摘要
当前,建立一套科学、系统、可操作的评价标准和指标体系,评价林业生态工程建设的多目标效益,已成为社会迫切需要研究和解决的问题,这也是一项国内外林业科学研究的热点。论文针对这一热焦问题,在系统分析林业生态工程及其评价系统特点和效益评价研究领域中有关理论和方法的基础上,运用辨证系统思想,将传统系统理论与方法(系统工程、系统分析)、现代系统理论及其方法(软系统理论和综合集成法等)与社会科学研究中的广义归纳法相结合,首次进行了林业生态工程效益评价得方法学研究,创建了林业生态工程效益评价的软系统归纳集成法(Soft System Method of Induction Integration,SSMⅡ);应用该方法开展了林业生态工程效益评价指标体系研究,建立了一套科学实用的效益评价指标体系;以川江流域防护林工程为例,基于大量的野外实地调查资料、定位与半定位监测资料以及林业行业的统计资料,运用所建指标体系,开展了防护林工程效益综合评价应用研究,提出了川江流域防护林工程建设中存在的问题及其调控对策;采用相关分析方法,拟合了川江流域防护林工程效益综合评价值与计量评价值间的关系,建立了各种预测模型。总体而言,论文研究突出了多学科、多专业和多领域相互交叉与融合的特色,主要成果和认识包括以下4个方面:
1、通过分析林业生态工程及其效益评价系统特点,依据软系统理论、系统工程理论、综合集成法和社会科学研究中的广义归纳法,创立了林业生态工程效益评价的软系统归纳集成法(SSMⅡ)。该方法论由四个相互关联部分组成:任务目标分析阶段是对接受的目标不明确和结构模糊的复杂软系统问题,采用广义归纳方法,以专家会议或咨询形式,形成对研究问题明确目标的公认的表述形式系统;问题科学化阶段是通过对问题系统的结构化分析,采用软系统方法(SSM)处理不良结构问题,并使其转换为良结构问题;寻求行动对策阶段主要采用综合集成法(SIM)处理半结构化问题;问题解决阶段是用系统工程方法(SE)处理良结构问题,以求得问题的最优解。
2、根据SSMⅡ方法论,系统研究了效益评价指标体系的构建技术、分指标
量化技术,建立了一套中国林业生态工程效益评价指标体系,即A级指标3个,
B级指标11个,C级指标39个,并确定了各级指标的权重。通过试评价对指标
体系进行检验,结果表明所建指标体系合理可行,可以运用于林业生态工程效益
的综合评价。
3、根据林业决策部门和基层管理部门的实际需要,依据SSM日方法论,建
立了一套实用简化的评价指标体系,即A级指标维持不变,B级指标简化为8个,
C级指标简化为14个,并确定了各级指标的权重。同时,利用简化的评价指标
体系,在林分类型一县一支流一流域总体四个层次上,对原川江流域防护林体系
一期工程林进行了效益静态与动态预测评价研究,取得了以下成果:
(1)从总体上看,投入资金91 .6亿元的长江中上游防护林一期工程川江部
分的防护林以幼林和中龄林为主,(幼林占防护林总面积的85.3%),2000年的综
合效益总产值已较启动初期的1985年增加了6倍。如果一期工程林面积维持现
状,随着防护林的逐渐成熟至2010年,川江流域防护林每公顷的综合效益将比
2000年提高38.5%,综合效益产出将达到1985年的9.7倍。
(2)截止2000年,川江流域所属六个支流域的防护林,按它们对综合效益
产出总分的贡献,依次为金沙江(21.3%)、嘉陵江(19.7%)、长江上游干流
(18.1%)、渠江(16.2%)、涪江(14.7%)、沱江(10.3%)。但从一期工程实施后效
益的变化速度来看,处在四川盆地低山丘陵区的涪江、嘉陵江和渠江等流域的防
护林效益发挥的较快、较好,其综合效益总产值比启动初期的1985年增加了
13一22.4倍;而金沙江流域防护林效益发挥的最慢,比启动初期的1985年仅增加
了4倍。对川江流域68个县各时期防护林效益的评价与各县防护林效益对川江
流域防护林总效益贡献大小的分析,可以看出各县之间防护林效益的大小既体现
出了各县自然条件、人文经济等方面的差异,也体现出防护林工程建设初期布局
上不尽合理的一面;而“七五”、“八五”、“九五”防护林效益变化趋势的分析结
果又充分表明了防护林工程建设布局正由不尽合理向合理化方向发展,林分质量
及其防护效益也由低至高方向发展。
(3)川江流域的防护林主要由28个造林树种组成。按所占面积比例,排在
前八名的树种为马尾松(31.1%)、柏木(30.5%)、云南松(10.5%)、栋类(6 .43%)、
杉木(4%)、软阔叶树种(3 .7%)、华山松(2.5%)、恺木(l .8%),八类造林树
种的面积约占防护林总面积的90.5%;按综合效益总产出贡献大小排序,前八名
树种依次为柏木(27.9%)、马尾松(26%)、云南松(14.6%)、栋类(7.2%)、杉
木(5 .6%)、软阔类(4.5%)、恺木(3%)、华山松(2.7%),它们的效益产出占
了少!!江防护林效益总产出的91.5%;从防护林每公顷产出效益来看,目前最好的
防护林树种依次为樟树、青冈、杉木、云南松、高山松、刺槐、栋类、桦木、千
丈、云杉、华山松、恺木、湿地松、杨树、柳杉和硬阔叶类等16个树种;由此
可以看出,目前防护林工程建设的布局和造林树种结构是不?
Construction of a set of the scientific, systematic and operational evaluation criteria and index system that is suitable for the benefit evaluation of forestry ecological engineering has been the problem which must be investigated and resolved, and also is a hot-spot problem in the domain of forestry science. To counter the hot-spot problem, based on the analysis for the characteristics of forestry ecological engineering benefit evaluation system and the theories and methods in realm of benefit evaluation, combined the traditional system theory and method, the modern system theory and method, the synthetical integration method and the generalized induction method in the realm of social science, the first study on the methodology of forestry ecological engineering benefit evaluation was made, the soft system method of induction integration (SSMII) was constructed. By means of SSMII, a set of a scientific and practical benefit evaluation index system of forestry ecological engineering was set up. As an exampl
e of the protective forest engineering of the Chuanjiang valley in the middle-upper reach of Changjiang river, based on a host of the field investigation reference, monitoring reference of the position and semi-position station, and forestry statistic reference, the comprehensive benefit evaluation study of protective forest engineering was made, problems existed in the construction of the protective forest engineering and the way to deal with them were put forward. Relation models between the comprehensive benefit evaluation value and the quantitative benefit value were also constructed by means of regression analysis methods. In brief, there are 4 main products or realizations with distinctive features combined by multi-speciality, multi-subject,
multi-field, etc. as follows:
1. Based on soft system method (SSM), system engineering method (SEM), synthetical integration method (SIM) and the generalized induction method (GIM)in the realm of social science, the soft system method of induction integration (SSMII) of forestry ecological engineering benefit evaluation is constructed. SSMII is composed of four related stages, analysis stage of objective and assignment: the distinct and accepted narrative system of complicated soft system problems with inexplicit objectives and indistinct structures is formed by means of the generalized induction method in form of expert meeting or advisory. Scientific disposal stage of problems: by means of structural analysis of problem system, unwell-defined problem is deal with, and transformed into well-defined problem with help of the soft system method. Seeking countermeasure stage: semi-structure problem is deal with by ways of synthetical integration method. Resolving problem stage: well-defined problem is deal with by ways of system engineering method, and resolved satisfactorily.
2. According to SSMII, the constructing technique of index system and the calculating technique of indexes are systematically studied, a set of benefit evaluation index system is constructed, which conclude 3 A-class indexes, 11 B-class indexes and 39 C-class indexes, and weight of indexes is also calculated. By means of evaluation index system constructed, the trial evaluation of protective forest benefits is carried out, the result shows the valuation index system is rational and feasible, and applied to the comprehensive benefit evaluation of forestry ecological engineering.
3. Based on practical needs of the forestry policy-making and administrative departments, a set of the simplified benefit evaluation index system is constructed in the light of SSMII, which conclude 39 A-class indexes, 8 B-class indexes and 14
C-class indexes, and weight of indexes was also calculated. Meanwhile, present situation and development of forestry ecological engineering benefits (for example the protective forest engineering of Chuanjiang valley) are evaluated by the use of the simplified index system in levels of forest types, county, branch valleys and Chuanjiang valley. Four new achievemen
引文
1.陈仲新,张新时.中国生态系统效益的价值.科学通报.2000,45(1):17-22.
2.董全.生态公益:自然生态过程对人类的贡献.1999,应用报,10(2):233-240.
3.高勇禄等.生态公益.黑龙江省森林防护效益及计量方法的初步研究.哈尔滨,黑龙江省林业区划办公室,1983.1-12
4.蒋延玲,周广胜.中国主要森林生态系统公益的评估.植物生态学报,1999,23(5):426-432.
5.雷效章,黄礼隆.长江上游防护林体系不同林种的生态经济效益研究.自然资源学报,1996,11(4):625-631.
6.雷效章,王金锡,彭培好等.中国生态林业工程效益评价指标体系.自然资源学报,1999,14(2):175-182.
7.李金昌等.生态价值论.重庆:重庆大学出版社,1999.
8.刘盛佳.长江流域经济发展和上、中、下游比较研究.武汉:华中师范大学出版社,1998.
9.慕长龙.森林涵养水源能力的综合评价方法研究.四川林业科技,1997,18(4):21-27.
10.欧阳志云等.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究.生态学报,1999:19(4):607-613.
11.彭培好,王金锡.人工桤柏混交林生态系统的能量特征.应用生态学报,1998,9(2):113-118.
12.彭培好,王金锡,王成善.川中丘陵区防护林群落多样性研究.四川林业科技,2000,21(4):5-9.
13.彭培好,王金锡,王成善.人工桤柏混交林光合生理生态机制研究.四川林业科技,2001,22(4):19-23.
14.彭培好,王金锡等.人工桤柏混交林降雨对养分物质的淋溶影响.生态学杂志,1996,15(5):12-15.
15.史立新,彭培好.长江防护林(四川段)初期水土保持效益研究.水土保持通报,1997,17(6):54-58.
16.史立新,彭培好.人工措施对川中丘陵区防护林建设的影响.山地学报,1999,17(1):81-85.
17.孙立达,朱金兆.水土保持林体系综合效益研究与评价.北京:林业出版社,1995.
18.王礼先,Brooks K N主编.长江中上游水土保持及环境保护.北京:中国林业出版社,1995.
19.王礼先等.山地防护林水土保持水文生态效益及其信息系统.北京:中国林业出版社,1998.
20.徐孝庆等.森林综合效益计量评价.北京:中国林业出版社,1992.
21.尧斯丹等.四川省资源环境保护与产业化发展研究.成都:四川人民出版社,2000.
22.赵景柱等.生态系统服务的物质量与价值评价方法的比较分析.应用生态学报,2000,11(4):290-292.
23.慕长龙等.防护林体系综合效益评价研究述评.四川林业科技,2001,21(2):13-19.
24.邓宏海.森林生态效能评价的理论和方法.林业科学,1985,21(1):61-67.
25.张建国等.福建森林综合效益计量与评价.生态经济,1994,(5):1-6.
26.张建国等.福建森林综合效益计量与评价.生态经济,1994,(6):10-16.
27.李周等.森林社会效益计量研究综述.北京林学院学报,1984,6(4):61-70.
28.周毅等.公益林生态效益计量研究进展.世界林业研究,1998,11(2):13-17.
29.崔清涛等.科尔沁沙地生态经济型防护林体系综合效益评价的研究.内蒙古林业科技,1996,(2):26-32.
30.朗奎建等.林业生态工程10种森林生态效益计量理论和方法.东北林业大学学报,2000,28(1):1-7.
31.宫伟光等.防护林系区域性生态效益的评价.东北林业大学学
报,1997,28(1):1-7.
32.李卫忠等.生态公益林建设效益评价指标体系初探.内蒙古大学学报,2001,22(2):12-15.
33.张会儒.从人与自然的关系社会的可持续发展.世界林业研究,1997,10(4):51-55.
34.钱学森等.一个科学新领域——开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论.自然杂志,1990,13(1):13-18.
35.李习彬.一般系统方法论.系统工程理论与实践,1996,(3):46-51.
36.曹光明.硬系统思想与软系统方法论的比较.系统工程理论与实践,1994,(1:)22-25.
37.成思危.复杂科学与系统工程.管理科学学报,1999,2(2):1-7.
38.景天魁等.现代科学基础定性与定量.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1996.
39.杨建梅.两过程软系统方法论与广东省产业结构调整.系统工程理论与实践,1995,(5):13-19.
40.栾玉广等.自然辩证法概论.合肥:中国科学技术出版社,1988.
41.陈国先等.教育评价系统工程——EVSE.四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),1990,11(4):275-294.
42.应天元.系统综合评价的赋权新方法—PC—LINMAP耦合模型.系统工程理论与实践,1997,(2):8-13.
43 陈国先等.教育评价系统工程——EVSE.四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),1991,12(1):36-52.
44.程根伟,钟祥浩.防护林生态效益定量指标体系研究.水土保持学报,1992,6(3):79-86.
45.蒋有绪.国际森林可持续经营的标准与指标体系研制进展.世界林业研究,1997,10(3):12-18.
46.杨玉坡,陈秀明.长江中上游防护林体系综合效益评价指标体系的初步研究.四川林业科技(增刊),1993,19-38.
47.王礼先,解明曙.山地防护林水土保持水文生态效益及其信息系统研究.北京:中国林业出版社,1997.
48.陈国阶,陈治谏.三峡工程对生态与环境影响的综合评价.北京:科学出版社,1993.
49.钱学森.论地理科学.杭州:浙江教学出版社,1994.
50.潘玉君.地理学基础.北京:科学出版社,2001.
51.田瑾等.经济、环境等非线性系统的预测和调整.北京:中国统计出版社,2001.
52.杨冬生.为了长江万古流.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1999.
53.王金锡等.长江中上游防护体系生态效益监测与计量评价(研究报告),2000.
54.国家林业局.中国林业发展报告.北京:中国林业出版社,2001.
55.国家科技委农村司.中国荒漠化灾害及其防治对策白皮书——国家农业科学技术管理系列书籍.1998.
56.孙保平.荒漠化防治工程学.北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
57.周晓峰.中国森林与生态环境.北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
58.中国地图出版社.世界地图册.北京:中国地图出版社,1993.
59.中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴.北京:中国统计出版社,2001.
60.中国环境与发展国际合作委员会生物多样性工作组著.利用天然植被改善中国退化环境.北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
61.朱金兆等.水土保持林综合效益调查和评价.北京:北京林业大学出版社,1991.
62.钱学森.谈地理科学的内容及研究方法.地理学报.1991,56(3):1-9
63.成思危.试论科学的融合.自然辩证法研究.1998,(11):49
64.朱原放主编.《简明社会科学词典》.上海:上海辞书出版社,1985.
65.邹平等著.人类.发展.前景.扶择.北京:学术书刊出版社,1990.
66.薛达元著.生物多样性经济价值评估.北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.
67.白效明主编.长白山地区自然资源开发与生态环境保护.长春:吉林科技出版社,1988.
68.周集中,马世骏.现代生态学透视.北京:科学出版社,1990.
69.钱迎倩等.生物多样性研究进展.合肥:中国科学技术出版社,1995.
70.钟祥浩等.长江上游环境特征与防护林体系建设.北京:科学出版社,1992.
71.王寿云等.《开放的复杂巨系统》.杭州:浙江科技出版社,1996.
72.钱学森等.论系统工程.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1982.
73.刘波等.科研系统工程理论与实践.北京:中国大地出版社,2002.
74.张培刚,厉以宁.宏观经济学与微观经济学.北京:人民出版社,1980.
75.曹瑞钰.环境经济学.上海:同济大学出版社,1993.
76.孙雪峰等.全球环境基金——GEF十年.北京:气象出版社,2001.
77.蒋有绪.中国森林生态系统结构与功能规律研究.北京:中国林业出版社,1996.
78.钟祥浩.长江上游地区水土流失影响因子特征与综合分区.大自然探索,1988,(4):81-87.
79.郭耀煌.多属性评价.软科学,1987,(2):46-51.
80.王浣尘编著.可行性研究和多目标决策.北京:机械工业出版社,1986.
81.郭耀煌等.综合评价与排序.系统工程理论与实践,1990,(2):26-30.
82.殷清堂等.主成分分析在《大学生体育合格标准》综合评价中的应用.数理统计与管理,1999,(2):14-19.
83.赵焕臣等.层次分析法.北京:科学出版社,1986.
84.钱学森等.一个学科新领域——开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论.北京:中国科技出版社,1990.
85.杨建梅.两过程软系统方法论与广东省产业结构研究.系统工程理论与实践,1995,(5):13-19.
86.郝庆升.多方案的软系统方法论与粮食生产经营模式研究.农业系统科学与综合研究,2002,18(2):96-103.
87.邝孔武.软系统方法论建设信息系统的新思路.专家论坛,1998,7-11.
88.陈国先等.系统方法在土地利用总体规划中的应用.四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),1996,17(2):3-11.
89.张文泉,张世英.软系统方法(SSM)初探.科学学与科学技术管理,1992,13(3):27-29.
90.陈俊,夏维力,江一.对软系统方法论(SSM)的探讨.管理工程学报,1990,4(4):41-47.
91.金卫华,赵晓康译.透过“新潮”管理法看系统管理学.系统工程理论与实践,1988,18:72-84.
92.杨林译.森林公益效能的经济评价.国外森林公益效能计量研究,1983,1-10.
93.刘启华.“软”系统方法论述评.自然辩证法研究,1999,15(10):5-12.
94.赵晓康,王维红.论当代系统思想的最新发展及演变趋势.系统辩证学学报,2002,10(2):8-12.
95. Hoos I R.Engineers as analysts of social:A critical enquiry.journal of Systems Engineering, 1976,2:23.
96. Ormerod R.J..Putting soft OR methods to work: information system strategy development at Sainsbury's. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994,46:277-293.
97. Ormerod R.J..Information system strategy development at Sainsbury's supermarkets using soft OR.Interface,1996,26:102-130.
98. Ormerod R.J..On the Nature of soft OR---Entering the Fray.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1996,47:1-17.
99. Ormerod R.J..Putting soft OR methods to work: information system strategy development at Richards Bay.Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1996,47:1083-1097.
100. Ormerod R.J. Putting soft OR methods to work:information system
strategy development at Palabora Omega Int.J. Mgmt. Sci.,1998, 46:277-293.
101. P.B.Cheeklanel(英).1981,Systems Thinking,systems practice, Wiley & sons Ltd.
102. Jackson M C.Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences.New York:Plenum Press, 1991.6-23.
103. Edmonds RL.Patterns of China's Lost Harmony A Survey of the Country's Environmental Deyradation and Protection.London & New Yoyk: Routledge, 1994.
104. Bengtsson,J.et al,.The value of biodiversity.TREE, 1997,(12):334-336
105. Costanza,R et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.Nature.1997,387:253~260
106. Costanza,R,et al.Valuing ecosystem,services with efficiency, fairness,and sustainability as goals,washing, D.C.:Island press, 1997.49-70
107. Daily, G.C.(ed).Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems.Washing,D.C.:Island Press,1997.49-70
108. Goulder, L.H.et al.Valuing ecosystem services:philosophical bases and empirical methods.In:G.Daily(ed).Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natual Ecosystems.Washing D.C.:Island Press,1997.23~48
109. Milner-Gulland E.J.Knowing the value of nature.Nature, 2001,410:751-752.
110. Criteria and indicators for conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests.Montereal Process. Ottawa:Canadian Forest Service, 1995.
108. The forest service program for forest and rangeland resource. A Long-term Strategic plan,RPA Program, 1995.
111. Harmonization of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest
management.FAO/ITTO Expert Consultation,1995.
112. Briefing note for national forestry action programes.Decenfralized and Participatory Planning, FAO, 1995.
113. MacArthur, R.Fluctuations of animal populations,and a measure of community stability Ecology.1955,36:533-53.
114. Hun saker,C.T. and Corpenter, D.E.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment program: Ecological Indicators.Usepa1600/3-90/060, 1990.
115. Pykh, Y.A.,Hyatt, D.E.and Lenz, R.J.M..Environmental Indices:Systems Analysis Approach. Oxford:EOLSS publishing Co. Ltd, 1999.
116. SCARM.Sustainable Agriculture:Assessing Australia's Recent Performance,A Report to SCARM of the National Collaborative Project,on Indicators for Sustainable Agriculture.Australia:CSIRO Publishing Collingwood, 1998.
117. Waker, J.,and,Reuter, D.J.Zndicators of Catchment Health,A Technical Perspective. Australia:C'S'IRO publishing,Collingwood,1996.
118. Liu Guobin,Huchusheng and et al.A Guidebook to Environmental Indicators.Australia:C'S'IRO publishing,1998.
119. Saaty, T.L.Hierarchies,Reciprocai Matrices and Ratio Scales, Discrete and Systen.Models.New York:Springer-verlag,1983.
120. Milan Zeleng.Multiple Criteria Decision Making,McGraw-Hill Book Company,1982.