基于粮食安全的县域耕地压力评价
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
粮食安全关乎国家的安危,是国家保持稳定、发展经济的基础。河南省作为我国粮食主产区对国家粮食安全战略起着重要的作用,被称为“中国花木第一县”的鄢陵县,是河南省传统的农业县,近年来调整种植业结构,推进产业化经营,经济作物种植面积增加,非农用地增加,市场利益的驱使必然促使耕地转化为其它用地,对粮食安全存在潜在的威胁,因此,对鄢陵县进行耕地压力研究,找出影响粮食产量的因素,保障粮食安全对于鄢陵县有现实的影响意义。
     本论文以可持续发展理论、人地协调理论、土地稀缺理论、粮食安全理论为理论基础,借助前人研究结果所定义的最小人均耕地面积和耕地压力指数模型来分析鄢陵县粮食安全情况,对鄢陵县1996-2010年影响耕地压力指数的相关要素进行分析,这些要素包括人口数量、粮食单产、粮食总产、粮食播种面积比重、复种指数、粮食自给率。通过这些要素分析鄢陵县的粮食生产是否能满足现有生活水平的需要,并且借用其他学者的研究成果,把鄢陵县的耕地压力状况和河南省18个地市的耕地压力状况作出比较;同时也分析了鄢陵县分乡镇的耕地压力状况,并对分乡镇的耕地压力指数作出比较,分析了各个乡镇耕地压力指数不同的原因。最后通过GM(1,1)灰色系统模型对影响耕地压力指数的相关因素进行预测,并且预测了鄢陵县在不同粮食自给率水平下的耕地压力指数。论文还对影响鄢陵县实际粮食产量因素进行灰色关联分析,找出了影响粮食单产的主要因素,并提出提高粮食产量,保障粮食安全的相关建议。研究结果表明:
     (1)在1996-2010年间,鄢陵县的实际人均耕地面积在不断下降,最小人均耕地面积呈现先升后降的趋势,耕地压力指数的变化趋势和最小人均耕地面积的变化趋势保持一致,在2003年的时候耕地压力指数最大,稍稍大于1,粮食安全受到威胁,这是由于自然灾害所致。其它年间的耕地压力相对较小,耕地压力指数小于1,没有超过耕地预警线,粮食的生产能够满足需求,可以保障粮食安全。总的来说,鄢陵县耕地压力不大,处于粮食安全状态。
     (2)对鄢陵县分乡镇的耕地压力进行比较可以发现,耕地压力的不同是由于经济的发展和产业结构的调整,城区所在的地方耕地压力指数最大,耕地压力指数大于2。大马乡和柏梁镇耕地压力指数大于1,由于是花卉生产基地,经济作物的种植面积较大,粮食生产数量相对较少,所以耕地压力也稍大。
     (3)对于鄢陵县未来的耕地压力指数预测表明,鄢陵县未来的耕地压力小于1,不会出现粮食危机,可以适当调整种植结构,促进经济发展。但是也要严格控制土地用途,保障粮食安全。
Food security,which relates to the safety of the country, is the basis for countries to maintain stableeconomic development. As China's major grain producing areas, Henan province plays an important role innational food security strategy. Known as the "Chinese flowers County", Yanling county is a traditionalagricultural county in Henan province. In recent years, It has being adjusting planting structure, promotingthe industry management. Driven by market interests is bound to arable land converted to other land, andthe increased acreage of cash crops and non-agricultural land is a potential danger on food security.Therefore, doing researches on Yanling County farmland pressure to identify the impact on foodproduction factors have an effect on ensuring food security for Yanling County reality.
     Based on the theory of sustainable development, human co-ordination theory, theory of scarcity ofland, food security theory, the paper analyzes the food security situation in Yanling county with the help ofProfessor Cai Yunlong defined by the minimum per capita arable land area and the pressure index oncropland model, and the relevant elements of the pressure index on cropland from1996to2010. Theseelements include population, grain yield, total grain output, the proportion of area sown to grain, multiplecropping index, food self-sufficiency rate, by which to analyze whether Yanling County's food productioncan meet the needs of the existing standard of living. By borrowing the other research’s results, it makescomparisons between Yanling County's farmland pressure status and the arable land of18cities in HenanProvince pressure situation; it also annalyzes Yanling County townships of cultivated land pressure, andpoints of township farmland pressure index to compare the pressure index on cropland at the township fordifferent reasons. Pressure index on cropland in the last gray system model GM (1,1) to forecast and predict the Yanling County in the different levels of food self-sufficiency rate pressure index on cropland.The gray correlation is used in this paper to analyze the impact of the actual grain yield of factors ofYanling County, in order to identify the main factors affecting the yield of grain, and proposedrecommendations to increase food production to ensure food security.
     The results show that:
     (1) From1996to2010, real per capita arable land in Yanling County continues to decline, theminimum per capita arable land area showing the trend first and then decreased, consistent with the trendof the pressure index on cropland and the trend of the minimum per capita arable land area. In2003, thepressure index on cropland is the largest, slightly greater than1, food security is threatened, which iscaused by the natural disasters. Arable land pressure in the other years is relatively small, the pressureindex on cropland is less than1, which does not exceed the the farmland warning line, and food productionis sufficient enough to meet people’s demand to ensure food security. Overall, the arable land pressure issmall in Yanling County, in the state of food security.
     (2) By comparing the farmland pressure of Yanling County townships, we can find that cultivatedpressure difference is due to the economic development and the adjustment of industrial structure. In urbanareas, the pressure index on cropland is the largest, which is greater than2. The index on cropland inMalaysian Township and Boliang Zhen is greater than1,because both areas are the flower production bases,they have the large acreage of cash crops, and food production is a relatively small.
     (3) Pressure index on cropland in Yanling County future projections indicate that the future of YanlingCounty's farmland pressure is less than1, the food crisis will not appear. The planting structure could beadjusted appropriately in order to promote economic development. But land use must be strictly controlledfor food security.
引文
[1]卢良恕.当前粮食安全问题的战略分析[J].作物杂志,2004,(3):1-5.
    [2]世界粮食不安全状况[R].联合国粮农组织,2009.
    [3] FAO. The state of food insecurity in the world: economic crises-impacts and lessons learned[R].2009
    [4]娄源功.中国粮食安全的宏观分析与比较研究[J].农场经济管理,2003,(3):30-32.
    [5]刘正伟.基于耕地压力指数的湖北省省粮食安全研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学硕士论文,2008.
    [6]陈白明,周小萍.中国粮食自给率与耕地资源安全底线的探讨[J].经济地理,2005,(2):145-148.
    [7] Brown, L.R Who will feed China? Wake-up for a small planet, New York: World-watch Institute.1995.
    [8]朱泽.中国粮食安全状况研究[J].中国农村经济,1997,(5):26-33.
    [9]史培军等.中国粮食自给率水平与安全性研究[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1996,(6):74-80.
    [10]吕耀.中国食物保障可持续性及其评价[J].中国农村经济,1999,(8):25-30.
    [11]黄季焜.迈向21世纪的中国粮食回顾与展望[J].农业经济问题,1996,(1):16-23.
    [12]郭书田.中国粮食供求与国际贸易[J].南京经济学院学报,1997,(5):1-5.
    [13]吴天锡.粮食安全的新概念和新要求[J].世界农业,2001,(6):8-10.
    [14]肖春阳.中外粮食、粮食安全概念比较[J].黑龙江粮食,2009,(2):40-43.
    [15]杨超.河北省粮食安全问题研究[D].天津:天津大学管理学院硕士论文,2006.
    [16]祝滨滨,刘笑然.我国粮食安全概念及标准研究[J].经济纵横,2010,(11):57-60.
    [17]黄广宇.福建省耕地资源态势与粮食安全对策[J].资源科学,2002,(1):45-50.
    [18]李玉平,蔡云龙.区域耕地-人口-粮食系统动态分析与耕地压力预测——以河北省邢台市为例[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2007,(2):230-234.
    [19]舒敏.新农村建设背景下四川财政支农总量与结构问题研究[D].四川:四川农业大学硕士论文,2007.
    [20] S. Samapundo et a1.Predictive Modeling of the Individual and Combined Effect of Water Activityand Temperature on the Radial Growth of Fusarium verticilliodes and F proliferatum onCorn[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2005(105):35-52.
    [21]杨涛.WTO体制下的中国粮食贸易地位与粮食安全[D].天津:天津财经大学,2008.
    [22]王永侠.基于粮食安全战略下的重庆市耕地保有量研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2008.
    [23]林永刚.广东省粮食安全对策的研究[D].广东:中山大学,2008.
    [24]杨超.河北省粮食安全问题研究[D].天津:天津大学,2006.
    [25]Maxwell S, E et al. Alternative Food Security Indictors: Revising the Frequency and Severity ofCoping Strategies [J].Food Policy.1999(24):411-429.
    [26]Maxwell S. Franken B, Household T. Food Security: Concepts,Indications,Measurements, ATechnical Review [M].UNICEF,New York and IFAD, Rome,1992.
    [27]Smith L, Obeid A, Jensen H.The Geography and Causes of Food Insecurity in Developing Countries[J]. Agriculture Economics,2000(22):199-215.
    [28]郑拥军.粮食安全下的甘肃省耕地保有量预测研究[D].甘肃:甘肃农业大学,2010.
    [29]唐为民.美国的现代化粮食流通[J].四川粮油科技,2003,(2):2-6.
    [30]张安禄.美国农地保护的政策措施[J].世界农业,2000,(1):21-26.
    [31]朱长国.加拿大、英国的粮食生产与流通[J].中国粮食经济,2000,(1):21-24.
    [32]颜波.澳大利亚的粮食流通体制与政府调控措施[J].粮食科技与经济,2002,(2):41-42.
    [33]袁晓丽等.国际化框架下的日本农业问题及政策对我国的启示[J].河北农业大学学报,2003,(4):64-70.
    [34]张宁宁.日本土地资源管理一瞥[J].中国土地管理科学,1999,(1):45-47.
    [35]付小强.印度的“第二次绿色革命”[J].现代国际关系,2004,(5):31-32.
    [36]刘正伟.基于耕地压力指数的湖北省粮食安全研究[D].华中师范大学,2008.
    [37]张士功.耕地资源与粮食安全[D].中国农业科学院博士论文,2005.
    [38]蔡云龙,傅泽强,戴尔阜.区域最小人均耕地面积与耕地资源调控[J].地理学报,2002,(3):127-132.
    [39]刘正伟.基于耕地压力指数的湖北省粮食安全研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2008.
    [40]李中才.内蒙古耕地压力的组合预测模型及动态分析[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2010,(4):385-389.
    [41]康开进.福建省耕地资源数量安全问题研究[D].福建:福建农林大学,2011.
    [42]陈白明,周小萍.中国粮食自给率与耕地资源安全底线的探讨[J].经济地理,2005,(2):145-148.
    [43]鲁西奇.人地关系理论与历史地理研究[J].史学理论研究,2001,(2):36-46.
    [44杨志峰,隋欣.基于生态系统健康的生态承载力评价[J].环境科学学报,2005,24(2):586~594.
    [45]胡保军.麻阳河国家级自然保护区人地关系研究[D].贵州:贵州师范大学,2009.
    [46] Wright L E et al LESA. Agricultural land evaluation and site assessment[J]. Journal of Soil and WaterConservation,1993.
    [47]毕宝德.土地经济学[M],北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
    [48]朱晓燕等.地球的心声—对可持续发展价值目标的透析[J].前沿,2004,(1):171-172.
    [49] F Eric E Lambina, B.L Turner, J.Samuel. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: movingbeyond the myths [J].Global Environmental Change.2001(11):261-269.
    [50] Jaques Antoine, Frankjihn J, Dent Sims and Robert Brinkman. Agro-eco-Logical Zones and ResoureManagement Domains in Relation to Land Use Planning FAO,1998.
    [51]A Veldkamp, E.E Lambina.Predicting land-use change[J].Agriculture Ecosystems andEnvironment,2001,(85):1-6.
    [52]ICSU-IU FoST: The Food Security Problem-Factors affecting the Global Food Supply [A]. Abstractsof14th World Congress of Food Science&Technology[C].2008
    [53]曹甲伟.我国小康阶段安全人均粮食占有量研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2003.
    [54]杨小爱.焦作市耕地压力评价及预测[D].焦作:河南理工大学,2011.
    [55]李启宇.四川耕地资源预警研究[D].四川:四川农业大学,2006.
    [56]封志明,李香莲.耕地与粮食安全战略:藏粮于土,提高中国土地资源的综合生产能力[J].地理学与国土研究,2006,16(3):1-5.
    [57]曹银贵,袁春,周伟,陶金,华蓉.中国耕地变化的驱动因子及其省域差异分析[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(6):17-22.
    [58]朱红波,张安录.中国耕地压力指数时空规律分析[J].资源科学,2007,(2):104-108.
    [59]李根明等.地压力评价模型的建立及应用[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2007,(11):464-470.
    [60]李玉平.河南省粮食生产与耕地变化的分析及预测[J].地域研究与开发,2007,(3):95-98.
    [61]马松林.河南省耕地压力时空分布研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2011,(5):35-36.
    [62]刘思峰等.灰色系统理论及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    [63]武威等.基于MATLAB灰色系统模型的拱坝温控数据预测[J].水电自动化与大坝监,2010,(1):51-53.
    [64]杨桂山.长江三角洲耕地数量变化趋势及总量动态平衡前景分析[J].自然资源学报,2002,(5):52-57.
    [65]尹世久.我国粮食产量波动影响因素的经验分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,(10):28-34.
    [66]邵晓梅,杨勤业,张洪业.山东省耕地变化趋势及驱动力研究[J].地理研究,2001,20(3):298—305.
    [67]李启宇.四川省耕地资源预警研究[D].四川:四川农业大学,2006.
    [68吴绍洪,李荣生.中国耕地与未来30年食物需求、保障及对策[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(2):12l-129.
    [69]鄢陵县统计局.鄢陵县统计年鉴[G].河南统计出版社,1985-2010.
    [70]陈百明,刘新卫,杨红.LUCC研究的最新进展评述[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(1):22-29.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700