用户名: 密码: 验证码:
我国上市公司管理者过度自信与报酬契约设计研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
科斯(Coase)曾把20世纪初形成的主流经济学称为“黑板经济学”,由于假定委托人和代理人都是理性的经济人,没有充分考虑到现实中委托人和代理人的某些非理性行为和心理因素对模型的影响,因此很多“异常”的经济现象得不到合理的解释。行为契约理论的兴起为解决这一问题提供了借鉴思路。作者希望通过本文的研究,能够在理论上补充和夯实委托代理理论体系,并为行为契约理论的后续研究搭建一个理论平台。在实践上为降低上市公司管理者的行为风险、改善上市公司内部委托代理关系和制定有效的上市公司管理者报酬契约从而提高激励效率提供一些理论指导和有益思路。
     本文以企业委托代理理论、激励理论及行为经济理论为研究基础,以上市公司管理者为研究对象,并结合问卷调查、博弈论和计量经济分析等方法,将我国上市公司管理者普遍存在的“过度自信心理偏差”融入到激励契约理论中来,开发并检验了我国上市公司管理者过度自信度量问卷,探索了过度自信的上市公司管理者的行为风险,然后对过度自信的上市公司管理者的报酬业绩敏感度展开了相关研究,最后设计了相应的报酬契约机制以规避行为风险。
     本文主要的研究成果如下:
     (1)回顾了委托代理理论的发展历程,系统而全面地总结了过度自信的研究成果,指出行为契约理论是委托代理理论研究的前沿。
     (2)开发了我国上市公司管理者过度自信度量问卷,问卷包括能力过度自信分问卷和风险识控过度自信分问卷两个部分,对总问卷和分问卷均进行了信度和效度检验,检验结果表明:问卷信度较高,结构效度、内容效度、外部关联效度等良好。
     通过过度自信问卷调查对我国上市公司管理者过度自信进行了差异分析,统计结果表明:我国上市公司管理者过度自信在性别和企业性质上差异显著;在地域、年龄、教育背景、职称的差异不显著。
     (3)系统完整地对既往研究中过度自信的度量方法进行了归纳总结,指出传统方法的缺陷和不足,结合我国上市公司管理者过度自信的特点,提出我国上市公司管理者过度自信的度量方法。
     (4)首次运用数理推导证明:过度自信的上市公司管理者报酬业绩敏感度比理性的上市公司管理者报酬业绩敏感度高;过度自信的上市公司管理者报酬业绩敏感度与风险成反向关系。并利用了2002-2007年我国上市公司高管的相关数据进行了计量检验。在此基础上提出提高我国上市公司管理者报酬业绩敏感度的策略建议。
     (5)分析了过度自信的我国上市公司管理者行为风险行为,根据其主要的危害和重要程度提出了“聘用”与“决策”二维模型,并指出“聘用”维的行为风险是工作不尽职,“决策”维的行为风险主要是投资过度等行为。提出规避行为风险的报酬契约设计方法:规避“聘用”维行为风险的方法是考虑过度自信对报酬契约设计的影响,并探究了影响机制;规避“决策”维行为风险的方法是采用联合基数法,既能保证管理者付出最大努力工作,又能保证管理者作出合理的决策。
Coase once called the mainstream economics formed at the beginning of twentieth century as blackboard economics. As the principle and agent are all rational and they have commonness in both economic behaviors and psychological ideas, the mainstream economics didn't fully consider that the irrational behaviors done by the principal and agent and psychological factors can influence the model. As a result, much abnormal economic phenomena can not be explained reasonably.Theory of behavior contract springs up and offers ways to solve this problem. The author hopes that this paper can complement the theoretical series of principle and agent, and build a platform for the further study of behavior contract theory. Practically, this paper will supply some theoretical advices and beneficial ideas to lower the manager's behavioral risks of the public company, to improve their inner relationship between the principal and agent and design effective incentive mechanism in order to enhance the efficiency of motivation.
     With the principle and agent theory, incentive theory, behavioral economic theory for study foundation, with public company managers for research objects, using questionnaire, game and econometrics, this paper introduces the overconfidence psychological warp of public company managers into the incentive theory and design the overconfidence questionnaire of public company managers and analyze their behavioral risks. According to the results, this paper studies how to enhance the overconfident manager's reward-performance sensitivity and designs compensation contract mechanism to avoid behavioral risks finally.
     Main results of this paper are as follows:
     (1)This paper systemically and fully summarizes the development process of principle and agent theory and the research results about overconfidence, points out that the behavioral contract theory is the new direction of principle-agent theory.
     (2)This paper has designed questionnaire to measure the overconfidence of public company managers, which is made up of two parts including overconfidence about ability and overconfidence of risk control. Both total and sub questionnaire are carried on reliability and validity test. The results show that reliability is high and the structure validity, content validity and exterior connection validity are good.
     Based on these, this paper analyzes the overconfidence of public company managers in several aspects. It shows that overconfidence lever is remarkable different in sex and kind of enterprise, while not remarkable in area, age, education background and position title.
     (3) This paper systematically and completely sums up the measure method for overconfidence in the past and points out the bugs and shortage of traditional method. At the same time, considering the peculiarity of Chinese public company, this paper suggests the right way to test those managers' overconfidence.
     (4) The first used Mathematical Analysis shows that: the sensitivity of reward-performance of public company managers is higher that rational ones; the sensitivity of reward-performance of public company managers is opposite to risk. This paper uses relevant dates from 2002 to2007 to test these assumptions. At last the strategies of raising the lever of sensitivity of reward-performance are put forward.
     (5) This paper analyzes the behavioral risk of Chinese overconfident public company managers, and brings forward two-dimension model of "employment" and "decision-making" according to the main damage and importance. Model shows that the behavioral risk of "employment" dimension is not line of duty, while the behavioral risk of "decision-making" dimension is over-investment. This paper puts forward how to design reward contract so as to avoid behavioral risks: the effective way to avoid behavioral risk of "employment" dimension is to consider the overconfidence influence on reward contract. The influence mechanism of overconfidence to compensation designing are analyzed. The effective way to avoid behavioral risk of "decision-making" dimension is to use HU, it can either make the managers do their best or ensure the managers make rational decision.
引文
[1]吴强.经济学研究的假设与理论的发展-基于罗纳德·科斯《企业的性质》[J].统计与决策,2007,6:138-140。
    [2]Debondt W.and R.Thaler.Financial Decision-Making in market and firms:a behavioral perspective[A],in R.A.Jarrow,V.Maksimovic and W.T.Ziemba,eds,Finance-Handbooks in operations research and management science[C],Elsevier,NewYork,1995(9):385-410.
    [3]Simon Gervais&Ttay Goldstein.Overconfidence and Team Coordination[J].Working paper,2004-2.
    [4]Karl Ludwig Keiber.Magagerial Compensation Contracts and Overconfidence[R].WHU Otto Beisheim Graduate School of Management,2002.[5]黄健柏,杨涛,朱学红.基于过度自信的相关研究及应用综述。预测.2007(3):1-7.
    [6]薛求知等.行为经济学-理论与应用[M].上海:复旦大学出版社。2003。
    [7]Kalneman D.and A.Tversky.Prospect Theory:An Analysis of Decision under Risk[J].Econometrica,1979(47):263-291.
    [8]Weinstein N D.Unrealistic Optimism about Future Life Events[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1980(37):806-820
    [9]Kahneman D.and A.Tversky.Judgement under Uncertainty:Heuristic and Biases[J].Science,1974(185):1124-1131.
    [10]Lord C.,Ross L.and M.Lepper.Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization:the Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1979(37):2098-2109.
    [11]Thaler R.Mental Accounting Matters,in D.Kahneman and A.Tversky eds.,Choice,values and Frames[C].Cambridge:Russell Sage Foundation,1999.
    [12]Ellsberg D.Risk,Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1961(75):643-649.
    [13]Geol A.M.and A.V.Thakor.Rationality,overconfidence and leadership[R],University of Michigan,2000.
    [14]Hackbarth D.Managerial optimism,overconfidence and capital structure decision.Mimeo,UC berkeley,2003.
    [15]Gervais,Heaton,Odean.The positive role of overconfidence and optimism in investment policy[R].University of Pennsylvania,2002.
    [16]Bolton,Scheinkman,Xiong.Executive compensation and short-termist behavior in speculative markets[R].Princeton University,2002.
    [17]Gervais S.,Heaton J.B.and T.Odean.Overconfidence,investment policy and executive stock options.Working paper,university of Pennsylvania,2003
    [18]Suren Basov.Incentives for Boundedly Rational Agents[J].Topics in theoretical Economics,2003.Vol.3:1093- 1107.
    [19]严志辉,钟美瑞,黄健柏.基于过度自信的多任务委托-代理模型扩展研究。系统工程.2006,2:19-22
    [20]Holmstrom B,Milgrom P.Multitask principal-agent analyses:incentive contracts,asset ownership,and job design[J].Journal of Law,Economics and Organization,1991,(7):24-52.
    [21]Hanming Fang,Giuseppe Moscarini(2002).Overconfidence,Morale and Wage-Setting Policies[R].Yale University.
    [22]Leonidas Enrique de la Rosa(2005).Overconfidence and Moral Hazard[R]University of California at Berkeley.
    [23]黄永杰.基金经理人升迁与过度自信之理论与实证:[硕士学位论文]。台湾:国立云林科技大学,2004。
    [24]Wu,B.,and Knott,A.M.Entrepreneurial Risk and market entry[J].Working University of Pennsylvania,2005.
    [25]余明桂,夏新平,邹振松。管理者过度自信与企业激进负债行为。管理世界。2006(8):104-172.
    [26]Malmendier,Tate.CEO overconfidence and corporate investment[R].Stanford University,2002
    [27]郝颖,刘星,林朝南。我国上市公司高管人员过度自信与投资决策的实证研究[J].中国管理科学,2005(5):140-146
    [28]赵振宇,田立延.激励论-发掘人力资源的奧秘[M].北京:华夏出版社,1994.
    [29]杨涛,黄健柏。基于过度自信的股权激励模型的研究,系统工程[J].2007,10(10):27-31
    [30]周嘉南,黄登仕.过度自信对经理业绩分享系数与风险之间关系的影响。系统管理学报.2007(6):269-274.
    [31]张征争,黄登仕.CEO过度自信对薪酬合同影响理论综述.西南交通大学学报.2007(3):114-117.
    [32]丁元耀,贾让成.行为风险防范模型研究.数量经济技术经济研究[J].2001,12:67-70.
    [33]金雪军,杨晓兰.实验经济学[M]。北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2006,11。
    [34]Hackbarth D.Managerial optimism,overconfidence and capital structure decision.Mimeo,UC berkeley,2003.
    [35]周颖。西方非完全理性决策的研究和启示.当代财经[J].2004,1:116-120。
    [36]陈其安。基于过度自信的行为企业理论研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2004
    [37]赵振宇,田立延.激励论-发掘人力资源的奧秘[M]。北京:华夏出版社.1994。
    [38]徐滇庆。民营银行与道德风险[J]。企业文化,2003,12:38-39.
    [39]魏刚。高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效.经济研究,2000,(3):32-39
    [40]李增泉.激励机制与企业绩效-一项基于上市公司的实证研究.会计研究,2000,(1):24-30
    [41]张俊瑞,赵进文,张建。高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效相关性的实证分析.会计研究,2003,(9):29-34
    [42]肖继辉,彭文平.高管人员报酬与业绩的敏感性-来自中国上市公司的证据。经济管理,2002,(18):4-16
    [43]刘斌,刘星,李世新等.CEO薪酬与企业业绩互动的实证检验。会计研究,2003,(3):35-39
    [44]林浚清,黄祖辉,孙永祥.高管团队内薪酬差距、公司绩效和治理结构.经济研究,2003,(4):31-40
    [45]胡铭.上市公司高层经理与经营绩效实证分析.财贸经济,2003,(4):59-62
    [46]堪新民,刘善敏.上市公司经营者报酬结构性差异的实证研究.经济研究,2003,(8):55-63
    [47]周立,贺颖奇。我国上市公司高级经理人补偿决定因素的实证研究.当代经济科学,2003,(3):67-73
    [48]范秀成,比约克曼英格玛.外商投资企业人力资源管理与绩效关系研究[J].管理科学学报,2003,(2):54-67
    [49]Aronson,Elliot(1994).The Social Animal.7th Ed.,W.H.Freeman and Company,New York
    [50]Fischhoff B.,Slovic P.and Lichtenstein S.Knowing with Certainty:The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1977(3):552-564
    [51]Russo J E.and Schoemaker P J H.Managing Overconfidence[J].Sloan Management Review,1992,(33):7-17
    [52]Bemardo,Weheh.On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs[J].Journal of Economies and Management Strategy,2001,(10):301-330
    [53]Busenitz L W.and Barney J B.Difference between Entrepreneurs and Managers in Large Organizations:Biases and Heuristics in Strategic Decision-making[J].Journal of Business Venturing,1997,(12):9-30
    [54]Shefrin H.Behavioral Corporate Finance.Journal of Applied corporate Finance,2001,14(3):113-124
    [55]赵蒲、孙爱英.产业竞争、非理性行为、公司治理与最优资本结构-现代资本结构理论发展趋势及理论前沿综述[J].经济研究,2003(6):81-89
    [56]黄健柏。我国经理人市场激励契约设计与效率研究:[博士学位论文]。湖南:中南大学,2004
    [57]拉丰,马赫蒂摩著;陈志俊等译.激励理论(第一卷)委托一代理模型[M]。北京:中国人民出版社。2002
    [58]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M]。上海:上海三联出版社,2005
    [59]Alpert M.and H.Raiffa.A progress report on the training of probability assessors,in D.Kahneman,P.slovic and A.Tversky,eds.,Judgement under uncertainty:Heuristic and Biases[M],Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982.
    [60]Hastorf A.H.,Schneider D.J.And J.Polefka.Person Perception,Reading,Mass[M].Los Angeles,California,U.S.A:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,1970.
    [61]Cooper A.C.,Dunkelberg W.C.and C.Y.Woo.Entrepreneurs Perceived Chances for Success[J],Journal of Business Venturing,1988(3):97-108.
    [62]Oskamp S.Overconfidence in Case-Study Judgment[J].Journal of consulting psychology,1965(29):261-265.
    [63]Christensen-Szalanski J.and J.B.Bushyhead.Physicians' use ofprobabilistie information in a real clinical setting[J].Journal of experimental psychology:Human perception and performance,1981(7):928-935.
    [64]Baumann A.Q.,Deber R.B.and G.G.Thompson.Overconfidence Among Physicians and Nurse:The "Micro-certainty,Macro-uncertainty" phenomenon[J],Social Science and Medicine,1991(32):167-174.
    [65]Stael von Holstein C.A.S.Probabilistic Forecasting:An Experiment related to the stock market[J].Organizational behavior and Human performance,1972(8):139-158.
    [66]Kidd J.B.The utilization of subjective probabilities in production planning[J].Acta Psychologica,1970(34):338-347.
    [67]Wagenaar W.and G.B.Keren.Does the expert know? The reliability of predictions and confidence ratings of experts,eds.E.Hollnagel,G.Maneini,and D.Woods,Intelligent decision support in process environments[C],Berlin:Springer,1986:87-107.
    [68]Neale M.A.and M.H.Bazeman.Cognition and rationality in negotiation[M].New York:The free Press,1990.
    [69]Kahneman D.and D.Lovallo.Timid choice and bold forecasts:A cognitive perspective on risk taking[J].Management Science,1993(39):17-31.
    [70]赵振宇,田立延.激励论-发掘人力资源的奧秘[M].北京:华夏出版社。1994.
    [71]Heaton J.B.Managerial optimism and corporate finance[J].Financial Management.2002(31):33-45.
    [72]Harris,Milton,ArthorRaviv.Optimalincentivecontractswithimperfectinformati on[J].Journal of Economic Theory,1979,(20).
    [73]张春霖.存在道德风险的委托代理问题[J]。经济研究,1995,(8)。
    [74]Ross S.The economics theory of agency:the principal's problem[J].American Economic Review,1973(63):134-139.
    [75]Mirrlees,J.Notes on welfare economics,information and uncertainty [J].Essays on Economic Behavior under Uncertainty,North Holland,1974.
    [76]Mirrlees,J.The optimal structure of authority and incentives within an organization[J],Bell Journal of Economics,1976(7):105-131
    [77]Holmstrom,B.Moral Hazard and Observability[J].Bell Journal of Economics,1979(10):74-91.
    [78]Grossman S,O Hart.An analysis of the principal-agent problem[J].Econometrica,1983(51):7-45.
    [79]Jensen&Meckling.Theory of the firm:managerial behavior,agency costs and ownership structure[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1976(3):305-360
    [80]Robinson S L,Kraatz M S,Rousseau D M.Changing obligations and the psychological contract:A longitudinal study[J].Academy of Management Journal,1994,37:137-152
    [81]Tsui A S,Pearce J L,Porter L W,etal.Alternative approaches to the employee_organization relationship:Does investment in employees pay off?[J].Academy of Management Journal,1997,40:1089-1121
    [82]Millward L J,Hopkins L J.Psychological contracts,organizational and job commitment[J].Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1998,28(16):1530-1556
    [83]Rousseau D M,Tijioriwala.Perceived legitimacy&Unilateral Contract Change:It Takes a Good Reason to Change a Psychological Contract[C].San Diago:Symposium at the SlOP Meetings,1996.(in Chinese)
    [84]Lee C,Tinsley C H.Psychological Normative Contracts of WorkGroup Member in the U.S.and HongKong[R].Working Paper.1999
    [85]魏峰,李皺,张文贤.国内外心理契约研究的新进展[J].管理科学学报,2005,10:83-88
    [86]李原.员工心理契约的结构及相关因素研究[D]。北京:首都师范大学,2002,6.
    [87]陈加州,凌文辁,方俐洛.心理契约的内容、纬度和类型[J].心理学科学进展,2003,11:437-445.
    [88]牛建波.CEO报酬来自心理契约的解释[J]。当代财经,2004,9:60-64
    [89]颜美达,彭建林.全面契约管理-经济契约与心理契约有机结合[J].沿海企业与科技,2005。7:8-9.
    [90]Armin Falk,Ernst Fehr &Christian Zehnder.The Behavioral Economics of Minimum Wages[R].University of Bonn and University of Zurich,Working paper,2004-9.
    [91]A.Tversky and D.Kahneman.Advances in Riskless Choice:A Reference-Dependent Model[J].Quarterly journal of Economics,1992:1039 -1061.
    [92]Brenner.Can evolutionary algorithms describe learning processes[J].JEvol Econ,1998(8):271-283.
    [93]Camerer,C.Behavioral Game Theory:Experiments in Strategic Interaction[M].Roundtable Series in Behavioral Economics,Princeton University Press,Princeton,New Jersey,2003.
    [94]Christophe J.Godlewski.Bank Risk-Taking in a Prospect Theory Framework Empirical Investigation in the Emerging Markets' Case[R].Working paper,2004,6.
    [95]Ernst Fehr,Armin Falk.Psychological Foundations of Incentives[R].Center for Economic Studies & Institute for Economic Research CES Ifo,Working Paper No.714,2002-5.
    [96]Fehr,E.&Schmidt,K.Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity - Evidence and Economic Applicationsin Dewatripont[M].L.Hansen and St.Turnovsky(Eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics - 8th World Congress,Econometric Society Monographs,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,2002.
    [97]冯·诺伊曼、摩根斯顿(王文玉、王宇译).博弈论与经济行为(上下册)[M].上海:三联书店,2004。
    [98]Fischbacher,U.& Gachter S.Heterogeneous social preferences and the dynamics of free riding in public goods mimeo[M].University of Zurich.,2004.
    [99]Holmstrom,B.and P.Milgrom.The Firm as Incentive Systern[J].American Economic Review,2001:972-991.
    [100]Holmstrom B.Managerial incentive schemes:a dynamic perspecive[J].Essays in Economics and Management in Honour of Lars Wahlbeck,Helsinki,Finland,1982b.
    [101]Jensen M,K J Murphy.Performance pay and top-management incentives[J].Journal of Political Economy,1990,98(2):225-264.
    [102]詹姆斯·莫里斯.非对称信息下的激励理论[M].张小松译.北京:商务出版社,1999。
    [103]Lazear,E.P.&S.Rosen.Rank-order tournaments as optimal labor contracts [J].Journal of Political Economy,1981,89:841-864.
    [104]Livio stracca.The optimal allocation of risks under prospect theory [R].Working paper,2002-6.
    [105]吕鹏、陈小悦。多任务委托-代理理论的发展与应用[J]。经济学动态,2004(8):74-77.
    [106]Radner,R.Monitoring Cooperative agreement in a Repeated Principal Agent Relationship[J].Econometrica,1981(11 ):27-48.
    [107]Richard Fairchild.Behavioral finance in a principal-agent model of capital budgeting[R].Working paper,2004,8.
    [108]Robert M.Wiseman&Luis R.Gomez-Mejia.A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking[J].Academy of management review,1998.Vol.23.no.1:133-153.
    [109]Simon,H.Models of bounded rationality[M].Cambridge,MIT Press,vo1(2):408-423.
    [110]Susanne B"uchner,Luis Gonz'alez,Wemer Guth,M.Vittoria Levati.Incentive Contracts versus Trust in Three-Person Ultimatum Games- An Experimental Study[R].Working paper,2004.
    [111]Veerendra-Kumar Rai&Dong-Hwan Kin.Principal-agent problem:a cognitive map approach[J].Electronic commerce research and applications,2002(1):174-192.
    [112]杨小凯。不完全信息和有限理性的差别[J].开放时代,2002(3):76-81。
    [113]赵逸荻.高管报酬与公司业绩无关[N]。经济观察报,2004-8-16.
    [114]张志华.企业的契约性质、所有权理论及公司治理结构述评[J].财经科学,2006(7):180-188。
    [115]肖映胜。经济理性与非理性的关系研究[J].东疆学刊,2006(3):153-156.
    [116]汪温泉,古远平,余菲菲.非完全理性市场中企业投资行为的研究评述[J].广东金融学院学报,2006(4):142-145。
    [117]邹晓青.“理性”向“非理性”的飞跃-简论西方主流经济学方法论的演进[J]。贵州教育学院学报,2006(3):146-149.
    [118]张莉.纯粹的矛盾-卡夫卡的理性与非理性[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(2):124-131.
    [119]刘佳刚,刘乐山.非理性消费行为理论与实证分析[J]。消费经济,2006(1):140-143.
    [120]饶育蕾.上市公司大股东的非理性行为剖析[J].文史博览,2005(20):136-137.
    [121]严力群,佘运九。非理性市场融资与上市公司治理[J].工业技术经济,2005(6):146-149。
    [122]李黔川,任宏,王兵.投资决策的非理性分析[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版).2005(7):134-137.
    [123]何大安.金融市场化与个体非理性选择[J].经济学家,2005(3):119-125。
    [124]方青军。行为金融理论与非理性交易行为[J].经济师.2005(7):134-135.
    [125]方青军。有效市场理论与非理性交易[J]。经济师,2005(8):134.
    [126]何大安.理性选择向非理性选择转化的行为分析[J]。经济研究,2005(8):46-50.
    [127]孙兆斌,刘正新。论经济中的非理性博弈行为[J].山西财经大学学报,2005(4):140-144。
    [128]郑湘娟.理性和非理性矛盾透视中的“以人为本”[J].青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(4):118-121.
    [129]刘成刚,高桂平,庄军.对当前民营企业非理性投资的原因探析[J]。经济师,2005(9):134-135.
    [130]陈其安。基于过度自信和外部监督的团队合作均衡研究[J].管理科学学报,2005(6):140-148.
    [131]陈其安,杨秀苔。基于过度自信的合伙人合作均衡模型研究[J].管理评论,2005(10):117-124。
    [132]江晓东.投资者过度自信理论与实证研究综述[J]。外国经济与管理,2005(9):159-165.
    [133]杨瑞龙.不完全契约理论:一个综述[J].经济研究,2006(2)
    [134]吴汉洪.不完全契约成因研究综述[J].经济学动态,2005(11)
    [135]于全辉。基于有限理性假设的行为经济学分析[J].经济问题探索,2006(7).
    [136]邱沛光.“有限理性”内涵辨析[J].商业时代,2006(24)
    [137]李凯,史金艳,李亚宁.部分信息下基于过度自信的动态最优消费投资决策[J].东北大学学报.2006(9):1038-1041。
    [138]杨奇志.对投资者过度自信影响证券交易量的研究.证券市场.2005(7):108.
    [139]汪德华,周晓艳.管理者过度自信与企业投资扭曲。山西财经大学学报.2007(4):56-61.
    [140]姜伟,杨春鹏,李莉莉.过度自信、风险溢价与套利有限性。青岛大学学报.2007(6):71-75。
    [141]程兵,梁衡义.过度自信、过度悲观与均衡资产定价[J].管理评论.2004(11).
    [142]文凤华,黄德龙,兰秋军,杨晓光.过度自信、后悔厌恶对收益率分布影响的数值模拟研究[J]。系统工程理论与实践.2007(7):10-19。
    [143]李平,曾勇。过度自信对金融资产短期价格行为的影响分析[J]。系统工程理论与实践.2004(12):39-43.
    [144]郑直。过度自信交易成本和投资[J].金融经济.2006(3):92-94.
    [145]薛斐。过度自信理论及其对金融市场的影响[J]。当代经济管理.2005(6):29-34.
    [146]胡昌生,蔡芳芳。过度自信与市场泡沫[J]。数量经济技术经济研究.2003(3):35-39。
    [147]买忆媛,李云鹤。过度自信与公平对风险投资契约与绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报.2006(11).703-708。
    [148]刘菲菲,王栋.基于过度自信的行为金融模型[J].现代金融.20007(2):28-29.
    [149]庄新田,王健。基于过度自信的资本市场多期最优激励契约研究[J].控制与决策.2007(3):294-300。
    [150]谢海东.基于过度自信理论的公司购并行为分析[J]。现代财 经.2006(10):37-40.
    [151]李红刚,梁玉梅.投资者过度自信对企业信息披露的抑制效应[J].经济科学.2007(1)。
    [152]唐伟敏,张戡,唐湘晋。投资者过度自信时的交易量[J].武汉大学学报。2003(5):300-306。
    [153]杨春鹏,吴冲锋。行为金融:过度自信与混合期望收益模型[J]。当代经济科学。2004(1):25-29.
    [154]杨青.证券市场个人投资者过度自信实证研究[J]。西北大学学报。2007(3):64-69.
    [155]郭敏华,范秉航。台湾投资人性别与投资行为之研究[D]。台湾:世新大学,2004.
    [156]黄健柏,杨涛,伍如昕.非对称过度自信条件下委托代理模型研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,已录用;
    [157]张跃平 刘荆敏。委托-代理激励理论实证研究综述[J].经济学动态,2003(6):76-80.
    [158]胡祖光,伍争荣.应用型委托代理理论研究--管理中的基数确定问题[M]。杭州:浙江大学出版社,2000.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700