香蜂花离体培养及其挥发油成分的GC-MS分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本试验以香蜂花(Melissa officinalis)带芽茎段为材料,比较系统地进行香蜂花茎段培养与快繁技术研究,摸索香蜂花试管苗工厂化生产模式的基本参数,并系统地研究了香蜂花试管苗玻璃化的影响因素;同时,以香蜂花种子、叶片和茎段为材料,进行愈伤组织培养与植株再生研究。最后,利用GC-MS技术分析香蜂花试管苗和盆栽实生苗的挥发油成分差异,以期为香蜂花离体培养建立有效途径,为香蜂花大规模工厂化试管育苗及种质资源保护提供科学依据。主要研究结果如下:
     1.香蜂花带芽茎段的培养。以香蜂花带芽茎段为材料,研究了香蜂花带芽茎段培养和离体繁殖。结果表明:3月取香蜂花带芽茎段经过75%乙醇30s+0.1%HgCl_2 5 min处理为最佳取材时期和消毒方式;带芽茎段在MS+0.5mg/L 6-BA+0.1mg/L NAA培养基中不定芽诱导率达到100.0%;不定芽适宜增殖的培养基为MS+1.0 mg/L 6-BA+0.2 mg/L NAA+0.1mg/L IBA,增殖倍数达到4.6;最佳的生根培养基为1/2MS+0.5 mg/L IBA,生根率达到100.0%;适宜的移栽基质为1:1:1珍珠岩:蛭石:河沙,成活率为93.3%。
     2.香蜂花试管苗工厂化生产模式的确定。香蜂花工厂化试管育苗主要技术参数:继代增殖系数4.5,每25 d继代1次,一年可增殖继代12代,生根率100.0%,移栽成活率93.3%。以此为参数,离体培养时污染率控制在5%以下,玻璃化苗控制在5%以下,理论上香蜂花1个芽1年继代12次既可增殖403.8万株,可以达到快繁的要求。
     3.香蜂花试管苗玻璃化现象的研究。以香蜂花正常试管苗的带芽茎段为材料,针对6-BA浓度、温度、培养器皿、继代时间、蔗糖浓度和琼脂浓度等影响因素,研究了香蜂花带芽茎段培养过程中控制玻璃化现象的措施。结果表明:香蜂花正常试管苗的适宜培养的6-BA浓度为0.5-2.0 mg/L,30g/L蔗糖和7g/L琼脂的培养基中玻璃化率为最低。试管苗培养于玻璃瓶+塑料膜的培养容器内,置于25℃培养温度,30 d继代培养一次时可有效地控制玻璃化发生。
     4.香蜂花愈伤组织的培养。以香蜂花种子、叶片、叶柄、茎段为材料,研究了香蜂花愈伤组织的培养。结果表明:香蜂花种子最佳的消毒方式为75%乙醇30 s+0.1%HgCl_2 5 min,于MS培养基中萌发率达到85.5%;愈伤组织最佳诱导培养基为MS+1.0 mg/L 6-BA+0.1 mg/L2,4-D,诱导率达97.1%;香蜂花不同取材部位(叶片,叶柄,茎段)的愈伤组织诱导率差异不显著,不同取材部位均可达到极高的愈伤诱导率;愈伤组织最佳增殖的培养基为MS+2mg/L 6-BA+0.01 mg/L NAA+0.2 mg/L 2,4-D,增殖率达到76.7%;在培养基MS+1.0 mg/L6-BA+0.1 mg/L NAA+0.1 mg/L 2,4-D上部分愈伤组织可以分化芽苗。
     5.香蜂花试管苗挥发油成分的气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)分析。以香蜂花试管苗为材料,利用GC-MS技术共分离出19种物质,主要成分为甲基庚烯酮、香茅醛、橙花醇、β-柠檬醛、香叶醇、α-柠檬醛、乙酸橙花酯、二丁基羟基甲苯、绿花白千层醇等。与香蜂花盆栽实生苗相比,两样本共测定出11种相同物质,虽然各成分的含量存在一些的差异,但其中主要物质成分橙花醇、β-柠檬醛、香叶醇和香叶醛在两样本中含量都很大,表明香蜂花试管苗可以应用于种苗快繁。
In this experiment,stems with buds were used as explants for the systematical studies on the tissue culture of stem segment and for further establishing the industrialized in vitro propagation model in Mellisa officinalis;and the systematical research on the vitrification in the culture of Mellisa officinali was also discussed.Leaves,stems and seeds were used as explants for the studies on the callus culture and plant regeneration.At the same time,GC-MS analysis was used for analyzing the difference of the volatile oil components of Mellisa officinalis between the plantlets in vitro and the seeding of potted planting.These studies would establish an effective way on tissue culture of Mellisa officinalis which could provide scientific evidence on industrial production of plantlets and protection of germplasm.The main results were as follows.
     1.Stem segment culture of Mellisa officinalis.Stems with buds were used as explants for the studies on tissue culture.The results showed that:the best season of taking explants was March.The best disinfection method for stems was 75%ethanol for 30 s +0.1%HgCl_2 5 min on MS medium.Adventitous buds induction rate was 100.0%on the medium:MS +0.5 mg/L 6-BA + 0.1 mg/L NAA.The most suitable medium for the multiplication of the adventitious buds was MS +1.0 mg/L 6-BA +0.2 mg/L NAA +0.1 mg/L IBA,the multiplication time was 4.6.The most suitable medium for rooting was 1/2 MS +0.5 mg/L IBA,rooting rate reached 100.0%.Substrate with perlite,vermiculite and sand by 1:1:1 was the optimal,the survival rate was 93.3%.
     2.Establishment of the industrialized in vitro propagation model of Mellisa officinalis. The main technical parameters were as follows:the proliferation coefficient was up to 4.5,the subculture cycle was 25 days,and the subculture time was 12 times every year;the rooting rate was up to 100%,and the survival rate of transplanting was 93.3%,.According to these parameters, a bud could proliferate to 4038000 copies a year theoretically when contamination rate was less than 5%and vitrification rate was less than 5%.
     3.Studies on the vitrification in the culture of Mellisa officinalis.Stems with buds of normal plantlets were used as explants,compared to different factors:6-BA,temperature,the containers,subculture time,and sucrose,studied on the control measures for the vitrification of Mellisa officinalis in vitro Culture.The results show that:when plantlets on the appropriate cultured medium with 0.5-2.0 mg/L 6-BA,30g/L sucrose and 7g/L agar,the rate of the vitrification could be lowest.When the temperature was 25℃,plantlets sealing with plastic film in glass bottles for 30 d subculture could be an effective control of the vitrification.
     4.Callus culture of Mellisa officinalis.Seeds,leaves,petiole and stems of Mellisa officinalis were used as explants for the studies on callus culture.The results showed that:the most suitable disinfection method for seed was 75%ethanol for 30 s +0.1%HgCl_2 5 min in MS medium,and the germination rate was 85.5%.The most suitable medium for callus induction was MS+1.0 mg/L 6-BA+0.1 mg/L 2,4-D,callus induction rate was 97.1%;there were no significant difference of callus induction rate when callus induced from leaves,petiole and stems。The most suitable medium for the multiplication of the Callus was MS +2 mg/L 6-BA +0.01 mg/L NAA +0.2 mg/L 2,4-D,the growth rate reached 76.7%.The most suitable differentiation medium was MS +1.0 mg/L 6-BA +0.1 mg/L NAA +0.1 mg/L 2,4-D,differentiation rate was 3.75%.
     5.GC-MS analysis of essential oil constituents of Melissa officinalis in vitro culture. Mellisa officinalis in vitro were used as the materials,using GC-MS separated 19 kinds of substances.Main composition were 6-Methyl-5-heptene-2-one,citronellal,neryl alcohol,β-citral, geraniol,1,3,4-Trimethyl-3-cyclohexen-1-carboxaldehyde,α-citral,nerol acetate,butylated hydroxytoluene,viridiflorol and so on.Compared to normal plants of Melissa officinalis there were 11 kind of same material in two samples together,although the contents existenced some differences,all of the main substances neryl alcohol,β-citral,geraniol,α-citral and nerol acetate have great content in the two samples.
引文
[1]安秋荣,郭志峰,彭玉谦.夏、秋季薄荷挥发油成分的对比研究[J].河北大学学报,2000,(20)4:351-354.
    [2]蔡汉权.罗勒的组织培养和快速繁殖[J].植物生理通讯,2005,41(3):347.
    [3]陈红兵,宋炜,王金胜,等.气相色谱-质谱法分析万寿菊根挥发油化学成分[J].农药,2007.2:114-115.
    [4]陈华林.不同培养条件和外植体处理对红掌品种组培效果的影响[J].西南园艺,2003,31(4):35-37.
    [5]王续衍,林秦碧.苹果组织培养研究简报[J]_四川农业大学学报,1988,3(1):46-48.
    [6]陈利萍.长寿花叶片愈伤组织的诱导和植株再生[J].植物生理学通讯,1999,35(6):471.
    [7]陈欣.广藿香化学成分的研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2007.
    [8]陈银龙.香蜂花的组织培养与快速繁殖.植物生理学通讯,2007,43(3):512
    [9]陈振光.茶树的花药培养实验[J].福建农业科技,1979,4:39.
    [10]程家胜,史永忠,张志云,等.苹果组织培养中的玻璃苗问题[J].植物生理通讯,1990,(1):33-35.
    [11]崔丽华.植物生长调节物质对组织培养中不定芽不定根的作用[J].辽宁师范专科学校学报,2000,2(2):97-99.
    [12]代二娜,戴平.薰衣草组织培养研究[J].广西农业科学,2004,35(5):352-354.
    [13]邓雪华,王光忠,孙丽娟,等.牛至挥发油化学成分GC-MS分析[J].中药材,2007,(30)5:555-557.
    [14]董岩,魏兴国,刘明成.肉桂挥发油化学成分的GC/MS分析[J].齐鲁药事,2004,3:34-35.
    [15]杜勤,王振华,徐鸿华.广藿香的组织培养和快速繁殖[J].植物生理学通讯,2002,38(5):454.
    [16]桂新,周荣汉.国产野生薄荷挥发油化学组分变异及其化学型[J].植物资源与环境,1998.3:13.
    [17]郭春华,徐玉霞.沙棘优良品系茎尖组织培养技术初探[J].沙棘,2000,13(1):26-27.
    [18]贺莉娟,梁逸曾,赵晨曦.唇形科植物挥发油化学成分的GC/MS研究[J].化学学报,2007,65(3):227-232.
    [19]洪立红.薰衣草的离体培养与工厂化试管育苗[D].福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    [20]洪立萍.柠檬香蜂草离体快速繁殖(简报)[J].亚热带植物科学,2006,35(3):58.
    [21]胡继金.青霉素在香石竹组织培养中的作用[J].园艺学报,1991,18(1):87-90.
    [22]黄俊义.薄荷离体培养与试管苗工厂化生产[D].福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    [23]黄学林,李悠菊.高等植物组织离体培养的形态建成及其调控[MI.北京:科学出版社,1995:150.
    [24]季良越,孙晓丽,韦小敏.玉米胚性愈伤组织诱导和植株再生研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2002,36(2):101-105.
    [25]贾文庆,刘会超,陈韵.香蜂花组培快繁试验.广东农业科学,2007,5:36-38.
    [26]解晓红,李江辉,冯文龙,等.丹参组培快繁技术研究[J].中药材,2004,27(7):474-475.
    [27]赖家业,杨振德.野薄荷的茎段培养[J].广西热作科技,2000,(3):9-11.
    [28]李昌珠,Sedlak Jiri,Jan Blazek.不同基因型欧洲梨离体繁殖研究[J].果树学报,2002,19(4):227-230.
    [29]李海航,潘瑞炽.青霉素在高等植物中的作用[J].植物生理学通讯,1987,5:1ˇ6.
    [30]李骏明.植物组织培养教程[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1996.
    [31]李师翁,范小峰,卢东平.大果良种沙棘愈伤组织诱导及植株再生的研究[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(2):262-266.
    [32]李颖,刘吉金,杨敏,等.GC-MS对鸡蛋花挥发油成分研究[J].天津药学,2006,4:2-3.
    [33]李勇慧,耿惠敏,李向民.驱蚊草挥发油成分的GC-MS分析[J].陕西农业科学,2008,1:63-66.
    [34]梁呈元,佟海英,赵志强,等.水蒸气蒸馏法与超临界CO_2萃取法提取薄荷油的化学成分比较[J].林产化学与工业,2007,21(1):81-84.
    [35]廖苏梅,周巍,徐程.薰衣草的组织培养[J].植物生理学通讯,2004,40(3):336.
    [36]林伯年.园艺植物繁育学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002:344.
    [37]刘百战,高芸.固相微萃取气相色谱/质谱分析栀子花的头香成分[J].色谱,2000,18(5):452-455.
    [38]刘宝光,刘玉波,陆斐,等.一串红组培快繁技术的研究[J].吉林林业科技,2002,31(5):20ˇ21,30.
    [39]刘非燕,郭达初.重瓣丝石竹试管苗玻璃化发生原因初探[J].杭州大学学报,1996,23(4):382-387.
    [40]刘会超,贾文庆,陈韵.香蜂草组织培养和快速繁殖.安徽农业科学[J].2006,34(19):48.82.
    [41]刘建福,吴清.阳桃的组织培养与快速繁殖[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2004,12(3):265-267.
    [42]刘信平,张驰,余爱农,等.香椿挥发性化学成分的研究[J].精细化工,2008,1:41ˇ44.
    [43]吕亚凤.厚荚相思(Acacia crassicarpa)试管苗玻璃化现象研究[D].福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [44]马春红,陈霞,彩霞,等.薄荷的快速繁殖与栽培技术的研究[J].中国农学通报,2004,20(4):230-233,247.
    [45]马钟丽.厚荚相思离体快繁技术的研究[D].福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    [46]牛自勉,王贤萍,戴桂林.苹果砧木玻璃化过程中内源激素的含量变化[J].华北农学报,1995,10(3):15-19.
    [47]潘超美,贺红,徐鸿华,等.广藿香组培苗快繁与工厂化生产程序的研究[J].中药材,2005,28(11):973ˇ974.
    [48]蒲海,王远强,张婧诗,等.运用气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)联用法对牛至挥发油化学成分的分析[J].重庆工学院学报,2007,5:115ˇ118.
    [49]蒲自连,梁健.淡黄杜鹃植物挥发油化学成分的研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,1999,5(4):371ˇ373.
    [50]任东植,李峰,曲运琴,等.影响枣组培苗玻璃化的几个因素及其防治(简报)[J].植物生理学通讯,2000,36(1):11ˇ19.
    [51]沙红,廖康.药用植物牛至的组织培养技术研究[J].新疆农业大学学报,2003,26(4):49-51.
    [52]师素云,陈兴明,薛启汉,等.薄荷离体培养愈伤组织诱导与植株分化[J].江苏农业科学,2000,6:27-28.
    [53]师校欣,等.几种因素对试管苗玻璃化作用的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,1992,15(3):27-30.
    [54]时群,韦大器.不同培养条件对光叶楮试管苗玻璃化的影响[J].亚热带植物科学,2007,36(3):12-14.
    [55]孙满芝,尹成涛.植物组培过程中玻璃化现象的发生与解决措施[J].山东林业科技,2001(6):19.
    [56]孙满芝,尹成淘.植物组织培养过程中玻璃化现象的发生与解决措施[J].山东林业科技,200l(6):19-20.
    [57]孙益.‘科罗粉'美国薄荷组织培养[J].中国花木盆景,2002,9:28ˇ29.
    [58]谭文澄,戴策刚.观赏植物组织培养[M].中国林业出版社.1991.
    f59]陶静,杨传平,刘玉喜,等.白桦组培再生系统的研究(Ⅱ)-影响因素及培养程序[J].东北林业大学学报,1998,26(6):1-5.
    [60]陶铭.组织培养中畸形胚状体及超度含水态苗的研究[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(5):1048ˇ1058.
    [61]王凤兰,黄子锋.香蜂花的利用及主要栽培技术培[J].特种经济动植物,2004,5:24.
    [62]王加旺,罗鹏,廖衍慧,MS和B5培养基对油菜茎尖培养中玻璃化作用的影响(简报)[J].植物生理学通讯,1990,(3):35-36.
    [63]王坚,罗永明,刘贤旺.樟科樟属植物樟的化学成分与组织培养研究[J].江西中医学院学报,2004,1(2):69-70.
    [64]王利平,刘扬岷,袁身淑.梅花香气成分初探[J].园艺学报,2002,(30):42.
    [65]王小敏,李维林,赵志强,等.不同培养条件对薄荷试管苗玻璃化现象的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2006,15(3):51ˇ54.
    [66]王晓立,郝建平,武宗信,等.丹参茎尖培养与快速繁殖[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版),2004,27(2):182-184.
    [67]王心宇,刘明春,杨迎,等.GC-MS法分析白兰花挥发油成分[J].重庆大学学报,2008,1:97.
    [68]韦三立.花卉组织培养[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2001.
    [69]魏兴国,董岩,崔庆新,等.野生薄荷挥发油化学成分的GC-MS分析[J].烟台师范学院学报,2003,19(2):116ˇ118.
    [70]吴涛,朱玉灵,范泽民,等.薄荷组培苗的组培快繁技术研究[J].安徽农业科学,1999, 6:609-612.
    [71]向邓云.植物生长调节物质对植物组织培养形态建成的调节控制[J].涪陵师专学报,2001,17(3):119-123.
    [72]徐士清,杨世湖,倪丹,等.非洲菊试管苗叶片的组培快繁[J].园艺学报,2002,29(5):493-494.
    [73]许萍,张王方.关于植物细胞脱分化的研究概况[J].植物学通报,1996,13(1):20-24.
    [74]许耀祖,王晓军,赵民安,等.几种生物学因子对薰衣草胚性愈伤组织悬浮培养生长的影响[J].生物技术通讯,2005,16(1):34-36.
    [75]许耀祖,王晓军,赵民安,等.薰衣草高频植株再生系统的建立[J].西南农业大学学报,2005,27,(3):344-348.
    [76]薛启汉,陈游,姜晓红,等.薄荷离体培养、无性系变异与经济性状改良的初步研究[J].江苏农业学报,1998,14(3):179-182.
    [77]杨淑珍,范燕萍.蝴蝶兰2个品种挥发性成分差异性分析[J].华南农业大学学报,2008,29(1):114-1 19.
    [78]姚丽娟.花卉类植物组织培养技术现状及在温州花卉产业发展中的应用[J].浙江业热带作物通讯,2003,6:21ˇ23.
    [79]叶梅,王伯初,段传人.植物组织培养外植体褐变的研究进展[J].生物技术通讯,2004,5(4):426-428.
    [80]于亚军,代汉萍,李宝江.植物激素和生长调节剂在果树组织培养中的应用[J].北方园艺,2002,6:68-70.
    [81]袁燕,生吉萍,王捍东,等.水花生愈伤组织的诱导及根的分化[J].水生生物学报,2004,28(6):622-628
    [82]臧玉琦,吴涛,朱玉灵,等.薄荷茎尖生长点离体培养[J].中国农学通报,1998,1:47-73.
    [83]张翠玉,廖晴.月季试管苗玻璃化原因及控制方法研究[J].新疆农业科学,1991,(2):76-78.
    [84]张东向.培养条件对齿瓣延胡索愈伤组织生长及延胡索乙素含量的影响[J].植物研究,2003,23(1):86-90.
    [85]张广文,蓝文键,苏镜娱,等.广藿香精油化学成分分析及其抗菌活性(Ⅱ)[J].中草药,2002.3:210-212.
    [86]张华通,林爵平,吴永平,等.迭迷香工厂化育苗技术[J].广东林业科技,2002,18(3):6-9.
    [87]张继,刘阿萍,杨永利.百里香挥发性成分的研究[J].四川大学学报,2004,41(4):890-892.
    [88]张树河,翁锦周,林江波,等.迭迷香组培快繁技术研究[J].广西农业科学,2006,37(2):111-112.
    [89]张文胜,张宝红,李秀兰.糖源在棉花愈伤组织诱导、胚胎发生与发育中的作用[J].江西农业大学学报,1997,19(3):34-39.
    [90]张晓龙,张加研,王燕云,等.云南松树皮挥发性成分分析[J].精细化工,2008,1:45-48.
    [91]张艳玲,姚雷,申晓辉.芳香植物唇萼薄荷组织培养中的污染控制[J].上海农业学报,2005,21(1):4-6.
    [92]张燕玲,姚军,王润珍,等.满天星组织培养中克服玻璃化现象的初探[J].广西植物,1997,17(3):246-248.
    [93]张远记,钱迎倩.毛花猕猴桃愈伤组织诱导与植株再生[J]_广西科学,1994,1(4):1-5.
    [94]张跃非,雷家容.丹参的组织培养及快速繁殖[J].植物生理学通讯,2003,29(4):139
    [95]赵恒田,王新华,班文杰,等.薄荷组培工厂化育苗技术[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2004,1:60-61.
    [96]赵洁,陈志胜,万钧.丹参叶片无性系快速繁殖及植株再生研究[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999,33(1):108ˇ111.
    [97]郑均宝.生物技术在林业应用研究工作进展[J].河北林学院学报,1994.
    [98]中国高等植物图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,1982:371.
    [99]中国植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1992,65(2):1,66:211.
    [100]周菊华,林证明,梁海曼.控制瑞香试管苗玻璃化的研究[J].园艺学报,1990.17(3):229ˇ232.
    [101]周俊辉,周家容,曾浩森,等.园艺植物组织培养中的褐化现象及抗褐化研究进展[J].园艺学报,2000,27(增刊):481一486.
    [102]周俊辉.植物快速繁殖中存在的问题与对策[J].仲恺农业技术学院学报,1999,12(4):64.
    [103]周维燕.植物细胞工程原理与技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2001(8):63
    [104]周音,张智奇,张建军,等.生菜遗传转化过程中克服玻璃苗的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2000,22(2):62-64.
    [105]邹翠霞,肖荣俊.雪柳的组织培养与植株再生[J].植物生理学通讯.2000,36(2):136ˇ137
    [106]A Tantos,A Meszaros,J Kissimon,et al.The effect of triacontanol on micropropagation of balm,Melissa officinalis L[J].Plant Cell Reports,1999,19:88 - 91.
    [107]Ali Osman Sari,Ayhan Ceylan.Yield characteristics and essential oil composition of Lemon Balm(Melissa officinalis L.)grown in the Aegean Region of Turkey[J].Turk J Agric For,2002,26." 217-224.
    [108]AnM,HaigT,HatfieldPJ.ChromatogrA[J],2001,917:245.
    [109]Annamaria Meszaros,Andrea Bellon,Eva Pirter,Gabor Horvath.Micropropagation of lemon balm[J].Plant Cell,1999,57:149-152.
    [110]Bonga JM,DurzanD J著.树木组织培养[M].阙国宁,郭达初,李金田译.北京:中国林业出版社,1998:25-26,141ˇ143,175.
    [111]Borman C H,Vogelmann T C.Effect of rigidity gel medium on benzylademine-inducedadventitioud bud formation and vitrification in vitro in Picea ablies.Physiol Plant,1984,61:505-512.
    [112] Botter I, Zoglaure K, Goring H. Inducation and revision of vitrification of plant cultured in vitro[J]. Physiology plant, 1988, 72: 560-564.
    [113] Brand ME, Lineberger RD. The effect of leaf source and developmental stage on shoot organogenic potential of sweeigum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.)Leaf explants[J]. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult, 1991,24:1-7.
    [114] Briolanja M. Micropropagation and Influence of Growth Regulators on Production of Essential Oil Constituents of Melissa officinalis L[J]. Plant, 2004, 40: 20-21.
    [115] Dcbergh. Effect of ager brand and concentration on the medium[J]. Physiol Plant, 1983, 59:270-276.
    [116] Debergh P, Maene L. Pathological and physiological problems related to the in vitro culture of plants[J]. Parasitia, 1984, 43:69-75.
    [117] Dimitrova Z, Dimov B, Manolova N. Antiherpes effect of Melissa officinalis L[J]. Acta Microbiol Bulg, 1993, 29: 65-72.
    [118] Filiz Ayanoglu, Mehmet Arslan, Avni Hatay. Effects of harvesting stages harvesting hours and drying methods on essential oil content of Lemon Balm grown in easter mediterranean[J]. International Journal of Botany, 2005, 1(2):138-142.
    [119] Hohmann J, Zupko I, Redei D. Protective effects of the aerial parts of Salvia officinalis, Melissa officinalis and Lavandula angustifolia and their constituents against enzyme-dependent and enzymeindependent lipid peroxidation[J]. Planta Med, 1999,65: 576-578.
    [120] Kataeva N V, Alexandrora I G, Butenko K G, et al. Effects of applied and Internal hormone on vitrification and apicaknecrosis of different plants cultured in vitro[J]. Plant cell. Tissue and Organ culture, 1992, 27(2): 149-154.
    [121] Kevers C, Coumans M and Gasper T. Physiological and biochemical events leading to vitrification of plantd cultured in vitro[J]. Physiol plant, 1986, 61:69-74.
    [122] Leshem P. The effects of growth regulators on vitrification in melon and carnation [J]. A nn Bot, 1988,62:271-276.
    [123] Li M J. The influence of different factors on callus induction of Dioscorea opposita[J]. Guihaia, 2000, 20(2): 156-160.
    [124] Pague M, Boxus P. Vitrification review of literature v[J]. Acta Horculture, 1987, 212: 156-166.
    [125] Pagues M. Vitrification and micropropagation cause, remedies and prospect[J]. Act Hort, 1991, (298): 283-290.
    [126] Reyhan B B, Belgin C. The essential oil of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.), its components and using fields[J]. J. of Fac. of Agric, OMU, 2006, 21(1): 116-121.
    [127] Rugini E. Almonds. In "Handbook of Plant Tissue Culture" [M], Evans D A et al. Eds, Macmillan Pub Co, London, 1986. (4): 574-611.
    [128] Sari A O, Ceylan A. Yield characteristics and Essential oil composition of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) grown in the Aegean Region of Turkey[J]. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2002, 26 (4): 217-224.
    [129] Sutter E G, Barker P B. In vitro propagation of mature Liquidambar styraciua[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 1985, 5: 13-21.
    [130] Vaverkova S, Tekel J, Holla M. The effect of herbicides on the qualitative properties of medicinal plants. Part 3: Content and composition of the essential oil from Melissa officinalis L. after application of basagran[J]. Pharmazie, 1995, 50: 835-836.
    [131] Zimmerman T W, Cobb B G. Vitrification and soluble carbohydrate levels in petunia leaves as influenced by malic gelrite and sucrose concentration [J]. Plant Cell Rept, 1989, 8: 358-360.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700