不同菌根真菌对烤烟生长的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
AM菌根真菌对烤烟幼苗生长和营养吸收具有很好的促进作用,本文选取聚丛球囊霉(Glomuse aggregatum,BGC HUN02D)和摩西球囊霉(Glomuse mosseae, BGC HUN01A)作为供试菌种,以K326烤烟品种作为宿主,在育苗环节和大田栽培应用中予以验证,以期为AM菌根真菌在烤烟生产中应用提供理论依据。试验结果表明:
     1、培养基质和营养液对丛枝菌根(AM)真菌生长发育的影响
     沙土混合物(沙土体积比为3:1)基质对AM真菌生长发育尤其是孢子的生长最为有利,沸石基质对AM真菌生长发育尤其是菌丝的生长最为有利,沙土混合物基质处理菌根侵染率稍高,说明沙土混合物对G.mosseae菌剂的生长发育最为有利。
     营养液的成分、数量和浇施频度等对AM菌剂的生产都是重要的因素,在各种营养元素中,AM真菌对磷的浓度最敏感,磷也是菌根菌生长发育中最关键的营养元素,速效磷含量在10 mg/kg左右时、最有利于AM真菌的生长和产孢。
     2、AM真菌对烟苗大田生长及营养的影响
     接种摩西球囊霉处理的烤烟株高、叶片数均要高于非菌根菌处理,且摩西球囊霉处理的叶片数和单叶重也高于聚丛球囊霉处理;摩西球囊霉处理能提高烤烟氮素、钾素、总糖、还原糖和烟碱含量,并能很好协调氮/碱、糖/碱以及调整适度的蛋白质含量,进而能提高烟叶品质,尤其在上部叶,下部叶摩西球囊霉处理的糖/碱较合理。
     在上部叶接种菌根真菌的烤烟和非菌根菌烤烟的氮/碱均在0.8~0.9之间,属正常范围内;中部叶以及下部叶聚丛球囊霉处理和非菌根菌处理的氮/碱大于1,处于偏高的水平,而摩西球囊霉处理的氮/碱均在0.8~0.9之间,属正常范围内,可见,摩西球囊霉处理相对于非菌根菌处理,能在一定程度上协调烟叶总氮和烟碱之间的关系,且效果好于聚丛球囊霉处理。
     此外,摩西球囊霉处理在提高上、中、下部烟叶钾/氯的效果明显好于非菌根菌处理,且能有效降低烟叶的蛋白质含量,表现出较好的营养和品质效应。
     3、AM真菌对K326幼苗生长和营养的影响
     在低的营养条件下接种摩西球囊霉和聚丛球囊霉的侵染率均高于高营养处理的侵染率,说明烤烟幼苗在低营养条件下接种菌根真菌就能基本满足其生长所需。聚丛球囊霉处理侵染率略高,但摩西球囊霉处理对烤烟促根生长、幼苗生物量增加和氮磷钾营养元素的吸收的效果明显,特别是接种AM真菌后土壤磷酸酶活性明显高于不接种处理,可能由于AM真菌能利用自身浓密的根外菌丝到达烤烟根系难以到达的区域吸收更多的磷素营养。
The AM fungi can increase the growth and the nutrient uptake of flue-cured tobacco seedling, so we verified its effection on seedling culture and field production through choosing the Glomuse aggregatum fungi (BGC HUN02D) and Glomuse mosseae fungi(BGC HUN01 A) as the tested fungi, and selected K326 tobacco as host plant. Aim to establish the industrial AM fungi growth technology. The main results were summarized as follows.
     1 The effection to growth and nutrient uptake of AM fungi by different culture medium and nutrient solution
     The culture medium of mixture of sand and soil which the rate of sand to soil was 3:1 could promote spore growth of AM fungi, and the culture medium of zeolite could promote mycelium growth of AM fungi. The infect rate of mixture of sand and soil treat was higher than other culture medium treat.
     The bring up process of AM fungi could been influencd by component, contents and irrigate frequency of nutrient solution especially the phosphorus value of nutrient solution, so we must control the phosphorus value of nutrient solution be about 10 mg/kg to guarantee the high efficiency produce of AM fungi.
     2 The effection to growth and nutrient uptake of flue-cured tobacco seedling by AM fungi
     Under the low nutritional conditions, the infect rate of Glomuse mosseae treat and Glomuse aggregatum treat better than non-inoculated treat, and the infect rate of Glomuse aggregatum treat better than Glomuse mosseae treat.The Glomuse mosseae treat could promote flue-cured tobacco's rooting ability and seedling yield, and also could increase uptake ability of N、P and K value, especially could strengthened the activity of soil Phosphatase.
     3 The effection to growth and nutrient uptake of flue-cured tobacco by AM fungi
     The plant height and the number of blade inoculated by Glomuse mosseae fungi was better than non-inoculated treat, and the number of blade and the weight of leaf inoculated by Glomuse mosseae fungi was better than Glomuse aggregatum treat. The Glomuse mosseae treat could increase N, K, total sugar, reducing sugar and nicotinamide value, and could coordinate the rate of N to nicotinamide and the rate of sugar to nicotinamide, also the Glomuse mosseae treat could control suitable protein value, and then its could improve the quality of flue-cured tobacco.
     The rate of N to nicotinamide on all treat in top leaf was belong to normal range about 0.8-0.9. The rate of N to nicotinamide on Glomuse aggregatum treat and non-inoculated treat in middle and under-part leaf was belong to high range about beyond 1.0, but The rate of N to nicotinamide on Glomuse mosseae treat was belong to normal range.
     The rate of K to chlorine on Glomuse mosseae treat in all parts of leaf better than non-inoculated treat, meanwhile Glomuse mosseae treat could turn down the protein value.
引文
[1]刘国顺.烟草栽培学[M].北京中国农业出版社.2003.7.
    [2]林先贵,廖继佩,施亚琴.VA菌根真菌在退化红壤恢复重建中的应用[J].土壤与环境(台湾),2002,5(3):221-232.
    [3]罗焕亮,陈伟元,邵志芳.VA菌根对植物的增效作用研究[[J].华南农业学报.2003,23(1):49-50.
    [4]张福锁.土壤与植物营养研究新动态(第一卷)[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社.1992.
    [5]张福锁.植物营养生态生理学和遗传学[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1993.
    [6]Al Karaki G. N.2002. Field response of garlic inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to phosphorus fertilization [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition,25:747-756.
    [7]Smith S. E., F. A. Smith and I. Jakobson.2003. Myconhizal fungi can dominate phosphate supply to plants irrespective of growth responses [J]. Plant Physiology, 133:16-20.
    [8]Koide R. T. and B. Mosse.2004. A history of research on arbuscular mycorrhiza[J]. Mycorrhiza,14:145-163.
    [9]Wallander H.Nitrogen nutrition and mycorrhiza development (J).Dev Agri Manage.For Ecol,1991,24:340-343.
    [10]Azcon R., J. M. Ruiz-Lozano and R. Rodriguez.2001.Different contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to plant nitrate uptake (15N) under increasing N supply to the soil [J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,79:1175-1180.
    [11]刘江,黄学跃,李天飞.丛枝菌根菌根真菌在不同磷肥水平下对烟叶产质量的影响[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),1999,21(3):239-242.
    [12]贺学礼,李斌.AM真菌和施磷量对不同叶位烟叶生长和化学成分的交互效应[J].应用生态学报.2001,12(5):761-764.
    [13]张素非,龚光炎,刘秀珍,等.丛枝菌根菌根在旱地烟草育苗中应用效果初报[J].陕西农业科学,1996,3(23):46-50.
    [14]Tosi L,Giovannetti M,Zazzerini A,et al.Influence of myconhizal tobacco roots,incorporated into the soil,on the development of The avopss boawoh[J]. J.Phytopathol.,1988,122(2):186-189.
    [15]Sreeramulu K R,Onkaappa T,Swamy H N.BioeonU'ol of damping of and black shank disease in tobacco nursery[J].Tob.Res.,1998,24(1):1-4.
    [16]李海燕,刘润进,束怀瑞.丛枝菌根真菌提高植物抗病性的作用机制[J].菌物系统,2001,20(3):435-439.
    [17]盛江梅,吴小芹.菌根真菌与植物根际微生物互作关系研究[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(5):104-108.
    [18]刘延荣,方宇澄.山东烟区土壤VA菌根真菌的分离鉴定[J].吉林农业大学学报,2001,23(1):40-45.
    [19]贺忠群,李焕秀,汤浩茹.不同AM真菌对番茄养分吸收及果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2010(9):8-10
    [20]张玲,冉成玺.繁殖AM真菌的土壤化学灭菌方法的研究[J].土壤肥料.1990,6:47-48.
    [21]鲍士旦主编.土壤农化分析(第三版).北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
    [22]萧浪涛,王三根.主编.植物生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
    [23]高俊风.植物生理学实验技术[M].西安:世界图书出版社,2000.
    [24]Liu R J,Luo X S.A new method to quantify the inoc。ulum potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi[J 3.New Phytol.,1994,128:89-92
    [25]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003
    [26]王允白,王宝华,郭承芳,等.影响烤烟品吸质量的主要化学成分研究[J].中国农业科学,1998,31(1):89-91.
    [27]王恩沛,崔明武编译.烟叶质量与标准.中国烟草学会与美国烟草协会.1987,76-78.
    [28]江苏农学院.植物生理学[M].北京:农业出版社,1998:115-142
    [29]中国农业科学院烟草研究所.中国烟草栽培学[M].上海:上海科技出版社,2005,2-22
    [30]曹志洪.优质烤烟生产的土壤与施肥[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1991,236-251
    [31]江龙,王茂胜,黄建国等.不同基质对接种丛枝茵根真菌烟苗生长和营养状况的影响[J].山地农业生物学报,2010,29(2):100-103
    [32]石伟琦.丛枝菌根真菌对内蒙古草原大针茅群落的影响[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(2):344-349
    [33]王明元,夏仁学,王鹏.丛枝菌根真菌对枳不同根围铁及球囊霉素螯合金属的影响[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2010,39(1):42-46
    [34]彭思利,邓胤,张宇亭.丛枝菌根真菌根外菌丝对紫色土中的氮素利用状况[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(6):269-274
    [35]肖艳平,邵玉芳,沈生元等.丛枝菌根真菌与蚯蚓对玉米修复砷污染农田土壤的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(3):235-240
    [36]刘进法,王鹏,罗园等.低磷胁迫下AM真菌对枳实生苗吸磷效应及根系分泌有机酸的影响[J].亚热带植物科学,2010,39(1):9-13
    [37]刘邦芳,赵淇,朱均等.灰棕紫泥土中具生态适应能力丛枝菌根真菌的筛选[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,28(4):577-579
    [38]郭兰萍,汪洪钢,黄璐琦等.泡囊丛枝菌根(AM)对苍术生长发育及挥发油成分的影响[J].中国中药杂志,2006,31(18):1491-1496
    [39]谢莉,韦业旺,蔡敏等.杀真菌剂对丛枝菌根烟苗生长及抗性的影响[J].广西农业科学,2010,41(4):319-322
    [40]张璐,张倩,叶宝兴.盐胁迫下丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)对紫花苜蓿生长的影响[J].山东农业科学,2010,3:32-37

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700