带约束的Lévy过程风险控制理论及其应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在实际风险市场中,往往存在监管约束,如最低现金要求水平、投资约束等等.因此,本文讨论了金融保险中带监管约束的Levy过程随机控制问题及其应用.通过运用更新方法、逐段决定马氏过程(PDMP)方法、鞅论、拟变分不等式(QVI)以及数值渐进等工具,本文主要研究了监管约束下保险公司单位时间内的长期平均利润及相关的偿付能力问题(如期望折扣分红,分红总量的矩母函数,Gerber-Shiu期望贴现惩罚函数).本文研究内容的结构安排如下.
     在第二至四章中,保险公司的风险模型带有监管约束,其中约束条件由监管部门决策.即,监管者通过执行最低现金要求水平及对保险公司的违规行为实行惩罚的方法来约束保险公司行为.该三章主要推广和深化了Tapiero等(1983)经典风险模型中联合监管部门-保险公司问题(监管成本函数最小条件下的保险公司利润最大化问题)的研究结果.第五章讨论了扩散风险模型中线性投资约束下的最优分红问题.最后,本文得到了随机保费收入风险模型在边际分红策略下的Gerber-Shiu期望贴现惩罚函数.
     我们首先在第二章中研究了重尾情形下的经典风险模型,假设该模型在上述监管机制下动态变化.保险公司的问题是建立投资/分红/风险控制策略来最大化其单位时间内的长期平均利润,该控制策略为监管者所执行约束策略的函数.在正则重尾索赔分布下,我们得到了风险模型平稳分布的渐进解,并导出了保险公司问题下最优控制策略的基本渐进结果.最后本章以Pareto索赔分布为例,得到了在某类参数设置下保险公司渐进最优控制策略的闭解及其数值结果.
     其次,第三章将监管约束下的经典风险模型推广至Levy风险模型.在给定的监管约束下,保险公司欲通过选择其投资/(非便宜)再保险/分红策略来最大化其单位时间内的长期平均利润.此外,当短期投资被转化为现金时,假设存在比例交易费用.我们导出了保险公司在单位时间内的长期平均利润函数及监管部门成本关于风险过程平稳分布的函数表达式.同时研究了无比例交易费用下的联合监管部门-保险公司问题,该联合问题的策略即为主从策略(Stakelberg strategies).最后,通过对平稳分布满足的Volterra积分方程的变量变形,得到了无比例交易费用下的联合监管部门-保险公司最优控制策略的渐进数值解.
     第四章将PDMP方法和鞅应用到相同监管约束下Tapiero等(1983)经典风险模型中的相关偿付能力研究.不同于前两章中平均期望费用结构下单位时间内长期平均利润函数的研究,本章侧重讨论于折扣期望费用结构的值函数.此时,该风险模型有三个特性,即,借贷利率,短期和长期投资,边际分红.在绝对破产条件下,我们导出了期望折扣分红及其矩母函数,及Gerber-Shiu期望贴现惩罚函数所满足的积分-微分方程.并以指数索赔分布为例,我们得到了对应研究值函数的具体表达式及其数值结果.
     第五章研究了线性扩散模型中带线性投资约束和分红交易费用的最优分红问题.其中公司作为小型投资者可将其盈余投资到经典Black-Scholes市场中,假设该投资行为不产生交易费用.本章的主要特点是在不允许卖空和无借款的情形下,对于投资行为存在一般线性约束条件,由此导致了正则-脉冲随机控制问题.在特征化值函数(期望净折扣分红)后,我们证明了值函数为对应拟变分不等式(QVI)的一阶连续粘性解.当正的市场风险价格下常数折扣存在时,称投资不能满足其资产损失的情形为非奇异情形.本章具体分析了非奇异情形中对应于QVI的三种可能情形,由此导出了值函数的具体构造形式及其最优投资/分红策略.此外,我们也给出了关于奇异情形的简单结论,并将本章结论应用到了具体的数值实例中.
     最后一章研究了保费随机到达和红利边界下的破产问题,推广了Albrecher和Kainhofer (2002)和Bao(2006)中的结论.首先本章考虑了索赔到达间隔服从普通离散概率分布和非线性红利边界下的期望贴现惩罚函数,并得到无红利边界时的极限解;再将红利边界固定为某常数,考虑了平稳更新过程和PH更新过程中的结果.最后本章将结论具体应用于破产概率、破产前盈余的概率分布及破产前盈余到达红利边界的概率等.
In practical risk markets, there always exist regulations such as minimum cash requirement, investment constraints and so on. In the context of stochastic control in finance and insurance, this thesis investigates Levy processes under regulations and its applications. By use of renewal argument, PDMP method, martingale theory, QVI and numerical approximations, this thesis focuses on value functions, including the long run average profit function per unit time of an insurance firm and the related solvency studies (e.g. the expected discounted dividends, the moment generating function of total dividends, the Gerber-Shiu expected discounted penalty function) and so on. The thesis is organized as follows.
     In chapters 2-4, the risk model of an insurance firm is investigated under regulation imposed by the regulatory authority. That is, the regulator exercises a minimum cash requirement level and penalties for violating it to regulate the insurance firm. These three chapters extend and deepen the studies in Tapiero et al. (1983), where a joint insurance corporation-regulatory authority problem was investigated in a classical risk model. In the fourth chapter, the dividend optimization problem is investigated for a diffusion model under linear investment constraints. At last, the Gerber-Shiu expected discounted penalty function is obtained with stochastic income and a barrier dividend strategy.
     First, we consider a classical risk model with heavy tailed claims, included in a regulation mechanism of minimum cash requirement. The problem of the insurance firm is to establish an investment and risk exposure policy as well as a barrier dividend strategy, which maximizes the long run average profit per unit time. The strategy of the insurance firm is a function of the strategy used by the regulator. For regularly varying tailed claim size distributions, we find the asymptotics of the stationary distribution of the risk model and derive fundamental asymptotic results of the insurance firm's problem. In the special case of Pareto claim size distributions with special parameters setting, the asymptotic optimal control policy is found in closed form, as well as numerical results.
     Then, chapter 3 investigates a Levy risk model with the same regulation as in Chap-ter 2. Under the given regulation, the insurance corporation maximizes its long run av-erage profit per unit time, by choosing its investment/(non-cheap) reinsurance/dividend policy. In addition, it is assumed that proportional transaction cost occurs, when short term investments is converted into cash. Explicit expressions of the long run average profit per unit time, of the regulatory authority's cost function are derived. For the case of non transaction cost, a joint insurance corporation-regulatory authority problem is also investigated, which is in the concept of Stackelberg strategies. Finally, by variable transformations in the numerical solution of Volterra integral equations for the station-ary distributions, the resulting values of the optimal control policy without traction cost are approximated numerically.
     The PDMP method and martingales are used to solvency studies in Chapter 4 for the classical risk model under the same regulation as in Tapiero et al. (1983). Chap-ter 4 focuses on the discounted value functions, which are different from the long run average profit function in Chapter 1 and Chapter 2. The risk model includes three features, namely debit interest, short-term and long-term invested interest, barrier div-idend strategy. We derive integro-differential equations under absolute ruin for the ex-pected discounted dividends and its moment generating function, and the Gerber-Shiu expected discounted penalty function. In the case of exponential claim amounts, explicit expressions of the corresponding value functions are obtained, as well as their numerical illustrations.
     Chapter 5 investigates the dividend optimization problem of a linear diffusion model with linear investment constraints and dividend transaction costs. Moreover a corpora-tion as a small investor can invest its reserve in a classical Black-Scholes market without paying transaction fees. The main feature of this chapter is that there exists general linear constraints on investments including the special case of short-sale and borrowing constraints. This results in a regular-impulse stochastic control problem. By character-izing the value function (the expected discounted dividends), then it is a once continuous viscosity solution of the corresponding quasi-variational inequalities (QVI). The nontriv-ial case is that the investment can't meet the loss of wealth due to discounting with positive market risk price. In this case, delicate analysis is carried out on QVI w.r.t three possible situations, leading to an explicit construction of the value functions to-gether with the optimal investment/dividend policies. We also give a brief conclusion of other trivial cases and apply the derived results into explicit examples numerically.
     At last, the ruin problem is investigated with stochastic income and barrier dividend strategy, which extends the results of Albrecher and Kainhofer (2002) and Bao (2006). Firstly, this chapter considers the expected discounted penalty with common distributed claim amounts and non-linear dividend barrier, and obtains the limit solution without barrier dividends; then the results of stationary renewal process and PH renewal process are derived for fixed constant dividend barrier. Finally, the conclusions are applied in ruin probabilities, probability distribution of surplus prior to ruin and the probability of surplus arriving at dividend barrier before ruin, as well as numerical examples.
引文
[1]Abramowitz M. Irene A S. Handbook of mathematical functions:with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. United States Department of Commeree, U.S. Government Printing office, Washington DC,1972
    [2]Albrecher H, Kainhofer R. Risk theory with a Nonlinear Dividend Barrier. Computing, 2002,68:289-311
    [3]Albrecher H, Claramunt M M, Marmol M. On the distribution of dividend payments in a Sparre Andersen model with generalized Erlang(n) interclaim times. Insurance:Mathemat-ics and Economics,2005,37:324-334
    [4]Alvarez L H R. A class of solvable impulse control problems. Applied Mathematics and Optimization,2004,49:265-295
    [5]Alvarez L H R, Rakkolainen T A. Optimal payout policy in presence of downside risk. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research,2009,69:27-58
    [6]Avram F, Palmowski Z, Pistorius M R. On the optimal dividend problem for a spectrally negative Levy process. The Annals of Applied Probability,2007,17:156-180
    [7]Baghery F, Oksendal B. A maximum principle for stochastic control with partial informa-tion. Stochastic Analysis and Applications,2007,25:493-514
    [8]Bao Z H. The expected discounted penalty at ruin in the risk process with random income. Applied Mathematics and Computation,2006,179:559-566
    [9]Benes V E, Shepp L A, Witsenhausen H S. Some solvable sotchastic control problems. Stochastics,1980,4:39-83
    [10]Bensoussan A, Lions J L. Nouvelle formulation de problemes de control impulsionnel et application. C R Aced SCI Paris ser,1973, A276:1189-1192
    [11]Bensoussan A, Lions J L. Nouvelle methocles in control impulsionnel. Appl Math and Op-timization Quart,1975,1:289-312
    [12]Bensoussan A. Maximum principle and dynamic programming approaches of the optimal control of partially observed diffusions. Stochastics,1983,9:169-222
    [13]Beard R E, Pentikainen T, Pesonen E. Risk Theory (3rd edn). London:Chapman and Hall, 1984
    [14]Brock W, Mirman L. Optim al economic growth and uncertainty the discounted case. Jour-nal of Economic Theory,1972,4:479-513.
    [15]Bouyoucos P J, Siegel M H. The Goldman Sachs Insurer ICO Survey. Industry Resource Group (New York:Goldman Sachs),1992
    [16]Brockett P L, Xia X. Operations research in insurance:a review. Transactions of the Society of Actuaries,1995, XLⅦ:7-80
    [17]Browne S. Optimal investment policies for a firm with a random risk process:exponential utility and minimizing the probability of ruin. Mathematical Operations Research,1995, 20:937-958
    [18]Buhlmann H. Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory, New York:Springer,1970,164-177
    [19]Cadenillas A, Choulli T et al. Classical and impulse stochastic control for the optimization of the dividend and risk policies of an insurance firm. Mathematical Finance,2006,16(1):181-202
    [20]Cai J, Gerber H U, Yang H L. Optimal dividends in an Ornstein-Uhlendeck model with credit and debit interest. North American Actuarial Journal,2006,10(2):94-119
    [21]Cai J. On the time value of absolute ruin with debit interest. Advances in Applied Proba-bility,2007,39:343-359
    [22]Cai J, Gerber H U, Yang H. Optimal dividends in an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck type model with credit and debit interest. North American Actuarial Journal,2006,10:94-108
    [23]Chaubey Y P, Garrido J, Trudeau S. On the computation of aggregate claims distributions: some new approximations. Insurance:Mathematical and Economics,1998,23(3):215-230
    [24]Choulli T, Taksar M I, Zhou X Y. A diffusion model for optimal dividend distribution for a company with constraints on risk control. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 2003,40(6):1946-1979
    [25]Christopher T H B. A perspective on the numerical treatment of volterra equations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,2000,125:217-249
    [26]Crandall M G, Lions P L. Viscosity Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society,1983,277(1)
    [27]Cummins J D, Derrig R.A. Financial models of insurance solvency. Kluwer Academic Pub-lisher,1989
    [28]D.法尼.保险企业管理学,经济科学出版社,2002年,第3版
    [29]Dassios A, Embrechts P. Martingales and insurance risk. Stochastic Models,1989,5(2):181-217
    [30]David C D M, Drekic S. Optimal dividends under a ruin probability constraint. Annals of Actuarial Science,2006, 1(2):291-306
    [31]David F B, David R K. Insurance Pedagogy:Executive Opinions and Priorities. The Journal of Risk and Insurance,55(4):701-712
    [32]Davis M H A. Piecewise-deterministic Markov processes:a general class of non-diffusion stochastic models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,1984,46:353-388
    [33]De Finetti B. Su un'impostazione alternativa dell teoria colletiva del rischio. Transactions of the XV International Congress of Actuaries,1957,2:433-443
    [34]Dimirios Konstantinides, Tang Q H, Gurami Tsitsiashvili. Estimates for the ruin probabil-ity in the classical risk model with constant interest force in the presence of heavy tails. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2002,31:447-460
    [35]Domenico Cuoco. Optimal Consumption and Equilibrium Prices with Portfolio Constraints and Stochastic Income. Journal of Economic Theory,1997,72:33-73
    [36]Dufresne F, Gerber H U, Shiu E S W. Risk theory with the Gamma process. ASTIN Bulletin, 1991,21(2):177-192
    [37]Elliott R J, Kohlmann M. The variational principle for optimal control of diffusions with partial information. Systems Control Letters,1989,12:63-89
    [38]Embrechts P, Schmidli H. Ruin estimation for a general insurance risk model. Advances in Applied Probability,1994,26:404-422
    [39]Fleming W H, Rishel R. Deterministic and Stochastic Optimal Control. Berlin:Springer, 1975
    [40]Fleming W H, Soner H M. Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions. Springer-Verlag,2005
    [41]Furrer H. Risk processes perturbed by α-stable Levy motion. Scandinavian Actuarial Jour-nal,1998,59-74.
    [42]Gaier J, Grandits P. Ruin probabilities in the presence of regularly varying tails and optimal investment. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2002,30:211-217
    [43]Galperin E A, Kansa E J, Makroglou A et al. Variable transformations in the numerical solution of second kind Volterra integral equations with continuous and weakly singular kernels; extensions to Fredholm integral equations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,2000,115:193-211
    [44]Gerber H U. Games of economic survival with discrete-and continuous-income processes. Operations Research,1972,20:37-45
    [45]Gerber H U. Martingales in risk theory. Mutteilungen der Schweizer Vereinigung der Ver-sicherungs Mathematiker,1973,205-216
    [46]Gerber H U. An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. S.S. Huebner Foundation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,1979
    [47]Gerber H U. On the probability of ruin in the presence of a linear dividend barrier. Scan-dinavian Actuarial Journal,1981,105-115.
    [48]Gerber H U, Shiu E S W. On the time value of ruin, North American Actuarial Journal, 1998,2(1):48-78
    [49]Gerber H U, Shiu E S W. Optimal dividends:analysis with Brownian motion. North Amer-ican Actuarial Journal,2004,8(1):1-20
    [50]Gerber H U, Yang H. Absolute ruin probabilities in a jump diffusion risk model with in-vestment. North American Actuarial Journal,2007,11:159-169
    [51]Grandell J. Aspects of Risk Theory. New York:Springer-Verlag,1990
    [52]Henry Grabowski, Viscusi W K, William N E. Price and Availability Tradeoffs of Automobile Insurance Regulation. The Journal of Risk and Insurance,1989,56(2):275-299
    [53]Hipp C, Plum M. Optimal investment for insurers. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics, 2000,27:215-228
    [54]Hipp C. Optimal dividend payment under a ruin constraint:discrete time and state space. Blatter de DGVFM,2003,26(2):255-264
    [55]H(?)jgaard B, Taksar M I. Optimal risk control for a large corporation in the presence of returns on investments. Finance amd Stochastics,2001,5:527-547
    [56]H(?)jgaard B. Optimal dynamic premium control in non-life insurance:maximizing dividend payouts. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal,2002.225-245
    [57]H(?)jgaard B. Taksar M I. Optimal dynamic portfolio selection for a corporation with con-trollable risk and dividend distribution policy. Quantitative Finance,2004,4(3):315-327
    [58]Indrajit Bardhan. Consumption and investment under constraints. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,1994,18(5):909-929
    [59]Joan Lamm-Tennant. Asset/Liability Management for the Life Insurer:Situation Analysis and Strategy Formulation. The Journal of Risk and Insurance,1989,56(3):501-517
    [60]J(?)rgensen. Bent. Statistical properties of the generalized inverse Gaussian distribution. In: Lecture Notes in Statistics; 9, NewYork:Springer,-1982
    [61]Jose Garrido, Manuel Morales. On the expected discounted penalty function for Levy risk processes. North American Actuarial Journal,2006,10(4):196-218
    [62]Karatzas I. A class of singular stochastic control problems. Advances in Applied Probability, 1983,15:225-254
    [63]Kohlmann M. Optimality conditions in optimal control of jump processes-extended abstract. In:Proceedings in Operation Research,7 (Sixth Annual Meeting, Deutsch. Gesellsch. Op-eration Res., Christian-Albrechts-Univ., Kiel,1977). Berlin:Springer,1997,48-57
    [64]Kristina P, Willmot G E. The discrete stationary renewal risk model and the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2004,35:267-277
    [65]Kyprianou A E, Palmowski Z. Distributional study of de Finetti's dividend problem for a general Levy insurance risk process. Journal of Applied Probability,2007,44:349-365
    [66]Kyprianou A E, Rivero V, Song R. Convexity and smoothness of scale functions with ap-plications to de Finetti's control problem. Journal of Theoretical Probability,2009, DOI: 10.1007/s10959-009-0220-z
    [67]Lin He, Ping Hou, Zongxia Liang. Optimal control of the insurance company with pro-portional reinsurance policy under solvency constraints. Insurance:Mathematics and Eco-nomics,2008,43:474-479
    [68]Loeffn R L. On Optimality of the Barrier Strategy in De Finetti's Dividend Problem for Spectrally Negative Levy Processes. Annals of Applied Probability,2008,18(5):1669-1680
    [69]Mao X R. Stochastic differential equations and their applications. Chichester:Horwood Publishing,1997
    [70]Martin Eling, Nadine Gatzert, Hato Schmeiser. Minimum standards for investment per-formance:A new perspective on non-life insurer solvency. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2009,45:113-122
    [71]Martin-Lof A. Lectures on the use of control theory in insurance. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal,1994,1-25
    [72]Maurice Robin. Long-term average cost control problems for continuous time Markov pro-cesses:A survey. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae,1983,1:281-299
    [73]Menaldi J L. On the optimal control problem for degenerate diffusions. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization,1980.18(6):722-739
    [74]Merton R C. Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainity:The continuous time case. Review of Economics and Statistics,1969,51:247-257
    [75]Merton R C. Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous time model. Journal of Economic Theory,1971,3:373-413
    [76]Michael Trott. The Mathematica Guide Book for Symbolics. New York:Springer,2006
    [77]Munch P, Smallwood D E. Solvency regulation in the property-liability insurance industry: Empirical evidence. The Bell Journal of Economics,1980, 11(1):261-279
    [78]Nagai H. On an impuolsive control fo additive proceas. Z W,1980,53:1-16
    [79]Oldfield G, Santomero A. The Place of Risk:Management in Financial Institution. Sloan Management Review,1997,39
    [80]Pardoux E, Peng S. Adapted solution of a backward stochastic differential equation. Systems and Control Letters,1990,14:55-61
    [81]Paulsen J, Gjessing H K. Optimal choice of dividend barriers for a risk process with stochas-tic return of investment. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,1997,29:965-985
    [82]Paulsen J. Optimal dividend payouts for diffusions with solvency constraints. Finance and Stochastics,2003,7:457-473
    [83]Pedro Pita Barros. Conduct effects of gradual entry liberalization in insurance. Journal of Regulatory Economics,1995,8(1):45-60
    [84]Peng S. A general stochastic maximum principle for optimal control. SIAM J Control,1978, 14:62-78
    [85]Pham H. Smooth Solutions to Optimal Investment Models with Stochastic Volatilities and Portfolio Constraints. Applied Mathematics and Optimization.2002.46(1):55-78
    [86]Protter P. Stochastic integration and differential equations:A new approach. Berlin: Springer,1992
    [87]QIHE Tang. The finite-time ruin probability of the compound Poisson model with constant interest force. Journal of Applied Probability,2005,42:608-619
    [88]Ray Rees, Hugh Gravelle, Achim Wambach. Regulation of Insurance Markets. In:The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory,1999,24:55-68
    [89]Renaud J F, Zhou X. Distribution of the present value of dividend payments in a Levy risk model. Journal of Applied Probability,2007,44:420-427
    [90]Richard S F. Optimal impulse control of a diffusion process with both fixed and proportional mats of control. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization,1977,15(1):79-91
    [91]Ron Adiel. Reinsurance and the management of regulatory ratios and taxes in the property-casualty insurance industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics,1996,22:207-240
    [92]Salter L J. Confluent Hypergeometric Functions. London:Cambridge University Press,1960
    [93]Santomero M, David M Babbel. Financial Risk Management by Insurers:An Analysis of the Process. The Journal of Risk and Insurance,1997,64(2):231-270
    [94]Sato KEN-Ⅲ. Levy processes and infinite divisible distributions. Cambridge, U.K.:Cam-bridge University Press,1999
    [95]Schlesinger H, Doherty N. Incomplete Markets for Insurance:An Overview. Journal of Risk and Insurance,1985,52(3):402-423
    [96]Schmidli H. On the minimizing the ruin probability by investment and reinsurance. Annals of Applied Probability,2002,12:890-907
    [97]Schimidli H. On optimal investment and subexponential claims. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2005,36:25-35
    [98]Schimidli H. Stochatic control in insurance. London:Springer-Verlag,2007
    [99]Segerdahl C. On some distributions in time connected with the collective theory of risk. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal,1970,167-192
    [100]Sethi S P, Zhang Q, Zhang H. Average-cost control of stochastic manufacturing systems. Springer,2005
    [101]Sheldon X, Willmot G E, Steve Drekic. The classical risk model with a constant dividend barrier:analysis of the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2003,33:551-556
    [102]Shangzhen Luo, Michael Taksar, Allanus Tsoi. On reinsurance and investment for large insurance portfolios. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2008,42:434-444
    [103]Stephan Miiller. Constrained Portfolio Optimization. Germany Dissertation no.3030 Adag Copy AG, Zurich,2005
    [104]Taksar M I. Optimal risk and dividend distribution control models for an insurance com-pany. Mathenatical Methods of Operations Research,2000,51:1-42
    [105]Taksar M I, Hunderup C L. The influence of bankruptcy value on optimal risk control for diffusion models with proportional reinsurance. Insurance:Mathematics and Econonimcs, 2007,40:311-321
    [106]Tang S J. The maximum principle for partially observed optimal control of stochastic differential equations. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization,1998,36:1596-1617
    [107]Tapiero C S, Dror Zuckerman. A note on the optimal control of a cash balance problem. Journal of Banking and Finance,1980,4:345-352
    [108]Tapiero C S, Dror Zuckerman, Yehuda Kahane. Optimal investment-dividend policy if an insurance firm under regulation. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal,1983,65-76
    [109]Toponogov V A. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. Birkhauser, Boston,2006
    [110]Willmot G, Dickson D. The Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function in the stationary renewal risk model. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2003,32:403-411
    [111]Wang C W, Yin C C, Li E Q. On the classical risk model with credit and debit interests under absolute ruin. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2010,80:427-436
    [112]Willmot G. A note on a class of delayed renewal risk processes. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2004,34:251-257
    [113]Yang Y H. Existence of optimal consumption and portfolio rules with portfolio constraints and stochastic income, durability and habit formation. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2000,33:135-153
    [114]Yin C C, Wang C W. Optimality of the barrier strategy in de Finetti's dividend problem for spectrally negative Levy processes:An alternative approach. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,2009,233(2),15:482-491
    [115]Yuan H L, Hu Y J. Absolute ruin in the compound Poisson risk model with constant dividend barrier. Statistics and Probability Letters,2008.78:2086-2094
    [116]Yuen K C, Zhou M, Guo J Y. On a risk model with debit interest and dividend payments. Statistics and Probability Letters,2008,78:2426-2432
    [117]Yuriy Krvavych, Michael Sherris. Enhancing insurer value through reinsurance optimiza-tion. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2006,38:495-517
    [118]Yuriy Krvavych. Enhancing insurer value through reinsurance, dividends and capital opti-mization:an expected utility approach, Topic 1:Risk Management of an Insurance Enter-prise. ASTIN,2007
    [119]Zariphopoulou T. Consumption-investment models with constraints. SIAM J Control and Optimization,1994,32(1):59-85
    [120]Zariphopoulou T. Transaction costs in portfolio management and derivative pricing. In: Heath, D.C., Swindle, G. (Eds.), Introduction to Mathematical Finance. Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI,1999, 57:101-163
    [121]Zariphopoulou T. Stochastic control methods in asset pricing. In:Kannan. D., Laksh-mikantham, V. (Eds.), Handbook of Stochastic Analysis and Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York,2001
    [122]Zhang C S, Wu R. On the distribution of the surplus of the D-E model prior to and at ruin. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,1999,24:309-321
    [123]Zhang X. The optimization of dividends and risk policy with fixed transaction costs. Preprint,2007
    [124]Zhang X, Meng Q B. The optimization of dividends and risk policy with fixed transaction costs under interest rate. Preprint,2007
    [125]Zweifel C, Rusch M, Corti S, Stephan R. Determination of various microbiological parame-ters in raw milk and raw milk cheese produced by bio-farms. Archiv fur Lebensmittelhygiene, 2006,57:13-16
    [126]黎锁平,杜建军,张民悦,李骏.随机控制理论研究内容及研究现状述评.兰州理工大学学报,2004,30(3):109-112
    [127]刘坤会.具有保留费用及按比例费用的受控扩散-脉冲过程的最佳控制问题.应用数学学报,1986,9(3):282-295
    [128]彭实戈.倒向随机微分方程及其应用.数学进展,1997,27:97-112
    [129]孙世良,赵新有.随机控制理论的现状和展望.太原理工大学学报,2001,32(2):209-212
    [130]汤伟,施颂椒,王孟效,吕士健.鲁棒控制理论中3种主要方法综述(一).西北轻工业学院学报,2000,18(4):54-59
    [131]伟,施颂椒,王孟效,吕士健.鲁棒控制理论中3种主要方法综述(二).西北轻工业学院学报,2001,19(1):49-53
    [132]田乃硕.休假随机服务系统.北京:北京大学出版社,2001,7-34
    [133]许世蒙.金融市场建模原则与财富过程的最优增长.应用数学学报,1998,21(2):171-178

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700