职业病防治绩效评价及分析研究
|
摘要
研究背景
职业健康问题是全球所面临的严重问题之一,是经济发展,特别是工业化进程的产物,但因其外部性、公共产品的特征,仅仅依靠市场机制这只“无形的手”无法有效解决这一难题,因此作为公共服务的提供者,政府在职业病防治领域负有高度的责任,职业病防治工作是政府公共服务的重要组成部分。但片面的发展观和以经济增长为核心的政绩考核机制,均制约了我国职业病防治工作的开展。因此,在职业病防治领域,政府失灵与市场失灵并存,而前者突出表现在管理不力和效率低下。
目前我国已处于职业病的高发期和矛盾凸显期,职业病患者人数、死亡人数均位居世界首位,职业病已成为重大的公共卫生问题和社会问题。职业病防治形势日益严峻的现实,迫使我们产生以下疑惑“我国职业病防治工作是否有效,绩效几何”,因此,以何标准衡量我国职业病防治工作所取得的成绩,如何客观、公正的对我国职业病防治投入、产出以及结果进行综合评价,成为各级政府关注的问题,也是职业病防治领域理论研究者以及实践工作者亟待解决的问题。但目前国内外关于职业病防治绩效评价的研究极少,而职业病防治绩效评价的实施对强化责任、监控进程、界定成败影响因素和提供实证依据有着十分重要的意义,因此本研究致力于解决这一难题,通过绩效评价提高职业病防治资源的利用效率,改善职业病防治的服务质量,切实维护劳动者的健康权益。
研究目的
基于上述背景,本研究以职业病防治绩效评价为主题,旨在通过构建职业病防治绩效评价体系,对我国职业病防治的绩效做出科学、公正的评价,并确定关键制约因素以及其内在根源,从而为相关部门采取针对性的改进措施提供客观依据。具体目标为：
1、构建以行政区域为对象的职业病防治绩效评价体系,包括指标体系的构建、基础数据集的建立、评价模型的确定以及评价标准的形成等。
2、通过对样本地区的实证研究,对构建的评价体系进行检验,并对样本地区进行诊断缺陷,发现薄弱环节,为针对性改进措施的实施提供依据。
3、确定制约我国职业病防治绩效的内在根源。
研究方法
针对以上研究目的,本研究按照一般与特殊相结合,理论与实证相结合,系统与局部相结合,内在与外在相结合的方法论原则,采用理论方法与实证方法两大类手法,通过对行政区域职业病防治绩效进行评价,提出进一步完善和发展我国职业病防治体系的政策建议,以供决策者参考。
本研究所采用的对应研究方法如下：
1、首先通过相关政策分析、文献复习和专题访谈确定了职业病防治绩效概念模型；
2、通过小组研讨、专家访谈和现场调研对指标进行初选,然后通过两轮Delphi专家咨询和离散趋势分析筛选出最终指标,进而采用主客观赋权法确定各指标的权重,然后经过专家咨询和论证,确定指标的标准值和收集方式等；
3、在文献复习的基础上,通过专家咨询确定职业病防治绩效不可控因素,然后利用偏最小二乘回归法构建这些因素与职业病防治绩效指数的回归模型,然后,通过建立样本地区内部影响因素矩阵,计算出“环境有利度”；
4、选择山东省九个地级市为样本,将构建的职业病防治绩效评价体系运用于实证研究,利用从样本地区收集的资料,分别应用克朗巴赫α系数、主成分分析和聚类分析,检验指标体系的信度、效度和区分度,采用综合指数法评价样本地区的职业病防治绩效；
5、采用规范分析的方法,借鉴经典的委托代理模型以及成本收益模型,对我国职业病防治绩效不佳的内在根源进行探讨。
主要研究结果
本研究的主要研究结果包括：
1、建立了职业病防治绩效的概念模型,包括投入、活动、产出、结果、影响及环境等维度。
2、构建了职业病防治绩效评价指标体系,包括投入、产出和结果三个一级指标,其中投入维度包括有形投入和无形投入两个二级指标,产出维度包括服务提供、行业自律和依法行政三个二级指标,结果维度包括健康促进和社会影响两个二级指标,共计22个三级指标,并确定了各指标的权重和标准值。与之相对应,基础数据集、评价模型以及评价标准的形成,最终形成职业病防治绩效评价体系。
3、为了确保职业病防治绩效评价结果的横向可比性,本研究构建了职业病防治绩效不可控因素模型,包括政治、经济、社会和技术等维度,共计十个指标,其中,人均GDP、规模以上工业万元增加值能耗、财政赤字率、第二产业比重、城镇登记失业率以及职业病危害因素接触率与职业病防治绩效呈负相关,R&D投入占GDP的比例、规模以上工业产值中高新技术产业比重、卫生技术人员千人拥有量、大专以上文凭所占比重与职业病防治绩效呈正相关。并在此基础上计算出这些不可控因素对样本地区的“环境有利度”。
4、建立了职业病防治绩效评价指标体系使用指南,针对三级指标制定了具体的测量公式、数据收集方式以及评价的标准值。
5、利用构建的职业病防治绩效评价体系对山东省9个地级市职业病防治的现状进行了综合评价,评价结果显示：
按照绩效从高到低依次排序为济南市、潍坊市、聊城市、烟台市、莱芜市、济宁市、威海市、枣庄市和菏泽市。本研究将绩效分为好、较好、一般、较差和差五类,按照分类标准,前七个市绩效类别为“一般”,枣庄市和菏泽市绩效类别为“较差”。
6、中央政府与地方政府的信息不对称以及目标函数的不一致,使得其在职业病防治领域存在严重的委托代理问题,主要表现在地方政府倾向于选择放松职业病防治,甚至直接非正当干预职业病防治工作的开展,成为一些企业的保护伞。
7、目前我国职业病防治体系及制度的不完善,使得用人单位缺乏自觉开展职业病防治工作的积极性。
结论和建议
通过理论分析和实证研究,结合我国相关政策,提出如下政策建议：
1、落实各级政府和相关部门的责任,加强组织领导是前提
2、加强职业病防治能力建设是基础
3、加强对用人单位的监管,强化其责任主体的地位是重点
4、加强政策引导,提高职业病防治各相关责任体的内在动力是关键
(1)制定有利于职业健康的产业政策,充分发挥产业政策导向和市场机制的作用,鼓励和引导用人单位采用先进的技术、装备和工艺。
(2)完善中央政府与地方政府之间的转移支付机制,建立中央政府-地方政府安全健康生产基金,中央政府根据地方政府的政策执行情况,按照一定比例从税收中返还给地方政府。
(3)完善我国工伤保险制度,对工伤保险金的使用范围进行相应的改革,建立弹性工伤保险金制度。
(4)实行更为严格的考核和责任追究制度,严格落实职业病防治目标考核制度,对各级政府、相关职能部门以及用人单位完成年度职业病防治指标情况进行严格考核,并建立相应的奖惩制度。
(5)实施用人单位职业健康公示和承诺制度,用人单位必须定期公示本单位职业健康的基本信息。
创新与不足
本研究的创新有以下几个方面:
1、理论创新
目前关于我国职业病防治绩效不佳的原因的探讨众多,但大都浮于表面,本研究借鉴经典的经济学原理,从委托代理以及成本-收益两个方面,分别对政府和用人单位开展职业病防治工作的内在动力进行探讨,从而确定了我国职业病防治绩效不佳的内在根源,那就是无论是地方政府还是用人单位都是“经济人”,它们均缺乏自觉开展职业病防治活动的积极性。
2、实践创新
目前的研究多集中在对用人单位职业卫生管理效果的评价上,本文的研究目标定位于区域性的职业病防治绩效评价,构建了一套科学、合理的职业病防治绩效评价体系,并进行了实证研究,对于强化责任、监控进程、界定成败影响因素和提供实证依据有着十分重要的实践意义。
3、方法创新
如何剔除不可控因素的干扰一直是评价领域的一个难题,本研究通过PLS模型构建了不可控因素与职业病防治绩效的回归方程,并结合内部影响因素模型,定量测量职业病防治绩效不可控因素的作用,计算出每个评价区域的“环境有利度”,从而可以剔除这些不可控的环境因素的影响,实现了区域之间的横向比较。
但是职业病防治绩效评价是一个复杂的系统工程,同时,由于作者能力和精力所限,本研究尚存在一些不足之处：
(1)由于职业病是一个笼统的概念,它包含很多种疾病,不同的职业病危害需要采取的防治措施不同,因此所需要的资源也相应不同。本研究没有对其进行细分,因此,需要进一步的完善。
(2)本研究利用“环境有利度”对职业病防治绩效进行校正,但也仅限于综合绩效指数,而没有对三级指标进行校正。
(3)本研究虽然剔除了一些不可控因素的干扰,但由于本研究以行政区域为评价对象,因此,不能采取实验或准实验研究的方法(因为没有那个区域完全不采取职业病防治措施),进行严格的因果论证,虽然是条件所限,但仍是缺憾之处。
(4)目前我国职业健康形势不佳是受到政治、经济、社会、文化等多方面制约引起的,本研究仅从经济学角度对其进行探讨。
BACKGROUND
Occupational health problem is one of the serious problems world widely, which is the product of economic development, especially the industrialization progress. Since it is characterized with public service and externalities, the "invisible hand" of the market mechanism can't solve it effectively, therefore as a provider of public services; the government has high degree of responsibility in the field of occupational disease prevention and control, which is an important part of government public services. But one-sided development concept and performance evaluation mechanism have restricted the work of occupational disease prevention and control. Therefore, in the field of occupational disease prevention and control, government failure and market failure coexist, while the latter was prominent in poor management and low efficiency.
Recently, China is in a period of high incidence and prominent contradictions of occupational disease, both the incidence and death toll of occupational disease patients ranked first in the world, so occupational disease has become a major public health problem and social problem. But the serious situation of occupational disease prevention and control at present forces us to doubt that if the work of occupational disease prevention and control effective and how much is the performance". So what criteria should be used to measure the achievement and how to evaluate the input, output and result of the occupational disease prevention and control objectively and impartially, become the concern of governments, and is also a problem to be solved urgently for theoretical researchers and practical workers. But there are very few researches on performance evaluation of occupational disease prevention and control, which is of extremely significance for strengthening responsibility, monitoring process, defining the success or failure factors and providing empirical basis. So this research is committed to solve this problem, and through the performance evaluation to improve the efficiency of resource utilization and the service quality, and to safeguard the health rights and interests of the workers.
OBJECTIVE
Based on the above background, this research whose theme is performance evaluation of occupational disease prevention and control aims to address the following questions:
1. To construct a performance evaluation system for regional occupational disease prevention and control, including the construction of index system, the establishment of basic database, the determination of evaluation model, and the formation of the evaluation standard, etc.
2. To inspect the constructed evaluation model through the empirical study in the sample areas, and then affirm the achievement and diagnosis defects, and to find the weaknesses, so as to provide basis for the implementation of targeted measures.
3. To explore the inner reasons restricting the performance of occupational disease prevention.
METHODOLOGY
According to methodological principle of combining common with specialty, theory with practice, system with part, internal aspects with external, and utilizing theoretical method and demonstrating methods, this research evaluates the performance of occupational disease prevention and control in sample areas, and then providing policy and suggestions for further improvement of occupational disease prevention and control system.
1. To identify the conceptual model of occupational disease prevention and control performance through the related policy analysis, literature review and thematic interviews.
2. To screen the primary indicators through group discussions, expert interview and field research, and then screen out the final indicators through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations and discrete trend analysis, and then the subjective and objective empowerment method is adopted to determine the weight of each index, and finally determine the standard and collection method of the indicators through expert consultation and demonstration.
3. To screen the uncontrollable factors influencing the performance of occupational disease prevention and control through literature review and expert consultations, and then the PLSR method is used to make sure the impact degree and property quantitatively.
4. This study selects nine prefecture-level cities in Shandong province as samples, and put the constructed index system into practice. Using the data collected from the sample areas, cronbach coefficient and principal component analysis are applied to test the reliability and validity of the index system. Synthetical index method is used to evaluate the performance of occupational disease prevention and control comprehensively.
5. Using the classic principal-agent model and cost-benefit model for reference, the normative analysis method is adopted to analyze the root of poor performance of the occupational disease prevention in China.
RESULTS
The main results of this research are as follows:
1. The concept model of occupational disease prevention and control performance has been constructed, including input, activity, output, the results and environment.
2. The index system for performance evaluation of the occupational disease prevention and control has been constructed, including three first-level indexes, that is input, output and result; and the input dimension includes two secondary indexes, that is tangible inputs and intangible inputs, the output dimension includes three secondary indexes, that is service provide, administration according to law, self-discipline, the result dimension includes two secondary indexes, that is health promotion and social impact, all in all22third-level index. The weight and standard of each index are also determined.
3. hi order to ensure the transverse comparison of the performance evaluation results of occupational disease prevention and control, this study constructs a uncontrollable factors model for occupational disease prevention and control, including the dimensions of political, economic, social, technology and so on with a total of10indicators. Per capita GDP, industrial added value of ten thousand Yuan, fiscal deficit, the proportion of secondary industry, urban registered unemployment rate and the occupational-disease-inductive factors contact rate are negatively correlated with the performance of occupational disease prevention and control, and the proportion of R&D investment in GDP, the proportion of high and new technology industry in gross value of industrial output over the scale, the number of health and technical personnel per thousand people, the proportion of college degree or above diploma are positively correlated with the performance of occupational disease prevention and control. Through calculating the "environmental benefit degree" for each sample areas, the performance results are adjusted.
4. The guidelines for index system for performance evaluation of the occupational disease prevention and control has been constructed, in which the specific measurement formula, data collection method and evaluation standard for the third-level index are listed.
5. With the constructed index system, this study carries on empirical study in nine cities in Shandong province, the evaluation results are as follows:
The performance order from high to low in turn is Jinan, Weifang, Liaocheng,Yantai, Laiwu, Jining, Weihai, Zaozhuang and Heze. The performance level in this study is divided into good, relatively good, general, relatively poor and poor, so the performance level of occupational disease prevention and control for the former seven cities is general, and the level for Zaozhuang and Heze is relatively poor.
6. Because of the information asymmetry between the central government and local government as well as the inconsistent objective function, there are serious agency problems exist in the field of occupational disease prevention and control. The local governments tend to relax the occupational disease prevention, and even directly intervene in the occupational disease prevention and control work, becoming the umbrella of some illegal enterprises.
7. The employers lack the enthusiasm of carrying out the work of prevention and control of occupational disease consciously because of the imperfect system and institution for the prevention and control of occupational diseases.
CONCLUSIONS&SUGGESTIONS
Through theoretical analysis and empirical research, combined with relevant policies in China, this paper puts forward the following suggestions:
1. To implement the responsibility of the government and relevant departments at all levels and strengthen organizational leadership is the premise.
2. To strengthen the ability construction of of occupational disease prevention and control is the foundation.
3. To strengthen the supervision employers, and guarantee their main responsibility body status is the emphasis.
4. To improve the intrinsic motivation of each related responsibility body for occupational disease prevention and control through policy guidance is the key pomt.
(1) To give full play to the role of the industrial policy guidance and market mechanism, so as to encourage and guide the employers to use the advanced technology, equipment and process.
(2) To improve the transfer payment mechanism between the central government and local government, and establish special fund for occupational disease prevention and control, the central government returns a certain proportion tax to the local government according to its policy implementation.
(3) To improve the work injury insurance system in our country, and reform the using range of work injury insurance, and construct the elastic work injury insurance system.
(4) To construct a stricter inspection and responsibility system, and strictly carry out the target appraisal system for for all levels of government, the relevant functional departments and the companies, and check the completion of the annual index of occupational disease prevention and control, and establish corresponding system of rewards and punishments.
(5) To implement publicity and commitment system of occupational health for the companies, and the companies must publicize the basic information of the occupational health regularly.
INNOVATIONS&LIMITATIONS
The innovations of this research are as follows:
1. theoretical innovation
At present the discussion about the the cause of the poor occupational health status in China is numerous, but most of them are superficial. This study is largely inspired by the classical economics principle, and principal-agent and cost-benefit theory are used respectively to explore the intrinsic motivation of the government and company to carry out the work of occupational disease prevention and control; so as to determine the the internal origin of the poor occupational health condition in our country, that is both the local government and companies are "economic man", they all lack the enthusiasm of carrying out the occupational-disease-prevention activities consciously.
2. practice innovation
At present, the studies focus on the effect of occupational disease prevention and control for companies, but this study targets at performance evaluation of regional occupational disease prevention and control, and has constructed a set of scientific and reasonable performance evaluation system of occupational disease prevention and control, and this study has conducted empirical study, which is of extremely practical significance for strengthening responsibility, monitoring process, defining the success or failure factors and providing empirical basis.
3. methodology innovation
How to eliminate the influence of environmental factors has always been a difficult problem in the field of evaluation, this study has constructed the regression equation between uncontrollable factors and performance of the occupational disease prevention and control by the PLS model, and the internal influencing factors model is used to measure the uncontrollable factors quantitatively, and calculate the "environmental benefit" of each areas, in order to eliminate the impact of these uncontrollable environmental factors, and realize the transverse comparison between regions.
But the performance evaluation of occupational disease prevention and control is a complex systematic engineer, and because of the complexity of the problem and limitations of the author, this study still exist some shortcomings that need further research and improvement. The limitations of this research are as follows:
1. Due to occupational disease is a general concept, it contains many kinds of diseases, and different prevention measures are needed to taken for different occupational disease hazards, therefore the resources needed are also different accordingly. This study failed to consider this, therefore we should make further improvement to optimize it.
2. The "environmental benefit degree" is used to adjust the performance of occupational disease prevention and control, but this is just limited to the comprehensive index, and no adjustment of the third-level indicators.
3. Although this study eliminated the interference of some uncontrolled factors, this study aims to evaluate the administrative areas, therefore, we cannot take the method of experimental or quasi-experimental research for the strict causal reasoning, although this is due to the limited conditions, but is still missing.
4. At present poor occupational health situation in our country is influenced by the restriction of political, economic, social and cultural aspects, this study only explores it from the perspective of economics.
职业健康问题是全球所面临的严重问题之一,是经济发展,特别是工业化进程的产物,但因其外部性、公共产品的特征,仅仅依靠市场机制这只“无形的手”无法有效解决这一难题,因此作为公共服务的提供者,政府在职业病防治领域负有高度的责任,职业病防治工作是政府公共服务的重要组成部分。但片面的发展观和以经济增长为核心的政绩考核机制,均制约了我国职业病防治工作的开展。因此,在职业病防治领域,政府失灵与市场失灵并存,而前者突出表现在管理不力和效率低下。
目前我国已处于职业病的高发期和矛盾凸显期,职业病患者人数、死亡人数均位居世界首位,职业病已成为重大的公共卫生问题和社会问题。职业病防治形势日益严峻的现实,迫使我们产生以下疑惑“我国职业病防治工作是否有效,绩效几何”,因此,以何标准衡量我国职业病防治工作所取得的成绩,如何客观、公正的对我国职业病防治投入、产出以及结果进行综合评价,成为各级政府关注的问题,也是职业病防治领域理论研究者以及实践工作者亟待解决的问题。但目前国内外关于职业病防治绩效评价的研究极少,而职业病防治绩效评价的实施对强化责任、监控进程、界定成败影响因素和提供实证依据有着十分重要的意义,因此本研究致力于解决这一难题,通过绩效评价提高职业病防治资源的利用效率,改善职业病防治的服务质量,切实维护劳动者的健康权益。
研究目的
基于上述背景,本研究以职业病防治绩效评价为主题,旨在通过构建职业病防治绩效评价体系,对我国职业病防治的绩效做出科学、公正的评价,并确定关键制约因素以及其内在根源,从而为相关部门采取针对性的改进措施提供客观依据。具体目标为：
1、构建以行政区域为对象的职业病防治绩效评价体系,包括指标体系的构建、基础数据集的建立、评价模型的确定以及评价标准的形成等。
2、通过对样本地区的实证研究,对构建的评价体系进行检验,并对样本地区进行诊断缺陷,发现薄弱环节,为针对性改进措施的实施提供依据。
3、确定制约我国职业病防治绩效的内在根源。
研究方法
针对以上研究目的,本研究按照一般与特殊相结合,理论与实证相结合,系统与局部相结合,内在与外在相结合的方法论原则,采用理论方法与实证方法两大类手法,通过对行政区域职业病防治绩效进行评价,提出进一步完善和发展我国职业病防治体系的政策建议,以供决策者参考。
本研究所采用的对应研究方法如下：
1、首先通过相关政策分析、文献复习和专题访谈确定了职业病防治绩效概念模型；
2、通过小组研讨、专家访谈和现场调研对指标进行初选,然后通过两轮Delphi专家咨询和离散趋势分析筛选出最终指标,进而采用主客观赋权法确定各指标的权重,然后经过专家咨询和论证,确定指标的标准值和收集方式等；
3、在文献复习的基础上,通过专家咨询确定职业病防治绩效不可控因素,然后利用偏最小二乘回归法构建这些因素与职业病防治绩效指数的回归模型,然后,通过建立样本地区内部影响因素矩阵,计算出“环境有利度”；
4、选择山东省九个地级市为样本,将构建的职业病防治绩效评价体系运用于实证研究,利用从样本地区收集的资料,分别应用克朗巴赫α系数、主成分分析和聚类分析,检验指标体系的信度、效度和区分度,采用综合指数法评价样本地区的职业病防治绩效；
5、采用规范分析的方法,借鉴经典的委托代理模型以及成本收益模型,对我国职业病防治绩效不佳的内在根源进行探讨。
主要研究结果
本研究的主要研究结果包括：
1、建立了职业病防治绩效的概念模型,包括投入、活动、产出、结果、影响及环境等维度。
2、构建了职业病防治绩效评价指标体系,包括投入、产出和结果三个一级指标,其中投入维度包括有形投入和无形投入两个二级指标,产出维度包括服务提供、行业自律和依法行政三个二级指标,结果维度包括健康促进和社会影响两个二级指标,共计22个三级指标,并确定了各指标的权重和标准值。与之相对应,基础数据集、评价模型以及评价标准的形成,最终形成职业病防治绩效评价体系。
3、为了确保职业病防治绩效评价结果的横向可比性,本研究构建了职业病防治绩效不可控因素模型,包括政治、经济、社会和技术等维度,共计十个指标,其中,人均GDP、规模以上工业万元增加值能耗、财政赤字率、第二产业比重、城镇登记失业率以及职业病危害因素接触率与职业病防治绩效呈负相关,R&D投入占GDP的比例、规模以上工业产值中高新技术产业比重、卫生技术人员千人拥有量、大专以上文凭所占比重与职业病防治绩效呈正相关。并在此基础上计算出这些不可控因素对样本地区的“环境有利度”。
4、建立了职业病防治绩效评价指标体系使用指南,针对三级指标制定了具体的测量公式、数据收集方式以及评价的标准值。
5、利用构建的职业病防治绩效评价体系对山东省9个地级市职业病防治的现状进行了综合评价,评价结果显示：
按照绩效从高到低依次排序为济南市、潍坊市、聊城市、烟台市、莱芜市、济宁市、威海市、枣庄市和菏泽市。本研究将绩效分为好、较好、一般、较差和差五类,按照分类标准,前七个市绩效类别为“一般”,枣庄市和菏泽市绩效类别为“较差”。
6、中央政府与地方政府的信息不对称以及目标函数的不一致,使得其在职业病防治领域存在严重的委托代理问题,主要表现在地方政府倾向于选择放松职业病防治,甚至直接非正当干预职业病防治工作的开展,成为一些企业的保护伞。
7、目前我国职业病防治体系及制度的不完善,使得用人单位缺乏自觉开展职业病防治工作的积极性。
结论和建议
通过理论分析和实证研究,结合我国相关政策,提出如下政策建议：
1、落实各级政府和相关部门的责任,加强组织领导是前提
2、加强职业病防治能力建设是基础
3、加强对用人单位的监管,强化其责任主体的地位是重点
4、加强政策引导,提高职业病防治各相关责任体的内在动力是关键
(1)制定有利于职业健康的产业政策,充分发挥产业政策导向和市场机制的作用,鼓励和引导用人单位采用先进的技术、装备和工艺。
(2)完善中央政府与地方政府之间的转移支付机制,建立中央政府-地方政府安全健康生产基金,中央政府根据地方政府的政策执行情况,按照一定比例从税收中返还给地方政府。
(3)完善我国工伤保险制度,对工伤保险金的使用范围进行相应的改革,建立弹性工伤保险金制度。
(4)实行更为严格的考核和责任追究制度,严格落实职业病防治目标考核制度,对各级政府、相关职能部门以及用人单位完成年度职业病防治指标情况进行严格考核,并建立相应的奖惩制度。
(5)实施用人单位职业健康公示和承诺制度,用人单位必须定期公示本单位职业健康的基本信息。
创新与不足
本研究的创新有以下几个方面:
1、理论创新
目前关于我国职业病防治绩效不佳的原因的探讨众多,但大都浮于表面,本研究借鉴经典的经济学原理,从委托代理以及成本-收益两个方面,分别对政府和用人单位开展职业病防治工作的内在动力进行探讨,从而确定了我国职业病防治绩效不佳的内在根源,那就是无论是地方政府还是用人单位都是“经济人”,它们均缺乏自觉开展职业病防治活动的积极性。
2、实践创新
目前的研究多集中在对用人单位职业卫生管理效果的评价上,本文的研究目标定位于区域性的职业病防治绩效评价,构建了一套科学、合理的职业病防治绩效评价体系,并进行了实证研究,对于强化责任、监控进程、界定成败影响因素和提供实证依据有着十分重要的实践意义。
3、方法创新
如何剔除不可控因素的干扰一直是评价领域的一个难题,本研究通过PLS模型构建了不可控因素与职业病防治绩效的回归方程,并结合内部影响因素模型,定量测量职业病防治绩效不可控因素的作用,计算出每个评价区域的“环境有利度”,从而可以剔除这些不可控的环境因素的影响,实现了区域之间的横向比较。
但是职业病防治绩效评价是一个复杂的系统工程,同时,由于作者能力和精力所限,本研究尚存在一些不足之处：
(1)由于职业病是一个笼统的概念,它包含很多种疾病,不同的职业病危害需要采取的防治措施不同,因此所需要的资源也相应不同。本研究没有对其进行细分,因此,需要进一步的完善。
(2)本研究利用“环境有利度”对职业病防治绩效进行校正,但也仅限于综合绩效指数,而没有对三级指标进行校正。
(3)本研究虽然剔除了一些不可控因素的干扰,但由于本研究以行政区域为评价对象,因此,不能采取实验或准实验研究的方法(因为没有那个区域完全不采取职业病防治措施),进行严格的因果论证,虽然是条件所限,但仍是缺憾之处。
(4)目前我国职业健康形势不佳是受到政治、经济、社会、文化等多方面制约引起的,本研究仅从经济学角度对其进行探讨。
BACKGROUND
Occupational health problem is one of the serious problems world widely, which is the product of economic development, especially the industrialization progress. Since it is characterized with public service and externalities, the "invisible hand" of the market mechanism can't solve it effectively, therefore as a provider of public services; the government has high degree of responsibility in the field of occupational disease prevention and control, which is an important part of government public services. But one-sided development concept and performance evaluation mechanism have restricted the work of occupational disease prevention and control. Therefore, in the field of occupational disease prevention and control, government failure and market failure coexist, while the latter was prominent in poor management and low efficiency.
Recently, China is in a period of high incidence and prominent contradictions of occupational disease, both the incidence and death toll of occupational disease patients ranked first in the world, so occupational disease has become a major public health problem and social problem. But the serious situation of occupational disease prevention and control at present forces us to doubt that if the work of occupational disease prevention and control effective and how much is the performance". So what criteria should be used to measure the achievement and how to evaluate the input, output and result of the occupational disease prevention and control objectively and impartially, become the concern of governments, and is also a problem to be solved urgently for theoretical researchers and practical workers. But there are very few researches on performance evaluation of occupational disease prevention and control, which is of extremely significance for strengthening responsibility, monitoring process, defining the success or failure factors and providing empirical basis. So this research is committed to solve this problem, and through the performance evaluation to improve the efficiency of resource utilization and the service quality, and to safeguard the health rights and interests of the workers.
OBJECTIVE
Based on the above background, this research whose theme is performance evaluation of occupational disease prevention and control aims to address the following questions:
1. To construct a performance evaluation system for regional occupational disease prevention and control, including the construction of index system, the establishment of basic database, the determination of evaluation model, and the formation of the evaluation standard, etc.
2. To inspect the constructed evaluation model through the empirical study in the sample areas, and then affirm the achievement and diagnosis defects, and to find the weaknesses, so as to provide basis for the implementation of targeted measures.
3. To explore the inner reasons restricting the performance of occupational disease prevention.
METHODOLOGY
According to methodological principle of combining common with specialty, theory with practice, system with part, internal aspects with external, and utilizing theoretical method and demonstrating methods, this research evaluates the performance of occupational disease prevention and control in sample areas, and then providing policy and suggestions for further improvement of occupational disease prevention and control system.
1. To identify the conceptual model of occupational disease prevention and control performance through the related policy analysis, literature review and thematic interviews.
2. To screen the primary indicators through group discussions, expert interview and field research, and then screen out the final indicators through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations and discrete trend analysis, and then the subjective and objective empowerment method is adopted to determine the weight of each index, and finally determine the standard and collection method of the indicators through expert consultation and demonstration.
3. To screen the uncontrollable factors influencing the performance of occupational disease prevention and control through literature review and expert consultations, and then the PLSR method is used to make sure the impact degree and property quantitatively.
4. This study selects nine prefecture-level cities in Shandong province as samples, and put the constructed index system into practice. Using the data collected from the sample areas, cronbach coefficient and principal component analysis are applied to test the reliability and validity of the index system. Synthetical index method is used to evaluate the performance of occupational disease prevention and control comprehensively.
5. Using the classic principal-agent model and cost-benefit model for reference, the normative analysis method is adopted to analyze the root of poor performance of the occupational disease prevention in China.
RESULTS
The main results of this research are as follows:
1. The concept model of occupational disease prevention and control performance has been constructed, including input, activity, output, the results and environment.
2. The index system for performance evaluation of the occupational disease prevention and control has been constructed, including three first-level indexes, that is input, output and result; and the input dimension includes two secondary indexes, that is tangible inputs and intangible inputs, the output dimension includes three secondary indexes, that is service provide, administration according to law, self-discipline, the result dimension includes two secondary indexes, that is health promotion and social impact, all in all22third-level index. The weight and standard of each index are also determined.
3. hi order to ensure the transverse comparison of the performance evaluation results of occupational disease prevention and control, this study constructs a uncontrollable factors model for occupational disease prevention and control, including the dimensions of political, economic, social, technology and so on with a total of10indicators. Per capita GDP, industrial added value of ten thousand Yuan, fiscal deficit, the proportion of secondary industry, urban registered unemployment rate and the occupational-disease-inductive factors contact rate are negatively correlated with the performance of occupational disease prevention and control, and the proportion of R&D investment in GDP, the proportion of high and new technology industry in gross value of industrial output over the scale, the number of health and technical personnel per thousand people, the proportion of college degree or above diploma are positively correlated with the performance of occupational disease prevention and control. Through calculating the "environmental benefit degree" for each sample areas, the performance results are adjusted.
4. The guidelines for index system for performance evaluation of the occupational disease prevention and control has been constructed, in which the specific measurement formula, data collection method and evaluation standard for the third-level index are listed.
5. With the constructed index system, this study carries on empirical study in nine cities in Shandong province, the evaluation results are as follows:
The performance order from high to low in turn is Jinan, Weifang, Liaocheng,Yantai, Laiwu, Jining, Weihai, Zaozhuang and Heze. The performance level in this study is divided into good, relatively good, general, relatively poor and poor, so the performance level of occupational disease prevention and control for the former seven cities is general, and the level for Zaozhuang and Heze is relatively poor.
6. Because of the information asymmetry between the central government and local government as well as the inconsistent objective function, there are serious agency problems exist in the field of occupational disease prevention and control. The local governments tend to relax the occupational disease prevention, and even directly intervene in the occupational disease prevention and control work, becoming the umbrella of some illegal enterprises.
7. The employers lack the enthusiasm of carrying out the work of prevention and control of occupational disease consciously because of the imperfect system and institution for the prevention and control of occupational diseases.
CONCLUSIONS&SUGGESTIONS
Through theoretical analysis and empirical research, combined with relevant policies in China, this paper puts forward the following suggestions:
1. To implement the responsibility of the government and relevant departments at all levels and strengthen organizational leadership is the premise.
2. To strengthen the ability construction of of occupational disease prevention and control is the foundation.
3. To strengthen the supervision employers, and guarantee their main responsibility body status is the emphasis.
4. To improve the intrinsic motivation of each related responsibility body for occupational disease prevention and control through policy guidance is the key pomt.
(1) To give full play to the role of the industrial policy guidance and market mechanism, so as to encourage and guide the employers to use the advanced technology, equipment and process.
(2) To improve the transfer payment mechanism between the central government and local government, and establish special fund for occupational disease prevention and control, the central government returns a certain proportion tax to the local government according to its policy implementation.
(3) To improve the work injury insurance system in our country, and reform the using range of work injury insurance, and construct the elastic work injury insurance system.
(4) To construct a stricter inspection and responsibility system, and strictly carry out the target appraisal system for for all levels of government, the relevant functional departments and the companies, and check the completion of the annual index of occupational disease prevention and control, and establish corresponding system of rewards and punishments.
(5) To implement publicity and commitment system of occupational health for the companies, and the companies must publicize the basic information of the occupational health regularly.
INNOVATIONS&LIMITATIONS
The innovations of this research are as follows:
1. theoretical innovation
At present the discussion about the the cause of the poor occupational health status in China is numerous, but most of them are superficial. This study is largely inspired by the classical economics principle, and principal-agent and cost-benefit theory are used respectively to explore the intrinsic motivation of the government and company to carry out the work of occupational disease prevention and control; so as to determine the the internal origin of the poor occupational health condition in our country, that is both the local government and companies are "economic man", they all lack the enthusiasm of carrying out the occupational-disease-prevention activities consciously.
2. practice innovation
At present, the studies focus on the effect of occupational disease prevention and control for companies, but this study targets at performance evaluation of regional occupational disease prevention and control, and has constructed a set of scientific and reasonable performance evaluation system of occupational disease prevention and control, and this study has conducted empirical study, which is of extremely practical significance for strengthening responsibility, monitoring process, defining the success or failure factors and providing empirical basis.
3. methodology innovation
How to eliminate the influence of environmental factors has always been a difficult problem in the field of evaluation, this study has constructed the regression equation between uncontrollable factors and performance of the occupational disease prevention and control by the PLS model, and the internal influencing factors model is used to measure the uncontrollable factors quantitatively, and calculate the "environmental benefit" of each areas, in order to eliminate the impact of these uncontrollable environmental factors, and realize the transverse comparison between regions.
But the performance evaluation of occupational disease prevention and control is a complex systematic engineer, and because of the complexity of the problem and limitations of the author, this study still exist some shortcomings that need further research and improvement. The limitations of this research are as follows:
1. Due to occupational disease is a general concept, it contains many kinds of diseases, and different prevention measures are needed to taken for different occupational disease hazards, therefore the resources needed are also different accordingly. This study failed to consider this, therefore we should make further improvement to optimize it.
2. The "environmental benefit degree" is used to adjust the performance of occupational disease prevention and control, but this is just limited to the comprehensive index, and no adjustment of the third-level indicators.
3. Although this study eliminated the interference of some uncontrolled factors, this study aims to evaluate the administrative areas, therefore, we cannot take the method of experimental or quasi-experimental research for the strict causal reasoning, although this is due to the limited conditions, but is still missing.
4. At present poor occupational health situation in our country is influenced by the restriction of political, economic, social and cultural aspects, this study only explores it from the perspective of economics.
引文
[1]金泰廙.职业卫生与职业医学(第六版)[M].北京：人民卫生出版社,2008.
[2]中国疾病预防控制中心.督导与评估术语表[S].
[3]何琴.我国职业安全规制问题研究[D].吉林大学,2007.
[4]蔡立辉.政府绩效评估[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012：5.
[5]中华人民共和国卫生部.卫生部通报2010年职业病防治工作情况[EB/OL].(2011-04-18).http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/mohwsjdj/s58 54/201105/51676.htm.
[6]王磊.中国职业安全规制改革研究[D].辽宁大学,2009.
[7]陈怡.公共财政支出绩效评价体系研究[D].厦门大学,2009.
[8]梁万年.卫生事业管理第二版.北京：：人民卫生出版社,2007.
[9]Kevin R. Murphy, Jeanette Cleveland. Performance appraisal:An organizational perspective [M]. Allyn & Bacon publishers.1991.
[10]Campbell, J. A Theory of Performance [M].In:N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman(ed.). Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1993.35-70.
[11]H. J. Bernardin, R. W. Beatty. Performance Appraisal:Assessing Human Behavior at work. Boston:Kent Publishers,1984:351-341.
[12]孟华.推进以公共服务为主要内容的政府绩效评估—从机构绩效评估向公共服务绩效评估的转变[J].中国行政管理,2009(2)：16-20.
[13]郭岩.卫生事业管理[M].北京：北京医科大学出版社,2003.
[14]张珊金.平衡计分卡在政府部门绩效评估中的应用研究[D].华中科技大学,2006.
[15]韩学义.基于平衡计分卡的地方政府绩效考核研究[D].中国矿业大学,2010.
[16]张红霞,沈志文,张兆梁.基于模糊综合评价的地方政府绩效评估模型[J].科学技术与工程,2006,6(7)：854-863.
[17]彭国甫.地方政府公共事业管理绩效模糊综合评价模型及实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005(7)：129-136.
[18]陈万明,卓越.层次分析法在地方政府绩效评估中的应用—一个实际案例的探讨[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2008,8(2)：55-62.
[19]刘惠萍.基于网络层次分析法(ANP)的政府绩效评估研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(6)：111-115.
[20]黄新建,李若山.基于主成分分析的房地产业的业绩评价模型[J].企业管理,2006(5)：163-165.
[21]陈嘉立,李学建.基于主成分和层次分析法的银行绩效评价研究[J].系统科学学报,2011,19(1)：74-77.
[22]李祚泳,邓新民.人工神经网络在台风预报中的应用初探[J].自然灾害学报,1995,4(2)：86-90.
[23]魏一鸣,万庆.基于神经网络的自然灾害灾情评估模型研究[J].自然灾害学报,1997,6(2)：1-6.
[24]庄霞.综合医院关键绩效评价指标体系研究及应用[D].山东大学,2006.
[25]唐月红,薛茜,汪平.加权综合指数法在平衡计分卡评价医院绩效中的应用[J].中国医院统计,2007,14(4)：301-303.
[26]方鹏骞,张治国,杨梅.TOPSIS法在医院绩效评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2005,22(3)：169-170.
[27]刘国柱,孙云伟,杨振宇.TOPSIS法运用于临床科室绩效评价的探讨[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(6)：671-672.
[28]Fischer Richard J. An Overview of Performance Measurement. Public Management.1994; 9:2-8.
[29]National Health Performance Committee. Fourth national report on health sector performance indicators. Sydney:NSW Health,2000.
[30]The National Health Performance Committee. National Health Performance Framework Report. Brisbane Queensland Health,2001.
[31]Filmer D. Pritchett L. The impact of public spending on health:does money matter? Soc Sci Med 1999; 49:1309-23.
[32]Castro-Leal F. Dayton l. Demery L. Public spending on health care in Africa: does the poor benefit? Bull World Health Organ 2000:78:66-74.
[33]Baldacci E. Guin-Sin MT. De Mello L. More on the effectiveness of public spending on health care and education:a covariance structure model. J Int Dev 2003:15:709-25.
[34]Gupta S. Verhoeven M. Tiongson ER. Public spending on health care and the poor. Health Econ 2003:12:685-96.
[35]Self S. Grabowski R. How effective is public health expenditure in improving overall health? A cross-country analysis. Appl Econ 2003:35:835-45.
[36]T. C. Schelling. The Life You Save May Be Your Own:Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis. Washington DC. The Brookings Institution,1968. pp 127-162.
[37]Richard Thaler, Sherwin Rosen. The Value of Saving Life Evidence from the Labor Market. New York National Bureau of Economic Research,1976:265-302
[38]L.S. Bacow. Bargaining for Job Safety and Health. Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press 1980:103-121.
[39]Simeon Djankov, Rafael La Porta. The Regulation of Entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics.2002,117(1):1-37
[40]Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny. Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1992(2):599-617.
[41]Robert Stewart Smith. The Impact of OSHA Inspection on Manufacturing Injury Rates. The Journal of Human Resources.1979,14 (2):145-170.
[42]Wayne B. Gray, John M. Mendeloff. The Declining Effects Of OSHA Inspections On Manufacturing Injuries,1979-1998. Industrial and Labor Relations Review.2005.58(4):571-587.
[43]Tampa, Emile. Economic evaluation of interventions for occupational health and safety. Oxford Univ Pr.2008,26(10):1142-1144.
[44]李国红,胡善联.医院绩效评价研究[J].中国医院,2002,6(8)：24.
[45]唐月红,薛茜,陈景春.基于平衡计分卡的公立医院绩效评价指标体系[J].中国医院管理,2008,28(5)：56-57.
[46]庄霞,尹爱田,任旭功.构建综合医院关键绩效评价指标体系研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(5)：352-355.
[47]孙振球,王乐三.医院综合评价及其应用[M].北京：北京工业出版社,2006.
[48]王奎.社区卫生服务绩效评价研究[D].江苏大学,2010.
[49]李亚曼.济南市社区卫生服务中心绩效评价指标体系及薪酬影响因素研究[D].山东大学,2008.
[50]王芳.社区卫生服务绩效评价指标体系研究[D].华中科技大学,2006.
[51]沈林.社区公共卫生服务绩效评价研究[D].浙江大学,2009.
[52]邹积志.威海市新型农村合作医疗绩效评价研究[D].山东大学,2007.
[53]李林贵.山东省新型农村合作医疗评价研究[D].山东大学,2006.
[54]张坤.山东省新型农村合作医疗运行绩效评价研究[D].山东财经大学,2011.
[55]张乐,徐凌忠.新型农村合作医疗定点医疗机构监管策略的假设与检验[J].2012,31(8)：50-51.
[56]蔡正茂.区域疾病预防控制绩效评价的方法学和指标体系研究[D].复旦大学,2009.
[57]郭玉莲.地方公共卫生支出项目绩效评价指标体系研究[D].武汉理工大学,2008.
[58]李洁雪.艾滋病综合防治绩效评价指标体系研究[D].安徽医科大学,2007.
[59]陈任.艾滋病综合防治绩效评价中防治活动和经济学指标研究[D].安徽医科大学,2008.
[60]李霞.艾滋病综合防治绩效评价中防治效果、满意度和反应性指标研究[D].安徽医科大学,2008.
[61]李绍奎.艾滋病综合防治绩效评价中需求评价与组织保障评价指标研究[D].安徽医科大学,2008.
[62]刘飞鹰,董柏青,王喜文.运用特尔菲法建立结核病防治效果综合评价指标体系[J].中国卫生统计,2009,26(1)：96-97.
[63]罗万军,谭晓东,谢洁广.结核病防治效果综合评价指标体系研究[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2010,21(1)：9-13.
[64]李新旭,徐汉成,李游.中国结核病防治规划监控与评价指标可信性研究[J].中国预防医学杂志,2010,11(12)：1202-1206.
[65]王明科,黄家运,曾世培.应用德尔菲法构建乡镇级结核病防治效果评价体系[J].卫生软科学,2012,26(1)：70-72.
[66]徐凌忠.现代结核病控制政策评价[J].济南：山东大学出版社,2011.
[67]汤海滢,胡永华,康辉.加权TOPSIS法综合评价职业卫生管理状况的探讨[J].中国工业医学杂志,2007,20(1)：20-22.
[68]汤海滢,康晓平,康辉.职业卫生管理综合评价指标的筛选[J].中国公共卫生,2005,21(2)：198-200.
[69]汤海滢,康晓平,康辉.用层次分析法确定职业卫生管理综合评价指标的权重系数[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2006,13(2)：88-91.
[70]蒋冰玲.加权TOPSIS法在综合评价职业卫生管理中的应用[J].中国职业医学,2008,35(4)：316-317.
[71]柯娜.政府职业健康监管成本及收益研究[J].华北电力大学,2011.
[72]张敏.用人单位职业病防治工作评估指南[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2010,17(1)：23-27.
[73]黄盛仁.一个评判组织职业安全健康管理体系绩效的模型[J].中国职业安全卫生管理体系认证,2003(2)：24-26.
[74]杨甲文.职业安全健康管理体系的理论及应用绩效研究[D].中国矿业大学,2006.
[75]边卫华.电力企业实施职业安全健康管理体系安全绩效影响的分析[J].中国职业安全健康协会2005年学术年会论文集,湖北.
[76]周小燕.职业健康与安全管理体系的培训、危险源辨识和绩效测量规范运行研究[D].四川大学,2006.
[77]陈全,温贺,陈波.基于二言语义的职业健康安全监管体系绩效评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(10)：156-160.
[78]陈秋玲,肖璐,张青.地区安全生产的经济社会风险因子分析—基于我国面板数据的实证分析[J].华东经济管理,2011,25(3)：51-56.
[79]汪崇鲜.北京市安全生产与经济社会发展耦合关系研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(5)：61-65.
[80]房曰荣,沈斐敏.福建省安全生产与经济社会发展关系研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,4(3)：54-58.
[81]陈小娥,雷光和,冯林林.职业病防治体系构建之管见—以公共管理理论为视角[J].中国卫生事业管理,2011(6)：440-446.
[82]蓝恭彦.我国国家职业病管理的缺失与多元化管理模式的构建[J].济南：山东大学,2006.
[83]杭一平,熊敏如,陈小春.职业病防治法律法规与控制职业病危害效果的影响因素[J].实用预防医学,2005,12(2)：371-376.
[84]张莹.安全生产监管博弈分析[D].山东大学,2007.
[85]李小三,崔文彩,赵云胜.企业安全投资现状及其利益博弈分析[J].中国公共安全,2006,7(4)：59-62.
[86]UMA G GUPTA and Robert E. Clark. The theory and applications of Delphi Technique:A Bibliography (1975-1994). Technological Forecasting and Social Change,1996(53):185-211.
[87]Joseph P. Martino. A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2003(70):719-733.
[88]Barbara Starfield. Health Services Research:A working model. The New England Journal of Medicine. July 19,1973,132-135.
[89]陈曦.农村区域公共卫生绩效评价指标体系研究[D].华中科技大学,2009.
[90]贝塔朗菲.一般系统论[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1987.
[91]Avi Yacar Ellencweig. Analyzing Health Systems:a modular approach, Oxford University Press,1st ed,1992.
[92]郝模.卫生政策学(第一版).北京：人民卫生出版社,2005,262-263.
[93]张俊霞,张浩.逻辑框架法在GEF海河项目评估中的应用分析[J].水利经济,2009(3)：56-59.
[94]夏永胜.基于逻辑框架法的政府公共项目绩效评价研究[D].厦门大学,2008.
[95]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2004.
[96]陈瑞华.信息经济学[M].天津：南开大学出版社,2003.
[97]张振强.基于逐步回归分析的财政收入模型研究[J].经济研究导刊,2009(5)：94-96.
[98]高倩倩,邢秀风,姚传金.基于逐步回归分析的粮食产量影响因素研究[J].当代经济,2010(5)：145-147.
[99]张斌.基于主成分回归分析法的新疆农业经济增长影响因素评价[J].新疆财政大学学报,2008(4)：27-31.
[100]黄金碧,金晓斌.基于主成分分析的全国城乡统筹发展评价研究[J].河南科学,2009,27(12)：1602-1607.
[101]李政,钟永红.基于岭回归分析法的中国区域经济差异影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2006(2)：103-106.
[102]张学智.基于岭回归的中国技术进步影响因素实证分析[J].经济研究导刊,2011(26)：264-265.
[103]许和连,赖明勇,钱晓英.外商直接投资影响因素的偏最小二乘回归建模分析[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(5)：20-25.
[104]柳利利.偏最小二乘回归在大坝安全监测资料分析中应用研究[D].西安理 工大学,2008.
[105]文献忠,陈维清,卢次勇.广州市六所中学初中男生吸烟行为影响因素的结构模型[J].中华流行病学,2006,27(3)：234-237.
[106]徐秀娟.结构方程模型及其在医学研究中的应用[D].山西医科大学,2004.
[107]戴峰.疾病预防控制中心(CDC)应急能力评价模型的研究[D].同济大学,2006.
[108]张胜林.健康行为改变理论统计模型研究-结构方程模型的应用[D].华中科技大学,2009.
[109]宁禄乔,于本海.结构方程模型-偏最小二乘法理论与应用—以软件项目绩效评价为例[M].北京：北京理工大学出版社,2012,3.
[110]Wold H. Path Models with Latent Variables:The NIPALS Approach. In Quantitative Sociology:International Perspectives on Mathematical and Statistical Modeling, Academic Press, New York,1975,307-357.
[111]王惠文.偏最小二乘回归方法及其应用[M].北京：国防工业出版社,1999.
[112]Fornell C,Bookstein F.L. Two structural Equation Models:LISREL and Pls Applied to Consumer Exit-voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research 1982,19(11):440-452.
[113]Fornell C. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis:Classification of Methods and Implications for Marketing Research. Reviews of Marketing. M. Houston(ed).1987,407-450.
[114]郭亚军.综合评价理论与方法[M].北京：科技出版社,2002.
[115]杨武,苗志敏,杨松凯.主管护师综合评价指标体系权重的研究[J].中国医院管理,2009,29(6)：47-49.
[116]段莉琼,刘立国,郭黎.应用层次分析法确定道路属性指标的权重[J].海洋测绘,2004,24(3)：44-446.
[117]程明熙.处理多目标决策问题的二项系数加权和法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1983,3(4)：23-26.
[118]梁耀元.社区卫生服务居民满意度评价指标赋权方法的探讨[D].广西医科大学,2010.
[119]王道平,王煦.基于AHP/熵值法的钢铁企业绿色供应商选择指标权重研究[J].软科学,2010,24(8)：117-122.
[120]陈长杰,马晓微,魏一鸣.基于多目标规划的中国可持续发展模式优化研究[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(5)：91-96.
[121]徐泽水.多属性决策的组合赋权方法研究权重[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(2)：84-87.
[122]陶菊春,吴建民.综合加权评分法的综合权重确定新探[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001(8)：43-48.
[123]孙振球,徐勇勇.医学统计学[M].北京：人民卫生出版社,2002.
[124]Brown B. Delphi process:A methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts. The Rand Corporation.1968.
[125]Arnold Levying. A model for health projections using knowledgeable information. World Health Statistics Quart[C],1984,37:310.
[126]艾尔巴比[美].社会研究方法基础(第四版)[M].北京：华夏出版社,2010.
[127]曾光.现代流行病学方法与应用.第1版.北京：北京医科大学与中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994.250,257.
[128]袁政.政府绩效评估权重设计中AHP法之改进[J].统计研究,2008,25(7)：39-44.
[129]蔡立辉.政府绩效评估[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012.
[130]肯尼斯.阿罗.社会选择：个性与多准则[M].北京：首都贸易大学出版社,2000.
[131]刘颖芬,占济舟.比例标度一致性比较的新方法[J].统计与决策,2007,8.
[132]Deadrick Diana L. Gardner Donard G. Performance Distributions:Measuring Employee Performance Using Total Quality Management Principles. Journal of Quality Management,1999:225-241.
[133]Deadrick Diana L. Gardner Donard G. Distributional Rating of Performance Levels and Variability:An Examination of Rating Validity in a Field Setting. Group & Organization Management.1997:317-342.
[134]庄俊汉.中国公立医院院长委托代理绩效管理研究[D].华中科技大学,2007.
[135]盛宇华,方志军,王平.企业高层管理人员考评模式研究.中国工业经济.2002(10)：73-75.
[136]陈尚卿.项目经理绩效不可控因素评价方法及应用[D].大连理工大学,2005.
[137]樊洪涛.航空制造项目经理绩效评价中不可控因素的影响及修正[D].南昌大学,2007.
[138]冯英俊,李成红.二次相对效益一衡量企业经济效益的一种新指标[J].中国软科学,1995,(7)：30-37.
[139]冯英俊,魏松贤,高欣.管理有效性[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2000,(2)：76-78.
[140]冯英俊,王大伟,丁文恒.绩效管理与管理有效性[J].中国软科学,2003(4)：132-136.
[2]中国疾病预防控制中心.督导与评估术语表[S].
[3]何琴.我国职业安全规制问题研究[D].吉林大学,2007.
[4]蔡立辉.政府绩效评估[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012：5.
[5]中华人民共和国卫生部.卫生部通报2010年职业病防治工作情况[EB/OL].(2011-04-18).http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/mohwsjdj/s58 54/201105/51676.htm.
[6]王磊.中国职业安全规制改革研究[D].辽宁大学,2009.
[7]陈怡.公共财政支出绩效评价体系研究[D].厦门大学,2009.
[8]梁万年.卫生事业管理第二版.北京：：人民卫生出版社,2007.
[9]Kevin R. Murphy, Jeanette Cleveland. Performance appraisal:An organizational perspective [M]. Allyn & Bacon publishers.1991.
[10]Campbell, J. A Theory of Performance [M].In:N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman(ed.). Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1993.35-70.
[11]H. J. Bernardin, R. W. Beatty. Performance Appraisal:Assessing Human Behavior at work. Boston:Kent Publishers,1984:351-341.
[12]孟华.推进以公共服务为主要内容的政府绩效评估—从机构绩效评估向公共服务绩效评估的转变[J].中国行政管理,2009(2)：16-20.
[13]郭岩.卫生事业管理[M].北京：北京医科大学出版社,2003.
[14]张珊金.平衡计分卡在政府部门绩效评估中的应用研究[D].华中科技大学,2006.
[15]韩学义.基于平衡计分卡的地方政府绩效考核研究[D].中国矿业大学,2010.
[16]张红霞,沈志文,张兆梁.基于模糊综合评价的地方政府绩效评估模型[J].科学技术与工程,2006,6(7)：854-863.
[17]彭国甫.地方政府公共事业管理绩效模糊综合评价模型及实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005(7)：129-136.
[18]陈万明,卓越.层次分析法在地方政府绩效评估中的应用—一个实际案例的探讨[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2008,8(2)：55-62.
[19]刘惠萍.基于网络层次分析法(ANP)的政府绩效评估研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(6)：111-115.
[20]黄新建,李若山.基于主成分分析的房地产业的业绩评价模型[J].企业管理,2006(5)：163-165.
[21]陈嘉立,李学建.基于主成分和层次分析法的银行绩效评价研究[J].系统科学学报,2011,19(1)：74-77.
[22]李祚泳,邓新民.人工神经网络在台风预报中的应用初探[J].自然灾害学报,1995,4(2)：86-90.
[23]魏一鸣,万庆.基于神经网络的自然灾害灾情评估模型研究[J].自然灾害学报,1997,6(2)：1-6.
[24]庄霞.综合医院关键绩效评价指标体系研究及应用[D].山东大学,2006.
[25]唐月红,薛茜,汪平.加权综合指数法在平衡计分卡评价医院绩效中的应用[J].中国医院统计,2007,14(4)：301-303.
[26]方鹏骞,张治国,杨梅.TOPSIS法在医院绩效评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2005,22(3)：169-170.
[27]刘国柱,孙云伟,杨振宇.TOPSIS法运用于临床科室绩效评价的探讨[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(6)：671-672.
[28]Fischer Richard J. An Overview of Performance Measurement. Public Management.1994; 9:2-8.
[29]National Health Performance Committee. Fourth national report on health sector performance indicators. Sydney:NSW Health,2000.
[30]The National Health Performance Committee. National Health Performance Framework Report. Brisbane Queensland Health,2001.
[31]Filmer D. Pritchett L. The impact of public spending on health:does money matter? Soc Sci Med 1999; 49:1309-23.
[32]Castro-Leal F. Dayton l. Demery L. Public spending on health care in Africa: does the poor benefit? Bull World Health Organ 2000:78:66-74.
[33]Baldacci E. Guin-Sin MT. De Mello L. More on the effectiveness of public spending on health care and education:a covariance structure model. J Int Dev 2003:15:709-25.
[34]Gupta S. Verhoeven M. Tiongson ER. Public spending on health care and the poor. Health Econ 2003:12:685-96.
[35]Self S. Grabowski R. How effective is public health expenditure in improving overall health? A cross-country analysis. Appl Econ 2003:35:835-45.
[36]T. C. Schelling. The Life You Save May Be Your Own:Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis. Washington DC. The Brookings Institution,1968. pp 127-162.
[37]Richard Thaler, Sherwin Rosen. The Value of Saving Life Evidence from the Labor Market. New York National Bureau of Economic Research,1976:265-302
[38]L.S. Bacow. Bargaining for Job Safety and Health. Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press 1980:103-121.
[39]Simeon Djankov, Rafael La Porta. The Regulation of Entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics.2002,117(1):1-37
[40]Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny. Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1992(2):599-617.
[41]Robert Stewart Smith. The Impact of OSHA Inspection on Manufacturing Injury Rates. The Journal of Human Resources.1979,14 (2):145-170.
[42]Wayne B. Gray, John M. Mendeloff. The Declining Effects Of OSHA Inspections On Manufacturing Injuries,1979-1998. Industrial and Labor Relations Review.2005.58(4):571-587.
[43]Tampa, Emile. Economic evaluation of interventions for occupational health and safety. Oxford Univ Pr.2008,26(10):1142-1144.
[44]李国红,胡善联.医院绩效评价研究[J].中国医院,2002,6(8)：24.
[45]唐月红,薛茜,陈景春.基于平衡计分卡的公立医院绩效评价指标体系[J].中国医院管理,2008,28(5)：56-57.
[46]庄霞,尹爱田,任旭功.构建综合医院关键绩效评价指标体系研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(5)：352-355.
[47]孙振球,王乐三.医院综合评价及其应用[M].北京：北京工业出版社,2006.
[48]王奎.社区卫生服务绩效评价研究[D].江苏大学,2010.
[49]李亚曼.济南市社区卫生服务中心绩效评价指标体系及薪酬影响因素研究[D].山东大学,2008.
[50]王芳.社区卫生服务绩效评价指标体系研究[D].华中科技大学,2006.
[51]沈林.社区公共卫生服务绩效评价研究[D].浙江大学,2009.
[52]邹积志.威海市新型农村合作医疗绩效评价研究[D].山东大学,2007.
[53]李林贵.山东省新型农村合作医疗评价研究[D].山东大学,2006.
[54]张坤.山东省新型农村合作医疗运行绩效评价研究[D].山东财经大学,2011.
[55]张乐,徐凌忠.新型农村合作医疗定点医疗机构监管策略的假设与检验[J].2012,31(8)：50-51.
[56]蔡正茂.区域疾病预防控制绩效评价的方法学和指标体系研究[D].复旦大学,2009.
[57]郭玉莲.地方公共卫生支出项目绩效评价指标体系研究[D].武汉理工大学,2008.
[58]李洁雪.艾滋病综合防治绩效评价指标体系研究[D].安徽医科大学,2007.
[59]陈任.艾滋病综合防治绩效评价中防治活动和经济学指标研究[D].安徽医科大学,2008.
[60]李霞.艾滋病综合防治绩效评价中防治效果、满意度和反应性指标研究[D].安徽医科大学,2008.
[61]李绍奎.艾滋病综合防治绩效评价中需求评价与组织保障评价指标研究[D].安徽医科大学,2008.
[62]刘飞鹰,董柏青,王喜文.运用特尔菲法建立结核病防治效果综合评价指标体系[J].中国卫生统计,2009,26(1)：96-97.
[63]罗万军,谭晓东,谢洁广.结核病防治效果综合评价指标体系研究[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2010,21(1)：9-13.
[64]李新旭,徐汉成,李游.中国结核病防治规划监控与评价指标可信性研究[J].中国预防医学杂志,2010,11(12)：1202-1206.
[65]王明科,黄家运,曾世培.应用德尔菲法构建乡镇级结核病防治效果评价体系[J].卫生软科学,2012,26(1)：70-72.
[66]徐凌忠.现代结核病控制政策评价[J].济南：山东大学出版社,2011.
[67]汤海滢,胡永华,康辉.加权TOPSIS法综合评价职业卫生管理状况的探讨[J].中国工业医学杂志,2007,20(1)：20-22.
[68]汤海滢,康晓平,康辉.职业卫生管理综合评价指标的筛选[J].中国公共卫生,2005,21(2)：198-200.
[69]汤海滢,康晓平,康辉.用层次分析法确定职业卫生管理综合评价指标的权重系数[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2006,13(2)：88-91.
[70]蒋冰玲.加权TOPSIS法在综合评价职业卫生管理中的应用[J].中国职业医学,2008,35(4)：316-317.
[71]柯娜.政府职业健康监管成本及收益研究[J].华北电力大学,2011.
[72]张敏.用人单位职业病防治工作评估指南[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2010,17(1)：23-27.
[73]黄盛仁.一个评判组织职业安全健康管理体系绩效的模型[J].中国职业安全卫生管理体系认证,2003(2)：24-26.
[74]杨甲文.职业安全健康管理体系的理论及应用绩效研究[D].中国矿业大学,2006.
[75]边卫华.电力企业实施职业安全健康管理体系安全绩效影响的分析[J].中国职业安全健康协会2005年学术年会论文集,湖北.
[76]周小燕.职业健康与安全管理体系的培训、危险源辨识和绩效测量规范运行研究[D].四川大学,2006.
[77]陈全,温贺,陈波.基于二言语义的职业健康安全监管体系绩效评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(10)：156-160.
[78]陈秋玲,肖璐,张青.地区安全生产的经济社会风险因子分析—基于我国面板数据的实证分析[J].华东经济管理,2011,25(3)：51-56.
[79]汪崇鲜.北京市安全生产与经济社会发展耦合关系研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(5)：61-65.
[80]房曰荣,沈斐敏.福建省安全生产与经济社会发展关系研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,4(3)：54-58.
[81]陈小娥,雷光和,冯林林.职业病防治体系构建之管见—以公共管理理论为视角[J].中国卫生事业管理,2011(6)：440-446.
[82]蓝恭彦.我国国家职业病管理的缺失与多元化管理模式的构建[J].济南：山东大学,2006.
[83]杭一平,熊敏如,陈小春.职业病防治法律法规与控制职业病危害效果的影响因素[J].实用预防医学,2005,12(2)：371-376.
[84]张莹.安全生产监管博弈分析[D].山东大学,2007.
[85]李小三,崔文彩,赵云胜.企业安全投资现状及其利益博弈分析[J].中国公共安全,2006,7(4)：59-62.
[86]UMA G GUPTA and Robert E. Clark. The theory and applications of Delphi Technique:A Bibliography (1975-1994). Technological Forecasting and Social Change,1996(53):185-211.
[87]Joseph P. Martino. A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2003(70):719-733.
[88]Barbara Starfield. Health Services Research:A working model. The New England Journal of Medicine. July 19,1973,132-135.
[89]陈曦.农村区域公共卫生绩效评价指标体系研究[D].华中科技大学,2009.
[90]贝塔朗菲.一般系统论[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1987.
[91]Avi Yacar Ellencweig. Analyzing Health Systems:a modular approach, Oxford University Press,1st ed,1992.
[92]郝模.卫生政策学(第一版).北京：人民卫生出版社,2005,262-263.
[93]张俊霞,张浩.逻辑框架法在GEF海河项目评估中的应用分析[J].水利经济,2009(3)：56-59.
[94]夏永胜.基于逻辑框架法的政府公共项目绩效评价研究[D].厦门大学,2008.
[95]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2004.
[96]陈瑞华.信息经济学[M].天津：南开大学出版社,2003.
[97]张振强.基于逐步回归分析的财政收入模型研究[J].经济研究导刊,2009(5)：94-96.
[98]高倩倩,邢秀风,姚传金.基于逐步回归分析的粮食产量影响因素研究[J].当代经济,2010(5)：145-147.
[99]张斌.基于主成分回归分析法的新疆农业经济增长影响因素评价[J].新疆财政大学学报,2008(4)：27-31.
[100]黄金碧,金晓斌.基于主成分分析的全国城乡统筹发展评价研究[J].河南科学,2009,27(12)：1602-1607.
[101]李政,钟永红.基于岭回归分析法的中国区域经济差异影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2006(2)：103-106.
[102]张学智.基于岭回归的中国技术进步影响因素实证分析[J].经济研究导刊,2011(26)：264-265.
[103]许和连,赖明勇,钱晓英.外商直接投资影响因素的偏最小二乘回归建模分析[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(5)：20-25.
[104]柳利利.偏最小二乘回归在大坝安全监测资料分析中应用研究[D].西安理 工大学,2008.
[105]文献忠,陈维清,卢次勇.广州市六所中学初中男生吸烟行为影响因素的结构模型[J].中华流行病学,2006,27(3)：234-237.
[106]徐秀娟.结构方程模型及其在医学研究中的应用[D].山西医科大学,2004.
[107]戴峰.疾病预防控制中心(CDC)应急能力评价模型的研究[D].同济大学,2006.
[108]张胜林.健康行为改变理论统计模型研究-结构方程模型的应用[D].华中科技大学,2009.
[109]宁禄乔,于本海.结构方程模型-偏最小二乘法理论与应用—以软件项目绩效评价为例[M].北京：北京理工大学出版社,2012,3.
[110]Wold H. Path Models with Latent Variables:The NIPALS Approach. In Quantitative Sociology:International Perspectives on Mathematical and Statistical Modeling, Academic Press, New York,1975,307-357.
[111]王惠文.偏最小二乘回归方法及其应用[M].北京：国防工业出版社,1999.
[112]Fornell C,Bookstein F.L. Two structural Equation Models:LISREL and Pls Applied to Consumer Exit-voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research 1982,19(11):440-452.
[113]Fornell C. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis:Classification of Methods and Implications for Marketing Research. Reviews of Marketing. M. Houston(ed).1987,407-450.
[114]郭亚军.综合评价理论与方法[M].北京：科技出版社,2002.
[115]杨武,苗志敏,杨松凯.主管护师综合评价指标体系权重的研究[J].中国医院管理,2009,29(6)：47-49.
[116]段莉琼,刘立国,郭黎.应用层次分析法确定道路属性指标的权重[J].海洋测绘,2004,24(3)：44-446.
[117]程明熙.处理多目标决策问题的二项系数加权和法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1983,3(4)：23-26.
[118]梁耀元.社区卫生服务居民满意度评价指标赋权方法的探讨[D].广西医科大学,2010.
[119]王道平,王煦.基于AHP/熵值法的钢铁企业绿色供应商选择指标权重研究[J].软科学,2010,24(8)：117-122.
[120]陈长杰,马晓微,魏一鸣.基于多目标规划的中国可持续发展模式优化研究[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(5)：91-96.
[121]徐泽水.多属性决策的组合赋权方法研究权重[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(2)：84-87.
[122]陶菊春,吴建民.综合加权评分法的综合权重确定新探[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001(8)：43-48.
[123]孙振球,徐勇勇.医学统计学[M].北京：人民卫生出版社,2002.
[124]Brown B. Delphi process:A methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts. The Rand Corporation.1968.
[125]Arnold Levying. A model for health projections using knowledgeable information. World Health Statistics Quart[C],1984,37:310.
[126]艾尔巴比[美].社会研究方法基础(第四版)[M].北京：华夏出版社,2010.
[127]曾光.现代流行病学方法与应用.第1版.北京：北京医科大学与中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994.250,257.
[128]袁政.政府绩效评估权重设计中AHP法之改进[J].统计研究,2008,25(7)：39-44.
[129]蔡立辉.政府绩效评估[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012.
[130]肯尼斯.阿罗.社会选择：个性与多准则[M].北京：首都贸易大学出版社,2000.
[131]刘颖芬,占济舟.比例标度一致性比较的新方法[J].统计与决策,2007,8.
[132]Deadrick Diana L. Gardner Donard G. Performance Distributions:Measuring Employee Performance Using Total Quality Management Principles. Journal of Quality Management,1999:225-241.
[133]Deadrick Diana L. Gardner Donard G. Distributional Rating of Performance Levels and Variability:An Examination of Rating Validity in a Field Setting. Group & Organization Management.1997:317-342.
[134]庄俊汉.中国公立医院院长委托代理绩效管理研究[D].华中科技大学,2007.
[135]盛宇华,方志军,王平.企业高层管理人员考评模式研究.中国工业经济.2002(10)：73-75.
[136]陈尚卿.项目经理绩效不可控因素评价方法及应用[D].大连理工大学,2005.
[137]樊洪涛.航空制造项目经理绩效评价中不可控因素的影响及修正[D].南昌大学,2007.
[138]冯英俊,李成红.二次相对效益一衡量企业经济效益的一种新指标[J].中国软科学,1995,(7)：30-37.
[139]冯英俊,魏松贤,高欣.管理有效性[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2000,(2)：76-78.
[140]冯英俊,王大伟,丁文恒.绩效管理与管理有效性[J].中国软科学,2003(4)：132-136.