论当代中国“生态观点”的实践理念
|
摘要
森林是陆地生态系统的主体,地球之肺。森林在涵养水源、保持水土、保护生物多样性等方面具有重要的作用。林业是人类以森林为改造对象的一种基础而特殊的实践活动方式。近代以来的森林生态危机,以至于自然界生态系统失去应有的平衡,根本原因在于人类林业实践的理念与方式存在误区。当穿越了一个多世纪的理论批判、思想反省之后,林业实践的理念与方式发生了重要的变革。在当代中国,人们既注重保护森林生态,又注重发展林业生态产业,努力寻求保护与发展的最佳结合点。人与森林的对象性关系经历了从最初的简单利用与被利用到掠夺与被掠夺再到保护与被保护的转变。
林业作为人类一种重要而基础的实践活动,其理念与践行方式的生态性变革不能不引发我们对人类一般性的实践理念及其践行方式的反思。在当代中国人未来发展的价值视域中,在历史与逻辑统一的思想理路中,本文以林业实践理念与方式变革为切入点,运用归纳与演绎的思维方法,对人类实践理念及其践行方式的变革展开研究。
本文认为,鉴于人类主体自觉性生成的不同境界,人类实践理念的生成要经历三个阶段:即“自然观点”的实践理念,“经济观点”的实践理念,“生态观点”的实践理念。“自然观点”的实践理念是自然经济中以“自然的生存需要”为核心的“依附性”实践理念;“经济观点”的实践理念是市场经济中以“以获取经济利润”为核心的“占有性”实践理念;“生态观点”的实践理念是生态经济中以“人与自然和谐统一”为核心的“和谐性”实践理念。“自然观点”与“经济观点”的实践理念属于人类传统的实践理念,而“生态观点”的实践理念是在生命层面统一与提升“自然观点”与“经济观点”实践理念的基础上形成的人类走向未来的理想性思想观念。
作为人类传统的实践理念,“自然观点”与“经济观点”的实践理念是人类核心价值的一重意蕴。在这两种实践理念的导引下,人类从野蛮不断走向文明。但由于人类主体自觉性的境界较低,贯穿于人类传统实践理念的“单一性”生命观、“实体性”思维方式与“功利性”价值取向亦使当代人类陷入了生存的焦虑之中,陷入了诸多生存危机之中。
在林业领域发生的实践理念及其践行方式的生态性变革,意味着当代人类若想走出传统实践理念带来的生存困境,必须塑造与确立“生态观点”的实践理念及其践行方式。在恰切地分析传统实践理念的特点与践行方式的基础上,本文以马克思主义人与自然关系的思想为理论根基,以分析西方生态性的社会思潮为理论参照,以当代中国生态文明的思想观点为理论前提,对“生态观点”实践理念的特质、思想观点与践行方式进行了深入的研究。
其一,“生态观点”实践理念的特质。
“生态观点”的实践理念具有“生命性”、“历史性”、“丰富性”、多重内在矛盾的特质。“生命性”特质意指此种实践理念既尊重人类的主体性生命价值,又不否定自然界的外在生命价值,并试图通过一种崭新的价值模式实现人与自然的生命和谐;“历史性”特质意指此种实践理念是对“自然观点”和“经济观点”实践理念的扬弃,是在更高的生命境界中对二者的容纳与发展;“丰富性”特质意指此种实践理念表征了人的生命的丰富性和全面性及其具体的实现方式;多重内在矛盾特质意指此种实践理念是人类生命之整体性与特殊性、理想性与现实性、继承性与超越性的矛盾观念统一体。
其二,“生态观点”实践理念的思想观点。
“生态观点”实践理念的核心问题是此种理念与传统实践理念之间的关系。本文认为,“生态观点”实践理念是人类核心价值之多重意蕴的统一,亦即“生态观点”实践理念不仅融含了传统实践理念的特质,而且在更高的生命境界中,以人的生命尺度与自然界尺度的双重尺度统一的思维方式,重构“科技理性”与“人文精神”双重精神元素的同一,追求实现人类“生命和谐”的“生态家园”之价值理想。
其三,“生态观点”实践理念的践行方式。
在形上的视域中,生态实践是“生态观点”实践理念的践行方式。生态实践是注重实践元素之间关系,注重生态能量持续循环发展,注重改造与保护、效益与发展统一,凸显生态公平的“和谐型”实践方式。在具体的人类实践中,应通过创立生态效益补偿机制的践行方式,建立生态保护体系的践行方式,形成生态循环发展的践行方式来实现“生态观点”实践理念的价值追求。
Forests are the main terrestrial ecosystems, the Earth's lungs. Of forests in water conservation, soil and water, the conservation of biological diversity plays an important role. Forestry is a forest for the transformation of human to an object based on the practice of special activities. Modern history of forest ecological crisis, that the loss of natural ecosystems should be a balance, the fundamental reason is that the concept of human forestry practice and the existence of errors. When more than a century through a critical theory, ideological soul searching, forestry practice and the way the concept of an important change. In contemporary China, people not only pay attention to the protection of forest ecosystems, but also pay attention to the development of eco-forestry industry, conservation and development efforts to find the best combination of points. The object and the forest has experienced sexual relations from the initial use of simple to use and has been plundered and looted and then to the protection and the protection changes.
Forestry as an important basic human practice, its philosophy and practice of ecological changes the way we human beings can not but lead to the practice of the general concept and its approach to reflect on practice. In contemporary China, as the value of the future development of the domain, in the logic of history and logic of the idea of unification, this article in order to practice the concept of forestry and changes in the way as the breakthrough point, the use of inductive and deductive ways of thinking, the concept of human practice and practice changes in the way of research.
This article holds that, in view of the main human-generated different realm of consciousness, the concept of the generation of human practice to go through three stages: the "natural perspective" the practice of philosophy, "the economic point of view," the practice of the concept of "ecological perspective" the practice of philosophy. "Natural perspective" the practice of philosophy is a natural economy to "the survival of the natural needs" as the core of the "dependency" in practice the idea; "economic point of view," the practice of the concept of a market economy in order to "to obtain economic profits" at the core " possession of "the practice of philosophy;" ecological perspective "is the practice of the concept of ecological economy of" harmony between man and nature "as the core of the" harmony "of the practice of philosophy. "Natural point of view" and "economic point of view," the practice of the concept of belonging to the traditional practice of human ideas, and "ecological perspective" in the practice of the concept of unity and enhance the level of life "natural point of view" and "economic perspective" practice based on the concept of the the ideal of humanity into the future of ideas.
The traditional practice of human philosophy, "natural point of view" and "economic point of view," the practice of philosophy is a core value of human re-implication. In both practice guided by the concept of human civilization from barbarism towards. However, due to the realm of human consciousness in the main low, through the traditional practice of the concept of human "oneness" concept to life, "entities" in the way of thinking and "utilitarian" values also fell into a contemporary human survival anxiety, and into a number of survival crisis.
Occurred in the field of forestry practice and practice the concept of ecological way of change, means that the contemporary human To bring out the traditional practice of the concept of the survival of the plight of the need to create and establish the "ecological perspective" the practice of philosophy and its practice methods. Analysis of the pertinent characteristics of the traditional practice of philosophy and practice based on the way, this article Marxism relationship between man and nature of the ideological foundation for the theory to analyze the ecology of Western social thought for the theoretical reference to the ecological civilization of contemporary China the premise for the theory of ideas of "ecological perspective" idea of the nature of practice, practice the way of ideas and in-depth research.
First, the "ecological perspective" the nature of the practice of philosophy.
"Ecological perspective" the practice of the concept of "life" and "historic", "rich", the characteristics of multiple internal contradictions. "Life" of the characteristics of such a practice means that both the concept of respect for human life of the main value of the external nature without denying the value of life, and trying to value a brand new mode of life between man and nature in harmony; "historic "characteristics of the concept of the meaning of such a practice is a" natural point of view "and" economic point of view, "the idea of abandoning the practice is at a higher level of life to accommodate both and development;" rich "means the characteristics of such practice Characterization of the idea of the wealth of human life and the realization of a comprehensive and concrete manner; multiple characteristics of the internal contradictions of such practice, the meaning of the concept of human integrity and particularity of life, ideals and reality, inheritance and transcendence the concept of unity of contradictions.
Second, the "ecological perspective" idea of ideas in practice.
"Ecological perspective" the core issue of the practice of philosophy is such a concept with the traditional concept of the relationship between the practice. In this paper, that the "ecological perspective" Our goal is to practice the core values of human multiple implication of the unity that is "ecological perspective" into the practice of philosophy not only with the traditional idea of the nature of the practice, but also in a higher realm of life to human life scale and nature of the double-scale-scale unified way of thinking, reconstruction of "technological rationality" and "the humanistic spirit of" double spirit of the same element, the human pursuit of "harmonious life" and "eco-home" value of the ideal.
Third, the "ecological perspective" means the practice of the concept of practice. As in the metaphysical domain, ecological practice is the "ecological perspective" means
the practice of the concept of practice. Ecological practice is focused on the relationship between elements of practice, pay attention to the continuing cycle of development of ecological energy, focus on transformation and protection, efficiency and development of a unified, highlights eco-fair "harmony-based" practices. In specific human practice, eco-efficiency through the creation of a compensation mechanism of the practice means to establish the practice of ecological protection system means the formation of the ecological cycle of the development of practice methods to achieve "ecological perspective" to pursue the practice of the concept of value.
林业作为人类一种重要而基础的实践活动,其理念与践行方式的生态性变革不能不引发我们对人类一般性的实践理念及其践行方式的反思。在当代中国人未来发展的价值视域中,在历史与逻辑统一的思想理路中,本文以林业实践理念与方式变革为切入点,运用归纳与演绎的思维方法,对人类实践理念及其践行方式的变革展开研究。
本文认为,鉴于人类主体自觉性生成的不同境界,人类实践理念的生成要经历三个阶段:即“自然观点”的实践理念,“经济观点”的实践理念,“生态观点”的实践理念。“自然观点”的实践理念是自然经济中以“自然的生存需要”为核心的“依附性”实践理念;“经济观点”的实践理念是市场经济中以“以获取经济利润”为核心的“占有性”实践理念;“生态观点”的实践理念是生态经济中以“人与自然和谐统一”为核心的“和谐性”实践理念。“自然观点”与“经济观点”的实践理念属于人类传统的实践理念,而“生态观点”的实践理念是在生命层面统一与提升“自然观点”与“经济观点”实践理念的基础上形成的人类走向未来的理想性思想观念。
作为人类传统的实践理念,“自然观点”与“经济观点”的实践理念是人类核心价值的一重意蕴。在这两种实践理念的导引下,人类从野蛮不断走向文明。但由于人类主体自觉性的境界较低,贯穿于人类传统实践理念的“单一性”生命观、“实体性”思维方式与“功利性”价值取向亦使当代人类陷入了生存的焦虑之中,陷入了诸多生存危机之中。
在林业领域发生的实践理念及其践行方式的生态性变革,意味着当代人类若想走出传统实践理念带来的生存困境,必须塑造与确立“生态观点”的实践理念及其践行方式。在恰切地分析传统实践理念的特点与践行方式的基础上,本文以马克思主义人与自然关系的思想为理论根基,以分析西方生态性的社会思潮为理论参照,以当代中国生态文明的思想观点为理论前提,对“生态观点”实践理念的特质、思想观点与践行方式进行了深入的研究。
其一,“生态观点”实践理念的特质。
“生态观点”的实践理念具有“生命性”、“历史性”、“丰富性”、多重内在矛盾的特质。“生命性”特质意指此种实践理念既尊重人类的主体性生命价值,又不否定自然界的外在生命价值,并试图通过一种崭新的价值模式实现人与自然的生命和谐;“历史性”特质意指此种实践理念是对“自然观点”和“经济观点”实践理念的扬弃,是在更高的生命境界中对二者的容纳与发展;“丰富性”特质意指此种实践理念表征了人的生命的丰富性和全面性及其具体的实现方式;多重内在矛盾特质意指此种实践理念是人类生命之整体性与特殊性、理想性与现实性、继承性与超越性的矛盾观念统一体。
其二,“生态观点”实践理念的思想观点。
“生态观点”实践理念的核心问题是此种理念与传统实践理念之间的关系。本文认为,“生态观点”实践理念是人类核心价值之多重意蕴的统一,亦即“生态观点”实践理念不仅融含了传统实践理念的特质,而且在更高的生命境界中,以人的生命尺度与自然界尺度的双重尺度统一的思维方式,重构“科技理性”与“人文精神”双重精神元素的同一,追求实现人类“生命和谐”的“生态家园”之价值理想。
其三,“生态观点”实践理念的践行方式。
在形上的视域中,生态实践是“生态观点”实践理念的践行方式。生态实践是注重实践元素之间关系,注重生态能量持续循环发展,注重改造与保护、效益与发展统一,凸显生态公平的“和谐型”实践方式。在具体的人类实践中,应通过创立生态效益补偿机制的践行方式,建立生态保护体系的践行方式,形成生态循环发展的践行方式来实现“生态观点”实践理念的价值追求。
Forests are the main terrestrial ecosystems, the Earth's lungs. Of forests in water conservation, soil and water, the conservation of biological diversity plays an important role. Forestry is a forest for the transformation of human to an object based on the practice of special activities. Modern history of forest ecological crisis, that the loss of natural ecosystems should be a balance, the fundamental reason is that the concept of human forestry practice and the existence of errors. When more than a century through a critical theory, ideological soul searching, forestry practice and the way the concept of an important change. In contemporary China, people not only pay attention to the protection of forest ecosystems, but also pay attention to the development of eco-forestry industry, conservation and development efforts to find the best combination of points. The object and the forest has experienced sexual relations from the initial use of simple to use and has been plundered and looted and then to the protection and the protection changes.
Forestry as an important basic human practice, its philosophy and practice of ecological changes the way we human beings can not but lead to the practice of the general concept and its approach to reflect on practice. In contemporary China, as the value of the future development of the domain, in the logic of history and logic of the idea of unification, this article in order to practice the concept of forestry and changes in the way as the breakthrough point, the use of inductive and deductive ways of thinking, the concept of human practice and practice changes in the way of research.
This article holds that, in view of the main human-generated different realm of consciousness, the concept of the generation of human practice to go through three stages: the "natural perspective" the practice of philosophy, "the economic point of view," the practice of the concept of "ecological perspective" the practice of philosophy. "Natural perspective" the practice of philosophy is a natural economy to "the survival of the natural needs" as the core of the "dependency" in practice the idea; "economic point of view," the practice of the concept of a market economy in order to "to obtain economic profits" at the core " possession of "the practice of philosophy;" ecological perspective "is the practice of the concept of ecological economy of" harmony between man and nature "as the core of the" harmony "of the practice of philosophy. "Natural point of view" and "economic point of view," the practice of the concept of belonging to the traditional practice of human ideas, and "ecological perspective" in the practice of the concept of unity and enhance the level of life "natural point of view" and "economic perspective" practice based on the concept of the the ideal of humanity into the future of ideas.
The traditional practice of human philosophy, "natural point of view" and "economic point of view," the practice of philosophy is a core value of human re-implication. In both practice guided by the concept of human civilization from barbarism towards. However, due to the realm of human consciousness in the main low, through the traditional practice of the concept of human "oneness" concept to life, "entities" in the way of thinking and "utilitarian" values also fell into a contemporary human survival anxiety, and into a number of survival crisis.
Occurred in the field of forestry practice and practice the concept of ecological way of change, means that the contemporary human To bring out the traditional practice of the concept of the survival of the plight of the need to create and establish the "ecological perspective" the practice of philosophy and its practice methods. Analysis of the pertinent characteristics of the traditional practice of philosophy and practice based on the way, this article Marxism relationship between man and nature of the ideological foundation for the theory to analyze the ecology of Western social thought for the theoretical reference to the ecological civilization of contemporary China the premise for the theory of ideas of "ecological perspective" idea of the nature of practice, practice the way of ideas and in-depth research.
First, the "ecological perspective" the nature of the practice of philosophy.
"Ecological perspective" the practice of the concept of "life" and "historic", "rich", the characteristics of multiple internal contradictions. "Life" of the characteristics of such a practice means that both the concept of respect for human life of the main value of the external nature without denying the value of life, and trying to value a brand new mode of life between man and nature in harmony; "historic "characteristics of the concept of the meaning of such a practice is a" natural point of view "and" economic point of view, "the idea of abandoning the practice is at a higher level of life to accommodate both and development;" rich "means the characteristics of such practice Characterization of the idea of the wealth of human life and the realization of a comprehensive and concrete manner; multiple characteristics of the internal contradictions of such practice, the meaning of the concept of human integrity and particularity of life, ideals and reality, inheritance and transcendence the concept of unity of contradictions.
Second, the "ecological perspective" idea of ideas in practice.
"Ecological perspective" the core issue of the practice of philosophy is such a concept with the traditional concept of the relationship between the practice. In this paper, that the "ecological perspective" Our goal is to practice the core values of human multiple implication of the unity that is "ecological perspective" into the practice of philosophy not only with the traditional idea of the nature of the practice, but also in a higher realm of life to human life scale and nature of the double-scale-scale unified way of thinking, reconstruction of "technological rationality" and "the humanistic spirit of" double spirit of the same element, the human pursuit of "harmonious life" and "eco-home" value of the ideal.
Third, the "ecological perspective" means the practice of the concept of practice. As in the metaphysical domain, ecological practice is the "ecological perspective" means
the practice of the concept of practice. Ecological practice is focused on the relationship between elements of practice, pay attention to the continuing cycle of development of ecological energy, focus on transformation and protection, efficiency and development of a unified, highlights eco-fair "harmony-based" practices. In specific human practice, eco-efficiency through the creation of a compensation mechanism of the practice means to establish the practice of ecological protection system means the formation of the ecological cycle of the development of practice methods to achieve "ecological perspective" to pursue the practice of the concept of value.
引文
[1]转引自周生贤.全面建设小康社会与林业跨越式发展[J].人民论坛,2003(3):23.
[2][18][23][45][77][81][138][139][142]高清海,胡海波,贺来.人的“类生命”与“类哲学”[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2006.140、144、388、236、67、245、242、238、76.
[3]盛世兴林创伟业,绿满神州铸和谐——“十五”林业建设成就综述[N] .绿色时报,2005-10-27(1).
[4]参见中共中央、国务院,关于加快林业发展的决定[N].2003年6月25日.
[5]参见高清海.高清海哲学文存[M]:第2卷.长春:吉林人民出版社,1998.10.
[6]庞元正,董德刚.马克思主义哲学前沿问题研究[M].北京:中央党校出版社,2004.327.
[7][16][54]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[[M]:第1卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1979.104、77、104.
[8][9]参见张建国,吴静和.现代林业论[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996.3,38.
[10]参见张建国,余建辉.生态林业论[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2002.39.
[11][12]余谋昌.生态伦理学——从理论走向实践[M].北京:首都师范大学出版社,1999.160—161,160.
[13]参见国家林业局经济发展研究中心课题组.对我国生态建设处在“治理与破坏相持阶段”的理解和认识[J].绿色中国,2005(4)B:16.
[14]参见罗小荷,陈义刚.生态危机与中国林业可持续发展[J].生态经济,2003(10):231.
[15]参见张孝庆等.中国生态林业发展研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2005(6),53.
[17][53][57][58][73][76][86][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][104][105][108][112][115][140][147][158]马克思. 1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,2000.105、88、57、56、88、56、85、78、77、56、105、87、67、89、89、107、57、57、83、83、83、83、81、83、89.
[19][38]列宁.列宁全集[M]:第38卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1959.90、244.
[20][21][22][27][28][41][42][43][55][67][72][111]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第46卷(上) .中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1979. 488、110、485、103—104、262、94、485、103—104、393、477-481、392—393、104.
[24][36]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第46卷(下) .中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1979. 212、109.
[25][26][31][40][48][49][66][101][102][103][106][134][141]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M]:第1卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.252、254、26—27、114、465、16、35、16、24、25、34-35、31、465.
[29]斯大林.斯大林选集[M]:下册.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.442.
[30][60]马克思.资本论[M]:第1卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1975.830、172.
[32][163]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M]:第2卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.67-68、518.
[33]参见董智勇.世界林业发展道路[M].北京,中国林业出版社,1999.18.
[34]阿·科辛.马克思列宁主义哲学辞典[M].北京:东方出版社,1991.
[35]何中华.马克思唯物史观二题新议[J].中州学刊,1995,(2):27.
[37]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M]:第4卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.243.
[39]参见张美华,生态林业补偿问题初探[J].生态经济,2001(4):42.
[44]马尔库塞.工业社会与新左派[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.160.
[46]徐复观.中国人性论史·先秦篇[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1984.99.
[47]李海峰.科学是一把双刃剑[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1998.334.
[50]盛庆徕.功利主义新论—统合效用主义理论及其在公平分配上的应用[M].上海:上海交大出版社,1996.13.
[51]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第3卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1991.479.
[52]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.173.
[56]多尔迈.主体性的黄昏[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1992.1.
[59]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第47卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1979.55.
[61]高清海.价值选择的实质是对人的本质之选择[J].吉林师范大学学报(人文社科版),2005(2).
[62]陈新夏.唯物史观与人的发展理论[J].哲学研究,2004(2):14.
[63]列宁.哲学笔记[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1960.229.
[64]王永昌.论实践理念[J].中国社会科学,1993,(4):28.
[65]高清海.哲学的奥秘[M].长春:吉林出版社,1997.20-21.
[68]转引自威廉姆·肖.马克思的历史理论[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2007.132.
[69]毛泽东.中国革命和中国共产党[M]:毛泽东选集(第2卷).北京:人民出版社,1991.623—624.
[70]列维·布留尔.原始思维[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.350.
[71]马克斯·霍克海默.批判理论[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1989.66.
[74][161]姜振寰.哲学与社会视野中的技术[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.231、231.
[75]宋周尧.论生态实践[J].长白学刊.1999(2):52-54.
[78]唐代兴.生态理性哲学导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.26.
[79]转引自余谋昌.生态伦理学——从理论走向实践[M].北京:首都师范大学出版社,1999[M]. 46-47.
[80]世界环境与发展委员会.我们共同的未来[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1997.52.
[82]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第20卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1971.519.
[83]参见李泽厚.实用理性与乐感文化[M].北京:三联书店,2005.16.
[84]佘正荣.生态智慧论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1996.173-174.
[85]F·Mathews.The Ecologocal Self[J].1991.127-128.
[87]李红卫.生态文明——人类文明发展的必由之路[J].社会主义研究,2004(6):114-116.
[88]黑格尔.小逻辑[M].贺麟译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.25.
[89]参见钱俊生、余谋昌.生态哲学[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,2004.17-18.
[90]唐代兴.生态理性哲学导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.219.
[107]高清海.高清海哲学文存[M]:第2卷.长春,吉林人民出版社,1996.309.
[109][110]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第27卷(上).中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.478、104.
[113]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第2卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1960. 118—119.
[114]弗莱德-R-多尔迈.主体性的黄昏[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1992.324.
[116]何怀宏.生态伦理——精神资源与哲学基础[M].石家庄:河北大学出版社.2002.452-455.
[117][118]David Pepper.Eco-socialism:from deep ecology to social justice[M].Routledge,1993.232、233.
[119]弗·卡普拉,查·斯普雷纳克.绿色政治—全球的希望[M].北京,东方出版社,1988.57.
[120]J·海华德.政治生态学的含义[J].哲学译丛,1996(1).
[121]Andre Grorz. Ecology As Politics[M].South End Press,1980.20.
[122]布莱恩·巴克斯特.生态主义导论[M].曾建平译.重庆:重庆出版社,2007.8-9.
[123]阿格尔.西方马克思主义理论[M].加利福尼亚:古得伊尔公司,1979.272.
[124]佩珀.生态社会主义——从深层生态学到社会公正[M].伦敦:洛雷特出版社,1993.93.
[125][164]詹姆斯·奥康纳[M].自然的理由——生态学马克思主义研究[M].唐正东等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2003.25、124.
[126]韩庆祥.解读“以人为本”[N].光明日报,2004-04-27.
[127]俞可平.马克思主义理论与生态主义[J].马克思主义与现实,2005(4).
[128]阿尔·戈尔.濒临失衡的地球——生态与人类精神[M].陈嘉映等译.北京:中央编译出版社,1997.198.
[129][131]中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会文件汇编[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[130]曹孟勤.人是与自然界的本质统一[J].自然辩证法研究,2006(9):18-21.
[132]Rudolf Bahro.Socialism and Survival[M].London,1982.17.
[133]徐孝庆.中国生态林业发展研究综述[J].世界林业研究,1995(6).
[135]李红卫.生态文明——人类文明发展的必由之路[J].社会主义研究,2004(6):114-116.
[136]Edward O. W ilson.OnHumanNature.CambridgeMA[M].HarvardUniversity Press,1978.17.
[137]DonaldWorster.Nature'sEconomy:AHistory ofEcological Ideas(Second Edition) [M]. CambridgeUK: Cambridge University Press,1994.356.
[143]余谋昌,王兴成.全球研究及其哲学思考——“地球村工程”[M].北京:中央党校出版社,1995.196.
[144]余谋昌.生态哲学[M].西安:陕西人民教育出版社,2000.61.
[145]袁贵仁.以人为本是科学发展观的核心[J].哲学研究,2005(11):6.
[146]凯蒂·索珀.人道主义与反人道主义[M].寥申白译.北京:人民出版社,1999.21.
[148]转引自科恩.科学中的革命[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[149] Horkheimer, M. ?Critical Theory: Selected Essays[M].New York: Continuum Pub.Corp,1982.32.
[150]胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1988.7.
[151]弗·卡普拉.转折点—科学·社会·兴起中的新文化[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989: 16.
[152]J.里夫金.生物技术世纪[M].付立杰译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000.37.
[153]转引自姚庆海.论科学理性与人文精神的统一[J].自然辩证法,1992(8):68.
[154]胡锦涛.在省部级主要领导干部提高构建社会主义和谐社会能力专题研讨班上的讲话[N].人民日报.
[155]余文烈.当代国外社会主义流派[M].合肥:安徽人民出版社,2000.534.
[156]愈可平.全球化时代的“马克思主义”:九十年代国外社会主义述评[M].北京:中央编译局出版社,1998.79.
[157]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第25卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1974. 926-927.
[159]薛为昶.超越与建构:生态理念及其方法论意义[J].东南大学学报(哲社版),2003(4).
[160]唐代兴.生态理性哲学导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.235.
[162]潘岳.环境保护与社会公平[J].中国国情国力,2004(12):35.
[165]严立冬.生态创新理论的内生化分析[J].生态经济通讯,2004,161(:8)1-5.
[166]参见费世民等.关于森林生态效益补偿问题的探讨[J].林业科学,2004(4):172.
[167]科技日报[N].2002-10-22.
[168]参见中国中央国务院[N].关于加快林业发展的决定,2003,6.25.
[169]参见江泽慧.中国现代林业[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.58.
[170]参见孔凡斌.试论森林生态补偿制度的政策理论、对策与实现途径[J].西北林学院学报,2003(2):103.
[171]肖峰.高技术时代的人文忧患[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2001.28.
[172]冯之浚.论生态循环发展[J].中国软科学,2004(10).
[173]光明网http://www.gmw.cn/03pindao/2004-04/05/content_10239.htm
[174]王如松.资源、环境与产业转型的复合生态管理[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003(2):125.
[175]张康之.公共行政中的哲学与伦理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.236.
[176]世界环境与发展委员会主编.我们共同的未来[G].王之佳等译.长春:吉林人民出版社1997.52.
[177]参见第12届世界林业大会文件选编[C].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.25.
[178]参见黄鹤羽等.中国林情[M].北京:开明出版社,2000.78.
[179]参见国家林业局森林资源管理司.第六次全国森林资源清查及森林资源状况[J].绿色中国,2005(1)(B):11.
[180]参见周生贤.中国林业的历史性转变[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.121.
[181]温铁军.新农村建设新在哪里[J].决策与信息,2006(4):10.
[182]《南风窗》编辑部.生态政治浮现中国[J].南风窗,2005(4).
[183]叶耀先.可持续城镇建设理念[J].建筑学报,2002(9):48-51.
[184]邵爱云,方明.生态小城镇规划探索——以安徽省淮南市毛集实验区规划为例[J].小城镇建设,2004(12):9-11.
[185]转引自张磊.福州市社区生态性现状调查及评价[D].福建:福建师范大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[186]董宪军.生态城市论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002.128-137.
[2][18][23][45][77][81][138][139][142]高清海,胡海波,贺来.人的“类生命”与“类哲学”[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2006.140、144、388、236、67、245、242、238、76.
[3]盛世兴林创伟业,绿满神州铸和谐——“十五”林业建设成就综述[N] .绿色时报,2005-10-27(1).
[4]参见中共中央、国务院,关于加快林业发展的决定[N].2003年6月25日.
[5]参见高清海.高清海哲学文存[M]:第2卷.长春:吉林人民出版社,1998.10.
[6]庞元正,董德刚.马克思主义哲学前沿问题研究[M].北京:中央党校出版社,2004.327.
[7][16][54]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[[M]:第1卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1979.104、77、104.
[8][9]参见张建国,吴静和.现代林业论[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996.3,38.
[10]参见张建国,余建辉.生态林业论[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2002.39.
[11][12]余谋昌.生态伦理学——从理论走向实践[M].北京:首都师范大学出版社,1999.160—161,160.
[13]参见国家林业局经济发展研究中心课题组.对我国生态建设处在“治理与破坏相持阶段”的理解和认识[J].绿色中国,2005(4)B:16.
[14]参见罗小荷,陈义刚.生态危机与中国林业可持续发展[J].生态经济,2003(10):231.
[15]参见张孝庆等.中国生态林业发展研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2005(6),53.
[17][53][57][58][73][76][86][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][104][105][108][112][115][140][147][158]马克思. 1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,2000.105、88、57、56、88、56、85、78、77、56、105、87、67、89、89、107、57、57、83、83、83、83、81、83、89.
[19][38]列宁.列宁全集[M]:第38卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1959.90、244.
[20][21][22][27][28][41][42][43][55][67][72][111]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第46卷(上) .中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1979. 488、110、485、103—104、262、94、485、103—104、393、477-481、392—393、104.
[24][36]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第46卷(下) .中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1979. 212、109.
[25][26][31][40][48][49][66][101][102][103][106][134][141]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M]:第1卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.252、254、26—27、114、465、16、35、16、24、25、34-35、31、465.
[29]斯大林.斯大林选集[M]:下册.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.442.
[30][60]马克思.资本论[M]:第1卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1975.830、172.
[32][163]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M]:第2卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.67-68、518.
[33]参见董智勇.世界林业发展道路[M].北京,中国林业出版社,1999.18.
[34]阿·科辛.马克思列宁主义哲学辞典[M].北京:东方出版社,1991.
[35]何中华.马克思唯物史观二题新议[J].中州学刊,1995,(2):27.
[37]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M]:第4卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.243.
[39]参见张美华,生态林业补偿问题初探[J].生态经济,2001(4):42.
[44]马尔库塞.工业社会与新左派[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.160.
[46]徐复观.中国人性论史·先秦篇[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1984.99.
[47]李海峰.科学是一把双刃剑[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1998.334.
[50]盛庆徕.功利主义新论—统合效用主义理论及其在公平分配上的应用[M].上海:上海交大出版社,1996.13.
[51]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第3卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1991.479.
[52]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.173.
[56]多尔迈.主体性的黄昏[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1992.1.
[59]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第47卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1979.55.
[61]高清海.价值选择的实质是对人的本质之选择[J].吉林师范大学学报(人文社科版),2005(2).
[62]陈新夏.唯物史观与人的发展理论[J].哲学研究,2004(2):14.
[63]列宁.哲学笔记[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1960.229.
[64]王永昌.论实践理念[J].中国社会科学,1993,(4):28.
[65]高清海.哲学的奥秘[M].长春:吉林出版社,1997.20-21.
[68]转引自威廉姆·肖.马克思的历史理论[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2007.132.
[69]毛泽东.中国革命和中国共产党[M]:毛泽东选集(第2卷).北京:人民出版社,1991.623—624.
[70]列维·布留尔.原始思维[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.350.
[71]马克斯·霍克海默.批判理论[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1989.66.
[74][161]姜振寰.哲学与社会视野中的技术[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.231、231.
[75]宋周尧.论生态实践[J].长白学刊.1999(2):52-54.
[78]唐代兴.生态理性哲学导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.26.
[79]转引自余谋昌.生态伦理学——从理论走向实践[M].北京:首都师范大学出版社,1999[M]. 46-47.
[80]世界环境与发展委员会.我们共同的未来[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1997.52.
[82]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第20卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1971.519.
[83]参见李泽厚.实用理性与乐感文化[M].北京:三联书店,2005.16.
[84]佘正荣.生态智慧论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1996.173-174.
[85]F·Mathews.The Ecologocal Self[J].1991.127-128.
[87]李红卫.生态文明——人类文明发展的必由之路[J].社会主义研究,2004(6):114-116.
[88]黑格尔.小逻辑[M].贺麟译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.25.
[89]参见钱俊生、余谋昌.生态哲学[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,2004.17-18.
[90]唐代兴.生态理性哲学导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.219.
[107]高清海.高清海哲学文存[M]:第2卷.长春,吉林人民出版社,1996.309.
[109][110]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第27卷(上).中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1972.478、104.
[113]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第2卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1960. 118—119.
[114]弗莱德-R-多尔迈.主体性的黄昏[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1992.324.
[116]何怀宏.生态伦理——精神资源与哲学基础[M].石家庄:河北大学出版社.2002.452-455.
[117][118]David Pepper.Eco-socialism:from deep ecology to social justice[M].Routledge,1993.232、233.
[119]弗·卡普拉,查·斯普雷纳克.绿色政治—全球的希望[M].北京,东方出版社,1988.57.
[120]J·海华德.政治生态学的含义[J].哲学译丛,1996(1).
[121]Andre Grorz. Ecology As Politics[M].South End Press,1980.20.
[122]布莱恩·巴克斯特.生态主义导论[M].曾建平译.重庆:重庆出版社,2007.8-9.
[123]阿格尔.西方马克思主义理论[M].加利福尼亚:古得伊尔公司,1979.272.
[124]佩珀.生态社会主义——从深层生态学到社会公正[M].伦敦:洛雷特出版社,1993.93.
[125][164]詹姆斯·奥康纳[M].自然的理由——生态学马克思主义研究[M].唐正东等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2003.25、124.
[126]韩庆祥.解读“以人为本”[N].光明日报,2004-04-27.
[127]俞可平.马克思主义理论与生态主义[J].马克思主义与现实,2005(4).
[128]阿尔·戈尔.濒临失衡的地球——生态与人类精神[M].陈嘉映等译.北京:中央编译出版社,1997.198.
[129][131]中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会文件汇编[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[130]曹孟勤.人是与自然界的本质统一[J].自然辩证法研究,2006(9):18-21.
[132]Rudolf Bahro.Socialism and Survival[M].London,1982.17.
[133]徐孝庆.中国生态林业发展研究综述[J].世界林业研究,1995(6).
[135]李红卫.生态文明——人类文明发展的必由之路[J].社会主义研究,2004(6):114-116.
[136]Edward O. W ilson.OnHumanNature.CambridgeMA[M].HarvardUniversity Press,1978.17.
[137]DonaldWorster.Nature'sEconomy:AHistory ofEcological Ideas(Second Edition) [M]. CambridgeUK: Cambridge University Press,1994.356.
[143]余谋昌,王兴成.全球研究及其哲学思考——“地球村工程”[M].北京:中央党校出版社,1995.196.
[144]余谋昌.生态哲学[M].西安:陕西人民教育出版社,2000.61.
[145]袁贵仁.以人为本是科学发展观的核心[J].哲学研究,2005(11):6.
[146]凯蒂·索珀.人道主义与反人道主义[M].寥申白译.北京:人民出版社,1999.21.
[148]转引自科恩.科学中的革命[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[149] Horkheimer, M. ?Critical Theory: Selected Essays[M].New York: Continuum Pub.Corp,1982.32.
[150]胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1988.7.
[151]弗·卡普拉.转折点—科学·社会·兴起中的新文化[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989: 16.
[152]J.里夫金.生物技术世纪[M].付立杰译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000.37.
[153]转引自姚庆海.论科学理性与人文精神的统一[J].自然辩证法,1992(8):68.
[154]胡锦涛.在省部级主要领导干部提高构建社会主义和谐社会能力专题研讨班上的讲话[N].人民日报.
[155]余文烈.当代国外社会主义流派[M].合肥:安徽人民出版社,2000.534.
[156]愈可平.全球化时代的“马克思主义”:九十年代国外社会主义述评[M].北京:中央编译局出版社,1998.79.
[157]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]:第25卷.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1974. 926-927.
[159]薛为昶.超越与建构:生态理念及其方法论意义[J].东南大学学报(哲社版),2003(4).
[160]唐代兴.生态理性哲学导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.235.
[162]潘岳.环境保护与社会公平[J].中国国情国力,2004(12):35.
[165]严立冬.生态创新理论的内生化分析[J].生态经济通讯,2004,161(:8)1-5.
[166]参见费世民等.关于森林生态效益补偿问题的探讨[J].林业科学,2004(4):172.
[167]科技日报[N].2002-10-22.
[168]参见中国中央国务院[N].关于加快林业发展的决定,2003,6.25.
[169]参见江泽慧.中国现代林业[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.58.
[170]参见孔凡斌.试论森林生态补偿制度的政策理论、对策与实现途径[J].西北林学院学报,2003(2):103.
[171]肖峰.高技术时代的人文忧患[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2001.28.
[172]冯之浚.论生态循环发展[J].中国软科学,2004(10).
[173]光明网http://www.gmw.cn/03pindao/2004-04/05/content_10239.htm
[174]王如松.资源、环境与产业转型的复合生态管理[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003(2):125.
[175]张康之.公共行政中的哲学与伦理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.236.
[176]世界环境与发展委员会主编.我们共同的未来[G].王之佳等译.长春:吉林人民出版社1997.52.
[177]参见第12届世界林业大会文件选编[C].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.25.
[178]参见黄鹤羽等.中国林情[M].北京:开明出版社,2000.78.
[179]参见国家林业局森林资源管理司.第六次全国森林资源清查及森林资源状况[J].绿色中国,2005(1)(B):11.
[180]参见周生贤.中国林业的历史性转变[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.121.
[181]温铁军.新农村建设新在哪里[J].决策与信息,2006(4):10.
[182]《南风窗》编辑部.生态政治浮现中国[J].南风窗,2005(4).
[183]叶耀先.可持续城镇建设理念[J].建筑学报,2002(9):48-51.
[184]邵爱云,方明.生态小城镇规划探索——以安徽省淮南市毛集实验区规划为例[J].小城镇建设,2004(12):9-11.
[185]转引自张磊.福州市社区生态性现状调查及评价[D].福建:福建师范大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[186]董宪军.生态城市论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002.128-137.