非手术食管癌临床分期的研究与应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
第一部分食管癌术前分期准确性的临床研究
     目的以术后病理分期为标准对比分析食管内镜超声(EUS)、CT及食道造影对食管癌术前T、N分期的准确性,探讨非手术食管癌临床分期的应用价值。
     方法收集中国医学科学院肿瘤医院2003年4月至2010年10月符合入组条件、首程治疗为手术的食管鳞癌患者390例。根据术后病理分期比较每种检查手段的准确性,并结合EUS、CT两种检查结果对患者进行临床分期,进一步根据临床分期对患者进行生存分析。
     结果中位随访时间39.6个月(1.6-112.9个月)。96例(24.6%)患者因食管局部狭窄内镜超声无法通过。334例(85.6%)患者有完备CT影像资料。337例(86.4%)患者行食道造影检查。EUS、CT和食道造影对T分期总的准确率、kappa值分别为80.95%、0.671;71.25%和0.490;50.70%、0.386。EUS和CT对N分期的准确率、kappa值分别为69.4%、0.243;78.2%和0.467。结合EUS和CT术前检查将患者进行术前临床分期(按2002年UICC TNM分期系统)。其结果显示,临床分期与术后病理分期的比较其准确率为71.2%。临床分期各期别间的生存率差异有显著性(p=0.000)。EUS能否完全通过和食道造影示病变长度(≤3cm和>3cm)均对预后有影响(p=0.000,p=0.000)。
     结论EUS和CT检查对食管癌的临床分期与病理分期有很好的一致性,且临床分期所示的不同期别与预后有明显的相关性。EUS联合CT是非手术食管癌临床分期的有效手段。
     第二部分非手术食管癌临床分期的有效性及预测预后的临床价值
     目的探讨非手术食管癌临床分期的有效性及预测预后的临床价值。
     方法选择2003.4-2010.10期间在我院行食管癌根治术,术前有食管腔内超声、食管镜、CT、食道造影等详细检查,术后有详细的病理分期共358例。分析术前影像学分期与术后病理分期的预测值。依据2002年、2009年UICC病理分期及基于影像学的临床分期,分析患者的无瘤生存及总生存。
     结果全组中位随访时间为47个月。有EUS+CT检查并能进行有效分期305例(85.2%)。在305例中,临床T分期对病理T分期的预测值为0-88.6%,其中T1最高为88.6%;T4最低。临床N分期(N0/N1)的预测值为62.5%-100%。虽然2002年和2009年UICC分期的总生存率及无瘤生存率差异均有显著性(p=0.000,p=0.000)。但2002年分期总生存的组间差异明显,除Ⅳ只有2例与各期别间差异没有显著性外,其余期别两两比较差异均有显著性。2009年分期总生存组间差异多不显著。按2002年UICC TNM分期标准对305例进行EUS+CT的临床分期,总生存率及无瘤生存差异均显著性(p=0.000,p=0.000)。
     结论影像学检查不能有效、准确的提供淋巴结转移个数,但对淋巴结定性的预测值较高。EUS+CT的临床分期能有效的预测非手术食管癌的预后。
     第三部分食管腔内超声参与非手术食管癌的临床分期与预后的相关性研究
     目的探讨有腔内超声(EUS)参与的非手术食管癌临床分期的实用性以及对预后的预测价值。
     方法收集我院2003年11月至2012年3月符合入组条件、非手术治疗的食管鳞癌290例。结合EUS、CT检查按2002年UICC分期标准对全组患者进行临床分期,并分析各期别间患者的生存率以及预后因素。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。用Logrank法进行显著性检验及单因素分析,用Cox回归模型进行多因素预后分析。
     结果EUS完全通过并能进行有效地T、N分期的有178例(61.4%)。T1-4的总生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.247)。但在45例EUS NO的患者中,T1-4分期总生存及无进展生存均有统计学差异(OS p=0.000; PFS p=0.006)。EUSNO与N1总生存及无进展生存率差异有显著性(OS p=0.012; PFS p=0.016)。腔内超声不能通过112例(38.6%),不能通过的患者无论是总生存率还是无进展生存率均较能通过的患者差(OSp=0.001;PFSp=0.003)=CT的T和N分期对总生存及无进展生存均有影响(OS p=0.004, PFS p=0.030; OS p=0.024, PFS p=0.020)。全组1,3,5年总生存率分别为61.7%,27.8%,19.8%,中位生存时间为16.7个月。2002UICC临床分期各期别间的总生存率及无进展生存率差异均有显著性(x2=22.197, p=0.000; χ2=19.540,p=0.000)。多因素分析显示性别、年龄和临床分期是总生存的独立预后因素(p=0.004,0.020,0.002)。
     结论有EUS参与的食管癌临床分期能够预测非手术治疗患者的预后,建议将EUS作为我国食管癌疗前分期检查的基本手段。
Part I:Evaluation and accuracy of preoperative stage of esophageal carcinoma
     Objective The purpose of this study was to (1) assess endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) staging, computed tomography (CT) staging and esophagography accuracy of esophageal cancer and to (2) evaluate the effort of the clinical stage grouping on survival in the same population.
     Methods A total of390esophageal cancer patients treated with surgery as first-time treatment were retrospectively reviewed for evaluation of preoperative EUS, CT and esophagography. The accuracy of T staging and N staging for each test were compared with the postoperative histopathological stage as the gold standard. The strength of the agreement between the radiological stage and the histopathological stage was determined by means of the Kappa statistic. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for each stage and the log-rank test was used to test for significant differences in survival.
     Results The total accuracy and Kappa value of T stage was80.95%and0.671for EUS,71.25%and0.490for CT, and50.70%and0.386for esophagography. The accuracy and Kappa value of N stage was69.4%and0.243for EUS, and78.2%and0.467for CT. The accuracy of clinical stage based on T stage by EUS and N stage by CT was71.2%compared with UICC stage2002. Survival analysis showed the clinical stage to predict survival (p=0.000). An obstructing lesion and tumor length based (≤3cm vs.>3cm) on esophagography were prognostic factors (p=0.000,p=0.000)
     Conclusions The clinical stage grouping based on EUS T stage and CT N stage compares favorably with UICC stage2002. And the most important is the clinical stage grouping can predict survival in patients with esophageal cancer.
     Part II:Efficacy and predicting value of non-surgical clinical stage for esophageal carcinoma
     Objective To investigate the efficacy and predicting value of clinical stage in non-surgical patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC).
     Methods A retrospective study was conducted in358EC patients who received radical surgery in our hospital From April2003to October2010and had preoperative work-up such as EUS, thoracic CT scan. Positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value of Clinical T/N stage based on CT+EUS were calculated compared with pathological stage. And the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were performed according to2002,2009UICC TNM stage and clinical stage groupings, respectively.
     Results The media following-up time was47months.305patients were analyzed with clinical stage based on EUS+CT. Among them, the predictive value of clinical T stage were0-88.6%, and88.6%for cTl. Predictive value of clinical N stage (N0/N1) were62.5%-100%. The significant differences in OS and DFS rates based on both2002and2009TNM stage were noted (p=0.000, p=0.000). For2002TNM stage, comparisons between the individual stage groupings showed a significant difference in overall survival in most of comparisons. There were305patients staged clinically based on EUS and CT according to2002TNM stage. A significant difference in OS and DFS rates based on clinical stage were noted (p=0.000, p=0.000).
     Conclusions1. Image modalities showed good predictive value for N stage (N0/N1), even they couldn't provide precisely number of Lymph nodes metastasis.2. The clinical stage based on EUS+CT could predict the prognosis for non-surgical patients with esophageal carcinoma.
     Part Ⅲ:Clinical staging of non-surgical esophageal cancer based on endoscopic ultrasonography and CT and its prognostic value
     Objective To investigate the clinic stageing of non-surgical esophageal cancer based on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) and its prognostic value.
     Methods A total of290patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with non-surgical treatment were retrospectively reviewed from November2003to March2012. The clinical stage of each patient was evaluated based on EUS and CT according to the2002UICC TNM staging system. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for each stage and significant differences in survival and univariate prognostic factor was analyzed by log-rank test. Multivariate prognostic factor was analyzed by Cox regression model.
     Results One hundred seventy eight patients (61.4%) were staged by EUS since EUS could be completely performed. Comparison of different EUS T-stages found no difference in overall survival (OS)(p=0.247). Comparison of different EUS T-stages among patients having EUS NO stage found significant difference in survivals (OS p=0.000; PFS p=0.006). EUS N-stages showed significant difference in survivals (OS p=0.012; PFS p=0.016). EUS was not completely performed in112patients (38.6%), and patients who had a stenotic tumor were poorer OS and PFS (OS p=0.001; PFS p=0.003). CT T-stages, and N-stages also affected OS and PFS(OS p=0.004, PFS p=0.030; OS p=0.024, PFS p=0.020).The1-,3-and5-OS rates were61.7%,27.8%,19.8%and the median survival time was16.7months. OS and PFS varied significantly between patients of different2002UICC clinical stages (p=0.000, p=0.000). The multivariate analyzed revealed sex, age and clinical stage were independent prognostic factors(p=0.004,0.020,0.002).
     Conclusions:The clinical stage grouping based on EUS and CT can predicts survival in esophageal carcinoma patients treated with non-surgical method. We recommend EUS as basic pretreatment examination was performed in patients with esophageal carcinoma in China.
引文
1. Lightdale CJ. Esophageal cancer. American College of Gastroenterology. The American journal of gastroenterology 1999,94(1):20-9.
    2. Rosch T. Endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer:a review of literature results. Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America 1995,5(3):537-47.
    3. Van Dam J. Endosonographic evaluation of the patient with esophageal cancer. Chest 1997,112(4 Suppl):184S-90S.
    4. Chak A, Canto M, Gerdes H, et al. Prognosis of esophageal cancers preoperatively staged to be locally invasive (T4) by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS): a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 1995, 42(6):501-6.
    5. Kelly S, Harris KM, Berry E, et al. A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma. Gut 2001,49(4):534-9.
    6. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM classification of malignant tumors.6th ed, vol. Wiley Liss,6th edn. New York:Wiley Liss; 2002.
    7. Catalano MF, Sivak MV Jr, Rice T, Gragg LA, Van Dam J. Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 1994, 40(4):442-6.
    8. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, Urmacher C, Brennan MF. Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer:comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology 1991,181(2):419-25.
    9. Tio TL, Cohen P, Coene PP, Udding J, den Hartog Jager FC, Tytgat GN. Endosonography and computed tomography of esophageal carcinoma. Preoperative classification compared to the new (1987) TNM system. Gastroenterology 1989,96(6):1478-86.
    10. Beck JR. Likelihood ratios. Another enhancement of sensitivity and specificity. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 1986,110(8):685-6.
    11. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977,33(1):159-74.
    12. Dwyer AJ. Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities. Radiology 1991,178(2):328-30.
    13. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind CH. TNM classification of malignant tumors.7th ed, vol. Wiley Liss,7th edn. New York:Wiley Liss; 2010.
    14. Stiles BM, Mirza F, Coppolino A, et al. Clinical T2-T3N0M0 esophageal cancer: the risk of node positive disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2011,92:491-496; discussion 496-498.
    15. Zhang JQ, Hooker CM, Brock MV, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is beneficial for clinical stage T2 NO esophageal cancer patients due to inaccurate preoperative staging. The Annals of thoracic surgery 2012,93:429-437.
    16. Nishimaki T, Tanaka O, Ando N, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of preoperative staging in thoracic esophageal cancer. The Annals of thoracic surgery 1999, 68(6):2059-64.
    17. Shimpi RA, George J, Jowell P, Gress FG. Staging of esophageal cancer by EUS: staging accuracy revisited. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2007,66(3):475-82.
    18. Murata Y, Suzuki S, Hashimoto H. Endoscopic ultrasonography of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Surgical endoscopy 1988,2(3):180-3.
    19. Tio TL, Coene PP, den Hartog Jager FC, Tytgat GN. Preoperative TNM classification of esophageal carcinoma by endosonography. Hepato-gastroenterology 1990,37(4):376-81.
    20. Dittler HJ, Bollschweiler E, Siewert JR. [What is the value of endosonography in the preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma?]. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift 1991,116(15):561-6.
    21. Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zeitz M, et al. Evaluation of endosonography in TN staging of oesophageal cancer. Gut 1991,32(1):16-20.
    22. Sugimachi K, Ohno S, Fujishima H, Kuwano H, Mori M, Misawa T. Endoscopic ultrasonographic detection of carcinomatous invasion and of lymph nodes in the thoracic esophagus. Surgery 1990,107(4):366-71.
    23. van Vliet E, Eijkemans M, Kuipers E, Poley J, Steyerberg E, Siersema P. Publication bias does not play a role in the reporting of the results of endoscopic ultrasound staging of upper gastrointestinal cancers. Endoscopy 2007, 39(04):325-32.
    24. Dittler H, Pesarini A, Siewert J. Endoscopic classification of esophageal cancer: correlation with the T stage. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 1992,38(6):662-8.
    25. Choi J, Kim SG, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer. Surgical endoscopy 2010,24(6):1380-6.
    26. Goei R, Lamers RJ, Engelshove HA, Oei KT. Computed tomographic staging of esophageal carcinoma:a study on interobserver variation and correlation with pathological findings. European journal of radiology 1992,15(l):40-4.
    27. Harris KM, Kelly S, Berry E, et al. Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Health technology assessment 1998,2(18):i-iv, 1-134.
    28. Weaver SR, Blackshaw GR, Lewis WG, et al. Comparison of special interest computed tomography, endosonography and histopathologieal stage of oesophageal cancer. Clinical radiology 2004,59(6):499-504.
    29. van Vliet EP, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MG, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD. Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer:a meta-analysis. British journal of cancer 2008,98(3):547-57.
    30. Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, et al. Impact of lymph node staging on therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2003, 125(6):1626-35.
    31. Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Norton ID, Clain JE, et al. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration on lymph node staging in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2001,53(7):751-7.
    32. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy:diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997,112(4):1087-95.
    33 刘明,李彩英,彰俊杰,等.食管癌病变长度与侵润深度关系的探讨[J]。中国医学影像技术,2003,19(7):885-886.
    34 Ueyama T, Kawamoto K, Yamada Y, et al. Early esophageal carcinoma. Evaluation of the depth of invasion based on double-contrast esophagography.Acta Radiaol 1998,39(2):133-137.
    35 中国非手术治疗食管癌临床分期专家小组.非手术治疗食管癌的临床分期标准.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2010,19(3):179-180
    1. Harmer MH. TNM classification of malignant tumours. Geneva:International Union Against Cancer 1978.
    2. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours.Wiley.com 2011.
    3. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch. TNM classification of malignant tumours. Wiley-Liss 2002.
    4. Stiles BM, Mirza F, Coppolino A, et al. Clinical T2-T3N0M0 esophageal cancer: the risk of node positive disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2011,92:491-496; discussion 496-498.
    5. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012,366: 2074-2084.
    6. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, et al. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 1994,220:364-372; discussion 372-363.
    7. Kato H, Tachimori Y, Watanabe Ⅱ, et al. Lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1991,48:106-111.
    8. Tachimori Y, Kato H, Watanabe H, et al. Neck ultrasonography for thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 1994,57:1180-1183.
    9. Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, Luketich JD. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet 2013,381:400-412.
    10. Rice TW. Diagnosis and staging of esophageal cancer. In:Pearson FG, Patterson GA, eds. Pearson's thoracic and esophageal surgery.3rd edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier,2008,454-463.
    11. Rosch T. Endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer:a review of literature results.Gastrointes.Endosc Clin N Am 1995,5:537-547
    12. Kayani B, Zacharakis E, Ahmed K, et al. Lymph node metastases and prognosis in oesophageal carcinoma-a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011,37: 747-753.
    13. van Vliet EP, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MG et al. Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer:a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2008,98:547-557.
    14. Pfau PR, Perlman SB, Stanko P, et al. The role and clinical value of EUS in a multimodality esophageal carcinoma staging program with CT and positron emission tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 2007,65:377-384.
    15. Grimm H, Binmoeller KF, Hamper K, et al. Endosonography for preoperative locoregional staging of esophageal and gastric cancer. Endoscopy 1993,25: 224-230.
    16. Meyers BF, Downey RJ, Decker PA, et al. The utility of positron emission tomography in staging of potentially operable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus:results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007,133:738-745.
    17. Zhang JQ, Hooker CM, Brock MV, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is beneficial for clinical stage T2 NO esophageal cancer patients due to inaccurate preoperative staging. The Annals of thoracic surgery 2012,93:429-437.
    18. Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, et al. Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus 2009,22:1-8.
    19. Talsma K, van Hagen P, Grotenhuis BA, et al. Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012,19:2142-2148.
    20. Reeh M, Nentwich MF, von Loga K, et al. An attempt at validation of the seventh edition of the classification by the International Union Against Cancer for esophageal carcinoma. The Annals of thoracic surgery 2012,93: 890-896.
    21. Gertler R, Schuser T, Feith M, et al. Long-term outcome of almost 3000 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus:evaluation of the new UICC/AJCC staging system. J Clin Oncol.29:2011(suppl 4; abstr 64).
    22. Nomura M, Shitara K, Kodaira T, et al. Prognostic impact of the 6th and 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging systems on esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82:946-952.
    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008:GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer,2010,127:2893-2917.
    2. 张思维,雷正龙,李光琳et al中国肿瘤登记地区2006年肿瘤发病和死亡资料分析.中国肿瘤,2010,19:356-365.
    3. Esophageal Cancer, www.cancer.org/cancer/esphaguscancer/detailedguide /esophagus-cancer-key-statistics.2014 Cancer Statistics.
    4. Rosch T. Endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer:a review of literature results. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am,1995,5:537-547.
    5. NCCN guidelines. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer. Version 2.2013. www.nccn.org
    6. Catalano MF, Sivak MV, Jr., Rice T et al. Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis. Gastrointest Endosc,1994,40:442-446.
    7. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG et al. Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer:comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology,1991,181: 419-425.
    8. Tio TL, Cohen P, Coene PP et al. Endosonography and computed tomography of esophageal carcinoma. Preoperative classification compared to the new (1987) TNM system. Gastroenterology,1989,96:1478-1486.
    9. 肖泽芬.食管癌//殷蔚伯,余子豪,徐国镇等主编.肿瘤放射治疗学(第四版).北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2008:546
    10. Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zeitz M et al. Evaluation of endosonography in TN staging of oesophageal cancer. Gut,1991,32:16-20.
    11. Sugimachi K, Ohno S, Fujishima H et al. Endoscopic ultrasonographic detection of carcinomatous invasion and of lymph nodes in the thoracic esophagus. Surgery,1990,107:366-371.
    12..Weaver SR, Blackshaw GR, Lewis WG et al. Comparison of special interest computed tomography, endosonography and histopathological stage of oesophageal cancer. Clin Radiol,2004,59:499-504.
    13. van Vliet EP, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MG et al. Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer:a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer,2008,98:547-557.
    14. Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Okabayashi K et al. The number of lymph node metastases influences survival in esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol,1998,67: 160-163.
    15. 肖泽芬,杨宗贻,王绿化等.食管癌术后淋巴结转移对生存率的影响和放射治疗的意义.中华肿瘤杂,2004,26:112-115.
    16. Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Sahai AV et al. Dilation of malignant esophageal stenosis to allow EUS guided fine-needle aspiration:safety and effect on patient management. Gastrointest Endosc,2000,51:309-313.
    17. Flamen P, Lerut A, Van Cutsem E et al. Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol,2000,18:3202-3210.
    18. Kelly S, Harris KM, Berry E et al. A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma. Gut,2001,49:534-539.
    19. Harris KM, Kelly S, Berry E et al. Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Health Technol Assess,1998,2:i-iv,1-134.
    20. Goei R, Lamers RJ, Engelshove HA, Oei KT. Computed tomographic staging of esophageal carcinoma:a study on interobserver variation and correlation with pathological findings. Eur J Radiol,1992,15:40-44.
    21. 王玉祥,祝淑钗,李娟.209例食管癌三维适形放疗疗效分析.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2010;19:101-104.
    22. 李娟,祝淑钗,王玉祥,等.375例食管癌三维适形放疗长期疗效分析.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21:334-337.
    23.孔洁,李晓宁,韩春,等.792例食管癌三维技术放疗的疗效分析.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21:421-422.
    24.韩春,王澜,祝淑钗,等.非手术治疗食管癌临床分期标准对225例放疗患者的预后评价.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2011,20:109-112.
    Aibe T, et al(1986). A fundamental study of normal layer structureof the gastroibtestinal wall visualized by endoscopic ultrasonography. Scand J Gastroenterol.123 (Suppl):6-15
    Antoch G, et al (2004). To enhance or not to enhance? 18F-FDG and CT contrast agents in dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med.45(suppl 1):56S-65S.
    Choi JY, et al (2000). Improved detection of individual nodal involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus by EDG PET. J Nucl Med.41:808-815
    Eloubeidi MA, et al (2003). Temporal trends (1973-1997) in survival of patients withesophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States:a glimmer of hope? Am J Gastroenterol.98:1627-1633.
    Enzinger PC (2003). Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med.125:2241-2252.
    Flamen P, et al (2000). Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol.18:3202-3210.
    Fukuda M et al (2000).Endoscopic ultrasonography of the esophagus. World J Surg.24(2):216-226
    Globocan (2008). [EB/OL]. http://globocan.icrc.fr/factsheets/populations.factsheet.asp? uno=160
    Hordijk ML, et al (1993). Influence of tumour stenosis on the accuracy of endosonography inpreoperative T staging of esophageal cancer. Endoscopy.25:171-175
    Hulscher, et a 1(2002). Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med.347: 1662-1669.
    Kato H, et al (2002). Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the assessment of esophageal carcinoma. Cancer.94:921-928
    Kato H, et al(2005). The incremental effect of positron emission tomography on diagnostic accuracy in the initial staging of esophageal carcinoma.Cancer.103:148-156.
    Kawahare I,et al(1993). Evaluation of the invasion of esophageal cancer to the aorta by cine-MR imaging [J]. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi.53(1):107-109
    Kawahare I (1994). Invasion of esophageal cancer to neighboring structuers diagnosis by CT, conventional MR imaging and cine-MR imaging [J]. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi.54(10):988-998
    Kelly S, et al (2001). A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastroesophageal carcinoma. Gut.49:534-539.
    Larson SM (2008). Practice-based evidence of the beneficial impact of positron emission tomography in clinical oncology. J Clin Oncol.26:2083-2084.
    Lehr L, et al (1988). Assessment of resectability of esophageal cancer by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Surgery.103:344-350.
    Leslie EQ, et al (2008). Staging esophageal cancer. Cancer Imaging.8:D33-S42
    Levine MS, et al (1997). Carcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: Sensitivity of radiographic diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol.168.1423-1426
    Lightdale CJ (2005). Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging and follow-up of esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol.20:4483-4489
    Lower VJ, et al (2005). Comparison of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopicul trasound in the initial staging of patients with esophageal cancer [J]. Mol Imaging Biol.7(6):422-430
    Massari M, et al (1999).The role of echo-endoscopy in the staging of squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Minerva Chri.54(4):205-212
    Meyers BF, et al (2007). The utility of positron emission tomography in staging of potentially operable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus:Results of the American College of Surgeons oncology group Z0060 trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.l33:738-745.
    Mizowaki T, et al(1996). Optimal size criteria of malignant lumph nodes in the treatment planning of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer:evaluation by computed tomography and magnetic resomance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.36:1091-1098
    Nishimura H, et al (2006). Preoperative Esophageal Cancer Staging:Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lymph Node with Ferumoxtran-10, an Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide. J Am Coll Surg.202(4):604-611
    Panebianco V, et al (2006).3D CT protocol in the assessment of the esophageal neoplastic lesions:can it improve TNM staging? Eur Radiol.16:414-421.
    Pera M (2000). Epidemiology of esophageal cancer, especially adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Recent results. Cancer Res.155:1-14.
    Pfau PR, et al (2007). The role and clinical value of EUS in a multimodality esophageal carcinoma staging program with CT and positron emission tomography. GastrointestEndosc.65:377-384
    Picus D, et al (1983). Computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. Radiology.146:433-438
    Rankin S (1990). The role of computerized tomography in the staging of oesophageal cancer. Clin Radiol.42:152-153.
    Rasanen JV, et al(2003). Prospective analysis of accuracy of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography in staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction [J]. Ann Surg Oncol.10(8):954-960.
    Reed CE et al (1999). Esophageal cancer staging:improved accuracy by endoscopic ultrasound of celiac lymph nodes. Ann Thorac Surg.67:319-322.
    Rice et al (1998).Esophageal carcinoma:depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status. Ann Thorac Surg.65(3):787-792
    Rice TW (2000). Clinical staging of esophageal carcinoma. CT, EUS, and PET. Chest Surg Clin N Am.10:471-485
    Rice TW, et al (2009). Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus. 22:1-8.
    Richards DG, et al (2000). Endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of tumours of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl.82:311-317
    Riddell AM, et al(2007). The appearances of oesophageal carcinoma demonstrated on high-resolution, T2-weighted MRI, with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol.17:391-399
    Rosch T (1995). Endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer:a review of literature results. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.5:537-547.
    Rouveal I, et al (2005). Survival after surgery for oesohageal cancer:a population-based study. Lancet Oncol.6:864-870
    Salminen JT, et al (1999). Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction. Scand J Gastroenterol.34:1178-1182
    Schroder W, et al(2002). Lymph node staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with and without neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy:histomorphologic analysis. World J Surg 2002; 26:584-587.
    Sihvo EI, et al (2004). Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction:positron emission tomography improves staging and prediction of survival in distant but not in locoregional diseas. J Gastrointest Surg.8(8): 988-996.
    Sozzi M, et al (1999). What is the current role of endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal cancer? Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol.31(2):154-161
    Sugimachi K, et al (1991).Propesed new criteria for early carcinoma of the esophagus. Surg Gynecol Obstet.173(4):303-308
    Takashima S, et al (1991). Carcinoma of the esophagus:CT vs MR imaging in determining resectability. AJR Am J Roentgenol.156:297-302
    Toru F, et al (1998). Evaluation of Esophageal Cancers Using Fluorine 18-Fluorodeoxy-glucose PET. J Nucl Med.39:1002-1007
    van Westreenen H.L., et al (2004). Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol.22:3805-3812.
    Vazquez-Sequeiros E, et al (2003). Impact of lymph node staging on therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterology.125:1626-1635.
    Wakelin, et al (2002). A comparison of computerised tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma. Eur J Radiol.41(2):161-167.
    Wallace MB, et al (2002). An analysis of multiple staging management strategies for carcinoma of the esophagus, computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, positron emission tomography and thoracoscopy/laparoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg.74:1026-1032.
    Wu LF, et al (2003). Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer:comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography, spiral CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol.9:219-224.
    Yamada I, et al (1997). Staging of esoghageal carcinoma in vitro with 4.7-T MR imaging. Radiology.204:521
    Yang L, et al (2003). Time trend in cancer mortality in China,1987-1999. Int J Cancer.106:771-783.
    Yasuda S, et al (1995). Application of whole-body positron emission tomography in the imaging of esophageal cancer:report of a case. Surg Today.25:261-264.
    Yoon YC,et al(2003). Metastasis to regional lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma:CT versus FDG PET for presurgical detection prospective study. Radiology.227:764-770.
    程贵余等(2004).内镜超声检查术在食管癌术前分期的临床应用.中华消化内镜杂.21(5):310-312
    程燕(1993).国外医学临床放射学分册.16(2):65-67
    胡祎等(2005).超声内镜检查在食管癌术前临床分期的应用价值.癌症.24(11):1358-1362
    张卫国等(2008).微探头内镜超声检查对食管癌TNM分期的价值.胃肠病学.13(5):290-292

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700