朝1-朝气3区块扶余油层层序地层学研究
|
摘要
为了解决大庆长垣东部低孔、低渗地区在开发中、后期由于储层非均质性认识不清造成的诸多生产实际问题,本文首次运用高分辨率层序地层学原理和方法,结合现代沉积学、石油地质学及储层特征研究的最新成果,对朝阳沟油田朝1-朝气3区块扶余油层进行了系统的高分辨率层序地层学研究,取得了以下主要研究成果:
1.结合区域标准层,识别出2个长期基准面半旋回;通过岩心资料,在研究区目的层识别出41个短期基准面旋回;通过岩心资料标定测井曲线,利用短期基准面旋回的结构类型和叠加样式等在长期基准面旋回框架内组合出7个中期基准面旋回,进而建立了高分辨率层序地层格架并分别对长期、短期、中期基准面旋回特征进行了详细描述。本次研究中长期、短期、中期基准面旋回的识别方法对相似沉积环境具有一定的借鉴意义。
2.建立了15种测井微相模式,对41个沉积单元(短期基准面旋回对应的地层)进行了精细沉积微相研究,分析了各沉积单元沉积微相与中、长期基准面旋回的关系。指出辫状河主要发育在长期基准面上升半旋回的早期,高能曲流河主要发育在长期基准面上升半旋回的中期。
3.利用取心井段的物性资料,建立了孔隙度、渗透率的预测模型,对研究区内的所有井进行二次解释,分析了各沉积单元孔隙度、渗透率与中、长期基准面旋回的关系。MSC5及MSC6上升半旋回早期沉积单元的孔隙度、渗透率值相对最高。
4.分不同沉积微相类型对各沉积单元的隔夹层特征及与中、长期基准面旋回的关系进行了详细分析。
5.针对研究区的实际特点,对各沉积单元的层内非均质性、层间非均质性、平面非均质性等宏观非均质性特征及与中、长期基准面旋回的关系进行了详细分析。
6.综合利用前述研究成果,引入表征储层性质的储层规模参数、物性参数、渗透率非均质性参数、储层隔夹层参数及含油性参数共5类12项参数,对目的层进行了储层定量综合评价,将储层划分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ四个级别,计算结果与中、长期基准面旋回特征、砂体分布特征、沉积相展布特征相吻合,评价结果对油田开发中后期综合调整具有指导意义。该评价方法对同类储层具有一定的借鉴意义。
To solve the realistic problems caused by the uncertainty of the heterogeneity of thereservoir during the middle or late stage of oil-field development in the low-permeability andlow-porosity district in the east of the Daqing placanticline, this article have a systematichigh resolution sequence stratigraphic study on the Fuyu reservoir in the Chao1-Chaoqi3block,Chaoyangou oil fields by using the principles and methods of high resolution sequencestratigraphy and modern sedimentology and petroleum geology and latest research results ofreservoir characteristics for the first time. The main results are listed below:
1. In combination with regional standards layer, 2 long-term base-level cycles aredistinguished. According to the data of rock cores, 41 short-term base-level cycles aredistinguished. 7 mid-term base-level cycles are distinguished within the framework oflong-term base-level cycles by using rock cores to demarcate logging curve and by using thelogging curve stacking patterns of the short-term base-level cycles, then the high resolutionsequence stratigraphic framework are established and the detailed description to thecharacteristic of the short-term and the mid-term and the long-term base-level cycles arecarried on separately. The identification methods to short-term and mid-term and long-termbase-level cycles in this article are significant to similar sedimentary environment.
2. 15 kinds of logging's microfacies models have been established. We made a deliberatesedimentary microfacies study on the 41 sedimentary units, corresponding to the stratum ofshort-term base-level cycle, and analyzed the relationship between sedimentary macrofaciesof the 41 sedimentary units with the changing mid-term and long-term base-level cycles. It ispointed out that the braided river develops mainly in the early stage of the uprising periods ofthe long-term base-level cycle, and the energetic meandering river develops mainly in themiddle stage of the uprising periods of the long-term base-level cycle.
3. By using the physical property of the coring, the predict model of porosity andpermeability are established. We made secondary interpretation to all the wells in theresearching field and analyzed the relationship between porosity and permeability of the 41sedimentary units with the changing mid-term and long-term base-level cycles. The porosityand permeability are much higher in the sedimentary units in the early stage of the uprisingperiods of MSC5 and MSC6 than others.
4. Analyzed the characteristic of the intercalation of the 41 sedimentary units and itsrelationship with the changing mid-term and long-term base-level cycles in details bydifferent microfacies.
5. Analyzed the macro heterogeneity characteristics including in-layer heterogeneity andthe interlayer heterogeneity and planar heterogeneity of every sedimentary units and itsrelationship with the changing mid-term and long-term base-level cycles in details.
6. Using the research results mentioned above, we take 12 parameters in 5 categoriessuch as reservoir size parameters and physical property parameters and permeabilityheterogeneity parameters and intercalation parameters of the reservoir and oil bearingproperties parameters into the quantitative comprehensive evaluation, and classify thereservoir into Ⅰor Ⅱ or Ⅲ or Ⅳ rank. The calculation results are consistent with thecharacteristics of mid-term and long-term base-level cycles and the distribution of sand bodies
and the distribution of sedimentary facies. The evaluation results are instructive to thecomprehensive adjustments during the middle or late stage of oil-field development. Theevaluation methods are significant to the similar reservoir.
1.结合区域标准层,识别出2个长期基准面半旋回;通过岩心资料,在研究区目的层识别出41个短期基准面旋回;通过岩心资料标定测井曲线,利用短期基准面旋回的结构类型和叠加样式等在长期基准面旋回框架内组合出7个中期基准面旋回,进而建立了高分辨率层序地层格架并分别对长期、短期、中期基准面旋回特征进行了详细描述。本次研究中长期、短期、中期基准面旋回的识别方法对相似沉积环境具有一定的借鉴意义。
2.建立了15种测井微相模式,对41个沉积单元(短期基准面旋回对应的地层)进行了精细沉积微相研究,分析了各沉积单元沉积微相与中、长期基准面旋回的关系。指出辫状河主要发育在长期基准面上升半旋回的早期,高能曲流河主要发育在长期基准面上升半旋回的中期。
3.利用取心井段的物性资料,建立了孔隙度、渗透率的预测模型,对研究区内的所有井进行二次解释,分析了各沉积单元孔隙度、渗透率与中、长期基准面旋回的关系。MSC5及MSC6上升半旋回早期沉积单元的孔隙度、渗透率值相对最高。
4.分不同沉积微相类型对各沉积单元的隔夹层特征及与中、长期基准面旋回的关系进行了详细分析。
5.针对研究区的实际特点,对各沉积单元的层内非均质性、层间非均质性、平面非均质性等宏观非均质性特征及与中、长期基准面旋回的关系进行了详细分析。
6.综合利用前述研究成果,引入表征储层性质的储层规模参数、物性参数、渗透率非均质性参数、储层隔夹层参数及含油性参数共5类12项参数,对目的层进行了储层定量综合评价,将储层划分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ四个级别,计算结果与中、长期基准面旋回特征、砂体分布特征、沉积相展布特征相吻合,评价结果对油田开发中后期综合调整具有指导意义。该评价方法对同类储层具有一定的借鉴意义。
To solve the realistic problems caused by the uncertainty of the heterogeneity of thereservoir during the middle or late stage of oil-field development in the low-permeability andlow-porosity district in the east of the Daqing placanticline, this article have a systematichigh resolution sequence stratigraphic study on the Fuyu reservoir in the Chao1-Chaoqi3block,Chaoyangou oil fields by using the principles and methods of high resolution sequencestratigraphy and modern sedimentology and petroleum geology and latest research results ofreservoir characteristics for the first time. The main results are listed below:
1. In combination with regional standards layer, 2 long-term base-level cycles aredistinguished. According to the data of rock cores, 41 short-term base-level cycles aredistinguished. 7 mid-term base-level cycles are distinguished within the framework oflong-term base-level cycles by using rock cores to demarcate logging curve and by using thelogging curve stacking patterns of the short-term base-level cycles, then the high resolutionsequence stratigraphic framework are established and the detailed description to thecharacteristic of the short-term and the mid-term and the long-term base-level cycles arecarried on separately. The identification methods to short-term and mid-term and long-termbase-level cycles in this article are significant to similar sedimentary environment.
2. 15 kinds of logging's microfacies models have been established. We made a deliberatesedimentary microfacies study on the 41 sedimentary units, corresponding to the stratum ofshort-term base-level cycle, and analyzed the relationship between sedimentary macrofaciesof the 41 sedimentary units with the changing mid-term and long-term base-level cycles. It ispointed out that the braided river develops mainly in the early stage of the uprising periods ofthe long-term base-level cycle, and the energetic meandering river develops mainly in themiddle stage of the uprising periods of the long-term base-level cycle.
3. By using the physical property of the coring, the predict model of porosity andpermeability are established. We made secondary interpretation to all the wells in theresearching field and analyzed the relationship between porosity and permeability of the 41sedimentary units with the changing mid-term and long-term base-level cycles. The porosityand permeability are much higher in the sedimentary units in the early stage of the uprisingperiods of MSC5 and MSC6 than others.
4. Analyzed the characteristic of the intercalation of the 41 sedimentary units and itsrelationship with the changing mid-term and long-term base-level cycles in details bydifferent microfacies.
5. Analyzed the macro heterogeneity characteristics including in-layer heterogeneity andthe interlayer heterogeneity and planar heterogeneity of every sedimentary units and itsrelationship with the changing mid-term and long-term base-level cycles in details.
6. Using the research results mentioned above, we take 12 parameters in 5 categoriessuch as reservoir size parameters and physical property parameters and permeabilityheterogeneity parameters and intercalation parameters of the reservoir and oil bearingproperties parameters into the quantitative comprehensive evaluation, and classify thereservoir into Ⅰor Ⅱ or Ⅲ or Ⅳ rank. The calculation results are consistent with thecharacteristics of mid-term and long-term base-level cycles and the distribution of sand bodies
and the distribution of sedimentary facies. The evaluation results are instructive to thecomprehensive adjustments during the middle or late stage of oil-field development. Theevaluation methods are significant to the similar reservoir.
引文
[1] 邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派-高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89～97
[2] 王洪亮,邓宏文.地层基准面原理在湖相储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):96～102
[3] 邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):9095
[4] 郑荣才.四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨段高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].沉积学报,1998,16( 2):42～49
[5] 杜春艳,郑荣才.陕北长 6油层组短期基准面旋回与储层非均质性的关系[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(1):17～22
[6] 郑荣才,吴朝容.西部凹陷深层沙河街组生储盖组合的层序分析[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):348～356
[7] 吴朝容,郑荣才.辽河油田西部洼陷沙河街组高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):375～381
[8] 柳梅青,陈亦军,郑荣才.川西新场气田蓬莱镇组陆相地层高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].沉积学报,2000,18(1):50～56
[9] 尹太举.高分辩率层序地层学及其在濮城油田开发中的应用[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国地质大学(北京),2002.8～20
[10] 王居峰,蔡希源,邓宏文.东营凹陷中央洼陷带沙三段高分辨率层序地层与岩性圈闭特征[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版)2004,28(4):7～11
[11] 杏树岗-太平屯地区扶杨油层层序地层研究[J].新疆石油地址,2004,25(6):607～609
[12] 邓宏文,王洪亮,阎伟鹏,Timothy A. Cross. 河流相层序地层构成模式探讨[J].沉积学报,2004,22(3):373～379
[13] 邓宏文,王洪亮,祝永军,Timothy A. Cross.高分辨率层序地层学—原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.4～24
[14] 冯志琨,张兴金,马世忠,杨清彦,刘新建,范旭.低渗透砂岩油田开发地质分析[M].黑龙江科学技术出版社,1994,12～14
[15] 柳成志,辛仁臣,王 刚.松辽盆地北部头台地区扶余油层浅水湖泊三角洲沉积特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,1998,22(1):68～70
[16] 王嗣敏,刘招君,董清水,朱建伟,郭 巍.陆相盆地层序地层形成机制分析—以松辽盆地为例[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(2):139～144
[17] 邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙吉.层序地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177～184
[18] 魏立民,柳梅青.川西新场气田蓬莱镇组陆相地层高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(3):220～225
[19] 邓 宏 文 , 王 洪 亮 , 阎 伟 朋 等 . 河 流 相 层 序 地 层 构 成 探 讨 [J]. 沉 积 学报,2004,22(3):373～379
[20] 郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):369～375
[21] 于兴河.碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学[M]北京:石油工业出版社,2002.72～77,108～124
[22] 渠永宏.高分辨率层序地层学在大庆油田开发储层非均质表征中的应用[D].博士后学位论文.北京:中国石油勘探开发研究院(北京),2003.15～16
[23] 穆龙新、贾爱林等.河流-三角洲储层露头和现代河流沉积综合研究[M].北京:大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院、石油勘探开发科学研究院,1998.90～102
[24] 高瑞祺、蔡希源等.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.40～50
[25] 陈发景、王新文、张光亚.中国中、新生代含油气盆地构造和动力学背景[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992.24～30
[26] 吕延防、付广等.油气藏封盖研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1987.40～56
[27] 陆克政、戴俊生等.扭动盆地和扭动构造[C].北京:“八五”地质科技重要成果学术交流会议论文选集,1994.30～47
[28] 陈发景、赵海玲、陈邵年等.中国中、新生代前陆盆地的构造特征和地球动力学[M].北京:地球科学,1996.14～20
[29] 马杏垣.论伸展构造[M].北京:地球科学,1981.30～44
[30] 吕延防、付广、高大岭.油气藏封盖研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.12～40
[31] 吴奇之.地震资料解释工作的现状与展望[M].北京:石油与天然气地质,1981. 5～9
[32] 吴元燕、徐龙、张昌民等.油气储层地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.40～60
[33] 冯增昭、王英华、刘焕杰等.中国沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.24～42
[34] 华东石油学院岩矿教研室编.沉积岩石学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1981. 14～32
[35] 杨万里.松辽陆相盆地石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1985.24～32
[36] {美}A.I.莱复生.石油地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1975.14～32
[37] 刘招君、董清水、王嗣敏等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.12～40
[38] 欧阳健、王贵文等.测井地质分析与油气层定量评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.30～44
[39] 李思田.含能源盆地沉积体系[M].北京:中国地质大学出版社,1996.30～47
[40] 徐 强 等 . 中 国 沉 积 学 研 究 的 现 状 和 发 展 方 向 [J]. 西 南 石 油 学 院 学报,200012(4):15～19
[41] 张昌民.储层研究中的层次分析法[J].石油与天然气地质,1992,13(3):344-350
[42] 刘吉余.流动单元研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(3):303-306
[43] 裘亦楠.碎屑岩储层沉积基础[M].第一版.北京:石油工业出版社,1987.3-7
[44] 马世忠,付春权等.单砂体三维地质的优势渗透率分析方法[J].大庆石油学院学报,2000,24(3):1-5
[45] T. A. Cross, M. R. Baker et. al Application of High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy to Reservoir Analysis, Proceeding of the 7`" Exploration and Production Research Conference:Paris, Technic, 1993.11～33
[46] T. A. Cross, M. R. Maker, et. al, Applications of High-resolution Sequence Stratigraphy to Reservoir Analysis, Proceedings of the 7`"Exploration and Production Research Conference Paris.Technip. 1993.11～33
[47] Shanley, K. W. and McCabe, P. J. Perspectives on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78(4):544～568
[48] Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, Campion K M, et a1.Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy in Well,Cores and Outcrops: Concept for High-Resolution Correlation of Time and Facies. AAPG Methods in Exploration series,1990(7):1～55
[49] Keith W. Shanley,Peter J. Macabe. Perspective on the sequence Stratigraphy of Continental Strata, AAPG Bulletin,1994,78(4):544～568
[50] Allen P A, Allen J R. Basin analysis: principles and application[M].Oxford:Black-Well Scientific Publication, 1990,141～188
[51] Brett C E , Goodman W M, Loduca S T . Sequence, Cycles, and basin dynamics in the silurian of the appalachian foreland basin.[J] Geology Sedimentary, 1990 69(3-4):191～244
[52] Cooper M R. Tectonic cycles in southern Africa [J].Earth Science Review, 1990, 28(4):321-364
[53] Fischer A G, Bottjer D J.Orbital forcing and sedimentary sequence [J].Jour Sediment Petrol, 1991 61(7):1063～1060
[54] Miall A D. Sequence stratigraphy and their chronostratigraphical correlation[J].Jour Sediment Petrol, 1991 61(4):497～505
[55] Bice D. Synthetic stratigraphy of carbonate platform and basin systems.[M]Geology,1988,6: 703～706
[56] Carlos H.L. High-Resolution Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Evolution of Coarse-Grained Canyon-Filling Turbidites from the Campos Basin,Offshore Brazil [J].Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1995,65 (4):426～42.
[57] Clark J. D&Pickering K. T. Architectural Elements and Growth Patterns of Submarine Channels: Application to Hydrocarbon Exploration[J]. AAPG. Bulletin. 1996, 80(2): 194～211
[58] Burton R,Kendall C G St C,L erche 1. Out of our depth on the impossibility of fathoming eustacy from the stratigraphic record[J]. Earth Science Reviews,1987(24):237～277
[59] Mail A D.Stratigraphic sequences and their chronostratigraphic correlation.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology. 1991, 61:497～505
[60] Mail A D. The architecture of fluvial-deltaic sequences in the Upper Mesaverde Group,Book Cliffs, Utah.In:Best J L,Bristow C eds. Brainded Rivers. Geological Society of London Special Publication,1993,75:305-331
[2] 王洪亮,邓宏文.地层基准面原理在湖相储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):96～102
[3] 邓宏文,王洪亮,李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):9095
[4] 郑荣才.四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨段高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].沉积学报,1998,16( 2):42～49
[5] 杜春艳,郑荣才.陕北长 6油层组短期基准面旋回与储层非均质性的关系[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(1):17～22
[6] 郑荣才,吴朝容.西部凹陷深层沙河街组生储盖组合的层序分析[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):348～356
[7] 吴朝容,郑荣才.辽河油田西部洼陷沙河街组高分辨率层序地层学特征[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):375～381
[8] 柳梅青,陈亦军,郑荣才.川西新场气田蓬莱镇组陆相地层高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].沉积学报,2000,18(1):50～56
[9] 尹太举.高分辩率层序地层学及其在濮城油田开发中的应用[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国地质大学(北京),2002.8～20
[10] 王居峰,蔡希源,邓宏文.东营凹陷中央洼陷带沙三段高分辨率层序地层与岩性圈闭特征[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版)2004,28(4):7～11
[11] 杏树岗-太平屯地区扶杨油层层序地层研究[J].新疆石油地址,2004,25(6):607～609
[12] 邓宏文,王洪亮,阎伟鹏,Timothy A. Cross. 河流相层序地层构成模式探讨[J].沉积学报,2004,22(3):373～379
[13] 邓宏文,王洪亮,祝永军,Timothy A. Cross.高分辨率层序地层学—原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.4～24
[14] 冯志琨,张兴金,马世忠,杨清彦,刘新建,范旭.低渗透砂岩油田开发地质分析[M].黑龙江科学技术出版社,1994,12～14
[15] 柳成志,辛仁臣,王 刚.松辽盆地北部头台地区扶余油层浅水湖泊三角洲沉积特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,1998,22(1):68～70
[16] 王嗣敏,刘招君,董清水,朱建伟,郭 巍.陆相盆地层序地层形成机制分析—以松辽盆地为例[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(2):139～144
[17] 邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙吉.层序地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177～184
[18] 魏立民,柳梅青.川西新场气田蓬莱镇组陆相地层高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(3):220～225
[19] 邓 宏 文 , 王 洪 亮 , 阎 伟 朋 等 . 河 流 相 层 序 地 层 构 成 探 讨 [J]. 沉 积 学报,2004,22(3):373～379
[20] 郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报,2000,18(3):369～375
[21] 于兴河.碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学[M]北京:石油工业出版社,2002.72～77,108～124
[22] 渠永宏.高分辨率层序地层学在大庆油田开发储层非均质表征中的应用[D].博士后学位论文.北京:中国石油勘探开发研究院(北京),2003.15～16
[23] 穆龙新、贾爱林等.河流-三角洲储层露头和现代河流沉积综合研究[M].北京:大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院、石油勘探开发科学研究院,1998.90～102
[24] 高瑞祺、蔡希源等.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.40～50
[25] 陈发景、王新文、张光亚.中国中、新生代含油气盆地构造和动力学背景[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992.24～30
[26] 吕延防、付广等.油气藏封盖研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1987.40～56
[27] 陆克政、戴俊生等.扭动盆地和扭动构造[C].北京:“八五”地质科技重要成果学术交流会议论文选集,1994.30～47
[28] 陈发景、赵海玲、陈邵年等.中国中、新生代前陆盆地的构造特征和地球动力学[M].北京:地球科学,1996.14～20
[29] 马杏垣.论伸展构造[M].北京:地球科学,1981.30～44
[30] 吕延防、付广、高大岭.油气藏封盖研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.12～40
[31] 吴奇之.地震资料解释工作的现状与展望[M].北京:石油与天然气地质,1981. 5～9
[32] 吴元燕、徐龙、张昌民等.油气储层地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.40～60
[33] 冯增昭、王英华、刘焕杰等.中国沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.24～42
[34] 华东石油学院岩矿教研室编.沉积岩石学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1981. 14～32
[35] 杨万里.松辽陆相盆地石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1985.24～32
[36] {美}A.I.莱复生.石油地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1975.14～32
[37] 刘招君、董清水、王嗣敏等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.12～40
[38] 欧阳健、王贵文等.测井地质分析与油气层定量评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.30～44
[39] 李思田.含能源盆地沉积体系[M].北京:中国地质大学出版社,1996.30～47
[40] 徐 强 等 . 中 国 沉 积 学 研 究 的 现 状 和 发 展 方 向 [J]. 西 南 石 油 学 院 学报,200012(4):15～19
[41] 张昌民.储层研究中的层次分析法[J].石油与天然气地质,1992,13(3):344-350
[42] 刘吉余.流动单元研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(3):303-306
[43] 裘亦楠.碎屑岩储层沉积基础[M].第一版.北京:石油工业出版社,1987.3-7
[44] 马世忠,付春权等.单砂体三维地质的优势渗透率分析方法[J].大庆石油学院学报,2000,24(3):1-5
[45] T. A. Cross, M. R. Baker et. al Application of High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy to Reservoir Analysis, Proceeding of the 7`" Exploration and Production Research Conference:Paris, Technic, 1993.11～33
[46] T. A. Cross, M. R. Maker, et. al, Applications of High-resolution Sequence Stratigraphy to Reservoir Analysis, Proceedings of the 7`"Exploration and Production Research Conference Paris.Technip. 1993.11～33
[47] Shanley, K. W. and McCabe, P. J. Perspectives on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78(4):544～568
[48] Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, Campion K M, et a1.Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy in Well,Cores and Outcrops: Concept for High-Resolution Correlation of Time and Facies. AAPG Methods in Exploration series,1990(7):1～55
[49] Keith W. Shanley,Peter J. Macabe. Perspective on the sequence Stratigraphy of Continental Strata, AAPG Bulletin,1994,78(4):544～568
[50] Allen P A, Allen J R. Basin analysis: principles and application[M].Oxford:Black-Well Scientific Publication, 1990,141～188
[51] Brett C E , Goodman W M, Loduca S T . Sequence, Cycles, and basin dynamics in the silurian of the appalachian foreland basin.[J] Geology Sedimentary, 1990 69(3-4):191～244
[52] Cooper M R. Tectonic cycles in southern Africa [J].Earth Science Review, 1990, 28(4):321-364
[53] Fischer A G, Bottjer D J.Orbital forcing and sedimentary sequence [J].Jour Sediment Petrol, 1991 61(7):1063～1060
[54] Miall A D. Sequence stratigraphy and their chronostratigraphical correlation[J].Jour Sediment Petrol, 1991 61(4):497～505
[55] Bice D. Synthetic stratigraphy of carbonate platform and basin systems.[M]Geology,1988,6: 703～706
[56] Carlos H.L. High-Resolution Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Evolution of Coarse-Grained Canyon-Filling Turbidites from the Campos Basin,Offshore Brazil [J].Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1995,65 (4):426～42.
[57] Clark J. D&Pickering K. T. Architectural Elements and Growth Patterns of Submarine Channels: Application to Hydrocarbon Exploration[J]. AAPG. Bulletin. 1996, 80(2): 194～211
[58] Burton R,Kendall C G St C,L erche 1. Out of our depth on the impossibility of fathoming eustacy from the stratigraphic record[J]. Earth Science Reviews,1987(24):237～277
[59] Mail A D.Stratigraphic sequences and their chronostratigraphic correlation.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology. 1991, 61:497～505
[60] Mail A D. The architecture of fluvial-deltaic sequences in the Upper Mesaverde Group,Book Cliffs, Utah.In:Best J L,Bristow C eds. Brainded Rivers. Geological Society of London Special Publication,1993,75:305-331