股票价格对货币政策实施机制的影响
|
摘要
资产价格与货币政策的关系一直是学术界的研究热点。从微观层面来看,已有的研究大多集中于资产价格对货币政策传导的作用以及资产价格是否能够准确地反应宏观经济等问题；从宏观层面来看,已有的研究大多集中于货币政策是否应该干预资产价格以及能否干预资产价格等问题。已有研究的视角往往较为独立,但实际上,金融应该是一个整体,并且对于整个金融行业来说,其也不是孤立的,而是与社会、经济、政治等方方面面的因素紧密相关的,因此对金融学的研究不仅应该将宏观领域和微观领域联合起来研究,更应该将视野扩展到金融行业以外的领域。正是基于这个原因,现代金融学的研究前沿便是将宏观金融研究与微观金融研究联系起来。
本文的研究正是以这个思路为基础而展开的。首先,本文根据研究中涉及到的问题,对相关文献进行了回顾,包括货币政策通过何种渠道影响实体经济以及资产价格与货币政策之间的关系。从理论的角度来看,前者主要是分析货币政策与实体经济之间的相关关系；而后者则主要是分析资产价格对货币政策实施的影响,其又分为两方面的内容,即货币政策是否应该干预资产价格和货币政策能否干预资产价格。
然后,本文对我国的货币政策和股票市场进行了一些相关性分析,考察了价格型的利率调控和数量型的货币供应量调控与国内生产总值、居民消费价格指数的相关关系、股票价格与股票交易量之间的相关关系和股票价格是否能够准确反应实体经济的问题。对于货币政策来说,本章主要是考察我国的货币政策如何对实体经济做出反应,即依据现实数据考察二者是否有较为明显的相关关系,如果有,那么货币政策是先于实体经济而变动,还是同步变动,亦或是滞后变动；对于股票市场来说,交易量对实体经济有直接影响,而交易量又与股价有着必然联系,不过,到底是交易量先于股价变动,还是同步变动,亦或是滞后变动,以及股票价格在多大程度上体现了实体经济的发展,这些问题都是本文研究所需要考虑的问题,因此第二章的研究为后续章节模型的提出以及得出本文的最终结论提供了初步的现实依据。
在第三章中,本文对影响我国股票市场价格的相关变量进行了分析,目的是为了对问题“货币政策是否能够干预资产价格”提供一种可能的答案。本章在定量分析的基础上分别探讨了股票收益率和股票价格的宏观、中观和微观决定因素,以大盘指数收益率、上市公司股票收益率以及单一个股的价格作为被考察对象,采用了计量分析、主成分分析和神经网络模型等多种分析手段,全方位的考察了股票价格的决定因素,发现宏观层面对股票收益率的影响大多来自经济的生产方面,比如考察经济活跃程度的指标、考察生产成本的指标以及衡量经济发展周期的指标；中观层面对股票收益率的影响主要取决于上市公司的盈利能力和高管持股水平；从微观层面来说,大单交易对上市公司股价的影响则较为显著。这一章的结果对后续章节模型的建立提供了重要的现实依据,并对本文的最终结论给出了一种可能的回答。
在第四章中,、本文以IS-LM模型的框架为基础,在紧紧把握市场流动性这一线索的思想指引下,将股票市场加入了IS-LM模型,通过模型,本文论述了股票市场对货币政策影响的作用机制在于股票市场作为人们一种重要的投资渠道,其与居民的消费或企业的生产投入一样,会吸收一部分的社会流动性,由于居民会受到消费约束,企业也会受到资金约束,因此股票市场与商品市场之间存在一定的替代效应,在这种情况下,试图调节商品市场的货币政策其最终实施效果便会受到这种替代效应的影响。同时,股票市场又具有体现实体经济的同步效应以及反作用于实体经济的财富效应,因此若货币政策改变了商品市场的相关指标,比如通货膨胀或产出缺口,那么其实际上也就改变了实体经济的发展水平,理论上股票市场也会相应地受到影响。因此,到底是同步效应和财富效应多一点,还是替代效应多一点,对这个问题的探讨可以回答股票价格对货币政策实行机制有何影响的问题。
第五章是对第四章定性模型的数理化探讨,在第四章分析的基础上,本章建立了一个包含居民、企业、银行和中央银行四个部门的一般均衡模型,讨论了其各自的最优化行为,并通过建立商品市场的一般均衡模型,将上述四个经济主体的行为加入到同一个均衡方程中。同时,我们根据市场投资者投资情绪的不同,设定了两种关于股票定价的函数,分别讨论了当股票定价函数不同时,股票价格对货币政策实施效果的影响,得出了与第四章定性分析相同的结论。在文章结构上,第五章是对第四章分析的一个递进,并回答了第四章所关注的问题,指出影响股票市场同步效应和财富效应与替代效应的主要因素是股票市场投资者的情绪。当投资者的投资情绪偏理性时,股票市场的同步效应与财富效应更大；当投资者的投资情绪偏非理性时,股票市场与商品市场之间的替代效应更大。
第六章是在对问题“股票价格对货币政策实行机制的影响”的定性分析和模型分析的基础上进行的对现实数据的考察,通过现实数据,我们首先通过计量模型找出了我国股票市场存在非理性行为的那些时间区间,然后分别对其进行考察,发现当股票市场投资情绪以理性为主时,货币政策对商品市场价格水平的调控效果较为明显,此时股票价格与物价水平之间具有较为明显的相关关系,货币政策不用关注股票价格,同时货币政策的调整会影响到股票价格的变动；当股票市场非理性情绪占主导时,货币政策对商品市场价格水平的调控效果需要更长的持续期和更大力度的调控才能起作用,此时股票价格与物价水平之间的相关关系较弱,货币政策对股票价格的调整与其对物价水平的调整一样,具有不确定性,为了达到调控效果,需要实施比市场理性情绪时更大力度的调控。
本文所得出的主要结论是,在股票市场偏理性或投资的成分较多时,由股票价格的变动引起的商品市场价格的变动较为稳定,此时央行的货币政策不用关注股票市场的价格,其对通货膨胀和产出缺口的调控目标容易达到,但是对股票市场价格的调控具有一定的不确定性；在股票市场非理性或投机的成分较多时,由于股票市场引入了价格反馈的作用机制,因此由股票价格的变动引起的商品市场价格的变动会变得不太确定,此时央行的货币政策为了达到对通货膨胀和产出缺口的调控目标,其调控力度会大于市场偏理性时的调控力度,同时该调控对股票市场价格的影响仍然具有一定的不确定性。本文在研究过程中还发现,价格调控型的利率政策对国内生产总值和通货膨胀的双向调控作用较为明显,而数量调控型的货币供应量调节则对国内生产总值和通货膨胀的推动作用大于回拉作用；股票大盘回报率和大盘指数的波动领先交易量的波动大约一个月左右；央行的货币政策对股票市场价格指数的影响具有较大的不确定性,在不同的时期可能会有不同的效果。对股票价格的决定因素来说,股票价格的宏观影响因素主要来自于生产方面；中观影响因素主要是公司经营和高管持股；微观层面的大单交易对股票价格的波动具有较大的解释力。对于我国的货币政策来说,由于对我国股市的宏观影响多来自于生产层面,并且在不同时期货币政策对股票价格具有不同的影响,因此并不建议将股票价格作为货币政策关注的最终目标。由于当股票价格发生较为非理性的波动时,往往需要更大力度的货币政策才能达到对股票价格的干预效果,因此为了避免股市暴涨暴跌对实体经济的影响,采取一些货币政策之外的措施来干预股市也是十分必要的。
本文的主要创新点在于：
首先,本文将宏观模型和微观模型放在一个框架下进行研究,通过微观个体的最优化行为建立了一个具有多个部门的一般均衡模型；
其次,在模型设定时,本文尽量做到让所有的变量都成为内生变量,这样可以有效的将不确定因素都放在模型内部讨论。并且本文从模型的建立到得出商品市场上的一般均衡模型,再到最后得出股票价格对货币政策实施机制的影响作用的结论,每一步的推导本文都有细致的描述,尽量做到从数学上和经济学上都具有合理性；
最后,本文联系现实数据和本文模型,通过计量的方法定位了我国股票市场出现非理性投资情绪的时期。这不仅反应了本文模型设定思路的正确性,也使得联系市场实际数据对模型结论的说明显得更有说服力。
然而本文仍有不足之处,具体来说主要有以下两点：
第一,现实中的金融资产不只股票一种,而本文只考虑了股票一种情况,并且本文中也没有考虑政府因素和进出口因素,因此对现实问题的模型化还不够全面；
第二、本文的模型中只对居民和企业部门的目标函数取了具体形式,银行和中央银行的相关函数采用的是一般形式,因此本文得出的最终结论是根据函数的边际性质对函数的一般形式进行讨论的基础上而得出的,并没有给出具体的解析解,因此若要应用计量模型还需要对本文模型中一般形式的函数进行进一步的假设,赋予其具体的形式。
不过,以上不足也正是本文今后研究的重点。
The relationship between asset prices and monetary policy has long been a hot issue discussed by the academic community. From the micro-level, previous studies have focused largely on the role of asset prices on monetary policy transmission, and whether asset prices accurately reflect the macro-economic and other issues. From the macro-level, the existing research focuses largely on whether monetary policy should intervene in asset prices and the ability to intervene in asset prices and other issues. The perspective of existing researches tend to be more independent, but in fact, this field of researches should be an entirety, so as the financial sector, and it should be closely related to all aspects of social, economic, political and other factors. Hence, the study of finance should not only be the joint of macro and micro researches, but extend the vision to areas outside the finance. For this reason, the frontier research of modern finance tries to contact the macro-financial researches with the micro-finance researches.
Our study is based and expanded on this idea. Firstly, we summarize the relevant literature on the channels of monetary policy effect the real economy and the relationship between asset prices and monetary policy. From a theoretical point of view, the former literature is to analyze the relationship between monetary policy and the real economy, and the latter literature mainly analyze the impact of asset prices on the implementation of monetary policy. It is divided into two aspects, namely, should the monetary policy intervene in asset prices and whether the monetary policy can intervene in asse prices.
Then, the article do some correlation analysis on China's monetary policy and the stock market, investigate the interest rate regulation of the price and quantity oriented monetary supply regulation and the correlation between the gross domestic product (GDP), the relationship of the consumer price index, stock price and trading volume and stock prices accurately reflect the real economy problem. For monetary policy, this chapter study shows that how the monetary policy reflects on the real economy, our study is basing on real data to examine whether they are obvious. If so, then monetary policy is anterior to the real economy changes, or changes in synchronization, or lag changes. For the stock market, trading volume has a direct impact on the real economy and the trading volume and price intrinsically linked, however, whether it is trading volume before the price change, or simultaneous changes or lag changes, and the stock price reflects to what extent the development of the real economy. All these problems are considered in this article, the second chapter studies the proposed model of the subsequent chapters and draw the final conclusion of this paper provides a preliminary realistic basis.
In the third chapter, I analysis the relevant variables affect China's stock market price, the purpose is to provides a possible answer to the question "whether the monetary policy is able to intervene in asset prices". In the next chapter, I based on the framework of the IS-LM model, this article discusses the mechanism of action of the stock market on monetary policy is that the stock market as an important investment channels for people, and people's consumption or corporate production inputs, will absorb part of social mobility. Chapter5translates the qualitative model in chapter4into the mathematical way. This chapter establishes a general equilibrium model of four departments:residents, businesses, banks and the central bank. Discussing their respective optimization behavior, and by the establishment of commodity markets general equilibrium model, the four behavior of economic agents to the same balanced equation.
The main conclusions of the article is, when rational preference and investment take a larger proportion in the stock market, the change in the price of the commodity market caused by changes in the stock price is relatively stable, the central bank's monetary policy need not take attention to the stock market price. It's easy to achieve control objectives frr inflation and the output gap with a certain degree of uncertainty, but not the regulation of the stock market price; When the irrational or speculate in the stock market's composition is large, as the stock market introduction of price feedback mechanism caused by the movements of the stock price changes in the market price of goods will become less certain, the central bank's monetary policy on inflation and the output gap in order to achieve control objectives, it's control efforts will be greater than the market when the rational side control efforts, while the regulation of the stock market prices still have a certain degree of uncertainty. This article also find out in the research process, price regulation-interest rate policy is more obvious, bi-directional regulation of the gross domestic product (GDP) and inflation adjustment pull back the role of the role of the gross domestic product (GDP) and inflation is greater than the number of regulation and control of the money supply. Fluctuations in the rate of return on the stock market and the market index of leading trading volume fluctuations around a month. The effects of central bank's monetary policy on stock market price index are great uncertainty, and in different time may have different effects. From the determinants of stock price, the macro-economic impact of the stock price factors mainly from the production side; the main Medium influence factors are the company's operations and executive stock ownership. Micro-level's big deal on the volatility of the stock price has greater explanatory power. China's monetary policy, macroeconomic impact on China's stock market from the level of production, and have different effects at different times of monetary policy on the stock price, so I do not recommend the stock price as the ultimate goal of monetary policy. In order to avoid the stock market rises and falls on the real economy, monetary policy often requires greater efforts in order to achieve the effect of the intervention on the stock price when the stock price is more irrational fluctuations, take some outside monetary policy measures to intervention in the stock market is also very necessary.
The article's main innovations are:
Firstly, in this paper, the macro model and micro model on a framework for research, through the microscopic individual behavior established a general equilibrium model with multiple departments;
Secondly, when setting up the model, the article as far as possible to put all variables into endogenous variables. So, all uncertainties are placed inside the model discussed effectively. And from the model to derive the general equilibrium model on the commodity markets, to finally arrive at the conclusion of the stock price effects of monetary policy implementation mechanisms, every step of the derivation of this article has a detailed description, as far as possible from mathematics and economics are reasonable;
Finally, contact the real data and the proposed model, the period of China's stock market irrational sentiment is located by the method of measurement. This not only reflects the correctness of our model setting ideas, but also making contact actual market data model conclusions seem more convincing.
This article also has inadequateness, specifically the following two main points:
First, the reality of financial assets more than the stock, and this article only consider the stock, and this article did not consider government factors, import and export factors neither, so the modeling of real-world problems is not comprehensive enough.
Second, this article only for residents in the model and objective function of the corporate sector to take the specific form, and the banks and the central bank takes the general form. Therefore, we draw the final conclusion is based on the marginal nature of the function of the general form of the function on the basis of the discussion arrived, we do not give specific analytical solution, to apply econometric model needs further assumptions on the function of the general form of the model in this article, need to give the concrete form.
However, the shortcomings above are also the focus of future research in this article.
本文的研究正是以这个思路为基础而展开的。首先,本文根据研究中涉及到的问题,对相关文献进行了回顾,包括货币政策通过何种渠道影响实体经济以及资产价格与货币政策之间的关系。从理论的角度来看,前者主要是分析货币政策与实体经济之间的相关关系；而后者则主要是分析资产价格对货币政策实施的影响,其又分为两方面的内容,即货币政策是否应该干预资产价格和货币政策能否干预资产价格。
然后,本文对我国的货币政策和股票市场进行了一些相关性分析,考察了价格型的利率调控和数量型的货币供应量调控与国内生产总值、居民消费价格指数的相关关系、股票价格与股票交易量之间的相关关系和股票价格是否能够准确反应实体经济的问题。对于货币政策来说,本章主要是考察我国的货币政策如何对实体经济做出反应,即依据现实数据考察二者是否有较为明显的相关关系,如果有,那么货币政策是先于实体经济而变动,还是同步变动,亦或是滞后变动；对于股票市场来说,交易量对实体经济有直接影响,而交易量又与股价有着必然联系,不过,到底是交易量先于股价变动,还是同步变动,亦或是滞后变动,以及股票价格在多大程度上体现了实体经济的发展,这些问题都是本文研究所需要考虑的问题,因此第二章的研究为后续章节模型的提出以及得出本文的最终结论提供了初步的现实依据。
在第三章中,本文对影响我国股票市场价格的相关变量进行了分析,目的是为了对问题“货币政策是否能够干预资产价格”提供一种可能的答案。本章在定量分析的基础上分别探讨了股票收益率和股票价格的宏观、中观和微观决定因素,以大盘指数收益率、上市公司股票收益率以及单一个股的价格作为被考察对象,采用了计量分析、主成分分析和神经网络模型等多种分析手段,全方位的考察了股票价格的决定因素,发现宏观层面对股票收益率的影响大多来自经济的生产方面,比如考察经济活跃程度的指标、考察生产成本的指标以及衡量经济发展周期的指标；中观层面对股票收益率的影响主要取决于上市公司的盈利能力和高管持股水平；从微观层面来说,大单交易对上市公司股价的影响则较为显著。这一章的结果对后续章节模型的建立提供了重要的现实依据,并对本文的最终结论给出了一种可能的回答。
在第四章中,、本文以IS-LM模型的框架为基础,在紧紧把握市场流动性这一线索的思想指引下,将股票市场加入了IS-LM模型,通过模型,本文论述了股票市场对货币政策影响的作用机制在于股票市场作为人们一种重要的投资渠道,其与居民的消费或企业的生产投入一样,会吸收一部分的社会流动性,由于居民会受到消费约束,企业也会受到资金约束,因此股票市场与商品市场之间存在一定的替代效应,在这种情况下,试图调节商品市场的货币政策其最终实施效果便会受到这种替代效应的影响。同时,股票市场又具有体现实体经济的同步效应以及反作用于实体经济的财富效应,因此若货币政策改变了商品市场的相关指标,比如通货膨胀或产出缺口,那么其实际上也就改变了实体经济的发展水平,理论上股票市场也会相应地受到影响。因此,到底是同步效应和财富效应多一点,还是替代效应多一点,对这个问题的探讨可以回答股票价格对货币政策实行机制有何影响的问题。
第五章是对第四章定性模型的数理化探讨,在第四章分析的基础上,本章建立了一个包含居民、企业、银行和中央银行四个部门的一般均衡模型,讨论了其各自的最优化行为,并通过建立商品市场的一般均衡模型,将上述四个经济主体的行为加入到同一个均衡方程中。同时,我们根据市场投资者投资情绪的不同,设定了两种关于股票定价的函数,分别讨论了当股票定价函数不同时,股票价格对货币政策实施效果的影响,得出了与第四章定性分析相同的结论。在文章结构上,第五章是对第四章分析的一个递进,并回答了第四章所关注的问题,指出影响股票市场同步效应和财富效应与替代效应的主要因素是股票市场投资者的情绪。当投资者的投资情绪偏理性时,股票市场的同步效应与财富效应更大；当投资者的投资情绪偏非理性时,股票市场与商品市场之间的替代效应更大。
第六章是在对问题“股票价格对货币政策实行机制的影响”的定性分析和模型分析的基础上进行的对现实数据的考察,通过现实数据,我们首先通过计量模型找出了我国股票市场存在非理性行为的那些时间区间,然后分别对其进行考察,发现当股票市场投资情绪以理性为主时,货币政策对商品市场价格水平的调控效果较为明显,此时股票价格与物价水平之间具有较为明显的相关关系,货币政策不用关注股票价格,同时货币政策的调整会影响到股票价格的变动；当股票市场非理性情绪占主导时,货币政策对商品市场价格水平的调控效果需要更长的持续期和更大力度的调控才能起作用,此时股票价格与物价水平之间的相关关系较弱,货币政策对股票价格的调整与其对物价水平的调整一样,具有不确定性,为了达到调控效果,需要实施比市场理性情绪时更大力度的调控。
本文所得出的主要结论是,在股票市场偏理性或投资的成分较多时,由股票价格的变动引起的商品市场价格的变动较为稳定,此时央行的货币政策不用关注股票市场的价格,其对通货膨胀和产出缺口的调控目标容易达到,但是对股票市场价格的调控具有一定的不确定性；在股票市场非理性或投机的成分较多时,由于股票市场引入了价格反馈的作用机制,因此由股票价格的变动引起的商品市场价格的变动会变得不太确定,此时央行的货币政策为了达到对通货膨胀和产出缺口的调控目标,其调控力度会大于市场偏理性时的调控力度,同时该调控对股票市场价格的影响仍然具有一定的不确定性。本文在研究过程中还发现,价格调控型的利率政策对国内生产总值和通货膨胀的双向调控作用较为明显,而数量调控型的货币供应量调节则对国内生产总值和通货膨胀的推动作用大于回拉作用；股票大盘回报率和大盘指数的波动领先交易量的波动大约一个月左右；央行的货币政策对股票市场价格指数的影响具有较大的不确定性,在不同的时期可能会有不同的效果。对股票价格的决定因素来说,股票价格的宏观影响因素主要来自于生产方面；中观影响因素主要是公司经营和高管持股；微观层面的大单交易对股票价格的波动具有较大的解释力。对于我国的货币政策来说,由于对我国股市的宏观影响多来自于生产层面,并且在不同时期货币政策对股票价格具有不同的影响,因此并不建议将股票价格作为货币政策关注的最终目标。由于当股票价格发生较为非理性的波动时,往往需要更大力度的货币政策才能达到对股票价格的干预效果,因此为了避免股市暴涨暴跌对实体经济的影响,采取一些货币政策之外的措施来干预股市也是十分必要的。
本文的主要创新点在于：
首先,本文将宏观模型和微观模型放在一个框架下进行研究,通过微观个体的最优化行为建立了一个具有多个部门的一般均衡模型；
其次,在模型设定时,本文尽量做到让所有的变量都成为内生变量,这样可以有效的将不确定因素都放在模型内部讨论。并且本文从模型的建立到得出商品市场上的一般均衡模型,再到最后得出股票价格对货币政策实施机制的影响作用的结论,每一步的推导本文都有细致的描述,尽量做到从数学上和经济学上都具有合理性；
最后,本文联系现实数据和本文模型,通过计量的方法定位了我国股票市场出现非理性投资情绪的时期。这不仅反应了本文模型设定思路的正确性,也使得联系市场实际数据对模型结论的说明显得更有说服力。
然而本文仍有不足之处,具体来说主要有以下两点：
第一,现实中的金融资产不只股票一种,而本文只考虑了股票一种情况,并且本文中也没有考虑政府因素和进出口因素,因此对现实问题的模型化还不够全面；
第二、本文的模型中只对居民和企业部门的目标函数取了具体形式,银行和中央银行的相关函数采用的是一般形式,因此本文得出的最终结论是根据函数的边际性质对函数的一般形式进行讨论的基础上而得出的,并没有给出具体的解析解,因此若要应用计量模型还需要对本文模型中一般形式的函数进行进一步的假设,赋予其具体的形式。
不过,以上不足也正是本文今后研究的重点。
The relationship between asset prices and monetary policy has long been a hot issue discussed by the academic community. From the micro-level, previous studies have focused largely on the role of asset prices on monetary policy transmission, and whether asset prices accurately reflect the macro-economic and other issues. From the macro-level, the existing research focuses largely on whether monetary policy should intervene in asset prices and the ability to intervene in asset prices and other issues. The perspective of existing researches tend to be more independent, but in fact, this field of researches should be an entirety, so as the financial sector, and it should be closely related to all aspects of social, economic, political and other factors. Hence, the study of finance should not only be the joint of macro and micro researches, but extend the vision to areas outside the finance. For this reason, the frontier research of modern finance tries to contact the macro-financial researches with the micro-finance researches.
Our study is based and expanded on this idea. Firstly, we summarize the relevant literature on the channels of monetary policy effect the real economy and the relationship between asset prices and monetary policy. From a theoretical point of view, the former literature is to analyze the relationship between monetary policy and the real economy, and the latter literature mainly analyze the impact of asset prices on the implementation of monetary policy. It is divided into two aspects, namely, should the monetary policy intervene in asset prices and whether the monetary policy can intervene in asse prices.
Then, the article do some correlation analysis on China's monetary policy and the stock market, investigate the interest rate regulation of the price and quantity oriented monetary supply regulation and the correlation between the gross domestic product (GDP), the relationship of the consumer price index, stock price and trading volume and stock prices accurately reflect the real economy problem. For monetary policy, this chapter study shows that how the monetary policy reflects on the real economy, our study is basing on real data to examine whether they are obvious. If so, then monetary policy is anterior to the real economy changes, or changes in synchronization, or lag changes. For the stock market, trading volume has a direct impact on the real economy and the trading volume and price intrinsically linked, however, whether it is trading volume before the price change, or simultaneous changes or lag changes, and the stock price reflects to what extent the development of the real economy. All these problems are considered in this article, the second chapter studies the proposed model of the subsequent chapters and draw the final conclusion of this paper provides a preliminary realistic basis.
In the third chapter, I analysis the relevant variables affect China's stock market price, the purpose is to provides a possible answer to the question "whether the monetary policy is able to intervene in asset prices". In the next chapter, I based on the framework of the IS-LM model, this article discusses the mechanism of action of the stock market on monetary policy is that the stock market as an important investment channels for people, and people's consumption or corporate production inputs, will absorb part of social mobility. Chapter5translates the qualitative model in chapter4into the mathematical way. This chapter establishes a general equilibrium model of four departments:residents, businesses, banks and the central bank. Discussing their respective optimization behavior, and by the establishment of commodity markets general equilibrium model, the four behavior of economic agents to the same balanced equation.
The main conclusions of the article is, when rational preference and investment take a larger proportion in the stock market, the change in the price of the commodity market caused by changes in the stock price is relatively stable, the central bank's monetary policy need not take attention to the stock market price. It's easy to achieve control objectives frr inflation and the output gap with a certain degree of uncertainty, but not the regulation of the stock market price; When the irrational or speculate in the stock market's composition is large, as the stock market introduction of price feedback mechanism caused by the movements of the stock price changes in the market price of goods will become less certain, the central bank's monetary policy on inflation and the output gap in order to achieve control objectives, it's control efforts will be greater than the market when the rational side control efforts, while the regulation of the stock market prices still have a certain degree of uncertainty. This article also find out in the research process, price regulation-interest rate policy is more obvious, bi-directional regulation of the gross domestic product (GDP) and inflation adjustment pull back the role of the role of the gross domestic product (GDP) and inflation is greater than the number of regulation and control of the money supply. Fluctuations in the rate of return on the stock market and the market index of leading trading volume fluctuations around a month. The effects of central bank's monetary policy on stock market price index are great uncertainty, and in different time may have different effects. From the determinants of stock price, the macro-economic impact of the stock price factors mainly from the production side; the main Medium influence factors are the company's operations and executive stock ownership. Micro-level's big deal on the volatility of the stock price has greater explanatory power. China's monetary policy, macroeconomic impact on China's stock market from the level of production, and have different effects at different times of monetary policy on the stock price, so I do not recommend the stock price as the ultimate goal of monetary policy. In order to avoid the stock market rises and falls on the real economy, monetary policy often requires greater efforts in order to achieve the effect of the intervention on the stock price when the stock price is more irrational fluctuations, take some outside monetary policy measures to intervention in the stock market is also very necessary.
The article's main innovations are:
Firstly, in this paper, the macro model and micro model on a framework for research, through the microscopic individual behavior established a general equilibrium model with multiple departments;
Secondly, when setting up the model, the article as far as possible to put all variables into endogenous variables. So, all uncertainties are placed inside the model discussed effectively. And from the model to derive the general equilibrium model on the commodity markets, to finally arrive at the conclusion of the stock price effects of monetary policy implementation mechanisms, every step of the derivation of this article has a detailed description, as far as possible from mathematics and economics are reasonable;
Finally, contact the real data and the proposed model, the period of China's stock market irrational sentiment is located by the method of measurement. This not only reflects the correctness of our model setting ideas, but also making contact actual market data model conclusions seem more convincing.
This article also has inadequateness, specifically the following two main points:
First, the reality of financial assets more than the stock, and this article only consider the stock, and this article did not consider government factors, import and export factors neither, so the modeling of real-world problems is not comprehensive enough.
Second, this article only for residents in the model and objective function of the corporate sector to take the specific form, and the banks and the central bank takes the general form. Therefore, we draw the final conclusion is based on the marginal nature of the function of the general form of the function on the basis of the discussion arrived, we do not give specific analytical solution, to apply econometric model needs further assumptions on the function of the general form of the model in this article, need to give the concrete form.
However, the shortcomings above are also the focus of future research in this article.
引文
[1]白鹤祥,2010, 《中国货币政策传导微观机制研究》,中国金融出版社
[2]程建胜,2004, 《中国真的存在“超额货币”吗?》, 《金融研究》,第6期,104-112
[3]邓瑛,2009：《不完全信息下的资产价格冲击与货币政策选择》,中国财政经济出版社
[4]封北麟,2009： 《资产价格波动与货币政策反应》,经济科学出版社
[5]耿强,2011, 《人民币汇率、资产价格与货币政策》,南京大学出版社
[6]郭田勇,2006,《资产价格、通货膨胀与中国货币政策体系的完善》,《金融研究》,第10期,23-35
[7]韩平,2005,《我国M2/GDP的动态增长路径、货币供应量与政策选择》《经济研究》,第10期,37-47
[8]瞿强,2001,《资产价格与货币政策》,《经济研究》,第7期,60-68
[9]李超,李奇霖,2012, 《货币政策和资产价格》, 《经济研究导刊》,第30期,77-78
[10]李连发,2010, 《通胀预期、资产替代与当前货币政策取向》, 《经济学动态》,第12期,53-59
[11]李勇,邓晶和王有贵,2011,《中国通胀、资产价格及货币政策间关系研究——基于开放经济视角的分析》, 《国际经济研究》,第1 0期,23-29
[12]刘明志,2001, 《中国的M2/GDP(1980-2000)：趋势、水平和影响因素》《经济研究》,第2期,3-13
[13]刘士余,王辰华,2005, 《中国经济货币化进程：动态演进及实证解说》《金融研究》,第3期,38-49
[14]刘伟,李绍荣,2002,《货币扩张、经济增长与资本市场制度创新》,《经济研究》,第1期,27-31
[15]卢宝梅,2008,《通货膨胀目标值、资产价格膨胀和货币政策反应》,《经济学动态》,第3期,11-19
[16]吕江林,2004,《货币政策与资产价格关系研究述评》,《经济学动态》,第5期,84-87
[17]骆祚炎,2011, 《资产价格波动、经济周期与货币政策调控研究进展》《经济学动态》,第3期,121-126
[18]牟敦果,2013,《新经济结构下货币供应与通货膨胀问题研究》,《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,第1期,56-63
[19]裴平,熊鹏,2003,《我国货币政策传导过程中的“渗漏”效应》,《经济研究》,第8期,21-28
[20]钱小安,1998,《资产价格变化对货币政策的影响》,《经济研究》,第1期,70-77
[21]邱崇明,张亦春,牟敦国,2005,《资产替代与货币政策》,《金融研究》,第1期,52-64
[22]石建民,2001,《股票市场、货币需求与总量经济：一般均衡分析》,《经济研究》,第5期,45-53
[23]王德,李建军,2012,《资产泡沫过程中的货币政策因素分析：基于美国1990-2008年数据实证检验》, 《中央财经大学学报》,第12期,39-44
[24]王亮亮,苗永旺,2013,《货币政策、宏观审慎政策与资产价格》, 《国际金融》,第2期,66-70
[25]王擎,韩鑫韬,2009,《货币政策能盯住资产价格吗?——来自中国房地产市场的证据》, 《金融研究》,第8期,114-123
[26]王一萱,屈文洲,2005,《我国货币市场与资本市场连通程度的动态分析》,《金融研究》,第8期,112-122
[27]魏杰,王韧,2010,《资产投资变动与货币政策选择》,《经济学动态》,第6期,20-27
[28]吴培新,2011,《以货币政策和宏观审慎监管应对资产价格泡沫》,《国际金融研究》,第5期,4-12
[29]伍超明,2004,《货币流通速度的再认识》,《经济研究》,第9期,36-47
[30]邢天才田蕊,2010, 《开放经济条件下我国资产价格与货币政策目标关 系的实证分析》, 《货币理论与政策》,第12期,4-12
[31]许桂华,余雪飞,周奋,2012,《资产价格泡沫背景下的货币政策新范式》,《经济学动态》,第3期,26-32
[32]杨龙光,2012,《构建多层次资本市场,完善中小微企业融资渠道》,《中国改革报》,8月2日
[33]杨龙光,2013,《利率市场化离我们还有多远》,《光明日报》,4月6日
[34]杨伟,谢海玉,2009,《资产价格与货币政策困境：善意忽视能解决问题么?》, 《货币理论与政策》,第11期,29-34
[35]易纲,王召,2002： 《货币政策与金融资产价格》,《经济研究》,第3期,13-21
[36]余明,2003： 《资产价格、金融稳定与货币政策》,中国金融出版社
[37]余永定,2002,《M2/GDP的动态增长路径》, 《世界经济》,第12期,3-14
[38]张杰,2006, 《中国的高货币化之谜》, 《经济研究》,第6期,59-70
[39]张晓慧,2009,《关于资产价格和货币政策问题的一些思考》, 《金融研究》,第7期,1-6
[40]赵进文,2011,《资产价格波动、货币政策规则的实证研究》,科学出版社
[41]赵留彦,王一鸣,2005,《货币存量与价格水平：中国的经验证据》, 《经济科学》,第2期,26-38
[42]中国人民银行研究局,德国技术合作公司编,2010,《货币政策与资产价格》,经济科学出版社
[43]周晖,2010, 《货币政策、股票资产价格与经济增长》, 《金融研究》第2期,91-101
[44]周晖,王擎,2009： 《货币政策与资产价格波动：理论模型与中国的经验分析》, 《经济研究》,第10期,61-74
[45]邹昆仑,张晶,2013,《货币政策、通货膨胀与股票资产价格波动研究》《统计与决策》,第1期,173-175
[46]Armen A. Alchian and Benjamin Klein,1973, "On a Correct Measure Inflation",Journal of Money,Credit and Banking,5, pp.173-191
[47]F Allen, D Gale,2001, "Comparative Financial Systems:A Survey", mimeo
[48]Angelo Ranaldo and Enzo Rossi,2010, "The reaction of asset markets to Swiss National Bank Communication", Journal of International Money and Finance,29(3), pp.486-503.
[49]William J. Baumol and James Tobin,1989, "The optimal cash balance proposition:Maurice Allais' priority". Journal of economic Literature,27(3), pp.1160-1162
[50]Ben Bernanke and Mark Gertler,1999, "Monetary Policy and Asset Price Volatility", Economic Review,84(4), pp.17
[51]Ben S. Bernanke and Mark Gertler,2001, "Should Central Banks Respond to Movements in Asset Price?", American Economic Review,91(2), pp.253-257
[52]Bernanke, B.,M. Gertler and S. Gilchrist,1999, "The Financial Accelerator and Flight to Quality", The Review of Economics and Statistics,78(1), pp.1-15
[53]Bernanke, Ben S. and Alan S. Blinder,1992, "The Federal Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission", The American Economic Reviews,82(4), pp.901-921
[54]Bodie,Z.,R.Merton,D.B.Crane,1995, "Global Financial System", Harvard University Press
[55]Bordo M, Jeanne O,2002, "Monetary Policy and Asset Prices:Does "Benign Neglect" Make Sense?" International Finance,5(2), pp.139-164
[56]Borio C and P Lowe,2003, "Imbalances or "Bubbles"? Implications for Monetary and Financial Stability", Cambridge:MIT Press.
[57]Borio and Lowe,2002, "Asset Prices, Financial and Monetary Stability: Exploring the Nexus", paper presented as the BIS conference on Changes in Risk through time:Measurement and Policy Options, BIS Working Papers,No.114.
[58]Borio, C.,2006, "Monetary and Prudential Policies at a Crossroads? New Challenges in the New Century", BIS Working Papers, No.216.
[59]Brayton and Mauskopf,1985, "The Federal Reserve Board MPS Quarterly Econometric Model of the U.S Economy", Economic Modeling,2(3), pp.170-192
[60]Broadbent,1996, "Taylor Rules and Optimal Rules", Mimeo, HMT Academic Panel
[61]Bryan, M. F. and S. G. Cecchetti,1993, "Measuring Core Inflation?", University of Chicago Press
[62]Capie, F., and G. Wood,1997, "Asset Prices and Real Economy", Macmillan Press
[63]Carl E. Walsh,2004, "Implications of Santa Cruz Center for International Economics", pp.318.
[64]Carlin, Mayer,2003, "Finance,investment and Growth", Journal of Financial Economics,69(1), pp.191:226
[65]Clarida, Richard, JoediGali and Mark Gertler,1998, "Monetary Policy Rules in Practice:Some International Evidence", European Economic Review,42, pp.1033-1067
[66]D Sondermann, MT Bohl and PL Siklos,2009, "The euro area stock market channel:Does one size fit all?", Finance Research Letters,6(4), pp.230-235.
[67]Detken, C., and F., Smets,2003, "Asset Price Booms and Monetary Policy", Paper presented at the ECB conference and ECB workshop, No.364.
[68]Edward Nelson,2000, "UK Monetary Policy 1972-1997:a Guide Using Taylor Rules", Bank of England
[69]Ferrero and Nobili,2005, "Futures contractrates as monetary policy forecasts", mimeo, Bank of Italy
[70]Ficher,I,1911, "The Purchasing Power of Money:Its Determination and Relation to Credit, Interest and Crises", New York:Macmillan
[71]Filardo Anfrew,2001, "Should Monetary Policy Respond to Asset Price Bubbles? Some Experimental Result", in G Kaufman(ed), Asset price Bubbles: Implications for Monetary and Regulatory Policies, Amsterdam:Elsecier Science.
[72]Florian Kajuth,2010, "The role of liquidity constraints in the response of monetary policy to house prices", Journal of Financial Stability,6(4), pp.230-242.
[73]Frederic S. Mishkin,1995, "Symposium on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism", Journal of Economic Perspectives,9(4), pp.3-10
[74]Friedman. M,1959, "The Demand for Money-Some Theoretic and Empirical Results". Journal of Political Economy, pp.327-351
[75]Friedman M.,1956, "The Quantity Theory of Money", Hoover Institution Press
[76]Garrison, R.M.,1982, Austian Economics as the Middle Ground:Comment on Loasby, Method, Process, and Austian Economics:Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises, ed. I. M. Kirzner, Lexington, Mass.:Lexington Books.
[77]Goodhart, C.,1995, "Price Stability and Financial Fragility in Central Bank and the Financial System", MIT Press
[78]Grande, G.,2006, "Asset Prices and Central Bank Policy:An Overview of Recent Research and Policy Analysis at the Bank of Italy", Paper Presented at the BIS Autumn Economists. Meeting,30-31 October, Basel.
[79]Greewood, J., and Smith, B. D.,1997, "Financial Markets in Development, and the Development of Financial Markets", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,21 (1, January).
[80]Hallman, J. J, R. D. Potrter and D. H. Small,1991, "Is P-Star a Good Indicator of Inflationary Pressure in OECD Countries?", OECD Economic Studies, Vol.17,pp7-29
[81]IMF,2000, "Asset Prices and the Business Cycle", World Economic Outlook, Chap.3, April.
[82]J.Tobin, "Monetary Semantics", in Targets and Indicators of Monetary Policy, P.165-174
[83]Judd, John and Glenn D. Rudebusch,1998, "Taylor's Rule and the Fed:1970-1997", Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review,No.3,3-16
[84]Keynes, J. M.,1936, "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money". In. the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vols 6,London:Macmollan,1971
[85]KozickiSharon,1999, "How Useful are Taylor Rules for Monetary Policy? " Economic Review, Second Quarter, Federal Bank of Kansas
[86]Levine,R.,1997, "Financial Development and Economic Growth:Views and Agenda", Journal of Economic Literature,35(2), pp.688-726
[87]Lucas, R. E. Jr. and Stokey,N.,1987, "Money and interest in a cash-in-advance economy", Econometrics,55(3), pp.491-513
[88]Lucas, R. Jr.,1978, "Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy," Econometrics, 46(6), pp.1429-1445
[89]Lucas,R.E.Jr.,1980, "Equilibrium in a pure currency economy", In Models of Monetary Economics, ed. J. II.Kareken and N. Wallance, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
[90]Macallum,B.T.,1983, "The role of overlapping-generatons models in monetary economics", Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 18,Spring:9-44
[91]Marshall,A.,1926, "Of fiscal papers by Alfred Marshall", Ed. J. M. Keynes, London:Macmollan
[92]McCallum, Bennett T.,1984, "Monetarist Rules in the Light of Recent Experience," American EcomicReciew
[93]Milton Friedman, Anna Schwartz,1963, "A Monetary History of the United Seates,1867-1960",Princeton:Princeton University Press
[94]Mishkin, Frederic S.,1978,"The Household Balance Sheet and the Great Depression", Journal of Economic Perspective,pp.918-937
[95]Nobili, A. (2007), "Assessing the predictive power of financial spreads in the Euroarea", Empirical Economics 33(1), pp.177-195.
[96]Orphanides, Athanasios,1998, "Monetary Policy Rules Based on Real-Time Data", Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Federal Reserve Board
[97]Pigou, A. C.1917. The Value of Money. Quarterly Journal of Economics,32, November.38-65
[98]Ramon Moreno, Intervention, Sterilization, and Monetary Control in Kero and T aiwan, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, July 1997.
[99]RICARDO LAGOS: Asset Prices, Liquidity, and Monetary Policy in an
[100]Roberto Rigobon, Brian Sack,2004, "The impact of monetary policy on asset prices", Journal of Monetary Economics 51, pp.1553-1575
[101]Romer, D.,1986, "A Simple general equilibrium version of the Baumol-Tobin model". Quarterly Journal of Economics 101:663-86
[102]Roosa, R.,1951, "Interest Rate and Central Bank", Money, Trade and Economic Growth
[103]Rudebusch, Glenn D. and Lars E. O. Svensson,1998, "Policy Rules for Inflation Targeting", paperprepared for the National Bureau of Economic Research Conference on Monetary Policy Rules, January 16-17
[104]Rudebush, G. D.,2002, "Assessing Nominal Income Rules for Monetary Policy with Model and Data Uncertainty", Economic Journal, pp.402-432
[105]Sevensson,1999, "Lars Price Level Targeting vs. Inflation Targeting:A Free Lunch?", Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,part Ⅰ, pages277-295,
[106]Shibuya,Hiroshi,1992, "Dynamic Equilibrium Price Index:Asset Price and Inflation", Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies.Bank of Japan
[107]Sidrauski,M.,1967,"Rational choice and patterns of growth in a monetary economy", American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 57, May:534-44
[108]Simon Gilchrist, John V. Leahy,2002, "Monetary policy and asset prices", Journal of Monetary Economics 49, pp.75-97
[109]Syed MujahidHussain:Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (2011) 752-764, Simultaneous monetary policy announcements and international stock markets response:An intraday analysis
[110]Taylor,John B.,1993a, "Macroeconomic Policy in a World Economy from Econometric Design to Practical Application", New York:w.w.Norton
[111]Taylor, John B.1993b, "Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol.39.
[112]Taylor, John B.,1998, "A Historical Analysis of Monetary Policy Rules", NBER Working Paper, No.6768.
[113]Taylor, John B., Fall 1995, "The Monetary Transmission Mechanism:An Empirical Framework", Journal of Economic Perspective.
[114]Tobin, James, Feb.1969, "A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory",Journal of Money,Credit and Banking, pp.15-29.
[115]Wallace,Neil,1980, "The Overlapping Generations Model of Fiat Money",in John H.Kareken and Niel Wallace(eds.),Models of Minneapolis, pp.49-82
[116]Whalen EL.A,1966,Rationalization of the Precautionaty Demand for Cash.Quarterly Journal of Economics,2:545-552
[117]Yang Longguang and Wang Qing,2012, "Predicting the Stock Price Based on BP Neural Network and Big Transaction",2012 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), pp.2957-2960.
[118]YASUO HIROSE:Equilibrium Indeterminacy and Asset Price Fluctuation in Japan:A Bayesian Investigation,2008, JEL codes:C11, C62, E30, E44.
[119]Yun Daisy Li, Talan B.Iscan and KuanXu,2010, "The impact of monetary policy shocks on stock prices:Evidence from Canada and the United States", Journal of International Money and Finance,29, pp.876-896.
[2]程建胜,2004, 《中国真的存在“超额货币”吗?》, 《金融研究》,第6期,104-112
[3]邓瑛,2009：《不完全信息下的资产价格冲击与货币政策选择》,中国财政经济出版社
[4]封北麟,2009： 《资产价格波动与货币政策反应》,经济科学出版社
[5]耿强,2011, 《人民币汇率、资产价格与货币政策》,南京大学出版社
[6]郭田勇,2006,《资产价格、通货膨胀与中国货币政策体系的完善》,《金融研究》,第10期,23-35
[7]韩平,2005,《我国M2/GDP的动态增长路径、货币供应量与政策选择》《经济研究》,第10期,37-47
[8]瞿强,2001,《资产价格与货币政策》,《经济研究》,第7期,60-68
[9]李超,李奇霖,2012, 《货币政策和资产价格》, 《经济研究导刊》,第30期,77-78
[10]李连发,2010, 《通胀预期、资产替代与当前货币政策取向》, 《经济学动态》,第12期,53-59
[11]李勇,邓晶和王有贵,2011,《中国通胀、资产价格及货币政策间关系研究——基于开放经济视角的分析》, 《国际经济研究》,第1 0期,23-29
[12]刘明志,2001, 《中国的M2/GDP(1980-2000)：趋势、水平和影响因素》《经济研究》,第2期,3-13
[13]刘士余,王辰华,2005, 《中国经济货币化进程：动态演进及实证解说》《金融研究》,第3期,38-49
[14]刘伟,李绍荣,2002,《货币扩张、经济增长与资本市场制度创新》,《经济研究》,第1期,27-31
[15]卢宝梅,2008,《通货膨胀目标值、资产价格膨胀和货币政策反应》,《经济学动态》,第3期,11-19
[16]吕江林,2004,《货币政策与资产价格关系研究述评》,《经济学动态》,第5期,84-87
[17]骆祚炎,2011, 《资产价格波动、经济周期与货币政策调控研究进展》《经济学动态》,第3期,121-126
[18]牟敦果,2013,《新经济结构下货币供应与通货膨胀问题研究》,《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,第1期,56-63
[19]裴平,熊鹏,2003,《我国货币政策传导过程中的“渗漏”效应》,《经济研究》,第8期,21-28
[20]钱小安,1998,《资产价格变化对货币政策的影响》,《经济研究》,第1期,70-77
[21]邱崇明,张亦春,牟敦国,2005,《资产替代与货币政策》,《金融研究》,第1期,52-64
[22]石建民,2001,《股票市场、货币需求与总量经济：一般均衡分析》,《经济研究》,第5期,45-53
[23]王德,李建军,2012,《资产泡沫过程中的货币政策因素分析：基于美国1990-2008年数据实证检验》, 《中央财经大学学报》,第12期,39-44
[24]王亮亮,苗永旺,2013,《货币政策、宏观审慎政策与资产价格》, 《国际金融》,第2期,66-70
[25]王擎,韩鑫韬,2009,《货币政策能盯住资产价格吗?——来自中国房地产市场的证据》, 《金融研究》,第8期,114-123
[26]王一萱,屈文洲,2005,《我国货币市场与资本市场连通程度的动态分析》,《金融研究》,第8期,112-122
[27]魏杰,王韧,2010,《资产投资变动与货币政策选择》,《经济学动态》,第6期,20-27
[28]吴培新,2011,《以货币政策和宏观审慎监管应对资产价格泡沫》,《国际金融研究》,第5期,4-12
[29]伍超明,2004,《货币流通速度的再认识》,《经济研究》,第9期,36-47
[30]邢天才田蕊,2010, 《开放经济条件下我国资产价格与货币政策目标关 系的实证分析》, 《货币理论与政策》,第12期,4-12
[31]许桂华,余雪飞,周奋,2012,《资产价格泡沫背景下的货币政策新范式》,《经济学动态》,第3期,26-32
[32]杨龙光,2012,《构建多层次资本市场,完善中小微企业融资渠道》,《中国改革报》,8月2日
[33]杨龙光,2013,《利率市场化离我们还有多远》,《光明日报》,4月6日
[34]杨伟,谢海玉,2009,《资产价格与货币政策困境：善意忽视能解决问题么?》, 《货币理论与政策》,第11期,29-34
[35]易纲,王召,2002： 《货币政策与金融资产价格》,《经济研究》,第3期,13-21
[36]余明,2003： 《资产价格、金融稳定与货币政策》,中国金融出版社
[37]余永定,2002,《M2/GDP的动态增长路径》, 《世界经济》,第12期,3-14
[38]张杰,2006, 《中国的高货币化之谜》, 《经济研究》,第6期,59-70
[39]张晓慧,2009,《关于资产价格和货币政策问题的一些思考》, 《金融研究》,第7期,1-6
[40]赵进文,2011,《资产价格波动、货币政策规则的实证研究》,科学出版社
[41]赵留彦,王一鸣,2005,《货币存量与价格水平：中国的经验证据》, 《经济科学》,第2期,26-38
[42]中国人民银行研究局,德国技术合作公司编,2010,《货币政策与资产价格》,经济科学出版社
[43]周晖,2010, 《货币政策、股票资产价格与经济增长》, 《金融研究》第2期,91-101
[44]周晖,王擎,2009： 《货币政策与资产价格波动：理论模型与中国的经验分析》, 《经济研究》,第10期,61-74
[45]邹昆仑,张晶,2013,《货币政策、通货膨胀与股票资产价格波动研究》《统计与决策》,第1期,173-175
[46]Armen A. Alchian and Benjamin Klein,1973, "On a Correct Measure Inflation",Journal of Money,Credit and Banking,5, pp.173-191
[47]F Allen, D Gale,2001, "Comparative Financial Systems:A Survey", mimeo
[48]Angelo Ranaldo and Enzo Rossi,2010, "The reaction of asset markets to Swiss National Bank Communication", Journal of International Money and Finance,29(3), pp.486-503.
[49]William J. Baumol and James Tobin,1989, "The optimal cash balance proposition:Maurice Allais' priority". Journal of economic Literature,27(3), pp.1160-1162
[50]Ben Bernanke and Mark Gertler,1999, "Monetary Policy and Asset Price Volatility", Economic Review,84(4), pp.17
[51]Ben S. Bernanke and Mark Gertler,2001, "Should Central Banks Respond to Movements in Asset Price?", American Economic Review,91(2), pp.253-257
[52]Bernanke, B.,M. Gertler and S. Gilchrist,1999, "The Financial Accelerator and Flight to Quality", The Review of Economics and Statistics,78(1), pp.1-15
[53]Bernanke, Ben S. and Alan S. Blinder,1992, "The Federal Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission", The American Economic Reviews,82(4), pp.901-921
[54]Bodie,Z.,R.Merton,D.B.Crane,1995, "Global Financial System", Harvard University Press
[55]Bordo M, Jeanne O,2002, "Monetary Policy and Asset Prices:Does "Benign Neglect" Make Sense?" International Finance,5(2), pp.139-164
[56]Borio C and P Lowe,2003, "Imbalances or "Bubbles"? Implications for Monetary and Financial Stability", Cambridge:MIT Press.
[57]Borio and Lowe,2002, "Asset Prices, Financial and Monetary Stability: Exploring the Nexus", paper presented as the BIS conference on Changes in Risk through time:Measurement and Policy Options, BIS Working Papers,No.114.
[58]Borio, C.,2006, "Monetary and Prudential Policies at a Crossroads? New Challenges in the New Century", BIS Working Papers, No.216.
[59]Brayton and Mauskopf,1985, "The Federal Reserve Board MPS Quarterly Econometric Model of the U.S Economy", Economic Modeling,2(3), pp.170-192
[60]Broadbent,1996, "Taylor Rules and Optimal Rules", Mimeo, HMT Academic Panel
[61]Bryan, M. F. and S. G. Cecchetti,1993, "Measuring Core Inflation?", University of Chicago Press
[62]Capie, F., and G. Wood,1997, "Asset Prices and Real Economy", Macmillan Press
[63]Carl E. Walsh,2004, "Implications of Santa Cruz Center for International Economics", pp.318.
[64]Carlin, Mayer,2003, "Finance,investment and Growth", Journal of Financial Economics,69(1), pp.191:226
[65]Clarida, Richard, JoediGali and Mark Gertler,1998, "Monetary Policy Rules in Practice:Some International Evidence", European Economic Review,42, pp.1033-1067
[66]D Sondermann, MT Bohl and PL Siklos,2009, "The euro area stock market channel:Does one size fit all?", Finance Research Letters,6(4), pp.230-235.
[67]Detken, C., and F., Smets,2003, "Asset Price Booms and Monetary Policy", Paper presented at the ECB conference and ECB workshop, No.364.
[68]Edward Nelson,2000, "UK Monetary Policy 1972-1997:a Guide Using Taylor Rules", Bank of England
[69]Ferrero and Nobili,2005, "Futures contractrates as monetary policy forecasts", mimeo, Bank of Italy
[70]Ficher,I,1911, "The Purchasing Power of Money:Its Determination and Relation to Credit, Interest and Crises", New York:Macmillan
[71]Filardo Anfrew,2001, "Should Monetary Policy Respond to Asset Price Bubbles? Some Experimental Result", in G Kaufman(ed), Asset price Bubbles: Implications for Monetary and Regulatory Policies, Amsterdam:Elsecier Science.
[72]Florian Kajuth,2010, "The role of liquidity constraints in the response of monetary policy to house prices", Journal of Financial Stability,6(4), pp.230-242.
[73]Frederic S. Mishkin,1995, "Symposium on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism", Journal of Economic Perspectives,9(4), pp.3-10
[74]Friedman. M,1959, "The Demand for Money-Some Theoretic and Empirical Results". Journal of Political Economy, pp.327-351
[75]Friedman M.,1956, "The Quantity Theory of Money", Hoover Institution Press
[76]Garrison, R.M.,1982, Austian Economics as the Middle Ground:Comment on Loasby, Method, Process, and Austian Economics:Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises, ed. I. M. Kirzner, Lexington, Mass.:Lexington Books.
[77]Goodhart, C.,1995, "Price Stability and Financial Fragility in Central Bank and the Financial System", MIT Press
[78]Grande, G.,2006, "Asset Prices and Central Bank Policy:An Overview of Recent Research and Policy Analysis at the Bank of Italy", Paper Presented at the BIS Autumn Economists. Meeting,30-31 October, Basel.
[79]Greewood, J., and Smith, B. D.,1997, "Financial Markets in Development, and the Development of Financial Markets", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,21 (1, January).
[80]Hallman, J. J, R. D. Potrter and D. H. Small,1991, "Is P-Star a Good Indicator of Inflationary Pressure in OECD Countries?", OECD Economic Studies, Vol.17,pp7-29
[81]IMF,2000, "Asset Prices and the Business Cycle", World Economic Outlook, Chap.3, April.
[82]J.Tobin, "Monetary Semantics", in Targets and Indicators of Monetary Policy, P.165-174
[83]Judd, John and Glenn D. Rudebusch,1998, "Taylor's Rule and the Fed:1970-1997", Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review,No.3,3-16
[84]Keynes, J. M.,1936, "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money". In. the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vols 6,London:Macmollan,1971
[85]KozickiSharon,1999, "How Useful are Taylor Rules for Monetary Policy? " Economic Review, Second Quarter, Federal Bank of Kansas
[86]Levine,R.,1997, "Financial Development and Economic Growth:Views and Agenda", Journal of Economic Literature,35(2), pp.688-726
[87]Lucas, R. E. Jr. and Stokey,N.,1987, "Money and interest in a cash-in-advance economy", Econometrics,55(3), pp.491-513
[88]Lucas, R. Jr.,1978, "Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy," Econometrics, 46(6), pp.1429-1445
[89]Lucas,R.E.Jr.,1980, "Equilibrium in a pure currency economy", In Models of Monetary Economics, ed. J. II.Kareken and N. Wallance, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
[90]Macallum,B.T.,1983, "The role of overlapping-generatons models in monetary economics", Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 18,Spring:9-44
[91]Marshall,A.,1926, "Of fiscal papers by Alfred Marshall", Ed. J. M. Keynes, London:Macmollan
[92]McCallum, Bennett T.,1984, "Monetarist Rules in the Light of Recent Experience," American EcomicReciew
[93]Milton Friedman, Anna Schwartz,1963, "A Monetary History of the United Seates,1867-1960",Princeton:Princeton University Press
[94]Mishkin, Frederic S.,1978,"The Household Balance Sheet and the Great Depression", Journal of Economic Perspective,pp.918-937
[95]Nobili, A. (2007), "Assessing the predictive power of financial spreads in the Euroarea", Empirical Economics 33(1), pp.177-195.
[96]Orphanides, Athanasios,1998, "Monetary Policy Rules Based on Real-Time Data", Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Federal Reserve Board
[97]Pigou, A. C.1917. The Value of Money. Quarterly Journal of Economics,32, November.38-65
[98]Ramon Moreno, Intervention, Sterilization, and Monetary Control in Kero and T aiwan, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, July 1997.
[99]RICARDO LAGOS: Asset Prices, Liquidity, and Monetary Policy in an
[100]Roberto Rigobon, Brian Sack,2004, "The impact of monetary policy on asset prices", Journal of Monetary Economics 51, pp.1553-1575
[101]Romer, D.,1986, "A Simple general equilibrium version of the Baumol-Tobin model". Quarterly Journal of Economics 101:663-86
[102]Roosa, R.,1951, "Interest Rate and Central Bank", Money, Trade and Economic Growth
[103]Rudebusch, Glenn D. and Lars E. O. Svensson,1998, "Policy Rules for Inflation Targeting", paperprepared for the National Bureau of Economic Research Conference on Monetary Policy Rules, January 16-17
[104]Rudebush, G. D.,2002, "Assessing Nominal Income Rules for Monetary Policy with Model and Data Uncertainty", Economic Journal, pp.402-432
[105]Sevensson,1999, "Lars Price Level Targeting vs. Inflation Targeting:A Free Lunch?", Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,part Ⅰ, pages277-295,
[106]Shibuya,Hiroshi,1992, "Dynamic Equilibrium Price Index:Asset Price and Inflation", Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies.Bank of Japan
[107]Sidrauski,M.,1967,"Rational choice and patterns of growth in a monetary economy", American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 57, May:534-44
[108]Simon Gilchrist, John V. Leahy,2002, "Monetary policy and asset prices", Journal of Monetary Economics 49, pp.75-97
[109]Syed MujahidHussain:Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (2011) 752-764, Simultaneous monetary policy announcements and international stock markets response:An intraday analysis
[110]Taylor,John B.,1993a, "Macroeconomic Policy in a World Economy from Econometric Design to Practical Application", New York:w.w.Norton
[111]Taylor, John B.1993b, "Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol.39.
[112]Taylor, John B.,1998, "A Historical Analysis of Monetary Policy Rules", NBER Working Paper, No.6768.
[113]Taylor, John B., Fall 1995, "The Monetary Transmission Mechanism:An Empirical Framework", Journal of Economic Perspective.
[114]Tobin, James, Feb.1969, "A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory",Journal of Money,Credit and Banking, pp.15-29.
[115]Wallace,Neil,1980, "The Overlapping Generations Model of Fiat Money",in John H.Kareken and Niel Wallace(eds.),Models of Minneapolis, pp.49-82
[116]Whalen EL.A,1966,Rationalization of the Precautionaty Demand for Cash.Quarterly Journal of Economics,2:545-552
[117]Yang Longguang and Wang Qing,2012, "Predicting the Stock Price Based on BP Neural Network and Big Transaction",2012 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), pp.2957-2960.
[118]YASUO HIROSE:Equilibrium Indeterminacy and Asset Price Fluctuation in Japan:A Bayesian Investigation,2008, JEL codes:C11, C62, E30, E44.
[119]Yun Daisy Li, Talan B.Iscan and KuanXu,2010, "The impact of monetary policy shocks on stock prices:Evidence from Canada and the United States", Journal of International Money and Finance,29, pp.876-896.