现金股利政策动因、盈余持续性与市场反应
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
“股利之谜”长期以来一直是学术界的热门话题。由于制度性缺陷以及监管制度不完善等问题,我国上市公司的股利政策表现出了与西方成熟资本市场不同的“股利之谜”。究竟如何去看待我国上市公司的股利之谜?本文基于2000年以后我国证券市场的制度背景,首先从最终控制人特征和公司治理环境层面上考察了上市公司现金股利政策的动因,然后从现金股利政策与盈余持续性关系的角度考察了派现公司的长期业绩表现,最后从股价反应上考察了证券市场投资者对待上市公司现金股利政策的态度以及现金股利信息在理解会计盈余信息含量上的作用。本文的基本结论是:
     1.总体而言,上市公司现金股利政策有助于抑制最终控制人“掏空”动机,具体表现为现金股利的支付水平随最终控制人控制权比例的增加呈先减少后增加的U形变动;最终控制人两权分离程度越小,且现金流量权比例越大,派发现金股利的概率和水平越大;而且当最终控制人性质为政府时,上市公司派发现金股利的概率和水平更高。此外,上市公司所处地区的市场化进程越快、政府干预越少、法治水平越高,对中小投资者利益的保护程度越高,公司派发现金股利的概率和水平也越高。
     2.总体而言,派现公司表现出了稳定增长的长期业绩,相比于未派现的公司,他们在盈余整体及其各个组成部分上,以及在净利润和营业利润的增长上均表现出更强的持续性。但是,在派发现金股利的公司中,股利支付率的大小与盈余持续性强弱并非简单线性关系,股利支付率高的公司在盈余的整体及其组成部分上并未表现出更强的盈余持续性。另外,第一大股东持股比例超过50%且派发了较大比例现金股利的公司无论在盈余整体还是盈余各个组成部分的持续性上并未表现出与其他派发现金股利公司显著的差别。
     3.投资者对于上市公司的现金股利政策持积极的态度,现金股利的变动与股价变动呈显著的正相关关系,现金股利政策是有信息含量的,而且现金股利的股价反应系数要大于盈余的反应系数。另外,虽然投资者在对上市公司现金股利政策的定价中同时考虑了盈利变动的信息,但与国外成熟市场不同的是,投资者并不会根据现金股利信息来对企业未来经营业绩做出判断。而股价长期反应的研究也表明,现金股利信息能够显著增加当期盈余对未来股价回报的解释力,这表明我国证券市场存在着对于派现公司较高盈余持续性的误定价。本文的创新和学术贡献在于:
     首先是利用法和金融理论的研究成果,在对上市公司现金股利分配行为的解释上引入公司治理环境的因素,从更为基础性的层面上来考察上市公司的派现行为,为理解现金股利政策提供新的证据。
     其次是利用会计学上关于盈余持续性的最新研究成果,从盈余及其组成部分的持续性角度考察上市公司股利政策与会计盈余的关系,丰富了有关盈余质量的研究,并从市场对盈余持续性误定价的角度为市场不能正确认识现金股利的价值提供经验证据。
     最后是利用我国上市公司股利分配信息与会计盈余信息同时公告的特点,研究了两种信息协同作用对市场反应的影响,该研究可以为我国学术界有关会计信息含量的研究提供新的思路和经验证据。
“Dividend puzzle”has been a hot academic topic for a long time. Because of the innate institutional deficiency and the imperfect supervising system, Chinese listed companies’dividend policy display a different“dividend puzzle”from the west mature capital market. Therefore, questions about Chinese listed companies’“dividend puzzle”are raised up. Based on Chinese stock market after 2000, this dissertation investigates Chinese listed companies’cash dividend motivations from the aspect of ultimate owner characteristics and corporate governance situations. Then it inspects the long-term performance of the listed company that paid cash dividend from the view of the relationship between cash dividend policy and earnings persistence. Finally, it tests the stock market reaction to cash dividend declare to investigates investors’posture on listed companies’cash dividend policy and the role of cash dividend information in understanding earnings content. The result of empirical test shows that:
     1. Overall, listed companies’cash dividend policy is helpful to restrain ultimate owner’s tunneling incentives. The result of empirical test shows that the level of cash dividend manifests a U shape following the increase of ultimate owner’s control rights. And when the divergence of control and cashflow rights is small and the cashflow rights are great, listed company will pay more cash dividend. Moreover, if the nature of ultimate owner can be classified into government, the probability and the level of cash dividend payment is bigger. Besides this, if corporate governance environments, measured by government intervention, legal system effect, marketization degree, can give minority shareholders more protect, listed company will pay more cash dividend.
     2. On the whole, listed companies that paid cash dividend display a stable growth in the long-run. Compared to other companies that don’t pay cash dividend, these companies’earnings and its part are more persistent. Moreover, these companies also display the stronger growth ability in the net income and operating income. But the relationship between cash dividend payout ratio and the earnings persistence is not a simple linear relation. The company with higher cash dividend payout ratio does not display stronger earnings persistence. In addition, the preference to cash dividend of the big shareholder does not significantly affect the earnings persistence.
     3. Investors regard listed companies’cash dividend policy with a positive manner. The cash dividend change is positively related to the stock price. Moreover, the cash dividend response coefficient is higher than the earnings response coefficient. This result indicates the cash dividend policy has the information content. In addition, although Chinese investors consider earnings information when they price listed companies’cash dividend policy, they can’t use cash dividend information to judge companies’long-term performance, which is different from west mature capital market. Furthermore, research on stock market reaction in a long-term indicate that cash dividend information can significantly increase the power of current earnings explaining further stock return. This result imply that there is mispricing to higher earnings persistence of companies that paid cash dividend.
     The main academic contributions of this dissertation are as follows:
     At first, based on the theory of law and finance, this dissertation introduces the corporate governance environment factors in multivariate regressions to explain listed companies’cash dividend policy. So we can investigate it from a more basic aspect and supply a new evidence for understanding cash dividend policy.
     Secondly, using fruits of research on earnings persistence, this dissertation investigates the relationship between cash dividend policy and earnings based on the persistence of earnings and its part. It enriches our studies about earnings quality. It also supplies an empirical evidence for the incorrect investor impression on cash dividend value from the aspect of earning persistence mispricing.
     Finally, using a unique market setting in China where all firms release earnings and dividend information in the same announcement, this dissertation examines the corroboration effect of earnings and dividend. It can provide a clue and new evidence for our research on earnings information contents.
引文
① 此处转引自魏刚著,《中国上市公司股利分配问题研究》,东北财经大学出版社,2001,P17。
     ① 转引自:杨家新. 2002. 《公司股利政策研究》. 北京:中国财政经济出版社,P79-80。
    [1] 白重恩、刘俏、陆洲、宋敏、张俊喜. 中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究 [J]. 经济研究,2005,(2):81-91.
    [2] 蔡宁. 上市公司最终控制人及其代理问题研究 [D]. 厦门大学博士学位论文打印稿. 2005.
    [3] 陈工孟、高宁. 盈余与股利信息含量的交互作用 [J]. 财经研究,2005,(3):58-66.
    [4] 陈宏. 中国上市公司对外担保行为研究--基于公司价值与治理结构的分析 [D]. 厦门大学博士学位论文打印稿. 2006.
    [5] 陈浪南、姚正春. 我国股利政策信号传递作用的实证研究 [J]. 金融研究,2000,(10):69-77.
    [6] 陈炜、孔翔、许年行. 我国的法律制度能有效保护中小投资者利益吗. [R]. 深圳证券交易所综合研究所研究报告,2005.
    [7] 陈晓、陈小悦、倪凡. 我国上市公司首次股利信号传递效应的实证研究 [J]. 经济科学,1998,(5):33~43.
    [8] 陈晓、王琨. 关联交易、公司治理与国有股改革 [J],经济研究,2005,(4):77-86.
    [9] 陈信元、陈冬华、时旭. 公司治理与现金股利:基于佛山照明的案例研究 [J]. 管理世界,2003,(8):118-126.
    [10] 邓建平、曾勇. 上市公司家族控制与股利决策研究 [J]. 管理世界,2005,(7):139-147.
    [11] 樊纲、王小鲁. 中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程 2004 年度报告 [M]. 北京:经济科学出版社,2004.
    [12] 葛家澍、林志军. 现代西方会计理论 [M]. 厦门:厦门大学出版社,2001.
    [13] 何涛、陈晓. 现金股利能否提高企业的市场价值——1997-1999 年上市公司会计年度报告期间的实证分析 [J]. 金融研究,2002,(8):26~37.
    [14] 孔小文,于笑坤. 上市公司股利政策信号传递效应的实证分析 [J]. 管理世界,2003,(6):114~118.
    [15] 郎咸平. 三家典型的派现公司 [J]. 新财富,2002,(11).
    [16] 李常青. 股利政策理论与实证研究 [M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
    [17] 李维安. 强制分红有利于投资功能的回归[N]. 中国证券报,2004-10-11,第 15 版.
    [18] 李增泉、孙铮、任强. 所有权安排与现金股利政策——来自我国上市公司的经验证据 [J]. 中国会计与财务研究,2004,(4):48-75.
    [19] 李增泉、孙铮、王志伟. “掏空”与所有权安排——来自我国上市公司大股东资金占用的经验证据 [J]. 会计研究,2004,(12):3-13.
    [20] 李卓、宋玉. 股利政策、盈余持续性与信号显示 [J]. 南开管理评论,2007,(1):3-13.
    [21] 廖理、方芳. 股利政策代理理论的实证检验 [J]. 南开管理评论,2005,8(5):55-62.
    [22] 刘峰、贺建刚. 股权结构与大股东利益实现方式的选择——中国资本市场利益输送的初步研究[J]. 中国会计评论,2004,(1):141-158.
    [23] 刘淑莲、胡燕鸿. 中国上市公司现金分红实证分析 [J]. 会计研究,2003,(4):29-35.
    [24] 吕长江、王克敏. 上市公司股利政策的实证分析 [J]. 经济研究,1999,(12):31-39.
    [25] 马曙光,黄志忠,薛云奎. 股权分置、资金占用与上市公司现金股利政策 [J]. 会计研究,2005,(9):44-50.
    [26] 皮海洲. 现金分红便宜了谁 非流通股股东两都受益[N]. 证券时报,2004-11-08.
    [27] 饶育蕾、马吉庆. 中小投资者对现金股利的心理反应的调查分析 [J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版),2004,10(5):610-614.
    [28] 上海证券交易所. 红利的价值 [EB/01]. 来源: http://www.sse.com.cn/sseportal/ps/zhs/sczn/zstx04.shtml (信息披露和动态 2006-07-31).
    [29] 上海证券交易所研究中心. 中国公司治理报告(2005)民营上市公司治理 [R]. 上海:复旦大学出版社. 2005.
    [30] 唐清泉、罗党论. 现金股利与控股股东的利益输送行为研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据 [J]. 财贸研究,2006,(1):92-97.
    [31] 田双全. “股利之谜”与控股股东效用最大化 [J]. 生产力研究,2004,(5):62-64.
    [32] 王海涛. 上证红利指数及其产品的综合性研究 [N]. 上海证券报 2006 年 08 月 04 日.
    [33] 王信. 从代理理论看上市公司的派现行为 [J]. 金融研究,2002,(9):44-53.
    [34] 魏刚. 中国上市公司股利分配问题研究 [M]. 大连:东北财经大学出版社,2001.
    [35] 伍利娜、高强、彭燕. 中国上市公司“异常高派现”影响因素研究 [J]. 经济科学,2003,(1):31~42.
    [36] 吴晓求主笔. 中国资本市场:股权分裂与流通性变革 [M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
    [37] 夏立军、方轶强. 政府控制、治理环境与公司价值——来自中国证券市场的经验证据 [J]. 经济研究,2005,(5):40-51.
    [38] 谢军. 股利政策、第一大股东和公司成长性:自由现金流理论还是掏空理论 [J]. 会计研究,2006,(4):51-57.
    [39] 徐国祥,苏月中. 中国股市现金股利悖论研究 [J]. 财经研究,2005,(6):132-144.
    [40] 徐莉萍、辛宇、陈工孟. 股权集中度和股权制衡及其对公司经营绩效的影响 [J]. 经济研究,2006,(1):90-100.
    [41] 阎大颖. 中国上市公司控股股东价值取向对股利政策的影响的实证研究 [J]. 南开经济研究,2004(6):94-105.
    [42] 阎大颖. 中国上市公司首次股票股利信号传递有效性的实证研究 [J]. 财贸研究,2005,(4): 53-61.
    [43] 杨家新. 公司股利政策研究 [M]. 北京:中国财政经济出版社,2002.
    [44] 俞乔、程滢. 我国公司红利政策与股市波动 [J]. 经济研究,2001,(4):32~40.
    [45] 原红旗. 中国上市公司股利政策分析 [J],财经研究,2001,(3):33-41.
    [22] 原红旗. 中国上市公司股利政策分析 [M]. 北京:中国财政经济出版社. 2004.
    [46] 赵宇龙著. 会计盈余与股价行为 [M]. 上海:上海三联书店,2000.
    [47] 周边. 大股东祸乱 320 亿灰飞烟灭 [N]. 证券时报. 2006-05-17.
    [48] 周中胜. 大股东资金占用与外部审计监督 [J]. 审计研究,2006,(3):73-81
    [49] 朱武祥,杜丽虹. 股东价值取向差异与股东利益最大化实践问题——佛山照明案例分析 [J]. 管理世界,2004,(6):113-122.
    [50] Agrawal, A. and N. Jayaraman, 1994, The Dividend Policies of All-Equity Firms: A Direct Test of the Free Cash Flow Theory [J], Managerial Decision Economics 15:139-148.
    [51] Aharony, Joseph and Swary I., 1980, Quarterly dividend and earnings announcements, and stockholders’ returns: an empirical analysis [J], Journal of Finance, 35: 1-12.
    [52] Amihud, Yakov, and Kefei Li, 2006, The declining information content of dividend announcements and the effects of institutional investors [J], Forthcoming Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.
    [53] Asquith P. and Mullins D. W., 1983, The impact of initiating dividend payment on shareholders’ wealth [J], Journal of Business, Vol.56, 77-96.
    [54] Atiase, R., 1985. Predisclosure information, firm capitalization and security price behavior around earnings announcements [J], Journal of Accounting Research 23(1):21-36.
    [55] Ball R. and P. Brown, 1968, An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Numbers [J], Journal of Accounting Research, 6: 159-78.
    [56] Benartzi S., R. Michaely and R. Thaler, 1997, Do changes in dividends signal the future or the past? [J] Journal of Finance, Vol.52, 1007–1034.
    [57] Bhattacharya, S., 1979, Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and "the Bird in the Hand" Fallacy [J]. Bell Journal of Economics. Spring, 259-270
    [58] Brickley, J. A., 1983, Shareholder Wealth, Information Signaling and the Specially Designated Dividend [J], Journal of Financial Economics, Aug, 187-209.
    [59] Chen Donghua, Jian Ming and T.J. Wong, 2003, Do dividend policies of Chinese listed firms constrain or Facilitate Tunneling? [Z], Working paper, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
    [60] Cheng, L T. W., Leungb, T. Y., 2006, Revisiting the corroboration effects of earnings and dividend announcements [J], Accounting and Finance, 46:221-241.
    [61] Choi H., 1994, Analysis and Valuation Implications of Persistence and Cash-Content Dimensions of Earnings Components Based on Extent of Analyst Following [D], Ph. D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
    [62] Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang, 2000, The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations [J], Journal of Financial Economics 58, 81–112.
    [63] Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang, 2002, Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings [J], Journal of Finance 57, 2741–2771.
    [64] Conroy, R. M., K. M. Eades, and R. S. Harris, 2000, A test of the relative pricing effects of dividends and earnings: evidence from simultaneous announcements in Japan [J], Journal of Finance 55: 1199-1227.
    [65] Crutchley, C. E., R. S. Hansen, 1989, A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends [J], Financial Management 18(4): 36-46.
    [66] DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo and D. J. Skinner, 1992, Dividends and losses [J]. Journal ofFinace 47(5), 1837-1864.
    [67] DeAngelo H., L. DeAngelo and D. J. Skinner, 2000, Special dividends and the evolution of dividend signaling [J], Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.57, 309–354
    [68] DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and R. Stulz, 2004, Dividend Policy, Agency Costs, and Earned Equity [Z], NBER Working Paper.
    [69] Dielman, T. E., and H. R. Oppenheimen, 1984, An Examination of Investor Behavior During Periods of Large Dividend Change [J], Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, June,197-216.
    [70] Demsetz, H., 1983, The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm, [J] Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, 301-325.
    [71] Easterbrook F.H., 1984, Two agency-cost explanations of dividends [J], American Economic Review, Vol.74, 650-659.
    [72] Easton, S., 1991, Earnings and dividend: is there an interaction effect? [J] Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 18, 255-266.
    [73] Easton, P. and Harris, T., 1991, Earnings as an Explanatory Variable for Returns [J], Journal of Accounting Research, 29: 19-36.
    [74] Easton, P. and M. Zmijewski, 1989, Cross-sectional Variation in the Stock Market Respose to Accounting Earnings Announcements [J], Journal of Accounting and Economics 11: 117-141.
    [75] El-Gazzar, S. M., 1998, Predisclosure Information and Institutional Ownership: A Cross-sectional Examination of Market Revaluations During Earnings Announcement Periods [J]. The Accounting Review 73(1):119-129.
    [76] Elgers, P. T. and M.H. Lo., 1994, Reduction in Analysts’ Annual Earnings Forecast Errors Using Information in Prior Earnings and Security Return [J], Journal of Accounting Research, 32: 290-303.
    [77] Faccio, M., and L. H. P. Lang, 2002, The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations [J], Journal of Financial Economics 65, 365-395
    [78] Faccio, M., L. H. P. Lang, and L.Young, 2001, Dividends and Expropriation [J], The American Economic Review 91(1):54-78.
    [79] Fama, E. F. and M. Jensen, 1983, Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics [J], Vol. 26, 327-349.
    [80] Fama, E, and J. Macbeth, 1973, Risk, Return and Equilibrium-Empirical Tests [J], Journal of Political Economy 81:607-636.
    [81] Fan, Joseph P.H., T. J. Wong, 2002, Corporate Ownership and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings [J], Journal of Accounting and Economics 33:401-425.
    [82] Farinha, J., 2003, Dividend Policy, Corporate Governance and the Managerial Entrenchment Hypothesis: An Empirical Analysis [J], Jornal of Business Finance & Accounting 30(9): 1173-1209.
    [83] Feltham, G. A. and J. A. Ohlson., 1995, Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities [J]. Contemporary Accounting Research,11: 689-731.
    [84] Gonedes, N., 1978, Corporate Signaling, External Accounting, and Capital Market Equilibrium: Evidence on Dividends, Income, and Extraordinary Items [J], Journal of Accounting Research 16: 26-79
    [85] Grullon, G., R. Michaely, S. Benartzi, and Richard Thaler, 2006, Dividend Changes do notSignal Changes in Future Profitability [J], Journal of Business.
    [86] Guay, W., and Harford, J., 2000. The Cash-flow Permanence and Information Content of Dividend Increases Versus Repurchase [J]. Journal of Financial Economics 57, 385-415.
    [87] Gugler, K., and B. B. Yurtoglu, 2003, Corporate Governance and Dividend Pay-out Policy in Germany [J], European Economic Review 47, 731-758.
    [88] Hayn, C., 1995, The Information Content of Losses [J], Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20: 123-153.
    [89] Healy P. and K. Palepu, 1988, Earnings Information Conveyed by Dividend Initiations and Omissions [J], Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.21, 149–175.
    [90] Jensen, G. R. and R. E. Miller, 2005, Dividend Drops and Firm Retrenchment [Z], working paper, Northern Illinois University
    [91] Jensen, G., D. Solberg and T. Zorn, 1992, Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies [J], Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27: 247-264.
    [92] Jensen, M. C.1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers [J], American Economic Review, 76(2): 323-329.
    [93] Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and capital structure [J], Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-60.
    [94] Johnson, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer, 2000, Tunneling [J], American Economic Review 90(2): 22-27.
    [95] Kalay, A. and U. Lowenstein, 1986, The Information Content of the Timing of Dividend Announcements [J], Journal of Financial Economics, 16: 373-388.
    [96] Kallapur, S., 1994, Dividend Payout Ratios as Determinants of Earnings Response Coefficients [J], Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 359-375.
    [97] Kane, A., Y. K. Lee, and A. Marcus, 1984, Earnings and dividend announcements: is there a corroboration effect? [J], Journal of Finance 39, 1091-1099.
    [98] Kormendi, R., and Lipe, R., 1987, Earnings Innovations, Earnings Persistence and Stock Returns [J], Journal of Business, 60: 323-345.
    [99] Kormendi, R., and Zarowin, P., 1996, Dividend changes and permanence of earnings [J], Review of Accounting Studies, 1: 141-160.
    [100] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, 1999, Corporate Ownership Around the World [J], Journal of Finance 54, 471-518
    [101] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, 1998, Law and Finance [J], Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113-1155.
    [102] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, 2000, Agency Problems and Dividend Policies Around the World [J], Journal of finance 55(1):1-33
    [103] Lang, Larry H. P., and Litzenberger, Robert H, 1989, Dividend Announcements: Cash Flow Signaling vs. Free Cash Flow Hypothesis [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, (24): 1-33.
    [104] Lee C.J. and X. Xiao, 2002, Cash dividends and large shareholder expropriation in China [Z], working paper, Tsinghua University
    [105] Leftwich, R., and M. E. Zmijewski, 1994, Contemporaneous announcements of dividends and earnings [J], Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 9, 725-762.
    [106] Lintner., 1956, Distribution of Incomes of Corporations Among Dividends, RetainedEarnings, and Taxes [J], The American Economic Review, 46: 97-113.
    [107] Lipson, M. L., C. P. Maquieira, W. L. Megginson, 1998, Dividend Initiations and Earnings Surprises [J], Financial Management 27(3): 36-45.
    [108] Lonie, A. A., G. Abeyratna, D.M. Power, and C. D. Sinclair, 1996, The Stock market reaction to dividend announcements: A UK study of complex market signals [J], Journal of Economic Studies, 23, 32-52.
    [109] Maury, C. B., and A. Pajuste, 2002, Controlling Shareholders, Agency Problems and Dividend Policy in Finland [Z], working paper.
    [110] McConnel, J.J. and H. Servaes, 1990, Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value [J], Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.
    [111] Michaely, R., R. Thaler, and K. Womack, 1995, Price Reactions to Dividend Initiations and Omissions: Overreaction or drift [J], Journal of Finance 50: 573-608.
    [112] Miller, M., and Rock, K., 1985, Dividend Policy Under Asymmetric Information [J], Journal of Finance 40: 1031-1051.
    [113] Ming Jian and T.J. Wong, 2003, Earnings Management and Tunneling through Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Chinese Corporate Groups [Z]. HKUST Working paper.
    [114] Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny, 1988, Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis [J], Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293-315.
    [115] Nissim D., and Ziv A., 2001, Dividend Changes and Future Profitability [J], The Journal of Finance, 56: 2111-2133.
    [116] Ofer, A. R. and D. R. Siegel, 1987, Corporate Financial Policy, Information, and Market Expectations: An Empirical Investigation of Dividends [J], The Journal of Finance, September: 889-911.
    [117] Ohlson J. A., 1995, Earnings, Book values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation [J], Contemporary Accounting Research, 6: 648-676.
    [118] Penman, S. H., 1984, Abnormal Return to Investment Strategies Based on the Timing of Earnings Reports [J], Journal of Accounting and Economics 6: 165-184.
    [119] Pettit R., 1972, Dividend Announcements, Security Performance, and Capital Market Efficiency [J], Journal of Finance, (27):993-1007.
    [120] Pettit R., 1976, The Impact of Dividend and Earnings Announcements: A Reconciliation [J], Journal of Business, (45): 86-96.
    [121] Potter, G., 1992, Accounting Earnings Announcements, Institutional Investor Concentration, and Common Stock Returns [J]. Journal of Accounting Research 30 (Spring):146-155.
    [122] Richardson, S. A., R. G. Sloan, M. T. Soliman, and I. Tuna, 2005, Accrual Reliability, Earnings Persistence and Stock Prices, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39: 437-485.
    [123] Ross S A., 1977, The Determinants of Financial Structure: the Incentive Signaling Approach [J], Bell journal of Economics, (08):23-40.
    [124] Rozeff, M., 1982, Growth, Beta and agency cost as Determinants of dividend payout ratios [J], Journal of Financial Research, Fall:249-259.
    [125] Schooley, D. K. and L. D. Barney Jr., 1994, Using Dividend Policy and Managerial Ownership to Reduce Agency Costs [J], Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 17, 363-373.
    [126] Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny, 1986, Larger Shareholders and Corporate Control [J], Journal of Political Economy 94: 461-488.
    [127] Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny, 1997, A Survey of Corporate Governance [J], Journal of Finance 52, 737-783.
    [128] Skinner D J., 2005, What Do Dividends Tell Us About Earnings Quality? [Z] Working paper, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
    [129] Sloan, R., 1996, Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? [J], The Accounting Review 71, 289–315.
    [130] Sun A. X., 2005, The Informativeness of Dividend Announcements and the Market’s Inefficient Response to Earnings [D]. Ph. D. dissertation, the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University.
    [131] Watts, R. L., 1973, Efficient Signaling with Dividends, Investment, and Stock Repurchases [J], Journal of Business 46:191-211.
    [132] Yoon, P. S., and Starks Laura, 1995, Signaling, Investment Opportunities, and Dividend Announcement [J], Review of Financial Studies 8(4): 995-1018.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700