区域创新网络结构与协同演化研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着知识全球化和网络经济的不断深入,区域经济发展方式已逐步从生产要素驱动模式向创新驱动模式转变,更加强调了知识、信息等创新要素在空间配置效率及创新的重要性。技术创新模式也已从传统的线性创新模式向网络式创新进行转变。在区域经济发展方式和技术创新模式的双重变化的背景下,区域创新网络便应运而生,并逐渐成为区域经济发展的重要驱动力。加强对区域创新网络的结构、效率、演化等方面问题的研究,有助于科学地把握区域创新网络中的关键问题,从而制定相关政策,提高区域创新能力,实现区域经济的跨越式发展。
     20世纪80年代,国内外学者从不同的角度对区域创新网络概念、特征、功能等方面的问题进行了研究,但对区域创新网络的内部结构及其对创新效率的影响、协同演化等方面的问题亟待深入,尤其是区域创新网络协同演化状态的实证研究匮乏。为此,本研究以中国30省级区域创新网络为研究对象,从静态和动态两个角度对区域创新网络的结构特征、效率及协同演化问题进行研究。具体而言,结合区域创新、技术创新等相关理论和研究成果,对区域创新网络的结构及特征进行分析,并探讨网络规模、网络开放性、网络结构洞和网络链接结构特征变量与创新效率之间的关系。随后借助复杂系统论的思想,对区域创新网络的系统结构进行解析,运用复合系统协同度模型对区域创新网络的协同演化状态进行测度,分析区域创新网络的薄弱环节,并建立评价标准对各区域创新网络的演化状态进行评价。在此基础上,对区域创新网络存在的问题进行分析,并结合协同学的思想,对区域创新网络的协同机制进行构建,并提出保障措施,以期为发挥创新网络在推动区域经济发展中的重要作用,提供理论和实践的参考。
     本研究的主要研究内容包括:
     第一,界定区域创新网络的概念。本研究主要通过对技术创新模式和区域发展方式的转变的分析,对区域创新网络的形成背景进行概述,并结合国内外对创新网络、区域创新网络等相关研究,对区域创新网络的概念进行界定,为本研究的后续研究奠定理论基础。
     第二,研究分析区域创新网络的结构及特征。本研究借助社会网络分析方法,从结构维度和关系维度对区域创新网络的结构特征进行分析,将区域创新网络结构特征分为网络规模、网络开放性、网络结构洞、网络链接等四个维度,并从理论上分析网络结构特征对创新的影响。
     第三,实证研究区域创新网络的结构特征对创新绩效的影响。结合网络规模、网络开放性、网络结构洞、网络链接等结构特征变量,选取相关指标,构建区域创新网络结构特征变量指标体系,运用随机前沿分析方法,探究了区域创新网络结构特征与创新绩效之间的关系,并对区域创新效率进行评价。
     第四,实证研究区域创新网络的协同演化状态。本研究结合自组织理论,对区域创新网络的自组织特征进行分析,后结合复杂系统论的思想,对区域创新网络的系统结构进行解析,将其划分为政策支持、技术研发、技术扩散等四个子系统,运用复合系统协同度模型对区域创新网络的协同演化状态进行测度,构建演化状态评价标准,对各区域创新网络的演化状态进行评价,分析区域创新网络协同演化中的薄弱环节。
     第五,促进区域创新网络协同演化的对策研究。本研究通过对区域创新网络的静态和动态分析,归纳区域创新网络协同演化存在的问题,并结合协同学的思想,对区域创新网络的协同机制进行构建,并从完善区域创新政策体系、搭建区域性协同创新网络平台等角度,提出若干保障措施,以不断促进区域创新网络的协同演化。
With globalization of knowledge and network economy, the development of regional economic development has gradually shift to innovation-driven mode from the production factors driving mode, which gives a greater emphasis on the importance of knowledge, information and other innovative resources. The innovation pattern has changed from the traditional linear innovation to network-based innovation. The regional innovation networks have come into being, and become an important driving force for regional economic development gradually. Therefore, we should pay more attention on regional innovation networks structure, function, co-evolution and other issues, which can contribute to scientifically formulate corresponding policies to enhance regional innovation capacity, and promote the rapid development of the economy.
     Since the1980's, scholars has been studying on the concepts, features, functions and other aspects of regional innovation networks from different perspectives, but the lacking in the relationship between structure of regional innovation networks and innovation efficiency, operating mechanism, especially empirical study of the evolution of the state of regional innovation networks. So this paper takes30provincial regional innovation networks in China to study these issues. Specifically, using regional innovation, technological innovation and other theories to analyze the structural characteristics of regional innovation networks, and employ Stochastic frontier production function to explore the impact of network size, network openness, network relational structure characteristic variables holes and network link on innovation efficiency. Then using complex system theory to study the system structure of the regional innovation networks, on this basis, we use complex systems coordination degree model to measure the co-evolutionary status of30provincial regional innovation networks, and analyze the weaknesses of regional innovation networks. We build the evaluation criteria for its evaluation. At last, we employ synergetic theory to construct collaborative operating mechanism of regional innovation networks, which can provide theoretical in promoting the practice of regional economic development.
     The main contents of this paper as follows:
     (1) Defining the concept and functions of regional innovation networks. In this paper, we analyze the changing of the patterns of technology innovation and regional economic development to explore the background of the formation of regional innovation networks. We combine with innovation networks, regional innovation networks and others literatures to define the concept and functions of regional innovation networks, which can provide methodological foundation for the study.
     (2) Analyzing structural features of regional innovation networks. We employ social network analysis method to analyze the structural characteristics of regional innovation networks, and divided it into network size, network openness, network structural holes and network links from the structural and relational dimensions. We also analyze the impact of network structure of regional innovation network theoretically.
     (3) Exploring the relationship between structural characteristics of regional innovation networks and its innovation performance. We employ social network analysis method to analyze the structural characteristics of regional innovation networks, and divide the structural characteristics into network size, network openness, network structural holes and network links. Then we use stochastic frontier analysis to study the relationship between the structural characteristics and its innovation efficiency, and evaluate the innovation efficiency of regional innovation networks.
     (4) Measuring the co-evolutionary status of regional innovation networks. We use self-organization theory to analyze the evolutionary stage and connotation. Then we divide the system structure of regional innovation networks into policy support, technology development, technology diffusion, and technology application four sub-systems. We use complex systems theory model to measure the evolutionary status of regional innovation networks, and construct evolutionary state evaluation criteria for the evolution of30regional innovation networks. At last, we explore the weaknesses of each regional innovation networks.
     (5) Enhancing the co-evolution of regional innovation networks. Through the static and dynamic analysis of regional innovation network, summarized the evolution of regional innovation network coordination problems. We use synergetic theory and other related theories to construct collaborative operation mechanism of regional innovation networks, and provide some policy recommendations to achieve coordinated development of regional innovation networks, such as improving regional innovation policy system, building research cooperation network, optimizing the structure of regional innovation network, building regional collaborative innovation network platform and so on.
引文
Acs Z J, Anselin L,Varga A.2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge[J]. Research Policy,31(7):1069-1085
    Aigner. D. J, Lovell, C. K, Schmidt, P.1977. Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic frontier production function models [J]. Journal of Econometrics, (6):21-37.
    Al-Laham A, Amburgey T, Baden-Fuller C.2010.Who is my partner and how do we dance? Technological collaboration and patenting speed in US biotechnology [J].British Journal of Management,21(3):789-807.
    Allen, MW.2001. A practical method for uncovering the direct and indirect relationships between human values and consumer purchases[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing,18 (2):102-120.
    Asheim. BT, Isaksen. A.2002, Regional Innovation Systems:The Integration of Local'Sticky' and Global'Ubiquitous'Knowledge[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer.27(1):77-86
    Autio E.1998. Evaluationof RTD in Regional systems of Innovation[J]. European Planning Studies,6(2):131-140.
    Auyang, SY.1998. Foundations of complex-system theories in economic, evolutionary bio logy and statistical physics. Cambridge university press, Cambridge.
    Battese, G. E. Coelli, T. J.1995. A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data [J]. Empirical Economics,20(2):325-332.
    Berninghaus S, Guth W, Kliemt H.2003. From teleology to evolution:bridging the gap between rationality and adaptation in social explanation[J]. J Evol Econ, (13):385-410.
    Boase J, Wellman B.2004. Suggested question on social networks and social capital[A]. Report to the Policy Research Initiative, Ottawa. Canada.
    Boschma. RA, Lambooy. GL.2002. Knowledge, Market Structure, and Economic Coordination: Dynamics of Industrial Districts [J]. Growth and Change,33(3):291-311.
    Bradach JL, Eccles RG.1989. Price, Authority, and Trust:From Ideal Types to Plural Forms [J]. Annual Review of Sociology, (15):97-118.
    Burt RS.1992. Structure Holes:the Social Structure of Competition [M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
    Cooke P, Keivn M.1999.The associational economy:Firms, regions and innovation [M].OxfordiOxford University Press
    Cooke P, et al.1998. Regional systems of innovation:An evolutionary perspective [J]. Environment and Planning,30:1563-1584.
    Cooke P, Schienstock G.2000. Structural Competitiveness and Learning Regions [J]. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies,1(3):265-280.
    Cooke P.2001. Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the know ledge economy[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,10(4);945-974.
    Cooke. P.1992. Evolution of regional innovation systems-emergence, theory, challenge fraction [A]. COOKE. ETAL. (Eds). Regional innovation systems, seconded. [C]. London: Routledge, (1):18-23.
    Doloreux. D.2002. What we should know about regional systems of innovation [J]. Technology in Society, (24):243-263
    Edquist. C, Hommen. L.1999. Systems of innovation:Theory and policy for the demand side [J]. Technology in Society,27(1)63-79.
    Ehrlich. P R, Raven. PH.1964. Butterflies and'Plants:A Study in Co-evolution [J]. Evolution, 18:586-608.
    Eisingerich AB, Bell SJ, Tracey E2010. How can clusters sustain performance? The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty [J]. Research Policy, 39(2):239-253.
    Feldman M P, Florida R.1994. The geographic sources of innovation:Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, (84):210-229.
    Freeman. C.1991. Networks of Innovators:A Synthesis of Research Issues[J]. Research Policy, (20):499-514.
    Fritsch M, Kauffeld-Monz M.2010. The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks [J]. Annals of Regional Science,44(1):21-38.
    Fritsch, M.2002. Measuring the quality of regional innovation systems:a know ledge production function approach[J]. InternationalRegional Science Review,25(1):86-101.
    Geels. F.2005. Co-evolution of technology and society:The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850-1930)—a case study in multi-level perspective [J]. Technology in Society.27:363-397
    Gilsing VA,Nooteboom B.2005.Density and strength of ties in innovation networks ananalysis of multimedia and biotechnology[J].European management review,2(3):179-197.
    Granovetter, M. S.1973. The strength of weak ties [J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6):1360-1380.
    Griliehes. Z.1980. R&D and the Productivity slowdown[J]. The American Economic Review, 70(2):343-348.
    Harland C.1995. Networks and globalization Review. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
    Harris Li Coles A. M, Diekson K.2000. Building innovation networks:Issues of Strategy and Expertise[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, (2):229-241.
    Isaksen A.2001. Building Regional Innovation Systems; a Possibility of Endogenous Industrial Development in the Global Economy [J]. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, (1): 101-120.
    Jochen M, Bemhard T.2008. Technological Innovation Systems and the Multi-level Perspective: Towards an Integrated Framework [J]. Research Policy, (37):596-615.
    Jones. O, Conway. S. Stewatd F.1999. Social interaction & organizational change:An Analytical review of Innovation Networks.
    Koschatzky K, Kulicke M, Zenker A.2001. Innovation Networks, Karlsruhe:Physical Ver Iag Heidelberg.
    Kraatz MS.1998. Learning by Association? Inter-organizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change[J]. Academy of Management Journal,41(6):621-643.
    Mekelvey B.1997.Quasi-natural organization science[J]. Organization Science.8(4)352-380.
    Lawendahl B R.0ivind Revang.2001. Knowledge and Value Creation in Professional Service Firms:A Framework for Analysis[J]. Human Relations. (54):911-931.
    LewinA.Y.Volberda H.W.1999.Prolegomena on co-evolution:a framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms [J].OrganizationScience,(5):12-25.
    Lundvall B A, Johnson B, Andersen, E S, et al.2002. National systems of production, innovation and competence building [J]. Research Policy,31(2):213-231
    Lundvall, B. A.1992. National Systems of Innovation toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers. London,1-19.
    Marsden PV.1990. Network Data and Measurement[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, (16): 435-463.
    Madhok A, Liu C.2006.A eoevolutionary theory of the multinational firm [J].Joumal of International Management,12(1):1-21.
    McKnight D. H, Larry L. C, Chervany, N L.1998. Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships[J]. TheAcademy of Management Review,23(3):473-490.
    Meeusen, W, van den Broeck, J.1977. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error[J]. International Economic Review.18 (2):435-44
    Murmann, J. P.2003. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage:The Co-evolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Murray. F.2002. Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks:exploring tissue engineering [J]. Research Policy.31:1389-1403
    Norgaard, R B.1985. Environmental economics:An evolutionary critique and a plea for pluralism [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,12:382-394.
    .Norgaard, RB.1985. Environmental economics:An evolutionary critique and a plea for pluralism [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,12:382-394.
    Obstfeld D.2005.Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation [J].Administrative science quarterly,50(1):100-130.
    Pelikan, P.2003. Bringing Institutions into Evolutionary Economics:Another View with Links to Changes in Physical and Social Technologies[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics.13: 237-258.
    PorterT.B.2006.Coevolution as a research framework for organizations and the natural environment[J].Organization&Environment.19(4):479-504.
    Richard R. Nelson.2003. on the uneven evolution of human knowhow[J]. Research Policy.32: 909-922.
    Rothwell et al.2000. Managing learning in informal innovation networks:overcoming the Daphne-dilemma[J]. R&D management.30(2):139-149.
    Sharpe S, Martinez-Fernandez C.2007.Measuring regional knowledge resources:what doknowledge occupations have to offer [J]. Innovation:Management, Policy & Practice, 9(3/4):262-275.
    Sternberg R.2000. Innovation Networks and Regional Development-Evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS):Theoretical Concepts, Methodological Approach, Empirical Basis and Introduction to the Theme Issue [J]. European Planning Studies, (8): 289-407.
    Storper M.1992. The limits to globalization:technology districts and international trade [J]. Economic geography. (6):121-135.
    Todtling F.2009. Intemational encyclopedia of human geography [M]. Oxford, Elsevier.
    Toivanen H, Ponomariov B.2011.African regional innovation systems:bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005-2009[J].Scientometrics? 88(2):471-493.
    Turkina E.2009.EU-Russia regional cooperation networks:assessment of EU influence in the Russian northwestern and southern regions[C].Paper presented at the EUSA Biannual Conference, Los Angeles.
    Valdis Krebs. June Holley.2002. Building Smart CommunitiesThrough Network Weaving[K], http:pwww.orgnet.eom.
    Van Aken J. E., Weggeman M. P.2000. Managing learning in informal innovation networks: Overcoming the Daphne-dilemma[J]. R&D Management,30(2):139-149.
    White D R, Smith J O, Moody J, Powell WW.2004. Networks fields and organizations: micro-dynamics, scale and cohesive embedding [J]. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, (10):95-117.
    于明洁,郭鹏,张果.2013.区域创新网络结构对区域创新效率的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,(8):56-63.
    于焱,李庆东.2009.产业创新系统中的协同演化理论研究[J].现代经济探讨,(12):35-39.
    王三义,刘新梅,万威武.2007.社会资本关系维度对知识转移的影响路径研究[J].科技进步与对策,24(9):84-87.
    王大洲.2001.企业创新网络的进化与治理,一个文献综述[J],科研管理,(9):48-55.
    王红领,李稻葵,冯俊新.2006.FDI与自主研发:基于行业数据的经验研究[J].经济研究,(2):44-56.
    王宏起,徐玉莲.2012.科技创新与科技金融协同度模型及其应用研究[J].中国软科学,(6):129-138.
    王国红,邢蕊,唐丽艳.2012.区域产业集成创新系统的协同演化研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,(2):74-81
    王国红,邢蕊,唐丽艳.2012.区域产业集成创新系统的协同演化研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(2):74-81
    王缉慈.2001.企业集群与区域发展[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
    王德禄,张丰超.2000.关于区域创新问题的若干思考[J].经济研究参考,(49):7-23.
    田钢.张永安.2008.集群创新网络演化的动力和合作机制研究[J].软科学,(8):91-97.
    白俊红,李婧.2011.政府R&D资助与企业技术创新——基于效率视角的实证分析[J].金融研究,(6):182-193.
    冯锋,汪良兵.2012.技术创新链视角下中国区域科技创新系统协调发展度研究[J].中国科技论坛.(3):36-42.
    任胜钢,胡春燕,王龙伟.2011.我国区域创新网络结构特征对区域创新能力影响的实证研究[J].系统工程,29(2):50-55.
    刘华,周莹.2012.我国技术转移政策体系及其协同运行机制研究[J].科研管理,(3):105-112
    刘志迎,谭敏.2012.纵向视角下中国技术转移系统演变的协同度研究[J].科学学研究,(4):534-542
    吕萍,柳卸林.2011.开放性对科学创新和技术创新的影响——以国家重点实验室为例[J].中国管理科学,19(6):185-192.
    孙鹏,罗新星.2012.区域现代物流服务业与制造业发展的协同度评价——基于湖南省数据的实证分析[J].系统工程,30(7):112-116.
    朱平芳,徐康宁.2006.高技术产业研发效率的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,(11):38-45.
    江小娟等著.全球化中的科技资重组与中国产业技术竞争力提升[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004.
    池仁勇.2005.区域中小企业创新网络形成、结构属性与功能提升:浙江省实证考察[J].管理世界,(10):102-112.
    汤铃,李建平,余乐安等.2010.基于距离协调度模型的系统协调发展定量评价方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,30(4):594-602.
    约瑟夫.熊比特.经济发展理论[M].何畏等译.北京:商务印书馆.1993
    邢建军,李洋.2010.区域创新网络要素间协同能力的测度[J].标准科学,(4):78-82.
    邬爱其.2006.企业创新网络构建与演进的影响因素实证分析[J].科学学研究,(1):141-149.
    吴延兵.2006.R&D存量、知识函数与生产效率[J].经济学(季刊),(4):1129-1156.
    吴贵生,李纪珍,孙议政.2000.技术创新网络和技术外包[J].科研管理,21(4):33-43.
    张岗.2005.企业组织网络化[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社.
    张首魁,党兴华,李莉.2006.松散耦合系统:技术创新网络组织结构研究[J].中国软科学,(9):10-16.
    李远.1999.创新环境及其政策的出发点——兼论增强区域的全球化竞争力[J].经济地理,19(3):7-11.
    李金华,孙东川,谢卓君.2005.创新网络的结构与行为研究框架[J].科技进步与对策,(8):8-11.
    李金华,孙东川.2006.创新网络的演化模型[J].科学学研究,(1):135-140.
    肖秀华.2004.科技进步与城区可持续发展关系研究[D].武汉;武汉理工大学硕士学位论文.
    陆小成,罗新星.2007.产业集群协同演化与策略选择[J].统计与决策,(22):45-48.
    陈丹宇.2007.基于效率的长三角区域创新网络形成机理[J].经济地理,(5):370-374.
    陈学光.2007.网络能力、创新网络及创新绩效关系研究——以浙江高新技术企业为例[D].浙江大学博士毕业学位论文.
    陈修德,梁彤缨.2010.中国高新技术产业研发效率及其影响因素——基于面板数据SFPF模型的实证研究[J].科学学研究,28(8):1198-1205.
    陈新跃,杨德礼,董一哲.2002.企业创新网络的联结机制研究[J].研究与发展管理,(6):26-30.
    汪良兵,洪进,赵定涛,徐中涛.2014.中国高技术产业创新系统协同度[J].系统工程.32(3):1-7.
    周玉萍,武杰,李润珍.2002.从协同学看中国近代社会系统的演化[J].系统辩证学学报,10(2):70-77.
    周立军.2009.区域创新网络的结构与创新能力研究——基于知识、学习和社会资本的视角[D].南开大学博士学位论文.
    孟庆松,韩文秀.2000.复合系统协调度模型[J].天津大学学报,(7):444-446.
    易将能,孟卫东,杨秀苔.区域创新网络演化的阶段性研究[J].科研管理,26(5):24-28.
    林毅夫,张鹏飞.2005.后发优势、技术引进和落后国家的经济增长[J].经济学(季刊),5(1):53-74.
    哈肯著,凌复华译.2005,协同学:大自然的构成的奥秘[M].上海市:上海人民出版社.
    洪进,汪良兵,赵定涛.2013.自组织视角下中国技术转移系统协同演化路径研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,34(10):77-84.
    赵抗南.2009.河南省区域创新系统协调发展研究[D].郑州:河南理工大学.
    陶长琪,陈文华,林龙辉.2007.我国产业组织演变协同度的实证分析——以企业融合背景下的我国IT产业为例[J].管理世界,(12):67-72.
    高勇,钱省三,李平,高峰.2006.区域创新网络形成的机理研究[J].科技管理研究,(5):166-168.
    盖文启.2002.创新网络:区域经济发展新思维.北京:北京大学出版社,74-77.
    盛亚,范栋梁.2009.结构洞分类理论及其在创新网络中的应用[J].科学学研究,27(9):1407-1411.
    盛垒.2010.跨国公司在华R&D投资的溢出效应研究——基于随机前沿分析方法SFA的检验[J].世界经济研究,(6):68-74.
    储德银,张同斌.2013.自主研发、技术引进与高新技术产业成长[J].科研管理,34(11):53-60,113.
    曾健,张一方.2000.社会协同学[M].北京市:科学出版社.
    蒋同明,刘世庆.2011.基于自组织理论的区域创新网络演化研究[J].科技管理研究,(7):23-26.
    谢永琴.2005.论我国高新技术产业园区的区域创新网络建设[J].科学管理研究,(4):9-12.
    韩晶.2010.中国高技术产业创新效率研究——基于SFA方法的实证分析[J].科学学研究,28(3):467-472.
    楼高翔.2009.供应链技术创新协同研宄[D].上海:上海交通大学.
    赫尔曼·哈肯.2001.协同学[M].上海:上海译文出版社出版.
    樊霞,朱桂龙.2008.区域创新网络与广东省产学研合作对策研究[J].科技管理研究,(12):188-189.
    薛太亮.2007.基于企业生命周期理论的创新网络演进分析[J].商场现代化,(9):17-18.
    霍云福,陈新跃,杨德礼,董一哲.2002.企业创新网络研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,(10):50-53.
    魏江.2003.小企业集群创新网络的知识溢出效应分析[J].科研管理,24(4):54-60.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700