耳霉属分子系统学及其中国资源研究
|
摘要
耳霉属真菌是虫霉门重要类群之一，在其系统学中占有特殊的重要地位。它是生态环境中重要的分解者，有些种还可用于害虫生物防治。王承芳等在2008年11月至2009年4月间，选择安徽和山东地区的自然保护区进行耳霉的分离和鉴定，共分离到耳霉菌株100余株，并发表了4株中国耳霉新记录种。本研究采用高效的耳霉分离方法，拟在我国东北、华东、华中、华南及西南地区选择自然保护区进行采样分离，来丰富我国耳霉菌种资源并对耳霉属的系统发育研究提供菌种材料。由于耳霉菌株在形态学上的高度异质性，且形态结构较为简单，使得仅仅依据形态学特征难以准确将耳霉鉴定到种级水平；近年来，发现朝上耳霉（ConidiobolusadiaeretusDrechsler）既产生小分生孢子，又产生毛管孢子，这导致基于次生分生孢子产生的类型对耳霉属三个亚属的划分产生了疑问，因此，需要开发一些新的分类特征和运用分子生物学手段来解决耳霉属种的分类地位和确定耳霉属亚属的分类地位。本研究拟运用耳霉一些稳定的形态学分类特征、新开发的耳霉生理和细胞学特性（最高生长温度和初生分生孢子细胞核平均数）及多基因位点的分子系统发育分析方法，准确鉴定中国耳霉分离菌株，澄清King耳霉分类系统中模式菌株的分类地位，并确定耳霉三个亚属的分类地位。
通过对耳霉同种不同菌株和不同种的最高生长温度的比较，发现同种不同菌株间具有相同或相差不超过1℃的最高生长温度值，大部分不同种间具有相差超过2℃的最高生长温度值，也有少数不同种之间具有相同的最高生长温度值，揭示最高生长温度是一个稳定的特性，可以作为耳霉种级鉴定的分类学指标；通过对耳霉同种不同菌株和不同种之间的初生分生孢子细胞核平均数的比较，发现同种不同菌株间具有相同或相近的细胞核平均数，大部分不同种间细胞核平均数差别较大，证明了初生分生孢子细胞核平均数与初生分生孢子大小相关性强，成正比关系，因而这种细胞学性状也是一个鉴定种的较为重要的分类特征。
通过nuc-LSU、mt-SSU、EF-1α和RPB2这4个基因位点的分子系统发育分析，发现耳霉在DNA水平上异质度高，形成了3个主要分支，且各分支类群之间遗传距离较远，再结合耳霉次生分生孢子类型和这三个类群具有较强的关联性，我们将耳霉属原有的3个亚属上升为属的分类地位：德拉霉属（DelacroixiaSacc.&P.Syd.）、毛管霉属（CapillidiobolusY.Nie&B.Huang）、耳霉属（ConidiobolusBrefeld）；其中，在德拉霉属的基部产生3个独立的分支，形态学观察这3个分支所包含的种都未产生小分生孢子，由于这3个分支在系统发育树上的位置特殊，但没有明确的属的分类特征，因此，这3个分支的分类地位待定，暂时划为广义耳霉属（Conidiobolussensulato)处理。此外虽然朝上毛管霉(Capillidiobolus adiaeretus)和班加罗尔毛管霉(CapillidioboluS bangalorensis Srin.&Thirum.)在毛管霉属中形成独立的分支,但他们还是位于产生毛管孢子类群的基部,和毛管孢子类群关系较近,同时考虑在他们都产生毛管孢子,虽然朝上耳霉也可产生小分生孢子,我们仍将这两个种划为毛管霉属来处理。对基于数值分类法的King分类系统中的部分耳霉模式菌株的分类地位进行了修订,通过形态学特征、初生分生孢子细胞核平均数、最高生长温度和分子系统发育分析,恢复了8个耳霉的种的分类地位,并将其中4个种组合进不同的属中：Capillidiobolus rugosus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang.Delacroixia lichenicola(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.megalotocus var.indicus(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B. Huang、D.mycophagus(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang；其余4个种作为广义耳霉属处理：Conidiobolus nodosus Srin.&Thirum.、C. terrestris Srin.&Thirum.、C. undulates Srin.&Thirum.、C. parvus Drechsler。对15个耳霉种进行了新组合：Delacroixia macrosporus(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D. mycophilus(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.khandalensis(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D. humicola(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.polytocus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B. Huang、D.incongruus (Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.firmipilleus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.megalotocus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.brefeldianus(Couch)Y. Nie&B.Huang.Capillidiobolus heterosporus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、C.lobatus (Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、C. rhysosporus(Drechsler) Y.Nie&B.Huang、C. pumilus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、C. adiaeretus(Drechsler) Y.Nie&B.Huang、C. bangalorensis(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang.
本研究共分离得到250余株中国广义耳霉菌株,对这些中国分离株运用形态学特征,新分类性状以及分子数据进行了分类地位的确认,共鉴定出24个种,1个待鉴定种,其中包括12个新种：霍山毛管霉(Capillidiobolus huoshanensis Y.Nie&B. Huang)、黄孢毛管霉(C.flavosporus Y.Nie&B.Huang)、中国耳霉(C. sinensis Y. Nie&B.Huang)、牯牛降耳霉(Conidiobous guniujiangensis Y. Nie&B.Huang)、双孢耳霉(C. bisporus Y. Nie&B.Huang)、束梗耳霉(C. stilbella Y. Nie&B.Huang)、李氏德拉霉(Delacroixia lii Y. Nie&B.Huang)、石台德拉霉(C. shitaiensis Y. Nie&B.Huang).鼎湖山德拉霉(D. dinghushanensis Y. Nie&B.Huang)、琅琊山德拉霉(D. langyashanensis Y. Nie&B.Huang)、汉博德拉霉(D. humberii Y. Nie&B. Huang)和德雷克斯勒德拉霉(C. drechslerii Y. Nie&B.Huang);1个新变种：冠德拉霉长柔毛变种(D. coronatus var. longvillosus Y.Nie&B.Huang);3个新纪录种：皱孢毛管霉(Capillidiobolus rhysosporus Drechsler)、褶孢毛管霉(C. rugosus Drechsler)和毛耳霉(Conidiobolus lachnodes Drechsler);8个已知种：有味耳霉(Conidiobolus osmodes Drechsler)、块状耳霉(C. thromboides Drechsler)、大乳突耳霉(C. macropapillatus C. F. Wang&B. Huang)、近隔接合孢耳霉(C. iuxtagenitus S. D. Waters&Callaghan)、异形孢毛管霉(Capillidiobolus heterosporus Drechsler)、冠德拉霉(Delacroixia coronatus (Costantin) Sacc.&P. Syd.)、牢盖德拉霉(D. firmipilleus Drechsler)和布尔弗雷德德拉霉(D. brefeldianus Couch);和1株待鉴定种：RCEF5845。
Conidiobolus is one of the most important genus, and has a special systematic position in the phylum Entomophthoromycota. The Conidiobolus is a key decomposer in ecosystem, and some species can be used as the agents for controlling pest. From November2008to April2009, more than100Conidiobolus isolates from Anhui and Shandong provinces were isolated by Wang et al., and4new records of Conidooblus in China were published. To investigate the species diversity in the genus Conidiobolus from China and provide much more materials for systematic research, an efficient method improved by our team was used to isolate Conidiobolus isolates from Nature Reserves in Northeast, East, Central, South and Southwest of China. It is difficult to identify exactly the Conidiobolus strains at species level only based on the morphological character for its high heterogeneity and simple morphological structure. Recent studies showed that Conidiobolus adiaeretus Drechsler produced either microconida or capilliconida, which means that the division of three subgenera in the genus Conidiobolus is unreasonable. Some new developed classification features combined with molecular method should be used to identify Conidiobolus strains and to clarify phylogenetic relations within the genus Conidiobolus. In this research, we will exactly identify the Conidiobolus strains isolated from China, revise the King's classification and resolve the taxonomic placement of three subgenera based on the new taxonomic characters (the maximum growth temperature and the average numbers of nucleus in primary conidia), important morphological features and nucleotide sequence data from multiloci.
By comparing the maximum growth temperature among different Conidiobolus strains of the same species and among different Conidiobolus species, each species possessed a stable and specific maximum growth temperature, which can be distinguishing Conidiobolus species. The optimum growth temperature showed variation within a single species and obvious overlap between species, which are of little value in taxonomy. By comparing the average numbers of nucleus in primary conidia among different Conidiobolus strains of the same species and among different Conidiobolus species, each species had similar average numbers of nucleus in primary conidia, which are of important taxonomic value. We also found that the average numbers of nucleus in primary conidia had proportional relations with the size of primary conidia.
Based on the molecular phylogenetic analysis of4gene loci:nuc-LSU, mt-SSU, EF-la and RPB2, a high level of heterogeneity was detected in the genus Conidiobolus. Combined far gentic distance among every clade in phylogenetic tree and the stable morphylogical character of the type of secondary conidia production, three subgenera in the genus Conidiobolus were rised to the status of the genus. A phylogenetic analysis assigned the Conidiobolus strains to three main lineages corresponding to the restored genus Delacroixia Sacc.&P. Syd., the estabished newly genus CapillidiobolusY. Nie&B. Huang and the emended genus Conidiobolus Brefeld. Clade I consists of four subgroups incuding subgroup A, subgroup B, subgroup C and subgroup D corresponding to the genus Delacroixia with microconidia, Conidiobolus iuxtagenitus, two Conidiobolus species and three small conidial species, respectively. The species from subgroup B, subgroup C and subgroup D do not produced microconidia and located at the base of the Clade I, and were put in Conidiobolus sensu lato. Although C. adiaeretus and C. bangalorensis Srin.&Thirum. formed a independent clade in the genus Capillidiobolus, they shared closer phylogentic relationship with Capillidiobolus than the species from other two genera. Therefore, these two species should classificated into the genus Capillidiobolus while C. adiaeretus could produce both microconidia and capilliconidia. The King's classification was revised based on molecular data and two new taxonomic features.8homonyms in Conidiobolus were restored as species level,4of them were combined into the new genus. They are Capillidiobolus rugosus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, Delacroixia lichenicola (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. megalotocus var. indicus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. mycophagus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, Conidiobolus nodosus Srin.&Thirum., C. terrestris Srin.&Thirum., C. undulates Srin.&Thirum., C. parvus Drechsler.15new combinations were made i.e. Delacroixia macrosporus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. mycophilus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. khandalensis (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. humicola (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. polytocus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. incongruus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. firmipilleus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. megalotocus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. brefeldianus (Couch) Y. Nie&B. Huang, Capillidiobolus heterosporus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. lobatus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. rhysosporus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. pumilus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. adiaeretus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. bangalorensis (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang.
During the investigation of Conidiobolus sensu lato in China in2009-2013, we have isolated more than250strains. Based on the careful morphological identification and molecular data,24taxa at species or variety level were described and illustrated. Among them,13taxa are new species or new variety. They are Capillidiobolus huoshanensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. flavosporus Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. sinensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, Conidiobolus guniujiangensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. bisporus Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. stilbella Y. Nie&B. Huang, Delacroixia lii Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. shitaiensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. dinghushanensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. langyashanensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. humberii Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. Drechslerii Y. Nie&B. Huang and Delacroixia coronatus var. longvillosus Y. Nie&B. Huang.3species are newly recorded for China. The3new records are:Capillidiobolus rhysosporus Drechsler, C. rugosus Drechsler, Conidiobolus lachnodes Drechsler.8species having been previously reported from China are redescribed and discussed, i. e. Conidiobolus osmodes Drechsler, C. thromboides Drechsler, C. macropapillatus C. F. Wang&B. Huang, C. iuxtagenitus S. D. Waters&Callaghan, Capillidiobolus heterosporus Drechsler, Delacroixia coronatus (Costantin) Sacc.&P. Syd., D. firmipilleus Drechsler and D. brefeldianus Couch. The strain RCEF5845needs to be instensively studied.
通过对耳霉同种不同菌株和不同种的最高生长温度的比较，发现同种不同菌株间具有相同或相差不超过1℃的最高生长温度值，大部分不同种间具有相差超过2℃的最高生长温度值，也有少数不同种之间具有相同的最高生长温度值，揭示最高生长温度是一个稳定的特性，可以作为耳霉种级鉴定的分类学指标；通过对耳霉同种不同菌株和不同种之间的初生分生孢子细胞核平均数的比较，发现同种不同菌株间具有相同或相近的细胞核平均数，大部分不同种间细胞核平均数差别较大，证明了初生分生孢子细胞核平均数与初生分生孢子大小相关性强，成正比关系，因而这种细胞学性状也是一个鉴定种的较为重要的分类特征。
通过nuc-LSU、mt-SSU、EF-1α和RPB2这4个基因位点的分子系统发育分析，发现耳霉在DNA水平上异质度高，形成了3个主要分支，且各分支类群之间遗传距离较远，再结合耳霉次生分生孢子类型和这三个类群具有较强的关联性，我们将耳霉属原有的3个亚属上升为属的分类地位：德拉霉属（DelacroixiaSacc.&P.Syd.）、毛管霉属（CapillidiobolusY.Nie&B.Huang）、耳霉属（ConidiobolusBrefeld）；其中，在德拉霉属的基部产生3个独立的分支，形态学观察这3个分支所包含的种都未产生小分生孢子，由于这3个分支在系统发育树上的位置特殊，但没有明确的属的分类特征，因此，这3个分支的分类地位待定，暂时划为广义耳霉属（Conidiobolussensulato)处理。此外虽然朝上毛管霉(Capillidiobolus adiaeretus)和班加罗尔毛管霉(CapillidioboluS bangalorensis Srin.&Thirum.)在毛管霉属中形成独立的分支,但他们还是位于产生毛管孢子类群的基部,和毛管孢子类群关系较近,同时考虑在他们都产生毛管孢子,虽然朝上耳霉也可产生小分生孢子,我们仍将这两个种划为毛管霉属来处理。对基于数值分类法的King分类系统中的部分耳霉模式菌株的分类地位进行了修订,通过形态学特征、初生分生孢子细胞核平均数、最高生长温度和分子系统发育分析,恢复了8个耳霉的种的分类地位,并将其中4个种组合进不同的属中：Capillidiobolus rugosus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang.Delacroixia lichenicola(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.megalotocus var.indicus(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B. Huang、D.mycophagus(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang；其余4个种作为广义耳霉属处理：Conidiobolus nodosus Srin.&Thirum.、C. terrestris Srin.&Thirum.、C. undulates Srin.&Thirum.、C. parvus Drechsler。对15个耳霉种进行了新组合：Delacroixia macrosporus(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D. mycophilus(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.khandalensis(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D. humicola(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.polytocus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B. Huang、D.incongruus (Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.firmipilleus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.megalotocus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、D.brefeldianus(Couch)Y. Nie&B.Huang.Capillidiobolus heterosporus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、C.lobatus (Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang、C. rhysosporus(Drechsler) Y.Nie&B.Huang、C. pumilus(Drechsler)Y.Nie&B.Huang、C. adiaeretus(Drechsler) Y.Nie&B.Huang、C. bangalorensis(Srin.&Thirum.)Y.Nie&B.Huang.
本研究共分离得到250余株中国广义耳霉菌株,对这些中国分离株运用形态学特征,新分类性状以及分子数据进行了分类地位的确认,共鉴定出24个种,1个待鉴定种,其中包括12个新种：霍山毛管霉(Capillidiobolus huoshanensis Y.Nie&B. Huang)、黄孢毛管霉(C.flavosporus Y.Nie&B.Huang)、中国耳霉(C. sinensis Y. Nie&B.Huang)、牯牛降耳霉(Conidiobous guniujiangensis Y. Nie&B.Huang)、双孢耳霉(C. bisporus Y. Nie&B.Huang)、束梗耳霉(C. stilbella Y. Nie&B.Huang)、李氏德拉霉(Delacroixia lii Y. Nie&B.Huang)、石台德拉霉(C. shitaiensis Y. Nie&B.Huang).鼎湖山德拉霉(D. dinghushanensis Y. Nie&B.Huang)、琅琊山德拉霉(D. langyashanensis Y. Nie&B.Huang)、汉博德拉霉(D. humberii Y. Nie&B. Huang)和德雷克斯勒德拉霉(C. drechslerii Y. Nie&B.Huang);1个新变种：冠德拉霉长柔毛变种(D. coronatus var. longvillosus Y.Nie&B.Huang);3个新纪录种：皱孢毛管霉(Capillidiobolus rhysosporus Drechsler)、褶孢毛管霉(C. rugosus Drechsler)和毛耳霉(Conidiobolus lachnodes Drechsler);8个已知种：有味耳霉(Conidiobolus osmodes Drechsler)、块状耳霉(C. thromboides Drechsler)、大乳突耳霉(C. macropapillatus C. F. Wang&B. Huang)、近隔接合孢耳霉(C. iuxtagenitus S. D. Waters&Callaghan)、异形孢毛管霉(Capillidiobolus heterosporus Drechsler)、冠德拉霉(Delacroixia coronatus (Costantin) Sacc.&P. Syd.)、牢盖德拉霉(D. firmipilleus Drechsler)和布尔弗雷德德拉霉(D. brefeldianus Couch);和1株待鉴定种：RCEF5845。
Conidiobolus is one of the most important genus, and has a special systematic position in the phylum Entomophthoromycota. The Conidiobolus is a key decomposer in ecosystem, and some species can be used as the agents for controlling pest. From November2008to April2009, more than100Conidiobolus isolates from Anhui and Shandong provinces were isolated by Wang et al., and4new records of Conidooblus in China were published. To investigate the species diversity in the genus Conidiobolus from China and provide much more materials for systematic research, an efficient method improved by our team was used to isolate Conidiobolus isolates from Nature Reserves in Northeast, East, Central, South and Southwest of China. It is difficult to identify exactly the Conidiobolus strains at species level only based on the morphological character for its high heterogeneity and simple morphological structure. Recent studies showed that Conidiobolus adiaeretus Drechsler produced either microconida or capilliconida, which means that the division of three subgenera in the genus Conidiobolus is unreasonable. Some new developed classification features combined with molecular method should be used to identify Conidiobolus strains and to clarify phylogenetic relations within the genus Conidiobolus. In this research, we will exactly identify the Conidiobolus strains isolated from China, revise the King's classification and resolve the taxonomic placement of three subgenera based on the new taxonomic characters (the maximum growth temperature and the average numbers of nucleus in primary conidia), important morphological features and nucleotide sequence data from multiloci.
By comparing the maximum growth temperature among different Conidiobolus strains of the same species and among different Conidiobolus species, each species possessed a stable and specific maximum growth temperature, which can be distinguishing Conidiobolus species. The optimum growth temperature showed variation within a single species and obvious overlap between species, which are of little value in taxonomy. By comparing the average numbers of nucleus in primary conidia among different Conidiobolus strains of the same species and among different Conidiobolus species, each species had similar average numbers of nucleus in primary conidia, which are of important taxonomic value. We also found that the average numbers of nucleus in primary conidia had proportional relations with the size of primary conidia.
Based on the molecular phylogenetic analysis of4gene loci:nuc-LSU, mt-SSU, EF-la and RPB2, a high level of heterogeneity was detected in the genus Conidiobolus. Combined far gentic distance among every clade in phylogenetic tree and the stable morphylogical character of the type of secondary conidia production, three subgenera in the genus Conidiobolus were rised to the status of the genus. A phylogenetic analysis assigned the Conidiobolus strains to three main lineages corresponding to the restored genus Delacroixia Sacc.&P. Syd., the estabished newly genus CapillidiobolusY. Nie&B. Huang and the emended genus Conidiobolus Brefeld. Clade I consists of four subgroups incuding subgroup A, subgroup B, subgroup C and subgroup D corresponding to the genus Delacroixia with microconidia, Conidiobolus iuxtagenitus, two Conidiobolus species and three small conidial species, respectively. The species from subgroup B, subgroup C and subgroup D do not produced microconidia and located at the base of the Clade I, and were put in Conidiobolus sensu lato. Although C. adiaeretus and C. bangalorensis Srin.&Thirum. formed a independent clade in the genus Capillidiobolus, they shared closer phylogentic relationship with Capillidiobolus than the species from other two genera. Therefore, these two species should classificated into the genus Capillidiobolus while C. adiaeretus could produce both microconidia and capilliconidia. The King's classification was revised based on molecular data and two new taxonomic features.8homonyms in Conidiobolus were restored as species level,4of them were combined into the new genus. They are Capillidiobolus rugosus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, Delacroixia lichenicola (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. megalotocus var. indicus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. mycophagus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, Conidiobolus nodosus Srin.&Thirum., C. terrestris Srin.&Thirum., C. undulates Srin.&Thirum., C. parvus Drechsler.15new combinations were made i.e. Delacroixia macrosporus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. mycophilus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. khandalensis (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. humicola (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. polytocus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. incongruus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. firmipilleus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. megalotocus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. brefeldianus (Couch) Y. Nie&B. Huang, Capillidiobolus heterosporus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. lobatus (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. rhysosporus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. pumilus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. adiaeretus (Drechsler) Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. bangalorensis (Srin.&Thirum.) Y. Nie&B. Huang.
During the investigation of Conidiobolus sensu lato in China in2009-2013, we have isolated more than250strains. Based on the careful morphological identification and molecular data,24taxa at species or variety level were described and illustrated. Among them,13taxa are new species or new variety. They are Capillidiobolus huoshanensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. flavosporus Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. sinensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, Conidiobolus guniujiangensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. bisporus Y. Nie&B. Huang, C. stilbella Y. Nie&B. Huang, Delacroixia lii Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. shitaiensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. dinghushanensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. langyashanensis Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. humberii Y. Nie&B. Huang, D. Drechslerii Y. Nie&B. Huang and Delacroixia coronatus var. longvillosus Y. Nie&B. Huang.3species are newly recorded for China. The3new records are:Capillidiobolus rhysosporus Drechsler, C. rugosus Drechsler, Conidiobolus lachnodes Drechsler.8species having been previously reported from China are redescribed and discussed, i. e. Conidiobolus osmodes Drechsler, C. thromboides Drechsler, C. macropapillatus C. F. Wang&B. Huang, C. iuxtagenitus S. D. Waters&Callaghan, Capillidiobolus heterosporus Drechsler, Delacroixia coronatus (Costantin) Sacc.&P. Syd., D. firmipilleus Drechsler and D. brefeldianus Couch. The strain RCEF5845needs to be instensively studied.
引文
[1]Alexopoulos CJ, Mims CW著;余永年,宋大康等译.真菌学概论[M].北京：农业出版社,1983.
[2]蒲蛰龙,李增智.昆虫真菌学[M].合肥：安徽科学技术出版社,1996.
[3]Hawksworth DL, Kirk PM, Sutton BC, et al. Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi,(8th edition), CAB International, Wallingford. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie,1997,285(4):577-578.
[4]周与良,刑来君.真菌学[M].北京：高等教育出版社.1986.
[5]陈毅坚.真菌分类的发展与变化[J].玉溪师范高等专科学校学报,2000,16(3)：70-71.
[6]Webster J. Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi,(6th edition), Commonwealth Mycological Institute[J]. Transactions of the British Mycological Society,1972,58:357.
[7]贺运春.真菌学[M].北京：中国林业出版社,2008.
[8]White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. PCR protocols a guide to methods and applications [M]. Academic Press,1990,315-322.
[9]王征,戴玉成.真菌生命之树项目(Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life)和美国真菌系统学研究现状[J].菌物学报,2009,28(6)：878-887.
[10]Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi [J]. Mycological Research,2007,111(5):509-547.
[11]James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, et al. Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny[J]. Nature,2006,443:818-822.
[12]Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, et al. Dictionary of the Fungi[M]. Tenth edition: CABI Publishing,2008.
[13]Maresca B, Kobayashi GS. Molecular biology of pathogenic fungi[M]. New York, Telos Press,1994.
[14]Benny GL. Classical morphology in fungi taxonomy[J]. Can J Bot,1994,73:725-730.
[15]朱研研,王耀耀,付美红等.真菌分类鉴定研究进展[J].河北化工,2010,33(4)：玉溪师范高等专科学校学报,2000,16(3)：37-39.
[16]缪承杜,洪葵.真菌分类技术的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(22)：6695-6697.
[17]Mervyn LE. G.S. de Hoog and J. Guarro, Editors, Atlas of clinical fungi [J]. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology,1997,37(2):291.
[18]Noguchi T, Banno Y, Watanabe T, et al. Carbohydrate composition of the isolated cell walls of dermatophytes[J]. Mycopathologia,1975,55(2):71-76.
[19]Millner PD. Radial growth responses to temperature by58Chaetomium species and some taxonomic relationships[J]. Mycologia,1977(69):492-502.
[20]Bartnicki G. Cell wall composition and other biochemical makers in phylogeny[M]. London:Academic Press,1970:81-103.
[21]Andersen B, Thrane U. Secondary metabolites produced by Alternaria infectoria[J]. Mycotoxin,1996,12:54-60.
[22]李多川,张天宇.链格孢属(丝孢纲)数值分类研究初探[J].真菌学报,1993,12(3)：232-239.
[23]刑来君,李明春.普通真菌学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[24]Jahnke KD, Bahnweg G. Activity and structural characterisitics of steroid and non-steroid lipid growth-factors for haliphthoros-milfordensis, a fungal parasite of marine crustaceans[J]. Transactions of the British Mycological Society,1984,83(10):447-454.
[25]黄原.分子系统学—原理、方法及应用[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1998,209-210.
[26]Driver FJ. Milner RWH, Trueman J. A taxonomic revision of Metarhizium based on a phylogenetic analysis of rDNA sequence data[J]. Mycological Research,2000,104(2):134-150.
[27]Huang B, Li CR, Humber RA, et al. Molecular evidence for the taxonomic status of Metarhizium taii and its teleomorph, Cordyceps taii (Hypocreales, Clavicipitaceae)[J]. Mycotaxon,2005,94:137-147.
[28]Larsson E, Ryberg M, et al. Taxonomy and evolutionary relationships within species of section Rimosae (Inocybe) based on ITS, LSU and mtSSU sequence data[J]. Persoonia,2009,23:86.
[29]Wilson AC, Cann RL, Carr SM, et al. Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics[J]. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,1985,26(4):375-400.
[30]Avise JC. Phylogeography[M]. Cambriddge, Moss:Harvard University Press.2000.
[30]黄勃.一些重要虫生真菌的分子系统学研究[D].中国科学技术大学,2000.
[31]Rehner SA, Minnis AM, Sung GH, et al. Phylogeny and systematics of the anamorphic, entomopathogenic genus Beauveria[J].Mycologia,2011,103(5):1055-1073.
[32]Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification[J]. Genome,1994,20(2):176-183.
[33]Han Q, Inglis GD, Hausner G. Phylogenetic relationships among strains of the entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi, as revealed by partial β-tubulin sequences and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis[J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology,2002,34(5):376-383.
[34]Lihme M, Jensen AB, Rosendahl S. Local scale population genetic structure of Entomophthora muscae epidemics[J]. Fungal Ecology,2009,2:81-86.
[35]Coates BS, Hellmich RL, Lewis LC. Beauveria bassiana haplotype determination based on nucleus rDNA internal transcribed spacer PCR-RFLP[J]. Mycological Research,2002,106(1):40-50.
[36]Kwasna H, Nirenberg HI. Delimitation of Penicillium virgatum sp. nov. and P. daleae on the basis of morphological and molecular characters [J]. Mycological Research,2005,109(9):974-982.
[37]Williams, John GK, Kubelik, et al. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1990,18(22):6531-6535.
[38]黄勃,李振刚,樊美珍等.粉拟青霉种内RAPD多态性分析[J].菌物系统,2001,1：62-67.
[39]Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, et al. AFLP:a new technique for DNA fingerprinting[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1995,23(21):4407-4414.
[40]瞿波.中国禾谷镰刀菌(Fusarium graminearum)的遗传多样性及其与尼泊尔、欧美菌系的比较[D].华中农业大学,2003.
[41]Fischer SG, Lerman LS. DNA fragments differing by single base-pair substitutions are separated in denaturing gradient gels:correspondence with melting theory[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,1983,80(6):1579-1583.
[42]刘上峰,傅俊江.变性梯度凝胶电泳的原理、应用及其进展[J].国外医学遗传学分册,2002,25(2)：74-76.
[43]Cai Y, Pu SC, Nie Y, et al. Discrimination of Chinese Beauveria strains by DGGE genotyping and taxonomic identification by sequence analysis of the Bloc nucleus intergenic region[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology,2013(Accepted).
[44]李增智.中国真菌志第13卷—虫霉目[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
[45]Humber RA. An alternative view of certain taxonomic criteria used in the Entomophthorales (Zygomycetes)[J]. Mycotaxon,1981,13(1):191-240.
[46]Tucker BE. A review of the nonentonmogenous Entomophthorales[J]. Mycotaxon,1981,13:481-505.
[47]Ben-Ze'ev I, Kenneth RG, Uziel A. A reclassification of Entomophthora turbinate in Thaxterosporum gen. nov., Neozygitaceae fam. nov.(Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales)[J]. Mycotaxon,1987,28:313-326.
[48]Humber RA. Synopsis of a revised classification for the Entomophthorales (Zygomycotina)[J]. Mycotaxon,1989,36:441-460.
[49]Nagahama T, Sato H, Shimazu M, et al. Phylogenetic divergence of the entomophthoralean fungi:evidence from nucleus18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences [J]. Mycologia,1995,87(2):203-209.
[50]Jensen AB, Gargas A, Eilenberg J, Rosendahl S.1998. Relationships of the insect-pathogenic order Entomophthorales (Zygomycota, Fungi) based on phylogenetic analyses of nucleus small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences (SSU rDNA)[J]. Fungal Genetics and Biology,1998,24(3):325-334.
[51]Gryganskyi AP, Humber RA, Smith ME, et al. Molecular phylogeny of the Entomophthoromycota[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,2012,65(2):682-694.
[52]Humber RA. Entomophthoromycota:a new phylum and reclassification for entomophthoroid fungi [J]. Mycotaxon,2012,120:477-492.
[53]Ben-Ze'ev I, Kenneth RG. Features criteria of taxonomic value in the Entomophthorales:II. A revision of the genus Ervnia nowakowski1881(=Zoophthora Batko1964)[J]. Mycotaxon,1982,14(2):456-475.
[54]Batko A. Some new combinations in the fungus family (Entomophthoraceae (Phycomycetes))[J]. Bull Acad Polon Sci,1964,12(9):403-406.
[55]Ben-Ze'ev I, Kenneth R. Zoophthora phytonomi and Conidiobolus osmodes [Zygomycetes:Entomophthoraceae], two pathogens of Hypera species [Col.: Curculionidae] coincidental in time and place[J]. BioControl,1980,25(2):171-186.
[56]Callaghan AA, Waters SD, Manning RJ. Alternative repetitional conidia in Conidiobolus adiaeretus:development and germination[J]. Mycological Research,2000,104(10):1270-1275.
[57]Drechsler C. Widespread distribution of Delacroixia coronata and other saprophytic Entomophthoraceae in plant detritus[J]. Science,1952,115:575-576.
[58]Drechsler C. A small Conidiobolus with globose and with elongated secondary conidia[J]. Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences,1955a,45(4):114-117.
[59]Drechsler C. A Small Conidiobolus with resting spores that germinate like zygospores[J]. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club,1962,89(4):233-240.
[60]Drechsler C. A robust Conidiobolus with zygospores containing granular parietal protoplasm[J]. Mycologia,1965,57(6):913-926.
[61]Drechsler C. Two new species of Conidiobolus occurring in leaf mold[J]. American Journal of Botany,1953a,40(3):104-115.
[62]Drechsler C. Two new species of Conidiobolus that produce microconidia[J]. American Journal of Botany,1955b,42(9):793-802.
[63]Drechsler C. Two new species of Conidiobolus[J].American Journal of Botany,1956,43(10):778-787.
[64]Drechsler C. Two small species of Conidiobolus forming lateral zygospores[J]. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club,1957,84(4):268-280.
[65]Drechsler C. Two species of Conidiobolus often forming zygospores adjacent to antheridium-like distentions[J]. Mycologia,1961,53(3):278-303.
[66]Drechsler C. Three new species of Conidiobolus isolated from leaf mold[J]. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science,1953b,43(2):29-34.
[67]Drechsler C. Three new species of Conidiobolus isolated from decaying plant detritus[J]. American Journal of Botany,1955c,42(5):437-443.
[68]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Evaluation of taxonomic characters in the genus Conidiobolus with a key to known species[J]. Mycologia,1967,59:698-713.
[69]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-III[J]. Mycologia,1962,54(6):685-693.
[70]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-IV[J]. Sydowia,1965,19:86-91.
[71]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-V[J]. Mycopathologia,1968,36(3-4):341-346.
[72]King DS. Systematics of Conidiobolus (Entomophthorales) using numerical taxonomy I. Biology and Cluster Analysis[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1976a,54:45-65.
[73]King DS. Systematics of Conidiobolus (Entomophthorales) using numerical taxonomy Ⅱ. Taxonomic considerations[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1976b,54:1285-1296.
[74]King DS. Systematics of Conidiobolus (Entomophthorales) using numerical taxonomy III. Descriptions of recognized species[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1977,55:718-729.
[75]Keller S. Arthropod-pathogenic Entomophthorales of Switzerland. Ⅱ. Erynia, Eryniopsis, Neozygites, Zoophthora and Tarichium[J].Sydowia,1991(43):39-122.
[76]Keller S. Validation of the description of some species of Entomophthorales (Zygomycetes)[J]. Sydowia,1994(46):41-43.
[77]Balazy S, Wisniewski J, Kaczamrek S. Some note worthy fungi occurring on mites[J]. Bull Polish Acad Sci Biol Sci,1987(35):199-224.
[78]Waters SD, Callaghan AA. Conidiobolus iuxtagenitus, a new species with discharge delongate repetitional conidia and conjugation tubes[J]. Mycological Research,1989(93):223-226.
[79]Balazy S. Entomophthorales:Flora of Poland (Flora Polska), Fungi (Mycota), v.24[J]. Krakow, Poland, Polish Academy of Science, W. Szafer Inst. Botany,1993.
[80]Tosi S, Caretta G, Humber RA. Conidiobolus antarcticus, a new species from continental Antarctica[J]. Mycotaxon,2004(90):343-348.
[81]Huang B, Humber RA, Hodge KT. A new species of Conidiobolus from Great Smoky Mountains National Park[J]. Mycotaxon,2007(100):227-233.
[82]Waingankar VM, Singh SK, Srinivasan MC. A new thermophilic species of Conidiobolus from India[J]. Mycopathologia,2008(165):173-177.
[83]Vilela R, Silva SMS, Correa FR, et al. Morphologic and Phylogenetic characterization of Conidiobolus lamprauges recovered from infected sheep[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology,2010(48):427-432.
[84]武觐文,王德祥.块状耳霉的分离、鉴定、培养和寄主范围[J].真菌学报,1984,3(3)：145-148.
[85]程素琴,龙厚茹.有味耳霉的分离,培养和鉴定[J].真菌学报,1987(6)：129-132.
[86]郑本暖,黄耀坚,罗佳.异孢耳霉的分离鉴定[J].微生物学通报,1989(15)：257-259.
[87]黄耀坚,张苏玮,连巧霞.中国虫霉三新纪录[J].福建林学院学报,1991(11)：249-252.
[88]王德祥,瞿俊杰.虫霉目的三种新纪录[J].北京林业大学学报,1993(15)：92-96.
[89]王承芳,李鲲鹏,黄勃.中国一新记录种—近隔接合孢耳霉[J].菌物研究,2010,8：12-14.
[90]王承芳,李鲲鹏,刘玉军等.耳霉属的三个中国新记录种[J].菌物学报,2010,29(4)：595-599.
[91]王德祥,黄少彬.耳霉属的一个新记录及蝇虫生霉和暗孢耳霉的鉴定[J].北京林业大学学报,1988,10(001)：79-81.
[92]赵瑞兴,刘淼,武觐文.耳霉属新记录—粉蚧耳霉[J].北京林业大学学报,1989,11(3)：106-106.
[93]应盛华,冯明光.冠状耳霉产生碱性蛋白酶及其活性[J].菌物系统,2000,19(1)：128-130.
[94]王未名,陈道峰,陆文华等.利用EB-82灭蚜菌防治不同蚜虫的研究[J].中国虫生真菌研究与应用,1997,4：74-77.
[95]王承芳.安徽和山东耳霉物种多样性与分子系统学研究[D].安徽农业大学,2010.
[96]Heinz S. Microbial Ecology:Organisms, Habitats, Activities[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1988.
[97]Zheng RY, Chen GQ. A monograph of Cunninghamella[J]. Mycotaxon,2001,80:1-75.
[98]Zheng RY, Chen GQ, Huang H, et al. A monograph of Rhzopus[J]. Sydowia,2007,59(2):273-372.
[99]Gryganskyi AP, Humber RA, Smith ME, et al. Phylogenetic lineages in Entomophthoromycota[J]. Persoonia,2013,30:94-105.
[100]Lambrecht SC, Loik ME, Inouye DW, et al. Reproductive and physiological responses to simulated climate warming for four subalpine species[J]. New phytologist,2007,173(1):121-134.
[101]Hoffman AA, Sorensen JG, Loeschcke V. Adaptation of Drosophila to temperature extremes:bringing together quantitative and molecular approaches[J]. Journal of Thermal Biology,2003,28:175-213.
[102]Bianciotto V, Bonfante P. Quantification of the nucleus DNA content of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi[J]. Mycological Research.1992,96(12):1071-1076.
[103]White MM, James TY, O'Donnell K, et al. Phylogeny of the Zygomycota based on nucleus ribosomal sequence data[J]. Mycologia,2006,98(6):872-884.
[104]Yi RH, Zhu XR, Zhou RX. Simplified the CTAB DNA extraction from filamentous fungi[J]. Journal of Zhanjiang Ocean University,2003,23:72-73.
[105]Rehner SA, Samuels GJ. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nucleus large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences[J]. Mycological Ressearch,1994,98,625-634.
[106]Vilgalys R, Hester M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species[J]. Journal of Bacteriol,1990,172,4238-4246.
[107]Zoller S, Scheidegger C, Sperisen C. PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming Ascomycetes[J]. Lichenologist,1999,31,511-516.
[108]Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. Phylogenetic relationships among Ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase Ⅱ subunit[J]. Molecular Biology Evolution1999,16,1799-1808.
[109]Hall TA. Bioedit:a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows95/98/NT[J]. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series,1999,41:95-98.
[110]Swofford DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods[J]. Version4. Sunderland, Massachusetts:Sinauer Associates.2003.
[111]Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MRBAYES3:bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models[J]. Bioinformatics,2003,19:1572-1574.
[112]Drechsler C. Two species of Conidiobolus with minutely ridged zygospores[J]. American Journal of Botany,1954,41:567-575.
[113]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Two new species of Conidiobolus from India[J]. Journal of the Mitchell Society,1968,84:211-212.
[114]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-II[J]. Sydowia, Annales Mycologici,1962,16:60-66.
[115]Nie Y, Yu CZ, Liu XY, et al. A new species of Conidiobolus (Ancylistaceae) from Anhui, China[J]. Mycotaxon,2012,120:427-435.
[116]Couch JN. A new Conidiobolus with sexual reproduction[J]. American Journal of Botany,1939,26(3):59-117.
[117]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-I[J]. Sydowia, Annales Mycologici,1961,15:237-241.
[118]Drechsler C. Two new species of Conidiobolus found in plant detritus[J]. American Journal of Botany,1960,47:368-377.
[2]蒲蛰龙,李增智.昆虫真菌学[M].合肥：安徽科学技术出版社,1996.
[3]Hawksworth DL, Kirk PM, Sutton BC, et al. Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi,(8th edition), CAB International, Wallingford. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie,1997,285(4):577-578.
[4]周与良,刑来君.真菌学[M].北京：高等教育出版社.1986.
[5]陈毅坚.真菌分类的发展与变化[J].玉溪师范高等专科学校学报,2000,16(3)：70-71.
[6]Webster J. Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi,(6th edition), Commonwealth Mycological Institute[J]. Transactions of the British Mycological Society,1972,58:357.
[7]贺运春.真菌学[M].北京：中国林业出版社,2008.
[8]White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. PCR protocols a guide to methods and applications [M]. Academic Press,1990,315-322.
[9]王征,戴玉成.真菌生命之树项目(Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life)和美国真菌系统学研究现状[J].菌物学报,2009,28(6)：878-887.
[10]Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi [J]. Mycological Research,2007,111(5):509-547.
[11]James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, et al. Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny[J]. Nature,2006,443:818-822.
[12]Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, et al. Dictionary of the Fungi[M]. Tenth edition: CABI Publishing,2008.
[13]Maresca B, Kobayashi GS. Molecular biology of pathogenic fungi[M]. New York, Telos Press,1994.
[14]Benny GL. Classical morphology in fungi taxonomy[J]. Can J Bot,1994,73:725-730.
[15]朱研研,王耀耀,付美红等.真菌分类鉴定研究进展[J].河北化工,2010,33(4)：玉溪师范高等专科学校学报,2000,16(3)：37-39.
[16]缪承杜,洪葵.真菌分类技术的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(22)：6695-6697.
[17]Mervyn LE. G.S. de Hoog and J. Guarro, Editors, Atlas of clinical fungi [J]. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology,1997,37(2):291.
[18]Noguchi T, Banno Y, Watanabe T, et al. Carbohydrate composition of the isolated cell walls of dermatophytes[J]. Mycopathologia,1975,55(2):71-76.
[19]Millner PD. Radial growth responses to temperature by58Chaetomium species and some taxonomic relationships[J]. Mycologia,1977(69):492-502.
[20]Bartnicki G. Cell wall composition and other biochemical makers in phylogeny[M]. London:Academic Press,1970:81-103.
[21]Andersen B, Thrane U. Secondary metabolites produced by Alternaria infectoria[J]. Mycotoxin,1996,12:54-60.
[22]李多川,张天宇.链格孢属(丝孢纲)数值分类研究初探[J].真菌学报,1993,12(3)：232-239.
[23]刑来君,李明春.普通真菌学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[24]Jahnke KD, Bahnweg G. Activity and structural characterisitics of steroid and non-steroid lipid growth-factors for haliphthoros-milfordensis, a fungal parasite of marine crustaceans[J]. Transactions of the British Mycological Society,1984,83(10):447-454.
[25]黄原.分子系统学—原理、方法及应用[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1998,209-210.
[26]Driver FJ. Milner RWH, Trueman J. A taxonomic revision of Metarhizium based on a phylogenetic analysis of rDNA sequence data[J]. Mycological Research,2000,104(2):134-150.
[27]Huang B, Li CR, Humber RA, et al. Molecular evidence for the taxonomic status of Metarhizium taii and its teleomorph, Cordyceps taii (Hypocreales, Clavicipitaceae)[J]. Mycotaxon,2005,94:137-147.
[28]Larsson E, Ryberg M, et al. Taxonomy and evolutionary relationships within species of section Rimosae (Inocybe) based on ITS, LSU and mtSSU sequence data[J]. Persoonia,2009,23:86.
[29]Wilson AC, Cann RL, Carr SM, et al. Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics[J]. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,1985,26(4):375-400.
[30]Avise JC. Phylogeography[M]. Cambriddge, Moss:Harvard University Press.2000.
[30]黄勃.一些重要虫生真菌的分子系统学研究[D].中国科学技术大学,2000.
[31]Rehner SA, Minnis AM, Sung GH, et al. Phylogeny and systematics of the anamorphic, entomopathogenic genus Beauveria[J].Mycologia,2011,103(5):1055-1073.
[32]Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification[J]. Genome,1994,20(2):176-183.
[33]Han Q, Inglis GD, Hausner G. Phylogenetic relationships among strains of the entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi, as revealed by partial β-tubulin sequences and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis[J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology,2002,34(5):376-383.
[34]Lihme M, Jensen AB, Rosendahl S. Local scale population genetic structure of Entomophthora muscae epidemics[J]. Fungal Ecology,2009,2:81-86.
[35]Coates BS, Hellmich RL, Lewis LC. Beauveria bassiana haplotype determination based on nucleus rDNA internal transcribed spacer PCR-RFLP[J]. Mycological Research,2002,106(1):40-50.
[36]Kwasna H, Nirenberg HI. Delimitation of Penicillium virgatum sp. nov. and P. daleae on the basis of morphological and molecular characters [J]. Mycological Research,2005,109(9):974-982.
[37]Williams, John GK, Kubelik, et al. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1990,18(22):6531-6535.
[38]黄勃,李振刚,樊美珍等.粉拟青霉种内RAPD多态性分析[J].菌物系统,2001,1：62-67.
[39]Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, et al. AFLP:a new technique for DNA fingerprinting[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1995,23(21):4407-4414.
[40]瞿波.中国禾谷镰刀菌(Fusarium graminearum)的遗传多样性及其与尼泊尔、欧美菌系的比较[D].华中农业大学,2003.
[41]Fischer SG, Lerman LS. DNA fragments differing by single base-pair substitutions are separated in denaturing gradient gels:correspondence with melting theory[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,1983,80(6):1579-1583.
[42]刘上峰,傅俊江.变性梯度凝胶电泳的原理、应用及其进展[J].国外医学遗传学分册,2002,25(2)：74-76.
[43]Cai Y, Pu SC, Nie Y, et al. Discrimination of Chinese Beauveria strains by DGGE genotyping and taxonomic identification by sequence analysis of the Bloc nucleus intergenic region[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology,2013(Accepted).
[44]李增智.中国真菌志第13卷—虫霉目[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
[45]Humber RA. An alternative view of certain taxonomic criteria used in the Entomophthorales (Zygomycetes)[J]. Mycotaxon,1981,13(1):191-240.
[46]Tucker BE. A review of the nonentonmogenous Entomophthorales[J]. Mycotaxon,1981,13:481-505.
[47]Ben-Ze'ev I, Kenneth RG, Uziel A. A reclassification of Entomophthora turbinate in Thaxterosporum gen. nov., Neozygitaceae fam. nov.(Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales)[J]. Mycotaxon,1987,28:313-326.
[48]Humber RA. Synopsis of a revised classification for the Entomophthorales (Zygomycotina)[J]. Mycotaxon,1989,36:441-460.
[49]Nagahama T, Sato H, Shimazu M, et al. Phylogenetic divergence of the entomophthoralean fungi:evidence from nucleus18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences [J]. Mycologia,1995,87(2):203-209.
[50]Jensen AB, Gargas A, Eilenberg J, Rosendahl S.1998. Relationships of the insect-pathogenic order Entomophthorales (Zygomycota, Fungi) based on phylogenetic analyses of nucleus small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences (SSU rDNA)[J]. Fungal Genetics and Biology,1998,24(3):325-334.
[51]Gryganskyi AP, Humber RA, Smith ME, et al. Molecular phylogeny of the Entomophthoromycota[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,2012,65(2):682-694.
[52]Humber RA. Entomophthoromycota:a new phylum and reclassification for entomophthoroid fungi [J]. Mycotaxon,2012,120:477-492.
[53]Ben-Ze'ev I, Kenneth RG. Features criteria of taxonomic value in the Entomophthorales:II. A revision of the genus Ervnia nowakowski1881(=Zoophthora Batko1964)[J]. Mycotaxon,1982,14(2):456-475.
[54]Batko A. Some new combinations in the fungus family (Entomophthoraceae (Phycomycetes))[J]. Bull Acad Polon Sci,1964,12(9):403-406.
[55]Ben-Ze'ev I, Kenneth R. Zoophthora phytonomi and Conidiobolus osmodes [Zygomycetes:Entomophthoraceae], two pathogens of Hypera species [Col.: Curculionidae] coincidental in time and place[J]. BioControl,1980,25(2):171-186.
[56]Callaghan AA, Waters SD, Manning RJ. Alternative repetitional conidia in Conidiobolus adiaeretus:development and germination[J]. Mycological Research,2000,104(10):1270-1275.
[57]Drechsler C. Widespread distribution of Delacroixia coronata and other saprophytic Entomophthoraceae in plant detritus[J]. Science,1952,115:575-576.
[58]Drechsler C. A small Conidiobolus with globose and with elongated secondary conidia[J]. Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences,1955a,45(4):114-117.
[59]Drechsler C. A Small Conidiobolus with resting spores that germinate like zygospores[J]. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club,1962,89(4):233-240.
[60]Drechsler C. A robust Conidiobolus with zygospores containing granular parietal protoplasm[J]. Mycologia,1965,57(6):913-926.
[61]Drechsler C. Two new species of Conidiobolus occurring in leaf mold[J]. American Journal of Botany,1953a,40(3):104-115.
[62]Drechsler C. Two new species of Conidiobolus that produce microconidia[J]. American Journal of Botany,1955b,42(9):793-802.
[63]Drechsler C. Two new species of Conidiobolus[J].American Journal of Botany,1956,43(10):778-787.
[64]Drechsler C. Two small species of Conidiobolus forming lateral zygospores[J]. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club,1957,84(4):268-280.
[65]Drechsler C. Two species of Conidiobolus often forming zygospores adjacent to antheridium-like distentions[J]. Mycologia,1961,53(3):278-303.
[66]Drechsler C. Three new species of Conidiobolus isolated from leaf mold[J]. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science,1953b,43(2):29-34.
[67]Drechsler C. Three new species of Conidiobolus isolated from decaying plant detritus[J]. American Journal of Botany,1955c,42(5):437-443.
[68]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Evaluation of taxonomic characters in the genus Conidiobolus with a key to known species[J]. Mycologia,1967,59:698-713.
[69]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-III[J]. Mycologia,1962,54(6):685-693.
[70]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-IV[J]. Sydowia,1965,19:86-91.
[71]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-V[J]. Mycopathologia,1968,36(3-4):341-346.
[72]King DS. Systematics of Conidiobolus (Entomophthorales) using numerical taxonomy I. Biology and Cluster Analysis[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1976a,54:45-65.
[73]King DS. Systematics of Conidiobolus (Entomophthorales) using numerical taxonomy Ⅱ. Taxonomic considerations[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1976b,54:1285-1296.
[74]King DS. Systematics of Conidiobolus (Entomophthorales) using numerical taxonomy III. Descriptions of recognized species[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1977,55:718-729.
[75]Keller S. Arthropod-pathogenic Entomophthorales of Switzerland. Ⅱ. Erynia, Eryniopsis, Neozygites, Zoophthora and Tarichium[J].Sydowia,1991(43):39-122.
[76]Keller S. Validation of the description of some species of Entomophthorales (Zygomycetes)[J]. Sydowia,1994(46):41-43.
[77]Balazy S, Wisniewski J, Kaczamrek S. Some note worthy fungi occurring on mites[J]. Bull Polish Acad Sci Biol Sci,1987(35):199-224.
[78]Waters SD, Callaghan AA. Conidiobolus iuxtagenitus, a new species with discharge delongate repetitional conidia and conjugation tubes[J]. Mycological Research,1989(93):223-226.
[79]Balazy S. Entomophthorales:Flora of Poland (Flora Polska), Fungi (Mycota), v.24[J]. Krakow, Poland, Polish Academy of Science, W. Szafer Inst. Botany,1993.
[80]Tosi S, Caretta G, Humber RA. Conidiobolus antarcticus, a new species from continental Antarctica[J]. Mycotaxon,2004(90):343-348.
[81]Huang B, Humber RA, Hodge KT. A new species of Conidiobolus from Great Smoky Mountains National Park[J]. Mycotaxon,2007(100):227-233.
[82]Waingankar VM, Singh SK, Srinivasan MC. A new thermophilic species of Conidiobolus from India[J]. Mycopathologia,2008(165):173-177.
[83]Vilela R, Silva SMS, Correa FR, et al. Morphologic and Phylogenetic characterization of Conidiobolus lamprauges recovered from infected sheep[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology,2010(48):427-432.
[84]武觐文,王德祥.块状耳霉的分离、鉴定、培养和寄主范围[J].真菌学报,1984,3(3)：145-148.
[85]程素琴,龙厚茹.有味耳霉的分离,培养和鉴定[J].真菌学报,1987(6)：129-132.
[86]郑本暖,黄耀坚,罗佳.异孢耳霉的分离鉴定[J].微生物学通报,1989(15)：257-259.
[87]黄耀坚,张苏玮,连巧霞.中国虫霉三新纪录[J].福建林学院学报,1991(11)：249-252.
[88]王德祥,瞿俊杰.虫霉目的三种新纪录[J].北京林业大学学报,1993(15)：92-96.
[89]王承芳,李鲲鹏,黄勃.中国一新记录种—近隔接合孢耳霉[J].菌物研究,2010,8：12-14.
[90]王承芳,李鲲鹏,刘玉军等.耳霉属的三个中国新记录种[J].菌物学报,2010,29(4)：595-599.
[91]王德祥,黄少彬.耳霉属的一个新记录及蝇虫生霉和暗孢耳霉的鉴定[J].北京林业大学学报,1988,10(001)：79-81.
[92]赵瑞兴,刘淼,武觐文.耳霉属新记录—粉蚧耳霉[J].北京林业大学学报,1989,11(3)：106-106.
[93]应盛华,冯明光.冠状耳霉产生碱性蛋白酶及其活性[J].菌物系统,2000,19(1)：128-130.
[94]王未名,陈道峰,陆文华等.利用EB-82灭蚜菌防治不同蚜虫的研究[J].中国虫生真菌研究与应用,1997,4：74-77.
[95]王承芳.安徽和山东耳霉物种多样性与分子系统学研究[D].安徽农业大学,2010.
[96]Heinz S. Microbial Ecology:Organisms, Habitats, Activities[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1988.
[97]Zheng RY, Chen GQ. A monograph of Cunninghamella[J]. Mycotaxon,2001,80:1-75.
[98]Zheng RY, Chen GQ, Huang H, et al. A monograph of Rhzopus[J]. Sydowia,2007,59(2):273-372.
[99]Gryganskyi AP, Humber RA, Smith ME, et al. Phylogenetic lineages in Entomophthoromycota[J]. Persoonia,2013,30:94-105.
[100]Lambrecht SC, Loik ME, Inouye DW, et al. Reproductive and physiological responses to simulated climate warming for four subalpine species[J]. New phytologist,2007,173(1):121-134.
[101]Hoffman AA, Sorensen JG, Loeschcke V. Adaptation of Drosophila to temperature extremes:bringing together quantitative and molecular approaches[J]. Journal of Thermal Biology,2003,28:175-213.
[102]Bianciotto V, Bonfante P. Quantification of the nucleus DNA content of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi[J]. Mycological Research.1992,96(12):1071-1076.
[103]White MM, James TY, O'Donnell K, et al. Phylogeny of the Zygomycota based on nucleus ribosomal sequence data[J]. Mycologia,2006,98(6):872-884.
[104]Yi RH, Zhu XR, Zhou RX. Simplified the CTAB DNA extraction from filamentous fungi[J]. Journal of Zhanjiang Ocean University,2003,23:72-73.
[105]Rehner SA, Samuels GJ. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nucleus large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences[J]. Mycological Ressearch,1994,98,625-634.
[106]Vilgalys R, Hester M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species[J]. Journal of Bacteriol,1990,172,4238-4246.
[107]Zoller S, Scheidegger C, Sperisen C. PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming Ascomycetes[J]. Lichenologist,1999,31,511-516.
[108]Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. Phylogenetic relationships among Ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase Ⅱ subunit[J]. Molecular Biology Evolution1999,16,1799-1808.
[109]Hall TA. Bioedit:a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows95/98/NT[J]. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series,1999,41:95-98.
[110]Swofford DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods[J]. Version4. Sunderland, Massachusetts:Sinauer Associates.2003.
[111]Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MRBAYES3:bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models[J]. Bioinformatics,2003,19:1572-1574.
[112]Drechsler C. Two species of Conidiobolus with minutely ridged zygospores[J]. American Journal of Botany,1954,41:567-575.
[113]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Two new species of Conidiobolus from India[J]. Journal of the Mitchell Society,1968,84:211-212.
[114]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-II[J]. Sydowia, Annales Mycologici,1962,16:60-66.
[115]Nie Y, Yu CZ, Liu XY, et al. A new species of Conidiobolus (Ancylistaceae) from Anhui, China[J]. Mycotaxon,2012,120:427-435.
[116]Couch JN. A new Conidiobolus with sexual reproduction[J]. American Journal of Botany,1939,26(3):59-117.
[117]Srinivasan MC, Thirumalachar MJ. Studies on species of Conidiobolus from India-I[J]. Sydowia, Annales Mycologici,1961,15:237-241.
[118]Drechsler C. Two new species of Conidiobolus found in plant detritus[J]. American Journal of Botany,1960,47:368-377.