开放经济下的贸易、环境与城市化协调发展的评价及政策研究
|
摘要
“十一五”规划专门将“推进城市化健康发展”作为六大发展战略之一加以重点突出,《国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要》和《国家“十一五”科学和技术发展规划纲要》等也把城市化与资源环境的协调发展正式列为国家科学研究的重点领域,《“十二五”规划前期重大问题研究选题指南》中指出要进行生态文明建设,推进循环经济发展,构建低碳城市,以促进城市的健康可持续发展。城市化与环境的协调发展已经上升为国家战略,健康和可持续的城市化已经成为构建社会主义和谐社会的重要内容。分析开放经济下的贸易、环境与城市化协调发展是对国家战略的积极响应,对于提高整体环境质量和城市可持续发展的能力,推动开放经济下的贸易、环境与城市化协调发展具有重大的实践价值。
长三角作为我国的发达地区,是城市化高速发展以及开放度较高的区域,他们在城市化进程中,贸易、环境与城市化存在怎样的关系,是协调发展还是存在矛盾?这是一个值得我们研究的问题。因此,为了使城市能够健康持续的发展,本文以长三角(16城市)为例,对贸易、环境与城市化协调发展问题进行了深入研究。在对贸易、环境与城市化三者相互作用分析的基础上,首先构建了贸易、环境与城市化发展水平的评价指标体系,然后运用层次分析法确定了贸易、环境与城市化各指标的权重,并对长三角(16城市)的贸易、环境与城市化发展水平进行了计算,根据协调发展度模型对16个城市贸易、环境与城市化的协调发展程度进行了测算,依据测度结果将16个城市划分为4种发展类型,并且在评价分析的基础上,进行了情景模拟,通过比较不同方案的优劣提出了贸易、环境与城市化协调发展的路径,为长三角(16城市)的可持续发展提供一定的借鉴。
"the healthy development of urbanization" is specially emphasized as one of the six development strategy in the "The Eleventh Five-year Plan", and the coordinated development of urbanization, resources and environment is thought as the key field of state scientific research and has been risen to to the national strategy in both "National Middle/Long-term Plan for Science and Technology Development" and "National Plan of the Eleventh Five-year for Science and Technology Development". "The Twelfth Five-year Plan Early Major Problems Research Topic Selection Guide" points out that we must carry on the ecological civilization, promote the recycle economy development and construct low-carbon cities to promote the healthy and sustainable development of the cities. The healthy and sustainable urbanization has become the important content when constructing a socialist harmonious society. It is a positive response to the national strategy that we analyze the coordinated development of trade, environment and urbanization under the background of the open economy. It has a significant practical value for improving the overall environment quality and the city's ability to develop sustainably and promoting the coordinated development of trade, environment and urbanization under the background of the open economy.
As a developed area in China, the Yangtze river delta has a rapid urbanization speed and the degree of openness is higher. During the progress of urbanization, whether the relationship between trade, environment and urbanization is coordinated or contradicted becomes an issue that is worth of study. In order to make the cities develop healthily and sustainably, this paper took the Yangtze river delta as an example to make a deep study about the coordinated development of trade, environment and urbanization under the background of the open economy. After analyzing the economic mechanism of interaction between trade, environment and urbanization, firstly, we constructed an evaluation index system on trade, environment and urbanization development level, and then used AHP to determine the weight of indexes of trade, environment and urbanization. And this paper calculated the development level of 16 cities's trade, environment and urbanization in Yangtze river delta. According to the coordinate development model, this paper estimated the coordinated development degree of the 16cities's trade, environment and urbanization. Based on the results, we divided the 16 cities into four types. And on the basis of evaluation, we make a scenario simulation. By comparing the different schemes, we proposed a way that trade, environment and urbanization can develop coordinately and provided some theoretical reference for the sustainable development of the Yangtze river delta.
长三角作为我国的发达地区,是城市化高速发展以及开放度较高的区域,他们在城市化进程中,贸易、环境与城市化存在怎样的关系,是协调发展还是存在矛盾?这是一个值得我们研究的问题。因此,为了使城市能够健康持续的发展,本文以长三角(16城市)为例,对贸易、环境与城市化协调发展问题进行了深入研究。在对贸易、环境与城市化三者相互作用分析的基础上,首先构建了贸易、环境与城市化发展水平的评价指标体系,然后运用层次分析法确定了贸易、环境与城市化各指标的权重,并对长三角(16城市)的贸易、环境与城市化发展水平进行了计算,根据协调发展度模型对16个城市贸易、环境与城市化的协调发展程度进行了测算,依据测度结果将16个城市划分为4种发展类型,并且在评价分析的基础上,进行了情景模拟,通过比较不同方案的优劣提出了贸易、环境与城市化协调发展的路径,为长三角(16城市)的可持续发展提供一定的借鉴。
"the healthy development of urbanization" is specially emphasized as one of the six development strategy in the "The Eleventh Five-year Plan", and the coordinated development of urbanization, resources and environment is thought as the key field of state scientific research and has been risen to to the national strategy in both "National Middle/Long-term Plan for Science and Technology Development" and "National Plan of the Eleventh Five-year for Science and Technology Development". "The Twelfth Five-year Plan Early Major Problems Research Topic Selection Guide" points out that we must carry on the ecological civilization, promote the recycle economy development and construct low-carbon cities to promote the healthy and sustainable development of the cities. The healthy and sustainable urbanization has become the important content when constructing a socialist harmonious society. It is a positive response to the national strategy that we analyze the coordinated development of trade, environment and urbanization under the background of the open economy. It has a significant practical value for improving the overall environment quality and the city's ability to develop sustainably and promoting the coordinated development of trade, environment and urbanization under the background of the open economy.
As a developed area in China, the Yangtze river delta has a rapid urbanization speed and the degree of openness is higher. During the progress of urbanization, whether the relationship between trade, environment and urbanization is coordinated or contradicted becomes an issue that is worth of study. In order to make the cities develop healthily and sustainably, this paper took the Yangtze river delta as an example to make a deep study about the coordinated development of trade, environment and urbanization under the background of the open economy. After analyzing the economic mechanism of interaction between trade, environment and urbanization, firstly, we constructed an evaluation index system on trade, environment and urbanization development level, and then used AHP to determine the weight of indexes of trade, environment and urbanization. And this paper calculated the development level of 16 cities's trade, environment and urbanization in Yangtze river delta. According to the coordinate development model, this paper estimated the coordinated development degree of the 16cities's trade, environment and urbanization. Based on the results, we divided the 16 cities into four types. And on the basis of evaluation, we make a scenario simulation. By comparing the different schemes, we proposed a way that trade, environment and urbanization can develop coordinately and provided some theoretical reference for the sustainable development of the Yangtze river delta.
引文
[1]郭娅琦.城市化进程对城市生态环境的影响研究[D].湖南大学,2007.
[2]Pearce D, et al. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment [M]. New York: Harvester Wreathes,1990.215-289.
[3]Button K J, et al. Improving the Urban Environment:How to Adjust National and Local Government Policy for Sustainable Urban Growth [M].Oxford:PergaMon Press, 1990.15-28.
[4]Markus Pasche. Technical Progress, Structural Change, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve[J]. Ecological EconoMics,2002,(42):381-389.
[5]Maclaren V W. Urban Sustainability Reporting [J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1996,62(2):185-202.
[6]Kuik O et al. In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development[C].Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishes,1994.57-67.
[7]L-Braat, Van Lieropw. Economic-ecological modeling:an introduction to methods and applications. Ecological Modeling,1986,31:33-44.
[8]H-Sukopp, Weilers. Biotopemapping and nature conservation strategies in urban area of the Federal Republic of Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning,1988,(15):39-58.
[9]Dae-Sik, Kim, Kei Mizuno, Shintaro Kobayashi. Analysis of urbanization characteristics causing farmland loss in a rapid growth area using GIS and RS [J].Paddy Water Environment,2003(1):189-199.
[10]Jeffrey DKline, Alissa Moses, RalphJAlig. Integrating urbanization into land-scape-level ecological assessments [J].Ecosystem,2001,(4):3-18.
[11]Portnov B A, Safriel U N. Combating desertication in the Negev:dry land agriculture vs. dry land urbanization [J].Journal of Arid Environments,2004,(56):659-680.
[12]Durwood Zealke, Pual Orbuch, Robert F. Housman, Trade and Environment, Law, Economics, and Policy[M].Published by Island Press,1993.
[13]Michael Raucher, International Trade, Factor Movements and the Environment [M].Oxford: Clarendon Press,1997.
[14]John J.Audley, Green Politics and Global Trade:NAFTA and the Future of Environmental Politics[M].Washington DC:Georgetown University Press.1997.
[15]Subramanian, A. Trade Measures for Environment:A Nearly Empty Box? The World Economy,1992,(1):15-32.
[16]Soras, P. Competitiveness and Environmental Standards. New York:the World Bank M Policy Research Working Paper,1994.
[17]Whalley, J. Bilateral Trade Liberalization in Quota Restricted Items:U.S. and Mexico in Textiles and Steel. NAFTA conference Paper, Washington, D.C., Center For Strategic and International Studies, mimeo,1991.
[18]Barrett, S. The Strategy of Trade Sanctions in International Environmental Agreements, Resource and Energy Economics,1997,19:345-361.
[19]Perroni, C. and Wigle, R. International Trade and Environmental Quality:How Important Are the Linkages? Canadian Journal of Economics,1994,27(3):551-567.
[20]Walter, Ingo. The Pollution Content of American Trade. Western Economic Journal,1973, 11(1):61-70.
[21]Beghin J, Roland-Holst, D, and van der Mensbrugghe, D. Trade Liberalization and the Environment in the Pacific Basin:Coordinated Approaches to Mexican Trade and Environment Policy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1995,77(3):778-785.
[22]Beghin J, Bowland B, Dessus S, Roland-Holst, D, and van der Mensbrugghe, D. Trade Integration, Environmental Degradation and Public Health in Chile:Assessing the Linkages. Environment and Development Economics, forthcoming,2002.
[23]Lee,H. and Roland-Holst, D. The Environment and Welfare Implications of Trade and Tax Policy. Journal of Development Economics,1997,52(1):65-82.
[24]Castells,M.La Question Urbaine[M].Paris:Maspero,1972.
[25]Roberts, B.The Provincial Urban System and the Process of Dependency[C]//A.Portes and H.L.Browning, eds., Current Perspectives in Latin America Research.Texas:University of Texas Press,1976.
[26]Amstrong, W. and McGee, T. G. Theatres of Accumulation:Studies in Asian and Latin American Urbanziation. New York:Methuem.1985.
[27]Friedmann, J. The Wprld City Hypotheis. Development and Change,1986, (17)
[28]Fuchs, R. J. and Pernia, E. M. External Economic Forces and National Spatial Development: Japanese Direct Investment in Pacific Asia. In Fuchs, R. J. et al. Urbanization and Urban Policies in Pacific Asia. Boulder and London:Westview Press,1987:88-114.
[29]Marcotullio, P. J.. Globalisation, Urban Form and Environmental Conditions in Asia-Pacific Cities. Urban Studies,2003,40 (2).
[30]Wu, Fulong. Globalization, Place Promotion and Urban Development in Shanghai. Journal of Urban Affairs,2003,25 (1)
[31]Hein, S.Trade Strategy and the Dependency Hypothesis[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change,1992,40(3):495-52.
[32]Kasarda, J.D.and E.M.Crenshaw.Third World Urbanization:Dimensions, Theories, and Determinants[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1991,17:467-501.
[33]Yue, C.S.Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN[M].Kuala Lumpur:Malaysian Economy Association,1993.
[34]Alfaro L, ChandaA, Kalemli-Ozcan S. et al. FDI and economic growth:the role of local financial markets[J]. Journalof Internationl Economics(S0022-1996),2004,64(1):89-112.
[35]Gilbert, A.Third World Cities:The Changing National Settlement Sy stem [J]. Urban Studies, 1993,30(4/5):721-740.
[36]King, A.F.Urbanism, Colonialism, and the World Economy:Cultural and Spatial Foundations of the World Urban System[M].London:Routledge,1990.
[37]Sit, V.F.S.Transnational Capital Flows, Foreign Investments, and Urban Growth in Developing Countries[C]//J.D.Kasarda and A.M.Parnell, eds., Third World Cities: Problems, Policies, and Prospects.California:Sage,1993.
[38]Kentor, J.Structural Determinants of Peripheral Urbanization:The Effects of International Dependence[J].American Sociological Review,1981,46:201-211.
[39]Sit V F S.Globalization, Foreign Direct Investment, and Urbanization in Developing Countries[C]//Shahid Yusuf,Simon Evenett,Weiping Wu.Facets of Globalization International and Local Dimensions of Development.The World Bank,2001:11-45.
[40]Kevin Honglin Zhang.What Explains China's Rising Urbanisation in the Reform Era?[J].Urban Studies,2002,39(12):2301-2315.
[41]马传栋.论生态经济学与经济生态学、环境科学的联系和区别[J].环境科学与技术,1983,(4)：18-22.
[42]胡滨.成都市生态环境与城市建设协调发展刍议[J].四川建筑,1997,17(1)：8-9.
[43]方创琳,黄金川,步伟娜.西北干旱区水资源约束下城市化过程及生态效应研究的理论探讨[J].干旱区地理,2004,27(1)：1-7.
[44]黄金川,方创琳.城市化与生态环境交互耦合机制与规律性分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(2)：211-220.
[45]刘耀彬,李仁东,宋学锋.中国城市化与生态环境耦合度分析[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(1)：105-112.
[46]陈晓红,宋玉祥,满强.城市化与生态环境协调发展机制研究[J].世界地理研究,2009,18(2)：153-160.
[47]马秋香.湖南省城市化与生态环境耦合关系动态计量分析[J].现代业,2010(8)：34-37.
[48]陈予群.上海城市经济建设与生态环境协调发展模式[J].上海社会科学院学术季刊,1993,(2)：33-41.
[49]曹慧,胡锋,李辉信,等.南京市城市生态系统可持续发展评价研究[J].生态学报,2002,22(5)：787-792.
[50]张妍,尚金城,于相毅.城市经济与环境发展耦合机制的研究[J].环境科学学报,2003,23(1)：107-112.
[51]黄金川,方创琳.城市化与生态环境交互耦合机制与规律性分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(2)：211-220.
[52]刘耀彬,李仁东,张守忠.城市化与生态环境协调标准及其评价模型研究[J].中国软科学,2005,(5)：140-148.
[53]李静,李雪铭.大连市城市化与城市生态环境发展协调性评价与分析[J].现代城市研究,2008,(2)：29-35.
[54]陈冬勤,卢新卫.咸阳市生态环境与城市化协调发展定量评价[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2008,24(2)：154-162.
[55]杜淑芳,甄江红,魏爱祥.鸟海市城市化与生态环境协调发展的定量分析[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),2008,37(5)：669-673.
[56]薛永鹏,张梅.中国城市化与生态环境协调发展预警系统研究[J].统计教育,2009,(8)：7-12.
[57]王新杰,薛东前.西安市城市化与生态环境协调发展模式演化分析[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(8)：1378-1385.
[58]李会宁.福建省城市化与生态环境水平协调度分析[J].科技广,2009,(4)：84-86.
[59]宋建波,武春友.城市化与生态环境协调发展评价研究——以长江三角洲城市群为例[J].中国软科学,2010,(2)：78-87.
[60]陈春桥,汤小华.区域城市化与生态环境协调发展分析——以福建省为例[J].沈阳师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,28(1)：274-278.
[61]宋超山,马俊杰,杨风,马营.城市化与资源环境系统耦合研究—以西安市为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(5)：85-90.
[62]马利邦,牛叔文,李怡欣.甘肃省城市化与生态环境耦合的量化分析[J].城市发展研究,2010,17(5)：52-58.
[63]安瓦尔·买买提明 张小雷 塔世根·加帕尔.基于模糊数学的新疆南疆地区城市化与生态环境的和谐度分析[J].经济地理,2010,30(2)：214-219.
[64]万年庆,吴国玺,张谦智.河南省城市化与生态环境耦合分析[J].资源开发与市场,2010,26(2)：116-119
[65]谢卓然,宗刚.环境成本内部化与我国对外贸易环境竞争力[J].经济与管理2003,(4)：8-9,12.
[66]黄蕙萍王毅成.论国际贸易中的环境成本内在化问题[J].武汉工业大学学报,2000,22(6)：97-100.
[67]傅京燕.环境成本内部化与南北贸易关系[J].国际贸易问题,2002,(11)：47-51.
[68]曹絮.国际贸易中环境成本内在化问题[J].江苏商论,2003,(9)：61-62.
[69]宋春峰,耿献辉.环境保护与贸易自由化的冲突及解决[J].商业研究,2003.(12)：6-9.
[70]谷祖莎.国际贸易中环境成本内部化及发展中国家对策[J].山东大学学报,2004,(4)：81-86.
[71]耿振韬,韩立红,丛海彬.可持续发展视角下的贸易与环境的协调[J].北方经贸,,2005,(7)：41-42.
[72]刘蕾.贸易与环境协调发展的路径选择[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)2005,29(5)：100-102.
[73]赵黎.论农产品对外贸易的环境成本内部化问题[J].农业环境与发,2006,(2)：64-67.
[74]戴桂林,王雪.如何实现环境保护与贸易自由化的协调发展[J].商业研究,2005(17):34-36.
[75]胡雅芬,李洋.协调贸易与环境的途径——环境成本内部化[J].西北工业大学学报,2009,29(9)：39-42.
[76]叶如求.环境与贸易[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2001.
[77]任建兰,范纯增.21世纪协调全球贸易与环境的基本原则和出路[J].科学技术与工程,20022(5)：56-60.
[78]范纯增,任建兰.国际贸易与环境协调发展的难点和出路[J].人文地理,2003,18(2).88-92.
[79]段七零,吕林.21世纪国际贸易与环境的协调策略研究[J].国际商务—时外经济贸易大学学报,2004,(6)：12-15.
[80]张云辉.我国对外贸易与环境协调发展问题研究[D].郑州大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[81]刘素霞.论国际贸易与环境和谐发展[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2007,(3)：58-59.
[82]杨华.贸易与环境关系的冲突与协调[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,24(1)：33-40.
[83]李顺萍.浅谈增城市对外贸易与环境和谐发展的途径[J].财经界,2009,(7)：45-46.
[84]程晓东.实现对外贸易与环境保护的协调发展[J].天津职业院校联合学报,2010,12(2)：140-143.
[85]黄清.加强生态环境保护促进贸易与环境协调发展[J].黑龙江对外经贸.2010,(3)：18-19.
[86]刘应元.湖北省对外贸易与环境协调发展的路径选择[J].学习月刊2010,(1)：21-22.
[87]王瑾、寿哲均.国际纺织品贸易中环境标志制度的经济学分析[J].国际贸易问题,2006,(12).
[88]徐泉.WTO体制的贸易与环境若干问题评析——基于GATS与环境服务贸易的视角[J].河北法学,2006,(9).
[89]莫莎.贸易与环境问题的多边及区域协调[J].世界经济与政治,2006,(1).
[90]黄洪涛.国际贸易与环境保护协调发展的法律问题研究[D].大连海事大学硕士学位论文,2004.
[91]韩绘宇.自由贸易与环境保护相互协调的法律问题研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学
硕十学位论文,2006.
[92]张宁.论环境保护与国际贸易的法律规制[D].中央民族大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[93]严利.国际贸易中环境保护问题的法律研究[D].中国地质大学(北京)硕十学位论文,2007.
[94]高虹.环境保护与国际贸易冲突研究[D].中国海洋大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[95]刘晓敏.WTO中自由贸易与环境保护的冲突与协调[D].华东政法学院硕士学位论文,2007.
[96]费凯.WTO体制下自由贸易与环境保护之协调[D].大连海事大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[97]童国根.论PPMs标准-环境保护与自由贸易冲突的协调[D].吉林大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[98]易露霞,刘芳.发展循环经济,实现国际贸易与环境协调发展[J].商业经济文荟,2005,(6)：95-97.
[99]陈晓文.区域经济一体化：贸易与环境—兼论东亚自由贸易区构建中的贸易与环境协调[D].青岛大学博十学位论文,2007.
[100]方鸣,应瑞瑶,刘美玲.FDI和环境污染的关系分析——基于中国省级面板数据的研究[J].科技管理研究,2010(10)：204-207.
[101]袁晓玲,许杨,杨万平.基于重心法的外商直接投资与我国环境污染关系研究[J].城市发展研究,2010,17(2)：73-77.
[102]何立华,金江.论对外贸易对环境的影响——基于中国的实证研究[J].河南理工大学学报 (社会科学版),2010,11(1)：32-37.
[103]贺文华.FDI视角的环境库兹涅茨假说检验——基于中国中部八省的面板数据[J].产经评论,2010(2)：84-96.
[104]杨永华.FDI与我国生态环境安全——基于我国工业面板数据的经验分析[J].国际商务研究,2010(1)：3-9.
[105]王冬梅,何青松.外商直接投资对长三角地区环境质量影响的实证分析[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,12(1)：120-124.
[106]包颉,侯建明.外商直接投资与上海环境问题的实证研究[J].科技与管理,2010,12(2)：15-19.
[107]党玉婷.中国对外贸易对环境污染影响的实证研究——全球视角下投入产出技术矩阵的环境赤字测算[J].财经研究,2010,36(2)：26-35.
[108]许学强,胡华颖.对外开放加速珠江三角洲市镇发展[J].地理学报,1988,43(3)：201—210.
[109]魏清泉.广东省城市体系状况与发展趋势[J].经济地理,1995,15(2)：59—64.
[110]宁越敏.新城市化进程—90年代中国城市化动力机制和特点探讨[J].地理学报,1998,53(5)：470-477.
[111]周一星,曹广忠.改革开放20年来的中国城市化进程[J].城市规划,1999,23(12)：8-13.
[112]李迅,许顺才,朱文华,等.21世纪初期我国城市化发展态势与对策的探讨[J].城市规划汇刊,2000,(4)：54-62.
[113]侯学钢.论上海郊区城市化的动力机制与后续调控[J].城市规划汇刊,1999(6)：66—72.
[114]李胜兰.外向型城市化发展模式研究—珠江三角洲个案研究[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2004,44(5)：11-15
[115]陈本清,徐涵秋.城市扩展及其驱动力遥感分析[J].经济地理,2005,25(1)：79-84.
[116]沈建法,冯志强,黄钧尧.珠江三角洲的双轨城市化川.城市规划,2006,30(3)：39—45.
[117]张弘.开发区带动区域整体发展的城市化模式—以长江三角洲地区为例[J].城市规划汇刊,2001,(6)：65-69.
[118]石忆邵,顾萌菁.外资驱动下长江三角洲地区城市化发展[J].现代城市研究,2003,18(4)：1-7.
[119]王小侠.外国直接投资与美国城市化(1970-1990)[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,33(3)：44-47.
[120]薛凤旋,杨春.外资：发展中国家城市化的新动力—珠江三角洲个案研究[J].地理学报,1997,52(3)：193-206.
[121]吴莉娅,顾朝林.全球化、外资与发展中国家城市化—江苏个案研究[J].城市化研究,2005,29(7)：28-33.
[122]王家庭.国际贸易对中国城市化贡献的测度研究[J].上海经济研究,2005,(8)：23-30.
[123]殷存毅,姜山.外来投资与城市化发展—对东莞和昆山城市化的实证研究[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,18(6)：71-79,84.
[124]罗茜.FDI对中国城市化进程推动的实证分析[J].首都经济贸易大学学 报,2008(3)：105-112.
[125]蒋伟,曹荣林.FDI与城市化水平的相关性分析——以江苏省地级市为例[J].信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版).2010,23(2)：254-256.
[126]程开明,段存章.FDI与中国城市化关联机理及动态分析[J].经济地理,2010,30(1)：99-103.
[127]张红伟,陈伟国.FDI在中国的区位决策因素分析与实证研究[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(1)：46-51.
[128]黄河,周春光,袁瑶南.我国城市化发展与FDI的动态关系研究[J].统计教育,2009,(8)：13-17.
[129]赵修渝,陈虹全.广东省FDI与城市化关系的实证研究——基于市级面板数据的检验[J].科技管理研究,2009,(11)：124-127.
[2]Pearce D, et al. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment [M]. New York: Harvester Wreathes,1990.215-289.
[3]Button K J, et al. Improving the Urban Environment:How to Adjust National and Local Government Policy for Sustainable Urban Growth [M].Oxford:PergaMon Press, 1990.15-28.
[4]Markus Pasche. Technical Progress, Structural Change, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve[J]. Ecological EconoMics,2002,(42):381-389.
[5]Maclaren V W. Urban Sustainability Reporting [J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1996,62(2):185-202.
[6]Kuik O et al. In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development[C].Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishes,1994.57-67.
[7]L-Braat, Van Lieropw. Economic-ecological modeling:an introduction to methods and applications. Ecological Modeling,1986,31:33-44.
[8]H-Sukopp, Weilers. Biotopemapping and nature conservation strategies in urban area of the Federal Republic of Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning,1988,(15):39-58.
[9]Dae-Sik, Kim, Kei Mizuno, Shintaro Kobayashi. Analysis of urbanization characteristics causing farmland loss in a rapid growth area using GIS and RS [J].Paddy Water Environment,2003(1):189-199.
[10]Jeffrey DKline, Alissa Moses, RalphJAlig. Integrating urbanization into land-scape-level ecological assessments [J].Ecosystem,2001,(4):3-18.
[11]Portnov B A, Safriel U N. Combating desertication in the Negev:dry land agriculture vs. dry land urbanization [J].Journal of Arid Environments,2004,(56):659-680.
[12]Durwood Zealke, Pual Orbuch, Robert F. Housman, Trade and Environment, Law, Economics, and Policy[M].Published by Island Press,1993.
[13]Michael Raucher, International Trade, Factor Movements and the Environment [M].Oxford: Clarendon Press,1997.
[14]John J.Audley, Green Politics and Global Trade:NAFTA and the Future of Environmental Politics[M].Washington DC:Georgetown University Press.1997.
[15]Subramanian, A. Trade Measures for Environment:A Nearly Empty Box? The World Economy,1992,(1):15-32.
[16]Soras, P. Competitiveness and Environmental Standards. New York:the World Bank M Policy Research Working Paper,1994.
[17]Whalley, J. Bilateral Trade Liberalization in Quota Restricted Items:U.S. and Mexico in Textiles and Steel. NAFTA conference Paper, Washington, D.C., Center For Strategic and International Studies, mimeo,1991.
[18]Barrett, S. The Strategy of Trade Sanctions in International Environmental Agreements, Resource and Energy Economics,1997,19:345-361.
[19]Perroni, C. and Wigle, R. International Trade and Environmental Quality:How Important Are the Linkages? Canadian Journal of Economics,1994,27(3):551-567.
[20]Walter, Ingo. The Pollution Content of American Trade. Western Economic Journal,1973, 11(1):61-70.
[21]Beghin J, Roland-Holst, D, and van der Mensbrugghe, D. Trade Liberalization and the Environment in the Pacific Basin:Coordinated Approaches to Mexican Trade and Environment Policy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1995,77(3):778-785.
[22]Beghin J, Bowland B, Dessus S, Roland-Holst, D, and van der Mensbrugghe, D. Trade Integration, Environmental Degradation and Public Health in Chile:Assessing the Linkages. Environment and Development Economics, forthcoming,2002.
[23]Lee,H. and Roland-Holst, D. The Environment and Welfare Implications of Trade and Tax Policy. Journal of Development Economics,1997,52(1):65-82.
[24]Castells,M.La Question Urbaine[M].Paris:Maspero,1972.
[25]Roberts, B.The Provincial Urban System and the Process of Dependency[C]//A.Portes and H.L.Browning, eds., Current Perspectives in Latin America Research.Texas:University of Texas Press,1976.
[26]Amstrong, W. and McGee, T. G. Theatres of Accumulation:Studies in Asian and Latin American Urbanziation. New York:Methuem.1985.
[27]Friedmann, J. The Wprld City Hypotheis. Development and Change,1986, (17)
[28]Fuchs, R. J. and Pernia, E. M. External Economic Forces and National Spatial Development: Japanese Direct Investment in Pacific Asia. In Fuchs, R. J. et al. Urbanization and Urban Policies in Pacific Asia. Boulder and London:Westview Press,1987:88-114.
[29]Marcotullio, P. J.. Globalisation, Urban Form and Environmental Conditions in Asia-Pacific Cities. Urban Studies,2003,40 (2).
[30]Wu, Fulong. Globalization, Place Promotion and Urban Development in Shanghai. Journal of Urban Affairs,2003,25 (1)
[31]Hein, S.Trade Strategy and the Dependency Hypothesis[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change,1992,40(3):495-52.
[32]Kasarda, J.D.and E.M.Crenshaw.Third World Urbanization:Dimensions, Theories, and Determinants[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1991,17:467-501.
[33]Yue, C.S.Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN[M].Kuala Lumpur:Malaysian Economy Association,1993.
[34]Alfaro L, ChandaA, Kalemli-Ozcan S. et al. FDI and economic growth:the role of local financial markets[J]. Journalof Internationl Economics(S0022-1996),2004,64(1):89-112.
[35]Gilbert, A.Third World Cities:The Changing National Settlement Sy stem [J]. Urban Studies, 1993,30(4/5):721-740.
[36]King, A.F.Urbanism, Colonialism, and the World Economy:Cultural and Spatial Foundations of the World Urban System[M].London:Routledge,1990.
[37]Sit, V.F.S.Transnational Capital Flows, Foreign Investments, and Urban Growth in Developing Countries[C]//J.D.Kasarda and A.M.Parnell, eds., Third World Cities: Problems, Policies, and Prospects.California:Sage,1993.
[38]Kentor, J.Structural Determinants of Peripheral Urbanization:The Effects of International Dependence[J].American Sociological Review,1981,46:201-211.
[39]Sit V F S.Globalization, Foreign Direct Investment, and Urbanization in Developing Countries[C]//Shahid Yusuf,Simon Evenett,Weiping Wu.Facets of Globalization International and Local Dimensions of Development.The World Bank,2001:11-45.
[40]Kevin Honglin Zhang.What Explains China's Rising Urbanisation in the Reform Era?[J].Urban Studies,2002,39(12):2301-2315.
[41]马传栋.论生态经济学与经济生态学、环境科学的联系和区别[J].环境科学与技术,1983,(4)：18-22.
[42]胡滨.成都市生态环境与城市建设协调发展刍议[J].四川建筑,1997,17(1)：8-9.
[43]方创琳,黄金川,步伟娜.西北干旱区水资源约束下城市化过程及生态效应研究的理论探讨[J].干旱区地理,2004,27(1)：1-7.
[44]黄金川,方创琳.城市化与生态环境交互耦合机制与规律性分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(2)：211-220.
[45]刘耀彬,李仁东,宋学锋.中国城市化与生态环境耦合度分析[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(1)：105-112.
[46]陈晓红,宋玉祥,满强.城市化与生态环境协调发展机制研究[J].世界地理研究,2009,18(2)：153-160.
[47]马秋香.湖南省城市化与生态环境耦合关系动态计量分析[J].现代业,2010(8)：34-37.
[48]陈予群.上海城市经济建设与生态环境协调发展模式[J].上海社会科学院学术季刊,1993,(2)：33-41.
[49]曹慧,胡锋,李辉信,等.南京市城市生态系统可持续发展评价研究[J].生态学报,2002,22(5)：787-792.
[50]张妍,尚金城,于相毅.城市经济与环境发展耦合机制的研究[J].环境科学学报,2003,23(1)：107-112.
[51]黄金川,方创琳.城市化与生态环境交互耦合机制与规律性分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(2)：211-220.
[52]刘耀彬,李仁东,张守忠.城市化与生态环境协调标准及其评价模型研究[J].中国软科学,2005,(5)：140-148.
[53]李静,李雪铭.大连市城市化与城市生态环境发展协调性评价与分析[J].现代城市研究,2008,(2)：29-35.
[54]陈冬勤,卢新卫.咸阳市生态环境与城市化协调发展定量评价[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2008,24(2)：154-162.
[55]杜淑芳,甄江红,魏爱祥.鸟海市城市化与生态环境协调发展的定量分析[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),2008,37(5)：669-673.
[56]薛永鹏,张梅.中国城市化与生态环境协调发展预警系统研究[J].统计教育,2009,(8)：7-12.
[57]王新杰,薛东前.西安市城市化与生态环境协调发展模式演化分析[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(8)：1378-1385.
[58]李会宁.福建省城市化与生态环境水平协调度分析[J].科技广,2009,(4)：84-86.
[59]宋建波,武春友.城市化与生态环境协调发展评价研究——以长江三角洲城市群为例[J].中国软科学,2010,(2)：78-87.
[60]陈春桥,汤小华.区域城市化与生态环境协调发展分析——以福建省为例[J].沈阳师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,28(1)：274-278.
[61]宋超山,马俊杰,杨风,马营.城市化与资源环境系统耦合研究—以西安市为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(5)：85-90.
[62]马利邦,牛叔文,李怡欣.甘肃省城市化与生态环境耦合的量化分析[J].城市发展研究,2010,17(5)：52-58.
[63]安瓦尔·买买提明 张小雷 塔世根·加帕尔.基于模糊数学的新疆南疆地区城市化与生态环境的和谐度分析[J].经济地理,2010,30(2)：214-219.
[64]万年庆,吴国玺,张谦智.河南省城市化与生态环境耦合分析[J].资源开发与市场,2010,26(2)：116-119
[65]谢卓然,宗刚.环境成本内部化与我国对外贸易环境竞争力[J].经济与管理2003,(4)：8-9,12.
[66]黄蕙萍王毅成.论国际贸易中的环境成本内在化问题[J].武汉工业大学学报,2000,22(6)：97-100.
[67]傅京燕.环境成本内部化与南北贸易关系[J].国际贸易问题,2002,(11)：47-51.
[68]曹絮.国际贸易中环境成本内在化问题[J].江苏商论,2003,(9)：61-62.
[69]宋春峰,耿献辉.环境保护与贸易自由化的冲突及解决[J].商业研究,2003.(12)：6-9.
[70]谷祖莎.国际贸易中环境成本内部化及发展中国家对策[J].山东大学学报,2004,(4)：81-86.
[71]耿振韬,韩立红,丛海彬.可持续发展视角下的贸易与环境的协调[J].北方经贸,,2005,(7)：41-42.
[72]刘蕾.贸易与环境协调发展的路径选择[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)2005,29(5)：100-102.
[73]赵黎.论农产品对外贸易的环境成本内部化问题[J].农业环境与发,2006,(2)：64-67.
[74]戴桂林,王雪.如何实现环境保护与贸易自由化的协调发展[J].商业研究,2005(17):34-36.
[75]胡雅芬,李洋.协调贸易与环境的途径——环境成本内部化[J].西北工业大学学报,2009,29(9)：39-42.
[76]叶如求.环境与贸易[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2001.
[77]任建兰,范纯增.21世纪协调全球贸易与环境的基本原则和出路[J].科学技术与工程,20022(5)：56-60.
[78]范纯增,任建兰.国际贸易与环境协调发展的难点和出路[J].人文地理,2003,18(2).88-92.
[79]段七零,吕林.21世纪国际贸易与环境的协调策略研究[J].国际商务—时外经济贸易大学学报,2004,(6)：12-15.
[80]张云辉.我国对外贸易与环境协调发展问题研究[D].郑州大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[81]刘素霞.论国际贸易与环境和谐发展[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2007,(3)：58-59.
[82]杨华.贸易与环境关系的冲突与协调[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,24(1)：33-40.
[83]李顺萍.浅谈增城市对外贸易与环境和谐发展的途径[J].财经界,2009,(7)：45-46.
[84]程晓东.实现对外贸易与环境保护的协调发展[J].天津职业院校联合学报,2010,12(2)：140-143.
[85]黄清.加强生态环境保护促进贸易与环境协调发展[J].黑龙江对外经贸.2010,(3)：18-19.
[86]刘应元.湖北省对外贸易与环境协调发展的路径选择[J].学习月刊2010,(1)：21-22.
[87]王瑾、寿哲均.国际纺织品贸易中环境标志制度的经济学分析[J].国际贸易问题,2006,(12).
[88]徐泉.WTO体制的贸易与环境若干问题评析——基于GATS与环境服务贸易的视角[J].河北法学,2006,(9).
[89]莫莎.贸易与环境问题的多边及区域协调[J].世界经济与政治,2006,(1).
[90]黄洪涛.国际贸易与环境保护协调发展的法律问题研究[D].大连海事大学硕士学位论文,2004.
[91]韩绘宇.自由贸易与环境保护相互协调的法律问题研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学
硕十学位论文,2006.
[92]张宁.论环境保护与国际贸易的法律规制[D].中央民族大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[93]严利.国际贸易中环境保护问题的法律研究[D].中国地质大学(北京)硕十学位论文,2007.
[94]高虹.环境保护与国际贸易冲突研究[D].中国海洋大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[95]刘晓敏.WTO中自由贸易与环境保护的冲突与协调[D].华东政法学院硕士学位论文,2007.
[96]费凯.WTO体制下自由贸易与环境保护之协调[D].大连海事大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[97]童国根.论PPMs标准-环境保护与自由贸易冲突的协调[D].吉林大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[98]易露霞,刘芳.发展循环经济,实现国际贸易与环境协调发展[J].商业经济文荟,2005,(6)：95-97.
[99]陈晓文.区域经济一体化：贸易与环境—兼论东亚自由贸易区构建中的贸易与环境协调[D].青岛大学博十学位论文,2007.
[100]方鸣,应瑞瑶,刘美玲.FDI和环境污染的关系分析——基于中国省级面板数据的研究[J].科技管理研究,2010(10)：204-207.
[101]袁晓玲,许杨,杨万平.基于重心法的外商直接投资与我国环境污染关系研究[J].城市发展研究,2010,17(2)：73-77.
[102]何立华,金江.论对外贸易对环境的影响——基于中国的实证研究[J].河南理工大学学报 (社会科学版),2010,11(1)：32-37.
[103]贺文华.FDI视角的环境库兹涅茨假说检验——基于中国中部八省的面板数据[J].产经评论,2010(2)：84-96.
[104]杨永华.FDI与我国生态环境安全——基于我国工业面板数据的经验分析[J].国际商务研究,2010(1)：3-9.
[105]王冬梅,何青松.外商直接投资对长三角地区环境质量影响的实证分析[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,12(1)：120-124.
[106]包颉,侯建明.外商直接投资与上海环境问题的实证研究[J].科技与管理,2010,12(2)：15-19.
[107]党玉婷.中国对外贸易对环境污染影响的实证研究——全球视角下投入产出技术矩阵的环境赤字测算[J].财经研究,2010,36(2)：26-35.
[108]许学强,胡华颖.对外开放加速珠江三角洲市镇发展[J].地理学报,1988,43(3)：201—210.
[109]魏清泉.广东省城市体系状况与发展趋势[J].经济地理,1995,15(2)：59—64.
[110]宁越敏.新城市化进程—90年代中国城市化动力机制和特点探讨[J].地理学报,1998,53(5)：470-477.
[111]周一星,曹广忠.改革开放20年来的中国城市化进程[J].城市规划,1999,23(12)：8-13.
[112]李迅,许顺才,朱文华,等.21世纪初期我国城市化发展态势与对策的探讨[J].城市规划汇刊,2000,(4)：54-62.
[113]侯学钢.论上海郊区城市化的动力机制与后续调控[J].城市规划汇刊,1999(6)：66—72.
[114]李胜兰.外向型城市化发展模式研究—珠江三角洲个案研究[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2004,44(5)：11-15
[115]陈本清,徐涵秋.城市扩展及其驱动力遥感分析[J].经济地理,2005,25(1)：79-84.
[116]沈建法,冯志强,黄钧尧.珠江三角洲的双轨城市化川.城市规划,2006,30(3)：39—45.
[117]张弘.开发区带动区域整体发展的城市化模式—以长江三角洲地区为例[J].城市规划汇刊,2001,(6)：65-69.
[118]石忆邵,顾萌菁.外资驱动下长江三角洲地区城市化发展[J].现代城市研究,2003,18(4)：1-7.
[119]王小侠.外国直接投资与美国城市化(1970-1990)[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,33(3)：44-47.
[120]薛凤旋,杨春.外资：发展中国家城市化的新动力—珠江三角洲个案研究[J].地理学报,1997,52(3)：193-206.
[121]吴莉娅,顾朝林.全球化、外资与发展中国家城市化—江苏个案研究[J].城市化研究,2005,29(7)：28-33.
[122]王家庭.国际贸易对中国城市化贡献的测度研究[J].上海经济研究,2005,(8)：23-30.
[123]殷存毅,姜山.外来投资与城市化发展—对东莞和昆山城市化的实证研究[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,18(6)：71-79,84.
[124]罗茜.FDI对中国城市化进程推动的实证分析[J].首都经济贸易大学学 报,2008(3)：105-112.
[125]蒋伟,曹荣林.FDI与城市化水平的相关性分析——以江苏省地级市为例[J].信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版).2010,23(2)：254-256.
[126]程开明,段存章.FDI与中国城市化关联机理及动态分析[J].经济地理,2010,30(1)：99-103.
[127]张红伟,陈伟国.FDI在中国的区位决策因素分析与实证研究[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(1)：46-51.
[128]黄河,周春光,袁瑶南.我国城市化发展与FDI的动态关系研究[J].统计教育,2009,(8)：13-17.
[129]赵修渝,陈虹全.广东省FDI与城市化关系的实证研究——基于市级面板数据的检验[J].科技管理研究,2009,(11)：124-127.