罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体泄漏扩散模型与风险评价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
气体危险货物作为燃料、原料及生产加工辅料在众多行业和人民日常生活中被广泛应用,但因具有种类繁多、性质复杂、危险性高等显著特征,其道路运输安全日益受到各界关注。其中,毒性气体除可能具有易燃、易爆特性外,毒害作用则是对公共安全与生态环境的最大威胁。毒性气体运输过程中一旦发生泄漏,将对运输沿线居民的生命健康与财产安全造成严重伤害,对周边环境的破坏及长远影响更加难以估量。罐式车辆是液体与气体危险货物道路运输的主要承载工具。相关调查表明,罐式车辆在我国道路危险货物运输车辆中占有较高比例,而近80%的道路运输危险货物事故涉及罐车。可见罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体是具有较高风险的作业活动,确保其安全与可靠性,对保障人民群众生命财产安全及社会稳定具有特殊意义。目前,国内外相关研究存在薄弱环节,一些关键问题有待深入探索。本文研究内容主要有以下方面:
     ①系统分析国内外道路危险货物运输风险评价和毒性气体泄漏扩散模型研究现状、发展趋势及存在的主要问题;通过现场勘查、资料查阅并使用各类事故数据系统,整理了886起我国罐式车辆道路运输危险货物事故案例;采用统计分析、对比分析等方法探究我国罐式车辆道路运输危险货物事故规律,并掌握其时间、空间、致因、形态、后果分布及泄漏概率等重要统计特征。
     ②基于罐式车辆道路运输危险货物事故特征,以系统论、控制论及安全工程学为理论依据,深入分析罐式车辆道路运输危险货物事故机理;建立基于改进GRA(Generalized Reliability Analysis)方法的罐式车辆道路运输危险货物可靠性分析模型,为事故防治及风险减缓提供理论依据。
     ③针对我国道路运输危险货物风险分析研究中事故概率取值依赖国外数据的现状,基于国内事故特征研究及多元非线性回归方法对国外相关数据进行合理修正,提出符合我国国情的道路运输危险货物事故概率取值方法;充分考虑道路因素与非道路因素对罐式车辆道路运输危险货物事故易发性的影响,提出罐式车辆道路运输危险货物泄漏事故概率计算模型。
     ④研究确定罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体泄漏事故后果严重度,充分考虑人口与环境因素,提出平均人口密度、时变人口密度和路段环境敏感度的概念及量化方法,用以建立针对不同对象的风险评价模型。
     ⑤考虑事故概率与事故后果两方面因素,构建罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体泄漏风险评价模型。针对罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体对沿线人员、环境、公共设施等社会元素的潜在威胁,建立了基于BP神经网络的社会风险度评价模型;针对罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体对沿线居民生命财产安全等个人因素造成的潜在威胁,建立了基于蒙特卡罗方法的个人风险值计算模型;
     ⑥基于数学物理方法并结合我国道路运输危险货物实际,推导出罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体泄漏的大气扩散方程;解决了扩散参数选取、边界条件设定、初始源强获取、变化及位置控制等系列问题,最终建立适用于固定点源连续泄漏、瞬时泄漏、移动点源连续泄漏的罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体泄漏扩散模型。
     ⑦运用现代求解理论与工具,对固定点源连续泄漏、瞬时泄漏、移动点源连续泄漏等典型事故场景进行数值模拟,验证所建扩散模型的合理性与适用性;得到不同事故场景下毒性气体三维空间分布及不同时刻各浓度区域范围,为事故预警、救援及风险分析提供科学依据。
     最后,运用所建罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体泄漏风险评价模型,对实例路段社会风险和个人风险进行分析,并得到道路两侧人口个体风险与群体风险评价结果;用所建罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体泄漏扩散模型,对事故场景进行数值模拟,并提出基于时间的事故预警方案及事故救援、疏散策略。研究表明,本文建立的罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体泄漏风险评价模型能够客观反映途经路段的风险水平,罐式车辆道路运输毒性气体泄漏扩散模型方程能准确描述毒性气体三维扩散过程,且与道路运输实际高度接近。
As the fuel, raw material and the manufactory producing auxiliary material, the gas hazardous goods are widely applied in the numerous professions and the people's daily life. Its road transportation safety receives attention from all circles day by day because of some marked feature such as its great variety, the complex nature, the high risk. Besides the flammable and combustible feature, the toxic action of toxic gases is the biggest threat to the public and the ecological environment. Once the toxic gas leaks out in the transportation process, it will cause serious consequences to resident's health of life and safety of property along the route. What's the worse, it's difficult to evaluate the destruction and the long-term effect to the peripheral environment. Tank cars are the main tool to transport the liquid and the gas hazardous goods. The related investigation indicates that tank cars hold high proportion in the vehicles which transport hazardous goods in our country, and nearly80percents of the accidents about transportation of road hazardous goods involve them. So it is a risky activity that tank car transport of gas hazardous goods. To mak sure its security and reliability has special significance to ensure safety of people's life and property and social stability. At present, there are some weak links in the related domestic and foreign research. And some key problems still remain to be explored and resolved. Therefore, the main study context for this thesis is as follows:
     ①The thesis carried on systematic research to the risk analysis of the domestic and foreign transportation of hazardous goods on road, the study present situation, the trend of development and the main existing problems of the leakage and diffusion model based on the toxic gas.886accident cases about the road hazardous goods transported by tank car in our country are sorted out through the investigation on the spot, referring data, using kinds of data systems for accident. Accidental rule of the road hazardous goods transported by tank car in our country was explored, using methods such as statistical analysis and contrastive analysis, and the important statistical features such as temporal distribution, dimensional distribution, reason, type, consequence and leakage probability.
     ②On the base of accidental features for the road ransportation of hazardous goods by tank car, taking system theory, cybernetics, safety engineering as basis, this thesis analysed the accidental mechanism about road ransportation of hazardous goods by tank car thoroughly; The analytical model for the reliability of road ransportation of hazardous goods by tank car was established, based on improved GRA (Generalized Reliability Analysis) method,which provides the theory basis of preventing accident and slowing down risk.
     ③Because the probability of accident about road tranmportation of hazardous goods in our country is calculated depends on overseas data, the overseas data was corrected reasonably and the computational method conforming to China conditions for the probability of accident about road transportation of hazardous goods was proposed, on the base of the research to domestic accidental feature and the method of multi non-liner regression.
     ④On the base of the research to accidental severity of the toxic gas leakage, considering the demographic and the environmental factor fully, the concept and quantificational method for the medium density of population, the time-varing density of population and the sensitivity of road environment were proposed, in order to establish the risk evaluation model applied to different object.
     ⑤Considering the accident probability and consequence, the risk evaluation model for the research to the leakage of toxic gas was established; Because the leakage of toxic gas is a potential threat to the people along road, environment, public facilities and so on, the evaluation model for the social risk based on the BP neural network was established; Because the leakage of toxic gas is a potential threat to safety of people's life and property along road, the computational model for personal risk based on Monte Carlo method was established.
     ⑥Based on physics-mathematic method and fact of cargo road transportation in China, dispersion equation for leakage accident of road transportation for toxic gases by tank car was derivated; problems such as diffusion parameter choosing, boundary condition setting, initial source strength calculating, source strength and location controlling were solved, and diffusion model fits for continuous leakage for fixed point source, instantaneous leakage for fixed point source and continuous leakage for moving point source were established.
     ⑦Modern solving theory and tools were utilized to simulate the typical accident scene, such as continuous leakage for fixed point source, instantaneous leakage for fixed point source and continuous leakage for moving point source, which proved rationality and validity of the diffusion model; on the other hand, real-time spatial distribution of concentration and dangerous area in different accident scene were achieved, which can be used as the basis for counter plan making and risk analysis.
     At last, the established risk evaluating model was used to analysis the social and individual risk of example road section, and the risk for units and colony on sides of road were achieved; on the other hand, the established diffuse model was used to simulate an accident scene, and the counter plan, scheme for evacuation and succor according to time were put forward. It is indicated, that the established risk evaluation model for road transportation of toxic gases by tank car can reflect the risk level of road section objectively; and the diffuse model for tank car leakage accidents can describe the three-dimensional diffusion of toxic gases exactly and is closer to the fact of road transportation.
引文
[1]国家质量监督检验检疫总局,国家标准化管理委员会.GB6944-2005危险货物分类和品名编号[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005
    [2]陕西省交通概况[EB/OL]http://www.sxsjtt.gov.cn/gzfwjtgk.asp?jtt=gzfw.
    [3]危险品货物运输“稳”字当头[EB/OL].http://www.szwl.cn/wuliu21/w15215/.
    [4]中国国家标准化管理委员会.危险货物品名表(GB12268-2005)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005
    [5]蔡继红,林建华,刘锦华.“3.29”京沪高速公路氯气泄漏事故的应急监测[J].黑龙江环境通报,2005,29(04):45-46
    [6]Erkut, E., Verter, V. Hazardous materials logistics. In:Drezner, Z. (Ed.), Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. Springer-Verlag, New York,1995(20):467-506
    [7]Zografos K.G., Davis C. Multi-objective programming approach for routing hazardous materials [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering,1989,115:661-673
    [8]Bonvicini, S., Leonelli, P., Spadoni, G. Risk analysis of hazardous materials transportation: evaluating uncertainty by means of fuzzy logic [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,1998,62 (1):59-74
    [9]Leonelli P., Bonvicini S., Spadoni G. Hazardous materials transportation:a risk analysis based routing methodology [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2000,71:283-300
    [10]全邵辉.事故理论与分析技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004
    [11]刘玉增,王洪明.道路交通事故学[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2005
    [12]OkamotoTsuneo, ShibaFumio,YamadaMasakazu.REAR-END CRASH CHARACTERIS-TICS AND FUEL SYSTEM SAFETY [J].SAE Preprints.1977, n 770815:26-30
    [13]Price D.L, Schmidt J.W., Davis R.P. Hazardous materials highway transportation accident potentials in Virginia [J].Accident Analysis and Prevention.1982,14(4):257-265
    [14]Rittvo, Steven M., Haddow, George D.TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:A CASE STUDY [J].Transportation Quarterly,1984,38(1):137-151
    [15]Gallagher, Gerard A. LESSONS IN HAZARDOUS MATERIAL TRANSPORTATION BASED ON CASE HISTORIES[C]. Symposium on Characterization of Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of Polymer Systems. New York:AIChE,1986:25-31
    [16]Abkowitz M., List G. Hazardous materials transportation incident-accident information systems[J]. Transportation Research Record.1987, n1148:1-8
    [17]Blades C.J. Safe transport of cryogenic liquids by road[J]. British Cryogenics Council Symposium.1988,28(12):853-855
    [18]Harwood, Douglas W., Viner, John G., Russel, Eugene R.Truck accident and release rates for hazmat routing[C]. Proceedings of the National Conference on Hazardous Materials Transportation, ASCE,1990:177-190
    [19]Hobeika, Antoine G, Kim, Sigon, Sethuraman, Raja.Characteristics of hazardous material accidents in Pennsylvania[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering,1993,119(2):226-238
    [20]Helmersson L. VTI Rapport [M]. No 387:1-150.1994
    [21]Qiao Yuanhua, Gentile, Michela, Mannan M., Sam. Fuzzy logic methodology for accident frequency assessment in hazardous materials transportation[C]. Center for Chemical Process Safety-19th Annual International Conference-Emergency Planning Preparedness, Prevention and Response, AICE,2004:215-224
    [22]Trepanier M., Leroux M., de Marcellis-Warin. Cross-analysis of hazmat road accidents using multiple databases [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention.2009,41(6):1192-1198
    [23]Qiao Yuanhua, Keren N., Mannan, M., Sam. Utilization of accident databases and fuzzy sets to estimate frequency of HazMat transport accidents [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials.2009,167 (3):367-382
    [24]C. Samuel, N. Keren, M.C. Shelley, Steven A. Freeman. Frequency analysis of hazardous material transportation incidents as a function of distance from origin to incident location [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.2009,22(6):783-790
    [25]刘浔华.在用液化气体汽车罐车事故分析及改进措施[J].压力容器.1997,14(1):81-84
    [26]陈继章,施倬嘉,蔡凤英,谈宗山.液氯汽车罐车罐体安全附件泄漏事故树分析[J].工业安全与环保.2005,31(4):51-53
    [27]沈小燕,刘浩学,李永芳.道路危险货物运输事故原因分析与对策研究[J].中国公共安全:学术版.2006,4(1):57-61
    [28]吴宗之,孙猛.200起危险化学品公路运输事故的统计分析及对策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术.2006,2(2):3-8
    [29]高建刚,陈宏云,郑昊.危险货物道路运输事故统计分析[J].中国安全科学学报 2007,17(8):160-166
    [30]杨琳,吴宗之.液氯槽罐车公路运输事故原因分析及建议措施[J].中国安全生产科学技术.2007,3(1):31-34
    [31]牛玉欣,李扬.公路危险品运输事故原因分析及对策研究[J].中国西部科技.2007,11:74-76
    [32]尹硕辉,唐亚鸣,张晓.槽罐车泄漏事故原因分析及预防建议[J].科技创新导报.2009,34:104-105
    [33]陈国华.风险工程学[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2007
    [34]Qiao Yuanhua. Quantitative Transportation risk Analysis based on available data database decision support tools for Hazardous Materials[R].Texas A&M University,2007.
    [35]Shappert, L.B., Brobst, W.A., Langhaar, J.W., Sisler, J.A. Probability and consequences of transportation accidents involving radioactive-material shipments in the nuclear fuel cycle [J]. Nuclear Safety,1973,14(6):597-604.
    [36]Lautkaski R., Fieandt J. Risk Assessment of the Transportation of Hazardous Gases in Bulk[C].3rd International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries. Swiss Soc of Chem Ind.1980:1052-1057
    [37]Lloyd L., Philipson Hyla S., Napadensky. The methodologies of hazardous materials transportation risk assessment [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials.1982,6(4):361-382
    [38]Transport Canada. Major hazards in the transport and storage of pressure liquefied gases: Proceedings of an international conference, selected papers [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials.1988,20(3):392
    [39]Raj P.K., Morris J.A. Computerized spill hazard evaluation models[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials.1990,25(1):77-92
    [40]Glickman, Theodore S. Expeditious risk assessment of the highway transportation of flammable liquids in bulk [J]. Transportation Science.1991,25(2):115-123
    [41]Purdy, G. Risk analysis of the transportation of dangerous goods by road and rail[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials.1993,33(2):229-259
    [42]Saccomanno F., Shortreed J.H.. Hazmat transport risks:Societal and individual perspectives [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering.1993,119(2):177-188
    [43]Parentela, Emelinda Maano.. A framework for modeling risk and emergency response in hazardous materials transportation [D]. Las Vegas:University of Nevada, Las Vegas:1996
    [44]S. Bonvicini, P. Leonelli, G. Spadoni. Risk analysis of hazardous materials transportation: evaluating uncertainty by means of fuzzy logic [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials.1998, 62(1):59-74
    [45]Bubbico, Roberto, Ferrari, Cinzia, Mazzarotta, Barbara. Risk analysis of LPG transport by road and rail [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.2000,13(1):27-31
    [46]Hwang, Steve T., Brown, David F., O'Steen, James K., Policastro, Anthony J., Dunn, William E.. Risk assessment for national transportation of selected hazardous materials [J].Transportation Research Record.2001, n1163:114-124
    [47]Zhang J., Hodgson J., Erkut E.. Using GIS to assess the risks of hazardous materials transport in networks [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2000,2(121):316-329.
    [48]Verter V, Kara B.Y.. A GIS-based framework for hazardous materials transport risk assessment [J].Risk Analysis,2001,21 (6):1109-1120.
    [49]Bubbico R., Ferrari C., Mazzarotta B.. Risk analysis of LPG transport by road and rail [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2000,13 (1):27-31
    [50]Bubbico R., DICave S., Mazzarotta B.. Risk analysis for road and rail transport of hazardous materials:a GIS approach [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2004,17:483-488.
    [51]张建莉.公路运输液态化学品风险辨识及危险度评价研究[D].长安大学硕士学位论文.2006
    [52]刘凯峥.毒性气体公路罐车运输危险性辨识及风险评价研究[D].长安大学硕士学位论文.2009
    [53]任常兴,吴宗之.危险品道路运输风险分级指数法研究[J].安全与环境学报2006,6(4):126-129
    [54]庄英伟.LPG罐车公路运输风险评价方法及应用研究[D].首都经贸大学硕士学位论文.2004
    [55]郝连胜.危险化学品罐式集装箱公路运输风险评价研究[D].上海海事大学硕士学位论文.2007
    [56]王伶俐,海涛,张星臣.基于风险控制的铁路危险货物罐车优化配置仿真模型[J].交通运输系统工程与信息.2008,8(1):98-101
    [57]李谷楠.危险品运输罐式半挂汽车列车侧翻危险状态仿真分析[D].吉林大学硕士学位论文.2009
    [58]RAMSDELL JR JV, HINDS WT. Concentration fluctuations and peak-to-mean concentration ratios in plumes from a ground-level continuous point source [J]. Atmospheric Environment, v 5, n 7, p 483-495, July 1971
    [59]Lee W.H., Weinstein M. COMPUTER MODELING OF MASSIVE LNG SPILLS FROM STORAGE TANKS AT POINT CONCEPTION, OXNARD, AND LOS ANGELES, HARBOR, CALIFORNIA [J]. Proceedings-IEEE Computer Society's International Computer Software & Applications Conference, p 83-99,1980
    [60]Pepper D.W., Cooper R.E., Baker A.J.. INVESTIGATION OF MULTI-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTATIONAL MODELS FOR CALCULATING POLLUTANT TRANSPORT [J]. Rundfunktechnische Mitteilungen. v 10, p 397-412,1980
    [61]Havens J.A.. A description and computational assessment of the SIGMET LNG vapor dispersion model [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, v 6, n 1-2, p 181-195, Jul 1982
    [62]Dvore D.S., Vaglio Laurin, R.. Atmospheric diffusion of small instantaneous point releases near the ground [J]. Atmospheric Environment-Part A General Topics, v 16, n 12, p 2791-2798, 1982
    [63]Purdy G., Davies P.C.. TOXIC GAS INCIDENTS-SOME IMPORTANT CONSIDER-ATIONS FOR EMERGENCY PLANNING [J]. Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, n 94, p 257-268,1985
    [64]Gryning S.E., Holtslag A.A.M., Irwin J.S., Sivertsen B.. Applied dispersion modelling based on meteorological scaling parameters[J]. Atmospheric Environment-Part A General Topics, v 21, n 1, p 79-89,1987
    [65]Badr, Osama, Karim G.A.. Formation of flammable zones due to the action of diffusional mass transfer. A simplified approach [J]. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Petrole-um Division (Publication) PD, v 41, p 59-66,1992, Emerging Energy Technology-1992
    [66]Lombardi, Douglas A.,Cheng, Meng-Dawn. Modeling downwind hazards after an acciden-tal release of chlorine trifluoride [J]. Proceedings of the Air & Waste Management Associa-tion's Annual Meeting & Exhibition,16pp,1996
    [67]Mazumder B.S., Dalal B.C. Contaminant dispersion from an elevated time-dependent source[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, v 126, n 1-2, p 185-205,2000
    [68]Mazumder B.S., Dalal B.C. Contaminant dispersion from an elevated time-dependent source [J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, v 126, n 1-2, p 185-205,2000
    [69]Annunziatellis A., Ciotoli G., Lombardi S., Nolasco F. Short-and long-term gas hazard: The release of toxic gases in the Alban Hills volcanic area (Central Italy)[J]. Journal of Geoche-mical Exploration, v 77, n 2-3, p 93-108, March 2003
    [70]Wu, Zhou-Hu. Advection and diffusion of poisonous gas contaminant released from bott-om sludge in open channel [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, v 16, n 1, p 80-83, February 2004
    [71]Yassin, Mohamed F., Ohba, Masaaki, Tanaka, Hideyuki. The influence of obstacles on the flow and pollutant dispersion in an urban environment [J].86th AMS Annual Meeting, January 29,2006
    [72]Carvalho, Jonas C., Vilhena, Marco T., Moreira, Davidson M.. Comparison between Eulerian and Lagrangian semi-analytical models to simulate the pollutant dispersion in the PBL [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, v 31, n 1, p 120-129, January 2007
    [73]Godoy S.M., Santa Cruz A.S.M., Scenna N.J.. STRRAP system-A software for hazardous materials risk assessment and safe distances calculation [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, v 92, n 7, p 847-857, July 2007
    [74]Montoya, Maria I.,Planas, Eulalia,Casal, Joaquim. A comparative analysis of mathematical models for relating indoor and outdoor toxic gas concentrations in accidental releases [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, v 22, n 4, p 381-391, July 2009
    [75]邓新民.点源大气扩散模式计算的参数选取[J].成都气象学报.1999,14(2):139-145
    [76]李继兵.有害气体运输过程中泄漏扩散的数值模拟与分析[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文.2004
    [77]张永新.毒气扩散中最大浓度及安全间距的估算[J].江苏环境科技,2006,19(2):69-73
    [78]吕东,梁成浩.毒气泄漏伤害区域评估系统研究与开发[J].工业安全与环保,2007,33(10):53-55
    [79]钟江荣,赵振东,余世舟.基于GIS的毒气泄漏和扩散模拟及其影响评估[J].自然灾害学报.2003,12(4):105-109
    [80]祁延军.运输过程中液氨泄漏后果分析及评价研究[J].辽宁化工,2010,39(7):774-780
    [81]侯瑞琴.液体推进剂泄漏时的安全疏散距离[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2010, 50(6):928-931
    [82]杜建科.毒气泄漏过程及其危险区域分析[J].中国安全科学学报.2002,12(6):55-59
    [83]林武安,廖学,王品.环境风险评价中氯气泄漏扩散的计算[J].化工环保,2009,29(3):269-273
    [84]张朝能,宁平,马彩霞.重气泄漏扩散的影响因素分析[J].武汉理工大学学报.2010,32(5):97-100
    [85]肖国清,温丽敏,陈宝智,王浩.毒气泄漏时的最佳疏散路径[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版).2001,22(6):674-677
    [86]陈庚,李丽芬.液氯运输泄漏应急救援行动预案实例[J].应急救援.2005,12(3):16-20
    [87]宋倩文,赵江平,谢红梅,张浩.毒气泄漏事故居民疏散心理行为特征相关性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术.2009,5(6):100-104
    [88]章博,陈国明.毒气泄漏环境下人员暴露风险评估[J].石油化工高等学校学报.2009,22(2): 73-76
    [89]杨晓璐.城市工业区毒气泄漏及应急疏散的研究[D].西安建筑科技大学硕士学位论文.2009
    [90]朱红钧,林元华,马成学.平坦地区含硫化氢集输管道的泄漏扩散模拟[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版).2009,31(6):156-160
    [91]吴玉剑,潘旭海.障碍物地形条件下重气泄漏扩散实验的CFD模拟验证[J].中国安全生产科学技术.2010,6(3):13-16
    [92]田超,范相阁,张文利,常江.大气污染物SO2扩散模式的建立及应用[J].河南农业大学学报.2001,35(3):234-238
    [93]邓顺熙,梁鹏.公路汽车排气污染物扩散模式的研究[J].西安公路交通大学学报.1997,17(3):80-84
    [94]徐晓虎,许开立,赵海荣.流动危险源毒气泄漏事故伤害模型研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术.2006,2(3):39-42
    [95]张甫仁,徐湃.燃气管道非稳态泄漏及扩散的模拟[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报.2009,41(5):201-204
    [96]刘林飞,陈晓敏,姚海波.移动源毒气泄漏危害区域定量预测[J].职业卫生与应急救援.2008,26(1):37-38
    [97]中华人民共和国道路交通安全法[EB/OL]. http://www.mps.gov.cn/n16/
    [98]裴玉龙,张殿业.道路交通安全[M].北京:人民交通出版社.2004:1-6
    [99]中国公路运输行业分析报告[EB/OL]. http://wenku.baidu.com/view/f262541 b6bd97 f192279e96e.html
    [100]FRANK W.C., THILL J.C., BATTA R.. Spatial decision support system for hazardous material truck routing [J].Transportation research. Part C,2000,8:337-359.
    [101]孙东川,李福永.系统工程引论[M].北京:清华大学出版社.2007
    [102]于永利,朱小东,张柳.离散事件系统模拟[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社.2003:66-84
    [103]E.Barber, L.Hildebrand. Guidelines for applying criteria to designate routes for transporting hazardous materials [R]. Report No. FHWA-IP-80-15,1980
    [104]Harwood D.W., E.R.Russell. Present practices of highway transportation of hazardous materials [R].Report No.FHWA-RD-89-013, Federal Highway Administration, U.S.DOT, 1990.
    [105]Davies, P.A., Lees F.P.. The assessment of major hazards:the road transport environment for conveyance of hazardous materials in Great Britain [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1992,32:41-79.
    [106]马社强,刘东,郑英力.中国道路交通事故影响因素及对策[J].中国公安大学学报(自然科学版).2007,3(3):72-76
    [107]D. Brown, W. Dunn. A National Risk Assessment for Selected Hazardous Materials in Transportation. ANL/DIS-01-1, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne,2000
    [108]Yen R., Langari. Fuzzy Logic:Intelligence, Control, and Information, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River,1999
    [109]M. Armstrong. A Handbook of Management Techniques:A Comprehensive Guide to Achieving Managerial Excellence and Improved Decision-Making.3rd ed., London, UK, 2006
    [110]T.L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,1999.
    [111]陈亦仁,郭星,马强.运用人机工程学事故控制理论剖析煤矿事故[J].河北煤炭.2006(4):30-31
    [112]JT617.汽车运输危险货物规则[S].北京:中国标准出版社.2004
    [113]JT618.汽车运输、装卸危险货物作业规程[S].北京:中国标准出版社.2004
    [114]秦寿康.综合评价原理与应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社.2003
    [115]黄崇福,王家鼎.模糊信息优化处理技术及应用[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社.1995
    [116]王家鼎,黄崇福.模糊信息处理中的信息扩散方法及其应用[J].西北大学学报,1992,22(4):383-389
    [117]任常兴,吴宗之.基于风险分析的危险品道路运输多目标Pareto最优选线[J].中国安全生产科学技术.2008,4(2):9-13
    [118]任常兴.基于风险分析的危险品道路运输路径优化方法研究[D].南开大学博士学位论文.2007
    [119]刘诗飞,詹予忠.重大危险源辨识及危害后果分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社.2004
    [120]GB5044-85.职业性接触毒性危害程度分级[S].北京:中国标准出版社.1985
    [121]魏航.时变条件下有害物品运输路径选择研究[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论.2006
    [122]任常兴,吴宗之.危险品道路运输风险分级指数法研究[J].安全与环境学报.2006,6(4):126-129
    [123]金国锋,黄智勇,王煊军.液体推进剂公路运输泄漏风险的模糊综合评价[J].安全与环境学报.2008,8(3):158-161
    [124]朱大奇,史慧.人工神经网络原理与应用[M].北京:科学出版社.2006
    [125]葛哲学,孙志强.神经网络理论与MATLAB R2007实现[M].北京:电子工业出版社.2007
    [126]朱大奇,史慧.人工神经网络原理与应用[M].北京:科学出版社.2006
    [127]吴望一.流体力学[M].北京:北京大学出版社.1982
    [128]李宗恺,潘云仙.空气污染气象学原理及应用[M].北京:气象出版社.1985
    [129]Lin S, Hildemann L M. Modeling vertical spread of airborne pollutants form sources near ground level, comparison with field measurements[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering,1997,123(12):1194-1202
    [130]Chrysikopoulos C V, Hildemann L M, Roberts P V.A three-dimensional atmospheric dispersion-deposition model for emissions from a ground-level area[J].Source Atmos.Environ, 1992,26A:747-757
    [131]Robert E E, J Hunt C R. Highway modeling, part1:prediction of velocity and turbulence
    field in the wake of vehicles [J]. J. Appl. Meteor.1979,18(4):387-400
    [132]Robert E E, Binkowski F S, J Hunt C R. Highway modeling. part2:advection and diffusion of SF6 tracer gas [J]. J. Appl. Meteor.1979,18(4):400-412
    [133]Horst T W. Lagrangian similarity modeling of vertical diffusion from a ground-level source. J. Appl. Meteor.1979,18:733-740
    [134]复旦大学数学系.数学物理方程[M].北京:人民教育出版社.1979
    [135]李宗恺.空气污染气象学[M].南京:南京大学出版社.2003
    [136]大气逆温层[EB/OL]. http://www.cma.gov.cn
    [137]Tyn Myint-U. Partial Differential Equation of Mathematical Physics. New York: Elsevier North Holland Inc.1980
    [138]邓顺熙.公路长隧道空气污染影响分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社.2004:73-75
    [139]胡二邦.环境风险评价实用技术和方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社.2006
    [140]American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Recommended Guide for the Prediction of Dispersion of Airborne Effluents (2nd ed) [M]. New York ASME.1973
    [141]US Environmental Protection Agency. User's guide for the ISC3 dispersion models. EPA-454/B-95-003b, US EPAOAQPS [R]. Research Triangle Park, NC.1995
    [142]Tony Held, Daniel P.Y Chang, UCD2001:an improved model to simulate dispersion from road way s[J]. Atoms Environ 2003,37:5325-5336
    [143]陈庆凯,梅智学,赵德孝.工程爆破技术与安全管理[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社,2002
    [144]JT36-79.工业企业设计卫生标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1979

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700