不同氮素形态配比对饲草玉米产量和品质的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
氮是植物生命活动的重要元素之一。施氮可以明显提高饲草玉米的产量和品质,但氮素形态对饲草玉米影响的相关报道甚少,因此研究不同氮形态下饲草玉米的生物学特性及影响其产量和饲用营养价值的因素,为充分发掘饲草玉米的生产潜力,促进品种推广有着非常重要的意义。本实验选择饲草玉米多年生SAUZ1和一年生SAUZ2两个品种,通过近红外光谱分析仪Vector 22/N等方法,研究铵态氮和硝态氮比例分别为1:0、1:0.25、1:0.75和1:1四个处理对饲草玉米SAUMZ1和SAUZ2生长、产量和粗蛋白、质粗纤维、粗脂肪等饲用营养价值的影响。试验取得主要结果如下:
     1.施氮量为150kg/hm~2和450kg/hm~2时,即在低氮和高氮条件下,均显著的增加了饲草玉米SAUZ1和SAUZ2植株的株高、叶长和叶宽,有利于饲草玉米的生长,且在高氮条件下促进饲草玉米SAUZ1和SAUZ2生长效果更加明显;同时,均显著的增加了饲草玉米SAUZ1和SAUZ2鲜草总产量、单株的鲜重和干重,有利于饲草玉米的增产,且在高氮条件下对饲草玉米SAUZ1和SAUZ2增产效果更加明显;另外,降低了SAUZ1第一次刈割干草的茎叶比和第二次刈割鲜草的茎叶比,而增加了SAUZ2的茎叶比。
     2.在低氮和高氮条件下,对饲草玉米SAUZ1和SAUZ2饲用品质的影响在不同的刈割时期和不同的部位影响不同。表现为:
     (1)均显著增加了饲草玉米SAUZ1和SAUZ2茎鞘中CP含量。同时对SAUZ2茎鞘和叶片中EE含量没显著影响,而均显著降低了SAUZ1两次刈割叶片中EE含量和第二次刈割茎鞘EE含量,但其降低幅度明显低于CP含量的增加幅度。
     (2)显著降低了SAUZ1第二次刈割时茎鞘中NDF的含量,同时均显著降低了SAUZ2茎鞘中ADF和NDF含量。
     (3)显著增加了SAUZ1第二次刈割时茎鞘和叶片中IVDMD和RFV含量,同时,均显著降低了SAUZ2茎鞘中IVDMD和RFV含量。
     3.在低氮和高氮条件下,随着硝态氮比例的增加,均有利于饲草玉米的生长,叶长和叶宽均显著增加,当铵态氮和硝态氮的比例为1:1时,饲草玉米SAUZ1和SAUZ2植株达到最高,且叶长和叶宽均达到最大值,此时生长较为旺盛。同时,在低氮和高氮条件下,随着硝态氮比例的增加,饲草玉米鲜草总产量、单株鲜重和干重均显著增加,当铵态氮和硝态氮的比例为1:1时,SAUZ1和SAUZ2鲜草总产量、单株鲜重和干重均达到最大值。
     4.铵态氮和硝态氮不同比例的配合影响饲草玉米品质,且这种影响因施肥量的高低、品种及刈割时期的不同而不同。具体表现为:
     (1)在低氮和高氮条件下,随着硝态氮比例的增加,饲草玉米SAUZ1和SAUZ2茎鞘CP含量均显著增加,当铵态氮和硝态氮的比例为1:1时,SAUZ1和SAUZ2茎鞘CP含量达到最大值,而EE含量则相反。
     (2)在低氮条件下,随着硝态氮比例的增加,SAUZ1两次刈割时茎鞘中ADF和NDF的含量均呈现下降的趋势,当铵态氮和硝态氮的比例为1:0.5—1:0.75时,茎鞘中ADF和NDF的含量最低,有利于提高饲用品质;但随着硝态氮比例的增加,SAUZ2茎鞘中ADF和NDF的含量明显增加,不施或少施硝态氮,主要施铵态氮,这时SAUZ 2的ADF和NDF含量较低。在高氮条件下,随着硝态氮比例的增加,SAUZ 1第一次刈割时和SAUZ2茎鞘中ADF和NDF的含量均显著增加,不施或少施硝态氮,主要施铵态氮时,饲草玉米ADF和NDF含量较低;而SAUZ 1第二次刈割时,随着硝态氮比例的增加,茎鞘中ADF和NDF的含量显著降低,在铵态氮和硝态氮的比例为1:0.75—1:1时,ADF和NDF含量最低。
     (3)低氮和高氮条件下,随着硝态氮比例的增加,饲草玉米SAUZ1在两次刈割时茎鞘IVDMD和RFV含量均显著增加,增施硝态氮,有利于提高SAUZ1干物质消化率和相对饲用价值。而SAUZ2茎鞘IVDMD和RFV含量随着硝态氮比例的增加,呈现显著降低的趋势,不施或少施硝态氮,有利于提高SAUZ2干物质消化率和相对饲用价值。
This research was carried out on the farm of Sichuan Agriculture University in 2007.The experiment materials were two types of forage maize,including SAUZ1 and SAUZ2,which was annual and perennial plant separately.It includes two aspects:(1)The influence of low nitrogen condition 150 kg/hm~2 and high nitrogen condition 450 kg/hm~2 to SAUMZ1 and SAUZ2 in growth,yield and feeding value.(2) The influence of four nitrogen forms of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen ratio at 1:0,1:0.25,1:0.75 and 1:1 to SAUMZ1 and SAUZ2 in growth,yield and feeding value.The main results are as follows:
     1.The plant height,leaf length and leaf width of forage maize were significantly increased at low nitrogen condition(150 kg/hm~2) and high nitrogen condition(450 kg/hm~2) respectively. Nitrogen application was beneficial to the growth of forage maize,and the efficiency of forage maize growth by high nitrogen condition was better than low nitrogen condition. Simultaneously,the total fresh yield,fresh matter and dry matter weight per plant of forage maize were significantly increased at low nitrogen condition and high nitrogen condition respectively,also the efficiency of yield by high nitrogen condition was better than low nitrogen condition. Moreover,the Shoot/Leaf ratio had been decreased at the first cutting but increased at the second cutting of SAUZ1,besides the Shoot/Leaf ratio had been increased of SAUZ2.
     2.It was difference in forage quality of different cutting stages and different parts of plant at low nitrogen condition and high nitrogen condition.Presented as:
     (1) Though the CP content of SAUZ1 and SAUZ2 had been increased,the EE content had been decreased in different degrees to SAUZ1 in stalks and leaves,the increasing extent of CP content was greater than the decreasing extent of EE content.
     (2) The NDF content in stalks of SAUZ1 had been decreased significantly at the second cutting stage,and the NDF and ADF content in stalks of SAUZ2 had been decreased significantly too.
     (3)The IVDMD and RFV content in stalks and leaves of SAUZ1 had been increased significantly at the second cutting stage,but decreased significantly in stalks of SAUZ2.
     3.As the increasing of nitrate nitrogen proportion at low nitrogen condition and high nitrogen condition,it was suitable for the growth of forage maize,because the plant height,leaf length and leaf width were increased significantly.While the proportion of nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen was 1:1,the forage maize was growing luxuriantly.Moreover,the total fresh yield,fresh matter and dry matter weight per plant of forage maize were significantly increased respectively,and while the proportion of nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen was 1:1,the total fresh yield,fresh matter and dry matter weight per plant of forage maize reached to maximum.
     4.The different proportion of nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen influenced in the forage quality among nitrogen condition,varieties and cutting stages.Presented as:
     (1) As the increasing of nitrate nitrogen proportion at low nitrogen condition and high nitrogen condition,the CP content in stalks of SAUZ1 and SAUZ2 had been significantly increased,but EE content in stalks was opposite.While the proportion of nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen was 1:1,the CP content in stalks of SAUZ1 and SAUZ2 reached to maximum.
     (2) As the increasing of nitrate nitrogen proportion at low nitrogen condition,the stalks of SAUZ1 were downward trend in NDF and ADF content.While the proportion of nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen was 1:0.5~1:0.75,the NDF and ADF content in stalks of SAUZ1 were the lowest.But the stalks of SAUZ2 obviously increased in NDF and ADF content,and the NDF and ADF content were the lowest while there's no nitrate nitrogen.As the increasing of nitrate nitrogen proportion at high nitrogen condition,the stalks of SAUZ1 at the first cutting stage and SAUZ2 significantly increased in NDF and ADF content,and the NDF and ADF content were the lowest while there's no nitrate nitrogen.But the stalks of SAUZ1 was significantly increased in NDF and ADF content at the second cutting stage,while the proportion of nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen was 1:0.75~1:1 that the NDF and ADF content in stalks of SAUZ1 were the lowest.
     (3) As the increasing of nitrate nitrogen proportion at low nitrogen and high nitrogen condition,the IVDMD and RFV content in stalks of SAUZ1 had been increased significantly at the two cutting stage.It can improve the vitro dry matter digestible and relative feeding value with increasing application of nitrate nitrogen.But the stalks of SAUZ2 obviously decreased in IVDMD and RFV content,it can improve the vitro dry matter digestible and relative feeding value while there's no nitrate nitrogen.
引文
[1]Vitousek P M,Howarth R W.Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea:how can it occur?[J].Biogeochemistry,1991.13:87-115
    [2]Matson P A,Lohse K,Hall S.The globalization of nitrogen deposition:consequences for terrestrial ecosystems[J].Amnio,2002,31:113-119
    [3]张福锁.养分资源利用的问题及其研究重点.李春剑主编:土壤与植物营养研究新动态(第四卷).北京:中国农业大学出版社,2001,12-23.
    [4]范仲学,干璞,粱振兴.谷类作物的氮肥利用效率及其提高途径研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2001,(4):47-50
    [5]Gillinham,J.R.,M.M.Shirer,et al.Relativeof occurrence of toxic concentrations of canide and nitrate invarieties of sudangrass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids[J].Agron.J,1969,61:727-730
    [6]王永军,王空军,董树亭,等.氮肥用量、时期对墨西哥玉米产量及饲用营养品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2005,8(3):492-497
    [7]王永军,王空军,董树亭,等.施氮对墨西哥玉米植株硝态氮累积及产量的影响[J].作物学报,2006,32(3):345-350
    [8]Rhykerd,C.L.,C.H.Noiler.The role of nitrogen in forage production[M].The Science of Gra ss land Agriculture,Third edition,The Iowa State University Press/Ames.Iowa,USA.1973,416-424
    [9]佟屏亚.确立玉米在饲料中的主导地位[J].中国农业资源与区划,1995(3):24-27(8):1555-1561
    [10]安晓宁,胡耀高,刘渊,等.中国畜牧业科学技术发展战略与对策(下)[J].世界农业,1999,(3):38-39
    [11]胡跃高,李志坚,李国辉.论我国绿色饲料产业建设基本战略问题[J].中国农业大学学报,1998,3(5):29-34
    [12]刘国栋.营养体农业与我国南方草业的持续发展[J].草业学报,1999,(6):1-7
    [13]负旭疆.发展营养体农业的理论基础和实践意义[J].草业学报,2002,11(1):65-69
    [14]张瑞珍,张恩和,孙长占.不同基因型玉米品种氮素营养效率差异的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2003,25(2):183-186.
    [15]唐祈林,李晚忱,宋运淳,等.玉米与四倍体多年生玉米代换种质的选育及其基因组原位杂交鉴定[J].遗传学报,2004,31(4):340-344
    [16]李冬郁,郭乐群,张忠,等.玉米野生近缘种类玉米和研究和利用[J].玉米科学,2001,9(2):11-13
    [17]唐祈林,杨克诚,郑祖平,等.玉米与玉米近缘种可杂交性研究[J].作物学报,2006,32(1):144-146
    [18]Qilin Tang,Tingzhao Rong,Yunchun Song,et al.Introgression of perennial teosinte genome into maize and identification of genomic in situ hybridization and microsatellite markers[J].Crop Science,2005,45:717-721
    [19]任勇,唐祈林,曹墨菊,等.新选玉草1号品系饲用营养价值初步研究[J].植物遗传资源学报,2005,6(4):444-447
    [20]张瑞珍,张恩和,孙长占.不同基因型玉米品种氮素营养效率差异的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2003,25(2):183-186
    [21]Langer,R.H.M.Tillering in herbage grasses[J].Herb Abstr,1963,33:141-148
    [22]邢素芝,汪建飞.施肥对高粱杂交草生长及干物质积累的影响[J].安徽技术师范学院报,2002,16(2):31-33
    [23]姚爱兴,邵生荣,刘彩霞.不同施氮水平与播种量对宁苏丹草生长特性及产草量的影响[J].中国草地,1997,5:29-32
    [24]夏劲伟.氮肥对一年生黑麦草产量及品质影响的研究[D].江苏:南京农业大学硕士学位论文,2000
    [25]Cox,W.J.,D.J.R.Cherney,and J.J.Hanchar.Row spacing,hybrid,and plant density effects on corn silage yield and quality[J].Prod.Agric.1998,11:128-134
    [26]何世炜,常系华,张建全,等.氮素用量和密度对玉米营养体产量的影响[J].草业学报,2003,2:74-79
    [27]Cox,W.J.,S.Kalonge,D.J.R.Chreney,and W.S.Reid.Growth,yield,and quality of forage maize under different nitrogen management practices[J].Agron.J.1993,85:341-347
    [28]李文庆,徐保民,冯永军,等.氮肥对黑麦草生长及其内部组分的影响[J].中国草地,2003,1:27-31
    [29]刘经荣,张美良,郑群英,等.不同施N水平对黑麦草产量和品质的效应[J].江西农业大学学报,2003,06:844-847
    [30]孙彦,史德宽,杨青川.施肥与刈割对新麦草产量影响的研究[J].草地学报,1998,6(1):11-19
    [31]陈锦新,张国平,赵国平.密度和氮肥对杂交狼尾草产量和品质的影响[J].浙江农业大学学报,1998,24(2):185-188
    [32]钟小仙,江海东,等.氮肥水平和刈割间隔对杂交狼尾草根系活力和粗蛋白含量的影响[J].草业学报,2004,13(6):60-64
    [33]车敦仁,郎百宁,等.施氮水平对无芒雀麦产量和营养成分含量的影响[J].中国草业科学,1987,4(5):11-16
    [34]Urbano.D.The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and quality of three tropical grasses.[J].Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia,Universidad del Zulia,1997,14:1,129-139
    [35]Babnik.D.Some environmental effects on relationships between in sacco degradability of protein and dry matter and chemical composition of Italian ryegrass[J].Archives of Animal Nutrition,1995,48:3,303-317
    [36]潘永年.一年生黑麦草的氨肥增产效益[J].草业科学,1989,6(1):55-57
    [37]李志坚,周道玮,胡跃高.不同施肥水平与组合对饲用黑麦生产性能的影响研究[J].草业学报,2005,14(4):72-81
    [38]Joseph C.Burns,Douglas S.et al.Nitrogen and defoliation management:Effect on yield and nutritive of flaccidgrass[J].Agron.J,1998,90,85-92
    [39]Cherney.DJR,Cherney.J H.Grass forage quality and digestion kinetics as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and maturity[J].Journal of Applied Animal Research,1997,11(2):105-120
    [40]王华静,吴良欢,陶勤南.氮形态对植物生长和品质的影响及其机理[J].科技通报,2005,21(1):50-55
    [41]Tian X—H,Li S-X.Uptake capacities for NO3—Nand NH;-N by several vegetable species[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition dndFertilizer,2000,6(2):194-201
    [42]Zhang C-L,Gao M—Z Influence of nitrogen forms and mixture ratios on Spinach growth and quality[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricuhural University,1990,13(3):70-74
    [43]Claussen W and Lenz F.Effect of ammonium or nitrate nutrition on net photosynthesis,growth,and activity of the enzymes nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase in blueberry,raspberry and strawberry [J].Plant and Soil,1999,208(1):95-102
    [44]樊明寿,孙亚卿,邵金旺,等.不同形态氮素对燕麦营养生长和磷素利用的影响[J].作物学报.2005,31(1):114-118
    [45]金松南,艾呈祥,姚峰君,等.氮素形态对新高梨生长和果实品质的影响[J].落叶果树.2007,4:1-3
    [46]Rosen C|,Allan D L.Luby j j.Nitrogen form and solution pH influ—ence growth and nutrition of two Vaxxinium clones[J].Journal ofAmerican SocietyforHorticultural Science,1990,115(1):83-89
    [47]Chen Y.Z.Media and nutrient s0luti0n for n0n soil flower culture[J].Journa/ofFujian Agricultural University,2002,17(2):128-131
    [48]赵越,马风鸣,王丽艳,等.不同氮源对甜菜蔗糖合成酶的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2001,(2):11-12
    [49]Bloom A J,Jackson L E and Smart D R.Root growth as a function of ammonium and nitrate in the root zone[J].Plant cell and environment,1993,16(2):199-206
    [50]Redhaiman K N A.Nitrate accumulation and metabolism in lettuce cultivars as influenced by ammonium:nitrate ratio in recirculating nutrient solution[J].Indian Journal of Agricultural Research,2001,35(4):219-225
    [51]田霄鸿,王朝晖,李生秀.不同氮素形态及配比对蔬菜生长和品质的影响[J].西北农业大学学报,1999, 27(2):6-10
    [52]杜猛军,张建仪,赵福康.不同硝态氮与铵态氮比例对生菜的产量和品质的影响[J].杭州农业科技,1992,4:1-3
    [53]Inal A and Tarakcioglu C.Effects of nitrogen forms on growth,nitrate accumulation,membrance permeability and nitrogen use efficiency of hydroponically grown bunch onion under boron deficiency and toxicity[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition,2001,24(10):1521-1534
    [54]林金哲,李文雄,白祥和,等.春小麦粒蛋白质积累和产量形成规律及施氮的调节作用[J].东北农业大学学报,1999,30(1):1-9
    [55]孙霞,胡尚连,曹颖,等.氮肥形态对不同HMW-GS类型春小麦主要品质指标的调控效应[J].麦类作物学报,2007,27(3):503-507
    [56]Smith V R Effect of nutrients on(202assimilation by mosses ona sub-Antarctic island[J].New Phytol,1993,123:693-697
    [57]Jerry H.Cherney.,Marvin H.Hall.Forage quality inperspective[J].Agronomy Facts.2001,30:1-4
    [58]Hans-Joachim G.Jung.Analysis of forage fiber and cell walls in ruminant nutrition[J].The Journal of Nutrition,1997,5:810-813
    [59]Paul chandler著,旭华译.影响青贮玉米营养价值的因素及其评价方法[J].国外畜牧科技,2001,1:25-26
    [60]韩文友主编.饲料与饲养学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1997,5-10
    [61]陈喜斌主编.饲料学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003,24-25
    [62]张丽英主编.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第二版)[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2002,45-79
    [63]隋连敏,张丽英.淀粉酶用量对玉米样品中性洗涤纤维测定结果影响的研究[J].饲料工业,2002,23(10):16-17
    [64]严衍禄,赵龙莲.现代近红外光谱分析的信息处理技术[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2000,20(6):777-780
    [65]徐广通,袁洪福.现代近红外光谱技术及应用进展[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2000,20(2):134-142
    [66]H G Jung,D R Mertens,and DR Buxton.Forage quality variation among maize inbreds:in vitro fiber digestion kinetics and prediction with NIRS[J].Crop Sci,1998,38:205-210
    [67]Roland Welle,Willi Greten,et al.Near-Infrared Spectroscopy on Chopper to Measure Maize Forage Quality Parameters Online,Crop Sci.,2003,43:1407-1413
    [68]白琪林,陈绍江,等.近红外漫反射光谱法测定玉米秸秆NDF与ADF含量[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2004,24(11):1345-1347
    [69]白琪林,陈绍江,等.近红外漫反射光谱法测定青贮玉米品质性状的研究[J].中国农业科学,2006,39 (7):1346-1351
    [70]刘彩霞,王康宁.用中性、酸性洗涤纤维及粗纤维预测猪饲粮消化能值的比较[J].西南农业学报,2000,13,增刊:51-56
    [71]张吉鵾.反刍家畜粗饲料品质评定的指标及其应用比较[J].中国畜牧杂志,2006,42(5):47-50
    [72]任勇.饲草玉米生物学特性及饲用营养价值研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学硕士学位论文,2006
    [73]陈柔屹.在不同耕作模式下对饲草玉米产量和品质动态机理研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学硕士学位论文,2006
    [74]陈锦新,张国平,赵国平.密度和氮肥对杂交狼尾草产量和品质的影响.浙江农业大学学报,1998,24(2):185-188
    [75]杨月英,张福墁,乔晓军.不同形态氮素对基质培番茄生育、产量及品质的影响[J].华北农学报,2003,18(1):86-89
    [76]郭丽娜,刘秀珍,赵兴杰.不同水分条件下不同形态氮素比例对茼蒿产量及品质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(1):258-260
    [77]李学俊,文建雷,韩书成.等.氮素形态对玉米幼苗生物机制及生物量的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2008,36(3):192-196
    [78]赵建荣,秦改花.不同氮形态配比对菠菜营养品质及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2008,39(5):1067-1070

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700