技术设计的哲学研究
|
摘要
技术是人类在世的方式,伴随近代工业革命的兴起,技术日益作为时代的一个焦点,其象征和隐喻性意义不断凸显。从1877年技术哲学家恩斯特·卡普(ErnstKapp)的《技术哲学纲要》出版以来,在众多研究者的拥趸下,技术哲学作为追求技术活动智慧的独立学科得以确立并迅速发展,成为“一个有着伟大未来的学科”。在技术哲学的研究中,“尽管有大量的文献关注技术,但技术很少成为技术哲学家的主要主题。即使有众多著作关注技术对人的影响,但很少有关技术本身的”,经典技术哲学理论基本上把技术作为既定事实存在加以考察,持久热切地关注技术大规模扩张的社会后果,而技术人工物、技术设计活动本身却被排斥在技术哲学关注的视域之外。人们对技术“没有从它同人的本质的联系,而总是仅仅从有用性这种外在关系来理解”,由于忽略技术本身,经典技术哲学理论在赖以成形的一系列中心问题(Central Issues)上缺乏一致性,没有形成集中于中心问题的内聚性理论(CohesiveTheory),缺乏统一的范式。正是这样的背景铺设下,发端了本文针对技术设计的哲学思考。
20世纪80年代以降,欧美技术哲学研究形成了“经验转向”(Empirical Turn)。技术哲学研究的经验转向着眼于对技术自身的内在分析,使其认识基于对技术的复杂性和丰富性以及可靠的和经验的充分描述基础上,而不是建立在对技术的预先设定的基础上,使技术哲学研究更加关注那些与技术有关的技术人工物、技术设计、工程活动等问题。从现象学角度看,对技术的审视和批判“不是反驳,不是反证,而是去理解被批判的命题,理解这些命题的意义起源在哪里”,探讨和分析技术就是去理解各种被批判的技术概念和命题,将其意义奠基在技术实事本身之上。人类技术系统发展到当代,技术已经成为一个复杂体系,技术概念很难用技巧、工艺、方法、知识或工具等语词来概括。美国技术哲学家卡尔·米切姆(Carl Mitcham)将技术现象分为四个层次:作为对象(Object)的技术、作为知识(Knowledge)的技术、作为活动(Action)的技术和作为意志(Volition)的技术。从动态上看,技术设计的构思(基于社会需求和科学理论)相当于作为知识的技术和作为意志的技术,技术设计的实施、生产过程相当于作为活动的技术,技术设计的物化成果——人工物(Artifacts)相当于作为对象的技术。可见,技术设计在复杂的技术体系中具有相对独立的意义,技术设计试图解决“做什么”、“怎么做”、“为谁做”的问题,它体现为人与自然、人与社会之间进行物质、能量和信息的交换,变自在自然为人工自然的过程。
提出一个问题的建设性方式是陈述一个假设,并力争在现实中付诸阙如,本文正是在做这样的尝试。技术哲学的经验转向是基于技术哲学研究的困境引发的,在技术哲学的“突围”中,把研究的“阿基米德点”着眼在技术发展的实际过程。本文对技术设计的哲学分析使技术哲学的追问基点建立于可靠的技术事实分析之上,以“深描”为手法,在“四周都有经验守护”下,揭示技术本身特有的哲学问题,真正打开技术黑箱(Opening the Black Box of Technology);对技术设计的哲学分析使技术哲学的提问方式发生巨大转变,使对技术的本质解读、价值判断和发展透视,建立在对技术设计实践的内在洞察和经验充分描述基础上,从而消除关于技术的种种神话和抽象虚构,体现技术不是“人类无法逃脱的天命”,不是“中性的工具”,也不是“具有绝对效率的方法总体”,而是与社会协同进化(Co-evolution);对技术设计的哲学分析有助于人们更加自觉合理地进行技术控制,使技术哲学向着“一个有着伟大现实的学科”转变,使技术实践朝着更加有利于人的方向发展。
技术设计作为技术哲学的经验转向所指涉的重要概念,是建构当代技术哲学的核心话语。对技术设计进行详尽的经验描述和理解,是我们有价值地分析处理技术本身的哲学问题及其对我们生活世界影响后果的前提,也是本文所要讨论的中心话题。本文分设为五个章节,开篇力求阐明技术设计作为技术哲学研究的一个新论域,其内在意涵,理论解释,研究维度,研究进路及技术设计视角对技术哲学研究的意义,总体上确立技术设计在技术哲学研究领域中的向标;在此基础上,从技术哲学研究传统的宏阔背景中敷陈开来,瞻顾了技术设计思想的来龙去脉,详细阐发了工程主义传统中以工具理性为特征的技术设计和人文主义传统中以人本理念为根本的技术设计,在考量这两种由抵牾走向融合的传统价值观中,确立了当代技术哲学研究中经验转向的多样性技术设计的基本构想;技术设计是一个沟通思与行的红线,体现在具体的实践活动中,涵盖了生活世界的所有能指领域,历史地因循着一条工业化路径,完成着由实用工具到信息技术的攀升,在对技术设计的表现形式与时代特征的述评中,得出技术设计的一般规律和特征:技术设计的径情直遂发展所引发的“大发展”和“大破坏”,使人们对技术设计的认识转入理性层面的认知思考,由此考察了以基础主义为基点的技术设计的真理观、以非理性认知为突破口的技术设计的生命意识和以整体主义为宏观尺度的技术设计的系统认识,抉发出当代技术设计认知的生成机制和一般方法论;最后归拢于技术设计的人学解读上,技术设计史是人类生存意志展现的缩影,技术设计进步张扬了人的存在本质,彰显了劳动实践的人格品质和人类多样化的文化存在,促使人类生活方式的变革,是人自由本质实现的基础。
顺应当代技术哲学研究的经验转向潮流,把对技术本质的追问附着于技术发展的一般过程即技术设计上,开辟了一条技术哲学研究的新理路;对工程主义和人文主义穷原竟委的分析有助于消除二者的分野,促进其融合过程;对工业化前后技术设计的表现形式与时代特征的一般描述中,理出技术设计的一般特征及其路径(technological paths);对技术设计的真理观、生命意识和系统认识的基础上,确立当代技术设计认知的生成机制和一般方法论原理;通过多维互镜的人学解读,展现了技术设计的进步是人本质的实现,是人走向自由和全面发展的前提。本文通过以上逻辑分析基阶而推,着力探讨和力图回答技术设计与社会协同进化及其本质旨归。
科学技术的进步和人类文明的发展,使得我们时代的人类智慧立足于整体这块基石上,形成整体思维的时代特征。本文从多角度整体透视技术设计,把握技术设计研究的当代走势,将其纳入时代发展的总体框架,阐释技术设计可以不只通过一种方式来进行,在各种不同技术可能性中存在多种选择,一种技术设计的形成要塑造(Shape)于特定环境;将技术设计置于当代技术实践的框图之中,生成技术设计研究的特定语境,关注“跨现代”(Transmodern)的技术话语中错综复杂的技术设计;整合技术哲学的研究特点,形成技术设计研究的基本理念,实现对技术设计外部与内部、静态与动态的综合性研究,达到与社会、制度和文化等的“视域融合”;推进相关学科领域的交叉研究,对技术设计的全景式把握使技术哲学突破工程主义、人类学的抽象界面,深入到技术内部,达到对技术理解的感性知觉与理性审视的有机统一。
技术设计作为世界构造、展现、解蔽的途径,是人的在世方式。技术社会是人类走向自由王国的必由之路,正是技术推动着生产力史无前例地高速发展,日益把人类理想变成现实,把人的精神力量转化为物质的力量,在“劳动自由”的前提下实现人的自由。当然,技术设计客观地具有吊诡性的历史后果,技术“通过工业日益在实践上进入人的生活,改造人的生活,并为人的解放做准备,尽管它不得不直接地完成非人化”,商品体制和产业化模式使人类蒙上物性化的阴影,但在自然转变为社会历史的过程中,技术也为这种异化的超越提供了条件,产生了能达到完全的自我解放的人。
Technology is the human being-in-the-world way. With the rise of modern industrial revolution, technology is increasingly becoming a focus of the times and the symbolic and metaphorical significance is more and more obvious. Since "Philosophy of Technology Program" was published, which was wrote by the philosopher Ernst Kapp in 1877, technology philosophy has been established and developing rapidly as an independent discipline. The subject is mainly about the soul of technology activities and has a great future. In the philosophy of technology research, there are a large number of literatures concerned about technology, but technology seldom becomes the main theme of technology philosopher. Even though there are many books about the impact of technology on people, few are about the technology itself. Technology is researched as an assured fact in classical theory of technology philosophy. The social consequence of technology large-scale expansion is fervidly investigated, but the technological artifacts and technical design action itself are ignored. Technology is considered only from the external relations of serviceability, not the nature connection with human beings. Because of the technology itself being ignored, the central issues of classical theory of technology philosophy are lack of consistency and haven't formed a cohesive theory focusing on it. So it is difficult to develop a unified paradigm for philosophy of technology. On the base of the background, philosophy thinking on technological design begins to be researched in this thesis.
The research on technology philosophy has formed empirical turn in Europe and the United States since 1980. The empirical turn of technology philosophy makes the philosophical analysis towards technique based on the sufficient description and towards technique from the empirical complexity and richness of technique, not based on the presuppose toward to technique making the research on philosophy of technique more taking attention of technical artifacts, design, engineering work and so on. Thinking from the theory of phenomenology, the survey and critique toward technique is not to refute, disproval, but to understand the criticized propositions and their origin of significance. To discuss and analyze technique is to understand all kinds of critical conceptions and propositions of technique, which makes their significance based on technical affairs. Technique has become a complicate system, and the conceptions of technique are hard to be generalized using such words as skills, craftworks, methods, knowledge and tools. American philosopher Carl Mitcham defined technical phenomena from four aspects: the technique as object, knowledge, action and volition. On developing aspect, the conception of technical design (based on social needs and scientific theory) corresponds to the technique as knowledge and volition; the implementation and producing process of technical design corresponds to the technique as action; materialized fruit (Artifacts) corresponds to the technique as object. It is obvious that technical design has comparatively independent significance, and attempts to resolve such questions as what to do ,how to do, and who to do for, embodiment the exchanges of substance, energy and information between man, nature and society, the process of turning existing nature into human surroundings.
The exploiting method of bringing a question forward is to present a presupposing and try to materialize it in reality. Solicited by the mass of technical philosophical research, the empirical turning of technical philosophy makes the research stress on the realistic process of technical development. The dissertation's philosophical analysis towards the design of technique makes the pursing aim of technology philosophy based on credible technical analysis of affairs ,cover the unique philosophical questions of technique using the way of deep description , open the Black Box of Technology, at the same time, makes the method of asking become great turning, the essential understanding and valuable judging towards technique based on the inner insight and sufficient empirical description towards the practice of technical design, It is embodied that technique is not the destiny man can't escape, not the neutral tool, also not the method collectivity of having utterly efficiency, but co-evolution with society. The philosophical analysis towards technical design is helpful for people to control technique with reason, makes technical philosophy turn to a great realistic subject, and makes technical practice develop towards an aspect in favor of human.
Technical design is an important concept, which is involved in an empirical turn of technology philosophy, and the core term of contemporary technology philosophy. In order to valuably analyzing and dealing with philosophical questions of the technology itself and effect on our lives, the understanding and detail experiential description on technical design is the premise. This is also the central topic to be discussed in the thesis. This thesis is divided into five sections and to clarify that technical design is a new domain of the technology philosophy study, and the significance of connotation, dimension, approaches and the perspective of technical design is to technology philosophy. On the whole, the orientation of technical design is to be established in the field of technology philosophy. On this basis, the source of technical design is discussed in detail from the context of traditional technology philosophy research. Technical design is detailed. It's character is instrument-rationality in engineering tradition and it's foundation is people-center in humanism tradition, which are from separation to unity. Through the research on traditional values, the basic concept formed, which is on various technical design of empirical turn in the contemporary philosophy of technology research. Technical design is a clue connecting thought and behavior, which is carried out in practice and involved in all fields of our life world. Technical design has been gradually improving from applied tools to information technology along a historical industrialized path. The general rules and features of technical design are concluded during reviewing the performance and the times characteristics of technical design. "Great development" and "great damage" of technical design makes people turn to the cognitive thinking rationally. The technical design truth on the foundation, the life awareness of the technical design making non-rational cognition as a breakthrough and the systemic cognition of overall macro-scale technical design are researched. So the formation mechanism and of the general methodology of the contemporary technical design cognition is gained. The final Interpretation to technical design should return to human beings. The history of technical design is the epitome of human existence show volition. The progress of technical design is the publicity of essence of human existence and show the character of the labor practice and the existence of diversity human culture. It promotes human lifestyle to transform and is the basis to achieve essence of human freedom.
Along the way of empirical turn of the contemporary philosophy of technology research, technical essence is studied through investigating the general course of technology development or the technical design. Therefore a new research method on philosophy of technology is inaugurated. To analyse the origin of engineering and humanism is helpful to eliminate their bifurcation and promote their unity. The universal rules and characters are achieved by the general description of performance form and times character of technical design in pre-industrialization and post-industrialization. On the basis of the truth, life consciousness and systemic cognition, the formation mechanism and the general methodology of the contemporary technical design cognition is established. Comprehensive interpretation to technical design from human himself exhibits that the progress of technical design achieves essence of human and is the precondition of human freedom and development.
Technology is the object of human nature power and technical design give deeply prominence to essence of the people existence, which is the foundation to achieve free nature and the means from the realm of necessity to the realm of freedom. Scientific and technological progress and the development of human civilization make our contemporary human wisdom base on the overall footstone and create a holistic thought with the time characteristics. This dissertation has expounded technical design in the whole from various angles, grasped the contemporary trends of technical design study, brought technology into the framework of sociology, and illustrated technology in different way. There are many choices in the various technical possibilities, but a certain technology need to be shaped in a specific environment. We place technical design in the contemporary technical practice, and a specific context on technical design study will come into being. The complex technical design with transmodern technology terms is concerned about. We integrate technical philosophy investigation Paradigm, form a basic program of the technical design study, realize the external and internal, static and the dynamic comprehensive research, and achieve political, social, institutional, cultural and other "horizon fusion"; We advance crossed research related to fields, show the integrated characteristics of technical design, make technology philosophy break through the abstract interface of engineering and anthropology, penetrate into technical interior, and actualize the organic unity of emotional perception and rational thought.
As a way of the world constructing, displaying, un-concealing, technical design is the human being-in-the world means. Technology of human society is the only way to the realm of freedom. The unprecedented rapid development of productive forces is driven by the technology .It makes the human ideals into reality, the people's spiritual strength into material power and achieving mankind freedom under the premise of "free labor". Of course, the technical design objectively has paradoxical historical consequences. Through the increasingly industrial practice, technology enters people's life and transforms people's life, and prepares for the liberation of people, even though it directly has completed automatization. Goods system and industrial model cast the human in the shadow of materialization, but technology also provided the conditions for natural history changing into social history and then humankinds come who are completely self-liberation.
20世纪80年代以降,欧美技术哲学研究形成了“经验转向”(Empirical Turn)。技术哲学研究的经验转向着眼于对技术自身的内在分析,使其认识基于对技术的复杂性和丰富性以及可靠的和经验的充分描述基础上,而不是建立在对技术的预先设定的基础上,使技术哲学研究更加关注那些与技术有关的技术人工物、技术设计、工程活动等问题。从现象学角度看,对技术的审视和批判“不是反驳,不是反证,而是去理解被批判的命题,理解这些命题的意义起源在哪里”,探讨和分析技术就是去理解各种被批判的技术概念和命题,将其意义奠基在技术实事本身之上。人类技术系统发展到当代,技术已经成为一个复杂体系,技术概念很难用技巧、工艺、方法、知识或工具等语词来概括。美国技术哲学家卡尔·米切姆(Carl Mitcham)将技术现象分为四个层次:作为对象(Object)的技术、作为知识(Knowledge)的技术、作为活动(Action)的技术和作为意志(Volition)的技术。从动态上看,技术设计的构思(基于社会需求和科学理论)相当于作为知识的技术和作为意志的技术,技术设计的实施、生产过程相当于作为活动的技术,技术设计的物化成果——人工物(Artifacts)相当于作为对象的技术。可见,技术设计在复杂的技术体系中具有相对独立的意义,技术设计试图解决“做什么”、“怎么做”、“为谁做”的问题,它体现为人与自然、人与社会之间进行物质、能量和信息的交换,变自在自然为人工自然的过程。
提出一个问题的建设性方式是陈述一个假设,并力争在现实中付诸阙如,本文正是在做这样的尝试。技术哲学的经验转向是基于技术哲学研究的困境引发的,在技术哲学的“突围”中,把研究的“阿基米德点”着眼在技术发展的实际过程。本文对技术设计的哲学分析使技术哲学的追问基点建立于可靠的技术事实分析之上,以“深描”为手法,在“四周都有经验守护”下,揭示技术本身特有的哲学问题,真正打开技术黑箱(Opening the Black Box of Technology);对技术设计的哲学分析使技术哲学的提问方式发生巨大转变,使对技术的本质解读、价值判断和发展透视,建立在对技术设计实践的内在洞察和经验充分描述基础上,从而消除关于技术的种种神话和抽象虚构,体现技术不是“人类无法逃脱的天命”,不是“中性的工具”,也不是“具有绝对效率的方法总体”,而是与社会协同进化(Co-evolution);对技术设计的哲学分析有助于人们更加自觉合理地进行技术控制,使技术哲学向着“一个有着伟大现实的学科”转变,使技术实践朝着更加有利于人的方向发展。
技术设计作为技术哲学的经验转向所指涉的重要概念,是建构当代技术哲学的核心话语。对技术设计进行详尽的经验描述和理解,是我们有价值地分析处理技术本身的哲学问题及其对我们生活世界影响后果的前提,也是本文所要讨论的中心话题。本文分设为五个章节,开篇力求阐明技术设计作为技术哲学研究的一个新论域,其内在意涵,理论解释,研究维度,研究进路及技术设计视角对技术哲学研究的意义,总体上确立技术设计在技术哲学研究领域中的向标;在此基础上,从技术哲学研究传统的宏阔背景中敷陈开来,瞻顾了技术设计思想的来龙去脉,详细阐发了工程主义传统中以工具理性为特征的技术设计和人文主义传统中以人本理念为根本的技术设计,在考量这两种由抵牾走向融合的传统价值观中,确立了当代技术哲学研究中经验转向的多样性技术设计的基本构想;技术设计是一个沟通思与行的红线,体现在具体的实践活动中,涵盖了生活世界的所有能指领域,历史地因循着一条工业化路径,完成着由实用工具到信息技术的攀升,在对技术设计的表现形式与时代特征的述评中,得出技术设计的一般规律和特征:技术设计的径情直遂发展所引发的“大发展”和“大破坏”,使人们对技术设计的认识转入理性层面的认知思考,由此考察了以基础主义为基点的技术设计的真理观、以非理性认知为突破口的技术设计的生命意识和以整体主义为宏观尺度的技术设计的系统认识,抉发出当代技术设计认知的生成机制和一般方法论;最后归拢于技术设计的人学解读上,技术设计史是人类生存意志展现的缩影,技术设计进步张扬了人的存在本质,彰显了劳动实践的人格品质和人类多样化的文化存在,促使人类生活方式的变革,是人自由本质实现的基础。
顺应当代技术哲学研究的经验转向潮流,把对技术本质的追问附着于技术发展的一般过程即技术设计上,开辟了一条技术哲学研究的新理路;对工程主义和人文主义穷原竟委的分析有助于消除二者的分野,促进其融合过程;对工业化前后技术设计的表现形式与时代特征的一般描述中,理出技术设计的一般特征及其路径(technological paths);对技术设计的真理观、生命意识和系统认识的基础上,确立当代技术设计认知的生成机制和一般方法论原理;通过多维互镜的人学解读,展现了技术设计的进步是人本质的实现,是人走向自由和全面发展的前提。本文通过以上逻辑分析基阶而推,着力探讨和力图回答技术设计与社会协同进化及其本质旨归。
科学技术的进步和人类文明的发展,使得我们时代的人类智慧立足于整体这块基石上,形成整体思维的时代特征。本文从多角度整体透视技术设计,把握技术设计研究的当代走势,将其纳入时代发展的总体框架,阐释技术设计可以不只通过一种方式来进行,在各种不同技术可能性中存在多种选择,一种技术设计的形成要塑造(Shape)于特定环境;将技术设计置于当代技术实践的框图之中,生成技术设计研究的特定语境,关注“跨现代”(Transmodern)的技术话语中错综复杂的技术设计;整合技术哲学的研究特点,形成技术设计研究的基本理念,实现对技术设计外部与内部、静态与动态的综合性研究,达到与社会、制度和文化等的“视域融合”;推进相关学科领域的交叉研究,对技术设计的全景式把握使技术哲学突破工程主义、人类学的抽象界面,深入到技术内部,达到对技术理解的感性知觉与理性审视的有机统一。
技术设计作为世界构造、展现、解蔽的途径,是人的在世方式。技术社会是人类走向自由王国的必由之路,正是技术推动着生产力史无前例地高速发展,日益把人类理想变成现实,把人的精神力量转化为物质的力量,在“劳动自由”的前提下实现人的自由。当然,技术设计客观地具有吊诡性的历史后果,技术“通过工业日益在实践上进入人的生活,改造人的生活,并为人的解放做准备,尽管它不得不直接地完成非人化”,商品体制和产业化模式使人类蒙上物性化的阴影,但在自然转变为社会历史的过程中,技术也为这种异化的超越提供了条件,产生了能达到完全的自我解放的人。
Technology is the human being-in-the-world way. With the rise of modern industrial revolution, technology is increasingly becoming a focus of the times and the symbolic and metaphorical significance is more and more obvious. Since "Philosophy of Technology Program" was published, which was wrote by the philosopher Ernst Kapp in 1877, technology philosophy has been established and developing rapidly as an independent discipline. The subject is mainly about the soul of technology activities and has a great future. In the philosophy of technology research, there are a large number of literatures concerned about technology, but technology seldom becomes the main theme of technology philosopher. Even though there are many books about the impact of technology on people, few are about the technology itself. Technology is researched as an assured fact in classical theory of technology philosophy. The social consequence of technology large-scale expansion is fervidly investigated, but the technological artifacts and technical design action itself are ignored. Technology is considered only from the external relations of serviceability, not the nature connection with human beings. Because of the technology itself being ignored, the central issues of classical theory of technology philosophy are lack of consistency and haven't formed a cohesive theory focusing on it. So it is difficult to develop a unified paradigm for philosophy of technology. On the base of the background, philosophy thinking on technological design begins to be researched in this thesis.
The research on technology philosophy has formed empirical turn in Europe and the United States since 1980. The empirical turn of technology philosophy makes the philosophical analysis towards technique based on the sufficient description and towards technique from the empirical complexity and richness of technique, not based on the presuppose toward to technique making the research on philosophy of technique more taking attention of technical artifacts, design, engineering work and so on. Thinking from the theory of phenomenology, the survey and critique toward technique is not to refute, disproval, but to understand the criticized propositions and their origin of significance. To discuss and analyze technique is to understand all kinds of critical conceptions and propositions of technique, which makes their significance based on technical affairs. Technique has become a complicate system, and the conceptions of technique are hard to be generalized using such words as skills, craftworks, methods, knowledge and tools. American philosopher Carl Mitcham defined technical phenomena from four aspects: the technique as object, knowledge, action and volition. On developing aspect, the conception of technical design (based on social needs and scientific theory) corresponds to the technique as knowledge and volition; the implementation and producing process of technical design corresponds to the technique as action; materialized fruit (Artifacts) corresponds to the technique as object. It is obvious that technical design has comparatively independent significance, and attempts to resolve such questions as what to do ,how to do, and who to do for, embodiment the exchanges of substance, energy and information between man, nature and society, the process of turning existing nature into human surroundings.
The exploiting method of bringing a question forward is to present a presupposing and try to materialize it in reality. Solicited by the mass of technical philosophical research, the empirical turning of technical philosophy makes the research stress on the realistic process of technical development. The dissertation's philosophical analysis towards the design of technique makes the pursing aim of technology philosophy based on credible technical analysis of affairs ,cover the unique philosophical questions of technique using the way of deep description , open the Black Box of Technology, at the same time, makes the method of asking become great turning, the essential understanding and valuable judging towards technique based on the inner insight and sufficient empirical description towards the practice of technical design, It is embodied that technique is not the destiny man can't escape, not the neutral tool, also not the method collectivity of having utterly efficiency, but co-evolution with society. The philosophical analysis towards technical design is helpful for people to control technique with reason, makes technical philosophy turn to a great realistic subject, and makes technical practice develop towards an aspect in favor of human.
Technical design is an important concept, which is involved in an empirical turn of technology philosophy, and the core term of contemporary technology philosophy. In order to valuably analyzing and dealing with philosophical questions of the technology itself and effect on our lives, the understanding and detail experiential description on technical design is the premise. This is also the central topic to be discussed in the thesis. This thesis is divided into five sections and to clarify that technical design is a new domain of the technology philosophy study, and the significance of connotation, dimension, approaches and the perspective of technical design is to technology philosophy. On the whole, the orientation of technical design is to be established in the field of technology philosophy. On this basis, the source of technical design is discussed in detail from the context of traditional technology philosophy research. Technical design is detailed. It's character is instrument-rationality in engineering tradition and it's foundation is people-center in humanism tradition, which are from separation to unity. Through the research on traditional values, the basic concept formed, which is on various technical design of empirical turn in the contemporary philosophy of technology research. Technical design is a clue connecting thought and behavior, which is carried out in practice and involved in all fields of our life world. Technical design has been gradually improving from applied tools to information technology along a historical industrialized path. The general rules and features of technical design are concluded during reviewing the performance and the times characteristics of technical design. "Great development" and "great damage" of technical design makes people turn to the cognitive thinking rationally. The technical design truth on the foundation, the life awareness of the technical design making non-rational cognition as a breakthrough and the systemic cognition of overall macro-scale technical design are researched. So the formation mechanism and of the general methodology of the contemporary technical design cognition is gained. The final Interpretation to technical design should return to human beings. The history of technical design is the epitome of human existence show volition. The progress of technical design is the publicity of essence of human existence and show the character of the labor practice and the existence of diversity human culture. It promotes human lifestyle to transform and is the basis to achieve essence of human freedom.
Along the way of empirical turn of the contemporary philosophy of technology research, technical essence is studied through investigating the general course of technology development or the technical design. Therefore a new research method on philosophy of technology is inaugurated. To analyse the origin of engineering and humanism is helpful to eliminate their bifurcation and promote their unity. The universal rules and characters are achieved by the general description of performance form and times character of technical design in pre-industrialization and post-industrialization. On the basis of the truth, life consciousness and systemic cognition, the formation mechanism and the general methodology of the contemporary technical design cognition is established. Comprehensive interpretation to technical design from human himself exhibits that the progress of technical design achieves essence of human and is the precondition of human freedom and development.
Technology is the object of human nature power and technical design give deeply prominence to essence of the people existence, which is the foundation to achieve free nature and the means from the realm of necessity to the realm of freedom. Scientific and technological progress and the development of human civilization make our contemporary human wisdom base on the overall footstone and create a holistic thought with the time characteristics. This dissertation has expounded technical design in the whole from various angles, grasped the contemporary trends of technical design study, brought technology into the framework of sociology, and illustrated technology in different way. There are many choices in the various technical possibilities, but a certain technology need to be shaped in a specific environment. We place technical design in the contemporary technical practice, and a specific context on technical design study will come into being. The complex technical design with transmodern technology terms is concerned about. We integrate technical philosophy investigation Paradigm, form a basic program of the technical design study, realize the external and internal, static and the dynamic comprehensive research, and achieve political, social, institutional, cultural and other "horizon fusion"; We advance crossed research related to fields, show the integrated characteristics of technical design, make technology philosophy break through the abstract interface of engineering and anthropology, penetrate into technical interior, and actualize the organic unity of emotional perception and rational thought.
As a way of the world constructing, displaying, un-concealing, technical design is the human being-in-the world means. Technology of human society is the only way to the realm of freedom. The unprecedented rapid development of productive forces is driven by the technology .It makes the human ideals into reality, the people's spiritual strength into material power and achieving mankind freedom under the premise of "free labor". Of course, the technical design objectively has paradoxical historical consequences. Through the increasingly industrial practice, technology enters people's life and transforms people's life, and prepares for the liberation of people, even though it directly has completed automatization. Goods system and industrial model cast the human in the shadow of materialization, but technology also provided the conditions for natural history changing into social history and then humankinds come who are completely self-liberation.
引文
[1]孙周兴选编.海德格尔选集(下).“技术的追问”.上海:三联书店出版社,1996.924.
[1]马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿.北京:人民出版社,2000.88.
[2]Simon H A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.132-133.
[3]Carl Mitcham,The Importance of Phiosophy to Engineering[J].Tecnos,1998.17.
[1]J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology[M],New York:Cambridge Press,2000.12.
[2]Vinceti.The Experimental Assessment of Engineering Theory as a Tool for Design[J],Techne,2001.5.
[3]Louis Bucciarelli:Designing Engineers[M],Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1994.18-21.
[1]转引自卡尔·米切姆.技术哲学概论.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1999.34.
[1]F.拉普.技术哲学导论.刘武等译.沈阳:辽宁科学出版社,1987.11-12.
[2]C.米切姆.技术哲学概论.殷登祥等译.天津:科学技术出版社,1999.8-17.
[3][法]F.贝尔.技术帝国.上海:三联书店,1999.12.
[1][法]马克·第亚尼.非物质社会.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.87.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷.人民出版社,1995.57.
[3]H.Achterhuis,American Philosophy of Technology,Indiana University Press.2001.56.
[4]马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿.人民出版社,2000.88.
[1]郭贵春、乔瑞金、陈凡.多维视野中的技术.东北大学出版社,2003.25-33.
[2]倪梁康.现象学的效应.三联书店,1994.178.
[3]Carl Mitcham,Thinking Through Technology:The Path between Engineering and Philosophy,Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1994.159.
[1]Simon H A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.132-133.
[2]Carl Mitcham,The Importance of Phiosophy to Engineering[J].Tecnos,1998.17.
[3]J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology[M],New York:Cambridge Press,2000.12.
[4]Vinceti.The Experimental Assessment of Engineering Theory as a Tool for Design[J],Techne,2001.5.
[5]Louis Bucciarelli:Designing Engineers[M],Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1994.18-21.
[1]张华夏、张志林.技术解释研究.科学出版社,2005.29.
[2]辞源(第4册)[M].商务印书馆,1999.2303.2298.
[3]汉语大词典(第11卷)[M].汉语大词典出版社,1993.84.
[4]Thomas H.Design[M].L ondon:Laurence King Publishing.1998.10.
[5]参见朱红文.“设计哲学”的可能性和意义[J].哲学研究:2000(3).
[6]Love,T,Constructing a coherent cross--disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs:Some philosophical issues[J].Design Studies,2002(3).351.
[1][法]马克·第亚尼.非物质社会.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.87.
[2]司马贺.人工科学[M].武夷山译.上海科技教育出版社,2004.103.
[3]转引自张华夏译.波士顿哲学丛书(第236卷).克罗斯(P.Kroes)巴克(M.Bakker)主编《工业时代的技术与科学的发展》.1992.34.
[4]Bunge M.Treatise on Basis Philosophy.Vol.7.Philosophy of Science and Technology.Part Ⅱ.D.Reidel Publishing Company.1985.231.
[5]Richards S.Philosophy and Sociology of Science.Basil Blackwell.1985.126.
[1]Richards S.Philosophy and Sociology of Science.Basil Blackwell.1985.126.
[2]Walter G.Engineering Knowledge,Type of Design,and Level of Hierarchy.In:Kroes P,Bakker M.Technological Development and Science in The Industrial Age.Kluwer Academic Publishers,1992.20-21.
[3]Simon.H.A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.132-133.
[1]K.Popper:The Logical Scientific Discovery.New York:Basic Books,1959.31.
[2]马克思.资本论(第1卷).北京:人民出版社,1975.378.
[3]郭贵春、乔瑞金、陈凡.多维视野中的技术.东北大学出版社,2003.444-445.
[1]Kroes,TechnicalFunctions as Dispositions:a Critical Assessment,Teche5:3Spring2001.1-16.
[2]同上.
[3]同上.
[4]Rothwell R,Reindustrialization and Technology Longman,1985.48.
[1]M.Polanyi.Personal Knowledge.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1962.328.
[2]J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology[M],New York:Cambridge Press,2000.42.
[1]W.G.Vincenti.What Engineers Knowand How They Know it:Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History.Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press,1990.45.
[2]同上,58.
[3]冯俊.后现代主义哲学讲演录.北京:商务印书馆,2003.88.
[1][俄]弗罗洛夫.人的前景.王思斌等译.中国社会科学出版社,1989.85.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集第26卷.人民出版社,1974.281.
[3]林德宏.技术生存的内在矛盾.自然辩证法研究,2004(2).
[4]远航.技术的价值负荷过程.自然辩证法研究,2003(12).
[1]陈凡、朱春艳、赵迎欢、田鹏颖、马会端.技术与设计:“经验转向”背景下的技术哲学研究——第14届国际技术哲学学会(SPT)会议述评.哲学动态,2006(6).
[2]转引自张华夏译.波士顿哲学丛书(第236卷).克罗斯(P.Kroes)、巴克(M.Bakker)主编《工业时代的技术与科学的发展》,1992.36.
[1]C.米切姆.技术哲学概论.般登样等译.天津:科学技术出版社,1999.7-8.
[2]F.拉普.技术科学的思维结构.刘武等译.吉林人民出版社,1988.92.
[1][英]迈克·费瑟斯通.消费文化与后现代主义.刘精明译.译林出版社,2000.78.
[2]W.拉莫特.技术的文化塑造与技术多样性的政治学.世界哲学,2005(4).
[3]Don Ihde,Philosophy of Technology,1975-1995[J].Techne,Volumel,Numbers1-2,Fall1995.48.
[1]Paul Durbin,Adances in Philosophy of Technology?Comparative Perspectives,Techne,Society for Philosophy & Technology,Volume4,Number2,Fall1998.62.
[2]Carl Mitcham,The Importance of Phiosophy to Engineering[J].Tecnos,1998.45.
[3]C.米切姆.技术哲学概论.殷登祥等译.天津:科学技术出版社,1999.7-8.
[4]F·拉普.技术哲学导论.刘武等译.辽宁科学技术出版社,1987.19.
[5]J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology[M],New York:Cambridge Press,2000.33.
[1]Andrew Feenberg,From Essentialism to Constructivism:Philosophy of Technology at the crossroads[J],www-rohan.edu/faculty/feenberg/talk4./html.
[2]Andrew Feenberg,Alternative Modernity,Berkeley:University of California Press.1995.44,
[3]乔瑞金.马克思技术哲学纲要.人民出版社,2002.7.
[1]Andrew Feenberg,Critical Theory of Technology,New York:Oxford University Press,1991.201.
[2]Andrew Feenberg,Alternative Modernity,Berkeley:University of California Press,1995.67.
[1]中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典(双英双语)[M].外语教学与研究出版社,2002.664、2507.
[2]简明不列颠百科全书(第三卷).中国大百科全书出版社.1985.
[1]于光远主编.自然辩证法百科全书.中国大百科全书出版社,1994.
[2]波塞尔.论科学与工程的结构性差异.刘则渊、王续琨主编.工程·技术·哲学.大连理工大学出版社,2002.207.
[3]Herbert Hoover.The Memories of Herbert Hoover:Years of Adventure,1874-1920(MacMillan,New York,1951).132-133.
[1]海德格尔.海德格尔选集.上海:三联书店,1996.925.
[2]P.Aarne Vesilind,Alastair S.Gunn.工程、伦理与环境.吴晓东、翁端译.北京:清华大学出版社,2003.40.
[1][美]安德鲁·芬伯格.技术批判理论.韩连庆,曹观法译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.4.
[2]卡尔·雅斯贝斯.卡尔·雅斯贝斯文集[C].朱更生译.西宁:青海人民出版社,2003.265.
[1]阿马蒂亚·森.伦理学与经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000.10-11.
[2]李伯聪.自然辩证法通讯[J],2006(2).47.
[3]摘自S.Florman,The Existential Pleasure of Engineering(St.Martin's Press,Inc.New York,1976).
[1]转引自马歇尔·麦克卢汉.理解媒介——论人的延伸.商务印书馆,2000.37.
[1]马克斯·韦伯.基督教伦理[A].转引自哈贝马斯.交往行动理论[M].洪佩郁等译.重庆:重庆出版社,1994.211.
[1][德]韦伯.新教伦理与资本主义精神[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1987.142.
[2]卡尔·雅斯贝斯.卡尔·雅斯贝斯文集[C].朱更生译.西宁:青海人民出版社,2003.159.
[3]郭冲辰、樊春华、陈凡.哲学动态,2002(10).42.
[1][美]安德鲁·芬伯格.技术批判理论[M].韩连庆,曹观法译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.3.
[2]中国大百科全书·哲学,1987.711.
[3]大美百科全书(第14卷)[Z].北京:外文出版社,1994.286.
[1]西方哲学原著选读(上卷),54、55.
[2]威尔·杜兰.世界文明史·希腊的生活[M].北京:东方出版社,1998.260.
[1]W.C.丹皮尔.科学史及其与哲学和宗教的关系.李珩译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2001.123.
[1]W.C.丹皮尔.科学史及其与哲学和宗教的关系.李珩译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2001.125-128.
[2]W.C.丹皮尔.科学简史.曾令先译.北京:人民日报出版社,2007.258.
[1]参见周辅成.西方伦理学名著选辑(上卷).商务印书馆,1987.94.
[2]转引自威尔·杜兰.世界文明史·希腊的生活[M].北京:东方出版社,1998、269.
[3]参见杜维明.儒家人文精神与宗教研究.载《理性主义及其限制》.三联书店,2003.231.
[4]柏拉图.理想国.郭斌和、张竹明译.商务印书馆,1996.375.
[1]尼采.苏鲁支语录.徐梵澄译.商务印书馆,1997.27.
[1]海德格尔.存在与时间[M].北京:三联书店,1998.228.
[2]同上,136.
[3]L.Tondl.Technology and Technological Science.in Rapp F.(ed.).Contributions to a Philosophy of Technology.Boston:D.Reidel Publishing Company,1974.4.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集,第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.16.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集,第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.73.
[3]陈凡、朱春艳、李权时.试论欧美技术哲学的特点及经验转向.自然辩证法通讯,2004(5).27.
[1]Jacques Ellul,The Technological Society,from Albert H.Teich,Technology and Man's Future,S Martin's Press,1981.43.
[2]《科学与哲学》参考资料 第1辑,1983.53.
[3]陈凡、朱春艳、李权时.试论欧美技术哲学的特点及经验转向.自然辩证法通讯,2004(5).26.
[1]H.Achterhuis,ed.American Philosophy of Technology,Indiana University Press,2001.
[2]Joseph C Pitt.New Directions in the Philosophy of Technology[A].Philosophy and Technology(Vol.11)[C].Dordrecht:Kluwei Academic Publishers,1995.ⅶ.
[3]Hans Achterhuis.American Philosophy of Technology:the Empirical Turn[M].Indianapolis:Indiana University Press,2001.ⅹⅹⅰ-ⅹⅸ.
[1]埃吕尔.技术的社会[J].科学与哲学,1983(1).56-71.
[2]Hans Achterhuis.American Philosophy of Technology:the Empirical Turn[M].Indianapolis:Indiana University Press,2001.ⅹⅹⅰ-ⅹⅸ.
[3]培根.新工具.十六——十八世纪西欧各国哲学,44.
[1]培根.新工具.商务印书馆,1936.22、236.
[2]陈凡、曹继东.现象学视野中的技术——伊代技术现象学评析[J].自然辩证法研究,2004(5).57-61.
[1]爱因斯坦文集第三卷.商务印书馆,1979.73.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第23卷,202.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第4卷.人民出版社,1995.732.
[2][法]吕特·舍普.技术帝国.三联书店,1999.14.
[1][美]罗伯特·金·默顿.十七世纪英国的科学、技术与社会.四川人民出版社,1986.234.
[2][美]罗伯特·金·默顿.十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会.商务印书馆,2000.207.
[1]列维-布留尔.原始思维.商务印书馆,1981.8.
[2]同上,2.
[1]丹皮尔.科学史——及其与哲学和宗教的关系.商务印书馆,1975,39.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集 第1卷.人民出版社,32.
[1][德]F·拉普.技术哲学导论.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1986.103.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第42卷.97.
[3]恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:人民出版社,1984.296.
[4]恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:人民出版社,1984.296-267.
[1]海德格尔.存在与时间[M].北京:三联书店,1987.273.
[2]李三虎.技艺与价值:分裂还是关联?——柏拉图的整体论解答及其当下意义.现代哲学,2005(2).114.
[1]亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学.廖申白译注.北京商务印书馆,2003.171.
[2]同上.
[1]墨翟.墨子[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.12.
[1]墨翟.墨子[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.12.
[2]同上
[3]韩非.韩非子[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.104.
[4]吴树平点校.周礼冬官考工记[M].北京:燕山出版社,1991.500.
[1]朱哲.先秦艺术设计思想简论.湖北社会科学,2005(4).113-114.
[2]马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.111.
[1]刘大椿.科学技术哲学导论.中国人民大学出版社,1999.226.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第39卷.198-199.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第4卷.292.
[1][英]佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.上海人民出版社,2001.198.
[2]杜普莱西斯.早期欧洲现代资本主义的形成过程.辽宁教育出版社,2001.280.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第23卷.386.
[2]资本论 第一卷.373-376.
[1]资本论 第一卷.358.
[2]同上,373.
[3]同上,376.
[4]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.572.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.518.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.564.
[3]马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.55.
[1]马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.55.
[2]资本论 第一卷.408.
[3]资本论 第一卷.412.
[4][美]罗伯特·金·默顿.十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会.商务印书馆,2000.59.
[1]资本论 第一卷.410-411.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.536.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第23卷.人民出版社,1972.463.
[2]马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.207.
[3][美]乔治·巴萨拉.技术发展简史.周光发译.复旦大学出版社,2000.122.
[4]马克思恩格斯全集 第23卷.386.
[1]陈昌曙.技术哲学引论.科学出版社,1999.216-217.
[1]参阅陈筠泉、殷登祥.科技革命与社会发展.人民出版社,2001.
[1]参阅吴维民.大汇流——论社会科学和自然科学的结合.四川大学出版社,1992.第一章至第四章.
[2]徐飞.科学交叉论.安徽教育出版社,1991.2.
[1]胡泳.三联生活周刊.2001(20).
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第19卷.372.
[2]机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.67.
[1]海德格尔.艺术作品的本源.海德格尔选集(上卷).孙周兴译.上海三联书店,1996.305.
[1]苗力田.古希腊哲学.中国人民大学出版社,1989.312.
[2]同上,339.
[3]同上,265.
[4]同上,323.
[1]海德格尔.世界图象的时代.海德格尔选集(下卷).孙周兴译.上海三联书店,1996.902.
[1]海德格尔.世界图象的时代.海德格尔选集(下卷).孙周兴译.上海三联书店,1996.902.
[2]同上,909.
[3]海德格尔.尼采(下卷).孙周兴译.商务印书馆,2002.675.
[1]海德格尔.尼采(下卷).孙周兴译.商务印书馆,2002.676.
[2]同上,671.
[3]海德格尔.尼采(下卷).孙周兴译.商务印书馆,2002.671.
[1]海德格尔.尼采(下卷).孙周兴译.商务印书馆,2002.672.
[2]同上,673.
[3]同上,885.
[1][英]贝尔纳.科学的社会功能.商务印书馆,1986.63.
[2][美]伯纳德·巴伯.科学与社会秩序.三联书店,1991.6.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第三卷.人民出版社,1972.574.
[2]Horkheimet M.Eelipse of Reason[M].New York:The Seabury Press,1974.3-5.
[1]赫伯特·马尔库塞.《单向度的人——发达工业社会意识形态研究》导言.上海译文出版社,1989.12-13.
[2]赵建军.追问技术悲观主义.东北大学出版社,2001.40.
[1]卡西尔.人论.上海译文出版社,1985.119.
[2]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录 第1卷.商务印书馆,1959.81.
[1]卡西尔.人论.上海译文出版社,1985.118.
[2]卡西尔.语言与神话.上海三联书店,1988.66.
[3]夏军.非理性世界.上海三联书店,1998.60.
[1]叔本华.作为意志和表象的世界.商务印书馆,1982.427.
[1]柏格森.形而上学导言.商务印书馆,1963.3-4.
[1]萨特.存在与虚无.三联书店,198.56.
[2]萨特.存在主义是一种人道主义.转引自《存在主义哲学》.商务印书馆,1983.337.
[1]张康之.总体性与乌托邦.中国人民大学出版社,1998.28.
[1]参见陈嘉明等.现代性与后现代性.人民出版社,2001.10-11.
[2]参见王岳川.后现代主义在中国的反思.黑龙江人民出版社,2002.277-280.
[1]恩格斯.自然辩证法.人民出版社,1984.35.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第4卷.人民出版社,1961.241.
[3]恩格斯.自然辩证法.人民出版社,1984.35.
[1]恩格斯.自然辩证法.人民教育出版社,1984.8.26.
[2]古希腊罗马哲学.商务印书馆,1961.27.
[3]海森堡.严密自然科学近年来的变化.上海译文出版社,1978.106.
[4]亚里士多德.形而上学.商务印书馆,1982.266.
[1]康德.未来形而上学导论.商务印书馆,1978.111.
[1]黑格尔.大逻辑(下卷).商务印书馆,1976.160.
[2]黑格尔.自然哲学.商务印书馆,1980.161.
[1]黑格尔.自然哲学.商务印书馆,1980.32.
[2]徐崇温.西方马克思主义论丛.重庆出版社,1989.3.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集 第3卷.人民出版社,1995.777.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集,中文1版,第23卷.87、202.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集 第4卷.人民出版社,1972.
[3]F·拉普.技术哲学导论.刘武等译.辽宁科学技术出版社,1986.182.
[4]同上,2-3.
[1]马克思.资本论第一卷第二版跋,马克思恩格斯选集第2卷.218.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第一卷.453.
[3]乔瑞金.马克思技术哲学纲要.北京:人民出版社,2002.207-211.
[1]参见[奥]贝塔朗菲.一般系统论.社会科学文献出版社,1987.8-44.
[1]转引自科学方法论文集.湖北人民出版社,1981.24.
[2][奥]贝塔朗菲.一般系统论.自然科学哲学问题丛刊,1979(3).
[1]参见[苏]叶·茹科夫.科学知识结构中的一般系统论的控制论.世界科学,1981(4).
[1]转引自成思危确定推进我国的软科学事业[J].中国软科学,1998(7).6.
[1]列宁全集 第33卷.411.
[2]Bunge M.Treatise on Basis Philosophy.Vol.7.Philosophy of Science and Technology.Part Ⅱ.D.Reidel Publishing Company.1985.231.
[3]J.D.Berna1.Science in History.London:C.A.Watts and Co.Ltd,1954.5-6.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.人民出版社,1979.570.
[2]Jacques Ellul,The Technological Order.Philosophy and Technology,Edited with an Introduction by Carl Mitcham and Robert Mackey,The Free Press,1983.86.
[3][苏]舍梅涅夫.哲学和技术科学.张斌译.中国人民大学出版社,1989.30.
[1]Andrew Feenberg.Critical Theory of Technology.New York:Oxford University Press,1991.201.
[2]阿诺德·佩斯.技术:实践与文化.自然科学哲学问题.1984(1).56.
[3]约翰·杜威.人的问题[M].傅统先译.上海:上海人民出版社.1965.131.
[4][苏]舍梅涅夫.哲学和技术科学.张斌译.中国人民大学出版社,1989.30.
[5]同上,69.
[1][英]罗素.宗教与科学.商务印书馆,1982.1.
[2][美]D.贝尔.后工业社会的来临.商务印书馆,1986.404.
[3]Arie Rip.Science and Technology as DancinaPartners.In:Kroes P,Bakker M.Technological Development and Science in The Industrial Age.Kluwer Academic Publishers,1992.236.
[4]Richards S.Philosophy and Sociology of Science.Basil Blackwell.1985.126.
[1]K.Popper:The Logical Scientific Discovery,New York:Basic Books,1959.31.
[2]L·劳丹.进步及其问题[M].刘新民译.北京:华夏出版社,1990.3.
[3]约翰·杜威.自由与文化[M].傅统先译.北京:商务印书馆,1964.105.
[4]Simon.H.A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.132-133.
[1]钱学森.在全国思维科学讨论会上的发言.思维科学探索.山西人民出版社,1985.14-15.
[2]爱因斯坦文集 第1卷.商务印书馆,1976.272.
[3]凯德洛夫.论直觉——凯德洛夫答(科学与宗教)杂志问.哲学译丛,1980(6).
[4]贝弗里奇.科学研究的艺术.科学出版社,1979.61.
[1][捷]弗·克罗日克.价值与评价.知识出版社,1988.73.
[2][苏]舍梅涅夫.哲学和技术科学.张斌译.中国人民大学出版社,1989.55.
[3][美]达德利·夏皮尔.理由与求知.上海译文出版社,1990.2.
[4]让·拉特利尔.科学对文化的挑战.北京:商务印书馆,1997.38.
[1]Rothwell R,Reindustrialization and Technology Longman,1985.48.
[1]普里戈金、斯唐热.从混沌到有序——人与自然的新对话.曾庆宏等译.上海译文出版社,1987.26.
[1]玻尔.原子论和自然的描述,69-70.
[2]褚毅平、梁俐.从模糊理论看科学主义和人本主义的认识论.南京师大学报,1998(2).3-8.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第3卷.人民出版社,1995.361.
[2]同上,362.
[1]邹珊刚.技术与技术哲学.北京:知识出版社,1987.1.
[2][法]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.北京,商务印书馆,2000.16.
[3]http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v4_n3html/RAPP.html.
[4]柏拉图.柏拉图全集(第1卷).王晓朝译.人民出版社,2002.443.
[1]北京大学外国哲学史教研室编译.十八世纪法国哲学.商务印书馆,1963.497.
[1]鲁道夫.工业化史.18.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷.人民出版社,1995.256.
[3]内森等.巨人箴言录:爱因斯坦论和平(上).李醒民译.湖南出版社,1992.384.
[4][法]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.董茂永译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.132.
[1]参见:2001年人类发展报告:让新技术为人类发展服务.联合国开发计划署组织翻译.中国财政经济出版社,2001.27.
[1]布鲁诺·雅可米.技术史.北京:北京大学出版社,2000.248.
[1]马克思.1844年经济学-哲学手稿.北京:人民出版社,1979.80.
[2]马克思.资本论第1卷.北京:人民出版社,1956.448.
[1]乔瑞金.技术哲学教程.北京:科学出版社,2006.16.
[2]晚期海德格尔的三天讨论班纪要[J].哲学译丛,2001(3).
[3][德]黑格尔.小逻辑[M].贺麟译.北京:商务印书馆,1980.68.
[1][德]尼采.人性的,太人性的[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.16.
[2]马克思恩格思选集[M]第一卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.1.
[3]同上,59.
[1]马克思恩格思选集[M]第一卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.79-80.
[2]参见李秀林、王于等编.辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义原理[M].北京:中国人民出版社,2004.65.
[1]卡普.技术哲学纲要[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1999.6.
[1]张华夏、张志林.技术解释研究.科学出版社,2005.62.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集[M]第一卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.76.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第一卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.80.
[2]马克思.1844年经济哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.80.
[1]亚里士多德.尼各马科伦理学[M].苗力田译.北京:中国人民人学出版社.1.
[2]同上,2.
[3]亚里士多德.形而上学[M].北京:商务出版社.34.
[1]康德.实践理性批判.韩水法译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.25.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第19卷.人民出版社,1963.405.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集 第一卷.人民出版社,1995.73.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第一卷[M].人民出版社,1995.67-68.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第46卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1980.211-212.
[1]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.北京:商务印书馆,2000.24.
[2]李晚莲.整体性技术实践价值观的理论特征及其实践意义[J].自然辩证法研究,2004(12).
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第一卷.人民出版社,1995.69.
[2]同上,71.
[1]Guarmer F,Schaafsma G J.Probiotics.International Journal of Food Microbiology,1998,39:237-238.
[2]麦乔治·邦迪.美国核战略.褚广友等译.世界知识出版社,1991.244.
[1]Don Ihde.Philosophy of Technology:An Introduction[M].New York:Paragon House Publishers,1993.29-31.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第12卷.人民出版社,1962.4.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集 第一卷.人民出版社,1995.114.
[4]同上,115.
[5]马克思恩格斯全集 第42卷.人民出版社,1962.120.
[1]倪梁康.现象学及其效应.上海:三联书店,1994.130.
[2]鹿林.论人的生活世界.哲学研究,2007(9).
[3]埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学.张庆熊译.上海:译文出版社,1988.60.
[1]Carl Mitcham.Thinking Through Techology the Between Engineering And Philosophy.The Univercity Of Chicago Press,Chicago And London,1999.161.
[2]Don lhde.Instrumental Realism.Indiana University Press,Blooming and lnianapolis,1991.35.
[3]路易·沃斯.作为一种生活方式的都市主义.见现代性基本读本,708.
[1]F.拉普.技术哲学导论.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1986.57.
[2]Andrew Feenberg.Transforming Technology.Oxford,2002.49.
[3]同上,78.
[4]马克思恩格斯全集(第23卷).北京:人民出版社,1976.464.
[1]Andrew Feenberg.Alternative Modernity.Berkeley:University of California Press,1995.2.
[2]同上,4.
[3]同上,46.
[4]Don lhde.Instrumental Realism Indiana University Press,Blooming and lnianapolis,1991.76.
[1][德]彼德·科斯洛夫斯基.后现代文化——技术发展的社会文化后果.北京:中央编译出版社,1999.3-5.
[2]汪民安.身体、空间与后现代性.南京:江苏人民出版社,2006.188.
[3]Albert Borgmann.Technology and Character of Contemporary Life:A Philosophy Inquiry.Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press,1984.248.
[1]Lewis Munford.Technics and Civilizatiln,Harcourt,Brace and Company,INC,1934.4.
[2]Lewis Munford.Man as Interpreter.8-9.
[1]默顿.十七世纪英国的科学、技术与社会.四川人民出版社,1986.79.
[2]文化书院学报 第14期 第三版.
[3]梁漱溟.东西文化及其哲学.北京:商务印书馆,2006.63.
[4]Lewis Munford.Technics and Civilization,Harcourt,Brace and Company,INC,1934.14.
[1]恩格斯.自然辩证法 导言.于光远等译编.人民出版社,1984.
[2][英]丹皮尔.科学史.广西师范大学出版社,2001.151.
[1]中国社会科学院哲学研究所自然辩证法研究室.国外自然科学哲学问题.中国社会科学出版社,1991.192-194.
[2]转引自高亮华.人文主义视野中的技术[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1996.14-15.
[1]霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.环境伦理学.杨永进译.中国社会科学出版社,2000.7.
[2]巴萨拉.技术发展简史.上海:复旦大学出版社,2000.43.
[3]转引自陈筠泉、殷登祥.科技革命与当代社会.北京:人民出版社,2001.206.
[1]北京大学外国哲学史教研室编译.十六一十八世纪西欧各国哲学.商务印书馆,1963.63-64.
[2]伍方斐.现代性:跨世纪中国文学展望的一个文化视角[J].文艺研究,1998(1).
[3]卢梭.论科学和艺术,商务印书馆,1963.8、19.
[1]摘自泰晤士报.1927年9月5日.15.
[2]凯文·德拉图尔、西蒙娜·德拉图尔.和平之道即进化之道[J].孔子研究,2006(1).
[1]埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学.张庆熊译.上海:译文出版杜,1988.71.
[2]E·A·Burtt.The Metaphysical Foundation of modern science.New York:1925.236.
[1]让·鲍德里亚.完美的罪行.北京:商务出版社,2000.28.
[2]弗洛姆.为自己的人.上海:三联书店,1988.25.
[3][荷兰]E·舒尔曼.科技文明与人类未来——在哲学深层的挑战.李小兵等译.北京:东方出版杜,1995.70.
[1]Erich Fromm.The Revolution of Hope:Toward A Humanized Technology.New York:Harpe and Row publishers,1968.38.
[2]霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.哲学走向荒野.刘耳等译.长春:吉林大学出版杜,2000.32.
[3]Albert Borgmann.Technology and Character of Contemporary Life;A Philosophy Inquiry.Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press,1984.156.
[1]Mark Poster(eds.).Jean Baudrillard Selected Writings,Stanford.University Press,1988.31.
[2]同上,33.
[3]同上,45.
[4]同上,8.
[5]Jean Baudrillard.Simulation And Simulacra.The University of Michigan Press,1994.79.
[1]Douglas Kellner.Jean Baudrillard From Marxism to Postmodernism and Beyond.Stanford University Press,1989.10.
[2]Jean Baudrillard.The Consumer Society,Tr.George Ritzer.London.1998.56.
[3]同上.86.
[4]同上.51.
[5]冈特绍伊博尔德.海德格尔分析新时代的技术.宋祖良译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993.55.
[1]Carl Mitcham and Robert Mackey,Philosophy and Technology,New York:The Free Press,1983.5.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集(第42卷).北京:人民出版社,1979.128.
[1][法]贝尔纳·斯蒂格勒.技术与时间:爱比米修斯的过失.译林出版社,2000.37.
1、马克思、恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(1、2、3、4).中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1995.
2、马克思.资本论(1、2、3).中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1998.
3、马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,2000.
4、马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.北京:人民出版社,1978.
5、[英]戴维·麦克莱伦.卡尔·马克思传(第3版).王珍译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
6、卡普.技术哲学纲要.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1999.
7、[法]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.董茂永译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.
8、F.拉普.技术哲学导论.刘武等译.沈阳:辽宁科学出版社,1987.
9、C.米切姆.技术哲学概论.殷登祥等译.天津:科学技术出版社,1999.
10、[德]哈贝马斯.作为“意识形态”的技术与科学.李黎、郭官义译.上海:学林出版社,1999.
11、[奥]维特根斯坦.哲学研究.李步楼译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
12、[奥]维特根斯坦.逻辑哲学论.贺绍甲译.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
13、霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.哲学走向荒野.刘耳等译.长春:吉林大学出版社,2000.
14、霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.环境伦理学.杨通进译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
15、海德格尔.艺术作品的本源.海德格尔选集(上卷).孙周兴译.上海:三联书店,1996.
16、海德格尔.世界图象的时代.海德格尔选集(下卷).孙周兴译.上海:三联书店,1996.
17、海德格尔.林中路.上海:译文出版社,2004.
18、海德格尔.存在与时间.北京:三联书店,2000.
19、卡尔·雅斯贝斯.卡尔·雅斯贝斯文集.朱更生译.西宁:青海人民出版 社,2003.
20、埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学.张庆熊译.上海:译文出版社,1988.
21、安德鲁·芬伯格.中国现代化之体现.Http://fiance.sina.com.cn.
22、安德鲁·芬伯格.可选择的现代性.陆俊等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003.
23、马尔库塞.理性与革命.程志民等译.重庆:重庆出版社,1993.
24、马尔库塞.爱欲与文明.黄勇、薛民译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
25、马尔库塞.单向度的人.刘继译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989.
26、布鲁诺·雅可米.技术史.北京:北京大学出版社,2000.
27、马克第亚尼.非物质社会——后工业世界的设计、文化与技术.滕守尧译.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.
28、[荷兰]E·舒尔曼.科技文明与人类未来——在哲学深层的挑战.李小兵等译.北京:东方出版社,1995.
29、[美]L.R.布郎.建设一个持续发展的社会.祝友三译.北京:科学技术文献出版社,1984.
30、[美]乔治·巴萨拉.技术发展简史.周光发译.复旦大学出版社.2000.
31、[法]让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔.后现代状态.车槿山译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997.
32、[德]彼得·科斯洛夫斯基.后现代文化.毛怡红译.北京:中央编译出版社,1999.
33、彼得多默.1945年以来的设计.梁梅译.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.
34、[法]让·鲍德里亚.消费社会.南京:南京大学出版社,2001.
35、冈特·绍伊博尔德.海德格尔分析新时代的技术.中国社会科学出版社,1998.
36、马斯洛等.人的潜能与价值.北京:华夏出版社,1987.
37、弗洛姆.为自己的人.上海:三联书店,1988.
38、[法]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.董茂永译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.
39、柏拉图.柏拉图全集(第1卷).王晓朝译.人民出版社,2002.
40、[德]彼德·科斯洛夫斯基.后现代文化——技术发展的社会文化后果.北京:中央编译出版社,1999.
41、让·鲍德里亚.完美的罪行.北京:商务出版社,2000.
42、[美]塞缪尔·亨廷顿.文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建.周琪、刘绯等译.北京:新华出版社,2002.
43、杜威.哲学的改造.北京:商务印书馆,2002.
44、杜威.确定性的寻求.上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
45、马尔库塞.现代文明与人的困境.李小兵译.上海:三联书店,1989.
46、孙周兴选编.海德格尔选集.上海:三联出版社.1996.
47、冈特·绍伊博尔德.海德格尔分析新时代的技术.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.
48、[法]F.贝尔.技术帝国.上海:三联书店,1999.
49、[英]贝尔纳.科学的社会功能.商务印书馆,1986.
50、培根.新工具.商务印书馆,1936.
51、内森等.巨人箴言录:爱因斯坦论和平(上).李醒民译.湖南出版社,1992.
52、波塞尔.论科学与工程的结构性差异.刘则渊、王续琨主编:工程·技术·哲学.大连理工大学出版社,2002.
53、陈昌曙.技术哲学引论.科学出版社,1999.
54、李伯聪.工程哲学引论——我造物故我在.大象出版社,2002.
55、郭贵春、乔瑞金、陈凡.多维视野中的技术.东北大学出版社,2003.
56、张华夏、张志林.技术解释研究.科学出版社,2005.
57、赵建军.追问技术悲观主义.东北大学出版社,2001.
58、刘大椿.科学技术哲学导论.中国人民大学出版社,1999.
59、陈筠泉、殷登祥.科技革命与社会发展.人民出版社,2001.
60、乔瑞金.马克思思想研究的新话语.太原:书海出版社,2005.
61、乔瑞金.马克思技术哲学纲要.北京:人民出版社,2002.
62、乔瑞金.现代整体论.北京:中国经济出版社,1996.
63、乔瑞金.科学进步论.北京:海洋出版社,1992.
64、柳冠中.设计文化论.哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1995.
65、陆俊.马尔库塞.长沙:湖南教育出版社,1999.
66、江天骥.法兰克福学派——批判的社会理论.上海:上海人民出版社,1981.
67、荆雷.设计概论.石家庄:河北美术出版社,1997.
68、杨铄、徐立.人类理性与设计科学.沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1987.
69、朱红文.工业、技术与设计.石家庄:河北美术出版社,1997.
70、柳树滋.通向二十一世纪的绿色道路.沈阳:东北林业大学出版社,1996.
71、倪梁康.现象学的效应.上海:三联书店,1994.
72、徐飞.科学交叉论.安徽教育出版社,1991.
73、苗力田.古希腊哲学.中国人民大学出版社,1989.
74、夏军.非理性世界.上海:三联书店,1998.
75、张康之.总体性与乌托邦.中国人民大学出版社,1998.
76、陈嘉明等.现代性与后现代性.人民出版社,2001.
77、王岳川.后现代主义在中国的反思.黑龙江人民出版社,2002.
78、邹珊刚.技术与技术哲学.北京:知识出版社,1987.
79、俞吾金.从康德到马克思.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.
80、衣俊卿、丁立群、李小娟、王晓东.20世纪的新马克思主义.北京:中央编译出版社,2001.
81、余文烈.分析马克思主义.重庆:重庆出版社,1993.
82、鹿林.论人的生活世界.哲学研究,2007(9).
83、陈凡、朱春艳.技术认识论.国外技术哲学研究的新动向.自然辩证法研究,2003(2).
84、陈凡、朱春艳、赵迎欢、田鹏颖、马会端.技术与设计:“经验转向”背景下的技术哲学研究——第14届国际技术哲学学会(SPT)会议述评.哲学动态,2006(6).
85、赵建军.技术理性的合理性考量.中共中央党校学报,2007(3).
86、夏保华.技术哲学研究的定位及关键.科学技术与辩证法,2004(4).
87、郭贵春、张培富.科学技术哲学研究未来发展展望.自然辩证法研究,2002(5).
88、李晚莲.整体性技术实践价值观的理论特征及其实践意义.自然辩证法研究,2004(12).
89、李三虎.技术哲学的空间叙事.哲学动态,2006(6).
90、林德宏.技术生存的内在矛盾.自然辩证法研究,2004(2).
91、朱红文.“设计哲学”的可能性和意义.哲学研究,2000(3).
92、于光远.自然辩证法百科全书.中国大百科全书出版社,1994.
93、辞源(第4册).商务印书馆,1999.
94、汉语大词典(第11卷). 汉语大词典出版社, 1993
1、 Gavin Kitching. Karl Marx and the Philosophy of Praxis. Routledge London and New York, 1998.
2、 Gavin Kitching. Marxism and Science: Analysis of Obsession. The Pennsylvania State University Press University Park. Pennsylvania, 1994.
3、 Gavin Kitching, Nigel Pleasants. Marx and Wittgenstein: knowledge, morality and politics.Routledge London and New York,2002.
4、 Rengasamy Kabilan.From Traditional Society to Post-Industrial Society,New Delh:commonwealth Publishers,1993.
5、 Robin Theobald.Understanding Industrial Society,New York:St.Martin Press, 1994.
6、 Marcus Roberts. Analytical Marxism-A Critique. Verso, 1996.
7、 Heidegger.Overcoming Metaphysics, tran. By Joan Stambaugh, in The Heidegger Controversy, a cirtical reader, ed. By Richard Wollin, The MIT Press, 1993.
8、 Heidegger.The Question Concerning Technology, in The Question Concerning Technology and other Essays, trans.& ed. By William Lovitt, Harper & Row, 1977.
9、 Heidegger.What are Poets For? in Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. By Albert Hofstadter, Harper & Row, 1971.
10、 Perry Anderson. Arguments within English Marxism. Verso, 1974.
11、 G. A. Cohen. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence. Oxford, 1978.
12、 Susan S Hanna,etc.Rights to Nature,Washington:Island Press,1996.
13、 Carl Mitcham.Thinking Through Technology:The Path between Engineering and Philosophy,Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1994,159.
14、 Carl Mitcham.The Importance of Phiosophy to Engineering .Tecnos, 1998.
15、 J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology,New York: Cambridge Press,2000.
16、 Vinceti.The Experimental Assessment of Engineering Theory as a Tool for Design,Techne,2001.
17、 Louis Bucciarelli.Designing Engineers,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press, 1994.
18、 Dictionary of the English language .Boston: American.Heritageo,2000.
19、 Thomas H.Design, London:Laurence King Publishing, 1998.
20、 H.Achterhuis.American Philosophy of Technology,Indiana University Press,2001.
21、 E.A.Burtt.The Metaphysical Foundation of modern science.New York. 1925.
22、 Carl Mitcham.Thinking through technology: the path between engineering andphilosophy.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.
23、 Bunge M. Treatise on Basis Philosophy. Vol.7. Philosophy of Science and Technology. Part II. D. Reidel Publishing Company. 1985.
24、 Richards S.Philosophy and Sociology of Science.Basil Blackwell.1985.
25、 Walter G.Engineering Knowledge,Type of Design,and Level of Hierarchy.In:Kroes P,Bakker M.Technological Development and Science in The Industrial Age.Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
26、 Simon.H.A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.
27、 K.Popper.The Logical Scientific Discovery, New York: Basic Books, 1959.
28、 Rothwell R.Reindustrialization and Technology Longman,1985.
29、 Erich Fromm.The Revolution of Hope: Toward A Humanized Technology. New York: Harpe and Row publishers. 1968.
30、 Simon H A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.
31、 Louis Bucciarelli.Designing Engineers,Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1994.
32、 Andrew Feenberg. Alternative Modernity,Berkeley:University of California Press, 1995.
33、 Rothwell R.Reindustrialization and Technology Longman,1985.
34、 M. Polanyi.Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
35、 W.G. Vincenti.What Engineers Know and How They Know it: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.
36、 Arnold Pacey.Meaning in Technology,Cambridge,MA:MIT press, 1999.
37、 E.Schuurman. Beyond the empirical turn:responsible technology [EB/OL] . http:// www.home.planet.nl/～srw/sch,2004(2).
38、 Love T. Constructing a coherent cross—disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: Some philosophical issues .Design Studies,2002(3)
39、 Kroes.P A.Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts [J].Design Studies,2002(3).
[1]马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿.北京:人民出版社,2000.88.
[2]Simon H A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.132-133.
[3]Carl Mitcham,The Importance of Phiosophy to Engineering[J].Tecnos,1998.17.
[1]J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology[M],New York:Cambridge Press,2000.12.
[2]Vinceti.The Experimental Assessment of Engineering Theory as a Tool for Design[J],Techne,2001.5.
[3]Louis Bucciarelli:Designing Engineers[M],Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1994.18-21.
[1]转引自卡尔·米切姆.技术哲学概论.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1999.34.
[1]F.拉普.技术哲学导论.刘武等译.沈阳:辽宁科学出版社,1987.11-12.
[2]C.米切姆.技术哲学概论.殷登祥等译.天津:科学技术出版社,1999.8-17.
[3][法]F.贝尔.技术帝国.上海:三联书店,1999.12.
[1][法]马克·第亚尼.非物质社会.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.87.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷.人民出版社,1995.57.
[3]H.Achterhuis,American Philosophy of Technology,Indiana University Press.2001.56.
[4]马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿.人民出版社,2000.88.
[1]郭贵春、乔瑞金、陈凡.多维视野中的技术.东北大学出版社,2003.25-33.
[2]倪梁康.现象学的效应.三联书店,1994.178.
[3]Carl Mitcham,Thinking Through Technology:The Path between Engineering and Philosophy,Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1994.159.
[1]Simon H A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.132-133.
[2]Carl Mitcham,The Importance of Phiosophy to Engineering[J].Tecnos,1998.17.
[3]J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology[M],New York:Cambridge Press,2000.12.
[4]Vinceti.The Experimental Assessment of Engineering Theory as a Tool for Design[J],Techne,2001.5.
[5]Louis Bucciarelli:Designing Engineers[M],Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1994.18-21.
[1]张华夏、张志林.技术解释研究.科学出版社,2005.29.
[2]辞源(第4册)[M].商务印书馆,1999.2303.2298.
[3]汉语大词典(第11卷)[M].汉语大词典出版社,1993.84.
[4]Thomas H.Design[M].L ondon:Laurence King Publishing.1998.10.
[5]参见朱红文.“设计哲学”的可能性和意义[J].哲学研究:2000(3).
[6]Love,T,Constructing a coherent cross--disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs:Some philosophical issues[J].Design Studies,2002(3).351.
[1][法]马克·第亚尼.非物质社会.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.87.
[2]司马贺.人工科学[M].武夷山译.上海科技教育出版社,2004.103.
[3]转引自张华夏译.波士顿哲学丛书(第236卷).克罗斯(P.Kroes)巴克(M.Bakker)主编《工业时代的技术与科学的发展》.1992.34.
[4]Bunge M.Treatise on Basis Philosophy.Vol.7.Philosophy of Science and Technology.Part Ⅱ.D.Reidel Publishing Company.1985.231.
[5]Richards S.Philosophy and Sociology of Science.Basil Blackwell.1985.126.
[1]Richards S.Philosophy and Sociology of Science.Basil Blackwell.1985.126.
[2]Walter G.Engineering Knowledge,Type of Design,and Level of Hierarchy.In:Kroes P,Bakker M.Technological Development and Science in The Industrial Age.Kluwer Academic Publishers,1992.20-21.
[3]Simon.H.A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.132-133.
[1]K.Popper:The Logical Scientific Discovery.New York:Basic Books,1959.31.
[2]马克思.资本论(第1卷).北京:人民出版社,1975.378.
[3]郭贵春、乔瑞金、陈凡.多维视野中的技术.东北大学出版社,2003.444-445.
[1]Kroes,TechnicalFunctions as Dispositions:a Critical Assessment,Teche5:3Spring2001.1-16.
[2]同上.
[3]同上.
[4]Rothwell R,Reindustrialization and Technology Longman,1985.48.
[1]M.Polanyi.Personal Knowledge.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1962.328.
[2]J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology[M],New York:Cambridge Press,2000.42.
[1]W.G.Vincenti.What Engineers Knowand How They Know it:Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History.Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press,1990.45.
[2]同上,58.
[3]冯俊.后现代主义哲学讲演录.北京:商务印书馆,2003.88.
[1][俄]弗罗洛夫.人的前景.王思斌等译.中国社会科学出版社,1989.85.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集第26卷.人民出版社,1974.281.
[3]林德宏.技术生存的内在矛盾.自然辩证法研究,2004(2).
[4]远航.技术的价值负荷过程.自然辩证法研究,2003(12).
[1]陈凡、朱春艳、赵迎欢、田鹏颖、马会端.技术与设计:“经验转向”背景下的技术哲学研究——第14届国际技术哲学学会(SPT)会议述评.哲学动态,2006(6).
[2]转引自张华夏译.波士顿哲学丛书(第236卷).克罗斯(P.Kroes)、巴克(M.Bakker)主编《工业时代的技术与科学的发展》,1992.36.
[1]C.米切姆.技术哲学概论.般登样等译.天津:科学技术出版社,1999.7-8.
[2]F.拉普.技术科学的思维结构.刘武等译.吉林人民出版社,1988.92.
[1][英]迈克·费瑟斯通.消费文化与后现代主义.刘精明译.译林出版社,2000.78.
[2]W.拉莫特.技术的文化塑造与技术多样性的政治学.世界哲学,2005(4).
[3]Don Ihde,Philosophy of Technology,1975-1995[J].Techne,Volumel,Numbers1-2,Fall1995.48.
[1]Paul Durbin,Adances in Philosophy of Technology?Comparative Perspectives,Techne,Society for Philosophy & Technology,Volume4,Number2,Fall1998.62.
[2]Carl Mitcham,The Importance of Phiosophy to Engineering[J].Tecnos,1998.45.
[3]C.米切姆.技术哲学概论.殷登祥等译.天津:科学技术出版社,1999.7-8.
[4]F·拉普.技术哲学导论.刘武等译.辽宁科学技术出版社,1987.19.
[5]J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology[M],New York:Cambridge Press,2000.33.
[1]Andrew Feenberg,From Essentialism to Constructivism:Philosophy of Technology at the crossroads[J],www-rohan.edu/faculty/feenberg/talk4./html.
[2]Andrew Feenberg,Alternative Modernity,Berkeley:University of California Press.1995.44,
[3]乔瑞金.马克思技术哲学纲要.人民出版社,2002.7.
[1]Andrew Feenberg,Critical Theory of Technology,New York:Oxford University Press,1991.201.
[2]Andrew Feenberg,Alternative Modernity,Berkeley:University of California Press,1995.67.
[1]中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典(双英双语)[M].外语教学与研究出版社,2002.664、2507.
[2]简明不列颠百科全书(第三卷).中国大百科全书出版社.1985.
[1]于光远主编.自然辩证法百科全书.中国大百科全书出版社,1994.
[2]波塞尔.论科学与工程的结构性差异.刘则渊、王续琨主编.工程·技术·哲学.大连理工大学出版社,2002.207.
[3]Herbert Hoover.The Memories of Herbert Hoover:Years of Adventure,1874-1920(MacMillan,New York,1951).132-133.
[1]海德格尔.海德格尔选集.上海:三联书店,1996.925.
[2]P.Aarne Vesilind,Alastair S.Gunn.工程、伦理与环境.吴晓东、翁端译.北京:清华大学出版社,2003.40.
[1][美]安德鲁·芬伯格.技术批判理论.韩连庆,曹观法译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.4.
[2]卡尔·雅斯贝斯.卡尔·雅斯贝斯文集[C].朱更生译.西宁:青海人民出版社,2003.265.
[1]阿马蒂亚·森.伦理学与经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000.10-11.
[2]李伯聪.自然辩证法通讯[J],2006(2).47.
[3]摘自S.Florman,The Existential Pleasure of Engineering(St.Martin's Press,Inc.New York,1976).
[1]转引自马歇尔·麦克卢汉.理解媒介——论人的延伸.商务印书馆,2000.37.
[1]马克斯·韦伯.基督教伦理[A].转引自哈贝马斯.交往行动理论[M].洪佩郁等译.重庆:重庆出版社,1994.211.
[1][德]韦伯.新教伦理与资本主义精神[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1987.142.
[2]卡尔·雅斯贝斯.卡尔·雅斯贝斯文集[C].朱更生译.西宁:青海人民出版社,2003.159.
[3]郭冲辰、樊春华、陈凡.哲学动态,2002(10).42.
[1][美]安德鲁·芬伯格.技术批判理论[M].韩连庆,曹观法译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.3.
[2]中国大百科全书·哲学,1987.711.
[3]大美百科全书(第14卷)[Z].北京:外文出版社,1994.286.
[1]西方哲学原著选读(上卷),54、55.
[2]威尔·杜兰.世界文明史·希腊的生活[M].北京:东方出版社,1998.260.
[1]W.C.丹皮尔.科学史及其与哲学和宗教的关系.李珩译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2001.123.
[1]W.C.丹皮尔.科学史及其与哲学和宗教的关系.李珩译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2001.125-128.
[2]W.C.丹皮尔.科学简史.曾令先译.北京:人民日报出版社,2007.258.
[1]参见周辅成.西方伦理学名著选辑(上卷).商务印书馆,1987.94.
[2]转引自威尔·杜兰.世界文明史·希腊的生活[M].北京:东方出版社,1998、269.
[3]参见杜维明.儒家人文精神与宗教研究.载《理性主义及其限制》.三联书店,2003.231.
[4]柏拉图.理想国.郭斌和、张竹明译.商务印书馆,1996.375.
[1]尼采.苏鲁支语录.徐梵澄译.商务印书馆,1997.27.
[1]海德格尔.存在与时间[M].北京:三联书店,1998.228.
[2]同上,136.
[3]L.Tondl.Technology and Technological Science.in Rapp F.(ed.).Contributions to a Philosophy of Technology.Boston:D.Reidel Publishing Company,1974.4.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集,第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.16.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集,第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.73.
[3]陈凡、朱春艳、李权时.试论欧美技术哲学的特点及经验转向.自然辩证法通讯,2004(5).27.
[1]Jacques Ellul,The Technological Society,from Albert H.Teich,Technology and Man's Future,S Martin's Press,1981.43.
[2]《科学与哲学》参考资料 第1辑,1983.53.
[3]陈凡、朱春艳、李权时.试论欧美技术哲学的特点及经验转向.自然辩证法通讯,2004(5).26.
[1]H.Achterhuis,ed.American Philosophy of Technology,Indiana University Press,2001.
[2]Joseph C Pitt.New Directions in the Philosophy of Technology[A].Philosophy and Technology(Vol.11)[C].Dordrecht:Kluwei Academic Publishers,1995.ⅶ.
[3]Hans Achterhuis.American Philosophy of Technology:the Empirical Turn[M].Indianapolis:Indiana University Press,2001.ⅹⅹⅰ-ⅹⅸ.
[1]埃吕尔.技术的社会[J].科学与哲学,1983(1).56-71.
[2]Hans Achterhuis.American Philosophy of Technology:the Empirical Turn[M].Indianapolis:Indiana University Press,2001.ⅹⅹⅰ-ⅹⅸ.
[3]培根.新工具.十六——十八世纪西欧各国哲学,44.
[1]培根.新工具.商务印书馆,1936.22、236.
[2]陈凡、曹继东.现象学视野中的技术——伊代技术现象学评析[J].自然辩证法研究,2004(5).57-61.
[1]爱因斯坦文集第三卷.商务印书馆,1979.73.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第23卷,202.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第4卷.人民出版社,1995.732.
[2][法]吕特·舍普.技术帝国.三联书店,1999.14.
[1][美]罗伯特·金·默顿.十七世纪英国的科学、技术与社会.四川人民出版社,1986.234.
[2][美]罗伯特·金·默顿.十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会.商务印书馆,2000.207.
[1]列维-布留尔.原始思维.商务印书馆,1981.8.
[2]同上,2.
[1]丹皮尔.科学史——及其与哲学和宗教的关系.商务印书馆,1975,39.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集 第1卷.人民出版社,32.
[1][德]F·拉普.技术哲学导论.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1986.103.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第42卷.97.
[3]恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:人民出版社,1984.296.
[4]恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:人民出版社,1984.296-267.
[1]海德格尔.存在与时间[M].北京:三联书店,1987.273.
[2]李三虎.技艺与价值:分裂还是关联?——柏拉图的整体论解答及其当下意义.现代哲学,2005(2).114.
[1]亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学.廖申白译注.北京商务印书馆,2003.171.
[2]同上.
[1]墨翟.墨子[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.12.
[1]墨翟.墨子[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.12.
[2]同上
[3]韩非.韩非子[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.104.
[4]吴树平点校.周礼冬官考工记[M].北京:燕山出版社,1991.500.
[1]朱哲.先秦艺术设计思想简论.湖北社会科学,2005(4).113-114.
[2]马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.111.
[1]刘大椿.科学技术哲学导论.中国人民大学出版社,1999.226.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第39卷.198-199.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第4卷.292.
[1][英]佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.上海人民出版社,2001.198.
[2]杜普莱西斯.早期欧洲现代资本主义的形成过程.辽宁教育出版社,2001.280.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第23卷.386.
[2]资本论 第一卷.373-376.
[1]资本论 第一卷.358.
[2]同上,373.
[3]同上,376.
[4]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.572.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.518.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.564.
[3]马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.55.
[1]马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.55.
[2]资本论 第一卷.408.
[3]资本论 第一卷.412.
[4][美]罗伯特·金·默顿.十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会.商务印书馆,2000.59.
[1]资本论 第一卷.410-411.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.536.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第23卷.人民出版社,1972.463.
[2]马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.207.
[3][美]乔治·巴萨拉.技术发展简史.周光发译.复旦大学出版社,2000.122.
[4]马克思恩格斯全集 第23卷.386.
[1]陈昌曙.技术哲学引论.科学出版社,1999.216-217.
[1]参阅陈筠泉、殷登祥.科技革命与社会发展.人民出版社,2001.
[1]参阅吴维民.大汇流——论社会科学和自然科学的结合.四川大学出版社,1992.第一章至第四章.
[2]徐飞.科学交叉论.安徽教育出版社,1991.2.
[1]胡泳.三联生活周刊.2001(20).
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第19卷.372.
[2]机器、自然力和科学的应用.人民出版社,1978.67.
[1]海德格尔.艺术作品的本源.海德格尔选集(上卷).孙周兴译.上海三联书店,1996.305.
[1]苗力田.古希腊哲学.中国人民大学出版社,1989.312.
[2]同上,339.
[3]同上,265.
[4]同上,323.
[1]海德格尔.世界图象的时代.海德格尔选集(下卷).孙周兴译.上海三联书店,1996.902.
[1]海德格尔.世界图象的时代.海德格尔选集(下卷).孙周兴译.上海三联书店,1996.902.
[2]同上,909.
[3]海德格尔.尼采(下卷).孙周兴译.商务印书馆,2002.675.
[1]海德格尔.尼采(下卷).孙周兴译.商务印书馆,2002.676.
[2]同上,671.
[3]海德格尔.尼采(下卷).孙周兴译.商务印书馆,2002.671.
[1]海德格尔.尼采(下卷).孙周兴译.商务印书馆,2002.672.
[2]同上,673.
[3]同上,885.
[1][英]贝尔纳.科学的社会功能.商务印书馆,1986.63.
[2][美]伯纳德·巴伯.科学与社会秩序.三联书店,1991.6.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第三卷.人民出版社,1972.574.
[2]Horkheimet M.Eelipse of Reason[M].New York:The Seabury Press,1974.3-5.
[1]赫伯特·马尔库塞.《单向度的人——发达工业社会意识形态研究》导言.上海译文出版社,1989.12-13.
[2]赵建军.追问技术悲观主义.东北大学出版社,2001.40.
[1]卡西尔.人论.上海译文出版社,1985.119.
[2]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录 第1卷.商务印书馆,1959.81.
[1]卡西尔.人论.上海译文出版社,1985.118.
[2]卡西尔.语言与神话.上海三联书店,1988.66.
[3]夏军.非理性世界.上海三联书店,1998.60.
[1]叔本华.作为意志和表象的世界.商务印书馆,1982.427.
[1]柏格森.形而上学导言.商务印书馆,1963.3-4.
[1]萨特.存在与虚无.三联书店,198.56.
[2]萨特.存在主义是一种人道主义.转引自《存在主义哲学》.商务印书馆,1983.337.
[1]张康之.总体性与乌托邦.中国人民大学出版社,1998.28.
[1]参见陈嘉明等.现代性与后现代性.人民出版社,2001.10-11.
[2]参见王岳川.后现代主义在中国的反思.黑龙江人民出版社,2002.277-280.
[1]恩格斯.自然辩证法.人民出版社,1984.35.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第4卷.人民出版社,1961.241.
[3]恩格斯.自然辩证法.人民出版社,1984.35.
[1]恩格斯.自然辩证法.人民教育出版社,1984.8.26.
[2]古希腊罗马哲学.商务印书馆,1961.27.
[3]海森堡.严密自然科学近年来的变化.上海译文出版社,1978.106.
[4]亚里士多德.形而上学.商务印书馆,1982.266.
[1]康德.未来形而上学导论.商务印书馆,1978.111.
[1]黑格尔.大逻辑(下卷).商务印书馆,1976.160.
[2]黑格尔.自然哲学.商务印书馆,1980.161.
[1]黑格尔.自然哲学.商务印书馆,1980.32.
[2]徐崇温.西方马克思主义论丛.重庆出版社,1989.3.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集 第3卷.人民出版社,1995.777.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集,中文1版,第23卷.87、202.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集 第4卷.人民出版社,1972.
[3]F·拉普.技术哲学导论.刘武等译.辽宁科学技术出版社,1986.182.
[4]同上,2-3.
[1]马克思.资本论第一卷第二版跋,马克思恩格斯选集第2卷.218.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第一卷.453.
[3]乔瑞金.马克思技术哲学纲要.北京:人民出版社,2002.207-211.
[1]参见[奥]贝塔朗菲.一般系统论.社会科学文献出版社,1987.8-44.
[1]转引自科学方法论文集.湖北人民出版社,1981.24.
[2][奥]贝塔朗菲.一般系统论.自然科学哲学问题丛刊,1979(3).
[1]参见[苏]叶·茹科夫.科学知识结构中的一般系统论的控制论.世界科学,1981(4).
[1]转引自成思危确定推进我国的软科学事业[J].中国软科学,1998(7).6.
[1]列宁全集 第33卷.411.
[2]Bunge M.Treatise on Basis Philosophy.Vol.7.Philosophy of Science and Technology.Part Ⅱ.D.Reidel Publishing Company.1985.231.
[3]J.D.Berna1.Science in History.London:C.A.Watts and Co.Ltd,1954.5-6.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集 第47卷.人民出版社,1979.570.
[2]Jacques Ellul,The Technological Order.Philosophy and Technology,Edited with an Introduction by Carl Mitcham and Robert Mackey,The Free Press,1983.86.
[3][苏]舍梅涅夫.哲学和技术科学.张斌译.中国人民大学出版社,1989.30.
[1]Andrew Feenberg.Critical Theory of Technology.New York:Oxford University Press,1991.201.
[2]阿诺德·佩斯.技术:实践与文化.自然科学哲学问题.1984(1).56.
[3]约翰·杜威.人的问题[M].傅统先译.上海:上海人民出版社.1965.131.
[4][苏]舍梅涅夫.哲学和技术科学.张斌译.中国人民大学出版社,1989.30.
[5]同上,69.
[1][英]罗素.宗教与科学.商务印书馆,1982.1.
[2][美]D.贝尔.后工业社会的来临.商务印书馆,1986.404.
[3]Arie Rip.Science and Technology as DancinaPartners.In:Kroes P,Bakker M.Technological Development and Science in The Industrial Age.Kluwer Academic Publishers,1992.236.
[4]Richards S.Philosophy and Sociology of Science.Basil Blackwell.1985.126.
[1]K.Popper:The Logical Scientific Discovery,New York:Basic Books,1959.31.
[2]L·劳丹.进步及其问题[M].刘新民译.北京:华夏出版社,1990.3.
[3]约翰·杜威.自由与文化[M].傅统先译.北京:商务印书馆,1964.105.
[4]Simon.H.A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.132-133.
[1]钱学森.在全国思维科学讨论会上的发言.思维科学探索.山西人民出版社,1985.14-15.
[2]爱因斯坦文集 第1卷.商务印书馆,1976.272.
[3]凯德洛夫.论直觉——凯德洛夫答(科学与宗教)杂志问.哲学译丛,1980(6).
[4]贝弗里奇.科学研究的艺术.科学出版社,1979.61.
[1][捷]弗·克罗日克.价值与评价.知识出版社,1988.73.
[2][苏]舍梅涅夫.哲学和技术科学.张斌译.中国人民大学出版社,1989.55.
[3][美]达德利·夏皮尔.理由与求知.上海译文出版社,1990.2.
[4]让·拉特利尔.科学对文化的挑战.北京:商务印书馆,1997.38.
[1]Rothwell R,Reindustrialization and Technology Longman,1985.48.
[1]普里戈金、斯唐热.从混沌到有序——人与自然的新对话.曾庆宏等译.上海译文出版社,1987.26.
[1]玻尔.原子论和自然的描述,69-70.
[2]褚毅平、梁俐.从模糊理论看科学主义和人本主义的认识论.南京师大学报,1998(2).3-8.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第3卷.人民出版社,1995.361.
[2]同上,362.
[1]邹珊刚.技术与技术哲学.北京:知识出版社,1987.1.
[2][法]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.北京,商务印书馆,2000.16.
[3]http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v4_n3html/RAPP.html.
[4]柏拉图.柏拉图全集(第1卷).王晓朝译.人民出版社,2002.443.
[1]北京大学外国哲学史教研室编译.十八世纪法国哲学.商务印书馆,1963.497.
[1]鲁道夫.工业化史.18.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷.人民出版社,1995.256.
[3]内森等.巨人箴言录:爱因斯坦论和平(上).李醒民译.湖南出版社,1992.384.
[4][法]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.董茂永译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.132.
[1]参见:2001年人类发展报告:让新技术为人类发展服务.联合国开发计划署组织翻译.中国财政经济出版社,2001.27.
[1]布鲁诺·雅可米.技术史.北京:北京大学出版社,2000.248.
[1]马克思.1844年经济学-哲学手稿.北京:人民出版社,1979.80.
[2]马克思.资本论第1卷.北京:人民出版社,1956.448.
[1]乔瑞金.技术哲学教程.北京:科学出版社,2006.16.
[2]晚期海德格尔的三天讨论班纪要[J].哲学译丛,2001(3).
[3][德]黑格尔.小逻辑[M].贺麟译.北京:商务印书馆,1980.68.
[1][德]尼采.人性的,太人性的[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.16.
[2]马克思恩格思选集[M]第一卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.1.
[3]同上,59.
[1]马克思恩格思选集[M]第一卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.79-80.
[2]参见李秀林、王于等编.辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义原理[M].北京:中国人民出版社,2004.65.
[1]卡普.技术哲学纲要[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1999.6.
[1]张华夏、张志林.技术解释研究.科学出版社,2005.62.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集[M]第一卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.76.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第一卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.80.
[2]马克思.1844年经济哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.80.
[1]亚里士多德.尼各马科伦理学[M].苗力田译.北京:中国人民人学出版社.1.
[2]同上,2.
[3]亚里士多德.形而上学[M].北京:商务出版社.34.
[1]康德.实践理性批判.韩水法译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.25.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第19卷.人民出版社,1963.405.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集 第一卷.人民出版社,1995.73.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第一卷[M].人民出版社,1995.67-68.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第46卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1980.211-212.
[1]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.北京:商务印书馆,2000.24.
[2]李晚莲.整体性技术实践价值观的理论特征及其实践意义[J].自然辩证法研究,2004(12).
[1]马克思恩格斯选集 第一卷.人民出版社,1995.69.
[2]同上,71.
[1]Guarmer F,Schaafsma G J.Probiotics.International Journal of Food Microbiology,1998,39:237-238.
[2]麦乔治·邦迪.美国核战略.褚广友等译.世界知识出版社,1991.244.
[1]Don Ihde.Philosophy of Technology:An Introduction[M].New York:Paragon House Publishers,1993.29-31.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集 第12卷.人民出版社,1962.4.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集 第一卷.人民出版社,1995.114.
[4]同上,115.
[5]马克思恩格斯全集 第42卷.人民出版社,1962.120.
[1]倪梁康.现象学及其效应.上海:三联书店,1994.130.
[2]鹿林.论人的生活世界.哲学研究,2007(9).
[3]埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学.张庆熊译.上海:译文出版社,1988.60.
[1]Carl Mitcham.Thinking Through Techology the Between Engineering And Philosophy.The Univercity Of Chicago Press,Chicago And London,1999.161.
[2]Don lhde.Instrumental Realism.Indiana University Press,Blooming and lnianapolis,1991.35.
[3]路易·沃斯.作为一种生活方式的都市主义.见现代性基本读本,708.
[1]F.拉普.技术哲学导论.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1986.57.
[2]Andrew Feenberg.Transforming Technology.Oxford,2002.49.
[3]同上,78.
[4]马克思恩格斯全集(第23卷).北京:人民出版社,1976.464.
[1]Andrew Feenberg.Alternative Modernity.Berkeley:University of California Press,1995.2.
[2]同上,4.
[3]同上,46.
[4]Don lhde.Instrumental Realism Indiana University Press,Blooming and lnianapolis,1991.76.
[1][德]彼德·科斯洛夫斯基.后现代文化——技术发展的社会文化后果.北京:中央编译出版社,1999.3-5.
[2]汪民安.身体、空间与后现代性.南京:江苏人民出版社,2006.188.
[3]Albert Borgmann.Technology and Character of Contemporary Life:A Philosophy Inquiry.Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press,1984.248.
[1]Lewis Munford.Technics and Civilizatiln,Harcourt,Brace and Company,INC,1934.4.
[2]Lewis Munford.Man as Interpreter.8-9.
[1]默顿.十七世纪英国的科学、技术与社会.四川人民出版社,1986.79.
[2]文化书院学报 第14期 第三版.
[3]梁漱溟.东西文化及其哲学.北京:商务印书馆,2006.63.
[4]Lewis Munford.Technics and Civilization,Harcourt,Brace and Company,INC,1934.14.
[1]恩格斯.自然辩证法 导言.于光远等译编.人民出版社,1984.
[2][英]丹皮尔.科学史.广西师范大学出版社,2001.151.
[1]中国社会科学院哲学研究所自然辩证法研究室.国外自然科学哲学问题.中国社会科学出版社,1991.192-194.
[2]转引自高亮华.人文主义视野中的技术[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1996.14-15.
[1]霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.环境伦理学.杨永进译.中国社会科学出版社,2000.7.
[2]巴萨拉.技术发展简史.上海:复旦大学出版社,2000.43.
[3]转引自陈筠泉、殷登祥.科技革命与当代社会.北京:人民出版社,2001.206.
[1]北京大学外国哲学史教研室编译.十六一十八世纪西欧各国哲学.商务印书馆,1963.63-64.
[2]伍方斐.现代性:跨世纪中国文学展望的一个文化视角[J].文艺研究,1998(1).
[3]卢梭.论科学和艺术,商务印书馆,1963.8、19.
[1]摘自泰晤士报.1927年9月5日.15.
[2]凯文·德拉图尔、西蒙娜·德拉图尔.和平之道即进化之道[J].孔子研究,2006(1).
[1]埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学.张庆熊译.上海:译文出版杜,1988.71.
[2]E·A·Burtt.The Metaphysical Foundation of modern science.New York:1925.236.
[1]让·鲍德里亚.完美的罪行.北京:商务出版社,2000.28.
[2]弗洛姆.为自己的人.上海:三联书店,1988.25.
[3][荷兰]E·舒尔曼.科技文明与人类未来——在哲学深层的挑战.李小兵等译.北京:东方出版杜,1995.70.
[1]Erich Fromm.The Revolution of Hope:Toward A Humanized Technology.New York:Harpe and Row publishers,1968.38.
[2]霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.哲学走向荒野.刘耳等译.长春:吉林大学出版杜,2000.32.
[3]Albert Borgmann.Technology and Character of Contemporary Life;A Philosophy Inquiry.Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press,1984.156.
[1]Mark Poster(eds.).Jean Baudrillard Selected Writings,Stanford.University Press,1988.31.
[2]同上,33.
[3]同上,45.
[4]同上,8.
[5]Jean Baudrillard.Simulation And Simulacra.The University of Michigan Press,1994.79.
[1]Douglas Kellner.Jean Baudrillard From Marxism to Postmodernism and Beyond.Stanford University Press,1989.10.
[2]Jean Baudrillard.The Consumer Society,Tr.George Ritzer.London.1998.56.
[3]同上.86.
[4]同上.51.
[5]冈特绍伊博尔德.海德格尔分析新时代的技术.宋祖良译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993.55.
[1]Carl Mitcham and Robert Mackey,Philosophy and Technology,New York:The Free Press,1983.5.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集(第42卷).北京:人民出版社,1979.128.
[1][法]贝尔纳·斯蒂格勒.技术与时间:爱比米修斯的过失.译林出版社,2000.37.
1、马克思、恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(1、2、3、4).中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1995.
2、马克思.资本论(1、2、3).中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,1998.
3、马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.北京:人民出版社,2000.
4、马克思.机器、自然力和科学的应用.北京:人民出版社,1978.
5、[英]戴维·麦克莱伦.卡尔·马克思传(第3版).王珍译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
6、卡普.技术哲学纲要.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1999.
7、[法]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.董茂永译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.
8、F.拉普.技术哲学导论.刘武等译.沈阳:辽宁科学出版社,1987.
9、C.米切姆.技术哲学概论.殷登祥等译.天津:科学技术出版社,1999.
10、[德]哈贝马斯.作为“意识形态”的技术与科学.李黎、郭官义译.上海:学林出版社,1999.
11、[奥]维特根斯坦.哲学研究.李步楼译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
12、[奥]维特根斯坦.逻辑哲学论.贺绍甲译.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
13、霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.哲学走向荒野.刘耳等译.长春:吉林大学出版社,2000.
14、霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.环境伦理学.杨通进译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
15、海德格尔.艺术作品的本源.海德格尔选集(上卷).孙周兴译.上海:三联书店,1996.
16、海德格尔.世界图象的时代.海德格尔选集(下卷).孙周兴译.上海:三联书店,1996.
17、海德格尔.林中路.上海:译文出版社,2004.
18、海德格尔.存在与时间.北京:三联书店,2000.
19、卡尔·雅斯贝斯.卡尔·雅斯贝斯文集.朱更生译.西宁:青海人民出版 社,2003.
20、埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学.张庆熊译.上海:译文出版社,1988.
21、安德鲁·芬伯格.中国现代化之体现.Http://fiance.sina.com.cn.
22、安德鲁·芬伯格.可选择的现代性.陆俊等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003.
23、马尔库塞.理性与革命.程志民等译.重庆:重庆出版社,1993.
24、马尔库塞.爱欲与文明.黄勇、薛民译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
25、马尔库塞.单向度的人.刘继译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989.
26、布鲁诺·雅可米.技术史.北京:北京大学出版社,2000.
27、马克第亚尼.非物质社会——后工业世界的设计、文化与技术.滕守尧译.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.
28、[荷兰]E·舒尔曼.科技文明与人类未来——在哲学深层的挑战.李小兵等译.北京:东方出版社,1995.
29、[美]L.R.布郎.建设一个持续发展的社会.祝友三译.北京:科学技术文献出版社,1984.
30、[美]乔治·巴萨拉.技术发展简史.周光发译.复旦大学出版社.2000.
31、[法]让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔.后现代状态.车槿山译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997.
32、[德]彼得·科斯洛夫斯基.后现代文化.毛怡红译.北京:中央编译出版社,1999.
33、彼得多默.1945年以来的设计.梁梅译.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.
34、[法]让·鲍德里亚.消费社会.南京:南京大学出版社,2001.
35、冈特·绍伊博尔德.海德格尔分析新时代的技术.中国社会科学出版社,1998.
36、马斯洛等.人的潜能与价值.北京:华夏出版社,1987.
37、弗洛姆.为自己的人.上海:三联书店,1988.
38、[法]让-伊夫·戈菲.技术哲学.董茂永译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.
39、柏拉图.柏拉图全集(第1卷).王晓朝译.人民出版社,2002.
40、[德]彼德·科斯洛夫斯基.后现代文化——技术发展的社会文化后果.北京:中央编译出版社,1999.
41、让·鲍德里亚.完美的罪行.北京:商务出版社,2000.
42、[美]塞缪尔·亨廷顿.文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建.周琪、刘绯等译.北京:新华出版社,2002.
43、杜威.哲学的改造.北京:商务印书馆,2002.
44、杜威.确定性的寻求.上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
45、马尔库塞.现代文明与人的困境.李小兵译.上海:三联书店,1989.
46、孙周兴选编.海德格尔选集.上海:三联出版社.1996.
47、冈特·绍伊博尔德.海德格尔分析新时代的技术.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.
48、[法]F.贝尔.技术帝国.上海:三联书店,1999.
49、[英]贝尔纳.科学的社会功能.商务印书馆,1986.
50、培根.新工具.商务印书馆,1936.
51、内森等.巨人箴言录:爱因斯坦论和平(上).李醒民译.湖南出版社,1992.
52、波塞尔.论科学与工程的结构性差异.刘则渊、王续琨主编:工程·技术·哲学.大连理工大学出版社,2002.
53、陈昌曙.技术哲学引论.科学出版社,1999.
54、李伯聪.工程哲学引论——我造物故我在.大象出版社,2002.
55、郭贵春、乔瑞金、陈凡.多维视野中的技术.东北大学出版社,2003.
56、张华夏、张志林.技术解释研究.科学出版社,2005.
57、赵建军.追问技术悲观主义.东北大学出版社,2001.
58、刘大椿.科学技术哲学导论.中国人民大学出版社,1999.
59、陈筠泉、殷登祥.科技革命与社会发展.人民出版社,2001.
60、乔瑞金.马克思思想研究的新话语.太原:书海出版社,2005.
61、乔瑞金.马克思技术哲学纲要.北京:人民出版社,2002.
62、乔瑞金.现代整体论.北京:中国经济出版社,1996.
63、乔瑞金.科学进步论.北京:海洋出版社,1992.
64、柳冠中.设计文化论.哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1995.
65、陆俊.马尔库塞.长沙:湖南教育出版社,1999.
66、江天骥.法兰克福学派——批判的社会理论.上海:上海人民出版社,1981.
67、荆雷.设计概论.石家庄:河北美术出版社,1997.
68、杨铄、徐立.人类理性与设计科学.沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1987.
69、朱红文.工业、技术与设计.石家庄:河北美术出版社,1997.
70、柳树滋.通向二十一世纪的绿色道路.沈阳:东北林业大学出版社,1996.
71、倪梁康.现象学的效应.上海:三联书店,1994.
72、徐飞.科学交叉论.安徽教育出版社,1991.
73、苗力田.古希腊哲学.中国人民大学出版社,1989.
74、夏军.非理性世界.上海:三联书店,1998.
75、张康之.总体性与乌托邦.中国人民大学出版社,1998.
76、陈嘉明等.现代性与后现代性.人民出版社,2001.
77、王岳川.后现代主义在中国的反思.黑龙江人民出版社,2002.
78、邹珊刚.技术与技术哲学.北京:知识出版社,1987.
79、俞吾金.从康德到马克思.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.
80、衣俊卿、丁立群、李小娟、王晓东.20世纪的新马克思主义.北京:中央编译出版社,2001.
81、余文烈.分析马克思主义.重庆:重庆出版社,1993.
82、鹿林.论人的生活世界.哲学研究,2007(9).
83、陈凡、朱春艳.技术认识论.国外技术哲学研究的新动向.自然辩证法研究,2003(2).
84、陈凡、朱春艳、赵迎欢、田鹏颖、马会端.技术与设计:“经验转向”背景下的技术哲学研究——第14届国际技术哲学学会(SPT)会议述评.哲学动态,2006(6).
85、赵建军.技术理性的合理性考量.中共中央党校学报,2007(3).
86、夏保华.技术哲学研究的定位及关键.科学技术与辩证法,2004(4).
87、郭贵春、张培富.科学技术哲学研究未来发展展望.自然辩证法研究,2002(5).
88、李晚莲.整体性技术实践价值观的理论特征及其实践意义.自然辩证法研究,2004(12).
89、李三虎.技术哲学的空间叙事.哲学动态,2006(6).
90、林德宏.技术生存的内在矛盾.自然辩证法研究,2004(2).
91、朱红文.“设计哲学”的可能性和意义.哲学研究,2000(3).
92、于光远.自然辩证法百科全书.中国大百科全书出版社,1994.
93、辞源(第4册).商务印书馆,1999.
94、汉语大词典(第11卷). 汉语大词典出版社, 1993
1、 Gavin Kitching. Karl Marx and the Philosophy of Praxis. Routledge London and New York, 1998.
2、 Gavin Kitching. Marxism and Science: Analysis of Obsession. The Pennsylvania State University Press University Park. Pennsylvania, 1994.
3、 Gavin Kitching, Nigel Pleasants. Marx and Wittgenstein: knowledge, morality and politics.Routledge London and New York,2002.
4、 Rengasamy Kabilan.From Traditional Society to Post-Industrial Society,New Delh:commonwealth Publishers,1993.
5、 Robin Theobald.Understanding Industrial Society,New York:St.Martin Press, 1994.
6、 Marcus Roberts. Analytical Marxism-A Critique. Verso, 1996.
7、 Heidegger.Overcoming Metaphysics, tran. By Joan Stambaugh, in The Heidegger Controversy, a cirtical reader, ed. By Richard Wollin, The MIT Press, 1993.
8、 Heidegger.The Question Concerning Technology, in The Question Concerning Technology and other Essays, trans.& ed. By William Lovitt, Harper & Row, 1977.
9、 Heidegger.What are Poets For? in Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. By Albert Hofstadter, Harper & Row, 1971.
10、 Perry Anderson. Arguments within English Marxism. Verso, 1974.
11、 G. A. Cohen. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence. Oxford, 1978.
12、 Susan S Hanna,etc.Rights to Nature,Washington:Island Press,1996.
13、 Carl Mitcham.Thinking Through Technology:The Path between Engineering and Philosophy,Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1994,159.
14、 Carl Mitcham.The Importance of Phiosophy to Engineering .Tecnos, 1998.
15、 J.C.Pitt.Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology,New York: Cambridge Press,2000.
16、 Vinceti.The Experimental Assessment of Engineering Theory as a Tool for Design,Techne,2001.
17、 Louis Bucciarelli.Designing Engineers,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press, 1994.
18、 Dictionary of the English language .Boston: American.Heritageo,2000.
19、 Thomas H.Design, London:Laurence King Publishing, 1998.
20、 H.Achterhuis.American Philosophy of Technology,Indiana University Press,2001.
21、 E.A.Burtt.The Metaphysical Foundation of modern science.New York. 1925.
22、 Carl Mitcham.Thinking through technology: the path between engineering andphilosophy.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.
23、 Bunge M. Treatise on Basis Philosophy. Vol.7. Philosophy of Science and Technology. Part II. D. Reidel Publishing Company. 1985.
24、 Richards S.Philosophy and Sociology of Science.Basil Blackwell.1985.
25、 Walter G.Engineering Knowledge,Type of Design,and Level of Hierarchy.In:Kroes P,Bakker M.Technological Development and Science in The Industrial Age.Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
26、 Simon.H.A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.
27、 K.Popper.The Logical Scientific Discovery, New York: Basic Books, 1959.
28、 Rothwell R.Reindustrialization and Technology Longman,1985.
29、 Erich Fromm.The Revolution of Hope: Toward A Humanized Technology. New York: Harpe and Row publishers. 1968.
30、 Simon H A.The Sciences of the Artificial.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press,1981.
31、 Louis Bucciarelli.Designing Engineers,Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1994.
32、 Andrew Feenberg. Alternative Modernity,Berkeley:University of California Press, 1995.
33、 Rothwell R.Reindustrialization and Technology Longman,1985.
34、 M. Polanyi.Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
35、 W.G. Vincenti.What Engineers Know and How They Know it: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.
36、 Arnold Pacey.Meaning in Technology,Cambridge,MA:MIT press, 1999.
37、 E.Schuurman. Beyond the empirical turn:responsible technology [EB/OL] . http:// www.home.planet.nl/～srw/sch,2004(2).
38、 Love T. Constructing a coherent cross—disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: Some philosophical issues .Design Studies,2002(3)
39、 Kroes.P A.Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts [J].Design Studies,2002(3).