小班化教育的历史考察与问题研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文考察了小班化教育的历史发展轨迹,研究了小班化教育所涉及到的一些基本的理论问题,探讨了小班化教育的可行性及其对传统教育的冲击,最后,根据国外小班化教育的研究成果,以及我国小班化教育的实施现状,提出了一些推行小班化教育的政策性意见与建议。全文共分为五个部分:
     第一部分:小班化教育的澄清与定位。对小班化教育所涉及到的三个基本概念:“小班”、“小班教育”、“小班化教育”,进行了区分与澄清,阐析了三个基本概念的属性及其相互之间的联系,进而,对小班化教育与传统的班级授课制之间的传承关系进行了探讨。
     第二部分:小班化教育的历史考察。从纵向对小班化教育的历史发展脉络进行剖析,分析了在各时期推动小班化教育发展的社会政治、经济以及文化的原因,阐述了各时期小班化教育的发展状况,及其历史的客观必然性。
     第三部分:小班化教育的问题研究。从横向对小班化教育所涉及到的三个基本问题进行探讨,回答了小班是否(WHETHER)、为什么(WHY)以及怎样(HOW)提高教育成效,以期为我国小班化教育的实施与推行提供理论上的依据与支持。
     第四部分:小班化教育的理论思考。从经济学的角度(经费运用的分析)来思考小班化教育的推行可行性,寻求一条符合时代精神,并在政策上可行的小班化教育改革之路;从教育学角度来分析小班化教育的开展,对传统教育(包括教育观念、学校组织及教师)所带来的一些冲击。
     第五部分:小班化教育的政策建议。根据国外小班化教育的研究进展,以及我国小班化教育的实施现状,对我国小班化教育的推行提出几点政策性的建议,以为我国小班化教育的开展提供借鉴。
The thesis investigates the historical track of small-class oriented education, and
    several basic theoretic issues involved in, then explores the feasibility of implementing
    small-class oriented education and its impact to tradition education. In the end, on reviewing the research conclusions abroad and the present domestic situation on small-class oriented education, the article puts forward a number of strategic suggestions on small-class oriented education. The whole thesis divides into five parts:
    Part I: A clarification and definition of small-class oriented education.
    This part makes a clarification and specification on three basic conceptions involved in small-class oriented education, 'small class', 'small-class education', 'small-class oriented education', after analyzing the attributes of the three concepts and the relations among them, the thesis further explores on the successive relationship between small-class oriented education and traditional class teaching.
    Part II: A review on the history of small-class oriented education.
    This part tries to draw a skeleton of the history of small-class oriented education on the time axes, while analyzing the social, political, economic and cultural reasons to push the development of small-class oriented education, the article specifying the status quo of small-class oriented education of each phase, discussed the objective inevitability of history wheel.
    Part III: A study on the key issues of small-class oriented education.
    This part tries to touch three basic issues around small-class oriented education and answer Whether, Why, and How small-class can improve education effects, so as to provide some theoretic foundations for putting small-class oriented education into practices and promoting its popularity.
    Part IV: A theoretic reflection on small-class education.
    This part exams the feasibility of extending small-class education from the
    economics view, and tries to seek an innovative way leading to small-class oriented
    education, which will match the spirit of the new era and be feasible on the policy level
    as well; then the article analyzes the impacts to tradition education caused by
    implementing small-class oriented education from the pedagogy view.
    Part V: Policy suggestions of small-class oriented education.
    Based on the research progress of small-class oriented education in foreign countries and the present situation of China in extending small-class oriented education, this part proposes a number of policy suggestions, to serve as reference for putting
    
    
    small-class education into practice in China.
引文
1. Bain, H.Achilies, C.M (1986) , Interesting Developments on Class Size, Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 9, PP.662-5.
    2. Center for Education Research, Analysis, and Innovation, "1999-2000 Results of The Students Achievement Guarantee In Education (SAGE) Program Evaluation Executive Summary" , from http: //www.weac.org/sage.
    3. Cooper, H.M. (1989) , Does Reducing Student-to instructor Ratios Affect Achievement? Educational Psychologist, 24, 1, PP.79-98.
    4. CSR Research Consortium (1999) , Class Size Reduction in California: The 1998-99 Evaluation Findings, from http: //www.classize.org.
    5. Daniel Gursky (1998) , Class Size Does Matter, The Education Digest, 64, 2, PP.15-18.
    6. David L. Watson & Joyce Frank (1984) , Social Psychology: Scince And Application, Scott, Foresman andCompany.
    7. Diane A.Harrison & Hugh Busher (1995) , Small Scholls, Big Ideas:Primary Education In Rural Areas, British Journal of Educational Studies, .23, 4, PP.384-397.
    8. Eric A. Hanushek (1996) , "The Evidence on Class Size" , from http: //www.wested.org/policy.
    9. Evertson (1989) , Teaching Practices and Class Size: A New Look at an Old Issue, Peabody Journal of Education, 67, 1, PP.85-105.
    10. Finn, Jeremy (1998) , Class Size and Students at Risk: What Is Know? What Is Next? , from http: //www.ed.gov/pubs.
    11. Frederick Mosteller, Richard J.light &Jason A.Sachs (1996) , Sustained Inquiry in Education: Lessons from Skill Grouping and Class Size, Harvard Educational Review, 66, 4, PP.797-842.
    12. Gene V Glass, Leonard S .Cahen, Mary Lee Smith & Nikola N .Filby (1982) , School Class Size, Sage Publication. Inc.
    13. Graham Gibbs, Lisa Lucas & Vanessa Simonite (1996) , Class Size and Student Performance: 1984-94, Studies in Higher Education, 21, 3, PP.261-273.
    14. Harder, H. (1990) , A Critical Look At Reduced Class Size, Contemporary Education, 62, 1, PP.28-30.
    
    
    15. Harold E. Mitzel (1982) , Encyclopedia of Educational Reseach , The Free Press, A Division of Machilla Publishing Inc. New York.
    16. Henry Clay Lindgren (1980) , Educational Psychology in the Classroom, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press.Inc.
    17. James W.Vander landen, Ann J.Pace (1983) , Educational Psychologr: in Theory and Practice, Random House, New York.
    18. Joan MC Robbie, Jeremy D. Finn & Patrick Harman (1998) , Class Size Reduction: Lessons Learned from Experience, Policy Brief, 23.
    19. Joseph Jay Tobin, David Y. H. Wu & Dana H. Davidson (1987) , Class Size and Student/Teacher Ratios in the Japanese Preschool, Comparative Education Review, 31, 4, PP.533-49.
    20. Joel Schwartz (1997) , Class Size Reduction, from http: //www.Iao.ca.gov.
    21. Judy Goldfinch (1996) , The Effectiveness of School-type Classes Compared to the Traditional Lecture/Tutirial Method for Taeching Quantitative Methods to Business Students, Studies in Higher Education, 21, 22, PP.207-20.
    22. Kathleen Cushman ( 2000 ) , Shrink Big Schools for Better Learning, The Education Digest, 65, 6, PP.36-39.
    23. Lee C.Deighton (1971) , The Encycocy of Education, The Macmllan Company & The Free Press, Volume 2.
    24. Martha L. Thurlow, James E. Ysseldyke, Joseph W. Wotruba&Bob Algozzine ( 1993 ) , Instruction in Special Education Classrooms under Varying Student-Teacher Ratios, The Elementary School Journal, 93, 3, PP.305-19.
    25. M.C.Giverin (1990) , A meta-analysis of the Relation Between Class Size and Achievement, The Elementary School Journal, 90, 1, PP.47-56.
    26. Pate-Bain, H. (1992) , Class Size Make A differece, Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 6, PP.253-6.
    27. Peter Blatchford &Peter Mortimore (1994) , The Issue of Class Size for Young Children in Schools: what can we learn from research ? , Oxford Review of Education, 20, 4, PP.411-28.
    28. Polansky&Johnson (1999) , Reducing Class Size, What Do We Know? , from http: //www.wested.org/policy.
    29. Richard Luckert (1999) , Student Rights Should Dictate Class Size, English Journal, 88, 5, PP. 18-20.
    
    
    30. S.J.Parais (1996) , Class-size and Learning: the Tennessee experiment-what follows? , Oxford Review of Education, Vol.22, No.4.
    31. Torstem Husen& T. Neviue (1985), The International Encycocy of Education, Pergamon Press, Volume 2.
    32. Tomlinson, T. (1990), Class Size and Public Policy: the plot thickens,Contemporary Education, 62, 1, PP.17-23.
    33. Thomas Toch &Betsy Streisand (1997) , Does Class Size Matter? , U.S. News & World Report, October 13, PP.22-29.
    33. Thomask Crowl, Sally Kaminsky& David M. Podell (1997) , Educational Psychology: Window on Teaching, Brown& Benchmark.
    34. U.S.Department of Education (2000) , The Class-Size Reduction Program: A First-Year Report, from http: //www.ed.gov.
    35. U.S.Department of Education (1999) , Local Success Stories : Reducing Class Size, from http: //www.ed.gov.
    36. William A. Firestone (1980) , Great Expections For Small Schools: The Limitations of Federal Projects, A Division of CBS, Inc. New York.
    中文部分:
    1.[英]博伊德、金合著,任宝祥、吴元训主译:《西方教育史》,人民教育出版社,1986年版。
    2.[澳大利亚]W.F.康纳尔著,孟湘砥、胡若愚主译:《二十世纪世界教育史》,湖南教育出版社,1991年版。
    3.[英]伊丽莎白·劳伦斯著,纪晓林译:《现代教育的起源和发展》,北京语言学院出版社,1992年版。
    4.[美]S·F·佛罗斯特著,吴元训等译:《西方教育的历史和哲学基础》,华夏出版社,1987年版。
    5.王天一、方晓东编著:《西方教育思想史》,湖南教育出版社,1996年版。
    6.张斌贤、褚洪启等著:《西方教育思想史》,四川教育出版社,1994年版。
    7.徐南号著:《当代教育思潮》,国立教育资料馆从书,三民书局印行,1984年版。
    8.徐宗林著:《西洋教育思想史》,文景出版社印行,1986年版。
    9.王义高主编:《当代世界教育思潮与各国教改趋势》,北京师范大学出版社,2000年版。
    
    
    10.李定仁、徐勋、裴文敏主编:《教学思想发展史略》,青海人民出版社1993年版。
    11.吴忠魁、张俊洪著:《教育变革的理论模式》,四川教育出版社,1988年版。
    12.黄济、王策三主编:《现代教育论》,人民教育出版社,1996年版。
    13.涂艳国著:《走向自由——教育与人的发展问题研究》,华中师范大学出版社,1999年版。
    14.龚浩然、黄秀兰著:《班集体建设与学生个性发展》,广东教育出版社,1999年版。
    15.吴杰编著:《教学论——教学理论的历史发展》,吉林教育出版社,1987年版。
    16.林生傅著:《新教学理论与策略——自由开放社会中的个别化教学与后个别化教学》,五南图书出版公司印行,1989年版。
    17.[美]A·C·奥恩斯坦著,刘付忱等译:《美国教育学基础》,人民教育出版社,1984年版。
    18.[苏]斯卡特金主编,赵维贤、丁酉成等译:《中学教学论》,人民教育出版社,1985年版。
    19.上海市教育委员会基础教育办公室、上海市教育科学研究院普通教育研究所编著:《小学小班化教育教学指南》,上海科学技术文献出版社,1999年版。
    20.林生傅著,《新教学理论与策略——自由开放社会中的个别化教学与后个别化教学》,五南图书出版公司印行,1989年版。
    21.钟启泉、黄志成主编:《美国教学论流派》,陕西人民教育出版社,1996年版。
    22.夸美纽斯著,傅任敢译:《大教学论》,人民教育出版社,1985年版。
    23.王天一、夏之连、朱美玉编著:《外国教育史(上、下)》,北京师范大学出版社,1995年版。
    24.日本教育行政学会编,林松庆译:《各国中小学班级编制的比较研究》,《外国教育参考资料》,1980年第3期。
    25.冯建华:《小比大好,还是大比小好——班级规模与教学效果的实验研究》,《教育研究与实验》,1995年第4期。
    26.和学新:《班级规模与学校规模对学校教育成效的影响》,《教育发展研究》,2001年第1期。
    27.李丽桦:《美国大力推动小班化教育改革》,《外国中小学教育》,2000年第2期。
    28.《步出高峰后,优化教育资源从进行小班化教育的可行性研究》课题组:《抓住机遇,促进上海小学教育现代化》,《上海教育》,1998年第6期。
    
    
    29.《步出高峰后,优化教育资源及进行小班化教育的可行性研究》课题组:《上海市小学实施小班化教育的研究》,《上海教育科研》,1998年第6期。
    30.金辉:《上海市小学实施“小班教育”的对策研究》,《上海高教研究》,1998年第第3期。
    31.吴志宏:《小班教学之后怎么办?》, 上海教育科研》,1998年第11期。
    32.傅禄建:《实施小班化教育的理论思考》,《上海教育科研》,1998年第6期。
    33.黄志成:《美国的个别化教学》,《外国教育资料》,1992年第1期。
    34.唐科莉:《美国小班教学实验介绍》,《外国中小学教育》,2001年第1期。
    35.俞玲萍:《我国与国外中小学师生比和教师课时数的比较研究》,《上海教育科研》,1997年第4期。
    36.张杰夫:《班级授课制存在的问题及其改革刍议》,《教育科学研究》,1987年第3期。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700