输电阻塞成本分摊及应用研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
阻塞是电力系统中的常见问题,它的出现将影响系统运行的经济性与可靠性。在电力市场环境下,对阻塞管理问题的研究具有理论意义和实践价值。阻塞管理是一项复杂的系统工程,它与电力市场的结构、系统的运行与规划等多种因素密切相关。本文对电力市场环境下实时市场、日前市场和中长期合约市场的阻塞成本问题进行了系统的、深入的研究,提出了双边交易模式下的阻塞成本分摊方法,为解决在运行中出现的阻塞问题提供了经济信号,有利于系统在短期内安全、经济地运行;针对中长期合约市场,提出了基于阻塞成本信号的网络规划方案,为从网络规划层面解决阻塞问题提供了依据,有利于系统在长期内稳定、健康地发展。
     提出了基于阻塞线路影响程度的阻塞成本分摊的原则。按该原则,交易所分摊的线路阻塞成本与其在阻塞线路中引起的潮流变化量成正比。其中,潮流变化量为阻塞消除前和阻塞消除后交易在阻塞线路中的潮流份额之差。针对不同市场的结算特点和要求,分别采用基于交易功率微增量的方法和基于交易功率总量方法确定交易在阻塞线路中的潮流份额,进而计算其潮流变化量。
     提出了实时市场中双边交易的阻塞成本快速分配方法。该方法首先计算系统阻塞成本对双边交易功率的灵敏度,通过灵敏度与交易功率乘积即可获得双边交易的阻塞成本。灵敏度能够为系统短期运行提供良好的经济信号,有利于市场成员及时了解系统运行状况。与基于节点电价的阻塞定价方法相比,所提方法更为直观地反映了双边交易对系统阻塞成本的影响,并且其计算速度与双边交易的数量及阻塞线路的数量无关,能够实现阻塞成本的快速分配,适用于目前市场的阻塞费用结算。
     提出了日前市场中双边交易的阻塞成本分配方法。该方法根据交易对线路的影响程度进行阻塞成本分配,首先将全网阻塞成本分摊至阻塞线路,然后将线路阻塞成本分摊至引起阻塞的双边交易,各双边交易所分摊的线路阻塞成本与其在阻塞线路中引起的潮流变化量成正比。与根据对线路使用程度进行分摊的方法相比,所提方法能够更为合理地反映交易引起阻塞的责任。文中采用针
    
    对交易功率总量计算的增量法确定交易在线路中的潮流份额,适用于日前市场
    的阻塞费用结算。
     提出了基于阻塞成本信号的网络规划方法。该方法将网络规划问题分解为
    多级规划子问题,首先计算各级待选方案的有效性指标,然后计算各方案总有
    效性指标,其值最大者为最优规划方案。该方法根据系统阻塞成本、影子价格
    确定线路的阻塞行为指标,进而确定待选线路集合。与通过直观判断确定待选
    线路的方法相比,阻塞行为指标提供了量化的数学依据。同时,采用综合考虑
    系统运行成本、投资成本和用户效用的有效性指标确定新增线路的最佳位置,
    可有效提高系统运行的经济性与可靠性。
    关键词:电力市场;阻塞管理;阻塞成本分摊;网络规划;灵敏度;增量法;
     阻塞行为指标;有效性指标。
Congestion is a common problem in electric power system and it affects economy and security of system operation. Under electric power market invironment, research on congestion management has theoretical significance and practical value. Congestion management is a complicated system project and it relates to many factors, such as structure of power market, network planning and system operation. In this paper congestion cost issue in real-time market, day-ahead market and forward market is researched. Congestion cost allocation methods in bilateral model are proposed. The allocation can provide economic signal for resolving congestion problem in operation and is favorable for system operating economically and safely in a short run. Network expasion scheme based on congestion cost signal is presented.A priciple of congestion cost allocation based on the degree of involvement is proposed. According to the principle, the cost of relieving a congested facility allocated to each transaction is proportional to the power flow change on the congested facility caused by the transaction. The Aggregated allocation method based on total transaction magnitude is adopted to determine the power flow in the congested line caused by each transaction in day-ahead market accounting, and the sensitivity method based on incermental transaction magnitude to accounting in real-time market.A method based on sensitivity is presented for allocating the cost of congestion relief in real-time market. Firstly, the sensitivity of congestion cost with bilateral transaction power is calculated. Then the cost allocated to each transaction is derived from the sensitivity multiplied by magnitude of contract power. For short-term run, the sensitivity can provide good economic signals. Differences between congestion cost and merchandise surplus are analyzed. Research indicates that the proposed method can allocate fastly the congestion cost, and the efficiency is not related to quantity of congested lines and bilateral transactions.
    
    A method of allocating congestion cost to bilatarel transactions in day-ahead market is proposed. The proposed method is a two-step process, in which the total congestion cost is firstly allocated to congested facilities and then to each transaction involved. The cost of relieving a congested facility allocated to each transaction is proportional to the power flow change on the congested facility caused by the transaction. The more the power flow change on the congested facility caused by the transaction is, the deeper the degree of involvement by the transaction is. The results can reflect reasonably the degree of involvement by each transaction in the congestion and provide correct price signals contributing to relieve congestion. Aggregated allocation approach is adopted to determine the power flow in the congested line caused by each transaction, which makes the proposed method suitable for accouting in day-ahead market.A framework for transmission planning in a deregulated electricity market environment is proposed. The level of congestion in the network is utilized as the driving signal for the need of network expansion. The network expansion problem is decoupled into multiple-stage planning subproblems. In each subproblem, validity index of candidates are computed. Then the total validity index(TVI) of each candidate is computed and the candidate which is provided with the maximal total validity index is selected as the optimal scheme. The proposed method determines the location according to validity index composed of running cost, investment cost and load benefit, which can improve economy and reliability. Meanwhile, the candidates are determined based on congeston performance index(CPI) which is derived from congeston cost and shadow price. CPI provides mathmatics basis for planning, which contributes to improve efficiency and quanlity of planning.
引文
[1] 于尔铿,韩放,谢开,曹昉.电力市场[M].北京:中国电力出版社.1998
    [2] 言茂松.当量电价与融资重组[M].北京:中国电力出版社.2000
    
    [3] 王锡凡.电力市场基础[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社.2003
    [4] 史连军,韩放.中国电力市场的现状与展望[J].电力系统自动化.2000,24(3):1-4
    [5] 焦连伟,祁达才,张永平,林济铿,文福拴,严正,倪以信.从现代工业组织看电力市场[J].电力系统自动化.2001,25(20):14-18
    [6] 曾鸣.电力市场理论及应用[M].北京:中国电力出版社.2000
    [7] 赵遵廉,辛耀中,郭国川等.电力市场运营系统[M].北京:中国电力出版社.2001
    [8] 言茂松,李玉平,辛洁晴,李晓刚.从加州电力危机看稳健的当量电价体系[J].电网技术.2001,25(6):8-17
    [9] 白晓民,钟金,仇明,赵社宏.中国电力市场研究和运营系统开发[J].电力系统自动化.1999,23(2):45-49
    [10] 魏玢.美国PJM电力市场及其对我国电力市场化改革的启示[J].电力系统自动化.2002,27(8):32-35
    [11] 国家电力调度通信中心.美国电力市场与调度运行[M].北京:中国电力出版社.2001
    [12] Littlechild S. Privatization, competition and regulation in British electricity industry[C]. Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management. APSCOM 2000 International Conference. 2000, 1:10
    [13] Cheong S S. Deregulation of the power industry in Singapore. Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management. APSCOM 2000 International Conference. 2000, 1: 11-32
    [14] 文福拴,David A K.加州电力市场失败的教训[J].电力系统自动化.2001,25(5):1-8
    [15] David A K. Restructuring the electricity supply industry in Asia. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 1998, 10: 2-4
    [16] 任震,吴国丙,黄雯莹.电力市场中输电问题的研究[J].电力系统自动化.2003,27(1):20-26
    [17] 魏萍,倪以信.输电系统开放中经济问题综述[J].电力系统自动化.1999,23(10):52-56
    [18] Tabors R D. Transmission system management and pricing: new paradigms and international comparisons[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1994, 9(1): 206-215
    [19] 戴彦,文福拴,韩祯祥.电力市场改革对电网规划的影响[J].浙江电力.2001(3):1-5
    [20] Hyman L S. Transmission, congestion, pricing and incentives[J]. IEEE Power Engineering Review. 1999, 19(8): 4-10
    
    [21] Samuelson P A, Nordhaus W D. Economics-16th Edition. Mc Graw-Hill Companies. Inc. 1998
    [22] 张永平.电力市场环境下输电管理的研究.清华大学博士学位论文.2004
    [23] Shirmohammadi D, Wollenbirg B F, Vojdani A, et al. Transmission dispatch and congestion management in the emerging energy market structures. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1998, 13(4): 1466-1474
    [24] Bompard E, Correia P, Gross G, et al. Congestion management schemes: a comparative analysis under a unified framework[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18 (1): 346-352
    [25] 魏萍,文福拴,倪以信等.三峡电力市场的输电定价与阻塞管理[J].电力系统自动化,2002,26(1):7-13
    [26] Kim B H, Baldick R. Coarse-grained distributed optimal power flow[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1997, 12(2): 932-939
    [27] Baldick R, Kim B H, Chase C. A fast distributed implementation of optimal power flow[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(3): 858-864
    [28] Kim B H, Baldick R. A comparison of distributed optimal power flow algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(2): 599-604
    [29] Conejo A J, Aguado J A. Multi-area coordinated decentralized DC optimal power flow[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1998, 13(4): 1272-1278
    [30] Wang X, Song Y H. Apply Lagrangian relaxation to multi-zone congestion management[C]. IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2001, 2: 399-404
    [31] Wang X, Song Y H, Lu Q. Lagrangian decomposition approach to active power congestion management across interconnected regions[J]. IEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2001, 148(5): 497-503
    [32] Biskas P N, Bakirtzis A G. Decentralised congestion management of interconnected power systems[J]. IEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2002, 149(4): 432-438
    [33] Aguado J, Quintana V, Madrigal M. Optimization-based auction mechanism for inter-ISO congestion management. Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting[C], IEEE, Vancouver, BC Canada, 2001, 3: 1647-1651
    
    [34] Gribik P R, Angelidis G A, Kovacs R R. A transmission access and pricing with multiple separate energy forward markets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(3): 865-876
    [35] Christie R D, Wangensteen I. The energy market in Norway and Sweden: congestion management [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Engineering Review, 1998, 18(5): 61-63
    [36] Schweppe F C, Caramanis M C, Tabors R D, Bohn R E. Spot price of electricity[M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988
    [37] Hogan W. Contract net works for electric power transmission[J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1992, 4(9): 211-242
    [38] 李帆,朱敏.英国电力市场及输电系统简介[J].电网技术,1999,23(2):33-40
    [39] 王秀丽,甘志,雷兵,王锡凡.输电阻塞管理的灵敏度分析模型及算法[J].电力系统自动化,2002,26(4):10-13
    [40] Singh H, Hao S, Papalexopoulos A D. Transmission congestion management in competitive electricity markets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1998, 13(2): 672-680
    [41] Losi A. Trade curtailment schemes for the security control of the transmission network in a deregulated environment[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2002, 24(1): 9-17
    [42] Fang R S, David A K. Optimal dispatch under transmission contracts[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(2): 732-737
    [43] Galiana F D, Ilic M. A mathematical framework for the analysis and management of power transactions under open access[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1998, 13(2): 681-687
    [44] Galiana F D, Kockar I, Franco P C. Combined pool/bilateral dispatch—Part I: performance of trading strategies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2002, 17(11): 92-99
    [45] Alomoush M I, Shahidehpour S M. Fixed transmission rights for zonal congestion management[J], IEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 1999, 146(5): 471-476
    [46] Lo E O, Xie Kai. A congestion management formulation with inter-temporal constraints. Power Industry Computer Applications[C]. IEEE Power Engineering Society International Conference on Innovative Computing for Power-Electric Energy Meets the Market. 2001, 22: 348-354
    [4
    
    [47] Lo E O, Xie Kai. Senthil J. Adjustable inter-SC trade modeling in congestion management[J]. IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2001, (2): 1063-1069
    [48] Fang R S, David A K. Transmission congestion management in an electricity market[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14 (3): 877-883
    [49] Gomes M H, Saraiva J T. Congestion management by maximizing the overall satisfaction degree of all participants in the market. Power Tech Proceedings, IEEE Porto, 2001, 1
    [50] Wang X, Song Y H, Lu Q. Primal-dual interior point linear programming optimal power flow for real-time congestion management. IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Singapore: 2000, (3): 1643-1649
    [51] 汤振飞,于尔铿,唐国庆.电力市场输电阻塞管理[J].电力系统自动化,2001, 25(23):13-16
    [52] 贺辉,徐政,黄莹.负荷在阻塞管理中的作用[J].电力系统自动化,2003,27(17):11-14
    [53] 凌永伟,辛洁晴,言茂松.基于输电当量电价的直接阻塞管理[J].电网技术,2003,27(7):19-24
    [54] 鲁丽娟,侯云鹤,吴耀武,熊信艮.计及用户需求弹性影响的输电阻塞解决方案研究[J].电网技术,2004,28(5):46-49
    [55] 高志华,任震,黄福全,潘锡芒.输电阻塞中的电价调整机制[J].电力系统自动化,2003,27(16):25-29
    [56] 赵晋泉,侯志俭,黎强.用最优潮流分析实时电价下的传输拥挤管理[J].上海交通大学学报,1999,33(12):1562-1564
    [57] 王承民,侯志俭.基于市场均衡原则的阻塞调度方法[J].上海交通人学学报,2003,37(9):1333-1337
    [58] 谢开,宋永华,于尔铿,刘广一.基于最优潮流的实时电价分解模型及其内点法实现——论最优潮流中λ_p、λ_q乘子的经济意义[J].电力系统自动化.1999,23(2):5-10
    [59] Glavitsch H, Alvarado F. Management of multiple congested conditions in unbundled operation of a power system. Power Industry Computer Applications 20th International Conference, 1997, 20: 374-380
    [60] 赵晋泉,侯志俭,吴际舜.电力市场中的交易模式和传输阻塞管理[J].电力系统自动化.1999,23(20):5-8
    
    [61] Bialek J. Elimination of merchandise surplus due to spot pricing of electrcity[J], IEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 1997, 144(5): 399-405
    [62] Harvey S M, Hogan W W, Susan L P. Transmission capacity reservations implemented through a spot market with transmission congestion contracts[M]. Harvard University Press, 1996
    [63] Baran M E, Banunarryanan V, Garren K E. Equitable allocation of congestion relief cost to transactions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2000, 15(2): 579-585
    [64] Rudnick H, Palma R, Fernandez J E. Marginal pricing and supplement cost allocation in transmission open access[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1995, 10(2): 1125-1132
    [65] Shirmohammadi D, Gribik P R, Law E T K, et al. Evaluation of transmission network capacity use for wheeling transactions [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1989, 4(4): 1405-1413
    [66] Fradi A, Brignone S, Wollenberg B E. Calculation of energy transaction allocation factors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(2): 266-272
    [67] Yang J, Anderson M D. Tracing the flow of power in transmission networks for use-of-transmission-system charges and congestion management[C]. IEEE Power Engineering Society 1999 Winter Meeting, 1999, 1: 399-405
    [68] Baran M E, Banunarryanan V, Garren K E, A transaction assessment method for allocation of transmission services[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1999, 14 (3): 920-928
    [69] Rau N S. Transmission loss and congestion cost allocation-an approach based on responsibility[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(4): 1401-1409
    [70] Fang R S, David A K. An integrated congestion management strategy for real-time system operation[J]. IEEE Power Engineering Review, 1999, 19(5): 52-54
    [71] Bialek J W, Germond A, Cherkaoui R. Improving NERC transmission loading relief procedures[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2000, 13(5): 11-19
    [72] Myerson, Roger B. Game theory: analysis of conflict[M]. Harvard University Press, 1991
    [73] 杨洪明,段献忠.双边交易模式下基于Aumann-Shapley值的阻塞成本分摊方法研究[J].中国电机工程学报.2002,22(11):59-63
    [74] 贺辉,徐政,黄莹.基于合作博弈的阻塞成本分配[J].华东电力,2004,32(3):27-30
    [75] 江辉,欧亚平,李朝昀,肖顺良.面向全电网用户的阻塞成本分摊方法[J].电力自动化 设备,2002,22(11):26-29
    [7
    
    [76] 许林,余贻鑫,刘怀东,卢放,张云,黄要贵.双侧输电阻塞管理与拟Aumann-Shapley定价[J].中国电机工程学报[J],2002,22(10):56-60
    [77] 尚金成,黄永皓,夏清.电力市场理论研究与应用[C].北京:中国电力出版社,2002
    [78] 叶鹏,宋家骅.基于不同交易阶段的电力市场阻塞管理方法研究[J].中国电力,2003,36(6):27-30
    [79] 张永平,焦连伟,倪以信,文福拴,陈寿孙,吴复立.区域电力市场双边交易阻塞管理实用计算方法[J].电力系统自动化,2003,27(14):18-22
    [80] 王功涛,丁鹏,刘霞等.东北区域电力市场月电量计划的分区安全校核[J].电网技术,2004,28(10):18-21
    [81] Ilic M, Faliana F, Fink L. Power systems restructuring engineering and economics[M]. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1998.
    [82] Billinton R, Allan R N. Reliability evaluation of power systems[M]. NewYork: Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1996
    [83] Lecinq B S, Ilic M D. Peak load pricing for electric power transmission[C]. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 1997, 5: 624-633
    [84] 谭伦农,张保会,刘海涛.市场环境下电力系统的安全可靠性问题.电力系统自动化.2002,26(6):11-14
    [85] Eric H, Brendan K. Expanding transmission capacity: a proposed planning process[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2002, October:54-59
    [86] Eric H, Brendan K. Key transmission planning issuses[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2001, October: 59-70
    [87] Ge S Y, Chung T S. Optimal active power flow incorporating power flow control needs in flexible AC transmission system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(2): 738-744
    [88] Liu M B, Tso S K, Xu L X. An interior-point nonlinear programming algorithm for optimal power flow calculation in systems incorporating FACTS devices[C]. Xi'an: Proceedings of international conference on electrical engineering, 2001
    [89] 占勇,李光熹,刘志超等.计及FACTS装置的最大输电能力研究[J].电力系统自动化,2001,25(5):23-26
    
    [90] Galiana F D, Almeida K, Toussaint M, et al. Assessment and control of the impact of devices on power system performance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1996, 11(4): 1931-1936
    [91] Srivastava S C, Kumar P. Optimal power dispatch in deregulated market considering congestion Management[C]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies, 2000: 53-59
    [92] Singh S N, David A K. Congestion management by optimizing FACTS device location[C]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. 2000: 23-28
    [93] Singh S N, David A K. Optimal location of FACTS device for congestion management[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2001, 58(7): 71-80.
    [94] Singh S N,David A K.有FACTS装置的电力系统在市场环境下的最优调度[J].电力系统自动化,2001,25(4):20-24.
    [95] Verma K S, Singh S N, Gupta H O. Location of unified power flow controller for congestion management[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2001, 58(7): 89-96.
    [96] Paterni P, Vitet S, Bena M, et al. Optimal location of phase Shifters in the french network by genetic algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power System, 1999, 14(1): 37-42.
    [97] Stephane G, Rachid C, Alain J G. Optimal location of multi-type FACTS Devices in a power system by means of genetic algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power System, 2001, 16(3): 537-544.
    [98] Rajaraman R, Alvarado F, Maniaci A, et al. Deteramination of location and amount of series compensation to increase power transfer capability[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power System. 1998, 13(2): 294-299
    [99] 凌永伟,辛洁晴,言茂松.基于输电当量电价的直接阻塞管理[J]:电网技术,2003,27(7):19-24
    [100] Finney J D, Othman H A, Rutz W L. Evaluating transmission congestion constraints in systems planning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1997, 12(3): 1143-1150
    [101] 汤振飞,唐国庆,于尔铿,李扬.电力市场输电定价[J].中国电机工程学报,2001,21(10):91-95
    [102] Chen Luonan, Suzuki Hideki, Wachi Tsunehisa et al. Components of nodal prices for electric power systems. IEEE Transactions on power systems, 2002, 17(1): 41-49
    
    [103]Gedra T W. On transmission congestion and pricing. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.1999, 14(1): 241-248
    [104]Lee K Y, Manuspiya Suwan, Choi Myeonsong et al. Network congestion assessment for short-term transmission planning under deregulated environment[C]. IEEE Power Engineering Society 2001 Winter Meeting, 2001:1266-1271
    [105]Knut S H, Ove S G, Bjorn H B. Main grid development planning in a deregulated market regime[J]. Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, Jan, 2000 IEEE. 2000, 2:845-849
    [106]Shrestha G B, Fonseka P A. Congestion-driven transmission expansion in competitive power markets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(3): 1658-1665
    [107]Majid O B, Gerd B, Hasan M S, Mohammad S. Market-based transmission expansion pIanning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(4):2060-2067
    [108]Sophie D, Francoise B, Patrick B, Laura P. Using two multivariate methods for line congestion study in transmission systems under uncertainty[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2003, 18(l):353-358

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700