大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛控制作用研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
光肩星天牛Anoplophora glabripennis是我国林业重要蛀干害虫,特别是在我国西北地区,对农田防护林造成极大危害。大斑啄木鸟Picoides major作为蛀干害虫的自然天敌,很早就引起了人们的注意,并且在保护和利用方面开展了部分研究。但是,大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛的控制作用机制还不清楚。本研究试图从3个方面探讨大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛的控制作用机制:不同季节大斑啄木鸟在农田防护林内食性组成、大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛的捕食作用、大尺度范围内大斑啄木鸟与光肩星天牛的种群相互动态。
     2005年到2007年在乌拉特前旗境内,通过在不同季节以跟踪调查法和取食痕迹法相结合调查了大斑啄木鸟的食性组成;2006年到2008年以标准地调查和查迹法相结合,研究了大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛幼虫的捕食作用;将乌拉特前旗有林地分布的区域分成111个方格,于1999年8月到9月、2002年8月到9月、2006年8月到9月、2007年8月到9月,以样线法调查和查迹法结合,调查了大斑啄木鸟和光肩星天牛的种群变化动态。主要结果如下:
     ①大斑啄木鸟的取食行为和食性组成在不同季节存在较大的差异。大斑啄木鸟共有14种取食行为。在冬季,啄食和捶击取食是最常见的取食行为;在食物相对充足的大斑啄木鸟繁殖季节和夏季,捡拾和探食是最常见的取食方式。大斑啄木鸟的食性组成在不同季节有较大差异。在繁殖季节,大斑啄木鸟主要以取食树干表皮节肢动物和昆虫(45.34%),蛀干害虫和食叶害虫的比例较少;夏季大斑啄木鸟取食最多的为树冠部的食叶害虫(53.59%),其次是树干表面节肢动物和昆虫,蛀干害虫比例较少;秋冬季节大斑啄木鸟主要以取食蛀干类害虫(62.64%)和植物种子为主。
     ②大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛幼虫的捕食量因虫口密度变化而变化,随着光肩星天牛虫口密度增加,捕食量的增加开始为正加速,接着是负加速,而后捕食量达到饱和水平。两者间捕食功能反应呈HollingⅢ型,回归方程为N e = exp(4.323 ? 39.758/ No);随着光肩星天牛虫口密度增加,大斑啄木鸟对其幼虫捕食率呈现先增高后下降的趋势,回归方程为:大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛幼虫捕食的数值反应为正密度反应。当光肩星天牛虫口密度较小或处于中等水平时,大斑啄木鸟对其控制作用较强;但当虫口密度较高时,大斑啄木鸟的控制作用较弱。
     ③1999年~2007年,乌拉特前旗农田防护林内大斑啄木鸟的分布面积和种群密度都呈增长趋势,光肩星天牛的分布区面积和种群密度呈下降趋势。前山地区和后山地区大斑啄木鸟种群呈稳定状态,前山地区光肩星天牛危害呈下降的趋势,到2007年前山地区基本没有天牛危害,后山地区一直没有光肩星天牛危害;河套地区光肩星天牛的发生区面积和危害程度都呈先增长后下降趋势,大斑啄木鸟种群呈现增长趋势,说明大斑啄木鸟作为光肩星天牛的自然天敌有跟随效应,但有一定的滞后性。预计今后几年,大斑啄木鸟种群会保持稳定状态,河套地区光肩星天牛的危害会缓慢减轻,大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛将会形成长期持续的控制作用。
     主要结论如下:
     ①大斑啄木鸟的取食行为和食性组成会因栖息环境、不同季节食物资源的改变而改变;大斑啄木鸟在冬季对光肩星天牛的控制作用较其它季节要强。
     ②大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛幼虫捕食的功能反应呈HollingⅢ型,数值反应为正密度反应。
     ③大斑啄木鸟作为光肩星天牛的自然捕食性天敌,具有天敌跟随效应,但有滞后性,光肩星天牛侵入早期容易造成较大危害和损失。
Asian Longhorned Beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) is a wood-boring beetle. It outbreaks seriously and caused great damage in the artificial shelter-wood plantations of the Three-Northern Areas. The Great Spotted Woodpecker (Picoides major) is one of the natural predators and important biological control agent of A. glabripennis. The P. major is common to Wulate Qianqi County of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and widely distributes in the artificial Shelterwood Plantations. The wood-boring were the important foods of the P. major, especially in the winter.
     From 2006 to 2008, the predatory of P. major on A. glabripennis was studied by the trace investigation and sample plot investigation in field. Fifteen study sites were selected. The result showed that the function response of P. major to A. glabripennis was HollingШ, with a non-linear regression equation N e = exp(4.323 ? 39.758/ No). Within certain density range, the predation capacity would increase with the increasing of density of A. glabripennis. When the density of A. glabripennis increased, the predatory capability has a positive acceleration phase, then a negative acceleration phase and a saturation state in the end. As the density increasing of A. glabripennis, the predation rate increased at first, and then it has a peak, reduced in the end, with a non-linear regression equation The result showed that numerieal resPonsewas PositiVe density resPonse.The PoPulation density of P.major would increase with the increase ofdensity ofA.glabriPennis.
     The feeding hablts of the P major were surveyed by field observations and trace eheeking from2005 to 2007,in WUlate Qianql County.The woodPeeker Pe而rmed fourteen tyPes of foraglng techniques. Pecking and hammering were most common in winter; gleaning and probing were most common at the time of high food availability at the trunk and tree branches during the breeding season and in summer. The woodpecker gleans arthropods and insect larvae in the breeding season and summer, seeds and nuts mainly in the winter and pokes holes for sap-sucking in winter. The main diet consisted of arthropods and plant seeds. The diet was significantly different in different seasons. The Great Spotted woodpecker primarily consumes defoliators and the food on tree trunks from March to October. The contribution of wood borers to the diet was higher in winter, lower in the breeding season and summer. The proportion of the food on ground was small in the breeding season and high in the summer and winter.
     From 1999 to 2007, the population density of P. major and A. glabripennis was studied by the trace investigation, line transect method and sample plot investigation in field. The Wulate Qianqi County divided into 111 square grids. The GPS was used to map distribution. The result showed that the population of P. major increased and the population density of A. glabripennis declined during the past 9 years. In the Hetao area, the population density of P. major increased while the population density of A. glabripennis increased from 1999 to 2002 and then declined from 2002 to 2007. The population of P. major was stable while the population density of A. glabripennis declined from 1999 to 2007, in the Qianshan area.
     The conclusions are as follows.
     ①The feeding habits and feeding behavior of the P. major were changed with habitat environment and food resources of different season. The control effects of P. major to A. glabripennis in winter was better than that in other seasons.
     ②The population density of P. major could be stabilized and increased by artificial attracting P. major.
     ③The control of P. major to A. glabripennis had the time following effect, but was hysteretic nature. Therefore, A. glabripennis caused great losses to the forest easily at the early stage.
引文
[1]HarrisRB,BurnhamKP.关于使用样线法估计种群密度[J],动物学报,2002,48(6):812-818.
    [2]包建中,古德祥.中国生物防治[M].太原:山西科学技术出版社,1998.
    [3]常家传,马金生,鲁长虎.鸟类学[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,2004.
    [4]陈均平,张洪德.具功能性反应的食饵-捕食者两种群模型的定性分析[J].应用数学和力学,1986,7(1):73-80.
    [5]陈烈动.虫与鸟的关系[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),1915,(1):41-43.
    [6]陈水华,丁平,郑光美,等.岛屿栖息地鸟类群落的丰富度及其影响因子[J].生态学报,2002,22(2):141-149.
    [7]程宏,刘欣茹,何春明.斑啄木鸟繁殖期的生境选择和取食生态位[J].东北师范大学学报(自然科学版),1997,(9):26-28.
    [8]楚国忠.大山雀雏鸟的生长、食量及对马尾松毛虫种群密度的功能反映和数值反应[J].林业科学研究,1989,2(1):9-14.
    [9]冯江,高玮,盛连喜.动物生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:202-212.
    [10]高念昭,胡涌,谢志勇,等.贵州烟仓害虫天敌种类及优势种的生物学特性[J].中国生物防治,2006,22(2):114-117.
    [11]高瑞桐,卢永农,刘传银.啄木鸟在杨树人工林内对几种昆虫捕食作用的研究[J].林业科学研究,1994,7(5):585-588.
    [12]高书晶,庞宝平,于洋,等.麦田昆虫群落的结构与时序动态[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(6):47-50.
    [13]高玮,李万超,吕杰娣.三种啄木鸟的生态位和竞争[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1997a,(1):78-81.
    [14]高玮,赵虹,邓秋香.斑啄木鸟巢位选择的研究[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),1997b,(9):15-21.
    [15]高玮,赵虹,相桂权.斑啄木鸟巢位选择及繁殖成效[C].见:中国鸟类学会编.中国鸟类学研究.北京:中国林业出版社,1996:12-18.
    [16]郭玉杰,王念英,陈俊炜,等.不同稻区节肢动物群落中捕食者与猎物的种类及数量特征[J].生物防治通报,1994,10(4):157-161.
    [17]郝永丰,奇志,杨奋勇,等.招引斑啄木鸟防治光肩星天牛实验[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2003,(7):72-73.
    [18]何晓瑞,吴金亮.滇东北黑颈鹤越冬食性的研究[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2000,22(6):460-464.
    [19]胡志平.浅析森林益鸟的人工招引[J].山西林业,2003,24(1):27-28.
    [20]黄琼,周祖基,周定刚,等.两种天牛的营养成分分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2007,35(1):49-52.
    [21]句荣辉,沈佐瑞.昆虫动态模拟模型[J].生态学报,2005,25(10):2709-2716.
    [22]李春喜,姜丽娜,邵云,等.生物统计学[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:58-60.
    [23]李刚,热希,张剑英.关于啄木鸟控制光肩星天牛的初步探讨研究[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2000,23(4):34-36.
    [24]李欣海,马志军,丁长青,等.朱鹮分布与栖息地内农民的关系[J].动物学报,2002,48(6):725-732.
    [25]刘益康,王景华.绿啄木鸟繁殖习性及食性的研究[J].动物学杂志,1984,(5):18-21.
    [26]吕军,高纯,王志坤.利用斑啄木鸟防治栗山天牛的初步研究[J].辽宁林业科技,2005,32(3):25-26.
    [27]罗维桢,宋俞钧.大斑啄木鸟取食行为的研究[J].生态学杂志,1992,(2):25-27.
    [28]骆有庆,刘荣光,许志春,等.防护林杨树天牛灾害的生态调控理论与技术[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(5):160-164.
    [29]骆有庆,刘志柏.光肩星天牛对小美旱杨幼林生长量危害损失的初步研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1993,15(3):75-87.
    [30]马金生,贾志云,吴云峰.危及大斑啄木鸟生存繁衍因子的研究[J].河北大学学报,1996,16(5):75-76.
    [31]马金生,张仲信.部分国家对啄木鸟的研究[J].野生动物,1999,(6):22-23.
    [32]倪喜军.地理信息系统在野生动物研究中的应用[J].生物学通报,1998,33(9):3-6.
    [33]蒲蛰龙.害虫生物防治的原理和方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1984:1-7.
    [34]钱燕文,郑作新.昌黎果区几种主要食虫鸟之繁殖习性的研究II[J].动物学报,1960,12(1):139-148.
    [35]邱立新,尤德康,常国彬,等.我国应用生物措施防治林木天牛概述[J].中国森林病虫,2003,23(1):33-37.
    [36]任顺祥,郭振中,熊继文.二双斑唇瓢虫对矢尖蚧的捕食作用[J].生态学报,2001,21(10):1903-1606.
    [37]任月萍,刘生祥.龟纹瓢虫对麦蚜的捕食功能反应及寻找效应研究[J].农业科学研究,2006,27(1):20-22.
    [38]赛道建,徐成纲,张永艳,等.黄河林场3种啄木鸟繁殖期生态位的研究[J].山东林业科技,1994,(1):22-25.
    [39]尚玉昌.动物行为学[M].北京:北京出版社,2005:152-160.
    [40]石寿强.烟草主要病虫害消长动态研究[J].烟草科技,2000,(11):44-47.
    [41]史海涛,郑光美.红腹角雉的食性研究[J].动物学研究,1998,19(3):225-229.
    [42]孙明荣,李克庆,朱九军,等.三种啄木鸟的繁殖习性及对昆虫的取食研究[J].中国森林病虫,2002,21(2):12-14.
    [43] 孙儒泳.动物生态学原理[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001:350-360.
    [44] 陶双伦,刘季科,李俊年.植食性哺乳动物觅食的功能反应及其模型[J].兽类学报,2000,20(4):297-303.
    [45] 陶双伦,刘季科,李俊年.植食性哺乳动物觅食功能反应模型机制的检验[J].生态学报,2003,23(11):2239-2245.
    [46] 田逢俊,刘瑞华,牛协申,等.光肩星天牛危害杨树木材的损失量研究[J].山东林业科技,1989,(3):42-45.
    [47] 田正仁,刘万仁,周世明.蚜虫天敌复合种群对麦蚜的跟随现象[J].植保技术与推广,1998,18(1):6-8.
    [48] 汪永俊,张纪林,秦旦仁,等.光肩星天牛对不同杨树品种危害程度的差异及其原因[J].江苏林业科技,1985,(4):34-36.
    [49] 王国红,刘兴平,戈峰,等.不同松林内马尾松毛虫种群动态的特征[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(4):355-359.
    [50] 王宁,张雁云,郑光美.黄眉姬鹟和白眉姬鹟繁殖期的栖息地与活动区特征[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,42(3):295-299.
    [51] 王树鹏,段雷,吕冬花,等.乌拉特前旗森林病虫鼠害调查分析[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2004,27(3):45-48.
    [52] 王卫东,刘益宁,宝山,等. 宁夏光肩星天牛、黄斑星天牛天敌昆虫的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4):90-93.
    [53] 吴诗宝,袁喜才,柯亚永,等.广东省原鸡种群数量、分布及栖息地现状的初步调查[J].动物学杂志,2002,37(3):30-33.
    [54] 向琼,李修炼,梁宗锁,等. 柴胡苗期蚜虫及捕食性天敌种群消长动态研究[J].西北农业学报,2005,14(2):78-80.
    [55] 萧刚柔.中国森林昆虫[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1992.
    [56] 许龙,张正旺,丁长青.样线法在鸟类数量中的应用[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(5):127-130.
    [57] 薛贤清.森林害虫预测预报[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1992:49-50.
    [58] 严静君,姚德富.关于“天敌的跟随现象”的讨论[J],昆虫知识,1995,32(6):370-371.
    [59] 阎俊杰.啄木鸟和天牛协同进化的观察[J].生态学杂志,1983,(3):17-20.
    [60] 杨奋勇,苏梅,郝永峰,等.斑啄木鸟生物学特性及控制光肩星天牛危害初探[J].中国森林病虫,2006,25(3):31-32.
    [61] 杨维康,钟文勤,高行宜.鸟类栖息地选择研究进展[J].干旱区研究,2000,17(3):71-78.
    [62] 杨月伟,刘季科,刘震.东方田鼠种群扩散及活动对外部因子的反应格局[J].生态学报,2005,25(6):1523-1528.
    [63] 叶兴乾,胡萃,王向.7种鞘翅目幼虫的食用营养成分分析(英文)[J].浙江农业大学学报,1998,24(1):101-106.
    [64] 岳书奎.森林害虫生物防治[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1989:1-20.
    [65] 曾兆华,赵士熙,吴光远,等.茶椰圆蚧的重要天敌——日本方头甲及其捕食作用的研究[J],华东昆虫学报,2000,9(1):73-79.
    [66] 张波,刘益宁,白杨,等.宁夏天牛病原菌的种类和致病力研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4):67-72.
    [67] 张星耀,骆有庆.中国森林重大生物灾害[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003:41-42.
    [68] 张 正 旺 , 倪 喜 军 . 山 西 雉 鸡 食 性 的 研 究 [J]. 北 京 师 范 大 学 学 报 ( 自 然 科 学版),1995,31(2):259-264.
    [69] 张正旺,郑光美.鸟类栖息地选择研究进展[C].见:中国动物学会.中国动物科学研究.北京:中国林业出版社,1999:1104-1109.
    [70] 张志勇,刘贤谦,谢映平.用查迹法编制杨天牛自然种群生命表的研究[J].林业科学(昆虫专辑),1987,46-53.
    [71] 张仲信.大斑啄木鸟在杨树林内的食性研究[J].森林病虫通讯,1986,(4):4-7.
    [72] 张仲信.利用大斑啄木鸟防治蛀干害虫的研究[C].森林害虫生物防治论文集.北京:中国林业出版社,1981:204-214.
    [73] 张仲信.利用啄木鸟防治杨树蛀干害虫[J].森林病虫通讯,1992,(4):33-35.
    [74] 赵博光,李周直,葛庆杰.光肩星天牛在杨树上产卵部位的选择[J].北京林业大学学报,1997,19(3):28-32.
    [75] 赵志模,朱文炳,叶辉.得氏绥螨对桔全爪螨捕食作用的研究[J].西南农业大学学报,1988,10(2):186-192.
    [76] 郑光美.鸟类学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1995:502-505.
    [77] 郑光美.世界鸟类分类与分布名录[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:98-103.
    [78] 郑汉业,夏乃斌.森林昆虫生态学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1995:110-116.
    [79] 郑丽颖,温俊宝,许志春,等.内蒙古乌拉特前旗大斑啄木鸟与光肩星天牛生态位分析[J].河北林果研究,2006,21(2):144-146.
    [80] 郑作新,钱燕文,傅守三.河北昌黎果区主要食虫鸟类的调查研究[J].北京:科学出版社,1958.
    [81] 郑作新,冼耀华,张荫荪,等.内蒙古自治区斑啄木鸟的一新亚种——乌拉山亚种[J].动物学报,1975,21(4):385-388.
    [82] 中村充博.利用红颈啄木鸟防治松材线虫病的研究[J].江苏林业科技,2000,10(5):48-49.
    [83] 朱曦,唐陆法,宣子灿.浙江省食虫鸟类食性分析[J].动物学杂志,1999,34(3):18-25.
    [84] 朱 云 龙 . 啄 木 鸟 对 黄 斑 星 天 牛 自 然 控 制 作 用 的 林 间 调 查 [J]. 西 北 林 学 院 学报,2002,17(3):72-74.
    [85] Biro P A, Post J R, Parkinson E A. From Individuals to Populations: Prey Fish Risk-TakingMediates Mortality in Whole-System Experiments[J]. Ecology, 2003, 84(9): 2419-2431.
    [86] Buckner C H, Turnock W J. Avian predation on the larch sawfly,Pristiphora erichsonii (HTG)(Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidea)[J]. Ecology, 1965, 46(3): 223-236.
    [87] Buckner C H. Avian and mammalian predators of forest insects[J]. Biocontrol, 1967, 12:491-501.
    [88] Catherine M R, Keith B A. Foraging ecology of Pileated Woodpecker in coastal forests of Washington[J]. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 2006, 70(5): 1266-1275.
    [89] Dobrowolski K A, Hakba R, Markiewicz D, et al. Foraging and territorial behaviours in Great Woodpecker Woodpecker (Dendrocopos major)[J]. Ecologie, 1994, 25:119-125.
    [90] Fayt P, Machmer M M, Steeger C. Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers-a literature review[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 206:1-14.
    [91] Franco A M A, Brito J C, Almeid, J. Modelling habitat selection of Common Crane Grus grus wintering in Portugal using multiple logistic regression[J]. Ibis, 2000, 142(3): 351-358.
    [92] Fritz H, Durant D, Guillemain M. Shape and sources of variations of the functional response of wildfowl: an experiment with mallards, Anas platyrhynchos[J]. Oikos, 2001, 93: 488–496.
    [93] Gaye S H, Miller C A, Mook L J. The feeding response of some forest birds to the black-headed budworm[J]. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1970, 48: 359-366.
    [94] Greenberg R., Bichier P, Angon A C, et al. The impact of avian insectivory on arthropods and leaf damage in some Guatemalan coffee plantations[J]. Ecology, 2000, 81(6): 1750-1755.
    [95] Gross J E, Shipley L A, Hobbs N T, et al. Functional Response of Herbivores in Food-Concentrated Patches: Tests of a Mechanistic Model[J]. Ecology, 1993, 74(3): 778-791.
    [96] Guisan A, Zimmermann N E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2000, 135(2): 147-186.
    [97] Gunn J S, Hagan III J M. Woodpecker abundance and tree use in uneven-aged managed, and unmanaged, forest in northern Maine[J]. Forestry Ecology and Management, 2000, 126 (1): 1-12.
    [98] Holling C S. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly[J]. Canadian Entomologist, 1959, 91: 293-320.
    [99] Hosseini M, Hatami B, Saboori A, et al. Predation by Allothrombium pulvinum on the spider mites Tetranychus urticae and Amphitetranychus viennensis: predation rate, prey preference and functional response[J]. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2005, 37(3): 173-181.
    [100] Jeschke J M, Kopp M, Tollrian R. Predator Functional Responses: Discriminating between Handling and Digesting Prey[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2002, 72(1): 95-112.
    [101] Knight K B. The effects of woodpecker on population of the Engelmann spruce beetle[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1958, 51: 603-607.
    [102] Koplin J R. The numerical response of woodpeckers to insect prey in a subalpine forestry in Colorado[J]. Condor, 1969, 71(4): 436-438.
    [103] Kosinski Z. Factors affecting the occurrence of middle spotted and great spotted woodpeckers in deciduous forests-a case study from Poland[J]. Annales zoologici Fennici, 2006, 43(2): 198-210.
    [104] Low C, Connor E F. Birds have no impact on folivorous insect guilds on a montane willow[J]. Oikos, 2003, 103(3): 579-589.
    [105] Mazgajski T D. Nesting phenology and breeding success in great spotted woodpecker Picoides major near Waraw (central Poland) [J]. Acta Ornithological, 2002, 37: 1-5.
    [106] Melletti M, Penteriani V. Nesting and feeding tree selection in the endangered white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos Lilfordi[J]. Wilson Bulletin, 2003, 115(3): 299-306.
    [107] Michalek K G, Miettinen J. Dendrocopos maior Great Spotted woodpecker[J]. BWP Update, 2003, 5(2): 101-184.
    [108] Mols C M, Visser M E. Great tits can reduce caterpillar damage in apple orchards[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 39(6): 888–899.
    [109] Moreby S J. An aid to the identification of arthropod fragments in the faeces of gamebird chicks (Galliformes) [J]. The Ibis, 1988, 130: 519-526.
    [110] Norris K, Johnstone I. The functional response of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) searching for cockles (Cerastoderma edule) by touch[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 1998, 67(3): 329-346.
    [111] Owen M. An assessment of fecal analysis technique in waterfowl feeding studies[J]. Journal of Wildlife Management, 1975, 39(2) : 271~279.
    [112] Pasinelli G. Oaks (Quercus sp.) and only oaks? Relations between habitat structure and home range size of the middle spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos medius)[J]. Biological Conservation, 2000, 93(2): 227-235.
    [113] Pechacek P, Kriistin A. Diet of woodpeckers in Berchtesgaden National Park[J], Vogelwelt, 1993,114(4): 165-177.
    [114] Rosenberg K V, Cooper R J. Approaches to avian diet analysis[J]. Studies in Avian Biology, 1990, 13: 80-90.
    [115] Scherzinger W. Niche separation in European in woodpecker[C]. In: Pechacek, P , D′Oleire-Oltmanns, W(eds), Foreschungsbericht 48, Nationalparkverwakung Berchtesgaden, 2003.
    [116] Simon C A. The influence of food abundance on territory size in the iguanid Sceloporus Jarrovi[J]. Ecology, 1975, 56(4): 993-998.
    [117] Smith K W. Has the reduction in nest-site competition from Starlings Sturnus vulgaris been a factor in the recent increase of Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major numbers in Britain?[J]. Bird Study, 2005, 52(3): 307-313.
    [118] Smith K W. Nest site selection of the Great spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos major in two oak woods in southern England and its implications for woodland management[J]. BiologicalConservation, 1997, 80: 283–288.
    [119] Solomon M E. The nature control of animal population[J]. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 1949, 18(1): 1-35.
    [120] Stillman R A, Simmons V L. Predicting the functional response of a farmland bird[J]. Functional Ecology, 2006, 20 (4): 723–730.
    [121] Stoate C, Borralho R, Araujo M. Factors affecting corn bunting Miliaria calandra abundance in a Portuguese agricultural landscape[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, 77(3): 219-226.
    [122] Tremblay A, Mineau P, Stewart R K. Effects of bird predation on some pest insect populations in corn[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 83(1): 143–152.
    [123] Trexler J C, McCulloch C E, Travis J. How can the functional response best be determined?[J]. Oecologia, 1988, 76(2): 206-214.
    [124] Wan T, Hu J F, Jiao Z B, et al. Nest-cavity characteristics of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in shelter plantations of west Inner Mongolia[J]. Forestry Studies in China, 2008, 10(1): 36-40.
    [125] Wong M C, Barbeau M A. Rock crab predation of juvenile sea scallops: the functional response and its implications for bottom culture[J]. Aquaculture International, 2006, 14: 355-376.
    [126] Zheng R Q, Bao Y X. Seasonal food habits of the black muntjac Muntiacus crinifrons[J]. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 2007, 53 (2): 201–207.
    [127] Ziemowit K, Pawe? K, Aleksander W. Nest sites of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius in near-natural and managed riverine forests[J]. Acta Ornithologica, 2006, 41 (1): 21-32.
    [128] Ziemowit K, Pawe? K. Nest holes of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpeckers D. medius: Do they really differ in size[J]. Acta Ornithologica, 2007, 42(1): 45-52.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700