摘要
在技术快速变化和竞争日趋激烈的今天,企业家不仅要充分利用现有知识,而且要不断探索新的技术和技能来适应商业环境的变化。因此,如何改善企业家探索式和利用式学习至关重要。
对个体来说,探索式学习和利用式学习是两种排他性的学习模式(Gupta&Smith,2006)。既有研究虽然考察了企业家探索式学习和利用式学习在自我经验学习中作用(Politis&Gabrielsson,2005),但是没有指出企业家该如何平衡这两种学习模式。而且,在经验学习研究中,企业家被看作是“智力罗宾逊(intellectual Robinson Crusoe)”(Pavlica,et al.,1998),社会互动对企业家学习的影响被忽视。事实上,网络学习是提升企业家能力的重要途径之一。
针对上述问题,论文在控制企业家经验情况下,关注以下四个议题:①企业家社会网络与企业家学习模式之间有什么样的关系?②不同网络维度在影响企业家学习模式上是否有替代或互补关系?③在竞争性的网络观点(如伯特的结构洞和科尔曼紧密社会资本理论)下,对应的网络变量是否分别对探索式学习和利用式学习产生积极作用?如果这样,这意味着企业家能通过构建不同的网络来平衡这两种学习模式;④社会网络、学习模式分别与学习的直接结果——机会识别(Politics,2005)之间的关系如何。围绕这些问题,按照从社会网络——企业家学习方式——学习结果的逻辑,论文进行了一系列的理论和实证研究。
论文以中小企业家为研究对象,结合文献和理论分析,提出了17假设。使用问卷调查方式获取研究数据。在问卷设计中,论文使用“提名”(name generators)法获取网络变量的信息,并运用社会网络分析软件UCINET6.0计算每个企业家网络的结构洞数值。最后,利用SPSS15.0,采用层次回归法对研究假设进行了验证。通过研究,论文有如下研究结论:
(1)关于企业家网络与学习模式关系的研究。根据Hoang&Antoncic(2003)总结,企业家社会网络分析有三个成份,即网络结构、网络治理和网络内容,对应的,论文分别考察了结构洞(限制性)和弱关系(强关系)、信任、企业家“自我中心”网络中“他人”之间的教育背景的异质性(同质性)和企业家与“他人”之间知识的差异性(相识性)与学习模式之间的关系。结果表明:结构洞、教育异质性、知识差异性与探索式学习显著正相关;强关系、信任、教育背景的同质性、知识的相似性与利用式学习显著正相关。也就是说,竞争性的网络观点通过对不同学习模式的影响显示出其正确性。这表明,企业家可以通过构建不同的网络来平衡探索式学习和利用式学习。
特别的,论文考察了过度信任问题,过度信任被认为不利于创新性的探索式学习(Zahra,et al.,2006),因此,论文期望信任与探索式学习呈倒U型关系。结果表明:信任的回归系数为正,信任平方的回归系数为负,但二者均不显著。不过,这也提醒我们,信任的作用并不总是正面的。
(2)网络维度之间关系的研究。论文通过两种方式来考察网络维度之间的关系:一是通过逐步将网络变量引入回归模型,考察后引入变量对已经进入变量的显著性是否有削弱作用,如果是,则说明后者对前者具有替代作用。结果表明,变量之间不存在相互替代关系,这证实了Seibert,et al.(2001)关于网络维度可以一起发挥作用的观点:二是通过考察网络变量之间的交互作用来判断网络维度之间是否具有依赖或互补关系。研究发现:结构洞与教育异质性的交互作用与探索式学习显著正相关,同时,结构洞的显著性消失,而教育异质性的显著性依然稳健,这表明结构洞的作用可能依赖于教育异质性:其它维度之间没有发现显著关系。
(3)关于网络、学习模式与机会识别关系的研究。研究发现:在网络变量中,只有教育异质性(同质性)与机会识别显著正(负)相关;探索式学习不仅与机会识别显著正相关,而且它在教育异质性与机会识别之间起到完全中介的作用;利用式学习与机会识别之间没有显著关系。
除了上述三个核心问题外,论文还考察了与之相关的另外两个问题:
(4)企业家认知风格的影响。企业家学习受认知风格的影响(Ulrich&Colc,1987;Man,2006),论文的研究发现:企业家创新型认知风格与探索式学习显著正相关,与利用式学习显著负相关;当企业家具有高创新型认知风格时,网络结构洞的多少并不影响企业家的探索式学习,当企业家具有高适应型认知风格时,企业家与网络成员间知识的相似性程度的高低对利用式学习没有显著影响。
(5)企业家个体特征和企业特征的影响。回归分析发现:①女性企业家、年龄比较大的企业家、有一定类似产业经验的企业家偏好利用式学习;②民营、外资和合资企业的企业家偏好探索式学习;③年龄在25岁以下的企业家、创业经验少的企业家机会识别能力偏低,高科技企业家的机会识别能力明显高于其它产业的企业家。
最后,论文系统地归纳了研究结论,指出了论文所取得的理论进展和指导实践的建议,并对论文研究的局限性和后续研究进行了客观分析。
In face of the rapid changing in technology and the increasingly fierce competition,it is necessary for entrepreneurs to make full use of existing knowledge and continuously explore new technologies and skills to adapt to the changes in the business environment.Therefore,it is very important how to improve entrepreneurs' explorative learning and exploitive learning.
On the individual,explorative learning and exploitive learning are two exclusive modes of learning(Gupta & Smith,2006).Literatures investigated roles of explorative learning and exploitive learning in entrepreneurs' experiential learning (Politis & Gabrielsson,2005),but failed to point out that how to balance these two modes.Moreover,this literatures treat entrepreneurs as "intellectual Robinson Crusoe"(Pavlica,et al,1998),and the impact of social interaction on entrepreneurs' learning has been ignored.In fact,network learning is one of the important ways to enhance entrepreneurial competencies.
To address above issues,the paper focus on the following four topics:①what kind of relationship are there between social networks and entrepreneurs' learning modes?②Whether there are alternative or complementary relationships between dimensions of network?③Corresponding to the competitive views of the network (such as Burt's structure hole theory and Coleman's social capital theory),if there are positive relationships between network variables and explorative learning and exploitive learning? If so,this means that entrepreneurs can balance explorative learning and exploitive learning by constructing different networks;④What kind of relationships are there between social network,learning modes and opportunity recognition(Politics,2005)? In order to cope with these issues,a series of theoretical and empirical studies are performed.
Based on the literatures and theory analysis,the paper put forward 17 research hypotheses.In questionnaires,the paper use "name generators" to measure network variables and applies social network analysis software UCINET6.0 to calculate the value of structural hole of each sample.Finally,through employing the statistical tool SPSS15.0 and multiple regression analysis(hierarchial enter) to examine all hypotheses.The conclusions are sum up as follow:
(1)According to Hoang&Antoncic(2003),there are three elements in analysis of entrepreneurs' social network,namely,network structure,network governance and network content,corresponding,the paper examines respectively the relations between structure holes(constraint),weak(strong) ties,trust,education heterogeneity(homogeneity),dissimilarities(similarities) between entrepreneur and "alters" in his/her network and learning modes.The results show that:there are significant positive correlations between structural holes,education heterogeneity, knowledge dissimilarities and explorative learning,and there are also significant positive correlations between strong ties,trust,education homogeneity,knowledge similar and exploitative learning.That is to say,the competitive views of network show their reasonableness through their effects on explorative(exploitive) learning. This means that entrepreneurs can balance explorative learning and exploitive learning by constructing different networks.
Especially,the paper pays attention to the problem of over-trust.Over-trust is not considered conducive to innovative and explorative learning(Zahra,et al,2006), therefore,the paper predicts that trust has an inverted U-shaped relationship to explorative learning.The results show that:the coefficient for the trust is positive, whereas the coefficient for trust is negative,but they are not significant.However,this reminds us that the role of trust is not always positive.
(2)This paper investigates the relationship between the network dimensions by two ways:First,by the progressive introduction of a network variable to regression model,if the significance of a previous variable fates after the introduction of new variable,this means that new variable is a complete surrogate for previous variable, but,such relationships between variables are found,this result confirms the view of Seibert,et al(2001) that the different dimensions of the network can play a role together.Second,through the interaction between network variables,we can determine whether or not there are complementary relationships between dimensions of network.The paper find:the interaction of structural hole and education heterogeneity has an significant positive relationship to explorative learning,at the same time,the significance of structure hole fades and education heterogeneity of significant remains robust,which indicating that the effects of structure hole may be dependent on education heterogeneity;No significance relationship exists among other dimension.
(3)The paper examines relationship between network variables, explorative(exploitive)learning and opportunity recognition.We find:only education heterogeneity(homogeneous) has significant positive(negative) relationship to opportunity recognition;Explorative learning not only has significant positive relationship to opportunity recognition,but also is full mediator between the relationship of education heterogeneity and opportunity recognition;But,no significance is found between exploitive learning and opportunity recognition.
In addition,two other important related issues are discussed:
(4) The first is the effect of entrepreneurs' cognitive style.Entrepreneurs' cognitive style impact entrepreneurs' learning(Ulrich & Cole,1987;Man,2006),this paper finds:Innovative cognitive style has significant positive relationship to explorative learning and adaptive cognitive style has significant negative relationship to exploitive learning;When with high innovative cognitive style,the number of structure holes does not affect entrepreneurs' explorative learning,when with high adaptive cognitive style,the extent of knowledge similarity has no significant impact on exploitive learning.
(5) The second are the effects individual characteristics of entrepreneurs and characteristics of firms.Regression analysis shows that:①Female entrepreneurs, older entrepreneurs,entrepreneurs with a certain experience in similar industries preferences exploitive learning;②Entrepreneurs in private firms,foreign-funded firms and joint ventures preferences explorative learning;③Entrepreneurs under the age of 25,entrepreneurs with fewer entrepreneurial experience have low capabilities of opportunities recognition,and entrepreneurs in high-tech firms can recognize more opportunities than entrepreneurs in other industries.
Finally,the paper summarizes the main conclusions,point out the theoretical progresses,and put forward some guides for practice,and discusses the limitations and future direction.
引文
[1]资料来源:Timmons.New venture creation:cntrepreneurship for 21~(st)century..Fifith edtion ed.Boston:Irwin Mcgraw-Hill,1999.
[2]资料来源:《中国高新技术产业导报》,中国中小企业经济发展指数,2006.12.11.
[1]巴布森学院创业研究前沿网址:http://www3.babson.edu/ESHIP/outreach-events/fer.cfm.
[1]13种学习理论包括操作性条件反射论、特征修正论、信息转移论、控制论、社会学习论、认知论、人文主义论、社会影响论、心理分析论、后结构论、存在主义论、团队实践论和默认(约定俗成)论。
[1]转引:谢荷锋,2007.
[2]转引:刘怀伟,2003;谢凤华,2005;杨志蓉,2006.
[3]转引:谢凤华,2005;杨志蓉,2006.
[4]转引:谢荷锋,2007.
[1]转引:谢荷锋,2007.
[1]资料来源:中国企业家调查系统.中国企业家成长与发展报告(上),经济科学出版社,2003.
[1]引自谢荷锋(2007)
[2]引自黄芳铭(2005)
[1]转引自杨志蓉,2006
[1] Ahuja, G., C.M.Lampert. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions[J]. Strategic management journal, 2001,22 (6/7):521-43.
[2] Ahuja,G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2000,45: 425-455.
[3] Anderson, A.R., S.L.Jack, S.D.Dodd. The role of fFamily members in entrepreneurial networks: beyond the boundaries of the family firm[J]. Family business review, 2005,2:135-154.
[4] Angelika Lindstrand. Network routines and change of network configuration[W]. Working paper from the department of business stuies of Uppsala university, 2003.9.
[5] Arenius,P., D.D.Clercq. A Network-based approach on opportunity recognition[J]. Small Business Economics,2005,24:249-265.
[6] Argris,C., D.A.Schon.Orgnizational learning: a theory of action perspective[M],Reading: MA:Addison-Wesley,1978.
[7] Atuahene-Gima,K., J.Y.Murray.Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China[J] Journal of international marketing,2007,15(2):1-29.
[8] Baron, R.A.. Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people [J]. Journal of business venturing, 1998,13(4):275-294.
[9] Baron, R.M., D.A. Kenny. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual ,strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182.
[10]Baron,B.B., G.D.Markman. Beyond social capital: the role of entrepreneurs' social competence in their financial success[J]. Journal of business venturing, 2003,18:41-60.
[11]Baron,R.A., M.D.Ensley. Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs [J]. Management Science,2006,52(9):1331-1344.
[12]Bates,T. Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity[J]. The review of economics and statistics,1990,4:551-559.
[13]Batjargal, B., Manhong Liu. Entrepreneurs' access to private equity in China: the role of social capital[J]. Organization science, 2004,15(2):159-172.
[14]Batjargal,B. Comparative social capital: networks of entrepreneurs and venture capitalist in Chian ang Russia[W]. Working paper, Peking university Guanghua school of management, 2007.
[15]Batjargal,B. Software entrepreneurship: knowledge networks and performance of software ventures in China and Russia[W]. William Davidson Institute working paper,2005.
[16]Baum, J.A.C., T.Calabrese, B.S.Silverman. Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups'performance in Canadian biotechnology[J]. Strategic Management journal, 2000,21: 267-294.
[17]Bechman,C.M., P.R.Haunschild. Network Learning: the effects of partners heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2002,47: 92-124.
[l8]Bird,B. Towards a theory of entrepreneurial competency[J]. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 1995,2;51-72.
[19]Birley,S. The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process[J]. Journal of busness venturing, 1985,l(2):107-117.
[20]Borgatti, Foster.The network paradigm in organizational research[J].Journal of management,2003,29(6):991-1013.
[21]Bosma,N., M.van Praag, R.Thurik,G. de Wit. The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups[J]. Small business economics,2004,23: 227-236.
[22]Boussouara,M, D.Deakins. Trust and the acquisition of knowledge from non-executive directions by high technologu entrepreneurs[J]. International journal of enterpreneurial behaviour and research, 2000,6(4):204-226.
[23] Box, T.M., M.A White, S.H.Barr. A contingency model of new manufacturing firm performance[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 1993,18 (2):31-45.
[24]Brown,B., J.E.Bulter. Networks and entrepreneurial development: the shadow of borders[J]. Entrepreneurship and reginal development, 1993,5:101-116.
[25]Brousseau, K.R., M.J.Driver, K.Eneroth, R.Larsson. Career pandemonium: Realigning organizations and individuals[J]. Academy of Management Executive, 1996,10(4): 52-66.
[26] Brown, B., J.E.Butler. Competitors as allies: a study of entrepreneurial networks in the U.S. wine industry [J]. Journal of small business Management, 1995,33 (3):57-66.
[27] Brown, J., P.Reingen. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behaviour[J]. Journal of consumer research, 1987,14:350-362.
[28]Brown,R.B. Contemplating the emotional component learning[J]. Management learning, 2000,31(3): 275-293.
[29]Bruderl,J., P.Preisendorfer. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses[J]. Small business economics,1998,10: 213-225.
[30]Brunetto,Y., R. Farr-Wharton. The moderating role of trust in SME owner/managers' decision-making about collaboration[J]. Journal of small business mManagement, 2007,45(3): 362-387.
[31]Burt, R. S. The network structure of social capital[C]. Paper presented at the Social Network and Social Capital Conference, Duke University, Dur-ham, NC,1998.
[32]Burt, R.S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition[M]. Harvard University press, Cambridge, MA., 1992.
[33]Burt,R.S. The network structure of social capital. Research in organizational behavior, edited by Robert I. Sutton and Barry M. Staw, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 2000. Downloaded from thttp://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/ronald. burt/research.
[34]Busenits,L.W.,J.B.Barnay. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making[J]. Journal of business venturing, 1997,12:9-30.
[35]Butler,J.E., R.Brown,W.Chamornmarn. Informational networks, entrepreneurial action and performance[J]. Asia pacific journal of management, 2003,20:151-174.
[36]Buttner, E. H., N.Gryskiewicz. Entrepreneurs' problem-solving styles: an empirical study using the Kirton adapton/innovation theory[J]. Journal of small business management, 1993,31(1): p22-31.
[37]Bygrave, W., C.W.Hofer, Theorising about entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1991,15(4),: 13-22.
[38] Carlisle, E., D. Flynn. Small business survival in China: GuanXi, legitimacy, an social capital[J].Journal of developmental entrepreneurship,2005,10(1):79-96.
[39]Casson,Mark. The entrepreneur: a economic theory. Oxford: Mardin Robertson,1982.
[40] Chandler,G. N., S.H.Hanks. Founder competence, the environment, and venture performance[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,1994,Spring:77-89.
[41]Chandler,G. N.,E.Jansen. The founder's self-assessed competence and venture performance[J]. Journal of business venturing, 1992,7:223-236
[42]Chaston, I. Small firm performance: assessing the interaction between entrepreneurial style and organizational structure[J]. European journal of marketing, 1995,31(11/12):814-831.
[43]Choueke, R., RArmstrong. The learning organization in small and medium-sized enterprises a destination or a journey? [J]. International journal of entrepreneurial behavior and research, 1998,4 (2): 129-40.
[44]Chowdhury,S. The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing[J]. Journal of manaherial issues, 2005,3:310-326.
[45]Chrisman,J.J., W.E.McMullan. Outsider assistance as a knowledge resource for new venture survival [J]. Journal of small business management, 2004, 42(3):229-244.
[46]Churchill,N.G., V.L.Lewis. The five stages of small business growth[J]. Harvard business review,1983,3:30-50.
[47]Clercq,D.D., H.J.Sapienza. When do venture capital firms learn from their portfolio Companies? [J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2005,4:517-535.
[48] Cohen, W.M., D.A.Levinthal. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation[J].Administrative science quarterly, 1990,35:128-152.
[49]Coleman, J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital [J]. American journal of sociology, 1988,94:95-120.
[50]Collins,O., D.G. Moore.The organization makers: a behavioral study of independent entrepreneurs[M]. New York: Appleton-century-crofts,1970.
[51]Colombo,M.G., L.Grilli.Founder's human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: a competemce-based view[J]. Research policy, 2005,34:795-816.
[52]Constant,D., L.Sproull, S.Kiesler. The kindness of strangers: the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice[J].Organizational science, 1996, 7:119-135.
[53] Cooper, A.C., C. Y. Woo, W.C.Dunkelberg. Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms[J]. Journal of business venturing, 1989,4:317-332.
[54] Cope, J. Entrepreneurial learning and the critical reflection: discontinuous events as triggers for 'higher-level' learning[J]. Management learning, 2003,34(4):429-450.
[55] Cope, J. Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2005,29 (4):373-397.
[56]Cope,J., GWatts. Learning by doing: an exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning[J]. International journal of entrepreneurial behaviour and research, 2000,6(3):104-124.
[57] Corbett, A.C. Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2005, 29 (4):473-491.
[58] Corbett, A.C. Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2007,22:97-118.
[59]Corbett,A.C., K.M.Hmieleski. The conflicting cognitions of corporate entrepreneurs [J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2007,January:103-121.
[60]Crapenter, D., K.Esterling, D.Lazer. The strength of strong ties: a model of contact-making in policy networks with evidence from U.S. hearlth politics[J]. Rationality and society, 2003,15(4):411-463.
[61]Cronbach,L.J. Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1987,102(3):414-417.
[62] Das, T.K., B.Teng. Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances[J]. Academy management review, 1998,23 (3):491-512.
[63]Davidsson, P.Continued entrepreneurship: ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth[J]. Journal of business venturing, 1991,6:405-429.
[64]Deakins, D., E.O'Neill, P.Mileham. Executive learning in entrepreneurial firms and the role of external directors[J]. Education and training, 2000,42 (4/5):317-325.
[65]Deakins, D., M. Freel. Entrepreneurial learning and the growth process in SMEs[J].The learning organization, 1998,5(3): 144-155.
[66]Dimov,D. Beyond the single-person, single-insight attribution in understanding entrepreneurial opportunities[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2007,5:713-731.
[67]Dimov,D. From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: the importance of person-situation learning match [J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2007,4:561-583.
[68] Down, S. Owner-manager learning in small firms[J]. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 1999, 6 (3):267-280.
[69] Dubini, P., H. Aldrich. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process[J]. Journal of business venturing, 1991,6:305-313.
[70]Dutta,D.K., M.M. Crossan. The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: understanding the process using the 41 organizational learning framework[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2005,4:425-449.
[71] Dyke, L.S., E.M. Fischer, A.R. Reuber. An inter-industry examination of the impact of owner experience on firm performance[J]. Journal of small businecs management,1992,10:72-87.
[72]Elfring,T., W.Hulsink. Networks in entrepreneurship: the case of high-technology firms[J]. Small business economics,2003,21:409-422.
[73]Erikson, T.Towards a taxonomy of entrepreneurial learning experiences among potential entrepreneurs[J]. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 2003,10(1):106-112.
[74] Fiol,C.M., M.A.Lyles. Organizational learning[J]. Academy of management review, 1985,10(4) :803-813.
[75]Florence, H.C.. Entrepreneurs' learning experience in small and medium-sized enterprise in Hong Kong: a phenomenological study [D]. PH.D. dissertation from the George Washing university, 2006.
[76]Foo, M-D., D.Ancona, J.J.Degroof. Effects of external contacats and internal make-up on entrepreneurial team performance. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DB/OL], http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers99/XXVII/XXVII_B/XXVII_B.html
[77]Fortner,M.L. Entrepreneurs and their social networks: motivations , expectations and outcomes[D]. Doctor paper from the faculty of the graduate school of education and human development of the George Washington university,2006.
[78]Foxall,G., C.G.Haskins. Cognitive style and consumer innovativeness: an empirical test of Kirtion's adaption-innovation theory in the context of food purchasing[J]. European journal of marketing,1986,20(3/4):63-80.
[79]Frazier,B.J. The influence of network characteristics on information access, marketing competence and perceptions of performance in small rural businesses[D]. Doctor paper from the department of human environment of Michigan State university, 2000.
[80] Gartner, W.B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1985,10(4):696-706.
[81] Gartner, W.B.. Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question[J]. American journal of small business,1988,13(1): 11-32.
[82]Gelderen,M., L.Sluis,P.Jansen. Learning opportunities and learning behaviours of small business starters: relations with goal achievement, skill development and satisfaction[J]. Small business economics,2005,25: 97-108
[83]Ghoshal, S., H.Korine, G.Szulanski. Interunit communication in multinational corporations[J]. Management science, 1994,40:96-110.
[84]Gilly,M.C., J.L.Graham, M.F. Wolfinbarger, L.J.Yale. A dyadic study of interpersonal information search[J]. Academy of marketing sciencetific journal,1998,26(2):83-100.
[85]Goel,S., R.Karri. Entrepreneurs, effectual logic, and over-trust[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2006,4:477-493.
[86]Granovetter, M.S. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. American journal of sociology, 1985,91(3):481-510.
[87]Granovetter, M.S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American journal of sociology, 1973,78(6):1360-1380.
[88]Greenberger, D.B., D.L.Sexton. An interactive model of new venture creation[J]. Journal of small business management, 1988,26(3): 1-7
[89] Greg Mandrake Alan.Astudy exploring managers' knowledge sharing strategies through the learning styles of experiential learning theory [D]. Doctor paper, from the graduate school of education and human development of the George Washington University, 2006.
[90]Greve,A., J.W.Salaff. Social networks and entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2003,Fall:l-22.
[91] Gupta, A.K., K.G.Smith. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of management journal, 2006,49(4):693-706.
[92]Hanneman R., M.Riddle. Introduction to social network methods. Free introductory textbook on social network analysis from www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/, 2005.
[93]Hansen, M.T. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits[J]. Administrative science quaterly, 1999,44:82-111.
[94]Hansen, M.T. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative science quaterly, 1999,44:82-111.
[95]Harper, M. The role of enterprise in poor countyies[J]. Entreprneurship theory and practice, 1991,15(4):7-11.
[96] Harrison, R.T., M.R.Dibben, C.M.Mason. The role of trust in the informal investor's decision: an exploratory analysis[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 1997,21(4):63-81.
[97]Harrison,R.T, C.M. Leitch. Entrepreneurial learning: researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2005,4:352-371.
[98]Hayes,J., C.W.Allinson. Cognitive style and its relevance for management practice[J]. British journal of management, 1994, 5:53-71.
[99]Hayes,J., C.W.Allinson. Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations [J]. Human relations, 1998,51(7):847-871.
[100] Herron, L., H.J. Sapienza. The entrepreneur and the initiation of new venture launch activities[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1992,17(1):49-55.
[101] Higgins, M.C., R.Gulati. Getting off to a good start: the effects of top management team affiliations on prestige of investment bank and IPO success[W]. Working paper,2000.
[102] Hills, G. E., G.T. Lumpkin, R.P. Singh. Opportunity recognition: pereption and behaviors of entrepreneurs. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DB/OL], http://www. babson. edu /entrep /fer/ papers97/hills/hilll.htm
[103] Hills,G.E., R.C.Shrader,G.T.Lumpkin. Opportunity recognition as a creative process. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley,MA: Babson college,1999. http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers99/X/X_A/X_A.html
[104] Hills,G.E., R.C.Shrader. Successful entrepreneurs' insights into opportunity recognition.Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley,MA:Babson college,1998..http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers98/I/I_A/I_A.html.
[105] Hoang,H., B.Antoncic. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review[J]. Journal of business venturing,2003,18:165-187.
[106] Holman,D., K.Pavlica, R.Thorpe. Rethinking Kolb's theory of experiental learning: the contribution of social construction and activity theory[J]. Management learning, 1996,24(4):485-504.
[107] Holste,J.S., D.Fields. The relationship of affect and cognition based trust with sharing ang use of tacit knowledge[C]. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper 2005 MED: B1-B6.
[108] Hood,J.N.,J.E.Young.Entrepreneurship's requisite areas of development: a survey of top executives in successful entrepreneurial firms[J]. Journal of business venturing, 1993,8:115-135
[109] Hornsby, J.S., D.F.Kuratko, S.A.Zahra. Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2002,17: 253-273.
[110] Howorth,C., A.Moro. Trust within entrepreneur bank relationships: insights from Italy[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2006,4(July):495-517.
[111] Huber,G.P. Organisational learning :the contributing process and the literatures[J]. Organisation science, 1991,2(1):88-115.
[112] Hunter, I. Risk, persistence and focus: a life cycle of the entrepreneur[J]. Australian Economic History Review,2005,45(3):244-272.
[113] I.J. Hetty van Emmerik.Gender differences in the creation of different types of social capital: A multilevel study[J]. Social Networks, 2006,28:24-37.
[114] IEkanem,I., P.Wyer. A fresh start and the learning experience of ethnic minority entrepreneurs[J]. International Journal of Consumer Studies,2007,31:144-151.
[115] Jiang Chuanyan. A system dynamics model of exploration and exploitation in Chinese new ventures: the roles social network and corporate[D]. Doctor paper from the Chinese University of HongKong, 2006.
[116] Johannisson,B. Network strategies: management technology for entrepreneurship and change[J]. Internatinal small business journal, 1986,5(1): 19-30.
[117] Johannisson,B., M.Monsted. Contextualizing Entrepreneurial networking: the case of Scandinavia[J]. Internationa studies of management and organizatinal, 1997,27(3):109-136.
[118] Jones, G., W.S Hesterly, S.P.Borgatti. A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms[J]. Academy management review,1997, 22 (4):911-945.
[119] Jose Celestino Dias Barreira. The influence of business knowledge and work experience, as antecedents to entrepreneurial success[D]. Doctor paper, from the faculty of economic and management sciences of University of Pretoria, 2004.
[120] Journal of business venturing,2004,19(6): 809-829.
[121] Katila, R., G.Ahuja. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction [J]. Academy of management journal, 2002,45: 1183-1194.
[122] Kautonen,T., F. Welter. Trust in mall business networks-empirical evidence from east and west Germany[C]. Paper to the Sub-theme "Trust in and around organizations" at the 19th EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen, 3-5 July,2003.
[123] Keeley, R.H., J.B. Roure. Management, strategy, and industry structure as influences on the success of new firms[J]. Management science,1990, 10:1256-1267.
[124] Kirzner,I.M.. Competition and entrepreneurship[M].Chicago:University of Chicago press, 1973.
[125] Kogosvek,T., Anuska Ferligoj. Effects on reliability and validity of egocentered network measurements[J]. Social Networks,2005,27:205-229.
[126] Krackhardt, D. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in networks[J]. Administrative science quaterly, 1990.35:342-369.
[127] Kyriakopoulos, K., C.Moorman. Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: the overlooked role of market orientation[J]. International journal of research in marketing, 2004,21:219-240.
[128] Lamont, L. What entrepreneurs learn from experience [J]. Journal of small business management, 1972,10 (3):36-41.
[129] Langfred,C.W. Too much of a good thing? Negtive effects o high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams[J]. Academy of management journal, 2004,47(3):385-399.
[130] Larson, A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relations[J]. Administrative science quaterly, 1992,3:7 76-104.
[131] Lawrence, M.L.. What entrepreneurs learn from experience[J]. Journal of small business management, 1972,10(3):36-41.
[132] Learned, K.E.. What happened before the organization? A model of organization formation[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 1992,17(1): 39-48.
[133] Lee,D.Y. The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth[J]. Journal of management studies, 2001, 38(4):583-602.
[134] Lee,R., O.Jones. The role of cognitive social capital in entrepreneurial learning:a Comparison of nascent entrepreneurs[W].Working paper from the centre for enterprise of Manchester Metropolitan University business school,2006.
[135] Levinthal,D.A., J.G.March. The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic management journal,1993,14:95-112.
[136] Lewicki, R., D.McAllister, R.J.Bies. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities[J]. Academy of management review, 1998,23(2):438-458.
[137] Liao, J., H.P.Welsch. Social capital and growth intention: the role of entrepreneurial networks in technology-based new venture. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DB/OL],http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/Babson2001/XII/XIIB/XIIB.htm.
[138] Lin,N. Building a network theory of social capital[J]. Connections,1999,22(1) :28-51.
[139] Lorenzoni, G., A.Lipparini. The leveraging of inter-firm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study [J]. Strategic management. Journal, 1999,20 (4):317-338.
[140] Lu, Xiaohui, M.W.Meyer. Network extensibility: creating entrepreneurial networks in China's high-technology sector[W]. Wharton-SMU research center paper,2006.
[141] Lumpkin,G.T., B.B.Lichtenstein. The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition rrocess[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2005,4:451-472.
[142] Malewicki,D.S. Member involvement in entrepreneur network organizations:the role of commitment and trust[J]. Journal of development entrepreneurship,2005,10(2): 141-166.
[143] Man,T.W.Y. Entrepreneurial competencies and the performance of small and medium enterprises in the Hong Kong services sector[D]. Doctor Paper, From the Department of Management Hong Kong Polytechnic University,2001.
[144] Man,T.W.Y. Exploring the behavioral patterns of entrepreneurial learning[J]. Education and training, 2006,48(5):309-321.
[145] Manolova,T.S., B.S.Gyoshey, I.M.Manev. The role of interpersonal trust for entrepreneurial exchange in a transition economy[J]. International journal of emerging markets, 2007,2(2): 107-122.
[146] Manolova,TS., B.S.Gyoshev, I.M.Manev. The role of interpersonal trust for entrepreneurial exchange in a transition econom[J]. International journal of emerging markets,2007,2(2): 107-122.
[147] March,J.G. Exploration and exploition in orgnizational learning[J]. Orgnization science,1991,2(1):71-87.
[148] Mariolis, P., M. H. Jones. Centrality in corporate interlock networks: Reliability and stability[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1982,27: 571-584.
[149] Markman, G.D., R.A. Baron. Social skills and entrepreneurs' financial success: evidence that the ability to get along with others really matters. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DB/OL], http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers98/IV/IV_B/IV_B.html.
[150] Markovsky, B., J.Skvoretz, D.Willer, M.J. Lovaglia; J.Erger.The seeds of weak power: an extension of network exchange theory[J]. American sociological review, 1993,58(2): 197-209.
[151] Marsden, P.V. The reliability of network density and composition measures[J]. Social networks, 1993,15:399-421.
[152] Marsden,P.V. Core discussion networks of americans[J]. American sociological review,1987,52:122-131.
[153] Mayer, R., J.Davis, F.Schoorman. An integrative model of organizational trust[J]. The academy of management review, 1995,20(3): 709-734.
[154] McAllister,D. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations[J]. Academy of manangement journal ,1995,36(1):24-59.
[155] McAllister,D.J. The second face of trust: reflections on the bake side of interpersonal trust in organizations[J]. Research on negotiation in organizations, 1997, 6:87-111.
[156] McClelland,D.C. The achieving society[M]. Princeton,New York: Princeton University Press,1961.
[157] McDonald, M.L., J.D. Westphal. Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs' advice networks and firms' strategic responses to poor performance[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2003,48:1-32.
[158] McEvily, B., A. Zaheer. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities[J]. Strategic management journal, 1999,20:1133-1156.
[159] McPherson,J.M., P.A.Popielarz, S.Drobnic. Social networks and organizational dynamics[J]. American sociological review, 1992,57:153-170.
[160] McPherson,M., L. Smith-Lovin, J.M.Cook. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks[J]. Annual reviews sociology,2001,27:415-444.
[161] Mina Yoo. The ties that (un)bind: social networks and entrepreneurship in high-technology industries[D. Doctor paper from the university of Michigan,2003.
[162] Mitchell, R.K., J.B.Smith, E.A.Morse, K.W.Seawright, A.M.Peredo, B.McKenzie. Are entrepreneurial cognitions universal? assessing entrepreneurial cognitions across cultures[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2002, 27(2): 9-29.
[163] Mitchell,R.K., L.W.Busenitz, B.Bird,C.M.Gaglio, J.S.McMullen, E.A.Morse, J.B.Smith. The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research[J].Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2007,January:1-27.
[164] Moore. Why companies fail[J]. Red herring, 1999(October):88.
[165] Mulder,M.,T.Lans, J.Verstegen,H.Biemans,Y.Meijer. Competence development of entrepreneurs in innovative horticulture[J]. Journal of Workplace Learning, 2007,19(1):32-44.
[166] Nahapiet, J., S. Ghoshal. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of management review, 1998,23, 242-266.
[167] Nelson, M.F. The effect of social support on the adoption of human resource management innovations: a problem-solving approach[D]. The Oklahoma State University, 2003.
[168] Nelson, R.E. The strength of strong ties: social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1989,32(2):377-401.
[169] O'Donnell,A., A.Gilmore, D.Cummins, D.Carson. The network construct in entrepreneurship research: a review and critique[J]. Management decision, 2001,39(9):749-760.
[170] Ozgen,E., R.A.Baron. Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: effects of mentors, industry networks,and professional forums[J]. Journal of business venturing, 2007,22:174- 192.
[171] Ozgen,E..Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: information flow, social and cognitive persperctives[D]. PH.D. dissertation from Rensselaer polytechnic institute, Troy, New Yoyk, 2003.
[172] Paige,H. An exploration of learning, the knowledge-based economy,and owner-managers of small bookselling business[J].Journal of workplace learning,2002,14(6):233-244.
[173] Parker, S.C. Entrepreneurial learning and the existence of credit markets[J]. Journal of economic behavior and organization, 2007,62:37-46.
[174] Pavlica, K., D.Holman, R. Thorpe. The manager as a practical author of learning[J]. Career development international, 1998,7 (3):300-307.
[175] Pia Arenius, Dirk De Clercq. A network-based approach on Opportunity recognition[J]. Small business economics, 2005,24: 249-265.
[176] Podolny, J.M., J.N. Baron. Relationships and resources: social networks and mobility in the workplace. American sociological review,1997, 62 (5): 673-93.
[177] Politis, D. The process of entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2005,29 (4):399-424.
[178] Politis,D., J.Gabrielsson. Exploring the role of experience in the process of entrepreneurial learning[W]. Working paper from Lund institute of economic research, 2005. File URL: http://www.lri.lu.se/pdf/wp/2005-1.pdf
[179] Portes, A., J.Sensenbrenner. Embeddedness and immigration: notes on the social determinants of economic action [J]. American journal sociology, 1993,98:1320-1350.
[180] Powell,W.W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization [J]. Reseach in orgnizational behaviour, 1990,12:295-336.
[181] Puhckka,V. Effects of social capital on the opportunity recognition process[J]. Journal of enterising culture,2006,14(2):105-124.
[182] Rae, D. Entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework for technology-based enterprise [J]. Technology analysis and strategic management,2006,18(1): 39-56.
[183] Rae, D., M. Carswell. Towards a conceptual understanding of entrepreneurial learning[J]. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 2001, 8 (2):150-158.
[184] Rae, D., M.Carswell. Using a life-story approach in researching entrepreneurial learning: the development of a conceptual model and its implications in the design of learning experiences[J]. Education and training,2000, 42(4/5):220-227.
[185] Rae, D.Understanding entrepreneurial learning: a question of how[J]? International journal of entrepreneurial behaviour and research, 2000, 6(3): 145-159.
[186] Ramasamy,B., K.W. Goh, C.H. Matthew. Yeung. Is Guanxi (relationship) a bridge to knowledge transfer[J]. Journal of business research,2006,59,130- 139.
[187] Rao,M.S. The entrepreneurial competency index: an assessment tool for financial institution[J]. Journal of entrepreneurship, 1997,6(2): 197-208.
[188] Ravasi,D., C.Turati. Exploring entrepreneurial learning: a comparative study of tehnology development projects[J]. Journal of business venturing, 2005,20:137-164.
[189] Ravasi,D., C.Turati. Exploring entrepreneurial learning: a comparativ study of technology development projects[J]. Journal of business venturing, 2005,20:137-1642.
[190] Reagans,R., B.McEvily. Network structure and knowledge transfenthe effects of cohesion and range[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2003,48: 240-267.
[191] Renzulli, L.A., H.Aldrich, J.Moody. Family matters: Gender, family, and entrepreneurial outcomes[J]. Social Forces, 2000,79(2):523-546.
[192] Rod Farr-Wharton, Yvonne Brunetto.Women entrepreneurs,opportunity recognition and government-sponsored business networks: a social capital perspective[J]. Women in management review, 2007 22(3): 187-207.
[193] Rodan,S. Exploration and exploitation revisited: extending March's model of mutual learning[J]. Scand. J. Mgmt., 2005,21:407-428.
[194] Rodan,S. More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performnceand innovationes[J]. Strategic management journal, 2004,25(6):541-562.
[195] Rodan,S., C.Galunic. Knowledge heterogenity in managerial networks and its effect on individual performance[J]. Academy of management proceedings,2002,BPS: Z1- Z2.
[196] Roper, S. Entrepreneurial characteristics, strategic choice and small business performance[J]. Small Business Economics, 1998 11(1):11.24.
[197] Rousseau, D.M., S.B. Sitkin, R.S. Burt, C. Camerer. Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust[J]. Academy of management review, 1998,23(3): 405-421.
[198] Rowley, T., D.Behrens, D.Krackhardt. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J]. Strategic management jounal, 2000,21: 369-386.
[199] Sadler-Smith, E., B.Badger. Cognitive style, learning and innovation[J]. Technology analysis and strategic management, 1998,10(2):247-265.
[200] Salancik, G. R. Wanted: a good network theory of organization[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1995,40:345-349.
[201] Saparito,P. Three dimensions of trust in bank-small firm relationships: instrument development and preliminary examination of the production of trust by various organizational structures. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DB/OL], 2005, http://www.babson.edu/entrep /fer/XVII/XVIIA/XVIIA.htm.
[202] Sapienza, H.J., A.Parhankangas, E.Autio. Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off-growth.
[203] Sapienza,H.J., C.M.Grima. Founder characteristics, start-up process, and strategy/structure variables as predictors of short line railroad performance[J]. Entrepreneurship: theory and practice, 1997,Fall:5-24
[204] Sarasvathy,S.D. Causation and efectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency[J]. Academy of manangementreview,2001,26(2):243-263.
[205] Schildt,H.A., M.V.J. Maula, T.Keil. Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2005,4:493-515.
[206] Schoorman,.F.D., G.C.Mayer, J.H.Davis.An integrative model of organizatonal trust: past, present and future[J]. Academy of management review,2007, 32(2):344-354.
[207] Sedaitis, J. The alliances of spin-offs versus start-ups: Social ties in the genesis of post-Soviet alliances[J]. Organization science, 1998,9: 368-381.
[208] Seibert,S.E., M.L.Kraimer, R.C. Liden. A social capital theory of career success[J]. Academy of manangement journal ,2001,44(2):219-237.
[209] Senge,P.M.. The leader's new work: building learning organizations[J]. Sloan manangementreview,1990b,32(1):7-23.
[210] Senge,P.M..The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization[M]. New York:Currency Doubleday, 1990a.
[211] Senjem,J.C, K. Reed. Social capital and network entrepreneurs. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DB/OL], http://ww.babson.edu/entrep/fer/Babson2002/V/V_P1/V_Pl.htm
[212] Shane,S., A.Venkataraman.The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research[J]. Academy of management review, 2000, 25(1):217-226.
[213] Shane, S., R.Khurana. Bringing individuals back in: the effects of Career experience on new firm founding[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2003,12(3):519-543.
[214] Shane, S.. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities[J]. Organization science,2000,11:448-469.
[215] Shane,S., Cable. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures[W]. Working paper, 2001.
[216] Silverman, B.S., J.A.C.Baum. Alliance-based competitive dynamics[W]. Working paper.,2000.
[217] Singh, R.P., E.H. Gerald, R.C. Hybels, G.T. Lumpkin. Opportunity recognition through social network characteriatics of entrepreneurs. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College.[DB/OL]. http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers99/X/X_B/X_B.html,1999.
[218] Singh, R.P., G.E.Hills, R.C.Hybels, G.T.Lumpkin. Opportunity recognition through social network characteristics of entrepreneurs. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College [DB/OL], http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers99/X/X_B/X_B.html.
[219] Slater.S.F., J.C.Narver.The markrt orientation and the learning organization[J]. Journal of marketing,1995,July(59):63-74.
[220] Smeltzer, L.R., B.L.Van Hook, R.W.Hutt. Analysis and use of advisors as information sources in venture startups[J]. Journal of small business Management,1991,29(3): 10-20.
[221] Stam,W., T.Elfring. Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: the mediating effects of network strategies[C]. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper,2006, ENT: K1.
[222] Starr, A.S., I.C. MacMillan. Resource cooptation via social contracting resource acquisition strategies for new resnurces[J]. Strategic management journal,1990,11:79-92.
[223] Stuart, R.W., P.A. Abetti. Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance[J]. Journal of business venturing, 1990,5:151-162.
[224] Stuart, T.E., H.Hoang, R.C.Hybels. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1999,44:315-349.
[225] Sullivan, R. Entrepreneurial learning and mentoring[J]. International Journal of entrepreneurial behaviour and research, 2000,6(3): 160-175.
[226] Sullivan, R. Entrepreneurial learning and mentoring[J]. International journal of entrepreneurial behaviour and research,2000,6(3):160-175.
[227] Takehiko Isobe, Shige Makino, D.B.Montgomery. Exploitation, exploration, and firm performance: the case of small manufacturing firms in Japan.Woringpaper from https:// www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/research/report2005.pdf, 2005.
[228] Tarja Niemela. Interfirm cooperation capability in the context of networking family firms: the role of power[J]. Family business review,2004,4:319-330.
[229] Taylor, D.W., R.Thorpe. Entrepreneurial learning: a process of co-participation [J]. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 2004,11(2):203-211.
[230] Teachman,J.F.D. Analysis of population diversity: mearsure of qualitative variation[J]. Sociological methods and research,1984,8:341-362.
[231] Thompson, J.E., R.Stuart, P.R.JJndsay. The competence of top team members: a framework for successful performance [J]. Journal of managerial psychology, 1996,11(3):48-66.
[232] Tonge,J. A review of small business literature part 1: Defining the small business[W]. Working paper from centre for corporate and public affairs Manchester Metropolitan university business school,2001
[233] Tsai,W., S.Ghoshal. Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks[J]. Academy of management journal,1998,41(4): 464-476.
[234] Ucbasaran,D., P.Westhead, M.Wright, M.Binks. Does entrepreneurial experience influence opportunity identification[J]? The journal of private equity, 2003, winter:7-14.
[235] Ulrich, T.A., G.S. Cole. Toward more effective training of future entrepreneurs[J]. Journal of small business management, 1987,25 (4):32-39.
[236] Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative science quaterly, 1997,42,35-47.
[237] Uzzi, B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American sociological review,1996,61:674-698.
[238] Uzzi, B., R.Lancaster. Relational embeddedness and learning: the case of bank loan managers and their clients[J]. Management Science, 2003,49:383-399.
[239] Vesa Puhakka. Effects of social capital on the opportunity recognition process[J]. Journal of enterprising culture,2006,14(2):105-124.
[240] Welter,F.,D.Smallbone. Exploring the role of trust in entrepreneurial activity[J].Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2006,4:465-475.
[241] Westhead, P., M.Wright. Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: are they different[J]? Journal of business venturing,, 1998 13 (3): 173-204.
[242] Williamson, O. Calculativeness, trust and economic organization[J]. Journal of law and economics, 1993,36:453-486.
[243] Witt, P. Entrepreneurs' networks and the success of start-ups[J]. Entrepreneurship and regional development, 2004,16: 391-412.
[244] Young, J.E., D.L. Sexton.Entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework[J]. Journal of enterprising culture, 1997,5(3):223-248.
[245] Zaheer,A., B.McEvily, V.Perrone. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interrganizational and interpersonal trust on performance [J]. Organization science,1998,9(2): 141-159.
[246] Zahra,S. A, R. I.Yavuz, D.Ucbasaran. How much do you trust me? the dark side of relational trust in new business creation in established companies[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2006,4:541-559.
[247] Zhang-Jing, Soh Pek-hooi. Human capital, competitive intensity and entrepreneur's propensity to exploit social networks in resource acquisition. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College.[DB/OL]. http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/ BABSON2003/ VIII/VIH-P1/VIII-P1.html,2003.
[248] Zhao, L.M., J.D.Aram. Networking and growth of yong technology-intensive ventures in China[J].Journal of business venturing,1995,10:349-370.
[249]Zhou YongMing.Social capital and power:entrepreneurial elite and the state in contemporary China[J].Policy sciences,2000,33:323-340.
[250]Zi-Lin He,Poh-Kam Wong.Exploration vs.exploitation:an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J].Organization science,2004,15(4):481-494.
[251]Zimmer,C.,H.Aldrich.Resource mobilization through ethnic networks:kinship and friendship ties of shopkeepers in England[J].Sociology.Perspective,1987,30:422-445.
[252]彼得·F·德鲁克著(1985),张炜译.创新与创业精神[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
[253]彼得·圣吉著,郭进隆译.第五项修炼—学习型组织的艺术与实务[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995.
[254]丁栋虹.双重资本与我国民营企业家成长的现实困惑[J].当代经济科学,1999,2:.
[255]丁栋虹.异质资本与企业家的四大性质[J].社会科学家,1998,3:22-25.
[256]丁栋虹.制度变迁中企业家成长模式研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1999.
[257]丁岳枫.创业组织学习与创业绩效研究[D].浙江大学博士论文,2006.
[258]范黎波,张中元.基于网络的企业学习与治理机制[J].中国工业经济,2006,10:106-112.
[259]富兰克·奈特[1921],王宇,王文玉译.风险、不确定性和利润[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[260]贺小刚,李新春.企业家能力与企业成长:基于中国经验的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005,10.
[261]贺小刚,沈瑜,连燕玲[J].企业家社会关系与高科技企业的成长.经济管理,2006,15:47-50.
[262]贺小刚.核心能力理论的拓展:企业家能力与竞争绩效的关系研究[J].科研管理,2007,4.
[263]侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004.
[264]蒋春燕,赵曙明.社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用[J].管理世界,2006,10:90-99.
[265]黎赔肆,丁栋虹.企业家精神含义:多视角的观点[J].广西经济管理干部学院学报,2007,2:16-20.
[266]李兰,彭泗清.中国企业家的职业化进程:回顾与展望[J].管理世界,2004, 9:148-149.
[267]李路路.社会结构变迁中的私营企业家——论“体制资本”与私营企业的发展[J].社会学研究,1996,2:93-104.
[268]李路路.社会资本与私营企业家——中国社会结构转型的特殊动力[J].中国社会科学,1995,6:46-58.
[269]李乾文,张玉利.外国学者论我国创业活动的特征与创业研究趋势[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26,12-18.
[270]李新春.企业家过程与国有企业的准企业家模型[J].经济研究,2000,6:51-56.
[271]李新春.中国国有企业重组的企业家机制[J].中国社会科学,2001,4:85-94.
[272]刘楚文.基于关键事件的中小企业家学习:一个认知的视角[B].浙江大学硕士论文,2007.
[273]刘军.社会网络分析导论(约翰·斯科特著)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004
[274]刘培峰.亲缘关系、地缘关系与私营企业主的生成.社会,2003,8:37-40.
[275]罗伯特·F·德威利斯.(魏勇刚等译).量表编制:理论与应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2004.
[276]马丁·奇达夫,蔡文彬.(王凤彬,朱超威等译).社会网络与组织[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[277]马庆国.管理统计[J].北京:科学出版社,2002.
[278]马庆国.中国管理科学研究面临的几个关键问题.管理世界[J],2002,8:105-115.
[279]米红,张文璋.实用现代统计分析方法及SPSS应用[M].北京:当代中国出版社,2004.
[280]苗青.基于规则聚焦的公司创业机会识别与决策机制研究[D].浙江大学博士论文,2006.
[281]石秀印.中国企业家成功的社会网络基础[J].管理世界,1998,6.
[282]孙早,刘庆岩.市场环境、企业家能力与企业绩效表现——转型期中国民营企业绩效表现影响因素的实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2006,2:92-104.
[283]王诚.增长方式转型中的企业家及其生成机制[J].经济研究,1999,5:73-79.
[284]王红军.科技企业家创业胜任力及其与企业绩效关系研究[J].科学学研究,2007,S1.
[285]王重鸣.管理心理学.北京:人民教育出版社,2000.
[286]王重鸣.心理学研究方法.北京:人民教育出版社,2001.
[287]魏江,沈璞,樊培仁.基于企业家网络的企业家学习过程模式剖析[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,2:150-157.
[288]魏江,沈璞,王新礼.中小企业家触发式非线性学习过程模式研究[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004,10:24-28.
[289]温忠麟,张雷、侯杰泰、刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620.
[290]吴结兵.基于企业网络结构和动态能力的产业集群竞争优势研究[D].浙江大学博士论文,2006.
[291]谢荷锋.企业员工知识分享中的信任问题实证研究[D].浙江大学博士论文,2007.
[292]徐淑英,张维迎.美国管理学会学报最佳论文集萃[M].北京:北京大学出版设,2006.
[293]严中华.论信任与知识管理各过程的关系[J].科技管理研究,2003,4:23-27.
[294]杨俊.创业过程研究及其发展动态[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26,8-12.
[295]杨瑞龙.试析我国企业家形成机制的缺陷及其改进思路[J].学术月刊,2002,6:99-105.
[296]伊丽莎白·切尔.李欲晓,赵琛微译.企业家精神:全球化、创新与发展[M].北京:中信出版社,2004,1.
[297]袁安府,潘惠,汪涛.企业家能力提高的途径——企业家学习研究[J].自然辩证法通讯,2001(1):48-54.
[298]约瑟夫·熊彼特(何畏,易家详译).经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1990.
[299]詹姆斯·科尔曼.社会理论的基础[J].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1990.
[300]张厚义.私营企业主阶层在我国社会结构中的地位[J].中国社会科学,1994,6:100-116.
[301]张建琦,赵文.学习途径与企业家能力关系实证研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2007,10:65-69.
[302]张胜荣.看不见资源与现代企业制度[J].经济研究,1995,10.
[303]张书军.企业家资源配置能力与企业成长[J].经济体制改革,2003,5:48-51.
[304]张维迎.公有制经济中的委托人—代理人关系:理论分析和政策含义[J].经济研究,1995.4.
[305]张维迎.企业的企业家——契约论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
[306]张学华,陈志辉.基于“关键事件——解决”的企业家学习模式[J].企业经济.2005,2:86-87.
[307]张学华,陈志辉.中小企业家的学习模式研究——嵌入在社会网络中的企业家学习[J].企业经济,2005,3:84-85.
[308]张玉利,陈寒松,李乾文.创业管理与传统管理的差异与融合[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26,2-7.
[309]张玉利,徐海林.中小企业成长中的复杂性管理及知识显性化问题研究[J].外国经济与管理,2002,24,18-23.
[310]中国企业家调查系统.企业家个人学习、组织学习与企业创新——2006中国企业家成长与发展报告。北京:机械工业出版社,2006.
[311]赵晓东,王重鸣.产业集群背景下创业者社会网络动态结构实证研究[J].技术经济,2007,26(1):14-17.
[312]周其仁.市场里的企业——一个人力资本与非人力资本的特别合约[J].经济研究,1996.6.