    [21]袁森泉.高蛋白玉米作猪饲料的经济效果[J].饲料广角, 1996, (2):38~39.
    [22] Richard G, Dado. Nutrition Benefits of Special Corn Grain Hybrids in Dairy Diets[J]. J.Anim.Sci,1999, 77(22):197~207.
    [23] Allen Trenkle. Value of High-Oil and High-Protein Corn Grains for Finishing Cattle[J]. Beef Research Report-Iowa State University, 2000, 19~22.
    [24] Dado R G. Nutritional Benefits of specialty Com Grain Hybrids in Dairy Diets[J]. J Anim.Sci, 1999, 77(Suppl 2):197~207.
    [25]任时成,吴连成,库丽霞,王志祥,等.高蛋白玉米日粮对肉仔鸡生产性能的影响[J].饲料工业, 2007, 28(01):42~45.
    [26]隋华,刘克祥,张义林,等.高油玉米青贮秸秆饲喂试验研究[J].天津农林科技, 1999,(5):1~3.
    [27]王颜波,于秀荣.高赖氨酸玉米在猪饲料中的应用[J].养殖技术顾问, 2007, (12):30~31.
    [28]陈刚.品种、密度、收割期对玉米青贮品质的影响[ J].北京农业科学, 1989, ( 1) : 20- 231.
    [29]陈玉香,周道玮,张玉芬.玉米营养成分时空动态[J].应用生态学报, 2005, 31( 6) : B1589-1593.
    [30]王兆凤,杨在宾,杨维仁,等.不同收获期玉米植株剪切力及其饲料营养特性的研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版) ,2012, 43 ( 1) : 38 -42.
    [31]张吉旺,王空军,胡昌浩,等.施氮时期对夏玉米饲用营养价值的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2002, 35( 11) : 1337- 1342.
    [32]王永军,王空军,董树亭,等.氮肥用量、时期对墨西哥玉米产量及饲用营养品质的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2005, 38(3):492-497.
    [33]辛杭书,许曾曾,张跃文,等.蒸汽压片技术对玉米营养价值及奶牛饲用效果的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志, 2006, 42(10):57~60.
    [34]陈涛,高艳霞,曹玉凤,等.蒸汽压片玉米对奶牛生产性能和氮磷排放影响的研究[J].畜牧兽医学报, 2009, 40(12):1769~1775.
    [35]冷静,刘鸿,朱仁俊,等.蒸汽压片玉米、烟酸和蛋氨酸锌对泌乳早期奶牛产奶量及乳成分的影响[J].中国饲料, 2010, (20):19~22.
    [36]冷静,刘鸿,朱仁俊,等.蒸汽压片玉米,烟酸和蛋氨酸锌对泌乳早期奶牛血液生化指标和酮体阳性率变化的影响[J].中国饲料, 2010, (17):15~18.
    [37]卢寿锋.玉米的不同加工处理对泌乳奶牛瘤胃能氮同步代谢及小肠消化影响的研究[D].内蒙古农业大学, 2004.
    [38]王洪亮.加工方法对玉米饲喂绵羊营养价值的影响[D].东北农业大学硕士学位论文, 2006.
    [39]冯仰廉.尼龙袋法测定几种精料的降解率[J].中国畜牧杂志, 1984, (5):12~14.
    [40]郜玉刚,金顺丹,马丽娟,杨福合,等.尼龙举法砰定鹿常用词料的营养价值[J].中国畜牧杂志, 1996, 32(6):15~18.
    [41]董世魁,龙瑞军,费尚燕,等.用尼龙袋法测定几种牧草在牦牛瘤胃内的消失率[J].草业科学, 1998, 15(2):35~38.
    [42]乔良,郝俊玺,闫素梅,等.奶牛主要饲料原料蛋白质瘤胃降解率的研究[J].中国奶牛,2008, (6):18~21.
    [43]刁其玉,屠焰.奶牛常用饲料蛋白质在瘤胃的降解参数[J].乳业科学与技术, 2005,(02):70~74.
    [44]齐智利,嘎尔迪,金曙光,等.奶牛常用饲料瘤胃干物质和淀粉降解规律的研究[J].草业科学, 2006, 23(6):63~68.
    [45]么学博,杨红建,谢春元,等.反刍家畜常用饲料蛋白质和氨基酸瘤胃降解特性和小肠消化率评定研究[J].动物营养学报, 2007, 19(3):225~231.
    [46]谢春元,杨红建,么学博,等.瘤胃尼龙袋法和体外产气法评定反刍动物饲料的营养价值的比较[J].中国畜牧杂志, 2007, 43(17):39~42.
    [47]萨其仍贵.奶牛主要饲料原料纤维物质和蛋白质瘤胃降解特性的研究[J].内蒙古农业大学, 2009.
    [48]唐兴,田雯,刘中流,等.瘤胃尼龙袋法评定木薯柠檬酸渣对山羊的营养价值[J].粮食与饲料工业, 2010, (8):60~62.
    [49]柏雪,张艳,郭春华,等.蚕沙作为山羊饲料营养价值的评定[J].饲料研究, 2011, (4):77~79.
    [50] Al-Masr M R. An In vitro Evaluation of Some Unconventional Ruminant Feeds in Terms of the Org-anic Matter Digestibility, Energy and Microbial Biomass[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2003, 35:155~167.
    [51]任莹,赵胜军,唐兴,等.利用体外产气法评定反刍动物饲料的营养价值[J].中国饲料, 2009, (23):16~19.
    [52] NRC. Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle.6th Reviseded[J].NationalAcademy Press,1989,Wachington, DC.
    [53] Hoover, W H. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion[J]. J.Dairy Sci, 1986, 69:2755~2766.
    [54] Robinson P H. Influence of level of concentrate allocation and fermentabilityof forage fiber on chewing behavior and production of dairy cows[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 1997, 80:681~691.
    [55] Bourquin L D, Garleb K A, Merchen N R, et al. Effects of intake and forge level on site and extent of digestion of plant cell wall monomeric componets by sheep[J]. J.Anim.Sci, 1990, 68:2479~2495.
    [56] Karunanandaa K, Varga G A, Akin D E, et al. Botanical fractions of rice straw colonized by white-rot fungi:changes in chemical composition and structure[J]. Anim.Feed Sci, Technol, 1995, 55:179~199.
    [57] Cheng K J, Forsberg C W, Minato H, et al. Microbial ecology and physiology of feed degradation within the rumen.In:Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants (Tsuda,T.,Sasaki,Y.﹠Kawashima,R.,eds.), Academic Press, Toronto, 1991, 595~624.
    [58] Harbers L H, Raiten D J, Paulsen G M. The role of plant epidermal silica as structural inhibitor of rumen microbial digestion in steers[J].Nutr. Rep. Int, 1981, 24:1057~1066.
    [59] Wallace R J, Cheng K J, Dinsdale D, et al. An independent microbiology of the rumen[J]. Nature, 1979, 279:424~426.
    [60]张乃锋,王中华,刘晓牧.提高反刍动物饲料蛋白质利用效率的技术途径[J].草食家畜,2001,(03):9~12.
    [61]杨凤.动物营养学. 2版.北京:中国农业出版社, 1993, 23~25.
    [62]董全民.日粮组成对生长牦牛消化和能量代谢的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志, 2008, 5(44):43~45.
    [63]董全民,赵新全,徐世晓,等.日粮组成对成年牦牛消化和能量代谢的影响[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2011, 41(02):1~4.
    [64]李辉,刁其玉,张乃峰.不同蛋白水平对犊牛生长,营养代谢及氨基酸消化率的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报, 2008, 39(11):1510~1516.
    [65] Theurer C B, Huber J T, Delgado-Elorduy A, et al. Invited review: Summary of steam-flaking corn or sorghum grain for lactating dairy cows[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 1999, 82:1950~1959.
    [66] Remond D, Cabrera-Estrada J I, Champion M, et al. Effect of Corn Particle Size on Site and Extent of Starch Digestion in Lactating Dairy Cows[J]. J.Dairy Sci, 2004, 87:1389~1399.
    [67] Kelzer J M, Kononoff P J, Tedeschi L O, et al. Evaluation of protein fractionation and ruminal and intestinal digestibility of corn milling coproducts[J]. J.Dairy Sci, 2010, 93:2803~2815.
    [68] Johnson L M, Harrison J H, Davidson D, et al. Corn Silage Management: Effects of Hybrid, Maturity,Chop Length, and Mechanical Processing on Rate and Extent of Digestion[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2003, 86:3271~3299.
    [69] Johnson L M, Harrison J H, Davidson D, et al. Corn Silage Management: Effects of Hybrid, Chop Length, and Mechanical Processing on Digestion and Energy Content[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2003, 86:208~231.
    [70] Taylor C C, Allen M S. Corn Grain Endosperm Type and Brown Midrib 3 Corn Silage: Site of Digestion and Ruminal Digestion Kinetics in Lactating Cows. J. Dairy Sci, 2005, 88:1413~1424.
    [71] Donkin S S, Velez J C, Totten A K, et al. Effects of Feeding Silage and Grain from Glyphosate-Tolerant or Insect-Protected Corn Hybrids on Feed Intake,Ruminal Digestion, and Milk Production in Dairy Cattle1, 2[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2003, 86:1780~1788.
    [72] Oba M, Allen M S. Effects of Corn Grain Conservation Method on Ruminal Digestion Kinetics for Lactating Dairy Cows at Two Dietary Starch Concentrations[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2003, 86:184~194.
    [73] Harvatine K J, Allen M S. Effects of Fatty Acid Supplements on Ruminal and Total Tract Nutrient Digestion in Lactating Dairy Cows[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2006, 89:1092~1103.
    [74] PHILIPPEAU C, MICHALET-DOREAU B. Influence of Genotype and Ensiling of Corn Grain on In Situ Degradation of Starch in the Rumen[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1998, 81:2178~2184.
    [75] CLARK J H, FROBISH R A, HARSHBARGER K.E, et al. Feeding Value of Dry Corn, Ensiled High Moisture Corn, and Propionic Acid Treated High Moisture Corn Fed with Hay or Haylage for Lactating Dairy Cows[J]. J .Dairy Sci, 1973, 56(12):1531~1539.
    [76] Ferreira G, Mertens D R. Chemical and Physical Characteristics of Corn Silages and Their Effects on In Vitro Disappearance[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2005 ,88:4414~4425.
    [77] Kendall C, Leonardi C, Hoffman P C, et al. Intake and milk production of cows fed diets that differed in dietaryneutral detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber digestibility[J]. J. Dairy Sci,2009, 92:313~323.
    [78]杨朋飞,闫素梅,王鹏宇,等.饲喂微生态制剂对奶牛后肠道微生物数量及营养物质消化率的影响[J].饲料工业, 2009, 30(01):37~39.
    [79]张海荣.不同精料补饲水平对藏绵羊生产性能和消化代谢影响的研究[J].畜牧与兽医, 2009,8(41):24~28.
    [80]姚美蓉.不同精粗比日粮对荷斯坦奶牛钙,磷,镁,锌消化代谢和泌乳性能的影响[D].新疆农业大学硕士学位论文, 2004.
    [81]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 3版.北京:中国农业大学出版, 2007.
    [82]吕玉玲,周玉香,肖桂萍.反刍动物常用饲料营养价值的评定[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2011, (09):86~87.
    [83]张民,王加启.我国北方地区奶牛常用饲料蛋白质组分及其降解规律的研究[J].中国饲料, 2005, (14):8~10.
    [84]谢志强,杨志鹏,高伟政.谈密植型玉米品种郑单958的推广[J].现代农业科技, 2008, 24:223.
    [85]φrskov E R, Mc Donald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage[J]. J Agric Sci (Camb), 1979, 92: 499~503.
    [86]李志强.苜蓿干草等几种粗饲料的营养价值比较[J].河南畜牧兽医, 2002, 23(12):27.
    [87] Philippeau C, Le Deschault de Monredon F, Michalet-Doreau B. Relationship Between Ruminal Starch Degradation and the Physical Characteristics of Corn Grain[J]. J Anim Sci, 1999, 77:238~243.
    [88]王吉峰,王加启.泌乳奶牛日粮精粗比对饲料瘤胃降解率及生产性能的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医, 2004, (7):326.
    [89]赵广永,张强,冯仰廉.常用精料干物质和脂肪在瘤胃中降解规律的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志, 1998, 34(3):6~8.
    [90]任莹.反刍动物常用饲料淀粉过瘤胃量及其小肠消化率的测定及相关技术的研究[D].广西大学硕士学位论文, 2001.
    [91]中国饲料成分及营养价值表2011年第22版[J].中国饲料, 2011, (22):32~42.
    [92]齐智利,噶尔迪,张润厚,等.不同加工处理的玉米干物质和淀粉在绵羊瘤胃内降解规律的研究[J].饲料工业, 2002, 23(12):12~15.
    [93]曲永利,姜宁,苗树君,等.不同收获期玉米青贮千物质在奶牛瘤胃内降解率的研究[J].黄牛杂志, 2003, 29(06):13~15.
    [94]王加启.反刍动物消化动力学研究进展[J].黄牛杂志, 1992, 18(1):76~79.
    [95]吴子林,丁晓明,陆治年.常用饲料蛋白质在水牛瘤胃中的降解率[J].南京农业大学学报, 1996, 19(3):79~83.
    [96]薛白,韩兴泰.牦牛和黑白花牛瘤胃内饲料蛋白质降解率的比较研究[J].中国草食动物, 1999, 1(3):3~7.
    [97]赵天章.奶牛主要饲料原料蛋白质和纤维物质瘤胃降解规律的研究[D].内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文, 2007.
    [98]那仁巴图,贾志海,孙海洲,等.日粮不同纤维水平和精粗比对绒山羊瘤胃内中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维消失率的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志, 2008, 44(01):20~24.
    [99] Chappell G L M, Fontenot J P. Effect of level of readily available carbohydrate in purified sheep rations on cellulose digestibility and nitrogen utilization [J] . J Anim Sci, 1968, 27:1709~1716.
    [100] Bines J A, Davey A W F. Voluntary intake, digestion. rate of passage, amount of material in the alimentary tract and behaviour in cows receiving complete diets containing straw and concentrates in different proportions [J] . Br J Nutr, 1970, 24:1013~1028.
    [101] Tamminga S, Van Straalen W M. The Dutch Protein Evaluation System:the DVE/OEB-system[J]. Livestock Production Sci, 1994, 40:139~155.
    [102]莫放,冯仰廉.常用饲料蛋白质在瘤胃的降解率[J].中国畜牧杂志, 1995, 31(3): 23~26.
    [103]高义彪,闫素梅,赵天章,等.奶牛主要饲料原料纤维物质瘤胃降解率的研究[J].中国饲料, 2008,(08):14~17.
    [104] Cole N A, Johnson R R, Owens F N. Influence of roughage level and corn processing method on the site and extent of digestion by beef steers[J]. J Anim Sci, 1976, 43: 490~496.
    [105]薛白.日粮精料水平对牦牛和黑白花牛营养物利用率的影响[J].中国草食动物, 2001, 6(3):3~7.
    [106] Miller E R, Ulirey D E, Zutaut C L, et al. Mineral belance studies with the baby pig:effects of dietary phosphorus level upon calcium and phosphorus balance[J]. J .Nutri, 1964, 82:111~114.
    [107]唐志高.不同精粗比日粮对妊娠小尾寒羊消化代谢及血液理化指标影响的研究[D].新疆农业大学硕士学位论文, 2007.
    [108] Burgoon K G, Hansen J A, Knabe D A, et al. Nutritional Value of Quality Protein Maize for Starter and Finisher Swine[J]. J.Anim.Sci, 1992, 70:811~817.
    [109]边革,孙亚波,刘庆全,等.不同精粗比例TMR日粮对中产奶牛能量代谢的影响[J].草食家畜(季刊), 2011, (01):64~67.
    [110]郑琛.不同处理饲粮及不同组合全饲粮颗粒料对绵羊瘤胃内环境和养分消化代谢的影响[D].甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文, 2004.
    [111]孟庆翔.精料水平与秸秆氨化对绵羊日粮消化,存留与进食量的影响[J].北京农业大学学报, 1991, 3(17):109~113.
    [112]齐智利.不同加工处理的玉米对绵羊瘤胃发酵和消化代谢的影响的研究[D].内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文, 2001.
    [113]赖景涛.精粗配合颗粒饲料对奶牛纤维性物质和蛋白质表观消化率的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志, 2007, 1(43):35~36.
    [114]穆阿丽. 7~10月龄杂交肉牛蛋白质需要量及其代谢规律的研究[J].畜牧与兽医, 2007, 4(39):11~13.
    [115] Huhtanen P, Rinne M, Nousiainen J. A meta-analysis of feed digestion in dairy cows. 2. The effects of feeding level and diet composition on digestibility[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2009, 92 :5031–5042.
    [116]姜莉.玉米秸秆精粗颗粒对青年奶牛日粮纤维性物质消化率的影响[J].中国草食动物, 2006, 3(26):13~14.
    [117]李大彪.绵羊和绒山羊采食行为以及对三种不同粗饲料日粮纤维消化率的比较[D].内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文, 2004.
    [118]王水平.不同日粮对奶牛瘤胃发酵,纤维消化,行为学及生产性能的影响[D].西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 2004.
    [119]侯先志,陈志伟,赵志恭,王海荣,等.营养限制持续时间对粗纤维,中性洗涤纤维,酸性洗涤纤维,酸性洗涤木质素消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报, 1999, 11(S1):191~194.
    [120]谭支良,卢德勋,胡明,牛文艺,等.绵羊日粮不同碳水化合物比例对纤维物质在消化道不同部位流通量和消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报, 1999, 11(04):29~38.
    [121] Miller W J, Britton W M, Ansri M S. Magnesium in livestock nrtrition.pp. 1972, 109-130 in magnesium in the environment,J.B.Jones,Jr.,M.C blownt,andS.R.Winlkinson,eds.Reynoda,G.A: Talyor country printing.
    [122] Wu Z, Tallam S K, Ishler V A, et al. Utilization of phosphorus in lactating cows fed varying amounts of phosphorus and forage[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2003, 86:3300~3308.
    [123] Challa J, Braithwaite G D. Phosphorus and calcium metabolism in growing calves with special emphasis on phosphorus homeostasis. 1.Studies of the effect of change in the dietary phosphorus intake on phosphorus and calcium metabolism[J]. Journal of Agricultral Science, 1988, 110:573~581.
    [124] Dann H M, Grant R J, Cotanch K W,et al. Comparison of brown midrib sorghum-sudangrass with corn silage on lactational performance and nutrient digestibility in holstein dairy cows[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2008, 91:663~672.
    [125] Moreira V R, Zeringue L K, Williams C C,et al. Influence of calcium and phosphorus feeding on markers of bone metabolism in transition cows[J]. J. Dairy Sci, 2009, 92:5189~5198.
    [126]申跃宇,曹琼,霍菁菁,等.日粮磷进食水平对西杂后备母牛日粮磷表观消化率的影响[J].中国草食动物, 2011, 31 (04):32~35.
    [127] Field A C. Maintenance requirements of phosphorus and absorbability of dietary phosphorus in sheep [J]. J Agric Sci , 1983, 100:231~233.
    [128] Field A C, Kam phues J, Woollams J A. The effect of calcium and phosphorus on the absorption and excretion of phosphorus in chim aera-derived sheep [J]. J Agric Sci, 1983, 101:579~602.
    [129] Van Soest P J, Wine R H. Use of detergent in the analysis of fibrous feed.IV:Determination of plant cell wall constituents[J]. Journal of the association of official analytical chemists, 1967, 50:50~55.
    [130] Morgan C A, Whittermore C T and Cockbum J H S. The effect of level and source of protein,fibre and fat in the diet on the energy values of compounded pig feeds[J]. Anim.Feed Sci. Techol, 1984,11:11~34.
    [131] Zhang W J, Campbell L D, Stothers S C. An investigation of the feasibility of predicting nitrdgenfrom chemical composition and physical characteristics[J]. J.Anim.Sci, 1984, PP:355~360.
    [132] Noblet J H, Fortune H, Shi X S, et al. Prediction of net energy value of feeds for growing pigs[J]. J.Anim.Sci, 1994, 72:344~354.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700