台风灾害下无车群体疏散需求预测与集散设施选址研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
世界范围内台风灾害频繁发生,呈现出数量逐年增多、强度增大、灾害影响范围增广的态势,对人类社会造成极大的经济损失。当台风灾害影响范围较大,并且存在较强的破坏性时,实施大规模应急疏散越来越多地成为科学防灾、主动避险的有效途径。台风灾害事件的紧迫性不仅要求疏散活动实现安全、低风险的目标,更要在有限的安全疏散时间内快速、高效地进行。为此以往的研究常常以疏散群体中占较大比例的有车群体,即机动车群体为研究对象研究高效的疏散策略。然而Katrina、Gustav和Ike等飓风灾害的疏散实践证明,弱势群体和无车群体的疏散效率才是制约台风灾害应急疏散活动成功与否的关键。由于无车群体涵盖人群类别较多,疏散中更需要疏散组织与运输支持,不同于机动车群体对于疏散交通管理策略的需求,因此如何最大限度地争取无车群体的利益,制定有效的台风灾害疏散组织方案,提高无车群体的应急疏散效率是应急管理领域亟待解决的前沿性课题。
     台风灾害下的无车群体应急疏散是一个系统问题,为完成大规模无车群体的应急疏散活动,制定合理有效的疏散组织方案是根本,而科学的疏散组织方案,基本前提是对被疏散者疏散行为的理解。本文以“台风灾害下无车群体疏散行为分析→疏散需求预测→基于公共交通运输的无车群体集散设施选址方案的制定”为研究主线,首先对台风灾害下无车群体应急疏散领域涉及的基本问题进行阐述,从引发大规模应急疏散的台风灾害条件、无车群体应急疏散的对象、疏散范围、疏散方式、以及疏散时间等方面对文中的研究对象和研究背景进行界定;为了验证无车群体应急疏散行为的客观存在,开展了台风灾害条件下疏散行为调查,为行为研究、疏散需求预测、集散设施选址等研究内容提供必要的数据支撑;其次从微观行为分析的角度,解析被疏散者最终疏散决策形成的机理,构建了基于有限理性和Probit回归理论的疏散风险容忍阈值模型,通过分析被疏散者在台风灾害条件下的风险承受能力,达到准确预测初始疏散需求的目的;再次针对被疏散者在应急条件下的特殊出行行为对疏散需求的影响,以其中最具有代表性的小群体集聚行为为研究对象,提出小群体疏散集聚地点选择模型,对集聚模式以及集聚行为造成的疏散需求预测结果进行重点分析;最后通过构建可靠的大规模集散设施选址与服务分配模型,提出基于公共车辆运输的无车群体疏散组织方案,在无车群体集散设施选址过程中着重考虑了无车人员在集散场所中等待并暴露在台风灾害环境中的风险,以寻求最优最为可靠的集散设施选址数量及位置、疏散服务分配、以及疏散车辆调度规划;最后以我国某一城市市区路网为例开展了台风灾害下无车群体应急疏散规划实例研究,在不同的疏散需求输入情况下,比较无车群体疏散集散设施选址及服务分配结果,针对疏散行为对最终选址结果的影响进行分析,最后为台风灾害下无车群体应急疏散管理实践提供了政策建议。
     本文以国内外相关研究成果为基础,以调查统计、行为分析、优化建模为研究手段,对台风灾害条件下无车群体疏散过程中的关键问题进行深入挖掘与研究,在理论层面上具有一定的创新和承接意义,在实践应用层面对于提升城市应急管理实践的科学水平、提高城市及区域应对灾害事件的响应效率也具有重要的现实意义。
With the increasing frequency and intensity of typhoon disasters to human lives,the large scale emergency evacuation has already become an active and effectivemethod to avoid or decrease economy losses. Emergency evacuation is required to besafe, low risky, rapid, and high effective due to the urgency of typhoon disasters;therefore, most researches were mostly focused on automobile groups which are in themajority of evacuees to explore effective evacuation strategies. However, afterexperienced with hurricane Katrina, Gustav, and Ike, it was found that carless andvulnerable population is the key point that restricts the performance of a high effectiveemergency evacuation. Carless evacuees cover a great range of groups and put moreconcentration on evacuation organization and transportation support compared toautomobile evacuees. Therefore, how to make effective evacuation organization strategyand improve the carless evacuation efficiency is an important topic in emergencymanagement.
     The carless emergency evacuation problem under typhoon disaster has to bestudied systematically, and a reasonable and effective organization strategy is thefoundation of a successful evacuation practice; while capturing and understanding theevacuation behaviors of carless evacuees is the basic condition of making suchorganization strategy. In this study, it follows the roadmap of carless evacuationbehavior analysis, evacuation demand forecasting, and evacuation pickup facilitylocation design under typoon disasters.
     Firstly, the basic problems of carless evacuation under typhoon conditions wereintroduced and the related evacuation problems studied in this paper are further defined,including typhoon conditions that trigger a large-scale emergency evacuation,evacuation groups, evacuation scope, evacuation modes, and evacuation periods. It wasfollowed by large scale emergency evacuation behavior analysis based on a Stated-Preference (SP) survey on evacuees' evacuation decisions so as to provide data supportfor the evacuation demand prediction and evacuation organization strategy studies.
     Secondly, from the point of micro behavior analysis, the final evacuation decision-making mechanism was studied, and an evacuation risk tolerance threshold model wasgiven based on bounded rationality theory and Probit regression method. The risk- resistant capability of evacuee under typhoon disaster was analyzed to predict the exactoriginal evacuation demand.
     Thirdly, based on small group evacuation gathering location chosen model,evacuee's group gathering behavior under typhoon conditions was targeted, and theeffect of group gathering behavior on the evacuation demand forcasting result wastypically analyzed.
     Fourthly, a transit-based evacuation organization strategy was constructed, and areliable emergency facility location design model was proposed to determine theoptimal transit pickup facility locations, evacuee allocations, and evacuation vehicledispatching schedules, when facilities were subject to disruption risks due to typhoondisasters. The waiting cost and exposure risks of carless people in the inclementsurroundings were systematically studied.
     Finally, a case study of carless evacuation planning in a certain urban districtnetwork was conducted. The optimal pickup facility locations and service assignmentunder different evacuation demand inputs and different evacuation behaviors (especiallythe group gathering behavior of evacuees) were compared and analyzed. Based on theresearch results, the strategy proposals for emergency evacuation management practiceunder typhoon disasters were provided.
     Based on the current research achievements in the carless evacuation field, thispaper deeply explored the key problems produced in the carless evacuation processunder typhoon disasters by adopting statistical methods, behavior analysis andoptimization theory. The research results not only can enrich the current emergencyevacuation management theory system, but also improve urban emergency practicecapability, crisis management capacity and the overall urban disaster response capacity,so this research has important theoretical significance and practical value.
引文
1Snow, J., Andreoli, L., Barborinas, J., Csiszar, I., Cunningham, P., Curran, P.,Fujioka, F., Goodrick, S., Linn, R., Mell, W., Pagni, P. and Saleen, M. Fire WeatherResearch: A Burning Agenda for NOAA, A Report from the NOAA ScienceAdvisory Board, October22,2008. Available at:http://www.sab.noaa.gov/Reports/FWRWGreportFINALfromSABtoNOAA_1103_08.pdf. Accessed on July25,2009
    2Renne, J. L., Sanchez, T. W., and Litman T. National Study on Carless and SpecialNeeds Evacuation Planning: A Literature Review. Produced by the University ofNew Orleans Transportation Center, October2008
    3Renne, J. L., Sanchez, T. W., and Peterson, R. C. National Study on Carless andSpecial Needs Evacuation Planning: Case Studies. Produced by the University ofNew Orleans Transportation Center, March2009
    4Guiney, J. L., Decker, D. M., Fincher, L., Gery, W. J., Kiser, S. C., Piltz, S.,Siebers, A., Vannozzi, L., Hogan, L. G., Olsen, B., Devaris, A. and Presnell, W.Service Assessment: Hurricane Katrina August23-31,2005. Department ofCommerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).Available At http://www.weather.gov/om/assessments/pdfs/Katrina.pdf.Accessed on March15,2009
    5中国人均汽车保有量仅相当于美国1917年水平.上海证券报,2010
    6George D. Haddow, Jane A. Bullock, Damon P. Coppola. Introduction toemergency management, third edition. Elsevier,2008,1-26
    7杨孝宽,魏恒.突发事件应急交通规划方法与应用.中国建筑工业出版社,2010,16-23
    8Urbanik, T. Evacuation time estimates for nuclear power plants. Journal ofHazardous Materials.2000,75(2-3):165-180
    9Sheffi, Y., Mahmassani, H. S., Powell, W. B. A transportation networkevacuation model. Transportation Research Part A.1982,16(3):209-218
    10Lindell, M.K., Bolton, P.A., et al. Planning concepts and decision criteria forsheltering and evacuation in a nuclear power plant emergency. NationalEnvironmental Studies Project, Atomic Industrial Forum, Inc.1985
    11United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The accident at Three Mile IslandFact Sheet. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.2000
    12Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge Evacuation Modeling System(OREMS) Users’ Guide. Oak Ridge, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.1999
    13Post, Buckley, Schuh, Jernigan (PBS&J). Southeast United States HurricaneEvacuation Traffic Study: Behavioral Analysis, Technical Memorandum. FinalReport, Tallahassee, Florida.2000,120-124
    14Post, Buckley, Schuh, Jernigan (PBS&J). Hurricane Floyd Assessment: Review ofHurricane Evacuation Studies Utilization and Information Dissemination.Tallahassee, Florida.2000,78-86
    15Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S. Development of a decision support system forevacuation management. The First International Conference on Debris-FlowDisaster Mitigation Strategy.2002
    16Urbina E., and Wolshon B. National review of hurricane evacuation plans andpolicies: a comparison and contrast of state practices. Transportation ResearchPart A.2003,37(3):257-275
    17Litman, A. T. Lessons From Katrina and Rita: What Major Disasters Can TeachTransportation Planners. Journal of Transportation Engineering.2006,132(1):11-18.
    18Lindell, M. K., Prater, C.S. Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation analysis:examples from hurricane research and planning. Journal of Urban Planning andDevelopment.2007,133(1):18-29
    19安实,崔建勋,王健.国外道路交通应急区域疏散研究综述.交通运输系统工程与信息.2008,8(6):38-45
    20Lindell, M. K. EMBLEM2: An empirically based large scale evacuation timeestimate model. Transportation Research Part A,2007:1-15
    21Lindell, M. K. Assessing emergency preparedness in support of hazardous facilityrisk analyses: An application at a U.S. hazardous waste incinerator. Journal ofhazardous materials.1995,40(3):297-319
    22Smith S. K., Tayman, J., and Swanson, D. A. State and local populationprojections: methodology and analysis. Kluwer, New york,2001
    23Southworth F., Chin S. M. Network evacuation modeling for flooding as a resultof dam failure. Environment and Planning.1987,19(11):1543-1558
    24Radwan, A. E., Hobeika, A.G., and Sivasailam, D. A computer simulation modelfor rural network evacuation under natural disasters. ITE Journal.1985,29(5):25-30
    25Cova, T. J., and Johnson, J. P. Microsimulation of neighborhood evacuations inthe urban-wildland interface. Environment and Planning A.2002,34(12):763-784
    26Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S., Perry, R. W., and Wu, J. Y. EMBLEM: Anempirically-based large scale evacuation time estimate model. Texas A&M Univ.Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, College Station, Texas,2002. Availableat: http://www.txdps. state.tx.us/dem/documents.htm#hurricane. Accessed onMarch9,2008
    27Dow, K., and Cutter, S. L. Emerging hurricane evacuation issues: Hurricane Floydand South Carolina. Natural Hazards Review.2002,3(1):12-18
    28Prater, C., Wenger, D., and Grady, K. Hurricane Bret post storm assessment: Areview of the utilization of hurricane evacuation studies and informationdissemination, Texas A&M Univ. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center,College Station, Texas,2000
    29Lindell, M. K., Lu, J. C., and Prater, C. S. Household evacuation decision makingresponse to Hurricane Lili. Natural Hazards Review.2005,6(4):171-179
    30Hobeika, A. G., Kim, C., and Beckwith, R. A decision support system fordeveloping evacuation plans around nuclear power stations. Interfaces.1994,24(5):22-35
    31Riad, J. K., Norris, F. H., and Ruback, R. B. Predicting evacuation in two majordisasters: Risk perception, social influence, and access to resources. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology.1999,29(5):918-934
    32Baker, E. J. Hurricane evacuation behavior. International Journal of MassEmergencies and Disasters.1991,9(2):287-310
    33Zeigler, D. J., Brunn, S. D., Johnson, J. H. Evacuation from a nucleartechnological disaster. Geographical Review.1981,71(1):1-16
    34Gladwin, C. H., Gladwin, H., Peacock, W. G. Modeling hurricane evacuationdecisions with ethnographic methods. International Journal of Mass Emergenciesand Disasters.2001,19(2):117-143
    35Barrett, B., Ran, B., and Pillai, R. Developing a dynamic traffic managementmodeling framework for hurricane evacuation. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board.2000,1733:115-121
    36Urbanik, T. State of the art in evacuation time estimates for nuclear power plants.International Journal Mass Emergency Disasters.1994,12(3):327-343
    37Lindell, M.K., and Prater, C. S. Evacuation from Hurricane Katrina: Jefferson andSt. Charles parishes. National Hurricane Conference, Orlando, Fla.,2006
    38Abkowitz, M., and Meyer, E. Technological advancements in hazardous materialsevacuation planning. Transportation Research Record: Journal of theTransportation Research Board.1996,1522:116-121
    39Tweedie, S. W., Rowland, J. R., Walsh, S. J., Rhoten, R. P., Hagle, P. I. Amethodology for estimating emergency evacuation times. Social Science Journal.1986,23(2):189-204
    40Hobeika, A. G., Kim, C. Comparison of traffic assignments in evacuationmodeling. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.1998,45(2):192-198
    41Fu, H. Q., Wilmot, C. G. A sequential logit dynamic travel demand model forhurricane evacuation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of theTransportation Research Board.2004,1882:19-26
    42White, R. A., Blumenberg, E., Brown, K A., Contestabile, J. M., Haghani, A.,Howitt, A. M., Lambert, T. C., Morrow B. H., Setzer, M. H., Stanley E. M.,Velasquez III, A. and Humphrey, N. P. The Role of Transit in EmergencyEvacuation. Transportation Research Board,2008. Available at:http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/sr/sr294.pdf. Accessed on December23,2009.
    43刘小明,胡红.应急交通疏散研究现状与展望.交通运输工程学报,2008,8(3):108-115
    44Rashid H., Haider W., H un t L. Post-flood assessment of emergency evacuationpolicies in the Red River Basin, Southern Manitoba. Canadian Geographer,2000,44(2):369-386
    45Church R L, Cova T J. Mapping evacuation risk on transportation networks usinga spatial optimization model. Transportation Research Part C,2000,8(1):321-336
    46赵道亮.紧急条件下人员疏散特殊行为的元胞自动机模拟.中国科学技术大学博士学位论文,2007
    47Dow K., Cutter S. L. Public orders and personal opinions: household strategies forhurricane risk assessment. Environmental Hazards,2000,2(4):143-155
    48Whitehead J. C., Edwards B., Willigen M. V., et al. Heading for higher ground:factors affecting real and hypothetical hurricane evacuation behavior.Environmental Hazards.2000,2(4):133-142
    49Simonovic, S., and Ahmad, S. Computer-based Model for Flood EvacuationEmergency Planning. Natural Hazards,2005,34(1):25-51
    50Goltz, J. D. Initial Behavioral Response to a Rapid Onset Disaster: A SocialPsychological Study of Three California Earthquakes.2006
    51Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S. A Hurricane Evacuation Management DecisionSupport System (EMDSS). Natural Hazards,2007,40:627-634
    52Bourque, L. B., Russell, L. A. Experiences During and Response to the LomaPrieta Earthquake. Los Angeles: The University of California,1994
    53Perry, R. W. Population Evacuations in Volcanic Eruptions, Floods, and NuclearPower Plant Accidents: Some Elementary Comparisons. Journal of CommunityPsychology,1983,11:36-47
    54Bourque, L. B., Siegel, J. M., Kano, M., Wood, M. M. Weathering the Storm: TheImpact of Hurricane on Physical and Mental Health. The Annals of The AmericanAcademy of Political and Social Science,2006,604:129-151
    55Perry, R.W., Lindell, M. K., Greene M. R. Evacuation planning in emergencymanagement. Lexington Books, Toronto, Canada,1981
    56Zelinsky, W., Kosinski, L. A. The emergency evacuation of cities: a cross-nationalhistorical and geographical study. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. USA,1991
    57Herr, P. Alarms of struggle and fight: citizen response to crisis relocation.Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts,1984
    58Sattayhatewa, P., Ran, B. Developing a dynamic traffic management model fornuclear power plant evacuation. The79th Annual Meeting of the TransportationResearch Board, Washington, D.C.,2000
    59Murray-Tuite P., Mahmassani H. S. Model of household trip chain sequencing inan emergency evacuation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of theTransportation Research Board,2003,1831:21-29
    60Murray-Tuite P., Mahmassani H. S. Transportation Network Evacuation Planningwith Household Activity Interactions. Transportation Research Record: Journal ofthe Transportation Research Board,2004,1894:150-159
    61Cova T. J., Drimmelen M. N. Family gathering in evacuations: the2007AngoraWildfire in South Lake Tahoe, California. Utah National Evacuation Conference,New Orleans, February4th,2010, Accessed on April7,2011
    62Michael S., Litman T. Evacuation Station: the Use of Public Transportation inEmergency Management Planning. ITE Journal online,2008,69-73. Available atwww.vtpi.org/evacuation.pdf. Accessed on Jan8,2010
    63Federal Transit Administration. Transportation Equity in Emergencies: A Review ofthe Practices of State Departments of Transportation, Metropolitan PlanningOrganizations, and Transit Agencies in20Metropolitan Areas, Office of Civil Rights,2007. Available at http://www.fta.dot.gov/civilrights/civil_rights_6343.html. Accessedon Oct18,2009
    64Higgins, L. L., Hickman M. D., Weatherby C. A. Role of Public TransportationOperations in Emergency Management: Research Report. Texas TransportationInstitute, College Station, Texas.1999
    65Chan, C. P. Large Scale Evacuation of Carless People during Short-and Long-notice Emergency. The University of Arizona: Doctor Thesis.2010. Available at:http://gradworks.umi.com/34/03/3403259.html. Accessed on June2,2011
    66Perkins, J. A., Dabipi I. K., and Han L. D. Modeling Transit Issues Unique toHurricane Evacuations: North Carolina’s Small Urban and Rural Areas.Transportation Institute, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University,Urban Transit Institute, Transportation Institute.2001. Available at:http://www.ncat.edu/~traninst/Perkins%20Final%20Report%202001.pdf. Accessedon May13,2011
    67Sayyady, F. Optimizing the Use of Public Transit System in No-Notice Evacuations inUrban Areas. Mississippi State University: Master Thesis.2007. Available athttp://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?vinst=PROD&attempt=1&fmt=6&startpage=-1&ver=1&vname=PQD&RQT=309&did=1390306131&exp=05-14-2014&scaling=FULL&vtype=PQD&rqt=309&cfc=1&TS=1242364883&clientId=43922. Accessedon May10,2011
    68Margulis, L., Charosky, P. and Fernandez, J. Hurricane Evacuation Decision-SupportModel for Bus Dispatch. Fourth LACCET International Latin American andCaribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology, June21-23,2006, Mayaguez,Puerto Rico. Available at: http://ormstomorrow.informs.org/archive/Summerfall06/paper_competition_runner.doc. Accessed on May13,2011
    69Clark, G., Wright, J. W. Scheduling of Vehicles from a Central Depot to a Numberof Delivery Points. Operations Research.1964,12(4):568-581
    70He, S., Zhang, L., Song, R., Wen, Y., and Wu, Di.(2009). Optimal Transit RoutingProblem for Emergency Evacuations. Paper Number:09-0931,88th Annual Meetingof the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., January11-15
    71Mastrogiannidou, C., Boile, M., Golias, M., Theofanis, S., and Ziliaskopoulos, A.(2009) Using Transit to Evacuate Facilities in Urban Areas: A Micro-SimulationBased Integrated Tool. Paper Number:09-3439,88th Annual Meeting of theTransportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., January11-15
    72Chen, C., Chou, C. Modeling and Performance Assessment of a Transit-BasedEvacuation Plan within a Contra-Flow Simulation Environment. TransportationResearch Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2009,2091:40-50
    73Naghawi, H., and Wolshon, B. Transit-Based Emergency Evacuation SimulationModeling. Journal of Transportation Safety&Security.2010,2(2):184-201
    74Cui, T., Ouyang, Y. and Shen, Z. M. Reliable facility location under the risk ofdisruptions. Operations Research.2010,58(4):998-1011
    75Daskin, M. S. Application of an expected covering model to emergency medicalservice system design. Decision Science.1982,13(3):416-439
    76Daskin, M. S. A maximum expected covering location model: Formulation,properties and heuristic solution. Transportation Science.1983,17(1):48-70
    77Ball, M. O., Lin, F. L. A reliability model applied to emergency service vehiclelocation. Operation Research.1993,41(1):18-36
    78Revelle, C., Hogan, K. The maximum availability location problem.Transportation Science.1989,23(3):192-200
    79Batta, R., Dolan, J. M., Krishnamurthy, N. N. The maximal expected coveringlocation problem: Revisited. Transportation Science.1989,23(4):277-287
    80Snyder, L. V., Daskin, M. S. Reliability models for facility location: The expectedfailure cost case. Transportation Science.2005,39(3):400-416
    81Berman, O., Krass, D., Menezes, M. B. C. Facility reliability issues in network p-median problems: Strategic centralization and co-location effects. OperationResearch.2007,55(2):332-350
    82Shen, Z. J. M., Zhan R. L., Zhang J. The reliable facility location problem:Formulations, heuristics, and approximation algorithms. Working paper,University of California, Berkeley,2009
    83Li, X. and Ouyang, Y. A continuum approximation approach to reliable facilitylocation design under correlated probabilistic disruptions. Transportation ResearchPart B.2010,44(4):535-548
    84Li, X. and Ouyang, Y. Reliable sensor deployment for network traffic surveillance.Transportation Research Part B.2010,45(1):218-231
    85张培红,陈宝智.建筑物火灾时人员疏散群集流动规律.东北大学学报(自然科学版).2001,22(5):564-567
    86肖国清,温丽敏,陈宝智,王浩.毒气泄漏时的最佳疏散路径.东北大学学报(自然科学版).2001,22(6):674-677
    87张培红,岳丽红,陈宝智.最优应急疏散路线动态模拟的研究.人类工效学.2001,7(1):10-13
    88许焱,荣建,刘小明等.2008年北京奥运会交通需求预测.北京工业大学学报.2003,29(3):315-319
    89许焱,杨孝宽,刘小明等.2008年奥运会交通紧急事件管理系统(EMS)规划.北京工业大学学报.2005,31(5):481-485
    90曹静,宫建,杨孝宽.奥运应急交通疏散预案评价指标体系研究.武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版).2008,32(3):431-434
    91胡红,蒋光胜,杨孝宽,刘小明.基于Link-node仿真的北京奥运应急交通疏散预案研究.北京工业大学学报.2007,33(11):1187-1192
    92胡红,刘小明,魏恒,杨孝宽.奥运应急疏散路网规划系统方法.北京工业大学学报.2008,34(8):865-872
    93袁建平,方正,卢兆明,黄河潮.城市灾时大范围人员应急疏散探讨.自然灾害学报.2005,14(6):116-119
    94初建宇,苏幼坡.城市地震避难疏散场所的规划原则与要求.世界地震工程.2006,22(4):80-83
    95安实,崔建勋,王建.国外道路交通应急区域疏散研究综述.交通运输系统工程与信息,2008,8(6):38-45
    96温丽敏.重大事故应急疏散研究.沈阳:东北大学.安全技术与工程博士学位论文.2000
    97邹亮,任爱珠,张新.基于GIS的灾害疏散模拟及救援调度.自然灾害学报.2006,15(6):141-145
    98卢兆明,林鹏,黄河潮.基于GIS的都市应急疏散系统.应急救援.2005,2:35-40
    99吴薇薇,宁宣熙.紧急疏散网络防堵塞改造研究.系统工程学报.2006,21(3):244-248
    100胡红,刘小明,杨孝宽.基于最小安全间距的应急交通疏散车辆跟驰模型.北京工业大学学报.2007,33(10):1070-1074
    101安实,崔建勋,王健.基于模糊逻辑与离散选择模型的混合疏散人口估计模型.交通运输工程学报.2009,9(5):78-82
    102陈志宗,尤建新.重大突发事件应急救援设施选址的多目标决策模型.管理科学.2006,19(4):10-14
    103方磊.基于偏好DEA的应急系统选址模型研究.系统工程理论与实践.2006,8:116-122
    104杨锋,梁樑,毕功兵,杜少甫.考虑道路特性的多个应急设施选址问题:基于DEA的研究.管理评论.2008,20(12):41-44
    105Y. Liu. An integrated optimal control system for emergency evacuation.University of Maryland PhD Thesis.2007:28-29
    106Wolshon, B., Urbina, E., et al. National Review of Hurricane Evacuation Plansand Policies. LSU Hurricane Center, Barton Rouge,2001
    107Chiu, Y. C., Zheng H. Real-time mobilization decisions for multi-priorityemergency response resources and evacuation groups: Model formulation andsolution. Transportation Research Part E.2007,43:710-736
    108Wolshon, B., Urbina E., Wilmot C. and Levitan M. Review of Policies andPractices for Hurricane Evacuation I: Transportation Planning, Preparedness, andResponse. Natural Hazards Review.2005,6(3):129-142
    109Chiu, Y. C., Zheng H., Vilialobos J., Gautam, B. Modeling no-notice massevacuation using a dynamic traffic flow optimization model. IIE Transactions.2007,39:83-94
    110FETPAFI (Field Epidemiology Training Program Alumni Foundation, Inc.). Typesof Disaster. Available at http://www.wpro.who.int/internet/files/eha/dir/Disaster%20Preparedness%20and%20Response/Types%20of%20Disasters.pdf. Accessedon May2,2011
    111Zelinsky, Wilbur&Leszek Kosinsky. The Emergency Evacuation of Cities: ACross-National Historical and Geographical Study. Savage, Maryland: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers.1991
    112American Highway Users Alliance AHUA. American Highway Users AllianceEmergency Evacuation Report Card2006. Washington D.C.: American HighwayUsers Alliance, October. Available at http://www.highways.org/pdfs/evacuation_report_card2006.pdf. Accessed on March29,2007
    113Wolshon, B. Planning for the Evacuation of New Orleans. ITE Journal, Institute ofTransportation Engineers.2002,72(2):44-49
    114Simon, H. A Behavior Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1955,69(1):99-118
    115Simon, H. Rational Choice and Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review,1956,63(2):129-138
    116黄建军.剖析Simon的有限理性理论.理论月刊.2001,3:13-15
    117Mahmassani. H. S., Chang, G. L. On Boundedly-rational User Equilibrium inTransportation Systems. Transportation Science.1987,21(2):89-99
    118Mahmassani, H. S., Stephan, D. G. Experimental Investigation of Route andDeparture Time Choice Dynamics to Urban Commuters. Transportation ResearchRecord.1988,1203:69-84
    119Mahmassani. H. S., Jou, R. C. Bounded Rationality in Commuter DecisionDynamics: Incorporating Trip Chaining in Departure Time and Route SwitchingDecisions. The Conference on Theoretical Foundations of Travel ChoiceModeling, Stockholm, Sweden,1996.
    120丁正飞.基于Agent的个性化出行信息定制技术研究.哈尔滨工业大学硕士论文.2006
    121Vickrey, W. S. Congestion theory and transportation investment. The AmericanEconomic Review.1969,59(2):251–260
    122Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., and Dube, L.(1995). Waiting Time and DecisionMaking: Is Time like Money? The Journal of Consumer Research,22(1),110-119.Accessed on May1,2011
    123Daganzo, C. F. Public Transportation Systems: Basic Principles of System Design,Operations Planning and Real-time Control. Course Notes UCB-ITS-CN-2010-1.Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Berkeley. October,2010
    124Li, X., Peng, F., Bai, Y. and Ouyang, Y. Effects of disruption risks on bio-refinerylocation design. Submitted to Biomass and Bioenergy. Under review.2011
    125Litman, A. T. Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis–Techniques, Estimatesand Implications, second edition. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.2009.Available at: http://www.vtpi.org/tca. Accessed on May2,2011
    126Finizza, A. Economic Benefits of Mitigating Refinery Disruptions. StudyConducted by AJF Consulting, CEC Report P600-02-018D,2002

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700