秦岭太白山草本植物多样性格局及其对林隙干扰的响应
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
生态环境退化和极端气候事件频发使物种多样性丧失,因而物种多样性保护及与此相关的多样性维持机制成为当今生态学领域亟待研究的重要科学问题。有冰期植物“避难所”之称的秦岭,是中国11个具有全球意义的陆地生物多样性关键保护区。然而,关于秦岭植物物种的分布和群落物种的共存机制研究较少。鉴于此,本研究选择秦岭主峰太白山植物群落为研究对象,通过资料收集和野外调查,从区域物种多样性、局域物种多样性及自然干扰三个角度分析:(1)太白山草本植物丰富度的海拔梯度格局及成因;(2)局域与区域种库对林隙-非林隙系统草本植物多样性的影响;(3)林隙干扰对森林植物群落草本植物多样性的影响。以期揭示局域和区域生态过程在草本植物群落构建中的相对重要性,为秦岭山地植物群落物种多样性保护提供科学依据。主要研究结果如下:
     1.共统计太白山草本植物1094种,隶属69科410属。草本植物丰富度的海拔梯度格局呈单峰分布,且丰富度峰值在海拔1200~1300m。通过物种种域Rhode法分析表明,草本植物平均种域沿海拔梯度呈单峰分布,不支持Stevens的“Rapoport法则”假说。空间自回归模型分析表明,反映山体垂直特征的面积、几何(边界)限制、温度和河网密度等因素能显著解释草本植物丰富度海拔梯度变异的75%。其中,面积单变量能解释46.9%,但其与几何(边界)限制的共线性问题掩盖了面积因素的相对重要性。几何(边界)限制的确对物种多样性,特别是大种域物种多样性具有显著的影响(R2=0.601),但与小种域种的分布相关性不显著(R2=0.007)。当温度和河网密度综合作用时能显著解释小种域种丰富度变化的36%,表明小种域物种更容易受局域和区域因子的综合作用影响。
     2.利用Bootstrap非参数统计方法对7种典型植物群落潜在区域物种丰富度与密闭林分和林隙干扰条件下的局域物种丰富度相关性分析表明:密闭林分下,1m~2局域样方草本植物平均丰富度与区域物种丰富度相互独立,呈“饱和关系”;林隙干扰下,1m~2局域样方草本植物平均丰富度随区域物种丰富度的增加而显著线性上升,呈“非饱和关系”。表明林隙干扰可以改变局域与区域物种丰富度的相关关系。林隙干扰使得森林系统向非平衡态变化,但其与密闭林分水平的整合可能促使新的复合稳定态再次出现。局域尺度上的随机过程与区域尺度上的相对稳定性互相兼容可能维持着植物群落的物种多样性。
     3.锐齿栎群落林隙调查记录57种草本植物,密闭林分41种。林隙内物种丰富度随林隙大小梯度显著增加(R~2=0.189, P=0.016)。但仅5种草本植物依赖于面积>130m~2的林隙,大部分物种在所调查林隙内的分布是泛性的,未呈现随林隙大小梯度连续变化的分布规律(P=0.120)。个体数≥4的51种物种与林隙环境变量的CCA梯度分析表明,仅36.3%的物种与生境显著相关。
     4.红桦群落林隙调查记录108种草本植物,密闭林分74种。林隙内0.25m~2和1m~2局域样方草本植物平均丰富度与林隙总物种数均显著相关(r=0.727和r=0.754),且随林隙总物种数的增加而线性增加。同时,林隙面积也能显著增加局域物种丰富度和林隙内总物种数。但控制林隙面积变量的多元回归分析表明,0.25m~2和1m~2局域物种丰富度仍与林隙内总物种数呈显著线性正相关(R~2=0.595和R~2=0.665)。方差分离表明,林隙面积仅能解释0.25m~2和1m~2局域物种丰富度变异的8.0%和1.0%,而林隙物种总丰富度能解释27.2%和39.4%,表明区域物种丰富度的变异在一定程度上决定着局域物种丰富度的组成。
     5.巴山冷杉群落林隙调查记录69种草本植物,密闭林分42种。ANOSIM检验表明,林隙与密闭林分物种组成差异显著(ANOSIM, R=0.509, P=0.001),但不同年龄组(ANOSIM, R=0.035, P=0.191)和不同大小组(ANOSIM, R=0.089,P=0.057)林隙内物种组成差异并不显著。在统计上,林隙内草本植物多度分布符合中性理论零和多项式模型的预测分布(χ2=5.58, P=0.90)。其中,有15种草本植物最大多度出现在面积>120m~2的林隙,仅8种依赖于面积>146.1m~2的林隙,其余88.5%的物种广泛分布在所调查的林隙。个体数≥5的55种物种与环境变量的CCA梯度分析表明,仅27%的物种与环境变量显著相关。
     6.太白红杉群落林隙调查记录84种草本植物,密闭林分52种,其物种多度分布均符合中性模型的预测,且多度的观测值均落在95%置信区间。其中,仅19种物种最大多度出现在面积>140m~2的林隙,5种物种仅依赖于面积>229m~2的林隙,其余77.3%的物种广泛分布于所调查的林隙。另外,除林地早熟禾(Poanemoralis)、披针苔草(Carex lanceolata)和唐松草外(Thalictrum aquilegiifoliumvar. sibiricum),MANOVA检验表明,12种早期演替种的物种多度组成在林隙与密闭林分差异不显著。个体数≥5的68种物种与环境变量的CCA梯度分析表明,30.9%的物种与环境变量显著相关,表明林隙对草本植物组成并未起到主要的筛选作用,在维持物种多样性上的作用偏于中性。
Biodiversity conservation is an urgent matter all over the world. Ecologicaldegradation and its corollary-biodiversity loss-have become pressing global issues.The Qinling Mountains as biology refugia after the Pleistocene glaciations has beendesignated one of the11key regions terresterial “biodiversity hotspots” in China.However, elevational patterns of species richness and mechanisms of speciescoexistence in ecological communities are still not fully known in the region.Therefore, in order to assess the relative importance of local and regional processes instructing herbaceous communities across a regional of Mt. Taibai in the middle part ofQingling Mountains. Using well-documented regional flora, local species richnessand small-scale disturbances information, the purposes of the present study is to:(1)examine the elevational pattern of herbaceous species richness and related hypothesesof mechanisms in Taibai Mountain;(2) evaluate the effects of local and regionalprocesses on herbaceous plant assemblages in temperate forest canopy gaps in TaibaiMountain;(3) detect the effects of natural canopy gap disturbances on herbaceousplant diversity in different temperate forest of Taibai Mountain. The main results wereas follows:
     1. Herbaceous species diversity totaled1094species in410genera and69families in Mt. Taibai, Qinling Mountains. The species richness of the1094recordedspecies showed a hump-shaped pattern with peak at1200~1300m, and the speciesdistributed in high and low elevations had smaller average elevational range sizes thanthose in mid-elevations accoding to the Rhode’s methods. Thus, Rapoport’ rule wasnot backed. The best fit models, CARs identified area, geometric constraints,temperature, and drainage density variables as stronger predtctors for overall species,and explained c.75%of the variation in species richness. The area explained46.9%of the richness variance, but the area itself had very low influence when the geometricconstraints was controlled because area and geometric constraints were highlycollinear variables. While the geometric constraints model predictions were well correlated with herbaceous species richness for all species and for large-rangedspecies (R~2=0.601), the explanatory power of the geometric constraints for thesmall-ranged species was lower (R~2=0.007). For small-ranged species, which showeda distribution only strongly correlated with drainage density and temperature. Thus,herbaceous species richness peak deviated notably from geometric constraints modelmay be largely caused by plently of small-ranged species, whose distribution partlyaffected by local-scale rather than regional-scale environmental factors.
     2. The Non-parametric Brootstrap was used to test the strengths of therelationships between potential regional species richness and local species richness inunderstories and canopy gaps conditions of7different vegetation types in TaibaiMountain. We found that, without canopy gap disturbances, the relationship betweenlocal and regional species richness was weak or nonexistent, suggesting speciessaturation in1m~2small-scale plots; but under canopy gap disturbances, local speciesrichness was positive function of regional species richness, because1m~2small-scaleplots were coloninzed from the potential species pool. These results suggested thatnatural canopy gap disturbances could alter local-regional richness relationships inTaibai Mountain. Thus, to investigate natural canopy gap disturbances may be animportant tool to understanding local and regional processes in determining speciesdiversity.
     3. We found57herbaceous species in the Quercus aliena var. acuteserratacommunity canopy gaps, and41species within closed canopy sites. The speciesrichness in herbaceous layer in gaps was significantly positively correlated with gapsize (R~2=0.189, P=0.016), but only7of57species displayed gap sizes specialization(>130m~2),87.7%herbaceous species were found across all gap sizes. Nomini-succesional sequence was observed in the herbaceous distribution with the gapsize gradient (P=0.12). Additionally, canonical correspondence analysis and randompermutation tests suggested that only36.3%of herbaceous with abundance≥4wereassociated with environmental variables in canopy gaps. It is concluded thatherbaceous species composition in canopy gaps was not constrainted significantly bygap characteristics in the Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata community.
     4. We found108herbaceous species in the Betula albosinensis communitycanopy gaps, and74species within closed canopy sites. The mean herbaceous speciesrichness in0.25m~2and1m~2within canopy gaps was correlated with the speciesrichness of the whole gap (r=0.727and r=0.754, respectively). And the two small-scales species richness showed a positive function of gap species richness,respectively. Additionally, there was also a significance correlation between gap sizewith gap species richness and small-scale richness, which might form a spuriousunsaturation local-regional richness relationships. But the unsaturation local-regionalrichness relationships were also found after controlling the effect of gap size inmultiple regression (R2=0.595for0.25m~2, and R2=0.665for1m~2). Moreover,analysis of variance showed that gap size only explained8.0%and1.0%of variationin species richness at0.25m~2and1m~2, whereas gap species richness could explaind27.2%and39.4%, respectively. These results suggested that even relativesmall-scales, local species richness can be constrained by the size of species pool inimmediately surrounding region.
     5. We found69herbacous species in the Abies fargesii community canopy gaps,and42species within closed canopy sites. Although herbaceous species compositionin gaps significantly differed from closed canopy (ANOSIM, R=0.509, P=0.001),there were no significant differences among gaps of different age groups (ANOSIM,R=0.035, P=0.191) or gaps of different size groups (ANOSIM, R=0.089, P=0.057).Herbaceous species abundance distribution within canopy gaps was well fit by aneutral model (χ2=5.58, P=0.90), showing that relative abundance was qualitativelyconsistent with stochastic processes. Moreover,15of69herbaceous species foundmore commonly in larger gaps (>120m~2), and eight species displayed gap sizespecialization (>146.1m~2). However,88.5%species were observed across the gapsize gradient. Additionally, the CCA ordination suggested that only27%of the55herbaceous species with abundance≥5was associated with environmental variables inthe Abies fargesii community gaps.
     6. We found84herbaceous species in the Larix chinensis community canopygaps, and52species within closed canopy sites. Herbaceous species-abundancedistribution within canopy gaps and closed canopy sites was well fit by zero-summultinomial, respectively, and no of the species in two of these communities fell outof the95%confidence envelope of the best fit neutral model distribution ofrank-abundance curves. And of the84herbaceous species recorded in the canopygaps,77.3%species were found across all gap sizes, and only5herbaceous speciesdisplayed gap size specialization. An additional14species were more common inlarger gaps but there was no gradient in composition of herbaceous species across gapsize. Additionally, except species of Poa nemoralis, Carex lanceolata, and Thalictrum aquilegiifolium var. sibiricum, the abundances of12early successional species werenot significant differed between canopy gaps and non-gaps. The CCA oridinationshowed that30.9%of68species with abundance≥5was correlated withenvironmental variables in the Larix chinensis community canopy gaps. In summary,the species compostion in gaps was not constrainted significnantly by gap traits;rather species were distributed stochastically, likely through by random dispersal andrecruitment limitation of species from the surrounding available species pool.
引文
白琰.2009.高寒草甸植物群落α多样性和β多样性形成的机制:是生态位还是中性理论?[硕士学位论文].兰州:兰州大学
    边巴多吉,郭泉水,次柏,罗大庆.2004.西藏冷杉原始林林隙对草本植物和灌木树种多样性的影响.应用生态学报,15(2):191~194
    陈彬和马克平.2008.全球变化对生物多样性的影响.中国科学院编.2008科学发展报告.北京:科学出版社:171~174
    曹敏,付先惠,杨一光,唐勇,何永涛.2000.热带森林中的斑块动态与物种多样性维持.生物多样性,8(2):172~179
    陈存根和彭鸿.1994.秦岭太白红杉林的群落学特征及类型划分.林业科学,30(6):487~496
    陈灵芝.1994.生物多样性保护现状及其对策.见:钱迎倩,马克平(主编).生物多样性研究的原理与方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社,13~35
    陈灵芝,陈清朗,刘文华.1997.中国森林的多样性及其地理分布.北京:科学出版社:1~235
    陈灵芝,马克平.2001.生物多样性科学:原理与实践.上海:上海科学技术出版社:308
    陈胜东,徐海根,曹铭昌,张党权,吴伟伟.2011.物种丰富度格局研究进展.生态与农村环境学报,27(3):1~9
    陈廷贵和张金屯.2000.山西关帝山神尾沟植物群落物种多样性与环境关系的研究I.丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数.应用与环境生物学报,6(5):406~411
    陈宜瑜和马克平.1998.生物多样性与人类未来—第二届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集.北京:中国林业出版社:464
    陈宜瑜和马克平.2002.生物多样性保护与区域可持续发展—第四届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集.北京:中国林业出版社:361
    陈宜瑜和马克平常.2004.中国生物多样性研究进展—第五届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集.北京:中国气象出版社:346
    程佳佳,米湘成,马克平,张金屯.2011.亚热带常绿阔叶林群落物种多度分布格局对取样尺度的相应.生物多样性,19(2):168~177
    池秀莲和唐志尧.2011.面积、温度及分布区限制对物种丰富度海拔格局的影响:以秦岭太白山为例.生物多样性,35(4):362~370
    崔友文.1982.秦岭植物区系成分的研究.西北植物研究,2(1):1~6
    党坤良,张长录,陈海滨,韩福利,于启昭.2006.秦岭南坡不同海拔土壤肥力的空间分异规律.林业科学,42(1):16~21
    杜晓光和周淑荣.2008.亚高寒草甸植物群落的中性理论验证.植物生态学报,32(2):347~354
    段仁燕,王孝安,黄敏毅,王志高,汪超.2009.太白红杉林斑块结构与群落特征.植物生态学报,33(3):460~468
    段文标,王晶,李岩.2008.红松阔叶混交林不同大小林隙小气候特征.应用生态学报,19(12):2561~2566
    方精云.2004.探索中国山地植物多样性的分布规律.生物多样性,12(1):1~4
    方精云,沈泽昊,唐志尧,王志恒.2004.“中国山地植物物种多样性调查计划”及若干技术示范.生物多样性,12(1):5~9
    方精云,王襄平,沈泽昊,唐志尧,贺金生,于丹,江源,王志恒,郑成洋,朱江玲,郭兆迪.2009.植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术示范.生物多样性,17(6):533~548
    冯建孟,王襄平,徐成东,杨元合,方精云.2006a.玉龙雪山植物物种多样性和群落结构沿海拔梯度的分布格局.山地学报,24(1):110~116
    冯建孟,王襄平,方精云.2006b.云南独龙江地区种子植物物种多样性垂直分布格局和Rapoport法则的验证.北京大学学报(自然科学版),42(2):515~520
    傅志军.1994.太白山太白红杉林的群落特征及生物量的研究.汉中师院学报,2:69~72
    傅志军.1998.秦岭太白山太白红杉种群结构研究.汉中师范学院学报(自然科学),16(1):53~56
    傅志军,葛永刚,张萍.2001.太白山国家保护植物优先保护顺序的定量分析.信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版),14(4):422~424
    傅志军和郭俊理.1997.太白山珍稀濒危植物资源及保护.宝鸡文理学院学报,17(1):49~53
    傅志军,郭俊理,孙宗明.1994.秦岭太白山牛皮桦林初步研究.宝鸡文理学院学报(自然科学版),1:79~83
    郝占庆,于德永,杨晓明,丁之慧.2002.长白山北坡植物群落多样性及其随海拔梯度的变化.应用生态学报,13(7):785~789
    贺东,陈小会,黄军侠,张宏斌.2011.关于解决“引胥济黑”项目对太白经济社会影响的建议.http://ducha.shaanxi.gov.cn/suggest/websit/htmlfiles/jycont/4185.htm[2012-03-01]
    贺金生和陈伟烈.1997.陆地植物群落物种多样性的梯度变化特征.生态学报,17(1):91~99
    贺书珍,王得祥,杨改河,李刚,秦晓威,杨俊杰,权悠,王琛.2012.局域与区域生态过程对太白山牛皮桦林林隙内草本植物物种丰富度的影响.西北植物学报,32(1):180~186
    侯琳,雷瑞德,张硕新,刘建军.2010.秦岭火地塘林区油松林土壤呼吸时空变异.生态学报,30(19):5225~5236
    侯学煜.1960.中国的植被.北京:人民教育出版社:201
    黄建辉.1994.物种多样性的空间格局及其形成机制初探.生物多样性,5(2):103~107
    黄建辉和韩兴国.1995.生物多样性和生态系统稳定性.生物多样性,3(1):31~37
    黄净,韩进轩,阳含熙.1993.长白山被迫阔叶红松林的DCA排序分析.植物生态学与地植物学学报,17(3):193~206
    葛炜,张奇奇,麻应太,马宇,李春宁.2010.影响牛背梁自然保护区生态环境的主要因素及保护对策.陕西林业科技,(6):78~81
    宫贵权,程积民,米湘成,陈声文,方腾.2007.古田山常绿阔叶林木本植物与生境的相关性.中国水土保持科学,5(3):79~83
    郭志华,臧润国,蒋有绪.2002.生物多样性的形成、维持机制及宏观研究方法.林业科学,38(6):116~122
    贾晓妮,程积民,万惠娥.2007. DCA、CCA和DCCA三种排序方法在中国草地植被群落中的应用现状.农业工程科学,23(12):391~395
    蒋高明,常杰,高玉葆,李永庚.2004.植物生理生态学.北京:高等教育出版社:24~36
    蒋有绪.2002.关于我国生物多样性保育工作的若干思考.中国科学院院刊,1:55~57
    蒋有绪,王伯荪,臧润国.2002.海南岛热带林生物多样性及其形成机制.北京:科学出版社:1~394
    江明喜,邓红兵,唐涛,蔡庆华.2002.香溪河流域河岸带植物群落物种丰富度格局.生态学报,22(5):629~635
    康冰,王得祥,崔宏安,迪玮峙,杜焰玲.2011.秦岭山地油松群落更新特征及影响因子.应用生态学报,22(7):1659~1667
    康慕谊.1993.秦岭旬河流域及邻近地区森林与其生境关系的初步研究.生态学杂志,12(6):60~66
    康永祥,刘婧辉,代拴发,何晓军.2010a.太白山不同海拔太白红杉年轮生长对气候变化的响应.西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),38(12):141~147
    康永祥,刘婧辉,孙菲菲,代栓发,何小军.2010b.太白山高山林线区太白红杉林年轮宽度对气候变化的响应.东北林业大学学报,38(8):11~13
    雷明德.1999.陕西植被.北京:科学出版社:669
    雷瑞德,尚廉斌,刘建军,叶宏谋,窦彬生.1996.秦岭南坡中山地带原生植被主要乔木种群的空间分布及相互关系.西北林学院学报,11:17~25
    李博,杨持,林鹏.1999.生态学.北京:高等教育出版社:112~115
    李家俊主编.1989.太白山自然保护区综合考察论文集.陕西:陕西师范大学出版社:358
    李景侠,张文辉,李红.2001.独叶草地理分布及生态学特性的研究.西北林学院学报,16(2):1~4
    李猛,段文标,陈立新.2009.红松阔叶混交林林隙光量子通量密度、气温和空气相对湿度的时空分布格局.应用生态学报,20(12):2853~2860
    李猛,段文标,陈立新.2011.红松阔叶混交林林隙光量子通量密度的时空分布格局.应用生态学报,22(4):880~884
    李淑静,李登武,秦延松,刘雨.2010.白皮松林林隙物种组成动态及更新规律.武汉植物学研究,28(5):583~588
    李先敏,胡步洲,赵宁红.2005.太白山太白红杉林的分布及其人为活动影响.防护林科技,4:41~43
    李岩,段文标,陈立新,刘洋.2007.阔叶红松林林隙地面温度微环境变异特征.中国水土保持科学,5(2):81~85
    李永科,王志恒,方精云.2009.中域效应模型中物种分布幅度梯度的影响.中国科学(C辑:生命科学),38(6):583~589
    李智军,刘虎祥,黄康友,任毅,贾良珍.2009.人为干扰对独叶草生长的影响研究.陕西林业科技,3:17~19
    梁晓东和叶万辉.2001.林窗研究进展(综述).热带亚热带植物学报,9(4):355~364
    梁晓东,叶万辉,蚁伟民.2001.林窗与生物多样性维持.生态学杂志,20(5):64~68
    林玥,任坚毅,岳明.2008.太白山红桦种群结构与空间分析.植物生态学报,32(6):1335~1345
    林鑫,王志恒,唐志尧,赵淑清,方精云.2009.中国陆栖哺乳动物物种丰富度的地理格局及其与环境因子的关系.生物多样性,17(6):652~663
    刘灿然和马克平.1998a.生物多样性的测度方法V.生物群落物种数目的估计方法.生态学报,17(6):601~610
    刘灿然,马克平,于顺利,王巍.1998b.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性研究VI.几种类型植物群落物种数目的估计.生态学报,18(2):138~150
    刘灿然,马克平,于顺利,王巍.1998c.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性研究VII.几种类型植物群落临界抽样面积的确定.生态学报,18(1):15~23
    刘建军和令智哲.1995.太白山巴山冷杉林初步研究.西北林学院学报,10(1):9~14
    刘建军,王得祥,雷瑞德,吴钦孝.2004.火地塘天然油松锐齿栎林细根生物量及其空间变化.西北林学院学报,19(1):1~4
    刘梦雪,刘佳佳,杜晓光,郑小刚.2010.亚高寒草甸不同生境植物群落物种多度分布格局的拟合.生态学报,30(24):6935~6942
    刘庆和吴彦.2002.滇西北亚高山针叶林林窗大小与更新的初步分析.应用与环境生物学报,8(5):453~459
    刘少冲,段文标,冯静,韩生忠.2011.林隙对小兴安岭阔叶红松林树种更新及物种多样性的影响.应用生态学报,22(6):1381~1388
    刘慎谔.1934.中国北部及西部植物地理概论.国立北平研究院植物学研究所丛刊,2(9):423~451
    刘慎谔,冯宗炜,赵大昌.1959.关于中国植被区划的若干原则问题.植物学报,8(4):87~105
    刘世荣,蒋有绪,史作明.1998.中国暖温带森林生物多样性研究.北京:中国科技出版社:1~231
    刘胤汉.1983.秦岭水文地理.陕西:陕西人民出版社:53
    龙翠玲和余世孝.2007.茂兰喀斯特森林林隙树种更新及其与环境的相关性分析.山地学报,25(6):684~690
    卢绮妍和沈泽昊.2009.神龙架海拔梯度上的植物种域分布特征及Rapoport法则检验.生物多样性,17(6):644~651
    罗大庆,郭泉水,薛会英,边巴多吉.2002.藏东南亚高山冷杉林林隙特征与干扰状况研究.应用生态学报,13(7):777~780
    马克明.2003.物种多度格局研究进展.植物生态学报,27(3):412~426
    马克平,钱迎倩,王晨.1994.生物多样性研究的现状与发展趋势.见:钱迎倩,马克平(主编).生物多样性的原理和方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社:1~12
    马克平.1995.东灵山地区植物区系的基本特征及其与若干山区植物区系的关系.植物研究15(4):263~276
    马克平.1999.中国重点地区与类型生态系统多样性.杭州:浙江科学技术出版社
    马克平.2005.中国生物多样性保护与研究进展VI.第六届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集.北京:气象出版社
    马克平.2007.中国生物多样性保护与研究进展VII.第七届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集.北京:气象出版社
    马克平.2011.监测是评估生物多样性保护进展的有效途径.生物多样性,19(2):125~126
    马克平,刘灿然,于顺利,王巍.1997a.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究III.几种类型森林群落的种多度关系研究.生态学报,17(6):573~583
    马克平,叶万辉,于顺利.1997b.北京东灵山植物群落多样性的研究VIII.群落组成随海拔梯度的变化.生态学报,17(6):593~600
    马克平,陈灵芝等.1997c.北京东灵山地区植物群落的基本类型.见:陈灵芝主编,暖温带森林生态系统的结构与功能研究.北京:科学出版社:56~75
    牛克昌,刘怿宁,沈泽昊,何芳良,方精云.2009.群落构建的中性理论和生态位理论.生物多样性,17(6):579~593
    毛志宏,朱教君,覃辉.2006.干扰对辽东山区次生林植物多样性的影响.应用生态学报,17(8):1357~1364
    穆尔和考克斯.2006.生物地理学:生态和进化的途径.第七版.赵铁桥译.2007.北京:高等教育出版社:1~411
    彭少麟和方炜.1996.广州白云山次生常绿阔叶林的群落结构动态.应用与环境生物学报,2(1):22~28
    彭晓邦,蔡靖,姜在民,雷瑞德,张硕新.2006.秦岭火地塘林区锐齿栎群落中6种植物光合作用特性研究.西北植物学报,26(10):2099~2103
    秦晓威,李刚,王得祥,杨改河,任学敏,赵双喜,白宇,刘振学.2010.林隙对太白山牛皮桦-巴山冷杉混交林内草本植物多样性的影响.应用生态学报,21(10):2494~2500
    阮英琴,赵纳勋,刘红彩.2008.基于地理信息系统技术的自然保护区信息化管理的实现—以佛坪国家级自然保护区为例.西华师范大学学报(自然科学版),29(3):302~306
    任坚毅,林玥,岳明.2008.太白山红桦种子的萌发特性.植物生态学报,32(4):883~890
    任学敏,杨改河,王得祥,秦晓威,刘振学,赵双喜,白宇.2012.环境因子对巴山冷杉-糙皮桦混交林物种分布及多样性的影响.生态学报,32(2):605~613
    任毅主编.2006.太白山自然保护区生物多样性研究与管理.北京:中国林业出版社:492
    茹文明,张金屯,张桂萍,张建国,金山,铁军.2005.晋东南山地种子植物区系多样性研究.长治学院学报,22(2):4~8
    沈茂才.2010.中国秦岭生物多样性的研究和保护:秦岭国家植物园总体规划与建设.北京:科学出版社:560
    沈泽昊,方精云,刘增力,伍杰.2001.贡嘎山东坡植被垂直带谱的物种多样性格局分析.植物生态学报,25(6):721~732
    沈泽昊和卢绮妍.2009.物种分布区范围地理格局的Rapoport法则.生物多样性,17(6):560~567
    宋新章和肖文发.2006.林隙微生境及更新研究进展.林业科学,42(5):114~119
    宋永昌.2001.植被生态学.上海:华东师范大学出版社:28~34
    宋永昌.2011.对中国植被分类系统的认知和建议.植物生态学报,35(8):882~882
    宋同清,彭晚霞,曾馥平,王克林,欧阳资文.桂西北喀斯特人为干扰区植被的演替规律与更新策略.山地学报,26(5):597~604
    苏建文.2005.太白山红桦林林隙特征及其稳定性的研究.[硕士学位论文].陕西:西北大学
    苏建文,岳明,王永军.2006.太白山红桦林林隙特征的研究.应用与环境生物学报,12(2):195~199
    孙华,白红英,张清雨,雒新萍,张善红.2009.秦岭南北地区植被覆盖对区域环境变化的响应.环境科学学报,29(12):2635~2641
    孙儒泳,李庆芬,牛翠娟,娄安如.2002.基础生态学.北京:高等教育出版社:154~156
    唐志尧和方精云.2004a.植物物种多样性的垂直分布格局.生物多样性,12(1):20~28
    唐志尧,方精云,张玲.2004b.秦岭太白山木本植物物种多样性的梯度格局及环境解释.生物多样性,12(1):115~122
    唐志尧和柯金虎.2004.秦岭牛背梁植物物种多样性垂直分布格局.生物多样性,12(1):108~114
    唐志尧,乔秀娟,方精云.2009.生物群落的种—面积关系.生物多样性,17(6):549~559
    陶晶,臧润国,余昌元.2011.云南哈巴雪山植物群落和植物多样性海拔梯度分布格局.林业科学,47(7):1~6
    凃云博.2008.太白红杉林林窗特征及其对群落更新的影响研究.[硕士学位论文].西安:陕西师范大学
    王得祥,刘建军,李登武,雷瑞德,兰国玉.2004.秦岭山地华山松林群落学特征研究.应用生态学报,15(3):357~362
    王得祥,刘淑明,雷瑞德,丁建超,尤其明.2003.秦岭华山松群落能量环境及光能利用率研究.西北林学院学报,18(4):5~9
    王伯荪.1987.植物群落学.北京:高等教育出版社:376
    王刚和张大勇.1996.生物竞争理论.西安:陕西科技技术出版社:138~140
    王国宏.2002.祁连山北坡中段植物群落多样性的垂直分布格局.生物多样性,10(1):7~14
    王宏康,杜晓光,周淑荣.2008.亚高寒草甸不同演替阶段植物群落的中性理论检验.中国科技论文在线, http://www.paper.edu.cn
    王建让.1989.秦岭林区锐齿栎林群落类型的初步研究.植物生态学报,13(3):277~281
    王微,陶建平,李宗峰,张炜银,丁易.2004.卧龙自然保护区亚高山暗针叶林林隙特征研究.应用生态学报,11:1898~1993
    王孝安,郭华,肖亚萍.2003.秦岭太白红杉群落种间关系的数量分析.西北植物学报,23(6):906~910
    王孝安,王志高,肖娅萍,段仁燕,赵相健.2005.秦岭山地太白红杉种群种实性状的生态可塑性研究.应用生态学报,1:29~32
    王孝安,肖娅萍,田先华,文传浩.1998.太白山针叶林的物种多样性.陕西师范大学学报,26(4):97~100
    王襄平,方精云,唐志尧.2009.中域效应假说:模型、证据和局限性.生物多样性,17(6):568~578
    王襄平,张玲,方精云.2004.中国高山林线的分布高度与气候的关系.地理学报,59(6):871~879
    王志恒,陈安平,朴世龙,方精云.2004.高黎贡山种子植物物种丰富度沿海拔梯度的变化.生物多样性,12(1):82~88
    王志恒,唐志尧,方精云.2009a.物种多样性地理格局的能量假说.生物多样性,17(6):613~624
    王志恒,唐志尧,方精云.2009b.生态学代谢理论:基于个体新陈代谢过程解释物种多样性的地理格局.生物多样性,17(6):625~634
    王忠.1999.植物生理学.北京:中国农业出版社:44~76
    魏晓华.2010.干扰生态学:一门必须重视的学科.江西农业大学学报,32(5):1032~1039
    文传浩,王孝安,田先华,肖亚萍.1998.太白山针叶林群落研究.云南林业科技,1:56~61
    吴承祯,洪伟,郑群瑞.2001.福建万木林保护区观光群落物种相对多度模型的拟合研究.热带亚热带植物学报,9(3):235~242
    邬建国.2006.景观生态学—格局、过程、尺度与等级.第二版.北京:高等教育出版社:2
    邬建国和Loucks O L.1992.自然均衡观与现代生志学理论—生态学思想中的一场根本性交革.当代生态学博论(中华海外生态学者协会).北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992,16~29
    吴秀芹.2007.ArcGIS9地理信息系统应用与实践.北京:清华大学出版社:247
    熊小刚,韩兴国,陈全胜,米湘成.2004.平衡与非平衡生态学在锡林河流域典型草原放牧系统中的应用.生态学报,24(10):2165~2170
    熊小刚,韩兴国,周才平.2005.平衡与非平衡生态学下的放牧系统管理.草业学报,14(6):1~6
    徐成东,冯建孟,王襄平,杨雪.2008.云南高黎贡北段植物物种多样性的垂直分布格局.生态学杂志,27(23):323~327
    许林军,彭鸿,陈存根,唐红亮,杨亚娟.2005.秦岭太白红杉林分布及太白山高山林线特征的定量分析.西北植物学报,25(5):9689~72
    徐卫华,欧阳志云,李宇,刘建国.2006.基于遥感和GIS的秦岭山系大熊猫生境评价.遥感技术与应用,21(3):238~242
    许智宏和马克平.2000.面向21世纪的中国生物多样性保护—第三届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集.北京:中国林业出版社
    闫桂琴,赵桂仿,胡正海.2001.秦岭太白红杉群落特征及其物种多样性的研究.西北植物学报,21(3):497~506
    杨利民,韩梅,李建东.中国东北样带草地群落放牧干扰植物多样性的变化.植物生态学报,25(1):110~114
    杨璐,侯必博,刘占林.2009.秦岭地区被子植物的特有现象研究.湖南农业科学,6:15~19
    杨元合和朴世龙.2006.青藏高原草地植被覆盖变化及其与气候因子的关系.植物生态学报,30(1):1~8
    叶万辉.2000.物种多样性与植物群落的维持机制.生物多样性,8(1):17~24
    叶万辉,马克平,马克明,桑卫国,高贤明.1998.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性研究IX.尺度变化对α多样性的影响.生态学报,18(1):10~14
    应俊生,李云峰,郭勤峰,崔禾.1990.秦岭太白山地区的植物区系和植被.植物分类学报,28(4):261~293
    应俊生.1994.秦岭植物区系的性质、特点和起源.植物分类学报,32(5):389~410
    岳明.1998.秦岭及陕北黄土区辽东栎林群落物种多样性特征.西北植物学报,18(1):124~131
    岳明,张林静,党高弟,辜天琪.2002.佛坪自然保护区植物群落物种多样性与海拔梯度的关系.地理科学,22(3):349~354
    岳明和周虹霞.1997.太白山北坡落叶阔叶林物种多样性特征云南植物研究.云南植物研究,19(2):171~176
    臧润国,安树青,陶建平,蒋有绪,王伯荪.2004.海南岛热带林生物多样性维持机制.北京:科学出版社:49~51
    臧润国,蒋有绪,杨彦承.2001.海南岛霸王岭热带山地雨林林隙更新生态位的研究.林业科学研究,14(1):17~22
    臧润国,刘静艳,董大方.1999.林隙动态与森林生物多样性.北京:中国林业出版社:1~41
    臧润国,刘涛,郭忠凌,高文韬.1998.长白山自然保护区阔叶红松林林隙干扰状况的研究.植物生态学报,22(2):135~142
    臧润国和徐化成.1998.林隙干扰研究进展.林业科学,34(1):90~98
    张大才和孙航.2009.大尺度空间上植物物种丰富度海拔梯度分布格局的研究进展.西南林学院学报,29(2):74~80
    张大勇.2004.植物生活史进化与繁殖生态学.北京:科学出版社
    张金屯.2004.数量生态学.北京:科学出版社:83~90
    张玲和方精云.2004a.秦岭太白山不同类型森林的土壤种子库研究.生物多样性,12(1):131~136
    张玲和方精云.2004b.太白山土壤种子库储量与物种多样性的垂直格局.地理学报,59:880~888
    张吕醉,王孝安,郭华,李峰.2008.辽东栎林林隙特征及其对群落更新的影响.生态学杂志,27(11):1835~1840
    张秦伟.1992a.秦岭种子植物区系的地理成分研究.地理科学,12(1):54~64
    张秦伟.1992b.秦岭南坡植被的植物区系分析—以水河流域为例.地理研究,11(2):83~92
    张秦伟.1994.秦岭种子植物区系组成及古老性研究.咸阳师专学报,9(3):34~42
    张秦伟.2002.秦岭种子植物区系中的北温带区系成分研究.广西植物,22(1):19~28
    张清雨,白红英,孙华,张善红,高翔.2010.近30年秦岭东西两县区森林景观类型的时空变化.环境科学学报,30(5):1101~1106
    张婉君,卢绮妍,梁军,沈泽昊.2010.台湾维管植物物种丰富度和种域宽度的海拔格局及对Rapoport法则的检验.生物多样性,18(3):312~322
    张善红,白红英,高翔,贺映娜,任园园.2011.太白山植被指数时空变化及其对区域温度的响应.自然资源学报,26(8):1377~1386
    张宋智,刘文帧,郭小龙,杜彦昌,张建国,王军辉.2010.秦岭西段锐齿栎群落林木个体大小分布特征及物种多样性.林业科学研究,23(1):65~70
    张文辉,王延平,康永祥,刘祥君.2005.太白山太白红杉种群空间分布格局研究.应用生态学报,16(2):207~212
    张艳华,聂绍荃,王志西.1999.林隙对草本植物的影响.植物研究,19(1):94~99
    张仰渠,张岂凡,吴建恭,朱志诚.1986.陕西森林.北京:中国林业出版社:34~56
    张志英和苏陕民.1984.太白山植物区系的特征.西北植物研究,4(1):22~28
    赵纳勋.2006.佛坪自然保护区科学论文集.陕西:西北农林科技大学出版社:586
    赵双喜,王得祥,边丹丹,白宇,秦晓威,任学敏,杨改河.2010.秦岭牛背梁自然保护区种子植物区系海拔梯度格局分析.西北植物学报,30(7):1468~1474
    赵祥云,陈新露,王树栋.1990.太白山野生观赏植物资源研究初报.西北林学院学报,5(4):38~42
    赵秀海.1996.长白山红松针阔混交林倒木对天然更新的影响(II).林冠空隙对森林天然更新的影响.吉林林学院学报,12(1):5~7
    赵秀海,张春雨,郑景明.2005.阔叶红松林林隙结构与树种多样性关系研究.应用生态学报,16(12):2236~2240
    周纪纶.1981.植被的多因子生态系统分析途径—评介威塔克的《植物群落分类》.植物生态学与地植物学丛刊,5(2):159~167
    钟补求.1947.秦岭之植物地理观.西北农林,2(1):53~90
    周淑荣和张大勇.2006.群落生态学的中性理论.植物生态学报,30(5):868~877
    朱壁如和张大勇.2011.基于过程的群落生态学框架.生物多样性,19(4):389~399
    朱彪,陈安平,刘增力,方精云.2004.南岭东西段植物群落物种组成及其树种多样性垂直格局比较.生物多样性,12(1):53~62
    朱珣之和张金屯.2005.中国山地植物多样性垂直变化格局.西北植物学报,25(7):1480~1486
    朱晓勤,刘康,秦耀民.2006.基于GIS的秦岭山地植被类型与环境梯度的关系分析.水土保持学报,20(5):192~196
    朱源,江源,刘全儒,熊敏.2007.基于等面积高度带划分的贺兰山维管植物物种丰富度的海拔分布格局.生物多样性,15(4):408~418
    朱志诚.1983.秦岭锐齿栎林初步研究.西北植物研究,3(2):122~132
    朱志诚.1991.秦岭及其以北黄土区植被地带性特征.地理科学,11(2):157~163
    Abrams P A.1995. Monotonic or unimodal diversity–productivity gradients: what does competition theorypredict? Ecology,76,2019~2027
    Abramsky Z and Rosenzweig M L.1984. Tilman's predicted productivity-diversity relationship shown bydesert rodents. Nature,309:150~151
    Aikens M L, Ellum D, McKenna J J, Kelty M J, Ashton M S.2007. The effects of disturbance intensity ontemporal and spatial patterns of herb colonization in a southern New England mixed-oak forest. ForestEcology and Management,252,144~158
    Akatov V, Chefranov S, Akatova T.2005. The relationship between local species richness and species pool:a case study from the high mountains of the Greater Caucasus. Plant Ecology,181(1):9~22
    Algar A C, Kerr J T, Currie D J.2007. A test of metabolic theory as the mechanism underlying broad-scalespecies-richness gradients. Global Ecology and Biogeography,16:170~178
    Allen A P, Brown J H, Gillooly J F.2002. Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and theenergetic-equivalence rule. Science,297:1545~1548
    Allen A P, Brown J H, Gillooly J F.2003. Response to comment on “global biodiversity, biochemicalkinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule”. Science,299:346.
    Allen A P, Gillooly J F, Savage V M, Brown J H.2006. Kinetic effects of temperature on rates of geneticdivergence and speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA,103:9130~9135
    Allen A P, Gillooly J F, Brown J H.2007. Recasting the species–energy hypothesis: the different roles ofkinetic and potential energy in regulating biodiversity. In: Storch D, Marquet P A, Brown J H. ScalingBiodiversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:283~299
    Anderson K L and Leopold D J.2002. The role of canopy gaps in maintaining vascular plant diversity at aforested wetland in New York State. Journal of Torrey Botanic Society,129:238~250
    Andrewartha H G and Birch L C.1954. The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press:782
    André H D, Daniel D K, Yves B.2007. Small gap dynamics in the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada:Do canopy gaps influence stand development? Journal of Vegetation Science,18:815~826
    Arii K, Hamel B, Lechowicz M J.2005. Environmental correlates of canopy composition at Mont St.Hilaire, Quebec, Canada. Journal of Torrey Botanic Society,132:90~102
    Ashton P S.1998. Niche specificity among tropical trees: a question of scales. In: Newbery D M, Pruis H HT, Brown N. Dynamics of tropical communities. Oxford: Blackwell Science:491~514
    Bachman S, Baker W J, Brummitt N, Dransfield J, Moat J.2004. Elevational gradients, area and tropicalisland diversity: an example from the palms of New Guinea. Ecography,27:299~310
    Bacaro G, Rocchini D, Bonini I, Marignani M, Maccherini S, Chiarucci A.2008. The role of regional andlocal scale predictors for plant species richness in Mediterranean forests. Plant Biosystems,142:630~642
    Barthlott W, Mutke J, Rafiqpoor M D, Kier G, Kreft H.2005. Global centres of vascular plant diversity.Nova Acta Leopoldina,92:61~83
    Beatty S W.1984. Influence of microtopography and canopy species on spatial patterns of forest understoryplants. Ecology,65:1406~1419
    Begon M, Harper J L, Townsend C R.1996. Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities.3rd ed.Oxford: Blackwell:848~846
    Bell G.2001. Neutral macroecology. Science,293:2413~2418
    Belote R T, Sanders N J, Jones R H.2009. Disturbance alters local-regional richness relationships inAppalachian forests. Ecology,90(10):2940~2947
    Bhattarai K R and Vetaas O R.2003. Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along asubtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, east Nepal. Global Ecology and Biogeography,12:327~340
    Bhattarai K R, Vetaas O R, Grytnes J A.2003. Fern species richness along a central Himalayan elevationalgradient, Nepal. Journal of Biogeography,31:389~400
    Bhattarai K R and Vetaas O R.2006. Can Rapoport's rule explain tree species richness along the Himalayanelevation gradient, Nepal? Diversity and Distributions,12:373~378
    Blackburn T M, Gaston K J.1996. Spatial patterns in the geographic range sizes of bird species in the NewWorld. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences,351:897~912
    Blondel J, Mourer-Chauviré C.1998. Evolution and history of the western Palaearctic avifauna. Trends inEcology and Evolution,13:488~492
    Bokma F J and Monkkonen M.2001. Random processes and geographic species richness patterns: why sofew species in the north? Ecography,24:43~49
    Bormann BT and Sidle RS.1990. Changes in productivity and distribution of nutrients in a chronosequenceat Glacier Bay, Alaska. Journal of Ecology,78:561~578
    Boudreau S and Lawes M J.2005. Small understory gaps created by subsistence harvesters do notadversely affect the maintenance of tree diversity in a sub-tropical forest. Biology Conservation,126:279~286
    Brawn-Blanquet J.1965. Plant Sociology: The study of plant communities.London: Hafner:439
    Brehm G, Colwell R K, Kluge J.2007. The role of environment and mid-domain effect on moth speciesrichness along a tropical elevational gradient. Global Ecology and Biogeography,16:205~219
    Brokaw N.1985. Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. Ecology,66:682~687
    Brokaw N and Busing R T.2000. Niche versus chance and tree diversity in forest gaps. Tree,15:183~188
    Brown J H.1981. Two decades of homage to Santa Rosalia: toward a general theory of diversity. AmericanZoologist,21:877~888
    Brown J H, Allen A P, Gillooly J F.2003. Response: heat and biodiversity. Science,299:512~513
    Brown J H and Kodric-Brown A.1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration onextinction. Ecology,58:445~449
    Brown J H and Lomolino M V.1998. Biogeography. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates:1~691
    Brown J H, Gillooly J F, Allen A P, Savage V M, West G B.2004. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology.Ecology,85:1771~1789
    Brown N D and Jennings S.1998. Gap-size niche differentiation by tropical rainforest trees: a testablehypothesis or a broken-down bandwagon? In: Newbery D M, Prins H H T, Brown N. Dynamics oftropical communities. Blackwell Science Press:79~94
    Busing R T and Brokaw N.2002. Tree species diversity in temperate and tropical forest gaps: the role oflottery recruitment. Folia Geobotanica,37:33~43
    Busing R T and White P S.1997. Species diversity and small scale disturbance in an old-growth temperateforest: a consideration of gap partitioning concepts. Oikos,78:562~568
    Caley M J and Schluter D.1997. The relationship between local and regional diversity. Ecology,78:70~80
    Callaway R M.1995. Positive interactions among plants. Botanical Review,61:306~349
    Callaway R. and D'Antonio C.1991. Shrub facilitation of coast live oak establishment in central Californiachaparral. Madrono,38:158~169
    Canham C D.1989. Different responses to gap among shade-tolerant tree species. Ecology,70(3):548~550
    Canham C D, Platt W J, Runkle J R, Spies T A, White P S.1990. Light regimes beneath closed canopiesand tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,20:620~631
    Canning-Clode J, Bellou N, Kaufmann M J, Wahl M.2009. Local-regional richness relationships in foulingassemblages-effects of succession. Basic and Applied Ecology,10:745~753
    Cardillo M, Orme C D L, Owens I P F.2005. Testing for latitudinal bias in diversification rates: Anexample using New World birds. Ecology,86:2278~2287
    Caron M-N, Kneeshaw D D, de Grandpré L, Kauhanen H, Kuuluvainen T.2009. Canopy gapcharacteristics and disturbance dynamics in old-growth Picea abies stands in northern Fennoscandia:Is the forest in quasi-equilibrium? Annales Botanici Fennici,46:251~262
    Carpenter C.2005. The environmental control of plant species woody density on a Himalayan elevationgradient. Journal of Biogeography,32:999~1018
    Chapman M G and Underwood A J.1999. Ecological patterns in multivariate assemblages: information andinterpretation of negative values in ANOSIM tests. Marine Ecology Process Series,180:257~265
    Chase J M.2003. Community assembly: when does history matter? Oecologia,136:489~495
    Chase J M and Leibold M A.2003. Ecological niches. Linking classical and contemporary approaches.Chicago: University of Chicago Press:212
    Chave J.2004. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters,7:241~253
    Chazdon R L, Colwell R K, Denslow J S.1999. Tropical tree richness and resource-based niches. Science,285:1459
    Chazdon R L and Pearcy R W.1991. The importance of sunflecks for forest understory plants. Bioscience,41:760~766
    Chen J J, Mi X C, Nadrowski K, Ren H B, Zhang J T, Ma K P.2012. Separating the effect of mechanismsshaping species–abundance distributions at multiple scales in a subtropical forest. Oikos,121:236~244
    Chesson P.2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology andSystematics,31:343~366
    Chisholm R A and Pacala S W.2010. Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent speciesabundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. PANS,36:15821~15825
    Clarke A and Gaston K J.2006. Climate, energy and diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,273:2257~2266
    Clements F E.1905. Research method in ecology. Lincoln: University Publishing Company:334
    Clements F E.1916. Plant Succession: An analysis of the development of vegetation. Washington: CarngieInst.:512
    Clarke K R.1993. Non parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. AustralianJournal of Ecology,18:117~143
    Clinton B D and Boring L R.1994. Regeneration patterns in canopy gaps of mixed-oak forests of thesouthern Appalachians: influences of topographic position and evergreen understory. The AmericanMidland Naturalist,132:308~319
    Collins S L, Glenn S M, Briggs J M.2002. Effect of local and regional processes on plant species richnessin tallgrass prairie. Oikos,99:571~579
    Colwell R K and Hurtt G C.1994. Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapoporteffect. The American Naturalist,144:570~595
    Colwell R K and Lees D C.2000. The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography ofspecies richness. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,15:70~76
    Colwell R K, Rahbek C, Gotelli N J.2004. The mid-domain effect and species richness patterns: what havewe learned so far? The American Naturalist,163: E1~E23
    Connell J H.1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science,199(4335):1302~1310
    Cornell H V and Lawton J H.1992. Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to therichness of ecological communities: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Animal Ecology,61:1~12
    Couwenberghe R V, Collet C, Lacombe E, Pierrat J-C, G gout J-C.2010. Gap partitioning amongtemperate tree species across a regional soil gradient in windstorm-disturbed forests. Forest Ecologyand Management,260:146~154
    Cox C B and Moore P D.2006. Biogeography. An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach. Victoria, Oxford,Malde: Blackwell Publishing:1~506
    Cresswell J E, Vidal-Martinez V M, Crichton N J.1995. The investigation of saturation in the speciesrichness of communities: some comments on methodology. Oikos,72:301~304
    Currie D J.1991. Energy and large-scale patterns of animaland plant-species richness. The AmericanNaturalist,137:27~49
    Currie D J, Mittelbach G G, Cornell H V, Field R, Guegan J F, Hawkins B A, Kaufman D M, Kerr J T,Oberdorff T, O’Brien E, Turner J R G.2004. Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses ofbroad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecology Letters,7:1121~1134
    Currie D J and Kerr J T.2007. Testing, as opposed to supporting, the Mid-domain Hypothesis: a responseto Lees and Colwell (2007). Ecology Letters,10: E9~E10
    de R mer A H, Kneeshaw D D, Bergeron Y.2007. Small gap dynamics in the southern boreal forest ofeastern Canada: do canopy gaps influence stand development? Journal of Vegetation Science,18:815~826
    da Silva Cassemiro F A, de Souza Barreto B, Rangel T F L V B, Diniz-Filho J A F.2007. Non-stationarity,diversity gradients and the metabolic theory of ecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography,16:820~822
    Dale M R.2002. Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests in ecology. Ecoscience,9(2):162~167
    Darwin C.1859. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection.1st ed. London: John Murray:60~79
    Dang H, Jiang M, Zhang Y, Dang G, Zhang Q.2009. Dendroecological study of a subalpine fir (Abiesfargesii) forest in the Qinling Mountains, China. Plant Ecology,201:67~75
    Dang H, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Jiang M, Zhang Q.2010. Age structure and regeneration of subalpine fir(Abies fargesii) forest across the altitudinal range in the Qinling Mountains, China. Forest Ecologyand Management,259:547~554
    Davies S J, Tan S, Lafrankie J V.2005. Soil related floristic variation in a hyperdiverse dipterocarp forest.In Roubik D W, Sakai S, Hamid Karim A A. Pollination ecology and the rain forest, Sarawak Studies.New York: Springer Verlag:22~34
    Degen T, Devillez F, Jacquemart A-L.2005. Gaps promote plant diversity in beech forests(Luzulo-Fagetum), North Vosges, France. Annual Forest Science,62:429~440
    Denslow J S.1980. Gap partitioning among tropical rainforest trees. Biotropica,12:47~55
    Denslow J S.1987. Tropical rainforest gaps and tree species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology andSystematics,18:431~451
    Denslow J S.1995. Disturbance and diversity in tropical rain forests: the density effect. EcologicalApplication,5(4):962~968
    Denslow M W, Palmer M W, Murrell Z E.2010. Patterns of native and exotic vascular plant richness alongan elevational gradient from sea level to the summit of the Appalachian Mountains, U.S.A. Journal ofthe Torrey Botanical Society,137(1):67~80
    Diniz-Filho J A, de Sant’Ana C E R, de Souza M C, Rangel T F L V B.2002. Null models and spatialpatterns of species richness in South American birds of prey. Ecology Letters,5:47~55
    Dirzo R, Horvitz C C, Quevedo H, López M A.1992. The effects of gap size and age on the understoryherb community of a tropical Mexican rain forest. Journal of Ecology,80:809~822
    Dobrowolska D and Veblen T T.2008. Treefall-gap strucure and regeneration in mixed Abies alba stands incentral Poland. Forest Ecology and Management,255:3469~3476
    Dole al J and r tek M.2002. Altitudinal changes in composition and structure of mountain temperatevegetation: a case study from the Western Carpathians. Plant Ecology,158:201~221
    Du X G, Zhou S R, Etienne R S.2011. Negative density dependence can offest the effect of speciescompetitive asymmetry: a niche-based mechanism for neutral-like patterns. Journal of TheoreticalBiology,278:127~134
    Duncan R P, Buckley H L, Urlich S C, Stewart G H, Geritzlehner J.1998. Small-scale species richness inforest canopy gaps: the role of niche limitation versus the size of the species pool. Journal ofVegetation Science,9:455~460
    Dunn R R, McCain C M, Sanders N.2007. When does diversity fit null model predictions? Scale and rangesize mediate the mid-domain effect. Global Ecology and Biogeography,3:305~312
    Dupré C.2000. How to determine a regional species pool: a study in two Swedish regions. Oikos,89:128~136
    Elenemts M.2004. Light, nutrients and the growth of herbaceous forest species. Acta Oecologica,26:197~202
    Elias R B and Dias E.2009. Cyclic patch dynamics in a Macaronesian island forest. Community Ecology,10(1):25~34
    Elton C S.1927. Animal Ecology. London: Methuen:1~15
    Engelberg J and Boyarsky L L.1979. The noncybernetic nature of ecosystems. The American Naturalist,114:317~324
    Etienne R S.2005. A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecology Letters,8:253~260
    Etienne R S.2009. Maximum likelihood estimation of neutral model parameters for multiple samples withdifferent degrees of dispersal limitation. Journal of Theoretical Biology,257:510~514
    Etienne R S and Haegeman B.2011. The neutral theory of biodiversity with random fission speciation.Theoretical Ecology,4:87~109
    Evans K L, Warren P H, Gaston K J.2005. Species–energy relationships at the macroecological scale: areview of the mechanisms. Biological Reviews,80:1~25
    Fajardo A and de Graaf R.2004. Tree dynamics in canopy gaps in old-growth forests of Nothofaguspumilio in Southern Chile. Plant Ecology,173(1):95~105
    Field R, O’Brien E M, Whittaker R J.2005. Global models for predicting woody plant richness fromclimate: development and evaluation. Ecology,86:2263~2277
    Fisher R A, Corbet A S, Williams C B.1943. The relation between the number of species and the number ofindividuals in a random sample of animal population. Journal of Animal Ecology,12:42~58
    Fleishman E, Austin G T, Weiss A.1998. An empirical test of Rapoport's rule: elevational gradients inmontane butterfly communities. Ecology,79:2482~2493
    Forman R T T.1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology,10:133~142
    France D.1992. The North American latitudinal gradient in species richness and geographical range offreshwater crayfish and amphipods. The American Naturalist,139:342~354
    Francis A P and Currie D J.2003. A globally consistent richness-climate relationship for angiosperms. TheAmerican Naturalist,161:523~536
    Fraver S, Brokaw N V L, Smith A P.1998. Delimiting the gap phase in the growth cycle of a Panamanianforest. Journal of Tropical Ecology,14(5):673~681
    Fu C, Hua X, Li J, Chang Z, Pu Z C, Chen J K.2006. Elevational patterns of frog species richness andendemic richness in the Hengduan Mountains, China: geometric constraints, area and climate effects.Ecography,29:919~927
    Fuhrman J A, Steele J A, Hewson I, Schwalbach M S, Brown M V, Green J L, Brown J H.2008. Alatitudinal diversity gradient in planktonic marine bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences, USA,105:7774~7778
    Gagnon J L, Jokela E J, Moser W K, Huber DA.2003. Dynamics of artificial regeneration in gaps within alongleaf pine flatwoods ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management,172:133~144
    Gaston K J.2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature,405:220~227
    Gaston K J and Blackburn T M.2000. Pattern and process in Macroecology. Oxford: Blackwell Science:33~74
    Gaston K J, Chown S L.1999. Why Rapoport's rule does not generalize? Oikos,84:309~312
    Gaston K J and Chown S L.2005. Neutrality and the niche. Function Ecology,19:1~6
    Gause G F.1934. The Struggle for Existence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins:163
    Gálhidy L, Mihók B, Hagyó A, Rajkai K, Standovár T.2006. Effects of gap size and associated changes inlight and soil moisture on the understorey vegetation of a Hungarian beech forest. Plant Ecology,183:133~145
    George M R, Brown J R, Clawson W J.1992. Application of nonequilibrium ecology to management ofMediterranean grasslands. Journal of Range Management,45:436~440
    Gignac L D and Dale M R.2005. Effects of fragment size and habitat heterogeneity on cryptogam diversityin the low-boreal forest of Western Canada. The Bryologist,108(1):50~66
    Gilbert B and Lechowicz M J.2004. Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory.PANS,101:7651~7656
    Gilliam F S.1988. Interactions of fire with nutrients in the herbaceous layer of a nutrient-poor CoastalPlain forest. Bulletin of the Theory Botanical Club,115(4):265~271
    Gilliam F S.2007. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems.BioScience,57(10):845~858
    Gilliam F S and Roberts M R.2003. Interactions between the herbaceous layer and overstory canopy ofeastern forests. In Gilliam F S and Roberts M R. The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern NorthAmerica. USA, New York, Oxford University Press:198~223
    Gillooly J F, Brown J H, West G B, Savage V M, Charnov E L.2001. Effects of size and temperature onmetabolic rate. Science,293:2248~2251
    Gillooly J F and Allen A P.2007. Linking global patterns in biodiversity to evolutionary dynamics usingmetabolic theory. Ecology,88:1890~1894
    Gleason H A.1926. The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Association. Bulletin of the Torrey BotanicalClub,53:7~26
    Glenn-Lewin D C.1977. Species diversity in the North American temperate forests. Vegetatio,33:153~162
    Gotelli N J and McGill B J.2006. Null versus neutral models: what’s the difference? Ecography,29:793~800
    Grace J B, Harrison S, Damschen E I.2011. Local richness along gradients in the Siskiyou herb flora: R. H.Whittaker revised. Ecology,91(1):108~120
    Graham M H.2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology,84:2809~2815
    Grau H R.2002. Scale-dependent relationships between treefails and species richness in a NeutropicalMountain forest. Ecology,83(9):2591~2601
    Gravel D, Canham C D, Beaudet M, Messier C.2010. Shade tolerate, canopy gaps and mechanisms ofcoexistence of forest trees. Oikos,119:475~484
    Grisebach A.1872. Die Vegetation der Erde nach ihrer klimatischen Anordnung. Eien Abriβ derverglichenden Geographie der Pflanzen.2. Bde. Leipzig: Engelmann Verl., Bd.1.,603S und Bd.2.2.,635S
    Grubb P J.1996. Rainforest dynamics: the need for new paradigms. http://www.google.com/books[2010-3-19].
    Grytnes J A and Beaman J H.2006. Elevational species richness patterns for vascular plants on MountKinabalu, Borno. Journal of Biogeography,33:1838~1849
    Grytnes J A, Heegaard E, Ihlen P G.2006. Species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichensalong an altitudinal gradient in western Norway. Acta Oecologica,29:241~246
    Grytnes JA and Vetaas OR.2002. Species richness and altitude: a comparison between null models andinterpolated plant species richness along the Himalayan altitudinal gradient, Nepal. The AmericanNaturalist,159:294~304
    Gurevitch J, Scheiner S M, Fox G A.2002. The Ecology of Plants. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates:523
    Halley J M and Iwasa Y.2011. Neutral theory as a predictor of avifaunal extinctions after habitat loss.PNAS,108:2316~2321
    Halpern C B and Spies T A.1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the PacificNorthwest. Ecological Applications,5:913~934
    Harms K E.1997. Habitat-specialization and seed dispersal-limitation in a Neutropical forest.[Ph DThesis]. Princeton: The Faculty of Princeton University
    Harms K E, Condit R, Hubbell S P, Foster R B.2001. Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a50-haNeotropical forest plot. Journal of Ecology,89:947~959
    Harpole W S and Tilman D.2006. Non-neutral patterns of species abundance in grassland communities.Ecology Letters,9:15~23
    Harrison S and Cornell H.2008. Toward a better understanding of the regional causes of local communityrichness. Ecology Letters,11:969~979
    Hatfield J S, William A L, Dawson D K, Lindquist E L.1996. Coexistence and community structure oftropical trees in a Hawaiian montane rain forest. Biotropica,28(4b):746~758
    Hawkins B A and Diniz-Filho J A F.2002. The mid-domain effect cannot explain the diversity gradient ofNearctic birds. Global Ecology and Biogeography,11:419~426
    Hawkins B A and Diniz-Filho J A F.2006. Beyond Rapoport’s rule: evaluating range size patterns of NewWorld birds in a two-dimensional framework. Global Ecology and Biogeography,15:461~469
    Hawkins B A, Diniz-Filho J A F, Weis A E.2005. The mid-domain effect and diversity gradients: is thereanything to learn. The American Naturalist,166: E140~E143
    Hawkins B A, Field R, Cornell H V, Currie D J, Guegan J F, Kaufman D M, Kerr J T, Mittelbach G G,Oberdorff T, O'Brien E M, Porter E E and Turner J R G.2003. Energy, water, and broad-scalegeographic patterns of species richness. Ecology,84:3105~3117
    He F.2005. Deriving a neutral model of species abundance from fundamental mechanisms of populationdynamics. Funcional Ecology,19:187~193
    Herben T.2000. Correlation between richness per unit area and the species pool cannot be used todemonstrate the species pool effect. Journal of Vegetation Science,11:123~126
    Herzog S K and Kessler M.2006. Local vs. regional control on species richness: a new approach to test forcompetitive exclusion at the community level. Global Ecology and Biogeography,15:163~172
    Hillebrand H.2005. Regressions of local on regional diversity do not reflect the importance of localinteractions or saturation of local diversity. Oikos,110:195~198
    Hu X S, He F L, Hubbell S P.2006. Neutral theory in macroecology and population genetics. Oikos,113:548~556
    Hubbell S P.1979. Tree dispersion, abundance and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science,203:1299~1309
    Hubbell S P.1997. A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application totropical rain forests and coral reefs. Coral Reefs,16: S9~S21
    Hubbell S P.2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. London: PrincetonUniversity Press:1~346
    Hubbell S.2005. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence.Functional Ecology,19:166~172
    Hubbell S P.2006. Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology,86(7):1387~1398
    Hubbell S P and Foster R B.1986. Biology, chance, and history and the structure of tropical rain forest treecommunities. In: Diamond J and Case T J. Community Ecology. New York: Harper and Row:314~329
    Hubbell S P, Foster R B, O’Brien S T, Harms K E, Condit R, Wechsler B, Wright S J, de Lao S l.1999.Light gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a Neotropical forest. Science,283(5401):554~557
    Humboldt v A.1807. Ideezu einer Geographi der Pflanzen nebst einem Naturgemalde der Tropenlander(Neudruck1960). Leipzig: Akad. Verlagsgesell,139S
    Hurtt G C and Pacala S W.1995. The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, historyand competitive differences between plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology,176:1~12
    Huston M A.1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. The American Naturalist,113:81~101
    Huston M A.1994. Biological Diversity—the Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Dehli:Cambridge Univeristy:278~289
    Huston M and DeAngelis D.1994. Competition and coexistence: the effects of resource transport andsupply rates. The American Naturalist,144:954~977
    Huston M A.2003. Heat and biodiversity. Science,299:512
    Hutchinson G E.1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? The AmericanNaturalist,93:145~159
    Hanski I.2005. The shrinking world: ecological consepuences of habitat loss.张大勇和陈小勇译.2006.北京:高等教育出版社:269
    Jetz W and Rahbek C.2001. Geometric constraints explain much of the species richness pattern in Africanbirds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA,98:5661~5666
    Johnson S, Ford W M, Hale P E.1993. The effects of clearcutting on herbaceous understories are still notfully known. Conservation Biology,7(2):433~435
    Joseph S, Reddy C S, Pattanaik C, Sudhakar S.2008. Distribution of plant communities along climatic andtopographic gradients in Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary (southern India). Biological Letters,45:29~41
    Kaspari M, Ward P S, Yuan M.2004. Energy gradients and the geographic distribution of local ant diversity.Oecologia,140:407~413
    Kerr J T.1999. Weak links:‘Rapoport’s rule’ and large-scale species richness patterns. Global Ecology andBiogeography,8:47~54
    Kerr J T, Perring M, Currie D J.2006. The missing Madagascan mid-domain effect. Ecology Letters,9:149~159
    Kessler M.2000. Altitudinal gradients in species richness and endemism of selected plant groups in thecentral Bolivian Andes. Plant Ecology,149:181~193
    Kessler M.2001. Patterns of diversity and range size of selected plant groups along an elevational transectin the Bolivian Andes. Biodiversity and Conservation,10:1897~1921
    Kharkwal G, Mehrotra P, Rawat Y S, Pangtey Y P S.2005. Phyto-diversity and growth form in relation toaltitudinal gradient in the Central Himalayan (Kumaun) region of India. Current Science,89(5):873~878
    Kilpatrick A M, Mitchell W A, Porter W P, Currie D J.2006. Testing a mechanistic explanation for thelatitudinal gradient in mammalian species richness across North American. Evolutionary EcologyResearch,8:333~344
    Kingsland S E.1995. Modeling Nature. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press:315
    Kluge J, Kessler M, Dunn R R.2006. What drives elevational patterns of diversity? A test of geometricconstraints, climate and species pool effects for pteridophytes on an elevational gradient in Costa Rica.Global Ecology and Biogeography,15:358~371
    Kneeshaw and Prévost.2006. Natural canopy gap disturbances and their role in maintaining mixed-speciesforests of central Quebec, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,37:1534~1544
    Koleff P and Gaston K J.2001. Latitudinal gradients in diversity: real patterns and random models.Ecography,24:341~351
    K rner C.2000. Why are there global gradients in species richness? Mountains might hold the answer.Trends in Ecology and Evolution,15:513~514
    Krebs C J.2001. Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance.(Fifth edition).Benjamin Cummings:454~456
    Kr mer T, Kessler M, Gradstein S R, Acebey A.2005. Diversity patterns of vascular epiphytes along anelevational gradient in the Andes. Journal of Biogeography,32:1799~1810
    Latham R E and Ricklefs R E.1993. Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity. InRicklefs R E and Schluter D. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographicalperspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press:294~314
    Latimer A M, Silander J A, Cowling R M.2005. Neutral ecological theory reveals isolation and rapidspeciation in a biodiversity hot spot. Science,309:1722~1725
    Lawes M J and Obiri J A F.2003. Canopy gaps in subtropical forest in South Africa: size of the speciespool and not the number of available niches limits species richness. Journal of Tropical Ecology,19:549~556
    Lawton J H.1984. Non-competitive populations, non-convergent communities, and vacant niches: theherbivores of bracken. In: Strong D R Jr, Simberloff D, Abele L G, Thistle A B. Ecologicalcommunities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press:67~101
    Laycock W A.1991. Stable states and thresholds of range condition on North American rangelands: aviewpoint. Journal of Range Management,44:427~433
    Légaré S, Bergeron Y, Paré D.2002. Influence of forest composition on understory cover in borealmixedwood forests of western Quebec. Silva Fennica,36(1):353~366
    Leibold M A and McPeek M A.2006. Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in communityecology. Ecology,87:1399~1410
    Lennon J J.2000. Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology. Ecography,23:101~113
    Lennon J J, Koleff P, Greenwood J J D, Gaston K J.2004. Contribution of rarity and commonness topatterns of species richness. Ecology Letters,7:81~87
    Letcher A J and Harvey P H.1994. Variation in geographical range size among mammals of the Palearctic.The American Naturalist,144:30~42
    Lieberman M, Lieberman D, Peralta R, Hartshorn G S.1995. Canopy closure and the distribution oftropical forest tree species at La Selva, Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology,11:161~178
    Linnaeus C.1735. Systema naturae, sive regna tria naturae systematic proposita per classes, ordines, generaat species. Lugduni Batavorum:1~12
    Liu Y, Zhang Y P, He D M, Cao M, Zhu H.2007. Climatic control of plant species richness along elevationgradients in the Longitudinal Range-Gorge Region. Chinese Science Bulletin,52:50~58
    Loreau M.2000. Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity. EcologyLetter,3:73~76
    MacArthur R H.1965. Ecological consequences of natural selection. In: Waterman T and Morowitz H.Theoretical and Mathematical Biology. New York: Blaisde:388~397
    MacArthur R H and Levins R.1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexistingspecies. The American Naturalist,101:377~385
    Margalef R.1968. Perspectives in ecological theory. Chicago: University Chicage Press:111
    Marini L, Gaston K J, Prosser F, Hulme P E.2009. Constrasting response of native and alien plant speciesrichness to environmental energy and human impact along alpine elevation gradients. Global Ecologyand Biogeography,18(2):652~661
    Martini A M Z, Santos F A M D, Prado P I, Jardim J G.2007. Community structure of vascular plants intreefall gaps and fire-disturbed habitats in the Atlantic rainforest, southern Bahia, Brazil. RevistaBrasileira de Botanica,30(2):303~313
    Mayer P, Abs C, Fischer A.2004. Colonisation by vascular plants after soil disturbance in the BavarianForest-key factors and relevance for forest dynamics. Forest Ecology and Management,188:279~289
    McCarthy B C.2003. The herbaceous layer of eastern old-growth deciduous forests. In: Gilliam F S andRoberts M R. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress:163~176
    McCarthy J W and Weetman G.2006. Age and size structure of gap-dynamic, old-growth boreal foreststands in Newfoundland. Silva Fennica,40:209~230
    McCain C M.2007. Could temperature and water availability drive elevational species richness patterns? Aglobal case study for bats. Global Ecolology and Biogeography,16:1~13
    McCarthy.2000. Gap dynamics of frest trees: a review with particular attention to boreal forests.Environmental Reviews,9:1~59
    McGill B J.2003. A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature,422~885
    Merelo J J, Mora A, Castillo P A, Laredo J L J, Araujo L, Sharman K, Esparcia-Alcázar A I, Alfaro-Cid E,Cotta C.2008. Testing the intermediate disturbance hypothesis: effect of asynchronous populationincorporation on multi-deme evolutionary algorithms. PPSN,5199:266~275
    Molino and Sabatier.2001. Tree diversity in tropical rain forests: a validation of the intermediatedisturbance hypothesis. Science,294:1702~1704
    Mora C, Robertson D R.2005. Factors shaping the range-size frequency distribution of the endemic fishfauna of the Tropical Eastern Pacific. Journal of Biogeography,32:277~286
    Moreno R A, Rivadeneira M M, Hernández C E, Sampértegui S, Rozbaczylo N.2008. Do Rapoport's rule,the mid-domain effect or the source–sink hypotheses predict bathymetric patterns of polychaeterichness on the Pacific coast of South America? Global Ecology and Biogeography,17:415~423
    Mouquet N, Miller T E, Daufresne T, Kneitel J M.2006. Consequences of varying regional heterogeneityin source-sink metacommunities. Oikos,113:481~488
    Mueller-Dombois D and Ellenberg H.1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York: Wiley:113~117
    Nagel T A, Svoboda M, Rugani T, Diaci J.2010. Gap regeneration and replacement patterns in anold-growth Fagus-Abies forest of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Plant Ecology,208:307~318
    Nicholson A J.1933. The balance of animal populations. Journal of Animal Ecology,2:132~178
    Noble A E, Temme N M, Fagan W F, Keitt T H.2011. A Sampling Theory for AsymmetricCommunities. Journal of Theoretical Biology,273:1~14
    Obiri J F and Lawes M J.2004. Chance versus determinism in canopy gap regeneration in coastal scarpforest in South Africa. Journal of Vegetation Science,15:539~547
    O’Brien E M.1993. Climatic gradients in woody plant species richness–towards an explanation based onan analysis of southern Africa’s woody flora. Journal of Biogeography,20:181~198
    O’Brien E M.1998. Water–energy dynamics, climate, and prediction of woody plant species richness: aninterim general model. Journal of Biogeography,25:379~398
    O’Brien E M.2006. Biological relativity to water–energy dynamics. Journal of Biogeography,33:1868~1888
    Odland A and Birks H J B.1999. The altitudinal gradient of vascular plant richness in Aurland, westernNorway. Ecography,22:548~566
    Odum E P.1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science,164:262~270
    Ohlemueller R and Wilson J B.2000. Vascular plant species richness along latitudinal and altitudinalgradients: a contribution from New Zealand temperate rainforests. Ecology Letters,3:262~266
    Oliver C D and Larson B C.1996. Forest stand dynamics. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.:520
    Orme C D L, Davies R G, Olson V A, Thomas G H, Ding T S, Rasmussen P C, Ridgely R S, Stattersfield AJ, Bennett P M, Owens I P F, Blackburn T M, Gaston K J.2006. Global patterns of geographic rangesize in birds. PLoS Biology,4:1276~1283
    Ott R A and Juday G P.2002. Canopy gap characteristics and their implications for management in thetemperate rainforests of southeast Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management,159:271~291
    Pagel M D, May R M, Collie A R.1991. Ecological aspects of the geographical distribution and diversityof mammalian species. The American Naturalist,137:791~815
    P rtel M, Zobel M, Zobel K, van der Maarel.1996. The species pool and its relationship to species richness:evidence from Estonian plant communities. Oikos,75:111~117
    P rtel M and Zobel M.1999. Small-scale plant species richness in calcareous grasslands determined by thespecies pool, community age and shoot density. Ecography,22:153~159
    Pennisi E.2005. What determines species diversity? Science,109:90
    Petraitis P S, Latham R E, Niesenbaum R A.1989. The maintaince of species diversity by disturbance. TheQuarterly Review of Biology,64(4):393~418
    Pickett S T A and White P S.1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Orlando:Academic Press:1~472
    Pimm S L and Brown J H.2004. Domains of diversity. Science,304:831833
    Platt R E, Vayssieres M P, Greco S E, Adams T E.1999. A qualitative spatial model of hardwood rangelandstate-and-transition dynamics. Journal of Range Management,52:51~59
    Preston F W.1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology,43:185~215
    Preston F W.1948. The Commonness, and Rarity of Species. Ecology,29:254~283
    Ptacnik R, Moorthi S D, Hillebrand H.2010. Hutchinson reversed, or why there need to be so many species.Advances in Ecological Research,43:1~43
    Qin X W, Li G, Wang D X, Yang G H, Liu R Y, Feng Y Z,Ren G X.2011. Determinism versus chance incanopy gap herbaceous species assemblages in temperate Abies-Betula forests. Forest Ecology andManagement,262:1138~1145
    Rahbek C.1995. The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography,18:200~205
    Rahbek C.1997. The relationship among area, elevation and regional species richness in neotropical birds.The American Naturalist,149:875~902
    Rahbek C.2005. The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns.Ecology Letters,8:224~239
    Rahbek C, Gotelli N, Colwell R K, Entsminger G L, Rangel T F L V B, Graves, G R.2007. Predictingcontinental-scale patterns of bird species richness with spatially explicit models. Proceedings of theRoyal Society of London Series B,274:165~174
    Rangel T F L V B, Diniz-Filho J A F, Bini L M.2006. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatialanalysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecology and Biogeography,15:321~327
    Rapoport E H.1975. Areografía. Estrategias Geográficas de las Especies. México: Fondo de CulturaEconómica:214
    Rapoport E H.1982. Areography. Geographical Strategies of Species. New York: Pergamon Press:269
    Reinhart K O, Royo A A, Kageyama S A. Clay K.2010. Canopy gaps decrease microbial densities anddisease risk for a shade-intolerant tree species. Acta Oecologica,36:530~536
    Rees M, Condit R, Crawley M, Pacala S, Tilman D.2001. Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics.Science,293:650~655
    Remmert H.1991. The mosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems. An overview. In: Remmert H. Themosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems. New York, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, Ecological Studies85:1~21
    Rey Benayas J M.1995. Patterns of diversity in the strata of boreal montane forest in British Columbia.Journal of Vegetation Science,6:95~98
    Richerson P J and Lum K L.1980. Patterns of plant species diversity in California: relation to weather andtopography. The American Naturalist,116:504~536
    Ricklefs R E.1987. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science,235:167~171
    Ritter E, Dalsgaard L, Einhorn K S.2005. Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gapformation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management,206:15~33
    Roberts M R.2004. Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests.Canadian Journal of Botany,82:1273~1283
    Rominger A J, Miller T E X, Collins S L.2009. Relative contributions of neutral and niche-based processesto the structure of a desert grassland grasshopper community. Oecologia,16:791~800
    Rohde K.1992. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos,6:514~527
    Rohde K, Heap M, Heap D.1993. Rapoport’s rule does not apply to marine teleosts and cannot explainlatitudinal gradients in species richness. The American Naturalist,142:1~16
    Romdal T S and Grytnes J A.2007. An indirect area effect on elevational species richness patterns.Ecography,30:440~448
    Rosenzweig M L.1992. Species diversity gradients: we know more and less than we thought. Journal ofMammalogy,73:715~730
    Rosenzweig ML.1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:8~23
    Rosenzweig M L.2003. How to reject the area hypothesis of latitudinal gradients. In: Blackburn T M andGaston K J. Macroecology: Concepts and Consequences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing:87~106
    Roxburgh S H, Shea K, Wilson B.2004. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics andmechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology,85(2):359~371
    Roy K, Jablonski D, Valentine J W.1994. Eastern Pacific molluscan provinces and latitudinal diversitygradient: no evidence for “Rapoport’s rule”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA,91:8871~8874
    Roy K, Jablonski D, Valentine J.2004. Beyond species richness: biogeographic patterns and biodiversitydynamics using other metrics of diversity. In: Frontiers of Biogeography: New Directions in theGeography of Nature. Massachusetts, Sunderland: Sinauer Associates:151~170
    Royo A A, Collins R, Adams M B, Kirschbaum C, Carson W P.2010. Pervasive interactions betweenungulate browsers and disturbance regimes promote temperate forest herbaceous diversity. Ecology,91:93~105
    Ruggiero A, Lawton J H, Blackburn T M.1998. The geographic ranges of mammalian species in SouthAmerica: spatial patterns in environmental resistance and anisotropy. Journal of Biogeography,25:1093~1103
    Ruggiero A, Werenkraut V.2007. One-dimensional analyses of Rapoport’s rule reviewed throughmeta-analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography,16:401~414
    Runkle J R.1982. Patterns of disturbance in some old-growth mesic forests of eastern North America.Ecology,63(5):1533~1546
    Runkle J R.1985. Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In: Pickett S T A and White P S. The ecologyof natural disturbance and patch dynamics. New York: Academic Press:17~33
    Ruse L P.1996. Multivariate techniques relating macroinvertebrate and environmental data from a rivercatchment. Water Research,30:3017~3024
    Samuels C L and Drake J A.1997. Divergent perspectives on community convergence. Trends in Ecologyand Evolution,12:427~432
    Sanders N J.2002. Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport’s rule.Ecography,25:25~32
    Sanders N J, Lessard J P, Fitzpatrick M, Dunn R R.2007. Temperature, but not productivity or geometry,predicts elevational diversity gradients in ants across spatial grains. Global Ecology and Biogeography,16:640~649
    Sapkota I P, Tigabu M, Odén P C.2009. Species diversity and regeneration of old-growth seasonally dryShorea robusta forests following gap formation. Journal of Forest Research,20(1):7~14
    Sasaki T, Okubo S, Okayasu T, Jamsran U, Ohkuro T, Takeuchi K.2009. Management applicability of theintermediate disturbance hypothesis across Mongolian rangeland ecosystem. Ecological Application,19(2):423~432
    Sax D F.2001. Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: implications forbiogeography. Journal of Biogeography,28:139~150
    Schimper A F W.1898. Pflanzengeographie auf physiologischer Grundlage. Jena: G Fischer Verl.,1612S
    Schnitzer S A, Mascaro J, Carson W P.2008. Treefall gaps and the maintenance of species diversity intropical forests. In: Carson W P and Schnitzer S A.Tropical Forest Community Ecology. Oxford:Blackwell Publishing:196~209
    Schliemann S A and Bockheim J G.2011. Methods for studying tree-fall gaps: a review. Forest Ecologyand Management,261:1143~1151
    Schmitz O J and Price J R.2011. Convergence of tropical interaction strengths in grassland food websthrough metabolic scaling of herbivore biomass. Journal of Animal Ecology,80:1330~1336
    Schouw J F.1823. Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Pflanzengeographie. Berlin: G. Reimer Verl:534S
    Sefidi K, Mohadjer M R M, Mosandl R, Copenheaver C A.2011. Canopy gaps and regeneration inold-growth Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands, northern Iran. Forest Ecology andManagement,262(6):1094~1099
    Svenning J C, Kinner D A, Stallard R F, Engelbrecht B M J, Wright S J.2004. Ecological determinism inplant community structure across a Tropical forest landscape. Ecology,85(9):2526~2538
    Sharma C M, Suyal S, Gairola S, Ghildiyal S K.2009. Species richness and diversity along an altitudinalgradient in moist temperate forest of Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of American Science,5(5):119~128
    Shea K and Chesson P.2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trendsin Ecology and Evolution,17:170~176
    Sheil D and Burslem D F R P.2003. Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests. Trends in Ecology andEvolution,18:18~26
    Shepherd T D and Litvak M K.2004. Density-dependent habitat selection and the ideal free distribution inmarine fish spatial dynamics: considerations and cautions. Fish and Fisheries,5:141~152
    Shmida A, Wilson M V.1985. Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography,12:1~20
    Silvertown J.2004. The ghost of competition past in the phylogeny of island endemic plants. Journal ofEcology,92:168~173
    Srivastava D.1999. Using local-regional richness plots to test for species saturation: pitfalls and potentials.Journal of Animal Ecology,68:1~16
    Stevens G C.1989. The latitudinal gradients in geographical range: how so many species co-exist in thetropics. The American Naturalist,133:240~256
    Stevens G C.1992. The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: an extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal ruleto altitude. The American Naturalist,140:893~911
    Stevens G C.1996. Extending Rapoport’s rule to Pacific marine fishes. Journal of Biogeography,23:149~154
    Stohlgren T J, Barnett D T, Jarnevich C S, Flather C, Katesz J.2008. The myth of plant species saturation.Ecology Letters,11:313~326
    Stone W E and Wolfe M L.1996. Response of understory vegetation to variable tree mortality following amountain pine beetle epidemic in lodgepole pine stands in northern Utah. Vegetation,122:1~12
    Szava-Kovats R C, Zobel M, P rtel M.2012. The local-regional species richness relationship: newperspective on the null-hypothesis. Oikos,121(3):321~326
    Tang C Q and Ohsawa M.1997. Zonal transition of evergreen, deciduous, and coniferous forests along thealtitudinal gradient on a humid subtropical mountain, Mt. Emei, Sichuan, China. Plant Ecology,133:63~78
    Tansley A G.1920. The classification of vegetation and the concept of development. Journal of Ecology,8:118~149
    Taylor A H and Qin Z S.1988. Regeneration patterns in old-growth Abies-Betula forest in the WolongNatural Reserve, Sichuan, China. Journal of Ecology,76:1204~1218
    Taylor A H, Huang J Y, Zhou S Q.2004. Canopy tree development and undergrowth bamboo dynamics inold-growth Abies-betula forests in southwestern China: a12-year study. Forest Ecology Management,200:347~360
    Taylor A H, Jang S W, Zhao L J, Liang C P, Miao C J, Huang J Y.2006. Regeneration patterns and treespecies coexistence in old-growth Abies-Picea forests in southwestern China. Forest Ecology andManagement,223:303~317
    Terborgh J.1973. On the notion of favorableness in plant ecology. The American Naturalist,107:481~501
    Terborgh J, Foster R B, V Nuńez P.1996. Tropical tree communities: a test of the nonequilibriumhypothesis. Ecology,77(2):561~567
    ter Steege H, Sabatier S, Castellanos H, van Andel T, Duivenvoorden J, de Oliveira A A, Ek R C, Lilwah R,Maas P J M, Mori S A.2000. An analysis of Amazonian floristic composition, including those of theGuiana Shield. Journal of Tropical Ecology,16:801~828
    Theurillat J P, Schluessel A, Geissler P, Guisan A, Velluti C, Wiget L.2003. Plant and bryophyte diversityalong elevational gradients in the Alps. In: Nagy L, Grabherr G, Koerner C, Thompson D B A. AlpineBiodiversity in Europe. New York: Springer-Verlag:185~193
    Tilman D.1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure. New Jersey: Princeton University Press:86
    Tilman D.1986. Nitrogen-limited growth in plants from different successional stages. Ecology,67:555~563
    Tilman D.2004. Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resourcecompetition, invasion, and community assembly. PANS,101(30):10854~10861
    Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J.1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grasslandecosystems. Nature,379:718~720
    da Silva Torreias S R and Ferreira-Keppler R L.2011. Macroinvertebrates inhabiting the tank leafterrestrial and epiphyte bromeliads at reserve Adolpho Ducke, Manaus, Amazonas. Brazilian Archivesof Biology and Technology,54(6):1193~1202
    Triants K A, Mylonas M, Lika K, Vardinoyannis K.2003. A model for the species-areahabitat relationship.Journal of Biogeography,30:19~27
    Tyrell L and Crow T.1994. Structural characteristics of old-growth hemlock-hardwood forests in relation toage. Ecology,75:370~386
    Turnbull L A, Manley L, Rees M.2005. Niches, rather than neutrality, structure a grassland pioneer guild.Proceedings of the Royal Society B,272:1357~1364
    Turner J R G.2004. Explaining the global biodiversity gradient: energy, area, history and natural selection.Basic and Applied Ecology,5:435~448
    Turner J R G, Gatehouse C M, Corey C A.1987. Does solar energy control organic diversity? Butterflies,moths and the British climate. Oikos,48:195~205
    Uhl C, Clark K, Dezzeo N, Maquirrino P.1988. Vegetation dynamics in Amazonian treefall gaps. Ecology,69:751~763
    van der Maarel, Noest V, Palmer M W.1995. Variation in species richness on small grassland quadrats:niche structure or small-scale plant mobility? Journal of Vegetation Science,6:741~752
    Vazquez G J A and Givnish T J.1998. Altitudinal gradients in tropical forest compositioin, structure, anddiversity in the Sierra de Manantlan. Journal of Ecology,86:999~1020
    Vetaas O R.1997. The effect of canopy disturbance on species richness in a central Himalaya oak forests,Nepal. Plant Ecology,132:29~38
    Vetaas O R and Grytnes J A.2002. Distribution of vascular plant richness and endemic richness along theHimalayan elevation gradient in Nepal. Global Ecology and Biogeography,11:291~301
    Volkov I, Banavar J R, Hubbell S P, Maritan A.2003. Neutral theory and the relative abundance of speciesin ecology. Nature,424:1035~1037
    Volkov I, Banavar J R, He F L, Hubbell S P.2005. Density dependence explains tree species abundance anddiversity in tropical forests. Nature,438:658~661
    Waide R B, Willig M R, Steiner C F, Mittelbach G, Gough L, Dodson S I, Juday G P, Parmenter R.1999.The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annual Review of Ecology andSystematics,30:257~300
    Wang W, Franklin S B, Ren Y, Ouellette J R.2006. Growth of bamboo Fargesia qinlingensis andregeneration of trees in a mixed hardwood-confier forest in the Qinling Mountains, China. ForestEcology and Management,234:1071~15
    Wang Z H, Tang Z Y, Fang J Y.2007. Altitudinal patterns of seed plant richness in the GaoligongMountians, South-east Tibet, China. Diversity and Distributions,13:845~854
    Wang Z H, Brown J H, Tang Z Y, Fang J Y.2009. Temperature dependence, spatial scale, and tree speciesdiversity in eastern Asia and North America. PNAS,106:13388~13392
    Warming E.1895. Plantesamfund-Grundtrcek af den kologiske Plantegeografi. P G Philipsens Forlag:Kj benhavn
    Weiser M D, Enquist B J, Boyle B, Killeen T J, J rgensen P M, Fonseca G, Jennings M D, Kerkhoff A J,Lacher T E, Monteagudo A, Vargas M P N, Phillips O L, Swenson N G, Martinez V.2007. Latitudinalpatterns of range size and species richness of New World woody plants. Global Ecology andBiogeography,16:679~688
    Weldon C W, Hewett S W, Hubbell S P, Foster R B.1991. Sapling survival, growth, and recruitment:relationship to canopy height in a neotropical forest. Ecology,72:35~50
    Werff H V D and Consiglio T.2004. Distribution and conservation significance of endemic species offlowering plants in Peru. Biodiversity Conservation,13:1699~1713
    West G B, Brown J H, Enquist B J.1997. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws inbiology. Science,276:122~126
    West G B, Brown J H, Enquist B J.1999. A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascularsystems. Nature,400:664~667
    Westoby M, Walker B H, Noy-Meir I.1989. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium.Journal of Range Management,42:266~274
    White P S.1979. Pattern, process and natural disturbance in vegetation. Botanical Review,45:229~299
    White E P and Hurlbert A H.2010. The combined influence of the local environment and regionalenrichment on bird species richness. The American Naturalist,175: E35~E43
    Whittaker R H.1952. A study of summer foliage insect communities in the Great Smoky Mountains.Ecological Monographs,22:144
    Whittaker R H.1953. A consideration of climax theory: the climax as a population and pattern. EcologicalMonographs,23:41~48
    Whittaker R H.1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs,26:1~80
    Whittaker R H.1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. EcologicalMonographs,30:279~338
    Whittaker R H and Niering W A.1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: a gradientanalysis of the south slope. Ecology,46:429452
    Whittaker RH.1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon,21:213~251
    Whitmore T C.1989. Canopy gaps and the two major groups of forest trees. Ecology,70:536~538
    Willig M R, Kaufmann D M, Stevens R. D.2003. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process,scale and synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,34:273~309
    Willig M R and Lyons S K.1998. An analytical model of latitudinal gradients of species richness with anempirical test for marsupials and bats in the New World. Oikos,81:93~98
    Wilson J B.1990. Mechanisms of species coexistence: twelve explanations for Hutchinson’s ‘Paradox ofthe Plankton’: evidence from New Zealand plant communities. New Zealand Journal of Ecology,13:17~42
    Wilson J B, Roxburgh S H, Watkins A J.1992. Limitation to plant species coexistence at a point: a study ina New Zealand lawn. Journal of Vegetation Science,3:711~714
    Wilson J B, Sykes M T, Peet R K.1995. Time and space in the community structure of a species-richlimestone grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science,6:729~740
    Witman J D, Cusson M, Archambault P, Pershing A, Mieszkowska N.2008. The relation betweenproductivity and species diversity in temperate-arctic marine ecosystems. Ecology, S66~S80
    Wootton J T.2005. Field parameterization and experimental test of the neutral theory of biodiversity.Nature,433:309~312
    Wright D H.1983. Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory. Oikos,41:496~506
    Wright S J.2002. Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence.Oecologia,130:1~14
    Wu J and Loucks O L.1995. From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift inecology. Quarterly Review of Biology,70:439~466
    Yamada T, Aiba S-I, Kubota Y, Okubo K, Miyata I, Suzuki E, Maenaka H, Nagano M.2011. Dynamics ofspecies diversity in a Japanese warm-temperate secondary forest. Ecosphere,2(7):1~19
    Yamamoto S.1993. Gap characteristics and gap regeneration in a subalpine coniferous forest on the MountOntake, central Honshu, Japan. Ecology Research,8:277~285
    Yamamoto S.2000. Forest gap dynamics and tree regeneration. Journal of Forest research,5:223~229
    Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozuml H.1963. Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated andnatural conditions. Journal of Biology Osaka Cy University,14:107~129
    Yu D W, Terborgh J W, Potts M D.1998. Can high tree species richness be explained by Hubbell’s nullmodel? Ecology Letters,1:193~199
    Zapata F A, Gaston K J, Chown S L.2003. Mid-domain models of species richness gradients: assumptions,methods and evidence. Journal of Animal Ecology,72:677~690
    Zapata F A, Gaston K J, Chown S L.2005. The mid-domain effect revisited. The American Naturalist,166:E144~E148
    Zhang D C, Zhang Y H, Boufford D E, Sun H.2009. Elevational patterns of species richness and endemismfor some important taxa in the Hengduan Mountains, southwestern China. Biodiversity Conservation,18:699~716
    Zhang D Y and Lin K.1997. The effects of competitive asymmetry on the rate of competitive displacement:how robust is Hubbell’s community drift model? Journal of Theoretical Biology,188:361~367
    Zhang Y and Ma K.2008. Geographic distribution patterns and status assessment of threatened plants inChina. Biodiversity and Conservation,17:1783~1798
    Zobel M.1997. The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternativeexplanation of species coexistence? Trends in Ecology and Evolution,12:266~269
    Zobel K, Zobel M, Peet R K.1993. Change in pattern diversity during secondary succession in Estonianforests. Journal of Vegetation Science,4:489~498
    Zobel M, van der Maarelm E, Dupre C.1998. Species pool: the concept, its determination and significancefor community structure. Applied Vegetation Science,1:55~66

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700