水蜜桃采后生理及贮藏保鲜技术研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究以上海市水蜜桃主栽品种——“大团蜜露”和“湖景蜜露”为试材,研究其采后生理特性及贮藏保鲜技术。通过对其适宜采收成熟度、贮藏温度的筛选,及不同保鲜技术对贮藏效果影响的研究,明确了不同贮藏条件对水蜜桃采后生理生化变化及贮藏效果的影响,确定了其适宜的采收成熟度、贮藏温度。主要研究结果如下:
     (1)与七成熟和九成熟“大团蜜露”和“湖景蜜露”水蜜桃相比,八成熟果实采后室温贮藏期间,呼吸强度较低;至第8d,“大团蜜露”水蜜桃TSS、Vc含量分别维持在16%-16.5%和7-7.5 mg/100 g,“湖景蜜露”水蜜桃分别维持在16.5%-17%和7.9-8.5 mg/100 g; SOD、POD、CAT等保护酶活性较高,MDA含量低,生理活性强。本研究表明:八成熟可作为“大团蜜露”和“湖景蜜露”水蜜桃室温贮藏的采收成熟度。
     (2)与0℃和4℃贮藏相比,2℃为“大团蜜露”水蜜桃的最适贮藏温度,显著抑制了其可滴定酸、TSS、Vc含量的下降,至第30 d,“大团蜜露”可滴定酸含量维持在0.128%-0.13%,果实失重率仅为2.8%;显著降低了果实的呼吸强度,维持了果肉原有色泽,并抑制了PG和CX酶活性;冷藏21d进行货架研究,货架期品质佳,冷害发生较轻;0℃为“湖景蜜露”水蜜桃最适贮藏温度,至第30 d,失重率为3.91%,贮藏21d进行货架研究,货架品质佳,冷害发生轻。说明,不同品种水蜜桃对低温的冷敏性有较大差异。
     (3)程序升温可使七、八成熟“湖景蜜露”水蜜桃正常软化,MDA含量低;第30d,总糖和Vc含量分别是0℃下贮藏的七、八成熟果实的1.09和1.11倍、1.33和2.09倍;整个贮藏期间,程序升温条件下,八成熟果实贮藏效果最佳。
     (4)低温(2-3℃)减压(1450-1550 Pa)贮藏显著降低了“大团蜜露”水蜜桃呼吸强度,并延缓了呼吸高峰的出现;较好地保持了果肉原有色泽,并能正常软化;低温减压贮藏显著降低了果实MDA含量,抑制了果实超氧阴离子产生速率和过氧化氢的含量,较好地保持了膜完整性。
     (5)500 nl/L的1-MCP处理可使果实正常软化,显著抑制贮藏期间果实可滴定酸、TSS、Vc和蛋白含量的下降,降低贮藏期间MDA的含量,较好地保持膜系统的完整性,不同浓度1-MCP处理对Vc含量的影响不显著。
     (6)46℃热空气处理30 min显著抑制了可溶性蛋白合成代谢的进程,使热稳定蛋白含量增加。与对照相比,冷藏及货架期期间,热空气处理可使果实保持较高TSS和还原糖含量,并有效抑制可滴定酸含量的降低,较好地保持果实的原有风味。
In order to reseach postharvest physiology and storage technology of "Datuanmilu" and "Hujingmilu" honey peach which were regarded as the main breed of Shanghai, the suitable harvrst maturity and storing-temperature were screened, and several storage technology were researched too. In the paper, we made clear that the effectiveness of some storage technology were remarkably, and determinated optimum picking-maturity and storing-temperature.The main results are as follows:
     (1) At room-temperature (25℃), the respiration rate of eight tenth maturity fruit was lower; At the eight day, the TSS and Vc content of eight tenth maturity "Datuanmilu" honey peach could be kept in 16%-16.5% and 7-7.5 mg/100 g, which of "Hujingmili" honey peach could be kept in 16.5%-17% and 7.9-8.5 mg/100 g; it had higher SOD, POD, CAT activity and lower MDA content, whose physiology was very strong.
     (2) 2℃was the optimum cold-storage temperature of "Datuanmilu" honey peach, storing at 2℃could restrain the descend of titratable acidity, TSS and Vc content, to the thirtieth day, the titratable acidity could be kept in 0.128%-0.13%, and the weight loss was only 2.8%; reduced the respiration intensity remarkably, maintained the pulp fresh and lovely luster, restrained the activity of PG and CX; fruits were taken out and put them at room-temperature(25℃) for three days after storing twenty days, the shelf-quality was better, the happening of cold injury was lighter; 0℃was the optimum cold-storage temperature of "Hujingmiu" honey peach, to the thirtieth day, the weightlessness was only 3.91%, to the 21th day, we showed that the result was in accord with "Datuanmilu". In a word, the cold-sensibility to low-temperature of different variety honey peach was quite different.
     (3) Storing at temperature-programming could make Seven tenth and eight tenth maturity of "Hujingmilu" honey peach fruit soften naturally, slow down the happening of cold injury, restrained the accumulate of MDA; to the thirtieth day, the total sugar and Vc content of seven tenth and eight tenth maturity stored at temperature-programming was the 1.09 and 1.11 times,1.33 and 2.09 times of which stored at 0℃. In a word, the effectiveness of 8 tenth maturity fruit was best stored at temperature-programming.
     (4) Storing at low-temperature and Hypobaric could reduce the respiration sensity and defer the appearance of respiration peak of "Datuanmilu" honey peach; keep pulp better fresh and and lovely luster, and make it soften naturally; reduce MDA content remarkably, restrain O~2- production rate and H2O2 content, keep the integrity of epicyte better.
     (5) 500nl/L 1-MCP gas strength could make fruit after-mature naturally, restrain the including of TA, TSS, Vc and protein content remarkably, reduce MDA content during storage period, keep the integrity of epicyte better, the effectiveness of different gas strength treatment to Vc content is indistinctively.
     (6) 46℃hot-treatment for 30 min could restrain synthesis process of soluble protein remarkably, make the hot-stability protein content increased. Compared with CK, during cold storage and shelf, hot-air treatment could make fruit keep higher TSS and reducing sugar content, restrain the reducing of titratable acidity effectively, keep the unique flavors better.
引文
1安建申,张憨,路起瑞,等.不同厚度薄膜气调包装对水蜜桃贮藏品质的影响[J].食品与生物技术学报,2005,24(3):76-79.
    2陈杭君,毛金林,宋丽丽,等.温度对南方水蜜桃贮藏生理及货架期品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(7):1567-1572.
    3蔡晓东,潘一山,王金强,等.自发气调贮藏对水蜜桃采后生理及相关酶活性的影响[J].漳州师范学院学报(自然学报),2006,2:70-73.
    4陈昆松,张上隆,吕均良,等.“玉露”桃的采后生理及其贮运技术研究[J].浙江农业大学学报,1994,20(2):183-187.
    5崔岩.减压条件对大久保桃采后活性氧代谢及品质的影响[J].保鲜与加工,2009,50(1):17-20.
    6陈文恒,浩海燕,陈杭君,等.减压贮藏条件下水蜜桃生理生化指标的变化[J].前沿科技,2004,6:16-18.
    7杜纪红,叶正文,张学英,等.遮光对沪油018油桃果皮花色苷含量及果实着色的影响[J].果树学报,2008,25(6):928-931.
    8丁建国,陈昆松,许文平,等.1-甲基环丙烯处理对美味猕猴桃果实后熟软化的影响[J].园艺学报,2003,30(3):277-280.
    9冯磊,郑永华,汪峰,等.茉莉酸甲酯处理对冷藏水蜜桃品质的影响[J].食品科学,2003,24(9):135-139.
    10付永琦,陈明,刘康,等.1-MCP二次处理对猕猴桃果实采后生理生化及贮藏效果的影响[J].果树学报,2007,24(1):43-48.
    11高慧,饶景萍.不同温度冷藏对于油桃生理生化变化的影响[J].果树学报,2004,21(2):173-175.
    12高慧,饶景萍.冷害对贮藏油桃膜脂肪酸及相关酶活性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(4):0710-0714.
    13高慧,饶景萍.油桃的采后生理及贮藏保鲜技术.陕西农业科学,2003,(4):55-59.
    14郭晓成,邓琴凤,高小宁,等.论我国桃产业发展的优势、品种和栽培技术[J].西北园艺,2004,4:5—7.
    15黄海英,李正英,李艳梅,等.减压贮藏条件下活性氧与丙二醛含量对富士苹果硬度影响的研究[J].农产品加工,2009,(160)1:83-85.
    16贺光祥.BP生物保鲜剂对南参贡桃的保鲜效果[J].中国南方果树,2006,35(3):81.
    17郝海燕,陈杭君,陈文烜,等.采收成熟度对冷藏水蜜桃果实品质和冷害的影响[J.中国农业科学,2009,42(2):612-618.
    18韩冬梅,吴振先,李建光,等.龙眼果实采收成熟度与耐贮性关系研究[J].华南农业大学学报,2008,29(4):12-16.
    19蒋跃明,傅家瑞,徐礼根.膜对采后园艺作物衰老的影响[J].广西植物,2002,22(2):160-166.
    20靳爱仙,王亚萍,梁丽松,等.减压贮藏对冬枣果实呼吸及软化相关指标的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(5):143-146.
    21金微微,吴振先,肖若,陈维信.枇杷采后生理变化与贮藏保鲜技术[J].保鲜与加工,2005,30(5):13-14.
    22康明丽.减压贮藏理论及技术研究进展[J].食品与机械,2000,(2):9-10.
    23康若伟,郁志芳,陆兆新,等.壳聚糖涂膜对冷藏水蜜桃品质变化的影响[J].食品科学,2005,26(2):228-231
    24李合生,孙群,赵世杰,等.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].高等教育出版社.2001.
    25逯明辉,宋慧,李晓明等.冷害过程中黄瓜叶片SOD、CAT和POD活性的变化[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(8):1570-1573.
    26李丽萍,黄万荣,韩涛,等.间歇升温对冷藏桃果实品质的影响[J].食品科学,1995,16(5):55-59.
    27李文香,张憨,陶菲,等.真空预冷集合降压贮藏保鲜水蜜桃[J].食品与生物工程学报,2005,24(5):42-46.
    28李文香,仇宏伟,孙萍,等.三阶段减压贮藏对绿芦笋采后生理变化的影响[J].食品科学,2008,(29)2:420-424.
    29李文香,张慜,余汉清,等.不同真空处理对水蜜桃贮藏效果的研究[J].食品与生物技术学报,2006,26(3):58-62.
    30李富军,翟衡,杨洪强,等.1-MCP对苹果果实贮藏期间乙烯合成代谢的影响[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(5):734-738.
    31罗自生,席玉芳,楼健.热处理减轻柿果实冷害与内源多胺的关系[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(4):429-432.
    32刘忆冬,童军茂.中华寿桃采后生理的研究.现代食品科技,2006,22(4):61-63.
    33吕昌文,齐灵,修德仁,等.桃波动温度贮藏及其研究机理[J].华北农学报,1994,9(1):75-80.
    34刘北林.食品保鲜技术[M].北京:中国物资出版社,2003.
    35刘国凌,许晓春,陈尚围.壳聚糖对枇杷保鲜的影响[J].现代食品科技,2006,(3):70-72.
    36李鹏程.香椿叶提取物对草莓保鲜效果的研究[J].农林科技,2007,36(1):50-51.
    37茅林春,张上隆.采后桃果实中多胺和乙烯对低温胁迫的反应[J].园艺学报,1999,26(6):360-363.
    38茂林春,王阳光,张上隆.热处理减缓桃果实的采后冷害[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)2000,26(2):137-140.
    39茂林春、张上隆.果胶酶和纤维素酶在桃果实成熟和絮败中的作用[J].园艺学报,2001,28(2):107-111.
    40茂林春,张上隆.间歇低温胁迫对桃果实细胞壁代谢的影响[J].植物生理学报,2001,27(2):151-155.
    41孟雪雁,岑涛.桃低温贮藏中生理变化与冷害发生的关系[J].山西农业大学学报,2001,21(3):268-270.
    42茅林春,应铁进,张上隆.桃果实絮败与果胶质变化和细胞壁结构的关系[J].植物生理学报,1999,25(2):121-126.
    43孟雪雁.不同温度下桃贮藏效果及冷害症状的发生[J].山西农业大学学报,2001,21(1):66-69.
    44马文月.植物抗冷害和抗冷性的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2004,32(5):1003-1006.
    45聂继云.水果辐射之保鲜应用[J].中国果菜,2000,2:11-13.
    46彭丽桃,杨书珍,任小林,等.采后两种不同果肉类型油桃软化相关酶活性的变化[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2002,10(2):171-176.
    47乔勇进,冯双庆,赵玉梅.热处理对黄瓜贮藏冷害及生理生化的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2003,8(1):71-74.
    48孙芳娟,韩明玉,赵彩萍,等.采收成熟度对油桃贮藏品质的影响[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(1):0183-0187.
    49石文星,邵双全,李先庭,等.冰温技术在食品贮藏中的应用[J].食品工业科技,2002,23(4):64-66.
    50绍兴锋,屠康,赵艺泽,等.中途加温和延期贮藏对“白凤2号”桃冷藏效果的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2006,28(1):98-102.
    51苏小军,蒋跃明,张昭其.1-MCP对低温贮藏的香蕉果实后熟的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,2003,39(5):437-440.
    52沙爱华,黄俊斌,林兴华,等.水稻白叶枯病呈抗株性与过氧化氢含量及几种酶活性变化的关系[J].植物病理学报,2004,34(4):340-345.
    53孙令强,李召虎,王倩,等.1-MAP对低温贮藏猕猴桃果实的品质及生理特性的影响[J].西南农业学报,2007,20(1):35-39
    54田春莲,钟晓红,黄荣芳,等.三种保鲜剂对巨峰葡萄保鲜效果的影响[J].食品科学,2006,27(12):761-763.
    55王友升,王贵禧.冷害桃果实品质劣变及其控制措施[J].林业科学研究,2003,16(4):465-472.
    56王育林,陈洪国,彭永宏,等.果实采后变温生物学研究进展[J].果树学报,2001,18(4):234-238.
    57王则金.水蜜桃果实冷藏适宜温度研究[J].制冷优秀论文集,2003.
    58吴秀兰,唐文武.臭氧在果蔬保鲜中的应用[J].江西农业学报,2007,19(3):75-76.
    59王佳璐,黄文,周兴苗,等.几种壳聚糖保鲜剂对番茄的保鲜作用研究[J].食品科学,2005,26(2):234-236.
    60魏好程.桃果实采后贮藏保鲜及其品质控制的研究.华南热带农业大学[D].2005.
    61吴彬彬,饶景萍,李百云,等.采收期对猕猴桃果实品质及其耐贮性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(4):788-792.
    62汪沂,田世平,徐勇,等.北京33号桃在不同贮藏温度下乙烯释放和贮藏性的研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2000,22:491-493.
    63王锋,谭兴和,李清明,等.间隙升温降低果蔬贮藏冷害研究进展[J].保鲜与加工,2004,25(6):6-8.
    64王伟,张有林.减压处理对采后杏果实软化的生理控制效应[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(1):0131-0135.
    65王俊宁,饶景萍,李落叶,等.1-MCP处理对油桃果实硬度、呼吸及乙烯合成的影响[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(5):1171-1175.
    66王爱国,罗广华.植物的超氧自由基与羟胺的定量关系[J].植物生理学通讯,1990,26(6)55—57.
    67薛梦林,张继澍,张平,等.减压对冬枣采后生理生化变化的影响[J].中国农业科学,2003,36 (2):196-200.
    68薛文通,李里特,赵凤敏,等.桃的冰温贮藏研究[J].Transaction of the CSAE,1997,12:216-220.
    69肖丽霞,王乔.壳聚糖在果蔬保鲜中的应用[J].保鲜与加工,2005,1:4-6.
    70许秀淡,郑少泉,黄金松,等.角颊木虱为害对龙眼叶片活性氧代谢的影响[J].福建农业学报,2000,15(3):60-63.
    71徐昌杰,陈昆松,张上隆.蔗糖酶对柑橘外切纤维素酶和外切多聚半乳糖醛酸酶活性测定的干扰及排除[J].植物生理学通讯,1997,33(1):43-46.
    72徐丽萍.蜜桃臭氧保鲜包装的实验研究[J].包装工程,2006,28(6):30-32.
    73徐丹,金军.水蜜桃冷藏保鲜技术的研究与应用[J].常州工学院学报,2007,20(5):47-51.
    74薛炳烨,束怀瑞.多聚半乳糖醛酸酶(PG)与果实成熟软化研究进展[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,33(2):252-256.
    75袁海娜.国内外果蔬热处理保鲜技术研究进展[J].粮油加工与食品机械,2002,(10):30-32.
    76杨虎清,王允祥,庞林江,等.1-MCP对不同成熟度白凤桃冷害发生的影响[J].果树学报,2008,25(1):111-114.
    77于建娜.桃采后低温贮藏冷害发生机理及防治措施[J].塔里木农垦大学学报,2004,16(4):32-35.
    78应本友,王慧萍,马礼良,蔡迎春等.成熟度和包装对程序降温贮藏枇杷品质的影响[J].浙江农村机电,2006,13-14.
    79颜志梅,蔺经,盛宝龙,等.1-MCP处理对梨常温贮藏效果的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2004,20(3):189-193.
    80余小林,徐步前,梁佳伟.热预处理对青霉低温贮藏品质的影响[J].食品科学,2007,28(5):343-347.
    81于建娜,任小林,张少颖.1-MCP处理对桃冷藏期品质和生理特性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2003,31(1):101-104.
    82尹明安,郭立.果品蔬菜低温贮藏时的冷害及贮藏措施[J].园艺学报,2003,(6):64-65.
    83周涛,许时婴,孙大文,等.热激处理及贮藏温度对水蜜桃果实生理生化变化的影响[J].中国南方果树,2003,32(2):39-44.
    84张培正,李坤,李大鹏,等.采收成熟度、温度、气体成分对青州蜜桃保鲜效果的影响[J].贮运保鲜,2002,23(5):61-63.
    85张显久,李玉超,周凤,等.无锡水蜜桃常温保鲜的初步研究.江苏农业科学,2005(2):109-110.
    86张辉玲.果蔬采后冰温贮藏技术研究进展[J].热带作物学报,2006,27(1):101-105.
    87赵朝辉,李里特.“绿化9号”水蜜桃的冰温贮藏[J].中国农业大学学报,1999,4(2):77-81.
    88张四奇,陈发河.1-MCP在果蔬采后保鲜上应用的研究进展.食品科学,2006,27(8):262-266.
    89朱正良,樊建,张惠芬,等.青刺果乙醇提取物对桃子的保鲜效果.西南农业大学学报,2002,24(5):442-444.
    90张飞,岳田利,费坚,等.果胶酶活力的测定方法研究[J].西北农业学报,2004,13(4):134-137.
    91赵鑫,张继澍,王敏.CaCl2和GA3处理对枣果采后衰老和膜脂过氧化的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2003,31(2):118-124.
    92赵晓芳,梁丽松,王贵禧.不同采收成熟度对“八月脆”桃果实低温贮运及货架期品质的影响 [J].中国农学通报,2008,24(4):167-171.
    93周春华,胡西琴.温度预处理对柑橘果实活性氧代谢相关酶的影响[J].果树学报,2001,18(5):267-271.
    94郑小林,田世平,李博强,等.草酸对冷藏期间桃果实抗氧化系统和活性的影响.园艺学报,2005,32(5):788-792.
    95朱世江,季作梁.热激蛋白与园艺植物的耐冷性[J].园艺学报,2002,29:607-612.
    96朱世江,季作梁,张昭其,等.热处理提高采后杧果抗冷性与蛋白含量变化的关系[J].园艺学报,2003,30(2):198-200.
    97张晓勇.枇杷果实冷害及其抗冷性诱导机理的研究[D].集美大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    99 Akbudak B, Eris A. Physical and chemical changes in peaches and nectarines during the modified atmosphere storage[J].Food Control,2004,15 (4):307-313.
    114 Abeles F B, Takeda T. Cellulase activity and ethylene in ripening strawberry and apple fruits[J]. Sci Hortic.1990,42:269-275.
    131 Anderson R E. The influence of storage temperature and warming during storage on peach and nectarine fruit quality[J]. Jamer Soc Hort Sci,1979,104:45-46.
    110 Badiani, Fuhrer M.J, Paolacci A. R,et al. Deriving critical levels for ozone effects on peach trees (Prunus persica L.Batsch) grown in open2top chambers in Central Italy [J]. Fresenius Environ Bull, 1996(5):594-603.
    138 Cai Y W, dong B X, Eaton C, et al. Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum by computer aided analysis of expressed sequence tags[J].Molecular breeding, 2004,14:21-34.
    128 Elmer P.A.G, Spiers T.M, Wood P.N.Effects of pre-harvest foliar calcium sprays on fruit calcium levels and brown rot of peaches[J].Crop Protection,2007,26 (1):11-18.
    127 Fernandez-trujilloj P, Martinezj A, Artes F. Effect of cold-storage on physiology and quality of Sudanell peach [J]. Food Science and technology International,1998,4 (4):245-255.
    98 Ferrer A. Changes during the ripening of the very late season Spanish peach cultivar Calanda Feasibility of using CIEL AB coordinates as maturity indices[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2005,105: 435-446.
    119 Hayama H, Tatsuki M, Ito A.et al. Ethylene and fruit softening in the stony hard mutation in peach[J].Postharvest Biology and Technology,2006,41 (1):16-21.
    120 Hewage, Wainwright K. Wijeratnam S H, et al. Quantitative assessment of chilling injury in bananas using a colorimeter[J] Journal of Horticultural Science.1996,71 (1):135-139.
    135 Hong S I, Lee H H, Kim D. Effects of hot water treatment on the storage stability of stasuma mandarin as a postharvest decay control[J].Postharvest Biol Technol,2007,43:271-279.
    118 King G A. Postharvest physiology of peaches and nectarines[J]. Horticultural Reviews,1989,11: 413-418.
    122 Klein J D, Lurie S. Prestorage heat treatment as a means of improving poststorage quality of apples[J]. Hort Sci,1990,115:265-269.
    121 Lara I, Garcia P, Vendrell M. Postharvest heat treatments modify cell wall composition of strawberry [J]. Sci Hort,2006,109:48-53.
    125 Luchsinger L E, Walsh C S. Chilling injury of peach fruit during storage[J].Acta Horti.1998. 46 (4):473-477.
    130 Lill R. E.Alleviation of internal breakdown of nectarines during cold storage by intermittent warming[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,1985,25 (3):241-246.
    132 Lill R E, Odonaghue E M, Val E D, et al. Poly mines, ethylene and physiochemical changes in low-temperature-stored peach[J] Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,1997,45(9):3406-3410.
    137 Leshem YY.植物衰老过程和调控[M].胡文玉译.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1990.
    134 Lurie S, Crisosto C.H. Chilling injury in peach and nectarine [J].Postharvest Biology and Technology,2005,37 (3):195-208.
    136 Mcollum T G. Heat treatment inhibits mango chilling injury[J].Hort Science,1993,28:197-198.
    115 Manganaris G.A, Vasilakakis M, Diamantidis G, et al.. Cell wall physicochemical aspects of peach fruit related to internal breakdown symptoms[J].Postharvest Biology and Technology,2006,39 (1): 69-74.
    117 Manganaris G.A, Vasilakakis M, Mignani I., et al.The effect of preharvest calcium sprays on quality attributes, physicochemical aspects of cell wall components and susceptibility to brown rot of peach fruits (Prunus persicaL. cv. Andross)[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2005,107 (1):43-50.
    124 Mollendorff L J V. Woolliness in peaches and nectarines [J].Horticultural Science,1987, (5):1-3.
    129 Murray R, Lucangeli C. Combined pre-storage heat treatment and controlled atmosphere storage reduced internal breakdown of'Flavorcrest'peach [J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2007,44: 116-121.
    116 Nanos G D, Mitchell F G. High temperature conditioning to delay internal breakdown development in peachs and nectarines[J].HortScience,1991,7:882-885.
    123 Parkin K L, Marangoni A, Jackman R, et al. Chilling injury.A review of possible mechanism[J]. Journal of food biochemistry,1989,13:127-135.
    133 Ruiz, Reich D, Bureau M, et al.Application of reflectance colorimeter measurements and infrared spectroscopy methods to rapid and nondestructive evaluation of carotenoids content in apricot (Prunus armeniacaL.)[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.2008,56 (13):4916-4922.
    113 Sisler E C, Serekm.Inhibitors of ethylene responses in plants at the receptor level:recent development [J]. Physiol Plant,1997,100:577-582.
    126 Sharrom M. Chilling injury induces lipid phase changes in membrances of tomato fruit [J].Plant physiol,1994,105:305-308.
    111 Valeriano D C, Fabio M R, Alessandro B, et al.The ethylene biosynthetic and signal transduction pathways are differently affected by 1-MCP in apple and peach fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2006,42 (2):125-133.
    112 Valers D, Serrano M, Martinez-madrid M C,et al. Polymines, ethylene and physiochemical changes in low-temperature-stored peach[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,1997,45(9): 3406-3410.
    139 Yates H E, Frary A, Doganlar S, et al. Comparative fine mapping of fruit quality QTLs on chromosome 4 introgressions derived from two wild tomato species[J].Euphytica,2004,135(3): 283-296.
    140 Yagiz, Balaban Y, Kristinsson M. O, et al.Comparison of Minolta colorimeter and machine vision system in measuring colour of irradiated Atlantic salmon[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2009,89 (4):728-730.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700