带偏心支撑的高层钢框架—混凝土核心筒结构的抗震性能研究
|
摘要
钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构体系是近年来在我国迅速发展的一种结构体系,由于其在降低结构自重、减少结构断面尺寸、加快施工进度等方面的明显优点,已引起工业界和投资商的广泛关注。目前国外对该结构体系抗震研究较少,而国内的研究也不多。由于钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构中筒体相对强度、延性不足,刚度相对有余;外钢框架刚度相对不足,强度、延性相对有余,使钢与混凝土筒体的抗震性能不协调,它们不能合理地分担地震力,即不能形成双重抗侧力体系。目前研究的钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构体系中都不曾见在钢框架部分考虑加设支撑,而本文考虑了在钢框架部分加设偏心支撑。
本文在高层钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构的外钢框架部分加设多列式并连偏心支撑、多列帽(或腰)连偏心支撑的。利用通用结构分析与设计软件ETABS plus C中文版9.0.0对未设支撑、设置偏心支撑、变化偏心支撑的位置和数量的高层钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构的地震反应特性进行了分析。根据《高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程》(JGJ3-2002 /J186-2002)关于结构计算分析的规定,先用振型分解反应谱法对该结构的自振周期、结构侧移、层间位移角、倾覆力矩比、各层总剪力、各层总弯矩、钢框架承担的剪力及剪力调整系数等指标进行了分析;再用弹性时程分析对该结构在四种不同地震波作用下的最大层间位移角和层位移曲线包络图、总剪力和总弯矩曲线包络图、楼层的最大加速度曲线包络图进行了补充分析。
综合全文对带偏心支撑的高层钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构的地震反应特性进行的分析,在一定程度上评价该结构体系的抗震性能,并对该结构体系作进一步的研究提出了若干建议。
Steel frame-concrete core tube structure system has been rapidly developed in recent years in china and has aroused widespread concern of investors and industrial circles,because of its obvious advantages such as reduction of self-weight and cross-section size, and speeding up the construction progress. At present there are few studies on the seismic properties of the structure in abroad, neither at home. because strength and ductility of the inner core tube are inadequate and stiffness relatively more than needed, however stiffness of steel frame is relatively not enough and strength and ductility adequate, as a result, the seismic performance of steel frame and concrete core tube lacks of coordination, which they neither reasonably contribute to earthquake nor form double side resistance system. Eccentrically braces have never been considered in the system at present, but additional eccentrically braces were considered in the steel framework in this paper.
In this paper, additional several parallel out eccentrically braces and cap connection or waist connection eccentrically braces are considered in the high-rise structure system. So the analysis of seismic response properties of the system for three models such as without braces, with eccentrically braces and with eccentrically braces changed in the location and number has been carried out through structural analysis and design software ETABS plus C Chinese version 9.0.0. According to“high-rise building concrete structures technical code”(JGJ3-2002 / J186-2002) on the analysis of the structural calculations, firstly, vibration mode decomposition spectrum of the structure was carried out on the analysis of the natural vibration period, the displacement, inter-story drift angle, ratio of overturning moment, total shear for each floor, total moment for each floor, the shear undertaken by steel framework and shear adjustment factor and other indicators. Secondly, additional analysis was studied through flexible time-analysis of the structure under four different seismic waves on the envelope diagram of max inter-story drift angle and max story displacement curve, the envelope diagram of total shear and total moment curve and of the largest floor acceleration curve.
In short, the seismic performance of the structure with eccentrically braces was analyzed and evaluated, and some recommendations are gived for further study.
本文在高层钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构的外钢框架部分加设多列式并连偏心支撑、多列帽(或腰)连偏心支撑的。利用通用结构分析与设计软件ETABS plus C中文版9.0.0对未设支撑、设置偏心支撑、变化偏心支撑的位置和数量的高层钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构的地震反应特性进行了分析。根据《高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程》(JGJ3-2002 /J186-2002)关于结构计算分析的规定,先用振型分解反应谱法对该结构的自振周期、结构侧移、层间位移角、倾覆力矩比、各层总剪力、各层总弯矩、钢框架承担的剪力及剪力调整系数等指标进行了分析;再用弹性时程分析对该结构在四种不同地震波作用下的最大层间位移角和层位移曲线包络图、总剪力和总弯矩曲线包络图、楼层的最大加速度曲线包络图进行了补充分析。
综合全文对带偏心支撑的高层钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构的地震反应特性进行的分析,在一定程度上评价该结构体系的抗震性能,并对该结构体系作进一步的研究提出了若干建议。
Steel frame-concrete core tube structure system has been rapidly developed in recent years in china and has aroused widespread concern of investors and industrial circles,because of its obvious advantages such as reduction of self-weight and cross-section size, and speeding up the construction progress. At present there are few studies on the seismic properties of the structure in abroad, neither at home. because strength and ductility of the inner core tube are inadequate and stiffness relatively more than needed, however stiffness of steel frame is relatively not enough and strength and ductility adequate, as a result, the seismic performance of steel frame and concrete core tube lacks of coordination, which they neither reasonably contribute to earthquake nor form double side resistance system. Eccentrically braces have never been considered in the system at present, but additional eccentrically braces were considered in the steel framework in this paper.
In this paper, additional several parallel out eccentrically braces and cap connection or waist connection eccentrically braces are considered in the high-rise structure system. So the analysis of seismic response properties of the system for three models such as without braces, with eccentrically braces and with eccentrically braces changed in the location and number has been carried out through structural analysis and design software ETABS plus C Chinese version 9.0.0. According to“high-rise building concrete structures technical code”(JGJ3-2002 / J186-2002) on the analysis of the structural calculations, firstly, vibration mode decomposition spectrum of the structure was carried out on the analysis of the natural vibration period, the displacement, inter-story drift angle, ratio of overturning moment, total shear for each floor, total moment for each floor, the shear undertaken by steel framework and shear adjustment factor and other indicators. Secondly, additional analysis was studied through flexible time-analysis of the structure under four different seismic waves on the envelope diagram of max inter-story drift angle and max story displacement curve, the envelope diagram of total shear and total moment curve and of the largest floor acceleration curve.
In short, the seismic performance of the structure with eccentrically braces was analyzed and evaluated, and some recommendations are gived for further study.
引文
[1] 中国建筑技术研究院主编.高层民用钢结构技术规程JGJ99-98.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998,1-100
[2] 蔡益燕.《高层民用建筑钢结构技术规程》修订雏议.建筑钢结构进展,2003,5(4):1-4
[3] 中华人民共和国建设部主编.建筑抗震设计规范GB50011-2001.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001,279-280
[4] 中国建筑科学研究院主编.高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程JGJ3-2002/J186-2002.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002,109-114
[5] 卢达洲.《钢-混凝土混合结构技术规程》通过评审.福建建设科技,2004,(4):30
[6] 李国强.当代建筑工程的新结构体系.建筑学报,2002,(7):22-26
[7] 刘大海,杨翠如.高楼钢结构设计.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003,4-5
[8] 居荣初,周鹏洋,张才傲.我国高层建筑钢结构的发展及展望.浙江建筑,2002, (增刊):14-17
[9] 蔡益燕,钟善桐.我国高层建筑钢结构发展方向初探.新型建筑材料,1999, (3):31-33
[10] 蒋运林,熊猛.高层建筑钢结构的特点及其在我国的发展与展望.四川建筑科学研究,2003,29(3):31-32
[11] 李国强,周昊圣,周向明.高层钢-混凝土混合结构弹塑性地震位移的工程实用计算.建筑结构学报,2003,24(1):40-45
[12] 林国章.地震作用下高层钢-混凝土混合结构时程反应分析:[中南大学硕士学位论文].长沙:中南大学,2007,3-4
[13] 王心田.建筑结构体系与选型.上海:同济大学出版社,2003,265-266
[14] 李国强,丁翔,郑敬有,等.高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构分区耦合分析模型及开裂层位移参数分析.建筑结构,2002,32(2):56-58
[15] Subhash C. Goel. United states-Japan cooperative earthquake engineering research program on composite and hybrid structures. J struct Eng,2004,(2): 157-158
[16] Franklin Y. Cheng. Inelastic analysis of 3-D mixed steel and reinforced concrete seismic building systems. Computers&Structures, 1981, 13(1-3): 189-196
[17] J Y Richard Liew, etc. Advanced inelastic analysis of thin-walled core-braced frames. Singopore: Reference of APEC,1997,485-500
[18] 龚炳年,郝锐坤,赵宁.钢-混凝土混合结构模型试验研究.建筑科学,1994,(1):10-14
[19] 龚炳年,郝锐坤,赵宁.钢-混凝土混合结构模型动力特性的试验研究.建筑结构学报,1995,16(3):37-43
[20] 李国强,周向明,丁翔.高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构模型模拟地震振动台试验研究.建筑结构学报,2001,22(2):2-7
[21] 黄海.高层钢-混凝土混合结构的抗震性能试验研究:[北京建筑工程学院硕士学位论文].北京:北京建筑工程学院,2003,1-77
[22] 梁博.钢框架-混凝土筒体混合结构抗震性能振动台试验研究:[西安建筑科技大学硕士学位论文].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2005,1-100
[23] 赵西安.高层建筑组合结构分层模型弹塑性动力分析.建筑结构学报,1989,(5):12-18
[24] 程绍革.钢-混凝土筒混合结构弹塑性反应分析及探讨.建筑结构,1998,(6):33-35
[25] 陆兢,张铜生,崔鸿超.大连远洋大厦弹塑性时程分析.建筑结构,1998,(10):14-19
[26] 刘英,王松涛,赵均.钢-混凝土核心筒组合结构抗震性能研究.工程力学,1999,(增刊):439-442
[27] 李国强,姜丽人,张晓光.高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构简化分析模型.建筑结构,1999,(6):12-13
[28] 周向明,李国强,丁翔.高层钢-混凝土混合结构弹塑性地震反应简化分析模型.建筑结构,2002,32(5):26-30
[29] 周向明.高层钢-混凝土混合结构弹塑性地震反应简化分析模型研究:[同济大学硕士学位论文].上海:同济大学,2000,1-71
[30] 李国强,丁翔,郑敬有,等.高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构分区耦合分析模型及开裂层位移参数分析.建筑结构,2002,32(2):21-25
[31] 刘坚,黄襄云,李开禧.基于超级单元的钢-混凝土混合结构动力特性及地震反应研究.地震工程与工程振动,2003,23(1):54-58
[32] 杨淑玲.钢框架-混凝土核心筒混合结构弹塑性地震反应分析方法:[北京工业大学硕士学位论文].北京:北京工业大学,2005,1-66
[33] Michael R Lindeburg and Majid Baradar. Seismic Design of Building Structures. Professional Publications Inc Belmont CA, 2001,51-76
[34] 易方民.高层建筑偏心支撑钢框架结构抗震性能和设计参数研究:[中国建筑科学研究院博士学位论文].北京:中国建筑科学研究院,2000,1-139
[35] Clarles W Roeder and Egor P Popov. Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames for Earthquakes. Journal of the Structural Division, 1979, 105(11):42-55
[36] Kasai K and Popov E P. A Study of Seismically Resistant Eccentrically Braced Steel Frame Systems. EERC Report, 1986,5-10
[37] 王堂根.带巨型柱的钢框架-核心筒结构抗震性能研究:[西安建筑科技大学硕士学位论文].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2006,1-70
[38] 北京金土木软件技术有限公司,中国建筑标准设计研究院.ETABS中文版使用指南.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2004,1-667
[39] 北京金土木软件技术有限公司,中国建筑标准设计研究院.SAP2000中文版使用指南.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006,283-289
[40] R.A.Clough. Dynamics of Structures (2nd Edition). London: McGraw-Hill, 1993:169-175
[41] 胡聿贤.地震工程学.北京:地震出版社,1988,300-380
[42] 刘大海,杨翠如,钟锡根.高层建筑抗震设计.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1993:274-295
[43] 丰定国,王社良.抗震结构设计.武汉:武汉理工大学出版社,2001,172-210
[44] T C Fung. Complex-time-step Newmark methods with controllable numerical dissipation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1998, 41(1):65-93
[45] B. S Smith and A. Coull. Tall Building Structures Analysis and Design. John Wiley &Son Inc, 1991: 80-90
[46] Anil K.Chopra. Dynamics of Structures-Theory and applications to Earthquake Engineering (2nd Edition). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2005,629-660
[47] 周学军,陈鲁,曲慧.多高层钢结构支撑的布置方式对框架侧向刚度的影响.钢结构,2003,18(4):51-54
[48] 黄怡,王元清,石永久.支撑布置方式对多高层钢结构抗震性能的影响分析.钢结构, 2005, 20(5): 41-44
[2] 蔡益燕.《高层民用建筑钢结构技术规程》修订雏议.建筑钢结构进展,2003,5(4):1-4
[3] 中华人民共和国建设部主编.建筑抗震设计规范GB50011-2001.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001,279-280
[4] 中国建筑科学研究院主编.高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程JGJ3-2002/J186-2002.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002,109-114
[5] 卢达洲.《钢-混凝土混合结构技术规程》通过评审.福建建设科技,2004,(4):30
[6] 李国强.当代建筑工程的新结构体系.建筑学报,2002,(7):22-26
[7] 刘大海,杨翠如.高楼钢结构设计.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003,4-5
[8] 居荣初,周鹏洋,张才傲.我国高层建筑钢结构的发展及展望.浙江建筑,2002, (增刊):14-17
[9] 蔡益燕,钟善桐.我国高层建筑钢结构发展方向初探.新型建筑材料,1999, (3):31-33
[10] 蒋运林,熊猛.高层建筑钢结构的特点及其在我国的发展与展望.四川建筑科学研究,2003,29(3):31-32
[11] 李国强,周昊圣,周向明.高层钢-混凝土混合结构弹塑性地震位移的工程实用计算.建筑结构学报,2003,24(1):40-45
[12] 林国章.地震作用下高层钢-混凝土混合结构时程反应分析:[中南大学硕士学位论文].长沙:中南大学,2007,3-4
[13] 王心田.建筑结构体系与选型.上海:同济大学出版社,2003,265-266
[14] 李国强,丁翔,郑敬有,等.高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构分区耦合分析模型及开裂层位移参数分析.建筑结构,2002,32(2):56-58
[15] Subhash C. Goel. United states-Japan cooperative earthquake engineering research program on composite and hybrid structures. J struct Eng,2004,(2): 157-158
[16] Franklin Y. Cheng. Inelastic analysis of 3-D mixed steel and reinforced concrete seismic building systems. Computers&Structures, 1981, 13(1-3): 189-196
[17] J Y Richard Liew, etc. Advanced inelastic analysis of thin-walled core-braced frames. Singopore: Reference of APEC,1997,485-500
[18] 龚炳年,郝锐坤,赵宁.钢-混凝土混合结构模型试验研究.建筑科学,1994,(1):10-14
[19] 龚炳年,郝锐坤,赵宁.钢-混凝土混合结构模型动力特性的试验研究.建筑结构学报,1995,16(3):37-43
[20] 李国强,周向明,丁翔.高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构模型模拟地震振动台试验研究.建筑结构学报,2001,22(2):2-7
[21] 黄海.高层钢-混凝土混合结构的抗震性能试验研究:[北京建筑工程学院硕士学位论文].北京:北京建筑工程学院,2003,1-77
[22] 梁博.钢框架-混凝土筒体混合结构抗震性能振动台试验研究:[西安建筑科技大学硕士学位论文].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2005,1-100
[23] 赵西安.高层建筑组合结构分层模型弹塑性动力分析.建筑结构学报,1989,(5):12-18
[24] 程绍革.钢-混凝土筒混合结构弹塑性反应分析及探讨.建筑结构,1998,(6):33-35
[25] 陆兢,张铜生,崔鸿超.大连远洋大厦弹塑性时程分析.建筑结构,1998,(10):14-19
[26] 刘英,王松涛,赵均.钢-混凝土核心筒组合结构抗震性能研究.工程力学,1999,(增刊):439-442
[27] 李国强,姜丽人,张晓光.高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构简化分析模型.建筑结构,1999,(6):12-13
[28] 周向明,李国强,丁翔.高层钢-混凝土混合结构弹塑性地震反应简化分析模型.建筑结构,2002,32(5):26-30
[29] 周向明.高层钢-混凝土混合结构弹塑性地震反应简化分析模型研究:[同济大学硕士学位论文].上海:同济大学,2000,1-71
[30] 李国强,丁翔,郑敬有,等.高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构分区耦合分析模型及开裂层位移参数分析.建筑结构,2002,32(2):21-25
[31] 刘坚,黄襄云,李开禧.基于超级单元的钢-混凝土混合结构动力特性及地震反应研究.地震工程与工程振动,2003,23(1):54-58
[32] 杨淑玲.钢框架-混凝土核心筒混合结构弹塑性地震反应分析方法:[北京工业大学硕士学位论文].北京:北京工业大学,2005,1-66
[33] Michael R Lindeburg and Majid Baradar. Seismic Design of Building Structures. Professional Publications Inc Belmont CA, 2001,51-76
[34] 易方民.高层建筑偏心支撑钢框架结构抗震性能和设计参数研究:[中国建筑科学研究院博士学位论文].北京:中国建筑科学研究院,2000,1-139
[35] Clarles W Roeder and Egor P Popov. Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames for Earthquakes. Journal of the Structural Division, 1979, 105(11):42-55
[36] Kasai K and Popov E P. A Study of Seismically Resistant Eccentrically Braced Steel Frame Systems. EERC Report, 1986,5-10
[37] 王堂根.带巨型柱的钢框架-核心筒结构抗震性能研究:[西安建筑科技大学硕士学位论文].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2006,1-70
[38] 北京金土木软件技术有限公司,中国建筑标准设计研究院.ETABS中文版使用指南.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2004,1-667
[39] 北京金土木软件技术有限公司,中国建筑标准设计研究院.SAP2000中文版使用指南.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006,283-289
[40] R.A.Clough. Dynamics of Structures (2nd Edition). London: McGraw-Hill, 1993:169-175
[41] 胡聿贤.地震工程学.北京:地震出版社,1988,300-380
[42] 刘大海,杨翠如,钟锡根.高层建筑抗震设计.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1993:274-295
[43] 丰定国,王社良.抗震结构设计.武汉:武汉理工大学出版社,2001,172-210
[44] T C Fung. Complex-time-step Newmark methods with controllable numerical dissipation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1998, 41(1):65-93
[45] B. S Smith and A. Coull. Tall Building Structures Analysis and Design. John Wiley &Son Inc, 1991: 80-90
[46] Anil K.Chopra. Dynamics of Structures-Theory and applications to Earthquake Engineering (2nd Edition). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2005,629-660
[47] 周学军,陈鲁,曲慧.多高层钢结构支撑的布置方式对框架侧向刚度的影响.钢结构,2003,18(4):51-54
[48] 黄怡,王元清,石永久.支撑布置方式对多高层钢结构抗震性能的影响分析.钢结构, 2005, 20(5): 41-44