现代服务业集聚区形成和发展的动力机制研究
|
摘要
现代服务业集聚区已成为国际大都市经济活动的一种重要现象,大都市版图由于一些现代服务业集聚区的存在,形成了色彩斑斓、块状明显的“经济马赛克”。现代服务业集聚区形成和发展动力机制是驱动集聚区形成和演化的一切有利因素,以及这些因素所形成的力量结构体系及其运行规则。因此,对现代服务业集聚区发展的动力机制研究将有助于我们把握集聚区演化的一般规律,对构建可持续发展空间、加快服务经济发展、提高城市综合竞争力有重要的意义。
运用自组织理论,对现代服务业集聚区的演化过程进行深入的分析。现代服务业集聚区是由企业、中介机构、大学和科研机构等行为主体以及它们之间的复杂联系所形成的流量经济系统,它具有开放性、非平衡性、非线性相互作用、涨落等的自组织特征。现代服务业集聚区还具有自组织与他组织契合的特征,自组织与他组织两种驱动力共同推动集聚区发展。按照形成阶段动力作用强度,把现代服务业集聚区分为自组织现代服务业集聚区和他组织现代服务业集聚区两种基本模式。应用系统科学原理分别对两种集聚区进行理论分析,并分别以环同济知识经济圈和陆家嘴金融贸易区为案例,进一步认识两种集聚区的演化规律。
深入分析现代服务业集聚区发展的动力机制作用机理,并构建完整的现代服务业集聚区发展动力体系。现代服务业集聚区的发展过程是自组织与他组织两种驱动力共同作用的结果。自组织动力是指以企业为主体、市场机制为行为规则驱动集聚区形成和发展的内生性动力,构建了现代服务业集聚区自组织动力机制动态模型,并深入分析了专业化分工、竞争与协同、网络创新等自组织动力机制。他组织动力机制指的是:一切有助于解决“市场失灵”和“系统失灵”等负集聚经济效应问题,促使集聚区系统可持续发展的各种政府行为耦合形成的作用力系统,主要包括政策引导、市场建设与管理、公共服务与公共产品提供、集聚区文化建设等政府行为。
最后,论文详细地分析了上海现代服务业的发展现状及其空间布局情况。基于典型案例分析和现代服务业集聚发展的现状分析,总结出当前上海市服务经济集聚发展中存在的动力机制问题,并提出促进上海市现代服务业集聚区发展的对策和建议,主要包括以下四个方面:第一,发挥政府作用,促进产业集聚区发展;第二,构建全方位的市场服务体系;第三,建立和完善集聚区创新网络体系;第四,营造良好的现代服务业集聚发展的社会环境。
Modern service industry agglomeration districts (MSIAD) are the important economic phenomena in modernized metropolises, and metropolis space is buildup of distinctive modern service industry areas. The formation and development dynamisms of MSIAD are all kinds of advantageous factors to promote MSIAD's formation and development also include these factors' interrelations and their functioning rules. The research into the formation and development dynamisms of MSIAD will help us to realize the common rules of MSIAD's evolvement, which is significant to constructing sustainable development districts, driving the growth of service economy and enhancing metropolis' competitiveness.
Based on the theory of self-organizaing, this dissertation deeply studied the MSIAD's evolvement. MSIAD is a flux economic system comprised of enterprises, intermediary organizations, universities, research institutions and their complex relations. The system possesses self-organizing characteristics of opening, non-equilibrium state, nonlinearity interaction and fluctuating, and also has the coaction character of self-organizing and hetero-organizing. According to impetus intensity at MSIAD's forming stage, author sorted MSIADs into self-organizing MSIADs and hetero-organizing MSIADs. Appling systematic science principle, author respectively analyzed these two kinds of MSIADs theoretically, and also specialized two typical cases to make the MSIAD's evolvement rules more comprehensible.
The article analyzed the operating mechanism of MSIAD development impetus, and established a MSIAD development dynamism system. MSIAD's foundation and development is impelled by self-organizing impetus and hetero-organizing impetus together. Self-organizing impetus are endogenetic forces that inner enterprises drive the evolvement of agglomeration district through market mechanism. Author founded a dynamic model to explain MSIAD self-organizing dynamism and deeply studied these inner impetuses of specialized labor division, competition and cooperation, network innovation. Hetero-organizing dynamism is defined as an impetus system of government action which can solve problems of market failure and system failure, and can facilitate MSIAD sustainable development. The hetero-organizing impetuses mainly includ governmental actions, like policy guidance, market setting up and administration, public services and public product supply, etc.
The article detailed analyzed the actuality and the spatial layout of Shanghai modern service industry. From the case study and the actuality analyses, author concluded some dynamism problems of MSIAD, and then put forward several countermeasures for promoting the development of Shanghai MSIADs. There are four advices, involve government functions, build up market service system, set up and perfect the innovation network system, and construct nicer social circumstance for MSIADs' development.
运用自组织理论,对现代服务业集聚区的演化过程进行深入的分析。现代服务业集聚区是由企业、中介机构、大学和科研机构等行为主体以及它们之间的复杂联系所形成的流量经济系统,它具有开放性、非平衡性、非线性相互作用、涨落等的自组织特征。现代服务业集聚区还具有自组织与他组织契合的特征,自组织与他组织两种驱动力共同推动集聚区发展。按照形成阶段动力作用强度,把现代服务业集聚区分为自组织现代服务业集聚区和他组织现代服务业集聚区两种基本模式。应用系统科学原理分别对两种集聚区进行理论分析,并分别以环同济知识经济圈和陆家嘴金融贸易区为案例,进一步认识两种集聚区的演化规律。
深入分析现代服务业集聚区发展的动力机制作用机理,并构建完整的现代服务业集聚区发展动力体系。现代服务业集聚区的发展过程是自组织与他组织两种驱动力共同作用的结果。自组织动力是指以企业为主体、市场机制为行为规则驱动集聚区形成和发展的内生性动力,构建了现代服务业集聚区自组织动力机制动态模型,并深入分析了专业化分工、竞争与协同、网络创新等自组织动力机制。他组织动力机制指的是:一切有助于解决“市场失灵”和“系统失灵”等负集聚经济效应问题,促使集聚区系统可持续发展的各种政府行为耦合形成的作用力系统,主要包括政策引导、市场建设与管理、公共服务与公共产品提供、集聚区文化建设等政府行为。
最后,论文详细地分析了上海现代服务业的发展现状及其空间布局情况。基于典型案例分析和现代服务业集聚发展的现状分析,总结出当前上海市服务经济集聚发展中存在的动力机制问题,并提出促进上海市现代服务业集聚区发展的对策和建议,主要包括以下四个方面:第一,发挥政府作用,促进产业集聚区发展;第二,构建全方位的市场服务体系;第三,建立和完善集聚区创新网络体系;第四,营造良好的现代服务业集聚发展的社会环境。
Modern service industry agglomeration districts (MSIAD) are the important economic phenomena in modernized metropolises, and metropolis space is buildup of distinctive modern service industry areas. The formation and development dynamisms of MSIAD are all kinds of advantageous factors to promote MSIAD's formation and development also include these factors' interrelations and their functioning rules. The research into the formation and development dynamisms of MSIAD will help us to realize the common rules of MSIAD's evolvement, which is significant to constructing sustainable development districts, driving the growth of service economy and enhancing metropolis' competitiveness.
Based on the theory of self-organizaing, this dissertation deeply studied the MSIAD's evolvement. MSIAD is a flux economic system comprised of enterprises, intermediary organizations, universities, research institutions and their complex relations. The system possesses self-organizing characteristics of opening, non-equilibrium state, nonlinearity interaction and fluctuating, and also has the coaction character of self-organizing and hetero-organizing. According to impetus intensity at MSIAD's forming stage, author sorted MSIADs into self-organizing MSIADs and hetero-organizing MSIADs. Appling systematic science principle, author respectively analyzed these two kinds of MSIADs theoretically, and also specialized two typical cases to make the MSIAD's evolvement rules more comprehensible.
The article analyzed the operating mechanism of MSIAD development impetus, and established a MSIAD development dynamism system. MSIAD's foundation and development is impelled by self-organizing impetus and hetero-organizing impetus together. Self-organizing impetus are endogenetic forces that inner enterprises drive the evolvement of agglomeration district through market mechanism. Author founded a dynamic model to explain MSIAD self-organizing dynamism and deeply studied these inner impetuses of specialized labor division, competition and cooperation, network innovation. Hetero-organizing dynamism is defined as an impetus system of government action which can solve problems of market failure and system failure, and can facilitate MSIAD sustainable development. The hetero-organizing impetuses mainly includ governmental actions, like policy guidance, market setting up and administration, public services and public product supply, etc.
The article detailed analyzed the actuality and the spatial layout of Shanghai modern service industry. From the case study and the actuality analyses, author concluded some dynamism problems of MSIAD, and then put forward several countermeasures for promoting the development of Shanghai MSIADs. There are four advices, involve government functions, build up market service system, set up and perfect the innovation network system, and construct nicer social circumstance for MSIADs' development.
引文
[1]《上海城市规划》编辑部.上海现代服务业发展规划.上海城市规划.2006.6:P57-58。
[2]H·哈肯.协同学导论.陕西科学技术出版社.1987.
[3]安虎森,朱妍.产业集聚区理论及其进展.南开经济研究.2003.3:P32。
[4]鲍荣富.产业集聚区自组织演化机制--以上海制造业集聚区为例.复旦大学学位论文.2005.5:P24。
[5]波特著,李明轩等译.国家竞争优势.华厦出版社.2006.
[6]才华.基于自组织理论的黑龙江省城市系统演化发展研究.哈尔滨工程大学学位论文.2006.6:P59。
[7]蔡铂,聂鸣.产业集聚区的创新机理研究.研究与发展管理.2006.2。
[8]蔡绍洪,戴陵江.平衡相变与非平衡相变临界标度理论.四川科学技术出版社.1999。
[9]蔡绍洪,徐和平等.区域集聚区创新网络形成发展的演进机制及特征.贵州社会科学.2007.5:P4。
[10]蔡绍洪、汪劲松等.区域企业群落向产业集聚区演化的自组织协同机制.经济问题探索.2007.3:P69。
[11]蔡绍洪等.耗散型自组织系统耗散参量的临界指数刻划.贵州大学学报(自然科学版).2003.8:P275-277。
[12]陈枊钦,黄坡.产业集聚区与城市化:基于外部性视角.贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版).2007.3-P3-9。
[13]陈继祥.产业集聚区与复杂性.上海财经大学出版社.2005:P34-37。
[14]陈文华.产业集聚区治理研究.江西财经大学学位论文.2006.5:P84-86。
[15]陈兴祖.培育和发展中介组织的对策研究.东方论坛.2001.4:P20-24。
[16]陈雪梅.中小企业集聚区理论与实践.经济科学出版社.2003.
[17]陈瑛.特大城市CBD系统的理论与实践--以重庆和西安为例.华东师范大学学位论文.2002:P20-22。
[18]谌飞龙,陈占葵.产业集聚区的区域创新网络系统分析.产业观察.P274-275。
[19]池仁勇等.产业集聚区发展阶段理论研究.软科学.2005.19:P3。
[20]仇保兴.小企业集聚区研究.复旦大学出版社.1999。
[21]崔蕴.上海市生产性服务业发展与城市功能提升研究.华东师范大学学位论文.2005.5.
[22]邓卫.我国房地产业发展的时弊与对策.清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版).1999:P75-76。
[23]范柏乃.我国地方政府信用缺失的实证调查.人大复印资料.公共行政.2005.4。
[24]盖文启,朱华晟.产业的柔性集聚及其区域竞争力.经济理论与经济管理.2001.10:P26-27。
[25]耿建泽.地域根植性对企业集聚区发展的影响.安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版).2007.1:P18-20。
[26]龚双红.国外产业集聚区理论综述.哈尔滨市委党校学报.2006.1:P43。
[27]古继宝,高杨.我国产业集聚区不经济现状分析与对策研究.产业观察.2004.1:P228。
[28]谷国锋.区域经济发展的动力系统研究.东北师范大学学位论文.2005.12:4.1.4P78。
[29]郭鉴.地方产业文化认知研究.城乡视点.2007.3:P86。
[30]郭艳.中国城市规模集聚经济效益研究.复旦大学学位论文.2004.5:2.1P8
[31]何骏.上海发展现代服务业的人才战略.上海企业.2006.3:P33。
[32]何骏.现代服务业集聚区促进上海现代服务业的加快发展问题.上海商学院学报.2007.9:P38-39。
[33]衡朝阳,魏景赋.分工与知识经济下的企业.现代经济探讨.2004.10:P61。
[34]衡朝阳.企业合作竞争研究.中央财经大学学报.2004.2:P55-57
[35]胡宝民.技术创新扩散系统演化特征与自组织演化过程.河北工业大学学报.1999.11:P7。
[36]胡大立,谌飞龙等.区域品牌机理与构建分析.产经论坛.2005.4:P31。
[37]胡丽华.产业集聚区动力要素及培育路径.宏观经济.2006.9。
[38]胡宇辰.产业集聚区的支持体系研究.江西财经大学学位论文.2004.10。
[39]霍丽,惠宁.制度优势与产业集聚区的形成.经济学家.2007.4:P54.
[40]吉亚辉,王雪娟.产业集聚区研究中几组主要概念的辨析.甘肃省经济管理干部学报.2006.5:P11。
[41]金青梅.地方政府在产业集聚区发展中的定位分析.农业经济.2007.2:P67。
[42]金学军.中国知识服务业发展分析.软科学.2002.3:P16。
[43]李超,朱祖平.由专业化分工看产业集聚的动因.管理科学文摘.P62。
[44]李大伟,王猛.分形理论及其在企业组织中的应用.石家庄经济学院学报.2004.2:P14-15。
[45]李红.知识密集型服务业集聚区研究述评.科学管理研究.2005.12:P87。
[46]李建军.硅谷产学创新系统及其集聚区效应.山东科技大学学报(社会科学版).2003.3。
[47]李剑力.从创业机会不断衍生与开发透视企业集聚区成长.经济师.2006.7。
[48]李振华.基于复杂性的企业协同竞争机制研究.天津大学学位论文.2005.6: P36。
[49]历无畏,王慧敏.世界产业服务化与发展上海现代服务业的战略思考.世界经济研究.2005.1:P58。
[50]梁琦.产业集聚论.商务印书馆.2000:P22。
[51]刘波.基于自组织模型的高技术产业组织政策研究.同济大学学位论文.2005.12:P114。
[52]刘恒江,陈继祥.国外产业集聚区政策研究综述.外国经济与管理.2004.11:P38-39。
[53]刘恒江.产业集聚区动力机制研究的最新动态.外国经济与管理.2004.1:P2-7。
[54]刘恒江.基于动力机制的我国产业集聚区发展研究.经济地理.2005.9:P608。
[55]刘建波.基于自组织理论的企业进化机制研究.哈尔滨工程大学学位论文.2005.06:2.4.5P40。
[56]刘军.社会网络分析导论.社会科学文献出版社.2004.
[57]刘林心.上海市现代服务业在经济增长中的作用和发展情况研究.复旦大学学位论文.2003。
[58]刘强.同济周边设计产业集聚区形成机制和价值研究.同济大学学报(社会科学版).2007.1:P61-64。
[59]刘芹等.基于集聚区文化的高科技产业竞争力的培育研究.中国科技论坛.2006.5:P48-50。
[60]刘筱,王铮等.政府在高技术产业集聚区中的作用--以深圳为例.科研管理.2006.7:P37。
[61]吕发.浦东开发开放:昨天、今天和明天.宏观经济.2000.4-P11。
[62]苗东升.系统科学精要(第二版).中国人民大学出版社.2006.6:P160。
[63]潘逢山,叶春明.论企业集聚区内部分工与协调.管理纵横.2007.4:P54-55。
[64]浦东新区发展和改革委员会统计调查所.陆家嘴功能区域投资与开发趋势分析.发展论坛.2006.7-P29。
[65]普利高津、斯唐热.从混沌到有序.曾庆宏、沈小峰译.上海译文出版社.1986:P235。
[66]綦伟琦.城市设计与自组织的契合.同济大学学位论文.2006.06-2.2P20。
[67]丘海雄,于永慧.嵌入性与根植性.广东社会科学.2007.1:P179。
[68]邱成利.制度创新与产业集聚的关系研究.中国软科学.2001.9:P100-102。
[69]沈洁.投资软件环境对提升区域经济竞争力的作用机制.安徽农业科学.2005.11:P2168。
[70]石良平.提升上海及浦东新区国际知名度和影响力的策略研究.上海市人民 政府发展研究中心研究报告2003.9:P20。
[71]宋方伟,高畅等.产业集聚区的核心要素演进分析.理论与方法.2003.10。
[72]王春宇.分工、专业化与产业集聚区研究.辽宁大学学位论文.2006.5:3.1.1P39-40。
[73]王缉慈.创新的空间:企业集聚区与区域发展.北京大学出版社.2005.11:P95。
[74]王炜.试析外部性、产业集聚区与区域经济发展.财会月刊.2006.12:P9。
[75]王晓玉.国外生产性服务业集聚研究述评.当代财经.2006.3:P94
[76]卫玲,邱德钧.现代产业集聚区理论的新进展及其述评.兰州大学学报(社会科学版).2007.3:P124。
[77]魏江,Boden M..知识密集型服务业与创新.科学出版社会.2004。
[78]吴彤.论协同学理论方法--自组织动力学方法及其应用.内蒙古社会科学.2000.11:P19。
[79]吴翔阳.产业自组织集聚区化及集聚区经济研究.中共中央学校出版社.2006.6:P59-64。
[80]项昺.同济现象--大学周边地区产业集聚现象研究.同济大学学位论文.2005.3:3.1P14。
[81]谢叙祎.上海经济增长的集聚效应研究.复旦大学学位论文.2006.4:2.1P8。
[82]熊爱华,汪波.基于产业集聚区的区域品牌形成研究.山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2007.2:P85-88。
[83]徐金发,余园园.基于产业集聚区生命周期理论的研究与探讨.技术经济.2006.10:P32-33。
[84]徐康宁.开放经济中的产业群集与竞争力.中国工业经济.2001.11。
[85]许国志.系统科学.上海科技教育出版社.2000.9:P154-156。
[86]杨宝良.外部经济与产业地理集聚:一个基本理论逻辑及对我国工业经济的实证研究.世界经济论坛.2003.6:P53-54。
[87]杨娟.我国中小企业的发展--柔性专业化.科技情报开发与经济.2007.4:P212。
[88]杨小凯,黄有光.专业化与经济组织.经济科学出版社.1999.
[89]杨亚琴、王丹.国际大都市现代服务业集聚区发展的比较研究-以纽约、伦敦、东京为例的分析.世界经济研究.2005.1:P61。
[90]杨亚琴.上海现代服务业集聚区发展的途径与机理-以陆家嘴金融贸易区、外高桥保税区、赤峰路一条街为例的分析.上海经济研究.2005.12:P59。
[91]姚为群.全球城市的经济成因.上海人民出版社.2003.8:P167-169。
[92]姚锡棠.浦东开发开放十年实践的理论回顾.社会科学.2000.5:P2。
[93]叶建亮.知识溢出与企业集聚区.经济科学.2001.3。
[94]叶向阳,叶生洪.混沌理论及其在经济系统中的应用.专题研究.2002.6:P153。
[95]于国安.创业机制与企业集聚区成长互动机制分析.经济问题.2006.2:P23。
[96]袁晓勐.城市系统的自组织理论研究.东北师范大学学位论文.2006.5:P104。
[97]臧新.产业集聚区产生原因的理论困惑和探索.产业论坛.2003.1:P189。
[98]张宏伟.产业集聚区研究的新进展.经济理论与经济管理.2004.4:69。
[99]张金成.论产业集聚区文化竞争力.学习月刊.2007.7:P14。
[100]张连业.资源型产业集聚区可持续发展研究.西北大学学位论文.2007.6:P73-74。
[101]张韬.区域产业集聚区效用评价与规划研究.北京交通大学学位论文.2006.2:P42。
[102]张毅.基于创新网络的地区产业集聚区发展研究.2004.4:P22。
[103]张永安,吉荣康.区域主导产业选择与培育模型.经济师.2006.5:P8-9。
[104]赵强等.产业集聚区创新优势分析及其启示.商业经济.2005.8。
[105]周新生.产业分析与产业策划方法及应用.经济管理出版社.2004.
[106]周振华.产业结构政策的选择基准:一个新的假说.维普资讯.1988.11:P26-27。
[107]朱晓青.借鉴经验,着力发展北京现代服务业核心产业群.北京行政学院学报.2005.6:P37。
[108]朱远方,朱廷柏.企业集聚区的内部分工研究.山东经济.2006.5:P47-48。
[109]庄晋财.企业集聚区地域根植性的理论演进及其政策含义.财经问题研究.2003.10:P20。
[110]邹国胜.集聚区文化与产业集聚区竞争力.企业文化.2006.6。
[111]A.J.Scott.New industrial spaces.London.1986.
[112]Anlexander.Office location and public policy.Methuen.1970.
[113]Beckmann,M.J..Economic growth in a central place system.Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth.Berlin Springer.1995.
[114]Belussi,Fiorenza.Policies for the development of knowledge-intensive local production system.Cambridge Journal of Economics.1999(23):P729-747.
[115]Best,Michael H..Cluster dynamics.The New Competitive Advantage:The Renewal of American Industry.Oxford University Press.2001.
[116]Browning H and J Singelman.The emergency of a service society:demographic and sociological aspects of the sectoral transformation in the labor force of the USA national technical information service.Springfield Virginia. 1975.
[117] Castells, M.. The informational city. Oxford: Blackwell. 1989.
[118] Charlie Karlsson. Agglomeration, economies of scale and dynamic specialization in central-place-system. JonKoping University, Sweden. 1999.8.
[119] D.Keeble, L. Nacham. Why do business service firms cluster. Working Paper, Cambridge. 2001
[120] Dainiels, P.W.. Services and the global system of cities in Dainels, P.W. Service industries in the world economy. Oxford:Blackwell.
[121] David. F.. Creating self-sustaining, high skill ecosystems. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 1999(1):P67-69.
[122] Enright, Michael J.. Survey of the characterization of regional clusters: initial results. University of Hong Kong. 2000.
[123] Francis E. Lindsay. Discerning intra-metropolitan patterns of producer service establishment location using geographic information systems. 2005 :P27.
[124] Francis E. Lindsay. Discerning intra-metropolitan patterns of producer service establishing location using geographic information systems. University of Maryland for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 2005.
[125] Fujita M., J.-F. Thisse. Economics of agglomeration, cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press. 2002.
[126] Fujita M., Krugman P.. The spatial economy, cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press. 1999.
[127] Giamarco Ottaviano, Jacques-Francois Thisse. Agglomeration and economic geography. 2003.
[128] Gordon, Mccann. Industrial clusters complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies. 2000(3):P513-532.
[129] Greenfield HI. Manpower and the growth of producer services, New York: Columbia, U, Press. 1966(2).
[130] Henry G Overman, Stephen Redding. The economic geography of trade, production and income: a survey of empirics. Working Paper, NBER. 2001.
[131] Hospers, G., Beugelsdijk, S.. Regional cluster policies: learning by comparing? Kyklos. 2002(3):P381-402.
[132] Howells, Green. Location, technology and industrial organization in UK services. Progress in Planning. 1986(2).
[133] Jay Kandampully. The dynamics of service clusters: A phenomenon for further study. Managing Service Quality. 2001(5).
[134] Jay Mitra. Building entrepreneurial clusters. Final dissemination workshop, University of Luton, United Kingdom. 2003.
[135] Jed Kolko. Agglomeration and co-agglomeration of services industries. Public Policy Institute of California. 2007.8.
[136] Ji-weon Choi, Kun-hyunck Ahn. Agglomeration-oriented behavior of new retail companies, analyzing the location of internet-based retailing companies in Korea. Seoul National University. 2004.
[137] Joel Kotkin, Fred Siegel. The remaking of city and country side in the new economy, Digital geography. Hudson Ins. 2000.
[138] Jorg Meyer-Stamer, Ulrich Harmes-Liedtke. How to promote clusters. www.mesopartner.com. 2005.
[139] Jorg Meyer-Stamer. Understanding the determinants of vibrant business development: the systemic competitiveness perspective, www.mesopartner.com. 2003.7.
[140] Jun Koo. Agglomeration and spillovers in a simultaneous framework. The Annals of Regional Science. 2005(38):P35-47.
[141] Jungyul Sohn. Spatial econometric modeling of urban spatial structure of Chicago and Seoul in the 1990s: agglomeration economies, information technology and commuting. Seoul National University. 2002.
[142] Keeble, Wilkinson, ed. High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe. Ashgate Adlershot. 2000(a):P1-20.
[143] Kolko, Jed. "The death of distance? The death of cities? Evidence from the geography of commercial internet usage", in The Internet Upheaval, eds. Ingo Vogelsang and Benjamin Compaine, Mit Press: 2000.
[144] Krugman P.. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy. 1991(99):P183-199.
[145] Krugman, P.. Geography and Trade(2nd Edition), Leuven University Press. 1992.
[146] Krugman,P.. Space: the final frontier. Journal of economic perspective. Berlin Springer. 1998(2):P161-175.
[147] Maillat, D.. From an industrial district to the innovative milieu: contribution to an analysis of territorial productive organizations. Recherches Economiques de Louvain. 1998(1):P111-129.
[148] Marshall, P.Damesick and P.wood. Understanding the location and role of producer service in the UK. Environment & Planning. 1987(19).
[149] Martin Bell, Michael Albu. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. Word Development. 1999(9):P1715 1734.
[150] Maurizio Mistri, Stefano Solari. Local self-organizing economic processes: industrial districts and liquidity preference. Paper of University of Padua.
[151] Michael J.. The globalization of competition and the localization of competitive advantage: Plicies toward regional clustering. London: Macmillan, 2001.
[152] Miller, P. et al. Business clusters in the UK - a first assessment, Bolume 1, Main Report. Department of Trade and Industry. 2001.
[153] Mills, E.S.. Sectoral clustering and metropolitan development, sources of metropolitan growth. Center for Urban Policy Research. 1992:P3-18.
[154] Moulaert, Gsllouj. The locational geography of advanced producer firms: the limits of economies of agglomeration. The Geography of services Frank Case. London. 1993:P91-106.
[155] Mulligan, GF. Agglomeration and central place theory: a review of the literature. International Regional Science Review. 1984(1):P1-42.
[156] Murat Iyigun. Clusters of invention, life cycle of technologies and endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2006(30):P687 719.
[157] Nachum, L., Keeble, D.. Neo-Marshallian nodes, global networks and firm competitiveness. The media cluster of central London, ESRC center for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper. 1999:P154.
[158] Naresh R P and Gary Cook. The benefits of industrial clustering insights from the financial services industry at three locations. Journal of Financial Services Marketing. 2003.
[159] Naresh R. Pandit, et.. Acomparison of clustering dynamics in the British broadcasting and financial services industries. Economics of Business, 2002(9): 195-224.
[160] Orjan Solvell, Goran Lindqvist, Christian Ketels. The cluster initiative greenbook. www.cluster-research.org. 2003.9.
[161] Porter Michael. Clusters and new economics of competition. Harvard business review. 1998(6):P77-90.
[162] Porter Michael. Location, competition and economic Development: local clusters in a global economy. Economic development quarterly. 2000(1):P15-34.
[163] Rabellotti R. Is there an "industrial district model"? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared. World Development. 1995(2):P29-41.
[164] Richardson, H.W. Economies and diseconomies of agglomeration. Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth. Berlin Springer. 1995.
[165] Rolf Stein, Producer services, transaction activities, and cities: Rethinking Occupational Categories in Economic Geography. European Planning Studies. 2002.6.
[166] Ron Martin, Peter Sunley. Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?. Journal of Economic Geography. 2003(3):P5-35.
[167] Rosenfeld, Stuart A.. Just clusters, economic development strategies that research more people and places. Acrrboro: Regional Technology Strategies, Inc. 2002.
[168] Ross Brown. Cluster dynamics in theory and pratice with application to Scotland. Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper. European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom. 2000:P1-58.
[169] Rui Baptista. Research round up: industrial clusters and technological innovation. Business Strategy Review. 1996(2).
[170] S.Illeris. Producer services: the key factor to economic development, Enterpreneurship and regional development. 1989(1).
[171] Sam Ock Park, Kee-Bom Nahm. Spatial structure and inter-firm networks of technical and information producer service in Seoul. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 1998.
[172] Sassen, S.. Cities in a World Economy. California: Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks. 1994.
[173] Sassen, Saskia. Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press. 1991.
[174] Saxenian, A.. Regional advantage: culture competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press. 1994.
[175] Scott, A.J.. Flexible production systems and regional development: the rise of new industrial spaces in North American and Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1988(12):P171-186.
[176] Scott, A.J.. From Silicon Valley to Hollywood: growth and development of the multimedia industrial in California in Braczyk, H.J., et al. eds Regional innovation. Theory, Culture and Society. 2000(17):P1-33.
[177] Shen, Q.. An application of GIS to the measurement of spatial autocorrelation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 1994(3):P167-191.
[178] Smith, Jr., R. Florida. Agglomeration and industrial: An econometric analysis of Japanese-affiliated manufacturing establishments in automotive-related industries. Journal of Urban Economics. 1994(36):P23-41.
[179] Staber, Udo. Spatial Proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: the case of knitwear firms in Baden-Wurttemberg. Regional studies. 2001(35):P329-341.
[180] Stoper. M., Walker R.. The capitalist imperative territory, technology and industrial growth. Sxford: Blackwell. 1989.
[181] Thomas Brenner, Niels Weigelt. The evolution of industrial clusters-simulating spatial dynamics. Advances in Complex System. 2001(1):P127-147.
[182] Wolter. The rise and fall of regional agglomerations structure. Internal Dynamics and change. Paper Presented at the DRU ID PHD Conference. 2004.
[183] Yoshiro Higano. Agglomeration diseconomies of traffic congestion and agglomeration economies of interaction in the information-oriented city. Journal of Regional Science. 1999(1):P21-49.
[2]H·哈肯.协同学导论.陕西科学技术出版社.1987.
[3]安虎森,朱妍.产业集聚区理论及其进展.南开经济研究.2003.3:P32。
[4]鲍荣富.产业集聚区自组织演化机制--以上海制造业集聚区为例.复旦大学学位论文.2005.5:P24。
[5]波特著,李明轩等译.国家竞争优势.华厦出版社.2006.
[6]才华.基于自组织理论的黑龙江省城市系统演化发展研究.哈尔滨工程大学学位论文.2006.6:P59。
[7]蔡铂,聂鸣.产业集聚区的创新机理研究.研究与发展管理.2006.2。
[8]蔡绍洪,戴陵江.平衡相变与非平衡相变临界标度理论.四川科学技术出版社.1999。
[9]蔡绍洪,徐和平等.区域集聚区创新网络形成发展的演进机制及特征.贵州社会科学.2007.5:P4。
[10]蔡绍洪、汪劲松等.区域企业群落向产业集聚区演化的自组织协同机制.经济问题探索.2007.3:P69。
[11]蔡绍洪等.耗散型自组织系统耗散参量的临界指数刻划.贵州大学学报(自然科学版).2003.8:P275-277。
[12]陈枊钦,黄坡.产业集聚区与城市化:基于外部性视角.贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版).2007.3-P3-9。
[13]陈继祥.产业集聚区与复杂性.上海财经大学出版社.2005:P34-37。
[14]陈文华.产业集聚区治理研究.江西财经大学学位论文.2006.5:P84-86。
[15]陈兴祖.培育和发展中介组织的对策研究.东方论坛.2001.4:P20-24。
[16]陈雪梅.中小企业集聚区理论与实践.经济科学出版社.2003.
[17]陈瑛.特大城市CBD系统的理论与实践--以重庆和西安为例.华东师范大学学位论文.2002:P20-22。
[18]谌飞龙,陈占葵.产业集聚区的区域创新网络系统分析.产业观察.P274-275。
[19]池仁勇等.产业集聚区发展阶段理论研究.软科学.2005.19:P3。
[20]仇保兴.小企业集聚区研究.复旦大学出版社.1999。
[21]崔蕴.上海市生产性服务业发展与城市功能提升研究.华东师范大学学位论文.2005.5.
[22]邓卫.我国房地产业发展的时弊与对策.清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版).1999:P75-76。
[23]范柏乃.我国地方政府信用缺失的实证调查.人大复印资料.公共行政.2005.4。
[24]盖文启,朱华晟.产业的柔性集聚及其区域竞争力.经济理论与经济管理.2001.10:P26-27。
[25]耿建泽.地域根植性对企业集聚区发展的影响.安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版).2007.1:P18-20。
[26]龚双红.国外产业集聚区理论综述.哈尔滨市委党校学报.2006.1:P43。
[27]古继宝,高杨.我国产业集聚区不经济现状分析与对策研究.产业观察.2004.1:P228。
[28]谷国锋.区域经济发展的动力系统研究.东北师范大学学位论文.2005.12:4.1.4P78。
[29]郭鉴.地方产业文化认知研究.城乡视点.2007.3:P86。
[30]郭艳.中国城市规模集聚经济效益研究.复旦大学学位论文.2004.5:2.1P8
[31]何骏.上海发展现代服务业的人才战略.上海企业.2006.3:P33。
[32]何骏.现代服务业集聚区促进上海现代服务业的加快发展问题.上海商学院学报.2007.9:P38-39。
[33]衡朝阳,魏景赋.分工与知识经济下的企业.现代经济探讨.2004.10:P61。
[34]衡朝阳.企业合作竞争研究.中央财经大学学报.2004.2:P55-57
[35]胡宝民.技术创新扩散系统演化特征与自组织演化过程.河北工业大学学报.1999.11:P7。
[36]胡大立,谌飞龙等.区域品牌机理与构建分析.产经论坛.2005.4:P31。
[37]胡丽华.产业集聚区动力要素及培育路径.宏观经济.2006.9。
[38]胡宇辰.产业集聚区的支持体系研究.江西财经大学学位论文.2004.10。
[39]霍丽,惠宁.制度优势与产业集聚区的形成.经济学家.2007.4:P54.
[40]吉亚辉,王雪娟.产业集聚区研究中几组主要概念的辨析.甘肃省经济管理干部学报.2006.5:P11。
[41]金青梅.地方政府在产业集聚区发展中的定位分析.农业经济.2007.2:P67。
[42]金学军.中国知识服务业发展分析.软科学.2002.3:P16。
[43]李超,朱祖平.由专业化分工看产业集聚的动因.管理科学文摘.P62。
[44]李大伟,王猛.分形理论及其在企业组织中的应用.石家庄经济学院学报.2004.2:P14-15。
[45]李红.知识密集型服务业集聚区研究述评.科学管理研究.2005.12:P87。
[46]李建军.硅谷产学创新系统及其集聚区效应.山东科技大学学报(社会科学版).2003.3。
[47]李剑力.从创业机会不断衍生与开发透视企业集聚区成长.经济师.2006.7。
[48]李振华.基于复杂性的企业协同竞争机制研究.天津大学学位论文.2005.6: P36。
[49]历无畏,王慧敏.世界产业服务化与发展上海现代服务业的战略思考.世界经济研究.2005.1:P58。
[50]梁琦.产业集聚论.商务印书馆.2000:P22。
[51]刘波.基于自组织模型的高技术产业组织政策研究.同济大学学位论文.2005.12:P114。
[52]刘恒江,陈继祥.国外产业集聚区政策研究综述.外国经济与管理.2004.11:P38-39。
[53]刘恒江.产业集聚区动力机制研究的最新动态.外国经济与管理.2004.1:P2-7。
[54]刘恒江.基于动力机制的我国产业集聚区发展研究.经济地理.2005.9:P608。
[55]刘建波.基于自组织理论的企业进化机制研究.哈尔滨工程大学学位论文.2005.06:2.4.5P40。
[56]刘军.社会网络分析导论.社会科学文献出版社.2004.
[57]刘林心.上海市现代服务业在经济增长中的作用和发展情况研究.复旦大学学位论文.2003。
[58]刘强.同济周边设计产业集聚区形成机制和价值研究.同济大学学报(社会科学版).2007.1:P61-64。
[59]刘芹等.基于集聚区文化的高科技产业竞争力的培育研究.中国科技论坛.2006.5:P48-50。
[60]刘筱,王铮等.政府在高技术产业集聚区中的作用--以深圳为例.科研管理.2006.7:P37。
[61]吕发.浦东开发开放:昨天、今天和明天.宏观经济.2000.4-P11。
[62]苗东升.系统科学精要(第二版).中国人民大学出版社.2006.6:P160。
[63]潘逢山,叶春明.论企业集聚区内部分工与协调.管理纵横.2007.4:P54-55。
[64]浦东新区发展和改革委员会统计调查所.陆家嘴功能区域投资与开发趋势分析.发展论坛.2006.7-P29。
[65]普利高津、斯唐热.从混沌到有序.曾庆宏、沈小峰译.上海译文出版社.1986:P235。
[66]綦伟琦.城市设计与自组织的契合.同济大学学位论文.2006.06-2.2P20。
[67]丘海雄,于永慧.嵌入性与根植性.广东社会科学.2007.1:P179。
[68]邱成利.制度创新与产业集聚的关系研究.中国软科学.2001.9:P100-102。
[69]沈洁.投资软件环境对提升区域经济竞争力的作用机制.安徽农业科学.2005.11:P2168。
[70]石良平.提升上海及浦东新区国际知名度和影响力的策略研究.上海市人民 政府发展研究中心研究报告2003.9:P20。
[71]宋方伟,高畅等.产业集聚区的核心要素演进分析.理论与方法.2003.10。
[72]王春宇.分工、专业化与产业集聚区研究.辽宁大学学位论文.2006.5:3.1.1P39-40。
[73]王缉慈.创新的空间:企业集聚区与区域发展.北京大学出版社.2005.11:P95。
[74]王炜.试析外部性、产业集聚区与区域经济发展.财会月刊.2006.12:P9。
[75]王晓玉.国外生产性服务业集聚研究述评.当代财经.2006.3:P94
[76]卫玲,邱德钧.现代产业集聚区理论的新进展及其述评.兰州大学学报(社会科学版).2007.3:P124。
[77]魏江,Boden M..知识密集型服务业与创新.科学出版社会.2004。
[78]吴彤.论协同学理论方法--自组织动力学方法及其应用.内蒙古社会科学.2000.11:P19。
[79]吴翔阳.产业自组织集聚区化及集聚区经济研究.中共中央学校出版社.2006.6:P59-64。
[80]项昺.同济现象--大学周边地区产业集聚现象研究.同济大学学位论文.2005.3:3.1P14。
[81]谢叙祎.上海经济增长的集聚效应研究.复旦大学学位论文.2006.4:2.1P8。
[82]熊爱华,汪波.基于产业集聚区的区域品牌形成研究.山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2007.2:P85-88。
[83]徐金发,余园园.基于产业集聚区生命周期理论的研究与探讨.技术经济.2006.10:P32-33。
[84]徐康宁.开放经济中的产业群集与竞争力.中国工业经济.2001.11。
[85]许国志.系统科学.上海科技教育出版社.2000.9:P154-156。
[86]杨宝良.外部经济与产业地理集聚:一个基本理论逻辑及对我国工业经济的实证研究.世界经济论坛.2003.6:P53-54。
[87]杨娟.我国中小企业的发展--柔性专业化.科技情报开发与经济.2007.4:P212。
[88]杨小凯,黄有光.专业化与经济组织.经济科学出版社.1999.
[89]杨亚琴、王丹.国际大都市现代服务业集聚区发展的比较研究-以纽约、伦敦、东京为例的分析.世界经济研究.2005.1:P61。
[90]杨亚琴.上海现代服务业集聚区发展的途径与机理-以陆家嘴金融贸易区、外高桥保税区、赤峰路一条街为例的分析.上海经济研究.2005.12:P59。
[91]姚为群.全球城市的经济成因.上海人民出版社.2003.8:P167-169。
[92]姚锡棠.浦东开发开放十年实践的理论回顾.社会科学.2000.5:P2。
[93]叶建亮.知识溢出与企业集聚区.经济科学.2001.3。
[94]叶向阳,叶生洪.混沌理论及其在经济系统中的应用.专题研究.2002.6:P153。
[95]于国安.创业机制与企业集聚区成长互动机制分析.经济问题.2006.2:P23。
[96]袁晓勐.城市系统的自组织理论研究.东北师范大学学位论文.2006.5:P104。
[97]臧新.产业集聚区产生原因的理论困惑和探索.产业论坛.2003.1:P189。
[98]张宏伟.产业集聚区研究的新进展.经济理论与经济管理.2004.4:69。
[99]张金成.论产业集聚区文化竞争力.学习月刊.2007.7:P14。
[100]张连业.资源型产业集聚区可持续发展研究.西北大学学位论文.2007.6:P73-74。
[101]张韬.区域产业集聚区效用评价与规划研究.北京交通大学学位论文.2006.2:P42。
[102]张毅.基于创新网络的地区产业集聚区发展研究.2004.4:P22。
[103]张永安,吉荣康.区域主导产业选择与培育模型.经济师.2006.5:P8-9。
[104]赵强等.产业集聚区创新优势分析及其启示.商业经济.2005.8。
[105]周新生.产业分析与产业策划方法及应用.经济管理出版社.2004.
[106]周振华.产业结构政策的选择基准:一个新的假说.维普资讯.1988.11:P26-27。
[107]朱晓青.借鉴经验,着力发展北京现代服务业核心产业群.北京行政学院学报.2005.6:P37。
[108]朱远方,朱廷柏.企业集聚区的内部分工研究.山东经济.2006.5:P47-48。
[109]庄晋财.企业集聚区地域根植性的理论演进及其政策含义.财经问题研究.2003.10:P20。
[110]邹国胜.集聚区文化与产业集聚区竞争力.企业文化.2006.6。
[111]A.J.Scott.New industrial spaces.London.1986.
[112]Anlexander.Office location and public policy.Methuen.1970.
[113]Beckmann,M.J..Economic growth in a central place system.Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth.Berlin Springer.1995.
[114]Belussi,Fiorenza.Policies for the development of knowledge-intensive local production system.Cambridge Journal of Economics.1999(23):P729-747.
[115]Best,Michael H..Cluster dynamics.The New Competitive Advantage:The Renewal of American Industry.Oxford University Press.2001.
[116]Browning H and J Singelman.The emergency of a service society:demographic and sociological aspects of the sectoral transformation in the labor force of the USA national technical information service.Springfield Virginia. 1975.
[117] Castells, M.. The informational city. Oxford: Blackwell. 1989.
[118] Charlie Karlsson. Agglomeration, economies of scale and dynamic specialization in central-place-system. JonKoping University, Sweden. 1999.8.
[119] D.Keeble, L. Nacham. Why do business service firms cluster. Working Paper, Cambridge. 2001
[120] Dainiels, P.W.. Services and the global system of cities in Dainels, P.W. Service industries in the world economy. Oxford:Blackwell.
[121] David. F.. Creating self-sustaining, high skill ecosystems. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 1999(1):P67-69.
[122] Enright, Michael J.. Survey of the characterization of regional clusters: initial results. University of Hong Kong. 2000.
[123] Francis E. Lindsay. Discerning intra-metropolitan patterns of producer service establishment location using geographic information systems. 2005 :P27.
[124] Francis E. Lindsay. Discerning intra-metropolitan patterns of producer service establishing location using geographic information systems. University of Maryland for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 2005.
[125] Fujita M., J.-F. Thisse. Economics of agglomeration, cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press. 2002.
[126] Fujita M., Krugman P.. The spatial economy, cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press. 1999.
[127] Giamarco Ottaviano, Jacques-Francois Thisse. Agglomeration and economic geography. 2003.
[128] Gordon, Mccann. Industrial clusters complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies. 2000(3):P513-532.
[129] Greenfield HI. Manpower and the growth of producer services, New York: Columbia, U, Press. 1966(2).
[130] Henry G Overman, Stephen Redding. The economic geography of trade, production and income: a survey of empirics. Working Paper, NBER. 2001.
[131] Hospers, G., Beugelsdijk, S.. Regional cluster policies: learning by comparing? Kyklos. 2002(3):P381-402.
[132] Howells, Green. Location, technology and industrial organization in UK services. Progress in Planning. 1986(2).
[133] Jay Kandampully. The dynamics of service clusters: A phenomenon for further study. Managing Service Quality. 2001(5).
[134] Jay Mitra. Building entrepreneurial clusters. Final dissemination workshop, University of Luton, United Kingdom. 2003.
[135] Jed Kolko. Agglomeration and co-agglomeration of services industries. Public Policy Institute of California. 2007.8.
[136] Ji-weon Choi, Kun-hyunck Ahn. Agglomeration-oriented behavior of new retail companies, analyzing the location of internet-based retailing companies in Korea. Seoul National University. 2004.
[137] Joel Kotkin, Fred Siegel. The remaking of city and country side in the new economy, Digital geography. Hudson Ins. 2000.
[138] Jorg Meyer-Stamer, Ulrich Harmes-Liedtke. How to promote clusters. www.mesopartner.com. 2005.
[139] Jorg Meyer-Stamer. Understanding the determinants of vibrant business development: the systemic competitiveness perspective, www.mesopartner.com. 2003.7.
[140] Jun Koo. Agglomeration and spillovers in a simultaneous framework. The Annals of Regional Science. 2005(38):P35-47.
[141] Jungyul Sohn. Spatial econometric modeling of urban spatial structure of Chicago and Seoul in the 1990s: agglomeration economies, information technology and commuting. Seoul National University. 2002.
[142] Keeble, Wilkinson, ed. High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe. Ashgate Adlershot. 2000(a):P1-20.
[143] Kolko, Jed. "The death of distance? The death of cities? Evidence from the geography of commercial internet usage", in The Internet Upheaval, eds. Ingo Vogelsang and Benjamin Compaine, Mit Press: 2000.
[144] Krugman P.. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy. 1991(99):P183-199.
[145] Krugman, P.. Geography and Trade(2nd Edition), Leuven University Press. 1992.
[146] Krugman,P.. Space: the final frontier. Journal of economic perspective. Berlin Springer. 1998(2):P161-175.
[147] Maillat, D.. From an industrial district to the innovative milieu: contribution to an analysis of territorial productive organizations. Recherches Economiques de Louvain. 1998(1):P111-129.
[148] Marshall, P.Damesick and P.wood. Understanding the location and role of producer service in the UK. Environment & Planning. 1987(19).
[149] Martin Bell, Michael Albu. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. Word Development. 1999(9):P1715 1734.
[150] Maurizio Mistri, Stefano Solari. Local self-organizing economic processes: industrial districts and liquidity preference. Paper of University of Padua.
[151] Michael J.. The globalization of competition and the localization of competitive advantage: Plicies toward regional clustering. London: Macmillan, 2001.
[152] Miller, P. et al. Business clusters in the UK - a first assessment, Bolume 1, Main Report. Department of Trade and Industry. 2001.
[153] Mills, E.S.. Sectoral clustering and metropolitan development, sources of metropolitan growth. Center for Urban Policy Research. 1992:P3-18.
[154] Moulaert, Gsllouj. The locational geography of advanced producer firms: the limits of economies of agglomeration. The Geography of services Frank Case. London. 1993:P91-106.
[155] Mulligan, GF. Agglomeration and central place theory: a review of the literature. International Regional Science Review. 1984(1):P1-42.
[156] Murat Iyigun. Clusters of invention, life cycle of technologies and endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2006(30):P687 719.
[157] Nachum, L., Keeble, D.. Neo-Marshallian nodes, global networks and firm competitiveness. The media cluster of central London, ESRC center for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper. 1999:P154.
[158] Naresh R P and Gary Cook. The benefits of industrial clustering insights from the financial services industry at three locations. Journal of Financial Services Marketing. 2003.
[159] Naresh R. Pandit, et.. Acomparison of clustering dynamics in the British broadcasting and financial services industries. Economics of Business, 2002(9): 195-224.
[160] Orjan Solvell, Goran Lindqvist, Christian Ketels. The cluster initiative greenbook. www.cluster-research.org. 2003.9.
[161] Porter Michael. Clusters and new economics of competition. Harvard business review. 1998(6):P77-90.
[162] Porter Michael. Location, competition and economic Development: local clusters in a global economy. Economic development quarterly. 2000(1):P15-34.
[163] Rabellotti R. Is there an "industrial district model"? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared. World Development. 1995(2):P29-41.
[164] Richardson, H.W. Economies and diseconomies of agglomeration. Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth. Berlin Springer. 1995.
[165] Rolf Stein, Producer services, transaction activities, and cities: Rethinking Occupational Categories in Economic Geography. European Planning Studies. 2002.6.
[166] Ron Martin, Peter Sunley. Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?. Journal of Economic Geography. 2003(3):P5-35.
[167] Rosenfeld, Stuart A.. Just clusters, economic development strategies that research more people and places. Acrrboro: Regional Technology Strategies, Inc. 2002.
[168] Ross Brown. Cluster dynamics in theory and pratice with application to Scotland. Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper. European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom. 2000:P1-58.
[169] Rui Baptista. Research round up: industrial clusters and technological innovation. Business Strategy Review. 1996(2).
[170] S.Illeris. Producer services: the key factor to economic development, Enterpreneurship and regional development. 1989(1).
[171] Sam Ock Park, Kee-Bom Nahm. Spatial structure and inter-firm networks of technical and information producer service in Seoul. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 1998.
[172] Sassen, S.. Cities in a World Economy. California: Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks. 1994.
[173] Sassen, Saskia. Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press. 1991.
[174] Saxenian, A.. Regional advantage: culture competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press. 1994.
[175] Scott, A.J.. Flexible production systems and regional development: the rise of new industrial spaces in North American and Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1988(12):P171-186.
[176] Scott, A.J.. From Silicon Valley to Hollywood: growth and development of the multimedia industrial in California in Braczyk, H.J., et al. eds Regional innovation. Theory, Culture and Society. 2000(17):P1-33.
[177] Shen, Q.. An application of GIS to the measurement of spatial autocorrelation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 1994(3):P167-191.
[178] Smith, Jr., R. Florida. Agglomeration and industrial: An econometric analysis of Japanese-affiliated manufacturing establishments in automotive-related industries. Journal of Urban Economics. 1994(36):P23-41.
[179] Staber, Udo. Spatial Proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: the case of knitwear firms in Baden-Wurttemberg. Regional studies. 2001(35):P329-341.
[180] Stoper. M., Walker R.. The capitalist imperative territory, technology and industrial growth. Sxford: Blackwell. 1989.
[181] Thomas Brenner, Niels Weigelt. The evolution of industrial clusters-simulating spatial dynamics. Advances in Complex System. 2001(1):P127-147.
[182] Wolter. The rise and fall of regional agglomerations structure. Internal Dynamics and change. Paper Presented at the DRU ID PHD Conference. 2004.
[183] Yoshiro Higano. Agglomeration diseconomies of traffic congestion and agglomeration economies of interaction in the information-oriented city. Journal of Regional Science. 1999(1):P21-49.