河南内乡与四川会理烤烟后期生长发育的分子特征研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本论文大田试验以河南内乡与四川会理大田生产的烤烟(Nicotiana tabacum L.)品种云烟85的上部烟叶为材料,从移栽后60 d开始取样,采集第18片叶同一部位分别:1,检测相关基因的表达量;2,检测化学成分和相关酶活性;3,取烟叶中间部位主脉两侧,用于组织切片的观察。以后每隔10 d取样一次。首先,本文研究了河南内乡与四川会理的烟草在移栽后60-100 d期间烤烟的化学成分及致香成分含量的差异,并分为碳代谢、氮代谢和次生代谢三种代谢相关的物质进行分析,通过分析与三种代谢相关的酶活性及相关基因表达的差异,从分子水平分析这些差异的原因。其次,本文研究了河南内乡与四川会理烟草烟叶中蔗糖和类胡萝卜素合成相关的关键基因(蔗糖磷酸合成酶、蔗糖合酶和番茄红素β-环化酶)的变化,以及这些基因与温度、光照和温度与光照交互作用之间的关系,为调控这些基因的表达奠定理论和技术基础。
     再者,本文建立了烤烟DNA甲基化水平的HPLC检测方法,并以确山烟叶生长期间主要的四个气象因子温度、日照、降水、湿度和烟叶DNA甲基化水平之间建立了Logistic方程的数学模型,研究烟草生长过程中气象因子与DNA甲基化之间的交互作用,从分子水平上探讨气象因子对烟叶生理生化的影响,为深入研究特色烟叶的形成与气象因子的关系提供依据。
     本论文通过相关的试验,得出的主要结论如下:
     1,河南内乡与四川会理烤烟的生长期不太一致,河南内乡的烟叶前期生长快,后期生长慢;会理的烟叶表现前期慢,后期生长较快。河南内乡与四川会理烟叶可溶性总糖、类胡萝卜素及其降解产物含量的差异较大。河南内乡与四川会理烟叶在移栽后60-100 d期间,烟叶的可溶性总糖的含量变化均为单峰曲线,在移栽后70 d达到高点,随后可溶性总糖的含量逐渐下降,到移栽后100 d时,烟叶中可溶性总糖的含量达到最低。烤后会理烟叶中可溶性总糖比内乡烟叶的要高1.5倍。
     2,在烟草移栽后60-80 d烟叶中蔗糖磷酸合成酶(SPS)的活性会理高于内乡烟叶,而到移栽90 d后,会理烟叶中SPS酶活性迅速降低,并且SPS酶活性低于内乡的。在烟草移栽后60-90 d烟叶中蔗糖合酶(SS)的活性会理低于内乡烟叶,而到移栽90 d后,内乡烟叶中SS酶活性降低的较快,并且会理SS酶活性高于内乡的。
     3,对烤烟叶圆片进行的温度和光照正交试验的结果表明,温度和光照处理能够下调或上调SPS和SS基因的表达,只有在适当的温度和光照条件下,才有利于SPS基因的表达。在较高温度和光照强度条件下,有利于SS基因的表达。极差的结果表明,三个因子对SPS和SS基因表达的影响作用的大小顺序一样,即(温度×光照强度)>光照强度=温度。Duncan’s测验比较结果表明:温度×光照强度分别对SPS和SS基因的表达影响较大,且达到差异显著水平(P<0.05)。
     4,SPS和SS基因的表达量和Northern杂交的结果表明,四川会理烟叶中SPS基因表达水平明显高于河南内乡烟叶。四川会理烟叶中SS基因的杂交带亮度稍高于河南内乡烟叶的条带亮度,表明四川会理烟叶中SS基因表达水平稍高于河南内乡烟叶。现蕾期四川会理烟叶SPS酶活性比河南内乡烟叶提高有利,而两地区烟叶SS酶活性的差异不大。四川会理烟叶的可溶性总糖的含量高于河南内乡的原因是:四川会理烟叶中SPS酶活性和SPSA基因的表达高于内乡烟叶,而四川会理烟叶中SS酶活性和SS基因的表达与河南内乡烟叶的差异不大,使得糖分在烟叶中积累。
     5,两地区烟叶中烟碱含量随着烟叶的成熟有逐渐增加的趋势,而烟叶中总氮和蛋白质的含量却随着烟叶的成熟逐渐下降。游离氨基酸的变化为,内乡烟叶在移栽后70 d达到高峰,随后逐渐下降。在移栽后60-100 d期间,NR酶活性和基因表现为逐渐下降,且会理烟叶中NR酶活性一直高于内乡烟叶;河南内乡与四川会理烟叶中GS基因的表达在此期间均表现逐渐下降,GS酶活性也表现为会理烟叶大于内乡;而河南内乡与四川会理烟叶中GDH基因的表达表现为逐渐升高的趋势,且四川会理烟叶中GDH基因的表达比河南内乡烟叶中该基因表达要高。
     6,在现蕾期四川会理烤烟上部叶中类胡萝卜素的含量显著高于河南内乡的,基因Lyc-β的半定量RT-PCR和Northern杂交的结果表明,四川会理烟叶中Lyc-β基因表达水平明显高于河南内乡烟叶。Lyc-β基因的表达受到温度和光照的调节,对Lyc-β基因的表达影响的顺序是,光照强度>温度>温度×光照强度,且三因素的三个水平之间没有显著差异(P<0.05)。较高光照的条件下,Lyc-β基因的表达是较低光照的1.60倍;温度为30℃时,Lyc-β基因的表达最高,温度在25℃时次之;温度在35℃时最小。在光照时间为2-6 h期间,Lyc-β基因随着光照时间的延长表达量增加,但光照处理超过8 h之后,Lyc-β基因随着光照时间的延长表达量下调。总之,光照和温度可能是通过调节lyc-β基因的表达造成不同生态区烟叶中类胡萝卜素差异的原因。
     7,气象因子与DNA甲基化之间Logistic模型的单因子效应分析表明,平均最高温度的升高对DNA甲基化水平的升高影响最大;总日照长度的延长也会提高烟叶DNA甲基化水平;平均相对湿度对DNA甲基化的影响不大;总降雨量的增加能够降低总DNA甲基化水平,虽然其系数绝对值较小,但总降雨量的数值较大,同样对DNA去甲基化水平的影响幅度也大。总之,平均最高温度、总日照时数、平均相对湿度与DNA甲基化水平正相关;总降雨量与DNA甲基化水平负相关。两因素交互效应分析表明,平均最高温度和平均相对湿度、平均最高温度和总日照时数之间对烟叶的DNA甲基化具有协同效应;总降雨量和平均最高温度、总降雨量和总日照时数、总降雨量和平均相对湿度之间对烟叶的DNA甲基化有拮抗作用;而平均相对湿度与总日照时数之间对烟叶的DNA甲基化水平没有明显的协同效应或拮抗作用。
This paper was designed with the top leaves (the 18th leaf) of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) between Henan and Sichuan for the materials. Sixty days after transplanting, we investigated the tobacco agronomic characters and collected the same position of the 18th leaves in order to detect chemical composition, related enzyme activity, related genes expression, and observations of tissue slice. We sampled after that every 10 days.
     Firstly, this paper discussed the differences in the three physicochemical properties: carbon metabolism, nitrogen metabolism and secondary metabolism of tobacco between Henan and Sichuan during 60-100 d after transplanting. Moreover, analyzed the differences of enzyme activity, genes expression related to the three metabolic, and analyzed the causes of the differences from molecular level. Secondly, this paper studied the differences on key genes (SPS, SS, lyc-β) related to sucrose and carotenoids synthetic of tobacco between Henan and Sichuan. This paper also studied the relation between these genes, temperature, and light to build a theoretical and technical basis to regulate these genes expression.
     In addition, this paper established Logistic model between tobacco DNA methylation levels and four meteorological factors (temperature, sunshine, rainfall, humidity) during the growth of Queshan tobacco, and researched the interact between meteorological factors during tobacco growth and DNA methylation, and explored meteorological factors’influence to tobacco physiology and biochemistry at the molecular level. In addition, this provides basis to further research the relation between the formation of characteristic leaf tobacco and meteorological factors. The main conclusions of this experiment were as follows:
     1. Total thickness of tobacco leaves both in Henan and Sichuan continuously increased after transplanting. The Neixiang tobacco growed fast in the early and slow in late. However, Huili’s growed slow at the earlier time and fast later. During 60-100 d after transplanting, both in Henan and Sichuan, soluble sugar content of tobacco presented single apex curve, 70 d after transplanting was the time that the peak value show, then 100 d after transplanting total soluble sugar content decreased to the lowest. Soluble sugar content of Huili tobacco was 1.5 times higher than Neixiang’s after cured.
     2. Sixty-eighty days after transplanting, SPS activity of tobacco in Huili is higher than that of tobacco in Neixiang, however, at 90 d after transplanting, SPS activity of tobacco in Huili decreased rapidly to lower than that in Neixiang. 60-90 d after transplanting, the SS activity of tobacco in Huili is lower than that of Neixiang, and the SS activity in Neixiang decreased rapidly to lower than that of Huili at 90 d after transplanting. Between 60-100 d after transplanting, the activity of sucrose invertase in Huili is higher than Neixiang. During the period 60-100 d after tobacco transplanting, SPS expression of tobacco in Sichuan showed a gradual decline but the level is higher than that in Henan. During the same period, SS expression of tobacco in Sichuan is biased single peak changes, which at the 90 d reached a peak. The genes expression of tobacco had no significant difference in Henan and Sichuan.
     3. The leaf discs for temperature and light orthogonal experiment results in laboratory showed that the temperature and light treatment could decrease or raise the SPS and SS genes expression: only a proper temperature and light condition was conducive to the SPS expression. High temperature and light intensity conditions will be helpful for SS gene expression. Influence of the three factors on SPS and SS genes expression is in the order that (temperature×light intensity)> light intensity = temperature. Duncan's test comparison results showed that the condition that the temperature interact light intensity achieves great influence on SPS and SS genes expression, which achieves significant levels (P < 0.05).
     4. SPS gene expression and Northern blot results showed that SPS gene expression levels of the tobacco in Sichuan were significantly higher than that of Henan. The result that SS gene hybridization bands brightness of Sichuan Tobacco was slightly higher than that of Henan revealed that SS gene expression in Sichuan tobacco leaves was slightly higher than that in Henan. In budding stage, SPS activity in Huili, Sichuan tobacco leaves is higher than that in Henan, however, SS activity in both regions had no much difference. In short, light and temperature may regulate the expression of lyc-βgene in tobacco, and cause the reasons for carotenoids contents in different ecological areas. Total soluble sugar content of Sichuan Huili tobacco was higher than in Henan Neixiang. The reason lies in the fact that SPS activity and gene expression of Sichuan Huili tobacco was higher than Hernan. However, SS activity and gene expression of tobacco were little difference between Sichuan and Henan.
     5. As tobacco was mature, nicotine content in two areas’tobacco both showed an increasing and content of total nitrogen and protein was decreasing. Variation of free amino acids was that it reached a peak on 70 d after transplanting, and then decreased gradually. During the periods 60-100 d after transplanting, NR activity and gene expression gradually decreased, and Huili's always had higher levels than Neixiang's. During the same period, GS gene expression of tobacco both Huili and Neixiang showed a gradual decline, however, Huili's was higher than Neixiang's. GDH gene expression in tobacco of the two areas showed a gradual increase tendency, moreover, Huili's was higher than Neixiang's. 6. At the budding age, in the cured upper leaves, the content of carotenoids in Sichuan tobacco was significantly higher than that in Henan. Results of semi-quantitative RT-PCR of Lyc-βgene and Northern blot show that the Lyc-βgene expression of Sichuan tobacco was significantly higher than Henan tobacco. Expression of Lyc-βgene was regulated by temperature and light and the influence effect is in the order that the light intensity> Temperature> Temperature×light intensity, furthermore, levels among the three factors had no significant difference (P < 0.05). Expression of Lyc-βgene under high light conditions is 1.60 times higher than that in low light. At the temperature of 30℃, its expression reaches the highest, followed by 25℃, the last 35℃. In the range of light time from 2 to 6 h, the expression extension of the gene increased with the extend of the light time, but would reduce when the light time exceeded 8 h.
     7. Single-factor effects analysis of Logistic model between meteorological factors and DNA methylation showed that the rise of the average maximum temperature would cause the greatest effect on DNA methylation increase. The extended total sunshine would cause the extension of DNA methylation in tobacco. DNA methylation relies little on mean relative humidity. The increase of total rainfall could reduce the total level of DNA methylation. Although the absolute value of the coefficient was relatively smaller, the value of total rainfall was large enough, which would also get great influence to DNA Methylation. Interaction analysis of two-factor showed that the average maximum temperature and average relative humidity, mean maximum temperature and total sunshine hours would cause a synergistic effect on tobacco DNA methylation; meanwhile, the total rainfall and average maximum temperature, total precipitation and total sunshine Hours, the total rainfall and average relative humidity would lead to antagonism to the DNA methylation. The mean relative humidity and total sunshine hours showed no apparent synergistic effect or antagonistic effect on the level of DNA methylation.
引文
Andersen R, Kasperbauer M, Burton H(1985). Shade during growth: effects on chemical composition and leaf color of air-cured burley tobacco. Agronomy journal, 77 543-546
    Baxter C, Foyer C, Turner J, Rolfe S, Quick W(2003). Elevated sucrose-phosphate synthase activity in transgenic tobacco sustains photosynthesis in older leaves and alters development. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54 (389): 1813
    Baxter CJ, Foyer CH, Turner J, Rolfe SA, Quick WP(2003). Elevated sucrose-phosphate synthase activity in transgenic tobacco sustains photosynthesis in older leaves and alters development. J. Exp. Bot., 54 (389): 1813-1820
    Becker TW, Carrayol E, Hirel B(2000). Glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase isoforms in maize leaves: localization, relative proportion and their role in ammonium assimilation or nitrogen transport. Planta, 211 (6): 800-806
    Bernard S, M?ller A, Dionisio G, Kichey T, Jahn T, Dubois F, Baudo M, Lopes M, Tercé-Laforgue T, Foyer C, Parry M, Forde B, Araus J, Hirel B, Schjoerring J, Habash D(2008). Gene expression, cellular localisation and function of glutamine synthetase isozymes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant molecular biology, 67 (1): 89-105
    Burkle L, Hibberd J, Quick W, Kuhn C, Hirner B, Frommer W(1998). The H+-sucrose cotransporter NtSUT1 is essential for sugar export from tobacco leaves. Plant Physiology, 118 (1): 59
    Cardini C, Leloir LF, Chiriboga J(1955). The biosynthesis of sucrose. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 214 (1): 149-155
    Chen L, Huang B(1970). Effects of light intensity and duration on relationships among leaf area, fresh weight, and dry weight of tobacco leaves. Tobacco Science, 14 58-62
    Chen S, Hajirezaei M, Peisker M, Tschiersch H, Sonnewald U, B?rnke F(2005). Decreased sucrose-6-phosphate phosphatase level in transgenic tobacco inhibits photosynthesis, alters carbohydrate partitioning, and reduces growth. Planta, 221 (4): 479-492
    Chinnusamy V, Zhu JK(2009). Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants. Current opinion in plant biology, 12 (2): 133-139
    Chiou T, Bush D(1998). Sucrose is a signal molecule in assimilate partitioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95 (8): 4784-4788
    Chiou T, Bush D(1998). Sucrose is a signal molecule in assimilate partitioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95 (8): 4784
    Cunningham J, Pogson B, Sun Z, McDonald K, DellaPenna D, Gantt E(1996). Functional analysis of the beta and epsilon lycopene cyclase enzymes of Arabidopsis reveals a mechanism for control of cyclic carotenoid formation. Plant Cell, 8 (9): 1613-1626
    Cunningham J, Gantt E(1998). Genes and enzymes of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 49 (1): 557-583
    Davis D(1976). Waxes and lipids in leaf and their relationship to smoking quality and aroma. Rec Adv Tob Sci, 2 80-106
    Davis L, Nielsen MT (1999). Tobacco: production, chemistry and technology. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd,
    Devitt L, Fanning K, Dietzgen R, Holton T(2010). Isolation and functional characterization of a lycopene β-cyclase gene that controls fruit colour of papaya (Carica papaya L.). J Exp Bot., 61 (1): 33-39
    Dharmapuri S, Rosati C, Pallara P, Aquilani R, Bouvier F, Camara B, Giuliano G(2002). Metabolic engineering of xanthophyll content in tomato fruits. FEBS Lett, 519 (1): 30-34
    Farrar J(1996). Sinks-integral parts of a whole plant. Journal of Experimental Botany, 47 1273-1279
    Ferrie BJ, Beaudoin N, Burkhart W, Bowsher CG, Rothstein SJ(1994). The cloning of two tomato lipoxygenase genes and their differential expression during fruit ripening. Plant Physiology, 106 (1): 109-118
    Giuliano G, Bartley G, Scolnik P(1993). Regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis during tomato development. The Plant Cell Online, 5 (4): 379-387
    Granot G, Sikron-Persi N, Gaspan O, Florentin A, Talwara S, Paul L, Morgenstern Y, Granot Y, Grafi G(2009). Histone modifications associated with drought tolerance in the desert plant Zygophyllum dumosum Boiss. Planta, 231 (1): 27-34
    Griffiths A, Barry C, Alpuche-Solis AG, Grierson D(1999). Ethylene and developmental signals regulate expression of lipoxygenase genes during tomato fruit ripening. Journal of Experimental Botany, 50 (335): 793-798
    Hopkins H, Specht A, Hendricks S(1950). Growth and nutrient accumulation as controlled by oxygen supply to plant roots. Plant Physiol., 25 (2): 193-209
    Imam E, Kushwaha S, Singh A(2009). Evaluation of suitable tiger habitat in Chandoli National Park, India, using multiple logistic regression. Ecological Modelling, 220 (24): 3621-3629
    Isaacson T, Ronen G, Zamir D, Hirschberg J(2002). Cloning of tangerine from tomato reveals a carotenoid isomerase essential for the production of beta-carotene and xanthophylls in plants. Plant Cell, 14 (2): 333-342
    Islam MS, Matsui T, Yoshida Y(1996). Carbohydrate content and the activities of sucrose synthase, sucrose phosphate synthase and acid invertase in different tomato cultivars during fruit development. Scientia Horticulturae, 65 (2): 125-136
    Islam SM, Matsui T, Yoshida Y(1996). Carbohydrate content and the activities of sucrose synthase, sucrose phosphate synthase and acid invertase in different tomato cultivars during fruit development. Scientia Horticulturae, 65 (2-3): 125-136
    Koch K(1996). Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 47 (1): 509-540
    Krapp A, Stitt M(1995). An evaluation of direct and indirect mechanisms for the "sink-regulation" of photosynthesis in spinach: changes in gas exchange, carbohydrates, metabolites, enzyme activities and steady-state transcript levels after cold-girdling source leaves. Planta, 195 (3): 313-323
    Lalonde S, Boles E, Hellmann H, Barker L, Patrick J, Frommer W, Ward J(1999). The dual function of sugar carriers: transport and sugar sensing. The Plant Cell Online, 11 (4): 707
    Leffingwell J, Leffingwell D(1988). Chemical and sensory aspects of tobacco flavor. Rec Adv Tob Sci, 14 169-218
    Lin C, Kao C(1996). Disturbed ammonium assimilation is associated with growth inhibition of roots in rice seedlings caused by NaCl. Plant Growth Regulation, 18 (3): 233-238
    Liu R, Xu S, Li J, Hu Y, Lin Z(2006). Expression profile of a PAL gene from Astragalus membranaceus var. Mongholicus and its crucial role in flux into flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell Reports, 25 (7): 705-710
    Lurie S, Handros A, Fallik E, Shapira R(1996). Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit gene expression at high temperature (effects on tomato fruit ripening). Plant Physiology, 110 (4): 1207-1214
    Marsh HV, Havir EA, Hanson KR(1968). L-Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase. III. Properties of the enzyme from maize seedlings. Biochemistry, 7 (5): 1915-1918
    Martens M, Dalen G, Russwurm HJ (1987). Flavour science and technology. New York, Wiley and Sons Chichester etc., 101-106
    Masclaux-Daubresse C, Valadier M, Carrayol E, Reisdorf-Cren M, Hirel B(2002). Diurnal changes in the expressionof glutamate dehydrogenase and nitrate reductase are involved in the C/N balance of tobacco source leaves. Plant Cell and Environment, 25 (11): 1451-1462
    Masclaux-Daubresse C, Carrayol E, Valadier M-H(2005). The two nitrogen mobilisation- and senescence-associated GS1 and GDH genes are controlled by C and N metabolites. Planta, 221 (4): 580-588
    Masclaux D, Carrayol E, Valadier M(2005). The two nitrogen mobilisation- and senescence-associated GS1 and GDH genes are controlled by C and N metabolites. Planta, 221 (4): 580-588
    Miflin B(2002). Carbon and Nitrogen Relationships and Signalling. The role of glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase in nitrogen assimilation and possibilities for improvement in the nitrogen utilization of crops. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53 (370): 979-987
    Pageau K, Reisdorf-Cren M, Morot-Gaudry J, Masclaux-Daubresse C(2006). The two senescence-related markers, GS1 (cytosolic glutamine synthetase) and GDH (glutamate dehydrogenase), involved in nitrogen mobilization, are differentially regulated during pathogen attack and by stress hormones and reactive oxygen species in Nicotiana tabacum L. leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57 (3): 547
    Park H, Kreunen S, Cuttriss A, DellaPenna D, Pogson B(2002). Identification of the carotenoid isomerase provides insight into carotenoid biosynthesis, prolamellar body formation, and photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell, 14 (2): 321-332
    Razin A, Riggs A(1980). DNA methylation and gene function. Science, 210 (4470): 604-610
    Rideout J, Raper J, Miner G(1992). Changes in ratio of soluble sugars and free amino nitrogen in the apical meristem during floral transition of tobacco. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 153 (1): 78-88
    Roberts DL, Rohde WA(1972). Isolation and identification of flavor components of burley tobacco. Tobacco Science, 16 107-112
    Sanchez-Amat A, Solano F(1997). A pluripotent polyphenol oxidase from the melanogenic marine Alteromonas sp shares catalytic capabilities of tyrosinases and laccases. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 240 (3): 787-792
    Sangwan R, Mishra S, Kumar S(1998). Direct fluorometry of phase-extracted tryptamine-based fast quantitative assay of L-tryptophan decarboxylase from Catharanthus roseus leaf. Analytical Biochemistry, 255 (1): 39-46
    Sch?fer WE, Rohwer JM, Botha FC(2005). Partial purification and characterisation of sucrose synthase in sugarcane. Journal of plant physiology, 162 (1): 11-20
    Sheen J(1990). Metabolic repression of transcription in higher plants. The Plant Cell, 2 (10): 1027-1038 Skelton R, Yu Q, Srinivasan R, Manshardt R, Moore P, Ming R(2006). Tissue differential expression of lycopeneβ-cyclase gene in papaya. Cell research, 16 (8): 731-739
    Skopelitis D, Paranychianakis N, Kouvarakis A, Spyros A, Stephanou E, Roubelakis-Angelakis K(2007). The isoenzyme 7 of tobacco NAD (H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase exhibits high deaminating and low aminating activities in vivo. Plant Physiology, 145 (4): 1726-1734
    Stitt M, Quick WP(1989). Photosynthetic carbon partitioning: its regulation and possibilities for manipulation. Physiologia Plantarum, 77 (4): 633-641
    Tao J, Zhang S, An X, Zhao Z(2003). Effects of light on carotenoid biosynthesis and color formation of citrus fruit peel. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14 (11): 1833-1836 (in Chinese with English abstract)
    Teixeira FK, Colot V(2009). Gene body DNA methylation in plants: a means to an end or an end to a means? . The EMBO Journal, 28 997-998
    Tso TC (1972). Physiology and biochemistry of tobacco plants. Stroudsburg, Pa., USA, , Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc.,
    Turano F, Dashner R, Upadhyaya A, Caldwell C(1996). Purification of mitochondrial glutamate dehydrogenase from dark-grown soybean seedlings. Plant Physiology, 112 (3): 1357
    Weeks W(1985). Chemistry of tobacco constituents influencing flavor and aroma. Rec Adv Tob Sci, 11 (2):175-200
    Weybrew J(1983). Factors affecting the usability of flue-cured tobacco. Rec. Adv To. Sc, 9 154
    Weybrew J, Wan Ismail W, Long R(1983). The cultural management of flue-cured tobacco quality. Tobacco International, 10 (6): 82-87
    Whetten RW, Sederoff RR(1992). Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from loblolly pine: purification of the enzyme and isolation of complementary DNA clones. Plant Physiology, 98 (1): 380-386
    White-Ziegler C, Hill M, Braaten B, van der Woude M, Low D(2002). Thermoregulation of Escherichia coli pap transcription: H-NS is a temperature-dependent DNA methylation blocking factor. Molecular Microbiology, 28 (6): 1121-1137
    Ye X, Al-Babili S, Kloti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, Beyer P, Potrykus I(2000). Engineering the provitamin A (β-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science, 287 (1): 303-305
    Yuan H, Gong C (2001). Studies on amylase and degradation of starch and pigment of tobacco leaf during process of curing, CORESTA: 36-39
    Zhang CF, Peng SB, Peng XX(1997). Response of glutamate synthase informs to nitrogen sucrose in rice roots. Plant Sci, 125 163-167
    凡时财,张学工(2009). DNA甲基化的生物信息学研究进展.生物化学与生物物理进展, 36 (2): 143-150
    于建军,庞天河,任晓红,李琳,代慧娟,李爱军(2006).烤烟中性致香物质与评吸结果关系研究.河南农业大学学报, 40 (4): 346-349
    于建军,邵惠芳,刘艳芳,庞天河,陈红丽,代惠娟,马新明(2009).四川凉山烤烟叶片巨豆三烯酮含量与生态因子的关系.生态学报, 29 (4): 1668-1674
    于建军,董高峰,杨寒文,马海燕(2009).四川会理烟区烤烟矿质元素含量与评吸结果的关系分析.中国烟草学报, 15 (6): 36-40
    于建军,董高峰,毕庆文,汪健,吴俊龙,钱宇(2009).四川会理烟区生态因素与烟叶质量特点分析.四川农业大学学报, 27 ((1)): 83-88
    于建军,王改丽,叶贤文,闫鼎,卫盼盼,封俊(2010).植烟地区海拔高度对烟叶品质的影响研究进展.湖南农业科学, (1): 38-41
    牛佩兰,石屹(1996).烟草基因型间钾效率差异研究初报.烟草科技, (1): 33-35
    王士强,胡银岗,佘奎军,周琳璘,孟凡磊(2007).小麦抗旱相关农艺性状和生理生化性状的灰色关联度分析.中国农业科学, 40 (11): 2452-2459
    王永章,张大鹏(2001).‘红富士’苹果果实蔗糖代谢与酸性转化酶和蔗糖合酶关系的研究.园艺学报, 28 (003): 259-261
    王成才,李现道,梁洪波,杨旭亮,赵金升,李光业,孟庆宏,刘俊平,胡强(2005).土壤与烟叶化学成分及内在品质调查分析.中国烟草科学, (3): 27-30
    王岩,刘国顺(2006).不同种类有机肥对烤烟生长及其品质的影响.河南农业科学, (2): 81-84
    王能如,李章海,王东胜,徐增汉,周慧玲,朱显灵(2009).我国烤烟主体香味成分研究初报.中国烟草科学, 30 (3): 1-6
    王彪,李天福(2005).气象因子与烟叶化学成分关联度分析.云南农业大学学报, 20 (5): 742-745
    王瑞新(2003).烟草化学.北京,中国农业出版社, 42-43
    王树生(1990).烟叶色素与化学成分及评吸结果的相关性.中国烟草科学, 4 21-24
    王树声,王宝华,李雪震,李新峰(2002).烤烟烟叶中游离氨基酸与内在质量关系的研究.中国烟草科学, 23 (4): 4-7
    史宏志,刘国顺(1998).烟草香味学.北京,中国农业出版社
    史宏志,韩锦峰(1998).单色蓝光和红光对烟苗叶片生长和碳氮代谢的影响.河南农业大学学报, 32 (003): 258-262
    史宏志,韩锦峰,官春云,远彤(1999).红光和蓝光对烟叶生长,碳氮代谢和品质的影响.作物学报, 25 (2):215-220
    史宏志,张建勋(2004).烟草生物碱.北京,北京农业出版社, 7-9
    史宏志,邸慧慧,赵晓丹,刘国顺,马永建,王维超,段杰(2009).豫中烤烟烟碱和总氮含量与中性香气成分含量的关系.作物学报, 35 (7): 1299-1305
    左天觉(1993).烟草的生产、生理和生物化学.上海,上海远东出版社, 386-396
    左天觉(1993).烟草的生产,生理和生物化学.上海,上海远东出版社,
    田峰,陈前锋,单海涛,王剑辉,文俊,袁非菲,罗朝觉(2010).移栽期对烤烟农艺性状及经济性状与上部烟叶可用性的影响.作物研究, 24 (3): 184-186
    白宝璋,赵景阳,田文勋,谭桂茹,郭志尧(1995).烟草旺长期叶片游离氨基酸的含量.中国烟草, 16 (1): 9-10
    石延霞,于洋,傅俊范,李宝聚(2008).病原菌诱导后黄瓜叶片中脂氧合酶活性与茉莉酸积累的关系.植物保护学报, 35 (6): 486-490
    朱大恒,陈锐,陈再根,周御风,韩锦峰,金保锋,宋润斌,于建(2001).烤烟自然醇化与人工发酵过程中微生物变化及其与酶活性关系的研究.中国烟草学报, 7 (2): 26-30
    朱长甫,陈星,王英典(2004).植物类胡萝卜素生物合成及其相关基因在基因工程中的应用.植物生理与分子生物学学报, 30 (6): 609-618
    何金牛,禹宗汉,王瑛(1998).移栽期对烤烟生长及产量,质量的影响初报.河南农业大学学报, 32 (2): 11-15
    余叔文,汤章城(1998).植物生理与分子生物学.北京,科学出版社,
    李天福,王彪,杨焕文,王树会(2006).气象因子与烟叶化学成分及香吃味间的典型相关分析.中国烟草学报, 12 (1): 23-26
    李永智,寸锦芬,李元贵,李自相,张自军,郭大仰,张银军,刘敬业,周金仙(2004).烤烟不同品种,地点游离氨基酸含量变化初探.云南农业大学学报, 19 (5): 565-568
    李志,史宏志,刘国顺,王道支,祖朝龙,王大洲(2010).土壤质地对皖南烤后烟叶中性香气成分含量及焦甜香风格的影响.中国烟草学报, 16 (2): 6-10
    李肖蕖,王建设,张根发(2008).植物蔗糖转化酶及其基因表达调控研究进展.园艺学报, 35 (9): 1384-1392
    李承荣,王政(2006).烟叶基地建设有关问题的探讨.广西烟草学会2005年度学术年会论文集,
    李建伟,郑少清,石俊雄,蔡刘体,李卫红(2003).氮素形态对烤烟品质的影响.贵州农业科学, 31 (006): 3-5
    李洪勋,唐远驹(2008).毕节烟叶气象因子的灰色关联分析.现代农业科技, (3): 136-138
    李海平,朱列书,黄魏魏,唐应勇,詹莜国,曹明锋,符昌武,何军(2008).不同植烟密度对填充型烟叶烟株农艺性状和产量的影响.湖南农业科学, (3): 34-35,38
    李梅兰,曾广文,朱祝军(2003).冬性与春性白菜品种花芽分化前后生理代谢的比较.中国农业科学, 36 (11): 1414-1418
    李雪震,张希杰,李念胜,王树声,梁洪波(1988).烤烟烟叶色素与烟叶品质的关系.中国烟草, 2 23-27
    李琦(1999).厄尔尼诺与凤阳县气候及烤烟单产和上中等烟比重的关系的研究.安徽农业科学, 27 (6): 567-571
    李姗姗,刘国顺,张玉丰(2008).施氯量对凉山烤烟产量和品质的影响.河南农业大学学报, 42 (001): 14-17
    杜咏梅,郭承芳,张怀宝,商耀,王晓玲,邱军,艾红丽(2000).水溶性糖,烟碱,总氮含量与烤烟吃味品质的关系研究.中国烟草科学, 21 (1): 7-10
    汪耀富,高华军,刘国顺,于建军,韩富根(2005).不同基因型烤烟叶片致香物质含量的对比分析.中国农学通报, 21 (5): 117-120
    汪耀富,高华军,刘国顺,于建军,韩富根(2006).氮,磷,钾肥配施对烤烟化学成分和致香物质含量的影响.植物营养与肥料学报, 12 (1): 76-81
    肖金香,刘正和,王燕,何宽信,李立新(2003).气候生态因素对烤烟产量与品质的影响及植烟措施研究. 中国农业生态学报, 11 (4): 158-160
    邢小军,吴晓彦(2007).四川凉山州植烟土壤养分丰缺刍议.中国烟草科学, 28 (002): 49-51
    周世朗,周文迅(2003).烤烟高产优质栽培及烘烤技术.四川农业科技, (10): 23-23
    周正红,高孔荣(1997).烟草中化学成分对卷烟色香味品质的影响及其研究进展.烟草科技, (2): 22-25
    周焱,沈宏,李志涛,江朝静,莫天黔,鲍利春(2002).环切对烤烟上部叶烟碱含量及品质的影响.西南农业大学学报, 24 (2): 131-134
    周冀衡,朱小平,王彦亭(1996).烟草生理与生物化学.合肥,中国科技大学出版社
    周冀衡,汪邓民(1998).不同烤烟品种对钾素响应能力的研究.土壤, 30 (5): 247-250
    周冀衡,杨虹琦,林桂华,杨述元(2004).不同烤烟产区烟叶中主要挥发性香气物质的研究.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 30 (1): 20-23
    周冀衡,张建平(2008).构建中式卷烟优质特色烟叶原料保障体系是新形势下中国烟草的战略选择.中国烟草学报, (1): 68-70,77
    招启柏,汤一卒,王广志(2005).烤烟烟碱合成及农艺调节效应研究进展.中国烟草科学, (4): 19-22
    招启柏,王广志,王宏武,汤一卒(2006).烤烟烟碱含量与其他化学成分的相关关系及其阈值的研究.中国烟草学报, 12 (2): 26-28
    林彩丽,杨铁钊,杨述元,李伟(2003).不同基因型烟草生长过程中主要化学成分的变化.烟草科技, (1): 30-34
    武雪萍,刘国顺,彭华伟,朱凯,杨超(2003).有机,无机肥不同配比对烤烟中有机酸的影响.华北农学报, 18 (1): 97-99
    武雪萍,钟秀明,秦艳青,刘国顺,杨超,王恒旭(2006).不同种类饼肥与化肥配施对烟叶香气质量的影响.中国农业科学, 39 (6): 1196-1201
    邵惠芳,焦桂珍,刘金霞(2007).烤烟烟叶淀粉含量的影响因素研究.安徽农业科学, 35 (13): 3884-3886
    柯油松,吴文斌(2003).浅析南雄国际型优质烟叶开发.安徽农业科学, 31 (2): 217-218
    胡雪琼,李天福(2006).云南省烤烟内在品质类型与气象条件的关系分析.云南农业科技, (5): 17-18
    胡国松,赵元宽,曹志洪,赵兴,赵振山,陈江华,张新,周秀如,李仲林(1997).我国主要产烟省烤烟元素组成和化学品质评价.中国烟草学报, 3 (3): 36-44
    胡荣海(2007).云南烟草栽培学.北京,科学出版社, 38-39
    唐莉娜,熊德中(2002).土壤酸度的调节对烤烟根系生长与烟叶化学成分含量的影响.中国生态农业学报, 10 (4): 65-67
    唐远驹(贵州省烟草种植区划报告.
    唐远驹(2004).试论特色烟叶的形成和开发.中国烟草科学, 25 (01): 10-13
    唐远驹(2008).烟叶风格特色的定位.中国烟草科学, 29 (03): 1-5
    唐远驹(2010).特色烟叶区域划分中的几个问题.中国烟草科学, 31 (2): 1-4,9
    徐天养,赵正雄,李忠环,陈荣平,许龙,王胱霖,金霞(2009).耕作深度对烤烟生长、养分吸收及产量、质量的影响.作物学报, 35 (7): 1364-1368
    徐昌杰,张上隆(2000).植物类胡萝卜素的生物合成及其调控.植物生理学通讯, 36 (1): 64-70
    徐茜,周泽启,巫常标(2003).烟苗不同移栽期对烤烟生长,产量和质量的影响.福建热作科技, 28 (3): 8-10
    徐晓燕,孙五三,李章海(2001).烟碱的生物合成及控制烟碱形成的相关因素.安徽农业科学, 29 (5): 663-664,666
    秦松,刘大翠,刘静,刘洪斌,王正银(2007).土壤肥力对烟叶化学成份及品质的影响.土壤通报, 38 (5): 901-905
    郝敬虹,李天来,孟思达,赵博,孙利萍(2009).夜间低温对薄皮甜瓜果实糖积累及代谢相关酶活性的影响.中国农业科学, 42 (10): 3592-3599
    商洁,喻会平(2003).烤烟地膜覆盖栽培不同揭膜时间对产量及质量的影响.种子, (1): 64-65
    戚元成,张世敏,王丽萍,王明道,张慧(2004).谷胱甘肽转移酶基因过量表达能加速盐胁迫下转基因拟南芥的生长.植物生理与分子生物学学报, 30 (5): 517-522
    戚元成,马雷,王菲菲,刘卫群(2009).烟草打顶对腐胺N-甲基转移酶基因表达的影响.植物生理学通讯, 45 (7): 684-686
    符云鹏,刘国顺,高致明(1996).土壤水分对香料烟发育及某些生理生化特性的影响.河南农业大学学报, 30 (2): 154-159
    郭予琦(2004).芝麻饼肥,秸秆还田与化肥配施条件下烤烟生长及品质表现.河南农业科学, (3): 32-34, 38
    郭兆奎,万秀清,魏继承,于艳华,于金涛(1999).适于PCR分析的烤后烟叶DNA提取方法的研究. 中国烟草科学, (4): 5-7
    郭金妹,李天来,姜晶,李媛,赵虹志(2007).昼间亚高温下番茄叶中糖含量与蔗糖代谢相关酶的活性日变化.植物生理学通讯, 43 (2): 231-234
    郭培国,陈建军(1996).不同施氮水平条件下烤烟对氮素的利用研究.热带亚热带土壤科学, 5 (003): 145-148
    程昌新,卢秀萍,许自威,黄平俊,张婷(2005).基因型和生态因素对烟草香气物质含量的影响.中国农学通报, 21 (11): 137-139
    程亮,毕庆文,许自成,汪健,王豹祥,王得强(2009).湖北保康不同海拔高度生态因素对烟叶品质的影响.郑州轻工业学院学报:自然科学版, 24 (2): 15-20
    舒海燕,杨铁钊,丁永乐,邵惠芳,陈浩,郭瑞(2002).环剥对烤烟叶片钾含量影响的研究初报.河南农业科学, (7): 15-17
    舒海燕,常胜合,杨铁钊(2005).烟株打顶对钾素含量的影响.河南农业科学, (1): 25-26
    廖要明,周小蓉(2003).气候变化对我国烟草生产及其适生地选择的影响研究.中国生态农业学报, 11 (4): 137-138
    熊德中,刘淑欣,李春英,曾文龙(1994).降雨对烤烟吸收养分及氮磷钾配施的效应.福建农业大学学报, 23 (3): 315-318
    潘雅姣,傅彬英,王迪,朱苓华,黎志康(2009).水稻干旱胁迫诱导DNA甲基化时空变化特征分析.中国农业科学, 42 (9): 3009-3018
    蔡涛,马丽征,张春红,胡韶华,祁建刚,李占芳(2008).卢氏烤烟移栽期与气象条件的关系分析.气象与环境科学, 31 (B09): 181-182
    戴冕(1985).光环境对烟草叶片的若干生理生态影响.中国烟草, (1): 5-8
    戴冕(1997).戴冕烟草科技论文选集.广州,广东科技出版社,16
    戴冕(2000).我国主产烟区若干气象因素与烟叶化学成分关系的研究.中国烟草学报, 6 (1): 27-34
    严小龙,张福锁(1997).植物营养遗传学.北京,中国农业出版社, 78-106
    乔新荣,杨兴有,刘国顺,云菲,郭桥燕,王芳,靳冬梅(2008).弱光胁迫对烤烟化学成分及中性挥发性致香物质的影响.烟草科技, (9): 56-58
    储大燕(2009).烟草中类胡萝卜素及其异构体的分析研究.分析化学.合肥,中国科学技术大学.硕士: 75
    刘思峰,党耀国,方志耕(2004).灰色系统理论及其应用.北京,科学出版社,
    刘添毅,李春英,熊德中,曾文龙,谢凤标(2000).烤烟有机肥与化肥配合施用效应的探讨.中国烟草科学, 21 (4): 23-26
    刘敬业,李天福,冉定邦(1994).成熟度,施肥量,留叶数与烟叶香吃味的关系.昆明师范专科学校学报: 自然科学版, 9 (1): 104-105
    刘德育,孙广玉,蔡淑燕(2005).移栽期对烤烟叶片组织结构的影响.中国农学通报, 21 (12): 187-189
    刘丽,甘志军,王宪泽(2004).植物氮代谢硝酸还原酶水平调控机制的研究进展.西北植物学报, 24 (7):1355-1361
    刘卫群(1998).数种烤烟品种中碳氮代谢与酶活性的研究.中国农业大学学报, 3 (001): 22-26
    刘卫群,丁永乐,张联合,陈江华(2002).烤烟打顶前后根系激素水平与物质代谢的关系初探.植物生理学通讯, 38 (4): 330-332
    刘卫群,郭群召,汪庆昌,张新要,郭红祥(2004).不同施氮水平对烤烟干物质,氮素积累分配及产质的影响.河南农业科学, (008): 25-28
    刘卫群,崔振伟,陈旭初,李浩(2006).打顶对烤烟谷氨酰胺合成酶和天冬酰胺合成酶活性的影响.植物生理学通讯, 42 (6): 1121-1122
    刘国顺(2003).烟草栽培学.北京,中国农业出版社,
    刘国顺,彭华伟(2004).生物有机肥对烤烟土壤肥力及生长发育的影响.耕作与栽培, (3): 29-31
    刘国顺,张晓远,毕庆文,王建安,汪健,王海明,黎根(2010).采收时间对烤烟烟叶中性致香物质和感官质量的影响.中国农学通报, 26 (22): 132-136
    刘录祥,孙其信,王士芸(1989).灰色系统理论应用于作物新品种综合评估初探.中国农业科学, 22 (3): 22-27
    叶协锋,李正,刘旭锋,郝伟红,李彦涛,李亚娟,李东霞,刘国顺(2009).烤烟巨豆三烯酮含量与中性香气成分含量关系分析.土壤通报, 40 (5): 1167-1170
    吴兴富,宋春满,邓建华,方敦煌(2010).云南烟区烤烟糖含量特点.湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 36 (3): 289-294
    孙建锋,刘霞,李伟,许自成,宫长荣(2006).不同生态条件下烤烟化学成分的相似性研究.中国烟草科学, 27 (3): 22-24
    孙敬国,闫铁军,司辉,何结望,谢豪,叶建美,涂书新(2008).烤烟醇化过程中酶的作用与变化特征研究进展.湖北农业科学, 47 (10): 1207-1211
    宫长荣(2003).烟草调制学.烟草专业“面向21世纪课程教材”.北京,中国农业出版社, 177-178
    张永安,王瑞强,杨述元,周冀衡(2006).生态因子与烤烟中性挥发性香气物质的关系研究.安徽农业科学, 34 (18): 4652-4654
    张吉旺,董树亭,王空军,胡昌浩,刘鹏(2007).大田遮荫对夏玉米光合特性的影响.作物学报, 33 (2): 216-222
    张志良,瞿伟菁(1990).植物生理学实验指导.北京,高等教育出版社,
    张明方,李志凌(2002).高等植物中与蔗糖代谢相关的酶.植物生理学通讯, 38 (3): 289-295
    张波,李鲜,陈昆松(2007).脂氧合酶基因家族成员与果实成熟衰老研究进展.园艺学报, 34 (1): 245-250
    张虹,苏建东,程多福(2005).中国特色烟叶开发之路[N/OL].东方烟草报.上海
    张洁,李天来,徐晶(2005).昼间亚高温对日光温室番茄光合作用及物质积累的影响.园艺学报, 32 (2): 228-233
    张家智,张茂松(2007).气候变暖对云南烤烟生产影响的初步分析.气象与环境科学, 30 (4): 17-19
    张喜琦,史衍玺(2004).不同基因型烟草成熟期钾在植株内的迁移特征.中国烟草科学, 25 (4): 8-12
    张槐苓,葛军英,穆怀静(1994).烟草分析与检验.郑州,河南科学拄术出版社, 12-141
    张国,朱列书,王奎武,屠乃美,徐坚强(2006).主要气象因子对烟草生长发育影响研究进展.作物研究, 20 (5): 486-489
    张国,朱列书,陈新联,王奎武,屠乃美,徐坚强(2007).湖南烤烟部分化学成分与气象因素关系的研究. 安徽农业科学, 35 (3): 748-750
    张晓海,苏贤坤,廖德智,刘宝泉,陈发荣,杨晓芳(2005).不同生育期水分调控对烤烟烟叶产质量的影响.烟草科技, 6 36-38
    张钟煊,王鑫,邱铭生,罗发健(2010).打顶时间对烤烟产质量的影响研究.现代农业科技, (14): 37-38 时向东,焦枫,叶红朝,熊莹(2010).黏土和沙壤土对烟叶发育过程中栅栏细胞超微结构的影响.河南农业大学学报, (3): 249-254
    杨式华,徐济仓,盛冀萍,邹悦,王保兴,丁中涛(2007).烟草中质体色素研究进展.云南化工, 34 (1): 69-73
    杨尚英(2005).烤烟生产气候生态因子的定量分析.安徽农业科学, 33 (8): 1449-1450
    杨建堂,王文亮,霍晓婷,刘建安,黄金虎,李元喜,贾刚,蒋金炜,马继盛(2004).烤烟地上部干物质增长过程与有效积温关系研究.河南农业大学学报, 38 (1): 28-32
    杨虹琦,周冀衡,罗泽民,王勇,周万春(2004).不同时期打顶对烤烟内在化学成分的影响.湖南农业科学, (4): 19-22
    杨虹琦,周冀衡,罗泽民,杨述元(2004).不同产区烤烟中质体色素及降解产物的研究.西南农业大学学报, 26 (5): 64-68
    杨虹琦,周冀衡,杨述元,彭艳,张永安,罗泽民(2005).不同纬度烟区烤烟叶中主要非挥发性有机酸的研究.湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 31 (3): 281-284
    杨虹琦,周冀衡,郭紫明,毛建华,罗泽民(2006).湖南不同烤烟中非挥发性有机酸含量的差异.中国烟草学报, 12 (4): 44-46,57
    杨丽丽,王一鸣,康孟珍,董乔雪(2008).基于修正Logistic模型的番茄单个果实生长规律模拟.农业机械学报, 39 (11): 81-84
    杨兴有,刘国顺(2007).成熟期光强对烤烟理化特性和致香成分含量的影响.生态学报, 27 (8): 3450-3456
    杨兴有,刘国顺,伍仁军,夏林,邢小军,张建慧,杜卫民,谢良文(2007).不同生育期降低光强对烟草生长发育和品质的影响.生态学杂志, 26 (7): 1014-1020
    杨兴有,叶协锋,刘国顺,位辉琴,王永(2007).光强对烟草幼苗形态和生理指标的影响.应用生态学报, 18 (11): 2642-2645
    杨焕文,丁金玲,耿宗泽,李佛琳(2003).烤烟烘烤过程中淀粉酶及淀粉含量的变化.云南农业大学学报, 18 385-388
    杨铁钊,林彩丽,丁永乐,许自成,舒海燕(2001).不同基因型烟草对氮素营养响应的差异研究.烟草科技, (6): 32-35
    杨铁钊(2003).烟草育种学.北京,中国农业出版社, 285
    杨铁钊(2003).烟草育种学.北京,中国农业出版社,
    汤章诚,魏家绵,陈因(1999).现代植物生理学实验指导.北京,科学出版社,
    温永琴,林良斌,陈宗瑜,陆富,林良斌,程辉斗,程迎辉(2002).云南烤烟石油醚提取物和多酚类与气候要素的关系.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 28 (2): 103-105
    窦逢科,张景略(1992).烟草品质与土壤肥料.郑州,河南科学技术出版社,
    缪元颖,杨顺楷,刘成君(2002).苯丙氨酸解氨酶的分子生物学研究进展. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 8 (6): 672-675
    缪明明,王昆文,古昆,李鲜(1998).叶黄素的化学降解产物及机理研究.烟草科技, (2): 30-31
    罗海波,钱晓刚(2002).截流(环割)对烤烟光合速率和烟碱含量的影响.作物杂志, (5): 14-16
    许自成,刘国顺,刘金海,金文华,石栓成,牛德江,祝照宇(2005).铜山烟区生态因素和烟叶质量特点. 生态学报, 25 (7): 1748-1753
    许自成,黄平俊,苏富强,李桂湘,王勇(2005).不同采收方式对烤烟上部叶内在品质的影响.西北农林科技大学学报, 33 (11): 13-17
    许自成,黎妍妍,肖汉乾,王林(2008).湘南烟区生态因素与烤烟质量的综合评价.植物生态学报, 32 (1): 226-234
    贺立红,张进标,宾金华(2001).苯丙氨酸解氨酶的研究进展.热带作物学报, 22 (1): 35-41
    贾峰,魏庆华,杜铮,王彩霞,黄晓书,刘卫群(2010).烤烟烟叶胞嘧啶和5-甲基胞嘧啶分离条件的优化. 山东农业科学, (6): 94-97
    赵巧梅,倪纪恒,熊淑萍,马新明,马海平(2002).不同土壤类型对烟叶主要化学成分的影响.河南农业大学学报, 36 (1): 23-26
    赵玉萍,邹志荣,杨振超,胡晓辉,白鹏威,李鹏飞,任雷(2010).不同温度和光照对温室番茄光合作用及果实品质的影响.西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 38 (5): 125-130
    赵兴,刘卫群,张维理,王树声(2003).中国烟草平衡施肥技术研究现状与展望.中国烟草学报, 9 (B11): 30-35
    邹琦(2000).植物生理学实验指导.北京,中国农业出版社, 191
    郑荣豪(2001).气温对广东烤烟产量和质量的影响.广东农业科学, (1): 13-14
    钟庆辉(1981).烟草芳香吃味化学指标的探索.烟草科技, 4 (41): 21-23
    闫克玉,陈鹏(1993).烤烟40级制烟叶主要化学成分分析研究.郑州轻工业学院学报, 8 (2): 35-39
    阎克玉,袁志永,吴殿信,李兴波,屈剑波(2001).烤烟质量评价指标体系研究.郑州轻工业学院学报, 16 (4): 57-61
    陈永明,陈建军,邱妙文(2010).施氮水平和移栽期对烤烟还原糖及烟碱含量的影响.中国烟草科学, 31 (1): 34-36
    陈向东,董建新,梁洪波,杨永发,雷强,吴纯奎,伍仁军,李霞,覃克炳,张隆伟,吴元华,周翔,王正旭(2010).四川省烤烟主要化学成分特征分析.中国烟草科学, 31 (5): 13-18
    陈建军,吕永华,王维(2009).烟草品质生理及其调控研究.广州,华南理工大学出版社, 256
    陈伟,王三根,王玉明,唐远驹(2009).不同生态区烤烟烟碱含量的变异分析.中国生态农业学报, 17 (2): 285-290
    韦凤杰,刘国顺,杨永锋,王芳,李亚娟,郭巧燕(2005).烤烟成熟过程中类胡萝卜素变化与其降解香气物质关系.中国农业科学, 38 (9): 1882-1889
    韦凤杰,范艺宽,刘国顺,王芳,李亚娟,郭巧燕(2006).饼肥对烤烟叶片发育过程中质体色素降解及相关酶类活性的影响.作物学报, 32 (5): 766-771
    韩富根,刘学芝,焦桂珍,彭奎(2005).不同窝肥对烤烟产量,质量效应的初步研究.河南农业科学, (11): 65-67
    韩富根,李浩亮,韩锦峰,尚现超(2006).不同留杈部位对烤烟性状及质量的影响.河南农业大学学报, 40 (4): 350-354
    韩晓哲,丁永乐,何澎,邓正平,王生才,宋瑞芳,黄飞,师金鸽(2008).湖南与河南烤烟烟叶中挥发性致香物质的对比分析.中国农学通报, 24 (10): 137-140
    韩锦峰,洪涛(1993).海拔高度对烤烟香气物质的影响.中国烟草, (3): 1-3
    韩锦峰,马常力,王瑞新,朱大恒,洪涛,侯文华,韩薇,黄元炯(1993).不同肥料类型及成熟度对烤烟香气物质成分及香型的影响.作物学报, 19 (3): 253-254
    韩锦峰,董钻(1995).作物生物化学.北京,中国农业出版社, 388
    韩锦峰,吕巧灵,杨素勤,王德勤,张秀英,叶玉珍,王广山(1998).饼肥种类及其与化肥配比对烤烟生长发育及产质的影响Ⅰ.对烤烟生长发育的影响.河南农业科学, 2 14-16
    韩锦峰,杨素勤,吕巧灵,王德勤,张秀英,叶玉珍,王广山(1998).饼肥种类及其与化肥配比对烤烟生长发育及产质的影响Ⅱ,对烤烟产质的影响.河南农业科学, (3): 11-14
    黄中艳,王树会,朱勇,邵岩,邓云龙,李天福(2007).云南烤烟5项化学成分含量与其环境生态要素的关系.中国农业气象, 28 (003): 312-317
    黄中艳,朱勇,王树会,李天福,邓云龙,邵岩(2007).云南烤烟内在品质与气候的关系.资源科学, 29 (2): 83-90
    黄中艳,朱勇,邓云龙,黄伟,倪霞(2008).云南烤烟大田期气候对烟叶品质的影响.中国农业气象, 29 (4): 440-445,449
    黄中艳,王树会,朱勇,邓云龙,邵岩(2009).气象条件对云南烤烟4项化学成分含量的影响.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 35 (1): 48-52
    黄元炯,刘建波,石威(2008).现代烟草农业科技进步的成效,问题与对策思考.中国烟草学报, 14 (005): 53-58

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700