长春高新技术产业开发区规划战略环境影响评价
|
摘要
本文以可持续发展理论、城市规划原理等为理论指导,采用模糊评判法、层次分析法等多种模型和方法对开发区总体规划进行战略环境影响评价。
论文首先从研究开发区现状入手,对开发区产业结构与用地布局、开发区与周边地区的关系、环境保护与环境基础设施状况等进行分析论述,找出存在的主要环境问题,由此对总体规划设计方案进行初步判断分析研究。然后对开发建设过程中的生态环境影响进行评价,预见可能出现的环境问题;针对有高新技术产业代表性的汽车产业园区、医药产业园区进行战略环境评价,为继续坚持主导产业的发展方向提供科学保证;最后对开发区的环境承载力作出分析评价。
本论文通过对典型实例——长春高新技术产业开发区的战略环境评价,对以工业用地为主的新开发建设区域,如何控制环境污染,解决环境问题提出了合理化建议,为开发区规划的实施提供了科学依据。
Strategic Environmental Assessment is the environmental impact assessment in the strategic level (policy, planning and urban planning) applications, is implementing the goals of sustainable development of a workable means. In this paper, the Changchun High-tech Industry Development Zone Planning for the SEA theoretical and practical research, from which to explore strategic planning for China's development of the environmental impact assessment techniques, and Changchun High-tech Industry Development Zone, planned to provide a scientific basis for the development and rationalization Recommendations.
1. First of all, planning and construction of development zones to carry out the necessity and feasibility of SEA were discussed, analyzed the current SEA research and practice challenges and problems; on strategic environmental impact assessment study and practice at home and abroad to carry out the analysis of induction , A study of the content of this article and research framework.
2. Analysis on the sustainable development theory, theory of cyclical economy, urban planning principles of ecosystem theory in urban planning and construction of the guiding role of theory and the above-mentioned high-tech industry development zones to carry out strategic planning environmental impact assessment. In theory based on research for the development of the SEA technology methods of planning and detailed information on a variety of application methods.
3. Details of high-tech Development Zone, economic development, social development, and production areas over the past 16 years to develop the review process. Special analysis of the development of the environmental conditions and environmental conditions of infrastructure.
4.High-tech development zone of Changchun sub-regional planning (2005-2020) had discussed the nature of their land planning, industrial planning, network infrastructure plan into an analysis, focused on the landscape green space system planning and the planning of the above The reasonableness of the implementation of the program conducted a preliminary analysis of the judge.
5. Through the development of the site and reasonable analysis, development and construction of the environmental feasibility analysis, planning and development of the region to coordinate the analysis of the environmental function zoning and reasonable analysis, changes in the ecosystem and ecological suitability analysis for the development and construction process in order to The eco-environmental impact evaluation.
6. High-tech development zone of Changchun pillar industries - the automobile industry, but also in Changchun City of Jilin Province, as well as pillar industries. Development of the automotive industry attaches great importance to this article from the history of the development of the automobile industry, the status quo to the future development of the targets discussed. Select the evaluation, concluded that the establishment of evaluation system and to make constructive comments. Changchun City became state-level bio-medical and industrial base in 2006, the city government regard the development of bio-medicine industry as the second key industries to cultivate, high-tech development zone is the development of bio-pharmaceutical industry-intensive areas. Papers from the pharmaceutical industry is facing the environment, medicine and industry development ideas, such as the pharmaceutical industry's status quo, select the evaluation of the medical industry, building strategic environmental impact assessment. According to the results of the evaluation of the pharmaceutical industry park planning and construction guidance.
7. The establishment of the Changchun High-tech Industry Development Zone regional environmental bearing capacity index system, the use of AHP to calculate the weight bearing capacity indicators, and methods of use of fuzzy membership of the bearing capacity of the respective membership, as well as a comprehensive indicator of membership are calculated, Draw water, air, and other indicators of Bearing-level position.
Finally, the strategy paper drawn Environmental Impact Assessment: (1) Development planning, if implemented, would resolve the status of a serious shortage of land for development, the industry was not obvious characteristics, the lack of billion on projects to support, and so on, so that the multi-go high-tech development zone of development. Through the development of leading industries of strategic environmental assessment, we can see its leading industries automobile industry as a whole a very good level of sustainable development, the pharmaceutical industry as a whole middle level of sustainable development. New Area Planning still attaches great importance to its leading industries left ample room for land to be correct. (2) Area of the existing enterprises and investment companies are to be non-polluting or less polluting enterprises, resulting from strong sources of pollution control technology is more mature, development planning and design of environmental protection infrastructure construction has also attached great importance to the maximum To protect the regional environment. (3) Leading Industry Development Zone, referring to the major automobile industry and medical industry, from the social, economic and environmental aspects of the three automobile and pharmaceutical industries to carry out strategic environmental impact assessment, evaluation results show that the implementation of the strategy, the high-tech Industry Development Zone, a leading social Sub-system, economic system, the environment sub-system and the sustainability of the region as a whole are in a better level. (4) AHP calculated using a weight bearing capacity of indicators came to the conclusion that the PM10 air environment may belong to the carrying capacity level, COD environmental bearing capacity, NH3-N to the environment and industrial capacity in a relatively weak capacity to carry Power level, and the remaining capacity of water resources, SO2 bearing capacity of the atmospheric environment, as well as the environmental voice in all non-load bearing capacity of the level. High-tech Industry Development Zone, comprehensive capacity may membership to 0.3308, its environmental capacity to carry a weak level.
The article is that innovation in this article for the first time in a strategic environmental impact assessment in the region of the green landscape ecological planning to carry out research on the matrix, the corridor, patches of different-scale ecological landscape elements to plan, establish a complete and rational pattern of the landscape. The use of landscape dominance on the development of ecological suitability analysis. Established by the social environment and the natural environment and pollution of the environment 3, a total of 7 indicators of the ecological component of satisfaction evaluation system of regional ecological assessment of satisfaction. For the first time a state-level development zone of the leading industries of strategic environmental impact assessment, the use of fuzzy evaluation method, from the social, economic and environmental point of view on the development of leading industries to evaluate the level of sustainable development. Strategic environmental impact assessment for the first time introduced the concept of regional environmental bearing capacity, the establishment of a regional environmental bearing capacity index system, all of a sudden supply of natural resources from pollution in areas such as the bearing capacity of the regional environmental bearing capacity to carry out a comprehensive evaluation.
论文首先从研究开发区现状入手,对开发区产业结构与用地布局、开发区与周边地区的关系、环境保护与环境基础设施状况等进行分析论述,找出存在的主要环境问题,由此对总体规划设计方案进行初步判断分析研究。然后对开发建设过程中的生态环境影响进行评价,预见可能出现的环境问题;针对有高新技术产业代表性的汽车产业园区、医药产业园区进行战略环境评价,为继续坚持主导产业的发展方向提供科学保证;最后对开发区的环境承载力作出分析评价。
本论文通过对典型实例——长春高新技术产业开发区的战略环境评价,对以工业用地为主的新开发建设区域,如何控制环境污染,解决环境问题提出了合理化建议,为开发区规划的实施提供了科学依据。
Strategic Environmental Assessment is the environmental impact assessment in the strategic level (policy, planning and urban planning) applications, is implementing the goals of sustainable development of a workable means. In this paper, the Changchun High-tech Industry Development Zone Planning for the SEA theoretical and practical research, from which to explore strategic planning for China's development of the environmental impact assessment techniques, and Changchun High-tech Industry Development Zone, planned to provide a scientific basis for the development and rationalization Recommendations.
1. First of all, planning and construction of development zones to carry out the necessity and feasibility of SEA were discussed, analyzed the current SEA research and practice challenges and problems; on strategic environmental impact assessment study and practice at home and abroad to carry out the analysis of induction , A study of the content of this article and research framework.
2. Analysis on the sustainable development theory, theory of cyclical economy, urban planning principles of ecosystem theory in urban planning and construction of the guiding role of theory and the above-mentioned high-tech industry development zones to carry out strategic planning environmental impact assessment. In theory based on research for the development of the SEA technology methods of planning and detailed information on a variety of application methods.
3. Details of high-tech Development Zone, economic development, social development, and production areas over the past 16 years to develop the review process. Special analysis of the development of the environmental conditions and environmental conditions of infrastructure.
4.High-tech development zone of Changchun sub-regional planning (2005-2020) had discussed the nature of their land planning, industrial planning, network infrastructure plan into an analysis, focused on the landscape green space system planning and the planning of the above The reasonableness of the implementation of the program conducted a preliminary analysis of the judge.
5. Through the development of the site and reasonable analysis, development and construction of the environmental feasibility analysis, planning and development of the region to coordinate the analysis of the environmental function zoning and reasonable analysis, changes in the ecosystem and ecological suitability analysis for the development and construction process in order to The eco-environmental impact evaluation.
6. High-tech development zone of Changchun pillar industries - the automobile industry, but also in Changchun City of Jilin Province, as well as pillar industries. Development of the automotive industry attaches great importance to this article from the history of the development of the automobile industry, the status quo to the future development of the targets discussed. Select the evaluation, concluded that the establishment of evaluation system and to make constructive comments. Changchun City became state-level bio-medical and industrial base in 2006, the city government regard the development of bio-medicine industry as the second key industries to cultivate, high-tech development zone is the development of bio-pharmaceutical industry-intensive areas. Papers from the pharmaceutical industry is facing the environment, medicine and industry development ideas, such as the pharmaceutical industry's status quo, select the evaluation of the medical industry, building strategic environmental impact assessment. According to the results of the evaluation of the pharmaceutical industry park planning and construction guidance.
7. The establishment of the Changchun High-tech Industry Development Zone regional environmental bearing capacity index system, the use of AHP to calculate the weight bearing capacity indicators, and methods of use of fuzzy membership of the bearing capacity of the respective membership, as well as a comprehensive indicator of membership are calculated, Draw water, air, and other indicators of Bearing-level position.
Finally, the strategy paper drawn Environmental Impact Assessment: (1) Development planning, if implemented, would resolve the status of a serious shortage of land for development, the industry was not obvious characteristics, the lack of billion on projects to support, and so on, so that the multi-go high-tech development zone of development. Through the development of leading industries of strategic environmental assessment, we can see its leading industries automobile industry as a whole a very good level of sustainable development, the pharmaceutical industry as a whole middle level of sustainable development. New Area Planning still attaches great importance to its leading industries left ample room for land to be correct. (2) Area of the existing enterprises and investment companies are to be non-polluting or less polluting enterprises, resulting from strong sources of pollution control technology is more mature, development planning and design of environmental protection infrastructure construction has also attached great importance to the maximum To protect the regional environment. (3) Leading Industry Development Zone, referring to the major automobile industry and medical industry, from the social, economic and environmental aspects of the three automobile and pharmaceutical industries to carry out strategic environmental impact assessment, evaluation results show that the implementation of the strategy, the high-tech Industry Development Zone, a leading social Sub-system, economic system, the environment sub-system and the sustainability of the region as a whole are in a better level. (4) AHP calculated using a weight bearing capacity of indicators came to the conclusion that the PM10 air environment may belong to the carrying capacity level, COD environmental bearing capacity, NH3-N to the environment and industrial capacity in a relatively weak capacity to carry Power level, and the remaining capacity of water resources, SO2 bearing capacity of the atmospheric environment, as well as the environmental voice in all non-load bearing capacity of the level. High-tech Industry Development Zone, comprehensive capacity may membership to 0.3308, its environmental capacity to carry a weak level.
The article is that innovation in this article for the first time in a strategic environmental impact assessment in the region of the green landscape ecological planning to carry out research on the matrix, the corridor, patches of different-scale ecological landscape elements to plan, establish a complete and rational pattern of the landscape. The use of landscape dominance on the development of ecological suitability analysis. Established by the social environment and the natural environment and pollution of the environment 3, a total of 7 indicators of the ecological component of satisfaction evaluation system of regional ecological assessment of satisfaction. For the first time a state-level development zone of the leading industries of strategic environmental impact assessment, the use of fuzzy evaluation method, from the social, economic and environmental point of view on the development of leading industries to evaluate the level of sustainable development. Strategic environmental impact assessment for the first time introduced the concept of regional environmental bearing capacity, the establishment of a regional environmental bearing capacity index system, all of a sudden supply of natural resources from pollution in areas such as the bearing capacity of the regional environmental bearing capacity to carry out a comprehensive evaluation.
引文
[1] Reed,Sue,The Environment Agency’Use of EIA/SEA to Deliver Sustainable Development. BACK TO THE FUTURE.-Where Will Impact Assessment Be in 10 Years AND HOW DO WE GET THREE? ABSTRACTS VOLUME. The HongKong Convention and Exhibition Center.Hong Kong:19-23,June,2000
[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(1992). A synoptic approach to cumulative impact assessment. EPA/600/R-92/167.Washington,DC:U.S.Department of Agriculture.
[3] William A ROSS,Cumulative effects Assessment:learning from Canadian case studies,Impact Assessment and Appraisal,vol.16,No.4,Dec.1998.
[4] Thomas B. Fischer, Benefits Arising from SEA Application-A Comparative Noord-Holland, and Brandenburg-Berlin,Environmental Impact Assessment Review,1999:19:143-173.
[5] Riordan T O and Seuell W R D.From project Appraisal to Policy Review. John wilcy &Sons Ltd.1981.
[6] Riordan T O and Seuell W R D.From project Appraisal to Policy Review. John wilcy &Sons Ltd.1981. Lam K C and Brown A L.EIA in Hong Kong: Effective But Limited. Asian Journal of Environmental Management.1997,5(1):51～65
[7] Lee N. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Training Guide, Occasional Paper 18,Department of Planning and Landscape.University of Manchester[J].2nd Edition.1989.
[8] Lee N, Walsh F. Strategic Environment Assessment[J]. An Overview Project Appraisal,7(3):126～136.
[9] Wood C,(1988), EIA in Plan Making.In P. Wathern(ed.) Environmental Impact Assessment:Theory and Practice[J].London:UnwinHyman,98～114.
[10] Keinlschmidt V. and Wanger D, Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe: Fourth European Workshop on Environmental Impact Assessment[J]. Dordrechi\Boston\London;Kluwer Academic Publishers.1998.
[11]王华东,李巍.区域战略环境影响评价研究[J].能源与环境.1997,14(2):1～5.
[12]尚金城,包存宽.战略环境评价系统及工作程序[J].城市环境与城市生态.2000,13(3):31～33.
[13]李巍,王华东,王淑华.战略环境影响评价研究[J].环境科学进展.1995,3(3).1～5
[14]马蔚纯,林健枝.战略环境评价(SEA)及其研究进展[J]。环境科学,2000,21(5):107～112.
[15] Mark Seasons. Monitoring and evaluation in municipal planning.American Planning Association.Journal of the American Planning Association[J],2003,69(4):430-432
[16] Canadian Federation. The 1999cabinet directive on the environmental impact assessment of policy, plan and program proposal[EB/OL].1999.
[17] Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board. Strategic Environmental Assessment[R].www.cnsopb.ns.ca/,2001.
[18] Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment,The Netherlands.Further experiences on EIA in the Netherlands,Process,Methodology,a Case Study[R].http://www.eia.nl,2001
[19] Michael Short,Carys Jones.Current Practice in the Strategic Environmental Assessment of Development Plans in England[J].Regional Studies,2004,38(2):177-179
[20] Adam Barker,Thomas B Fischer. English Regionalization and Sustainability:Towards the Development of an Integrated Approach to Strategic Environmental Assessment[J]. European Planning Studies,2003,11(6):697-701
[21] Robert A Rosen, Alessandro Olivieri. European Environmental Compliance 2002:The Shift from Carrot to Stick[J]. Environmental Claims Journal,2003,15(3):397-402
[22]尚金城,包存宽.战略环境评价的研究与进展.[J]中加战略环境影响评价研讨会论文集.2001,11
[23]中国21世纪议程—中国21世纪人口,环境与发展白皮书.北京:中国环境科学出版社.1994,111～112
[24]丁品.从项目环评走向战略环评—九届全国人大常委会分组审议《环境影响评价法“草案”》综述[J].中国环境报(网络版).2000,12
[25]王灿发.环境影响评价法起草中应予以重视的几个问题的探讨[J].中国环境报(网络版).2001,3
[26]王彬辉.关于《环境影响评价法》有关立法问题的思考[J].中国环境报(网络版).2001,4
[27]第九届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第三十次会议《中华人民共和国环境影响评价法》.中国环境报(网络版).2002,10
[28]郝明家,郭怀成.沈阳市浑南新区规划环境影响评价研究[J].环境保护科学,2003,29:42-45
[29]杨林,舒麒麟等.西安曲江新区可持续发展的战略环境评价及环境规划[J].陕西环境,2003,10(5):14-16
[30]杜庆民等.天津市蓟县经济开发区环境影响评价与规划[J].城市环境与城市生态,2000,13(3)17-19
[31]史志娟,袁九毅.浅谈甘肃省西部开发战略环境评价[J].甘肃科技,2004,20(9):24-26
[32]李书绅.战略环境评价与区域环境影响评价[J].中国环境科学.2000,20(suppl):59～63
[33]段永蕙.关于我国环境影响评价制度发展与完善的思考[J].环境保护科学.2000,26(2):40～43
[34]李巍.政策环境影响评价.北京师范大学博士学位论文[D].1997,4.
[35]李巍,杨志峰.重大经济政策环境影响评价初探—中国汽车产业政策环境影响评价[J].中国环境科学.2000,20(2):114～118.
[36]李巍,程红光,毛渭峰.西部大开发概要性战略环境评价大纲研究[J].环境科学与技术.2002,25(3):35～37.
[37]车秀珍,尚金城,陈冲.生态学理念在城市化进行战略环境评价中的应用[J].重庆环境科学.2002,24(3):71～73.
[38]徐鹤,朱坦,贾纯荣.战略环境评价(SEA)在中国的开展[J].城市环境与城市生态.2000,13(3):4～10.
[39]徐鹤,朱坦,戴树桂等.战略环境影响评价与可持续发展[J].中国人口?资源与环境.2000,10(Special Issue):9～11
[40]徐鹤,朱坦,梁丹.战略环境评价方法学研究[J].上海环境科学.2001,21(6):295～296.
[41]洪尚群,贺京,董海京等.基于政策规律的战略环境影响评价[J].重庆环境科学.2002,24(1):9～12.
[42]洪尚群,李亚园,闫自申等.不同政策组合的战略环境影响评价[J].环境保护科学.2001,27(108):49～51.
[43]马蔚纯,林健枝,沈家等.高密度城市道路交通噪声的典型分布及其在战略环境评价中的应用[J].环境科学学报.2002,22(4):514～518.
[44]彭理通.战略环境评价探索研究[J].中加战略环境影响评价论文集.2001,11
[45]郭红连,黄懿瑜,马蔚纯等。战略环境评价(SEA)的指标体系研究[J]。复旦学报(自然科学版).2003,42(3):468～475.
[46]沈清基.规划环境影响评价及城市规划的应对[J].城市生态研究,2004,28:52～56
[47]薛继斌.土地整理规划环境影响评价研究[D].浙江大学,2004,7:1～66
[48]张红军,王学东,陶雪良.社会经济政策的环境分析[M].北京北京大学出版社,1994
[49]高尚宾.政府决策的农业环境影响评价初探[J].农业环境与发展,1995,(4):1～4
[50]车秀珍,尚金城.晋陕蒙接壤地区能源基地战略环境影响评价研究[J].资源开发与市场,2002,(5):24～27
[51]项立新.风力发电场环境影响评价初步探讨[J].华东水电技术,1992,(2):40～42
[52]对修订中的《大气污染防治法》进行EIA,国家环境保护总局环境与经济政策研究中心,2000
[53]吉林省石油化工设计研究院.长春德惠玉米生物化工工业区新建项目环境影响报告书。2004:3～17.
[54] Keinlschmidt V. and Wanger D., Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe: Fourth European Workshop on Environmental Impact Assessment. Dordrechi\Boston\London:Kluwer Academic Publishers.1998.
[55] Therivel R., Partidaro M.K. The practice of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan Publication Ltd, 1996.
[56] A.Chaker,K.EI—Fadl,L.Chamas,ete.Areview of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2006,26:15～56
[57] Maria Rosario Partidario. Elements of an SEA Framework—Improving the Added Value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2000,(20):647～663
[58] Dimitri Devuyst, Thomas Van Wijngaarden, Luc Hens. Implementation of SEA in Flanders;Attitude of Key Stakeholders and User～Friendly Methodology[J].Environmental Impact Review.2000,(20):65～83.
[59] Goran Finnveden, Mans Nilsson, Jessica Johansson. Strategic Environmental Assessment Methodologies—Application within the Energy Sector. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2003,(23):91～123.
[60] Rosa Arce, Natalia Gullon. The Application of Strategic Environmental Assessment to Sustainability Assessment of Infrastructure Development[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2000,(20):393～402.
[61] Hauk von Seht. Requirements of a Comprehensive Strategic Environmental Assessment System[J].Landscape and Urban Planning.1999,(45):1～14.
[62] P. Benjamin Underwood, Charles C. Alton. Could the SEA～Directive Succeed in United States. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2003,(23):259～261
[63] Nathalie Risse, Michel Crowley,Philippe Vincke,et al.Implementing the Europan SEA Directive: the Member States’Margin of Discretion[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2003,(23):453～470.
[64] Clive Briffett, Jeffrey Philip Obbard, Jamie Mackee. Towards SEA for the Developing Countries in Asia[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2003,(23):171～196.
[65] Working Group of the SEA of the TEN.Spatial and Ecological Assessment of the TEN:Demonstration of indicators and GIS Methods progress Report of the DGVII DGXI Eurostal EEA[R].European Environment Agency,1998
[66] Riki T,Maria R.The Practice of strategic Environmental Assessment.London:Earthscan,publication Ltd,1996.
[67] European Environment Agency.Data collection guidelines for the Kiev report[R].Europe:EEA, September,2001.
[68] Gustavson R,Lonergan C,Ruitenbeele H J.Selection and modeling of sustainable development indicators:A case study of the Fraser River Basin ,British Columbia[J].Ecological economics,1999,28:117～132.
[69]刘培哲,潘家华,周宏春,庄贵阳,Emily Yeh.可持续发展理论与中国21世纪议程.气象出版社.2001,2
[70]黄思明等.可持续发展的评判[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001
[71]李巍等.面向可持续发展的战略环境影响评价[J]中国环境科学,1998,18(9):66-69
[72]何德文,钱晓荣.战略环境影响评价与可持续发展的关系研究[J]重庆环境科学.2000,22(1):20-22
[73]同济大学主编,城市规划原理[M]中国建筑工业出版社1991:26-28
[74]宋永昌,城市生态学[M]华东师范大学出版社,2000
[75]王如松,转型期城市生态学前沿研究进展[J]生态学报,2000
[76]朱铁臻.循环经济的理论基础是生态经济.http://www.e-economic.com, 2005.4.20
[77]孙国强.循环经济的新范式—循环经济生态城市的理论与实践[M]北京:清华大学出版社,2005.3
[78]张凯.循环经济理论研究与实践[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2004.9
[79]马锦义.论城市绿地系统的组成与分类.中国园林,2002,18(1):23-26.
[80]陈国平.21世纪城市绿地系统规划的认识与思考.湖南城市学院学报(自然科学版),2004,13(1):28-30
[81]李敏.论城市绿地系统规划理论与方法的与时俱进.中国园林,2202(5):17-20.
[82]千庆兰,陈颖彪.吉林市城市绿地系统规划研究.北京林业大学学报,2004,26(5):61-65
[83] Odum E P. The strategy of ecosystem development science, 1996, 16(4):262-270.
[84]吴承照.风景园林研究进展.中国园林,200,16(3):88-93
[85]振海.从得梅因市的生态环境看美国的园林绿化.中国园林,1997,13(2):30-32.
[86]常玉生.绿化和文化是城市的灵魂——驻德归来随想.中国园林,2001,17(6):60-66
[87]谢华.新加坡花园城市建设之研究.中国园林,2002,18(6):33-35
[88]曹鉴燎,苏启林,刘一明.城市绿地规划分析与评述.中国人口资源与环境,2001,11(1):97-100
[89]车生泉.城市绿地景观结构分析与生态规划——以上海市为例.南京东南大学出版社,2003:1
[90]许先升,梁伊任,王浩.安阳市市域绿地景观生态规划初探.北京林业大学学报,2003,2(2):31-35
[91]胡勇,赵媛.南京城市绿地景观格局之初步分析.中国园林,2004,20(11):34-36
[92]王天明,王晓春,国庆喜,等.哈尔滨市绿地景观格局与过程的连通性和完整性.应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(4):402-407.
[93]魏斌,王景旭,张涛.城市绿地生态效果评价方法的改进.城市环境与城市生态,1997,10(4):54-56.
[94]王丽荣,李贞,管东生.广州城市绿地系统景观生态学分析.城市环境与城市生态,1998,11(3):26-29
[95]李贞,王丽荣,管东生.广州城市绿地系统景观异质性分析.应用生态学报,2000,11(1):127-130.
[96]周廷刚,陈云浩,郭达志,等.模糊综合法在城市绿地系统景观生态综合评价中的应用.城市环境与城市生态,1999,12(4):23-25
[97]侯碧清.株洲市城市绿地系统景观生态综合评价.中南林业调查规划,2004,23(4):12-13,22
[98]严玲璋.发挥上海绿色空间优势的思考.中国园林,2001,17(2):57-59
[99]豆俊峰.重庆城市绿地景观生态建设[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2002,24(2):7-10
[100]刘玉华,刘奎.浅议景观生态学在城市绿地系统规划中的应用.江苏林业科技,2004,31(5):22-25
[101] Jim, C.Y., Chen, S.S. Comprehensive greenspace planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing City, China. Landscape Urban Planning, 2003, (65):95-116.
[102] Feng Li, Rusong Wang, Juergen Paulussen, Xusheng Liu. Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China. Landscapeand Urban Planning, 2005,(72):325-336.
[103]田国行,薛永卿,朱德昭.郑州经济技术开发区绿地系统规划.中国园林,2003,(6):73-74
[104]原帅让.高科技园区绿地系统规划初探.广东园林,2006,28(2):19-22
[105]孙青丽,姚崇怀.武汉经济技术开发区绿地景观格局分析.农业科技与信息.现代园林,2006,(4):25-27
[106]罗云浩,王新建,李晓阁,等.城市绿地系统的景观生态功能及问题.河南林业科技,2004,24(1):36-37,55
[107]郑强.城市园林绿地规划.北京:气象出版社,2001:64-81
[108]曲格平.中国生态安全的战略重点和措施[J].环境保护,2002,8
[109]张宏伟,王亮,辛志伟.改善生态环境规划的战略环境评价[J].城市环境与城市生态,2003,16:60-62
[110]刘华,钟炜,张建民,张文兴.城市化过程中的生态问题初探,经济地理,2006,26(1)
[111]姜乃力,论城市生态系统特征及其平衡的调控.水土保持学报,2005,19(2)
[112]廖承彬,王国平.东阳市实施水土保持生态修复的实践与思考.中国水土保持,2006,1
[113]陈彩虹,姚士谋,陈爽.城市化过程中的景观生态环境效应.干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(3) 1-5
[114] Z Naveh;Landscape ecology as a bridge between bio-ecology and human ecology,Cultural Aspects of Landscape[M],Pudoc,Wageningen,Nethelands,1990
[115] Z Naveh and A.Liebeman: Landscape Ecology—Theory and Application [M],Second Edition,Spriner—Verlag New York,1994.
[116]肖笃宁,赵羿,孙中伟等.景观生态学理论、方法及应用[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 1991.189—195
[117]王文初.浅谈生态系统满意度在区域开发生态环境影响评价中的应用[J].环境污染与防治,2004,4(2):1-4.
[118]田刚.环境影响评价典型实例[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
[119]唐晓慧,林年丰,姜玲玲.吉林省城市生态建设现状评价及对比分析[J] .吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004(S1):144-148
[120]赛珠.关于城市绿化建设问题.“绿色论坛”,国土绿化,2001.5
[121]中国现代化报告课题组.中国现代化报告[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001
[122]杨伟清.大鹏一日同风起-记长春高新区汽车产业高技术产业发展[J].开发区建设,2003(19):22-25.
[123]许治,师萍.我国汽车产业技术能力发展战略[J].中国软科学,2005,(5):125-130
[124]朱盛镭,王莹.汽车大集团可持续发展战略研究(下)[J].技术经济,2003:1-10.
[125]高韵,罗有贤.重庆汽车产业发展战略[J].重庆工学院学报(社会科学),2008,22(6):74-76
[126]李金津.对我国新能源汽车产业的发展思考及相关建议[J].工业技术经济,2008,27(1):6-8.
[127]汽车产业发展政策.http://www.autorepair.com.cn/standard/cyzhc.htm
[128]王兰霞,周立国,祁向前.黑龙江省可持续发展模糊综合评价研究[J].鸡西大学学报,2007,7,(2):27-29
[129]李利锋,郑度.区域可持续发展评价进展及展望[J].地理科学进展,2002(3):237-248
[130]陈晓燕,何有世.江苏城市可持续发展能力的综合评价[J]..经济纵横,2005(8):109-111
[131] sun Lixin,Li Liangbao.Multi-IEVEL fuzzy Comprehensive Appraisal on Social Effects of Projects.Procedings of 2003 international conference on construction,2003,10:56-59
[132]姚建,王燕,雷蕾,苏维,罗佩宁.崛江上游生态脆弱性的模糊评价[J].国土科技管理,2006(2):90-92
[133]李祚泳.模糊数学与环境科学[J].自然杂志,1986,9(2):97-100.
[134]邓峰.水质评价的一种新方法—模糊综合指数法[J].中国环境科学,1991,11(l):63-66.
[135]张旭成.水质分级评价的模糊数学方法研究[J].水文,1998,18(6):24-27.
[136]王红丹.用贴近度进行大气质量综合评价[J].上海环境科学,1989,8(6):22-23
[137]刘康兰,袁浩.模糊综合评判在环境质量评价中的应用[J].环境工程:2000,18(1):55-56.
[138]潘峰,傅强,梁川.模糊综合评判在水环境质量综合评价中的应用研究[J].环境工程,2002,20(2):58-61.
[139]叶文虎,唐剑武.可持续发展的衡量方法及衡量指标初探[M].可持续发展之路.北京:北京大学出版社, 1995:57-61
[140]徐建华.现代地理学中数学方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2002
[141]孙英兰,宋荣兴,孙海涛.城市水资源系统模糊综合评价[J].中国海洋大学学报,2008,38(2):232-236
[142]宋旭光.可持续发展测度方法的系统分析[D],东北财经大学博士论文,2002:134-142] [朱启贵.可持续发展评估[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1999:8-50
[143]吴曙霞,李培进,蔡国友,张传本,吴翠玲.基于区域竞争力的生物医药产业规划研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2005,15(21):129~130.
[144]舒燕.我国医药产业集群现状及发展对策分析[J].中国卫生行业,2007,1:88~90.
[145]顾海,董艳平,卫陈,朱航宇.中国医药产业的发展思路探析[J].中国药业,2004,13(5):7~8
[146]肖波.规划环境影响评价初探[J].污染防治技术, 2005, (1): 16-18.
[147]周灵,彭钮茸,杜阳.战略环境影响评价(SEIA)初探[J].中国环保产业, 2004, (2): 14~15.
[148]周以毅.铁路行业规划环境影响评价之初探[J].铁道劳动卫生与环保, 2006, (1): 39~41.
[149]袁旭梅,韩文秀.复合系统的协调与可持续发展[J].中国人口、资源与环境,1998,8(2):51~55.
[150]路正南,王正明,张爱龙.经济技术开发区可持续发展测评指标体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(3):116~119.
[151]方创琳,毛汉英.区域发展规划体系建立方法探讨[J].地理学报,1999.54(5):410~419
[152]程宙.淮安经济开发区的综合评价与区内项目的规划设计.南京工业大学学位论文,2004.
[153]姚雪珍.城市公共交通评价指标体系初探[J].西北建筑工程学院学报,1999
[154]池宏,伶凤勤,计雷.可持续发展的指标体系与发展规划优选模型的研究[J].中国管理科学,1996,(1):8~12
[155]赵玉林,汪芳.高新技术开发区评价指标体系的构建与应用[J].科技进步与对策,2000,17(6):37~39.
[156]苏亚芳.城市投资环境的评价模型及应用[J].地理研究,1994,13(3):14~23
[157]李金海.区域生态承载力与可持续发展[Jl.中国人口喷源与环境,2001,11(3):76一78
[158]曾维华,杨月梅。环境承载力不确定性多目标优化模型及其应用。中国环境科学,20008,28(5):667~672
[159]唐剑武,郭怀成,叶文虎. 1997.环境承载力及其在环境规划中的初步应用[J ] .中国环境科学,17 (1) :6～9.
[160]韩波,邵波.门槛分析法在区域承载力测算中的应用研究一以海岛承载力研究为例[J1.经济地理,1992(4):巧一19
[161]陈百明.我国土地资源承载力能力研究一以黄淮海为例[J].自然资源学报,1989,4(l):38一41
[162]董巍,刘听等.生态旅游承载力评价与功能分区研究一以金华市为例【J].复旦大学学报(自然科学版),2004.12:1024一1029
[163]毛汉英,余丹林.区域承载力定量研究方法探讨[J].地球科学进展,2001,16(4):549一555
[164]杜金辉,吕培茹,甄文栋,张媛,张承,慕金波.山东省生态环境承载力评价指标体系探讨[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2008,18(01):10~14
[165]唐建武,郭怀成,叶文虎.环境承载力及其在环境规划中的初步应用[J].中国环境科学,1997,17(I
[166]郭怀成,商金城,张天柱。环境规划学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001:130
[167]朱国宇,黄川友,华国春.层次分析法在水环境规划中的应用[J]东北水利水电, 2003,(04) :128~130
[168]张明顺,钟杰青.层次分析法在城市环境规划指标体系研究中的应用[J].环境科学研究, 1995,8(05):13~19
[169]曾毅.区域土地利用现状评价指标体系研究[J]国土资源导刊, 2005,(05) .23~27
[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(1992). A synoptic approach to cumulative impact assessment. EPA/600/R-92/167.Washington,DC:U.S.Department of Agriculture.
[3] William A ROSS,Cumulative effects Assessment:learning from Canadian case studies,Impact Assessment and Appraisal,vol.16,No.4,Dec.1998.
[4] Thomas B. Fischer, Benefits Arising from SEA Application-A Comparative Noord-Holland, and Brandenburg-Berlin,Environmental Impact Assessment Review,1999:19:143-173.
[5] Riordan T O and Seuell W R D.From project Appraisal to Policy Review. John wilcy &Sons Ltd.1981.
[6] Riordan T O and Seuell W R D.From project Appraisal to Policy Review. John wilcy &Sons Ltd.1981. Lam K C and Brown A L.EIA in Hong Kong: Effective But Limited. Asian Journal of Environmental Management.1997,5(1):51～65
[7] Lee N. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Training Guide, Occasional Paper 18,Department of Planning and Landscape.University of Manchester[J].2nd Edition.1989.
[8] Lee N, Walsh F. Strategic Environment Assessment[J]. An Overview Project Appraisal,7(3):126～136.
[9] Wood C,(1988), EIA in Plan Making.In P. Wathern(ed.) Environmental Impact Assessment:Theory and Practice[J].London:UnwinHyman,98～114.
[10] Keinlschmidt V. and Wanger D, Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe: Fourth European Workshop on Environmental Impact Assessment[J]. Dordrechi\Boston\London;Kluwer Academic Publishers.1998.
[11]王华东,李巍.区域战略环境影响评价研究[J].能源与环境.1997,14(2):1～5.
[12]尚金城,包存宽.战略环境评价系统及工作程序[J].城市环境与城市生态.2000,13(3):31～33.
[13]李巍,王华东,王淑华.战略环境影响评价研究[J].环境科学进展.1995,3(3).1～5
[14]马蔚纯,林健枝.战略环境评价(SEA)及其研究进展[J]。环境科学,2000,21(5):107～112.
[15] Mark Seasons. Monitoring and evaluation in municipal planning.American Planning Association.Journal of the American Planning Association[J],2003,69(4):430-432
[16] Canadian Federation. The 1999cabinet directive on the environmental impact assessment of policy, plan and program proposal[EB/OL].1999.
[17] Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board. Strategic Environmental Assessment[R].www.cnsopb.ns.ca/,2001.
[18] Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment,The Netherlands.Further experiences on EIA in the Netherlands,Process,Methodology,a Case Study[R].http://www.eia.nl,2001
[19] Michael Short,Carys Jones.Current Practice in the Strategic Environmental Assessment of Development Plans in England[J].Regional Studies,2004,38(2):177-179
[20] Adam Barker,Thomas B Fischer. English Regionalization and Sustainability:Towards the Development of an Integrated Approach to Strategic Environmental Assessment[J]. European Planning Studies,2003,11(6):697-701
[21] Robert A Rosen, Alessandro Olivieri. European Environmental Compliance 2002:The Shift from Carrot to Stick[J]. Environmental Claims Journal,2003,15(3):397-402
[22]尚金城,包存宽.战略环境评价的研究与进展.[J]中加战略环境影响评价研讨会论文集.2001,11
[23]中国21世纪议程—中国21世纪人口,环境与发展白皮书.北京:中国环境科学出版社.1994,111～112
[24]丁品.从项目环评走向战略环评—九届全国人大常委会分组审议《环境影响评价法“草案”》综述[J].中国环境报(网络版).2000,12
[25]王灿发.环境影响评价法起草中应予以重视的几个问题的探讨[J].中国环境报(网络版).2001,3
[26]王彬辉.关于《环境影响评价法》有关立法问题的思考[J].中国环境报(网络版).2001,4
[27]第九届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第三十次会议《中华人民共和国环境影响评价法》.中国环境报(网络版).2002,10
[28]郝明家,郭怀成.沈阳市浑南新区规划环境影响评价研究[J].环境保护科学,2003,29:42-45
[29]杨林,舒麒麟等.西安曲江新区可持续发展的战略环境评价及环境规划[J].陕西环境,2003,10(5):14-16
[30]杜庆民等.天津市蓟县经济开发区环境影响评价与规划[J].城市环境与城市生态,2000,13(3)17-19
[31]史志娟,袁九毅.浅谈甘肃省西部开发战略环境评价[J].甘肃科技,2004,20(9):24-26
[32]李书绅.战略环境评价与区域环境影响评价[J].中国环境科学.2000,20(suppl):59～63
[33]段永蕙.关于我国环境影响评价制度发展与完善的思考[J].环境保护科学.2000,26(2):40～43
[34]李巍.政策环境影响评价.北京师范大学博士学位论文[D].1997,4.
[35]李巍,杨志峰.重大经济政策环境影响评价初探—中国汽车产业政策环境影响评价[J].中国环境科学.2000,20(2):114～118.
[36]李巍,程红光,毛渭峰.西部大开发概要性战略环境评价大纲研究[J].环境科学与技术.2002,25(3):35～37.
[37]车秀珍,尚金城,陈冲.生态学理念在城市化进行战略环境评价中的应用[J].重庆环境科学.2002,24(3):71～73.
[38]徐鹤,朱坦,贾纯荣.战略环境评价(SEA)在中国的开展[J].城市环境与城市生态.2000,13(3):4～10.
[39]徐鹤,朱坦,戴树桂等.战略环境影响评价与可持续发展[J].中国人口?资源与环境.2000,10(Special Issue):9～11
[40]徐鹤,朱坦,梁丹.战略环境评价方法学研究[J].上海环境科学.2001,21(6):295～296.
[41]洪尚群,贺京,董海京等.基于政策规律的战略环境影响评价[J].重庆环境科学.2002,24(1):9～12.
[42]洪尚群,李亚园,闫自申等.不同政策组合的战略环境影响评价[J].环境保护科学.2001,27(108):49～51.
[43]马蔚纯,林健枝,沈家等.高密度城市道路交通噪声的典型分布及其在战略环境评价中的应用[J].环境科学学报.2002,22(4):514～518.
[44]彭理通.战略环境评价探索研究[J].中加战略环境影响评价论文集.2001,11
[45]郭红连,黄懿瑜,马蔚纯等。战略环境评价(SEA)的指标体系研究[J]。复旦学报(自然科学版).2003,42(3):468～475.
[46]沈清基.规划环境影响评价及城市规划的应对[J].城市生态研究,2004,28:52～56
[47]薛继斌.土地整理规划环境影响评价研究[D].浙江大学,2004,7:1～66
[48]张红军,王学东,陶雪良.社会经济政策的环境分析[M].北京北京大学出版社,1994
[49]高尚宾.政府决策的农业环境影响评价初探[J].农业环境与发展,1995,(4):1～4
[50]车秀珍,尚金城.晋陕蒙接壤地区能源基地战略环境影响评价研究[J].资源开发与市场,2002,(5):24～27
[51]项立新.风力发电场环境影响评价初步探讨[J].华东水电技术,1992,(2):40～42
[52]对修订中的《大气污染防治法》进行EIA,国家环境保护总局环境与经济政策研究中心,2000
[53]吉林省石油化工设计研究院.长春德惠玉米生物化工工业区新建项目环境影响报告书。2004:3～17.
[54] Keinlschmidt V. and Wanger D., Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe: Fourth European Workshop on Environmental Impact Assessment. Dordrechi\Boston\London:Kluwer Academic Publishers.1998.
[55] Therivel R., Partidaro M.K. The practice of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan Publication Ltd, 1996.
[56] A.Chaker,K.EI—Fadl,L.Chamas,ete.Areview of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2006,26:15～56
[57] Maria Rosario Partidario. Elements of an SEA Framework—Improving the Added Value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2000,(20):647～663
[58] Dimitri Devuyst, Thomas Van Wijngaarden, Luc Hens. Implementation of SEA in Flanders;Attitude of Key Stakeholders and User～Friendly Methodology[J].Environmental Impact Review.2000,(20):65～83.
[59] Goran Finnveden, Mans Nilsson, Jessica Johansson. Strategic Environmental Assessment Methodologies—Application within the Energy Sector. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2003,(23):91～123.
[60] Rosa Arce, Natalia Gullon. The Application of Strategic Environmental Assessment to Sustainability Assessment of Infrastructure Development[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2000,(20):393～402.
[61] Hauk von Seht. Requirements of a Comprehensive Strategic Environmental Assessment System[J].Landscape and Urban Planning.1999,(45):1～14.
[62] P. Benjamin Underwood, Charles C. Alton. Could the SEA～Directive Succeed in United States. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2003,(23):259～261
[63] Nathalie Risse, Michel Crowley,Philippe Vincke,et al.Implementing the Europan SEA Directive: the Member States’Margin of Discretion[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.2003,(23):453～470.
[64] Clive Briffett, Jeffrey Philip Obbard, Jamie Mackee. Towards SEA for the Developing Countries in Asia[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2003,(23):171～196.
[65] Working Group of the SEA of the TEN.Spatial and Ecological Assessment of the TEN:Demonstration of indicators and GIS Methods progress Report of the DGVII DGXI Eurostal EEA[R].European Environment Agency,1998
[66] Riki T,Maria R.The Practice of strategic Environmental Assessment.London:Earthscan,publication Ltd,1996.
[67] European Environment Agency.Data collection guidelines for the Kiev report[R].Europe:EEA, September,2001.
[68] Gustavson R,Lonergan C,Ruitenbeele H J.Selection and modeling of sustainable development indicators:A case study of the Fraser River Basin ,British Columbia[J].Ecological economics,1999,28:117～132.
[69]刘培哲,潘家华,周宏春,庄贵阳,Emily Yeh.可持续发展理论与中国21世纪议程.气象出版社.2001,2
[70]黄思明等.可持续发展的评判[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001
[71]李巍等.面向可持续发展的战略环境影响评价[J]中国环境科学,1998,18(9):66-69
[72]何德文,钱晓荣.战略环境影响评价与可持续发展的关系研究[J]重庆环境科学.2000,22(1):20-22
[73]同济大学主编,城市规划原理[M]中国建筑工业出版社1991:26-28
[74]宋永昌,城市生态学[M]华东师范大学出版社,2000
[75]王如松,转型期城市生态学前沿研究进展[J]生态学报,2000
[76]朱铁臻.循环经济的理论基础是生态经济.http://www.e-economic.com, 2005.4.20
[77]孙国强.循环经济的新范式—循环经济生态城市的理论与实践[M]北京:清华大学出版社,2005.3
[78]张凯.循环经济理论研究与实践[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2004.9
[79]马锦义.论城市绿地系统的组成与分类.中国园林,2002,18(1):23-26.
[80]陈国平.21世纪城市绿地系统规划的认识与思考.湖南城市学院学报(自然科学版),2004,13(1):28-30
[81]李敏.论城市绿地系统规划理论与方法的与时俱进.中国园林,2202(5):17-20.
[82]千庆兰,陈颖彪.吉林市城市绿地系统规划研究.北京林业大学学报,2004,26(5):61-65
[83] Odum E P. The strategy of ecosystem development science, 1996, 16(4):262-270.
[84]吴承照.风景园林研究进展.中国园林,200,16(3):88-93
[85]振海.从得梅因市的生态环境看美国的园林绿化.中国园林,1997,13(2):30-32.
[86]常玉生.绿化和文化是城市的灵魂——驻德归来随想.中国园林,2001,17(6):60-66
[87]谢华.新加坡花园城市建设之研究.中国园林,2002,18(6):33-35
[88]曹鉴燎,苏启林,刘一明.城市绿地规划分析与评述.中国人口资源与环境,2001,11(1):97-100
[89]车生泉.城市绿地景观结构分析与生态规划——以上海市为例.南京东南大学出版社,2003:1
[90]许先升,梁伊任,王浩.安阳市市域绿地景观生态规划初探.北京林业大学学报,2003,2(2):31-35
[91]胡勇,赵媛.南京城市绿地景观格局之初步分析.中国园林,2004,20(11):34-36
[92]王天明,王晓春,国庆喜,等.哈尔滨市绿地景观格局与过程的连通性和完整性.应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(4):402-407.
[93]魏斌,王景旭,张涛.城市绿地生态效果评价方法的改进.城市环境与城市生态,1997,10(4):54-56.
[94]王丽荣,李贞,管东生.广州城市绿地系统景观生态学分析.城市环境与城市生态,1998,11(3):26-29
[95]李贞,王丽荣,管东生.广州城市绿地系统景观异质性分析.应用生态学报,2000,11(1):127-130.
[96]周廷刚,陈云浩,郭达志,等.模糊综合法在城市绿地系统景观生态综合评价中的应用.城市环境与城市生态,1999,12(4):23-25
[97]侯碧清.株洲市城市绿地系统景观生态综合评价.中南林业调查规划,2004,23(4):12-13,22
[98]严玲璋.发挥上海绿色空间优势的思考.中国园林,2001,17(2):57-59
[99]豆俊峰.重庆城市绿地景观生态建设[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2002,24(2):7-10
[100]刘玉华,刘奎.浅议景观生态学在城市绿地系统规划中的应用.江苏林业科技,2004,31(5):22-25
[101] Jim, C.Y., Chen, S.S. Comprehensive greenspace planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing City, China. Landscape Urban Planning, 2003, (65):95-116.
[102] Feng Li, Rusong Wang, Juergen Paulussen, Xusheng Liu. Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China. Landscapeand Urban Planning, 2005,(72):325-336.
[103]田国行,薛永卿,朱德昭.郑州经济技术开发区绿地系统规划.中国园林,2003,(6):73-74
[104]原帅让.高科技园区绿地系统规划初探.广东园林,2006,28(2):19-22
[105]孙青丽,姚崇怀.武汉经济技术开发区绿地景观格局分析.农业科技与信息.现代园林,2006,(4):25-27
[106]罗云浩,王新建,李晓阁,等.城市绿地系统的景观生态功能及问题.河南林业科技,2004,24(1):36-37,55
[107]郑强.城市园林绿地规划.北京:气象出版社,2001:64-81
[108]曲格平.中国生态安全的战略重点和措施[J].环境保护,2002,8
[109]张宏伟,王亮,辛志伟.改善生态环境规划的战略环境评价[J].城市环境与城市生态,2003,16:60-62
[110]刘华,钟炜,张建民,张文兴.城市化过程中的生态问题初探,经济地理,2006,26(1)
[111]姜乃力,论城市生态系统特征及其平衡的调控.水土保持学报,2005,19(2)
[112]廖承彬,王国平.东阳市实施水土保持生态修复的实践与思考.中国水土保持,2006,1
[113]陈彩虹,姚士谋,陈爽.城市化过程中的景观生态环境效应.干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(3) 1-5
[114] Z Naveh;Landscape ecology as a bridge between bio-ecology and human ecology,Cultural Aspects of Landscape[M],Pudoc,Wageningen,Nethelands,1990
[115] Z Naveh and A.Liebeman: Landscape Ecology—Theory and Application [M],Second Edition,Spriner—Verlag New York,1994.
[116]肖笃宁,赵羿,孙中伟等.景观生态学理论、方法及应用[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 1991.189—195
[117]王文初.浅谈生态系统满意度在区域开发生态环境影响评价中的应用[J].环境污染与防治,2004,4(2):1-4.
[118]田刚.环境影响评价典型实例[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
[119]唐晓慧,林年丰,姜玲玲.吉林省城市生态建设现状评价及对比分析[J] .吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004(S1):144-148
[120]赛珠.关于城市绿化建设问题.“绿色论坛”,国土绿化,2001.5
[121]中国现代化报告课题组.中国现代化报告[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001
[122]杨伟清.大鹏一日同风起-记长春高新区汽车产业高技术产业发展[J].开发区建设,2003(19):22-25.
[123]许治,师萍.我国汽车产业技术能力发展战略[J].中国软科学,2005,(5):125-130
[124]朱盛镭,王莹.汽车大集团可持续发展战略研究(下)[J].技术经济,2003:1-10.
[125]高韵,罗有贤.重庆汽车产业发展战略[J].重庆工学院学报(社会科学),2008,22(6):74-76
[126]李金津.对我国新能源汽车产业的发展思考及相关建议[J].工业技术经济,2008,27(1):6-8.
[127]汽车产业发展政策.http://www.autorepair.com.cn/standard/cyzhc.htm
[128]王兰霞,周立国,祁向前.黑龙江省可持续发展模糊综合评价研究[J].鸡西大学学报,2007,7,(2):27-29
[129]李利锋,郑度.区域可持续发展评价进展及展望[J].地理科学进展,2002(3):237-248
[130]陈晓燕,何有世.江苏城市可持续发展能力的综合评价[J]..经济纵横,2005(8):109-111
[131] sun Lixin,Li Liangbao.Multi-IEVEL fuzzy Comprehensive Appraisal on Social Effects of Projects.Procedings of 2003 international conference on construction,2003,10:56-59
[132]姚建,王燕,雷蕾,苏维,罗佩宁.崛江上游生态脆弱性的模糊评价[J].国土科技管理,2006(2):90-92
[133]李祚泳.模糊数学与环境科学[J].自然杂志,1986,9(2):97-100.
[134]邓峰.水质评价的一种新方法—模糊综合指数法[J].中国环境科学,1991,11(l):63-66.
[135]张旭成.水质分级评价的模糊数学方法研究[J].水文,1998,18(6):24-27.
[136]王红丹.用贴近度进行大气质量综合评价[J].上海环境科学,1989,8(6):22-23
[137]刘康兰,袁浩.模糊综合评判在环境质量评价中的应用[J].环境工程:2000,18(1):55-56.
[138]潘峰,傅强,梁川.模糊综合评判在水环境质量综合评价中的应用研究[J].环境工程,2002,20(2):58-61.
[139]叶文虎,唐剑武.可持续发展的衡量方法及衡量指标初探[M].可持续发展之路.北京:北京大学出版社, 1995:57-61
[140]徐建华.现代地理学中数学方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2002
[141]孙英兰,宋荣兴,孙海涛.城市水资源系统模糊综合评价[J].中国海洋大学学报,2008,38(2):232-236
[142]宋旭光.可持续发展测度方法的系统分析[D],东北财经大学博士论文,2002:134-142] [朱启贵.可持续发展评估[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1999:8-50
[143]吴曙霞,李培进,蔡国友,张传本,吴翠玲.基于区域竞争力的生物医药产业规划研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2005,15(21):129~130.
[144]舒燕.我国医药产业集群现状及发展对策分析[J].中国卫生行业,2007,1:88~90.
[145]顾海,董艳平,卫陈,朱航宇.中国医药产业的发展思路探析[J].中国药业,2004,13(5):7~8
[146]肖波.规划环境影响评价初探[J].污染防治技术, 2005, (1): 16-18.
[147]周灵,彭钮茸,杜阳.战略环境影响评价(SEIA)初探[J].中国环保产业, 2004, (2): 14~15.
[148]周以毅.铁路行业规划环境影响评价之初探[J].铁道劳动卫生与环保, 2006, (1): 39~41.
[149]袁旭梅,韩文秀.复合系统的协调与可持续发展[J].中国人口、资源与环境,1998,8(2):51~55.
[150]路正南,王正明,张爱龙.经济技术开发区可持续发展测评指标体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(3):116~119.
[151]方创琳,毛汉英.区域发展规划体系建立方法探讨[J].地理学报,1999.54(5):410~419
[152]程宙.淮安经济开发区的综合评价与区内项目的规划设计.南京工业大学学位论文,2004.
[153]姚雪珍.城市公共交通评价指标体系初探[J].西北建筑工程学院学报,1999
[154]池宏,伶凤勤,计雷.可持续发展的指标体系与发展规划优选模型的研究[J].中国管理科学,1996,(1):8~12
[155]赵玉林,汪芳.高新技术开发区评价指标体系的构建与应用[J].科技进步与对策,2000,17(6):37~39.
[156]苏亚芳.城市投资环境的评价模型及应用[J].地理研究,1994,13(3):14~23
[157]李金海.区域生态承载力与可持续发展[Jl.中国人口喷源与环境,2001,11(3):76一78
[158]曾维华,杨月梅。环境承载力不确定性多目标优化模型及其应用。中国环境科学,20008,28(5):667~672
[159]唐剑武,郭怀成,叶文虎. 1997.环境承载力及其在环境规划中的初步应用[J ] .中国环境科学,17 (1) :6～9.
[160]韩波,邵波.门槛分析法在区域承载力测算中的应用研究一以海岛承载力研究为例[J1.经济地理,1992(4):巧一19
[161]陈百明.我国土地资源承载力能力研究一以黄淮海为例[J].自然资源学报,1989,4(l):38一41
[162]董巍,刘听等.生态旅游承载力评价与功能分区研究一以金华市为例【J].复旦大学学报(自然科学版),2004.12:1024一1029
[163]毛汉英,余丹林.区域承载力定量研究方法探讨[J].地球科学进展,2001,16(4):549一555
[164]杜金辉,吕培茹,甄文栋,张媛,张承,慕金波.山东省生态环境承载力评价指标体系探讨[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2008,18(01):10~14
[165]唐建武,郭怀成,叶文虎.环境承载力及其在环境规划中的初步应用[J].中国环境科学,1997,17(I
[166]郭怀成,商金城,张天柱。环境规划学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001:130
[167]朱国宇,黄川友,华国春.层次分析法在水环境规划中的应用[J]东北水利水电, 2003,(04) :128~130
[168]张明顺,钟杰青.层次分析法在城市环境规划指标体系研究中的应用[J].环境科学研究, 1995,8(05):13~19
[169]曾毅.区域土地利用现状评价指标体系研究[J]国土资源导刊, 2005,(05) .23~27