国际外包及其对产业竞争力的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
20世纪80年代以来,随着经济全球化的不断发展和产业国际分工的继续细化,越来越多的企业从参与国际化进程中获得利益,它们不断将内部开展的高成本、低成效的业务以契约的形式委托给国外的企业来完成,即通过国际外包的形式来降低成本、提高效率,国际外包也由此不断影响着一国的产业竞争力。本论文即是从发包国的角度,研究国际外包对中国工业行业产业竞争力的影响。
     本文以国际外包如何影响产业竞争力为研究中心,首先从理论上叙述了国际外包的定义、分类以及测度方法,并对产业竞争力的内涵进行介绍,在此基础上,分析国际外包影响产业竞争力的渠道和机制:通过专注生产优势产品使得比较优势效应得到发挥;进口高质量中间投入品利于技术溢出效应的发生;国际外包的规模经济效应利于降低产品成本;中间产品的进口多样化通过品种增加效应提高企业生产效率;国际外包通过转移更高技术含量的生产环节利于提高发展中国家在国际产业链上的地位。
     然后,在综合已有文献的基础上,运用三种常见的测算国际外包的方法对我国工业行业的物质外包率和服务外包率分别进行了测算,并比较分析了行业间的差异和原因。接着运用Shift-Share分解法对三种指标进行对比分析,指出三种方法优缺点。研究结果表明,不同测算方法得出的国际外包率存在较大差异,进口中间投入品占总进口比重指标能更好的描述我国国际外包率现状;我国工业行业国际外包率总体呈现上升趋势,行业的物质外包率要大于服务外包率,但是服务外包率的增速要远大于物质外包率增速。其中,物质外包率增长受结构性因素影响较大,服务外包率增长受结构性因素影响相对较小,且表现出强烈的行业差异性。
     第三,分析了我国工业行业1996-2008贸易竞争力的动态演化过程,结果表明,我国劳动密集型产业的贸易竞争力要大于资本密集型产业,资本技术密集型产业的贸易竞争力水平最低。从变化趋势来看,资本技术密集型产业的贸易竞争力提升速度较快,劳动密集型产业贸易竞争力没有呈现继续增长态势。在此基础上,实证分析了国际外包对贸易竞争力的影响。研究表明,物质外包和服务外包的增加对提升我国产业竞争力均具有明显的正向促进作用;而且服务外包对产业竞争力的促进作用要大于物质外包对产业竞争力的影响;工业行业特征会对国际外包的劳动生产率效应的大小产生影响,行业规模大、外资比例高的产业国际外包率对提升贸易竞争力的积极作用更大。
     第四,分析了我国1996-2008年35个工业行业的研发投入情况和创新产出情况。结果表明,我国工业行业的研发投入呈现逐年递增趋势,而且创新产出也有明显增加。其中,资本技术密集型行业的专利申请数增速要明显高于其他三个类型产业,资源密集型产业的专利申请数最低,而且增速较缓。其次,从单位专利投入来看,四种类型行业的单位专利产出成本都呈现逐年递减趋势,资源密集型行业的专利产出成本最高,资本技术密集型产业的单位专利产出成本最低。然后从实证角度分析了国际外包对提升我国产业创新能力的影响,结果表明,物质外包是可以明显提高我国工业行业的创新能力,服务外包的作用没有通过显著性检验。行业规模和研发经费投入会影响国际外包对产业创新能力的作用水平,行业规模越大、研发投入越高的行业,国际外包对提升产业创新能力的作用就越明显。
     最后,本文探讨了国际外包对生产率的影响。在运用Malmquist指数对中国工业行业全要素生产率及其分解指标进行测算的基础上,分析了不同性质外包对生产率的影响,并进一步考察了行业异质性对国际外包的生产率效应的影响。研究发现,在控制研发投入和外商直接投资的情况下物质外包和服务外包都对全要素生产率有明显的促进作用,而且服务外包对生产率的影响要远大于物质外包所产生的作用。行业特性会影响国际外包的生产率效应,相对于低研发投入和低外商投资比例的行业,高研发投入和高外商投资比例的行业发生国际外包对提高生产率的影响更大。
Since 1980s, with the development of economic globalization and the changes of production, more and more enterprises gain from the process. They reduce enterprise cost and raise efficiency by entrusting the high cost of internal and low effectiveness business to the foreign enterprises with contract, which is one form of international outsourcing, and international outsourcing is continuously affecting one country's industrial competitiveness. This dissertation focuses on the effect of outsourcing on the competitiveness of the industry in China from the perspective of eontracting states.
     This dissertation focuses effect of international outsourcing on the industrial competitiveness. Firstly, this dissertation describes the definition, classification and the methods of measure international outsourcing. Then it analyzes the channels and mechanism of how international outsourcing influences industrial competitiveness:take full advantage of comparative advantage effect by focusing production which has comparative advantage; the effect of technological overflow by importing high quality inputs; the scale economies effect to reduce the cost of product; importing of diverse intermediate products can enhance efficiency through the effect of increasing variety of inputs; the effect of improving the status of international industrial chains by technology overflow.
     Then, on the basis of comprehensive literatures, this dissertation uses three methods estimating material and services outsourcing ratio of China's 36 industrial sectors in 1997, 2002 and 2007, then investigates the quality of the three methods through the Shift-Share method. The results show that different methods will lead to a big difference. Three methods all show an upward trend of China's industrial sector outsourcing ratio during 1997-2007, and the growth rate of service outsourcing is higher than material outsourcing; structural changes have a greater impact on the material outsourcing ratio than the services outsourcing ratio.
     Thirdly, this dissertation analyzes the dynamic evolution process of the trade competitiveness of industries in China during 1996-2008.The conclusion shows that:trade competitiveness of labor-intensive industries are stronger than capital-intensive industries, and capital technology-intensive industries are the lowest. From the perspective of change trend, the trade competitiveness of capital technology-intensive industries increases fastest. Then the dissertation establishes the econometric model to test the effect of outsourcing on trade competitiveness. The results shows that:Material outsourcing and service outsourcing both have an obvious positive role in promoting the trade competitiveness of China, and the service outsourcing shows a bigger effect; Characteristics of industry will influence the effect of international outsourcing. Outsourcing will have greater effect on competiveness in the larger scale industry and higher proportion of foreign investment of an industry.
     Fourthly, the dissertation analyzes the R&D investment and innovation output of 35 industries in China during 1996-2008. The conclusion shows that both R&D investment and innovation output show an obvious increasing trend. The patent applications number of capital-technology intensive industry is much higher than the other three industries; the number of patent applications in resource-intensive industries has a slower growth. Then the dissertation empirically analyzes the effect of outsourcing on the innovation output. The conclusion shows that the material outsourcing has a significant positive effect on the innovation, but the effect of service outsourcing does not pass test.Industry scale and R&D expenditure will both affect the effect of international outsourcing on industry innovation ability, outsourcing will have a more obvious effect on larger scale industries and higher R&D investment industries.
     Finally, this dissertation discusses the influence of international outsourcing on productivity. Specifically, this dissertation measures total factor productivity and its decomposition indicators of industrial sectors in China through Malmquist index based on the method of DEA. Then the dissertation analyses the effects about material outsourcing and service outsourcing on the TFP and its decomposition indexes, as well as studying the influence of industry heterogeneity on the effect of outsourcing on the productivity. The results show that material outsourcing and service outsourcing both have positive effects on the productivity when controlling the variables of R&D investment and FDI, and the effect of service outsourcing on productivity is greater than that of material outsourcing. And also, industry characteristics will affect the effect of outsourcing on productivity. Relative to the low R&D investment and low proportion of foreign investment of an industry, outsourcing will have a greater effect on the productivity in high R&D input and high proportion of foreign investment industry.
引文
[1]Acemoglu, D., Zilibotti, F., Productivity Differences [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2001,116 (2):563-606.
    [2]Agell, J., Lommerud, K.E., Union Egalitarianism as Income Insurance [J]. Economica,1992,59:295-310.
    [3]Aigner,D.C.,Schmidt,L.P.. Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models [J], Journal of Economics,1977,6:21-37.
    [4]Amiti, M., & Wei, S. J. Fear of Service Outsourcing: Is It Justified?[Z] NBER Working Paper,2004,10808.
    [5]Amiti,M., & Wei,S. Service Off Shoring, Productivity, And Employment:Evidence from the United States[Z]. IMF Working Paper,2005, WP/05/238.
    [6]Arndt, S. W. Globalization in the Open Economy [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance,1997,8(1):71-79.
    [7]Arndt, S. W.. Super Specialization and the Gains from Trade [J]. Contemporary Economic Policy,1998,16:480-485.
    [8]Bardhan, A. D., & Kroll, C. A. The New Wave of Outsourcing, Research Report, Fischer Center For Real Estate and Urban Economics. Berkeley:University Of California,2003.
    [9]Bassanini, A., Duval, R., Employment Patterns in OECD Countries:Reassessing the Role of Policies and Institutions [Z]. OECD Economics Department Working Paper,2006 No.486.
    [10]Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U.S. Manufacturing:Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufacturing [Z]. NBER Working Paper 4255.1993.
    [11]Braun, S., Scheffel, J., Does International Outsourcing Depress Union Wages? [Z] SFB 649 Discussion Paper,2007-033.
    [12]Calabrese, G., Erbetta,F.. Outsourcing and Firm Performance:Evidence from Italian Automotive Suppliers [J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management,2005,5(4):461-479.
    [13]Campa, J., & Goldberg, L. S. The Evolving External Orientation of Manufacturing Industries:Evidence from Four Countries [Z].1997, NBER Working Paper 5919.
    [14]Caves,D.W.,Christensen,L.R., Diewert, W.E. The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input and Output, and Productivity [J]. Econometrica,1982,50:1393-1414.
    [15]Chen, H., Kondratowicz, M., & Yi, K. M. Vertical Specialization and Three Facts about U.S. International Trade [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance,2005,16:33-59.
    [16]Criscuolo,C., Leaver,M.. Offshore Outsourcing and Productivity [Z].2005
    [17]Deardorff, A. V. Fragmentation in Simple Trade Models [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance,2001,12:121-137.
    [18]Diehl, M.,1999. The Impact of International Outsourcing on the Skill Structure of Employment:Empirical Evidence from German Manufacturing Industries [Z]. Kiel Working Paper 1999, No.946.
    [19]Dreher, A., Gaston, N.,2008. Has Globalization Increased Inequality? [J] Review of International Economics,2008,16:516-536.
    [20]Egger, H. Outsourcing in a Global World [Z]. University of Zurich, Dissertation.2003.
    [21]Egger, H., & Egger, P. How International Outsourcing Drives up Eastern European Wages [J]. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,2002,138:83-96.
    [22]Egger, H., & Egger, P. Labor Market Effects of Outsourcing under Industrial Interdependence [J]. International Review of Economics and Finance,2005, 14:349-363.
    [23]Egger, H., & Egger, P. On Market Concentration and International Outsourcing [J]. Applied Economics Quarterly,2003,49:49-64.
    [24]Egger, H., & Falkinger, J. The Distributional Effects of International Outsourcing [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance,2003,14:189-206.
    [25]Egger, H., & Kreickemeier, U. International Fragmentation:Boon or Bane for Domestic Employment? [J] European Economic Review,2008,52:116-132.
    [26]Egger, H., Egger, P. Outsourcing and Skill-Specific Employment in a Small Economy:Austria after the Fall of the Iron Curtain [J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 2003,55:625-643.
    [27]Ethier, W. Globalization:Trade, Technology, and Wages [J]. International Review of Economics and Finance,2005,14:237-258.
    [28]European Economic Advisory Group, Outsourcing in Cesifo (Ed.) [J], Report on the European Economy,2005:39-50.
    [29]Fagerberg, Jan. International Competitiveness [J], Economic Journal,1998, 6:355-374.
    [30]Falk,M., Wolfmayr,Y.. Services and Materials Outsourcing to Low-Wage Countries and Employment:Empirical Evidence from EU Countries [J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2008,19:38-52.
    [31]Feenstra, R. C. Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1998,12(4),31-50.
    [32]Feenstra, R. C., & Hanson, G. H. Foreign Direct Investment and Relative Wages: Evidence from Mexico's Maquiladoras [J]. Journal of International Economics, 1997,42:371-393.
    [33]Feenstra, R. C., & Hanson, G. H. Globalization, Outsourcing, and Wage Inequality [J]. American Economic Review,1996,86:240-245.
    [34]Feenstra, R. C., & Hanson, G. H.. Foreign Investment, Outsourcing, and Relative Wages [J]. In R. C. Feenstra, G. M. Grossman, & D. A. Irwin (Eds.), The Political Economy of Trade Policy, Essays in Honor of Jagdisch Bhagwati,1996,89-127.
    [35]Feenstra, R.C., & Hanson, GH. The Impact of Outsourcing and High-Technology Capital on Wage Estimates for the United States,1979-1990 [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,114:907-940.
    [36]Geishecker, I., & Gorg, H. Do Unskilled Workers Always Lose from Fragmentation [J]? North American Journal of Economics and Finance,2005,16:81-92.
    [37]Geishecker, I., & Gorg, H. Winners and Losers:A Micro-Level Analysis of International Outsourcing and Wages [J]. Canadian Journal of Economics,2008, 41(1):243-270.
    [38]Glass, A.J., Saggi, K.,. Innovation and Wage Effects of International Outsourcing [J]. European Economic Review,2001,45:67-86.
    [39]Gorg, H., Hanley, A.,. Labor Demand Effects of International Outsourcing: Evidence from Plant-Level Data [J]. International Review of Economics and Finance,2005,14:365-376.
    [40]Grossman, G.M. & Helpman. Managerial Incentives and International Organization of Production [J]. Journal of International Economics,2004,63:237-262.
    [41]Grossman, G.M. & Helpman. Outsourcing in a Global Economy. Review of Economics Studies [J],2005,72(1):135-159.
    [42]Grossman, G.M. & Helpman, E. Integration versus Outsourcing in Industry Equilibrium [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2002,117(2):85-120.
    [43]Hijzen, A. International Outsourcing, Technological Change, and Wage Inequality [J]. Review of International Economics,2007,15(1):188-205.
    [44]Hijzen, A., Gorg, H., & Hine, R. C. International Outsourcing and the Skill Structure of Labor Demand in the United Kingdom [Z]. Iza Discussion Paper 1249, 2004.
    [45]Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K.-M. The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade [J]. Journal of International Economics,2001, 54:75-96.
    [46]Ishii,J., Yi,K.. The Growth of World Trade [Z].Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research Paper,1997,9718
    [47]Jondrow, J., Knox Lovell, C.A., Materov, I.S, et al..On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier production Function Model [J],Journal of Econometrics,1982,19:233-238
    [48]Jones, R., Kierzkowski, H., & Lurong, C. What Does Evidence Tell Us about Fragmentation and Outsourcing [J]? International Review of Economics and Finance,2005,14:305-316.
    [49]Jones, R.W., & Kierzkowski, H. The Role of Services in Production and International Trade:A Theoretical Framework. In R.W. Jones & A. O. Krueger (Eds.), The political Economy of International Trade[J], Essays In Honor Of Robert E.Baldwin,1990,31-48.
    [50]Kierzkowski, H. Outsourcing or Fragmentation:Blessing or Threat [J]. International Review of Economics and Finance,2005,14:233-235.
    [51]Kimura, F., & Ando, M. Two-Dimensional Fragmentation in East Asia:Conceptual Framework and Empirics [J]. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2005,14:317-348.
    [52]Kohler, W. A Specific-Factors View on Outsourcing [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance,2001,12:31-53.
    [53]Krugrnan, P.R..Does Third World Growth Hurt First World Prosperity? [J].Harvard Business Review.1996,72:113-121
    [54]Liu, Jane B., Tung, A.. Export Outsourcing and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Taiwanese Exporting Firms[C]. in:DEGIT Conference Papers, 2005, c010-047
    [55]Lommerud, K.E., Meland, F., Straume, O.R., An Deunionization Lead to International Outsourcing [J]? Journal of International Economics,2009,77: 109-119.
    [56]Marin, D., Verdier, T.. Globalization and the Empowerment of Talent [Z].Centre for Eeonomic Policy Researeh Paper,2003,4129
    [57]Markusen, J.. Productivity, Competitiveness, Trade Performance and Real Income: The Nexus among Four Concepts,1992.
    [58]Mckee, K. and Sessions-Robinson,C, Manufacturing Productivity and Competitiveness [J]. Journal of Manufacturing, Spring,1989,35-39.
    [59]Meeusen, W., Broeck, J.. Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Function with Composed Error [J]. International Economic Review, 1977(18):435-444
    [60]Munch, J.R., Skaksen, J.R.. Specialization, Outsourcing and Wages. Review of World Economics [J],2009,145:57-73.
    [61]Olsen, K.B.. Productivity Impacts of Offshoring and Outsourcing:A Review [Z].SIT Working Paper,2006,1.
    [62]Romer, P.M.. Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization[J]. American Economic Review,1987,2:56-62.
    [63]Scott, Bruce, Competitiveness:Self-Help for Worsening Problem [J], Harvard Business Review.1999,115-121.
    [64]Senses, M.Z.. The Effects of Outsourcing on the Elasticity of Labor Demand [Z]. CES Discussion Paper, Washington, DC,2006(3).
    [65]Siegel, D., Griliehes, Z.. Purchases Services, Outsourcing, Computers, and Productivity in Manufacturing[C].Output Measurement in the Service Sector. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1992
    [66]Skaksen, J.R.. International Outsourcing When Labor Markets Are Unionized [J]. Canadian Journal of Economics,2004,37:78-94.
    [67]Stefanova, B.M.,2006. The Political Economy of Outsourcing in the European Union and the East-European Enlargement [J]. Business and Politics,2006,8 (2).
    [68]Strauss-Kahn, V. The Role of Globalization in the Within-Industry Shift away from Unskilled Workers in France [Z]. NBER Working Papers 9716,2003.
    [69]Tee, R.T., Wolff, E.N.. Outsourcing of Services and the Productivity Recovery in U.S. Manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2001,16(2):149-165
    [70]Tomiura, E.. Foreign Outsourcing and Firm-level Characteristics:Evidence from Japanese Manufacturers [J].The Journal of the Japanese and International Economics,2005,19:255-271.
    [71]Williamson, O.E.. Markets and Hierarehies:Analysis and Antitust ImPlications[M]. NewYork:Free Press,1975
    [72]Wooldridge, J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Ma:Mit Press,2002.
    [73]Yeats, A.J. Just How Big Is Global Production Sharing [Z]? In S. W. Arndt & H. Kierzkowski(Eds.), Fragmentation, New Production Patterns in the World Economy,2001,1:108-143.
    [74]北京大学中国经济研究中心课题组.中国出口贸易中的垂直专门化与中美贸易[J].世界经济,2006(5):12-23。
    [75]陈菲.服务外包动因机制分析及发展趋势预测:美国服务外包的验证[J].中国工业经济,2005(6):67-73
    [76]陈宏辉,罗兴.“贴牌”是一种过时的战略选择吗—来自广东省制造型企业的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2008(1):96-105.
    [77]陈景华.服务业离岸外移的经济效应分析[J].世界经济研究,2007(2):16-22
    [78]陈涛涛.影响中国外商直接投资溢出效应的行业特征[J].中国社会科学,2003(4):33-43
    [79]陈涛涛.中国FDI行业内溢出效应的内在机制研究[J].世界经济,2003(9):23-28
    [80]鄂丽丽.服务外包竞争力影响因素研究:基于中国的分析[J].经济问题探索,2008,(3):151-154
    [81]胡昭玲.国际垂直专业化分工与贸易:研究综述[J].南开经济研究,2006(5):12-26
    [82]方希桦,包群,赖明勇.国际技术溢出:基于进口传导机制的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2004(7):48-57
    [83]顾磊.国际外包与我国城乡收入差距关系的实证研究,国际贸易问题,2009,(2).
    [84]侯茂章,王斌.基于全球价值链视角的地方产业集群国际化发展研究[J].财贸经济,2009(5):68-75.
    [85]胡军,陶锋,陈建林.珠三角外包企业持续成长的路径选择:基于全球价值链外包体系的视角[J].中国工业经济,2005(8):42-49.
    [86]胡昭玲,刘旭.中国工业品贸易的就业效应:基于32个行业面板数据的实证分析[J].财贸经济,2007(8):36-44.
    [87]胡昭玲,张蕊.中国制造业参与产品内国际分工的影响因素分析[J].世界经济研究,2006(3):3-8
    [88]胡昭玲.产品内国际分工对中国工业生产率的影响分析阴.中国工业经济,2007(6):30-37
    [89]胡昭玲.国际垂直专业化分工与贸易:研究综述[J].南开经济研究,2006(5):12-26.
    [90]黄晶.产业内垂直分工研究:基于产业组织的视角和中国实证[D].暨南大学博士学位论,2009
    [91]黄先海,韦畅.中国制造业出口垂直专业化程度的测度与分析[J].管理世界,2007(4):158-166.
    [92]江小娟.服务外包:合约形态变革及其理论蕴意:人力资本市场配置与劳务活动企业配置的统一[J].经济研究,2008(7):4-11.
    [93]李平,鲁靖领.进口贸易对我国各地区全要素生产率增长的实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2006(2):44-47
    [94]李小平,朱钟棣.国际贸易、R&D溢出和生产率增长[J].经济研究,2006(2):31-43
    [95]李小平,朱钟棣.国际贸易的技术溢出门槛效应:基于中国各地区面板数据的分析[J].统计研究,2004(10):56-63.
    [96]刘景江.网络时代的外包模式[J].中国工业经济,2003(11):21-29.
    [97]刘庆林,廉凯.FDI与外包:基于企业国际化模式选择的对比分析田.经济学家,2007(2):110-115.
    [98]卢锋.我国承接国际服务外包问题研究[J].经济研究,2007(9):49-61
    [99]刘绍坚.中国承接国际软件外包的技术外溢效应研究[D]中国社科院博士论文,2008.
    [100]刘志彪,刘晓旭.垂直专业化:经济全球化中的贸易和生产模式[J].经济理论与经济管理,2001(10):5-10
    [101]刘志彪,吴福象.贸易一体化与生产非一体化:基于经济全球化两个重要假说的实证研究[J].中国社会科学,2006(2):80-92
    [102]刘志彪,吴福象.全球化经济中的生产非一体化:基于江苏投入产出表的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2005(7):12-19
    [103]卢锋.产品内分工[J].经济学(季刊),2004(10):55-82
    [104]卢锋.服务外包经济学分析:产品内分工视角:兼论我国承接国际服务外包问题.北京大学中国经济研究中心2007年讨论稿系列,No,e2007012。
    [105]卢锋.我国承接国际服务外包问题研究[J].经济研究,2007(9):49-62.
    [106]迈克尔波特.国家竞争优势.北京:华夏出版社.2002:724
    [107]潘文卿.外商投资对中国工业部门的外溢效应:基于面板数据的分析[J].世界经济,2003(6):3-7
    [108]平新乔.产业内贸易理论与中美贸易关系[J].国际经济评论,2005(9-10):12-14
    [109]邱斌,唐保庆,孙少勤.FDI、生产非一体化与美中贸易逆差[J].世界经济,2007(5):33-43
    [110]沈坤荣,耿强.外国直接投资、技术外溢与内生经济增长:中国数据的计量检验与实证分析[J].中国社会科学,2001(5):82-93
    [111]盛斌,马涛.中国工业部门垂直专业化与国内技术含量的关系研究[J].世界经济研究,2008(8):35-43
    [112]司光禄、巩琴贤.FDI对我国出口商品竞争力影响作用的协整分析.山东财政学院学报,2007,(1):47-49
    [113]孙辉煌.跨国外包对承接国收入分配效应的实证分析:基于中国的经验研究[J].南京财经大学学报,2008(4):26-28
    [114]孙宇.国际服务外包、结构转型与扩大就业[J].宏观经济研究,2009(2):15-20.
    [115]唐玲,刘海云.外包的生产率效应及行业差异[J].中国工业经济,2009(8):78-87.
    [116]唐玲,刘海云.外包生产率效应的研究评述[J].国际经贸探索,2009(11):30-35
    [117]唐玲.国际外包率的测量及行业差异—基于中国工业行业的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题,2009(8):66-74
    [118]唐宜红,马风涛.国际垂直专业化对中国劳动力就业结构的影响[J].财贸经济,2009(4):94-98
    [119]唐宜红,闰金光.离岸外包对中国出口结构的影响[X].南开学报,2006(3):20-28
    [120]田文.产品内贸易的定义、计量及比较分析[J].财贸经济,2005(5):77-79.
    [121]汪建成,毛蕴诗,邱楠.由OEM到ODM再到OBM的自主创新与国际化路径一格兰仕技术能力构建与企业升级案例研究[J].管理世界,2008(6):148-157.
    [122]汪建成,毛蕴诗.从OEM到ODM、OBM的企业升级路径:基于海鸥卫浴与成霖股份的比较案例研究[J].中国工业经济,2007(12):110-117
    [123]王爱虎,钟雨晨.中国吸引跨国外包的经济环境和政策研究[J].经济研究,2006(8):81-92
    [124]王中华,代中强.外包与生产率:基于中国工业行业物品外包与服务外包的比较分析[J].当代经济科学,2009(4):54-66.
    [125]王中华,王雅琳,赵曙东.国际垂直专业化与工资收入差距:基于工业行业数据的实证分析[J].财经研究,2009(3):36-42.
    [126]文东伟,冼国明.垂直专业化与中国制造业贸易竞争力[J].中国工业经济,2009(6):16-29.
    [127]谢冰.外国直接投资的贸易效应及实证分析[J].经济评论,2002.4
    [128]谢建国.外商直接投资与中国的出口竞争力一个中国的经验研究[J].世界经济研究,2004(2):23-28.
    [129]徐毅,张二震.FDI、外包与技术创新:基于投入产出表数据的经验研究[J].世界经济,2008(9):41-48
    [130]徐毅,张二震.外包与生产率:基于工业行业数据的经验研究[J].经济研究,2008(1):103-113
    [131]颜鹏飞,王兵.技术效率、技术进步与生产率增长:基于DEA的实证分析[J].经济研究,2004(12):26-37
    [132]杨立强.中国制造业产业成长中的外包因素分析[D].博士学位论文.北京:对外经济贸易大学图书馆,2006
    [133]叶炜、王瑛.FDI对我国出口竞争力的影响与对策.市场论坛,2005,(1):31-34
    [134]尹希果,陈刚.外商直接投资、国际贸易与中国生产率增长研究:基于非参数Malmquist指数的经验分析[J].国际贸易问题,2008(6):89-98.
    [135]喻美辞.国际服务外包、技术外溢与承接国的技术进步[J].世界经济研究, 2008(4):50-65
    [136]袁奇.离岸外包对美国经济的影响分析[J].对外经济贸易大学学报,2005(2):34-39.
    [137]袁永友,魏宏贵.外包服务与我国服务贸易增长方式的缺陷、效应及创新[J].国际贸易,2007(8):33-37
    [138]张海洋.R&D两面性、外资活动与中国工业生产率增长[J].经济研究2005(5):107-117
    [139]张纪.产品内国际分工:动因、机制与效应研究.上海社会科学院博士学位论文[D].2007.
    [140]张明志.国际外包对发展中国家产业升级影响的机理分析[1].国际贸易问题,2008(1):42-48.
    [141]张其仔,比较优势的演化与中国产业升级路径的选择[J].中国工业经济,2008(9):58-69.
    [142]张秋菊,孙赫.跨国外包的承接对我国工业行业技术进步的影响[J].国际贸易问题,2009(8):92-97
    [143]张秋菊,朱钟棣.跨国外包的承接与我国技术进步关系的实证分析—基于VECM的长、短期因果关系检验[J].世界经济研究,2008(6):74-79
    [144]张小蒂,孙景蔚.基于垂直专业化分工的中国产业国际竞争力分析[J].世界经济,2006(5):16-21
    [145]卓越,张眠.全球价值链中的收益分配与悲惨增长:基于中国纺织服装业的分析[J].中国工业经济,2006(1):40-45.
    [146]宗毅君.国际产品内分工与进出口贸易:基于我国工业行业面板数据的经验研究[J].国际贸易问题,2008(2):7-13
    [147]邹全胜,王莹.服务外包:理论与经验分析[J].国际贸易问题,2006(5):54-61

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700