2002-2010年中国转型水平测度的区域差异研究
|
摘要
1978年我国开始了由计划经济向市场经济的转型,社会经济体制发生了翻天覆地的变化,在对经济的调控中市场占据了主导地位,我国经济得到了空前的快速发展,在国际上发挥着越来越重要的作用,转型进程将会影响到地球上的每个角落。然而我国不同地区发展水平和发展环境的不同,其转型水平也将呈现不同的特征。通过对我国发展转型水平的测度和分析,可为国家和地方促进社会经济发展政策的制定提供依据。
论文在查阅相关文献的基础上,总结了经济转型、社会转型的定性和定量研究进展,从经济建设、社会发展和环境建设三个方面构建了转型的指标测度体系,并在国家、省域和城市三种空间尺度上,分别分析和评价了经济建设、社会发展、环境建设和综合转型水平,试图从中总结出相应的发展变化规律。最后,尝试论述各地转型水平的影响因素,并试图建立理论解释模型。
通过对指标测度体系的测算,并从国家、省域和城市尺度分析的结果可得出如下主要结论：(1)从国家尺度来看,在经济建设、社会发展、环境建设和综合转型水平的角度,东、中、西部地区大体呈现从东向西降低的空间规律,这与我国经济发展的空间分布规律相一致；在年均增长率的角度,东部地区不及中、西部地区增长幅度大；各地区的转型水平总体呈逐年上升的趋势。(2)从省域尺度来看,京津地区、长三角和珠三角地区的各一级指标得分和综合得分是最高的；中部地区的年均增长率高于东、西部地区,转型水平潜力较大；(3)从城市尺度来看,大多数直辖市和省会城市的经济建设、社会发展、环境建设和综合转型水平较其他城市高；指标得分较高的城市的年均增长率较低,年均增长率在空间分布上大体呈中部高,两边低的态势。
由于不同地区的转型水平存在差异,因此,论文最后分析了影响转型水平的因素：制度变迁和政府推进、国家渐进的空间政策、对外开放和经济全球化、区域整合与区域合作,并对其作用机制进行了总结和概括。
In1978, China began to transition from the planned economy to a market economy, and the socio-economic system has undergone enormous changes. In the regulation of economy, the market was in the dominant position, and our country economy obtained the unprecedented rapid growth. As China plays an increasingly important role in international,China's economic restructuring process will also affect every corner of the Earth. However, due to the differences in the levels of the development and the environment in different regions of China, its level of transition will also present different characteristics. On the measure and analysis of reforming level to our country,the article may provides the basis for the national and place to make the policy for socio-economic development.
on the basis of relevant literature, the article summed up the qualitative and quantitative research of the economic transition and social transition;Besides, the article also tries to build the index system to measure the transition from three aspects of economic construction, social development and environmental construction.
At the national, provincial and city three spatial scales, the article respectively analysis and evaluates the level of economic construction, social development, environmental construction and comprehensive transition, and attempts to summarize the development regular; Finally, the article tries to discusses the factors affecting the level of transition, and tried to establish a theory to explain the model. Through the calculation of index system, and analyses from the national, provincial and city scale, we can draw the following main conclusion:
First, from the national scale, in economic construction, social development, environmental construction and comprehensive transition level angle, east to west, area generally shows the space law decreases from east to west, which is consistent with the distribution of China's economic development space law;In the perspective of the average growth, the eastern area is inferior to central and western area. The level of transition in regional shows a rising trend year by year.
Second, from the provincial scale, scores of each level index and the comprehensive score of Beijing and Tianjin area, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta region is the highest;The average growth of the central region is higher than the East and the western region.There are potential in transition.
Third,From the point of city scale, the level of economic construction, social development, environmental construction and comprehensive transformation of most municipalities directly under the central government and provincial capital cities are higher than other cities.The city has higher scores that average growth is lower,In the spatial distribution,the average growth is higher in the center and lower around the center.
As a result, the paper finally analyzes the factors that affect the level of transition, institutional change and the government promoting, progressive space policies, open-door to the outside world and economic globalization, regional integration and regional cooperation, and its mechanism are summarized and summed up.
论文在查阅相关文献的基础上,总结了经济转型、社会转型的定性和定量研究进展,从经济建设、社会发展和环境建设三个方面构建了转型的指标测度体系,并在国家、省域和城市三种空间尺度上,分别分析和评价了经济建设、社会发展、环境建设和综合转型水平,试图从中总结出相应的发展变化规律。最后,尝试论述各地转型水平的影响因素,并试图建立理论解释模型。
通过对指标测度体系的测算,并从国家、省域和城市尺度分析的结果可得出如下主要结论：(1)从国家尺度来看,在经济建设、社会发展、环境建设和综合转型水平的角度,东、中、西部地区大体呈现从东向西降低的空间规律,这与我国经济发展的空间分布规律相一致；在年均增长率的角度,东部地区不及中、西部地区增长幅度大；各地区的转型水平总体呈逐年上升的趋势。(2)从省域尺度来看,京津地区、长三角和珠三角地区的各一级指标得分和综合得分是最高的；中部地区的年均增长率高于东、西部地区,转型水平潜力较大；(3)从城市尺度来看,大多数直辖市和省会城市的经济建设、社会发展、环境建设和综合转型水平较其他城市高；指标得分较高的城市的年均增长率较低,年均增长率在空间分布上大体呈中部高,两边低的态势。
由于不同地区的转型水平存在差异,因此,论文最后分析了影响转型水平的因素：制度变迁和政府推进、国家渐进的空间政策、对外开放和经济全球化、区域整合与区域合作,并对其作用机制进行了总结和概括。
In1978, China began to transition from the planned economy to a market economy, and the socio-economic system has undergone enormous changes. In the regulation of economy, the market was in the dominant position, and our country economy obtained the unprecedented rapid growth. As China plays an increasingly important role in international,China's economic restructuring process will also affect every corner of the Earth. However, due to the differences in the levels of the development and the environment in different regions of China, its level of transition will also present different characteristics. On the measure and analysis of reforming level to our country,the article may provides the basis for the national and place to make the policy for socio-economic development.
on the basis of relevant literature, the article summed up the qualitative and quantitative research of the economic transition and social transition;Besides, the article also tries to build the index system to measure the transition from three aspects of economic construction, social development and environmental construction.
At the national, provincial and city three spatial scales, the article respectively analysis and evaluates the level of economic construction, social development, environmental construction and comprehensive transition, and attempts to summarize the development regular; Finally, the article tries to discusses the factors affecting the level of transition, and tried to establish a theory to explain the model. Through the calculation of index system, and analyses from the national, provincial and city scale, we can draw the following main conclusion:
First, from the national scale, in economic construction, social development, environmental construction and comprehensive transition level angle, east to west, area generally shows the space law decreases from east to west, which is consistent with the distribution of China's economic development space law;In the perspective of the average growth, the eastern area is inferior to central and western area. The level of transition in regional shows a rising trend year by year.
Second, from the provincial scale, scores of each level index and the comprehensive score of Beijing and Tianjin area, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta region is the highest;The average growth of the central region is higher than the East and the western region.There are potential in transition.
Third,From the point of city scale, the level of economic construction, social development, environmental construction and comprehensive transformation of most municipalities directly under the central government and provincial capital cities are higher than other cities.The city has higher scores that average growth is lower,In the spatial distribution,the average growth is higher in the center and lower around the center.
As a result, the paper finally analyzes the factors that affect the level of transition, institutional change and the government promoting, progressive space policies, open-door to the outside world and economic globalization, regional integration and regional cooperation, and its mechanism are summarized and summed up.
引文
[1]吴光炳、张海年、高红贵.转型经济学[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2008.
[2]张良、戴扬.经济转型理论综述开放导报[J],2006(6)：93-96.
[3]张庭伟.转型时期中国的规划理论和规划改革.城市规划[J],2008,32(3)：15-24.
[4]张京祥,吴缚龙,马润潮.体制转型与中国城市空间重构-建立一种空间演化的制度分析框架.城市规划[J],2008(6)：55-60.
[5]Kornai,J.What the Change of System from Socialism to Capitalism Does and Does Not Mean[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2000,14(1):27-42.
[6]Chow,G.C.Capital Formation and Economic Growth in China[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1993,108(3):809-842.
[7]保建云.经济转型、制度变迁与转型经济学研究范式及内容拓展[J].教学与研究,2007(08)：32-39.
[8]陶爱萍.科技革命与社会转型[J].科技管理研究,2008(07)：439-441.
[9]李德、郝秋华.断裂与弥合-社会转型理论及对中国当前社会发展的反思[J].甘肃理论学刊,2008(05)：81-85.
[10]车裕斌.典型村落经济社会转型及发展趋势[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,30(03)：7-13.
[11]陈占江.差序格局与中国社会转型[J].社会科学评论,2007(03)：40-46.
[12]刘祖云.当前中国社会转型特征再探讨[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2002,55(06)：656-659.
[13]刘建荣.社会转型时期农民价值观念的冲突[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2005,34(03)：28-31.
[14]Marangos,J.Alternative models of transition and institutional development[J].Global Business and Economics Review,2005,7(4):390-408.
[15]Marangos,J.Was there an optimum model of transition?[J].Global Business and Economics Review,2006,8(2):133-160.
[16]黄安余.论台湾经济转型与就业关联[J].中国经济史研究,2005,(03)：123-131,160.
[17]厉以宁.转型发展理论[J].经济学动态,1997(4)：3-11.
[18]刘国光.政府功能与财政功能的转型—兼谈当前经济形势[J].经济前言,1997(4)：3-11.
[19]吴敬琏.中国：政府在市场经济转型中的作用[J].财经执法资讯,2005,21(2)：57-57.
[20]孙景宇.经济转型的国际维度与转型国家的战略选择[J].长白学刊,2007,(05)：79-83.
[21]张慧君.经济转型的阶段性及其路径演化研究[J].江苏社会科学,2007,(03)：47-55.
[22]郭旭新.论经济转型中的秩序—关于可持续发展的制度经济学解释[J].南京社会科学,2007,(01)：30-36.
[23]谢琦.经济增长模式的转型[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2008.
[24]孙立平.社会转型：发展社会学的新议题[J].开放时代,2008,(02)：57-72.
[25]雷恒军.简论近代西欧的社会转型[J].陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版),2007,25(03)：30-35.
[26]高续增.解读日本的社会转型[J].银行家,2007,(06)：413-417.
[27]孙慕天、刘玲玲.西方社会转型理论研究的历史和现状[J].哲学动态,1997(04)：40-45.
[28]Marczynska - Witczak,E.Changes in living conditions in Poland under economic transition[J].International Advances in Economic Research,1998,4(4):318-323.
[29]Lombard,A.The impact of social transformation on the non-government welfare sector and the social work profession[J].International Journal of social Welfare,2008,17(2):124-131.
[30]Touraine,A.Social transformations of the twentieth century[J].International Social Science Journal,1998,50(156):165-171.
[31]Kollontai,V.Social transformations in Russia[J].International Social Science Journal,1999,51(159):103-121.
[32]袁志准.当代中国城市建筑文化擅变与社会转型[J].艺术百家,2007(06)：50-53.
[33]乌力吉.城市化进程中的少数民族社会转型[J].贵州民族研究,2008,28(03)：12-16.
[34]卢中原、李建伟.我国经济运行的基本特征与发展趋势预测[J].经济学动态,2002(9)：4-12.
[35]卢中原、胡鞍钢.市场化改革对我国经济运行的影响[J].经济研究,1993,(12)：49-55.
[36]常修泽、高明华,中国国民经济市场化的推进程度及发展思路[J].1998(11)：48-55.
[37]陈宗胜等.中国经济体制市场化进程研究[M].上海：上海人民出版社,1999.
[38]樊纲,王小鲁,张立文.中国各地区市场化进程2000年报告[J].国家行政学院学报,2001(3)：17-27.
[39]杨晓猛.转型国家市场化进程测度的地区差异分析——基于产业结构调整指标的设计与评价[J].世界经济研究,2006(01)：72-78.
[40]江晓薇,宋红旭.中国市场经济的探索[J].管理世界,1995(6)：
[41]沈坤荣.改革二十年我国所有制结构变动对产业结构变动的影响分析[J].管理世界,1999(2)：86-94.
[42]郭庆旺、贾俊雪.稳健财政政策的非凯恩斯效应及其可持续性[J].中国社会科学,2006(5)：58-67.
[43]李岳平.经济增长质量评估体系[J].上海统计,2001(1)：15-17.
[44]赵英才、张纯洪、刘海英.转轨以来中国经济增长质量的综合评价研究[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2006,46(3)：27-35.
[45]申世军、邬凯生.广东省 山东省经济增长质量研究[J].工业技术经济,2007,26(3)：64-68.
[46]钞小静、任保平.中国经济增长质量的时序变化与地区差异分析[J].经济研究,2011(4)：26-40.
[47]舒元、王曦.构造我国经济转型的量化指标体系：关于原则和方法的思考[J].管理世界,2002(4)：16-22.
[48]沈露莹、葛寅等.上海转变经济发展方式评价指标体系研究[J].科学发展,2010(6)：11-35.
[49]李玲玲、张耀辉.我国经济发展方式转变测评指标体系构建及初步测评[J].中国工业经济,2011(4)：54-63.
[50]宋林飞.中国社会转型的趋势、代价及其度量[J].江苏社会科学,2002(6)：30-36.
[51]陈健.基于制度变迁视角的转型期中国城市发展分析[硕士论文].兰州：兰州大学.2008.
[52].科斯,阿尔钦,诺斯.财产权利与制度变迁—产权学派与新制度学派译文集[M].上海：上海三联书店,1996.
[53]张庭伟.转型时期中国的规划理论和规划改革.城市规划[J].2008,32(3)：15-24.
[54]张京祥,吴缚龙,马润潮.体制转型与中国城市空间重构—建立一种空间演化的制度分析框架.城市规划[J].2008(6)：55-60.
[55]Held, Dai, Anthony. Global Transformations:Polities, Economies and Culture[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press,1999.
[56]Lin G C S, Wei H Y D. China's Restless Urban Landscapes:New Challenges for Theoretical Reconstruction[J]. Environment and Planning A,2002,34(9):1535-1544.
[57]蒋殿春、张宇.经济转型与外商直接投资技术溢出效应[J].经济研究,2008(7)：26-38.
[58]汤晓莉.郑州市经济转型研究[博士论文].河南：河南大学.2011.
[2]张良、戴扬.经济转型理论综述开放导报[J],2006(6)：93-96.
[3]张庭伟.转型时期中国的规划理论和规划改革.城市规划[J],2008,32(3)：15-24.
[4]张京祥,吴缚龙,马润潮.体制转型与中国城市空间重构-建立一种空间演化的制度分析框架.城市规划[J],2008(6)：55-60.
[5]Kornai,J.What the Change of System from Socialism to Capitalism Does and Does Not Mean[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2000,14(1):27-42.
[6]Chow,G.C.Capital Formation and Economic Growth in China[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1993,108(3):809-842.
[7]保建云.经济转型、制度变迁与转型经济学研究范式及内容拓展[J].教学与研究,2007(08)：32-39.
[8]陶爱萍.科技革命与社会转型[J].科技管理研究,2008(07)：439-441.
[9]李德、郝秋华.断裂与弥合-社会转型理论及对中国当前社会发展的反思[J].甘肃理论学刊,2008(05)：81-85.
[10]车裕斌.典型村落经济社会转型及发展趋势[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,30(03)：7-13.
[11]陈占江.差序格局与中国社会转型[J].社会科学评论,2007(03)：40-46.
[12]刘祖云.当前中国社会转型特征再探讨[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2002,55(06)：656-659.
[13]刘建荣.社会转型时期农民价值观念的冲突[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2005,34(03)：28-31.
[14]Marangos,J.Alternative models of transition and institutional development[J].Global Business and Economics Review,2005,7(4):390-408.
[15]Marangos,J.Was there an optimum model of transition?[J].Global Business and Economics Review,2006,8(2):133-160.
[16]黄安余.论台湾经济转型与就业关联[J].中国经济史研究,2005,(03)：123-131,160.
[17]厉以宁.转型发展理论[J].经济学动态,1997(4)：3-11.
[18]刘国光.政府功能与财政功能的转型—兼谈当前经济形势[J].经济前言,1997(4)：3-11.
[19]吴敬琏.中国：政府在市场经济转型中的作用[J].财经执法资讯,2005,21(2)：57-57.
[20]孙景宇.经济转型的国际维度与转型国家的战略选择[J].长白学刊,2007,(05)：79-83.
[21]张慧君.经济转型的阶段性及其路径演化研究[J].江苏社会科学,2007,(03)：47-55.
[22]郭旭新.论经济转型中的秩序—关于可持续发展的制度经济学解释[J].南京社会科学,2007,(01)：30-36.
[23]谢琦.经济增长模式的转型[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2008.
[24]孙立平.社会转型：发展社会学的新议题[J].开放时代,2008,(02)：57-72.
[25]雷恒军.简论近代西欧的社会转型[J].陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版),2007,25(03)：30-35.
[26]高续增.解读日本的社会转型[J].银行家,2007,(06)：413-417.
[27]孙慕天、刘玲玲.西方社会转型理论研究的历史和现状[J].哲学动态,1997(04)：40-45.
[28]Marczynska - Witczak,E.Changes in living conditions in Poland under economic transition[J].International Advances in Economic Research,1998,4(4):318-323.
[29]Lombard,A.The impact of social transformation on the non-government welfare sector and the social work profession[J].International Journal of social Welfare,2008,17(2):124-131.
[30]Touraine,A.Social transformations of the twentieth century[J].International Social Science Journal,1998,50(156):165-171.
[31]Kollontai,V.Social transformations in Russia[J].International Social Science Journal,1999,51(159):103-121.
[32]袁志准.当代中国城市建筑文化擅变与社会转型[J].艺术百家,2007(06)：50-53.
[33]乌力吉.城市化进程中的少数民族社会转型[J].贵州民族研究,2008,28(03)：12-16.
[34]卢中原、李建伟.我国经济运行的基本特征与发展趋势预测[J].经济学动态,2002(9)：4-12.
[35]卢中原、胡鞍钢.市场化改革对我国经济运行的影响[J].经济研究,1993,(12)：49-55.
[36]常修泽、高明华,中国国民经济市场化的推进程度及发展思路[J].1998(11)：48-55.
[37]陈宗胜等.中国经济体制市场化进程研究[M].上海：上海人民出版社,1999.
[38]樊纲,王小鲁,张立文.中国各地区市场化进程2000年报告[J].国家行政学院学报,2001(3)：17-27.
[39]杨晓猛.转型国家市场化进程测度的地区差异分析——基于产业结构调整指标的设计与评价[J].世界经济研究,2006(01)：72-78.
[40]江晓薇,宋红旭.中国市场经济的探索[J].管理世界,1995(6)：
[41]沈坤荣.改革二十年我国所有制结构变动对产业结构变动的影响分析[J].管理世界,1999(2)：86-94.
[42]郭庆旺、贾俊雪.稳健财政政策的非凯恩斯效应及其可持续性[J].中国社会科学,2006(5)：58-67.
[43]李岳平.经济增长质量评估体系[J].上海统计,2001(1)：15-17.
[44]赵英才、张纯洪、刘海英.转轨以来中国经济增长质量的综合评价研究[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2006,46(3)：27-35.
[45]申世军、邬凯生.广东省 山东省经济增长质量研究[J].工业技术经济,2007,26(3)：64-68.
[46]钞小静、任保平.中国经济增长质量的时序变化与地区差异分析[J].经济研究,2011(4)：26-40.
[47]舒元、王曦.构造我国经济转型的量化指标体系：关于原则和方法的思考[J].管理世界,2002(4)：16-22.
[48]沈露莹、葛寅等.上海转变经济发展方式评价指标体系研究[J].科学发展,2010(6)：11-35.
[49]李玲玲、张耀辉.我国经济发展方式转变测评指标体系构建及初步测评[J].中国工业经济,2011(4)：54-63.
[50]宋林飞.中国社会转型的趋势、代价及其度量[J].江苏社会科学,2002(6)：30-36.
[51]陈健.基于制度变迁视角的转型期中国城市发展分析[硕士论文].兰州：兰州大学.2008.
[52].科斯,阿尔钦,诺斯.财产权利与制度变迁—产权学派与新制度学派译文集[M].上海：上海三联书店,1996.
[53]张庭伟.转型时期中国的规划理论和规划改革.城市规划[J].2008,32(3)：15-24.
[54]张京祥,吴缚龙,马润潮.体制转型与中国城市空间重构—建立一种空间演化的制度分析框架.城市规划[J].2008(6)：55-60.
[55]Held, Dai, Anthony. Global Transformations:Polities, Economies and Culture[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press,1999.
[56]Lin G C S, Wei H Y D. China's Restless Urban Landscapes:New Challenges for Theoretical Reconstruction[J]. Environment and Planning A,2002,34(9):1535-1544.
[57]蒋殿春、张宇.经济转型与外商直接投资技术溢出效应[J].经济研究,2008(7)：26-38.
[58]汤晓莉.郑州市经济转型研究[博士论文].河南：河南大学.2011.