采后保鲜处理和振动胁迫对杏子生理及品质影响的研究
|
摘要
新疆杏栽培历史悠久,产量大、品质优。但是杳的采收期比较集中,非常容易腐烂变质,并且杏对振动很敏感,受振动后的杏果实褐变、软化非常严重,这就造成了杏极大的损失,因此,研究杏采后有效的保鲜方法和杏果实的振动情况显的尤为重要。
本文以新疆库买提杏和小白杏为实验材料,研究了采后热水处理和保鲜纸处理对库买提杏果实采后生理和品质的影响；另外,针对库买提杏,模拟了汽车在运输过程中的振动,研究振动胁迫时间和包装方式对杏采后生理和品质的影响,以库买提杏和小白杏为材料,研究了实际振动对两个品种杏采后生理和品质的影响,主要得出以下结论：
(1)处理库买提杏较适宜的热水处理条件为40℃15 min、45℃10 min、50℃5 min。最佳的热水处理条件为50℃5 min。
(2)50℃5 min热水处理可以有效的延缓杏果实的衰老,并且较好的保持杏子原有的品质。与对照相比,50℃5 min热水处理的呼吸高峰下降了21.54%,乙烯高峰下降19.6%,显著抑制保护性酶活的下降、LOX酶和PPO酶活性的上升以及MDA含量的增加,并可以很好的保持膜的完整性,有效的延缓了杏果实硬度的下降,50℃5 min热水处理后杏果实腐烂率得到较好的控制,在贮藏至第56 d时,腐烂率仅为对照的37.5%。
(3)高锰酸钾纸和活性炭纸处理对于杏果实有很好的保鲜效果,从总体来看,高锰酸钾纸处理效果优于活性炭纸处理。
(4)高锰酸钾纸处理后,对照及处理果的呼吸高峰值分别为62.2mg·kg-1·h-1FW、38.06 mg-kg-1·h-1FW,处理果呼吸高峰值为对照的61.2%,且推迟7d出现,经DPS分析,差异极显著(P<0.01),处理果乙烯高峰为对照的74.4%,高锰酸钾纸处理可以保持SOD、POD酶较高的活性、使LOX酶和PPO酶活性低、膜透性小以及丙二醛积累量小,可溶性固形物含量、Vc含量、有机酸含量下降慢的特点,另外,保鲜纸处理还可有效的保持果胶含量,有效的降低PG酶活性,保持杏果实的硬度,高锰酸钾纸和活性炭纸处理的腐烂率与对照相比达极显著水平(P<0.01)。
(5)模拟汽车振动的实验可以看出,在振动过程中,杏的成熟衰老过程已经启动,对杏的品质也有一定的影响。
(6)在振动过程中,无网套包装的果实在振动12h之前呼吸速率上升迅速,而网套包装的果实在振动24 h之前呼吸速率上升迅速,但均显著高于对照。另外网套包装还可有效的减缓有机酸、硬度的变化,对乙烯生成量、可溶性固形物含量、Vc含量的影响不显著(P<0.05)。在随后的贮藏期间可以看出,呼吸速率与乙烯生成量变化趋于一致。无网套包装的果实振动12h以后其各项生理和品质指标与对照相比变化显著,而网套包装的果实振动24 h后其各项生理和品质指标与对照相比变化显著。网套包装的杏果实其各项生理指标均优于无网套包装。
(7)经过振动的果实,其生理和品质指标均有不同程度的变化,与库买提杏相比小白杏对振动的影响更为敏感。
(8)振动刚结束时小白杏无网套包装和网套包装的呼吸速率分别为对照的2.83倍和2.58倍,在随后的贮藏过程中,先下降,然后又上升,与对照的变化趋势一致；乙烯的变化趋势与呼吸速率相同,无包装小白杏的乙烯高峰提前1d,出现这可能是杏对振动的应激定反应。库买提杏的保护性酶活性比小白杏高,小白杏的PPO酶活性虽然比库买提杏低,但其外观比库买提杏褐变更严重,可能由于其本身颜色比较白。经过振动后,库买提杏比小白杏对于品质的保持作用更好,无网套包装的小白杏在贮藏期间腐烂率上升最为迅速,褐变也很严重,说明振动显著的增加了小白杏的腐烂。振动对小白杏的生理和品质均有较大的影响,因此,在运输过程中,应当采取合适的保护措施,以防止杏生理和品质的变化。由果实切片显微镜观察可知,振动胁迫破坏了果实的果皮结构,从而使其贮藏期缩短,这与本实验的生理和品质结果一致。
Xinjiang apricot, which has the characteristics of large yield and good quality, cultivated for a long time. But the apricot harvest season is more concentrated and very perishable bad. Apricot is very sensitive to vibration which will occur after severe apricot browning, softening, this has resulted in great loss of apricot. Therefore, the study of fresh apricot and vibration was extremely important.
The Xinjiang Kumaiti apricots and Kuqa apricots were used as the experimental materials to study the postharvest hot water treatment and preservation of paper on the apricot fruit postharvest physiology and quality. While, simulated automotive vibration during transport, the effects of the different vibration time on the postharvest physiology and quality of Kumaiti apricots, also, the real vibration during transport was used to study the effects of different varieties of apricot on the postharvest physiology and quality, The main conclusions were summarized as follows:
(1) 40℃15min,45℃10 min,50℃5 min were the suitable hot water treatment for the Kumaiti apricots, the best hot water treatment was 50℃5 min.
(2) 50℃5 min hot water treatment can effectively retard the aging apricot fruit, and better maintained the original quality apricots. Compared with the control,50℃5 min hot water can slow down the respiratory peak of 21.54%, and 19.6% ethylene peak, significantly inhibited the decline in the protective activity, LOX activity and PPO activity increased and MDA content increased, and can well maintained membrane integrity, delayed the effective decline in apricot fruit firmness,50℃5 min after the hot water get a better rate of apricot fruit rot control to 56 d in storage, the decay rate was controlled 37.5%.
(3) The potassium permanganate paper and activated carbon paper can effectly control the fresh of apricot fruit, overall, the treated of potassium permanganate paper was better than the activated carbon paper.
(4)After the treatment of potassium permanganate paper, control and treated fruit respiration peak values were 62.2mg·kg-1·h-1 FW,38.06mg·kg-1·h-1 FW, treated fruit respiration peak was 61.2% of the control, and delayed emergence 7 d, after the DPS analysis, the difference was significant (P<0.01), the peak of ethylene treatment results were 74.4%, the treatment of potassium permanganate paper can keep SOD, POD enzyme activity of the higher, the LOX enzymes and low PPO activity, membrane permeability and MDA accumulation of small, soluble solids content, Vc content, the characteristics of organic acid content decreased slowly, the other, it can effectively deal with plastic wrap to keep pectin content, effective reduction of PG activity, to maintain the hardness of apricot fruit, potassium permanganate and activated carbon paper, paper handling, compared with the control of decay rates was highly significant (P<0.01).
(5) Though the experimental simulation of vehicle vibration we can see that at the vibra tion, the process of maturation and senescence of apricot has been launched, the quality of the apricot has a certain impact.
(6) At the vibration process, respiration rate of no nets packaged fruit before the vibration 12h was increased rapidly, while the nets packaged fruit before the vibration 24h was increased rapidly, but they were significantly higher than the control. Also nets packaging could effective mitigate organic acids and hardness changes; the ethylene production, soluble solids, Vc content was not significant (P<0.05). In the following storage process, it can be seen that changes of the respiration rate and ethylene production were same. The quality and physiological indicators changes of no nets packaged fruit after the vibration 12 h were significant compared with the control, while the nets packaged fruit was changed significantly after the vibration 24h.The physiological indicators of Apricot which was the nets packaged were better than no nets packaging.
(7) Through the vibration of the fruit, and quality indicators of physiological changes in different degrees, compared with the Kumaiti apricots, Kuqa apricots were more sensitive to the vibration
(8) Immediately after the vibration, the respiration rate of white apricot which was no nets packaging and packaging nets respectively were 2.83 times and 2.58 times compared with the control, in the course of the subsequent storage, the first decline, then rise, the trend with the control was consistent; the change of ethylene was sames as respiratory rate, the peak of ethylene of no packaging was ahead of Id, it was due to that the apricot response to vibration stress. The protective enzyme of Library Amat apricot was higher than the white apricot, although the PPO activity of white apricot was lower than the library Amat, but the brown changes of appearance were serious compared with the library Amat apricot change, it was may be that their own color was white. After vibration, the library Amat apricot was better than the white apricot about maintainimg the quality, the decay rate of no nets packaging white apricot was the most rapid during storage, browning was also very seriously and it was a significant increase decay rate in the vibration of white apricot. Vibration was a great influence about white apricot. Therefore, in the transport process, it should take appropriate protective measures to prevent changes in physiology and quality of apricot. It was known by the apricot slices, the vibration stress damaged to the apricot skin structure, made it shorter storage period, which was consistent with the physiological and quality of the experimental results
本文以新疆库买提杏和小白杏为实验材料,研究了采后热水处理和保鲜纸处理对库买提杏果实采后生理和品质的影响；另外,针对库买提杏,模拟了汽车在运输过程中的振动,研究振动胁迫时间和包装方式对杏采后生理和品质的影响,以库买提杏和小白杏为材料,研究了实际振动对两个品种杏采后生理和品质的影响,主要得出以下结论：
(1)处理库买提杏较适宜的热水处理条件为40℃15 min、45℃10 min、50℃5 min。最佳的热水处理条件为50℃5 min。
(2)50℃5 min热水处理可以有效的延缓杏果实的衰老,并且较好的保持杏子原有的品质。与对照相比,50℃5 min热水处理的呼吸高峰下降了21.54%,乙烯高峰下降19.6%,显著抑制保护性酶活的下降、LOX酶和PPO酶活性的上升以及MDA含量的增加,并可以很好的保持膜的完整性,有效的延缓了杏果实硬度的下降,50℃5 min热水处理后杏果实腐烂率得到较好的控制,在贮藏至第56 d时,腐烂率仅为对照的37.5%。
(3)高锰酸钾纸和活性炭纸处理对于杏果实有很好的保鲜效果,从总体来看,高锰酸钾纸处理效果优于活性炭纸处理。
(4)高锰酸钾纸处理后,对照及处理果的呼吸高峰值分别为62.2mg·kg-1·h-1FW、38.06 mg-kg-1·h-1FW,处理果呼吸高峰值为对照的61.2%,且推迟7d出现,经DPS分析,差异极显著(P<0.01),处理果乙烯高峰为对照的74.4%,高锰酸钾纸处理可以保持SOD、POD酶较高的活性、使LOX酶和PPO酶活性低、膜透性小以及丙二醛积累量小,可溶性固形物含量、Vc含量、有机酸含量下降慢的特点,另外,保鲜纸处理还可有效的保持果胶含量,有效的降低PG酶活性,保持杏果实的硬度,高锰酸钾纸和活性炭纸处理的腐烂率与对照相比达极显著水平(P<0.01)。
(5)模拟汽车振动的实验可以看出,在振动过程中,杏的成熟衰老过程已经启动,对杏的品质也有一定的影响。
(6)在振动过程中,无网套包装的果实在振动12h之前呼吸速率上升迅速,而网套包装的果实在振动24 h之前呼吸速率上升迅速,但均显著高于对照。另外网套包装还可有效的减缓有机酸、硬度的变化,对乙烯生成量、可溶性固形物含量、Vc含量的影响不显著(P<0.05)。在随后的贮藏期间可以看出,呼吸速率与乙烯生成量变化趋于一致。无网套包装的果实振动12h以后其各项生理和品质指标与对照相比变化显著,而网套包装的果实振动24 h后其各项生理和品质指标与对照相比变化显著。网套包装的杏果实其各项生理指标均优于无网套包装。
(7)经过振动的果实,其生理和品质指标均有不同程度的变化,与库买提杏相比小白杏对振动的影响更为敏感。
(8)振动刚结束时小白杏无网套包装和网套包装的呼吸速率分别为对照的2.83倍和2.58倍,在随后的贮藏过程中,先下降,然后又上升,与对照的变化趋势一致；乙烯的变化趋势与呼吸速率相同,无包装小白杏的乙烯高峰提前1d,出现这可能是杏对振动的应激定反应。库买提杏的保护性酶活性比小白杏高,小白杏的PPO酶活性虽然比库买提杏低,但其外观比库买提杏褐变更严重,可能由于其本身颜色比较白。经过振动后,库买提杏比小白杏对于品质的保持作用更好,无网套包装的小白杏在贮藏期间腐烂率上升最为迅速,褐变也很严重,说明振动显著的增加了小白杏的腐烂。振动对小白杏的生理和品质均有较大的影响,因此,在运输过程中,应当采取合适的保护措施,以防止杏生理和品质的变化。由果实切片显微镜观察可知,振动胁迫破坏了果实的果皮结构,从而使其贮藏期缩短,这与本实验的生理和品质结果一致。
Xinjiang apricot, which has the characteristics of large yield and good quality, cultivated for a long time. But the apricot harvest season is more concentrated and very perishable bad. Apricot is very sensitive to vibration which will occur after severe apricot browning, softening, this has resulted in great loss of apricot. Therefore, the study of fresh apricot and vibration was extremely important.
The Xinjiang Kumaiti apricots and Kuqa apricots were used as the experimental materials to study the postharvest hot water treatment and preservation of paper on the apricot fruit postharvest physiology and quality. While, simulated automotive vibration during transport, the effects of the different vibration time on the postharvest physiology and quality of Kumaiti apricots, also, the real vibration during transport was used to study the effects of different varieties of apricot on the postharvest physiology and quality, The main conclusions were summarized as follows:
(1) 40℃15min,45℃10 min,50℃5 min were the suitable hot water treatment for the Kumaiti apricots, the best hot water treatment was 50℃5 min.
(2) 50℃5 min hot water treatment can effectively retard the aging apricot fruit, and better maintained the original quality apricots. Compared with the control,50℃5 min hot water can slow down the respiratory peak of 21.54%, and 19.6% ethylene peak, significantly inhibited the decline in the protective activity, LOX activity and PPO activity increased and MDA content increased, and can well maintained membrane integrity, delayed the effective decline in apricot fruit firmness,50℃5 min after the hot water get a better rate of apricot fruit rot control to 56 d in storage, the decay rate was controlled 37.5%.
(3) The potassium permanganate paper and activated carbon paper can effectly control the fresh of apricot fruit, overall, the treated of potassium permanganate paper was better than the activated carbon paper.
(4)After the treatment of potassium permanganate paper, control and treated fruit respiration peak values were 62.2mg·kg-1·h-1 FW,38.06mg·kg-1·h-1 FW, treated fruit respiration peak was 61.2% of the control, and delayed emergence 7 d, after the DPS analysis, the difference was significant (P<0.01), the peak of ethylene treatment results were 74.4%, the treatment of potassium permanganate paper can keep SOD, POD enzyme activity of the higher, the LOX enzymes and low PPO activity, membrane permeability and MDA accumulation of small, soluble solids content, Vc content, the characteristics of organic acid content decreased slowly, the other, it can effectively deal with plastic wrap to keep pectin content, effective reduction of PG activity, to maintain the hardness of apricot fruit, potassium permanganate and activated carbon paper, paper handling, compared with the control of decay rates was highly significant (P<0.01).
(5) Though the experimental simulation of vehicle vibration we can see that at the vibra tion, the process of maturation and senescence of apricot has been launched, the quality of the apricot has a certain impact.
(6) At the vibration process, respiration rate of no nets packaged fruit before the vibration 12h was increased rapidly, while the nets packaged fruit before the vibration 24h was increased rapidly, but they were significantly higher than the control. Also nets packaging could effective mitigate organic acids and hardness changes; the ethylene production, soluble solids, Vc content was not significant (P<0.05). In the following storage process, it can be seen that changes of the respiration rate and ethylene production were same. The quality and physiological indicators changes of no nets packaged fruit after the vibration 12 h were significant compared with the control, while the nets packaged fruit was changed significantly after the vibration 24h.The physiological indicators of Apricot which was the nets packaged were better than no nets packaging.
(7) Through the vibration of the fruit, and quality indicators of physiological changes in different degrees, compared with the Kumaiti apricots, Kuqa apricots were more sensitive to the vibration
(8) Immediately after the vibration, the respiration rate of white apricot which was no nets packaging and packaging nets respectively were 2.83 times and 2.58 times compared with the control, in the course of the subsequent storage, the first decline, then rise, the trend with the control was consistent; the change of ethylene was sames as respiratory rate, the peak of ethylene of no packaging was ahead of Id, it was due to that the apricot response to vibration stress. The protective enzyme of Library Amat apricot was higher than the white apricot, although the PPO activity of white apricot was lower than the library Amat, but the brown changes of appearance were serious compared with the library Amat apricot change, it was may be that their own color was white. After vibration, the library Amat apricot was better than the white apricot about maintainimg the quality, the decay rate of no nets packaging white apricot was the most rapid during storage, browning was also very seriously and it was a significant increase decay rate in the vibration of white apricot. Vibration was a great influence about white apricot. Therefore, in the transport process, it should take appropriate protective measures to prevent changes in physiology and quality of apricot. It was known by the apricot slices, the vibration stress damaged to the apricot skin structure, made it shorter storage period, which was consistent with the physiological and quality of the experimental results
引文
[1]邢军,杨洁,郑力.新疆杏子分布及贮藏保鲜的可行性分析研究[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版),2005,(1)：79-82.
[2]张加延,张钊.中国果树志.杏卷[M].北京：中国林业出版社,2003,385-386.
[3]张强,李西萍.新疆杏树种质资源及开发利用前景[J].内蒙古农业科技,2005,(4)：38-40.
[4]新疆维吾尔自治区统计局.新疆统计年鉴[J].北京：中国统计出版社,2009：318-319.
[5]何天明,陈学森,张大海,等.中国普通杏种质资源若干生物学性状的频度分布[J].园艺学报,2007,34(1)：17-22.
[6]苑兆和,陈学森,何天明,等.南疆栽培杏群体遗传结构的荧光AFLP分析[J].遗传学报,2007,34(11)：1037-1047.
[7]杨月欣,王光亚,潘兴昌.中国食物成分表2002[M].北京：农业出版社,1980,204-205.
[8]张加延.杏的营养成分与医疗保健作用[J].干果研究进展.2001(2)：131-135.
[9]张大海,吕昭智,胡天恩,等.新疆杏产业发展现状及其相关资源配置评述[J].中国经济与管理科学,2009,(5)：53-56,61.
[10]中国农学会遗传资源学会.中国作物遗传资源[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1994.
[11]新疆维吾尔自治区统计局.新疆统计年鉴[J].北京：中国统计出版社,2001-2010.
[12]王伟,张有林.鲜杏贮藏技术[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(10)：2246.
[13]Calros H.Crisosto, Adel A.Kader.The Commercial storage of Fruits, Vegetables, and Florist and Nursery Stocks:Apricot[M].USDA Agriculture Handbook,2004,66.
[14]蒙盛华.《水果蔬菜贮藏保鲜技术》讲座—第四讲桃、李、杏的保鲜技术[J].农村实用工程技术,1999,(7)：29-30.
[15]朱建兰,常永义,陈德蓉—杏果实斑点病研究[J].中国果树,1995,(31)：5-17.
[16]王吉奎,王勇,冯启收,等.杏果实斑点病的发生与防治[J].山西果树,1995,(4)：27-28.
[17]刘开启,杨炜华,郭派.杏果实黑斑病病原鉴定及病原菌生物学特性[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报,2004,17(1)：1-6.
[18]张天宇.中国真菌志(第十六卷)链格抱属[M].北京：科学出版社2003：188-190.
[19]杨炜华.杏果实黑斑病病原鉴定及相关链格抱菌的RAPD分析[D].泰安：山东农业大学,2002.
[20]曹建康.杏采后黑斑病潜伏侵染时期、机制及控制[D].兰州：甘肃农业大学,2002.
[21]郭香凤.杏果实采后活性氧代谢的变化及其调节[D].武汉：华中农业大学,2005.
[22]王淑贞,鲁墨深,张静.金太阳杏的贮藏保鲜试验初报[J].落叶果树,2001,33(4)：35-36.
[23]陈富,赵成纲.低温条件下单果包膜和戴挫霉浸泡处理对兰州大接杏贮藏性的影响[J].甘肃农业科技,2003(3)：34-36.
[24]杨娟侠,鲁墨森.壳聚糖在贮藏保鲜金太阳杏中的应用[J].落叶果树,2007,39(5)：19-20.
[25]罗云波,蔡同一.园艺产品贮藏加工学[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2003：214.
[26]黄永红,张静,陈文玉.挂机自动冷库贮藏红丰杏的试验初报[J].落叶果树,2005,37(5)：35-36.
[27]Serek M,Sisler E C, Reid M S.Novel gaseous ethylene binding inhibitor Prevens ethylene effects in potted flowing plants[J]. j. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.,1994,119(6):1230-1233.
[28]Sisler E C, Serek M. Inhibition of ethylene responses by 1-MethyICycloproene and 3-Methylcyclopropene[J]. Plant Grow Regul.,1999,27(6):105-111.
[29]Fan X, Argenta L, Mattheis J P. Inhibition of ethylene action by 1-methylcycloPropene Prolongs storage life of apricots[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2000,20:135-142.
[30]王庆国,邓正焱,谷林.1-甲基环丙烯对杏采后保鲜效果的影响[J].山东农业科学,2005,(1)：59-61.
[31]Mei Zhong, Bin Wu, Ji De Wang, Jian-Ming Wu, Li-Hui Wei. Eeffect of chlorine dioxide on ripening of "xiaobai"apricots[J]. Eur. Food Res. Tcchnol.,2006,223:791-795.
[32]Erol Ayranci, Sibel Tunc. The effect of edible coatings on water and vitamin C loss of apricots(Armeniaca vulgaris Lam.) and green peppers(Ccpsicum annuum L.)[J]. Food Chemistry,2004, 87:339-342.
[33]刁春英,毕阳.采后壳聚糖涂膜处理对损伤接种杏黑斑病的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2000,35(4)：445-449.
[34]M I Egeaa, M C Martinez-Madridb, P Sa, nchez-Belc, M A Murciaa, F Romojaro. The influence of electron-beam ionization on ethylene metabolism andqualityparameters in apricot(Prunus armeniaca L., cv. Bulida)[J]. LWT,2007,40:1027-1035.
[35]蒋耀庭,孙英,王永利.高压静电场杏保鲜试验[J].烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版),1993,1(1)：66-68.
[36]王静,张辉,逢焕明,等.热处理对库车小白杏贮藏品质的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2010,33(3)：234-239.
[37]张慜.我国果蔬汁饮料加工现状及发展对策[J].食品与机械,2000,76(2)：4-6.
[38]肖丽娟.振动胁迫对水蜜桃和黄花梨采后生理及贮藏品质的影响[D].西南大学.2006.
[39]卢立新,王志伟.果品运输中的机械损伤机理及减损包装研究进展[J].包装工程,2004,25(4)：131-134.
[40]Berardinelli A, Donati V, Giunchi A, et al. Damage to pears caused by simulated transport[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,2005,66,219-226.
[41]Barchi G L, Berardinelli A, Guarnieri A, et al. Damage to loquats by vibration-simulatin intra-state transport[J]. Biosystems Engineering,2002,82:305-312.
[42]Turczyn M T, Grant S W, Ashby B H, et al. Potato shatter bruising during laboratory handling and transport simulation[J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1986,29:1171-1175.
[43]Grant S W, Turczyn M T, Ashby B H, et al. Potato bruising during transport[J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1986,29(4):1176-1179.
[44]Vergano P J, Testin R F, Newall W C, et al. Peach bruising:susceptibility to impact, vibration, and compression abuse[J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1991,34:2110-2116.
[45]Chen P, Ruiz M, Lu F, et al. Study of impact and compression damage on asian pears[J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1987,30(4):1193-1197.
[46]Hung Y C, Prussia S E. Effect of maturity and storage time on the bruise susceptibility of peaches (CV. Red Globe) [J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1989,32(4):1377-1382.
[47]康维民,肖念新,蔡金星等.稳定振动条件下梨的振动损伤研究[J].农业机械学报,2004,35：105-108.
[48]康维民,肖念新,蔡金星等.模拟3自由度振动条件下水果运输振动加速度传递率及损伤研究[J].农业工程学报,2003,19：219-222.
[49]Singh J, Singh S P, Joneson E. Measurement and analysis of US truck vibration for leaf spring and air ride suspensions, and development of tests to simulate these conditions. Packaging Technology and Science, 2006,19:309-323.
[50]Wang C Y, Mellenthin W M. Relationship of friction discoloration to phenolic compounds in'd'Anjou' pears[J]. Hortscience,1973,8:321-323.
[51]Mellenthin W M, Wang C Y. Friction discoloration of d'Anjou'pears in relation to fruit size, maturity, storage and poly phenoloxidase activities[J]. Hortscience,1974,9(6):592-593.
[52]李正国,苏彩萍,王贵禧.振动胁迫对猕猴桃果实成熟衰老生理的影响[J].农业工程学报,2000, 16：142-143.
[53]应铁进,茅林春,席玙芳,等.草莓果实对机械振动胁迫的生理反应与抗性机制研究[J].科技通报,1998,14,1-5.
[54]李志荣.农产品加工实用技术[M].北京：中国农业科学技术出版社,2002：148-159.
[55]胡柏文,车凤斌,片建明,等.南疆杳树栽培和产业发展研究[J].新疆农业科学,2006,43(5)：432-435.
[56]彭永宏.芒果(Mangifera indica Linn.)热处理保鲜技术研究[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),1997,(3)：75-80.
[57]郝浩永,陈莉,张伟峰.采后热处理对番茄保鲜效果的影响[J].农业与技术,2009,1：27-31.
[58]赵艺泽,屠康,潘秀娟,等.采后热处理对红富士苹果青霉病和灰霉病的控制[J].食品与发酵工业,2004,30(12)：129-133.
[59]陈爱平,史辉,王莉,等.热处理与贮藏温度对草莓果实贮藏期和品质的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(8)：48-52.
[60]HOA T T, CLARK C J, WADDELL B C,et al. Postharvest quality of Dragon fruit (Hylocereusundatus) following disinfesting hot air treatments[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2006,41:62-69.
[61]HONG S I, LEE H H, KIM D. Effects of hot water treatment on the Storage stability of Satsuma mandarin as a postharvest decay control [J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2007,43:271-279.
[62]寇莉萍,刘兴华,任亚梅,等.采后热处理技术在果蔬贮藏保鲜上的应用[J].食品科学,2005,26(1)：162-165.
[63]李正国,曾凯芳,黄琼珍,等.农产品贮藏运销学实验教程[M].重庆：西南农业大学,1997：34-36.
[64]郑永华,席屿芳,应铁进.枇杷果实采后呼吸与乙烯释放规律的研究[J].果树科学,1993,11(1)：38-40.
[65]曹建康,姜微波,赵玉梅.果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2007.
[66]曾庆梅,潘见,谢慧明,等.超高压处理对砀山梨汁中过氧化物酶活性的影响[J].农业工程学报.2004(04)：17-19.
[67]王韧,周星,徐广超,等.超高压失活大豆脂肪氧合酶数学模型的建立[J].江苏大学学报：自然科学版.2008,29(6)：469-473.
[68]黄伟坤.食品检验与分析[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,1995：29-30.
[69]吴彩蛾,王文生,寇晓虹.果实成熟衰老与保护酶系统的关系[J].保鲜与加工,2000,创刊号：5-8.
[70]Klein J D, Lurie S. Postharvest heat treatment and fruit quality[J]. Postharvest News Info,1991, 2:15-19.
[71]Klein J D, Lurie S. Prestorage heat treatment as a means of improving poststorage quality of apples[J]. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.1990,115,255-259.
[72]陈留勇,孔秋莲,孟宪军,等.热激处理对黄桃保鲜效果的影响[J].保鲜与加工,2003,17(3)：21-23.
[73]Lurie, S. Review Postharvest heat treatments. Postharvest Biol Technol.1998,14:257-269.
[74]乔勇进,冯双庆,赵玉梅.热处理对黄瓜冷害及生理变化的影响[J].食品科学,2003,24(1)：131-135.
[75]王育林,彭永宏.热空气处理对荔枝生理特性和贮藏效果的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2003,9(2)：137-140.
[76]陆旺金,张昭其,季作梁热带亚热带果蔬低温贮藏冷害及御冷技术[J].植物生理学通讯,1999,35(2)：158-163.
[77]马俊莲,张子德,陈志周,等.热处理对菜豆冷害及生理生化的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2000,23(1)：57-59.
[78]蒋侬辉,钟云,陈金印.热处理对板栗贮藏过程中部分生理指标与贮藏效果的影响[J].果树学报,2004,21(3)：237-240.
[79]韩涛.热激处理冷藏桃果实的生理效应[J].植物生理学通讯,1996,32(3)：184-186.
[80]李丽萍,韩涛.热处理条件对番茄采后冷害的影响[J].农业工程学报,1996,12(4)：189-193.
[81]陈发河,张维一,吴光斌.贮前热处理对冷藏甜椒果实品质的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2000,23(2)：6-10.
[82]Spalding DH, Reeder WE Decay and acceptability of mangos treated with combinations of hot water, i-mazalil and g-radiation [J]. Plant Dis,1986,70:1149-1151.
[83]Klein JD, Lurie S. Prestorage heat treatment as a means of improving poststorage quality of apples [J]. J Amer Soc Hort Sci,1990,115:265-269.
[84]Lara,I., Garcia, P., Vendrell, M. Post-harvest heat treatments modified cell wall composition of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) fruit[J]. Scientia horticulturae.2006,109:48-53.
[85]李成,章文霞.稳定性二氧化氯处理对杏保鲜的影响研究[J].太原科技,2007(7)：82-83.
[86]王伟,张有林.减压处理对采后杏果实软化的生理控制效应[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(1)：131-135.
[87]陈富,赵成纲.低温条件下单果包膜和戴挫霉浸泡处理对兰州大接杏贮藏性的影响[J].甘肃农业科技,2003(3)：34 36.
[88]赵晓梅,张谦,徐麟,等.自制壳聚糖保鲜纸对鲜杏贮藏效果的影响[J].北方园艺2010,(10)：197-201.
[89]王庆国,邓正焱,谷林.1-1甲基环丙烯对杏采后保鲜效果的影响[J].山东农业科学,2005(1)：60-61.
[90]王静,张辉,逢焕明,等.热处理对库车小白杏贮藏品质的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2010,33(3)：234-239.
[91]Brummell D A, Harpster M H. Cell wall metabolism in fruit softening and quality and its manipulation in transgenic plants[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,2001,47:311-340.
[92]严丽.水果保鲜纸箱用保鲜涂料的制备及应用的初步研究[D].西安：陕西科技大学,2007.
[93]赵晓梅,张谦,徐麟,等.自制壳聚糖保鲜纸对鲜杏贮藏效果的影响[J].北方园艺,2010(10)：197-201.
[94]REMON S, VENTURINI M E, LOPEZ-BUESA P, et al. Burlat cherry quality after long range transport:optimization of packaging conditions [J]. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2003,4(4):425-434.
[95]PELEG K, HINGA S. Simulation of vibration damage in produce transportation [J]. Transactions of the A SAE,1986,29 (2):633-641.
[96]卢立新,王志伟.果品运输中的机械损伤机理及减损包装研究进展[J]. 包装工程,2004,4(25)：131-134.
[97]周然,李云飞.不同强度的运输振动对黄花梨的机械损伤及贮藏品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(11)：255-258.
[98]李家庆.果蔬保鲜手册[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,1997：97-105.
[99]胡柏文,车凤斌,片建明,等.南疆杏树栽培和产业发展研究[J].新疆农业科学,2006,43(5)：432-435.
[100]郭香凤,梁华,赵胜娟,等.1-MCP对杏果实采后贮藏品质的影响[J].农业机械学报,2006,37(8)：107-110.
[101]江英,胡小松,刘琦,等.壳聚糖处理对采后酶杏贮藏品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,10(26)：343-348.
[102]赵晓梅,张谦,徐麟,等.不同贮藏条件对新疆“赛买提”杏品质变化的影响[J].食品研究与开发,2010,31(3)：176-179.
[103]曾凯芳,肖丽娟,曾凡坤.振动胁迫对果品采后贮藏特性的影响[J].贮运保鲜,2005(4)：81-83.
[104]席屿芳,应铁进,郑永华,等.振动胁迫对桃果实哀老的影响[J].园艺学报,1997,24(2)：137-140.
[105]应铁进,陈萃仁,席屿芳,等.振动胁迫下杨梅果实呼吸强度与质膜差别透性变化[J].浙江农业大学学报,1993,19(1)：80-81.
[106]李正国,苏彩萍,王贵禧.振动胁迫对猕猴桃果实成熟衰老生理的影响[J].农业工程学报.2000,16(4)：142-143.
[107]郑永华,应铁进,席玙芳,等.振动胁迫对杨梅果实采后衰老生理的影响[J].园艺学报.1996,23(3)：231-234.
[108]孙广宇,宗兆锋.植物病理学试验技术[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2002.
[109]李武汉,朱玮,景耀.马尾松瘤锈病与酚类物质关系的研究[J].西北林学院学报.1995,10(3)：25-28.
[110]MASSANTIN R, LANZAROTTA L, BOTONDI R, et al. Ripening of kiwifruit following stimulated brush- ing with commercial brushes [J]. Hortscience,1995,30(3):566-569.
[111]MILLER A R, DALMASSO J P, KRETCHMAN D W. Michanical, stress storage time and temperature influence cell wall degrading enzymes, firmness and ethylene production by cucumbers [J]. J Amer Sci Hort Sci,1987,112 (4):666-671.
[112]刘兴华,饶景萍.果品蔬菜贮运学.西安：陕西科学技术出版社,1998.
[113]Biale J B, Young RE, In:Reeent Advances in the Biochemistry of fruits and Vegetables. Eds:Friend J, Rhodes MJC, Academic press, London.1981,1-39.
[114]茅林春,叶立扬.无花果果实对非外伤性振动的生理反应[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2000,25(4)：423-426.
[115]应铁进,茅林春,席当芳,等.草墓果实对机械振动胁迫的生理反应与抗性机制研究[J].科技通报,1998,14(1)：1-5.
[116]应铁进,陈萃仁,席玛芳,等.振动胁迫下杨梅果实的呼吸强度与质膜差别透性变化(简报).浙江农业大学学报,1993,19：80-81.
[117]席玛芳,应铁进,郑永华,等.振动胁迫对桃果实衰老的影响.园艺学报,1997,24：137-140.
[118]卢立新,王志伟.果品运输中的机械损伤机理及减损包装研究进展.包装工程,2004,25(4)：131-134,141.
[119]Abu-Goukh A A, Bashir H A. Changes in pectic enzymes and cellulase activity during guava fruit ripening. Food Chemistry,2003,83:213-218.
[120]Barnes M F, Patchett B J. Cell wall degrading enzymes and the softening of senescent strawberry fruit. Journal of Food Science,1976,41:1392-1395.
[121]Van Buren J P,1991. Function of pectin in plant tissue structure and firmness. In:Water R H(Ed.), The chemistry and technology of pectin. Academic Press, San Diego, pp.1-22.
[122]Roe B, Bruemmer J H. Changes in pectic substances and enzymes during ripening andstorage of "Keitt" mangosJournal of Food Science,1981,46:186-189.
[123]刘剑锋,程云清,彭抒昂.梨采后细胞壁成分及果胶酶活性与果肉质地的关系.园艺学报,2004,31(5)：579-583.
[124]李正国,苏彩萍,王贵禧.振动胁迫对猕猴桃果实成熟衰老生理的影响.农业工程学报,2000,16：142-143.
[2]张加延,张钊.中国果树志.杏卷[M].北京：中国林业出版社,2003,385-386.
[3]张强,李西萍.新疆杏树种质资源及开发利用前景[J].内蒙古农业科技,2005,(4)：38-40.
[4]新疆维吾尔自治区统计局.新疆统计年鉴[J].北京：中国统计出版社,2009：318-319.
[5]何天明,陈学森,张大海,等.中国普通杏种质资源若干生物学性状的频度分布[J].园艺学报,2007,34(1)：17-22.
[6]苑兆和,陈学森,何天明,等.南疆栽培杏群体遗传结构的荧光AFLP分析[J].遗传学报,2007,34(11)：1037-1047.
[7]杨月欣,王光亚,潘兴昌.中国食物成分表2002[M].北京：农业出版社,1980,204-205.
[8]张加延.杏的营养成分与医疗保健作用[J].干果研究进展.2001(2)：131-135.
[9]张大海,吕昭智,胡天恩,等.新疆杏产业发展现状及其相关资源配置评述[J].中国经济与管理科学,2009,(5)：53-56,61.
[10]中国农学会遗传资源学会.中国作物遗传资源[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1994.
[11]新疆维吾尔自治区统计局.新疆统计年鉴[J].北京：中国统计出版社,2001-2010.
[12]王伟,张有林.鲜杏贮藏技术[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(10)：2246.
[13]Calros H.Crisosto, Adel A.Kader.The Commercial storage of Fruits, Vegetables, and Florist and Nursery Stocks:Apricot[M].USDA Agriculture Handbook,2004,66.
[14]蒙盛华.《水果蔬菜贮藏保鲜技术》讲座—第四讲桃、李、杏的保鲜技术[J].农村实用工程技术,1999,(7)：29-30.
[15]朱建兰,常永义,陈德蓉—杏果实斑点病研究[J].中国果树,1995,(31)：5-17.
[16]王吉奎,王勇,冯启收,等.杏果实斑点病的发生与防治[J].山西果树,1995,(4)：27-28.
[17]刘开启,杨炜华,郭派.杏果实黑斑病病原鉴定及病原菌生物学特性[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报,2004,17(1)：1-6.
[18]张天宇.中国真菌志(第十六卷)链格抱属[M].北京：科学出版社2003：188-190.
[19]杨炜华.杏果实黑斑病病原鉴定及相关链格抱菌的RAPD分析[D].泰安：山东农业大学,2002.
[20]曹建康.杏采后黑斑病潜伏侵染时期、机制及控制[D].兰州：甘肃农业大学,2002.
[21]郭香凤.杏果实采后活性氧代谢的变化及其调节[D].武汉：华中农业大学,2005.
[22]王淑贞,鲁墨深,张静.金太阳杏的贮藏保鲜试验初报[J].落叶果树,2001,33(4)：35-36.
[23]陈富,赵成纲.低温条件下单果包膜和戴挫霉浸泡处理对兰州大接杏贮藏性的影响[J].甘肃农业科技,2003(3)：34-36.
[24]杨娟侠,鲁墨森.壳聚糖在贮藏保鲜金太阳杏中的应用[J].落叶果树,2007,39(5)：19-20.
[25]罗云波,蔡同一.园艺产品贮藏加工学[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2003：214.
[26]黄永红,张静,陈文玉.挂机自动冷库贮藏红丰杏的试验初报[J].落叶果树,2005,37(5)：35-36.
[27]Serek M,Sisler E C, Reid M S.Novel gaseous ethylene binding inhibitor Prevens ethylene effects in potted flowing plants[J]. j. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.,1994,119(6):1230-1233.
[28]Sisler E C, Serek M. Inhibition of ethylene responses by 1-MethyICycloproene and 3-Methylcyclopropene[J]. Plant Grow Regul.,1999,27(6):105-111.
[29]Fan X, Argenta L, Mattheis J P. Inhibition of ethylene action by 1-methylcycloPropene Prolongs storage life of apricots[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2000,20:135-142.
[30]王庆国,邓正焱,谷林.1-甲基环丙烯对杏采后保鲜效果的影响[J].山东农业科学,2005,(1)：59-61.
[31]Mei Zhong, Bin Wu, Ji De Wang, Jian-Ming Wu, Li-Hui Wei. Eeffect of chlorine dioxide on ripening of "xiaobai"apricots[J]. Eur. Food Res. Tcchnol.,2006,223:791-795.
[32]Erol Ayranci, Sibel Tunc. The effect of edible coatings on water and vitamin C loss of apricots(Armeniaca vulgaris Lam.) and green peppers(Ccpsicum annuum L.)[J]. Food Chemistry,2004, 87:339-342.
[33]刁春英,毕阳.采后壳聚糖涂膜处理对损伤接种杏黑斑病的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2000,35(4)：445-449.
[34]M I Egeaa, M C Martinez-Madridb, P Sa, nchez-Belc, M A Murciaa, F Romojaro. The influence of electron-beam ionization on ethylene metabolism andqualityparameters in apricot(Prunus armeniaca L., cv. Bulida)[J]. LWT,2007,40:1027-1035.
[35]蒋耀庭,孙英,王永利.高压静电场杏保鲜试验[J].烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版),1993,1(1)：66-68.
[36]王静,张辉,逢焕明,等.热处理对库车小白杏贮藏品质的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2010,33(3)：234-239.
[37]张慜.我国果蔬汁饮料加工现状及发展对策[J].食品与机械,2000,76(2)：4-6.
[38]肖丽娟.振动胁迫对水蜜桃和黄花梨采后生理及贮藏品质的影响[D].西南大学.2006.
[39]卢立新,王志伟.果品运输中的机械损伤机理及减损包装研究进展[J].包装工程,2004,25(4)：131-134.
[40]Berardinelli A, Donati V, Giunchi A, et al. Damage to pears caused by simulated transport[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,2005,66,219-226.
[41]Barchi G L, Berardinelli A, Guarnieri A, et al. Damage to loquats by vibration-simulatin intra-state transport[J]. Biosystems Engineering,2002,82:305-312.
[42]Turczyn M T, Grant S W, Ashby B H, et al. Potato shatter bruising during laboratory handling and transport simulation[J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1986,29:1171-1175.
[43]Grant S W, Turczyn M T, Ashby B H, et al. Potato bruising during transport[J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1986,29(4):1176-1179.
[44]Vergano P J, Testin R F, Newall W C, et al. Peach bruising:susceptibility to impact, vibration, and compression abuse[J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1991,34:2110-2116.
[45]Chen P, Ruiz M, Lu F, et al. Study of impact and compression damage on asian pears[J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1987,30(4):1193-1197.
[46]Hung Y C, Prussia S E. Effect of maturity and storage time on the bruise susceptibility of peaches (CV. Red Globe) [J]. Transactions of the ASAE,1989,32(4):1377-1382.
[47]康维民,肖念新,蔡金星等.稳定振动条件下梨的振动损伤研究[J].农业机械学报,2004,35：105-108.
[48]康维民,肖念新,蔡金星等.模拟3自由度振动条件下水果运输振动加速度传递率及损伤研究[J].农业工程学报,2003,19：219-222.
[49]Singh J, Singh S P, Joneson E. Measurement and analysis of US truck vibration for leaf spring and air ride suspensions, and development of tests to simulate these conditions. Packaging Technology and Science, 2006,19:309-323.
[50]Wang C Y, Mellenthin W M. Relationship of friction discoloration to phenolic compounds in'd'Anjou' pears[J]. Hortscience,1973,8:321-323.
[51]Mellenthin W M, Wang C Y. Friction discoloration of d'Anjou'pears in relation to fruit size, maturity, storage and poly phenoloxidase activities[J]. Hortscience,1974,9(6):592-593.
[52]李正国,苏彩萍,王贵禧.振动胁迫对猕猴桃果实成熟衰老生理的影响[J].农业工程学报,2000, 16：142-143.
[53]应铁进,茅林春,席玙芳,等.草莓果实对机械振动胁迫的生理反应与抗性机制研究[J].科技通报,1998,14,1-5.
[54]李志荣.农产品加工实用技术[M].北京：中国农业科学技术出版社,2002：148-159.
[55]胡柏文,车凤斌,片建明,等.南疆杳树栽培和产业发展研究[J].新疆农业科学,2006,43(5)：432-435.
[56]彭永宏.芒果(Mangifera indica Linn.)热处理保鲜技术研究[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),1997,(3)：75-80.
[57]郝浩永,陈莉,张伟峰.采后热处理对番茄保鲜效果的影响[J].农业与技术,2009,1：27-31.
[58]赵艺泽,屠康,潘秀娟,等.采后热处理对红富士苹果青霉病和灰霉病的控制[J].食品与发酵工业,2004,30(12)：129-133.
[59]陈爱平,史辉,王莉,等.热处理与贮藏温度对草莓果实贮藏期和品质的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(8)：48-52.
[60]HOA T T, CLARK C J, WADDELL B C,et al. Postharvest quality of Dragon fruit (Hylocereusundatus) following disinfesting hot air treatments[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2006,41:62-69.
[61]HONG S I, LEE H H, KIM D. Effects of hot water treatment on the Storage stability of Satsuma mandarin as a postharvest decay control [J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2007,43:271-279.
[62]寇莉萍,刘兴华,任亚梅,等.采后热处理技术在果蔬贮藏保鲜上的应用[J].食品科学,2005,26(1)：162-165.
[63]李正国,曾凯芳,黄琼珍,等.农产品贮藏运销学实验教程[M].重庆：西南农业大学,1997：34-36.
[64]郑永华,席屿芳,应铁进.枇杷果实采后呼吸与乙烯释放规律的研究[J].果树科学,1993,11(1)：38-40.
[65]曹建康,姜微波,赵玉梅.果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,2007.
[66]曾庆梅,潘见,谢慧明,等.超高压处理对砀山梨汁中过氧化物酶活性的影响[J].农业工程学报.2004(04)：17-19.
[67]王韧,周星,徐广超,等.超高压失活大豆脂肪氧合酶数学模型的建立[J].江苏大学学报：自然科学版.2008,29(6)：469-473.
[68]黄伟坤.食品检验与分析[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,1995：29-30.
[69]吴彩蛾,王文生,寇晓虹.果实成熟衰老与保护酶系统的关系[J].保鲜与加工,2000,创刊号：5-8.
[70]Klein J D, Lurie S. Postharvest heat treatment and fruit quality[J]. Postharvest News Info,1991, 2:15-19.
[71]Klein J D, Lurie S. Prestorage heat treatment as a means of improving poststorage quality of apples[J]. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.1990,115,255-259.
[72]陈留勇,孔秋莲,孟宪军,等.热激处理对黄桃保鲜效果的影响[J].保鲜与加工,2003,17(3)：21-23.
[73]Lurie, S. Review Postharvest heat treatments. Postharvest Biol Technol.1998,14:257-269.
[74]乔勇进,冯双庆,赵玉梅.热处理对黄瓜冷害及生理变化的影响[J].食品科学,2003,24(1)：131-135.
[75]王育林,彭永宏.热空气处理对荔枝生理特性和贮藏效果的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2003,9(2)：137-140.
[76]陆旺金,张昭其,季作梁热带亚热带果蔬低温贮藏冷害及御冷技术[J].植物生理学通讯,1999,35(2)：158-163.
[77]马俊莲,张子德,陈志周,等.热处理对菜豆冷害及生理生化的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2000,23(1)：57-59.
[78]蒋侬辉,钟云,陈金印.热处理对板栗贮藏过程中部分生理指标与贮藏效果的影响[J].果树学报,2004,21(3)：237-240.
[79]韩涛.热激处理冷藏桃果实的生理效应[J].植物生理学通讯,1996,32(3)：184-186.
[80]李丽萍,韩涛.热处理条件对番茄采后冷害的影响[J].农业工程学报,1996,12(4)：189-193.
[81]陈发河,张维一,吴光斌.贮前热处理对冷藏甜椒果实品质的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2000,23(2)：6-10.
[82]Spalding DH, Reeder WE Decay and acceptability of mangos treated with combinations of hot water, i-mazalil and g-radiation [J]. Plant Dis,1986,70:1149-1151.
[83]Klein JD, Lurie S. Prestorage heat treatment as a means of improving poststorage quality of apples [J]. J Amer Soc Hort Sci,1990,115:265-269.
[84]Lara,I., Garcia, P., Vendrell, M. Post-harvest heat treatments modified cell wall composition of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) fruit[J]. Scientia horticulturae.2006,109:48-53.
[85]李成,章文霞.稳定性二氧化氯处理对杏保鲜的影响研究[J].太原科技,2007(7)：82-83.
[86]王伟,张有林.减压处理对采后杏果实软化的生理控制效应[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(1)：131-135.
[87]陈富,赵成纲.低温条件下单果包膜和戴挫霉浸泡处理对兰州大接杏贮藏性的影响[J].甘肃农业科技,2003(3)：34 36.
[88]赵晓梅,张谦,徐麟,等.自制壳聚糖保鲜纸对鲜杏贮藏效果的影响[J].北方园艺2010,(10)：197-201.
[89]王庆国,邓正焱,谷林.1-1甲基环丙烯对杏采后保鲜效果的影响[J].山东农业科学,2005(1)：60-61.
[90]王静,张辉,逢焕明,等.热处理对库车小白杏贮藏品质的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2010,33(3)：234-239.
[91]Brummell D A, Harpster M H. Cell wall metabolism in fruit softening and quality and its manipulation in transgenic plants[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,2001,47:311-340.
[92]严丽.水果保鲜纸箱用保鲜涂料的制备及应用的初步研究[D].西安：陕西科技大学,2007.
[93]赵晓梅,张谦,徐麟,等.自制壳聚糖保鲜纸对鲜杏贮藏效果的影响[J].北方园艺,2010(10)：197-201.
[94]REMON S, VENTURINI M E, LOPEZ-BUESA P, et al. Burlat cherry quality after long range transport:optimization of packaging conditions [J]. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2003,4(4):425-434.
[95]PELEG K, HINGA S. Simulation of vibration damage in produce transportation [J]. Transactions of the A SAE,1986,29 (2):633-641.
[96]卢立新,王志伟.果品运输中的机械损伤机理及减损包装研究进展[J]. 包装工程,2004,4(25)：131-134.
[97]周然,李云飞.不同强度的运输振动对黄花梨的机械损伤及贮藏品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(11)：255-258.
[98]李家庆.果蔬保鲜手册[M].北京：中国轻工业出版社,1997：97-105.
[99]胡柏文,车凤斌,片建明,等.南疆杏树栽培和产业发展研究[J].新疆农业科学,2006,43(5)：432-435.
[100]郭香凤,梁华,赵胜娟,等.1-MCP对杏果实采后贮藏品质的影响[J].农业机械学报,2006,37(8)：107-110.
[101]江英,胡小松,刘琦,等.壳聚糖处理对采后酶杏贮藏品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,10(26)：343-348.
[102]赵晓梅,张谦,徐麟,等.不同贮藏条件对新疆“赛买提”杏品质变化的影响[J].食品研究与开发,2010,31(3)：176-179.
[103]曾凯芳,肖丽娟,曾凡坤.振动胁迫对果品采后贮藏特性的影响[J].贮运保鲜,2005(4)：81-83.
[104]席屿芳,应铁进,郑永华,等.振动胁迫对桃果实哀老的影响[J].园艺学报,1997,24(2)：137-140.
[105]应铁进,陈萃仁,席屿芳,等.振动胁迫下杨梅果实呼吸强度与质膜差别透性变化[J].浙江农业大学学报,1993,19(1)：80-81.
[106]李正国,苏彩萍,王贵禧.振动胁迫对猕猴桃果实成熟衰老生理的影响[J].农业工程学报.2000,16(4)：142-143.
[107]郑永华,应铁进,席玙芳,等.振动胁迫对杨梅果实采后衰老生理的影响[J].园艺学报.1996,23(3)：231-234.
[108]孙广宇,宗兆锋.植物病理学试验技术[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2002.
[109]李武汉,朱玮,景耀.马尾松瘤锈病与酚类物质关系的研究[J].西北林学院学报.1995,10(3)：25-28.
[110]MASSANTIN R, LANZAROTTA L, BOTONDI R, et al. Ripening of kiwifruit following stimulated brush- ing with commercial brushes [J]. Hortscience,1995,30(3):566-569.
[111]MILLER A R, DALMASSO J P, KRETCHMAN D W. Michanical, stress storage time and temperature influence cell wall degrading enzymes, firmness and ethylene production by cucumbers [J]. J Amer Sci Hort Sci,1987,112 (4):666-671.
[112]刘兴华,饶景萍.果品蔬菜贮运学.西安：陕西科学技术出版社,1998.
[113]Biale J B, Young RE, In:Reeent Advances in the Biochemistry of fruits and Vegetables. Eds:Friend J, Rhodes MJC, Academic press, London.1981,1-39.
[114]茅林春,叶立扬.无花果果实对非外伤性振动的生理反应[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2000,25(4)：423-426.
[115]应铁进,茅林春,席当芳,等.草墓果实对机械振动胁迫的生理反应与抗性机制研究[J].科技通报,1998,14(1)：1-5.
[116]应铁进,陈萃仁,席玛芳,等.振动胁迫下杨梅果实的呼吸强度与质膜差别透性变化(简报).浙江农业大学学报,1993,19：80-81.
[117]席玛芳,应铁进,郑永华,等.振动胁迫对桃果实衰老的影响.园艺学报,1997,24：137-140.
[118]卢立新,王志伟.果品运输中的机械损伤机理及减损包装研究进展.包装工程,2004,25(4)：131-134,141.
[119]Abu-Goukh A A, Bashir H A. Changes in pectic enzymes and cellulase activity during guava fruit ripening. Food Chemistry,2003,83:213-218.
[120]Barnes M F, Patchett B J. Cell wall degrading enzymes and the softening of senescent strawberry fruit. Journal of Food Science,1976,41:1392-1395.
[121]Van Buren J P,1991. Function of pectin in plant tissue structure and firmness. In:Water R H(Ed.), The chemistry and technology of pectin. Academic Press, San Diego, pp.1-22.
[122]Roe B, Bruemmer J H. Changes in pectic substances and enzymes during ripening andstorage of "Keitt" mangosJournal of Food Science,1981,46:186-189.
[123]刘剑锋,程云清,彭抒昂.梨采后细胞壁成分及果胶酶活性与果肉质地的关系.园艺学报,2004,31(5)：579-583.
[124]李正国,苏彩萍,王贵禧.振动胁迫对猕猴桃果实成熟衰老生理的影响.农业工程学报,2000,16：142-143.