执政党的执政伦理及其实现方式研究
|
摘要
近代以来,随着政党政治的出现,政党在国家政治生活以及整个社会生活中扮演的角色日益凸显。执政党作为掌握国家政权、负责组织政府的政党,在国家政治体系中的地位举足轻重,加强和改进执政党的自身建设,不断提高执政党的领导能力和执政水平成为执政党保持执政地位、提升执政能力的内在要求。
近年来,关于政党方面的理论研究不断深化,理论成果也不断丰富。由于执政党处在国家政治生活的前台,因此,围绕执政党而展开的研究工作和取得的研究成果也逐渐向纵深领域拓展。学者们从执政合法性、执政规律、执政能力、执政环境、执政组织结构、执政行为方式等多方面展开了对于执政党的研究,但是对于执政党的执政伦理研究却很不够。而执政伦理的重要性在于它构成了执政合法性、执政规律、执政能力、执政行为方式的价值底蕴。执政党的执政伦理追求不仅成为增强其凝聚力和合法性认同的重要方面,同时也在整个社会的价值选择和伦理建构过程中起着关键作用。执政党的执政伦理主导着社会的政治伦理理念、政治制度伦理、政治组织伦理以及政治行为主体伦理,并且可以为社会成员的行为正当性提供一种解释范式。
上世纪八十年代末到本世纪初,许多执政多年的党如苏联和东欧的共产党、印度的国大党以及墨西哥的革命制度党等,在执政几十年之后,纷纷失去了执政地位。这些执政党失去执政地位,原因固然是多方面的,但在思想认识上忽视执政伦理建设的重要性无疑成为一个主要方面。由于这些党长期执政,缺乏危机意识,容易产生道德上的麻痹症,由于忽视对执政理念、执政行为的伦理审视,最终使其执政权威因失去了道义基础而受到削弱,并失去执政地位。在这样的背景下,深入研究执政党的执政伦理内涵,执政伦理的生成机制、价值诉求、评价标准及其实现方式对于任何一个执政党来讲,不仅具有重大的理论意义也具有很强的实践意义。
本研究通过对所有执政党共同面对的一些伦理关系的研究,从应然的层面揭示了执政党执政伦理的价值追求,同时运用比较研究的方法,对不同制度、不同文化背景下的执政党的执政伦理进行了深入研究,并把马克思主义阶级分析的方法引入到执政伦理的研究上来,对不同性质的执政党的执政伦理作了分析,特别是对以马克思主义为指导的中国共产党的执政伦理做出了理论提炼,阐明了中国共产党执政伦理的特性,在逻辑分析的同时,又不忘历史的关照。全文由导论、正文和结论三部分构成。导论部分主要阐述了本课题的研究现状、研究意义、研究思路和方法;结论部分对本研究的创新性观点作了梳理;正文部分是论文的主体,共六章,第一章主要分析了政治发展史上人们对政治与伦理关系的不同理解,马克思主义的政治伦理观,政治伦理的内涵:第二章对政党政治出现后执政伦理的内生,执政伦理的内涵、特征以及执政伦理关系和执政伦理的价值诉求作了深入分析;第三章重点分析了执政伦理的影响因素以及执政伦理的生成机制;第四章通过对执政伦理的干预、执政伦理的外化、执政伦理的内化阐述了执政伦理的实现方式;第五章解析了执政伦理评价的复杂性、执政伦理评价的必要性以及执政伦理的评价标准;第六章将落脚点放在中国特色执政党的执政伦理上,通过对毛泽东、邓小平、江泽民、胡锦涛等领袖人物关于执政伦理思想的阐述,说明马克思主义者在执政伦理观上既一脉相承,又不断创新发展,分析了中国的执政党、中国的政党制度以及中国共产党执政伦理的特性,阐明中国共产党执政伦理建设的必要性、可能性及路径,认为中国共产党的执政伦理与执政能力能够形成良性互动。
本文认为:执政党的执政伦理是执政党基于合理正当的价值追求,在执政实践中形成并在执政过程中自觉践行,得到整个社会认同的伦理理念以及伦理规范的总和。包括执政伦理理念、执政伦理规范、渗透于制度中的制度伦理和执政党及其成员的伦理自觉。人类思想史上关于政治与伦理的论争十分激烈,既有政治与伦理的对立论,也有政治与伦理的统一论,还有价值中立论,更有现代学者对政治伦理的深刻理解,这些思想为执政伦理提供了可供参考的理论资源。马克思主义将政治伦理思想建立在一定的经济基础之上,能够为我们分析执政伦理问题提供理论指导。执政伦理是执政党执政的道德基础,执政伦理较之一般的伦理道德规范自觉性更高、具有更高的社会示范效应、更强的公共性和更为崇高的伦理品格。从政治文明的取向上来看,执政伦理应该蕴含一些基本的价值诉求,并在处理各种伦理关系中遵循一定的道德规范和要求。执政伦理不能只停留在伦理理念的层面上,只有通过伦理干预、外化在制度中并最终成为人们行动的自觉,才能真正得以有效实现。由于不同的执政党产生于不同的国家之中,因此,不同的政治文化生态、不同的经济社会状况、不同的政党属性会产生不同的执政伦理,政治精英能够为执政伦理提供重要的智力支援,继承创新机制、汲取整合机制、反馈调节机制是执政伦理建构的三种重要机制。在对不同的执政伦理进行评价时,由于受评价主体的多元性、评价内容的多样性和意识形态的差异性能因素的影响,伦理评价会呈现出复杂性的特征,但人们最终可以通过执政的合法性状态、执政的人文关怀程度、执政期间生产力的发展水平、对权力的规约以及利益共享状况等指标,找寻出对执政伦理较为客观的评价标准。中国共产党人将马克思主义与中国的具体实践相结合,在对马克思主义政治伦理思想继承创新、对传统文化进行吸收和创造性转化的基础上,形成了以为人民服务为宗旨,以“以人为本”为中轴,公正、和谐、责任、先进性内在统一的四位一体的执政伦理价值观构架。具体表现为执政伦理价值层面上的合道德性,执政伦理目标层面上的合公意性,执政伦理行为主体层面上的合规律性,执政伦理制度层面上的合法律性,执政伦理决策层面上的合程序性,执政伦理社会关系层面上的合群体性。在执政的实践中,中国共产党人十分重视政治实践中执政伦理的建设,将“以人为本”作为执政理念,“以德治国”作为治国方略,“执政为民”作为执政的目标,为进一步巩固党的执政地位,不断提高党的执政能力和领导水平,提供了强大的伦理支撑力。
Since modern age, along with the emergence of the party politics, the political party plays in the nation the political living and whole the social activities of the role highlights day by day. The ruling party is the political party which controls national political power and is responsible for form a government, prominent strengthen with the oneself construction of the improvement ruling party in the position in the national political system, continuously improve the leadership ability of ruling party and ruling the level become ruling party to keep a ruling position and promote the inside request of ruling ability.
In recent years, the theories concerning political party studies to continuously and deeply turn and the theories result is also continuously abundant. Because the ruling party is placed in the stage of national political life, therefore, around ruling party and launch of research work with obtain of the research result also expands toward the deep realm gradually. The scholars are from the ruling legitimacy, ruling regulation, ruling ability, ruling environment, ruling organization structure, ruling behavior method's etc. in many ways launched for the research of ruling party, but for the ruling ethics research of ruling party but very not enough. But the importance of the ruling ethics lie in it constituted a ruling legitimacy, ruling regulation, ruling ability, ruling behavior method of worth bottom Yun. The ruling ethics of ruling party pursue not only become strengthen it coagulate dint and legitimacy approve of important aspect, also have in the whole social worth choice and the ethics the construction or purchase the process in the meantime key function. The ruling ethics of ruling party predominates social political ethics principle, political system ethics, political organization ethics and political behavior corpus ethics, and can provide a kind of hermeneutic Fan4 Shi4 for the social member's behavior proper.
At the beginning of from the end of 80's in last century to this century, many parties which govern for several years are like the Soviets and the kvass communist, India of the countries big party and Mexico of revolutions system party etc., lost a ruling position in succession after govern several decades. These ruling parties lose a ruling position, the reason be surely various, but in the aspects of thoughting understanding ascend neglect the importance that the ruling ethics constuct doubtless become a ly mainly. Because these parties govern over a long period of time, lack feeling of impending crisis, easily produce to morally paralyze a disease, in order to neglect to ruling principle, ruling behavior of the ethics examine, end make it the ruling authority be weaken because of losing righteous foundation, and lose a ruling position.At thus of under the background go deep into a ruling ethics content of study the ruling party, ruling ethics of born mechanism, value claim, evaluation standard and in fact way speaks for the whichever ruling party now, not only have important theories meaning but also have very strong fulfillment meaning.
This research passes the research which relates to to some ethicses that all ruling parties together face, from in response to however of the level announced to public ruling party ruling ethics of the value pursue and make use of comparison research in the meantime of method, to under the different system, different cultural background of the ruling ethics of ruling party carried on a thorough research, and lead the Marxist rank analytical method into to arrive ruling ethics of the research come up, to not the ruling ethics of the ruling party of congeniality made analysis, especially do theories to refine towards taking Marxism as the ruling ethics of directive Communist Party of China, clarified Communist Party of China ruling ethics of characteristic, at the logic analyze of in the meantime, and then don't forget a historical pass to shine on.The full text is constitute by introduction, text and conclusion three parts. The introduction was mainly part of to elaborate research present condition, research meaning, research way of thinking and method of this topic;The conclusion part made to comb to the creative sex standpoint of this research; Text part is the corpus of thesis, total 6, chapter 1 mainly analyzed political a development people in history to the different comprehension that politics and the ethics relate to, Marxist of political ethics, political ethics of content;Chapter 2 to the party politics appear behind ruling ethics of inside living, ruling ethics of content, characteristic and ruling ethics relation with ruling ethics of worth the claim made thorough analysis;Chapter 3 point analyzed to govern ethical impact factor and ruling ethics of born mechanism;Chapter 4 passes to turn towards govern ethical intervention, govern ethics of outside, ruling ethics of inside turned to elaborate ruling ethics of carry out a way;Chapter 5 complexity which analyzed ruling ethics to evaluate, ruling ethics evaluation of necessity and ruling ethics of evaluation standard;Pass to the leader persons, such as hair Ze east, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zoning and Hu Jintao...etc. on chapter 6 ruling ethics that will stop for a rest a point to put in the Chinese special features ruling party concerning ruling the ethics thought of elaborate, explain Marxist at ruling ethics top since a vein mutually accepts, again continuously creative development, analyze China of ruling party, China of party system and Communist Party of China be ruling ethical characteristic, clarify Communist Party of China ruling the ethics constuct of necessity, possibility and path, think the ruling ethics of Communist Party of China with ruling the ability can become positive interaction.
This text think:The ruling ethics of ruling party is a ruling party according to the reasonable proper of the value pursue, in rulingly the fulfillment formation combine in rulingly the process aware of self the Jian go and get the ethics principle of the whole social approbation and the total of the ethics norm. Include a ruling ethics principle and govern ethics norm, permeate self-conscious at the ethics of the system ethics in the system and the ruling party and its member. The contestation concerning politics and the ethics of mankind the top of the history of thought is very vigorous, current politics and ethics of stand opposite a theory, also have politics and ethics of unify a theory, also have the value neutral the theory, have modern scholar more to political ethics of deep comprehension, these thought for ruling the ethics provided to can be provided as the theories resources of reference. The Marxism builds up political ethics thought at the certain economic foundation on, can analyze a ruling ethics problem to provide theories instruction for us. Govern the ethics is the morals foundation that the ruling party govern and govern ethics compare it is general the norm aware of self of the ethics morals be higher and have higher social demonstration effect, stronger public and more lofty ethics character. The mindset which joins the government to cure civilization comes up to see, govern the ethics should contain some basic value claims, and follow certain morals norm and request in the processing various ethics relation. Ruling ethics can't the level which stay around an ethics principle up, only pass an ethics intervention and outside turn in the system combine end become people to act of aware of self, then can be real can effectively carry out. Because the different ruling party produces in different nation, therefore, the different political cultural ecosystem, different economic social condition, different political affiliation will produce different ruling ethics, the political elite can provide an important intelligence support for the ruling ethics and inherit a creative mechanism and draw to take an integration mechanism, feedback to regulate a mechanism is three kinds of important mechanisms that the ruling ethics construct or purchase. At to different of ruling the ethics carry on evaluation, in order to being subjected to diverse of evaluating the corpus and evaluate the influence of factor of the difference function of diverse sex and consciousness appearance of contents, the ethics evaluation will present a characteristic of complexity, but people be end and can pass ruling legitimacy appearance, ruling of humanities concern degree, ruling the development level of period productivity, to power of the share condition of code and benefits etc. index sign, search a Tightness ruling ethics more objective evaluation standard. The person of Communist Party of China combines together Marxism and the concrete fulfillment of China, is inheritting to the Marxist and political ethics thought innovation, carry on absorb and create the foundation of sex conversion to the traditional culture up, became to think people the service take"make people the center" as in the stalk for the aim, fair, harmony, the responsibility, advanced sex internality unify of the ruling ethics value of four integral whole frame. Concrete performance for ruling ethics value level up of match morals, govern ethics target level up of match majority opinion, govern the corpus level of the ethics behavior up of match regulation, govern ethics system level up of match law, govern ethics decision level up of match procedure, govern the relation level of the ethics society up of live together as a group body. In rulingly of the fulfillment, the Communist Party of China person values very political practice in ruling ethics of construction, will "make people the center" conduct and actions ruling principle, "with virtuous cure a country"conduct and actions cure a country square slightly, "ruling is people"conduct and actions ruling of target, in order to make stronger the ruling position of party further, continuously improve ruling ability and leadership level of party, provided strong ethics to prop up dint.
近年来,关于政党方面的理论研究不断深化,理论成果也不断丰富。由于执政党处在国家政治生活的前台,因此,围绕执政党而展开的研究工作和取得的研究成果也逐渐向纵深领域拓展。学者们从执政合法性、执政规律、执政能力、执政环境、执政组织结构、执政行为方式等多方面展开了对于执政党的研究,但是对于执政党的执政伦理研究却很不够。而执政伦理的重要性在于它构成了执政合法性、执政规律、执政能力、执政行为方式的价值底蕴。执政党的执政伦理追求不仅成为增强其凝聚力和合法性认同的重要方面,同时也在整个社会的价值选择和伦理建构过程中起着关键作用。执政党的执政伦理主导着社会的政治伦理理念、政治制度伦理、政治组织伦理以及政治行为主体伦理,并且可以为社会成员的行为正当性提供一种解释范式。
上世纪八十年代末到本世纪初,许多执政多年的党如苏联和东欧的共产党、印度的国大党以及墨西哥的革命制度党等,在执政几十年之后,纷纷失去了执政地位。这些执政党失去执政地位,原因固然是多方面的,但在思想认识上忽视执政伦理建设的重要性无疑成为一个主要方面。由于这些党长期执政,缺乏危机意识,容易产生道德上的麻痹症,由于忽视对执政理念、执政行为的伦理审视,最终使其执政权威因失去了道义基础而受到削弱,并失去执政地位。在这样的背景下,深入研究执政党的执政伦理内涵,执政伦理的生成机制、价值诉求、评价标准及其实现方式对于任何一个执政党来讲,不仅具有重大的理论意义也具有很强的实践意义。
本研究通过对所有执政党共同面对的一些伦理关系的研究,从应然的层面揭示了执政党执政伦理的价值追求,同时运用比较研究的方法,对不同制度、不同文化背景下的执政党的执政伦理进行了深入研究,并把马克思主义阶级分析的方法引入到执政伦理的研究上来,对不同性质的执政党的执政伦理作了分析,特别是对以马克思主义为指导的中国共产党的执政伦理做出了理论提炼,阐明了中国共产党执政伦理的特性,在逻辑分析的同时,又不忘历史的关照。全文由导论、正文和结论三部分构成。导论部分主要阐述了本课题的研究现状、研究意义、研究思路和方法;结论部分对本研究的创新性观点作了梳理;正文部分是论文的主体,共六章,第一章主要分析了政治发展史上人们对政治与伦理关系的不同理解,马克思主义的政治伦理观,政治伦理的内涵:第二章对政党政治出现后执政伦理的内生,执政伦理的内涵、特征以及执政伦理关系和执政伦理的价值诉求作了深入分析;第三章重点分析了执政伦理的影响因素以及执政伦理的生成机制;第四章通过对执政伦理的干预、执政伦理的外化、执政伦理的内化阐述了执政伦理的实现方式;第五章解析了执政伦理评价的复杂性、执政伦理评价的必要性以及执政伦理的评价标准;第六章将落脚点放在中国特色执政党的执政伦理上,通过对毛泽东、邓小平、江泽民、胡锦涛等领袖人物关于执政伦理思想的阐述,说明马克思主义者在执政伦理观上既一脉相承,又不断创新发展,分析了中国的执政党、中国的政党制度以及中国共产党执政伦理的特性,阐明中国共产党执政伦理建设的必要性、可能性及路径,认为中国共产党的执政伦理与执政能力能够形成良性互动。
本文认为:执政党的执政伦理是执政党基于合理正当的价值追求,在执政实践中形成并在执政过程中自觉践行,得到整个社会认同的伦理理念以及伦理规范的总和。包括执政伦理理念、执政伦理规范、渗透于制度中的制度伦理和执政党及其成员的伦理自觉。人类思想史上关于政治与伦理的论争十分激烈,既有政治与伦理的对立论,也有政治与伦理的统一论,还有价值中立论,更有现代学者对政治伦理的深刻理解,这些思想为执政伦理提供了可供参考的理论资源。马克思主义将政治伦理思想建立在一定的经济基础之上,能够为我们分析执政伦理问题提供理论指导。执政伦理是执政党执政的道德基础,执政伦理较之一般的伦理道德规范自觉性更高、具有更高的社会示范效应、更强的公共性和更为崇高的伦理品格。从政治文明的取向上来看,执政伦理应该蕴含一些基本的价值诉求,并在处理各种伦理关系中遵循一定的道德规范和要求。执政伦理不能只停留在伦理理念的层面上,只有通过伦理干预、外化在制度中并最终成为人们行动的自觉,才能真正得以有效实现。由于不同的执政党产生于不同的国家之中,因此,不同的政治文化生态、不同的经济社会状况、不同的政党属性会产生不同的执政伦理,政治精英能够为执政伦理提供重要的智力支援,继承创新机制、汲取整合机制、反馈调节机制是执政伦理建构的三种重要机制。在对不同的执政伦理进行评价时,由于受评价主体的多元性、评价内容的多样性和意识形态的差异性能因素的影响,伦理评价会呈现出复杂性的特征,但人们最终可以通过执政的合法性状态、执政的人文关怀程度、执政期间生产力的发展水平、对权力的规约以及利益共享状况等指标,找寻出对执政伦理较为客观的评价标准。中国共产党人将马克思主义与中国的具体实践相结合,在对马克思主义政治伦理思想继承创新、对传统文化进行吸收和创造性转化的基础上,形成了以为人民服务为宗旨,以“以人为本”为中轴,公正、和谐、责任、先进性内在统一的四位一体的执政伦理价值观构架。具体表现为执政伦理价值层面上的合道德性,执政伦理目标层面上的合公意性,执政伦理行为主体层面上的合规律性,执政伦理制度层面上的合法律性,执政伦理决策层面上的合程序性,执政伦理社会关系层面上的合群体性。在执政的实践中,中国共产党人十分重视政治实践中执政伦理的建设,将“以人为本”作为执政理念,“以德治国”作为治国方略,“执政为民”作为执政的目标,为进一步巩固党的执政地位,不断提高党的执政能力和领导水平,提供了强大的伦理支撑力。
Since modern age, along with the emergence of the party politics, the political party plays in the nation the political living and whole the social activities of the role highlights day by day. The ruling party is the political party which controls national political power and is responsible for form a government, prominent strengthen with the oneself construction of the improvement ruling party in the position in the national political system, continuously improve the leadership ability of ruling party and ruling the level become ruling party to keep a ruling position and promote the inside request of ruling ability.
In recent years, the theories concerning political party studies to continuously and deeply turn and the theories result is also continuously abundant. Because the ruling party is placed in the stage of national political life, therefore, around ruling party and launch of research work with obtain of the research result also expands toward the deep realm gradually. The scholars are from the ruling legitimacy, ruling regulation, ruling ability, ruling environment, ruling organization structure, ruling behavior method's etc. in many ways launched for the research of ruling party, but for the ruling ethics research of ruling party but very not enough. But the importance of the ruling ethics lie in it constituted a ruling legitimacy, ruling regulation, ruling ability, ruling behavior method of worth bottom Yun. The ruling ethics of ruling party pursue not only become strengthen it coagulate dint and legitimacy approve of important aspect, also have in the whole social worth choice and the ethics the construction or purchase the process in the meantime key function. The ruling ethics of ruling party predominates social political ethics principle, political system ethics, political organization ethics and political behavior corpus ethics, and can provide a kind of hermeneutic Fan4 Shi4 for the social member's behavior proper.
At the beginning of from the end of 80's in last century to this century, many parties which govern for several years are like the Soviets and the kvass communist, India of the countries big party and Mexico of revolutions system party etc., lost a ruling position in succession after govern several decades. These ruling parties lose a ruling position, the reason be surely various, but in the aspects of thoughting understanding ascend neglect the importance that the ruling ethics constuct doubtless become a ly mainly. Because these parties govern over a long period of time, lack feeling of impending crisis, easily produce to morally paralyze a disease, in order to neglect to ruling principle, ruling behavior of the ethics examine, end make it the ruling authority be weaken because of losing righteous foundation, and lose a ruling position.At thus of under the background go deep into a ruling ethics content of study the ruling party, ruling ethics of born mechanism, value claim, evaluation standard and in fact way speaks for the whichever ruling party now, not only have important theories meaning but also have very strong fulfillment meaning.
This research passes the research which relates to to some ethicses that all ruling parties together face, from in response to however of the level announced to public ruling party ruling ethics of the value pursue and make use of comparison research in the meantime of method, to under the different system, different cultural background of the ruling ethics of ruling party carried on a thorough research, and lead the Marxist rank analytical method into to arrive ruling ethics of the research come up, to not the ruling ethics of the ruling party of congeniality made analysis, especially do theories to refine towards taking Marxism as the ruling ethics of directive Communist Party of China, clarified Communist Party of China ruling ethics of characteristic, at the logic analyze of in the meantime, and then don't forget a historical pass to shine on.The full text is constitute by introduction, text and conclusion three parts. The introduction was mainly part of to elaborate research present condition, research meaning, research way of thinking and method of this topic;The conclusion part made to comb to the creative sex standpoint of this research; Text part is the corpus of thesis, total 6, chapter 1 mainly analyzed political a development people in history to the different comprehension that politics and the ethics relate to, Marxist of political ethics, political ethics of content;Chapter 2 to the party politics appear behind ruling ethics of inside living, ruling ethics of content, characteristic and ruling ethics relation with ruling ethics of worth the claim made thorough analysis;Chapter 3 point analyzed to govern ethical impact factor and ruling ethics of born mechanism;Chapter 4 passes to turn towards govern ethical intervention, govern ethics of outside, ruling ethics of inside turned to elaborate ruling ethics of carry out a way;Chapter 5 complexity which analyzed ruling ethics to evaluate, ruling ethics evaluation of necessity and ruling ethics of evaluation standard;Pass to the leader persons, such as hair Ze east, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zoning and Hu Jintao...etc. on chapter 6 ruling ethics that will stop for a rest a point to put in the Chinese special features ruling party concerning ruling the ethics thought of elaborate, explain Marxist at ruling ethics top since a vein mutually accepts, again continuously creative development, analyze China of ruling party, China of party system and Communist Party of China be ruling ethical characteristic, clarify Communist Party of China ruling the ethics constuct of necessity, possibility and path, think the ruling ethics of Communist Party of China with ruling the ability can become positive interaction.
This text think:The ruling ethics of ruling party is a ruling party according to the reasonable proper of the value pursue, in rulingly the fulfillment formation combine in rulingly the process aware of self the Jian go and get the ethics principle of the whole social approbation and the total of the ethics norm. Include a ruling ethics principle and govern ethics norm, permeate self-conscious at the ethics of the system ethics in the system and the ruling party and its member. The contestation concerning politics and the ethics of mankind the top of the history of thought is very vigorous, current politics and ethics of stand opposite a theory, also have politics and ethics of unify a theory, also have the value neutral the theory, have modern scholar more to political ethics of deep comprehension, these thought for ruling the ethics provided to can be provided as the theories resources of reference. The Marxism builds up political ethics thought at the certain economic foundation on, can analyze a ruling ethics problem to provide theories instruction for us. Govern the ethics is the morals foundation that the ruling party govern and govern ethics compare it is general the norm aware of self of the ethics morals be higher and have higher social demonstration effect, stronger public and more lofty ethics character. The mindset which joins the government to cure civilization comes up to see, govern the ethics should contain some basic value claims, and follow certain morals norm and request in the processing various ethics relation. Ruling ethics can't the level which stay around an ethics principle up, only pass an ethics intervention and outside turn in the system combine end become people to act of aware of self, then can be real can effectively carry out. Because the different ruling party produces in different nation, therefore, the different political cultural ecosystem, different economic social condition, different political affiliation will produce different ruling ethics, the political elite can provide an important intelligence support for the ruling ethics and inherit a creative mechanism and draw to take an integration mechanism, feedback to regulate a mechanism is three kinds of important mechanisms that the ruling ethics construct or purchase. At to different of ruling the ethics carry on evaluation, in order to being subjected to diverse of evaluating the corpus and evaluate the influence of factor of the difference function of diverse sex and consciousness appearance of contents, the ethics evaluation will present a characteristic of complexity, but people be end and can pass ruling legitimacy appearance, ruling of humanities concern degree, ruling the development level of period productivity, to power of the share condition of code and benefits etc. index sign, search a Tightness ruling ethics more objective evaluation standard. The person of Communist Party of China combines together Marxism and the concrete fulfillment of China, is inheritting to the Marxist and political ethics thought innovation, carry on absorb and create the foundation of sex conversion to the traditional culture up, became to think people the service take"make people the center" as in the stalk for the aim, fair, harmony, the responsibility, advanced sex internality unify of the ruling ethics value of four integral whole frame. Concrete performance for ruling ethics value level up of match morals, govern ethics target level up of match majority opinion, govern the corpus level of the ethics behavior up of match regulation, govern ethics system level up of match law, govern ethics decision level up of match procedure, govern the relation level of the ethics society up of live together as a group body. In rulingly of the fulfillment, the Communist Party of China person values very political practice in ruling ethics of construction, will "make people the center" conduct and actions ruling principle, "with virtuous cure a country"conduct and actions cure a country square slightly, "ruling is people"conduct and actions ruling of target, in order to make stronger the ruling position of party further, continuously improve ruling ability and leadership level of party, provided strong ethics to prop up dint.
引文
[1]沈晓阳,中国共产党执政伦理新探[J].求实,2007(4):19.
[2]王爱党,谢峻峰,论执政的制度伦理[J].求索,2007(8):30.
[3]罗建文,吴晓蓉,论执政党执政伦理的基本构成[J].广东行政学院学报,2007(2):12.
[4]天羽,论党的创新理论与执政伦理品格[J].湖北社会科学,2008(4):45.
[5]天羽,论党的创新理论与执政伦理品格[J].湖北社会科学,2008(4).
[6]肖祥,公正--执政伦理的核心理念[J].社会科学家,2005(10)(增刊).
[7]石作斌,中国共产党的执政价值观[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2005(3).
[8]王翔,曾长秋,合公益性:中国共产党执政的价值尺度[J].理论探讨,2008(3).
[9]李建华,执政与善政--执政党伦理问题研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2006:69-86.
[1]常健,论权利的合理性基础[J]南开学报,1998(5):18.
[2]赵玲,社会主义政治道德的基本内涵及其实现途径[J].政治学研究,2004(2).
[3]汪前员,党风政风与市场经济运行秩序[J].湖北大学学报,1998(5).
[1]李建华,《执政与善政--执政党伦理问题研究》,北京:人民出版社,2006:18.
[2](德)哈贝马斯,交往与社会进化[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1989:184.
[1]A·麦金太尔,德性之后[M]龚群、戴扬毅等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1995:65.
[2]A·麦金太尔,谁之正义?何种合理性?[M]万俊人等译,北京:当代中国出版社,1996:78.
[1](美)罗伯特·诺齐克,无政府、国家与乌托邦[M].何怀宏译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991:1.
[1]《韩非子·解老》
[2]《韩非子·备内》
[1]《韩非子·六反》
[2]《韩非子·难一》
[3]《韩非子·八经》
[4]《韩非子·用人》
[5]《商君书·靳令》
[6]《韩非子·心度》
[1]《韩非子·心度》
[2]《韩非子·奸劫弑臣》
[3]《韩非子·心度》
[4]《韩非子·八经》
[5]《韩非子·扬权》
[6]《韩非子·外储说右下》
[7]《韩非子·定法》
[8]《韩非子·难三》
[9]《韩非子·定法》
[10]《韩非子·外储说右上》
[1]《韩非子·五蠹》
[2]《韩非子·八说》
[3]《韩非子·五蠹》
[4]《韩非子·八说》
[1](意)马基雅维里,君主论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985:83.
[1]《论语·为政》
[2]《论语·子路》
[3]《论语·为政》
[4]《孟子·公孙丑上》
[5]《孟子·离娄上》
[6]《孟子·离娄上》
[7]《孟子·尽心下》
[1][古希腊]伯拉图,理想国[M].郭斌和、张竹明译,北京:商务印书馆,1996:276.
[2][古希腊]亚里士多德,政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆1965:8.
[1]康德,道德形而上学原理[M].苗力田译,上海人民出版社,2002:9.
[1](美)约翰罗·尔斯,正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:62.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社1957:103.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社1995:38.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1956:82.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:283.
[3]马克思恩格斯全集第23卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:590-591.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1956:439.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集第11卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1997:399.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:335.
[4]马克思恩格斯选集第3卷,[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:223.
[5]马克思恩格斯选集第3卷,[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:223.
[6]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:261.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:285.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:294.
[1]列宁全集第20卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1989:327.
[1]列宁全集,第5卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1986:5.
[1]列宁全集第28卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1990:168.
[1]列宁选集第4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:746.
[1]王沪宁主编,政治的逻辑--马克思主义政治学原理[M],上海:上海人民出版社,2004:5.
[2](英)亚当·弗格森,道德哲学原理[M].孙飞宇、田耕译,上海:上海人民出版社,2005:4.
[1](美)约翰罗·尔斯,正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:7.
[2]常健,论权利的合理性基础[J].南开学报,1998(5):18.
[3]赵玲,社会主义政治道德的基本内涵及其实现途径[J].政治学研究,2004(2).
[4]汪前员,党风政风与市场经济运行秩序[J].湖北大学学报,1998(5).
[1]虞崇胜,政治文明论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2003:132.
[1]沈晓阳,中国共产党执政伦理新探[J].求实,2007(4):19.
[2]王爱党,谢峻峰,论执政的制度伦理[J].求索,2007(8):130.
[3]罗建文,吴晓蓉,论执政党执政伦理的基本构成[J].广东行政学院学报,2007(2):12.
[4]天羽,论党的创新理论与执政伦理品格[J].湖北社会科学,2008(4):45.
[5]石作斌,中国共产党的执政价值观[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2005(3):5.
[1]《论语·宪问》
[2]《论语·子路》
[3]鲍传文,王润平,论官德的道德示范效[N],工人日报,2001年7月7日.
[4](美)约翰·罗尔斯,政治自由主义[M].万俊人译,北京:译林出版社,2000:145.
[1]王海明,伦理学导论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2009:248.
[1]休谟,人性论[M]北京:商务印书馆,1980:535.
[2]莱斯利·利普森,政治学的重大问题:政治学导论[M].刘晓等译,北京:华夏出版社,2001:17.
[1]杨楹,宽容:现代政治的伦理内蕴[J],哲学动态,2005(11):6.
[1]俞可平,治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:9-10.
[1](美)科恩,论民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988年:10.
[2](美)罗伯特·达尔,现代政治分析[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987:21.
[3]熊彼特,资本主义、社会主义与民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999:395-396.
[1]罗伯特·达尔,论民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999:165.
[1]齐格蒙特·鲍曼,个体化社会[M].范祥涛译,北京:三联书店,2002:197.
[1](美)加布里埃尔·A·阿尔蒙德,西德尼·维巴,公民文化--五个国家的政治态度和民主制[M].徐湘林等译,北京:东方出版社,2001:12-13.
[2](美)加布里埃尔·A·阿尔蒙德,西德尼·维巴,公民文化--五个国家的政治态度和民主制[M].徐湘林等译,东方出版社,2001:14.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社1995:32-33.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:695-696.
[1]黄宗良,现代政党政治的产生和变化[J].党建研究,2004(8).
[1](瑞士)皮亚杰,发生认识论原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981:17.
[1]王邦佐,执政党与社会整合[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007:163.
[1]约翰·罗尔斯,政治自由主义[M].万俊人译,北京:译林出版社,2000:24.
[1]戴维·伊斯顿,政治生活的系统分析[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999:374.
[1]威尔·金里卡,当代政治哲学(上、下)[M].刘莘译,上海:上海三联书店,2004:471.
[1]袁振国,朱永新,试谈个体政治社会化的意义及过程[J],社会学研究,1998(1):120.
[1]塔尔科·特帕森斯,现代社会的结构与过程[M].北京:光明日报出版社,1998:4.
[1]罗尔斯,正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:54.
[2]何颖,制度伦理及其价值诉求[J].社会科学战线,2007(4):38.
[3]戴木才,制度伦理的现代建构[J].伦理学研究,2003(6):49.
[4]戴木才,李占会,中国共产党执政制度伦理初探[J].道德与文明,2005(3):9.
[1]朱登梅,制度伦理何以可能-制度的伦理诉求[J].大庆师范学院学报,2008(1):6.
[1]朱前星,执政道德建设与执政党社会整合能力的提升[J].求索,2007(8):129.
[1](法)盂德斯鸠,论法的精神上册[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982:154.
[1]赵晓呼,政党论[M].天津人民出版社,2002:342.
[1][美]]塞缪尔·亨廷顿,变化世界中的政治秩序[M].北京:三联书店,1989:19页.
[1]张明军,关于中国共产党执政的若干思考[J].政治学研究,2005(3):18.
[1]齐格蒙特·鲍曼,个体化社会[M].范祥涛译,北京:三联书店,2002:5.
[1]毛泽东选集第三卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:1094-1096.
[1]毛泽东选集第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:277.
[2]毛泽东选集第二卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:526-527.
[1]毛泽东选集第二卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:821.
[1]毛泽东选集第三卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:1096.
[2]毛泽东选集第三卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:1004.
[3]邓小平文选第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:116.
[4]邓小平文选第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:155.
[1]邓小平文选第3卷[M]北京:人民出版社,1994:111.
[2]邓小平文选第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:333.
[1]邓小平文选第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:372.
[2]林国治,李建华,邓小平执政伦理思想探究[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2006(2):153.
[1]赵馥洁,建设先进文化培育民族精神[N]光明日报,2003年9月9日.
[1]中国共产党历史大辞典(新民主主义革命时期)[M1.北京:中共中央党校出版社,1991:105-106.
[2]中国共产党历史大辞典(新民主主义革命时期)[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,1991:109.
[3]江泽民,在庆祝中国共产党成立八十周年大会上的讲话[M].北京:人民出版社,2001:26.
[1]中共中央关于加强和改进党的作风建设的决议[M].北京:人民出版社,2001:1.2.
[1]沈晓阳,中国共产党执政伦理新探[J].求实,2007(4):21.
[1]《邓小平文选》第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社出版,1994:177页.
[1]王仕国,论执政伦理建设的民主本质[J].求实,2007(6):15.
[2]汉娜·阿伦特,人的条件[M].竺乾威译,上海:上海人民出版社,1999:1.
[1]刘小丰,政治伦理化与党的执政伦理建设[J].岭南学刊,2008(11):29.
[1]王振亚,人的政治主体性建构的理性自觉[J].政治学研究,2005(3):44.
[1]夏小丽,政府善治与公民参与-甚于治理的视角[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2008(3):82.
[2]朱登梅,制度伦理何以可能--制度的伦理诉求[J].大庆师范学院学报,2008(1):7.
[1]邓小平文选第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:155.
[2]邓小平文选第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:304.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集.第1-4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[2]列宁全集.第55卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1990.
[3]毛泽东选集.第1-4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.
[4]邓小平文选.第1-2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994.
[5]邓小平文选.第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1993.
[6]祝灵君.一致与冲突--政党与群众关系的再思考[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[7]王沪宁主编.政治的逻辑--马克思主义政治学原理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
[8]王邦佐.执政党与社会整合[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
[9]王振亚.政治文明与当代中国政治发展[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[10]李建华.执政与善政--执政党伦理问题研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[11]袁贵仁.价值学引论[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1991.
[12]万俊人.现代西方伦理学史(上,下)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1990.
[13]王浦劬主编.政治学基础[M].北京,北京大学出版社,1995.
[14]林尚立.政治建设与国家成长[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2008.
[15]徐大同,马德普主编.现代西方政治思想[M].北京:人民出版社,2003.
[16]俞可平.权利政治与公益政治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[17]俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[18]王辑思.文明与国际政治:中国学者评亨廷顿的文明冲突论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
[19]刘杰.执政党与政治文明[M].北京:时事出版社,2006.
[20]罗荣渠.现代化新论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1993.
[21]袁方.中国社会结构转型[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.
122]何怀宏.契约伦理与社会正义[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993.
[23]厉以宁.经济学的伦理问题[M].北京:三联书店,1995.
[24]李德顺.价值论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1987.
[25]兰久富.社会转型时期的价值观念[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999.
[26]刘小枫.现代性伦理的叙事纬语[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1999.
[27]高兆明.社会失范论[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2000.
[28]苏力.制度是如何形成的[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2000.
[29]卢现祥.西方新制度经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1996.
[30]常健.当代中国权利规范的转型[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2000.
[31]施惠玲.制度伦理研究论纲[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2003.
[32]王长江.中国政治文明视野下的党的执政能力建设[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[33]赵理富.政党的魂灵--中国共产党政党文化研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2008.
[34]彭澎,柳立子.中外执政能力比较研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006.
[35]施雪华.政治现代化比较研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[36]单继刚,孙晶,容敏德.政治与伦理--应用政治哲学的视角[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[37]赵玲.社会主义社会政治道德的基本内涵及其实现途径[J].政治学研究,2004(2).
[38]俞可平.社会公平和善治是建设和谐社会的两大墓石[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2005(1).
[39]肖光荣.中国共产党执政道德建设:研究现状及其评价[J].当代世界与社会主义,2005(5).
[40]郭定平.论中国民主政治的内源发展道路[J].政治与法律,1996(2).
[41]李忠杰.论社会发展的动力与平衡机制[J].中国社会科学,2007(1).
[42]林尚立.权力与体制:中国政治发展的现实逻辑[J].学术月刊,2001(5).
[43]王韶兴.中国共产党监督的主要经验和基本规律[J].马克思主义研究,2000(5).
[44]王俊拴.当代中国政治体系权威性建构的基本特色[J].政治学研究,2002(2).
[45]李建华.从政治合法性看执政党伦理[J].新华文摘,2005(10).
[46]黄立营.论执政理念的战略地位与时代内涵[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2004(11).
[47]尹杰钦.构建社会主义和谐社会:呼唤领导干部政治道德素质的提升[J].马克思主义与现实,2005(4).
[48]李慎明.准确理解和努力实践“三个代表”重要思想[J].马克思主义研究,2004(2).
[49]郭定平.论新加坡政党与政治发展[J].政治学研究,1996(1).
[50]孙君恒,许玲.责任的伦理意组[J].哲学动态,2004(9).
[51]任剑涛.道德与中国传统政治的合法性[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005(1).
[52]朱前星.执政道德建设与执政党社会整合能力的提升[J].求索,2007(8).
[53]李良明,熊经谷.论毛泽东廉政思想的来源与内涵[J].中国人民大学复印资料,毛泽东思想,2004(3).
[54]天羽.论党的创新理论与执政伦理品格[J].湖北社会科学,2008(4).
[55]王振亚.人的政治主体性建构的理性自觉[J].政治学研究,2005(3).
[56]王爱党,谢峻峰.论执政的制度伦理[J].求索,2007(8).
[57]沈晓阳.中国共产党执政伦理新探[J].求实,2007(4).
[58]王翔,曾长秋.合公益性:中国共产党执政的价值尺度[J].理论探讨,2008(3).
[59][美]约翰·布赖恩·斯塔尔.毛泽东的政治哲学[M].曹志为,王晴波译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[60][美]费正清.美国与中国[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2001.
[61][美]巴林顿·摩尔.民土和专制的社会起源[M].北京:华夏出版社,1987.
[62][美]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.
[63][美]约翰·罗尔斯.政治自由主义[M].万俊人译.北京:译林出版社,2000.
[64][英]亚当·弗格森.道德哲学原理[M].孙飞宇,田耕译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[65][美]戴维·伊斯顿.政治生活的系统分析[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.
[66][古希腊]亚里士多德.政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1965.
[67][加]威尔·金里卡.当代政治哲学(上,下)[M].刘莘译.上海:上海三联书店,2004.
[68][英]莱士列·史蒂文森.人性七论[M].袁荣生等译.北京:商务印书馆,1994.
[69][美]J.R·康芒斯.制度经济学(上,下)[M].于树生译.北京:商务印书馆,1962.
[70][美]查尔斯·林德布洛姆.政治与市场[M].王逸舟译.上海:上海人民出版社,1994.
[71][德]马克思·韦伯.经济与社会(上,下)[M].林荣远译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[72][德]马克思·韦伯.新教伦理与资本主义精神[M].于晓等译.北京:三联书店,1987.
[73][美]米尔顿·弗里德里曼.资本主义与自由[M].张瑞玉译.北京:商务印书馆,1986.
[74][英]弗里德里希·哈耶克.自由秩序原理(上,下)[M].邓正来译.北京:三联书店,1997.
[75][美]A.麦金太尔.德性之后[M].龚群,戴扬毅译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1995.
[76][美]A.麦金太尔.三种对立的道德探究观[M].万俊人等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
[77][德]Mo石里克.伦理学问题[M].张国珍等译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[78][德]尤尔根·哈贝马斯.合法性危机[M].刘北成,曹卫东等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.
[79][美]西摩·李普塞特.一致与冲突[M].张华青等译.上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
[80][美]塞缪尔·亨廷顿.文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建[M].周琪,刘绯等译.北京:新华出版社,1999.
[81][美]罗伯特·诺齐克.无政府,国家与乌托邦[M].何怀宏译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.
[82][美]罗伯特·达尔.现代政治分析[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
[83][瑞士]皮亚杰.发生认识论原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
[84][德]马克斯·韦伯.学术生涯与政治生涯[M].北京:国际文化出版公司,1998.
[85][英]威廉·葛德文.政治正义论[M].何慕李译.北京:商务印书馆,1980.
[86][法]卢梭.论人类不平等的起源与基础[M].北京:商务印书馆,1962.
[87][美]列奥·施特劳斯,约瑟夫·克罗波西.政治哲学史[M].李天然等译.石家庄:河北人民出版社,1993.
[88][美]费正清,[英]麦克法夸尔.剑桥中华人民共和国史(1949-1965)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1990.
[89][美]科恩.论民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988.
[90][英]齐格蒙特·鲍曼.个体化社会[M].范祥涛译.北京:三联书店,2002.
[91][美]道格拉斯·诺斯.经济史上的结构和变革[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992.
[92][美]托马斯·截伊·齐格勒.民主的嘲讽[M].北京:世界知识出版社,1991.
[93]Guo Shangxiang.A History of Culture.HeNan University Press,1994.
[94]Becker.Moral Basis of Property Rights.NOMOS ⅩⅩⅡ.
[95]Martin Parker.Post-Modem Organization or Post-Modem Organization Theory [J].Organization Studies,1992(13).
[96]Monty Johnstone,"Party",A dictionary of Marxist Thought.
[2]王爱党,谢峻峰,论执政的制度伦理[J].求索,2007(8):30.
[3]罗建文,吴晓蓉,论执政党执政伦理的基本构成[J].广东行政学院学报,2007(2):12.
[4]天羽,论党的创新理论与执政伦理品格[J].湖北社会科学,2008(4):45.
[5]天羽,论党的创新理论与执政伦理品格[J].湖北社会科学,2008(4).
[6]肖祥,公正--执政伦理的核心理念[J].社会科学家,2005(10)(增刊).
[7]石作斌,中国共产党的执政价值观[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2005(3).
[8]王翔,曾长秋,合公益性:中国共产党执政的价值尺度[J].理论探讨,2008(3).
[9]李建华,执政与善政--执政党伦理问题研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2006:69-86.
[1]常健,论权利的合理性基础[J]南开学报,1998(5):18.
[2]赵玲,社会主义政治道德的基本内涵及其实现途径[J].政治学研究,2004(2).
[3]汪前员,党风政风与市场经济运行秩序[J].湖北大学学报,1998(5).
[1]李建华,《执政与善政--执政党伦理问题研究》,北京:人民出版社,2006:18.
[2](德)哈贝马斯,交往与社会进化[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1989:184.
[1]A·麦金太尔,德性之后[M]龚群、戴扬毅等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1995:65.
[2]A·麦金太尔,谁之正义?何种合理性?[M]万俊人等译,北京:当代中国出版社,1996:78.
[1](美)罗伯特·诺齐克,无政府、国家与乌托邦[M].何怀宏译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991:1.
[1]《韩非子·解老》
[2]《韩非子·备内》
[1]《韩非子·六反》
[2]《韩非子·难一》
[3]《韩非子·八经》
[4]《韩非子·用人》
[5]《商君书·靳令》
[6]《韩非子·心度》
[1]《韩非子·心度》
[2]《韩非子·奸劫弑臣》
[3]《韩非子·心度》
[4]《韩非子·八经》
[5]《韩非子·扬权》
[6]《韩非子·外储说右下》
[7]《韩非子·定法》
[8]《韩非子·难三》
[9]《韩非子·定法》
[10]《韩非子·外储说右上》
[1]《韩非子·五蠹》
[2]《韩非子·八说》
[3]《韩非子·五蠹》
[4]《韩非子·八说》
[1](意)马基雅维里,君主论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985:83.
[1]《论语·为政》
[2]《论语·子路》
[3]《论语·为政》
[4]《孟子·公孙丑上》
[5]《孟子·离娄上》
[6]《孟子·离娄上》
[7]《孟子·尽心下》
[1][古希腊]伯拉图,理想国[M].郭斌和、张竹明译,北京:商务印书馆,1996:276.
[2][古希腊]亚里士多德,政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆1965:8.
[1]康德,道德形而上学原理[M].苗力田译,上海人民出版社,2002:9.
[1](美)约翰罗·尔斯,正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:62.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社1957:103.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社1995:38.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1956:82.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:283.
[3]马克思恩格斯全集第23卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:590-591.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1956:439.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集第11卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1997:399.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:335.
[4]马克思恩格斯选集第3卷,[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:223.
[5]马克思恩格斯选集第3卷,[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:223.
[6]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:261.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:285.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:294.
[1]列宁全集第20卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1989:327.
[1]列宁全集,第5卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1986:5.
[1]列宁全集第28卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1990:168.
[1]列宁选集第4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:746.
[1]王沪宁主编,政治的逻辑--马克思主义政治学原理[M],上海:上海人民出版社,2004:5.
[2](英)亚当·弗格森,道德哲学原理[M].孙飞宇、田耕译,上海:上海人民出版社,2005:4.
[1](美)约翰罗·尔斯,正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:7.
[2]常健,论权利的合理性基础[J].南开学报,1998(5):18.
[3]赵玲,社会主义政治道德的基本内涵及其实现途径[J].政治学研究,2004(2).
[4]汪前员,党风政风与市场经济运行秩序[J].湖北大学学报,1998(5).
[1]虞崇胜,政治文明论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2003:132.
[1]沈晓阳,中国共产党执政伦理新探[J].求实,2007(4):19.
[2]王爱党,谢峻峰,论执政的制度伦理[J].求索,2007(8):130.
[3]罗建文,吴晓蓉,论执政党执政伦理的基本构成[J].广东行政学院学报,2007(2):12.
[4]天羽,论党的创新理论与执政伦理品格[J].湖北社会科学,2008(4):45.
[5]石作斌,中国共产党的执政价值观[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2005(3):5.
[1]《论语·宪问》
[2]《论语·子路》
[3]鲍传文,王润平,论官德的道德示范效[N],工人日报,2001年7月7日.
[4](美)约翰·罗尔斯,政治自由主义[M].万俊人译,北京:译林出版社,2000:145.
[1]王海明,伦理学导论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2009:248.
[1]休谟,人性论[M]北京:商务印书馆,1980:535.
[2]莱斯利·利普森,政治学的重大问题:政治学导论[M].刘晓等译,北京:华夏出版社,2001:17.
[1]杨楹,宽容:现代政治的伦理内蕴[J],哲学动态,2005(11):6.
[1]俞可平,治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:9-10.
[1](美)科恩,论民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988年:10.
[2](美)罗伯特·达尔,现代政治分析[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987:21.
[3]熊彼特,资本主义、社会主义与民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999:395-396.
[1]罗伯特·达尔,论民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999:165.
[1]齐格蒙特·鲍曼,个体化社会[M].范祥涛译,北京:三联书店,2002:197.
[1](美)加布里埃尔·A·阿尔蒙德,西德尼·维巴,公民文化--五个国家的政治态度和民主制[M].徐湘林等译,北京:东方出版社,2001:12-13.
[2](美)加布里埃尔·A·阿尔蒙德,西德尼·维巴,公民文化--五个国家的政治态度和民主制[M].徐湘林等译,东方出版社,2001:14.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社1995:32-33.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集第4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:695-696.
[1]黄宗良,现代政党政治的产生和变化[J].党建研究,2004(8).
[1](瑞士)皮亚杰,发生认识论原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981:17.
[1]王邦佐,执政党与社会整合[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007:163.
[1]约翰·罗尔斯,政治自由主义[M].万俊人译,北京:译林出版社,2000:24.
[1]戴维·伊斯顿,政治生活的系统分析[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999:374.
[1]威尔·金里卡,当代政治哲学(上、下)[M].刘莘译,上海:上海三联书店,2004:471.
[1]袁振国,朱永新,试谈个体政治社会化的意义及过程[J],社会学研究,1998(1):120.
[1]塔尔科·特帕森斯,现代社会的结构与过程[M].北京:光明日报出版社,1998:4.
[1]罗尔斯,正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:54.
[2]何颖,制度伦理及其价值诉求[J].社会科学战线,2007(4):38.
[3]戴木才,制度伦理的现代建构[J].伦理学研究,2003(6):49.
[4]戴木才,李占会,中国共产党执政制度伦理初探[J].道德与文明,2005(3):9.
[1]朱登梅,制度伦理何以可能-制度的伦理诉求[J].大庆师范学院学报,2008(1):6.
[1]朱前星,执政道德建设与执政党社会整合能力的提升[J].求索,2007(8):129.
[1](法)盂德斯鸠,论法的精神上册[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982:154.
[1]赵晓呼,政党论[M].天津人民出版社,2002:342.
[1][美]]塞缪尔·亨廷顿,变化世界中的政治秩序[M].北京:三联书店,1989:19页.
[1]张明军,关于中国共产党执政的若干思考[J].政治学研究,2005(3):18.
[1]齐格蒙特·鲍曼,个体化社会[M].范祥涛译,北京:三联书店,2002:5.
[1]毛泽东选集第三卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:1094-1096.
[1]毛泽东选集第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:277.
[2]毛泽东选集第二卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:526-527.
[1]毛泽东选集第二卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:821.
[1]毛泽东选集第三卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:1096.
[2]毛泽东选集第三卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991:1004.
[3]邓小平文选第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:116.
[4]邓小平文选第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:155.
[1]邓小平文选第3卷[M]北京:人民出版社,1994:111.
[2]邓小平文选第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:333.
[1]邓小平文选第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:372.
[2]林国治,李建华,邓小平执政伦理思想探究[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2006(2):153.
[1]赵馥洁,建设先进文化培育民族精神[N]光明日报,2003年9月9日.
[1]中国共产党历史大辞典(新民主主义革命时期)[M1.北京:中共中央党校出版社,1991:105-106.
[2]中国共产党历史大辞典(新民主主义革命时期)[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,1991:109.
[3]江泽民,在庆祝中国共产党成立八十周年大会上的讲话[M].北京:人民出版社,2001:26.
[1]中共中央关于加强和改进党的作风建设的决议[M].北京:人民出版社,2001:1.2.
[1]沈晓阳,中国共产党执政伦理新探[J].求实,2007(4):21.
[1]《邓小平文选》第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社出版,1994:177页.
[1]王仕国,论执政伦理建设的民主本质[J].求实,2007(6):15.
[2]汉娜·阿伦特,人的条件[M].竺乾威译,上海:上海人民出版社,1999:1.
[1]刘小丰,政治伦理化与党的执政伦理建设[J].岭南学刊,2008(11):29.
[1]王振亚,人的政治主体性建构的理性自觉[J].政治学研究,2005(3):44.
[1]夏小丽,政府善治与公民参与-甚于治理的视角[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2008(3):82.
[2]朱登梅,制度伦理何以可能--制度的伦理诉求[J].大庆师范学院学报,2008(1):7.
[1]邓小平文选第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:155.
[2]邓小平文选第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994:304.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集.第1-4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[2]列宁全集.第55卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1990.
[3]毛泽东选集.第1-4卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.
[4]邓小平文选.第1-2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1994.
[5]邓小平文选.第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1993.
[6]祝灵君.一致与冲突--政党与群众关系的再思考[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[7]王沪宁主编.政治的逻辑--马克思主义政治学原理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
[8]王邦佐.执政党与社会整合[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
[9]王振亚.政治文明与当代中国政治发展[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[10]李建华.执政与善政--执政党伦理问题研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[11]袁贵仁.价值学引论[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1991.
[12]万俊人.现代西方伦理学史(上,下)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1990.
[13]王浦劬主编.政治学基础[M].北京,北京大学出版社,1995.
[14]林尚立.政治建设与国家成长[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2008.
[15]徐大同,马德普主编.现代西方政治思想[M].北京:人民出版社,2003.
[16]俞可平.权利政治与公益政治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[17]俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[18]王辑思.文明与国际政治:中国学者评亨廷顿的文明冲突论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
[19]刘杰.执政党与政治文明[M].北京:时事出版社,2006.
[20]罗荣渠.现代化新论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1993.
[21]袁方.中国社会结构转型[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.
122]何怀宏.契约伦理与社会正义[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993.
[23]厉以宁.经济学的伦理问题[M].北京:三联书店,1995.
[24]李德顺.价值论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1987.
[25]兰久富.社会转型时期的价值观念[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999.
[26]刘小枫.现代性伦理的叙事纬语[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1999.
[27]高兆明.社会失范论[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2000.
[28]苏力.制度是如何形成的[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2000.
[29]卢现祥.西方新制度经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1996.
[30]常健.当代中国权利规范的转型[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2000.
[31]施惠玲.制度伦理研究论纲[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2003.
[32]王长江.中国政治文明视野下的党的执政能力建设[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[33]赵理富.政党的魂灵--中国共产党政党文化研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2008.
[34]彭澎,柳立子.中外执政能力比较研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006.
[35]施雪华.政治现代化比较研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[36]单继刚,孙晶,容敏德.政治与伦理--应用政治哲学的视角[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
[37]赵玲.社会主义社会政治道德的基本内涵及其实现途径[J].政治学研究,2004(2).
[38]俞可平.社会公平和善治是建设和谐社会的两大墓石[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2005(1).
[39]肖光荣.中国共产党执政道德建设:研究现状及其评价[J].当代世界与社会主义,2005(5).
[40]郭定平.论中国民主政治的内源发展道路[J].政治与法律,1996(2).
[41]李忠杰.论社会发展的动力与平衡机制[J].中国社会科学,2007(1).
[42]林尚立.权力与体制:中国政治发展的现实逻辑[J].学术月刊,2001(5).
[43]王韶兴.中国共产党监督的主要经验和基本规律[J].马克思主义研究,2000(5).
[44]王俊拴.当代中国政治体系权威性建构的基本特色[J].政治学研究,2002(2).
[45]李建华.从政治合法性看执政党伦理[J].新华文摘,2005(10).
[46]黄立营.论执政理念的战略地位与时代内涵[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2004(11).
[47]尹杰钦.构建社会主义和谐社会:呼唤领导干部政治道德素质的提升[J].马克思主义与现实,2005(4).
[48]李慎明.准确理解和努力实践“三个代表”重要思想[J].马克思主义研究,2004(2).
[49]郭定平.论新加坡政党与政治发展[J].政治学研究,1996(1).
[50]孙君恒,许玲.责任的伦理意组[J].哲学动态,2004(9).
[51]任剑涛.道德与中国传统政治的合法性[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005(1).
[52]朱前星.执政道德建设与执政党社会整合能力的提升[J].求索,2007(8).
[53]李良明,熊经谷.论毛泽东廉政思想的来源与内涵[J].中国人民大学复印资料,毛泽东思想,2004(3).
[54]天羽.论党的创新理论与执政伦理品格[J].湖北社会科学,2008(4).
[55]王振亚.人的政治主体性建构的理性自觉[J].政治学研究,2005(3).
[56]王爱党,谢峻峰.论执政的制度伦理[J].求索,2007(8).
[57]沈晓阳.中国共产党执政伦理新探[J].求实,2007(4).
[58]王翔,曾长秋.合公益性:中国共产党执政的价值尺度[J].理论探讨,2008(3).
[59][美]约翰·布赖恩·斯塔尔.毛泽东的政治哲学[M].曹志为,王晴波译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[60][美]费正清.美国与中国[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2001.
[61][美]巴林顿·摩尔.民土和专制的社会起源[M].北京:华夏出版社,1987.
[62][美]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.
[63][美]约翰·罗尔斯.政治自由主义[M].万俊人译.北京:译林出版社,2000.
[64][英]亚当·弗格森.道德哲学原理[M].孙飞宇,田耕译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[65][美]戴维·伊斯顿.政治生活的系统分析[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.
[66][古希腊]亚里士多德.政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1965.
[67][加]威尔·金里卡.当代政治哲学(上,下)[M].刘莘译.上海:上海三联书店,2004.
[68][英]莱士列·史蒂文森.人性七论[M].袁荣生等译.北京:商务印书馆,1994.
[69][美]J.R·康芒斯.制度经济学(上,下)[M].于树生译.北京:商务印书馆,1962.
[70][美]查尔斯·林德布洛姆.政治与市场[M].王逸舟译.上海:上海人民出版社,1994.
[71][德]马克思·韦伯.经济与社会(上,下)[M].林荣远译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[72][德]马克思·韦伯.新教伦理与资本主义精神[M].于晓等译.北京:三联书店,1987.
[73][美]米尔顿·弗里德里曼.资本主义与自由[M].张瑞玉译.北京:商务印书馆,1986.
[74][英]弗里德里希·哈耶克.自由秩序原理(上,下)[M].邓正来译.北京:三联书店,1997.
[75][美]A.麦金太尔.德性之后[M].龚群,戴扬毅译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1995.
[76][美]A.麦金太尔.三种对立的道德探究观[M].万俊人等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
[77][德]Mo石里克.伦理学问题[M].张国珍等译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[78][德]尤尔根·哈贝马斯.合法性危机[M].刘北成,曹卫东等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.
[79][美]西摩·李普塞特.一致与冲突[M].张华青等译.上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
[80][美]塞缪尔·亨廷顿.文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建[M].周琪,刘绯等译.北京:新华出版社,1999.
[81][美]罗伯特·诺齐克.无政府,国家与乌托邦[M].何怀宏译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.
[82][美]罗伯特·达尔.现代政治分析[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
[83][瑞士]皮亚杰.发生认识论原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
[84][德]马克斯·韦伯.学术生涯与政治生涯[M].北京:国际文化出版公司,1998.
[85][英]威廉·葛德文.政治正义论[M].何慕李译.北京:商务印书馆,1980.
[86][法]卢梭.论人类不平等的起源与基础[M].北京:商务印书馆,1962.
[87][美]列奥·施特劳斯,约瑟夫·克罗波西.政治哲学史[M].李天然等译.石家庄:河北人民出版社,1993.
[88][美]费正清,[英]麦克法夸尔.剑桥中华人民共和国史(1949-1965)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1990.
[89][美]科恩.论民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988.
[90][英]齐格蒙特·鲍曼.个体化社会[M].范祥涛译.北京:三联书店,2002.
[91][美]道格拉斯·诺斯.经济史上的结构和变革[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992.
[92][美]托马斯·截伊·齐格勒.民主的嘲讽[M].北京:世界知识出版社,1991.
[93]Guo Shangxiang.A History of Culture.HeNan University Press,1994.
[94]Becker.Moral Basis of Property Rights.NOMOS ⅩⅩⅡ.
[95]Martin Parker.Post-Modem Organization or Post-Modem Organization Theory [J].Organization Studies,1992(13).
[96]Monty Johnstone,"Party",A dictionary of Marxist Thought.