银耳孢子发酵物(TSF)对生长肥育猪生产性能、免疫功能以及肉质的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本试验考察了银耳孢子发酵物(Tremella fuciformis Berk Spore Fermentation, TSF)对生长肥育猪生产性能、免疫功能以及肉质的影响,并与抗生素的应用效果作比较。试验选用24头平均体重10.01±0.65kg的去势杜×长×大杂交仔猪,采用单项分类设计,按性别一致,体重相近原则随机分为3个处理,分别为对照组(不加抗生素),抗生素组(恩拉霉素20mg/kg+硫酸抗敌素40mg/kg)和银耳孢子发酵物组(TSF 0.4%)。分三个阶段(10~20kg、20~50kg、50~100kg)饲养。在试验第28d、70d、112d各处理选取5头猪,前腔静脉采血用以测定淋巴细胞转化率(LTR)、血清中IGF-Ⅰ、IL-2、IgG、IgM、IgA的含量,当各个处理组平均体重达到100kg,各处理选取5头猪,用以肉质的测定。
     试验结果:(1)在10-20kg阶段,TSF组的ADG略低于ANT组,但较对照组有所提高(P>0.05),ANT组显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。20-50kg阶段,TSF组的ADG较ANT组显著提高(P<0.05),极显著高于对照组(P<0.01),而ANT组仍然高于对照组(P<0.05)。50-100kg阶段,TSF组的ADG显著高于ANT组和对照组(P<0.05),而ANT组与对照组无显著差异(P>0.05)。试验全期,TSF组的ADG比ANT组提高了6%(P>0.05),较对照组显著提高了10.6%(P<0.01),ANT组较对照组有所提高但差异不显著(P>0.05)。对于ADFI,10-20kg阶段,ANT组显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。20-50kg阶段,TSF组显著高于对照组(P<0.05);其余各阶段各组的ADFI均无显著性差异,但TSF组和ANT组较对照组均有提高的趋势。各阶段各处理之间的F/G均无显著差异,但TSF组的全期F/G较ANT组降低了2.5%(P>0.05),相对于对照组降低了5.2%(P<0.05)。
     (2)在猪生长肥育的各个阶段,银耳孢子发酵物都能够提高血清中IGF-I浓度。试验第28d,TSF组血清IGF-I浓度与ANT组相比无显著差异(P>0.05),但两组较对照组均有显著提高(P<0.05)。第70d,TSF组IGF-I较ANT组有所提高(P>0.05),显著高于对照组(P<0.05),而ANT组仍略高于对照组(P>0.05)。第112d,TSF组IGF-I显著高于ANT组和对照组(P<0.05),而ANT组与对照组相比已无显著差异(P>0.05)
     (3)在试验第28d和112d,TSF组的LTR均显著高于ANT组和对照组(P<0.05);ANT组与对照组的LTR在各个阶段均无显著差异(P>0.05)。TSF组血清中IL-2的含量在试验第28d、70d和112d均显著高于ANT组(P<0.05);TSF组较对照组有所提高但不显著(P>0.05);ANT组与对照组之间的差异也不显著(P>0.05)。TSF组的IgG在试验第70d显著高于对照组(P<0.05),在112d极显著高于ANT组和对照组(P<0.01)。对于IgM,TSF组在各个阶段均显著高于ANT组(P<0.05)、极显著高于对照组(P<0.01);ANT组较对照组也有所提高(P<0.05)。TSF组的IgA在第70d和112d极显著或显著高于对照组(P<0.01或P<0.05),TSF组与ANT组间差异不显著。
     (4)各处理组间屠宰率、背膘厚度以及板油重差异不显著(P>0.05)。TSF组和ANT组的眼肌面积无显著差异(P>0.05),但较对照组均有显著提高(P<0.05)。TSF组的滴水损失显著低于ANT组(P<0.01),较对照组也有所降低(P>0.05)。TSF组的pH*45 min值与ANT组无显著差异(P>0.05),但较对照组显著提高(P<0.05)TSF较ANT降低了L*45 min。值(P<0.05),与对照组无显著差异。TSF组的b*45 min值与ANT组无差异(P>0.05),但较对照组有所降低(P<0.05)。各处理的pH*24h、a*45min、a*24h、b*24 h值之间差异均不显著(P>0.05)。TSF组较ANT组肌内脂肪含量显著提高(P<0.05),与对照组无显著差异。
     试验结果表明:银耳孢子发酵物能够促进生长肥育猪生长,试验中后期其效果要优于恩拉霉素+硫酸抗敌素;银耳孢子发酵物对生长肥育猪各个生长阶段的免疫功能都具有改善作用;银耳孢子发酵物还具有改善胴体性状和肉质的作用。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Tremella fuciformis Berk Spore Fermentation (TSF) on the growth performance, immune function and meat quality of growing-finishing pigs, and comparation was made against the antibiotic group. Twenty-four DLY(Duroc×Landrace×Large White) piglets with average weight 10.01±0.65kg were randomly allocated to 3 treatments in signal factor design, each treatment with 8 replicates of 1 piglets, one treatment was act as control group feed on basal diets, and the other two were feed on the same basal diet supplement with antibiotics (enramycin+kangdisu sulfas) and TSF, the whole feeding duriation included 10-20kg, 20-50kg,50-100kg three feeding phase.At 28,70,112 d.5 piglets with approximate BW were selected from each treatment and blood samples were collected via anterior vena cava puncture.The peripheral blood LTR, serum IGF-Ⅰ,IL-2, IgG, IgM, IgA were measured. The experiment last when each treatment's averge weight reached 100kg. Five pigs selected from each treatment were slaughtered by electrical stunning and exsanguinations, and meat quality were measured.
     The result of the feeding test showed that (1) in the 10-20kg feeding phases, the ADG of the TSF group was slightly lower than ANT, TSF had improved the ADG compared with control, but failed in significant(P>0.05),the ANT significantly improved the ADG compared with that of the control (P<0.05).During the phase 20-50kg, the ADG of TSF had improved 9.2% compared with that of ANT(P<0.05), and significantly improvement was observed compared with that of control (P<0.01),and ANT was still higer than that of control (P<0.05).During the 50~100kg phase, the ADG of TSF was higher than that of ANT and control(P<0.05), no significant difference was observed between the control and the ANT. In the whole duration, the ADG of TSF was improved 6% compared with that of ANT(P>0.05),and the ADG of TSF was 10.6% higher than that of control(P<0.05), there was no significantly difference between the ADG of control and ANT in the whole duration(P>0.05).During the first phase, the ADFI of ANT was significantly improved compared with that of control(P<0.05). During the 20-50kg feeding phase, the ADFI of the TSF had improved 13.4% compared with that of control(P<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the ADFI of the three treatments in the whole duriation. There was no significant difference between the F/G of the three treatments among each feeding phase and the whole duriation, except the F/G of the TSF had been reduced 5.2% (P<0.05) compared with the control in the whole duriation.
     (2) At the 28th day, there was no significantly difference between the serum IGF-Ⅰlevel of TSF and ANT(P>0.05),but they were both higher than that of the control (P<0.05).The serum IGF-Ⅰof TSF was slightly improved compared with ANTat 70 day, and higher than that of control(P<0.05),and the serum IGF-Ⅰof ANT was still higher than that of control(P>0.05).At the 112nd day, the serum IGF-Ⅰlevel of TSF was significantly improved compared with ANT and control(P<0.05),no significant difference was observed between ANT and control(P>0.05)
     (3)At the 28,112 day, the pigs supplemented with TSF demonstrated a higher T lymphocyte transfer ratio (LTR) than that of ANT and control(P<0.05)
     32.The serum IL-2 of TSF was higher than that of ANT in the whole duration(P<0.05), and also slightly improved compared with control, but failed in significance(P>0.05).The IgG of TSF was signicantly improved compared with control on the 70 d(P<0.05),and higher than both that of ANT and control on 112d(P<0.05).The IgM of TSF was significantly improved compared with both of ANT and control(P<0.05), and ANT was higher than that of control(P>0.05).There was no significant difference between the IgA of TSF and ANT,but the IgA of TSF was improved compared with that of control(P<0.05).
     (4) There was no significant difference among the dressing percentage and the back fat thickness of the treatments. No significant difference was found between the loin-eye area of TSF and ANT, and both of them were higher than that of control (P<0.05).The dropping loss of TSF was significant decreased compared with ANT (P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed between the dropping loss of TSF and control(P>0.05). Compared with the control the pH*45 min of the TSF was improved(P<0.05),no significant difference was found between the TSF and the ANT(P>0.05). The TSF was significanty reduced the L*45 min compared with the ANT(P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed among the TSF and the control.TSF supplement significanty reduced the b*45 min compared with control(P<0.05).There was no significant difference among the pH*24 h,a*45 min, a*24 h, b*24 h of the three treatment. The intramuscular fat content of TSF and control was improved 19.6%(P<0.05) and 18.1%(P<0.05)compared with ANT.
     The results indicated that supplying tremella polysaccharides would improve growth performance of growing-finishing pigs. Compared with control and ANT the supplement TSF of was more proned to enhance the cellular and humoral immune functions. And tremella polysaccharides had a positive effort on the carcass traits and meat quality of growing-finishing pigs.
引文
[1]Moore P R, Evenston A and Luckey TD et al.1946. Use of sulfasuxidine, streptothricin and streptomycin in nutritional studies with the chick[J].Journal of Biological Chemistry,165: 437-445
    [2]邹健.银耳多糖对断奶仔猪生长性能和肠道菌群及免疫功能的影响[D].硕士学位论文,四川农业大学,2006
    [3]吴玉玲.银耳多糖替代喹烯酮和高铜对断奶仔猪生产性能及免疫功能影响[D].硕士学位论文,四川农业大学.2006
    [4]傅祖良,王康宁等.银耳孢子发酵物及于pGRF基因质粒合用对断奶仔猪生长、部分免疫指标及肠道菌群的影响.动物营养学报[J].2009,21(5).777-783
    [5]高小荣.银耳碱提多糖的提取、分离、结构分析及其抗氧化活性的研究[D].北京.中国协和医科大学,2004
    [6]姜瑞芝,陈怀永,陈英红等.银耳孢糖的的化学结构初步研究及其免疫活性[J].中国天然药物,2006,4(1):13-16
    [7]徐文清.银耳孢子多糖结构表征、生物活性及抗肿瘤作用机制研究[D].博士学位论文.天津,天津大学,2006
    [8]Kakuta M, Sone Y, Vmeda T. Comparative structural studies on acidic heteropolysaccharides isolated from "shirokikurage" fruit body of Tremella fuciformis Berk and the growing culture of its yeast-like cells[J].Agricultural and Biological Chemistry,1979,43(8):1659-1666
    [9]Yui T, K Ogawa, M Kakuta,et al. Chain conformation of a glucuronoxylomannan isolated from fruit body of Tremella fuciformis Berk[J].J Carbohydr Chem,1995,14:255-263
    [10]De Baets S,E J Vandamme. Extracellular Tremella polysaccharides:structure,properties and applications[J].Biotechnol let,2001,23:1361-1366
    [11]高其品,陈慧群,王坤等.银耳多糖在大鼠体内的吸收、分布和排除[J].中国药学杂志.2002,37(3):205-208.
    [12]贾汉卿,安英林,郑淑芹.银耳多糖对中枢神经及肝、肾、血细胞的影响.佳木斯医学院学报.1990,13(2):97
    [13]程时,黄静,王之湄等.银耳多糖TP对小鼠肝脏细胞超微结构影响的定量电镜观察[J].北京医学院学报.1984,16(3):208-210.
    [14]夏尔宁,陈琼华.黑木耳、银耳、银耳孢子多糖对血清蛋白生物合成的影响[J].南京药学院学 报,1985,16(3):49-51
    [15]岳微,丛静.银耳多糖对小鼠正常胀和受伤肝蛋白质合成及糖原合成的影响.中国药理院学报.1986,7(4):364
    [16]江青艳,傅伟龙.神经内分泌生长轴对动物生长发育的调控及机制,动物科学进展[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2001
    [17]BUONOMO F C, LAUTERIO TJ, BAILE C A.Deremination of insulin-like growth factor land IGF binding protein levels in swine[J].Domestic Animal Endocrinology.1987, (4):23-31
    [18]章晋武.决明子多糖的结构及其对仔猪生长、免疫和肠道微生态的影响研究[D].南昌大学2005
    [19]彭慧珍,李丽立.白术粗多糖对断奶仔猪生产性能及血液生化指标的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报,2006,32(6):648-651
    [20]袁书林.黄芪多糖对断奶仔猪免疫调控作用及其机理[D].北京,中国农业大学.博士学位论文,2006
    [21]ZHANG Cai-fen, SHI Bin-1in et al. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Chitosan on Growth Performance and Serum IGF-I and GH in PigLets. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition.2008, Vol 20(2):191-195
    [22]杨正平,刘福柱,邓兴照等.壳聚糖对肉仔鸡生长性能及血清生化指标的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志.2007,43(7):28-31
    [23]李同洲,薛凌峰等.香菇多糖对仔猪生产性能、部分血清激素和免疫指标的影响[J].动物营养学报.2009,21(1):101-106
    [24]高峰,江芸,周光宏等.寡果糖对断奶仔猪生长、代谢和免疫的影响[J].2001,33(6):8-12
    [25]陆承平.兽医微生物学[M].北京,中国农业出版社,2001,127-128
    [26]林志彬,孙曼琴,柴宝玲等.银耳多糖对巨噬细胞吞噬功能、骨髓造血功能及蛋白子、核酸合成的影响[J].中医杂志,1982,23(5):389-391.
    [27]陈子齐,王占存.银耳孢糖对造血和免疫作用的临床观察[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志.1984,4(3):54-56
    [28]Godes M, Mischnick P. Determination of the substitution pattern in the polymer chain of cellulose sulfates[J].Carbohydr Res,1998,309 (1):109-115
    [29]郑仕中,李志旺,王汝勤.银耳孢糖对离体小鼠免疫细胞功能的影响[J].南京医科大学学报,1994,14(4):52-57
    [30]徐继英,胡庭俊.银耳多糖配合禽霍乱白油苗对鸡外周血淋巴细胞玫瑰花环形成率的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2007,14(10):90-92
    [31]徐庆乐,杨锋.香菇多糖、银耳多糖对s-180荷瘤小鼠的免疫调节作用[J].浙江临床医学.2002,4(10):730-731
    [32]Xia Dong, Lin Zhi-Bin. Effects of Tremella Polysaccharides on Immune Function in Mice[J].Acta Pharrnacdoglca Sinica,1989,10(5):453-457
    [33]邓文龙,廖渝英.银耳多糖的免疫药理研究[J].中草药.1984,15(9):22-26
    [34]Gao QP, RZ Jiang, HQ Chen, et al. Characterization and cytokine stimulating activities of heteroglycans from Tremella fuciformis[J].Planta Med.1996,62(4):297-302
    [35]马莉,林志彬.银耳多糖对小鼠脾细胞产生白细胞介素2(IL-2)的影响[J].药学学报,1992,27(1):1-4
    [36]姜瑞芝,陈怀永,陈英红等.银耳孢糖的的化学结构初步研究及其免疫活性[J].中国天然药物,2006,4(1):13-16
    [37]李燕.银耳多糖对实验性衰老小鼠的保护作用[J].第二军医大学学报.2004,25(10):1104-1107
    [38]董志恒,魏春利,曲萌等.IL-2联合银耳多糖激活的同种脾细胞对肝癌实验性治疗的研[J].中国免疫学杂志,2004,20(5):356-359
    [39]夏尔宁,陈琼华.银耳和银耳多糖的生物活性比较[J].南京药学院学报.1984,15(3):50-53.
    [40]徐继英.银耳多糖免疫增效作用的初步研究[D].甘肃农业大学,硕士学位论文2003.
    [41]侯建明,王爱东.银耳多糖对免疫功能影响的实验报告[J].中国疗养医学,2007,16(11):641-643
    [42]崔金莺,林志彬.银耳多糖对小鼠脾细胞内游离钙离子浓度的影响[J].药学学报,1997,32(8):561-564.
    [43]胡庭俊,梁纪兰,程富胜等.银耳多糖对小鼠脾脏淋巴细胞蛋白激酶C活性的影响[J].中草药,2005,36(1):81-84
    [44]Elena E. Solomou, Yuang-Taung Juang and George C.Protein Kinase C-{{theta}}Participatesin the Activation of Cyclic AMP-Responsive Element-Binding Protein and Its Subsequent Binding to the-180 Site of the IL-2 Promoter in Normal Human T Lymphocytes[J]. Immunol.2001,166: 5665-5674
    [45]Nour Abboushi,Aimee EL-Hed,Wissal EL-Assaad et al. Ceramide Inhibits IL-2 Production by Preventing Protein Kinase C-Dependent NF-{kappa}B Activation:Possible Role in Protein Kinase C{theta} Regulation[J].The Journal of Immunology,2004,173:3193-3200
    [46]崔金莺,林志彬.银耳多糖对小鼠IL-2、IL-6、TNF-α活性及其mRNA表达的影响[J].北京医科大学学报.1996,28(4):244-248.
    [47]刘培勋,高小荣,徐文清等.银耳碱提多糖抗氧化活性的研究[J].中国生化药物杂志,2005,26(3):169-170
    [48]赵琳静.多糖及其衍生物抗氧化性质的研究进展[J].上海工程技术大学学报.2008.22(1).44-47
    [49]颜军,郭晓强,邬晓勇等.银耳多糖的提取及其清除自由基作用[J].成都大学学报,2006,25(1):35-38
    [50]吴琼,郑成等.碱溶性银耳粗多糖的提取及其清除自由基作用的研究[J].食品科学.2007,28(6):153-156
    [51]沈卫,曲丹,蔡东联等.银耳多糖对D-半乳糖所致衰老小鼠抗氧化能力的影响[J].中华临床营养杂志,2009,17(3):158-160
    [52]曲丹,张浩,冯晓慧等.银耳多糖对心肌细胞及在体心肌的抗凋亡作用[J].中华临床营养杂志,2009,17(4):215-220
    [53]许梓荣,胡彩虹.寡果糖对肥育猪生长性能、肠道菌群和免疫功能的影响[J].中国兽医学报.2003,23(1):69-71.
    [54]屠友金,胡彩虹.低聚果糖和丙酸钠对肥育猪胆固醇代谢的影响[J].中国粮油学报.2005,20(1):65-68
    [55]潘飞.低聚木糖与产酶益生素合用对肥育猪生长性能的影响试验[J].浙江畜牧兽医,2005,6:3-4
    [56]庄洪廷.低聚木糖对生长肥育猪的生产性能、肉品质和PRKAG3基因表达的影响[D].北京,中国农业科学院,2007
    [57]王彬、黄瑞林、印遇龙等.半乳甘露寡糖对育肥猪的应用效果[J].中国科学院研究生院学报.2006,23(3):364-369
    [58]魏凤仙,李绍钰,孔祥书等.黄芪多糖对生长猪生产性能及免疫性能的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医.2006.33(10):17-19
    [59]周晓容,杨飞云,姚焰础.壳聚糖对生长育肥猪生产性能、体脂沉积及血脂的影响[J].中国饲料,2007,14:21-23
    [60]张彩芬,史彬林,马跃军等.壳聚糖对仔猪细胞免疫和体液免疫机能的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2009,12:54-56
    [61]詹勇.糖萜素-Ⅱ对猪屠宰性能和肉质的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2005,41(3):30-34
    [62]Ammerman, E, C.Quarles, P. V. Twining.1988. Broiler response to the addition of dietary fructooligosaccharides[J].Poult Sci.67(Suppl.):46.
    [63]马彦博.果寡糖对固始鸡生产性能、胴体组成和肉品质的影响[J].中国饲料,2006,20:16-19
    [64]胡彩虹,王友明,果寡糖对肥育猪生长和臭素、胆固醇代谢的影响及作用机理[D].浙江大学学位论文.2001.
    [65]Anderson H J. What is pork quality:Quality of meat an fat in pigs as affected by genetic and nutrition.2000.Zurich Swizerland:EAAP Publication,100:15-26
    [66]印遇龙.猪氨基酸营养与代谢[M].科学出版社,2007,82-85
    [67]曾志宏.肉的品质与pH值的相关性[J].肉类工业,2001,235(1):31-34
    [68]G.Otto, R Roehe, H. Looft et al.Drip loss of case-ready meat and of premium cuts and their associations with earlier measured sample drip loss, meat quality and carcass traits in pigs[J].Meat Science,2006,68(3):401-409
    [69]Zhang H, Gong DQ, Zhang J, et al.Study Oil the capability of meat production and meat quality of Liyang chicken. Journal of Yangzhou University(Agricultural and Life Science Edition),2005, 26(1):30-36
    [70]郭亮,杜娟,胡忠泽.茶多糖对鸡肉质的影响及其机理研究[J].中国兽医学报,2007,27(4):654-657
    [71]宋涛.日粮种不同水平壳寡糖对北京肉鸭生产性能、脂肪沉积以及肉品质的影响[D].华中农业大学,硕士学位论文,2005:43-44.
    [72]杨惠.糖萜素-Ⅱ对艾维茵肉鸡生长性能和肉质的影响[J].福建畜牧兽医,2007,29(2):6-8.
    [73]Mos mann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and cytotoxicity assays[J].Journal of Immunology Methords,1983,65:55-63.
    [74]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京,中国农业出版社,2003,56-58
    [75]中华人民共和国农业部.畜禽肉品质测定方法.中华人民共和国农业行业标准,NY-T1333-2007
    [76]P. C. Owens, K. L. Gatford, P. E. Walton et al. The relationship between endogenous insulin-like growth factors and growth in pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,1999,77:2098-2103
    [77]文贵辉.白术多糖对樱桃谷鸭生长性能及免疫机能的影响[D].湖南农业大学,硕士学位论文,2006
    [78]林学颜,张玲.现代细胞与分子免疫学[J].北京:科学出版社,2000:126-130
    [79]刘祝英,陈清华,贺建华.药用植物复合多糖对断奶仔猪生产性能和免疫功能的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2007,34(12):14-16.
    [80]赵燕飞.微米白术多糖及白术多糖对仔猪生长、免疫、抗菌肽基因表达和肠道微生态区系影响的研究.浙江大学,硕士学位论文,2005
    [81]帅学宏,胡庭俊,陈炅然.鬼臼多糖对小鼠免疫功能和抗氧化能力的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2008,39(7):1000-1004
    [82]冷静,朱仁俊,马黎.抗生素对断奶仔猪免疫机能的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2004,2:63-64
    [83]周艳.硫酸粘杆菌素对雏鸡免疫器官生长发育及红细胞免疫功能的影响[D].雅安,四川农业大学,硕士学位论文,2007
    [84]Hubert Schorle, Thomas Holtschke, et al. Development and fucation of T cells in mice rendered interleukin-2 deficient by gene targeting[J].NATURE,352:621-624
    [85]Thomas R.Malek. The main function of IL-2 is to promote the development of T regulatory cells[J]. Journal of Leukocyte Biology,2003. Volume 74,961
    [86]Brad H. Nelson.IL-2 Regulatory T Cell and Tolerance[J].J.Immune,2004,172:3983-3988
    [87]Eugeni Rourajosep Homedes,KirkC,et al.Prevention of Immunologic Stress Contributes to he Growth-permitting Ability of Dietary Antibiotics in Chicks[J].Nutrition,1992,122:2382-2390.
    [88]李丽立,张彬,朱南山等.白术多糖对早期断奶仔猪部分免疫功能的影响[J].2007,28(4):487-451
    [89]上官明军,王芳,张红岗等.菊粉对蛋雏鸡生长性能、免疫器官指数和血清免疫球蛋白的影响[J].动物营养学报,21(1):118-121
    [90]刘海凤,张曦,陶琳丽等.猪肉品质的营养调控研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2009,36(10):184-187
    [91]李梦云.猪PRKAG3基因表达规律及其与肉质关系的研究[D].博士学位论文,四川,四川农业大学,2006
    [92]Sahlin, K.,A.Alvestrand, R. Brandt, E. Hultman. Intracellular pH and bicarbonate concentration in humanmuscle during recovery from exercise[J]. J. Appl. Physio,1978,45:474-480.
    [93]杜炳旺,王润莲,常斌等.壳聚糖对贵妇鸡肉质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2009,21(1): 113-117
    [94]Gray J, Gomaa E A, Buckley D J. Oxidative quality and shelf life of meat [J].Meat Science,1996, 43:111-123
    [95]Maclin L J, Bendich A. Free radical tissue damage protective role of antioxidant nutritient [J],FASEBJ,1987,1:441-445
    [96]李华,曾永庆,魏述东等.猪宰后SOD与MDA的变化及其对肉质特性的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2010,41(3):257-261.
    [97]李燕,刘晓丽,斐素萍等.银耳多糖对实验性衰老模型小鼠免疫功能的影响[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(4):228-231
    [98]张金枝,刘小锋,赵晓枫等.猪肉颜色与其他肉质和胴体指标间的相关性研究[J].浙江大学学报,2007,33(6):663-666
    [99]刘希良,葛长荣.肉品工艺学[M].昆明,云南科技出版社

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700