中国能耗强度影响因素分析与节能目标实现
|
摘要
自改革开放以来,我国经济在高速增长过程中,在一个较短的时间内完成了工业化转型,并迅速进入到工业发展的中后期阶段。但是,伴随着社会物质水平和国民收入及福利的稳步提升,我国能源消耗也迅速增加且资源瓶颈也逐步显现。我国作为一个资源大国,当前石油产品的对外依存度已超过50%,并且自2007年开始成为煤炭的净进口国。能源消耗的迅速增加,在导致能源产品安全供应压力日趋增强的同时,也衍生了日益严峻的碳排放及生态环境压力,中国经济增长的可持续物质基础开始动摇,能源要素已经从一个极富竞争力的资源类产品,转移成为制约经济进一步发展的要素瓶颈。
正是在这样的现实背景下,我国自2006年起首次将节能降耗纳入到宏观调控目标体系中,在“十一五”发展纲要中确定了GDP能耗下降20%的节能目标,并且在顺利实现“十一五”节能目标的基础上,继续将节能工作作为“十二五”时期宏观调控的重点,并制定了16%的降耗任务。
不过考虑到短时期内,重工业高速发展仍将是我国工业化进程的主要特征,政府主导的投资模式也存在对高能耗行业的偏好,技术创新能力和全要素生产率水平依然处于较低水平,能源消费结构也还是以低效高污染的煤炭消耗为主,同时人均收入水平突破1000美元大关也将产生更多的居民能源消费需求,这些中国经济的现实特征无疑将不同程度上加大节能目标实现的困难和复杂性。如何顺利完成“十二五”节能减排目标,实现增长方式向集约化增长转变,已经成为中国经济奇迹得以维持的关键和基础性问题。
基于这样的认识,本文将研究对象集中于中国经济发展过程中能耗强度的变化轨迹,尝试通过对能耗强度演化机制的模拟和重现,实证分析技术、价格、结构、体制等多种因素对能耗强度变化的影响机制和作用强度,并将之印证于“十一五”时期我国节能减排政策的实施过程,进而从节能政策的长效性视角出发,对符合我国增长特征和体制背景的节能政策设计提出建议和参考。
文章首先借助于面板计量模型,实证分析了能源消费强度的演化机制,考察了政府投资偏好、产业结构、技术进步、固定资产投资、体制、能源价格等多种相关因素对能耗强度的作用机理,并且在省际、区域、城市经济体、产业和工业行业五个不同的样本纬度条件下,进行了能耗影响路径分析,从而刻画了区域差异、行业差异和经济发展模式差异对能耗水平演化轨迹的微妙影响,同时在多样本的比较分析基础上,形成了能耗影响机制的交叉论证。
根据实证结论,在省际能耗强度变化中,政府投资偏好的存在确实对能耗降低具有不利影响,而技术进步与结构调整对能耗强度的降低则存在显著而积极的影响。同时能源消费结构优化对能源效率改善的积极作用也得到了进一步的证实。作为节能减排的核心因素,投资、技术、产业结构和能源结构的变化主导了中国能耗水平的波动。结构的重型化是能耗强度阶段性上升的主因,但是,要素价格、FDI、所有制变化等因素对能耗强度的影响路径,却反映出经济发展水平、增长动力源、产业结构等区域样本经济之间的差异。
在将样本拓展到产业和行业层面时,也可以得到类似的结果,即投资、技术、结构和能源间替代的影响依然是相对稳定和持续的,但关联到要素配置等微观环节的影响变量,其影响轨迹则呈现出差异性和不稳定性特征。如价格变动和电能的更多使用确实显著地降低了能耗水平,但资本形成加速和产业发展中的资本密集化趋势也部分地将这种影响抵消了。或者说,资本与劳动间互补关系被再一次印证。此外,FDI对能耗强度的影响也出现了差异性的结果。
总体看来,在不同维度样本下,政府投资偏好、技术进步、结构调整和能源消费结构的优化确实对能耗强度存在稳定且一致的影响,但其余相关变量,如固定资产投资、能源价格、FDI、所有制变革以及贸易结构等变量的影响则对样本较为敏感,其实际作用机制反映着经济发展的阶段特征和部门属性的差异。
在实证分析基础上,文章开始将重心集中于节能政策和降耗规制的实施与路径选择上。首先分析了“十一五”期间我国节能目标约束体系的形成与分解过程,文章认为平均的节能目标分解思路,无法体现对节能工作有显著影响的区域特征和区域经济增长的需要,并且进一步加大了最终目标完成的不确定性和复杂性。而科学的节能分解应该沿着“先东、再中、后西”的次序逐步推进。
接下来,利用有限的数据资料,本文分析和回顾了“十一五”期间能耗指标的相关变化轨迹,在前文实证分析结论基础上,比较分析了节能约束的政策途径选择,论证了这种选择的必然性和有效性：基于规模改善的“关、停、并、转”和严苛的高能耗项目投资抑制政策,其管制途径在具有便于操作、便于监督和较低管制成本的特点同时,有效地弱化了中央和地方政府的目标差异,从而出现了两级利益主体一致性的政策取向与行政激励。也因此实现了能耗强度在规划期内的持续下降。
文章进一步从节能机制长效性的角度出发,对“十一五”期间节能政策的设计思路进行了分析,剖析和阐述了节能减排的推进对结构调整产生的细微影响。结论认为,以规模整合为主要手段的管制体系,将强化高能耗行业的技术能力,加剧工业部门的偏重化发展趋势。这种试图避开结构影响而直接作用于效率改善的管制思路,以规模管制为主要手段的强制政策,对市场化调节手段的忽视,可能会由于规模整合的效应在短时期内被迅速释放而无以为继,其将动摇当前节能约束的长效性基础。而深层次结构矛盾的存在和激化,势必会在规模管制达到一定峰值而难以推进时,使得增长与节能成为零和博弈。
最后,文章在前述分析基础上,对我国节能减排政策提出了相关建议,一个具有长效性,符合中国经济增长特征和体制背景的节能政策体系设计具有相当的复杂性。然而,加快推进能耗领域数据统计体系的完备,细化能耗监测指标,调整总量检测的思路和方法,科学、合理的分解和制定区域节能目标,结合区域特征实行差别化的调控政策通道,加快高耗能行业管控思路的扭转,创造和培育管制主体从横向向纵向转移的体制环境以及推进生态和环境成本价格化的改革步伐,势必在“十二五”乃至更长时期内,符合市场化原则的节能约束体系建立和中国能源消费强度的下降提供长久的帮助。
Since the reform and opening up, China's economy maintains stable in the process of high speed growth. Meanwhile, in a relatively short period of time, it completed the transformation of industrialization and rapidly accessed to the middle and late stages of the industrial development. But along with the steady improvement in the level of social material and national income and welfare, it shows that our country's resource consumption is increasing rapidly and the resource bottleneck effects gradually appear. As a big country which is full of resource, the foreign degree of dependency of petroleum products in our country has exceeded50%currently, and China has become a net coal importer since2007. Because the energy consumption increases rapidly, the pressure of energy product safe supply is enhanced, and at the same time, it derives from the increasingly severe carbon emissions and environmental pressure. The sustainable material foundation of Chinese economic growth begins to waver, and the energy factor has been transformed from a highly competitive resource product to the bottleneck element which restricts further development of economy.
It is in this background that our country began to make energy saving into the target of macroscopical adjusting control system since2006. In the "Eleventh Five-Year" development compendium, it is specified that the GDP energy consumption falls20%. Basing on the successful implementation of "Eleven Five-Year" energy saving target, the energy-saving work is still vital as focus of macroeconomic regulation and control in "the Twelfth Five Year Plan" period and the consumption will fall16%.
But in the short period, the heavy industry development will still be the main feature of our country industrialized process, the investment of governmental dominant mode also exists in the high energy consumption industries, technology innovation ability and factor productivity level are still in a low level, the main structure of energy consumption is still coal consumption which causes low efficiency and high pollution, at the same time, average per capita income breaks through1000dollars which will produce more residential energy consumption demand. The reality features of Chinese economy will undoubtedly make the complement of the energy-saving difficult and complex. How to successfully complete energy saving emission reduction targets and change the grow manner into intensive growth have become the fundamental problem which relates to the maintenance of China's economic miracle.
Firstly, we make use of panel data econometric model to analyze empirically the evolutional mechanism of the energy consumption intensity and study the mechanism of action of various factors, such as the structure, technique, system, price, etc., which have effects on the energy consumption intensity. Then we make an analysis of samples in five different situations, that is, interprovincial, regional, urban economic, and industrial, and characterize the subtle impacts of the regional differences, the industrial differences and differences in models of economic development on the evolutional track of the energy consumption level. At the same time, we cross-prove the mechanism of the energy consumption impacts on the basis of the comparative analysis of various samples.
In our study based on the interprovincial samples, technical progress and structural adjustment have significant and positive impacts on the decline of the energy consumption intensity. But the real influencing power varies regularly with diverse sample compositions. Meanwhile, it is further confirmed that the optimization of the energy consumption structure has positive effect on improving the energy efficiency. As the core of conserving energy and reducing emissions, the changes of technology, industrial structure and energy structure dominate the fluctuations in the level of Chinese energy consumption. However, the influencing approaches to the energy consumption intensity, which are caused by factor prices, FDI, the changes of ownership and other factors, reflect the economic environmental differences of regional samples like the level of economic development, the growth of the power source and the basic pattern of industrial compositions.
Also, we find the similar changes when the samples are extend to the industry and the trade. That is to say, the substitute impacts among the technology, structure and energy remain relatively stable and continuous, while the impact tracks show diversity and instability associated with the micro influencing variables such as the allocation of elements. For example, though the changes of the price and increased use of electricity do reduce the energy consumption level significantly, the acceleration of capital formation and the capital-intensive trend in the industrial development offset some of this effect. In other words, the complementary relationship between the capital and the labor is confirmed again. Besides, there is a diverse analysis result about the impacts of FDI on the energy consumption intensity as well.
Furthermore, we introduce two control variables in the industrial level, the changes of scale level and "resource dividend", to the model and test the impacts of scale changes and trade structure on the energy consumption intensity. Therefore, we do get the expected results:we prove the existence of "resource dividend" in the capital-intensive industry and reinforcement of "resource comparative advantage" does strengthen the dependence of Chinese economy on energy.
Generally speaking, we find that technological progress, structural adjustment and optimization of energy consumption structure indeed have stable and consistent influence on the energy consumption intensity, but the impacts of variables like energy prices, FDI, ownership changes and trade structure, etc. are sensitive to the samples. Its real mechanism of action reflects the characteristics of the economic development stages and the diversity of departments'attributes.
How did energy constraints and controls decrease the energy consumption and by which political approaches was the decline achieved?
At first, we elaborate the formation and decomposition of constraint systems about conserving energy and evaluate them scientifically and practically. The idea of average target decomposition could not indicate the regional characteristics which affect conserving energy significantly and the necessity of regional economic growth and further enlarge the uncertainty and complexity of completing the ultimate goal. However, scientific conserving energy decomposition should advance gradually in the order of "east first, then center and last west".
Then we begin with the changes of the related factors during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan period and analyze the real changes of the structure, technology, energy consumption structure and production scale, etc.. On the assumption of the causal chain about the evolutional mechanism of energy consumption, we recognize how to choose political approaches to energy-conserving constraints and confirm the necessity and effectiveness of this choice:the controlled approaches on the basis of scale improvement are convenient to operate, to supervise and have the lower controlling costs. Meanwhile, they can weaken the differences between the central and local government's targets so that the policy orientation and administrative incentive are appeared in which the two of the interest subjects are consistent. As a consequence, the continuous decline of the energy consumption has been achieved during the Plan period.
Could the same experience and success continue to be reproduced during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period?
From the perspective of long-term effectiveness, we make an analysis of the design ideas of the energy-conserving policies which were formulated during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan period, and dissect and set forth the subtle impacts of the promotion of energy conservation and emissions reduction on the structural adjustment. Then we conclude that the controlling system regarding scale integration as the main means will strengthen the dependence of technological capabilities and growth on it, and aggravate the development trend which emphasizes on the industry. Thus we make a judgment and answer to the long-tern effectiveness of present energy-conserving polices. This control thought which tries to avoid structural effects and improve effectiveness directly, an enforcement policy which regards scale control as the main means, neglects the means of market-oriented regulation so that the long-tern effectiveness of current energy-conserving constraints is undermined seriously. And the existence and intensification of deep structural contradictions must be difficult to promote when the scale control reaches to a peak, making the growth and energy conservation become a zero-sum game.
In fact, if we continue to advance with the same controlling idea and political approaches during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period, perhaps it would not go on since the effects of scale integration are released quickly in the short term. In other words, as for the characteristics of Chinese economic development, how to explore a political approach to mitigating the pressure from energy and environment on the basis of the guarantee that the economy remains growing rapidly without touching upon deep contradictions is unknown. At least, we don't the answer at present.
It can provide long-term help to set up energy-conserving constraints'system which accords with market principles and decrease Chinese energy consumption intensity during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period and even a longer time that the completeness of energy consumption statistic system is accelerated, energy consumption indicators for monitoring are detailed, the ideas and methods of testing total amount are adjusted, regional energy-conserving targets are decomposed and formulated scientifically and reasonably, differentiated controlling political access is implemented with the regional characteristics, the torsion of the ideas of controlling high energy-consuming industries is speeded up, the institutional environment of which the controlling principle bodies are transferred from horizontal to vertical is created and nurtured and the revolution of pricing ecological and environmental costs is promoted.
正是在这样的现实背景下,我国自2006年起首次将节能降耗纳入到宏观调控目标体系中,在“十一五”发展纲要中确定了GDP能耗下降20%的节能目标,并且在顺利实现“十一五”节能目标的基础上,继续将节能工作作为“十二五”时期宏观调控的重点,并制定了16%的降耗任务。
不过考虑到短时期内,重工业高速发展仍将是我国工业化进程的主要特征,政府主导的投资模式也存在对高能耗行业的偏好,技术创新能力和全要素生产率水平依然处于较低水平,能源消费结构也还是以低效高污染的煤炭消耗为主,同时人均收入水平突破1000美元大关也将产生更多的居民能源消费需求,这些中国经济的现实特征无疑将不同程度上加大节能目标实现的困难和复杂性。如何顺利完成“十二五”节能减排目标,实现增长方式向集约化增长转变,已经成为中国经济奇迹得以维持的关键和基础性问题。
基于这样的认识,本文将研究对象集中于中国经济发展过程中能耗强度的变化轨迹,尝试通过对能耗强度演化机制的模拟和重现,实证分析技术、价格、结构、体制等多种因素对能耗强度变化的影响机制和作用强度,并将之印证于“十一五”时期我国节能减排政策的实施过程,进而从节能政策的长效性视角出发,对符合我国增长特征和体制背景的节能政策设计提出建议和参考。
文章首先借助于面板计量模型,实证分析了能源消费强度的演化机制,考察了政府投资偏好、产业结构、技术进步、固定资产投资、体制、能源价格等多种相关因素对能耗强度的作用机理,并且在省际、区域、城市经济体、产业和工业行业五个不同的样本纬度条件下,进行了能耗影响路径分析,从而刻画了区域差异、行业差异和经济发展模式差异对能耗水平演化轨迹的微妙影响,同时在多样本的比较分析基础上,形成了能耗影响机制的交叉论证。
根据实证结论,在省际能耗强度变化中,政府投资偏好的存在确实对能耗降低具有不利影响,而技术进步与结构调整对能耗强度的降低则存在显著而积极的影响。同时能源消费结构优化对能源效率改善的积极作用也得到了进一步的证实。作为节能减排的核心因素,投资、技术、产业结构和能源结构的变化主导了中国能耗水平的波动。结构的重型化是能耗强度阶段性上升的主因,但是,要素价格、FDI、所有制变化等因素对能耗强度的影响路径,却反映出经济发展水平、增长动力源、产业结构等区域样本经济之间的差异。
在将样本拓展到产业和行业层面时,也可以得到类似的结果,即投资、技术、结构和能源间替代的影响依然是相对稳定和持续的,但关联到要素配置等微观环节的影响变量,其影响轨迹则呈现出差异性和不稳定性特征。如价格变动和电能的更多使用确实显著地降低了能耗水平,但资本形成加速和产业发展中的资本密集化趋势也部分地将这种影响抵消了。或者说,资本与劳动间互补关系被再一次印证。此外,FDI对能耗强度的影响也出现了差异性的结果。
总体看来,在不同维度样本下,政府投资偏好、技术进步、结构调整和能源消费结构的优化确实对能耗强度存在稳定且一致的影响,但其余相关变量,如固定资产投资、能源价格、FDI、所有制变革以及贸易结构等变量的影响则对样本较为敏感,其实际作用机制反映着经济发展的阶段特征和部门属性的差异。
在实证分析基础上,文章开始将重心集中于节能政策和降耗规制的实施与路径选择上。首先分析了“十一五”期间我国节能目标约束体系的形成与分解过程,文章认为平均的节能目标分解思路,无法体现对节能工作有显著影响的区域特征和区域经济增长的需要,并且进一步加大了最终目标完成的不确定性和复杂性。而科学的节能分解应该沿着“先东、再中、后西”的次序逐步推进。
接下来,利用有限的数据资料,本文分析和回顾了“十一五”期间能耗指标的相关变化轨迹,在前文实证分析结论基础上,比较分析了节能约束的政策途径选择,论证了这种选择的必然性和有效性：基于规模改善的“关、停、并、转”和严苛的高能耗项目投资抑制政策,其管制途径在具有便于操作、便于监督和较低管制成本的特点同时,有效地弱化了中央和地方政府的目标差异,从而出现了两级利益主体一致性的政策取向与行政激励。也因此实现了能耗强度在规划期内的持续下降。
文章进一步从节能机制长效性的角度出发,对“十一五”期间节能政策的设计思路进行了分析,剖析和阐述了节能减排的推进对结构调整产生的细微影响。结论认为,以规模整合为主要手段的管制体系,将强化高能耗行业的技术能力,加剧工业部门的偏重化发展趋势。这种试图避开结构影响而直接作用于效率改善的管制思路,以规模管制为主要手段的强制政策,对市场化调节手段的忽视,可能会由于规模整合的效应在短时期内被迅速释放而无以为继,其将动摇当前节能约束的长效性基础。而深层次结构矛盾的存在和激化,势必会在规模管制达到一定峰值而难以推进时,使得增长与节能成为零和博弈。
最后,文章在前述分析基础上,对我国节能减排政策提出了相关建议,一个具有长效性,符合中国经济增长特征和体制背景的节能政策体系设计具有相当的复杂性。然而,加快推进能耗领域数据统计体系的完备,细化能耗监测指标,调整总量检测的思路和方法,科学、合理的分解和制定区域节能目标,结合区域特征实行差别化的调控政策通道,加快高耗能行业管控思路的扭转,创造和培育管制主体从横向向纵向转移的体制环境以及推进生态和环境成本价格化的改革步伐,势必在“十二五”乃至更长时期内,符合市场化原则的节能约束体系建立和中国能源消费强度的下降提供长久的帮助。
Since the reform and opening up, China's economy maintains stable in the process of high speed growth. Meanwhile, in a relatively short period of time, it completed the transformation of industrialization and rapidly accessed to the middle and late stages of the industrial development. But along with the steady improvement in the level of social material and national income and welfare, it shows that our country's resource consumption is increasing rapidly and the resource bottleneck effects gradually appear. As a big country which is full of resource, the foreign degree of dependency of petroleum products in our country has exceeded50%currently, and China has become a net coal importer since2007. Because the energy consumption increases rapidly, the pressure of energy product safe supply is enhanced, and at the same time, it derives from the increasingly severe carbon emissions and environmental pressure. The sustainable material foundation of Chinese economic growth begins to waver, and the energy factor has been transformed from a highly competitive resource product to the bottleneck element which restricts further development of economy.
It is in this background that our country began to make energy saving into the target of macroscopical adjusting control system since2006. In the "Eleventh Five-Year" development compendium, it is specified that the GDP energy consumption falls20%. Basing on the successful implementation of "Eleven Five-Year" energy saving target, the energy-saving work is still vital as focus of macroeconomic regulation and control in "the Twelfth Five Year Plan" period and the consumption will fall16%.
But in the short period, the heavy industry development will still be the main feature of our country industrialized process, the investment of governmental dominant mode also exists in the high energy consumption industries, technology innovation ability and factor productivity level are still in a low level, the main structure of energy consumption is still coal consumption which causes low efficiency and high pollution, at the same time, average per capita income breaks through1000dollars which will produce more residential energy consumption demand. The reality features of Chinese economy will undoubtedly make the complement of the energy-saving difficult and complex. How to successfully complete energy saving emission reduction targets and change the grow manner into intensive growth have become the fundamental problem which relates to the maintenance of China's economic miracle.
Firstly, we make use of panel data econometric model to analyze empirically the evolutional mechanism of the energy consumption intensity and study the mechanism of action of various factors, such as the structure, technique, system, price, etc., which have effects on the energy consumption intensity. Then we make an analysis of samples in five different situations, that is, interprovincial, regional, urban economic, and industrial, and characterize the subtle impacts of the regional differences, the industrial differences and differences in models of economic development on the evolutional track of the energy consumption level. At the same time, we cross-prove the mechanism of the energy consumption impacts on the basis of the comparative analysis of various samples.
In our study based on the interprovincial samples, technical progress and structural adjustment have significant and positive impacts on the decline of the energy consumption intensity. But the real influencing power varies regularly with diverse sample compositions. Meanwhile, it is further confirmed that the optimization of the energy consumption structure has positive effect on improving the energy efficiency. As the core of conserving energy and reducing emissions, the changes of technology, industrial structure and energy structure dominate the fluctuations in the level of Chinese energy consumption. However, the influencing approaches to the energy consumption intensity, which are caused by factor prices, FDI, the changes of ownership and other factors, reflect the economic environmental differences of regional samples like the level of economic development, the growth of the power source and the basic pattern of industrial compositions.
Also, we find the similar changes when the samples are extend to the industry and the trade. That is to say, the substitute impacts among the technology, structure and energy remain relatively stable and continuous, while the impact tracks show diversity and instability associated with the micro influencing variables such as the allocation of elements. For example, though the changes of the price and increased use of electricity do reduce the energy consumption level significantly, the acceleration of capital formation and the capital-intensive trend in the industrial development offset some of this effect. In other words, the complementary relationship between the capital and the labor is confirmed again. Besides, there is a diverse analysis result about the impacts of FDI on the energy consumption intensity as well.
Furthermore, we introduce two control variables in the industrial level, the changes of scale level and "resource dividend", to the model and test the impacts of scale changes and trade structure on the energy consumption intensity. Therefore, we do get the expected results:we prove the existence of "resource dividend" in the capital-intensive industry and reinforcement of "resource comparative advantage" does strengthen the dependence of Chinese economy on energy.
Generally speaking, we find that technological progress, structural adjustment and optimization of energy consumption structure indeed have stable and consistent influence on the energy consumption intensity, but the impacts of variables like energy prices, FDI, ownership changes and trade structure, etc. are sensitive to the samples. Its real mechanism of action reflects the characteristics of the economic development stages and the diversity of departments'attributes.
How did energy constraints and controls decrease the energy consumption and by which political approaches was the decline achieved?
At first, we elaborate the formation and decomposition of constraint systems about conserving energy and evaluate them scientifically and practically. The idea of average target decomposition could not indicate the regional characteristics which affect conserving energy significantly and the necessity of regional economic growth and further enlarge the uncertainty and complexity of completing the ultimate goal. However, scientific conserving energy decomposition should advance gradually in the order of "east first, then center and last west".
Then we begin with the changes of the related factors during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan period and analyze the real changes of the structure, technology, energy consumption structure and production scale, etc.. On the assumption of the causal chain about the evolutional mechanism of energy consumption, we recognize how to choose political approaches to energy-conserving constraints and confirm the necessity and effectiveness of this choice:the controlled approaches on the basis of scale improvement are convenient to operate, to supervise and have the lower controlling costs. Meanwhile, they can weaken the differences between the central and local government's targets so that the policy orientation and administrative incentive are appeared in which the two of the interest subjects are consistent. As a consequence, the continuous decline of the energy consumption has been achieved during the Plan period.
Could the same experience and success continue to be reproduced during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period?
From the perspective of long-term effectiveness, we make an analysis of the design ideas of the energy-conserving policies which were formulated during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan period, and dissect and set forth the subtle impacts of the promotion of energy conservation and emissions reduction on the structural adjustment. Then we conclude that the controlling system regarding scale integration as the main means will strengthen the dependence of technological capabilities and growth on it, and aggravate the development trend which emphasizes on the industry. Thus we make a judgment and answer to the long-tern effectiveness of present energy-conserving polices. This control thought which tries to avoid structural effects and improve effectiveness directly, an enforcement policy which regards scale control as the main means, neglects the means of market-oriented regulation so that the long-tern effectiveness of current energy-conserving constraints is undermined seriously. And the existence and intensification of deep structural contradictions must be difficult to promote when the scale control reaches to a peak, making the growth and energy conservation become a zero-sum game.
In fact, if we continue to advance with the same controlling idea and political approaches during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period, perhaps it would not go on since the effects of scale integration are released quickly in the short term. In other words, as for the characteristics of Chinese economic development, how to explore a political approach to mitigating the pressure from energy and environment on the basis of the guarantee that the economy remains growing rapidly without touching upon deep contradictions is unknown. At least, we don't the answer at present.
It can provide long-term help to set up energy-conserving constraints'system which accords with market principles and decrease Chinese energy consumption intensity during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period and even a longer time that the completeness of energy consumption statistic system is accelerated, energy consumption indicators for monitoring are detailed, the ideas and methods of testing total amount are adjusted, regional energy-conserving targets are decomposed and formulated scientifically and reasonably, differentiated controlling political access is implemented with the regional characteristics, the torsion of the ideas of controlling high energy-consuming industries is speeded up, the institutional environment of which the controlling principle bodies are transferred from horizontal to vertical is created and nurtured and the revolution of pricing ecological and environmental costs is promoted.
引文
①该图摘自张炎治,中国能源消费强度演化机制研究[D],中国矿业大学,2010
①该图源自腾讯网,中国能源强度有多高?[P],2008年3月29日
①该图源自欧育辉等,基于面板数据的能耗与固定资产投资关系的实证研究[J],管理学报,2009.1。
①面板数据模型介绍中的主要内容源自高铁梅,《计量经济分析方法与建模》,清华大学出版社,2006年1月。
[1]D.梅多斯等.增长的极限[M].北京：商务印书馆,1984.
[2]白重恩,钱震杰,武康平.我国工业部门要素分配份额决定因素研究[J].经济研究,2008,8.
[3]车卉淳.资源耗竭原因的经济学分析[J].现代经济探讨,2002.
[4]陈军,成金华.中国非可再生能源生产效率评价-基于数据包络分析方法的实证分析[J].经济评论,2007,5.
[5]陈清泰.中国的能源战略和政策-在中国发展高层论坛“能源战略和改革”国际研讨会上的主题发言[N].中国经济时报,2003-11-7.
[6]陈诗一.节能减排与中国工业的双赢发展[J].经济研究,2010,3.
[7]陈诗一.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究,2009,4.
[8]陈诗一.能源驱动型经济增长不可持续[N].中国社会科学报,2010,8,26.
[9]陈文山.中国制造业经济增长与能源消耗分析[J]. 产业经济2005,9.
[10]成金华,李世祥.结构变动、技术进步以及价格对能源效率的影响[J].中国人口资源与环境,2010,4.
[11]邓祥周,田立新,段希波.能源价格的动态模型及分析[J].统计与决策,2007,1.
[12]干春晖,郑若谷.中国工业生产绩效：1998-2007-基于细分行业的推广随机前沿生产函数的分析[J].财经科学,2009,6.
[13]高宇明,齐中英.基于时变参数的我国全要素生产率估算[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,2.
[14]高振宇,王益.我国能源生产率的地区划分及影响因素[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,9.
[15]龚益,彼得·劳埃德.中国工业部门生产函数的参数估计[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1999,12.
[16]郭纹廷,王文峰.缓解我国能源瓶颈的影响因素分析[J].中国地质大学学报(社科版),2005,3.
[17]胡鞍钢,鄢一龙,刘生龙.市场经济条件下的“计划之手”[J].中国工业经济,2010(7)：26-35.
[18]韩颖,马萍,刘璐.一种能源消耗强度影响因素分解的新方法[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010,4.
[19]韩智勇,魏一鸣,范英.我国能源强度与经济结构变化特征分析[J].数理统计与管理,2004,11.
[20]韩智勇,魏一鸣,焦建玲,范英,张九天.中国能源消费与经济增长的协整性与因果关系分析[J].系统工程,2004,12.
[21]杭雷鸣.我国能源消费结构问题研究[D].上海交通大学,2007.
[22]何建坤,张希良.我国产业结构变化对GDP能源强度上升的影响及趋势分析[J].环境保护,2005,12.
[23]黄飞.能源消费与国民经济发展的灰色关联分析[J].热能动力工程,2001,1.
[24]蒋萍,谷彬.中国服务业TFP增长与效率演进[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,8
[25]孔婷,孙林岩,何哲,孙荣庭.能源价格对制造业能源强度调节效应的实证分析[J].管理科学,2008(21)：9.
[26]李宾,曾志雄.中国全要素生产率变动的再测算：1978-2007年[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,3.
[27]李丹,胡小娟.中国制造业企业相对效率和全要素生产率增长研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,7.
[28]李廉水,周勇.技术进步能提高能源效率吗?-基于中国工业部门的实证检验[J].管理世界,2006,10.
[29]李世祥,成金华.中国工业行业的能源效率特征及其影响因素-基于非参数前沿的实证分析[J].财经研究,2009,7.
[30]李小平,朱钟棣.中国工业行业的全要素生产率测算[J].管理世界,2005,4
[31]李治国,唐国兴.中国平均资本成本的估算[J].统计研究,2002,11.
[32]李子奈,潘文卿编著.计量经济学第二版[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2005.
[33]吕振东,郭菊娥,席酋民.中国能源CES生产函数的计量估算及选择[J].中国人口资源与环境,2009(19)：4.
[34]梁怀学,陈权宝.基于面板数据模型的我国行业能源消费特征分析[J].东北师大学报自然科学版,2005,6.
[35]梁进社,郑蔚,蔡建明.中国能源消费增长的分解-基于投入产出方法[J].自 然资源学报,2007,6.
[36]梁巧梅,魏一鸣,范英,Norio, Okada.中国能源需求和能源强度预测的情景分析模型及其应用[J].管理学报,2004,1.
[37]廖华,魏一鸣.能源效率及其与经济系统关系的再认识[J].公共管理学报,2010,1.
[38]林伯强.电力消费与中国经济增长—基于生产函数的研究[J].管理世界,2003,11.
[39]林伯强.中国能源需求的经济计量分析[J].统计研究,2001,10.
[40]刘长生,郭小东,简玉峰.能源消费对中国经济增长的影响研究-基于线性和非线性回归方法的比较分析[J].产业经济研究,2009,1.
[41]刘畅,崔艳红.中国能源消耗强度区域差异的动态关系比较研究[J].中国工业经济,2008,4.
[42]刘畅,孔宪丽,高铁梅.我国能源消耗强度变动机制与价格非对称效应研究[J].中国工业经济,2009,3.
[43]刘红玖,陶全.大中型工业企业能源密度下降的动因探寻[J].统计研究,2002,9.
[44]刘树杰,陈扬.新时期能源价格政策的基本思路[J].宏观经济研究,2005,7.
[45]刘舜佳.国际贸易、FDI和中国全要素生产率下降[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,11.
[46]刘小玄,李双杰.制造业企业相对效率的度量和比较及其外生比较因素[J].经济学季刊,2008,3.
[47]鲁成军,周瑞明.中国工业部门的能源替代研究-基于对ALLEN替代弹性模型的修正[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,5.
[48]罗长远.中国经济增长的源泉、机理及前景分析：一个理论综述[J].经济学动态,2003,10.
[49]马超群,储慧斌,李科,周四清.中国能源消费与经济增长的协整与误差校正模型研究[J].系统工程,2004,10.
[50]欧晓万.能源消费对产业结构调整的长期与短期约束[J].统计与决策,2007,7.
[50]潘祺志.我国工业能耗强度变化与节能路径选择[D].东北财经大学,2010.
[51]齐绍洲,罗威.中国地区经济增长与能源消费强度差异分析[J].经济研究,2007,2.
[52]齐志新,陈文颖.结构调整还是技术进步-改革开发后我国能源效率提高的因素分析[J].上海经济研究,2006,6.
[53]邱东,陈梦根,中国不应在资源消耗问题上过于自责[J].统计研究,2007,2.
[54]齐建国.中国经济高速增长与节能减排目标分析[J].财贸经济,2007,10.
[55]屈小娥.中国省际全要素能源效率变动分解[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,8.
[56]日本电力中央研究所,日本能源及电力供求的长期展望[M]西安：西安交通大学出版社,1985.
[57]师博,沈坤荣.市场分割下的中国全要素能源效率：基于超效率DEA方法的经验分析[J].世界经济,2008,9.
[58]施发启.对我国能源消费弹性系数变化及成因的初步分析[J].统计研究,2005,5.
[59]施发起.对我国能源消费弹性系数变化及成因的初步分析[J].统计研究,2005,5.
[60]史丹.我国经济增长过程中能源利用效率的改进[J].经济研究,2002,9.
[61]史丹.中国能源效率的地区差异与节能潜力分析[J].中国工业经济2006,10.
[62]史丹,张金隆.产业结构变动对能源消费的影响[J].经济理论与经济管理,2003,8.
[63]史丹,吴利学,傅晓霞,吴滨.中国能源效率地区差异及其成因分析[J].管理世界,2008,2.
[64]孙鹏,顾晓薇.中国能源消费的分解分析[J].资源科学,2005,5.
[65]孙鹏,顾晓薇,刘敬智,王青.中国能源消费的分解分析[J].资源科学,2005,9.
[66]唐玲,杨正林.能源效率与工业经济转型-基于中国1998-2007年行业数据的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,10.
[67]陶小马,邢建武,黄鑫,周雯.我国工业部门的能源价格扭曲与要素替代研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,11.
[68]滕玉华. 中国工业行业能源强度影响因素的实证分析[J].兰州商学院学报,2009,4.
[69]滕玉华.技术进步与中国能源效率研究文献综述[J].产业观察,2009,27.
[70]滕玉华.自主研发、技术引进与中国工业能源强度[J].财经论丛,2009,3.
[71]田立新等著.能源经济系统分析[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[72]田晓文.双向纯增量模型[J].经济研究,1997,11.
[73]涂正革.区域经济和谐发展的全要素生产率研究-基于对1995-2004年28个省市大中型工业企业的非参数生产前沿[J].经济评论,2008,1.
[74]涂正革.全要素生产率与区域经济增长的动力[J]. 南开经济研究,2007,4.
[75]涂正革,肖耿.中国的工业生产力革命-用随机前沿生产函数对中国大中型工 业企业全要素生产率增长的分解及分析[J].经济研究,2005,3.
[76]王海鹏,田澎,靳萍.中国能源消费、经济增长间协整关系和因果关系的实证研究——以电力行业为例[J].生产力研究,3.
[77]王火根,沈利生.中国经济增长与能源消费空间面板分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,12.
[78]王火根,龙建辉.能源消费与经济增长非线性关系分析：基于门限协整系统[J].技术经济与管理研究,2008,4.
[79]王群伟,周德群.中国全要素能源效率变动的实证分析[J].系统工程,2008,7.
[80]王小鲁.中国经济增长的可持续性与制度变革[J].经济研究,2000,7.
[81]王玉潜.能源消耗强度变动的因素分析方法及其应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,8.
[82]王争,孙柳媚,史晋川.外资溢出对中国私营企业生产率的异质性影响—来自普查数据的证据[J].经济学季刊,2008,1.
[83]王维国,潘祺志.辽宁省工业行业技术与配置无效率的研究-基于成本函数视角的实证分析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2009(19)：4.
[84]魏楚.规模效率与配置效率：一个对中国能源低效的解释—基于35个国家(地区)的比较[J].世界经济,2009,4.
[85]魏楚.能源效率研究发展及趋势：一个综述[J].浙江大学学报(社科版),2009,4.
[86]魏楚.中国能源效率问题研究[D].浙江大学,2009.
[87]魏楚,沈满洪.能源效率及其影响因素：基于DEA的实证分析[J].管理世界,2007,8.
[88]魏楚,沈满洪.能源效率与能源生产率-基于方法的省际数据比较[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,9.
[89]魏一鸣,廖华.能源效率的七类测度指标及其测度方法[J].中国软科学,2010,1.
[90]吴巧生.中国能源消费与GDP关系的再检验-基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,6.
[91]吴巧生,成金华.中国工业化中的能源消耗强度变动及因素分析[J].财经研.究,2006,6.
[92]吴巧生,成金华,王华.中国工业化进程中的能源消费变动—基于计量模型的实证分析[J]中国工业经济,2005,4.
[93]吴延瑞.生产率对中国经济增长的贡献：新的估计[J].经济学季刊,2008.3.
[94]徐绍峰.中国能源状况与经济社会可持续发展分析[J].经济论坛,2005,7.
[95]徐士元.基于技术进步与市场化改革的中国能源效率研究[D].华中科技大学,2009.
[96]徐士元.技术进步对能源效率影响的实证分析[J].科研管理,2009,6.
[97]杨红亮,史丹.能效研究方法和中国各地区能源效率比较[J].经济理论与经济管理,2008,3.
[98]杨正林.中国能源效率的影响因素研究[D].华中科技大学,2009.
[99]姚渝芳,陈杰,李花菊.结构变化的节能潜力计算的方法论研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,4.
[100]尹宗成,丁日佳,江激宇.FDI、人力资本、R&D与中国能源效率[J].财贸经济,2008,9.
[101]于立.能源价格理论研究[M].大连：东北财经大学出版社,1994.
[102]苑新丽.能源节约中的财税政策选择[J].财经问题研究,2.
[103]曾胜,黄登仕.中国能源消费、经济增长与能源效率[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,8.
[104]张红霞,刘汽运.我国高耗能产业的地区相对有效性及其影响[J].统计研究,2008,4.
[105]张军.资本形成、工业化与经济增长：中国的转轨特征[J].经济研究,2002,6.
[106]张军,陈诗一.Gary H.Jefferson结构改革与中国工业增长[J].经济研究,2009,7.
[107]张明海.增长和要素替代弹性—中国经济增长1978-1999年的实证研究[J].学术月刊,2002,8.
[108]张明海.中国经济的增长和要素配置的市场化：1978-1999[J].世界经济文汇,2002,3.
[109]张晓平.20世纪90年代以来中国能源消费的时空格局及其影响因素[J].中国人口,2005,2.
[110]张炎治.中国能源强度的演变机理及情景模拟研究[D].中国矿业大学,2009.
[111]张宗成,周猛.中国经济增长与能源消费的异常关系分析[J].上海经济研究,2004,4.
[112]赵建军.论不同要素密集型产业的就业效应[J].中共中央党校学报,2005,2.
[113]赵进文,范继涛.经济增长与能源消费内在依从关系的实证研究[J].经济研究,2007,8.
[114]赵丽霞,魏巍贤.能源与经济增长模型研究[J].预测,1998,6.
[115]郑照宁,刘德顺.考虑资本-能源-劳动投入的中国超越对数生产函数[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004.5.
[116]郑照宁,刘德顺.中国能源资本替代的不确定性[J].运筹与管理,2004,2.
[117]周黎安.晋升博弈中政府官员的激励与合作-兼论我国地方保护主义和重复建设问题长期存在的原因[J].经济研究,2004,6.
[118]周瑞明.技术进步、技术效率与中国农业生产率增长[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,12.
[119]周勇,李廉水.基于AMD的我国能源强度变化因素分析[J].煤炭经济研究,2006,5.
[120]朱绍格,鲁成军,王元凯.能源价格对中国工业资本存量的冲击效应[J].统计教育,2009,6.
[1]Aigner, D.J., C.A.K. Lovell and P. Schmidt, "Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models, " [J]. Journal of Econometrics,1977,6(1) 21-37.
[2]Arqam A-R and L. C. Hunt (2004). Panel unit roots and cointegration:evidence for OECD energy demand. Discussion Paper.6Th IAEE European Conference.
[3]Asafu-Adjaye J. The relationship between electricity consumption,electricity price and economic growth:time series evidence from Asian developing countries [J]. Energy Economics,2000,22:615-625.
[4]Atkinson,S.E. and C.Cornwell, "Estimation of Output and Input Technical Efficiency Using a Flexible Functional Form and Panel Data" [J]. International Economic Review,1994b,35,No.l,pp.245-255.
[5]Ang,B.W.,Zhang F.Q. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies [J]. Energy,2000,Vol.25,12.
[6]B.W.Ang, P.W.Lee. Decomposition of industrial energy consumption:the energy coefficient approach[J]. Energy Economics,1996,18,129-143.
[7]B.W.Ang, S.Y. Lee. Decomposition of industrial energy consumption. Some Methodological and application issues[J]. Energy Economics,1994,16 (2),83 92.
[8]Bauer,P.W., "An Approach for the Analysis of Multiproduct Technology and Efficiency Using Panel Data:An Application ti the U.S. Airline Industry", Unpublished Dissertation,1985, University of North Carolina.
[9]Bentzen J, Engsted T, Short and long-run elasticitise in energy demand:a co-integration approach[J]. Journal of Energy Economics,1993,16(2):139-143.
[10]Cheng B S, Lai T W, An investigation of co-integration and causality between electricity consumption and economic activity in Taiwan[J]. Energy Economics,1997,19:435-444.
[11]Daly,H.E. Beyond Growth:the economics of sustainable development[M]. Beacon Press,1996.
[12]Eltony M N, Al-Mutairi N H, Demand for gasoline in Kuwai-An empirical analysis using co-integration techoniques[J]. Energy Economics,1995, 17:249-253.
[13]Erol U, Yu E S H, On the relationship between electricity and income for industrialized countries[J]. Journal of Electricity and Employment,1987, 13:113-122.
[14]Fan sheng gen, "Technology Change,Technical and Allocative Inefficiency In Chinese Agriculture:A case of Rice Production In jiangsu".[J]. Journal of International Development,200,12:1-12.
[15]George H, Estimating residential demand for electricity in Greece [J]. Energy Economics,2004,26:319-334.
[16]Ghali K H, El-Sakka M I T, Energy use and output growth in Canada:a multivariate cointegration analysis[J]. Energy Economics,2004,26:225-238.
[17]Gigli.K., Santon D H, The causal relationship between energy and GNP:comparied study[J]. Energy Economics,1986,2.
[18]Glasure Y U, Lee A R. Cointegration,error-correction,and the relationship between GDP and electricity:the case of South Korea and Singapore [J]. Resource and Electricity Economics,1997,20:17-25.
[19]Granger, Some recent developments in a concept of causality[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1988,39:77-86.
[20]Griffin and Grogery, An intercountry Translog Model of Energy Substitution Respons[J]. American Economics Review,Vol.66,1976:845-857.
[21]Guilkey,D.K.,Lovell,C.A.K., “On the Flexibility of the Translog Aproximation”,[J]. International Economic Review,1980,21(1),pp.137-147.
[22]Hirst,E-Fulkerson,W.Carlsmith,R.and Wilbanks,T. Inproving Energy efficiency: The effectivness of Government action[J]. Energy Policy,1982.
[23]Hwang D B K, Gum.B, The causal relationship between energy and GNP:the case of Taiwan[J]. The Journal of Energy and Development 1992,12:219-226.
[24]Im,K., Pesaran, M., Shin.Y., Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels[J].Mimeographed.2002.
[25]J.W.Sun, T.Meristo. Measurement of Dematerialization/Materialization:A Case Analysis of Energy Saving and Decarbonization in OECD Countries,1960-95. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,1999, (60),275-294.
[26]Jorgenson,D.W. and Wilcoxen,P.J. Energy,The Environment and Economics Growth[C]. in Handbook of Nature Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier,1993.
[27]Kao C, Chiange M H and Chen B. (1999) International R&D spillovers:An application of Estimation and Inference in Panel Cointegration, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue,Vol.61,691-709.
[28]Kemfert C, Welsch H, Energy-capital-labours Substitution and the Economics Efforts of CO abatement:evidence for germany[J]. J of policy modeling,2000, Vol22(6):641-660.
[29]Khanna N, Analyzing the Economics Cost of the Kyoto Protocol[J]. Ecological Economics,2001, Vol38(1):59-69.
[30]Kraft.J.,Kraft.A., On the relationship between energy and GNP[J]. Energy Devolopment,1978,3:401-403.
[31]L.A.Greening, W.B.Davis, L. Schipper, M.Khrushch. Comparison of six decomposition methods:application to aggregate energy intensity for manufacturing in 10 OECD countries. Energy Economics 1997,19,375-390.
[36]Lau,L.J. and P.A.Yotopoulos, "A Test for Ralitive Efficiency and an Application to Indian Agiculture" [J]. American Economic Review,1971,61,No.1,pp.94-109.
[33]Mark J.Koetse, Henri L.F.de Groot and Raymond J.G.M.Florax,2006, Capital-Energy Sunstitution and Shifts in Factor Demond:A Meta-Analysis, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
[34]Masih A.M.M, Masih R. Energy comsumption,real income and temporal causality:results from a multicountry study based on cointegration and error-corrcetion modeling techniques[J]. Energy Economics,1996,18:165-183.
[35]Masih R, Masih A.M.M, Stock-Watson dynamic OLS(DOLS) and error-correction modeling approach to estimating long and short run elasticities in a demand function:new evidence and methodological implication from a application to the demand for coal in mainland China[J]. Energy Economics,1996,18:315-334.
[36]Matthew A. Cole, Does trade liberalization increase national energy use [J]. Economics Letters,2006(92):108-112.
[37]McCoskey S. and Kao C. Testing the Stability of a production function with urbanization as a shift factor, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue,1999,Vol.61,671-690.
[38]Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck, "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error," [J]. International Economic Review, 1977,18(2),435-444.
[39]Meeusen,, W. and J. van den Broeck., "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error", International Economic Review, 1977,18(2),435-444.
[40]Patterson,M.G and Wadsworth C. Updating New Zealands'Energy Intensity trends:What has happened Since 1984 and why[R]. Wellington:Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority,1993.
[41]Popp,D.C. Induced Innovation and Energy Prices[J]. American Economic Reviews,2002,Vol.92(1):160-180.
[42]R.Pindyck, The Structure of World Energy Demand[M]. MIT Press,1979.
[43]Robert K K, The mechanisms for autonomous energy efficience increases:a cointegration anlysis of the US Energy/GDP Ratio[J]. The Energy Journal,2004,25:63-86.
[44]Rodney S, Road transport energy demand in Australia:a co-integration approach[J]. Energy Economics,1995,17:329-339.
[45]Sinton,J.E. and Levine,M.D.Changing Energy Intensity in Chinese Industry:the relative importance of structure shift and intensity change[J]. Energy Policy,1994,Vol.22,3.
[46]Soytas U, Sari R, Energy consumption and GDP:Causality relationship in G-7 countrise and Emerging Marking[J]. Energy Economics,2003,25:33-37.
[47]Stern D I, A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy[J]. Energy Economics,2000,22:267-283.
[48]Tirole, J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge[M]. TheMIT Press, 1998.
[49 Unander F., Karbuz, S., Schipper, L., Ting, M.. Manufacturing energy use in OECD countries:devomposition of long term trends [J]. Energy Policy, 1999(27):769-778.
[50]Wankeun Oh, Kihoon lee, Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP Revisited:the case of Korea 1970-1999[J]. Energy:Economics, 2004,26:51-59.
[51]Welsch, H. and Ochsen, C. The determinants of aggregate energy use in West Germany:factor substitution, technological change, and trade [J]. Energy Economics,2005,27 (1):93-111.
[52]Yang H Y, A note on the causal relationship between electricity and GDP in Taiwan[J]. Energy Economics,2000,22:309-317.
①该图源自腾讯网,中国能源强度有多高?[P],2008年3月29日
①该图源自欧育辉等,基于面板数据的能耗与固定资产投资关系的实证研究[J],管理学报,2009.1。
①面板数据模型介绍中的主要内容源自高铁梅,《计量经济分析方法与建模》,清华大学出版社,2006年1月。
[1]D.梅多斯等.增长的极限[M].北京：商务印书馆,1984.
[2]白重恩,钱震杰,武康平.我国工业部门要素分配份额决定因素研究[J].经济研究,2008,8.
[3]车卉淳.资源耗竭原因的经济学分析[J].现代经济探讨,2002.
[4]陈军,成金华.中国非可再生能源生产效率评价-基于数据包络分析方法的实证分析[J].经济评论,2007,5.
[5]陈清泰.中国的能源战略和政策-在中国发展高层论坛“能源战略和改革”国际研讨会上的主题发言[N].中国经济时报,2003-11-7.
[6]陈诗一.节能减排与中国工业的双赢发展[J].经济研究,2010,3.
[7]陈诗一.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究,2009,4.
[8]陈诗一.能源驱动型经济增长不可持续[N].中国社会科学报,2010,8,26.
[9]陈文山.中国制造业经济增长与能源消耗分析[J]. 产业经济2005,9.
[10]成金华,李世祥.结构变动、技术进步以及价格对能源效率的影响[J].中国人口资源与环境,2010,4.
[11]邓祥周,田立新,段希波.能源价格的动态模型及分析[J].统计与决策,2007,1.
[12]干春晖,郑若谷.中国工业生产绩效：1998-2007-基于细分行业的推广随机前沿生产函数的分析[J].财经科学,2009,6.
[13]高宇明,齐中英.基于时变参数的我国全要素生产率估算[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,2.
[14]高振宇,王益.我国能源生产率的地区划分及影响因素[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,9.
[15]龚益,彼得·劳埃德.中国工业部门生产函数的参数估计[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1999,12.
[16]郭纹廷,王文峰.缓解我国能源瓶颈的影响因素分析[J].中国地质大学学报(社科版),2005,3.
[17]胡鞍钢,鄢一龙,刘生龙.市场经济条件下的“计划之手”[J].中国工业经济,2010(7)：26-35.
[18]韩颖,马萍,刘璐.一种能源消耗强度影响因素分解的新方法[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010,4.
[19]韩智勇,魏一鸣,范英.我国能源强度与经济结构变化特征分析[J].数理统计与管理,2004,11.
[20]韩智勇,魏一鸣,焦建玲,范英,张九天.中国能源消费与经济增长的协整性与因果关系分析[J].系统工程,2004,12.
[21]杭雷鸣.我国能源消费结构问题研究[D].上海交通大学,2007.
[22]何建坤,张希良.我国产业结构变化对GDP能源强度上升的影响及趋势分析[J].环境保护,2005,12.
[23]黄飞.能源消费与国民经济发展的灰色关联分析[J].热能动力工程,2001,1.
[24]蒋萍,谷彬.中国服务业TFP增长与效率演进[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,8
[25]孔婷,孙林岩,何哲,孙荣庭.能源价格对制造业能源强度调节效应的实证分析[J].管理科学,2008(21)：9.
[26]李宾,曾志雄.中国全要素生产率变动的再测算：1978-2007年[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,3.
[27]李丹,胡小娟.中国制造业企业相对效率和全要素生产率增长研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,7.
[28]李廉水,周勇.技术进步能提高能源效率吗?-基于中国工业部门的实证检验[J].管理世界,2006,10.
[29]李世祥,成金华.中国工业行业的能源效率特征及其影响因素-基于非参数前沿的实证分析[J].财经研究,2009,7.
[30]李小平,朱钟棣.中国工业行业的全要素生产率测算[J].管理世界,2005,4
[31]李治国,唐国兴.中国平均资本成本的估算[J].统计研究,2002,11.
[32]李子奈,潘文卿编著.计量经济学第二版[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2005.
[33]吕振东,郭菊娥,席酋民.中国能源CES生产函数的计量估算及选择[J].中国人口资源与环境,2009(19)：4.
[34]梁怀学,陈权宝.基于面板数据模型的我国行业能源消费特征分析[J].东北师大学报自然科学版,2005,6.
[35]梁进社,郑蔚,蔡建明.中国能源消费增长的分解-基于投入产出方法[J].自 然资源学报,2007,6.
[36]梁巧梅,魏一鸣,范英,Norio, Okada.中国能源需求和能源强度预测的情景分析模型及其应用[J].管理学报,2004,1.
[37]廖华,魏一鸣.能源效率及其与经济系统关系的再认识[J].公共管理学报,2010,1.
[38]林伯强.电力消费与中国经济增长—基于生产函数的研究[J].管理世界,2003,11.
[39]林伯强.中国能源需求的经济计量分析[J].统计研究,2001,10.
[40]刘长生,郭小东,简玉峰.能源消费对中国经济增长的影响研究-基于线性和非线性回归方法的比较分析[J].产业经济研究,2009,1.
[41]刘畅,崔艳红.中国能源消耗强度区域差异的动态关系比较研究[J].中国工业经济,2008,4.
[42]刘畅,孔宪丽,高铁梅.我国能源消耗强度变动机制与价格非对称效应研究[J].中国工业经济,2009,3.
[43]刘红玖,陶全.大中型工业企业能源密度下降的动因探寻[J].统计研究,2002,9.
[44]刘树杰,陈扬.新时期能源价格政策的基本思路[J].宏观经济研究,2005,7.
[45]刘舜佳.国际贸易、FDI和中国全要素生产率下降[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,11.
[46]刘小玄,李双杰.制造业企业相对效率的度量和比较及其外生比较因素[J].经济学季刊,2008,3.
[47]鲁成军,周瑞明.中国工业部门的能源替代研究-基于对ALLEN替代弹性模型的修正[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,5.
[48]罗长远.中国经济增长的源泉、机理及前景分析：一个理论综述[J].经济学动态,2003,10.
[49]马超群,储慧斌,李科,周四清.中国能源消费与经济增长的协整与误差校正模型研究[J].系统工程,2004,10.
[50]欧晓万.能源消费对产业结构调整的长期与短期约束[J].统计与决策,2007,7.
[50]潘祺志.我国工业能耗强度变化与节能路径选择[D].东北财经大学,2010.
[51]齐绍洲,罗威.中国地区经济增长与能源消费强度差异分析[J].经济研究,2007,2.
[52]齐志新,陈文颖.结构调整还是技术进步-改革开发后我国能源效率提高的因素分析[J].上海经济研究,2006,6.
[53]邱东,陈梦根,中国不应在资源消耗问题上过于自责[J].统计研究,2007,2.
[54]齐建国.中国经济高速增长与节能减排目标分析[J].财贸经济,2007,10.
[55]屈小娥.中国省际全要素能源效率变动分解[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,8.
[56]日本电力中央研究所,日本能源及电力供求的长期展望[M]西安：西安交通大学出版社,1985.
[57]师博,沈坤荣.市场分割下的中国全要素能源效率：基于超效率DEA方法的经验分析[J].世界经济,2008,9.
[58]施发启.对我国能源消费弹性系数变化及成因的初步分析[J].统计研究,2005,5.
[59]施发起.对我国能源消费弹性系数变化及成因的初步分析[J].统计研究,2005,5.
[60]史丹.我国经济增长过程中能源利用效率的改进[J].经济研究,2002,9.
[61]史丹.中国能源效率的地区差异与节能潜力分析[J].中国工业经济2006,10.
[62]史丹,张金隆.产业结构变动对能源消费的影响[J].经济理论与经济管理,2003,8.
[63]史丹,吴利学,傅晓霞,吴滨.中国能源效率地区差异及其成因分析[J].管理世界,2008,2.
[64]孙鹏,顾晓薇.中国能源消费的分解分析[J].资源科学,2005,5.
[65]孙鹏,顾晓薇,刘敬智,王青.中国能源消费的分解分析[J].资源科学,2005,9.
[66]唐玲,杨正林.能源效率与工业经济转型-基于中国1998-2007年行业数据的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,10.
[67]陶小马,邢建武,黄鑫,周雯.我国工业部门的能源价格扭曲与要素替代研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,11.
[68]滕玉华. 中国工业行业能源强度影响因素的实证分析[J].兰州商学院学报,2009,4.
[69]滕玉华.技术进步与中国能源效率研究文献综述[J].产业观察,2009,27.
[70]滕玉华.自主研发、技术引进与中国工业能源强度[J].财经论丛,2009,3.
[71]田立新等著.能源经济系统分析[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[72]田晓文.双向纯增量模型[J].经济研究,1997,11.
[73]涂正革.区域经济和谐发展的全要素生产率研究-基于对1995-2004年28个省市大中型工业企业的非参数生产前沿[J].经济评论,2008,1.
[74]涂正革.全要素生产率与区域经济增长的动力[J]. 南开经济研究,2007,4.
[75]涂正革,肖耿.中国的工业生产力革命-用随机前沿生产函数对中国大中型工 业企业全要素生产率增长的分解及分析[J].经济研究,2005,3.
[76]王海鹏,田澎,靳萍.中国能源消费、经济增长间协整关系和因果关系的实证研究——以电力行业为例[J].生产力研究,3.
[77]王火根,沈利生.中国经济增长与能源消费空间面板分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,12.
[78]王火根,龙建辉.能源消费与经济增长非线性关系分析：基于门限协整系统[J].技术经济与管理研究,2008,4.
[79]王群伟,周德群.中国全要素能源效率变动的实证分析[J].系统工程,2008,7.
[80]王小鲁.中国经济增长的可持续性与制度变革[J].经济研究,2000,7.
[81]王玉潜.能源消耗强度变动的因素分析方法及其应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,8.
[82]王争,孙柳媚,史晋川.外资溢出对中国私营企业生产率的异质性影响—来自普查数据的证据[J].经济学季刊,2008,1.
[83]王维国,潘祺志.辽宁省工业行业技术与配置无效率的研究-基于成本函数视角的实证分析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2009(19)：4.
[84]魏楚.规模效率与配置效率：一个对中国能源低效的解释—基于35个国家(地区)的比较[J].世界经济,2009,4.
[85]魏楚.能源效率研究发展及趋势：一个综述[J].浙江大学学报(社科版),2009,4.
[86]魏楚.中国能源效率问题研究[D].浙江大学,2009.
[87]魏楚,沈满洪.能源效率及其影响因素：基于DEA的实证分析[J].管理世界,2007,8.
[88]魏楚,沈满洪.能源效率与能源生产率-基于方法的省际数据比较[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,9.
[89]魏一鸣,廖华.能源效率的七类测度指标及其测度方法[J].中国软科学,2010,1.
[90]吴巧生.中国能源消费与GDP关系的再检验-基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,6.
[91]吴巧生,成金华.中国工业化中的能源消耗强度变动及因素分析[J].财经研.究,2006,6.
[92]吴巧生,成金华,王华.中国工业化进程中的能源消费变动—基于计量模型的实证分析[J]中国工业经济,2005,4.
[93]吴延瑞.生产率对中国经济增长的贡献：新的估计[J].经济学季刊,2008.3.
[94]徐绍峰.中国能源状况与经济社会可持续发展分析[J].经济论坛,2005,7.
[95]徐士元.基于技术进步与市场化改革的中国能源效率研究[D].华中科技大学,2009.
[96]徐士元.技术进步对能源效率影响的实证分析[J].科研管理,2009,6.
[97]杨红亮,史丹.能效研究方法和中国各地区能源效率比较[J].经济理论与经济管理,2008,3.
[98]杨正林.中国能源效率的影响因素研究[D].华中科技大学,2009.
[99]姚渝芳,陈杰,李花菊.结构变化的节能潜力计算的方法论研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,4.
[100]尹宗成,丁日佳,江激宇.FDI、人力资本、R&D与中国能源效率[J].财贸经济,2008,9.
[101]于立.能源价格理论研究[M].大连：东北财经大学出版社,1994.
[102]苑新丽.能源节约中的财税政策选择[J].财经问题研究,2.
[103]曾胜,黄登仕.中国能源消费、经济增长与能源效率[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,8.
[104]张红霞,刘汽运.我国高耗能产业的地区相对有效性及其影响[J].统计研究,2008,4.
[105]张军.资本形成、工业化与经济增长：中国的转轨特征[J].经济研究,2002,6.
[106]张军,陈诗一.Gary H.Jefferson结构改革与中国工业增长[J].经济研究,2009,7.
[107]张明海.增长和要素替代弹性—中国经济增长1978-1999年的实证研究[J].学术月刊,2002,8.
[108]张明海.中国经济的增长和要素配置的市场化：1978-1999[J].世界经济文汇,2002,3.
[109]张晓平.20世纪90年代以来中国能源消费的时空格局及其影响因素[J].中国人口,2005,2.
[110]张炎治.中国能源强度的演变机理及情景模拟研究[D].中国矿业大学,2009.
[111]张宗成,周猛.中国经济增长与能源消费的异常关系分析[J].上海经济研究,2004,4.
[112]赵建军.论不同要素密集型产业的就业效应[J].中共中央党校学报,2005,2.
[113]赵进文,范继涛.经济增长与能源消费内在依从关系的实证研究[J].经济研究,2007,8.
[114]赵丽霞,魏巍贤.能源与经济增长模型研究[J].预测,1998,6.
[115]郑照宁,刘德顺.考虑资本-能源-劳动投入的中国超越对数生产函数[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004.5.
[116]郑照宁,刘德顺.中国能源资本替代的不确定性[J].运筹与管理,2004,2.
[117]周黎安.晋升博弈中政府官员的激励与合作-兼论我国地方保护主义和重复建设问题长期存在的原因[J].经济研究,2004,6.
[118]周瑞明.技术进步、技术效率与中国农业生产率增长[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,12.
[119]周勇,李廉水.基于AMD的我国能源强度变化因素分析[J].煤炭经济研究,2006,5.
[120]朱绍格,鲁成军,王元凯.能源价格对中国工业资本存量的冲击效应[J].统计教育,2009,6.
[1]Aigner, D.J., C.A.K. Lovell and P. Schmidt, "Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models, " [J]. Journal of Econometrics,1977,6(1) 21-37.
[2]Arqam A-R and L. C. Hunt (2004). Panel unit roots and cointegration:evidence for OECD energy demand. Discussion Paper.6Th IAEE European Conference.
[3]Asafu-Adjaye J. The relationship between electricity consumption,electricity price and economic growth:time series evidence from Asian developing countries [J]. Energy Economics,2000,22:615-625.
[4]Atkinson,S.E. and C.Cornwell, "Estimation of Output and Input Technical Efficiency Using a Flexible Functional Form and Panel Data" [J]. International Economic Review,1994b,35,No.l,pp.245-255.
[5]Ang,B.W.,Zhang F.Q. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies [J]. Energy,2000,Vol.25,12.
[6]B.W.Ang, P.W.Lee. Decomposition of industrial energy consumption:the energy coefficient approach[J]. Energy Economics,1996,18,129-143.
[7]B.W.Ang, S.Y. Lee. Decomposition of industrial energy consumption. Some Methodological and application issues[J]. Energy Economics,1994,16 (2),83 92.
[8]Bauer,P.W., "An Approach for the Analysis of Multiproduct Technology and Efficiency Using Panel Data:An Application ti the U.S. Airline Industry", Unpublished Dissertation,1985, University of North Carolina.
[9]Bentzen J, Engsted T, Short and long-run elasticitise in energy demand:a co-integration approach[J]. Journal of Energy Economics,1993,16(2):139-143.
[10]Cheng B S, Lai T W, An investigation of co-integration and causality between electricity consumption and economic activity in Taiwan[J]. Energy Economics,1997,19:435-444.
[11]Daly,H.E. Beyond Growth:the economics of sustainable development[M]. Beacon Press,1996.
[12]Eltony M N, Al-Mutairi N H, Demand for gasoline in Kuwai-An empirical analysis using co-integration techoniques[J]. Energy Economics,1995, 17:249-253.
[13]Erol U, Yu E S H, On the relationship between electricity and income for industrialized countries[J]. Journal of Electricity and Employment,1987, 13:113-122.
[14]Fan sheng gen, "Technology Change,Technical and Allocative Inefficiency In Chinese Agriculture:A case of Rice Production In jiangsu".[J]. Journal of International Development,200,12:1-12.
[15]George H, Estimating residential demand for electricity in Greece [J]. Energy Economics,2004,26:319-334.
[16]Ghali K H, El-Sakka M I T, Energy use and output growth in Canada:a multivariate cointegration analysis[J]. Energy Economics,2004,26:225-238.
[17]Gigli.K., Santon D H, The causal relationship between energy and GNP:comparied study[J]. Energy Economics,1986,2.
[18]Glasure Y U, Lee A R. Cointegration,error-correction,and the relationship between GDP and electricity:the case of South Korea and Singapore [J]. Resource and Electricity Economics,1997,20:17-25.
[19]Granger, Some recent developments in a concept of causality[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1988,39:77-86.
[20]Griffin and Grogery, An intercountry Translog Model of Energy Substitution Respons[J]. American Economics Review,Vol.66,1976:845-857.
[21]Guilkey,D.K.,Lovell,C.A.K., “On the Flexibility of the Translog Aproximation”,[J]. International Economic Review,1980,21(1),pp.137-147.
[22]Hirst,E-Fulkerson,W.Carlsmith,R.and Wilbanks,T. Inproving Energy efficiency: The effectivness of Government action[J]. Energy Policy,1982.
[23]Hwang D B K, Gum.B, The causal relationship between energy and GNP:the case of Taiwan[J]. The Journal of Energy and Development 1992,12:219-226.
[24]Im,K., Pesaran, M., Shin.Y., Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels[J].Mimeographed.2002.
[25]J.W.Sun, T.Meristo. Measurement of Dematerialization/Materialization:A Case Analysis of Energy Saving and Decarbonization in OECD Countries,1960-95. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,1999, (60),275-294.
[26]Jorgenson,D.W. and Wilcoxen,P.J. Energy,The Environment and Economics Growth[C]. in Handbook of Nature Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier,1993.
[27]Kao C, Chiange M H and Chen B. (1999) International R&D spillovers:An application of Estimation and Inference in Panel Cointegration, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue,Vol.61,691-709.
[28]Kemfert C, Welsch H, Energy-capital-labours Substitution and the Economics Efforts of CO abatement:evidence for germany[J]. J of policy modeling,2000, Vol22(6):641-660.
[29]Khanna N, Analyzing the Economics Cost of the Kyoto Protocol[J]. Ecological Economics,2001, Vol38(1):59-69.
[30]Kraft.J.,Kraft.A., On the relationship between energy and GNP[J]. Energy Devolopment,1978,3:401-403.
[31]L.A.Greening, W.B.Davis, L. Schipper, M.Khrushch. Comparison of six decomposition methods:application to aggregate energy intensity for manufacturing in 10 OECD countries. Energy Economics 1997,19,375-390.
[36]Lau,L.J. and P.A.Yotopoulos, "A Test for Ralitive Efficiency and an Application to Indian Agiculture" [J]. American Economic Review,1971,61,No.1,pp.94-109.
[33]Mark J.Koetse, Henri L.F.de Groot and Raymond J.G.M.Florax,2006, Capital-Energy Sunstitution and Shifts in Factor Demond:A Meta-Analysis, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
[34]Masih A.M.M, Masih R. Energy comsumption,real income and temporal causality:results from a multicountry study based on cointegration and error-corrcetion modeling techniques[J]. Energy Economics,1996,18:165-183.
[35]Masih R, Masih A.M.M, Stock-Watson dynamic OLS(DOLS) and error-correction modeling approach to estimating long and short run elasticities in a demand function:new evidence and methodological implication from a application to the demand for coal in mainland China[J]. Energy Economics,1996,18:315-334.
[36]Matthew A. Cole, Does trade liberalization increase national energy use [J]. Economics Letters,2006(92):108-112.
[37]McCoskey S. and Kao C. Testing the Stability of a production function with urbanization as a shift factor, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue,1999,Vol.61,671-690.
[38]Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck, "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error," [J]. International Economic Review, 1977,18(2),435-444.
[39]Meeusen,, W. and J. van den Broeck., "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error", International Economic Review, 1977,18(2),435-444.
[40]Patterson,M.G and Wadsworth C. Updating New Zealands'Energy Intensity trends:What has happened Since 1984 and why[R]. Wellington:Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority,1993.
[41]Popp,D.C. Induced Innovation and Energy Prices[J]. American Economic Reviews,2002,Vol.92(1):160-180.
[42]R.Pindyck, The Structure of World Energy Demand[M]. MIT Press,1979.
[43]Robert K K, The mechanisms for autonomous energy efficience increases:a cointegration anlysis of the US Energy/GDP Ratio[J]. The Energy Journal,2004,25:63-86.
[44]Rodney S, Road transport energy demand in Australia:a co-integration approach[J]. Energy Economics,1995,17:329-339.
[45]Sinton,J.E. and Levine,M.D.Changing Energy Intensity in Chinese Industry:the relative importance of structure shift and intensity change[J]. Energy Policy,1994,Vol.22,3.
[46]Soytas U, Sari R, Energy consumption and GDP:Causality relationship in G-7 countrise and Emerging Marking[J]. Energy Economics,2003,25:33-37.
[47]Stern D I, A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy[J]. Energy Economics,2000,22:267-283.
[48]Tirole, J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge[M]. TheMIT Press, 1998.
[49 Unander F., Karbuz, S., Schipper, L., Ting, M.. Manufacturing energy use in OECD countries:devomposition of long term trends [J]. Energy Policy, 1999(27):769-778.
[50]Wankeun Oh, Kihoon lee, Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP Revisited:the case of Korea 1970-1999[J]. Energy:Economics, 2004,26:51-59.
[51]Welsch, H. and Ochsen, C. The determinants of aggregate energy use in West Germany:factor substitution, technological change, and trade [J]. Energy Economics,2005,27 (1):93-111.
[52]Yang H Y, A note on the causal relationship between electricity and GDP in Taiwan[J]. Energy Economics,2000,22:309-317.